The result was redirect to The Blasters. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Has been through BLPProd x3, so time for a conversation. He's a working guitarist who teaches and writes for publications, but I cannot find any evidence that adds up to notability for his writing or any other criteria. Star Mississippi 14:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Indians cricketers (Madras Presidency). ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Well, her we go again. 3rd or 4th time for puff-piece UPE. NO coverage. Refs are passing mentions, PR, event listing, catalogue entries. scope_creep Talk 23:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 23:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails notability. References either just list him as a participant or are bare statistics sites. From
WP:SPORTCRIT: Although statistics sites may be reliable sources, they are not sufficient by themselves to establish notability.
Search just finds more stat sites. —
rsjaffe
🗣️
23:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
The associated article, Cosmic entity (DC Comics), will almost certainly be deleted at its AfD, and this list has exactly the same problems as the main article — namely, it is pure WP:OR without any references, has unclear inclusion criteria, and fails WP:LISTN — except that unlike the embedded list at the main article, it includes additional characters who are not significant enough for inclusion in the more general lists of DC Comics characters. I'm not sure that the definition stated in the lead is the same as in the other list, and I can once again make the examples of Bat-Mite and Starro I gave in the other AfD. At the talk page, there's a discussion with similar concerns from 2005–2006 that I wish to embed here.
During the last AfD in 2020, users argued for trimming the non-notable entries, despite that the trimmed article would be exactly the same as the embedded list at the main article. The contents haven't changed one bit since then. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 23:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be non-notable. Lacks coverage. Refs are PR, clickbait and interviews. On the music side, no social media, no streaming info scope_creep Talk 23:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Zero notability— the only reference provided is a link to the company Facebook page. A search for possible sources turned up nil except for their advertisements, which we cannot use. Helen( 💬 📖) 23:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was
WP:SNOW delete.
BD2412
T
03:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable micronation. I cannot find any evidence that it exists, other than its own website. No claim of significance. No coverage in independent, reliable sources. (edited to add: I also tried searching on the founder's name since "Austin" is so common; found nothing.) Schazjmd (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Per the tickets for the UK shows here, this is billed as her "UK Tour" - that's it. There's no specific name for it. The appearances at festivals around the US, Europe and UK do not and have not been promoted alongside the mini UK headline tour. There's no marketing or cohesion that shows this is a single body of events. Its also fair too early - no information beyond dates has been provided. WP:NTOUR applies, as does WP:GNG, a lack of WP:SIGCOV beyond some dates. No reference to any jaunt being called "Summer 2022". ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claim here is that he's won beatboxing championships and that his career is "outlined" in a "compilation" -- but the reference for the first claim is an unreliable fansite and the reference for the second claim is a "Page Not Found" on Amazon, neither of which are valid support for notability. None of this is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have any proper coverage about him in real media. Bearcat ( talk) 22:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Article about a musician, not making any properly sourced claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claims here are bit parts in movies (none of whose articles mention him at all) and a Subway commercial, none of which is "inherently" notable in the absence of a WP:GNG-worthy volume of reliable source coverage about it, but there are absolutely no reliable sources cited here at all, and the article's been flagged for citation problems since 2009 without ever being improved. Bearcat ( talk) 22:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not much known about this defunct station; no sources. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Propose deletion per WP:GNG. The article has had no references or sources aside from a single external link to a boxing record database, and therefore no verifiable claim to notability, since its creation twelve years ago. It also appears to have been created by the article's subject (the username matches and only edited for a month after article creation on pages directly related to the article's subject). I could not find any verifiable, independent or reliable sources proving the subjects notability. This includes the claim made that the article's subject won gold at the 1994 African Games held in South Africa (which were in fact held in 1995 in Zimbabwe). SamWilson989 ( talk) 21:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Sources are YouTube and a dubious looking directory site. Nothing better found. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by VH1. Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No sourcing found beyond a 404 link to TV.com. Just a random one-shot countdown show that got no attention. Prod contested. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Harris Faulkner. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Barely any sourcing found. Has been a stub since forever. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shalmali Kholgade#Discography as an WP:ATD. Anyone is free to merge anything important to the target article. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 10:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
like the dozens of other articles with similar title, this isn't a necessary standalone list and is basically just an itunes directory. Anything relevant can be included in the main article about Shalmali Kholgade (as in anything that can be sourced outside of places to buy it.) Abbasulu ( talk) 20:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
There are some quite reliable sources in the article, however all of them quote the subject of the article. "Gürkan Keçici is a lifestyle coach. He says that you should do bla bla bla." No significant coverage, fails GNG. ~Styyx Talk? 20:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Actor without any lead roles. This source from Hürriyet seems ok, but it's only 3 sentences long and doesn't come close to being significant coverage. This from Demirören News Agency would also be good, but almost all of it is just quoting the subject himself. The rest are either "Kimdir?" sources which aren't reliable in the slightest. Fails NACTOR and GNG. This was deleted on trwiki with a deletion discussion. Important thing to note is that now globally locked UPE Seyit12 (also locally blocked here) !voted keep in the discussion saying that he revised the article, so this article might also be an UPE creation. ~Styyx Talk? 20:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails notability. First article just a listing, second is not found, searched paper web site and Donegal Sport Hub, sounds like an interview anyway (primary source, not valid for notability), third just has his name listed. Search finds no significant secondary independent indepth articles about him. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This actor has 0 lead roles; so insignificant that the article of the projects he has appeared in don't even mention him. Regarding the sources, all come from pretty shit websites that no one has ever heard of. "Kimdir?" sources aren't reliable in the slightest, and the rest are simply quoting the subject. tr:Can Storm has been deleted 4 times already and is currently salted. Person fails NACTOR and GNG. ~Styyx Talk? 20:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM applies. ✗ plicit 23:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Contested prod (I'd forgotten I'd previously prodded this more than a decade ago, to boot.) There's just no evidence this is notable; even among the Macintosh press it was a minor point of contention and style that's been irrelevant for longer than a decade at this point. A relevant line can be placed in Aqua (user interface) (which already seems to adequately cover it) but I see no notability independent of the OS; there was some blogger complaints years ago that didn't amount to anything enduring, or enough to actually write an article about it. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
20:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:56, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
The website doesn't have any significant set of references that can make it pass WP:WEB or WP:GNG. Nanpofira ( talk) 22:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
20:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM in both source list and in google search (no secondary sources). Iseult Δx parlez moi 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 23:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under New Page Patrol No indication of notability under GNG or SNG. The only sourse is stats-only in a database. Tagged since April 26 with no further development North8000 ( talk) 02:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. Rest everything WP:MILL. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 08:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 23:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under New Page Patrol. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Tagged since April 26th with no further developments North8000 ( talk) 02:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 20:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
List of non-notable mayors of a relatively small town. Sourced to a collection of obituaries from local newspapers. Fails WP:NLIST Rusf10 ( talk) 01:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Every entry in the list fails the notability criteria. ... (Note that this criterion is never used for living people.). Don't think CSC can be used to support keeping this. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
jjrj24 ( talk) 08:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Non-notable software. SL93 ( talk) 19:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
wikipeda-client
, which does not (and should not) have an article has over ten times that number. Furthermore, I can find almost nothing to establish its notability.
Tartar
Torte
17:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person notable only as an as yet non-winning candidate in a future election. This has existed since 2018 as a redirect to our article about a prior election she ran in but did not win, and was then repointed (appropriately) to our article about the current election a few weeks ago, until being spun off into a full article a couple of days ago when she won the primary -- but as always, the actual notability test at
WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one, and unelected candidates get Wikipedia articles only if they can show either (a) preexisting notability in another field that would already have gotten them an article anyway (the
Cynthia Nixon test), or (b) a reason why their candidacy should be seen as markedly more special than other people's candidacies in some way that would pass the
ten year test for enduring significance (the
Christine O'Donnell test.)
But this shows neither of those things, and is referenced to the merely expected volume of
run of the mill campaign coverage that every candidate in any election can always show, which is not enough to make her candidacy more special than all the other candidates who didn't get articles just for being candidates per se.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation in November if she wins the seat, but nothing here is already enough to earn her a standalone biographical article five months in advance of election day.
Bearcat (
talk)
19:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
He doesn't meet any of the standards at WP:NBOX. Coverage appears to be either routine fight reporting or listings in databases and so fails the standards of the GNG. Sandals2 ( talk) 18:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 19:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Other than some passing mentions, i don't see any significant coverage from any reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 18:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. consensus is sufficient sourcing exists. Check with the Wikipedia Library folks to see about accessing the Melbourne Herald Sun Star Mississippi 03:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Non notable martial artist, at least by Wikipedia standards. Fails to meet WP:MANOTE. He lacks the significant independent coverage required by the GNG and there's no evidence of him meeting WP:NACTOR. My search found no evidence of competitive success to show him notable as an athlete or martial artist. Sandals2 ( talk) 18:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
References
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Most of the sources are about her death. Her award is not notable. Unfortunately, her notability can not proven. Kadı Message 18:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Bit part actor with no parts. Fail WP:SIGCOV, WP:NACTOR. scope_creep Talk 18:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
My search didn't find significant coverage in multiple independent sources to show that the GNG is met nor did I find any evidence that he meets notability standards as an actor or director. Sandals2 ( talk) 17:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing the claim for notability here for this local sports complex. Mentions online are all routine local coverage.
Another option could be redirecting to Bellows Free Academy, St. Albans, whose athletics teams use the complex. As the complex isn't based on the school's campus, I'm unsure if a redirect would be appropriate.
Could also be redirected to Vermont Voltage who played here for a time? MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk) 17:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Very minor superhero, whose comic book series lasted two issues. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Cited sources confirm this is not a hoax but do not contain any analysis or in-depth discussion as required by WP:SIGCOV. A redirected and maybe a tiny merge to Fox_Feature_Syndicate#Fox_characters might be appropriate, but keeping this as a stand-alone entry, simply summarizing the publication history and his (rather short) fictional biography, is rather WP:FANCRUFTy. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Too complicated for PROD since there appears to be sourcing, but looking at this one and another it's clear they're all reproductions of the same text, likely issued from the company. I found this but there's no indication that's a reliable source, and can find no evidence this search engine found notability. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 15:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was Move and rewrite to William Henry (company). Not much feedback after @ Jayron32:'s proposal, but no dissent either and it's a viable AtD. I don't see a 3rd relist being helpful in changing the outcome. Star Mississippi 03:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Topic does not appear to pass Wikipedia's notability standards and I did not find any other evidence to support the contrary. Source 1 is a trivial mention about topic's company, William Henry. Does not discuss the topic himself. Source 2 and Source 3 does not exist. Source 4 is a trivial mention about topic's company halfway down the page. Source 5 does not exist. Source 6 does not exist, and was linking from the topic's own website. Source 7 does not exist. Source 8 is just about topic's company, William Henry. Source 9 is actually a decent source, however, it's from PitchEngine which is $14.95 a month to publish your own stories. Moving on. Source 10 is from the topic's own website. Source 11 is a product award given to the topic's company, not him personally. Source 12, 13 and 14 are awards given to the topic's company. None of the sources are SIGCOV about him, as the main topic. There's a couple mentions of him in some blogs and rag newspapers, but none constitute RS for Wikipedia inclusion. I don't believe this topic is notable enough to establish an entry here. Megtetg34 ( talk) 00:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Itcouldbepossible
Talk
15:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK: no reviews, academic or otherwise. Only 8 google scholar citations at all (here: [12]). A previous AfD in 2008 closed as keep, but it's not 2008 en-wiki anymore. asilvering ( talk) 09:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment This article has a paragraph on the book. It is mostly a footnote, but it is (mostly negative) commentary. Daranios ( talk) 15:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
G11 declined without commentary, PROD declined without improvement. Obvious COI from creator User:Writercsk (subject is "known as CSK" per the article). I wasn't able to locate any significant coverage of him as a subject. The awards appear to be marginal at best - either non-notable awards or, in the case of the Tamil gov't Best Book award, actually awarded to a bunch of people yearly (31 in this case) so don't really confer much notability IMO. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 2pou ( talk) 17:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Absolutely no evidence of notability whatsoever. No citations, tagged since 2018 and promotional in tone. It's incredible this has been around for so long. Deleted, moved to draftspace, returned - it just refuses to die. No significant coverage, no chart placings, just no. Fails WP:GNG; WP:BASIC; WP:BAND. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No sources given in this 2011 long-tagged yet unimproved throwback and the band's website domain is for sale. The web yieldeth nothing. Charting at 118 cuts no mustard - fails WP:GNG; WP:BAND. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to France at the 1928 Summer Olympics#Rowing. Consensus to redirect, and of the two proposed targets, this had no arguments against it. (non-admin closure) 2pou ( talk) 18:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
There are not any sources beyond sports stat tables. He was a non-medalist so there is no justification for this article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Ah! The latest JPL copy-and-paste. Isn't that what StickyWicket mentioned at the ANI? If memory serves me correctly over the space of five minutes, I think that's precisely what you said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raúl Antoli. The answer to it is the same. Why didn't you use the word Redirect to commence your reason for XFD? NGS Shakin' All Over 19:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
I've specified France at the 1928 Summer Olympics#Rowing as redirect target above. I agree with BM that it's more appropriate, but happy enough either way as long as it is a redirect. NGS Shakin' All Over 19:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Bushxingu ( talk) 13:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NWRITER Bushxingu ( talk) 13:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
received a well-known and significant award or honor, they also have received significant coverage in reliable sources per WP:GNG. Netherzone ( talk) 14:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. A merge can be discussed on the article talkpage. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPROF Bushxingu ( talk) 13:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM Bushxingu ( talk) 13:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
@DaxServer - Two reviews? Many countries are poor or less educated. So, countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan or Nigeria doesn't make movie reviews or have enough information about their timeless hit films. That doesn't mean these films are less important. Abbasulu ( talk) 18:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable small company which doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Subject is a small (5 to 50 person?) textile company, which is similar to any other equivalent company, and hasn't been the subject of any significant coverage. As part of a WP:BEFORE exercise, I have improved, found or added a number of sources to support the text. While these sources support the text, none of them materially support a claim to notability (in each case the sources are the subject's own press releases, website, or news articles which mention the subject but which are substantially about something else). Outside of the refs in the article, various searches in national news sources, for example in the Irish Times or the Irish Examiner, returns barely a handful of results. A majority of which are trivial passing mentions or other ROTM coverage that doesn't contribute to CORPDEPTH/SIGCOV. Guliolopez ( talk) 12:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN. Also: abandoned and extremely incomplete (in case you wonder: the Cook Islands still produce stamps, and have put many people on their stamps since, er, 1949). A disservice to the few readers of this article. Fram ( talk) 12:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
There is no topic here other than a List of rappers from the midwest United States. Certainly there is no established style of midwest hip hop: see the Denver source saying "artists from the Midwest have succeeded each with their own unique style and flavor". Chopper (rap) is from the Midwest, but the Midwest is not all chopper. There is no defining style of Midwest rap music except the geography of origin. I suggest creating a list of hip hop artists from this geography. Binksternet ( talk) 19:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
I have edited the introduction to make it more than just s list of subgenres. There's more sources on it than east coast hip hop and an explanation that there's a bias towards midwest hip hop not being a real genre. Complexity or being nebulous doesn't mean it's not a genre as IDM demonstrates. IDM is a nebulous genre with very minimal defining characteristics that even its creators reject as a label and argue isn't a real genre. Same with progressive music. Just like midwest hip hop. If were deleting midwest hip hop based off citations then we should delete east coast hip hop which has way less citations, progressive music and the IDM pages to by this logic. I even explained the distinct influences and lyricism in general for it. I've added sources explaining why it's a genre in and of itself as well as demonstrating the overlap between subregions sounds. At least a few of them. Synthesis is based on sources and patterns it reveals. This is not original research since the citations justify these conclusions. The entire explanation for why it is in the introduction is not entirely synthesis. Many parts are just stating exactly what those articles say. even then extrapolating based on patterns of data from cited sources is not original research that would violate Wikipedia's synthesis policy. A loosely connected genre is still a genre. I have sources that clearly demonstrate there are connecting characteristics between subregions sounds that make it a genre even if those could be considered subgenres of this genre. Umbrella terms as shown by the other articles I mentioned can be genres if there's a minimal set of characteristics. This page thus should be seen as a page needing improvement and based off this it shouldn't be deleted based of wikipedia's own deletion standard. Matsuiny2004 ( talk) 19:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Sourced with press releases etc. Fails WP:GNG. Balchandra Upendra ( talk) 01:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
There are many other articles from reliable resources which passes WP:RS. The Hindu - This article is written by newspaper editor Yukti Joshi and The Hindu is a reliable newspaper check here WP:THEHINDU
Economictimes - Story independently covered by Anand Vasu, one of India's eminent Sports writer and editor. As mentioned it does not carry any disclaimer.
Free Press Journal - An article by Joe Williams and news website by The Indian Express.
Asianetnews - A story covered by Asianet News and meet WP:RS and WP:NPOV.
Outlook - A reliable newspaper, story written by Soumitra Bose, a famous sports writer and editor in the country. Please note this is not an interview.
Rajbhavan - An article by Government of Maharashtra, Again a reliable resources. Passes GNG.
The news Indian Express - An article covered by The New Indian Express, a website by The Indian Express. Passes GNG.
Times of India - The story covered by The most famous and trusted news website Times of India. passes WP:RS, WP:GNG.
The Hindu - An independent story by The Hindu editor Alok Deshpande. Please check WP:THEHINDU.
DNA India] - An article about Guinness World Records covered by DNA India. A reliable news agency in India.
Times Now - An interview by Times Now with International Olympic player Yohan Blake. An appreciation by Yohan Blake.
Guinness World Records - An achievent link from Guinness World Records. passes WP:RS and WP:GNG.
NDTV - An interview by NDTV's sports editor Vimal Mohan. Reliable resource and meets GNG.
Sportstar - An article by Sportstar magazine by The Hindu. written independent and meets GNG. GuliverJack ( talk) 10:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
unable to find any independent, reliable source with a quick wp:before. in fact, half the results are of some other johan bergqvist.
refs consist only of bands's and personal websites, a sv.wiki page (???), and obscure websites. 何をしましたか? 那晚安啦。 07:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This articles as the same problems as the recently deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Navy SEALs in popular culture, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Force in popular culture Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defense Intelligence Agency in popular culture and like. Mainly: "mostly unreferenced TVtropic listcruft." Like them, it fails numerous policies, guidelines and like: as an 'in popular culture' article, WP:IPC and MOS:POPCULT/TRIVIA, as a list, WP:NLIST and WP:SALAT, as a potential topic, WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE, due to lack of references, WP:OR and WP:V. This just more of the mostly unreferenced trivia ("In Ronin, Robert De Niro portrays a former CIA officer."). The tiny amount of prose content is either irrelevant or likewise, trivial descripions. This type of content is not encyclopedic - it's pure OR that belongs at https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UsefulNotes/CIA . Note that like often, BEFORE and even the Furter reading section suggests this topic is notable (well, perhaps as CIA in culture> CIA in popular culture, see this discussion,but nothing here is redeemable, so WP:TNT is needed (although the further reading section does provide useful sources, so if anyone feels like rewriting this into even a stub, go for it). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable "product" Mooonswimmer 11:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This article suffers from heavy WP:OR, WP:RS, WP:SYNTH, WP:VER and WP:POV issues. Examples can be found in the discussions at [30] [31]. It has already been established that WP:RS heavily contradicts this article and its contents (such as the newly created article Safavid Arabestan). HistoryofIran ( talk) 11:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
And here are the results of the key words search:
My point is that there are plenty of sources to be found and improve the page based even on the initial search here. I see no sense in deleting the article only because it is poorly written. We are not talking about company or a person here, - it is a historical region. However, I may agree that "Arabistan" might be more appropriate and I do not mind to change the page's title, and it most certainly has to be improved. -- Onetimememorial ( talk) 19:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability on Google. Tube· of· Light 10:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not notable. An obituary in The Guardian doesn't push us past WP:BASIC "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources". She worked for a company who made kids' clothes. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD A7 Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated and draftified with different titles. Perhaps best to finish this once and for all through AfD then. Fails WP:N; no evidence found that this is a notable person, just some passing mentions. Fram ( talk) 09:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
The game fails WP:GNG as there's no significant coverage in reliable sources beyond the WP:ROUTINE announcements citing press releases and/or the teaser trailer in 2017/early 2018. My searches bring nothing, as it went vaporware since and the developers started focusing on other projects apparently. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Alumni do not make the school notable. The Banner talk 08:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Television series that was announced and then cancelled; the only available information is the original announcement, and as such there will never be in-depth coverage that establishes notability. Previous keep arguments were based on the assumption that would be released, which were incorrect. Paul_012 ( talk) 06:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 06:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Does not seem to have any real possibility of becoming more than a simple definition. Clarityfiend ( talk) 05:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete.
BD2412
T
03:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
See
WP:NLIST. For example One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources
. This is also inherently unmaintainable, as construction status changes across this large list continually. —
rsjaffe
🗣️
04:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nobody has challenged valereee's improvements, so I take silence as equalling consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
There are some reliable sources about a commercial, but no in-depth coverage. It does not meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom ( talk) 22:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Last chance to reach consensus!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
gidonb (
talk)
03:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was move to Draft:Gar Robinson. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
I have had a draft on this subject sitting in my sandbox since December and the reason I hadn't added it to mainspace then is the reason why I am nominating this article now; WP:GNG is still not met and the driver's accomplishments don't pass WP:NMOTORSPORT. Appears to have been added on the premise of him attempting (and fialing) to qualify for a single 2nd-tier NASCAR race in an attempt to make a database on NASCAR drivers, which Wikipedia is not (hence the use of infobox:NASCAR driver in mainspace as opposed to infobox:racing driver that should be used for a driver who's actually made starts in IMSA and Trans-Am). - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" 04:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I just can't find any rationale for deletion. Article quality and/or content and ways to improve thereof can be discussed on the talk page or at WT:MATH, in this case there's no need for TNT. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
A glossary requires that the entries are well defined. This is not the case of subareas of mathematics.
The relationships between areas of mathematics are very complicated (inclusion, common subareas, etc.), and are completely hidden by the glossary structure. This glossary is exactly as meaningless as would be a flat list of Wikipedia categories.
Moreover, most item descriptions are WP:OR or WP:NPOV, when they are not blatantly wrong.
So, I suggest to delete this article D.Lazard ( talk) 14:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment I forgot that, six months ago, I submitted already ⋅this article for deletion, and the result was keep. However, I do not withdraw this nomination, because Mathematics#Areas of mathematics has been written since the previous discussion, and this section may change the result of the discussion. D.Lazard ( talk) 14:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 06:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep - This footballer is notable for his part in Cotonsport's run to the 2008 CAF Champions League Final (he scored a goal in the semi-final too), and I think there is enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG - in particular at camport.com. Jogurney ( talk) 17:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to discuss the quality of identified sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. His most important roles are "Narrator" and several "Narrator, DVD Trailer". SL93 ( talk) 01:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Eidos-Montréal. Liz Read! Talk! 02:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable game engine. One source is a press relief. Of the remaining sources, one doesn't directly mention the engine at all, and the rest are one sentence name drops. This is a proprietary engine with little coverage, none of it significant and indepth. -- ferret ( talk) 00:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MaxnaCarter (
talk)
01:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not a notable film. Found no reviews, no in-depth sources, no anything beyond Wikipedia page clones, IMDb, various junk sites, and a single interview with the creator that makes up a small part of an obscure book. Dronebogus ( talk) 01:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 00:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kiribati international footballers. As ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; all sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kiribati international footballers. As ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; all sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kiribati international footballers. as ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; all sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Blasters. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Has been through BLPProd x3, so time for a conversation. He's a working guitarist who teaches and writes for publications, but I cannot find any evidence that adds up to notability for his writing or any other criteria. Star Mississippi 14:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Indians cricketers (Madras Presidency). ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Well, her we go again. 3rd or 4th time for puff-piece UPE. NO coverage. Refs are passing mentions, PR, event listing, catalogue entries. scope_creep Talk 23:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 23:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails notability. References either just list him as a participant or are bare statistics sites. From
WP:SPORTCRIT: Although statistics sites may be reliable sources, they are not sufficient by themselves to establish notability.
Search just finds more stat sites. —
rsjaffe
🗣️
23:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
The associated article, Cosmic entity (DC Comics), will almost certainly be deleted at its AfD, and this list has exactly the same problems as the main article — namely, it is pure WP:OR without any references, has unclear inclusion criteria, and fails WP:LISTN — except that unlike the embedded list at the main article, it includes additional characters who are not significant enough for inclusion in the more general lists of DC Comics characters. I'm not sure that the definition stated in the lead is the same as in the other list, and I can once again make the examples of Bat-Mite and Starro I gave in the other AfD. At the talk page, there's a discussion with similar concerns from 2005–2006 that I wish to embed here.
During the last AfD in 2020, users argued for trimming the non-notable entries, despite that the trimmed article would be exactly the same as the embedded list at the main article. The contents haven't changed one bit since then. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 23:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be non-notable. Lacks coverage. Refs are PR, clickbait and interviews. On the music side, no social media, no streaming info scope_creep Talk 23:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Zero notability— the only reference provided is a link to the company Facebook page. A search for possible sources turned up nil except for their advertisements, which we cannot use. Helen( 💬 📖) 23:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was
WP:SNOW delete.
BD2412
T
03:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable micronation. I cannot find any evidence that it exists, other than its own website. No claim of significance. No coverage in independent, reliable sources. (edited to add: I also tried searching on the founder's name since "Austin" is so common; found nothing.) Schazjmd (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Per the tickets for the UK shows here, this is billed as her "UK Tour" - that's it. There's no specific name for it. The appearances at festivals around the US, Europe and UK do not and have not been promoted alongside the mini UK headline tour. There's no marketing or cohesion that shows this is a single body of events. Its also fair too early - no information beyond dates has been provided. WP:NTOUR applies, as does WP:GNG, a lack of WP:SIGCOV beyond some dates. No reference to any jaunt being called "Summer 2022". ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claim here is that he's won beatboxing championships and that his career is "outlined" in a "compilation" -- but the reference for the first claim is an unreliable fansite and the reference for the second claim is a "Page Not Found" on Amazon, neither of which are valid support for notability. None of this is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have any proper coverage about him in real media. Bearcat ( talk) 22:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Article about a musician, not making any properly sourced claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claims here are bit parts in movies (none of whose articles mention him at all) and a Subway commercial, none of which is "inherently" notable in the absence of a WP:GNG-worthy volume of reliable source coverage about it, but there are absolutely no reliable sources cited here at all, and the article's been flagged for citation problems since 2009 without ever being improved. Bearcat ( talk) 22:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not much known about this defunct station; no sources. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Propose deletion per WP:GNG. The article has had no references or sources aside from a single external link to a boxing record database, and therefore no verifiable claim to notability, since its creation twelve years ago. It also appears to have been created by the article's subject (the username matches and only edited for a month after article creation on pages directly related to the article's subject). I could not find any verifiable, independent or reliable sources proving the subjects notability. This includes the claim made that the article's subject won gold at the 1994 African Games held in South Africa (which were in fact held in 1995 in Zimbabwe). SamWilson989 ( talk) 21:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Sources are YouTube and a dubious looking directory site. Nothing better found. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by VH1. Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No sourcing found beyond a 404 link to TV.com. Just a random one-shot countdown show that got no attention. Prod contested. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Harris Faulkner. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Barely any sourcing found. Has been a stub since forever. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shalmali Kholgade#Discography as an WP:ATD. Anyone is free to merge anything important to the target article. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 10:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
like the dozens of other articles with similar title, this isn't a necessary standalone list and is basically just an itunes directory. Anything relevant can be included in the main article about Shalmali Kholgade (as in anything that can be sourced outside of places to buy it.) Abbasulu ( talk) 20:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
There are some quite reliable sources in the article, however all of them quote the subject of the article. "Gürkan Keçici is a lifestyle coach. He says that you should do bla bla bla." No significant coverage, fails GNG. ~Styyx Talk? 20:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Actor without any lead roles. This source from Hürriyet seems ok, but it's only 3 sentences long and doesn't come close to being significant coverage. This from Demirören News Agency would also be good, but almost all of it is just quoting the subject himself. The rest are either "Kimdir?" sources which aren't reliable in the slightest. Fails NACTOR and GNG. This was deleted on trwiki with a deletion discussion. Important thing to note is that now globally locked UPE Seyit12 (also locally blocked here) !voted keep in the discussion saying that he revised the article, so this article might also be an UPE creation. ~Styyx Talk? 20:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails notability. First article just a listing, second is not found, searched paper web site and Donegal Sport Hub, sounds like an interview anyway (primary source, not valid for notability), third just has his name listed. Search finds no significant secondary independent indepth articles about him. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This actor has 0 lead roles; so insignificant that the article of the projects he has appeared in don't even mention him. Regarding the sources, all come from pretty shit websites that no one has ever heard of. "Kimdir?" sources aren't reliable in the slightest, and the rest are simply quoting the subject. tr:Can Storm has been deleted 4 times already and is currently salted. Person fails NACTOR and GNG. ~Styyx Talk? 20:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM applies. ✗ plicit 23:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Contested prod (I'd forgotten I'd previously prodded this more than a decade ago, to boot.) There's just no evidence this is notable; even among the Macintosh press it was a minor point of contention and style that's been irrelevant for longer than a decade at this point. A relevant line can be placed in Aqua (user interface) (which already seems to adequately cover it) but I see no notability independent of the OS; there was some blogger complaints years ago that didn't amount to anything enduring, or enough to actually write an article about it. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
20:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:56, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
The website doesn't have any significant set of references that can make it pass WP:WEB or WP:GNG. Nanpofira ( talk) 22:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
20:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM in both source list and in google search (no secondary sources). Iseult Δx parlez moi 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 23:56, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under New Page Patrol No indication of notability under GNG or SNG. The only sourse is stats-only in a database. Tagged since April 26 with no further development North8000 ( talk) 02:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. Rest everything WP:MILL. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 08:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 23:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under New Page Patrol. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Tagged since April 26th with no further developments North8000 ( talk) 02:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 20:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
List of non-notable mayors of a relatively small town. Sourced to a collection of obituaries from local newspapers. Fails WP:NLIST Rusf10 ( talk) 01:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Every entry in the list fails the notability criteria. ... (Note that this criterion is never used for living people.). Don't think CSC can be used to support keeping this. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
jjrj24 ( talk) 08:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Curbon7 (
talk)
19:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Non-notable software. SL93 ( talk) 19:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
wikipeda-client
, which does not (and should not) have an article has over ten times that number. Furthermore, I can find almost nothing to establish its notability.
Tartar
Torte
17:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a person notable only as an as yet non-winning candidate in a future election. This has existed since 2018 as a redirect to our article about a prior election she ran in but did not win, and was then repointed (appropriately) to our article about the current election a few weeks ago, until being spun off into a full article a couple of days ago when she won the primary -- but as always, the actual notability test at
WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one, and unelected candidates get Wikipedia articles only if they can show either (a) preexisting notability in another field that would already have gotten them an article anyway (the
Cynthia Nixon test), or (b) a reason why their candidacy should be seen as markedly more special than other people's candidacies in some way that would pass the
ten year test for enduring significance (the
Christine O'Donnell test.)
But this shows neither of those things, and is referenced to the merely expected volume of
run of the mill campaign coverage that every candidate in any election can always show, which is not enough to make her candidacy more special than all the other candidates who didn't get articles just for being candidates per se.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation in November if she wins the seat, but nothing here is already enough to earn her a standalone biographical article five months in advance of election day.
Bearcat (
talk)
19:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
He doesn't meet any of the standards at WP:NBOX. Coverage appears to be either routine fight reporting or listings in databases and so fails the standards of the GNG. Sandals2 ( talk) 18:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 19:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Other than some passing mentions, i don't see any significant coverage from any reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 18:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. consensus is sufficient sourcing exists. Check with the Wikipedia Library folks to see about accessing the Melbourne Herald Sun Star Mississippi 03:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Non notable martial artist, at least by Wikipedia standards. Fails to meet WP:MANOTE. He lacks the significant independent coverage required by the GNG and there's no evidence of him meeting WP:NACTOR. My search found no evidence of competitive success to show him notable as an athlete or martial artist. Sandals2 ( talk) 18:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
References
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Most of the sources are about her death. Her award is not notable. Unfortunately, her notability can not proven. Kadı Message 18:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Bit part actor with no parts. Fail WP:SIGCOV, WP:NACTOR. scope_creep Talk 18:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
My search didn't find significant coverage in multiple independent sources to show that the GNG is met nor did I find any evidence that he meets notability standards as an actor or director. Sandals2 ( talk) 17:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing the claim for notability here for this local sports complex. Mentions online are all routine local coverage.
Another option could be redirecting to Bellows Free Academy, St. Albans, whose athletics teams use the complex. As the complex isn't based on the school's campus, I'm unsure if a redirect would be appropriate.
Could also be redirected to Vermont Voltage who played here for a time? MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk) 17:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Very minor superhero, whose comic book series lasted two issues. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Cited sources confirm this is not a hoax but do not contain any analysis or in-depth discussion as required by WP:SIGCOV. A redirected and maybe a tiny merge to Fox_Feature_Syndicate#Fox_characters might be appropriate, but keeping this as a stand-alone entry, simply summarizing the publication history and his (rather short) fictional biography, is rather WP:FANCRUFTy. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Too complicated for PROD since there appears to be sourcing, but looking at this one and another it's clear they're all reproductions of the same text, likely issued from the company. I found this but there's no indication that's a reliable source, and can find no evidence this search engine found notability. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 15:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was Move and rewrite to William Henry (company). Not much feedback after @ Jayron32:'s proposal, but no dissent either and it's a viable AtD. I don't see a 3rd relist being helpful in changing the outcome. Star Mississippi 03:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Topic does not appear to pass Wikipedia's notability standards and I did not find any other evidence to support the contrary. Source 1 is a trivial mention about topic's company, William Henry. Does not discuss the topic himself. Source 2 and Source 3 does not exist. Source 4 is a trivial mention about topic's company halfway down the page. Source 5 does not exist. Source 6 does not exist, and was linking from the topic's own website. Source 7 does not exist. Source 8 is just about topic's company, William Henry. Source 9 is actually a decent source, however, it's from PitchEngine which is $14.95 a month to publish your own stories. Moving on. Source 10 is from the topic's own website. Source 11 is a product award given to the topic's company, not him personally. Source 12, 13 and 14 are awards given to the topic's company. None of the sources are SIGCOV about him, as the main topic. There's a couple mentions of him in some blogs and rag newspapers, but none constitute RS for Wikipedia inclusion. I don't believe this topic is notable enough to establish an entry here. Megtetg34 ( talk) 00:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Itcouldbepossible
Talk
15:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK: no reviews, academic or otherwise. Only 8 google scholar citations at all (here: [12]). A previous AfD in 2008 closed as keep, but it's not 2008 en-wiki anymore. asilvering ( talk) 09:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment This article has a paragraph on the book. It is mostly a footnote, but it is (mostly negative) commentary. Daranios ( talk) 15:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
G11 declined without commentary, PROD declined without improvement. Obvious COI from creator User:Writercsk (subject is "known as CSK" per the article). I wasn't able to locate any significant coverage of him as a subject. The awards appear to be marginal at best - either non-notable awards or, in the case of the Tamil gov't Best Book award, actually awarded to a bunch of people yearly (31 in this case) so don't really confer much notability IMO. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 2pou ( talk) 17:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Absolutely no evidence of notability whatsoever. No citations, tagged since 2018 and promotional in tone. It's incredible this has been around for so long. Deleted, moved to draftspace, returned - it just refuses to die. No significant coverage, no chart placings, just no. Fails WP:GNG; WP:BASIC; WP:BAND. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No sources given in this 2011 long-tagged yet unimproved throwback and the band's website domain is for sale. The web yieldeth nothing. Charting at 118 cuts no mustard - fails WP:GNG; WP:BAND. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to France at the 1928 Summer Olympics#Rowing. Consensus to redirect, and of the two proposed targets, this had no arguments against it. (non-admin closure) 2pou ( talk) 18:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
There are not any sources beyond sports stat tables. He was a non-medalist so there is no justification for this article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Ah! The latest JPL copy-and-paste. Isn't that what StickyWicket mentioned at the ANI? If memory serves me correctly over the space of five minutes, I think that's precisely what you said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raúl Antoli. The answer to it is the same. Why didn't you use the word Redirect to commence your reason for XFD? NGS Shakin' All Over 19:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
I've specified France at the 1928 Summer Olympics#Rowing as redirect target above. I agree with BM that it's more appropriate, but happy enough either way as long as it is a redirect. NGS Shakin' All Over 19:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Bushxingu ( talk) 13:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NWRITER Bushxingu ( talk) 13:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
received a well-known and significant award or honor, they also have received significant coverage in reliable sources per WP:GNG. Netherzone ( talk) 14:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. A merge can be discussed on the article talkpage. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPROF Bushxingu ( talk) 13:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM Bushxingu ( talk) 13:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
@DaxServer - Two reviews? Many countries are poor or less educated. So, countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan or Nigeria doesn't make movie reviews or have enough information about their timeless hit films. That doesn't mean these films are less important. Abbasulu ( talk) 18:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable small company which doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Subject is a small (5 to 50 person?) textile company, which is similar to any other equivalent company, and hasn't been the subject of any significant coverage. As part of a WP:BEFORE exercise, I have improved, found or added a number of sources to support the text. While these sources support the text, none of them materially support a claim to notability (in each case the sources are the subject's own press releases, website, or news articles which mention the subject but which are substantially about something else). Outside of the refs in the article, various searches in national news sources, for example in the Irish Times or the Irish Examiner, returns barely a handful of results. A majority of which are trivial passing mentions or other ROTM coverage that doesn't contribute to CORPDEPTH/SIGCOV. Guliolopez ( talk) 12:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN. Also: abandoned and extremely incomplete (in case you wonder: the Cook Islands still produce stamps, and have put many people on their stamps since, er, 1949). A disservice to the few readers of this article. Fram ( talk) 12:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
There is no topic here other than a List of rappers from the midwest United States. Certainly there is no established style of midwest hip hop: see the Denver source saying "artists from the Midwest have succeeded each with their own unique style and flavor". Chopper (rap) is from the Midwest, but the Midwest is not all chopper. There is no defining style of Midwest rap music except the geography of origin. I suggest creating a list of hip hop artists from this geography. Binksternet ( talk) 19:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
I have edited the introduction to make it more than just s list of subgenres. There's more sources on it than east coast hip hop and an explanation that there's a bias towards midwest hip hop not being a real genre. Complexity or being nebulous doesn't mean it's not a genre as IDM demonstrates. IDM is a nebulous genre with very minimal defining characteristics that even its creators reject as a label and argue isn't a real genre. Same with progressive music. Just like midwest hip hop. If were deleting midwest hip hop based off citations then we should delete east coast hip hop which has way less citations, progressive music and the IDM pages to by this logic. I even explained the distinct influences and lyricism in general for it. I've added sources explaining why it's a genre in and of itself as well as demonstrating the overlap between subregions sounds. At least a few of them. Synthesis is based on sources and patterns it reveals. This is not original research since the citations justify these conclusions. The entire explanation for why it is in the introduction is not entirely synthesis. Many parts are just stating exactly what those articles say. even then extrapolating based on patterns of data from cited sources is not original research that would violate Wikipedia's synthesis policy. A loosely connected genre is still a genre. I have sources that clearly demonstrate there are connecting characteristics between subregions sounds that make it a genre even if those could be considered subgenres of this genre. Umbrella terms as shown by the other articles I mentioned can be genres if there's a minimal set of characteristics. This page thus should be seen as a page needing improvement and based off this it shouldn't be deleted based of wikipedia's own deletion standard. Matsuiny2004 ( talk) 19:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Sourced with press releases etc. Fails WP:GNG. Balchandra Upendra ( talk) 01:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
There are many other articles from reliable resources which passes WP:RS. The Hindu - This article is written by newspaper editor Yukti Joshi and The Hindu is a reliable newspaper check here WP:THEHINDU
Economictimes - Story independently covered by Anand Vasu, one of India's eminent Sports writer and editor. As mentioned it does not carry any disclaimer.
Free Press Journal - An article by Joe Williams and news website by The Indian Express.
Asianetnews - A story covered by Asianet News and meet WP:RS and WP:NPOV.
Outlook - A reliable newspaper, story written by Soumitra Bose, a famous sports writer and editor in the country. Please note this is not an interview.
Rajbhavan - An article by Government of Maharashtra, Again a reliable resources. Passes GNG.
The news Indian Express - An article covered by The New Indian Express, a website by The Indian Express. Passes GNG.
Times of India - The story covered by The most famous and trusted news website Times of India. passes WP:RS, WP:GNG.
The Hindu - An independent story by The Hindu editor Alok Deshpande. Please check WP:THEHINDU.
DNA India] - An article about Guinness World Records covered by DNA India. A reliable news agency in India.
Times Now - An interview by Times Now with International Olympic player Yohan Blake. An appreciation by Yohan Blake.
Guinness World Records - An achievent link from Guinness World Records. passes WP:RS and WP:GNG.
NDTV - An interview by NDTV's sports editor Vimal Mohan. Reliable resource and meets GNG.
