Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Hey, something similar happened at ASC San Diego related to the move of this page. I'm still trying to figure out what precisely is going on with this merger, but thought I would let you know. Jay eyem ( talk) 00:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I have blocked the IP editor for their legal threats, but your behavior in that conversation was inappropriate and way too aggressive. Nothing useful will come from discussing where an IP address geolocates to. Do not get into pointless back and forth exchanges with disruptive editors. You know where to file reports. Cullen328 ( talk) 01:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music § Colin Larkin references. We could really use an experienced editor with this matter, and I hope you're able to provide some input. Thanks. Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 21:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
You actually explained something in an edit summary that's more than just linking to whatever. Was that so hard? That's what you should do in instances such as this. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 18:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words and welcome message, I just wanted to say I appreciate you taking the time to share what will work best for my editing skills instead of berating me like the other editor did. If you can provide any other feedback as I continue my editing journey, I would like that. Wtfsteph ( talk) 17:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Nobody views that page. It would not be likely to gain a fair consensus there. I will take it to the WikiProject instead. dannymusiceditor oops 16:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I was doing a bit of copyediting on the Mario Gómez article and I noticed the method of reporting scores in games was not consistent. The section in the loan to Beşiktaş uses an – between scores (5–1 win), while the International section does not (2–3 loss). Is either method preferred, or are both acceptable? Perfect4th ( talk) 18:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
In 13 years editing here I've never seen this. I thought it was a burp in the mark up. Old dog, new tricks, I guess. Tide rolls 13:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
I didn’t realize the problem with my edits, thanks for helping me notice! 68.97.131.85 ( talk) 20:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Wondering if you may have any citations that I could add to the ‘tailor’ article. A 4chan user emailed me about it a couple weeks ago and I would like to know if you have any knowledge of places I can find a good citation to save the article. If you have any you can either respond here to the talk:Tailor page. It would be very helpful if you can find any. Thanks 68.97.131.85 ( talk) 20:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Someone redirected the MLS verion of the Whitecaps 2 to the USL version of the Whitecaps 2. Shouldn't there be separate pages since the USL team played in the second division and was dissolved while the new team will play in the third division of soccer's hierarchy? Different leagues, different divisions. The only common thing about them is the name. Thoughts... Roberto221 ( talk) 15:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
It seems you get a lot of abuse so.. A nice hot cup of tea to calm you down. Govvy ( talk) 19:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hi. I don't really care one way or another about Hillsong, but just to let you know, there are plenty of Australian templates with redlinks! I can't think of the names of all of them now, but I know I've seen quite a few. Template:Islands of Tasmania is one example. Just for future info! :-) Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 07:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
After the little revert that you did the other day, can you provide me with a link to where this is defined? I was adding |30em based on information directly in the Template:Reflist, and some other Talk page discussions some time ago that it was to be preferred over Reflist|2 or reflist by itself. I understood it was also something to do with readability via mobile apps. but I cant remember. So any link you can provide me to a discussion or guideline to understand how this works or how it has changed would be welcomed. Matilda Maniac ( talk) 10:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
| 30 em
is listed is in a section that has been deprecated. It is automatically responsive to 30em when there are 10 or more references, otherwise, it is single column. You can try in your own sandbox. Find an article. Copy the source. Make sure that you have an undecorated reflist template and show preview. If there are fewer than 10 references, they should show in a single column; duplicate some of there references so that it is more than 10 and see how it changes. If there are more than 10 references, the preview should show that the columns are responsive. Remove copy and references until the preview shows fewer than 10 references. As the final experiment, adjust the decoration so that the refs are responsive to more than 30em and less than 30em. That is why the code is still present. You should see that, when there are more than 10 references, {{Reflist}} performs exactly like {{Reflist|30em}}.It appears the new MLS team in St. Louis are stylizing "City" as "CITY" in all their comms across their website, socials, etc, so that appears to be the official name. See their website. UncleTupelo1 ( talk) 01:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Anyting that could be added, removed or worded betterr?? Drawbacks. Moxy- 01:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Quick Q, I'm noticing that you're adding -pres. to player team histories. Is this a recent change to how we're supposed to edit that? Seems like an impossible task to try and change that on every active players page.
And it's not problem, I'll add edit summaries as you asked on my talk page, although I don't see that very often from others, and I assume they aren't being stalked like you've been doing with me over the last number of years. Very odd but ultimately if you feel the need to shadow me specifically, more power to you then man.
Vince193 ( talk) 21:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Just letting you know as I have seen you remove headline= from Template:Track listing. I know it may be "redundant", but captions are required for all tables per MOS:ACCESS. The documentation of Template:Track listing also says headline= is required for accessibility. There was a consensus on all of this in 2020, and they were found to be necessary even where considered redundant and repeating information "obvious" to readers: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Archive 15#RfC on table captions. Ss 112 22:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Erik ten Hag is seeing a lot of edits by IPs changing his current club. Would an RFPP be appropriate here? Perfect4th ( talk) 15:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for this; I forget not all WikiProjects use current class, and too early in my morning I forgot to double check before I reassessed the article. My bad. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{ re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 08:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your comment at Pep Guardiola GA review. Can you use the script which changes the date formats at Federico Gatti? I don't know the reason but the script doesn't work to me. This article is being GA reviewed (by someone who's not very active). Dr Salvus 18:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
It's one of the tricky things about oversight that generally, we just don't talk about it on-wiki, which is why I did not really reply to your posts on my talk page, just took the actions I felt were appropriate. It's a little odd to me that @ Uncle G: blocked them based on edits that he could not actually see, leaving me little choice but to convert it to an oversight block as there is no way for non-oversighters to review a block based on suppressed material, but it is a requirement that all OS blocks be reported to our mailing list for review by the team so that process is already underway. My point here is that part of the idea of removing outing content is that we just do it, quietly, and generally starting a noticeboard thread is not the best idea. Requests for suppression (oversight) or revision deletion are best made off-wiki through the process outlined at WP:RFO. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the introductory greeting Walter. I have been contributing to Wikipedia for years now but generally just small and quick edits when I run across obvious passages that could use improvement (with most being done on the fly without logging in). Decided I'd do it a little more formally now, complete with a user page. :-) If I need help, I'll know who to turn to. Thanks for reaching out. Socalville ( talk) 06:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I was making corrections and didn't realize how laborious the Code of Ethics page would be. Had I known beforehand, I would have started it in my sandbox. It was late, I was tired, so I just published it unfinished. haha. I'll get better with more experience and better recognize what should probably be worked in the sandbox first.
Hope you ave a great Good Friday, and Easter weekend! ForefrontFollower ( talk) 12:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Walter, I have a question: I am interested about joining WP:RCP, how I can join in? There is a page that you can click in a part and you can inscribe? TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 01:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
You need to dial back the rhetoric in your comments at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. You've been blocked for personal attacks and uncivil conduct before. Given the length of that block, you're well on your way to earning an indefinite one with comments like this. The implication that the other editors involved have brain damage is entirely unacceptable. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
In my opinion this [1] edit is an exaggeration. In the vast majority of the infoboxes flatlists are preferred to commas. Do you really expect me to start a long discussion about replacing a comma? Okay, I don't want to start an edit war, I will leave that style unchanged, that article will be the only one to retain a style that apparently no one likes. Blueberry72 ( talk) 20:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TheEncyclopediaReader reported by User:Moxy (Result: ) Moxy- 04:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Hallo,
Sie haben meine Bearbeitung auf der Seite zum FC Bayern rückgängig gemacht. Ihre Ausführung war diesbezüglich sehr knapp und somit schwer nachvollziehbar. Der Klub hat seit der vergangenen Saison den fünften sogenannten "Meisterstern". Dies ist hinsichtlich der Erfolge des Klubs durchaus relevant. Des Weiteren stellt der Gewinn der Fifa-Klub-Weltmeisterschaft (2013 und 2020) weitere Meilensteine dar. Dies lässt sich durch das Abzeichen sehr gut darstellen.
Ich würde mich daher freuen, wenn Sie mir ihre Beweggründe näher erläutern.
-- Bildersindtoll ( talk) 14:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
150px
and
MOS:IMAGELOC, so there's no need to place the image on the left. The additional images weren't really useful either.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 16:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 00:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)In September of last year TonyBallioni warned you that further edit warring would likely lead to an indefinite block. Between your recent conduct at 2022 FIFA World Cup, We Cry Out: The Worship Project, Dennis Villeneuve and your MOS:DATETOPRES related changes, you've clearly not taken that warning to heart, and I'm left with no choice but to make good on it. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello;
Could you help me out please? I created season 16 under List of episodes, but the link isn't working. Thank you. RiverviewPatches ( talk) 22:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Walter, a number of fair minded edits you made to this page have been reversed and made more inflammatory by a contributor named “nicetryearl” who has made it his mission to discredit mr Noormohamed, as evidenced by his own profile page. His edits are inaccurate and inflammatory (as you previously noted) yet his edits continue to be allowed to stand unchecked. His edits violate a number of Wikipedia policies and I would ask if you could please assist in correcting what “nicetryearl” continues to do as it is both misleading and defamatory. 2607:FEA8:760:3400:BD65:8B8B:4B3B:1B69 ( talk) 12:39, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Project 86 has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Consider your edits at User talk:Metalcub back in May to August 2021. That user was subsequently banned indefinitely in February this year. Almost all of their edits were to supply Wall of Sound as a source. They started editing in late October 2020.
Consider also User talk:Brownypaul87, where they also contributed almost exclusively by adding Wall of Sound as a source. They stopped editing in late October 2020 not long after our discussion at Talk:Amy Shark.
Did you follow up with raising your concerns about that website at WP:RSN? shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 06:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
I know I haven't edited much but I'm not exactly new. Simply put, I'd like to edit NF's 'Personal Life' Category. He now has a child and it wasn't mentioned. Xinegod ( talk) 19:38, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Sanctus Real has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Walter Görlitz! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Hey, something similar happened at ASC San Diego related to the move of this page. I'm still trying to figure out what precisely is going on with this merger, but thought I would let you know. Jay eyem ( talk) 00:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I have blocked the IP editor for their legal threats, but your behavior in that conversation was inappropriate and way too aggressive. Nothing useful will come from discussing where an IP address geolocates to. Do not get into pointless back and forth exchanges with disruptive editors. You know where to file reports. Cullen328 ( talk) 01:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music § Colin Larkin references. We could really use an experienced editor with this matter, and I hope you're able to provide some input. Thanks. Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 21:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
You actually explained something in an edit summary that's more than just linking to whatever. Was that so hard? That's what you should do in instances such as this. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 18:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind words and welcome message, I just wanted to say I appreciate you taking the time to share what will work best for my editing skills instead of berating me like the other editor did. If you can provide any other feedback as I continue my editing journey, I would like that. Wtfsteph ( talk) 17:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Nobody views that page. It would not be likely to gain a fair consensus there. I will take it to the WikiProject instead. dannymusiceditor oops 16:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I was doing a bit of copyediting on the Mario Gómez article and I noticed the method of reporting scores in games was not consistent. The section in the loan to Beşiktaş uses an – between scores (5–1 win), while the International section does not (2–3 loss). Is either method preferred, or are both acceptable? Perfect4th ( talk) 18:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
In 13 years editing here I've never seen this. I thought it was a burp in the mark up. Old dog, new tricks, I guess. Tide rolls 13:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
I didn’t realize the problem with my edits, thanks for helping me notice! 68.97.131.85 ( talk) 20:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Wondering if you may have any citations that I could add to the ‘tailor’ article. A 4chan user emailed me about it a couple weeks ago and I would like to know if you have any knowledge of places I can find a good citation to save the article. If you have any you can either respond here to the talk:Tailor page. It would be very helpful if you can find any. Thanks 68.97.131.85 ( talk) 20:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Someone redirected the MLS verion of the Whitecaps 2 to the USL version of the Whitecaps 2. Shouldn't there be separate pages since the USL team played in the second division and was dissolved while the new team will play in the third division of soccer's hierarchy? Different leagues, different divisions. The only common thing about them is the name. Thoughts... Roberto221 ( talk) 15:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
It seems you get a lot of abuse so.. A nice hot cup of tea to calm you down. Govvy ( talk) 19:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hi. I don't really care one way or another about Hillsong, but just to let you know, there are plenty of Australian templates with redlinks! I can't think of the names of all of them now, but I know I've seen quite a few. Template:Islands of Tasmania is one example. Just for future info! :-) Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 07:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
After the little revert that you did the other day, can you provide me with a link to where this is defined? I was adding |30em based on information directly in the Template:Reflist, and some other Talk page discussions some time ago that it was to be preferred over Reflist|2 or reflist by itself. I understood it was also something to do with readability via mobile apps. but I cant remember. So any link you can provide me to a discussion or guideline to understand how this works or how it has changed would be welcomed. Matilda Maniac ( talk) 10:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
| 30 em
is listed is in a section that has been deprecated. It is automatically responsive to 30em when there are 10 or more references, otherwise, it is single column. You can try in your own sandbox. Find an article. Copy the source. Make sure that you have an undecorated reflist template and show preview. If there are fewer than 10 references, they should show in a single column; duplicate some of there references so that it is more than 10 and see how it changes. If there are more than 10 references, the preview should show that the columns are responsive. Remove copy and references until the preview shows fewer than 10 references. As the final experiment, adjust the decoration so that the refs are responsive to more than 30em and less than 30em. That is why the code is still present. You should see that, when there are more than 10 references, {{Reflist}} performs exactly like {{Reflist|30em}}.It appears the new MLS team in St. Louis are stylizing "City" as "CITY" in all their comms across their website, socials, etc, so that appears to be the official name. See their website. UncleTupelo1 ( talk) 01:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Anyting that could be added, removed or worded betterr?? Drawbacks. Moxy- 01:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Quick Q, I'm noticing that you're adding -pres. to player team histories. Is this a recent change to how we're supposed to edit that? Seems like an impossible task to try and change that on every active players page.
And it's not problem, I'll add edit summaries as you asked on my talk page, although I don't see that very often from others, and I assume they aren't being stalked like you've been doing with me over the last number of years. Very odd but ultimately if you feel the need to shadow me specifically, more power to you then man.
Vince193 ( talk) 21:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Just letting you know as I have seen you remove headline= from Template:Track listing. I know it may be "redundant", but captions are required for all tables per MOS:ACCESS. The documentation of Template:Track listing also says headline= is required for accessibility. There was a consensus on all of this in 2020, and they were found to be necessary even where considered redundant and repeating information "obvious" to readers: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Archive 15#RfC on table captions. Ss 112 22:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Erik ten Hag is seeing a lot of edits by IPs changing his current club. Would an RFPP be appropriate here? Perfect4th ( talk) 15:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for this; I forget not all WikiProjects use current class, and too early in my morning I forgot to double check before I reassessed the article. My bad. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{ re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 08:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your comment at Pep Guardiola GA review. Can you use the script which changes the date formats at Federico Gatti? I don't know the reason but the script doesn't work to me. This article is being GA reviewed (by someone who's not very active). Dr Salvus 18:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
It's one of the tricky things about oversight that generally, we just don't talk about it on-wiki, which is why I did not really reply to your posts on my talk page, just took the actions I felt were appropriate. It's a little odd to me that @ Uncle G: blocked them based on edits that he could not actually see, leaving me little choice but to convert it to an oversight block as there is no way for non-oversighters to review a block based on suppressed material, but it is a requirement that all OS blocks be reported to our mailing list for review by the team so that process is already underway. My point here is that part of the idea of removing outing content is that we just do it, quietly, and generally starting a noticeboard thread is not the best idea. Requests for suppression (oversight) or revision deletion are best made off-wiki through the process outlined at WP:RFO. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the introductory greeting Walter. I have been contributing to Wikipedia for years now but generally just small and quick edits when I run across obvious passages that could use improvement (with most being done on the fly without logging in). Decided I'd do it a little more formally now, complete with a user page. :-) If I need help, I'll know who to turn to. Thanks for reaching out. Socalville ( talk) 06:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I was making corrections and didn't realize how laborious the Code of Ethics page would be. Had I known beforehand, I would have started it in my sandbox. It was late, I was tired, so I just published it unfinished. haha. I'll get better with more experience and better recognize what should probably be worked in the sandbox first.
Hope you ave a great Good Friday, and Easter weekend! ForefrontFollower ( talk) 12:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Walter, I have a question: I am interested about joining WP:RCP, how I can join in? There is a page that you can click in a part and you can inscribe? TheEncyclopediaReader Contact me! :) 01:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
You need to dial back the rhetoric in your comments at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. You've been blocked for personal attacks and uncivil conduct before. Given the length of that block, you're well on your way to earning an indefinite one with comments like this. The implication that the other editors involved have brain damage is entirely unacceptable. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
In my opinion this [1] edit is an exaggeration. In the vast majority of the infoboxes flatlists are preferred to commas. Do you really expect me to start a long discussion about replacing a comma? Okay, I don't want to start an edit war, I will leave that style unchanged, that article will be the only one to retain a style that apparently no one likes. Blueberry72 ( talk) 20:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TheEncyclopediaReader reported by User:Moxy (Result: ) Moxy- 04:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Hallo,
Sie haben meine Bearbeitung auf der Seite zum FC Bayern rückgängig gemacht. Ihre Ausführung war diesbezüglich sehr knapp und somit schwer nachvollziehbar. Der Klub hat seit der vergangenen Saison den fünften sogenannten "Meisterstern". Dies ist hinsichtlich der Erfolge des Klubs durchaus relevant. Des Weiteren stellt der Gewinn der Fifa-Klub-Weltmeisterschaft (2013 und 2020) weitere Meilensteine dar. Dies lässt sich durch das Abzeichen sehr gut darstellen.
Ich würde mich daher freuen, wenn Sie mir ihre Beweggründe näher erläutern.
-- Bildersindtoll ( talk) 14:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
150px
and
MOS:IMAGELOC, so there's no need to place the image on the left. The additional images weren't really useful either.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 16:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 00:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)In September of last year TonyBallioni warned you that further edit warring would likely lead to an indefinite block. Between your recent conduct at 2022 FIFA World Cup, We Cry Out: The Worship Project, Dennis Villeneuve and your MOS:DATETOPRES related changes, you've clearly not taken that warning to heart, and I'm left with no choice but to make good on it. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello;
Could you help me out please? I created season 16 under List of episodes, but the link isn't working. Thank you. RiverviewPatches ( talk) 22:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Walter, a number of fair minded edits you made to this page have been reversed and made more inflammatory by a contributor named “nicetryearl” who has made it his mission to discredit mr Noormohamed, as evidenced by his own profile page. His edits are inaccurate and inflammatory (as you previously noted) yet his edits continue to be allowed to stand unchecked. His edits violate a number of Wikipedia policies and I would ask if you could please assist in correcting what “nicetryearl” continues to do as it is both misleading and defamatory. 2607:FEA8:760:3400:BD65:8B8B:4B3B:1B69 ( talk) 12:39, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Project 86 has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Consider your edits at User talk:Metalcub back in May to August 2021. That user was subsequently banned indefinitely in February this year. Almost all of their edits were to supply Wall of Sound as a source. They started editing in late October 2020.
Consider also User talk:Brownypaul87, where they also contributed almost exclusively by adding Wall of Sound as a source. They stopped editing in late October 2020 not long after our discussion at Talk:Amy Shark.
Did you follow up with raising your concerns about that website at WP:RSN? shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 06:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
I know I haven't edited much but I'm not exactly new. Simply put, I'd like to edit NF's 'Personal Life' Category. He now has a child and it wasn't mentioned. Xinegod ( talk) 19:38, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Sanctus Real has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 02:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Walter Görlitz! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)