![]() |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
One primary reference. Probably fails WP:GNG as it stands, unless it can be expanded. Uhooep ( talk) 23:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Maybe Man. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
BLARed due to lack of coverage. Tour was just announced the other day and hasn't received much coverage yet, which isn't too surprising given it's for an album which also hasn't received much coverage. No prejudice toward restoring when there's more coverage – given the notability of the group and the size of venues they're covering, it wouldn't surprise me if more does appear closer to the tour's start next year – but I don't see reason to keep this around as more than the couple sentences at The Maybe Man#Tour for now. Redirect there for now. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 23:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
A former footballer whose career has been almost exclusively at the amateur level. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV, as all I could find was nothing more but passing mentions, empty stats pages (mostly automatically generated), occasional transfer reports and little more, including passing references to his current professional activity in the food industry (he has apparently retired from the game). [1] Angelo ( talk) 23:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost exclusively career at the amateur level, who fails WP:GNG due to a clear lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find is just passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent, and non-secondary sources. [2] Angelo ( talk) 23:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost entirely amateur career, who fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find is just passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent, and non-secondary sources. [3] Angelo ( talk) 23:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost entirely amateur career, who fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find is merely passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent and non-secondary sources. [4] Angelo ( talk) 23:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I'm seeing arguments to Delete all, Redirect/Merge all and some opposing this entire bundled nomination. In this case, I don't think relisting will bring with it an actual consensus but just more opinions on all sides of this discussion. So, I'm closing this discussion and recommend either nominating this articles individually or at least in smaller bunches. With nominations this large, even the most diligent AFD participant can't track down additional sources for over 25 articles over a week and it's unreasonable to expect anyone to do this. So, instead, we often get opinions to "Keep/Delete/Redirect all" where few or none of the articles are carefully analyzed which is not how AFD is intended to work. Liz Read! Talk! 20:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This should be deleted per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Vientiane, and because none of these articles tells us anything about the purported topic, namely the embassy building of the United States in various foreign capitals. Instead, they deal with bilateral relations, and articles covering that phenomenon already exist. Biruitorul Talk 23:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
:
Embassy of the United States, Wellington (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost entirely amateur career, who fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find was passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent sources and little more. [5] Angelo ( talk) 23:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league player, very little experience in Italian professional football, fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. All I could find was passing mentions, empty stats pages and non-independent sources: [6] Angelo ( talk) 23:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Article doesn't pass WP:GNG, not in its current state, at least. BEFORE doesn't help and this article has been having issues since 2006. No inline citations, etc. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 23:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Malian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Chad international footballers. Daniel ( talk) 17:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Chad international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. With just two caps, there is no indication of notability, either. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable enough to the point where the page is a stub that previously looked like a subject-generated resume. She was a guest opinion piece writer on some of the sources listed, but the ones she actually works for don't have Wikipedia pages. It's also missing significant biographical information.
I'm not sure how to correctly nominate a page for deletion this way, as the rules prevent me from doing it the usual way given how this is an appeal of a nomination removal with which I disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brobbz ( talk • contribs)
The result was no consensus due to a lack of participation. Daniel ( talk) 17:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Article about a film and music video director, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of passing one or more criteria for notability -- significant awards, evidence of third-party reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work in media and/or books, etc. -- but this literally just says he exists, lists a bunch of jobs he did, and sources all of it exclusively to directory entries (IMDb) and other
primary sources (Vevo) that aren't support for notability at all, which is not enough.
He needs either a significant volume of
WP:GNG-worthy coverage, or a stronger notability claim than just his work's existence.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 17:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Created by a now-blocked sock, one of a number of entirely misleading geographical articles about Dubai sourced by the author from a statistical database and then dressed up to look like 'places', this article was submitted to AfC by a sock of the blocked user and then accepted in AGF. However, Al Yalayis is a mostly uninhabited area of mostly desert at the edge of which we find a couple of newer housing developments not named Al Yalayis. Not notable per WP:GNG, no RS on offer and a fail of WP:GEO as a community or place - quite rightly tagged as OR and needing citations, it's really not going to get 'em because is not actually a place at all... Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we need to hear from other editors about this article and how GEOLAND applies to it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep. More credible sources just need to be added to the article because just by a simple google search, there several reliable sources that can be added. Micheal Kaluba ( talk) 15:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Question: Is there a relevant wikiproject, perhaps a geographical one, whose members could contribute some insight here? Newyorkbrad ( talk) 23:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
An honest time consuming BEFORE did not provide sources that didn't rely on "according to..." "In a Facebook post..." et cetera. The sources available as also seen in the article are not independent of the subject and lacks significant coverage. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 22:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Poorly sourced promotion of a non notable event. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 17:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Despite the name, this "Museum" is just a single room within the Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, and only got a tiny media coverage when first opened. It does not even have a building of its own (note that the photo is the University, not the museum). This page (an official page of Argentina and its topics) lists Argentine museums, and this one is not listed in it. Cambalachero ( talk) 17:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Central and Adams ( talk) 15:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Redirect option can be explored editorially on the talk page if desired. Daniel ( talk) 17:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:MILL coverage, no claim to notability Sohom ( talk) 20:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This article about a musician has been tagged as unsourced since November 2022. I have carried out WP:BEFORE and have not found references to add. I don't think he meets WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC. Tacyarg ( talk) 20:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lists of stars. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no coverage in basically any sources (so it fails WP:GNG) and the stars are basically just random well-known stars. Half of them are included in List of brightest stars too. Diamantinasaurus ( talk) 20:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable enough to the point where the page is a stub that previously looked like a subject-generated resume. She was a guest opinion piece writer on some of the sources listed, but the ones she actually works for don't have Wikipedia pages. It's also missing significant biographical information.
I'm not sure how to correctly nominate a page for deletion this way, as the rules prevent me from doing it the usual way given how this is an appeal of a nomination removal with which I disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brobbz ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Article about former footballer which fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG. PROD was declined without making any effort to demonstrate that either guideline is satisfied. My English-, French- and Thai-language searches yielded nearly no coverage of this player. I did find a messageboard post that confirms he played for Muangthong United and that he wore the #9 shirt for the club, but it's not a reliable source and the coverage is far from being significant. Jogurney ( talk) 20:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND, WP:NSINGER. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. No indication of significance. scope_creep Talk 20:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest thing I found was this and this, which does not suffice. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Soft Delete- only statistics sources , I found from my search on Google Wasilatlovekesy ( talk) 06:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. Daniel ( talk) 17:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Java applet. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
The article does not contain any sources, and all I can find online is stuff by the companies that make it, tutorials, documentation, or references to it's existence, which in my opinion fails WP:GNG. There's been tags on this page since 2019 and 2020 and no improvements have been made. Lewcm Talk to me! 19:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
appletviewer
executable as part of the
JDK."
SWinxy (
talk)
21:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)The result was redirect to BattleTech or a subsection thereof, which can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi 01:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
I thought we cleaned BattleTech WP:FANCRUFT years ago... somehow, this survived. Almost unreferenced, this is just a mix of BattleTech history + plot summary, and should be redirected to BattleTech just like BattleTech (fictional setting) was (that said, that article was boldly redirected (with some merge) without discussion by User:BalinKingOfMoria so we might as well have formal AfD for that remainder to sanction both redirects). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to generate clarity between keep or redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
17:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete and salt (again). Daniel ( talk) 17:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable individual who has their stage name admin protected, see B Major (record producer). Nominated for non-notable awards and cited a user written source and other cited sources are primary and non-reliable. Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and ultimately WP:ANYBIO. dxneo ( talk) 17:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I also found the 2 articles on Google News which is the Daily Voice and Press Info articles, that should pass the multiple coverage required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UncleCedric ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to EMD F40PH#History. Daniel ( talk) 17:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Pointless Article, was brought back after over a decade of being gone. The F40PHR is almost identical to the regular F40PH and has no reason to have an independent article. BigSneeze444 ( talk) 16:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mirabito Range. Daniel ( talk) 17:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I'm not really sure if this is notable, I can't really find any reliable sources about it other than the public domain material it was taken from. Most results on Google are for other mountains also named similarly. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Daniel ( talk) 17:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
