![]() |
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I will preface this AFD by saying that I believe the article was created and maintained by an undisclosed paid editing ring comprising Label4me and Ekucha belrima, who were likely the same person, and Ziofy, who may or may not have been the same person. Ziofy appeared a day after Ekucha was blocked to move the article back from Draft to Live space.
The subject is a 17-year-old Indian singer who was the first runner up on one of the seasons on a televised singing competition, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa L'il Champs. So far, I'm not convinced they would be notable per the WP:GNG.
There are currently 13 references in the article, most of them mashed together in one strand, as we see so often in UPE articles. Of these references:
These references support that the subject was either going to be on the TV show, or that he was a runner-up. India.com, Bhaskar.com, Jagran.com, Rediff, Financial Express is focussed on the winner, with a mention of Tyohar.
Of the rest:
IMO, WP:TOOSOON, even if the article hadn't been polluted by UPEs. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. A discussion on whether or not to merge or redirect can happen after this AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
She's not notable per WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Unelected candidates for office are not inherently notable. There is nothing else in her biography that confers notability. All sourcing is about the candidacy. Also note that the wire source "Bradshaw Overcomes Odds to Win Tenn. Senate Nomination" is present twice from NYT and once from ABC. – Muboshgu ( talk) 22:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times, which is not the case,
The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field, which is also not the case because winning a primary election is hardly a "widely recognized contribution" to anything, and
The person has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publicationis also not the case. So, how does this meet ANYBIO? – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 04:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC. Tried to remove some promo material (spotify, itunes, soundcloud, shazam) before nominating here. Decided the sources don't establish notability. Sources other than those mentioned in my source assess table aren't worth discussing, imv. - hako9 ( talk) 21:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
hako9 ( talk) 21:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)major music competition(emphasis "major"). If you have doubts about the word major you need to read the line above the guideline. The word major is used before an award such as
Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis. That implies a major competition can never be a competition like Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Voice Hunt. Also, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa is notable as a tv reality show. Not as a music competition or an award. Most importantly, GNG trumps any SNG. NMUSIC says
conversely, meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. I never said IANS cannot be independent. You haven't even read the two articles. Please see WP:SYNDICATED. Both of them need to be counted as one source only. You also did not note that they fail GNG because aren't sigcov. Those articles just have 1 para when you exclude direct quotations. The Hans is unreliable according to me. You can disagree, that's fine. I think you need to reassess your flawed !vote. - hako9 ( talk) 22:31, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
"online versions of print media"), it would qualify as reliable source. However, given the trivial mention, its overall contribution to GNG is nil. Even if we consider SYNICATED sources as one GNG source, the article would not cut notability guidelines. -- Ab207 ( talk) 17:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
I am baffled by the existence of this list, which I think fails
WP:NOTDIR,
WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and
WP:LISTN. It does not aid in navigation, because a fair number of the books do not have WP entries. It is unsourced. And all relevant information about the publisher can be found and included at
Freedom Press. Wikipedia is not a mirror of Worldcat—and this is actually substantially less useful than a library catalog entry.
AleatoryPonderings (
talk)
21:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2006. It is occasionally mentioned in articles on titles that it worked on, often with a footnote that says: "Additional work by Hypnos Entertainment". That work is typically porting a title to another platform. Vexations ( talk) 21:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unclear how this passes notability criteria: the subject interned at the White House and has a few local mentions for covering his trip from Italy to the U.S. Reads like a CV. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 21:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The article doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines and is not well-referenced. As it stands, it is also somewhat confusing. (What is an "acknowledged tourism enthusiast and activist"?) Noahfgodard ( talk) 21:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Reads like a resume. Non-notable subject with passing mentions in media. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 21:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete Large unverified claims with no inline citations. The only possibly noteworthy thing is the position he held as Director General for the National Institute for Hospitality and Tourism of Nigeria (don't know if that's an official government position). But it's iffy anyways and can't establish notability on its own. - hako9 ( talk) 22:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete - does not establish notability. Balle010 ( talk) 01:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Delete claims are not at all verifiable, also not a notable person to be on Wikipedia. Iitianeditor ( talk) 16:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 04:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Despite a relatively long career behind the scenes, little reliable and significant information can be found about this singer. Note that the items listed in the article's Discography section, despite being in italics, are actually singles, and over the years she only released four singles of her own and guested on two singles by other people. Otherwise she appears to be mostly a session singer. The article's attempted Google Books citation points to a book page in which she was merely listed as being present at someone else's session. Otherwise she can only be found at typical retail, streaming, and lyrics sites for the few songs in her own name, with no pro reviews or other analysis to qualify for notability as a musician. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 20:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 04:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The article only has references to primary sources and a dead link. Plus, when I did a WP:BEFORE about it I was unable to find the multiple in-depth reliable secondary sources the subject would need to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. As an alternative to deletion the article could be merged or redirected to the article for the city where it's located, Gaborone. That seems to be the preferred thing to do with articles about non-notable schools. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 09:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Stumbled on this article as needing clean-up. Discovered that nearly the entire article had been copy pasted from an external site. Relevance of said text was also unclear. Upon further review I'm not sure this article meets notability or significance. It might be the largest natural gas reserve in Pakistan, but that's about it. Nothing significant or notable about it in any other domain. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 20:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. On the surface, there is no agreement about whether the subject meets WP:SOLDIER or not. But, the deeper problem is that (as is almost always the case), nobody can agree what "presume" means. And, no wonder, that. I just went and read WP:PRESUME hoping it would give me clarity about how to sort this out. I have no clue what WP:PRESUME is trying to say. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER or really even WP:1E, but that was a minority opinion. The gist, however, is that whether it meets SOLDIER or not, there's no agreement here if that's enough, i.e. the whole question about what "presume" means, and how SNGs interact with GNG. That's the important thing that led to this being closed No Consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The article does not meet WP:GNG, is WP:1E // Timothy :: talk 04:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Most of the media sourcing is low quality, reads like poorly written fancruft and so does not satisfy WP:RS, most of it is very similar to the article from the Times of India. If that isn't a reliable source for Indian affairs then I don't know what is. I think what you read as
poorly written fancruftis just the way many Indian journalists write; it's a cultural difference. That doesn't make it unreliable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
If, for instance, there is enough information in reliable sources to include details about a person's birth, personal life, education and military career, then they most likely warrant a stand-alone article.Certainly applies here. I would also note that, despite "only" being an essay, WP:SOLDIER is listed on Wikipedia:Notability (people) under the header note:
People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards.It is therefore clear that, despite the comments above that he does not, Rather rather easily meets our criteria for inclusion. I would also reiterate that two of the "delete" !votes completely ignore the fact that he is an air commodore and only focus on the non-notable fact that he may have been the first IAF pilot to fly a particular aircraft. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
If, for instance, there is enough information in reliable sources to include details about a person's birth, personal life, education and military career, then they most likely warrant a stand-alone article.-- Necrothesp ( talk) 08:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm unsure if there are any specific notability guidelines for academic conferences, but I am unable to find any independent coverage of this one which would indicate that WP:GNG is met. The article creator appears to have a major conflict of interest: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Older_/_broader_COI_issues SmartSE ( talk) 10:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This station can't possibly have existed.
Raymie ( t • c) 19:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 10:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The company's digital marketing team members are directly involved in editing this page. The user Pritamgandhi happens to be on the company payroll who did unreferenced edits to showcase recent developments such as the resignation of their CEO. (Redacted). This page is nothing but a promotional activity for this entity ( WP:PROMO). Please do note, this wiki page is active since 2004, without having any encyclopedic value. The company may be listed on the stock market but that doesn't prove notability ( WP:GNG, WP:NCORP). Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 14:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
this wiki page is active since 2004, without having any encyclopedic valuedisregards all the !votes made by editors of the previous afds and keep close by the closing admin. Coming to this afd, the CEO resignation was kinda a big deal covered by reliable sources in India - [9], [10], [11]. Anyways, I'd classify the sources cited/found as follows,
Due diligence is required. Yes. You need to diligently read the sources. - hako9 ( talk) 04:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Angelo Falcón. The one "keep" doesn't address the sourcing problems. Sandstein 10:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
non-notable org. Very little in terms of coverage. Therapyisgood ( talk) 07:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Weak keep is still a keep Tone 04:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
This article is about a "larger than life" character sourced primarily from a book. Using an offline source is of course OK, provided that source is reliable. The problem is that the story contains multiple implausible claims, Being born a 3 foot long baby, catching 25 foot long alligators and 35 foot long pythons, and those are just the ones I knew would be improbable world records if true. It is possible that the book was properly researched and set out which stories the author was able to verify and which were tall tales revolving around or from the subject, if so a rewrite by someone with access to that book would be in order. But if the book recounts those tales uncritically then we can't treat it as a reliable source, and therefore we may not have sufficient reliable sourcing available for an article. Ϣere SpielChequers 10:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It might be worth discussing on the talk page whether this content is better framed as a broader article or section about race and gender in Conan the Barbarian. Sandstein 10:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. At best this can be redirected to the novellete she appeared in ( Queen of the Black Coast) - there is next to no referenced (and non-pure plot) content to merge, anyway. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
... it is the corrupt bias of the will that bribes and besots the understanding: none so blind as those that will not see.
The result was delete. Ping me if content needs to be checked for merging. Tone 19:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary article split that goes into too much detail about in-universe details and fails to justify its existence through reliable sources needed to pass WP:GNG. I don't even know if it's possible to establish independent notability for such a split because any sources, should they even exist, would likely be weighted towards one particular interpretation or another rather than the whole grouping. This should be maybe a paragraph in the main article at best, but I don't think any existing content is worthy of being merged. It should be started from scratch. TTN ( talk) 18:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Although several "keep" opinions apear questionable, nobody except for the nominator supports deletion. Sandstein 10:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
I almost passed it but the sources gave me the pause - with such unclear sources, this could be a hoax. Now, I don't think it is, but while looking for the sources, no English sources seem to discuss him outside a few websites that don't look very reliable. If there are mentions on books, they are inaccessible to me, and Google Scholar and News have nothing. Now, there may be something in Hebrew or Yddish, but the he wiki article was also recently created by the same relatively new account, and the clincher is, the subject seems to fail WP:ANYBIO and Wikipedia:Notability (priests) which says "The Chief Rabbis of nation states with large Jewish communities are notable by virtue of their status." Well, he was chief rabbi of a city, and overall I am afraid this reads like a WP:OBIT of a non-notable priest. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment - Can someone explain in more detail how this person meets WP:Notability (biographies), please? - GizzyCatBella 🍁 09:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep this great scholar and rebbe! Lubinski was a Polish Holocaust survivor and lost his wife at Stutthof. In the immediate aftermath of the war he was instrumental in rebuilding the spiritual life of Jewish Polish refugees who fled the pogroms in Poland to the Bergen-Belsen refugee camp in the British occupation zone. Much has been written on this great scholar: [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lomed Tamid ( talk • contribs) 09:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
[38]: more on the spiritual greatness, mesirot of the rebbe. In 1944 he was a forced laborer in the HASAG camp in Częstochowa Poland. He organized the chasidim to keep Pesach, not eating chametz. They stored food in secret. They hid potatoes for the holiday, and furtively roasted them in an industrial oven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lomed Tamid ( talk • contribs) 10:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
-- Steamboat2020 ( talk) 13:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment: among the excessive text above, there certainly was a substantial argument made for notability. In fact, other then the nominator (@piotrus), the consensus was to keep the page. Granted, there were a couple of new users (@Lomed Tamid & @nochiZ) who participated but the majority were established users (@Andrew Davidson and @Toughpigs and @Wm335td and @Cts499m) and they all voted to keep it.-- Steamboat2020 ( talk) 18:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
A non-notable music director and producer. Fails WP:GNG. Zoodino ( talk) 18:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Subject appears non-notable. All sources seem promotional and unreliable. Upon searching for trusted sources, I was unable to find anything. The article is unlikely to be improved. ElliotPadfield ( talk) 18:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
All of the refs listed in the article are interview articles of the subject, making them clearly inadmissible as an independent ref. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Page creator is welcome to list best three sources in the discussion, if wants to rebut the claim. Zoodino ( talk) 18:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable list of episodes in violation of WP:LISTN. Article was deprodded with no attempt to improve with reliable sources Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 12:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. I speedy deleted the article as it was created by a sockpuppet of Daaask. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
No sign of notability. No significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Zoodino ( talk) 18:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:AUTHOR Roller26 ( talk) 01:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Effectively unsourced since creation in 2006 [ sic]. A search turned up their Discogs page ( according to which they released only the one album listed in the article) and nothing else. (They are not to be confused with other bands with similar names, such as Australian duo The Dalmatians.) Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Narky Blert ( talk) 17:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Coverage found only for when the subject was awarded Padma Shri (fourth highest civilian honor in India), which classifies as WP:1E. Zoodino ( talk) 17:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:TVSERIES and WP:GNG, no significant (better to say none) coverage in reliable and independent sources. P.S. - Times of India (used as a ref in the article) has a history of including promotional articles and the general consensus is not to accept it as a reliable source in such context. Zoodino ( talk) 17:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable person. Making claim to notability. Yes he/she may have helped saved lives but still doesnt meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:RS. Lapablo ( talk) 17:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not seeing the need for salting, given that the page hasn't been repeatedly recreated. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable predatory journal. All Akinik Publications I could find are in Beall's list (individually, not trough the publisher). Indexed nowhere. Fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 16:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. With the amount of proper citations in the article now, I feel this passes WP:N. Namcokid 47 (Contribs) 04:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
This game does not meet the notability guidelines. Nothing I could find proves that this is deserving of its own page. Namcokid 47 (Contribs) 16:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This article is not necessary to be on Wikipedia Chinar( Message) 16:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unreachable website that had little to no actual impact during its lifespan. Fully half of the text is not about this company/web site at all but about other things the founder has done in an obvious attempt to pump up the citations. Of the ten citations about the company, seven are 404 or redirected and no longer available. Two of the remaining are simple press releases and one is a story in the Independent newspaper about that paper buying tech from this company for the paper's then-new video news service. None of the sources in the article are independent of the company. The possibility of making this an article about Eborn (the founder) since two-thirds of the cites are about their projects instead is also undermined by the same sourcing problems. There are no other sources available through searches to suggest notability of the person or the company under GNG or any relevant SNG that do not share these issues. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find sources which indicate that WP:NMUSIC is met SmartSE ( talk) 16:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
* Delete: I didn't want to vote delete, but doesn't meet
WP:NMUSIC or
WP:GNG. //
Timothy ::
talk
14:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
An apparently non-notable concept in Nihang Sikhism. I found an entry on SikhiWiki ( [44], great name, btw), but it cites no sources and suggests that this is more of a derogatory term than a theologically significant concept. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 16:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find sources that demonstrate that either WP:BIO or WP:PROF are satisfied. SmartSE ( talk) 15:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
He doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE or even WP:NPOL. He is amongst top officials of a number of local organizations. However he doesn't have significant or independent coverage. All coverage about him is either 1 liner quotes about some recent business impact or a press release stating his election or nomination to such and such post. Roller26 ( talk) 15:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
This incomprehensible article is about a non-notable speculative concept in thermodynamics. The article, which was written by one of the people who came up with the idea, is sourced entirely to the authors' own papers and I have not been able to find much beyond this. There's no significant mentions in news or book results either, suggesting this is a hypothesis that has not gained prominence or acceptance beyond the authors' own work. Reyk YO! 15:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary article split that goes into too much detail about in-universe details and fails to justify its existence through reliable sources needed to pass WP:GNG. I don't even know if it's possible to establish independent notability for such a split because any sources, should they even exist, would likely be weighted towards one particular interpretation or another rather than the whole grouping. This should be a two to three paragraph section in the main article at best, but I don't think any existing content is worthy of being merged. It should be started from scratch. TTN ( talk) 15:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Patriot Act, Title III. Sandstein 10:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Wow, just wow. This article is a combination of original research, essay, and mostly is only based on primary sources. It is essentially devoid of analysis by secondary sources, and should be deleteed and redirected to Patriot Act, Title III. This is in pretty clear violation of WP:IINFO-- anybody who wants this level of detail is better off just reading the law themselves. See WP:TNT. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
You did conduct your own web search, before you weighed in here, right?
This is the section of the Patriot Act intended to counter terrorists use of money-laundering to covertly finance terrorist projects. It has been highly controversial, and so measures up to GNG. Can't it be adequately covered in USA Patriot Act. No. The USA Patriot Act article is already very long, and already tries to cover many related topics. It is ripe for forking.
Please re-read the deletion policy and related guidelines. If the anti-money-laundering provisions of the Patriot Act is a topic that measures up to GNG, but the current version of the article is written like "an annotated law book", that is not an argument for deletion. That is an argument for the article to be rewritten. AFD is not supposed to be used as a whip to force article improvement. Eddie891, concerns like yours should have been raised on the article's talk page, not AFD.
Maybe the article should be renamed to something like The Patriot Act's anti-money-laundering measures. Geo Swan ( talk) 21:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This is an article about a short film that was supposed to be made a decade ago, but never was. There's so little coverage, it's impossible to say what the status is. There is some independent coverage. It's use of crowdsourcing the funding at the time, is arguably notable. Maybe that's enough for an actual released film. But, an (apparently) unreleased film, should have a higher standard. Rob ( talk) 15:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Couldn't find any reliable sources for this film. TamilMirchi ( talk) 15:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Has been listed at WP:PNT for two weeks+ without translation. Procedural nomination, unable to prod due to previous BLPPROD Jac16888 Talk 14:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Blablubbs recently PRODed this Article with the rationale "Article is completely unsourced and makes no indication of the subject's notability despite having been tagged since 2015. I can't see any indication of this meeting WP:BOOKCRIT and even if, the article would likely have to be almost entirely rewritten." I agree with this rationale, but the article had already been PRODed in MAY 2015. So I am sending it to AFD. Techie3 ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable singer who does not satisfy any criteria from WP:SINGER and only cites YouTube videos as sources. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 14:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is a close call, but I believe there is enough consensus to suggest the article should be improved and not deleted Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. All of the refs are either pieces written by the journalist herself or in one case, an interview, and another one being a blog. A WP:BEFORE search did not yield significant independent sources about the journalist. SD0001 ( talk) 14:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Lieutenant colonel doesn't meet WP:NSOLDIER, and just being involved in various trials doesn't mean he's notable. The only coverage I found is essentially the same as listed in the article, local papers writing about a former soldier who lost in the primary of an election. I'm not positive about his judge/prosecutorial roles, but cannot find anything beyond the fluff that would suggests they convey notability. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
It's not clear that the title of "deputy general secretary of UEFA" is one that conveys notability. The three provided references include: a short biography as a guest presenter at a training; a link that has no mention of him; and a press release. It seems mostly that his mentions in news articles are in the context of conveying updates so the article focuses are about the updates and he's merely a spokesperson. I don't see substantive coverage for HIM, just for the news he shares. only ( talk) 14:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
This is really an ad for random Zimbabwean podcasts and there's currently nothing worth keeping. There's one linked BBC review of 'The Shona Podcast', but I found nothing else suggesting that podcast was notable. I highly doubt the topic would be notable even if written about podcasting in Zimbabwe, the only good sources I found were a Springer article and a paragraph here, not quite enough. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indian school with no secondary sources available at all. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. SD0001 ( talk) 14:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
This hotel is not notable just because a minor crime was committed there. It fails WP:NBUILD. The article is mostly advertising language. Wikiwriter700 ( talk) 14:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Delete votes solely reference nfooty, but keep votes indicate a consensus that whilst nfooty is not me that gng is. Fenix down ( talk) 06:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Although this individual has received a little coverage already, they have not actually done anything in their career that would confer notability and currently fails WP:NFOOTY. If he actually ever plays a professional match, the info currently in the article will be great background info, but saying "a few big clubs wanted to sign him but he hasn't actually done anything yet" isn't good enough. – Pee Jay 14:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Scandic Hotels. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
This hotel is not notable and fails WP:NBUILD. The article is mostly advertising language. Wikiwriter700 ( talk) 14:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Seems a very promotional article that fails WP:NONPROFIT. The only coverage I found was in local papers which do not meet the audience requirements of NONPROFIT. Given that their's quite a bit of coverage from Northern Illinois, I felt an AFD discussion was merited. Tagged for notability since May 2009. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Procedural nomination on behalf of an IP. Their rationale is:
Verifying this channel's existence itself was a hard task. No reliable coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG Reyk YO! 13:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Procedural nomination on behalf of an IP. Their rationale is:
Verifying this channel's existence itself was a hard task. No reliable coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG Reyk YO! 13:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The previous AfD in 2018 closed as delete. I'm not convinced that anything has changed and WP:NOTNEWS still applies. Spiderone 09:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
He doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. The only bit of coverage he has received is during Suri led Bay capital's acquisition of Barnes & Noble#Barnes & Noble Education which was termed by Forbes as "substantially undervalued BNED, were highly conditional and not credible". The second one is 1 or 2 pieces due to Bio diesel. He hasn't received significant coverage in any of the articles. Roller26 ( talk) 13:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Minor member of Romanov family only born after the Russian Revolution, he has done nothing which would confer notability. PatGallacher ( talk) 13:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 13:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSEASONS. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 12:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 13:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSEASONS as the club was playing non-league football that season. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 12:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Notability concerns. The only reference is the World Curling Federation database, and I can't find any coverage of this person. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Technical nomination because Vexations ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) tagged the article for AfD using Twinkle but did not complete the process. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 14:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
This K-8 school appears to have no coverage that establishes notability. The article is written in the form of an advertisement for a relatively new branch of the London Stock Exchange-listed Nord Anglia Education plc's chain of schools. The New York Times article is almost entirely about Avenues school; Nord Anglia is only briefly mentioned. Fiachra10003 ( talk) 11:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of locations of the DC Universe. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with no meaningful rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Sigh. Let's discuss. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Just a random IPS Officer among thousands and thousands, who left his job to join a political party as a basic low level party worker. Fails WP:NPOL and doesn't even come closer to WP:BLP1E.
The present article is a copy of a previously hijacked article of K. Annamalai who is a Member of the legislative assembly, during the start of this year [58], till a user reverted it back to its previous revision before the hijack here. The present unverified image in the article also seems like a screenshot from a youtube video which could be also violate the copyright policy.
This subject is not notable in any way to have an article on Wikipedia and the article is written like a promotion of his biography. The older versions form the hijacked page even had highly promotional content with no citations
here which highly suspects of
WP:PAID editng and
WP:COI. I suggest to delete the article for now and wait till anything develops reason being wikipedia is not a soapbox and biographical host for every person. Thank you,
King of Victory (
talk)
08:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable e-product. This article is just an advertisement for it. Page was created by WP:SPA. Normal Op ( talk) 08:47, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Opened by an LTA. See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gomorisy. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
No importence,No notability. In the world lacks of musicians are there.Wikipedia is not platform for all of them.Even he elected as a member "Royal Swedish Academy of Music" is not a notability. We cant create articles all hundreds of members of this academy. ( Gomorisy ( talk) 08:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) Gomorisy ( talk) 08:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:COMPOSER. Most of the article's sources do not mention him. his work is not notable and the articles are too brief to establish notability.(
Cklabert (
talk) 09:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) LTA
Dreamy Jazz
talk to me |
my contributions
22:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:MUSICBIO. I searched Google, ProQuest and but couldn't get valuable sources. Subject does not meet our notability standards. (
Karappodiii (
talk) 17:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) LTA
Dreamy Jazz
talk to me |
my contributions
22:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:JOURNALIST and WP:BIO. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NMUSIC. Very few hits on google. Albums do not appear to have been released on major labels or important indie labels. noq ( talk) 08:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 17:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Notability claim is borderline, and the page was likely written by one or more WP:UPEs. Nathan2055 talk - contribs 22:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/business/ahmass-fakahany-from-merrill-lynch-to-restaurants.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-alatamarea-group-took-over-wall-street-2015-8 | ? | ? | ![]() |
? Unknown |
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/19/business/merrill-lynch-promotes-chief-finance-officer.html | ![]() |
![]() |
? Unlikely. | ? Unknown |
https://www.inc.com/magazine/201705/sheila-marikar/task-delegate.html | ? | ? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.forbes.com/sites/hunteratkins/2015/11/24/the-high-quality-and-high-society-of-vaucluse-michael-whites-new-restaurant-vaucluse/#5ad0625a4c81 | ? | ? | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Kind regards, — Unforgettableid ( talk) 07:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. A merge or a rename can be discussed at the article, but it's generally agreed that the content is notable. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
As much as I understand their struggle, this article does not meet our guidelines (like WP:SINGLEEVENT or WP:ANYBIO). This person is in no way encyclopedic, their article would more likely be accepted in Wikinews project. Cheers! Nadzik ( talk) 07:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Nadzik ( talk) 07:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Since then [May 2019], Stop Bzdurom have been very busy. They organised flyering actions; distributed materials across Poland in order to help other queer people undertake their own actions; designed stickers and sent them free of charge all over the place (up to date, approx 50 thousand); publicly laughed at fascist organisations; supported queer events and projects; took part in Pride Marches; and challenged the queerphobic lies prevalent in the Polish state-run media.
In 2020, during the electoral campaign subsequently won by the PiS representative Andrzej Duda, the group organised a protest in coalition with Queer Tour to confront Duda’s and other politicians’ queerphobic rhetoric. The rally, titled “LGBT Ideology Provocation” saw a large crowd gathering in front of the Presidential Palace in Warsaw and again involved dancing as well as a number of other happenings designed to mock and confront the propaganda spread by the far right. [68]
People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Being covered by reliable independent newspapers is thus sufficient for notability. Plus, it has also been covered by a number of English sources that aren't newspapers, including Time, Jezebel, and The World. I don't know the details of the other article that you linked, but a brief read of the Google Translation of it suggests that it is also deserving of a Wikipedia page, assuming that it was covered in multiple independent sources. An article doesn't exist in Wikipedia, but that's because no one has made one, not because it isn't notable or isn't in English (see WP:NONENG). If some Polish speakers here want to make one, I encourage it! The exception to this is if WP:BLP1E applied. However, this isn't the case because Margot is clearly not a low-profile individual (criteria 2 of BLP1E), plus the event is significant and her role in it is well documented (criteria 3 of BLP1E). Gbear605 ( talk) 02:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
I came across this one while closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Gage (16th-century landowner). Same reasons, no nontrivial coverage in secondary sources, also WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. I am also nominating the following related pages, which suffer from the same issues. Some of the articles have a Career section, but those again only list trivial mentions from other sources.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 08:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with no meaningful rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Sigh. Let's discuss. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Article about a hotel in the Hilton chain. DEPRODed with the rationale “hotels of this size are almost always notable.” Accidentally PRODed again by me. I don’t agree that hotels with <600 beds are usually notable at all. This seems an entirely run of the mill hotel near an airport. Mccapra ( talk) 05:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete, no prejudice to recreation at later date. Likely TOOSOON. Tone 09:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't see GNG or ACADEMIC demonstrated for this article. The article states that he was co-PI of the BUFFALO Hubble Space Telescope survey
, but I don't think this survey is large enough to qualify WP:NACADEMIC #6. Currently an associate professor, so will perhaps have notability in the future, but not now I'm afraid.
Sam-2727 (
talk)
05:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Johann Rafelski. Not strictly the consensus, but it seems like an obvious suggestion and I'm guessing none of the people who argued to delete would have any objections. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any reviews of the book online, nor any coverage that would indicate WP:GNG compatibility. Sam-2727 ( talk) 05:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Most of the contents of Prince Ea or Richard Williams were cited by self published Youtube or Facebook,.wordpress.com links. I was unable find significant media coverage about him. One of his tittle The Man formerly Known as Prince, it directly imitating a title of one of the greatest musician Prince (musician), he was sometimes referred to as such.
