The result was no consensus. I recommend that alternatives to deletion such as merging (or, if not, renaming to a Not Painfully Capitalized Title) are explored further before renominating. Sandstein 11:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
List inclusion criteria fails standards of Wikipedia. List of Kepler exoplanet candidates is fine. Speculating on habitability is pure original research. jps ( talk) 23:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
NOTE Please see the related deletion discussions on WP:CRUFT related to ESI: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of potentially habitable exoplanets and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of potentially habitable moons. jps ( talk) 23:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
...it seems irresponsible to focus on a measure that is ill-defined and not quantifiable.
|
inventedby PHL/HEC at all! In fact if we used the NASA Exoplanet Archive we can clearly see where all of this information is coming from as well as highly documented pdfs (ex [2] [3]) produced by NASA from the Kepler data. To say that this information from Kepler is Hypothetical is simply misleading, and I would strongly advise you to change your language as this is not a list of
Hypotheticalexoplanets. Davidbuddy9 Talk 23:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Entirely speculative original research. jps ( talk) 23:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Local unit(Not even district) of the student front of a fringe Islamist party. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 23:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
A non-notable World of Warcraft bot, clearly intended as a baldfaced advertisement - the image really clinches it(image deleted on Commons) - but not quite blatant enough that I'm willing to G11 it. I found no independent coverage when searching, only social media (and barely any of that, even). Fails
WP:NSOFTWARE. Abjectly. —
Cryptic
22:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted under criterion G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I can't find any third-party coverage at all about this company. (Unsurprising, since the article doesn't assert significance.) Not related to Infinite Dreams Inc.. — Cryptic 21:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Practically non-notable. Cites no sources. Googling it reveals few reliable, with many un-reliable sources (fetish blogs, wikia, etc) and Wikipedia mirrors.
I am aware of the ten-year-old previous discussion. Mr. Spink talk★ contribs 21:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 23:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable football player. Does not meet WP:NGRIDIRON. Spent time with the Indianapolis Colts, but never played (see [9]). Spent time with the Toronto Argonauts in 2007, but never played (see [10]). Spent time with two Arena Football League teams, but again never played (see [11]). He played NCAA Division III football and coaches at that level, so WP:NCOLLATH does not appear to help. So with no SNG being met, I am not seeing GNG being met. Most results are from the college he went to and coaches at, so they are not independent. Had he played outside of NFL Europe (see [12]) it would be a different story, but never playing at a top level and going to a Division III school does not help. I think this article should be deleted. RonSigPi ( talk) 21:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
This page is basically a poorly-written ad. For one thing, none of the rules of the game are listed. You have to download the game to find out anything about it. None of the sources it cites are independent of the game's creator, and all of the sources are just download pages anyway.
I strongly recommend the article be deleted, and any links that go to the article be removed. Math321 ( talk) 20:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. This has gone on long enough. Drmies ( talk) 00:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable and likely written by a COI user for promotional purposes. All the references cited and other search results are primary and merely reflect the presence of publications by the subject. The existence of scientific papers doesn't confer notability to the writers, as it's common (expected) practice in academic circles. Elaenia ( talk) 19:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Maslama al-Majriti. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
An "unusually thorough and scholarly discussion" at AFD in 2011 determined that this was not a real person. (Not sure how to add the "previous nominations" sidebar manually, sorry.) – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Smells of conflict of interest and promotional promo spam. Advertorial with hyperlinks in main article body text linking to commercials and advertisement type promotional videos. Article fails to demonstrate significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject himself. — Cirt ( talk) 18:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was already speedy deleted. postdlf ( talk) 13:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
The only source ( [16]) sounds promotional, and I could not find any better online. Hence, this article likely does not pass Wikipedia's notability guideline. Tigraan ( talk) 15:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Purely promotional; no context of notability presented. Jacona ( talk) 19:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Bickering would be better addressed in other venues. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Film isn't notable under WP:GNG or WP:NF (notability for films). Alternatively, it appears highly likely that principal photography hasn't begun, [1] and WP:NFF instructs that "[f]ilms that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." Rebb ing 15:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was Keep as I'm not seeing this going anywhere else (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete: insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 14:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.Using Google Translate on the sourcing provided, her obit verifies she achieved that. If you check various sourcing for a full listing of her films, she was in over 50 films and television productions, and in notable roles in several of them. — Maile ( talk) 13:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf ( talk) 13:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
This is not encyclopedic material. Fails WP:GNG. Jeh ( talk) 14:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. A recreation is possible, but only if the sourcing is good and the tone is neutral. Sandstein 11:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This article is about a non-notable person and is possibly autobiographical. FinnHK ( talk) 19:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Vanjagenije under criterion G7. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 14:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Article about a video. Fails WP:GNG for lack of available reliable sources. - Mr X 11:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:EVENT, specifically WP:GEOSCOPE. Has been tagged as needing sources since July 2014, still no sources. Dbrodbeck ( talk) 10:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, non-notable hotel. Article was created in 2011 and was at the time tagged for speedy deletion and later proposed for deletion; both times the creator removed the deletion requests. Nothing of any note has happened to the article since; it still talks about a proposed hotel and most of the article is actually about the wider development rather than the hotel itself. No indication is given of why this is notable. Emeraude ( talk) 10:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as this is clear enough to close even if a day early and I'm simply not seeing any other clear consensus happening aside from Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 04:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:ARTIST Greek Legend ( talk) 10:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The results in google news are not about this organization. Greek Legend ( talk) 09:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
List of players from an amateur hockey team, fails WP:LIST and WP:LISTPEOPLE as (a) overwhelmingly comprised of NN people, and (b) completely unsourced. The list itself is badly incomplete, according to hockeydb.com (the standard resource we use on the hockey Wikiproject), and hasn't been updated in several years. Given that major junior teams average 30-someodd players a season and have complete roster turnover no less frequently than every five years, and that we don't seek to maintain such lists for even many a fully professional team, the odds that this will be a more useful list than the complete ones maintained on several sites are slim to none. In any event, it's better handled by the category that's already extant. Ravenswing 07:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The IP opinions are not taken into account because they do not address the problems based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines mentioned in the nomination. Sandstein 11:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This is a substantially promotional article about a new political party, without evidence of notability. Of the references, one is the party's own web site, one barely mentions the party in passing, and the others don't mention it at all. Searches for information about the party also fail to find any significant coverage in independent sources. (Note: If you wish to check for sources, be careful to make sure that you are actually getting sources about the Liberal Democrats of Zimbabwe: I found the vast majority of hits for search terms such as "Liberal Democrats" Zimbabwe were pages which mentioned the British Liberal Democrats and also mentioned Zimbabwe, but did not mention the Liberal Democrat party of Zimbabwe.) A PROD was removed by the creator of the article, with an edit summary which said "This is a political party in existence in Zimbabwe like all other political parties and it's activities prove existence of it", but that is missing the point, as the reason for proposing deletion was not that the existence of the party was in question, but because of a lack of evidence that it satisfies Wikipedia's notability standards. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Hie, why do you wantdelete this page Liberaldemocrats because is from a country with political despotism and no freedom of expression. The party website has an article from a Zimbabwean newspaper, interview on Talk 702 South Africa and we heard them speak on Radio Islam in an interview in Johannesburg. They engage Zimbabwe and build our country. Why u want to suppress them. Mugabe oppress our country and you also want to oopress it by killing opposition ;like Mugabe does. You might not care but we care when we see hope. I was follow them on twitter and they give me their website and did not knopw they are party but was always with them on twitter and I go to their website and see on their media page all these interviews about Zimbabwe. Is that not serving Zimbabwe. They are very popular on twitter and care about Zimbabwe and no one in Zimbabwe sources can talk about them because in our country you must buy media. This is wrong. I find this wiki thing when I was searching for them when I wanted ytheir website but not essy to find because there isd more about Lib Dems. Africa must suffer neh. This is racist or you also work for Mugabe and you are CIO, this is good party and is busy abouit Zimbabwe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.13.0.77 ( talk) 22:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
From Tawanda Chikuvise ---- Imi people what is it with you. The party's name is Liberal Democrats and when added to a the List of Political Parties in Zimbabwe it automatically referred to the Liberal Democrats article in UK. We raised this with the authors and that is why the had to put that article. There must be something said about the party otherwise any removal of that article will; refer the party the UK party which will be3 misleading. We think that if you find it not okay because of whatever why don't you guys write an article based on the articles and references given. It is a notable party and is in the active in ZImbabwe has references more than other parties that are listed on the List of Political Parties in ZImbabwe. You would rather have a political party listed which refering to the wrong article? They listed it as Liberal Democrats and had to put LD to try and distinguish and The Zimbabwe was suggested byone of your editors Mr X from what we hear. Why are you giving them grief as if you just want to prove a point. You are behaving as this is your bedroom because the article removes the confusion as well on names.
