This is GoingBatty's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello Mr.@ GoingBatty, Can you please copyedit this draft for clean article Draft:Rama Krishna Veerapaneni to improve acceptance accordingly! Saishna96 ( talk) 19:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
https://t.me/c/2089124444/6 -- Mus12rchnffv ( talk) 13:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
@ GoingBatty Hello!
I've recently been noticing that BattyBot has removed the importance rating from {{ WikiProject Appalachia}} banners on GAs and FAs. I'm not sure what can be done but I was just wondering if there could be any easy solution. Dionysius Miller talk 22:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
|importance=
|importance=
|importance=
|importance=
I wanted to know if this source was viable https://www.artix.com/posts/dagestory/ -- Ovenly Furnace ( talk) 15:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to ask if this information i provided here was not biased and neutral about the topic, and if the degree of information was enough for Wikipedia, here's the article : /info/en/?search=User:Ovenly_Furnace/Star_Wars:_Battlefront_Classic_Collection_Controversy -- Ovenly Furnace ( talk) 10:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
|first=
and |last=
fields for each referenceThe redirect Clinistrip has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Clinistrip until a consensus is reached. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 11:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Khangarid FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Companies based in Stephens County, Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit 14:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your response in the tea house, you were very kind.
matt. (
talk) 18:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi GoingBatty. Instead of adding |living=yes
to WPBiography template (
example), could your bot add the banner shell along with |blp=yes
? — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 21:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
|living=no
to an existing WPBS instead of WPBiography. (e.g.,
this edit)
GoingBatty (
talk) 21:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)In
Special:Diff/1215589074 the bot changed |volume=no. 2
to |number=2
in a citation template that already had |issue=126
. This caused a broken citation because now it had both number and issue, redundant. In this case it turns out that the volume is 126 and the issue is 2, but regardless, this bot should not be taking working citation templates with mixed-up metadata and turning them into broken citation templates. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 01:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
volume=194
, but arguably the rendering might be clearer when the template has volume=No. 194
in this example. –
jacobolus
(t) 03:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
|volume=No. 194
now generates an error:
{{cite journal |last=Gray |first=Carroll F.|title=The 1906 Santos=Dumont No. 14bis |journal=World War I Aeroplanes |volume=No. 194 |date=November 2006 |page=4}}
{{
cite journal}}
: |volume=
has extra text (
help)This is GoingBatty's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello Mr.@ GoingBatty, Can you please copyedit this draft for clean article Draft:Rama Krishna Veerapaneni to improve acceptance accordingly! Saishna96 ( talk) 19:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
https://t.me/c/2089124444/6 -- Mus12rchnffv ( talk) 13:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
@ GoingBatty Hello!
I've recently been noticing that BattyBot has removed the importance rating from {{ WikiProject Appalachia}} banners on GAs and FAs. I'm not sure what can be done but I was just wondering if there could be any easy solution. Dionysius Miller talk 22:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
|importance=
|importance=
|importance=
|importance=
I wanted to know if this source was viable https://www.artix.com/posts/dagestory/ -- Ovenly Furnace ( talk) 15:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanted to ask if this information i provided here was not biased and neutral about the topic, and if the degree of information was enough for Wikipedia, here's the article : /info/en/?search=User:Ovenly_Furnace/Star_Wars:_Battlefront_Classic_Collection_Controversy -- Ovenly Furnace ( talk) 10:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
|first=
and |last=
fields for each referenceThe redirect Clinistrip has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Clinistrip until a consensus is reached. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 11:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Khangarid FC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Companies based in Stephens County, Georgia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit 14:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your response in the tea house, you were very kind.
matt. (
talk) 18:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi GoingBatty. Instead of adding |living=yes
to WPBiography template (
example), could your bot add the banner shell along with |blp=yes
? — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk) 21:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
|living=no
to an existing WPBS instead of WPBiography. (e.g.,
this edit)
GoingBatty (
talk) 21:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)In
Special:Diff/1215589074 the bot changed |volume=no. 2
to |number=2
in a citation template that already had |issue=126
. This caused a broken citation because now it had both number and issue, redundant. In this case it turns out that the volume is 126 and the issue is 2, but regardless, this bot should not be taking working citation templates with mixed-up metadata and turning them into broken citation templates. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 01:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
volume=194
, but arguably the rendering might be clearer when the template has volume=No. 194
in this example. –
jacobolus
(t) 03:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
|volume=No. 194
now generates an error:
{{cite journal |last=Gray |first=Carroll F.|title=The 1906 Santos=Dumont No. 14bis |journal=World War I Aeroplanes |volume=No. 194 |date=November 2006 |page=4}}
{{
cite journal}}
: |volume=
has extra text (
help)