![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Could you teach me how I add National team logos ? I would like to add many National team logos. Please thoroughly teach me. Could you add any Photo, you add it. RKC_Vakwai ( talk) 2:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I see nation logo examples that you allow to add in wiki pages. I see and copy this logo to create India nation football logo.png but you don't allow my creation logo. What's different ?. I am very stuned. If you explain it, you can explain to me and type instruction such as for me to create logo
explanation step |
---|
step 1. click this " Click here to start the Upload Wizard " massage. |
step 2. choose picture file in step 1. |
step 3. type picture name and describe picture in step 2. |
step 4. click this " This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use." massage in step 3. |
step 5. type article with use this logo under " This file will be used in the following article:" in space box. |
step 6. choose this " This is a logo of an organization, company, brand, etc." massage. |
step 7. add picture origin link in space box of " Source: " |
step 8. check space box before " This image will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question." |
step 9. explain How I use this logo ? under "In view of this, please explain how the use of this file will be minimal." massage |
step 10. click upload button |
You can explain instruction same me, Can't you ? RKC_Vakwai ( talk) 9:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for discussion. Could you teach me how is creation of nation logo instruction ? I would like truely creation step with admin allow because all articles, which you send it to me for reading, don't tell instruction to me. RKC_Vakwai ( talk) 3:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you!!! Jackguitarfan ( talk) 02:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Am I right about this or am I wrong? The university seal should only be used in the university article, not a child entity like the law school? Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 17:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi! You removed the Vasas SC logo (File:Vasac_SC.png) from the articles Vasas SC (women's handball), Vasas SC (men's water polo), Vasas SC (men's basketball) and Vasas SC (fencing) but not from Vasas SC (football). Why? All of those use the same logo because all of these are part of the sport organization Vasas SC. If you think it is against Wiki rules (WP:NFCCP), you should remove from all articles, but if it is appropriate for the football branch, it is appropriate for the basketball, handball, water polo etc. branches too. Vasas SC means all of these and not only the football club which owns the Vasas SC name here on Wiki. BR, vampeare ( talk) 13:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi there MarchJuly- You left me a message concerning the St. Martin's Chamber Choir page that I developed. I'm not completely sure how to proceed with it. I indeed do have a conflict of interest, which I declared. Much of the material is simply "true", i.e., there really isn't anyway to document it.
Concerning Timothy Krueger's bio, he is indeed a living person. The advisement reads:
"This section of a biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful. (August 2016)"
Not sure what additional citations could be provided. I would be pleased to have general suggestions. Or specific for that matter. There is nothing contentious in the material. I have added references for Mr. Krueger's two professional positions other than St. Martin's.
Notability: I might cite the 13 CDs, two of them on the British Toccata Classics label and the newly added host of world premiere performances. There are as many U.S. and regional premieres in addition, not included. St. Martin's 9/11 memorial concert was broadcast live on Colorado Public Radio. This statewide live broadcast was the first by CPR of a choral concert. This was world-wide if one includes Internet streaming.
I agree that some of the CD descriptions were not neutral in tone and I have eliminated some text and even more descriptive adjectives.
So with those explanations and changes, what would you suggest?
Gene McCullough ( talk) 04:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Gene McCullough
Hi Marchjuly. Just wondering, has any progress been made on this issue since I last asked? I know you said you were very busy so I'm assuming there hasn't been much progress. If that's the case then I will start an RfC (even though I don't know how to do it but I will find out because this issue it has gone on for too long and needs to be resolved now). Thanks, Hashim-afc ( talk) 18:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on improving this page! I am staying out of the fight regarding the photo(s) of the demolition. The articles includes photos and they speak for themselves. I'd still like to see my photo on the page (I do think it's useful) but I'm waiting for an administrator to address it. 2601:442:C100:9A90:BDBB:663E:9A0C:A55C ( talk) 01:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I agree. I started a discussion on the article's Talk page, but at this point the article has been stripped down and the relevant recent updates are missing. I will copy this post to the discussion page for the article. Yes, in my haste, I forgot to sign my post (above). KIRTIS ( talk) 02:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I just reviewed the article again. I see that the section on "Current Status" was moved to the bottom. In my haste I had thought it had been removed. I should not have said it was "stripped down." I now realize that is not the case. My apologies. I will try to act more mindfully and read more thoroughtly before adding comments on Talk/Discussion pages. Thanks again. KIRTIS ( talk) 02:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding the image of RAF Boulmer; you've tagged it for speedy deletion - not questioning the right to do it, I'm just wondering why? There's no mention of why it needs deleting in the edit summary or on the talk page ( where I would've expected a rundown of the reasons behind the delete status). Happy for this to go ahead (I'm not invested or anything) it would just be a courtesy to know why. Regards. Hope the day is going well in the Far East. The joy of all things ( talk) 05:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
It appears the photo of buildings, etc. are permitted exemptions to UK freedom of paranoia rules, so it seems as if a freely licensed equivalent of this image could be created to serve the same encyclopedic purpose as this non-free; simply not being able to locate such an image is not really sufficient justification for non-free use. Moreover, NFCC#8 is also not satisfied because the image is being used in a decorative manner within the body of the article, not for identification purposes at the top and nothing written in the article requires the reader to see this particular image to be understood.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Could you teach me how I add National team logos ? I would like to add many National team logos. Please thoroughly teach me. Could you add any Photo, you add it. RKC_Vakwai ( talk) 2:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I see nation logo examples that you allow to add in wiki pages. I see and copy this logo to create India nation football logo.png but you don't allow my creation logo. What's different ?. I am very stuned. If you explain it, you can explain to me and type instruction such as for me to create logo