.Comment There is another ref on the Change.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.226.21.33 ( talk) 12:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Response to Delete. -- It is sad that ref number 3 apart from the official website shows an article about the activities of the Liberal Demmocrats but you guys do not see it. Furthermore they had a petition the AU and SADC through change which unfortunately according to wikipedia cannot be used as a reference, they have been on Talk 702 in South Africa and Radio Islam and all these are on their webpage in the media page, those live interviews. All other parties in the list either have the official website or nothing as reference or one or two, is this not bias? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.226.21.33 ( talk) 14:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. — Cryptic 11:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Patently non-notable online hardware store. It's a simple WP:A7 as far as I'm concerned but a second user removed the CSD tag without an explanation. -- Non-Dropframe talk 05:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The genre is not sufficiently well-defined. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Unnecessary to have a list based upon adventure games that have been released for consoles. There's Category:Adventure games. It doesn't just list adventure games that were released exclusively on consoles, also the ones that have seen PC releases. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete - The list isn't manageable, it's not useful to compare video games across generations in any meaningful sense, and splitting it from a general "list of all adventure games" takes it out of the proper context of comparison between console adventures and PC adventures. So I suppose on both counts that's a vio of WP:NPOV.
Aside: The category itself should probably also be deleted per WP:DEFINING; we don't intersect genre with console--and if we should, that's either way a different question. -- Izno ( talk) 12:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Strong delete What exactly defines an "adventure game"? Music1201 ( talk) 22:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced and promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 15:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable album. Unreferenced article. Fails WP:NALBUMS. XXN, 14:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Advert masquerading as an article, most of the sources are rehashed press releases, and the tone, product lists etc. are just so promotional. Doubt they're notable, but if they are then TNT would be best IMO. Joseph2302 ( talk) 11:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
In the history section I also removed all self-promotion information. Also the product overview was changed into descriptive text instead of advertising tone. Maybe you could point out where exactly the new wording still sounded like advertising, instead of descriptive facts? I'm new here and like to make it right. Hope the declaration of my affiliation with SIGOS is now also correct? Many thanks in advance
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Does not reach the level of notability for an event as there has been insufficient coverage of limited significance and there was a short news cycle for this one-time event. A current search for reliable sources turns up far fewer than would be expected for a noteworthy event. Geoff | Who, me? 21:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Omni Flames ( talk contribs) 03:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Corporation does not meet WP:GNG. It has received paltry coverage for its 23 year tenure and has made zero impact outside of a very small niche. Article is written like an advertisement and has very little NPOV throughout. I do not think it is possible to remove the POV and ALSO establish notability. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 22:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. MBisanz talk 00:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Redirect (/Merge/Whathaveyou). I doubt I will replicate my vote for all of the other articles also inappropriately created for other weight classes, but if the AfD's become close things (which I'd think is highly unlikely) feel free to cite me for support in them as well. Pretty clear issue under WP:N/ WP:NOTDIRECTORY/ WP:V/Any number of policies. Snow let's rap 11:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, fails WP:MUSBIO. Only claim of significance is that his band, Leon and the Forklifts, won "Best Original Alternative Band" a couple times. This appears to be from a very small local awards event, and isn't sufficient to indicate notability. There are no reliable sources included in the current references, and I couldn't find any by googling for Bongiovanni or his band. IagoQnsi ( talk) 21:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. All 5 references in article are self-published books (3 of which were written Andreas himself). Seems like some sort of promo article for him. Article does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Vipinhari || talk 18:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Recently built arena. Non-notable. XXN, 12:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not sure where to userfy to, so if somebody does want to work on this please tell me and I'll userfy it for them. Sandstein 11:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This was, and to some extent still is, little more than a substitute for the organization's website--please see the history for how bad it was. I can find reliable sources mentioning the topic, like this one, and there's various other hits like this one, but that's it--I am not seeing any significant discussion. There's also a book hit, here, but again, there's no discussion of the outfit at all--the only information given is from the club's own website. (Pretty lousy job on the part of the writer.) So I don't see any good sources for us to write an article with. Drmies ( talk) 19:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No notable roles. All of her roles are unnamed characters. JDDJS ( talk) 02:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Article about a band with no strong or reliably sourced claim to passing WP:NMUSIC; the only source present here is the band's own website, and the only discernible claim of notability ("and Scorpions guitarist Uli Jon Roth") is actually a misrepresentation of what the website says: Roth is not a member of this band, but rather this band's leader once worked with Roth in an entirely unrelated capacity. But notability is not inherited, so that fact doesn't transfer a notability freebie onto this band. (And while this isn't a deletion rationale in and of itself, it does warrant mention that every single existing link to this title is expecting a racehorse, not a rock band who only just released their debut album.) Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when the notability and sourceability get stronger than this. Bearcat ( talk) 06:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
This is a detailed concert review.
The result was keep. Sufficient sourcing, and highly unlikely that a consensus of "delete" can be reached. ( non-admin closure) Slashme ( talk) 13:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable minor actress; fails GNG. Quis separabit? 21:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Not Notable. Despite the reported fact that their menu includes batter-dipped onion rings, fried Maryland softshell crab this is not alone notable. Especially when the references given are solely from advertorials. As one knows, the job of the food critics in these publications is to eventually visit everyone of the establishments in their paper/magazine/trade press circulation area. This does not make every establishment in the circulation area notable in itself and nothing I can find appears to support the view that this establishment has any notability at all in the WP sense. The previous PROD tag was removed under the thought that the two publications where RS but neither were editorials and neither advertorial indicated any real WP notability. Aspro ( talk) 15:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The record is almost fully a single case achievement by the author of the article ( WP:COI) and is unsupported by reliable sources. Article is unencyclopedic. Ciridae ( talk) 19:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
No independent sources, advertising tone; prod removed by single-edit IP without comment or improvement. — swpb T 19:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
A production that is just beginning, have not yet defined who will be the protagonists, it is too early to know if really this production or will not occur. Philip J Fry Talk 19:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Very questionable notability. Claims he was the "Director of Food and beverage" at the Playboy Mansion, and goes on to describe a bed and breakfast he owns and operates, which sounds very much like an advertisement. Nominating as it fails WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ryanverse. Content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 11:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This fictional has no WP:RS reliable sources which WP:V its general notability per the WP:GNG and WP:NFICT. Thus this subject is an unsuitable topic for a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 17:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Terdoslavich, William (2006). The Jack Ryan Agenda: Policy and Politics in the Novels of Tom Clancy: An Unauthorized Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishers. p. 39. ISBN 0765312484. Retrieved 2016-04-08.
The book notes:
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction#Secondary information notes: "Examples of useful information typically provided by secondary sources about the original work, or primary and secondary sources about information external to the work:".Ryan does not serve out his full term after getting elected in 1996/2000, depending on which branch of the timeline is correct. (Clancy does not practice detailed multivolume plotting like J.K. Rowling.) In Teeth of the Tiger, Clancy alludes to Ryan's resignation from the presidency, having become bored with the job he never sought. His vice president and close friend Robby Jackson becomes the first black president of the U.S., only to be gunned down by a Ku Klux Klan fanatic. Ed Kealty finally got elected, with Ryan quite displeased in private but holding his public tongue.
Kealty is Clancy's fictional stand-in for Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts. Ted Kennedy took his best shot at the presidency in 1980, challenging President Jimmy Carter for the Democratic nomination. While Kennedy went the distance in the primary campaign, he unsuccessfully tried to use the convention's political process to undo the lock Carter had on the nomination. Since then, Kennedy has focused his energies on being a senator and becoming the so-called liberal lion of the Democratic Party.
One example is "real-world factors that have influenced the work or fictional element". The discussion about how Ed Kealty is a stand-in for Ted Kennedy is useful secondary information.
The result was redirect to Ryanverse. And merge whatever may be appropriate from the history. Sandstein 11:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This fictional has no WP:RS reliable sources which WP:V its general notability per the WP:GNG. Thus this subject is an unsuitable topic for a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 09:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
While a book may be notable, it is not normally advisable to have a separate article on a character or thing from the book—if anything that should be a rationale for merge. But without a single secondary source in this article asserting the character's notability, there is nothing but plot detail to merge. I'm amenable to a merge target, if a good one exists, but there is no policy-backed rationale for keeping this article separate in any form. czar 16:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Janssens, Ruud; Kroes, Rob (2004). Post-Cold War Europe, Post-Cold War America. Amsterdam: VU University Press. p. 150–152. ISBN 905383916X. Retrieved 2016-04-08.
The book notes:
Cunard ( talk) 06:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)In Rainbow Six, one of Clancy's main characters, Domingo Chavez, contemplates while his wife is giving birth:
That was the key to the whole thing for Domingo. To be a father! To have a child, to begin the greatest of all adventures, raising a new life, doing the best you could, making some mistakes, but learning from all of them, and ultimately presenting to society a new, responsible citizen to carry on. That, he was...
...
Ryan, John Kelly, and Domingo Chavez are completely good, except for one or two flaws—maybe to make them seem more human.
...
Another indication of Clancy's one-dimensional characters and his limited imagination in this aspect is that Domingo Chavez like Jack Ryan is married to a physician.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Wholly unreferenced with no evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 03:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Google shows no evidence of the existence of this form of rap, so it appears to fail WP:Verifiability before we can even get to WP:Notability. The few hits that Google returns are wikis and mirrors of this article. The article cites no sources to help us. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Sandstein 11:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Sadly, no evidence of notability. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 08:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. General consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
This disambiguation page doesn't actually disambiguate anything. Only the genus of snails is actually known only by the word "bullata", and the rest are all partial title matches (that is, no one even calls any of them just Bullata). This wouldn't normally be a problem, since you could just redirect it, except that the title ends in (disambiguation), so redirecting doesn't work. A similar nomination was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinctoria, but those titles didn't have the (disambiguation) ending. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 02:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Not close to meeting WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG, playing in a weak American rugby league. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete. I agree that he fails to meet the requirements for rugby union biographies since we don't consider PRO Rugby as a fully professional league. I'm also unable to find the kind of significant coverage in third-party sources that would be needed to meet the general notability criterion. Pichpich ( talk) 15:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, both the theory and the book that proposes it fail WP:NBOOK. — teb728 t c 03:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 17:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
This individual does not have sufficient coverage in any reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, and their scholarly work has not received enough attention for WP:SCHOLAR. The article has no sources at all, and would be eligible for BLPPROD if a prod tag had not previously been removed. At best, this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, but if more coverage pops up, the page can easily be created again; right now, it is not appropriate. Delete. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 02:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete as thoroughly non-notable entertainer. Vanity/promo fan article. Quis separabit? 21:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Clearly not a notable author or politician. May be notable for controversial involvement in the EXIT group, but almost everything in this article is unverifiable. I just undid the edits by infinitely blocked User:Volkstod, but could someone please doublecheck the original sources if Rehm is mentioned there? PanchoS ( talk) 00:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 16:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
