![]() |
The result was Draftify which allows for improvement "once these state elections are over" .New draft is at Draft:(November AfD) List of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance candidates in the 2024 Indian general election. October draft is at: Draft:List of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance candidates in the 2024 Indian general election . Protecting mainspace to avoid a 3rd. Star Mississippi 01:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This is going to be a weird one. I have no doubt in my mind that this topic is going to be notable. However, there have been no announcements/new coverage/reports of which candidates are contesting what making it WP:TOOSOON and potentially falling afoul of WP:CRYSTAL to have a article. Having empty tables helps nobody, we should only be having this article once multiple candidates have decided to contest specific seats under the coalitions banner (and there has been significant coverage of the said declarations). Sohom ( talk) 23:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 01:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
A review of all of the sources listed in the article don't establish notability. Instead, they link to one-off mentions of his reviews of other popular work.
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish) 17:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC) Correction: one of the sources address the subject directly, but I question it's reliability. The other one is a collection of information that doesn't even contain the information it is cited to in the article. I have already removed the birthdate as per
WP:BLP.
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish)
17:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
2023-10 ✗ deleted
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
L
Faraone
23:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Nothing much on the page appears to show notability - it was a company acquired by Blackberry more than a decade ago which has re-emerged as a company without a product. It wasn't notable before, it isn't notable now. JMWt ( talk) 10:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – DreamRimmer ( talk) 12:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Failed WP:GNG and WP:SIRS. The article is primarily written based on GitHub's readme description and MinIO's documentation page. -- WikiLinuz ( talk) 16:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep Citations added. Flurrious ( talk) 17:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep It seems notable to me, but perhaps I'm too close to the technical niche MinIO targets. The coverage given to it by TechCrunch, Forbes, Blocks & Files, Diamanti, and The Register (all cited in the article -- maybe Flurrious just added those?) seem like significant coverage in some depth to me. I'm going to nab a copy of the article in case you decide to delete it, but I hope you decide to keep it. TTK ( talk) 22:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Team in the 8th tier of Italian football that isn't notable for any particular reason and fails WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE also doesn't produce anything of note except for the usual websites for statistics and data. Sgubaldo ( talk) 22:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 November 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
</noinclude>
The result was Delete. Ignoring the canvassed, explanation-free votes, consensus is for deletion. Owen× ☎ 20:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails the general and band-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Less meta, more sourcing and notability discussion please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
11:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I can only echo Star Mississippi's comment. Also, Keep even if there is not evidence of notability for this band
is one of the most inexplicable comments I've seen at an AFD. Notability is generally the basis of a Keep argument. It doesn't help that only an editor advocating Delete is discussing the available sources which are typically the territory for those arguing Keep. Finally, closer's don't like to decide Merge/Redirect target articles by flipping a coin. That just increases the possibility of a Deletion review and being accused of casting a "supervote".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Tes, that was my fault to say Merge/Redirect because they often get combined in opinions but there was only some support for a Merge, not Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Severe lack of references to back up the information, and those that exist are all primary. Take away all the unsourced info and you'd be left with an article that doesn't really have a purpose to be its own - the content could really easily just be a part of BitTorrent instead of separate here.
Even if sources are added right now in this article, I still think it's wiser to have this info about torrent files just be a part of BitTorrent. Chifonr ( talk) 14:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep. Poor sourcing is a problem but that is probably fixable. If content is moved to BitTorrent, this should become a redirect not a red link. So keep without prejudice to reworking of content which might leave this a redirect. Eluchil404 ( talk) 21:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: From discussion so far it seems like merge or redirect might be appropriate, but more input would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
22:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep. There are 17 articles currently present in the Template:BitTorrent "technology" subsection, all dealing with technical aspects of the BitTorrent protocol. The nominator hasn't advanced an argument for why this particular article should be merged into the BitTorrent article - which would imply the topic has some sort of general interest above all the other technical aspects of the protocol, which I don't think is true. And if the argument is that all 17 articles should be merged (after significant condensations), that's something I really think should be done only after consulting related WikiProjects. I also don't see a sourcing issue. Technical articles on recent software often rely on primary source documentation. Ceconhistorian ( talk) 01:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Ceconhistorian. Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [ User ] [ Talk ] [ Contributions ] 17:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails the GNG/ WP:BASIC. I performed a WP:BEFORE and did not find any in-depth coverage of Mackenzie in independent reliable sources; no other notability guidelines are met, and no alternatives to deletion are apparent. DePRODder stated "may be notable" but provided no explanation or evidence in support of that conclusion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This 2018 RfC discussion established that standalone lists of airline destinations violate WP:NOTDIRECTORY and should categorically be deleted. Many airline destination lists have already been deleted, and this list should be as well. Carguychris ( talk) 18:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already has been tagged for an AFD discussion so can't be Soft Deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK (withdrawn nomination, no delete !votes). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 00:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Promo campaign BLP. Fails GNG and NBIO. Two sources in article are promo. BEFORE showed no WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. BLPs require strong sourcing. No objection to a redirect to Telerik, sources found in BEFORE with mentions arece about this subject. // Timothy :: talk 22:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This article was clearly written by the company who created the software. The software itself is also most likely malicious, the possibility of which is mentioned nowhere on the page. It's also not significant enough to have a Wikipedia article, which is made apparent by the lack of real references (note: looking back, it also seems to cite a lot of fake reviews that I noticed while checking out the product for myself). This is clearly just a company trying to sell its sketchy PUP to people looking it up on Wikipedia to tell if it's legitimate or not. After looking through the article, it's most likely that the latter is the case. -A Fluffy Kitteh | FluffyKittehz User Profile Page 22:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Prod removed for no reason. Sources 1 and 3 are dead. Source 4 is a blog. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. LibStar ( talk) 19:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Previously speedily deleted by User:Liz as unambiguous promotion and lacking indicia of notability. Restoration was requested at WP:RFU. On the face of the article, I see no reason to disagree with Liz's assessment, but a full discussion will yield a more definitive determination on that point. BD2412 T 01:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since I previously deleted this article, I won't be closing this discussion but I think it's okay to relist it. We need more opinions here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
21:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. I believe the fairly routine coverage fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 20:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Interview, not WP:IS | 1. "Departing British ambassadors reflect on four-year tenure in Costa Rica". The Tico Times. 23 May 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2020. |
from employer, not WP:IS | 2. ^ "Change of Ambassador to the Republic of Ecuador - November 2020". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Named in list, no SIGCOV | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b "El Gobierno Nacional pagó USD 285 millones a proveedores del Estado – Secretaría General de Comunicación de la Presidencia". www.comunicacion.gob.ec. Retrieved 14 October 2020. |
from employer, not WP:IS | 4. ^ "Change of Her Majesty's Ambassador to the Dominican Republic". WiredGov. 21 April 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2020. |
from employer, not WP:IS | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b "Chris Campbell - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 6. ^ Jump up to:a b c Adewunmi, Bim (3 July 2011). "A very diplomatic marriage". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Government notice about his spouse, name drop for subject, not SIGCOV | 7. ^ "Appointment: Ambassador to Costa Rica and Non Resident Ambassador to Nicaragua". The Times. 25 June 2011. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 8. ^ Dolores Vicioso (4 February 2020). "Ambassador Chris Campbell says Brexit opens opportunities for UK and DR". DR1.com. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 9. ^ "Interview with Chris Campbell, HM Ambassador to Ecuador". LatAm Investor. 7 January 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 10. ^ "Special report: Ecuador is back on the map" (PDF). British Ecuadorian Society. LatAm Investor. pp. 32–33. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Namedrop, no SIGCOV | 11. ^ "UK Foreign Office Eases Travel Warnings for Ecuador". Northern Ireland Travel News. 11 July 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Namedrop, no SIGCOV | 12. ^ Chris Moss (22 September 2021). "It is beginning to feel like we may never visit Latin America again". The Telegraph. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Namedrop, no SIGCOV | 13. ^ "Live updates: Charles back in London as king; queen mourned". The San Diego Union-Tribune. 9 September 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
21:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There has been minimal participation, but the most convincing arguments are for retention and clean up of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Non-notable roles including an "electrician" in a web series. Other references are just credits, mentions, or fail WP:NEWSORGINDIA. CNMall41 ( talk) 20:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More participation would be welcome here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
"…a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source."( Notability#Notes, footnote 4)
बिनोद थारू ( talk) 00:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Non notable group fails WP:NMUSIC. Lightoil ( talk) 23:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis would be helpful. Can't close this as a Soft Deletion due to the unstated Keep response.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
I've already culled a significant amount of unsourced content from here ( before my removal), but this just seems to be an idea promoted by a MLM ( Primerica) with little to no actual coverage outside of crappy websites online. Seems to have been similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buy term and invest the difference. – Isochrone ( T) 21:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
PROD by User:TartarTorte Upon WP:BEFORE, I could not find anything that would put this athlete over WP:GNG. Endorsed by me. This was then removed by the original creator, who added some sources. I am not satisfied that any of the new sources meet the requirements of GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC, both of which require significant coverage from sources that are independent of the subject. A source analysis will follow and this will analyse the 6 sources used in the article as well as the best 3 found in my own BEFORE search. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://torpedo.ru/news/45288/ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't comment as this is 403 Forbidden | ✘ No |
https://int.soccerway.com/matches/2020/08/09/russia/2-division/fc-tver/fk-zenit-radian-irkutsk/3322840/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://torpedo.ru/news/45288/ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't comment as this is 403 Forbidden | ✘ No |
https://1fnl.ru/champioship/results/896/921/924/6009/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://torpedo.ru/news/45207/ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't comment as this is 403 Forbidden | ✘ No |
https://int.soccerway.com/players/daniil-erofeev/662652/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://ufa.aif.ru/sport/details/vospitannik_dinamo_daniil_erofeev_stal_igrokom_fk_ufa | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://ufaved.info/articles/sport/daniil_erofeev_pokinul_ryady_fk_ufa/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://sport24.ru/news/football/2023-01-24-ufa-zabila-12-myachey-turetskomu-klubu-v-zaklyuchitelnom-matche-na-pervom-sbore | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
BeanieFan11 (
talk)
20:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Maliner ( talk) 19:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced since it was created 18 years ago. On its face it looks like a textbook case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and I can't find anything which talks about this at all. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 19:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 19:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability for kickboxer (as ISKA isn't a major belt) or GNG. Nswix ( talk) 19:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
News story in violation of WP:NOTNEWS. Only a brief burst of coverage without any sustained secondary coverage, failing WP:N. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability for kickboxer (as ISKA isn't a major belt) or GNG Nswix ( talk) 19:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be notable. Only claim to fame appears to be having once been featured in a tv episode. PepperBeast (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Lack of coverage. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has appeared for the Lithuania women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This list is almost infinitely expandable. The definition of "outdoor proponents" and "outdoor educators" is very vaguely defined and not a good subject for a list, especially when arbitrarily limited to a specific century. SilverStar54 ( talk) 16:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Recreation of salted TaDarius Thomas (wrestler) (deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TaDarius Thomas (wrestler) as non-notable) by sock of blocked editor. I would tag this as WP:G5 if not for the edits by other users. (Are those edits "substantial"?) And I can't see the deleted article to say whether this is WP:G4. SilverLocust 💬 15:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Created too early based on WP:RECENTISM before the event has attained a lasting historical significance to justify an article, WP:LASTING. Additionally, it violates WP:NOTNEWS as Wikipedia is not intended to function as a newspaper for breaking news. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 15:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
All breaking news stories, without exception, are primary sources, and must be treated with caution. This is in line with how historiography treats new information coming from news reports. Secondary sources are those that synthesise primary sources. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 21:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Accidental duplication of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jong-su Kim (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
fails notability, unreliable source
microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 15:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Accidental duplication of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jong-su Kim (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
fails notability, unreliable source microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 15:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability, unreliable source microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 15:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Advertorialized
WP:BLP of a spiritualist and writer, not
properly sourced as passing Wikipedia inclusion criteria. This is based almost entirely on
primary source content
self-published by people or organizations directly affiliated with the claims (her own website about herself, her book sourced to its own publisher, events sourced to the self-published websites of their own organizers, etc.) with very little evidence of
reliable source coverage about her in real
WP:GNG-worthy media.
As always, people are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia just because it's possible to verify that they exist -- the significance of their work has to be externally validated by GNG-worthy third-party coverage about them. And furthermore, the advertorialism here has been flagged since 2012 without being noticeably toned down in the entire decade since then.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on her sourcing — but this, as written, is such a poorly sourced (self?)-promotional mess that even if legitimate GNG-worthy sourcing can be found to salvage it with, it would still need to be
blown up and restarted from scratch regardless.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable illustrator. No independent sigcov to establish notability. Jdcooper ( talk) 13:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Tails Wx 13:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Woman with a web site. Non-notable entrepreneur. PepperBeast (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 14:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Mayor of Sandy, Utah, a city with a population of about 96,000 people. Their claim to notability appears to be that they are the city's first female mayor. However, I don't think in of itself is enough to pass WP:GNG and is not enough to pass WP:NPOL. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG with a lack of significant coverage. A search on Google newspaper archive found several mentions in the Evening Times but nothing approaching sigcov. A search on www-newspapers-com. found more mentions but it was just routine coverage such as transfers/injuries/match reports. Dougal18 ( talk) 12:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
A street which is verifiable, and mentioned as the location of other things, but which hasn't received significant attention (the street names articles are very passing mentions). Notability is not inherited, a street doesn't get notable because some building on it gets some attention, or an activity happens in a building on the street. Fram ( talk) 09:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Maliner ( talk) 19:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
No refs on the page. Nothing to show that this radio programme (no longer running) was particularly notable JMWt ( talk) 09:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
We should not split articles by ethnicity. This is a non-neutral POV fork of tulku intended as an attack page against Western tulkus. Tulkus are tulkus. The entire system is criticized, and there are non-western examples of misidentification. Skyerise ( talk) 11:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
include positive material about Western tulkus along with listing Western tulkus who have NOT been criticized, as they told me to do on my talk page.
-- MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!( talk or whatever) 05:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
integral part of the tulku system.They're a marginal part of it and there are only a handful of Western tulku while there are literally hundreds of Tibetan tulku. Western tulku, on the other hand, have generated a disproportionate amount of (English-language) literature regarding the globalization of Tibet Buddhism, which threatens to overtake the original tulku article as the Western tulku article is now over half the length of the older one...although it's now hard to gage since someone has been copying prose and references. That is why I created a separate article instead of adding to the older one.
splitting the articleand how this has something to do with "criticizing Western tulku", as if I've forked an article out to dunk on them -- which I haven't -- everything is entirely original and reflects the sources I have on hand. I'm sorry the sources offend you but that's what they say. A significant amount of the literature published is critical and I've done my best to attribute those opinions to their respective authors. If you don't like that, go publish your own research responding to them. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!( talk or whatever) 16:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
A self-described
master-comment. If you want to discuss conduct, take it to the
WP:AN thread. This is not the place.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
10:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
|
---|
References
|
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people). Can't find info on this person and only found on the doctor [10] of the same name. I smell COI in this article. Best to redirect their husband? Manoj Bhatnagar [11] DareshMohan ( talk) 07:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
. Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to
Bright (American band). Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to
Bright (American band). Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to
Bright (American band). Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
No independent refs on the page for many years, very little other than passing news refs to show notability. If there was anything to merge, it could go to FEMA Urban Search and Rescue Task Force as am AtD JMWt ( talk) 12:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to SCSI Enclosure Services. Star Mississippi 02:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
I searched but I could not find enough good sources to show this is notable Chidgk1 ( talk) 06:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Merge into SCSI Enclosure Services per above. Mooonswimmer 23:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
-- KorTed ( talk) 02:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or go to WP:REFUND. I agree that this is TOOSOON and if it was Kept, the article would just be renominated for another appearance at AFD until we get closer to 2025. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
We have just had the 2023 local government elections. There have been no reforms to local government since then which might merit mentioning in this article. It is far too early for people to announce their candidacies. In short, this article was created too soon. Steelkamp ( talk) 03:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
the event is notable and almost certain to take place, with notability passing via WP:RS with WP:DEPTH. Since election reform is already a key issue, either yea or nay results will end up touching WP:LASTING under
effects on... society and legislation. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 14:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any support for moving this to Draft or User space until the elections get closer?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 03:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus seems clear after relisting. I do not see any reason to protect the title at this time, but please ping me on my talk page if it is deemed necessary. Kinu t/ c 19:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR. Only roles so far have been one episode of an animated series, and three uncredited roles, and it's not clear yet how big the roles are for the two upcoming films. I can find no evidence that he won a BET award. Google search for "Ricky Guillart" results in one screen worth of hits, mainly social media and film directories, but no significant discussion of the individual. May be a case of WP:TOOSOON. ... discospinster talk 02:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looking over the article, I'd like to suggest draftification if that is okay with the nominator. Otherwise I see this as a Soft Delete and I imagine this article will be restored and back into main space soon enough.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn
Thanks for the sourcing, Since we have access to offline resources and results, as your notoriety was established, I withdraw this nomination and close this debate. --
This notification is canceled because the nomination debate for deletion was closed and its result was to cancel the nomination, it can be verified in the debate article, thank you
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable former beauty pageant winner with a lack of sustained coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 01:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing has been found to be insufficient Star Mississippi 03:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Sources are all unviewable, but his accomplishments appear to be minor, with the possible exception of his memoirs. However, while the memoirs are in the Library of Congress, I don't see any notice of them. Clarityfiend ( talk) 02:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least 10 caps for the Malawi women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The most I was able to find was this transfer piece, which is already in the article. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable British screenwriter. Could not find SIGCOV on him. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least four caps for the Uganda women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The most I found was 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 00:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war. This kind of discussion leads to a no-win type of closure but I think a Merge will address both those who believe this article should be Deleted (as this page will become a Redirect after Merger) and preserve some of the content for those who argue that it should be Kept. I will say that I briefly considered closing this as a procedural Keep as there wasn't a strong, policy-based deletion rationale but given the depth and breadth of the discussion that has evolved, I think that decision would have been disruptive. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not a lastingly significant event in this conflict, he doesn't appear to be that senior of a member of the organisation, and it's not even clear that it's actually an assassination (Hamas are blatant liars, and anything they say should be taken with a massive grain of salt). I would prefer a redirect to Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war where this is already listed. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Why is “assassination” not a neutral title? Two RS sources, Al Jazeera and Reuters used it( Reuters article)}}". Nothing else. The response you responded to that started with and I quote, "
Jesus fucking christ"...You aren't going after a notability reason, but rather a POV reason. That is the whole issue. Noting, I am WP:COALing out, given other editors are commenting and I think it is clear a lack of good faith is occurring. Have a good day y'all! Cheers! The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 01:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as any closure with this makeup of comments is due to be contested. I see substantial arguments to Delete, Merge or Draftify this article. Sorry to prolong this divisive discussion but any closing decision would be seen as inserting my own opinion. Also noting that during this AFD, this article has been moved to be titled
Omar Daraghmeh.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
This certainly seems like SIGCOV, unless someone has an argument that this is not a WP:RS | 1. Laxmi, Bijay (9 October 2023). "Prominent Hamas Leader, Omar Daraghmeh, Arrested by Israeli Forces". BNN. Retrieved 23 October 2023. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its simply reporting a statement with one sentence | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b Mughrabi, Nidal Al; Abd-Alaziz, Moaz; Adler, Leslie; McCool, Grant (23 October 2023). "Hamas accuses Israel of assassinating senior member in prison". Reuters. Archived from the original on 23 October 2023. Retrieved 23 October 2023. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its simply reporting a statement with basic background | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Hamas accuses Israel of assassinating its senior member". Al Arabiya. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its simply reporting a statement in two sentences | 4. ^ Jump up to:a b "Hamas accuses Israel of assassinating senior member in prison". Jerusalem Post. |
Fails WP:IS WP:RS | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Hamas: Leader in West Bank Daraghmeh 'Tortured to Death' in Israeli Prison". Palestinan Chronicle. |
A one sentence bullet point. Not SIGCOV | 6. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i "'Operation Al-Aqsa Flood' Day 18: Palestinian prisoner dies in Israeli custody; 32 health centers in Gaza forced out of service". Mondoweiss. |
This seems like weak SIGCOV, unless someone has an argument that this is not a WP:RS | 7. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Palestinian prisoners dies in Israel's jails 2 weeks into his detention". Middle East Monitor. |
This seems like weak SIGCOV, unless someone has an argument that this is not a WP:RS | 8. ^ "Palestinian group accuses Israel of killing senior Hamas leader in prison". Anadolu Agency. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its two sentences | 9. ^ "Palestinians protest in West Bank after Hamas official dies in Israeli custody". Time of Israel. |
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or go to WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON. This article is based off of early highly-speculative articles for an election that is entirely WP:Crystal Ball at this moment. It is also written with the presumption that the next leadership election will be to succeed Sunak. Likely, but that would be entirely presumptuous and WP:Crystal Ball given it is not an impossibility that the party’s next leadership election sees Sunak seek to remain leader while facing a challenger, as Thatcher did in both 1989 and 1990 (and Labour’s Kinnock did in 1988). Should be either deleted or draftified. SecretName101 ( talk) 00:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Draftify which allows for improvement "once these state elections are over" .New draft is at Draft:(November AfD) List of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance candidates in the 2024 Indian general election. October draft is at: Draft:List of Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance candidates in the 2024 Indian general election . Protecting mainspace to avoid a 3rd. Star Mississippi 01:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This is going to be a weird one. I have no doubt in my mind that this topic is going to be notable. However, there have been no announcements/new coverage/reports of which candidates are contesting what making it WP:TOOSOON and potentially falling afoul of WP:CRYSTAL to have a article. Having empty tables helps nobody, we should only be having this article once multiple candidates have decided to contest specific seats under the coalitions banner (and there has been significant coverage of the said declarations). Sohom ( talk) 23:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 01:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
A review of all of the sources listed in the article don't establish notability. Instead, they link to one-off mentions of his reviews of other popular work.