explanation step |
---|
step 1. click this " Click here to start the Upload Wizard " massage. |
step 2. choose picture file in step 1. |
step 3. type picture name and describe picture in step 2. |
step 4. click this " This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use." massage in step 3. |
step 5. type article with use this logo under " This file will be used in the following article:" in space box. |
step 6. choose this " This is a logo of an organization, company, brand, etc." massage. |
step 7. add picture origin link in space box of " Source: " |
step 8. check space box before " This image will be shown as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question." |
step 9. explain How I use this logo ? under "In view of this, please explain how the use of this file will be minimal." massage |
step 10. click upload button |
You can explain instruction same me, Can't you ? RKC_Vakwai ( talk) 9:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for discussion. Could you teach me how is creation of nation logo instruction ? I would like truely creation step with admin allow because all articles, which you send it to me for reading, don't tell instruction to me. RKC_Vakwai ( talk) 3:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you!!! Jackguitarfan ( talk) 02:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Am I right about this or am I wrong? The university seal should only be used in the university article, not a child entity like the law school? Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 17:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi! You removed the Vasas SC logo (File:Vasac_SC.png) from the articles Vasas SC (women's handball), Vasas SC (men's water polo), Vasas SC (men's basketball) and Vasas SC (fencing) but not from Vasas SC (football). Why? All of those use the same logo because all of these are part of the sport organization Vasas SC. If you think it is against Wiki rules (WP:NFCCP), you should remove from all articles, but if it is appropriate for the football branch, it is appropriate for the basketball, handball, water polo etc. branches too. Vasas SC means all of these and not only the football club which owns the Vasas SC name here on Wiki. BR, vampeare ( talk) 13:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi there MarchJuly- You left me a message concerning the St. Martin's Chamber Choir page that I developed. I'm not completely sure how to proceed with it. I indeed do have a conflict of interest, which I declared. Much of the material is simply "true", i.e., there really isn't anyway to document it.
Concerning Timothy Krueger's bio, he is indeed a living person. The advisement reads:
"This section of a biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful. (August 2016)"
Not sure what additional citations could be provided. I would be pleased to have general suggestions. Or specific for that matter. There is nothing contentious in the material. I have added references for Mr. Krueger's two professional positions other than St. Martin's.
Notability: I might cite the 13 CDs, two of them on the British Toccata Classics label and the newly added host of world premiere performances. There are as many U.S. and regional premieres in addition, not included. St. Martin's 9/11 memorial concert was broadcast live on Colorado Public Radio. This statewide live broadcast was the first by CPR of a choral concert. This was world-wide if one includes Internet streaming.
I agree that some of the CD descriptions were not neutral in tone and I have eliminated some text and even more descriptive adjectives.
So with those explanations and changes, what would you suggest?
Gene McCullough ( talk) 04:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Gene McCullough
Hi Marchjuly. Just wondering, has any progress been made on this issue since I last asked? I know you said you were very busy so I'm assuming there hasn't been much progress. If that's the case then I will start an RfC (even though I don't know how to do it but I will find out because this issue it has gone on for too long and needs to be resolved now). Thanks, Hashim-afc ( talk) 18:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on improving this page! I am staying out of the fight regarding the photo(s) of the demolition. The articles includes photos and they speak for themselves. I'd still like to see my photo on the page (I do think it's useful) but I'm waiting for an administrator to address it. 2601:442:C100:9A90:BDBB:663E:9A0C:A55C ( talk) 01:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I agree. I started a discussion on the article's Talk page, but at this point the article has been stripped down and the relevant recent updates are missing. I will copy this post to the discussion page for the article. Yes, in my haste, I forgot to sign my post (above). KIRTIS ( talk) 02:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I just reviewed the article again. I see that the section on "Current Status" was moved to the bottom. In my haste I had thought it had been removed. I should not have said it was "stripped down." I now realize that is not the case. My apologies. I will try to act more mindfully and read more thoroughtly before adding comments on Talk/Discussion pages. Thanks again. KIRTIS ( talk) 02:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding the image of RAF Boulmer; you've tagged it for speedy deletion - not questioning the right to do it, I'm just wondering why? There's no mention of why it needs deleting in the edit summary or on the talk page ( where I would've expected a rundown of the reasons behind the delete status). Happy for this to go ahead (I'm not invested or anything) it would just be a courtesy to know why. Regards. Hope the day is going well in the Far East. The joy of all things ( talk) 05:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
It appears the photo of buildings, etc. are permitted exemptions to UK freedom of paranoia rules, so it seems as if a freely licensed equivalent of this image could be created to serve the same encyclopedic purpose as this non-free; simply not being able to locate such an image is not really sufficient justification for non-free use. Moreover, NFCC#8 is also not satisfied because the image is being used in a decorative manner within the body of the article, not for identification purposes at the top and nothing written in the article requires the reader to see this particular image to be understood.