After seeing the consensus build on the Afd of the current United States Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, it appears clear that the position does not confer notability on its own. There's nothing else other than routine announcements of appointments to boards and one article he wrote. [32] Clarityfiend ( talk) 15:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for essentially the same reason:
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any significant coverage online. Article was also created by the subject. There perhaps could be some Serbian sources I missed, but for now it doesn't seem like the subject passes general or artist-specific notability guidelines. Sgubaldo ( talk) 13:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Editors interested in launching an appropriate RFC or Merging this article know where they should go next. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
"Minor planets" are rocks of often less than a kilometre in diametre, of which there is a nearly endless supply, almost none of them (of these higher numbered, smaller ones) in any way notable. We can continue creating pages for them, but why? It's a WP:NOTSTATS violation, a reposting of database entries. I don't know where the cutoff should be (first 100,000? first 500,000?), but we can start by discussing if this one (and by definition future even higher numbered ones) should exist or not. Fram ( talk) 08:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Modussiccandi (
talk)
12:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 08:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Footballer with zero professional appearances (all his career has been at amateur level in Italy and the US), and the older brother of Italian youth international Cesare Casadei. All the sources I could find, apart from transfer reports, stats reports and non-independent sources from the clubs he played for at the time, are about him being the boyfriend of some minor starlet in 2021 [34] and little more [35] , none of which are either independent enough (including article sources) or covering the subject in thorough detail to be defined as WP:GNG. Angelo ( talk) 11:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep - Player with an ongoing career, off the back of a good season in the United States at college level and the potential to continue his career there. Has a decent amount of coverage, especially for the level he's played at, and this interview, and especially this one are independent and decently in-depth. At worst draftify. Davidlofgren1996 ( talk) 12:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails NSCHOOL as a for-profit school. No secondary sources with significant coverage available. Fermiboson ( talk) 07:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
"DONT Delete" I believe that this page meets the notability guidelines for educational institutions,-- Kasyap ( talk) 09:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Clearly a WP:SNOWBALL closure. I see no reason to continue this discussion further. (non-admin closure) Scorpions1325 ( talk) 17:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
not notable Atakhanli ( talk) 07:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Just a results listing and a list of non notable athletes. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar ( talk) 06:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ahwahnechee#Paiute Ahwahnechee place names. Thanks for the clarification on target articles. Editors interested in Merging any information know where they can find it. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Mass-created article by Carlossuarez46.
Cites only GNIS, which is unreliable and does not satisfy the requirement for legal recognition per WP:GNIS. Populated places without legal recognition need to pass WP:GNG, however there is no evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources here.
In my WP:BEFORE I searched Newspapers.com for Hokokwito, Hococwedoc, and Hok-ok-wi-dok but drew a blank. I also searched Google Books which found a single one-sentence mention that appears to originate in the 1870's with work by Stephen Powers. In full it reads:
"Hok-ok'-wi-dok, which stood very near where Hutchings Hotel now stands, opposite Yosemite Fall"
This single-sentence, 16-word mention, is not significant coverage. Whilst other books include exactly the same description copied from the Powers one, this copying also does not amount to significant coverage. A search on the Internet Archive also only turned up copies of this single-sentence description from Powers.
A redirect to
Yosemite Valley, California would be acceptable as an ATD. We do not have an article specifically about Yosemite Village, in which Hutchings Hotel was apparently located.(apparently I just wasn't looking in the right place).
FOARP (
talk)
16:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
06:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting just because there are several different Redirect/Merge target articles mentioned. We need to narrow that down to one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Tânia Tomé. ✗ plicit 06:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
BLP, Duplicates subject Tânia Tomé. Unneeded CFORK. No sourcing shows the different name is notable for a standalone article. Suggest redirect to Tânia Tomé#Music and writing where the subject already exists. // Timothy :: talk 05:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable, but this person never reached the top post of ambassador/high commissioner. Coverage is routine like of her speaking to the media on behalf of the UK Government. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 05:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I could have called this N/C and probably been within admin discretion, but what put me closer to keep is that we have reasonable belief that the Weldon chair is tied with the Dean position. This is not THEREMUSTBESOURCES as StarryGrandma has provided reasonable evidence of that being true in the very recent past, and non one has been able to ID a change rendering it no longer true. If sources don't eventuate, this can be revisited down the line. Star Mississippi 01:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
This person fails the notability guidelines for biographies, namely:
This alone qualifies the article for notability deletion, but in several other guidelines, such as
WP:SIGCOV and having and independent source it just barely squeaks by. Clearly and article that should be deleted.
