![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi, Marchjuly. I see you flagged the image for deletion. It's a low resolution screenshot for the Lucos article illustration, that is taken by me and is uploaded under the clearly chosen "Non-free use rationale". Is this rationale no longer available at Wikipedia? AlexBern73 ( talk) 20:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, where was this being reported? It shouldn't be, since the Media: prefix doesn't display anything. Your edits have also changed the sense of the discussion, since the point was to compare Media: with :File:, and you have altered it so that people are being asked to compare :File: with :File:. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 19:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
[[Media:2018_AFC_Women%27s_Asian_Cup_logo.svg|here]]
, maybe using the external link[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d8/2018_AFC_Women%27s_Asian_Cup_logo.svg here]
will work just as well. I don't think neither the Media namespace nore
WP:SVG are exemptions to
WP:NFCC per
WP:NFEXMP, but if they're commonly used this way then maybe they should be proposed as an exemptions. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
00:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your advice and help about 3rr on the teahouse! <3 SunnyBoi ( talk) 06:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hi. At
Wikipedia:Teahouse#Verifying a source in languages other than english, you wrote ... if you can't read it, do just assume it is automatically OK to use ...
. I assume you meant do not?
As a practical matter, do articles with entirely non-English sources really stand a chance of being considered notable in enwiki (assuming there are no English-language RSs found on the subject)? I stumbled over this earlier at Teahouse and was called offensive. Though I've done a lot of work here, article creation and notability is really not my thing, so I'm asking. —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 01:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Doug Weller talk 06:50, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Marchjuly, Thank you for the information on removing talk page posts, it was very useful. I am new to Wikipedia and I apologize if I didn't do things correctly. Blinshnikt ( talk) 20:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey Marchjuly, I would like to thank you for removing Qaher-1 Missile image, " UAEAF F16F Block 60 image, and all images that might be as a seen as a propaganda to normal readers in this article I would like to notice that I'm the one who've added this image back in 2016 when the article had only Saudi side weapons and didn't had any Yemeni weapons, so I've added it to balance the article for all the readers with different backgrounds
Please do not delete the image , just unlink it from the post, it might be used in another article
967Bytes ( Contact) 15:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, maybe you can help me. You've posted a warning about an image I posted quite awhile ago. Saying that I was not properly using the image. I may have incorrectly identified it as fair use when its real date of production in 1923 should actually identify the image of a prominent statement by a former president is actually in public domain, not in fair use.
I do not know how to go back and correct this, I believe the image should be allowed to stay for this reason.
Energynet ( talk) 07:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi, Marchjuly. I see you flagged the image for deletion. It's a low resolution screenshot for the Lucos article illustration, that is taken by me and is uploaded under the clearly chosen "Non-free use rationale". Is this rationale no longer available at Wikipedia? AlexBern73 ( talk) 20:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, where was this being reported? It shouldn't be, since the Media: prefix doesn't display anything. Your edits have also changed the sense of the discussion, since the point was to compare Media: with :File:, and you have altered it so that people are being asked to compare :File: with :File:. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 19:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
[[Media:2018_AFC_Women%27s_Asian_Cup_logo.svg|here]]
, maybe using the external link[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d8/2018_AFC_Women%27s_Asian_Cup_logo.svg here]
will work just as well. I don't think neither the Media namespace nore
WP:SVG are exemptions to
WP:NFCC per
WP:NFEXMP, but if they're commonly used this way then maybe they should be proposed as an exemptions. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
00:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your advice and help about 3rr on the teahouse! <3 SunnyBoi ( talk) 06:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hi. At
Wikipedia:Teahouse#Verifying a source in languages other than english, you wrote ... if you can't read it, do just assume it is automatically OK to use ...
. I assume you meant do not?
As a practical matter, do articles with entirely non-English sources really stand a chance of being considered notable in enwiki (assuming there are no English-language RSs found on the subject)? I stumbled over this earlier at Teahouse and was called offensive. Though I've done a lot of work here, article creation and notability is really not my thing, so I'm asking. —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 01:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Doug Weller talk 06:50, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Marchjuly, Thank you for the information on removing talk page posts, it was very useful. I am new to Wikipedia and I apologize if I didn't do things correctly. Blinshnikt ( talk) 20:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey Marchjuly, I would like to thank you for removing Qaher-1 Missile image, " UAEAF F16F Block 60 image, and all images that might be as a seen as a propaganda to normal readers in this article I would like to notice that I'm the one who've added this image back in 2016 when the article had only Saudi side weapons and didn't had any Yemeni weapons, so I've added it to balance the article for all the readers with different backgrounds
Please do not delete the image , just unlink it from the post, it might be used in another article
967Bytes ( Contact) 15:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, maybe you can help me. You've posted a warning about an image I posted quite awhile ago. Saying that I was not properly using the image. I may have incorrectly identified it as fair use when its real date of production in 1923 should actually identify the image of a prominent statement by a former president is actually in public domain, not in fair use.
I do not know how to go back and correct this, I believe the image should be allowed to stay for this reason.
Energynet ( talk) 07:55, 31 August 2019 (UTC)