The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article with the claim that the individual meets GNG coverage even if they haven't acquired notability through WP:NPOL. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete and replace with a redirect either to 2022 United States Senate election in Georgia or 2024 Libertarian Party presidential primaries.
Article was re-created despite the subject having obtained no new claims to notability since its previous deletion. Article was previously deleted in May 2023.
This is a minor political figure that fails WP:NPOL and WP:NPOL notability criteria. SecretName101 ( talk) 18:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't see a consensus, just a divide between editors arguing that SIGCOV exists so Keep and editors insisting on Deletion. Just a note that I'm uncomfortable disallowing coverage because of a perceived bias as just about any mainstream newspaper and many magazines could be seen to have a perceived bias. That doesn't mean that they are not independent, secondary sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
GNews returns one hit for him, which is an unreliable society page about his marriage. Otherwise all provided sources are to Youtube, social media and Socialblade. Notability is not established. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 23:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, notability of schools is based on WP:ORG and WP:N, which this fails. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 23:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "黎惠玲因被评定为轻度弱智,不适合在普通小学接受 育,早在小一已给转介到特殊学校──才俊学校就读。但发掘玲玲别具打乒乓球天份的,就正正是才俊学校的体育老师。... 梁校长相信,要学生有心求学,他们必先要有好的体魄,才有条件发展别的项目,因此也就格外重视学生的适体能训练。于是,才俊亦特别 意发掘个别学生的运动才能,由此,才俊组成了不少校队,例如:田径队、足球队、榄球队、泳队、乒乓球队等。老师会挑选小四或以上学生,按其个别兴趣及长处安排入队。"
From Google Translate: "Because Lai Wai Ling was judged to be mildly mentally handicapped and not suitable for education in an ordinary primary school, she had been referred to a special school, Caijun School, as early as Primary 1. But it was the physical education teacher at Caijun School who discovered Lingling's unique talent for playing table tennis. ... Principal Liang believes that if students want to be determined to study, they must first have good physical fitness before they can develop other sports. Therefore, he pays special attention to students' physical fitness training. Therefore, Caijun also pays special attention to exploring the sports talents of individual students. As a result, Caijun has formed many school teams, such as track and field teams, football teams, rugby teams, swimming teams, table tennis teams, etc. Teachers will select primary four or above students and place them into the team based on their individual interests and strengths."
The article notes: "鄧韋樂今年21 歲,2012 年首次代表香港,出戰倫敦殘障奧運會,... 當時他仍在才俊學校求學,畢業後轉為全職運動員。 ... 分享喜悅韋樂今年在才俊學校畢業,順利完成了中學學業,他在畢業典禮時跟媽媽分享喜悅。 ... 轉讀才俊學校 游泳天份被發掘 ... 不再勉強適應主流教育,反造就了韋樂的人生轉折點:他的游泳生涯正是從才俊學校展開。 著重體藝的才俊學校,有林林總的課外活動,如游泳、羽球、樂器等,讓學生的才華有機會顯露出來。 韋樂過去曾參加暑期游泳班,教師得知他懂遊水,便叫他參加校內水運會選拔,"
From Google Translate: " Tang Wai-lok is 21 years old. He represented Hong Kong for the first time in 2012 at the London Paralympic Games. At that time, he was still studying at Choi Jun School and turned into a full-time athlete after graduation. ... Sharing the joy Wei Le graduated from Choi Jun School this year and successfully completed his secondary school studies. He shared the joy with his mother at the graduation ceremony. ... Transferred to Choi Jun School and his swimming talent was discovered... No longer reluctantly adapting to mainstream education, this was a turning point in Wei Le's life: his swimming career started at Choi Jun School. Choi Jun School focuses on physical education and offers a wide range of extracurricular activities, such as swimming, badminton, musical instruments, etc., giving students the opportunity to show off their talents. Wei Le attended a summer swimming class in the past. When the teacher learned that he knew how to swim, he asked him to participate in the school water sports competition."
The article notes: "政務司司長唐英年昨天到訪沙田一間為輕度智障學生提供教學的才俊學校,跟師生交談近況,並視察學生上烹飪課,其間有學生向他送上自製曲奇、月餅及一 幅畫。 他鼓勵學生要努力學習,積極面對人生的挑戰。"
From Google Translate: "Chief Secretary for Administration Henry Tang yesterday visited a talented school in Sha Tin that provides teaching for students with mild intellectual disabilities. He talked with teachers and students about the current situation and inspected the students’ cooking class. During this period, some students presented him with homemade music. Qi, moon cakes and a painting. He encouraged students to study hard and face challenges in life positively."
The article notes: "才俊學校○七年開始與扶輪社合作並開展各種計劃,舉辦特長培訓班,如普及游泳計劃和曲奇製作培訓班。 該校校長李啟光錶示,該校已有六成學生學會游泳,由於是特殊學校,所以學生透過遊水鍛鍊了肌肉,重拾了自信,教學生做曲奇餅也是讓學生踏入社會後可有一技之長 。"
From Google Translate: "In 2007, Caijun School began to cooperate with the Rotary Club and carry out various programs and hold specialty training classes, such as popular swimming programs and cookie making training classes. Li Qiguang, the principal of the school, said that 60% of the students in the school have learned to swim. Since it is a special school, the students have exercised their muscles and regained their confidence through swimming. Teaching students to make cookies also allows students to have good skills when they enter the society. A skill."
The article notes: "八名來自才俊學校的學生昨日走入錄音室,首次做小DJ,初嘗“開咪”經驗,親身訪問偶像方力申,表演非洲鼓,在大氣電波中展現藝術才能。 當中有曾兩度打破女子四乘一百接力泳賽世界紀錄的智障運動員週沅凝,她更用電子琴彈奏大長今主題曲“希望”,送給偶像。 八位輕度弱智的學生接受為期兩個月的「校園小DJ訓練計劃」,昨日出席港台節目「無火主席–呢分鐘我話事」,首次「開咪」做節目。"
From Google Translate: "Eight students from Talent School walked into the recording studio yesterday to be small DJs for the first time, have their first experience of "opening microphones", personally visited idol Alex Fong, performed African drums, and showed off their artistic talents in the atmospheric airwaves. Among them was Zhou Yunying, an mentally retarded athlete who twice broke the world record in the women's 4x100 relay. She even played Dae Jang Geum's theme song "Hope" on her electronic keyboard as a gift to her idol. Eight students with mild mental retardation received a two-month "Campus DJ Training Program" and yesterday attended RTHK's program "Chairman Without Fire - I'll Talk About This Minute" for the first time."
The article notes: "AXA國衛日前為才俊學校的同學安排課外活動,並提供志工服務,與二十多位師生一同參觀清水灣電視城。 當日參觀了 TVB多個外景拍攝場地如民初街、大型錄影廠及兒童節目錄影場地。 其間 AXA Phoenix的多位營業員提供義工服務,沿途照顧學童和維持秩序,令活動得以順利進行。"
From Google Translate: "AXA National Health Service recently arranged extracurricular activities and provided volunteer services for students of Cai Chun School. They visited Clear Water Bay TV City with more than 20 teachers and students. On that day, they visited multiple TVB location shooting locations such as Minchu Street, a large video studio and a children's program recording venue. During this period, many salespersons from AXA Phoenix provided volunteer services to take care of the children and maintain order along the way, making the event go smoothly."
The article notes: "黎惠玲和林志強是才俊學校的乒乓球隊主將。 前者剛奪雪梨奧運智障女子組乒乓球金牌﹐後者世界排名名列廿四。兩人皆異口同聲謂奪獎全賴校內主任賴Sir的啟蒙教導。"
From Google Translate: " Lai Wai Ling and Lin Zhiqiang are the captains of the table tennis team of Caijun School. The former just won the table tennis gold medal in the mentally retarded women's group at the Sydney Olympics, and the latter is ranked 24th in the world. Both of them said in unison that winning the award was entirely due to the enlightenment and guidance of the school director Lai Sir."
The article notes: "才俊學校日前假尖沙咀東部富豪酒店為該校學生黎惠玲勇奪悉尼二○○○年傷殘人士奧運金牌舉行祝捷會。"
From Google Translate: "Cai Chun School recently held a celebration party at the Regal Hotel in Tsim Sha Tsui East for its student Lai Wai Ling for winning the Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games gold medal."
The article notes: "下午三點四十五分,許美霞在沙田才俊學校門前,迎接快將十六歲的瑋瑋放學,母子徒步回家,十分鐘的路程,瑋瑋不用媽媽牽著,也能安份 地走路。 很難想像患有輕度智障及自閉症的瑋瑋,以往上街例必大喊大叫,甚至打途人,坐上陌生人的大腿。... 直到她帶著當時快將六歲的瑋瑋來到才俊學校,她看到一線曙光:「我見到這裡的小朋友情緒穩定又開心,當時的校長跟我說,只要有耐性,逐樣慢慢 教,瑋瑋可以教好的。」校長教她,瑋瑋每個偏差行為皆必有因,找出根源,就可以教導他正確做法。 "
From Google Translate: "At 3:45 in the afternoon, Xu Meixia greeted Weiwei, who was about to turn 16, after school in front of Shatin Caijun School. Mother and son walked home. It was a ten-minute journey. Weiwei could be content without being held by her mother. It’s hard to imagine that Weiwei, who has mild mental retardation and autism, used to yell when going out on the street, even hit passers-by and sit on strangers’ laps... Until she brought her then fast When the six-year-old Weiwei came to Caijun School, she saw a glimmer of hope: "I saw that the children here were emotionally stable and happy. The principal at the time told me that as long as we have patience and teach things slowly, Weiwei can Teach him well." The principal taught her that every deviant behavior of Weiwei must have a reason. If you find the root cause, you can teach him the correct way."