AriTheHorse
04:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It sounds like there is an absence of reliable sources establishing academic notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
This "rivalry" appears to be simply a marketing slogan and does not have significant, independent coverage with which to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 18:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
outwith,
coinersand
aforegiven: Brings to mind a zinger coined by old Bill Shakespeare: "Who knows himself a braggart, let him fear this, for it will come to pass that every braggart shall be found an ass." SIGCOV is the touchstone, and no one has said otherwise. That said, it is entirely appropriate (one might even say " snotor") in close cases to look at other real-world factors in determining whether or not a series of football games is worthy of a stand-alone article. Cbl62 ( talk) 16:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I could make a fair stub out of this, but it would have glaring holes in it that the phrase-only headline-only matching research doesn't fill in. Amusingly with regard an earlier comment in this discussion, the second 2022 newspaper article explains how this is not something that has gone on continuously for 70 years, because it explains that there was a gap when it didn't. We have 40 years missing, during which there could have been further gaps, for all that we know. Would that people were properly researching this, instead of phrase matching with search engines!
So that's a stub with probable scope for expansion, although we have no sources to show that the scope for expansion, to the missing decades, and to the other sports (the proffered sources all discussing one sport and not even the women's teams), is definitely there.
The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political figure, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:NPOL. The article literally just states that she's a person who exists, while completely failing to state what political offices she may have held -- but politicians are not all "inherently" notable just for existing, and are only presumed notable in certain specific major offices, so an article that completely elides what offices the person even held in the first place clearly doesn't cut it.
Additionally, the fact that there's no article about her at all on the Swedish Wikipedia doesn't bode well, since there's just no way that Swedish editors would completely overlook her if she were actually a holder of any NPOL-passing office.
In addition, two of the three footnotes here are just address directory entries, which are not reliable or
WP:GNG-building sourcing, and the only one that comes from a real media outlet appears to suggest that she's just a local figure in a small town, which is a level at which we would need far, far more than just one GNG-worthy source to deem her notable enough.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this article from having to contain a lot more substance than this, and a lot more sourcing for it than just one media hit and a bunch of phone books.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For a stronger consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Maybe consider the possibility of draftification.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:NCORP fail. All google hits are trivial mention (hiring and departure of personnel). See also draft at the same name, which was created when someone moved the article to draft, and the article author recreated an unlinked identical article. Fermiboson ( talk) 05:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NLIST; there's a difference between Anglophones in Quebec and 'people in Quebec who can/do speak English'. To me, this is the difference between 'hockey players from Quebec' and 'people from Quebec who can/do play hockey'. I don't see this as a cohesive group of people per the terms of NLIST ("topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources") compared to Anglo-Quebecois or Anglophones in Quebec. It's also not clear what the criteria for "English-speaking" is - should both Justin and Pierre Elliott Trudeau be on this list? Even Quebecer is vague - John Abbott was born in Lower Canada, Samuel Bronfman was from Bessarabia and lived for many years in Manitoba, etc. The topic isn't specific enough to warrant a list under this title. Relatedly, we do not have articles for 'List of French-speaking Albertans' and such from other provinces. Kazamzam ( talk) 04:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
One non-notable think tank among thousands. Current sourcing is pretty bad (all SPS), and a WP:BEFORE turns up no WP:SIGCOV of the organization. Only routine WP:NOTNEWS coverage of the org signing statements or listed affiliations of its personnel, which does not establish WP:GNG. Tag for WP:V have been on the page for 10 years. Longhornsg ( talk) 03:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Neighborhood association. Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
10 years later, User:Missvain's PROD concerns hold true: the article fails WP:GNG and is WP:OR. Its synthesis would will remain the latter unless WP:reliable sources could be found that extensively compare these associations. The top search results ( [44] [45]) are merely 4 paragraphs. Scholarly sources are unlikely to provide necessary comparison [46] [47]. XxTechnicianxX ( talk) 02:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find any sources besides the two used in the article, and both are interviews. QuietCicada - Talk 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is largely sourced from one source which is primary. In fact, all sources are primary. Lacking elements of notable relations like embassies and state visits. The agreements are minor. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 01:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya. ✗ plicit 00:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
No third-party sources found. Sohom ( talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Last AfD was 13 years ago. some of the sources identified then are now dead links. I searched for "Organization for Understanding Cluster Headaches" and "Organisation for the Understanding of Cluster Headache " and could not find significant indepth coverage. LibStar ( talk) 00:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
One primary reference. Probably fails WP:GNG as it stands, unless it can be expanded. Uhooep ( talk) 23:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Maybe Man. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
BLARed due to lack of coverage. Tour was just announced the other day and hasn't received much coverage yet, which isn't too surprising given it's for an album which also hasn't received much coverage. No prejudice toward restoring when there's more coverage – given the notability of the group and the size of venues they're covering, it wouldn't surprise me if more does appear closer to the tour's start next year – but I don't see reason to keep this around as more than the couple sentences at The Maybe Man#Tour for now. Redirect there for now. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 23:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
A former footballer whose career has been almost exclusively at the amateur level. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV, as all I could find was nothing more but passing mentions, empty stats pages (mostly automatically generated), occasional transfer reports and little more, including passing references to his current professional activity in the food industry (he has apparently retired from the game). [1] Angelo ( talk) 23:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost exclusively career at the amateur level, who fails WP:GNG due to a clear lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find is just passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent, and non-secondary sources. [2] Angelo ( talk) 23:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost entirely amateur career, who fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find is just passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent, and non-secondary sources. [3] Angelo ( talk) 23:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost entirely amateur career, who fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find is merely passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent and non-secondary sources. [4] Angelo ( talk) 23:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I'm seeing arguments to Delete all, Redirect/Merge all and some opposing this entire bundled nomination. In this case, I don't think relisting will bring with it an actual consensus but just more opinions on all sides of this discussion. So, I'm closing this discussion and recommend either nominating this articles individually or at least in smaller bunches. With nominations this large, even the most diligent AFD participant can't track down additional sources for over 25 articles over a week and it's unreasonable to expect anyone to do this. So, instead, we often get opinions to "Keep/Delete/Redirect all" where few or none of the articles are carefully analyzed which is not how AFD is intended to work. Liz Read! Talk! 20:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This should be deleted per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Vientiane, and because none of these articles tells us anything about the purported topic, namely the embassy building of the United States in various foreign capitals. Instead, they deal with bilateral relations, and articles covering that phenomenon already exist. Biruitorul Talk 23:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
:
Embassy of the United States, Wellington (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league footballer with an almost entirely amateur career, who fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - all I could find was passing mentions, transfer reports, non-independent sources and little more. [5] Angelo ( talk) 23:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Minor league player, very little experience in Italian professional football, fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. All I could find was passing mentions, empty stats pages and non-independent sources: [6] Angelo ( talk) 23:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Article doesn't pass WP:GNG, not in its current state, at least. BEFORE doesn't help and this article has been having issues since 2006. No inline citations, etc. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 23:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:56, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Malian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Chad international footballers. Daniel ( talk) 17:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Chad international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. With just two caps, there is no indication of notability, either. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable enough to the point where the page is a stub that previously looked like a subject-generated resume. She was a guest opinion piece writer on some of the sources listed, but the ones she actually works for don't have Wikipedia pages. It's also missing significant biographical information.
I'm not sure how to correctly nominate a page for deletion this way, as the rules prevent me from doing it the usual way given how this is an appeal of a nomination removal with which I disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brobbz ( talk • contribs)
The result was no consensus due to a lack of participation. Daniel ( talk) 17:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Article about a film and music video director, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of passing one or more criteria for notability -- significant awards, evidence of third-party reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work in media and/or books, etc. -- but this literally just says he exists, lists a bunch of jobs he did, and sources all of it exclusively to directory entries (IMDb) and other
primary sources (Vevo) that aren't support for notability at all, which is not enough.