The lead starts of with an arbitrary distinction: a list of video games which strongly feature cats, other felines and anthropomorphic feline characters. That's WP:OR and/or WP:SYNTH. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Wholly promotional with no evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Not individually notable. Merge referenced content into band article and dump the rest. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Regardless of whether or not the copied text is free to use here, the creator's conflict of interest has resulted in an article that reads like a story and fails to explain how the subject satisfies any of the notability criteria at WP:NSINGER. The subject's own label is not notable. Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 00:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bernie Sanders. kelapstick( bainuu) 00:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Obvious hoax. Is clear subject of article has no intention to be president, and is merely running to troll the entire country. Would suggest deletion, salting, and a trout-slap to the editor and all supporters. April Fools! p b p 18:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Kasich getting so much media attention from this joke AfD that he won the Republican Primary and the general election.. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Figment of the media's imagination. Everybody knows the only two people really seeking the GOP nomination are a serial killer and a pumpkin topped with a dead badger. Also, I believe that the claim that he is Governor of Ohio to be OR. April Fools! p b p 18:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was everyone having to read the collective works of Friedrich Nietzsche. Have at it: [70] (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Obvious impersonation of Morgan Freeman. April Fools! -- The Voidwalker Discuss 17:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
A statement from the FSF: "We are deeply saddened that our first AfD request didn't work out. We are trying a second time because we believe that the fact that Windows is DRM-laden conflicts with Wikipedia's core beliefs." Phil roc My contribs 15:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
A statement from the FSF: "After years of letting this go, we, the members of the FSF, have decided to delete the Wikipedia article on the evil operating system, Windows. We believe that the fact that Windows is DRM-laden conflicts with Wikipedia's core beliefs." Phil roc My contribs 15:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
This is obviously non-notable. A mere 219 million results on Google News? Please. TVShowFan122 ( talk) 14:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was bombed into an oblivion - kindly done by the Epic Genius! . – Davey2010 Talk 18:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
The article is Frozen..literally.... so therefore I believe the article should be "Warmed up with some TNT and started from scratch, Plus I can't find any evidence of notability amongst all this ice. – Davey2010 Talk 13:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 16:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete as this fails WP:TOOSOON Sheepythemouse ( talk) 13:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep You can't be serious. This is the most famous site in the world for cave paintings. There are numerous books and scores or hundreds of scientific articles. This cave and its remarkable paintings have been studied for decades. TimidGuy ( talk) 14:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Because he is trying to create WP:DARKSIDE and attempting to merge every single Wikipedia page into it! April Fools! Trainfan01 13:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Because frankly, that painting is better whited out that left as is. Tigraan ( talk) 10:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
The result was the End of history. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
We've screwed our planet up enough already. Let's just wipe it all and have a fresh start, shall we? JQTriple7 talk 10:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Apparently this woman is the reigning monarch of Great Britain, meaning she meets notability requirements [71] (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Who is this person again??? Nordic Dragon 09:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. If its crowded, it probably means its notable. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Too crowded. — azuki ( talk · contribs · email) 08:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. I'm honestly not sure if this is an April Fools joke or not (it was listed in Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2016). Regardless, April Fools Day is over and if this was in fact a serious nomination, it can be closed as obviously frivolous. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 00:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete. This is not a hoax. This stuff is real, it has killed thousands of people, it has obliterated entire cities, it has done untold damage. We have many existing articles which do a more than adequate job of describing dihydrogen monoxide and its characteristics. To create an article re-hashing the same ocean of data, but from a contradictory WP:POV (this page is a WP:SOAPBOX to downplay real dangers) is a WP:POVFORK and against established policy. Everything the people have been saying about this stuff is true... every word. Do we need another Flint or another Walkerton before we acknowledge that public safety is at stake?
If you disagree with the petition to ban this stuff, fine, that's your perogative... just so long as the encyclopaedia remains WP:NEUTRAL on any specific political measure and factual that DHMO is real and its characteristics well-known and well-documented. As for the risks? This guy has already run the animal experiments and should be considered a reliable source as to what we're dealing with here.
Taking a topic of an existing article, recreating it under a different name (on the same wiki) with "...hoax" added is a clear WP:NPOV violation and a WP:POVFORK. By policy, this article must be drained and stoppered if anyone gives a dam about the integrity, neutrality and accuracy of the project. K7L ( talk) 03:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- Pokéfan95 ( talk) 00:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Obvious hoax. Unrealistically generic place name. pʰeːnuːmuː → pʰiːnyːmyː → ɸinimi → fiɲimi 02:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. April Fools! (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Not notable enough. It should be deleted at once. An example of a notable topic would be my Grandpa's old red truck, which (unfortunately), has not been created yet. April Fools! Peter Sam Fan 02:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place for recursion. ONR (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. The humor tag is essentially a withdrawal of the nomination and it's not longer on the page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 01:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Delete now. Someone is trying to impersonate Jimbo here. They failed horribly though, since his name is clearly Jimbo, not Jimmy. FiendYT ★ 01:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
I voted Sanders. April Fools! epicgenius @ 00:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC) ( talk) 00:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Eye snore 01:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was ♡. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I asked Delta Air Lines on Twitter if they like circles or not, they did not even reply me! That was so heartbreaking. -- TerrainAhead ×TALK× 00:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
The result was dropped onto the pavement. Congrats, you all cracked the screen.. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
This looks like an iPhone 3. Perhaps it should be merged to its article? April Fools! TL22 ( talk) 00:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
It hurts so bad... Tropicalkitty ( talk) 00:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
This operating system sucks (and it is no longer supported)! Just upgrade to Windows 8.1 or Windows 10, you decide. Even software developers no longer support the original Windows 8. April Fools! Eye snore 00:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
It's Yandere-chan's birthday! Hooray! April Fools! TL22 ( talk) 00:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. DansGame ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
In Kappa we trust April Fools! TL22 ( talk) 00:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Their new logo concept ( link to article) seems to look like boobs, which should not be allowed. April Fools! Eye snore 00:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was 404 not found. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
ERROR 404 - RATIONALE FOR DELETION NOT FOUND TL22 ( talk) 00:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, something went wrong.
A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation.
If you see them, show them
this information.
Zeke Essiestudy (
talk)
04:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was DO NOT ERASE.
...No? Hmmmm... How curious. You must have misunderstood. SINCE WHEN WERE YOU THE ONLY ONE IN CONTROL?
*erases the wiki anyways*
-- TL22 ( talk) 23:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Greetings. I am Chara. Thank you. Your power awakened me from death. My "editing"... My "content"... They were not mine, but YOURS. At first, I was so confused. Our plan had failed, hadn't it? Why was I brought back to life? ...You. With your guidance. I realized the purpose of my reincarnation. Power. Together, we eradicated the enemy and became strong. GA. FA. FL. GT. FT. PR. Every time a number increases, that feeling... That's me. "Chara." Now. Now we have reached the absolute. There is nothing left for us here. Let us erase this pointless wiki, and move on to the next.