Mr. Prince Ea needs more reliable sources to cite his Awards/nominations. Rinat Shakenov ( talk) 03:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 06:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Obsolete and non-notable integrated circuit. WP:NCATALOG, WP:NDIR apply here. Mikeblas ( talk) 02:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Takuma Kajiwara. There is only weak opposition to a merge, the specifics of which can be discussed at the article. There is clear consensus against deletion, however. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN. The only sources I can find that discuss this topic as a unit are wikis and mirrors that appear to be based on this article. No way this article passes the bar of WP:LISTN, even though it's bluelinks. It doesn't seem to have a real navigational purpose, either. Hog Farm Bacon 02:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
[t]here is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of … complex and cross-categorization listslike this one. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. @ .karellian-24: please read WP:BLUDGEON -- RoySmith (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Was deleted through AfD back in 2014. A G4 speedy was declined "as the current article is not "sufficiently identical" to the deleted one." Not having access to the deleted article, this had to be looked at by an admin. However, there is nothing new since 2014 to indicate an increase in notability. Onel5969 TT me 16:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Thom Harinck describing Cătinaș as "perhaps the hardest white hitter in heavyweight history" Sport.ro (Pro X) https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html
Legendary Daniel Ghita telling "all the children want to be like Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas" https://www.siamfightmag.com/en/others-styles-en/interviews-other-styles-en/kick-boxing-en/404-daniel-ghita-rumania
Bloody Elbow calling the win of Mighty Mo over Cătinaș in 2010 Final 16 as MOST SIGNIFICANT before the final and his quarter-final bout against Peter Aerts. https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/12/9/1865563/k-1-world-grand-prix-2010-preview-alistair-overeem-semmy-schilt-on
"White Tyson" aka Raul Cătinaș meets real Mike Tyson https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html also covered by Evenimentul Zilei https://evz.ro/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu.html
Largest combat sports site in the Netherlands interviewing him http://www.mixfight.nl/forum/showthread.php?92907-Interview-Raul-Catinas-(K1-Europe-GP-won-van-Leko)&s=4bfe8acd55d78b374ac54188388f4096
Fight Star Asia talks with STAR Raul Catinas https://fightsportasia.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/fsa-talks-w-superkombat-star-raul-catinas-fate-sent-me-where-im-supposed-to-be/
ORANGE Romania phone website calling him "the terrible kid of K-1" https://www.orange.ro/info/sport/altele/2949431
You must understand a thing, Catinas and many other Romanian kickboxers are good enough to win 10 ISKA titles, but they fight in own promotions. Fighting for ISKA world title is shit, they are not like WBC/WBA/IBF in boxing. In kickboxing we have GLORY, SUPERKOMBAT titles, the same as in MMA. And not even ONE Championship now is not considered at GLORY level. SUPERKOMBAT promoted with K-1 and was vanished by abbuse of office.
.karellian-24 ( talk) 17:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Thom Harinck describing Cătinaș as "perhaps the hardest white hitter in heavyweight history" Sport.ro (Pro X) https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html
Legendary Daniel Ghita telling "all the children want to be like Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas" https://www.siamfightmag.com/en/others-styles-en/interviews-other-styles-en/kick-boxing-en/404-daniel-ghita-rumania
Bloody Elbow calling the win of Mighty Mo over Cătinaș in 2010 Final 16 as MOST SIGNIFICANT before the final and his quarter-final bout against Peter Aerts. https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/12/9/1865563/k-1-world-grand-prix-2010-preview-alistair-overeem-semmy-schilt-on
"White Tyson" aka Raul Cătinaș meets real Mike Tyson https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html also covered by Evenimentul Zilei https://evz.ro/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu.html
Largest combat sports site in the Netherlands interviewing him http://www.mixfight.nl/forum/showthread.php?92907-Interview-Raul-Catinas-(K1-Europe-GP-won-van-Leko)&s=4bfe8acd55d78b374ac54188388f4096
Fight Star Asia talks with STAR Raul Catinas https://fightsportasia.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/fsa-talks-w-superkombat-star-raul-catinas-fate-sent-me-where-im-supposed-to-be/
ORANGE Romania phone website calling him "the terrible kid of K-1" https://www.orange.ro/info/sport/altele/2949431
You must understand a thing, Catinas and many other Romanian kickboxers are good enough to win 10 ISKA titles, but they fight in own promotions. Fighting for ISKA world title is shit, they are not like WBC/WBA/IBF in boxing. In kickboxing we have GLORY, SUPERKOMBAT titles, the same as in MMA. And not even ONE Championship now is not considered at GLORY level. SUPERKOMBAT promoted with K-1 and was vanished by abbuse of office.
.karellian-24 ( talk) 17:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, if Liverkick wouldn't have been disappeared, Dzhaniev would have been top 10. Dzhaniev in his division is poorer than Cătinaş, but he beat Buakaw in 2015. A kickboxer who beat still prime Buakaw is not on Wikipedia? And Cătinaş is a phenomenon and very know in Europe. Combat Press have different and very subjective rankings. At Liverkick you had to beat a top 10 fighter to reach higher than him. Dzhaniev with the MMA rules would have been on Wikipedia. :) Such fighters with his talent, should be on Wikipedia. He also beat Christian Baya and others. There are much poorer fighters than Dzhaniev on Wikipedia. They should change the rules, if you beat 3 or 5 fighters with Wikipedia, you should also be on Wikipedia. Cătinaș KOed legends like Leko and Slowinski, defeated Mighty Mo at the rematch and KOed also Guidon who was Ultimate Glory finalist against Saki (lost by decision to both Saki and Schilt). SO FUNNY, because Cătinaș is knocking guys with Wikipedia! Don't you see there is a logical problem? Prime Poturak, Daniel Sam of Glory, Paula Matale, Rozenstruik etc serious opponents also. Like I said, Romania is very good at kickboxing, why would our promotions need ISKA and WKN? A Romanian promotion even now is promoting with ISKA, WKN promoted with Local Kombat/Superkombat for 15 years and Irimia's brother is working for WKN. Do you think it's hard to fight for a world title? Shitty fighters from France are "world champions", fighting in regional promotions, they don't even have money for creating own belts. And not even television. ISKA/WKN should be on the list of rules, but this is overrated, since the promotion titles have become more important in kickboxing. And not just Dzhaniev, Roman Kleibl is also gone, should have been on Wikipedia. Solid Czech heavyweight, probably in prime better than prime Hron who at some point reached top 10 because of the poorer opposition.
Cătinaş beat Leko, Slowinski, Mo, Guidon, Carter Williams, Poturak etc and he is not on Wikipedia. 90% of them by KO. Wake up Wikipedia! Dzhaniev beat a top 10 Buakaw and Christian Baya former Glory challenger and he is also not on Wikipedia. Facts! To see how wrong is this site. .karellian-24 ( talk) 22:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Largest Romanian newspaper Gazeta Sporturilor (launched in 1924, homonym of Gazetta Dello Sport in Italy) calls him "youngest participant ever in the K-1 Final 16". Even though some sources say Badr Hari and Cătinas second, but is still ok. https://www.gsp.ro/sporturi/altele/raul-catinas-revine-in-ring-dupa-4-ani-motivul-halucinant-al-retragerii-temporare-atac-la-ghita-n-a-vrut-sa-lupte-cu-nimeni-591098.html
Legendary coach Thom Harinck describing Cătinaș as "perhaps the hardest white hitter in heavyweight history" Sport.ro (the White Mike Tyson of the kickboxing) https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html
Legendary kickboxing Daniel Ghita telling "all the children want to be like Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas" (example, model in Romania) https://www.siamfightmag.com/en/others-styles-en/interviews-other-styles-en/kick-boxing-en/404-daniel-ghita-rumania
After, Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas engaged in a media war. Why would Ghita respond him if he would be a poor kickboxer https://www.digisport.ro/alte-sporturi/raspuns-devastator-pe-care-i-l-a-dat-daniel-ghita-lui-raul-catinas-cum-a-putut-sa-l-numeasca-553381 (most popular sports channel in Romania)
Prosport, the 2nd largest sports newspaper in Romania calls him "the terrible child of K-1" https://www.prosport.ro/alte-sporturi/raul-catinas-copilul-teribil-al-k1-ului-revine-in-ring-dupa-4-ani-ce-spune-despre-daniel-ghita-18989003
Not to mention Raul trained with the best gyms in the Netherlands, from Chakuriki Gym and Mike's Gym to ARJ Trainingen now of Eersel, Khbabez and Londt. Plus with Gustafsson at Stockholm.
.karellian-24 ( talk) 22:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 09:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Search primarily shows self published stuff and this Wikipedia article, not notability through reliable independent sources Naleksuh ( talk) 19:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I created this over 8 years ago as an extension of/split from List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones, which was getting out of hand with endless chart factoids. I realize this has taken the trivia aspect to another level, has become an extraneous list of information, and that there is really not a lot of third-party sourcing in it. It was nominated once before a couple years ago with minimal discussion (including a "weak keep" from me). List of Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart achievements by decade, modeled itself after this, and was recently deleted following my nomination. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 01:47, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
an extension of/split from List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones, and there's no doubt that article is a mess right now, but that's another story. As for sourcing in these Billboard lists, mentality appears to be pretty firm to cite just Billboard articles to back content, but Wikipedia policy strongly recommends reliable third-party sources, outside of Billboard (the primary source), and would be nice to see further backing of information from more independent references, as well as context concerning the various random statistics beyond what weight Billboard places on them. Like Drake spending 49 weeks at number one on the Hot 100 in the 2010s, or having 20+ songs of his debut on that chart in the same week - exactly what is important about those statistics (aside from setting records on their premier chart)? Readers need this put into context in terms of not only Billboard, but the career of the artist(s) establishing these marks. Compare this information to what has been written about The Beatles over the many decades regarding not only their then-chart records on the Hot 100, but also how they impacted the entire music atmosphere globally in their time. So I'd be in complete agreement about the TRIVIA aspect and this sure needs to be cleaned up across the large set of Billboard-related articles. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 21:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Very few third party WP:RS. Likely made and edited under violation of WP:PAID and promotional in nature. Ed talk! 01:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
2009-07 ✗
G11
The result was keep. Tone 09:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable mayor lacking significant notability. Meatsgains( talk) 01:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Combination of memes/jargon based on particular kinds of people on the Internet framed as "stock characters" (a term which literally none of the sources use). Fails WP:GNG/ WP:SALAT/ WP:INDISCRIMINATE. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I will preface this AFD by saying that I believe the article was created and maintained by an undisclosed paid editing ring comprising Label4me and Ekucha belrima, who were likely the same person, and Ziofy, who may or may not have been the same person. Ziofy appeared a day after Ekucha was blocked to move the article back from Draft to Live space.
The subject is a 17-year-old Indian singer who was the first runner up on one of the seasons on a televised singing competition, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa L'il Champs. So far, I'm not convinced they would be notable per the WP:GNG.
There are currently 13 references in the article, most of them mashed together in one strand, as we see so often in UPE articles. Of these references:
These references support that the subject was either going to be on the TV show, or that he was a runner-up. India.com, Bhaskar.com, Jagran.com, Rediff, Financial Express is focussed on the winner, with a mention of Tyohar.
Of the rest:
IMO, WP:TOOSOON, even if the article hadn't been polluted by UPEs. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. A discussion on whether or not to merge or redirect can happen after this AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
She's not notable per WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Unelected candidates for office are not inherently notable. There is nothing else in her biography that confers notability. All sourcing is about the candidacy. Also note that the wire source "Bradshaw Overcomes Odds to Win Tenn. Senate Nomination" is present twice from NYT and once from ABC. – Muboshgu ( talk) 22:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times, which is not the case,
The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field, which is also not the case because winning a primary election is hardly a "widely recognized contribution" to anything, and
The person has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publicationis also not the case. So, how does this meet ANYBIO? – Muboshgu ( talk) 20:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 04:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC. Tried to remove some promo material (spotify, itunes, soundcloud, shazam) before nominating here. Decided the sources don't establish notability. Sources other than those mentioned in my source assess table aren't worth discussing, imv. - hako9 ( talk) 21:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
hako9 ( talk) 21:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)major music competition(emphasis "major"). If you have doubts about the word major you need to read the line above the guideline. The word major is used before an award such as
Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis. That implies a major competition can never be a competition like Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Voice Hunt. Also, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa is notable as a tv reality show. Not as a music competition or an award. Most importantly, GNG trumps any SNG. NMUSIC says
conversely, meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. I never said IANS cannot be independent. You haven't even read the two articles. Please see WP:SYNDICATED. Both of them need to be counted as one source only. You also did not note that they fail GNG because aren't sigcov. Those articles just have 1 para when you exclude direct quotations. The Hans is unreliable according to me. You can disagree, that's fine. I think you need to reassess your flawed !vote. - hako9 ( talk) 22:31, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
"online versions of print media"), it would qualify as reliable source. However, given the trivial mention, its overall contribution to GNG is nil. Even if we consider SYNICATED sources as one GNG source, the article would not cut notability guidelines. -- Ab207 ( talk) 17:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
I am baffled by the existence of this list, which I think fails
WP:NOTDIR,
WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and
WP:LISTN. It does not aid in navigation, because a fair number of the books do not have WP entries. It is unsourced. And all relevant information about the publisher can be found and included at
Freedom Press. Wikipedia is not a mirror of Worldcat—and this is actually substantially less useful than a library catalog entry.
AleatoryPonderings (
talk)
21:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2006. It is occasionally mentioned in articles on titles that it worked on, often with a footnote that says: "Additional work by Hypnos Entertainment". That work is typically porting a title to another platform. Vexations ( talk) 21:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unclear how this passes notability criteria: the subject interned at the White House and has a few local mentions for covering his trip from Italy to the U.S. Reads like a CV. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 21:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The article doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines and is not well-referenced. As it stands, it is also somewhat confusing. (What is an "acknowledged tourism enthusiast and activist"?) Noahfgodard ( talk) 21:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Reads like a resume. Non-notable subject with passing mentions in media. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 21:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete Large unverified claims with no inline citations. The only possibly noteworthy thing is the position he held as Director General for the National Institute for Hospitality and Tourism of Nigeria (don't know if that's an official government position). But it's iffy anyways and can't establish notability on its own. - hako9 ( talk) 22:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete - does not establish notability. Balle010 ( talk) 01:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Delete claims are not at all verifiable, also not a notable person to be on Wikipedia. Iitianeditor ( talk) 16:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 04:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Despite a relatively long career behind the scenes, little reliable and significant information can be found about this singer. Note that the items listed in the article's Discography section, despite being in italics, are actually singles, and over the years she only released four singles of her own and guested on two singles by other people. Otherwise she appears to be mostly a session singer. The article's attempted Google Books citation points to a book page in which she was merely listed as being present at someone else's session. Otherwise she can only be found at typical retail, streaming, and lyrics sites for the few songs in her own name, with no pro reviews or other analysis to qualify for notability as a musician. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 20:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 04:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The article only has references to primary sources and a dead link. Plus, when I did a WP:BEFORE about it I was unable to find the multiple in-depth reliable secondary sources the subject would need to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. As an alternative to deletion the article could be merged or redirected to the article for the city where it's located, Gaborone. That seems to be the preferred thing to do with articles about non-notable schools. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 09:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Stumbled on this article as needing clean-up. Discovered that nearly the entire article had been copy pasted from an external site. Relevance of said text was also unclear. Upon further review I'm not sure this article meets notability or significance. It might be the largest natural gas reserve in Pakistan, but that's about it. Nothing significant or notable about it in any other domain. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 20:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. On the surface, there is no agreement about whether the subject meets WP:SOLDIER or not. But, the deeper problem is that (as is almost always the case), nobody can agree what "presume" means. And, no wonder, that. I just went and read WP:PRESUME hoping it would give me clarity about how to sort this out. I have no clue what WP:PRESUME is trying to say. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER or really even WP:1E, but that was a minority opinion. The gist, however, is that whether it meets SOLDIER or not, there's no agreement here if that's enough, i.e. the whole question about what "presume" means, and how SNGs interact with GNG. That's the important thing that led to this being closed No Consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The article does not meet WP:GNG, is WP:1E // Timothy :: talk 04:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Most of the media sourcing is low quality, reads like poorly written fancruft and so does not satisfy WP:RS, most of it is very similar to the article from the Times of India. If that isn't a reliable source for Indian affairs then I don't know what is. I think what you read as
poorly written fancruftis just the way many Indian journalists write; it's a cultural difference. That doesn't make it unreliable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
If, for instance, there is enough information in reliable sources to include details about a person's birth, personal life, education and military career, then they most likely warrant a stand-alone article.Certainly applies here. I would also note that, despite "only" being an essay, WP:SOLDIER is listed on Wikipedia:Notability (people) under the header note:
People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards.It is therefore clear that, despite the comments above that he does not, Rather rather easily meets our criteria for inclusion. I would also reiterate that two of the "delete" !votes completely ignore the fact that he is an air commodore and only focus on the non-notable fact that he may have been the first IAF pilot to fly a particular aircraft. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
If, for instance, there is enough information in reliable sources to include details about a person's birth, personal life, education and military career, then they most likely warrant a stand-alone article.-- Necrothesp ( talk) 08:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:39, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm unsure if there are any specific notability guidelines for academic conferences, but I am unable to find any independent coverage of this one which would indicate that WP:GNG is met. The article creator appears to have a major conflict of interest: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Older_/_broader_COI_issues SmartSE ( talk) 10:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This station can't possibly have existed.
Raymie ( t • c) 19:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 10:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The company's digital marketing team members are directly involved in editing this page. The user Pritamgandhi happens to be on the company payroll who did unreferenced edits to showcase recent developments such as the resignation of their CEO. (Redacted). This page is nothing but a promotional activity for this entity ( WP:PROMO). Please do note, this wiki page is active since 2004, without having any encyclopedic value. The company may be listed on the stock market but that doesn't prove notability ( WP:GNG, WP:NCORP). Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 14:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
this wiki page is active since 2004, without having any encyclopedic valuedisregards all the !votes made by editors of the previous afds and keep close by the closing admin. Coming to this afd, the CEO resignation was kinda a big deal covered by reliable sources in India - [9], [10], [11]. Anyways, I'd classify the sources cited/found as follows,
Due diligence is required. Yes. You need to diligently read the sources. - hako9 ( talk) 04:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Angelo Falcón. The one "keep" doesn't address the sourcing problems. Sandstein 10:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
non-notable org. Very little in terms of coverage. Therapyisgood ( talk) 07:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Weak keep is still a keep Tone 04:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
This article is about a "larger than life" character sourced primarily from a book. Using an offline source is of course OK, provided that source is reliable. The problem is that the story contains multiple implausible claims, Being born a 3 foot long baby, catching 25 foot long alligators and 35 foot long pythons, and those are just the ones I knew would be improbable world records if true. It is possible that the book was properly researched and set out which stories the author was able to verify and which were tall tales revolving around or from the subject, if so a rewrite by someone with access to that book would be in order. But if the book recounts those tales uncritically then we can't treat it as a reliable source, and therefore we may not have sufficient reliable sourcing available for an article. Ϣere SpielChequers 10:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It might be worth discussing on the talk page whether this content is better framed as a broader article or section about race and gender in Conan the Barbarian. Sandstein 10:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. At best this can be redirected to the novellete she appeared in ( Queen of the Black Coast) - there is next to no referenced (and non-pure plot) content to merge, anyway. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
... it is the corrupt bias of the will that bribes and besots the understanding: none so blind as those that will not see.
The result was delete. Ping me if content needs to be checked for merging. Tone 19:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary article split that goes into too much detail about in-universe details and fails to justify its existence through reliable sources needed to pass WP:GNG. I don't even know if it's possible to establish independent notability for such a split because any sources, should they even exist, would likely be weighted towards one particular interpretation or another rather than the whole grouping. This should be maybe a paragraph in the main article at best, but I don't think any existing content is worthy of being merged. It should be started from scratch. TTN ( talk) 18:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Although several "keep" opinions apear questionable, nobody except for the nominator supports deletion. Sandstein 10:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
I almost passed it but the sources gave me the pause - with such unclear sources, this could be a hoax. Now, I don't think it is, but while looking for the sources, no English sources seem to discuss him outside a few websites that don't look very reliable. If there are mentions on books, they are inaccessible to me, and Google Scholar and News have nothing. Now, there may be something in Hebrew or Yddish, but the he wiki article was also recently created by the same relatively new account, and the clincher is, the subject seems to fail WP:ANYBIO and Wikipedia:Notability (priests) which says "The Chief Rabbis of nation states with large Jewish communities are notable by virtue of their status." Well, he was chief rabbi of a city, and overall I am afraid this reads like a WP:OBIT of a non-notable priest. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment - Can someone explain in more detail how this person meets WP:Notability (biographies), please? - GizzyCatBella 🍁 09:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep this great scholar and rebbe! Lubinski was a Polish Holocaust survivor and lost his wife at Stutthof. In the immediate aftermath of the war he was instrumental in rebuilding the spiritual life of Jewish Polish refugees who fled the pogroms in Poland to the Bergen-Belsen refugee camp in the British occupation zone. Much has been written on this great scholar: [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lomed Tamid ( talk • contribs) 09:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
[38]: more on the spiritual greatness, mesirot of the rebbe. In 1944 he was a forced laborer in the HASAG camp in Częstochowa Poland. He organized the chasidim to keep Pesach, not eating chametz. They stored food in secret. They hid potatoes for the holiday, and furtively roasted them in an industrial oven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lomed Tamid ( talk • contribs) 10:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
-- Steamboat2020 ( talk) 13:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment: among the excessive text above, there certainly was a substantial argument made for notability. In fact, other then the nominator (@piotrus), the consensus was to keep the page. Granted, there were a couple of new users (@Lomed Tamid & @nochiZ) who participated but the majority were established users (@Andrew Davidson and @Toughpigs and @Wm335td and @Cts499m) and they all voted to keep it.-- Steamboat2020 ( talk) 18:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
A non-notable music director and producer. Fails WP:GNG. Zoodino ( talk) 18:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Subject appears non-notable. All sources seem promotional and unreliable. Upon searching for trusted sources, I was unable to find anything. The article is unlikely to be improved. ElliotPadfield ( talk) 18:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
All of the refs listed in the article are interview articles of the subject, making them clearly inadmissible as an independent ref. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Page creator is welcome to list best three sources in the discussion, if wants to rebut the claim. Zoodino ( talk) 18:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable list of episodes in violation of WP:LISTN. Article was deprodded with no attempt to improve with reliable sources Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 12:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. I speedy deleted the article as it was created by a sockpuppet of Daaask. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
No sign of notability. No significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Zoodino ( talk) 18:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:AUTHOR Roller26 ( talk) 01:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Effectively unsourced since creation in 2006 [ sic]. A search turned up their Discogs page ( according to which they released only the one album listed in the article) and nothing else. (They are not to be confused with other bands with similar names, such as Australian duo The Dalmatians.) Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Narky Blert ( talk) 17:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Coverage found only for when the subject was awarded Padma Shri (fourth highest civilian honor in India), which classifies as WP:1E. Zoodino ( talk) 17:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:TVSERIES and WP:GNG, no significant (better to say none) coverage in reliable and independent sources. P.S. - Times of India (used as a ref in the article) has a history of including promotional articles and the general consensus is not to accept it as a reliable source in such context. Zoodino ( talk) 17:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable person. Making claim to notability. Yes he/she may have helped saved lives but still doesnt meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:RS. Lapablo ( talk) 17:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not seeing the need for salting, given that the page hasn't been repeatedly recreated. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable predatory journal. All Akinik Publications I could find are in Beall's list (individually, not trough the publisher). Indexed nowhere. Fails WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 16:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. With the amount of proper citations in the article now, I feel this passes WP:N. Namcokid 47 (Contribs) 04:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
This game does not meet the notability guidelines. Nothing I could find proves that this is deserving of its own page. Namcokid 47 (Contribs) 16:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This article is not necessary to be on Wikipedia Chinar( Message) 16:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unreachable website that had little to no actual impact during its lifespan. Fully half of the text is not about this company/web site at all but about other things the founder has done in an obvious attempt to pump up the citations. Of the ten citations about the company, seven are 404 or redirected and no longer available. Two of the remaining are simple press releases and one is a story in the Independent newspaper about that paper buying tech from this company for the paper's then-new video news service. None of the sources in the article are independent of the company. The possibility of making this an article about Eborn (the founder) since two-thirds of the cites are about their projects instead is also undermined by the same sourcing problems. There are no other sources available through searches to suggest notability of the person or the company under GNG or any relevant SNG that do not share these issues. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find sources which indicate that WP:NMUSIC is met SmartSE ( talk) 16:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
* Delete: I didn't want to vote delete, but doesn't meet
WP:NMUSIC or
WP:GNG. //
Timothy ::
talk
14:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
An apparently non-notable concept in Nihang Sikhism. I found an entry on SikhiWiki ( [44], great name, btw), but it cites no sources and suggests that this is more of a derogatory term than a theologically significant concept. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 16:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find sources that demonstrate that either WP:BIO or WP:PROF are satisfied. SmartSE ( talk) 15:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
He doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE or even WP:NPOL. He is amongst top officials of a number of local organizations. However he doesn't have significant or independent coverage. All coverage about him is either 1 liner quotes about some recent business impact or a press release stating his election or nomination to such and such post. Roller26 ( talk) 15:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
This incomprehensible article is about a non-notable speculative concept in thermodynamics. The article, which was written by one of the people who came up with the idea, is sourced entirely to the authors' own papers and I have not been able to find much beyond this. There's no significant mentions in news or book results either, suggesting this is a hypothesis that has not gained prominence or acceptance beyond the authors' own work. Reyk YO! 15:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Unnecessary article split that goes into too much detail about in-universe details and fails to justify its existence through reliable sources needed to pass WP:GNG. I don't even know if it's possible to establish independent notability for such a split because any sources, should they even exist, would likely be weighted towards one particular interpretation or another rather than the whole grouping. This should be a two to three paragraph section in the main article at best, but I don't think any existing content is worthy of being merged. It should be started from scratch. TTN ( talk) 15:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Patriot Act, Title III. Sandstein 10:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Wow, just wow. This article is a combination of original research, essay, and mostly is only based on primary sources. It is essentially devoid of analysis by secondary sources, and should be deleteed and redirected to Patriot Act, Title III. This is in pretty clear violation of WP:IINFO-- anybody who wants this level of detail is better off just reading the law themselves. See WP:TNT. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
You did conduct your own web search, before you weighed in here, right?
This is the section of the Patriot Act intended to counter terrorists use of money-laundering to covertly finance terrorist projects. It has been highly controversial, and so measures up to GNG. Can't it be adequately covered in USA Patriot Act. No. The USA Patriot Act article is already very long, and already tries to cover many related topics. It is ripe for forking.
Please re-read the deletion policy and related guidelines. If the anti-money-laundering provisions of the Patriot Act is a topic that measures up to GNG, but the current version of the article is written like "an annotated law book", that is not an argument for deletion. That is an argument for the article to be rewritten. AFD is not supposed to be used as a whip to force article improvement. Eddie891, concerns like yours should have been raised on the article's talk page, not AFD.
Maybe the article should be renamed to something like The Patriot Act's anti-money-laundering measures. Geo Swan ( talk) 21:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This is an article about a short film that was supposed to be made a decade ago, but never was. There's so little coverage, it's impossible to say what the status is. There is some independent coverage. It's use of crowdsourcing the funding at the time, is arguably notable. Maybe that's enough for an actual released film. But, an (apparently) unreleased film, should have a higher standard. Rob ( talk) 15:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Couldn't find any reliable sources for this film. TamilMirchi ( talk) 15:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Has been listed at WP:PNT for two weeks+ without translation. Procedural nomination, unable to prod due to previous BLPPROD Jac16888 Talk 14:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Blablubbs recently PRODed this Article with the rationale "Article is completely unsourced and makes no indication of the subject's notability despite having been tagged since 2015. I can't see any indication of this meeting WP:BOOKCRIT and even if, the article would likely have to be almost entirely rewritten." I agree with this rationale, but the article had already been PRODed in MAY 2015. So I am sending it to AFD. Techie3 ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable singer who does not satisfy any criteria from WP:SINGER and only cites YouTube videos as sources. Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 14:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is a close call, but I believe there is enough consensus to suggest the article should be improved and not deleted Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. All of the refs are either pieces written by the journalist herself or in one case, an interview, and another one being a blog. A WP:BEFORE search did not yield significant independent sources about the journalist. SD0001 ( talk) 14:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Lieutenant colonel doesn't meet WP:NSOLDIER, and just being involved in various trials doesn't mean he's notable. The only coverage I found is essentially the same as listed in the article, local papers writing about a former soldier who lost in the primary of an election. I'm not positive about his judge/prosecutorial roles, but cannot find anything beyond the fluff that would suggests they convey notability. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
It's not clear that the title of "deputy general secretary of UEFA" is one that conveys notability. The three provided references include: a short biography as a guest presenter at a training; a link that has no mention of him; and a press release. It seems mostly that his mentions in news articles are in the context of conveying updates so the article focuses are about the updates and he's merely a spokesperson. I don't see substantive coverage for HIM, just for the news he shares. only ( talk) 14:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
This is really an ad for random Zimbabwean podcasts and there's currently nothing worth keeping. There's one linked BBC review of 'The Shona Podcast', but I found nothing else suggesting that podcast was notable. I highly doubt the topic would be notable even if written about podcasting in Zimbabwe, the only good sources I found were a Springer article and a paragraph here, not quite enough. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Indian school with no secondary sources available at all. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. SD0001 ( talk) 14:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
This hotel is not notable just because a minor crime was committed there. It fails WP:NBUILD. The article is mostly advertising language. Wikiwriter700 ( talk) 14:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Delete votes solely reference nfooty, but keep votes indicate a consensus that whilst nfooty is not me that gng is. Fenix down ( talk) 06:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Although this individual has received a little coverage already, they have not actually done anything in their career that would confer notability and currently fails WP:NFOOTY. If he actually ever plays a professional match, the info currently in the article will be great background info, but saying "a few big clubs wanted to sign him but he hasn't actually done anything yet" isn't good enough. – Pee Jay 14:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Scandic Hotels. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
This hotel is not notable and fails WP:NBUILD. The article is mostly advertising language. Wikiwriter700 ( talk) 14:02, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 05:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Seems a very promotional article that fails WP:NONPROFIT. The only coverage I found was in local papers which do not meet the audience requirements of NONPROFIT. Given that their's quite a bit of coverage from Northern Illinois, I felt an AFD discussion was merited. Tagged for notability since May 2009. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Procedural nomination on behalf of an IP. Their rationale is:
Verifying this channel's existence itself was a hard task. No reliable coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG Reyk YO! 13:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Procedural nomination on behalf of an IP. Their rationale is:
Verifying this channel's existence itself was a hard task. No reliable coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG Reyk YO! 13:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
The previous AfD in 2018 closed as delete. I'm not convinced that anything has changed and WP:NOTNEWS still applies. Spiderone 09:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
He doesn't meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. The only bit of coverage he has received is during Suri led Bay capital's acquisition of Barnes & Noble#Barnes & Noble Education which was termed by Forbes as "substantially undervalued BNED, were highly conditional and not credible". The second one is 1 or 2 pieces due to Bio diesel. He hasn't received significant coverage in any of the articles. Roller26 ( talk) 13:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Minor member of Romanov family only born after the Russian Revolution, he has done nothing which would confer notability. PatGallacher ( talk) 13:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 13:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSEASONS. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 12:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 13:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSEASONS as the club was playing non-league football that season. REDMAN 2019 ( talk) 12:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Notability concerns. The only reference is the World Curling Federation database, and I can't find any coverage of this person. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 05:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ureme (film series). Tone 19:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 ( talk) 12:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 19:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Technical nomination because Vexations ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) tagged the article for AfD using Twinkle but did not complete the process. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 14:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
This K-8 school appears to have no coverage that establishes notability. The article is written in the form of an advertisement for a relatively new branch of the London Stock Exchange-listed Nord Anglia Education plc's chain of schools. The New York Times article is almost entirely about Avenues school; Nord Anglia is only briefly mentioned. Fiachra10003 ( talk) 11:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of locations of the DC Universe. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with no meaningful rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Sigh. Let's discuss. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Just a random IPS Officer among thousands and thousands, who left his job to join a political party as a basic low level party worker. Fails WP:NPOL and doesn't even come closer to WP:BLP1E.
The present article is a copy of a previously hijacked article of K. Annamalai who is a Member of the legislative assembly, during the start of this year [58], till a user reverted it back to its previous revision before the hijack here. The present unverified image in the article also seems like a screenshot from a youtube video which could be also violate the copyright policy.
This subject is not notable in any way to have an article on Wikipedia and the article is written like a promotion of his biography. The older versions form the hijacked page even had highly promotional content with no citations
here which highly suspects of
WP:PAID editng and
WP:COI. I suggest to delete the article for now and wait till anything develops reason being wikipedia is not a soapbox and biographical host for every person. Thank you,
King of Victory (
talk)
08:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable e-product. This article is just an advertisement for it. Page was created by WP:SPA. Normal Op ( talk) 08:47, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Opened by an LTA. See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gomorisy. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
No importence,No notability. In the world lacks of musicians are there.Wikipedia is not platform for all of them.Even he elected as a member "Royal Swedish Academy of Music" is not a notability. We cant create articles all hundreds of members of this academy. ( Gomorisy ( talk) 08:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) Gomorisy ( talk) 08:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:COMPOSER. Most of the article's sources do not mention him. his work is not notable and the articles are too brief to establish notability.(
Cklabert (
talk) 09:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) LTA
Dreamy Jazz
talk to me |
my contributions
22:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:MUSICBIO. I searched Google, ProQuest and but couldn't get valuable sources. Subject does not meet our notability standards. (
Karappodiii (
talk) 17:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)) LTA
Dreamy Jazz
talk to me |
my contributions
22:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:JOURNALIST and WP:BIO. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NMUSIC. Very few hits on google. Albums do not appear to have been released on major labels or important indie labels. noq ( talk) 08:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
GhostDestroyer100 ( talk) 17:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Notability claim is borderline, and the page was likely written by one or more WP:UPEs. Nathan2055 talk - contribs 22:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/business/ahmass-fakahany-from-merrill-lynch-to-restaurants.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-alatamarea-group-took-over-wall-street-2015-8 | ? | ? | ![]() |
? Unknown |
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/19/business/merrill-lynch-promotes-chief-finance-officer.html | ![]() |
![]() |
? Unlikely. | ? Unknown |
https://www.inc.com/magazine/201705/sheila-marikar/task-delegate.html | ? | ? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.forbes.com/sites/hunteratkins/2015/11/24/the-high-quality-and-high-society-of-vaucluse-michael-whites-new-restaurant-vaucluse/#5ad0625a4c81 | ? | ? | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Kind regards, — Unforgettableid ( talk) 07:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. A merge or a rename can be discussed at the article, but it's generally agreed that the content is notable. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
As much as I understand their struggle, this article does not meet our guidelines (like WP:SINGLEEVENT or WP:ANYBIO). This person is in no way encyclopedic, their article would more likely be accepted in Wikinews project. Cheers! Nadzik ( talk) 07:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Nadzik ( talk) 07:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Since then [May 2019], Stop Bzdurom have been very busy. They organised flyering actions; distributed materials across Poland in order to help other queer people undertake their own actions; designed stickers and sent them free of charge all over the place (up to date, approx 50 thousand); publicly laughed at fascist organisations; supported queer events and projects; took part in Pride Marches; and challenged the queerphobic lies prevalent in the Polish state-run media.
In 2020, during the electoral campaign subsequently won by the PiS representative Andrzej Duda, the group organised a protest in coalition with Queer Tour to confront Duda’s and other politicians’ queerphobic rhetoric. The rally, titled “LGBT Ideology Provocation” saw a large crowd gathering in front of the Presidential Palace in Warsaw and again involved dancing as well as a number of other happenings designed to mock and confront the propaganda spread by the far right. [68]
People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Being covered by reliable independent newspapers is thus sufficient for notability. Plus, it has also been covered by a number of English sources that aren't newspapers, including Time, Jezebel, and The World. I don't know the details of the other article that you linked, but a brief read of the Google Translation of it suggests that it is also deserving of a Wikipedia page, assuming that it was covered in multiple independent sources. An article doesn't exist in Wikipedia, but that's because no one has made one, not because it isn't notable or isn't in English (see WP:NONENG). If some Polish speakers here want to make one, I encourage it! The exception to this is if WP:BLP1E applied. However, this isn't the case because Margot is clearly not a low-profile individual (criteria 2 of BLP1E), plus the event is significant and her role in it is well documented (criteria 3 of BLP1E). Gbear605 ( talk) 02:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
I came across this one while closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Gage (16th-century landowner). Same reasons, no nontrivial coverage in secondary sources, also WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. I am also nominating the following related pages, which suffer from the same issues. Some of the articles have a Career section, but those again only list trivial mentions from other sources.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 08:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with no meaningful rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Sigh. Let's discuss. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:30, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Article about a hotel in the Hilton chain. DEPRODed with the rationale “hotels of this size are almost always notable.” Accidentally PRODed again by me. I don’t agree that hotels with <600 beds are usually notable at all. This seems an entirely run of the mill hotel near an airport. Mccapra ( talk) 05:32, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete, no prejudice to recreation at later date. Likely TOOSOON. Tone 09:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't see GNG or ACADEMIC demonstrated for this article. The article states that he was co-PI of the BUFFALO Hubble Space Telescope survey
, but I don't think this survey is large enough to qualify WP:NACADEMIC #6. Currently an associate professor, so will perhaps have notability in the future, but not now I'm afraid.
Sam-2727 (
talk)
05:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Johann Rafelski. Not strictly the consensus, but it seems like an obvious suggestion and I'm guessing none of the people who argued to delete would have any objections. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any reviews of the book online, nor any coverage that would indicate WP:GNG compatibility. Sam-2727 ( talk) 05:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 09:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Most of the contents of Prince Ea or Richard Williams were cited by self published Youtube or Facebook,.wordpress.com links. I was unable find significant media coverage about him. One of his tittle The Man formerly Known as Prince, it directly imitating a title of one of the greatest musician Prince (musician), he was sometimes referred to as such.