Sportstar - An article by Sportstar magazine by The Hindu. written independent and meets GNG. GuliverJack ( talk) 10:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
unable to find any independent, reliable source with a quick wp:before. in fact, half the results are of some other johan bergqvist.
refs consist only of bands's and personal websites, a sv.wiki page (???), and obscure websites. 何をしましたか? 那晚安啦。 07:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This articles as the same problems as the recently deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Navy SEALs in popular culture, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Force in popular culture Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defense Intelligence Agency in popular culture and like. Mainly: "mostly unreferenced TVtropic listcruft." Like them, it fails numerous policies, guidelines and like: as an 'in popular culture' article, WP:IPC and MOS:POPCULT/TRIVIA, as a list, WP:NLIST and WP:SALAT, as a potential topic, WP:GNG and WP:INDISCRIMINATE, due to lack of references, WP:OR and WP:V. This just more of the mostly unreferenced trivia ("In Ronin, Robert De Niro portrays a former CIA officer."). The tiny amount of prose content is either irrelevant or likewise, trivial descripions. This type of content is not encyclopedic - it's pure OR that belongs at https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UsefulNotes/CIA . Note that like often, BEFORE and even the Furter reading section suggests this topic is notable (well, perhaps as CIA in culture> CIA in popular culture, see this discussion,but nothing here is redeemable, so WP:TNT is needed (although the further reading section does provide useful sources, so if anyone feels like rewriting this into even a stub, go for it). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable "product" Mooonswimmer 11:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
This article suffers from heavy WP:OR, WP:RS, WP:SYNTH, WP:VER and WP:POV issues. Examples can be found in the discussions at [30] [31]. It has already been established that WP:RS heavily contradicts this article and its contents (such as the newly created article Safavid Arabestan). HistoryofIran ( talk) 11:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
And here are the results of the key words search:
My point is that there are plenty of sources to be found and improve the page based even on the initial search here. I see no sense in deleting the article only because it is poorly written. We are not talking about company or a person here, - it is a historical region. However, I may agree that "Arabistan" might be more appropriate and I do not mind to change the page's title, and it most certainly has to be improved. -- Onetimememorial ( talk) 19:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability on Google. Tube· of· Light 10:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not notable. An obituary in The Guardian doesn't push us past WP:BASIC "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources". She worked for a company who made kids' clothes. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD A7 Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated and draftified with different titles. Perhaps best to finish this once and for all through AfD then. Fails WP:N; no evidence found that this is a notable person, just some passing mentions. Fram ( talk) 09:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
The game fails WP:GNG as there's no significant coverage in reliable sources beyond the WP:ROUTINE announcements citing press releases and/or the teaser trailer in 2017/early 2018. My searches bring nothing, as it went vaporware since and the developers started focusing on other projects apparently. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 22:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Alumni do not make the school notable. The Banner talk 08:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Television series that was announced and then cancelled; the only available information is the original announcement, and as such there will never be in-depth coverage that establishes notability. Previous keep arguments were based on the assumption that would be released, which were incorrect. Paul_012 ( talk) 06:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 06:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Does not seem to have any real possibility of becoming more than a simple definition. Clarityfiend ( talk) 05:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete.
BD2412
T
03:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
See
WP:NLIST. For example One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources
. This is also inherently unmaintainable, as construction status changes across this large list continually. —
rsjaffe
🗣️
04:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nobody has challenged valereee's improvements, so I take silence as equalling consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
There are some reliable sources about a commercial, but no in-depth coverage. It does not meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom ( talk) 22:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Last chance to reach consensus!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
gidonb (
talk)
03:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was move to Draft:Gar Robinson. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:39, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
I have had a draft on this subject sitting in my sandbox since December and the reason I hadn't added it to mainspace then is the reason why I am nominating this article now; WP:GNG is still not met and the driver's accomplishments don't pass WP:NMOTORSPORT. Appears to have been added on the premise of him attempting (and fialing) to qualify for a single 2nd-tier NASCAR race in an attempt to make a database on NASCAR drivers, which Wikipedia is not (hence the use of infobox:NASCAR driver in mainspace as opposed to infobox:racing driver that should be used for a driver who's actually made starts in IMSA and Trans-Am). - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" 04:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I just can't find any rationale for deletion. Article quality and/or content and ways to improve thereof can be discussed on the talk page or at WT:MATH, in this case there's no need for TNT. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
A glossary requires that the entries are well defined. This is not the case of subareas of mathematics.
The relationships between areas of mathematics are very complicated (inclusion, common subareas, etc.), and are completely hidden by the glossary structure. This glossary is exactly as meaningless as would be a flat list of Wikipedia categories.
Moreover, most item descriptions are WP:OR or WP:NPOV, when they are not blatantly wrong.
So, I suggest to delete this article D.Lazard ( talk) 14:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment I forgot that, six months ago, I submitted already ⋅this article for deletion, and the result was keep. However, I do not withdraw this nomination, because Mathematics#Areas of mathematics has been written since the previous discussion, and this section may change the result of the discussion. D.Lazard ( talk) 14:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 06:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep - This footballer is notable for his part in Cotonsport's run to the 2008 CAF Champions League Final (he scored a goal in the semi-final too), and I think there is enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG - in particular at camport.com. Jogurney ( talk) 17:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to discuss the quality of identified sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. His most important roles are "Narrator" and several "Narrator, DVD Trailer". SL93 ( talk) 01:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Eidos-Montréal. Liz Read! Talk! 02:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable game engine. One source is a press relief. Of the remaining sources, one doesn't directly mention the engine at all, and the rest are one sentence name drops. This is a proprietary engine with little coverage, none of it significant and indepth. -- ferret ( talk) 00:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
MaxnaCarter (
talk)
01:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Not a notable film. Found no reviews, no in-depth sources, no anything beyond Wikipedia page clones, IMDb, various junk sites, and a single interview with the creator that makes up a small part of an obscure book. Dronebogus ( talk) 01:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 00:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kiribati international footballers. As ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; all sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kiribati international footballers. As ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; all sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kiribati international footballers. as ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; all sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)