This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Wikipedia is a
former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check
the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Wikipedia Reference Desk was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 27 February 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Wikipedia. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
Deletion discussions:
Keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2022, see
discussion.
Keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2019, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2017, see
discussion.
Delete (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2016, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2015, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 7 April 2014, see
discussion.
Tedium (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2014, see
discussion.
No consensus (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2011, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2010, see
discussion.
Speedy close (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2010, see
discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic
coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page. Please remember to
avoid self-references and maintain a
neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major
websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
This article was
copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on September 10, 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
...the single-sentence paragraphs, the lack of flow within paragraphs, the broken connections between paragraphs, the weak large-scale architecture in the article, the huge number of references for a paltry amount of data, the lack of distinction between important and trivial facts.
Record a new audio file once it reaches FA standard
Other:
Is it worth having an FAQ like other heavy traffic articles? E.g. "Why should Wikipedia have an article on itself?"
The "sub-articles" that were split off from this article are badly in need of attention, as are several other related articles. The following all need work:
History of Wikipedia — this one in particular is missing information and should be reorganized
Can we get the first three of these into a template somehow?
Many other language Wikipedia articles of questionable notability, particularly the smallest ones. A thorough going through is needed, with non-notable articles being AFD material.
Images: update graph in history section
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Expand : Add information about how well the open model is working. The number of articles protected and its evolution in time. Even better, share of reads (hits) according to page protection status.
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
Folklore: Is This Or Is This Not A Current Endeavour?
Folklore: Is this a current endeavor? I have seen it in one instance but when I looked for it, I couldn't find it as an endeavour; only as pages of the many different cultural references and other relevant information, including detailed definitions and information therefore. Please, if this is a current endeavour, contact me. I am quite interested in this topic!
Reikimom333 (
talk) 00:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Try
Folklore and
category:Folklore, that should lead to many other pages on Wikipedia. Quite a good collection here. Thanks for checking and not giving up (probably not the page for it but who knows).
Randy Kryn (
talk) 00:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Many thanks, Randy Kryn. I'm just so glad to find such a collection of folklore that is here. It could always use more, and I shall keep the hope for more and future contributions.
Reikimom333 (
talk) 17:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A chief executive officer (CEO) (executive officer, or just chief executive (CE), or as managing director (MD) in the UK) is the highest officer charged with the management of an organization – especially a company or nonprofit institution.
The highest officer is a very important person that many decisions should be made with her. The introduction of such an important person in Infobox is very helpful. But the highest officer does not exist for
Wikipedia, but maybe its duties are delegated to its upper officer.
Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks.
Making such decisions for Wikipedia as well as
Wikicommons and others is done by
Maryana Iskander. And introduction of her in Infobox is very helpful. Thanks,
Hooman Mallahzadeh (
talk) 14:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello
Hooman Mallahzadeh. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a non-profit organization. You are thinking of the
Wikimedia Foundation, which owns, funds, and maintains the encyclopedia via equipment and legal assistance. But there is no CEO of Wikipedia, the title does not have a place in the day-by-day and case-by-case managing hierarchy.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 14:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
If someone wants to propose an idea for Wikipedia, for example, he proposes a new Logo for it (because he is making a more informative one) who should he talk to? Probably
Maryana Iskander makes the final decision. Am I wrong?
It proves that these duties are delegated from "CEO of Wikipedia" office to "CEO of Wikimedia" office.
Hooman Mallahzadeh (
talk) 14:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Interesting question. But no, she could not change the logo, the Wikipedia community as a whole would have to discuss and "vote" on such a change (as far as I know anyway, maybe I'm mistaken but I would think that the CEO stays as hands-off Wikipedia as possible. Please see
Wikipedia:Wikipedia logos for a history of the globe-logo). Others who work for the Foundation, and would be working under the CEO, may read this and hopefully comment. May be worth pinging
Jimbo Wales, who would have organizational insight on your question and interest in adding the CEO to the infobox.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 15:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Lede mention of systemic bias criticism
Should the lede mention systemic bias criticisms? They’re not a really prominent part of coverage of Wikipedia.