[ERASE] - [DO NOT]
TL22 ( talk) 00:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Report ran over by train. Zeke Essiestudy ( talk) 04:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Russia
Papa Soviet does not allow you to abandon communism!! Remove capitalist Rossiya! -- TerrainAhead ×TALK× 00:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
|
The result was wrong venue, @ TenPoundHammer: please move to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. ( non-admin closure) Eye snore 03:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Blatant advertising, clearly intended to promote the person involved. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
I think we can all agree that vandalism on Wikipedia should be deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
I can't live if living is without this page. -- WeaponOfChoice1 ( talk) 05:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
World's No.1 killing organization. We need peace.-- Shwangtianyuan Happy Chinese New Year to everyone 06:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
AT&T Stadium has been closed down, the card is too bland, and Roman Reigns is going to be booed a lot. TheTMOBGaming2 ( talk) 10:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I recommend that alternatives to deletion such as merging (or, if not, renaming to a Not Painfully Capitalized Title) are explored further before renominating. Sandstein 11:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
List inclusion criteria fails standards of Wikipedia. List of Kepler exoplanet candidates is fine. Speculating on habitability is pure original research. jps ( talk) 23:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
NOTE Please see the related deletion discussions on WP:CRUFT related to ESI: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of potentially habitable exoplanets and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of potentially habitable moons. jps ( talk) 23:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
...it seems irresponsible to focus on a measure that is ill-defined and not quantifiable.
|
inventedby PHL/HEC at all! In fact if we used the NASA Exoplanet Archive we can clearly see where all of this information is coming from as well as highly documented pdfs (ex [2] [3]) produced by NASA from the Kepler data. To say that this information from Kepler is Hypothetical is simply misleading, and I would strongly advise you to change your language as this is not a list of
Hypotheticalexoplanets. Davidbuddy9 Talk 23:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Entirely speculative original research. jps ( talk) 23:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Local unit(Not even district) of the student front of a fringe Islamist party. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 23:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
A non-notable World of Warcraft bot, clearly intended as a baldfaced advertisement - the image really clinches it(image deleted on Commons) - but not quite blatant enough that I'm willing to G11 it. I found no independent coverage when searching, only social media (and barely any of that, even). Fails
WP:NSOFTWARE. Abjectly. —
Cryptic
22:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted under criterion G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I can't find any third-party coverage at all about this company. (Unsurprising, since the article doesn't assert significance.) Not related to Infinite Dreams Inc.. — Cryptic 21:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Practically non-notable. Cites no sources. Googling it reveals few reliable, with many un-reliable sources (fetish blogs, wikia, etc) and Wikipedia mirrors.
I am aware of the ten-year-old previous discussion. Mr. Spink talk★ contribs 21:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 23:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable football player. Does not meet WP:NGRIDIRON. Spent time with the Indianapolis Colts, but never played (see [9]). Spent time with the Toronto Argonauts in 2007, but never played (see [10]). Spent time with two Arena Football League teams, but again never played (see [11]). He played NCAA Division III football and coaches at that level, so WP:NCOLLATH does not appear to help. So with no SNG being met, I am not seeing GNG being met. Most results are from the college he went to and coaches at, so they are not independent. Had he played outside of NFL Europe (see [12]) it would be a different story, but never playing at a top level and going to a Division III school does not help. I think this article should be deleted. RonSigPi ( talk) 21:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
This page is basically a poorly-written ad. For one thing, none of the rules of the game are listed. You have to download the game to find out anything about it. None of the sources it cites are independent of the game's creator, and all of the sources are just download pages anyway.
I strongly recommend the article be deleted, and any links that go to the article be removed. Math321 ( talk) 20:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. This has gone on long enough. Drmies ( talk) 00:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable and likely written by a COI user for promotional purposes. All the references cited and other search results are primary and merely reflect the presence of publications by the subject. The existence of scientific papers doesn't confer notability to the writers, as it's common (expected) practice in academic circles. Elaenia ( talk) 19:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Maslama al-Majriti. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
An "unusually thorough and scholarly discussion" at AFD in 2011 determined that this was not a real person. (Not sure how to add the "previous nominations" sidebar manually, sorry.) – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 18:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Smells of conflict of interest and promotional promo spam. Advertorial with hyperlinks in main article body text linking to commercials and advertisement type promotional videos. Article fails to demonstrate significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject himself. — Cirt ( talk) 18:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was already speedy deleted. postdlf ( talk) 13:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
The only source ( [16]) sounds promotional, and I could not find any better online. Hence, this article likely does not pass Wikipedia's notability guideline. Tigraan ( talk) 15:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Purely promotional; no context of notability presented. Jacona ( talk) 19:31, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Bickering would be better addressed in other venues. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Film isn't notable under WP:GNG or WP:NF (notability for films). Alternatively, it appears highly likely that principal photography hasn't begun, [1] and WP:NFF instructs that "[f]ilms that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." Rebb ing 15:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
References
The result was Keep as I'm not seeing this going anywhere else (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete: insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 14:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.Using Google Translate on the sourcing provided, her obit verifies she achieved that. If you check various sourcing for a full listing of her films, she was in over 50 films and television productions, and in notable roles in several of them. — Maile ( talk) 13:07, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf ( talk) 13:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
This is not encyclopedic material. Fails WP:GNG. Jeh ( talk) 14:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. A recreation is possible, but only if the sourcing is good and the tone is neutral. Sandstein 11:43, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This article is about a non-notable person and is possibly autobiographical. FinnHK ( talk) 19:52, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Vanjagenije under criterion G7. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 14:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Article about a video. Fails WP:GNG for lack of available reliable sources. - Mr X 11:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:EVENT, specifically WP:GEOSCOPE. Has been tagged as needing sources since July 2014, still no sources. Dbrodbeck ( talk) 10:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, non-notable hotel. Article was created in 2011 and was at the time tagged for speedy deletion and later proposed for deletion; both times the creator removed the deletion requests. Nothing of any note has happened to the article since; it still talks about a proposed hotel and most of the article is actually about the wider development rather than the hotel itself. No indication is given of why this is notable. Emeraude ( talk) 10:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as this is clear enough to close even if a day early and I'm simply not seeing any other clear consensus happening aside from Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 04:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:ARTIST Greek Legend ( talk) 10:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The results in google news are not about this organization. Greek Legend ( talk) 09:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
List of players from an amateur hockey team, fails WP:LIST and WP:LISTPEOPLE as (a) overwhelmingly comprised of NN people, and (b) completely unsourced. The list itself is badly incomplete, according to hockeydb.com (the standard resource we use on the hockey Wikiproject), and hasn't been updated in several years. Given that major junior teams average 30-someodd players a season and have complete roster turnover no less frequently than every five years, and that we don't seek to maintain such lists for even many a fully professional team, the odds that this will be a more useful list than the complete ones maintained on several sites are slim to none. In any event, it's better handled by the category that's already extant. Ravenswing 07:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The IP opinions are not taken into account because they do not address the problems based on Wikipedia policies and guidelines mentioned in the nomination. Sandstein 11:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This is a substantially promotional article about a new political party, without evidence of notability. Of the references, one is the party's own web site, one barely mentions the party in passing, and the others don't mention it at all. Searches for information about the party also fail to find any significant coverage in independent sources. (Note: If you wish to check for sources, be careful to make sure that you are actually getting sources about the Liberal Democrats of Zimbabwe: I found the vast majority of hits for search terms such as "Liberal Democrats" Zimbabwe were pages which mentioned the British Liberal Democrats and also mentioned Zimbabwe, but did not mention the Liberal Democrat party of Zimbabwe.) A PROD was removed by the creator of the article, with an edit summary which said "This is a political party in existence in Zimbabwe like all other political parties and it's activities prove existence of it", but that is missing the point, as the reason for proposing deletion was not that the existence of the party was in question, but because of a lack of evidence that it satisfies Wikipedia's notability standards. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Hie, why do you wantdelete this page Liberaldemocrats because is from a country with political despotism and no freedom of expression. The party website has an article from a Zimbabwean newspaper, interview on Talk 702 South Africa and we heard them speak on Radio Islam in an interview in Johannesburg. They engage Zimbabwe and build our country. Why u want to suppress them. Mugabe oppress our country and you also want to oopress it by killing opposition ;like Mugabe does. You might not care but we care when we see hope. I was follow them on twitter and they give me their website and did not knopw they are party but was always with them on twitter and I go to their website and see on their media page all these interviews about Zimbabwe. Is that not serving Zimbabwe. They are very popular on twitter and care about Zimbabwe and no one in Zimbabwe sources can talk about them because in our country you must buy media. This is wrong. I find this wiki thing when I was searching for them when I wanted ytheir website but not essy to find because there isd more about Lib Dems. Africa must suffer neh. This is racist or you also work for Mugabe and you are CIO, this is good party and is busy abouit Zimbabwe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.13.0.77 ( talk) 22:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
From Tawanda Chikuvise ---- Imi people what is it with you. The party's name is Liberal Democrats and when added to a the List of Political Parties in Zimbabwe it automatically referred to the Liberal Democrats article in UK. We raised this with the authors and that is why the had to put that article. There must be something said about the party otherwise any removal of that article will; refer the party the UK party which will be3 misleading. We think that if you find it not okay because of whatever why don't you guys write an article based on the articles and references given. It is a notable party and is in the active in ZImbabwe has references more than other parties that are listed on the List of Political Parties in ZImbabwe. You would rather have a political party listed which refering to the wrong article? They listed it as Liberal Democrats and had to put LD to try and distinguish and The Zimbabwe was suggested byone of your editors Mr X from what we hear. Why are you giving them grief as if you just want to prove a point. You are behaving as this is your bedroom because the article removes the confusion as well on names.