He needs either a significant volume of
WP:GNG-worthy coverage, or a stronger notability claim than just his work's existence.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 17:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Created by a now-blocked sock, one of a number of entirely misleading geographical articles about Dubai sourced by the author from a statistical database and then dressed up to look like 'places', this article was submitted to AfC by a sock of the blocked user and then accepted in AGF. However, Al Yalayis is a mostly uninhabited area of mostly desert at the edge of which we find a couple of newer housing developments not named Al Yalayis. Not notable per WP:GNG, no RS on offer and a fail of WP:GEO as a community or place - quite rightly tagged as OR and needing citations, it's really not going to get 'em because is not actually a place at all... Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as we need to hear from other editors about this article and how GEOLAND applies to it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep. More credible sources just need to be added to the article because just by a simple google search, there several reliable sources that can be added. Micheal Kaluba ( talk) 15:37, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Question: Is there a relevant wikiproject, perhaps a geographical one, whose members could contribute some insight here? Newyorkbrad ( talk) 23:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
An honest time consuming BEFORE did not provide sources that didn't rely on "according to..." "In a Facebook post..." et cetera. The sources available as also seen in the article are not independent of the subject and lacks significant coverage. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 22:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Poorly sourced promotion of a non notable event. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 17:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Despite the name, this "Museum" is just a single room within the Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, and only got a tiny media coverage when first opened. It does not even have a building of its own (note that the photo is the University, not the museum). This page (an official page of Argentina and its topics) lists Argentine museums, and this one is not listed in it. Cambalachero ( talk) 17:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Central and Adams ( talk) 15:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Redirect option can be explored editorially on the talk page if desired. Daniel ( talk) 17:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:MILL coverage, no claim to notability Sohom ( talk) 20:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This article about a musician has been tagged as unsourced since November 2022. I have carried out WP:BEFORE and have not found references to add. I don't think he meets WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC. Tacyarg ( talk) 20:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lists of stars. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no coverage in basically any sources (so it fails WP:GNG) and the stars are basically just random well-known stars. Half of them are included in List of brightest stars too. Diamantinasaurus ( talk) 20:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 17:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable enough to the point where the page is a stub that previously looked like a subject-generated resume. She was a guest opinion piece writer on some of the sources listed, but the ones she actually works for don't have Wikipedia pages. It's also missing significant biographical information.
I'm not sure how to correctly nominate a page for deletion this way, as the rules prevent me from doing it the usual way given how this is an appeal of a nomination removal with which I disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brobbz ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Article about former footballer which fails WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG. PROD was declined without making any effort to demonstrate that either guideline is satisfied. My English-, French- and Thai-language searches yielded nearly no coverage of this player. I did find a messageboard post that confirms he played for Muangthong United and that he wore the #9 shirt for the club, but it's not a reliable source and the coverage is far from being significant. Jogurney ( talk) 20:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND, WP:NSINGER. Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. No indication of significance. scope_creep Talk 20:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest thing I found was this and this, which does not suffice. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Soft Delete- only statistics sources , I found from my search on Google Wasilatlovekesy ( talk) 06:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. Daniel ( talk) 17:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Java applet. Daniel ( talk) 17:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
The article does not contain any sources, and all I can find online is stuff by the companies that make it, tutorials, documentation, or references to it's existence, which in my opinion fails WP:GNG. There's been tags on this page since 2019 and 2020 and no improvements have been made. Lewcm Talk to me! 19:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
appletviewer
executable as part of the
JDK."
SWinxy (
talk)
21:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)The result was redirect to BattleTech or a subsection thereof, which can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi 01:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
I thought we cleaned BattleTech WP:FANCRUFT years ago... somehow, this survived. Almost unreferenced, this is just a mix of BattleTech history + plot summary, and should be redirected to BattleTech just like BattleTech (fictional setting) was (that said, that article was boldly redirected (with some merge) without discussion by User:BalinKingOfMoria so we might as well have formal AfD for that remainder to sanction both redirects). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to generate clarity between keep or redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
17:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete and salt (again). Daniel ( talk) 17:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable individual who has their stage name admin protected, see B Major (record producer). Nominated for non-notable awards and cited a user written source and other cited sources are primary and non-reliable. Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and ultimately WP:ANYBIO. dxneo ( talk) 17:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I also found the 2 articles on Google News which is the Daily Voice and Press Info articles, that should pass the multiple coverage required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UncleCedric ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to EMD F40PH#History. Daniel ( talk) 17:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Pointless Article, was brought back after over a decade of being gone. The F40PHR is almost identical to the regular F40PH and has no reason to have an independent article. BigSneeze444 ( talk) 16:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mirabito Range. Daniel ( talk) 17:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I'm not really sure if this is notable, I can't really find any reliable sources about it other than the public domain material it was taken from. Most results on Google are for other mountains also named similarly. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Daniel ( talk) 17:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
After seeing the consensus build on the Afd of the current United States Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, it appears clear that the position does not confer notability on its own. There's nothing else other than routine announcements of appointments to boards and one article he wrote. [32] Clarityfiend ( talk) 15:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for essentially the same reason:
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any significant coverage online. Article was also created by the subject. There perhaps could be some Serbian sources I missed, but for now it doesn't seem like the subject passes general or artist-specific notability guidelines. Sgubaldo ( talk) 13:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Editors interested in launching an appropriate RFC or Merging this article know where they should go next. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
"Minor planets" are rocks of often less than a kilometre in diametre, of which there is a nearly endless supply, almost none of them (of these higher numbered, smaller ones) in any way notable. We can continue creating pages for them, but why? It's a WP:NOTSTATS violation, a reposting of database entries. I don't know where the cutoff should be (first 100,000? first 500,000?), but we can start by discussing if this one (and by definition future even higher numbered ones) should exist or not. Fram ( talk) 08:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Modussiccandi (
talk)
12:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 08:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Footballer with zero professional appearances (all his career has been at amateur level in Italy and the US), and the older brother of Italian youth international Cesare Casadei. All the sources I could find, apart from transfer reports, stats reports and non-independent sources from the clubs he played for at the time, are about him being the boyfriend of some minor starlet in 2021 [34] and little more [35] , none of which are either independent enough (including article sources) or covering the subject in thorough detail to be defined as WP:GNG. Angelo ( talk) 11:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep - Player with an ongoing career, off the back of a good season in the United States at college level and the potential to continue his career there. Has a decent amount of coverage, especially for the level he's played at, and this interview, and especially this one are independent and decently in-depth. At worst draftify. Davidlofgren1996 ( talk) 12:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails NSCHOOL as a for-profit school. No secondary sources with significant coverage available. Fermiboson ( talk) 07:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
"DONT Delete" I believe that this page meets the notability guidelines for educational institutions,-- Kasyap ( talk) 09:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Clearly a WP:SNOWBALL closure. I see no reason to continue this discussion further. (non-admin closure) Scorpions1325 ( talk) 17:59, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
not notable Atakhanli ( talk) 07:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Just a results listing and a list of non notable athletes. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. LibStar ( talk) 06:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ahwahnechee#Paiute Ahwahnechee place names. Thanks for the clarification on target articles. Editors interested in Merging any information know where they can find it. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Mass-created article by Carlossuarez46.
Cites only GNIS, which is unreliable and does not satisfy the requirement for legal recognition per WP:GNIS. Populated places without legal recognition need to pass WP:GNG, however there is no evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources here.
In my WP:BEFORE I searched Newspapers.com for Hokokwito, Hococwedoc, and Hok-ok-wi-dok but drew a blank. I also searched Google Books which found a single one-sentence mention that appears to originate in the 1870's with work by Stephen Powers. In full it reads:
"Hok-ok'-wi-dok, which stood very near where Hutchings Hotel now stands, opposite Yosemite Fall"
This single-sentence, 16-word mention, is not significant coverage. Whilst other books include exactly the same description copied from the Powers one, this copying also does not amount to significant coverage. A search on the Internet Archive also only turned up copies of this single-sentence description from Powers.
A redirect to
Yosemite Valley, California would be acceptable as an ATD. We do not have an article specifically about Yosemite Village, in which Hutchings Hotel was apparently located.(apparently I just wasn't looking in the right place).
FOARP (
talk)
16:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
06:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting just because there are several different Redirect/Merge target articles mentioned. We need to narrow that down to one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Tânia Tomé. ✗ plicit 06:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
BLP, Duplicates subject Tânia Tomé. Unneeded CFORK. No sourcing shows the different name is notable for a standalone article. Suggest redirect to Tânia Tomé#Music and writing where the subject already exists. // Timothy :: talk 05:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable, but this person never reached the top post of ambassador/high commissioner. Coverage is routine like of her speaking to the media on behalf of the UK Government. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 05:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I could have called this N/C and probably been within admin discretion, but what put me closer to keep is that we have reasonable belief that the Weldon chair is tied with the Dean position. This is not THEREMUSTBESOURCES as StarryGrandma has provided reasonable evidence of that being true in the very recent past, and non one has been able to ID a change rendering it no longer true. If sources don't eventuate, this can be revisited down the line. Star Mississippi 01:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
This person fails the notability guidelines for biographies, namely:
This alone qualifies the article for notability deletion, but in several other guidelines, such as
WP:SIGCOV and having and independent source it just barely squeaks by. Clearly and article that should be deleted.
AriTheHorse
04:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It sounds like there is an absence of reliable sources establishing academic notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
This "rivalry" appears to be simply a marketing slogan and does not have significant, independent coverage with which to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 18:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
outwith,
coinersand
aforegiven: Brings to mind a zinger coined by old Bill Shakespeare: "Who knows himself a braggart, let him fear this, for it will come to pass that every braggart shall be found an ass." SIGCOV is the touchstone, and no one has said otherwise. That said, it is entirely appropriate (one might even say " snotor") in close cases to look at other real-world factors in determining whether or not a series of football games is worthy of a stand-alone article. Cbl62 ( talk) 16:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I could make a fair stub out of this, but it would have glaring holes in it that the phrase-only headline-only matching research doesn't fill in. Amusingly with regard an earlier comment in this discussion, the second 2022 newspaper article explains how this is not something that has gone on continuously for 70 years, because it explains that there was a gap when it didn't. We have 40 years missing, during which there could have been further gaps, for all that we know. Would that people were properly researching this, instead of phrase matching with search engines!
So that's a stub with probable scope for expansion, although we have no sources to show that the scope for expansion, to the missing decades, and to the other sports (the proffered sources all discussing one sport and not even the women's teams), is definitely there.
The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 06:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political figure, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:NPOL. The article literally just states that she's a person who exists, while completely failing to state what political offices she may have held -- but politicians are not all "inherently" notable just for existing, and are only presumed notable in certain specific major offices, so an article that completely elides what offices the person even held in the first place clearly doesn't cut it.
Additionally, the fact that there's no article about her at all on the Swedish Wikipedia doesn't bode well, since there's just no way that Swedish editors would completely overlook her if she were actually a holder of any NPOL-passing office.
In addition, two of the three footnotes here are just address directory entries, which are not reliable or
WP:GNG-building sourcing, and the only one that comes from a real media outlet appears to suggest that she's just a local figure in a small town, which is a level at which we would need far, far more than just one GNG-worthy source to deem her notable enough.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this article from having to contain a lot more substance than this, and a lot more sourcing for it than just one media hit and a bunch of phone books.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For a stronger consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Maybe consider the possibility of draftification.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:NCORP fail. All google hits are trivial mention (hiring and departure of personnel). See also draft at the same name, which was created when someone moved the article to draft, and the article author recreated an unlinked identical article. Fermiboson ( talk) 05:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 08:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NLIST; there's a difference between Anglophones in Quebec and 'people in Quebec who can/do speak English'. To me, this is the difference between 'hockey players from Quebec' and 'people from Quebec who can/do play hockey'. I don't see this as a cohesive group of people per the terms of NLIST ("topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources") compared to Anglo-Quebecois or Anglophones in Quebec. It's also not clear what the criteria for "English-speaking" is - should both Justin and Pierre Elliott Trudeau be on this list? Even Quebecer is vague - John Abbott was born in Lower Canada, Samuel Bronfman was from Bessarabia and lived for many years in Manitoba, etc. The topic isn't specific enough to warrant a list under this title. Relatedly, we do not have articles for 'List of French-speaking Albertans' and such from other provinces. Kazamzam ( talk) 04:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
One non-notable think tank among thousands. Current sourcing is pretty bad (all SPS), and a WP:BEFORE turns up no WP:SIGCOV of the organization. Only routine WP:NOTNEWS coverage of the org signing statements or listed affiliations of its personnel, which does not establish WP:GNG. Tag for WP:V have been on the page for 10 years. Longhornsg ( talk) 03:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Neighborhood association. Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
10 years later, User:Missvain's PROD concerns hold true: the article fails WP:GNG and is WP:OR. Its synthesis would will remain the latter unless WP:reliable sources could be found that extensively compare these associations. The top search results ( [44] [45]) are merely 4 paragraphs. Scholarly sources are unlikely to provide necessary comparison [46] [47]. XxTechnicianxX ( talk) 02:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find any sources besides the two used in the article, and both are interviews. QuietCicada - Talk 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is largely sourced from one source which is primary. In fact, all sources are primary. Lacking elements of notable relations like embassies and state visits. The agreements are minor. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 01:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya. ✗ plicit 00:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
No third-party sources found. Sohom ( talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Last AfD was 13 years ago. some of the sources identified then are now dead links. I searched for "Organization for Understanding Cluster Headaches" and "Organisation for the Understanding of Cluster Headache " and could not find significant indepth coverage. LibStar ( talk) 00:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)