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish) 17:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC) Correction: one of the sources address the subject directly, but I question it's reliability. The other one is a collection of information that doesn't even contain the information it is cited to in the article. I have already removed the birthdate as per
WP:BLP.
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish)
17:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
2023-10 ✗ deleted
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
L
Faraone
23:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Nothing much on the page appears to show notability - it was a company acquired by Blackberry more than a decade ago which has re-emerged as a company without a product. It wasn't notable before, it isn't notable now. JMWt ( talk) 10:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – DreamRimmer ( talk) 12:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Failed WP:GNG and WP:SIRS. The article is primarily written based on GitHub's readme description and MinIO's documentation page. -- WikiLinuz ( talk) 16:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep Citations added. Flurrious ( talk) 17:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep It seems notable to me, but perhaps I'm too close to the technical niche MinIO targets. The coverage given to it by TechCrunch, Forbes, Blocks & Files, Diamanti, and The Register (all cited in the article -- maybe Flurrious just added those?) seem like significant coverage in some depth to me. I'm going to nab a copy of the article in case you decide to delete it, but I hope you decide to keep it. TTK ( talk) 22:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Team in the 8th tier of Italian football that isn't notable for any particular reason and fails WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE also doesn't produce anything of note except for the usual websites for statistics and data. Sgubaldo ( talk) 22:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 November 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
</noinclude>
The result was Delete. Ignoring the canvassed, explanation-free votes, consensus is for deletion. Owen× ☎ 20:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails the general and band-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Less meta, more sourcing and notability discussion please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
11:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I can only echo Star Mississippi's comment. Also, Keep even if there is not evidence of notability for this band
is one of the most inexplicable comments I've seen at an AFD. Notability is generally the basis of a Keep argument. It doesn't help that only an editor advocating Delete is discussing the available sources which are typically the territory for those arguing Keep. Finally, closer's don't like to decide Merge/Redirect target articles by flipping a coin. That just increases the possibility of a Deletion review and being accused of casting a "supervote".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Tes, that was my fault to say Merge/Redirect because they often get combined in opinions but there was only some support for a Merge, not Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Severe lack of references to back up the information, and those that exist are all primary. Take away all the unsourced info and you'd be left with an article that doesn't really have a purpose to be its own - the content could really easily just be a part of BitTorrent instead of separate here.
Even if sources are added right now in this article, I still think it's wiser to have this info about torrent files just be a part of BitTorrent. Chifonr ( talk) 14:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep. Poor sourcing is a problem but that is probably fixable. If content is moved to BitTorrent, this should become a redirect not a red link. So keep without prejudice to reworking of content which might leave this a redirect. Eluchil404 ( talk) 21:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: From discussion so far it seems like merge or redirect might be appropriate, but more input would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
22:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep. There are 17 articles currently present in the Template:BitTorrent "technology" subsection, all dealing with technical aspects of the BitTorrent protocol. The nominator hasn't advanced an argument for why this particular article should be merged into the BitTorrent article - which would imply the topic has some sort of general interest above all the other technical aspects of the protocol, which I don't think is true. And if the argument is that all 17 articles should be merged (after significant condensations), that's something I really think should be done only after consulting related WikiProjects. I also don't see a sourcing issue. Technical articles on recent software often rely on primary source documentation. Ceconhistorian ( talk) 01:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Ceconhistorian. Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [ User ] [ Talk ] [ Contributions ] 17:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails the GNG/ WP:BASIC. I performed a WP:BEFORE and did not find any in-depth coverage of Mackenzie in independent reliable sources; no other notability guidelines are met, and no alternatives to deletion are apparent. DePRODder stated "may be notable" but provided no explanation or evidence in support of that conclusion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
This 2018 RfC discussion established that standalone lists of airline destinations violate WP:NOTDIRECTORY and should categorically be deleted. Many airline destination lists have already been deleted, and this list should be as well. Carguychris ( talk) 18:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already has been tagged for an AFD discussion so can't be Soft Deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK (withdrawn nomination, no delete !votes). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 00:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Promo campaign BLP. Fails GNG and NBIO. Two sources in article are promo. BEFORE showed no WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. BLPs require strong sourcing. No objection to a redirect to Telerik, sources found in BEFORE with mentions arece about this subject. // Timothy :: talk 22:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This article was clearly written by the company who created the software. The software itself is also most likely malicious, the possibility of which is mentioned nowhere on the page. It's also not significant enough to have a Wikipedia article, which is made apparent by the lack of real references (note: looking back, it also seems to cite a lot of fake reviews that I noticed while checking out the product for myself). This is clearly just a company trying to sell its sketchy PUP to people looking it up on Wikipedia to tell if it's legitimate or not. After looking through the article, it's most likely that the latter is the case. -A Fluffy Kitteh | FluffyKittehz User Profile Page 22:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Prod removed for no reason. Sources 1 and 3 are dead. Source 4 is a blog. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. LibStar ( talk) 19:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Previously speedily deleted by User:Liz as unambiguous promotion and lacking indicia of notability. Restoration was requested at WP:RFU. On the face of the article, I see no reason to disagree with Liz's assessment, but a full discussion will yield a more definitive determination on that point. BD2412 T 01:47, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since I previously deleted this article, I won't be closing this discussion but I think it's okay to relist it. We need more opinions here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
21:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. I believe the fairly routine coverage fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 20:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Interview, not WP:IS | 1. "Departing British ambassadors reflect on four-year tenure in Costa Rica". The Tico Times. 23 May 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2020. |
from employer, not WP:IS | 2. ^ "Change of Ambassador to the Republic of Ecuador - November 2020". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Named in list, no SIGCOV | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b "El Gobierno Nacional pagó USD 285 millones a proveedores del Estado – Secretaría General de Comunicación de la Presidencia". www.comunicacion.gob.ec. Retrieved 14 October 2020. |
from employer, not WP:IS | 4. ^ "Change of Her Majesty's Ambassador to the Dominican Republic". WiredGov. 21 April 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2020. |
from employer, not WP:IS | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b "Chris Campbell - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 6. ^ Jump up to:a b c Adewunmi, Bim (3 July 2011). "A very diplomatic marriage". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Government notice about his spouse, name drop for subject, not SIGCOV | 7. ^ "Appointment: Ambassador to Costa Rica and Non Resident Ambassador to Nicaragua". The Times. 25 June 2011. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 2 January 2020. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 8. ^ Dolores Vicioso (4 February 2020). "Ambassador Chris Campbell says Brexit opens opportunities for UK and DR". DR1.com. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 9. ^ "Interview with Chris Campbell, HM Ambassador to Ecuador". LatAm Investor. 7 January 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Interview, not WP:IS | 10. ^ "Special report: Ecuador is back on the map" (PDF). British Ecuadorian Society. LatAm Investor. pp. 32–33. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Namedrop, no SIGCOV | 11. ^ "UK Foreign Office Eases Travel Warnings for Ecuador". Northern Ireland Travel News. 11 July 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Namedrop, no SIGCOV | 12. ^ Chris Moss (22 September 2021). "It is beginning to feel like we may never visit Latin America again". The Telegraph. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Namedrop, no SIGCOV | 13. ^ "Live updates: Charles back in London as king; queen mourned". The San Diego Union-Tribune. 9 September 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2023. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
21:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There has been minimal participation, but the most convincing arguments are for retention and clean up of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Non-notable roles including an "electrician" in a web series. Other references are just credits, mentions, or fail WP:NEWSORGINDIA. CNMall41 ( talk) 20:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More participation would be welcome here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
"…a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source."( Notability#Notes, footnote 4)
बिनोद थारू ( talk) 00:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Non notable group fails WP:NMUSIC. Lightoil ( talk) 23:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis would be helpful. Can't close this as a Soft Deletion due to the unstated Keep response.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
I've already culled a significant amount of unsourced content from here ( before my removal), but this just seems to be an idea promoted by a MLM ( Primerica) with little to no actual coverage outside of crappy websites online. Seems to have been similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buy term and invest the difference. – Isochrone ( T) 21:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
PROD by User:TartarTorte Upon WP:BEFORE, I could not find anything that would put this athlete over WP:GNG. Endorsed by me. This was then removed by the original creator, who added some sources. I am not satisfied that any of the new sources meet the requirements of GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC, both of which require significant coverage from sources that are independent of the subject. A source analysis will follow and this will analyse the 6 sources used in the article as well as the best 3 found in my own BEFORE search. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://torpedo.ru/news/45288/ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't comment as this is 403 Forbidden | ✘ No |
https://int.soccerway.com/matches/2020/08/09/russia/2-division/fc-tver/fk-zenit-radian-irkutsk/3322840/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://torpedo.ru/news/45288/ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't comment as this is 403 Forbidden | ✘ No |
https://1fnl.ru/champioship/results/896/921/924/6009/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://torpedo.ru/news/45207/ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't comment as this is 403 Forbidden | ✘ No |
https://int.soccerway.com/players/daniil-erofeev/662652/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://ufa.aif.ru/sport/details/vospitannik_dinamo_daniil_erofeev_stal_igrokom_fk_ufa | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://ufaved.info/articles/sport/daniil_erofeev_pokinul_ryady_fk_ufa/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://sport24.ru/news/football/2023-01-24-ufa-zabila-12-myachey-turetskomu-klubu-v-zaklyuchitelnom-matche-na-pervom-sbore | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
BeanieFan11 (
talk)
20:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Maliner ( talk) 19:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced since it was created 18 years ago. On its face it looks like a textbook case of WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and I can't find anything which talks about this at all. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 19:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 19:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability for kickboxer (as ISKA isn't a major belt) or GNG. Nswix ( talk) 19:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
News story in violation of WP:NOTNEWS. Only a brief burst of coverage without any sustained secondary coverage, failing WP:N. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 19:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability for kickboxer (as ISKA isn't a major belt) or GNG Nswix ( talk) 19:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be notable. Only claim to fame appears to be having once been featured in a tv episode. PepperBeast (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Lack of coverage. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has appeared for the Lithuania women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This list is almost infinitely expandable. The definition of "outdoor proponents" and "outdoor educators" is very vaguely defined and not a good subject for a list, especially when arbitrarily limited to a specific century. SilverStar54 ( talk) 16:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Recreation of salted TaDarius Thomas (wrestler) (deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TaDarius Thomas (wrestler) as non-notable) by sock of blocked editor. I would tag this as WP:G5 if not for the edits by other users. (Are those edits "substantial"?) And I can't see the deleted article to say whether this is WP:G4. SilverLocust 💬 15:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Created too early based on WP:RECENTISM before the event has attained a lasting historical significance to justify an article, WP:LASTING. Additionally, it violates WP:NOTNEWS as Wikipedia is not intended to function as a newspaper for breaking news. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 15:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
All breaking news stories, without exception, are primary sources, and must be treated with caution. This is in line with how historiography treats new information coming from news reports. Secondary sources are those that synthesise primary sources. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 21:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Accidental duplication of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jong-su Kim (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
fails notability, unreliable source
microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 15:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Accidental duplication of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jong-su Kim (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
fails notability, unreliable source microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 15:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability, unreliable source microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish• growths) 15:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Advertorialized
WP:BLP of a spiritualist and writer, not
properly sourced as passing Wikipedia inclusion criteria. This is based almost entirely on
primary source content
self-published by people or organizations directly affiliated with the claims (her own website about herself, her book sourced to its own publisher, events sourced to the self-published websites of their own organizers, etc.) with very little evidence of
reliable source coverage about her in real
WP:GNG-worthy media.