Zanahary (
talk) 04:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, it should. Whether people talk about it or not, it's still a significant aspect of Wikipedia.
HiLo48 (
talk) 04:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)reply
What do you mean by “whether people talk about it or not”? If it’s not a prominent theme in Wikipedia’s coverage in reliable sources, we should reflect that here.
Zanahary (
talk) 05:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)reply
But people DO talk about it. A lot. There's thousands of articles on Scholar about this problem. It's the most significant criticism of WP and shouldn't be removed from the lead for
WP:NPOV.
Larataguera (
talk) 12:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Done, thanks, your concern makes sense. This was a new edit and have asked that it be talked-paged if the editor wants to return it.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 11:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Erasmus Prize (2015)
The text says in the section "Cultural influence" - awards: "In 2015, Wikipedia was awarded (both) the annual
Erasmus Prize, which recognizes exceptional contributions to culture, society or social sciences," It would be good / nice / fair to add, that the prize specifically has been awarded to Wikipedia as a community - the collective enterprise of tens of thousands of volunteers who, worldwide, offer support to build the initiative" (Original text in Dutch: "De prijs werd in het bijzonder toegekend aan Wikipedia als community – de gezamenlijke onderneming van tienduizenden vrijwilligers die, wereldwijd, helpen om dit initiatief vorm te geven." see: website
erasmusprijs.org) Thanks!
VanArtevelde (
talk) 17:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 April 2024
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I will like to have full right to edit any pages on this website. I wont do any random some promise
139.130.63.38 (
talk) 06:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 April 2024
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the ==Policies and content== section, in the last paragraph before the ===Content policies and guidelines=== section, please make a couple minor grammar edits.
Current text: "...the category namespace (which are a collection of pages...".
Please change "are" to "is" since "collection" is a singular noun.
Current text: "...there have been various books and reading list..."
Please change the word "list" to plural "lists".
BackspaceSomethingElse (
talk) 15:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Wikipedia is a
former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check
the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Wikipedia Reference Desk was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 27 February 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Wikipedia. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
Deletion discussions:
Keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2022, see
discussion.
Keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2019, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2017, see
discussion.
Delete (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2016, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2015, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 7 April 2014, see
discussion.
Tedium (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2014, see
discussion.
No consensus (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2011, see
discussion.
Speedy keep (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2010, see
discussion.
Speedy close (joke AFD for April Fool's Day), 1 April 2010, see
discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic
coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page. Please remember to
avoid self-references and maintain a
neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major
websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
This article was
copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on September 10, 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
...the single-sentence paragraphs, the lack of flow within paragraphs, the broken connections between paragraphs, the weak large-scale architecture in the article, the huge number of references for a paltry amount of data, the lack of distinction between important and trivial facts.
Record a new audio file once it reaches FA standard
Other:
Is it worth having an FAQ like other heavy traffic articles? E.g. "Why should Wikipedia have an article on itself?"
The "sub-articles" that were split off from this article are badly in need of attention, as are several other related articles. The following all need work:
History of Wikipedia — this one in particular is missing information and should be reorganized
Can we get the first three of these into a template somehow?
Many other language Wikipedia articles of questionable notability, particularly the smallest ones. A thorough going through is needed, with non-notable articles being AFD material.
Images: update graph in history section
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Expand : Add information about how well the open model is working. The number of articles protected and its evolution in time. Even better, share of reads (hits) according to page protection status.
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to
provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
Folklore: Is This Or Is This Not A Current Endeavour?
Folklore: Is this a current endeavor? I have seen it in one instance but when I looked for it, I couldn't find it as an endeavour; only as pages of the many different cultural references and other relevant information, including detailed definitions and information therefore. Please, if this is a current endeavour, contact me. I am quite interested in this topic!
Reikimom333 (
talk) 00:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Try
Folklore and
category:Folklore, that should lead to many other pages on Wikipedia. Quite a good collection here. Thanks for checking and not giving up (probably not the page for it but who knows).
