The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
One appearance for the British Virgin Islands national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
One appearance for the British Virgin Islands national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
One appearance for the Vanuatu national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Little to no notability— this article's only source is a FAQ by the creators of the distribution and the only relevant sources I've been able to find related to this distro are just copies of this page from other wikis. Dawnbails ( talk) 22:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There's a majority of editors wanting to Keep this article but little work being done to improve sourcing which was mentioned as the primary problem in the nominator's statement.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There's a lot of support for renaming too, but it's not unanimous among keep supporting editors, and this isn't the right forum for that. Editors are encouraged to continue a move discussion on the article's talk page. signed, Rosguill talk 02:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Bad use of disambiguation page. When someone says "Sardar Patel", they unambiguously refer to Vallabhbhai Patel and not to random colleges or universities named after him. This may have been better off as List of places named after Vallabhbhai Patel (with much more information to be added) rather than a disambiguation page. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 10:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 02:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOTDATA, WP:MILL. There’s a lot of Italian Americans on TV and there’s no point in exhaustively listing them with no meaningful context about their portrayal and significance. It also seems to be a case of WP:GREATWRONGS since the only details provided are either negative/unflattering character traits or occupations that are usually stereotypes— basically WP:OR cherrypicking for an implicit case that TV depicts Italian Americans negatively. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 02:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE list with a huge percentage of entries being non-notable or devoid of context. Even if cleaned up there’s no reason to have a list for this topic since no information can be provided by one that wouldn’t work better in prose or category format. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus here to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Arbitrary cross-category without evidence of notability that wouldn’t need to exist even if the topic was notable. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Google News only has [14] which is limited circulation, WP:AUD. There are COI tags on the article but I am not going to evaluate that allegation here. Rs chen 7754 20:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Weak Keep After a quick google session, I managed to find a few secondary sources - I consider these RS, but they are narrow in scope to industry publication sand may not meet WP:SIGCOV. Ive worked them into the article for now. Cannot comment on COI tags, although the program's designer was also credited as a contributor to the NY art expo. Dfadden ( talk) 23:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The reprinting of the same information across the te.20minut.ua and teren.in.ua articles, the only two sources presented as good in the keep-!voted source analysis, significantly undermines the case for keep. signed, Rosguill talk 02:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
The article fails considerably on the criteria of WP:GNG. There is any significant achievement in verifiable and reliable sources to pass WP:ACADEMIC. Chiserc ( talk) 23:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.could certainly be interpreted such that dean of dentistry qualifies. However, I don't think that's necessary, because she appears to pass GNG:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is disagreement on the whether the sources analysis supports notability enough to Keep this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I am not finding that this artist meets notability criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. A BEFORE search reveals only social media or other trivial mentions, nothing in-depth could be found. The current article sourcing does not support notability, it consists of dead links, a few press releases, name-check mentions. It seems he was nominated for a few non-notable awards, but that is not enough to sustain an encyclopedia article. No significant exhibitions or any collections. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone ( talk) 22:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mold painting which is related. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 01:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
was one of the few artist selected to exhibit in the Tenth international Paratissima Turin, the most visited contemporary art event in Italy. Exhibited at the prestigious Osten Biennial of Drawing, 42nd World Gallery of Drawing – Skopje 2014 and received the Special Award by the Jury(Nickolas Thaw, USA – President, Anita Haldemann, Switzerland – Member, Pavle Pejovic, Montenegro – Member). Ppt91 talk 00:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 10:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Coverage in mostly in unreliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. BookishReader ( talk) 12:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Mahira Khan, Hamza Ali Abbasi sizzle on DIVA Magazine coverand the line in The Nation:
Khan was earlier this month recognized as the 2020’s Best Actor for both television and web series by Diva Magazine Pakistan ...suggest the magazine is somewhat notable. Also some Urdu sources mention the magazine in a similar way: Urdu News, Daily Pakistan, Dawn TV news. Insight 3 ( talk) 14:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
22:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It's been pointed out that the nominator has changed their opinion to Keep and since there is no support any longer for Deletion, I think we can consider this nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 00:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Fail GNG, not a notable person. I couldn't find any significant coverage. MRRaja001 ( talk) 17:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NASTRO as coverage is only from databases and large scale surveys with thousands of listings that don't provide in depth coverage. C messier ( talk) 21:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The 1975. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Bundled nomination for redirection (not deletion) to The 1975:
( Rosguill's {{ Notability}} tag has been contested, so a blank-and-redirect would be controversial; note AfD can be used for this per WP:ATD-R.)
These articles on performers from the 1975 contain almost no content about the individual, as no such content exists. A few sentences under "Artistry" or "Personal life" shed a little bit of detail that could be incorporated into an existing article if relevant, but almost all of the article content is duplicated and not specific to each member (as they grew up together, have performed together their entire adult life and have not generated much media attention as individuals).
The lead singer Matty Healy is an exception (and not nominated) as his media persona, stage persona, personal life and political commentary has garnered significant, sustained coverage. — Bilorv ( talk) 19:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
This article on a fine art painting process using mold to paint on surfaces does not meet criteria for notability per WP:GNG. A BEFORE search reveals lots of hits on how to get rid of mold on paintings, but virtually nothing about using mold as a painting medium. The current soucing is weak, as the first source does mention the process, but the other two sources are simply press releases about the work of "mold painting" by the article creator (whose work is also represented in the image in the article which was uploaded as their "own work") so it looks like this is also a COI entry. Netherzone ( talk) 19:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goran Menkov which is related. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 01:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Star Mississippi 12:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG and both sources are the company website, failing WP:ORG. WP:BEFORE check shows a lack of secondary sources. Let'srun ( talk) 18:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD R3. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The article has no sources and I can't find any evidence that this series of films ever existed. My searches are coming up with nothing at all. The articles Went to California and Late Dinner claim that the films were released in the US and Japan and many notable people were involved in their production, so coverage should be easy to find if these were ever genuine films. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hori7on. So Why 18:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBANDMEMBER criteria. – robertsky ( talk) 17:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) The person who loves reading ( talk) 20:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Page fails WP:GNG and also reads heavily like an advertisement, violating WP:CORP. WP:BEFORE check reveals a lack of secondary sources Let'srun ( talk) 17:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator - article now has sufficient content to establish notability. Let'srun ( talk) 19:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus exists to delete this article. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to pass WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Only 1 source found on both the English and Arabic pages, which is the same article, and it is an interview, not a review DonaldD23 talk to me 16:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus exists to delete this article. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
The article lacks reliable references, and the place does not meet the notability criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thesaurabhsaha ( talk) 16:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is sufficient consensus to delete this article at this time. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. is what WP:SPORTBASIC tells us is a requirement for any sportsperson to have their own article. My Bulgarian searches did not produce any WP:SIGCOV. The best sources that I could find were Gong, Blitz and BTV, all of which are reliable sources but none address Andonov in any detail at all. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 15:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Mostly unreferenced article, topic seems to have limited notability. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 14:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 15:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Iberian peninsula does not have a bird list, because it's too large for a decent list and not a zoogeographically important list. Even if it did, all other "birds of place" lists just mark accidentals with a tag instead of splitting them into a separate list. AryKun ( talk) 14:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If editors are interested in revisiting information from this article for merging to kakapo-related articles, I am happy to restore it in userspace. signed, Rosguill talk 02:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Zero notability as a whole. No reason why kakapos are notable enough for a list collating each individual bird. All of the references used are primary, because no secondary source discusses this in a way that would justify a list. AryKun ( talk) 14:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Zero notability as a whole. No reason why kakapos are notable enough for a list collating each individual bird." This is a species with a world population of 248, every single one of which is named, tracked and monitored. The Kākāpō recovery programme itself is highly notable. Obviously almost all the specific material in the list is primary-sourced (and there seem to be big gaps in the sourcing, too.) That's a problem, but I think it is mainly taken care of by the fact that the list topic itself is indisputably notable and extensively covered by secondary and tertiary sources. I think an argument could be made that this list is a reasonable extension of the coverage we give at the above link, especially since it is not available anywhere else in this collated form - this seems brought together from lots of individual nuggets, making it a valuable resource. See List of giant squid specimens and sightings (2001–2014) for a prime example of this kind of added value (admittedly that one is much stronger in secondary coverage). Sourcing for the article does need to be cleaned up though - there needs to be a ref for every one of these entries. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 15:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet relevant notability criteria; a few mentions of his name on cast lists, but unable to find significant coverage. — Moriwen ( talk) 14:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Another “list of superheroes by non-defining trait” article. No evidence age is a notable factor in superhero fiction, or that Aang from Avatar TLA is even a superhero for that matter, nor any explanation for why 19 is treated as the age of the majority when in most places its 18. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
His claim to fame seems to be playing half an hour of a 2-0 loss to Mozambique. No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Best sources are Sunday Standard, Mmegi 1 and Mmegi 2, all of which are trivial mentions of Kgoboge. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors have found that the article has been significantly improved since its initial nomination and it now demonstrates notability. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a student organization with no strong claim to passing WP:ORG. As always, organizations are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH on their sourceability -- but this cites no references at all, and has been tagged for lacking sources since 2007 without ever having any new sources added. Bearcat ( talk) 12:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Purely local coverage focussed primarily on recent opening. The likelihood a popup that has been open for six weeks being notable is slim. Valereee ( talk) 12:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Created in 2011 by an WP:SPA that seems to represent the school. I could find no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NORG based on my English and Sinhala (උදයගිරිය විද්යාලය) searches. Best source was Air Force, which mentions the school once in passing. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I can't find evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Regio Fussball is a trivial mention. I've revived the two dead links in the article but both are examples of trivial coverage: see Gazeta Dita and Illyria Press, neither of which discuss Berisha in any detail and merely list him among other players. BeSoccer is just a database source so doesn't confer notability, it records him plying his trade in the 2. Liga Interregional, the amateur fifth tier of Swiss football, so it's not surprising that there's so little written about him. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I am not able to locate any reliable sources addressing Balakishiyev directly and in detail. No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. is what WP:SPORTBASIC tells us is a requirement for any sportsperson to have their own article. The sources cited fall way short of requirements. The best sources that I can find are Digi Sport, a trivial mention in a match report about scoring a goal, Red Bull, which mentions him once, and Monitorul, which also mentions him only once. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There appears to have been a rough consensus found to keep this article based on new in-depth sources discovered. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are mostly database pages. Google Books search turned up some mentions, but I didn't see anything more than one paragraph in travel guides. May fail WP:NCORP. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 10:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The article's opening sentences note: "台中望族何家所創辦的永豐棧酒店,過去以歐美日商務客為主,在引進阿利海產後,獨特的台式熱炒餐廳帶動營運成長,惟近年競爭劇烈、疫情搗亂,酒店營運也陷入困境。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung, founded by the famous Taichung He family, used to have mainly European, American and Japanese business customers. After the introduction of Ali Seafood, the unique Taiwanese hot-fried restaurant drove the growth of operations. However, in recent years, the competition has been fierce and the pandemic has disrupted the operation of the hotel, which is in trouble."
The article notes: "永豐棧酒店位於台灣大道二段689號,自1997年開始營運,為台中早期指標性五星級酒店,本館共有250間客房,提供多達20種房型。永豐棧酒店推估平均房價約在4500元,第一年平均住房率可以來到6成。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung is located at No. 689, Section 2, Taiwan Boulevard. It has been in operation since 1997. It is an early indicator five-star hotel in Taichung. There are 250 rooms in the hotel, providing as many as 20 room types. Tempus Hotel Taichung estimates that the average room price is about NT$4,500, and the average occupancy rate in the first year can reach 60%."
The article notes: "有26年歷史的台中知名老牌飯店永豐棧酒店,日前爆發租賃與經營糾紛停業,授信永豐棧酒店原經營者豐昱國際公司的安泰銀,在對方未正常繳息下,於昨(30)日決定大舉增提9.57億元呆帳準備,據悉,安泰銀與另一共同授信的遠雄人壽,已研擬在明年1月該筆授信打入逾放後,展開債權確保行動,不排除聲請拍賣價值約有30億元的永豐棧酒店不動產抵債。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung, a well-known old hotel in Taichung with a history of 26 years, was closed due to a lease and management dispute. ) decided to increase the bad debt provision by NT$957 million. It is reported that Entie Commercial Bank and Farglory Life Insurance, another joint credit line, have planned to start the credit guarantee action after the credit line is over-released in January next year. It is not ruled out Apply for the auction of the real estate of Tempus Hotel Taichung worth about NT$3 billion to pay off debts."
The article notes: "昨天台永豐棧麗緻酒店正式開幕,催化台中旅館業的競爭氣氛,不過,該飯店希望以提升台中地區旅遊價值,包裝適當旅遊產品的方式,擴大台中旅館市場,為台中旅遊業帶來新契機。永豐棧麗緻酒店位在台中市中港路二段九號,擁有二百間客房,由永豐棧建設投資興建,委託台北亞都飯店所屬麗緻管理顧問公司全權經營,這也是「麗緻連鎖旅館系統」成立的第一家加盟飯店。"
From Google Translate: "The official opening of the Tempus Hotel Taichung yesterday has catalyzed the competitive atmosphere in the hotel industry in Taichung. However, the hotel hopes to expand the Taichung hotel market by enhancing the tourism value of the Taichung area and packaging appropriate tourism products, so as to bring new opportunities to the Taichung tourism industry. opportunity. The Tempus Hotel Taichung is located at No. 9, Section 2, Zhonggang Road, Taichung City. It has 200 guest rooms. It was invested and built by Yongfeng Construction, and entrusted with the full management of the Landis Management Consulting Company, which is affiliated to the Yadu Hotel in Taipei. The first franchised hotel established by Hotel System."
The article notes: "台中永豐棧麗緻酒店昨(26)日更名為「永豐棧酒店」,與麗緻飯店系統正式切割,永豐棧酒店董事長何豐棧同時宣布,將揮軍南下,搶攻墾丁飯店與餐飲市場。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung Landis Hotel changed its name to "Tempus Hotel" yesterday (26th), officially cutting off from the system of Landis Hotel. He Fengzhan, the chairman of Tempus Hotel, announced at the same time that he would send troops south to attack the Kenting Hotel and catering market."
The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDB. Primarily consists of hundreds of redlinks to non-notable laws which in all likelihood, never will be notable. It also unnecessarily duplicates a large part of List of statutes of New Zealand (2017–present). Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 09:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable actor, having acted in only 1 movie, thereby failing WP:NACTOR. All his upcoming movies have been shelved as per [29]. His claim to fame is as the grandson of acclaimed actor Amrish Puri, but since notability is not inherited, it should not get to remain. Jupitus Smart 00:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
05:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wilhelm Reich. Liz Read! Talk! 20:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Lacking in significant coverage from independent sources. The sources currently in the article are either by the subject (#1), don't mention the subject (#2-5, which are about orgone generally), or only mention the organization in passing (#6-7).
Sources not mentioned in the article are better, though not enough to save it from deletion [30] is the only one I've found that discusses it in depth, but a single source isn't sufficient for an article. Other mentions ( [31] [32]) are clearly trivial.
Also, while this doesn't strictly bear on whether the article gets deleted, it's also worth noting that the article was transparently created by a member of the organization, and a glance at the history will show that it's been repeatedly whitewashed, even if the current iteration isn't. Vahurzpu ( talk) 04:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Week keep It's getting 10K+ hits on google, and is a fairly well known college of nonsense. At worst, this should be merged to Wilhelm Reich, but not deleted. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 01:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Like to hear more opinions on whether this article should be Redirected or Merged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I'm going to do a procedural close as the nominator never tagged this article as being the subject of an AFD. A bot later added an AFD tag but as far as I can see, this nomination happened at the moment the article was created but it's impossible to tell with any certainty. They also neglected to inform the article creator of this nomination but luckily a bot took care of that along the way. To the nominator: Please follow the AFD guidelines perfectly, it's a multistep process and all steps are important. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fail in WP:SINGER ... no secondery reliable sources about his work Worldiswide ( talk) 03:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Gorge Amphitheatre. Liz Read! Talk! 07:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a routine shooting by US precedents. One week after the shooting, and the article remains a stub. Nothing suggests the content is standalone noteworthy. The event can easily be accommodated in List of mass shootings in the United States in 2023. WWGB ( talk) 04:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because although there is a consensus to Merge, we have two different target articles suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) JTtheOG ( talk) 17:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Fiji international footballers. One official appearance for the Fiji national football team. No indication of notability. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. I found this if anyone can find more coverage. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Fiji international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Fiji international footballers. One appearance for the Fiji national football team. No indication of notability. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 05:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO, with all sources being statistics. A PROD was contested. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 04:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced and no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 04:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Golden Axe#Characters. Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Article's whole reception section relies on quick quips, and the biggest part for her standalone game is more reception for that game than the character (hell one of the reception comments is for her running animation from it?). I though there might be something, but sources turned up nothing other than the occasionally passing note. This was never a character marketed the best and most of the recognizability comes from "girl in chain mail bikini" than actually being a character. Red Sonja she is not. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 03:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 03:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The article seems to be falling off on its notability. I tried looking for WP:BEFORE, but I dont see anything that could make the article notable. Thou, I am having hard time to check web archive (Taking all the criticism if the sources happens to fulfill her notability). Right now, the reception is only filled with listicles and game reviews (passing mention). GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 03:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment there seems to be a lot of sources at the web archive, thus resulting me withdrawing afd. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 03:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable restaurant, fails WP:CORPDEPTH, only local coverage, most of which are restaurant reviews. My attempt at tagging this article for notability to get more attention was promptly reverted. – bradv 02:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Does not have significant coverage in non-database sources. Searched Soviet newspaper database and found no mention at all in central newspapers from 1952. Kges1901 ( talk) 02:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
[This] is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply.The reason that sentence is there is so that we do not delete true all-time greats through a strict following of the guidelines, like we'd be doing here. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 17:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep due to the finding of multiple Spanish language sources during the discussion. RL0919 ( talk) 01:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOLY and WP:SPORTSCRIT. There is limited coverage of her but also there is a namesake who is an American abortion campaigner. LibStar ( talk) 07:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet GNG and NSOFT. The only reliable independent coverage I could is a brief CNET article from 2008 ( [48]) and a Softpedia post ( [49]). I'm unclear on the editorial standards or reliability of the latter; previous RSN discussion suggests it may be a marginally reliable source but either way this limited coverage does not seem significant enough to suggest notability to me. Ineligible for PROD due to prior AfD. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 22:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For input on the sources listed above...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Both sources in the article are statistics, and any sources online were also statistics. A PROD was contested by an IP who left a source on the talk page claiming that it showed notability, despite the fact that it is about an artist rather than a footballer. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 23:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
One appearance for the British Virgin Islands national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
One appearance for the British Virgin Islands national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
One appearance for the Vanuatu national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Little to no notability— this article's only source is a FAQ by the creators of the distribution and the only relevant sources I've been able to find related to this distro are just copies of this page from other wikis. Dawnbails ( talk) 22:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There's a majority of editors wanting to Keep this article but little work being done to improve sourcing which was mentioned as the primary problem in the nominator's statement.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There's a lot of support for renaming too, but it's not unanimous among keep supporting editors, and this isn't the right forum for that. Editors are encouraged to continue a move discussion on the article's talk page. signed, Rosguill talk 02:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Bad use of disambiguation page. When someone says "Sardar Patel", they unambiguously refer to Vallabhbhai Patel and not to random colleges or universities named after him. This may have been better off as List of places named after Vallabhbhai Patel (with much more information to be added) rather than a disambiguation page. — CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { C• X}) 10:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 02:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOTDATA, WP:MILL. There’s a lot of Italian Americans on TV and there’s no point in exhaustively listing them with no meaningful context about their portrayal and significance. It also seems to be a case of WP:GREATWRONGS since the only details provided are either negative/unflattering character traits or occupations that are usually stereotypes— basically WP:OR cherrypicking for an implicit case that TV depicts Italian Americans negatively. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 02:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE list with a huge percentage of entries being non-notable or devoid of context. Even if cleaned up there’s no reason to have a list for this topic since no information can be provided by one that wouldn’t work better in prose or category format. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus here to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Arbitrary cross-category without evidence of notability that wouldn’t need to exist even if the topic was notable. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Google News only has [14] which is limited circulation, WP:AUD. There are COI tags on the article but I am not going to evaluate that allegation here. Rs chen 7754 20:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Weak Keep After a quick google session, I managed to find a few secondary sources - I consider these RS, but they are narrow in scope to industry publication sand may not meet WP:SIGCOV. Ive worked them into the article for now. Cannot comment on COI tags, although the program's designer was also credited as a contributor to the NY art expo. Dfadden ( talk) 23:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The reprinting of the same information across the te.20minut.ua and teren.in.ua articles, the only two sources presented as good in the keep-!voted source analysis, significantly undermines the case for keep. signed, Rosguill talk 02:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
The article fails considerably on the criteria of WP:GNG. There is any significant achievement in verifiable and reliable sources to pass WP:ACADEMIC. Chiserc ( talk) 23:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.could certainly be interpreted such that dean of dentistry qualifies. However, I don't think that's necessary, because she appears to pass GNG:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is disagreement on the whether the sources analysis supports notability enough to Keep this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I am not finding that this artist meets notability criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. A BEFORE search reveals only social media or other trivial mentions, nothing in-depth could be found. The current article sourcing does not support notability, it consists of dead links, a few press releases, name-check mentions. It seems he was nominated for a few non-notable awards, but that is not enough to sustain an encyclopedia article. No significant exhibitions or any collections. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone ( talk) 22:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mold painting which is related. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 01:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
was one of the few artist selected to exhibit in the Tenth international Paratissima Turin, the most visited contemporary art event in Italy. Exhibited at the prestigious Osten Biennial of Drawing, 42nd World Gallery of Drawing – Skopje 2014 and received the Special Award by the Jury(Nickolas Thaw, USA – President, Anita Haldemann, Switzerland – Member, Pavle Pejovic, Montenegro – Member). Ppt91 talk 00:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 10:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Coverage in mostly in unreliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. BookishReader ( talk) 12:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Mahira Khan, Hamza Ali Abbasi sizzle on DIVA Magazine coverand the line in The Nation:
Khan was earlier this month recognized as the 2020’s Best Actor for both television and web series by Diva Magazine Pakistan ...suggest the magazine is somewhat notable. Also some Urdu sources mention the magazine in a similar way: Urdu News, Daily Pakistan, Dawn TV news. Insight 3 ( talk) 14:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
22:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It's been pointed out that the nominator has changed their opinion to Keep and since there is no support any longer for Deletion, I think we can consider this nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 00:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Fail GNG, not a notable person. I couldn't find any significant coverage. MRRaja001 ( talk) 17:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NASTRO as coverage is only from databases and large scale surveys with thousands of listings that don't provide in depth coverage. C messier ( talk) 21:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The 1975. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Bundled nomination for redirection (not deletion) to The 1975:
( Rosguill's {{ Notability}} tag has been contested, so a blank-and-redirect would be controversial; note AfD can be used for this per WP:ATD-R.)
These articles on performers from the 1975 contain almost no content about the individual, as no such content exists. A few sentences under "Artistry" or "Personal life" shed a little bit of detail that could be incorporated into an existing article if relevant, but almost all of the article content is duplicated and not specific to each member (as they grew up together, have performed together their entire adult life and have not generated much media attention as individuals).
The lead singer Matty Healy is an exception (and not nominated) as his media persona, stage persona, personal life and political commentary has garnered significant, sustained coverage. — Bilorv ( talk) 19:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
This article on a fine art painting process using mold to paint on surfaces does not meet criteria for notability per WP:GNG. A BEFORE search reveals lots of hits on how to get rid of mold on paintings, but virtually nothing about using mold as a painting medium. The current soucing is weak, as the first source does mention the process, but the other two sources are simply press releases about the work of "mold painting" by the article creator (whose work is also represented in the image in the article which was uploaded as their "own work") so it looks like this is also a COI entry. Netherzone ( talk) 19:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goran Menkov which is related. -- DanielRigal ( talk) 01:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Star Mississippi 12:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG and both sources are the company website, failing WP:ORG. WP:BEFORE check shows a lack of secondary sources. Let'srun ( talk) 18:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD R3. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The article has no sources and I can't find any evidence that this series of films ever existed. My searches are coming up with nothing at all. The articles Went to California and Late Dinner claim that the films were released in the US and Japan and many notable people were involved in their production, so coverage should be easy to find if these were ever genuine films. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hori7on. So Why 18:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NBANDMEMBER criteria. – robertsky ( talk) 17:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) The person who loves reading ( talk) 20:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Page fails WP:GNG and also reads heavily like an advertisement, violating WP:CORP. WP:BEFORE check reveals a lack of secondary sources Let'srun ( talk) 17:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator - article now has sufficient content to establish notability. Let'srun ( talk) 19:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus exists to delete this article. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to pass WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Only 1 source found on both the English and Arabic pages, which is the same article, and it is an interview, not a review DonaldD23 talk to me 16:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus exists to delete this article. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
The article lacks reliable references, and the place does not meet the notability criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thesaurabhsaha ( talk) 16:19, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is sufficient consensus to delete this article at this time. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. is what WP:SPORTBASIC tells us is a requirement for any sportsperson to have their own article. My Bulgarian searches did not produce any WP:SIGCOV. The best sources that I could find were Gong, Blitz and BTV, all of which are reliable sources but none address Andonov in any detail at all. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 15:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Mostly unreferenced article, topic seems to have limited notability. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 14:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 15:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Iberian peninsula does not have a bird list, because it's too large for a decent list and not a zoogeographically important list. Even if it did, all other "birds of place" lists just mark accidentals with a tag instead of splitting them into a separate list. AryKun ( talk) 14:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If editors are interested in revisiting information from this article for merging to kakapo-related articles, I am happy to restore it in userspace. signed, Rosguill talk 02:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Zero notability as a whole. No reason why kakapos are notable enough for a list collating each individual bird. All of the references used are primary, because no secondary source discusses this in a way that would justify a list. AryKun ( talk) 14:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Zero notability as a whole. No reason why kakapos are notable enough for a list collating each individual bird." This is a species with a world population of 248, every single one of which is named, tracked and monitored. The Kākāpō recovery programme itself is highly notable. Obviously almost all the specific material in the list is primary-sourced (and there seem to be big gaps in the sourcing, too.) That's a problem, but I think it is mainly taken care of by the fact that the list topic itself is indisputably notable and extensively covered by secondary and tertiary sources. I think an argument could be made that this list is a reasonable extension of the coverage we give at the above link, especially since it is not available anywhere else in this collated form - this seems brought together from lots of individual nuggets, making it a valuable resource. See List of giant squid specimens and sightings (2001–2014) for a prime example of this kind of added value (admittedly that one is much stronger in secondary coverage). Sourcing for the article does need to be cleaned up though - there needs to be a ref for every one of these entries. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 15:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet relevant notability criteria; a few mentions of his name on cast lists, but unable to find significant coverage. — Moriwen ( talk) 14:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Another “list of superheroes by non-defining trait” article. No evidence age is a notable factor in superhero fiction, or that Aang from Avatar TLA is even a superhero for that matter, nor any explanation for why 19 is treated as the age of the majority when in most places its 18. Dronebogus ( talk) 09:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
His claim to fame seems to be playing half an hour of a 2-0 loss to Mozambique. No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Best sources are Sunday Standard, Mmegi 1 and Mmegi 2, all of which are trivial mentions of Kgoboge. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors have found that the article has been significantly improved since its initial nomination and it now demonstrates notability. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a student organization with no strong claim to passing WP:ORG. As always, organizations are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH on their sourceability -- but this cites no references at all, and has been tagged for lacking sources since 2007 without ever having any new sources added. Bearcat ( talk) 12:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Purely local coverage focussed primarily on recent opening. The likelihood a popup that has been open for six weeks being notable is slim. Valereee ( talk) 12:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Created in 2011 by an WP:SPA that seems to represent the school. I could find no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NORG based on my English and Sinhala (උදයගිරිය විද්යාලය) searches. Best source was Air Force, which mentions the school once in passing. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:48, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I can't find evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Regio Fussball is a trivial mention. I've revived the two dead links in the article but both are examples of trivial coverage: see Gazeta Dita and Illyria Press, neither of which discuss Berisha in any detail and merely list him among other players. BeSoccer is just a database source so doesn't confer notability, it records him plying his trade in the 2. Liga Interregional, the amateur fifth tier of Swiss football, so it's not surprising that there's so little written about him. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
I am not able to locate any reliable sources addressing Balakishiyev directly and in detail. No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. is what WP:SPORTBASIC tells us is a requirement for any sportsperson to have their own article. The sources cited fall way short of requirements. The best sources that I can find are Digi Sport, a trivial mention in a match report about scoring a goal, Red Bull, which mentions him once, and Monitorul, which also mentions him only once. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There appears to have been a rough consensus found to keep this article based on new in-depth sources discovered. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are mostly database pages. Google Books search turned up some mentions, but I didn't see anything more than one paragraph in travel guides. May fail WP:NCORP. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 10:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The article's opening sentences note: "台中望族何家所創辦的永豐棧酒店,過去以歐美日商務客為主,在引進阿利海產後,獨特的台式熱炒餐廳帶動營運成長,惟近年競爭劇烈、疫情搗亂,酒店營運也陷入困境。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung, founded by the famous Taichung He family, used to have mainly European, American and Japanese business customers. After the introduction of Ali Seafood, the unique Taiwanese hot-fried restaurant drove the growth of operations. However, in recent years, the competition has been fierce and the pandemic has disrupted the operation of the hotel, which is in trouble."
The article notes: "永豐棧酒店位於台灣大道二段689號,自1997年開始營運,為台中早期指標性五星級酒店,本館共有250間客房,提供多達20種房型。永豐棧酒店推估平均房價約在4500元,第一年平均住房率可以來到6成。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung is located at No. 689, Section 2, Taiwan Boulevard. It has been in operation since 1997. It is an early indicator five-star hotel in Taichung. There are 250 rooms in the hotel, providing as many as 20 room types. Tempus Hotel Taichung estimates that the average room price is about NT$4,500, and the average occupancy rate in the first year can reach 60%."
The article notes: "有26年歷史的台中知名老牌飯店永豐棧酒店,日前爆發租賃與經營糾紛停業,授信永豐棧酒店原經營者豐昱國際公司的安泰銀,在對方未正常繳息下,於昨(30)日決定大舉增提9.57億元呆帳準備,據悉,安泰銀與另一共同授信的遠雄人壽,已研擬在明年1月該筆授信打入逾放後,展開債權確保行動,不排除聲請拍賣價值約有30億元的永豐棧酒店不動產抵債。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung, a well-known old hotel in Taichung with a history of 26 years, was closed due to a lease and management dispute. ) decided to increase the bad debt provision by NT$957 million. It is reported that Entie Commercial Bank and Farglory Life Insurance, another joint credit line, have planned to start the credit guarantee action after the credit line is over-released in January next year. It is not ruled out Apply for the auction of the real estate of Tempus Hotel Taichung worth about NT$3 billion to pay off debts."
The article notes: "昨天台永豐棧麗緻酒店正式開幕,催化台中旅館業的競爭氣氛,不過,該飯店希望以提升台中地區旅遊價值,包裝適當旅遊產品的方式,擴大台中旅館市場,為台中旅遊業帶來新契機。永豐棧麗緻酒店位在台中市中港路二段九號,擁有二百間客房,由永豐棧建設投資興建,委託台北亞都飯店所屬麗緻管理顧問公司全權經營,這也是「麗緻連鎖旅館系統」成立的第一家加盟飯店。"
From Google Translate: "The official opening of the Tempus Hotel Taichung yesterday has catalyzed the competitive atmosphere in the hotel industry in Taichung. However, the hotel hopes to expand the Taichung hotel market by enhancing the tourism value of the Taichung area and packaging appropriate tourism products, so as to bring new opportunities to the Taichung tourism industry. opportunity. The Tempus Hotel Taichung is located at No. 9, Section 2, Zhonggang Road, Taichung City. It has 200 guest rooms. It was invested and built by Yongfeng Construction, and entrusted with the full management of the Landis Management Consulting Company, which is affiliated to the Yadu Hotel in Taipei. The first franchised hotel established by Hotel System."
The article notes: "台中永豐棧麗緻酒店昨(26)日更名為「永豐棧酒店」,與麗緻飯店系統正式切割,永豐棧酒店董事長何豐棧同時宣布,將揮軍南下,搶攻墾丁飯店與餐飲市場。"
From Google Translate: "Tempus Hotel Taichung Landis Hotel changed its name to "Tempus Hotel" yesterday (26th), officially cutting off from the system of Landis Hotel. He Fengzhan, the chairman of Tempus Hotel, announced at the same time that he would send troops south to attack the Kenting Hotel and catering market."
The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 17:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN, WP:LISTPURP and WP:NOTDB. Primarily consists of hundreds of redlinks to non-notable laws which in all likelihood, never will be notable. It also unnecessarily duplicates a large part of List of statutes of New Zealand (2017–present). Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 09:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable actor, having acted in only 1 movie, thereby failing WP:NACTOR. All his upcoming movies have been shelved as per [29]. His claim to fame is as the grandson of acclaimed actor Amrish Puri, but since notability is not inherited, it should not get to remain. Jupitus Smart 00:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
05:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wilhelm Reich. Liz Read! Talk! 20:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Lacking in significant coverage from independent sources. The sources currently in the article are either by the subject (#1), don't mention the subject (#2-5, which are about orgone generally), or only mention the organization in passing (#6-7).
Sources not mentioned in the article are better, though not enough to save it from deletion [30] is the only one I've found that discusses it in depth, but a single source isn't sufficient for an article. Other mentions ( [31] [32]) are clearly trivial.
Also, while this doesn't strictly bear on whether the article gets deleted, it's also worth noting that the article was transparently created by a member of the organization, and a glance at the history will show that it's been repeatedly whitewashed, even if the current iteration isn't. Vahurzpu ( talk) 04:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Week keep It's getting 10K+ hits on google, and is a fairly well known college of nonsense. At worst, this should be merged to Wilhelm Reich, but not deleted. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 01:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Like to hear more opinions on whether this article should be Redirected or Merged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I'm going to do a procedural close as the nominator never tagged this article as being the subject of an AFD. A bot later added an AFD tag but as far as I can see, this nomination happened at the moment the article was created but it's impossible to tell with any certainty. They also neglected to inform the article creator of this nomination but luckily a bot took care of that along the way. To the nominator: Please follow the AFD guidelines perfectly, it's a multistep process and all steps are important. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fail in WP:SINGER ... no secondery reliable sources about his work Worldiswide ( talk) 03:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Gorge Amphitheatre. Liz Read! Talk! 07:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a routine shooting by US precedents. One week after the shooting, and the article remains a stub. Nothing suggests the content is standalone noteworthy. The event can easily be accommodated in List of mass shootings in the United States in 2023. WWGB ( talk) 04:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because although there is a consensus to Merge, we have two different target articles suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) JTtheOG ( talk) 17:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Fiji international footballers. One official appearance for the Fiji national football team. No indication of notability. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. I found this if anyone can find more coverage. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Fiji international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Fiji international footballers. One appearance for the Fiji national football team. No indication of notability. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 05:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO, with all sources being statistics. A PROD was contested. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 04:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced and no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 04:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Golden Axe#Characters. Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Article's whole reception section relies on quick quips, and the biggest part for her standalone game is more reception for that game than the character (hell one of the reception comments is for her running animation from it?). I though there might be something, but sources turned up nothing other than the occasionally passing note. This was never a character marketed the best and most of the recognizability comes from "girl in chain mail bikini" than actually being a character. Red Sonja she is not. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 03:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 03:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The article seems to be falling off on its notability. I tried looking for WP:BEFORE, but I dont see anything that could make the article notable. Thou, I am having hard time to check web archive (Taking all the criticism if the sources happens to fulfill her notability). Right now, the reception is only filled with listicles and game reviews (passing mention). GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 03:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment there seems to be a lot of sources at the web archive, thus resulting me withdrawing afd. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 03:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable restaurant, fails WP:CORPDEPTH, only local coverage, most of which are restaurant reviews. My attempt at tagging this article for notability to get more attention was promptly reverted. – bradv 02:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Does not have significant coverage in non-database sources. Searched Soviet newspaper database and found no mention at all in central newspapers from 1952. Kges1901 ( talk) 02:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
[This] is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply.The reason that sentence is there is so that we do not delete true all-time greats through a strict following of the guidelines, like we'd be doing here. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 17:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep due to the finding of multiple Spanish language sources during the discussion. RL0919 ( talk) 01:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOLY and WP:SPORTSCRIT. There is limited coverage of her but also there is a namesake who is an American abortion campaigner. LibStar ( talk) 07:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:38, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet GNG and NSOFT. The only reliable independent coverage I could is a brief CNET article from 2008 ( [48]) and a Softpedia post ( [49]). I'm unclear on the editorial standards or reliability of the latter; previous RSN discussion suggests it may be a marginally reliable source but either way this limited coverage does not seem significant enough to suggest notability to me. Ineligible for PROD due to prior AfD. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 22:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For input on the sources listed above...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
01:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Both sources in the article are statistics, and any sources online were also statistics. A PROD was contested by an IP who left a source on the talk page claiming that it showed notability, despite the fact that it is about an artist rather than a footballer. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 23:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)