As always, people are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia just because it's possible to verify that they exist -- the significance of their work has to be externally validated by GNG-worthy third-party coverage about them. And furthermore, the advertorialism here has been flagged since 2012 without being noticeably toned down in the entire decade since then.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on her sourcing — but this, as written, is such a poorly sourced (self?)-promotional mess that even if legitimate GNG-worthy sourcing can be found to salvage it with, it would still need to be
blown up and restarted from scratch regardless.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable illustrator. No independent sigcov to establish notability. Jdcooper ( talk) 13:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Tails Wx 13:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Woman with a web site. Non-notable entrepreneur. PepperBeast (talk) 13:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 14:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Mayor of Sandy, Utah, a city with a population of about 96,000 people. Their claim to notability appears to be that they are the city's first female mayor. However, I don't think in of itself is enough to pass WP:GNG and is not enough to pass WP:NPOL. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG with a lack of significant coverage. A search on Google newspaper archive found several mentions in the Evening Times but nothing approaching sigcov. A search on www-newspapers-com. found more mentions but it was just routine coverage such as transfers/injuries/match reports. Dougal18 ( talk) 12:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
A street which is verifiable, and mentioned as the location of other things, but which hasn't received significant attention (the street names articles are very passing mentions). Notability is not inherited, a street doesn't get notable because some building on it gets some attention, or an activity happens in a building on the street. Fram ( talk) 09:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Maliner ( talk) 19:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
No refs on the page. Nothing to show that this radio programme (no longer running) was particularly notable JMWt ( talk) 09:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
We should not split articles by ethnicity. This is a non-neutral POV fork of tulku intended as an attack page against Western tulkus. Tulkus are tulkus. The entire system is criticized, and there are non-western examples of misidentification. Skyerise ( talk) 11:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
include positive material about Western tulkus along with listing Western tulkus who have NOT been criticized, as they told me to do on my talk page.
-- MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!( talk or whatever) 05:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
integral part of the tulku system.They're a marginal part of it and there are only a handful of Western tulku while there are literally hundreds of Tibetan tulku. Western tulku, on the other hand, have generated a disproportionate amount of (English-language) literature regarding the globalization of Tibet Buddhism, which threatens to overtake the original tulku article as the Western tulku article is now over half the length of the older one...although it's now hard to gage since someone has been copying prose and references. That is why I created a separate article instead of adding to the older one.
splitting the articleand how this has something to do with "criticizing Western tulku", as if I've forked an article out to dunk on them -- which I haven't -- everything is entirely original and reflects the sources I have on hand. I'm sorry the sources offend you but that's what they say. A significant amount of the literature published is critical and I've done my best to attribute those opinions to their respective authors. If you don't like that, go publish your own research responding to them. MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!( talk or whatever) 16:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
A self-described
master-comment. If you want to discuss conduct, take it to the
WP:AN thread. This is not the place.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
10:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
|
---|
References
|
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people). Can't find info on this person and only found on the doctor [10] of the same name. I smell COI in this article. Best to redirect their husband? Manoj Bhatnagar [11] DareshMohan ( talk) 07:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
. Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to
Bright (American band). Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to
Bright (American band). Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bright (American band). Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to
Bright (American band). Fails
WP:NALBUM I can't find anything in the way of non-trivial coverage. That's not to say sources don't exist, but in any case per
WP:NALBUM: Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography
Polyamorph (
talk)
10:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
No independent refs on the page for many years, very little other than passing news refs to show notability. If there was anything to merge, it could go to FEMA Urban Search and Rescue Task Force as am AtD JMWt ( talk) 12:34, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to SCSI Enclosure Services. Star Mississippi 02:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
I searched but I could not find enough good sources to show this is notable Chidgk1 ( talk) 06:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Merge into SCSI Enclosure Services per above. Mooonswimmer 23:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
-- KorTed ( talk) 02:38, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or go to WP:REFUND. I agree that this is TOOSOON and if it was Kept, the article would just be renominated for another appearance at AFD until we get closer to 2025. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
We have just had the 2023 local government elections. There have been no reforms to local government since then which might merit mentioning in this article. It is far too early for people to announce their candidacies. In short, this article was created too soon. Steelkamp ( talk) 03:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
the event is notable and almost certain to take place, with notability passing via WP:RS with WP:DEPTH. Since election reform is already a key issue, either yea or nay results will end up touching WP:LASTING under