Randy Kryn (
talk) 00:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Many thanks, Randy Kryn. I'm just so glad to find such a collection of folklore that is here. It could always use more, and I shall keep the hope for more and future contributions.
Reikimom333 (
talk) 17:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)reply
A chief executive officer (CEO) (executive officer, or just chief executive (CE), or as managing director (MD) in the UK) is the highest officer charged with the management of an organization – especially a company or nonprofit institution.
The highest officer is a very important person that many decisions should be made with her. The introduction of such an important person in Infobox is very helpful. But the highest officer does not exist for
Wikipedia, but maybe its duties are delegated to its upper officer.
Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks.
Making such decisions for Wikipedia as well as
Wikicommons and others is done by
Maryana Iskander. And introduction of her in Infobox is very helpful. Thanks,
Hooman Mallahzadeh (
talk) 14:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello
Hooman Mallahzadeh. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a non-profit organization. You are thinking of the
Wikimedia Foundation, which owns, funds, and maintains the encyclopedia via equipment and legal assistance. But there is no CEO of Wikipedia, the title does not have a place in the day-by-day and case-by-case managing hierarchy.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 14:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
If someone wants to propose an idea for Wikipedia, for example, he proposes a new Logo for it (because he is making a more informative one) who should he talk to? Probably
Maryana Iskander makes the final decision. Am I wrong?
It proves that these duties are delegated from "CEO of Wikipedia" office to "CEO of Wikimedia" office.
Hooman Mallahzadeh (
talk) 14:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Interesting question. But no, she could not change the logo, the Wikipedia community as a whole would have to discuss and "vote" on such a change (as far as I know anyway, maybe I'm mistaken but I would think that the CEO stays as hands-off Wikipedia as possible. Please see
Wikipedia:Wikipedia logos for a history of the globe-logo). Others who work for the Foundation, and would be working under the CEO, may read this and hopefully comment. May be worth pinging
Jimbo Wales, who would have organizational insight on your question and interest in adding the CEO to the infobox.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 15:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Lede mention of systemic bias criticism
Should the lede mention systemic bias criticisms? They’re not a really prominent part of coverage of Wikipedia.
Zanahary (
talk) 04:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, it should. Whether people talk about it or not, it's still a significant aspect of Wikipedia.
HiLo48 (
talk) 04:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)reply
What do you mean by “whether people talk about it or not”? If it’s not a prominent theme in Wikipedia’s coverage in reliable sources, we should reflect that here.
Zanahary (
talk) 05:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)reply
But people DO talk about it. A lot. There's thousands of articles on Scholar about this problem. It's the most significant criticism of WP and shouldn't be removed from the lead for
WP:NPOV.
Larataguera (
talk) 12:34, 9 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Done, thanks, your concern makes sense. This was a new edit and have asked that it be talked-paged if the editor wants to return it.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 11:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Erasmus Prize (2015)
The text says in the section "Cultural influence" - awards: "In 2015, Wikipedia was awarded (both) the annual
Erasmus Prize, which recognizes exceptional contributions to culture, society or social sciences," It would be good / nice / fair to add, that the prize specifically has been awarded to Wikipedia as a community - the collective enterprise of tens of thousands of volunteers who, worldwide, offer support to build the initiative" (Original text in Dutch: "De prijs werd in het bijzonder toegekend aan Wikipedia als community – de gezamenlijke onderneming van tienduizenden vrijwilligers die, wereldwijd, helpen om dit initiatief vorm te geven." see: website
erasmusprijs.org) Thanks!
VanArtevelde (
talk) 17:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 April 2024
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I will like to have full right to edit any pages on this website. I wont do any random some promise
139.130.63.38 (
talk) 06:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 April 2024
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
In the ==Policies and content== section, in the last paragraph before the ===Content policies and guidelines=== section, please make a couple minor grammar edits.
Current text: "...the category namespace (which are a collection of pages...".
Please change "are" to "is" since "collection" is a singular noun.
Current text: "...there have been various books and reading list..."
Please change the word "list" to plural "lists".
BackspaceSomethingElse (
talk) 15:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply