![]() |
The result was redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers. ✗ plicit 00:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers as it fails WP:GNG. I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage of the subject to warrant a standalone article. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Without any support for deletion, redirect cannot be chosen as an ATD. Discussion about merger or redirect can continue on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 13:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Same listing exists at Preeti. Jax 0677 ( talk) 23:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; no sources; notable only on local level. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
22:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage per WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 22:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers#Aimee Aikenhead. ✗ plicit 00:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers as I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Coverage of places such as Jersey is sparse so sources are often hard to come by.is precisely what makes a topic non-notable: if IRS sources are not interested enough to give the subject significant coverage, then why should Wikipedia? JoelleJay ( talk) 22:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A merge can be an alternative to deletion, but an AfD cannot pick it as an alternative to keeping the article. Without a single !vote to delete, including the nom, no action can be taken here. Proposed mergers should take place on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 12:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge Fails to meet WP:GNG. Should be included in /info/en/?search=Castletown,_Isle_of_Man#Places_of_interest Wikilover3509 ( talk) 09:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No new comments since last relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Arguments divided between Merge and Keep, no support for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The article does not meet the notability guidelines of WP:POLITICIAN TheNuggeteer ( talk) 13:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Phyllis Schlafly#Viewpoints. Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Majority of article comes from WP:PRIMARY sources. Relevant info can be merged into Phyllis_Schlafly#Viewpoints but there isn't enough to justify its own article. मल्ल ( talk) 14:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to New Democracy (Greece) as an ATD where it can be improved and, if needed, spun back out once independent notability has been established Star Mississippi 16:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge to New Democracy (Greece). On its own it fails WP:NORG, as the student wing of New Democracy it adds value to that article. Disputed draftification 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
16:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Menai Bridge. Star Mississippi 16:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Not enough significant coverage - I could only find this article; everything else is trivial mentions when discussing Menai Bridge. While its location is sourced, that doesn't make it notable, and the rest of the information in the article is unsourced and I can't find it anywhere else, so is probably original research. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 18:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet and two different Merge target articles suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 ( talk) 22:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discarding canvassed votes and views not based on P&G, there is rough consensus to delete. Owen× ☎ 13:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Sources are trivial (included in a list of other youtubers) and non-independent. One significant coverage is about his investigation by the police. No other significant independent secondary source covering his popularity as a content creator. - AlbeitPK ( talk) 01:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given previous AFDs, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Have any sources mentioned in previous discussions been examined?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD. There's close to a consensus to delete here, but not something I'm comfortable closing as myself given the promises I made to stay out of using my admin tools for tricky content issues.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
20:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Strong arguments on both sides. But after more than five weeks, consensus failed to materialize. Owen× ☎ 13:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 00:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
20:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Looking at the criteria listed at WP:NPRODUCER (and performing WP:BEFORE pre-requisite searches) I think this individual's article fails to meet the criteria. I suggest deletion at this time. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of islands of Estonia. (non-admin closure) '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Struggling to find 3 sources not some WMF project or copying off it, not 1 source of in-depth coverage at all. Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 19:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of islands of Estonia. Actually many one-sentence articles in Category:Islands of Estonia should be redirected to the aforementioned list-- Estopedist1 ( talk) 14:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of islands of Estonia. But, I do not agree that AWB should be used as a blanket as suggested by Reywas92, as some of the "non-notable one-liners in the category" of articles are actually notable and can be enlarged with sources. ExRat ( talk) 07:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Those arguing to keep the article have pointed out a number of reliable sources, while those arguing to delete have pointed out that many of these sources are passing mentions. It does not seem that we are coming to a clear consensus. Malinaccier ( talk) 13:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
13:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
17:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The BLP clearly falls short of meeting the GNG as well NJOURNALIST - It was previously nominated for deletion back in 2017, but it survived due to insufficient participation. The only participant who voted to keep it was a sock account who provided no strong sourcing based on GNG. The sockpuppet also claimed that the subject had received one award. However, per WP:NBIO, receiving a single award does not automatically guarantee that a subject should get a WP BLP. Saqib ( talk) 11:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
17:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 18:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kautilya3 ( talk) 17:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kautilya3 ( talk) 17:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Previous draftified by Wikishovel and I — returned to mainspace without any improvements that show notability. Essentially a WP:MILL business person. No SNGs apply here and there is no independent, significant coverage in reliable sources. A Google search only returns his Linkedin and a Google News search returns nothing at all. I've manged to find one 2008 NYT article (referenced in the article) which trivially mentions his name once in a quote/interview and that's it. C F A 💬 17:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. This was virtually certainly heading for deletion anyway, but there's no point wasting further editor time on it, because in addition to the other reasons for deletion, it qualifies for speedy deletion criterion G5, as the article was created by Abdiaziizho while evading multiple blocks. JBW ( talk) 18:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't meet the notability criteria for an article. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Som Production (SP). Ae245 ( talk) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. I unfortunately don't believe that this is likely to result in deletion at this point. This withdrawal doesn't foreclose future nominations, nor does this mean that I agree with any rationale presented here. (non-admin closure) HyperAccelerated ( talk) 17:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This was dePRODed in 2010 for being a "possibly valid combination article" -- however, this article consists of original research (in particular, it features a user's feature testing), and cleaning that up would amount to blanking the page. I'm not sure if this topic is notable, but even if it is, we'd need to WP: STARTOVER here. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 16:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ilya Sutskever. Star Mississippi 13:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotional B.S.; no evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization.Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 18:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Wiki contributor xyz ( talk) 19:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)— Wiki_contributor_xyz ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
References
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
With only primary sources listed, the article of this men's footballer clearly fails WP:GNG. My Google searches are limited to database, match reports, and brief mentions in squad list. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. No one is arguing for retention, nor is there indication further input is forthcoming. Star Mississippi 13:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Charitable foundation that doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG. Created 10 years ago by an account that did nothing else on Wikipedia, no content edits or inbound links have been made since. The references are two old, deleted newspaper articles simply repeating the foundation's press release. It really doesn't seem like the sort of coverage we'd need to write a decent article on this subject. Searching for other sources I just get social media hits suggesting this foundation might not have been active past 2015. Here2rewrite ( talk) 13:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 11:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP. There is not enough coverage for this person in the article. Attempted to search for sources but did not come across any relevant. Normanhunter2 ( talk) 13:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 13:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
There's not much significant coverage of Fleur Revell published in multiple secondary and reliable sources. None of the conditions outlined in the notability guideline for creative professionals apply in her case. There are many articles that mention her in the context of her affair but it isn't significant coverage. She has supposedly won 3 Qantas awards yet there is no evidence of that online and the claim is unreferenced. There might be proof in print and not online since she probably received them in the 90's. If that cannot be proved, there is not much to base her notability on. Certainly not the affair. Ynsfial ( talk) 08:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced rhythmic gymnast. I could not find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 08:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:SINGER. Most references from same minor blog, some other interview on Google but all promotional. Orange sticker ( talk) 08:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. Article previously soft-deleted, however no evidence of improvement. I share the concerns of the previous AfD as well, which stated "Article fails both WP:RELIABILITY and WP:VERIFY." Mdann52 ( talk) 07:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Unable to locate independent reliable sources which discuss the subject in detail. C 679 07:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. WP:FAILN - organizations local to a city, town or country maybe added to respective article - /info/en/?search=London#Leisure_and_entertainment Wikilover3509 ( talk) 7:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This article was created [25] as a copy of a 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica article and the Who Wrote That? tool shows that 89.1% of the current text is the same as 1911. What initially struck me as odd was the article's complete and total focus on Europe. The 1911 encyclopedia's explanation for why it was "sufficient to confine the present inquiry ... to nations of Aryan race" was "principally because the Aryan race in its history has gone through all sorts of experiences" (it also said that it "might also be reasonably urged" that the Aryan race was most important, yikes). The section explaining the Aryan focus was removed from the article in 2008, [26] and since then the total focus on Europe has been unexplained. So there are the content issues, and now here is why I think the best path forward is deletion. I thought about merging Village communities into Village but I do not consider any of the info in Village communities to be worthy of inclusion. I'm disconcerted by phrases like "we hear that" and "a good clue to the subject is provided by a Serb proverb" that suggest a tenuous relationship to verifiable fact. The 1911 Britannica might be a reliable source in articles like University court or Castle-guard, which deal with old European history, but I don't think it's a reliable source here. Plus even if I were to improve it, the content would overlap with the village article. Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk) 23:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
B E C K Y S A Y L E S
07:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Melissa (novel)#Reception. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:EVENT. Local incident that had no lasting or widespread impact. The competition involved in this controversy ( Oregon Battle of the Books) also appears to be non-notable. However, the incident is worthy of a short mention at Melissa (novel), so relevant information should be merged there. Astaire ( talk) 04:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
'Soft' deleted back in May, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Fishback.
No new developments as far as I can tell, still likely to fail WP:NBIO KH-1 ( talk) 05:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced list; suggested by User:NLeeuw. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marion County Public Schools. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NWEB; written like an advertisement Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Regional Media-Virden Broadcasting. Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP as there is a lack of independent significant coverage. Let'srun ( talk) 01:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Green Day discography#Extended plays. I don't see a real consensus here but I doubt that a final relisting will change the course of this discussion so I'm picking the clearest option mentioned. Liz Read! Talk! 01:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. Appears to have not charted or been covered by reliable sources - May be some Japanese coverage, but difficult to locate. Mdann52 ( talk) 06:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Commentary in relation to
WP:NALBUM number two and the new information that this EP charted in Japan?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
01:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Draftify as I am unable to find enough coverage of this rhythmic gymnast to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. Non-notable organization. SL93 ( talk) 02:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The article was marked in 2013 as requiring better citation, and has not progressed with citations nor with clear information about activity in the field. Nothing exists in native language wiki for the person and would appear to have been deleted on multiple occasions. One should seriously question the notability in a case like this. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage, and the two references are trivial mentions. SL93 ( talk) 01:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
01:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 01:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the 1998 Asian Games – Men's team squads#North Korea. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
A search of sources including historical newspapers has not uncovered anything that might assist this subject to meet WP:GNG. Assertions of historical significance that might contribute to WP:NBUILDING are sourced to a student newspaper, which per WP:RSSM cannot contribute to notability. Triptothecottage ( talk) 00:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers. ✗ plicit 00:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers as it fails WP:GNG. I am unable to find enough in-depth coverage of the subject to warrant a standalone article. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Without any support for deletion, redirect cannot be chosen as an ATD. Discussion about merger or redirect can continue on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 13:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Same listing exists at Preeti. Jax 0677 ( talk) 23:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; no sources; notable only on local level. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 22:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
22:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage per WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 22:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers#Aimee Aikenhead. ✗ plicit 00:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Jersey women Twenty20 International cricketers as I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Coverage of places such as Jersey is sparse so sources are often hard to come by.is precisely what makes a topic non-notable: if IRS sources are not interested enough to give the subject significant coverage, then why should Wikipedia? JoelleJay ( talk) 22:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A merge can be an alternative to deletion, but an AfD cannot pick it as an alternative to keeping the article. Without a single !vote to delete, including the nom, no action can be taken here. Proposed mergers should take place on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 12:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge Fails to meet WP:GNG. Should be included in /info/en/?search=Castletown,_Isle_of_Man#Places_of_interest Wikilover3509 ( talk) 09:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No new comments since last relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Arguments divided between Merge and Keep, no support for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The article does not meet the notability guidelines of WP:POLITICIAN TheNuggeteer ( talk) 13:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Phyllis Schlafly#Viewpoints. Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Majority of article comes from WP:PRIMARY sources. Relevant info can be merged into Phyllis_Schlafly#Viewpoints but there isn't enough to justify its own article. मल्ल ( talk) 14:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to New Democracy (Greece) as an ATD where it can be improved and, if needed, spun back out once independent notability has been established Star Mississippi 16:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Merge to New Democracy (Greece). On its own it fails WP:NORG, as the student wing of New Democracy it adds value to that article. Disputed draftification 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:25, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
16:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Menai Bridge. Star Mississippi 16:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Not enough significant coverage - I could only find this article; everything else is trivial mentions when discussing Menai Bridge. While its location is sourced, that doesn't make it notable, and the rest of the information in the article is unsourced and I can't find it anywhere else, so is probably original research. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 18:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet and two different Merge target articles suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 ( talk) 22:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discarding canvassed votes and views not based on P&G, there is rough consensus to delete. Owen× ☎ 13:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Sources are trivial (included in a list of other youtubers) and non-independent. One significant coverage is about his investigation by the police. No other significant independent secondary source covering his popularity as a content creator. - AlbeitPK ( talk) 01:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given previous AFDs, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Have any sources mentioned in previous discussions been examined?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD. There's close to a consensus to delete here, but not something I'm comfortable closing as myself given the promises I made to stay out of using my admin tools for tricky content issues.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
20:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Strong arguments on both sides. But after more than five weeks, consensus failed to materialize. Owen× ☎ 13:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 00:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist to rescue lost AfD
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
20:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Looking at the criteria listed at WP:NPRODUCER (and performing WP:BEFORE pre-requisite searches) I think this individual's article fails to meet the criteria. I suggest deletion at this time. -- Classicwiki ( talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of islands of Estonia. (non-admin closure) '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 02:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Struggling to find 3 sources not some WMF project or copying off it, not 1 source of in-depth coverage at all. Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 19:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of islands of Estonia. Actually many one-sentence articles in Category:Islands of Estonia should be redirected to the aforementioned list-- Estopedist1 ( talk) 14:07, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of islands of Estonia. But, I do not agree that AWB should be used as a blanket as suggested by Reywas92, as some of the "non-notable one-liners in the category" of articles are actually notable and can be enlarged with sources. ExRat ( talk) 07:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Those arguing to keep the article have pointed out a number of reliable sources, while those arguing to delete have pointed out that many of these sources are passing mentions. It does not seem that we are coming to a clear consensus. Malinaccier ( talk) 13:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
13:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
17:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The BLP clearly falls short of meeting the GNG as well NJOURNALIST - It was previously nominated for deletion back in 2017, but it survived due to insufficient participation. The only participant who voted to keep it was a sock account who provided no strong sourcing based on GNG. The sockpuppet also claimed that the subject had received one award. However, per WP:NBIO, receiving a single award does not automatically guarantee that a subject should get a WP BLP. Saqib ( talk) 11:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
17:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 18:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kautilya3 ( talk) 17:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kautilya3 ( talk) 17:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Previous draftified by Wikishovel and I — returned to mainspace without any improvements that show notability. Essentially a WP:MILL business person. No SNGs apply here and there is no independent, significant coverage in reliable sources. A Google search only returns his Linkedin and a Google News search returns nothing at all. I've manged to find one 2008 NYT article (referenced in the article) which trivially mentions his name once in a quote/interview and that's it. C F A 💬 17:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. This was virtually certainly heading for deletion anyway, but there's no point wasting further editor time on it, because in addition to the other reasons for deletion, it qualifies for speedy deletion criterion G5, as the article was created by Abdiaziizho while evading multiple blocks. JBW ( talk) 18:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't meet the notability criteria for an article. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Som Production (SP). Ae245 ( talk) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. I unfortunately don't believe that this is likely to result in deletion at this point. This withdrawal doesn't foreclose future nominations, nor does this mean that I agree with any rationale presented here. (non-admin closure) HyperAccelerated ( talk) 17:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This was dePRODed in 2010 for being a "possibly valid combination article" -- however, this article consists of original research (in particular, it features a user's feature testing), and cleaning that up would amount to blanking the page. I'm not sure if this topic is notable, but even if it is, we'd need to WP: STARTOVER here. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 16:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ilya Sutskever. Star Mississippi 13:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotional B.S.; no evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization.Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 18:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Wiki contributor xyz ( talk) 19:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)— Wiki_contributor_xyz ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
References
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
With only primary sources listed, the article of this men's footballer clearly fails WP:GNG. My Google searches are limited to database, match reports, and brief mentions in squad list. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. No one is arguing for retention, nor is there indication further input is forthcoming. Star Mississippi 13:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Charitable foundation that doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG. Created 10 years ago by an account that did nothing else on Wikipedia, no content edits or inbound links have been made since. The references are two old, deleted newspaper articles simply repeating the foundation's press release. It really doesn't seem like the sort of coverage we'd need to write a decent article on this subject. Searching for other sources I just get social media hits suggesting this foundation might not have been active past 2015. Here2rewrite ( talk) 13:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 11:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP. There is not enough coverage for this person in the article. Attempted to search for sources but did not come across any relevant. Normanhunter2 ( talk) 13:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 13:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
There's not much significant coverage of Fleur Revell published in multiple secondary and reliable sources. None of the conditions outlined in the notability guideline for creative professionals apply in her case. There are many articles that mention her in the context of her affair but it isn't significant coverage. She has supposedly won 3 Qantas awards yet there is no evidence of that online and the claim is unreferenced. There might be proof in print and not online since she probably received them in the 90's. If that cannot be proved, there is not much to base her notability on. Certainly not the affair. Ynsfial ( talk) 08:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced rhythmic gymnast. I could not find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 08:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:SINGER. Most references from same minor blog, some other interview on Google but all promotional. Orange sticker ( talk) 08:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG. Article previously soft-deleted, however no evidence of improvement. I share the concerns of the previous AfD as well, which stated "Article fails both WP:RELIABILITY and WP:VERIFY." Mdann52 ( talk) 07:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Unable to locate independent reliable sources which discuss the subject in detail. C 679 07:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. WP:FAILN - organizations local to a city, town or country maybe added to respective article - /info/en/?search=London#Leisure_and_entertainment Wikilover3509 ( talk) 7:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
This article was created [25] as a copy of a 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica article and the Who Wrote That? tool shows that 89.1% of the current text is the same as 1911. What initially struck me as odd was the article's complete and total focus on Europe. The 1911 encyclopedia's explanation for why it was "sufficient to confine the present inquiry ... to nations of Aryan race" was "principally because the Aryan race in its history has gone through all sorts of experiences" (it also said that it "might also be reasonably urged" that the Aryan race was most important, yikes). The section explaining the Aryan focus was removed from the article in 2008, [26] and since then the total focus on Europe has been unexplained. So there are the content issues, and now here is why I think the best path forward is deletion. I thought about merging Village communities into Village but I do not consider any of the info in Village communities to be worthy of inclusion. I'm disconcerted by phrases like "we hear that" and "a good clue to the subject is provided by a Serb proverb" that suggest a tenuous relationship to verifiable fact. The 1911 Britannica might be a reliable source in articles like University court or Castle-guard, which deal with old European history, but I don't think it's a reliable source here. Plus even if I were to improve it, the content would overlap with the village article. Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk) 23:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
B E C K Y S A Y L E S
07:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Melissa (novel)#Reception. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:EVENT. Local incident that had no lasting or widespread impact. The competition involved in this controversy ( Oregon Battle of the Books) also appears to be non-notable. However, the incident is worthy of a short mention at Melissa (novel), so relevant information should be merged there. Astaire ( talk) 04:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
'Soft' deleted back in May, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Fishback.
No new developments as far as I can tell, still likely to fail WP:NBIO KH-1 ( talk) 05:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced list; suggested by User:NLeeuw. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marion County Public Schools. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NWEB; written like an advertisement Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Regional Media-Virden Broadcasting. Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP as there is a lack of independent significant coverage. Let'srun ( talk) 01:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Green Day discography#Extended plays. I don't see a real consensus here but I doubt that a final relisting will change the course of this discussion so I'm picking the clearest option mentioned. Liz Read! Talk! 01:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. Appears to have not charted or been covered by reliable sources - May be some Japanese coverage, but difficult to locate. Mdann52 ( talk) 06:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Commentary in relation to
WP:NALBUM number two and the new information that this EP charted in Japan?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
01:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Draftify as I am unable to find enough coverage of this rhythmic gymnast to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. Non-notable organization. SL93 ( talk) 02:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The article was marked in 2013 as requiring better citation, and has not progressed with citations nor with clear information about activity in the field. Nothing exists in native language wiki for the person and would appear to have been deleted on multiple occasions. One should seriously question the notability in a case like this. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage, and the two references are trivial mentions. SL93 ( talk) 01:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
01:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 01:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the 1998 Asian Games – Men's team squads#North Korea. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
A search of sources including historical newspapers has not uncovered anything that might assist this subject to meet WP:GNG. Assertions of historical significance that might contribute to WP:NBUILDING are sourced to a student newspaper, which per WP:RSSM cannot contribute to notability. Triptothecottage ( talk) 00:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)