effects on... society and legislation. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 14:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any support for moving this to Draft or User space until the elections get closer?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 03:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus seems clear after relisting. I do not see any reason to protect the title at this time, but please ping me on my talk page if it is deemed necessary. Kinu t/ c 19:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR. Only roles so far have been one episode of an animated series, and three uncredited roles, and it's not clear yet how big the roles are for the two upcoming films. I can find no evidence that he won a BET award. Google search for "Ricky Guillart" results in one screen worth of hits, mainly social media and film directories, but no significant discussion of the individual. May be a case of WP:TOOSOON. ... discospinster talk 02:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looking over the article, I'd like to suggest draftification if that is okay with the nominator. Otherwise I see this as a Soft Delete and I imagine this article will be restored and back into main space soon enough.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn
Thanks for the sourcing, Since we have access to offline resources and results, as your notoriety was established, I withdraw this nomination and close this debate. --
This notification is canceled because the nomination debate for deletion was closed and its result was to cancel the nomination, it can be verified in the debate article, thank you
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable former beauty pageant winner with a lack of sustained coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 01:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing has been found to be insufficient Star Mississippi 03:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Sources are all unviewable, but his accomplishments appear to be minor, with the possible exception of his memoirs. However, while the memoirs are in the Library of Congress, I don't see any notice of them. Clarityfiend ( talk) 02:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least 10 caps for the Malawi women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The most I was able to find was this transfer piece, which is already in the article. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable British screenwriter. Could not find SIGCOV on him. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least four caps for the Uganda women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The most I found was 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 00:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war. This kind of discussion leads to a no-win type of closure but I think a Merge will address both those who believe this article should be Deleted (as this page will become a Redirect after Merger) and preserve some of the content for those who argue that it should be Kept. I will say that I briefly considered closing this as a procedural Keep as there wasn't a strong, policy-based deletion rationale but given the depth and breadth of the discussion that has evolved, I think that decision would have been disruptive. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not a lastingly significant event in this conflict, he doesn't appear to be that senior of a member of the organisation, and it's not even clear that it's actually an assassination (Hamas are blatant liars, and anything they say should be taken with a massive grain of salt). I would prefer a redirect to Timeline of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war where this is already listed. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Why is “assassination” not a neutral title? Two RS sources, Al Jazeera and Reuters used it( Reuters article)}}". Nothing else. The response you responded to that started with and I quote, "
Jesus fucking christ"...You aren't going after a notability reason, but rather a POV reason. That is the whole issue. Noting, I am WP:COALing out, given other editors are commenting and I think it is clear a lack of good faith is occurring. Have a good day y'all! Cheers! The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 01:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as any closure with this makeup of comments is due to be contested. I see substantial arguments to Delete, Merge or Draftify this article. Sorry to prolong this divisive discussion but any closing decision would be seen as inserting my own opinion. Also noting that during this AFD, this article has been moved to be titled
Omar Daraghmeh.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
This certainly seems like SIGCOV, unless someone has an argument that this is not a WP:RS | 1. Laxmi, Bijay (9 October 2023). "Prominent Hamas Leader, Omar Daraghmeh, Arrested by Israeli Forces". BNN. Retrieved 23 October 2023. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its simply reporting a statement with one sentence | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b Mughrabi, Nidal Al; Abd-Alaziz, Moaz; Adler, Leslie; McCool, Grant (23 October 2023). "Hamas accuses Israel of assassinating senior member in prison". Reuters. Archived from the original on 23 October 2023. Retrieved 23 October 2023. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its simply reporting a statement with basic background | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Hamas accuses Israel of assassinating its senior member". Al Arabiya. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its simply reporting a statement in two sentences | 4. ^ Jump up to:a b "Hamas accuses Israel of assassinating senior member in prison". Jerusalem Post. |
Fails WP:IS WP:RS | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d "Hamas: Leader in West Bank Daraghmeh 'Tortured to Death' in Israeli Prison". Palestinan Chronicle. |
A one sentence bullet point. Not SIGCOV | 6. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i "'Operation Al-Aqsa Flood' Day 18: Palestinian prisoner dies in Israeli custody; 32 health centers in Gaza forced out of service". Mondoweiss. |
This seems like weak SIGCOV, unless someone has an argument that this is not a WP:RS | 7. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Palestinian prisoners dies in Israel's jails 2 weeks into his detention". Middle East Monitor. |
This seems like weak SIGCOV, unless someone has an argument that this is not a WP:RS | 8. ^ "Palestinian group accuses Israel of killing senior Hamas leader in prison". Anadolu Agency. |
WP:IS, WP:RS, but fails WP:SIGCOV, its two sentences | 9. ^ "Palestinians protest in West Bank after Hamas official dies in Israeli custody". Time of Israel. |
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or go to WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON. This article is based off of early highly-speculative articles for an election that is entirely WP:Crystal Ball at this moment. It is also written with the presumption that the next leadership election will be to succeed Sunak. Likely, but that would be entirely presumptuous and WP:Crystal Ball given it is not an impossibility that the party’s next leadership election sees Sunak seek to remain leader while facing a challenger, as Thatcher did in both 1989 and 1990 (and Labour’s Kinnock did in 1988). Should be either deleted or draftified. SecretName101 ( talk) 00:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)