The article notes: "曾經被視為問題多多的學生,轉校為鄧韋樂帶來極大改變,才俊學校校長彭章球說,原因很簡單, ... 除了學業能力外,SEN學童大多有情緒問題,引伸至衝動行為,「最常見的是固執,一面對改變有很大情緒反應」。 因此,有別於主流學校,才俊學校每班有兩名班主任,每2至3年才換一次,而且只會換其中一名,另一名班主任會跟隨學生,升上較高年級,“ 要幫他們適應變化,不能所有事物都不變,但又要有限度,令他們感到安全」。 "
From Google Translate: "Once regarded as a student with many problems, changing schools has brought about great changes for Deng Weile. Peng Zhangqiu, the principal of Caijun School, said that the reason is very simple... In addition to academic ability, most SEN students have emotional problems, which extend to impulsive behavior. " The most common one is stubbornness, with a strong emotional reaction to changes." Therefore, unlike mainstream schools, each class in Caijun School has two head teachers, who only change once every 2 to 3 years, and only one of them will be replaced. The other head teacher will follow the students to a higher grade, " We need to help them adapt to changes. Everything cannot remain the same, but there must be limits to make them feel safe.”"
The article notes: "匡智獅子會晨崗學校及才俊學校適合輕度智障的學生,而天保民學校則適宜輕至中度。匡智會服務焦點放在智障人士的能力上,而非着眼於先天的缺陷;才俊學校則為輕度智障兒童提供優質特殊教育服務,辦學團體為慈雲山街坊福利 會,故重視發揚街坊會四大信條的精神,你可視乎兒子的需要作出選擇。"
From Google Translate: "Hong Chi Lions Club Morning Hill School and Talent School are suitable for students with mild intellectual disabilities, while Tin Po Man School is suitable for students with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities. The focus of Hong Chi Club's services is on the abilities of people with intellectual disabilities, rather than focusing on congenital defects; Choi Jun School provides high-quality special education services for children with mild intellectual disabilities. The school is run by the Tsz Wan Shan Neighborhood Welfare Association, so it attaches great importance to carrying forward the spirit of the four tenets of the neighborhood association. You can make a choice based on your son's needs."
The article notes: "Lai Wai-ling was born to be a world-class table tennis player. ... said coach Lam Chi-bang, explaining how he recruited Lai to the national squad from Sha Tin's Choi Jun School."
The article notes: "At the 2000 Paralympics, Lai Wai-ling, a student at Choi Jun School, snapped up a gold medal in table tennis."
The article notes: "It is only two months since up-and-coming swimmer Kelvin Tang Wai-lok secured a place as Hong Kong's youngest representative at the London Paralympics. The 15-year-old, who has won many medals in international competitions this year, is unfazed by having so little time in which to prepare. "I'm going to do my best," says the mildly mentally handicapped teenager, who studies at Choi Jun School, in Tai Wai."
The article notes: "Tang, who studies at Choi Jun School in Tai Wai for the learning impaired, will be one of five local swimmers in London."
The article notes: "Wai-ling, a Form Five student at Choi Jun School in Sha Tin, is the world's No 1 mentally handicapped table-tennis player and is accustomed to winning such accolades."
The caption notes: "A pupil enjoys a sports therapy class at Choi Jun School in Sha Tin during a visit yesterday by Chief Secretary Henry Tang Ying-yen (third, right). The 120 primary and secondary students with mild intellectual disabilities receive extra training in life skills, and counselling."
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and building-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
keep this is a good article Evangp ( talk) 16:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of You're Under Arrest characters. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Following up on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natsumi Tsujimoto, nearly identical case - plot summary failing WP:GNG. Reception is limited to the single sentence that "Miyuki was among the Top 10 Most Popular Female Characters in the August 2001 issue of Newtype magazine.". No ja wiki article. My BEFORE shows next to nothing (one or two possible plot summaries on GBooks, in very limited view). Suggest merger and redirect to List of You're Under Arrest characters per WP:ATD. As with Natsumi, there's a tiny chance something exists in non-digitized, Japanese sources, but first, we have to find them. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:34, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Not confident it meets notability standards. There are news articles about the company, but they're mostly inflated by ultimately meaningless corporate jargon. Removing the advertising content from the current article, the entire article becomes "Radiant Logic is a US-based computer software company that develops software for enterprise information integration, information security, and data management." -- Primium ( talk) 22:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Page with minimal citations for a now defunct promotion that hasn't held events in almost a decade HeinzMaster ( talk) 21:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I initially created this as a redirect to Little Mix The Search, a show they competed in, and it has since been expanded. A WP:BEFORE finds that they don't meet WP:NBAND as they have no WP:SIGCOV, mainly primary sources that do not establish notability outside of the series. – Meena • 11:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing as No consensus after two relistings with no further editor participation. Possible ATDs can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and corporate-specific notability requirements. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
No claim of notability. Schools aren't automatically notable. Subject fails NCORP and GNG. The sister article in bn-wiki is similarly poorly written and sourced. From my BEFORE search in Bengala, I found little that was independent and reliable. I am not sure about Samay updates. Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Sources do not establish notability. WP:BEFORE shows news articles for a single event about dyed hair, but nothing that would warrant a standalone article for the college - Rich T| C| E-Mail 19:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Painfully brief career as a professional and no evidence of passing WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. Best sources found were Telegraph India, a squad list mention, CPD Football, a passing mention in a blog (not WP:RS), and India Footy, a single passing mention. I could not find any RS addressing Monirul Mondal directly and in detail, which is not surprising considering how short and uneventful his career was. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:18, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no indication of notability for the league itself, much less for a single season. The only in-line citation takes me to an error code on the Chinese Football Association website. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet WP:NMMA, as his highest quarterly ranking by Fight Matrix, was #362nd. Appears to fail WP:GNG as well, being his main coverage (outside of standard MMA media reporting) is through interviews, or passing mentions. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 20:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Played one season as a pro and then disappeared. I can't see any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC, even when searching in Hindi (बिमल मिंज). GCS Stars mentions him twice, as Bimal Minz, and it's a blog so clearly not WP:RS and doesn't help with GNG. Deccan Herald mentions him once, as Bimal Minz, and LatestLY mentions him once. None of these mentioned sources provide significant coverage of Minz/Minj. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Completely non-notable unit, does not deserve its own article Elshad ( talk) 18:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete - there aren't many pages in the category [6] so probably not worth this article to stay public as well as this having just one external link and two sentences. Iggy ( Swan) ( Contribs) 21:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG with zero significant coverage in reliable sources. All I could find are self-referential articles or WP:PROMO & WP:ROUTINE press releases about winners or nominations. Macktheknifeau ( talk) 17:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person not
properly sourced as passing Wikipedia inclusion criteria. The closest thing to a notability claim here is that he was the designated
substitute to a member of the French Parliament: that is, he was the guy who would have succeeded
Élisabeth Pochon if she had resigned the seat or died in the middle of her term, but that isn't an "inherently" notable role in its own right. If Pochon had vacated the seat and Bouton had accordingly become an MP, then he would obviously pass
WP:NPOL #1, but that didn't happen, so there's nothing "inherently" notable about being the substitute-in-waiting.
The rest of the content here is candidacies in elections he didn't win, his work for various organizations and committees, and a statement of the "first member of [underrepresented minority group] to do a non-notable thing" variety, none of which is notability-clinching stuff without proper sourcing either, and the referencing is parked almost entirely on directly affiliated
primary sources that aren't support for notability, with absolutely no evidence of
WP:GNG-worthy coverage about him shown at all: the only citation in the entire article that technically comes from a reliable source is here solely to tangentially verify a stray fact, and completely fails to name Raphaël Bouton at all in conjunction with it, and thus does not help to boost his notability either.
In addition, it warrants note that (a) there's no article about him on the French Wikipedia, where one would obviously be expected if he actually had any genuine notability in French politics, and (b) the article was created by a
WP:SPA with a direct
conflict of interest.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced far, far better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
17:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 11:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY and Biography of Living Persons Policy, therefore I have nominated it for deletion. Nobody expects the UnexpectedSmoreInquisition ( talk)! 17:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to C31 Melbourne. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 20:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It looks like the article is no longer unreferenced although if the editors arguing to Keep this article could supply more reliable sources, I think that would prevent a return trip to AFD. A rename can be done by any interested editor. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. Unreferenced, fails WP:NACTOR 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. i see a consensus to Keep this article, also it has been greatly expanded since the nomination. Moreover, I see no support for Deleting this article since it has been expanded. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis about their work in reliable sources -- but this is referenced entirely to IMDb, and makes no meaningful notability claim beyond the fact of his existence.