Mr. Prince Ea needs more reliable sources to cite his Awards/nominations. Rinat Shakenov ( talk) 03:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 06:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Obsolete and non-notable integrated circuit. WP:NCATALOG, WP:NDIR apply here. Mikeblas ( talk) 02:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Takuma Kajiwara. There is only weak opposition to a merge, the specifics of which can be discussed at the article. There is clear consensus against deletion, however. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN. The only sources I can find that discuss this topic as a unit are wikis and mirrors that appear to be based on this article. No way this article passes the bar of WP:LISTN, even though it's bluelinks. It doesn't seem to have a real navigational purpose, either. Hog Farm Bacon 02:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
[t]here is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of … complex and cross-categorization listslike this one. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. @ .karellian-24: please read WP:BLUDGEON -- RoySmith (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Was deleted through AfD back in 2014. A G4 speedy was declined "as the current article is not "sufficiently identical" to the deleted one." Not having access to the deleted article, this had to be looked at by an admin. However, there is nothing new since 2014 to indicate an increase in notability. Onel5969 TT me 16:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Thom Harinck describing Cătinaș as "perhaps the hardest white hitter in heavyweight history" Sport.ro (Pro X) https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html
Legendary Daniel Ghita telling "all the children want to be like Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas" https://www.siamfightmag.com/en/others-styles-en/interviews-other-styles-en/kick-boxing-en/404-daniel-ghita-rumania
Bloody Elbow calling the win of Mighty Mo over Cătinaș in 2010 Final 16 as MOST SIGNIFICANT before the final and his quarter-final bout against Peter Aerts. https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/12/9/1865563/k-1-world-grand-prix-2010-preview-alistair-overeem-semmy-schilt-on
"White Tyson" aka Raul Cătinaș meets real Mike Tyson https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html also covered by Evenimentul Zilei https://evz.ro/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu.html
Largest combat sports site in the Netherlands interviewing him http://www.mixfight.nl/forum/showthread.php?92907-Interview-Raul-Catinas-(K1-Europe-GP-won-van-Leko)&s=4bfe8acd55d78b374ac54188388f4096
Fight Star Asia talks with STAR Raul Catinas https://fightsportasia.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/fsa-talks-w-superkombat-star-raul-catinas-fate-sent-me-where-im-supposed-to-be/
ORANGE Romania phone website calling him "the terrible kid of K-1" https://www.orange.ro/info/sport/altele/2949431
You must understand a thing, Catinas and many other Romanian kickboxers are good enough to win 10 ISKA titles, but they fight in own promotions. Fighting for ISKA world title is shit, they are not like WBC/WBA/IBF in boxing. In kickboxing we have GLORY, SUPERKOMBAT titles, the same as in MMA. And not even ONE Championship now is not considered at GLORY level. SUPERKOMBAT promoted with K-1 and was vanished by abbuse of office.
.karellian-24 ( talk) 17:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Thom Harinck describing Cătinaș as "perhaps the hardest white hitter in heavyweight history" Sport.ro (Pro X) https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html
Legendary Daniel Ghita telling "all the children want to be like Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas" https://www.siamfightmag.com/en/others-styles-en/interviews-other-styles-en/kick-boxing-en/404-daniel-ghita-rumania
Bloody Elbow calling the win of Mighty Mo over Cătinaș in 2010 Final 16 as MOST SIGNIFICANT before the final and his quarter-final bout against Peter Aerts. https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/12/9/1865563/k-1-world-grand-prix-2010-preview-alistair-overeem-semmy-schilt-on
"White Tyson" aka Raul Cătinaș meets real Mike Tyson https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html also covered by Evenimentul Zilei https://evz.ro/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu.html
Largest combat sports site in the Netherlands interviewing him http://www.mixfight.nl/forum/showthread.php?92907-Interview-Raul-Catinas-(K1-Europe-GP-won-van-Leko)&s=4bfe8acd55d78b374ac54188388f4096
Fight Star Asia talks with STAR Raul Catinas https://fightsportasia.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/fsa-talks-w-superkombat-star-raul-catinas-fate-sent-me-where-im-supposed-to-be/
ORANGE Romania phone website calling him "the terrible kid of K-1" https://www.orange.ro/info/sport/altele/2949431
You must understand a thing, Catinas and many other Romanian kickboxers are good enough to win 10 ISKA titles, but they fight in own promotions. Fighting for ISKA world title is shit, they are not like WBC/WBA/IBF in boxing. In kickboxing we have GLORY, SUPERKOMBAT titles, the same as in MMA. And not even ONE Championship now is not considered at GLORY level. SUPERKOMBAT promoted with K-1 and was vanished by abbuse of office.
.karellian-24 ( talk) 17:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, if Liverkick wouldn't have been disappeared, Dzhaniev would have been top 10. Dzhaniev in his division is poorer than Cătinaş, but he beat Buakaw in 2015. A kickboxer who beat still prime Buakaw is not on Wikipedia? And Cătinaş is a phenomenon and very know in Europe. Combat Press have different and very subjective rankings. At Liverkick you had to beat a top 10 fighter to reach higher than him. Dzhaniev with the MMA rules would have been on Wikipedia. :) Such fighters with his talent, should be on Wikipedia. He also beat Christian Baya and others. There are much poorer fighters than Dzhaniev on Wikipedia. They should change the rules, if you beat 3 or 5 fighters with Wikipedia, you should also be on Wikipedia. Cătinaș KOed legends like Leko and Slowinski, defeated Mighty Mo at the rematch and KOed also Guidon who was Ultimate Glory finalist against Saki (lost by decision to both Saki and Schilt). SO FUNNY, because Cătinaș is knocking guys with Wikipedia! Don't you see there is a logical problem? Prime Poturak, Daniel Sam of Glory, Paula Matale, Rozenstruik etc serious opponents also. Like I said, Romania is very good at kickboxing, why would our promotions need ISKA and WKN? A Romanian promotion even now is promoting with ISKA, WKN promoted with Local Kombat/Superkombat for 15 years and Irimia's brother is working for WKN. Do you think it's hard to fight for a world title? Shitty fighters from France are "world champions", fighting in regional promotions, they don't even have money for creating own belts. And not even television. ISKA/WKN should be on the list of rules, but this is overrated, since the promotion titles have become more important in kickboxing. And not just Dzhaniev, Roman Kleibl is also gone, should have been on Wikipedia. Solid Czech heavyweight, probably in prime better than prime Hron who at some point reached top 10 because of the poorer opposition.
Cătinaş beat Leko, Slowinski, Mo, Guidon, Carter Williams, Poturak etc and he is not on Wikipedia. 90% of them by KO. Wake up Wikipedia! Dzhaniev beat a top 10 Buakaw and Christian Baya former Glory challenger and he is also not on Wikipedia. Facts! To see how wrong is this site. .karellian-24 ( talk) 22:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Largest Romanian newspaper Gazeta Sporturilor (launched in 1924, homonym of Gazetta Dello Sport in Italy) calls him "youngest participant ever in the K-1 Final 16". Even though some sources say Badr Hari and Cătinas second, but is still ok. https://www.gsp.ro/sporturi/altele/raul-catinas-revine-in-ring-dupa-4-ani-motivul-halucinant-al-retragerii-temporare-atac-la-ghita-n-a-vrut-sa-lupte-cu-nimeni-591098.html
Legendary coach Thom Harinck describing Cătinaș as "perhaps the hardest white hitter in heavyweight history" Sport.ro (the White Mike Tyson of the kickboxing) https://www.sport.ro/local-kombat/reactia-lui-mike-tyson-cand-a-vazut-ca-raul-catinas-are-tatuaj-cu-el-ce-a-facut-fostul-campion-de-box.html
Legendary kickboxing Daniel Ghita telling "all the children want to be like Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas" (example, model in Romania) https://www.siamfightmag.com/en/others-styles-en/interviews-other-styles-en/kick-boxing-en/404-daniel-ghita-rumania
After, Daniel Ghita and Raul Catinas engaged in a media war. Why would Ghita respond him if he would be a poor kickboxer https://www.digisport.ro/alte-sporturi/raspuns-devastator-pe-care-i-l-a-dat-daniel-ghita-lui-raul-catinas-cum-a-putut-sa-l-numeasca-553381 (most popular sports channel in Romania)
Prosport, the 2nd largest sports newspaper in Romania calls him "the terrible child of K-1" https://www.prosport.ro/alte-sporturi/raul-catinas-copilul-teribil-al-k1-ului-revine-in-ring-dupa-4-ani-ce-spune-despre-daniel-ghita-18989003
Not to mention Raul trained with the best gyms in the Netherlands, from Chakuriki Gym and Mike's Gym to ARJ Trainingen now of Eersel, Khbabez and Londt. Plus with Gustafsson at Stockholm.
.karellian-24 ( talk) 22:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 09:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Search primarily shows self published stuff and this Wikipedia article, not notability through reliable independent sources Naleksuh ( talk) 19:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I created this over 8 years ago as an extension of/split from List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones, which was getting out of hand with endless chart factoids. I realize this has taken the trivia aspect to another level, has become an extraneous list of information, and that there is really not a lot of third-party sourcing in it. It was nominated once before a couple years ago with minimal discussion (including a "weak keep" from me). List of Billboard Hot Latin Songs chart achievements by decade, modeled itself after this, and was recently deleted following my nomination. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 01:47, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
an extension of/split from List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones, and there's no doubt that article is a mess right now, but that's another story. As for sourcing in these Billboard lists, mentality appears to be pretty firm to cite just Billboard articles to back content, but Wikipedia policy strongly recommends reliable third-party sources, outside of Billboard (the primary source), and would be nice to see further backing of information from more independent references, as well as context concerning the various random statistics beyond what weight Billboard places on them. Like Drake spending 49 weeks at number one on the Hot 100 in the 2010s, or having 20+ songs of his debut on that chart in the same week - exactly what is important about those statistics (aside from setting records on their premier chart)? Readers need this put into context in terms of not only Billboard, but the career of the artist(s) establishing these marks. Compare this information to what has been written about The Beatles over the many decades regarding not only their then-chart records on the Hot 100, but also how they impacted the entire music atmosphere globally in their time. So I'd be in complete agreement about the TRIVIA aspect and this sure needs to be cleaned up across the large set of Billboard-related articles. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 21:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Very few third party WP:RS. Likely made and edited under violation of WP:PAID and promotional in nature. Ed talk! 01:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
2009-07 ✗
G11
The result was keep. Tone 09:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable mayor lacking significant notability. Meatsgains( talk) 01:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Combination of memes/jargon based on particular kinds of people on the Internet framed as "stock characters" (a term which literally none of the sources use). Fails WP:GNG/ WP:SALAT/ WP:INDISCRIMINATE. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)