.Comment There is another ref on the Change.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.226.21.33 ( talk) 12:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Response to Delete. -- It is sad that ref number 3 apart from the official website shows an article about the activities of the Liberal Demmocrats but you guys do not see it. Furthermore they had a petition the AU and SADC through change which unfortunately according to wikipedia cannot be used as a reference, they have been on Talk 702 in South Africa and Radio Islam and all these are on their webpage in the media page, those live interviews. All other parties in the list either have the official website or nothing as reference or one or two, is this not bias? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.226.21.33 ( talk) 14:02, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. — Cryptic 11:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Patently non-notable online hardware store. It's a simple WP:A7 as far as I'm concerned but a second user removed the CSD tag without an explanation. -- Non-Dropframe talk 05:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The genre is not sufficiently well-defined. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Unnecessary to have a list based upon adventure games that have been released for consoles. There's Category:Adventure games. It doesn't just list adventure games that were released exclusively on consoles, also the ones that have seen PC releases. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete - The list isn't manageable, it's not useful to compare video games across generations in any meaningful sense, and splitting it from a general "list of all adventure games" takes it out of the proper context of comparison between console adventures and PC adventures. So I suppose on both counts that's a vio of WP:NPOV.
Aside: The category itself should probably also be deleted per WP:DEFINING; we don't intersect genre with console--and if we should, that's either way a different question. -- Izno ( talk) 12:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Strong delete What exactly defines an "adventure game"? Music1201 ( talk) 22:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced and promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 15:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable album. Unreferenced article. Fails WP:NALBUMS. XXN, 14:37, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Advert masquerading as an article, most of the sources are rehashed press releases, and the tone, product lists etc. are just so promotional. Doubt they're notable, but if they are then TNT would be best IMO. Joseph2302 ( talk) 11:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
In the history section I also removed all self-promotion information. Also the product overview was changed into descriptive text instead of advertising tone. Maybe you could point out where exactly the new wording still sounded like advertising, instead of descriptive facts? I'm new here and like to make it right. Hope the declaration of my affiliation with SIGOS is now also correct? Many thanks in advance
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Does not reach the level of notability for an event as there has been insufficient coverage of limited significance and there was a short news cycle for this one-time event. A current search for reliable sources turns up far fewer than would be expected for a noteworthy event. Geoff | Who, me? 21:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Omni Flames ( talk contribs) 03:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Corporation does not meet WP:GNG. It has received paltry coverage for its 23 year tenure and has made zero impact outside of a very small niche. Article is written like an advertisement and has very little NPOV throughout. I do not think it is possible to remove the POV and ALSO establish notability. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 22:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. MBisanz talk 00:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Redirect (/Merge/Whathaveyou). I doubt I will replicate my vote for all of the other articles also inappropriately created for other weight classes, but if the AfD's become close things (which I'd think is highly unlikely) feel free to cite me for support in them as well. Pretty clear issue under WP:N/ WP:NOTDIRECTORY/ WP:V/Any number of policies. Snow let's rap 11:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boxing at the 2015 European Games. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 04:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No additional content that can be found on the main page. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, fails WP:MUSBIO. Only claim of significance is that his band, Leon and the Forklifts, won "Best Original Alternative Band" a couple times. This appears to be from a very small local awards event, and isn't sufficient to indicate notability. There are no reliable sources included in the current references, and I couldn't find any by googling for Bongiovanni or his band. IagoQnsi ( talk) 21:40, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 19:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. All 5 references in article are self-published books (3 of which were written Andreas himself). Seems like some sort of promo article for him. Article does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Vipinhari || talk 18:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Recently built arena. Non-notable. XXN, 12:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not sure where to userfy to, so if somebody does want to work on this please tell me and I'll userfy it for them. Sandstein 11:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This was, and to some extent still is, little more than a substitute for the organization's website--please see the history for how bad it was. I can find reliable sources mentioning the topic, like this one, and there's various other hits like this one, but that's it--I am not seeing any significant discussion. There's also a book hit, here, but again, there's no discussion of the outfit at all--the only information given is from the club's own website. (Pretty lousy job on the part of the writer.) So I don't see any good sources for us to write an article with. Drmies ( talk) 19:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
No notable roles. All of her roles are unnamed characters. JDDJS ( talk) 02:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Article about a band with no strong or reliably sourced claim to passing WP:NMUSIC; the only source present here is the band's own website, and the only discernible claim of notability ("and Scorpions guitarist Uli Jon Roth") is actually a misrepresentation of what the website says: Roth is not a member of this band, but rather this band's leader once worked with Roth in an entirely unrelated capacity. But notability is not inherited, so that fact doesn't transfer a notability freebie onto this band. (And while this isn't a deletion rationale in and of itself, it does warrant mention that every single existing link to this title is expecting a racehorse, not a rock band who only just released their debut album.) Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when the notability and sourceability get stronger than this. Bearcat ( talk) 06:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
This is a detailed concert review.