While there are a lot of notable films in the filmography list, his credit on nearly all of them was "second unit/assistant director", which is in no way an "inherently" notable role that would constitute a "no sourcing required" freebie -- and while he later had some "associate producer" credits followed by one credit as a lead producer, that still isn't an inclusion freebie in the absence of adequate sourcing.
The article has been tagged for referencing improvement since 2016 without ever being improved -- and while the film he was a full producer on does have an article in which his name is listed in the infobox, this article gets so little attention that his name was never even wikilinked there.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more than just an IMDb profile for sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
16:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Severe promotional language and primarily edited and created by User:Jtylek and User:Ktylek, who appear to be the developers of Epesi. Only sources are reviews and the installer. —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 14:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
SPA5CE! (
talk about it, talk about it, talk about it!)
16:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 17:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
A long life in service and practice of the arts and in collecting African art, nevertheless does not make the subject notable per WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
08:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 15:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
14:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Bibliography
His collection has ended up in some notable places, I'd be surprised if there wasn't commentary about them in art journals. Agree on the idea of trimming the article. Closer should consider this is a weak keep. // Timothy :: talk 17:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Entirely relies on WP:UGC sources such as imdb and YouTube (see WP:IMDB and WP:RSPYT). Gnews search brings up nothing relevant either. [12], clearly not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. Ratnahastin ( talk) 14:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC) Ratnahastin ( talk) 14:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Many sources in the article are primary, there's a reception section but it only lists what list the character was part of. A quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Law & Order characters. Spinixster (chat!) 10:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
14:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A consensus is not going to emerge here to delete the article. However, there isn't a clear consensus to keep this either. What I would suggest rather than a renom, since this was so well attended, is to consider whether improvement is possible so that a firmer consensus to retain is possible, or whether there's a viable AtD. None of which require a relist, so closing. Star Mississippi 12:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The last nomination for this article was not descriptive and the nominator failed to demonstrate a lack of notability. In the time since this article has been put into mainspace, there has been no indication that Skibidi Toilet is notable despite receiving coverage from sources that are ambiguous in reliability. Sources such as Lifehacker and Distractify may be acceptable for expanding on an article that has already been deemed notable, but the only sources that seem to bear weight are For The Win—a publication that is likely not held to the same standards as its parent USA Today—and Kotaku.
major amount of contentyou refer to, for instance, would be insurmountable for someone outside of the zeitgeist. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
<del>
and </del>
) or reply to it with clarification; please don't post new bulleted lines with bolded recommendations per
WP:DISCUSSAFD: "You can explain your earlier recommendation in response to others but do not repeat a bolded recommendation on a new bulleted line." ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 08:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep Sources are enough to pass GNG, such as Kotaku and Cartoon Brew. Skyshifter talk 14:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
*Keep or Redirect to
List of Internet phenomena. Skibidi toilet has already met
WP:GNG and has enough
SIGCOV for it to not be deleted. The article does meet GNG and the
previous AfD was closed as a speedy keep. Checking Google through the above links also indicates through many news sources that Skibidi Toilet is being popular. --
Wesoree (
talk·
contribs)
14:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
11:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG with a lack of significant coverage about him. Dougal18 ( talk) 11:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient. Since there isn't a consensus on a viable ATD, there is nowhere to redirect it. Should consensus emerge on one, happy to restore the history for merger. Star Mississippi 12:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I just declined a G11 nomination here on the basis that the page isn't overtly promotional, but I'm not convinced this subject is actually notable so filing this nomination instead. News coverage seems to entirely be from local media. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Another commercially motivated African awards ceremony, no WP:SIGCOV, no WP:RS, no backing from a reputable organisation (unless you count a "social enterprise communications firm" as reputable), with organisers selling its media reach. Even the impressive Forbes quote is, of course, from Forbes/sites. Needs to go - and so does the 2022 The Future Awards Africa article. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per G11 by Amakuru. ( non-admin closure) Shellwood ( talk) 11:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NEVENT and undisclosed paid editing. Theroadislong ( talk) 08:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable event. Sources are a mix of primary and passing mentions, and search finds nothing better. Was already rejected at AfC, moved into main space regardless, re-draftified, published again, so next stop AfD. Fails WP:GNG and every other flavour of notability I can think of. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Was already speedy deleted by User:Amakuru. Black Kite (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable ROTM business. Sources don't come even close to establishing notability, and search finds nothing better. Speedy request was reverted without explanation, so here we are. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT by a country mile. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Guardian (Nigeria). Liz Read! Talk! 07:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Most of the sources in this article are to articles about the people listed in the article. It's a sort of nested iterative articlefest. Outside The Guardian itself - or pieces in society magazines saying how subjects look 'hot' or other commentary regarding cover stars (likely paid/promoted content) there is no independent notability for The Guardian Life, no WP:RS, no WP:SIGCOV and no evidence it is a notable publication or business per WP:NCORP. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPROF, I was not able to find enough to justify notability Tehonk ( talk) 07:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
German company. Fails WP:NCORP, no notability. Sourcing is not WP:RS, independent or WP:SIGVCOV. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to TT255. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposing redirect to TT255. Seems to be only notable for the relatively well-preserved tomb she was buried in. Online sources appear to just interpret the tomb paintings. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 06:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to TT255. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposing redirect to TT255. Seems to be only notable for the relatively well-preserved tomb he was buried in. Online sources appear to just interpret the tomb paintings. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 06:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 02:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. It happened, with the usual announcements, but beyond that there is nothing especially noteworthy about this one of several thousand supernovae discovered so far this year. It was moderately bright, but not exceptionally so. I suggest returning to the original redirect, to the host galaxy, where it is already mentioned as one of four supernovae observed in that galaxy. Lithopsian ( talk) 16:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
02:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please review recently located sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I don't say this often but we need some more "Votes" on what should happen with this article. If you think it should be Redirected, please provide the target article. Be specific and direct.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposing deletion of this page due to a lack of notability. There is basically no information about this person listed and they do not seem to be notable. GraziePrego ( talk) 02:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More participation here would help.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Citations are all primary, self-published, or unreliable. Basic origin is crossing of two separate breeds by two separate breeders. That is all. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 03:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable list per WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:LISTCRUFT of people from "births" section in the main article that was split from the RfC discussion, also that fails WP:NLIST and WP:BLPLISTS. MirrorPlanet ( talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't see a consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 02:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. The only source provided is a directory listing. LibStar ( talk) 00:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please offer your opinion on this subject.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Lebanese jeweler, signally fails WP:NCORP. Only coverage is routine store opening and 140th anniversary celebration news release. Only possible grounds for notability is longevity, but that longevity has been spent doing nothing whatsoever remarkable, impactful or in any other way notable. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. With an unbolded Keep, this can't be closed as Soft Deletion. So more opinions would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Non notable photographer - fails WP:N - if non encyclopedic sentences and sources were removed pretty much a nothing article LegalSmeagolian ( talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sean nós. as at ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopedia article at all. It's a mixture of repetition of the Sean nós disambiguation page, rambling and often repetitive opinion, and Irish-language lessons. This serves no encyclopedic purpose whatsoever, and is not even on an identifiable topic, but is an attempt to distinguish different meanings of a term (which is already what the disambiguation page exists for. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jones Radio Networks#Satellite formats. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as a defunct radio network. Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult rock and roll, redirect this subject to Jones Radio Networks#Satellite formats. Let'srun ( talk) 12:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with other pages and relisting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I would really like to see more than two opinions on any bundled nomination where the fate of multiple articles is being considered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that there are adequate sources and this article should be Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 02:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable video game. I've tried to scour WP:VG/S for sourcing, but the only in-depth coverage I found were GameSpot and IGN both covering the announce/reveal at a trade show (added to talk page). There was no coverage afterwards, and all other hits were database entries. Note that the game is in English sourcing as "Portable Resort" rather than what the article shows. Searching the japanese title turned up a database entry on Famitsu, but no actual news/articles. It seems neither English nor Japanese reliable sources that we currently have identified took real note of the game. -- ferret ( talk) 17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: With new advocates for Keeping this article, I see No Consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Express Oil Change & Tire Engineers. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, routine financial coverage and trivia. WP:BEFORE search does not yield any extensive coverage ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: TO discuss FloridaArmy's improvements or determine whether the redirect is preferable. Also, is there sourcing or not? Advertising is an issue that can be addressed editorially if there is sourcing
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Generally not a satisfying outcome after this much effort has been put toward a discussion, but there remains substantial disagreement over whether there is a sufficient quantity of reference material to sustain an article on this subject, and neither side conclusively refuted the other. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
This fringe organization fails both the Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) as well as the Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline. Having a lot of Google hits is not going to turn the tide either. In fact, there are hardly no independent and reliable sources that actually describe the activities and achievements of this organisation. 62.183.185.10 ( talk, c) 15:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) — 62.183.185.10 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
site:
parameter.
SmartSE (
talk)
22:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.(my emphasis). Let's examine the sources that you added in detail to see what they say about it:
Shortly after the Code of Conduct was first issued, the International Organization of Consumers Unions (IOCU) and the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) developed a Citizens’ Action Guide to the Code of Conduct (Goldenman and Rengam 1987). PAN also published a consolidated guide to the chemical tools and conventions (Goldenman and Pozo Vera 2008) which provided a checklist for implementation of the Code of Conduct. A dedicated Code monitoring module has been developed to help concerned organisations to monitor compliance with the Code of Conduct by governments and industry (Pesticide Action Network Asia and Pacific and Pesticide Action Network UK 2016). In addition, PAN carries out projects that promote implementation of parts of the Code of Conduct, in particular on alternatives to more hazardous pesticides.
Member organizations of the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) conducted community monitoring in 13 countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America between 2007 and 2009 (PAN 2010). They assessed pesticide use practices, use of personal protective equipment and self-reported symptoms of pesticide poisoning. Based on this survey, their assessment was that 25 years after initial publication of the Code of Conduct, pesticides in these regions were still exposing farmers to significant health risks.The best source of all of them, but the text is about reports that they have published rather than the organisation itself and is two small paragraphs in a 60 page document which is itself only chapter 3 of 12 of a larger report.
Noting high turnover, Pesticide Action Network (PAN) called for the appointment of experts who can complete their terms.and then several mentions of them supporting various decisions. Clearly not significant coverage.
Known to cause a high incidence of severe or irreversible adverse effects on human health or the environment (Pesticide Action Network, 2009).That's it - not significant coverage.
They would only delete an article if they felt their omissions would leave nothing substantial.SmartSE ( talk) 10:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The term “prior informed consent” appears to have been coined by David Bull of Oxfam (UK) in the late 1970s to convey a trade norm specifically in the context of trade in hazardous pesticides.15 Bull’s work at Oxfam influenced the Pesticides Action Network (PAN), which lobbied international institutions to regulate pesticides. PAN was motivated both to address serious environmental and health consequences of current pesticide practices and to curb what it saw as irresponsible behavior by multinational corporations (Paarlberg 1994: 316–319). Thus, the moral, legal, and economic origins of prior informed consent came together in pesticides trade.from "Informed Consent: A Negotiated Formula for Trade in Risky Organisms and Chemicals" by Amanda Wolf. Is this nothing more than a passing mention in your view? Is PAN not prominent here? Did they "just happen to be one of the participants"? For context the concept of Prior informed is central to the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent. To me the answer is no to all of those questions, but we might have different sensibilities here. Let's hear from others. {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 14:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Pesticides Action Network (PAN), which lobbied international institutions to regulate pesticides. And I quote the abstract (passing mention?) of another source:
The establishment of PIC as a binding international rule was sealed by eventually gaining the support of the chemical industry in the early 1990s, after initial opposition, after a civil society campaign led by the Pesticide Action Network (PAN), an alliance of nongovernmental organizations.[91] Have you included this source in your review? {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 19:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
took a look at all the sources mentioned here so far (including paywalled ones): can you provide us with the relevant portions of text from this one [92] that mentions PAN in the abstract? Also from Toxic Chemicals in America that contains a full entry on PAN. I've been reviewing all of the sources myself and have come to a very different conclusion than yours but I do not have access to all the full texts. Thanks. {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 19:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
References
We selected the five most central NGOs dedicated to environmental sustainability in agriculture: Friends of the Earth (FoE), Greenpeace, Oxfam, Pesticide Action Network (PAN), and World Wildlife Fund (WWF)
In such instances, the immediate need to save lives trumps concerns about subsequent health or environmental complications (including the potential for mosquitoes to develop resistance to the toxin). It was recognition of this stark calculus that forged the 2001 compromise on DDT, which was agreed to by groups with histories of firm opposition to the insecticide, such as the World Wildlife Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and the Pesticide Action Network (PAN)
Profiles are then presented to eight consumer international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) that have been active in international food safety work, with emphasis on the participation in the work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission
The next section examines evidence that just as economic globalization was leading to the global spread of toxic hazards, a parallel process was occurring in which social movements to resist toxic threats were becoming increasingly global. Particular attention is paid to the evolution of the international organization Pesticide Action Network and the constellation of other organizations in its orbit.
@ Goldsztajn: Thank you for the sources #1 is trivial coverage, #2 looks to be the same but I can't find the full text - do you have it? #3 I also can't access to assess. #4 is finally the kind of source that we need, the author appears to be independent and it contains several pages of content specifically about PAN. If anyone else would like to read the full text, drop me an email. SmartSE ( talk) 08:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Particular attention is paid to the evolution of the international organization Pesticide Action Network and the constellation of other organizations in its orbit.. It has everything we need from PAN's origins to the main campaigns with great detail. {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 14:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.(my bolds) after surveying this many sources. KoA ( talk) 16:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
PAN is an international alliance of environmental, farm-worker, and consumer advocacy organizations that promotes pesticide safety in a variety of contexts. PAN has been actively involved with the FAO’s Agriculture Committee and with the United Nations Environment Program. Pesticide residues in foods are one of PAN’s many concerns, and PAN has attended occasional past sessions of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues.
References
Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.These articles are highlighting a product, case, or a report at best, not PAN itself.
The result was merge to Highs in the Mid-Sixties, Volume 1. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Barring database entries or extreme passing mentions ("SONG was included in ALBUM"), this does not appear to be notable as a stand-alone entry in the (likely notable) album series. I could not find any specific reviews for this entry. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) Talk to Me! 17:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Non notable corporation. Didn't locate sufficient CORPDEPTH-compliant sourcing to meet NCORP. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
No notable tag team. Article includes 1 source. Most of sources found online are just WP:ROUTINE results, not in deep coverage of the team. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 19:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. (given that all but one Keep vote came from a sock farm, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoinFluffy250) Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a businessman and politician, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for businessmen or politicians. As always, neither businessmen nor politicians are "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis about their work -- but the attempted notability claim as a businessman is that his company exists, cited entirely to
primary sources such as press releases
self-published by his own company and Q&A interviews in which he's the speaker and not the subject under discussion; the attempted notability claim as a politician is that he's served on a borough council, which is not a level of office that guarantees inclusion under
WP:NPOL, and is still referenced to a primary source "staff" profile rather than GNG-building media coverage about his work on the council; and what's left for GNG-worthy coverage is two pieces that are covering him in trivial human interest contexts entirely tangential to the attempted notability claims, which thus aren't enough coverage to vault him over GNG all by themselves if "man is proud to be Irish" and "man is Olympic torchbearer" are the only fully independent third party sourcing he has.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
20:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'd like to hear more from those editors advocating Keep to counter objections from editors seeking Deletion. A simple "Keep" is insufficient in a deletion discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I can't help but notice that most of the editors advocating Keep have low edit counts reflecting a lack of AFD experience. So, I'm doing one final relisting. A reminder that while editors can make multiple comments in a deletion discussion, you can only "vote" once.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
No notable wrestler. Only worked for small, independet promotions. Not in deep coverage about him, just WP:ROUTINE results HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 19:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
2021-01 ✍️ create
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
01:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Constellation Automotive Group. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
No independent sources, only routine financial information and quotes from founders. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Los Angeles crime family. There is certainly an overwhelming desire for this to not be kept as a standalone article, that much is clear. Closing as no consensus would not be in keeping with that desire. A delete decision would not preclude anyone from updating any proposed merge target, but it would remove the current title from being a redirect. As the List of Cohen crime family members is already slated to be merged to the LA crime family article, any remaining sourced information from this article should be merged there as well. I note that there is nothing stopping anyone from adding any sourced material to Mickey Cohen as well. UtherSRG (talk) 18:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Article is a largely unsourced, largely OR compendium of material. Sure there are sources, but all deal with irrelevancies and side topics and none, zero, even attempt to address the subject of the article, the supposed "Cohen crime family" No sourcing is offered to indicate that such a "crime family" actually existed. In fact, if you look at the section called "Formation," you find that the formation of this supposed "crime family" is not described.
This article was merged into
Mickey Cohen in 2019 but was recently unmerged. I have no objection to merging in lieu of deletion, but this article adds little if anything to the Cohen article due to its lack of useful sourcing.
Note that the realated article List of Cohen crime family members, which has zero sourcing, has been nominated for deletion on the same grounds. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cohen crime family members Coretheapple ( talk) 17:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC) nomination updated. Coretheapple ( talk) 16:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
*Merge
List of Cohen crime family members into this one.
— Maile (
talk)
00:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a Keep and two different Merge targets that have been proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in case there are more opinions about the two different Merge target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Aside from one editor advocating Keep, it looks like opinion is divided between Delete and Merge which might result in a No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to White Pine Series of Architectural Monographs. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable hoax, with one piece about its uncovering and one primary "source" that is the original hoax article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. I don't see anything elsewhere which would seem to meet the GNG. JMWt ( talk) 19:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
2006-06 (closed as No consensus)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
00:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article with the claim that the individual meets GNG coverage even if they haven't acquired notability through WP:NPOL. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete and replace with a redirect either to 2022 United States Senate election in Georgia or 2024 Libertarian Party presidential primaries.
Article was re-created despite the subject having obtained no new claims to notability since its previous deletion. Article was previously deleted in May 2023.
This is a minor political figure that fails WP:NPOL and WP:NPOL notability criteria. SecretName101 ( talk) 18:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't see a consensus, just a divide between editors arguing that SIGCOV exists so Keep and editors insisting on Deletion. Just a note that I'm uncomfortable disallowing coverage because of a perceived bias as just about any mainstream newspaper and many magazines could be seen to have a perceived bias. That doesn't mean that they are not independent, secondary sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
GNews returns one hit for him, which is an unreliable society page about his marriage. Otherwise all provided sources are to Youtube, social media and Socialblade. Notability is not established. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 23:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, notability of schools is based on WP:ORG and WP:N, which this fails. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 23:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "黎惠玲因被评定为轻度弱智,不适合在普通小学接受 育,早在小一已给转介到特殊学校──才俊学校就读。但发掘玲玲别具打乒乓球天份的,就正正是才俊学校的体育老师。... 梁校长相信,要学生有心求学,他们必先要有好的体魄,才有条件发展别的项目,因此也就格外重视学生的适体能训练。于是,才俊亦特别 意发掘个别学生的运动才能,由此,才俊组成了不少校队,例如:田径队、足球队、榄球队、泳队、乒乓球队等。老师会挑选小四或以上学生,按其个别兴趣及长处安排入队。"
From Google Translate: "Because Lai Wai Ling was judged to be mildly mentally handicapped and not suitable for education in an ordinary primary school, she had been referred to a special school, Caijun School, as early as Primary 1. But it was the physical education teacher at Caijun School who discovered Lingling's unique talent for playing table tennis. ... Principal Liang believes that if students want to be determined to study, they must first have good physical fitness before they can develop other sports. Therefore, he pays special attention to students' physical fitness training. Therefore, Caijun also pays special attention to exploring the sports talents of individual students. As a result, Caijun has formed many school teams, such as track and field teams, football teams, rugby teams, swimming teams, table tennis teams, etc. Teachers will select primary four or above students and place them into the team based on their individual interests and strengths."
The article notes: "鄧韋樂今年21 歲,2012 年首次代表香港,出戰倫敦殘障奧運會,... 當時他仍在才俊學校求學,畢業後轉為全職運動員。 ... 分享喜悅韋樂今年在才俊學校畢業,順利完成了中學學業,他在畢業典禮時跟媽媽分享喜悅。 ... 轉讀才俊學校 游泳天份被發掘 ... 不再勉強適應主流教育,反造就了韋樂的人生轉折點:他的游泳生涯正是從才俊學校展開。 著重體藝的才俊學校,有林林總的課外活動,如游泳、羽球、樂器等,讓學生的才華有機會顯露出來。 韋樂過去曾參加暑期游泳班,教師得知他懂遊水,便叫他參加校內水運會選拔,"
From Google Translate: " Tang Wai-lok is 21 years old. He represented Hong Kong for the first time in 2012 at the London Paralympic Games. At that time, he was still studying at Choi Jun School and turned into a full-time athlete after graduation. ... Sharing the joy Wei Le graduated from Choi Jun School this year and successfully completed his secondary school studies. He shared the joy with his mother at the graduation ceremony. ... Transferred to Choi Jun School and his swimming talent was discovered... No longer reluctantly adapting to mainstream education, this was a turning point in Wei Le's life: his swimming career started at Choi Jun School. Choi Jun School focuses on physical education and offers a wide range of extracurricular activities, such as swimming, badminton, musical instruments, etc., giving students the opportunity to show off their talents. Wei Le attended a summer swimming class in the past. When the teacher learned that he knew how to swim, he asked him to participate in the school water sports competition."
The article notes: "政務司司長唐英年昨天到訪沙田一間為輕度智障學生提供教學的才俊學校,跟師生交談近況,並視察學生上烹飪課,其間有學生向他送上自製曲奇、月餅及一 幅畫。 他鼓勵學生要努力學習,積極面對人生的挑戰。"
From Google Translate: "Chief Secretary for Administration Henry Tang yesterday visited a talented school in Sha Tin that provides teaching for students with mild intellectual disabilities. He talked with teachers and students about the current situation and inspected the students’ cooking class. During this period, some students presented him with homemade music. Qi, moon cakes and a painting. He encouraged students to study hard and face challenges in life positively."
The article notes: "才俊學校○七年開始與扶輪社合作並開展各種計劃,舉辦特長培訓班,如普及游泳計劃和曲奇製作培訓班。 該校校長李啟光錶示,該校已有六成學生學會游泳,由於是特殊學校,所以學生透過遊水鍛鍊了肌肉,重拾了自信,教學生做曲奇餅也是讓學生踏入社會後可有一技之長 。"
From Google Translate: "In 2007, Caijun School began to cooperate with the Rotary Club and carry out various programs and hold specialty training classes, such as popular swimming programs and cookie making training classes. Li Qiguang, the principal of the school, said that 60% of the students in the school have learned to swim. Since it is a special school, the students have exercised their muscles and regained their confidence through swimming. Teaching students to make cookies also allows students to have good skills when they enter the society. A skill."
The article notes: "八名來自才俊學校的學生昨日走入錄音室,首次做小DJ,初嘗“開咪”經驗,親身訪問偶像方力申,表演非洲鼓,在大氣電波中展現藝術才能。 當中有曾兩度打破女子四乘一百接力泳賽世界紀錄的智障運動員週沅凝,她更用電子琴彈奏大長今主題曲“希望”,送給偶像。 八位輕度弱智的學生接受為期兩個月的「校園小DJ訓練計劃」,昨日出席港台節目「無火主席–呢分鐘我話事」,首次「開咪」做節目。"
From Google Translate: "Eight students from Talent School walked into the recording studio yesterday to be small DJs for the first time, have their first experience of "opening microphones", personally visited idol Alex Fong, performed African drums, and showed off their artistic talents in the atmospheric airwaves. Among them was Zhou Yunying, an mentally retarded athlete who twice broke the world record in the women's 4x100 relay. She even played Dae Jang Geum's theme song "Hope" on her electronic keyboard as a gift to her idol. Eight students with mild mental retardation received a two-month "Campus DJ Training Program" and yesterday attended RTHK's program "Chairman Without Fire - I'll Talk About This Minute" for the first time."
The article notes: "AXA國衛日前為才俊學校的同學安排課外活動,並提供志工服務,與二十多位師生一同參觀清水灣電視城。 當日參觀了 TVB多個外景拍攝場地如民初街、大型錄影廠及兒童節目錄影場地。 其間 AXA Phoenix的多位營業員提供義工服務,沿途照顧學童和維持秩序,令活動得以順利進行。"
From Google Translate: "AXA National Health Service recently arranged extracurricular activities and provided volunteer services for students of Cai Chun School. They visited Clear Water Bay TV City with more than 20 teachers and students. On that day, they visited multiple TVB location shooting locations such as Minchu Street, a large video studio and a children's program recording venue. During this period, many salespersons from AXA Phoenix provided volunteer services to take care of the children and maintain order along the way, making the event go smoothly."
The article notes: "黎惠玲和林志強是才俊學校的乒乓球隊主將。 前者剛奪雪梨奧運智障女子組乒乓球金牌﹐後者世界排名名列廿四。兩人皆異口同聲謂奪獎全賴校內主任賴Sir的啟蒙教導。"
From Google Translate: " Lai Wai Ling and Lin Zhiqiang are the captains of the table tennis team of Caijun School. The former just won the table tennis gold medal in the mentally retarded women's group at the Sydney Olympics, and the latter is ranked 24th in the world. Both of them said in unison that winning the award was entirely due to the enlightenment and guidance of the school director Lai Sir."
The article notes: "才俊學校日前假尖沙咀東部富豪酒店為該校學生黎惠玲勇奪悉尼二○○○年傷殘人士奧運金牌舉行祝捷會。"
From Google Translate: "Cai Chun School recently held a celebration party at the Regal Hotel in Tsim Sha Tsui East for its student Lai Wai Ling for winning the Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games gold medal."
The article notes: "下午三點四十五分,許美霞在沙田才俊學校門前,迎接快將十六歲的瑋瑋放學,母子徒步回家,十分鐘的路程,瑋瑋不用媽媽牽著,也能安份 地走路。 很難想像患有輕度智障及自閉症的瑋瑋,以往上街例必大喊大叫,甚至打途人,坐上陌生人的大腿。... 直到她帶著當時快將六歲的瑋瑋來到才俊學校,她看到一線曙光:「我見到這裡的小朋友情緒穩定又開心,當時的校長跟我說,只要有耐性,逐樣慢慢 教,瑋瑋可以教好的。」校長教她,瑋瑋每個偏差行為皆必有因,找出根源,就可以教導他正確做法。 "
From Google Translate: "At 3:45 in the afternoon, Xu Meixia greeted Weiwei, who was about to turn 16, after school in front of Shatin Caijun School. Mother and son walked home. It was a ten-minute journey. Weiwei could be content without being held by her mother. It’s hard to imagine that Weiwei, who has mild mental retardation and autism, used to yell when going out on the street, even hit passers-by and sit on strangers’ laps... Until she brought her then fast When the six-year-old Weiwei came to Caijun School, she saw a glimmer of hope: "I saw that the children here were emotionally stable and happy. The principal at the time told me that as long as we have patience and teach things slowly, Weiwei can Teach him well." The principal taught her that every deviant behavior of Weiwei must have a reason. If you find the root cause, you can teach him the correct way."
The article notes: "曾經被視為問題多多的學生,轉校為鄧韋樂帶來極大改變,才俊學校校長彭章球說,原因很簡單, ... 除了學業能力外,SEN學童大多有情緒問題,引伸至衝動行為,「最常見的是固執,一面對改變有很大情緒反應」。 因此,有別於主流學校,才俊學校每班有兩名班主任,每2至3年才換一次,而且只會換其中一名,另一名班主任會跟隨學生,升上較高年級,“ 要幫他們適應變化,不能所有事物都不變,但又要有限度,令他們感到安全」。 "
From Google Translate: "Once regarded as a student with many problems, changing schools has brought about great changes for Deng Weile. Peng Zhangqiu, the principal of Caijun School, said that the reason is very simple... In addition to academic ability, most SEN students have emotional problems, which extend to impulsive behavior. " The most common one is stubbornness, with a strong emotional reaction to changes." Therefore, unlike mainstream schools, each class in Caijun School has two head teachers, who only change once every 2 to 3 years, and only one of them will be replaced. The other head teacher will follow the students to a higher grade, " We need to help them adapt to changes. Everything cannot remain the same, but there must be limits to make them feel safe.”"
The article notes: "匡智獅子會晨崗學校及才俊學校適合輕度智障的學生,而天保民學校則適宜輕至中度。匡智會服務焦點放在智障人士的能力上,而非着眼於先天的缺陷;才俊學校則為輕度智障兒童提供優質特殊教育服務,辦學團體為慈雲山街坊福利 會,故重視發揚街坊會四大信條的精神,你可視乎兒子的需要作出選擇。"
From Google Translate: "Hong Chi Lions Club Morning Hill School and Talent School are suitable for students with mild intellectual disabilities, while Tin Po Man School is suitable for students with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities. The focus of Hong Chi Club's services is on the abilities of people with intellectual disabilities, rather than focusing on congenital defects; Choi Jun School provides high-quality special education services for children with mild intellectual disabilities. The school is run by the Tsz Wan Shan Neighborhood Welfare Association, so it attaches great importance to carrying forward the spirit of the four tenets of the neighborhood association. You can make a choice based on your son's needs."
The article notes: "Lai Wai-ling was born to be a world-class table tennis player. ... said coach Lam Chi-bang, explaining how he recruited Lai to the national squad from Sha Tin's Choi Jun School."
The article notes: "At the 2000 Paralympics, Lai Wai-ling, a student at Choi Jun School, snapped up a gold medal in table tennis."
The article notes: "It is only two months since up-and-coming swimmer Kelvin Tang Wai-lok secured a place as Hong Kong's youngest representative at the London Paralympics. The 15-year-old, who has won many medals in international competitions this year, is unfazed by having so little time in which to prepare. "I'm going to do my best," says the mildly mentally handicapped teenager, who studies at Choi Jun School, in Tai Wai."
The article notes: "Tang, who studies at Choi Jun School in Tai Wai for the learning impaired, will be one of five local swimmers in London."
The article notes: "Wai-ling, a Form Five student at Choi Jun School in Sha Tin, is the world's No 1 mentally handicapped table-tennis player and is accustomed to winning such accolades."
The caption notes: "A pupil enjoys a sports therapy class at Choi Jun School in Sha Tin during a visit yesterday by Chief Secretary Henry Tang Ying-yen (third, right). The 120 primary and secondary students with mild intellectual disabilities receive extra training in life skills, and counselling."
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and building-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
keep this is a good article Evangp ( talk) 16:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 23:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of You're Under Arrest characters. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Following up on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natsumi Tsujimoto, nearly identical case - plot summary failing WP:GNG. Reception is limited to the single sentence that "Miyuki was among the Top 10 Most Popular Female Characters in the August 2001 issue of Newtype magazine.". No ja wiki article. My BEFORE shows next to nothing (one or two possible plot summaries on GBooks, in very limited view). Suggest merger and redirect to List of You're Under Arrest characters per WP:ATD. As with Natsumi, there's a tiny chance something exists in non-digitized, Japanese sources, but first, we have to find them. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:34, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Not confident it meets notability standards. There are news articles about the company, but they're mostly inflated by ultimately meaningless corporate jargon. Removing the advertising content from the current article, the entire article becomes "Radiant Logic is a US-based computer software company that develops software for enterprise information integration, information security, and data management." -- Primium ( talk) 22:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Page with minimal citations for a now defunct promotion that hasn't held events in almost a decade HeinzMaster ( talk) 21:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I initially created this as a redirect to Little Mix The Search, a show they competed in, and it has since been expanded. A WP:BEFORE finds that they don't meet WP:NBAND as they have no WP:SIGCOV, mainly primary sources that do not establish notability outside of the series. – Meena • 11:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing as No consensus after two relistings with no further editor participation. Possible ATDs can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and corporate-specific notability requirements. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
No claim of notability. Schools aren't automatically notable. Subject fails NCORP and GNG. The sister article in bn-wiki is similarly poorly written and sourced. From my BEFORE search in Bengala, I found little that was independent and reliable. I am not sure about Samay updates. Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Sources do not establish notability. WP:BEFORE shows news articles for a single event about dyed hair, but nothing that would warrant a standalone article for the college - Rich T| C| E-Mail 19:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Painfully brief career as a professional and no evidence of passing WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. Best sources found were Telegraph India, a squad list mention, CPD Football, a passing mention in a blog (not WP:RS), and India Footy, a single passing mention. I could not find any RS addressing Monirul Mondal directly and in detail, which is not surprising considering how short and uneventful his career was. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:18, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no indication of notability for the league itself, much less for a single season. The only in-line citation takes me to an error code on the Chinese Football Association website. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet WP:NMMA, as his highest quarterly ranking by Fight Matrix, was #362nd. Appears to fail WP:GNG as well, being his main coverage (outside of standard MMA media reporting) is through interviews, or passing mentions. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 20:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Played one season as a pro and then disappeared. I can't see any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC, even when searching in Hindi (बिमल मिंज). GCS Stars mentions him twice, as Bimal Minz, and it's a blog so clearly not WP:RS and doesn't help with GNG. Deccan Herald mentions him once, as Bimal Minz, and LatestLY mentions him once. None of these mentioned sources provide significant coverage of Minz/Minj. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Completely non-notable unit, does not deserve its own article Elshad ( talk) 18:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete - there aren't many pages in the category [6] so probably not worth this article to stay public as well as this having just one external link and two sentences. Iggy ( Swan) ( Contribs) 21:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG with zero significant coverage in reliable sources. All I could find are self-referential articles or WP:PROMO & WP:ROUTINE press releases about winners or nominations. Macktheknifeau ( talk) 17:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person not
properly sourced as passing Wikipedia inclusion criteria. The closest thing to a notability claim here is that he was the designated
substitute to a member of the French Parliament: that is, he was the guy who would have succeeded
Élisabeth Pochon if she had resigned the seat or died in the middle of her term, but that isn't an "inherently" notable role in its own right. If Pochon had vacated the seat and Bouton had accordingly become an MP, then he would obviously pass
WP:NPOL #1, but that didn't happen, so there's nothing "inherently" notable about being the substitute-in-waiting.
The rest of the content here is candidacies in elections he didn't win, his work for various organizations and committees, and a statement of the "first member of [underrepresented minority group] to do a non-notable thing" variety, none of which is notability-clinching stuff without proper sourcing either, and the referencing is parked almost entirely on directly affiliated
primary sources that aren't support for notability, with absolutely no evidence of
WP:GNG-worthy coverage about him shown at all: the only citation in the entire article that technically comes from a reliable source is here solely to tangentially verify a stray fact, and completely fails to name Raphaël Bouton at all in conjunction with it, and thus does not help to boost his notability either.
In addition, it warrants note that (a) there's no article about him on the French Wikipedia, where one would obviously be expected if he actually had any genuine notability in French politics, and (b) the article was created by a
WP:SPA with a direct
conflict of interest.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced far, far better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
17:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 11:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY and Biography of Living Persons Policy, therefore I have nominated it for deletion. Nobody expects the UnexpectedSmoreInquisition ( talk)! 17:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to C31 Melbourne. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 20:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It looks like the article is no longer unreferenced although if the editors arguing to Keep this article could supply more reliable sources, I think that would prevent a return trip to AFD. A rename can be done by any interested editor. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. Unreferenced, fails WP:NACTOR 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. i see a consensus to Keep this article, also it has been greatly expanded since the nomination. Moreover, I see no support for Deleting this article since it has been expanded. Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis about their work in reliable sources -- but this is referenced entirely to IMDb, and makes no meaningful notability claim beyond the fact of his existence.
While there are a lot of notable films in the filmography list, his credit on nearly all of them was "second unit/assistant director", which is in no way an "inherently" notable role that would constitute a "no sourcing required" freebie -- and while he later had some "associate producer" credits followed by one credit as a lead producer, that still isn't an inclusion freebie in the absence of adequate sourcing.
The article has been tagged for referencing improvement since 2016 without ever being improved -- and while the film he was a full producer on does have an article in which his name is listed in the infobox, this article gets so little attention that his name was never even wikilinked there.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more than just an IMDb profile for sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
16:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Severe promotional language and primarily edited and created by User:Jtylek and User:Ktylek, who appear to be the developers of Epesi. Only sources are reviews and the installer. —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 14:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
SPA5CE! (
talk about it, talk about it, talk about it!)
16:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 17:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
A long life in service and practice of the arts and in collecting African art, nevertheless does not make the subject notable per WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
08:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 15:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
14:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Bibliography
His collection has ended up in some notable places, I'd be surprised if there wasn't commentary about them in art journals. Agree on the idea of trimming the article. Closer should consider this is a weak keep. // Timothy :: talk 17:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Entirely relies on WP:UGC sources such as imdb and YouTube (see WP:IMDB and WP:RSPYT). Gnews search brings up nothing relevant either. [12], clearly not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. Ratnahastin ( talk) 14:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC) Ratnahastin ( talk) 14:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Many sources in the article are primary, there's a reception section but it only lists what list the character was part of. A quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Law & Order characters. Spinixster (chat!) 10:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
14:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A consensus is not going to emerge here to delete the article. However, there isn't a clear consensus to keep this either. What I would suggest rather than a renom, since this was so well attended, is to consider whether improvement is possible so that a firmer consensus to retain is possible, or whether there's a viable AtD. None of which require a relist, so closing. Star Mississippi 12:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The last nomination for this article was not descriptive and the nominator failed to demonstrate a lack of notability. In the time since this article has been put into mainspace, there has been no indication that Skibidi Toilet is notable despite receiving coverage from sources that are ambiguous in reliability. Sources such as Lifehacker and Distractify may be acceptable for expanding on an article that has already been deemed notable, but the only sources that seem to bear weight are For The Win—a publication that is likely not held to the same standards as its parent USA Today—and Kotaku.
major amount of contentyou refer to, for instance, would be insurmountable for someone outside of the zeitgeist. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
<del>
and </del>
) or reply to it with clarification; please don't post new bulleted lines with bolded recommendations per
WP:DISCUSSAFD: "You can explain your earlier recommendation in response to others but do not repeat a bolded recommendation on a new bulleted line." ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 08:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep Sources are enough to pass GNG, such as Kotaku and Cartoon Brew. Skyshifter talk 14:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
*Keep or Redirect to
List of Internet phenomena. Skibidi toilet has already met
WP:GNG and has enough
SIGCOV for it to not be deleted. The article does meet GNG and the
previous AfD was closed as a speedy keep. Checking Google through the above links also indicates through many news sources that Skibidi Toilet is being popular. --
Wesoree (
talk·
contribs)
14:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
11:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG with a lack of significant coverage about him. Dougal18 ( talk) 11:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient. Since there isn't a consensus on a viable ATD, there is nowhere to redirect it. Should consensus emerge on one, happy to restore the history for merger. Star Mississippi 12:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
I just declined a G11 nomination here on the basis that the page isn't overtly promotional, but I'm not convinced this subject is actually notable so filing this nomination instead. News coverage seems to entirely be from local media. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 14:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Another commercially motivated African awards ceremony, no WP:SIGCOV, no WP:RS, no backing from a reputable organisation (unless you count a "social enterprise communications firm" as reputable), with organisers selling its media reach. Even the impressive Forbes quote is, of course, from Forbes/sites. Needs to go - and so does the 2022 The Future Awards Africa article. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per G11 by Amakuru. ( non-admin closure) Shellwood ( talk) 11:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NEVENT and undisclosed paid editing. Theroadislong ( talk) 08:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable event. Sources are a mix of primary and passing mentions, and search finds nothing better. Was already rejected at AfC, moved into main space regardless, re-draftified, published again, so next stop AfD. Fails WP:GNG and every other flavour of notability I can think of. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Was already speedy deleted by User:Amakuru. Black Kite (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable ROTM business. Sources don't come even close to establishing notability, and search finds nothing better. Speedy request was reverted without explanation, so here we are. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT by a country mile. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Guardian (Nigeria). Liz Read! Talk! 07:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Most of the sources in this article are to articles about the people listed in the article. It's a sort of nested iterative articlefest. Outside The Guardian itself - or pieces in society magazines saying how subjects look 'hot' or other commentary regarding cover stars (likely paid/promoted content) there is no independent notability for The Guardian Life, no WP:RS, no WP:SIGCOV and no evidence it is a notable publication or business per WP:NCORP. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPROF, I was not able to find enough to justify notability Tehonk ( talk) 07:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
German company. Fails WP:NCORP, no notability. Sourcing is not WP:RS, independent or WP:SIGVCOV. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to TT255. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposing redirect to TT255. Seems to be only notable for the relatively well-preserved tomb she was buried in. Online sources appear to just interpret the tomb paintings. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 06:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to TT255. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposing redirect to TT255. Seems to be only notable for the relatively well-preserved tomb he was buried in. Online sources appear to just interpret the tomb paintings. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 06:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 02:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. It happened, with the usual announcements, but beyond that there is nothing especially noteworthy about this one of several thousand supernovae discovered so far this year. It was moderately bright, but not exceptionally so. I suggest returning to the original redirect, to the host galaxy, where it is already mentioned as one of four supernovae observed in that galaxy. Lithopsian ( talk) 16:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
02:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please review recently located sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I don't say this often but we need some more "Votes" on what should happen with this article. If you think it should be Redirected, please provide the target article. Be specific and direct.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposing deletion of this page due to a lack of notability. There is basically no information about this person listed and they do not seem to be notable. GraziePrego ( talk) 02:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More participation here would help.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Citations are all primary, self-published, or unreliable. Basic origin is crossing of two separate breeds by two separate breeders. That is all. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 03:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable list per WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:LISTCRUFT of people from "births" section in the main article that was split from the RfC discussion, also that fails WP:NLIST and WP:BLPLISTS. MirrorPlanet ( talk) 01:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't see a consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 02:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. The only source provided is a directory listing. LibStar ( talk) 00:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please offer your opinion on this subject.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Lebanese jeweler, signally fails WP:NCORP. Only coverage is routine store opening and 140th anniversary celebration news release. Only possible grounds for notability is longevity, but that longevity has been spent doing nothing whatsoever remarkable, impactful or in any other way notable. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. With an unbolded Keep, this can't be closed as Soft Deletion. So more opinions would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:08, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Non notable photographer - fails WP:N - if non encyclopedic sentences and sources were removed pretty much a nothing article LegalSmeagolian ( talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sean nós. as at ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
This is not an encyclopedia article at all. It's a mixture of repetition of the Sean nós disambiguation page, rambling and often repetitive opinion, and Irish-language lessons. This serves no encyclopedic purpose whatsoever, and is not even on an identifiable topic, but is an attempt to distinguish different meanings of a term (which is already what the disambiguation page exists for. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jones Radio Networks#Satellite formats. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as a defunct radio network. Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adult rock and roll, redirect this subject to Jones Radio Networks#Satellite formats. Let'srun ( talk) 12:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with other pages and relisting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I would really like to see more than two opinions on any bundled nomination where the fate of multiple articles is being considered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that there are adequate sources and this article should be Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 02:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable video game. I've tried to scour WP:VG/S for sourcing, but the only in-depth coverage I found were GameSpot and IGN both covering the announce/reveal at a trade show (added to talk page). There was no coverage afterwards, and all other hits were database entries. Note that the game is in English sourcing as "Portable Resort" rather than what the article shows. Searching the japanese title turned up a database entry on Famitsu, but no actual news/articles. It seems neither English nor Japanese reliable sources that we currently have identified took real note of the game. -- ferret ( talk) 17:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: With new advocates for Keeping this article, I see No Consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Express Oil Change & Tire Engineers. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, routine financial coverage and trivia. WP:BEFORE search does not yield any extensive coverage ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: TO discuss FloridaArmy's improvements or determine whether the redirect is preferable. Also, is there sourcing or not? Advertising is an issue that can be addressed editorially if there is sourcing
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Generally not a satisfying outcome after this much effort has been put toward a discussion, but there remains substantial disagreement over whether there is a sufficient quantity of reference material to sustain an article on this subject, and neither side conclusively refuted the other. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
This fringe organization fails both the Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) as well as the Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline. Having a lot of Google hits is not going to turn the tide either. In fact, there are hardly no independent and reliable sources that actually describe the activities and achievements of this organisation. 62.183.185.10 ( talk, c) 15:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) — 62.183.185.10 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
site:
parameter.
SmartSE (
talk)
22:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.(my emphasis). Let's examine the sources that you added in detail to see what they say about it:
Shortly after the Code of Conduct was first issued, the International Organization of Consumers Unions (IOCU) and the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) developed a Citizens’ Action Guide to the Code of Conduct (Goldenman and Rengam 1987). PAN also published a consolidated guide to the chemical tools and conventions (Goldenman and Pozo Vera 2008) which provided a checklist for implementation of the Code of Conduct. A dedicated Code monitoring module has been developed to help concerned organisations to monitor compliance with the Code of Conduct by governments and industry (Pesticide Action Network Asia and Pacific and Pesticide Action Network UK 2016). In addition, PAN carries out projects that promote implementation of parts of the Code of Conduct, in particular on alternatives to more hazardous pesticides.
Member organizations of the Pesticide Action Network (PAN) conducted community monitoring in 13 countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America between 2007 and 2009 (PAN 2010). They assessed pesticide use practices, use of personal protective equipment and self-reported symptoms of pesticide poisoning. Based on this survey, their assessment was that 25 years after initial publication of the Code of Conduct, pesticides in these regions were still exposing farmers to significant health risks.The best source of all of them, but the text is about reports that they have published rather than the organisation itself and is two small paragraphs in a 60 page document which is itself only chapter 3 of 12 of a larger report.
Noting high turnover, Pesticide Action Network (PAN) called for the appointment of experts who can complete their terms.and then several mentions of them supporting various decisions. Clearly not significant coverage.
Known to cause a high incidence of severe or irreversible adverse effects on human health or the environment (Pesticide Action Network, 2009).That's it - not significant coverage.
They would only delete an article if they felt their omissions would leave nothing substantial.SmartSE ( talk) 10:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The term “prior informed consent” appears to have been coined by David Bull of Oxfam (UK) in the late 1970s to convey a trade norm specifically in the context of trade in hazardous pesticides.15 Bull’s work at Oxfam influenced the Pesticides Action Network (PAN), which lobbied international institutions to regulate pesticides. PAN was motivated both to address serious environmental and health consequences of current pesticide practices and to curb what it saw as irresponsible behavior by multinational corporations (Paarlberg 1994: 316–319). Thus, the moral, legal, and economic origins of prior informed consent came together in pesticides trade.from "Informed Consent: A Negotiated Formula for Trade in Risky Organisms and Chemicals" by Amanda Wolf. Is this nothing more than a passing mention in your view? Is PAN not prominent here? Did they "just happen to be one of the participants"? For context the concept of Prior informed is central to the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent. To me the answer is no to all of those questions, but we might have different sensibilities here. Let's hear from others. {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 14:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Pesticides Action Network (PAN), which lobbied international institutions to regulate pesticides. And I quote the abstract (passing mention?) of another source:
The establishment of PIC as a binding international rule was sealed by eventually gaining the support of the chemical industry in the early 1990s, after initial opposition, after a civil society campaign led by the Pesticide Action Network (PAN), an alliance of nongovernmental organizations.[91] Have you included this source in your review? {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 19:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
took a look at all the sources mentioned here so far (including paywalled ones): can you provide us with the relevant portions of text from this one [92] that mentions PAN in the abstract? Also from Toxic Chemicals in America that contains a full entry on PAN. I've been reviewing all of the sources myself and have come to a very different conclusion than yours but I do not have access to all the full texts. Thanks. {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 19:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
References
We selected the five most central NGOs dedicated to environmental sustainability in agriculture: Friends of the Earth (FoE), Greenpeace, Oxfam, Pesticide Action Network (PAN), and World Wildlife Fund (WWF)
In such instances, the immediate need to save lives trumps concerns about subsequent health or environmental complications (including the potential for mosquitoes to develop resistance to the toxin). It was recognition of this stark calculus that forged the 2001 compromise on DDT, which was agreed to by groups with histories of firm opposition to the insecticide, such as the World Wildlife Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and the Pesticide Action Network (PAN)
Profiles are then presented to eight consumer international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) that have been active in international food safety work, with emphasis on the participation in the work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission
The next section examines evidence that just as economic globalization was leading to the global spread of toxic hazards, a parallel process was occurring in which social movements to resist toxic threats were becoming increasingly global. Particular attention is paid to the evolution of the international organization Pesticide Action Network and the constellation of other organizations in its orbit.
@ Goldsztajn: Thank you for the sources #1 is trivial coverage, #2 looks to be the same but I can't find the full text - do you have it? #3 I also can't access to assess. #4 is finally the kind of source that we need, the author appears to be independent and it contains several pages of content specifically about PAN. If anyone else would like to read the full text, drop me an email. SmartSE ( talk) 08:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Particular attention is paid to the evolution of the international organization Pesticide Action Network and the constellation of other organizations in its orbit.. It has everything we need from PAN's origins to the main campaigns with great detail. {{u| Gtoffoletto}} talk 14:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization.(my bolds) after surveying this many sources. KoA ( talk) 16:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
PAN is an international alliance of environmental, farm-worker, and consumer advocacy organizations that promotes pesticide safety in a variety of contexts. PAN has been actively involved with the FAO’s Agriculture Committee and with the United Nations Environment Program. Pesticide residues in foods are one of PAN’s many concerns, and PAN has attended occasional past sessions of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues.
References
Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.These articles are highlighting a product, case, or a report at best, not PAN itself.
The result was merge to Highs in the Mid-Sixties, Volume 1. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Barring database entries or extreme passing mentions ("SONG was included in ALBUM"), this does not appear to be notable as a stand-alone entry in the (likely notable) album series. I could not find any specific reviews for this entry. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) Talk to Me! 17:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:17, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Non notable corporation. Didn't locate sufficient CORPDEPTH-compliant sourcing to meet NCORP. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
No notable tag team. Article includes 1 source. Most of sources found online are just WP:ROUTINE results, not in deep coverage of the team. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 19:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. (given that all but one Keep vote came from a sock farm, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoinFluffy250) Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a businessman and politician, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for businessmen or politicians. As always, neither businessmen nor politicians are "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG on substantive coverage and analysis about their work -- but the attempted notability claim as a businessman is that his company exists, cited entirely to
primary sources such as press releases
self-published by his own company and Q&A interviews in which he's the speaker and not the subject under discussion; the attempted notability claim as a politician is that he's served on a borough council, which is not a level of office that guarantees inclusion under
WP:NPOL, and is still referenced to a primary source "staff" profile rather than GNG-building media coverage about his work on the council; and what's left for GNG-worthy coverage is two pieces that are covering him in trivial human interest contexts entirely tangential to the attempted notability claims, which thus aren't enough coverage to vault him over GNG all by themselves if "man is proud to be Irish" and "man is Olympic torchbearer" are the only fully independent third party sourcing he has.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
20:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'd like to hear more from those editors advocating Keep to counter objections from editors seeking Deletion. A simple "Keep" is insufficient in a deletion discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I can't help but notice that most of the editors advocating Keep have low edit counts reflecting a lack of AFD experience. So, I'm doing one final relisting. A reminder that while editors can make multiple comments in a deletion discussion, you can only "vote" once.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
No notable wrestler. Only worked for small, independet promotions. Not in deep coverage about him, just WP:ROUTINE results HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 19:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
2021-01 ✍️ create
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
01:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Constellation Automotive Group. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
No independent sources, only routine financial information and quotes from founders. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Los Angeles crime family. There is certainly an overwhelming desire for this to not be kept as a standalone article, that much is clear. Closing as no consensus would not be in keeping with that desire. A delete decision would not preclude anyone from updating any proposed merge target, but it would remove the current title from being a redirect. As the List of Cohen crime family members is already slated to be merged to the LA crime family article, any remaining sourced information from this article should be merged there as well. I note that there is nothing stopping anyone from adding any sourced material to Mickey Cohen as well. UtherSRG (talk) 18:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Article is a largely unsourced, largely OR compendium of material. Sure there are sources, but all deal with irrelevancies and side topics and none, zero, even attempt to address the subject of the article, the supposed "Cohen crime family" No sourcing is offered to indicate that such a "crime family" actually existed. In fact, if you look at the section called "Formation," you find that the formation of this supposed "crime family" is not described.
This article was merged into
Mickey Cohen in 2019 but was recently unmerged. I have no objection to merging in lieu of deletion, but this article adds little if anything to the Cohen article due to its lack of useful sourcing.
Note that the realated article List of Cohen crime family members, which has zero sourcing, has been nominated for deletion on the same grounds. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cohen crime family members Coretheapple ( talk) 17:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC) nomination updated. Coretheapple ( talk) 16:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
*Merge
List of Cohen crime family members into this one.
— Maile (
talk)
00:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a Keep and two different Merge targets that have been proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in case there are more opinions about the two different Merge target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Aside from one editor advocating Keep, it looks like opinion is divided between Delete and Merge which might result in a No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to White Pine Series of Architectural Monographs. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable hoax, with one piece about its uncovering and one primary "source" that is the original hoax article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. I don't see anything elsewhere which would seem to meet the GNG. JMWt ( talk) 19:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
2006-06 (closed as No consensus)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
00:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)