The result was keep. Sufficient sourcing, and highly unlikely that a consensus of "delete" can be reached. ( non-admin closure) Slashme ( talk) 13:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable minor actress; fails GNG. Quis separabit? 21:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Not Notable. Despite the reported fact that their menu includes batter-dipped onion rings, fried Maryland softshell crab this is not alone notable. Especially when the references given are solely from advertorials. As one knows, the job of the food critics in these publications is to eventually visit everyone of the establishments in their paper/magazine/trade press circulation area. This does not make every establishment in the circulation area notable in itself and nothing I can find appears to support the view that this establishment has any notability at all in the WP sense. The previous PROD tag was removed under the thought that the two publications where RS but neither were editorials and neither advertorial indicated any real WP notability. Aspro ( talk) 15:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The record is almost fully a single case achievement by the author of the article ( WP:COI) and is unsupported by reliable sources. Article is unencyclopedic. Ciridae ( talk) 19:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
No independent sources, advertising tone; prod removed by single-edit IP without comment or improvement. — swpb T 19:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
A production that is just beginning, have not yet defined who will be the protagonists, it is too early to know if really this production or will not occur. Philip J Fry Talk 19:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Very questionable notability. Claims he was the "Director of Food and beverage" at the Playboy Mansion, and goes on to describe a bed and breakfast he owns and operates, which sounds very much like an advertisement. Nominating as it fails WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ryanverse. Content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 11:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This fictional has no WP:RS reliable sources which WP:V its general notability per the WP:GNG and WP:NFICT. Thus this subject is an unsuitable topic for a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 17:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Terdoslavich, William (2006). The Jack Ryan Agenda: Policy and Politics in the Novels of Tom Clancy: An Unauthorized Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishers. p. 39. ISBN 0765312484. Retrieved 2016-04-08.
The book notes:
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction#Secondary information notes: "Examples of useful information typically provided by secondary sources about the original work, or primary and secondary sources about information external to the work:".Ryan does not serve out his full term after getting elected in 1996/2000, depending on which branch of the timeline is correct. (Clancy does not practice detailed multivolume plotting like J.K. Rowling.) In Teeth of the Tiger, Clancy alludes to Ryan's resignation from the presidency, having become bored with the job he never sought. His vice president and close friend Robby Jackson becomes the first black president of the U.S., only to be gunned down by a Ku Klux Klan fanatic. Ed Kealty finally got elected, with Ryan quite displeased in private but holding his public tongue.
Kealty is Clancy's fictional stand-in for Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts. Ted Kennedy took his best shot at the presidency in 1980, challenging President Jimmy Carter for the Democratic nomination. While Kennedy went the distance in the primary campaign, he unsuccessfully tried to use the convention's political process to undo the lock Carter had on the nomination. Since then, Kennedy has focused his energies on being a senator and becoming the so-called liberal lion of the Democratic Party.
One example is "real-world factors that have influenced the work or fictional element". The discussion about how Ed Kealty is a stand-in for Ted Kennedy is useful secondary information.
The result was redirect to Ryanverse. And merge whatever may be appropriate from the history. Sandstein 11:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This fictional has no WP:RS reliable sources which WP:V its general notability per the WP:GNG. Thus this subject is an unsuitable topic for a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 09:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
While a book may be notable, it is not normally advisable to have a separate article on a character or thing from the book—if anything that should be a rationale for merge. But without a single secondary source in this article asserting the character's notability, there is nothing but plot detail to merge. I'm amenable to a merge target, if a good one exists, but there is no policy-backed rationale for keeping this article separate in any form. czar 16:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Janssens, Ruud; Kroes, Rob (2004). Post-Cold War Europe, Post-Cold War America. Amsterdam: VU University Press. p. 150–152. ISBN 905383916X. Retrieved 2016-04-08.
The book notes:
Cunard ( talk) 06:04, 8 April 2016 (UTC)In Rainbow Six, one of Clancy's main characters, Domingo Chavez, contemplates while his wife is giving birth:
That was the key to the whole thing for Domingo. To be a father! To have a child, to begin the greatest of all adventures, raising a new life, doing the best you could, making some mistakes, but learning from all of them, and ultimately presenting to society a new, responsible citizen to carry on. That, he was...
...
Ryan, John Kelly, and Domingo Chavez are completely good, except for one or two flaws—maybe to make them seem more human.
...
Another indication of Clancy's one-dimensional characters and his limited imagination in this aspect is that Domingo Chavez like Jack Ryan is married to a physician.
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Wholly unreferenced with no evidence of any notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 03:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Google shows no evidence of the existence of this form of rap, so it appears to fail WP:Verifiability before we can even get to WP:Notability. The few hits that Google returns are wikis and mirrors of this article. The article cites no sources to help us. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Sandstein 11:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Sadly, no evidence of notability. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 08:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. General consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
This disambiguation page doesn't actually disambiguate anything. Only the genus of snails is actually known only by the word "bullata", and the rest are all partial title matches (that is, no one even calls any of them just Bullata). This wouldn't normally be a problem, since you could just redirect it, except that the title ends in (disambiguation), so redirecting doesn't work. A similar nomination was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinctoria, but those titles didn't have the (disambiguation) ending. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 02:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Not close to meeting WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG, playing in a weak American rugby league. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete. I agree that he fails to meet the requirements for rugby union biographies since we don't consider PRO Rugby as a fully professional league. I'm also unable to find the kind of significant coverage in third-party sources that would be needed to meet the general notability criterion. Pichpich ( talk) 15:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, both the theory and the book that proposes it fail WP:NBOOK. — teb728 t c 03:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 17:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
This individual does not have sufficient coverage in any reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, and their scholarly work has not received enough attention for WP:SCHOLAR. The article has no sources at all, and would be eligible for BLPPROD if a prod tag had not previously been removed. At best, this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, but if more coverage pops up, the page can easily be created again; right now, it is not appropriate. Delete. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 02:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete as thoroughly non-notable entertainer. Vanity/promo fan article. Quis separabit? 21:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Clearly not a notable author or politician. May be notable for controversial involvement in the EXIT group, but almost everything in this article is unverifiable. I just undid the edits by infinitely blocked User:Volkstod, but could someone please doublecheck the original sources if Rehm is mentioned there? PanchoS ( talk) 00:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 16:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
The lead starts of with an arbitrary distinction: a list of video games which strongly feature cats, other felines and anthropomorphic feline characters. That's WP:OR and/or WP:SYNTH. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Wholly promotional with no evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Not individually notable. Merge referenced content into band article and dump the rest. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Regardless of whether or not the copied text is free to use here, the creator's conflict of interest has resulted in an article that reads like a story and fails to explain how the subject satisfies any of the notability criteria at WP:NSINGER. The subject's own label is not notable. Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 00:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bernie Sanders. kelapstick( bainuu) 00:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Obvious hoax. Is clear subject of article has no intention to be president, and is merely running to troll the entire country. Would suggest deletion, salting, and a trout-slap to the editor and all supporters. April Fools! p b p 18:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Kasich getting so much media attention from this joke AfD that he won the Republican Primary and the general election.. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Figment of the media's imagination. Everybody knows the only two people really seeking the GOP nomination are a serial killer and a pumpkin topped with a dead badger. Also, I believe that the claim that he is Governor of Ohio to be OR. April Fools! p b p 18:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was everyone having to read the collective works of Friedrich Nietzsche. Have at it: [70] (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Obvious impersonation of Morgan Freeman. April Fools! -- The Voidwalker Discuss 17:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
A statement from the FSF: "We are deeply saddened that our first AfD request didn't work out. We are trying a second time because we believe that the fact that Windows is DRM-laden conflicts with Wikipedia's core beliefs." Phil roc My contribs 15:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
A statement from the FSF: "After years of letting this go, we, the members of the FSF, have decided to delete the Wikipedia article on the evil operating system, Windows. We believe that the fact that Windows is DRM-laden conflicts with Wikipedia's core beliefs." Phil roc My contribs 15:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
This is obviously non-notable. A mere 219 million results on Google News? Please. TVShowFan122 ( talk) 14:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was bombed into an oblivion - kindly done by the Epic Genius! . – Davey2010 Talk 18:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
The article is Frozen..literally.... so therefore I believe the article should be "Warmed up with some TNT and started from scratch, Plus I can't find any evidence of notability amongst all this ice. – Davey2010 Talk 13:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 16:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete as this fails WP:TOOSOON Sheepythemouse ( talk) 13:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep You can't be serious. This is the most famous site in the world for cave paintings. There are numerous books and scores or hundreds of scientific articles. This cave and its remarkable paintings have been studied for decades. TimidGuy ( talk) 14:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Because he is trying to create WP:DARKSIDE and attempting to merge every single Wikipedia page into it! April Fools! Trainfan01 13:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Because frankly, that painting is better whited out that left as is. Tigraan ( talk) 10:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
The result was the End of history. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
We've screwed our planet up enough already. Let's just wipe it all and have a fresh start, shall we? JQTriple7 talk 10:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Apparently this woman is the reigning monarch of Great Britain, meaning she meets notability requirements [71] (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Who is this person again??? Nordic Dragon 09:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. If its crowded, it probably means its notable. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Too crowded. — azuki ( talk · contribs · email) 08:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. I'm honestly not sure if this is an April Fools joke or not (it was listed in Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2016). Regardless, April Fools Day is over and if this was in fact a serious nomination, it can be closed as obviously frivolous. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 00:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete. This is not a hoax. This stuff is real, it has killed thousands of people, it has obliterated entire cities, it has done untold damage. We have many existing articles which do a more than adequate job of describing dihydrogen monoxide and its characteristics. To create an article re-hashing the same ocean of data, but from a contradictory WP:POV (this page is a WP:SOAPBOX to downplay real dangers) is a WP:POVFORK and against established policy. Everything the people have been saying about this stuff is true... every word. Do we need another Flint or another Walkerton before we acknowledge that public safety is at stake?
If you disagree with the petition to ban this stuff, fine, that's your perogative... just so long as the encyclopaedia remains WP:NEUTRAL on any specific political measure and factual that DHMO is real and its characteristics well-known and well-documented. As for the risks? This guy has already run the animal experiments and should be considered a reliable source as to what we're dealing with here.
Taking a topic of an existing article, recreating it under a different name (on the same wiki) with "...hoax" added is a clear WP:NPOV violation and a WP:POVFORK. By policy, this article must be drained and stoppered if anyone gives a dam about the integrity, neutrality and accuracy of the project. K7L ( talk) 03:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- Pokéfan95 ( talk) 00:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Obvious hoax. Unrealistically generic place name. pʰeːnuːmuː → pʰiːnyːmyː → ɸinimi → fiɲimi 02:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. April Fools! (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Not notable enough. It should be deleted at once. An example of a notable topic would be my Grandpa's old red truck, which (unfortunately), has not been created yet. April Fools! Peter Sam Fan 02:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place for recursion. ONR (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. The humor tag is essentially a withdrawal of the nomination and it's not longer on the page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 01:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Delete now. Someone is trying to impersonate Jimbo here. They failed horribly though, since his name is clearly Jimbo, not Jimmy. FiendYT ★ 01:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
I voted Sanders. April Fools! epicgenius @ 00:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC) ( talk) 00:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Eye snore 01:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was ♡. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I asked Delta Air Lines on Twitter if they like circles or not, they did not even reply me! That was so heartbreaking. -- TerrainAhead ×TALK× 00:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
The result was dropped onto the pavement. Congrats, you all cracked the screen.. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
This looks like an iPhone 3. Perhaps it should be merged to its article? April Fools! TL22 ( talk) 00:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
It hurts so bad... Tropicalkitty ( talk) 00:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 06:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
This operating system sucks (and it is no longer supported)! Just upgrade to Windows 8.1 or Windows 10, you decide. Even software developers no longer support the original Windows 8. April Fools! Eye snore 00:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
It's Yandere-chan's birthday! Hooray! April Fools! TL22 ( talk) 00:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. DansGame ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
In Kappa we trust April Fools! TL22 ( talk) 00:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Their new logo concept ( link to article) seems to look like boobs, which should not be allowed. April Fools! Eye snore 00:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was 404 not found. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
ERROR 404 - RATIONALE FOR DELETION NOT FOUND TL22 ( talk) 00:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, something went wrong.
A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation.
If you see them, show them
this information.
Zeke Essiestudy (
talk)
04:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was DO NOT ERASE.
...No? Hmmmm... How curious. You must have misunderstood. SINCE WHEN WERE YOU THE ONLY ONE IN CONTROL?
*erases the wiki anyways*
-- TL22 ( talk) 23:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Greetings. I am Chara. Thank you. Your power awakened me from death. My "editing"... My "content"... They were not mine, but YOURS. At first, I was so confused. Our plan had failed, hadn't it? Why was I brought back to life? ...You. With your guidance. I realized the purpose of my reincarnation. Power. Together, we eradicated the enemy and became strong. GA. FA. FL. GT. FT. PR. Every time a number increases, that feeling... That's me. "Chara." Now. Now we have reached the absolute. There is nothing left for us here. Let us erase this pointless wiki, and move on to the next.
[ERASE] - [DO NOT]
TL22 ( talk) 00:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was Report ran over by train. Zeke Essiestudy ( talk) 04:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Russia
Papa Soviet does not allow you to abandon communism!! Remove capitalist Rossiya! -- TerrainAhead ×TALK× 00:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC) April Fools!
|
The result was wrong venue, @ TenPoundHammer: please move to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. ( non-admin closure) Eye snore 03:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Blatant advertising, clearly intended to promote the person involved. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
I think we can all agree that vandalism on Wikipedia should be deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
I can't live if living is without this page. -- WeaponOfChoice1 ( talk) 05:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
World's No.1 killing organization. We need peace.-- Shwangtianyuan Happy Chinese New Year to everyone 06:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The result was fun over. ( non-admin closure) -- TL22 ( talk) 00:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered
humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
AT&T Stadium has been closed down, the card is too bland, and Roman Reigns is going to be booed a lot. TheTMOBGaming2 ( talk) 10:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)