![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
De-PROD'ed. WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NFF for a future film lacking a notable production. A draft at Draft:X=Prem exists. If merged into the draft, I'd suggest a history merge — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. there is a consensus that a redirect would not be helpful to the reader, and that a merger is inappropriate due to the state of the content. Star Mississippi 00:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Basically an advertisement that has sat there for twelve years virtually unsourced except for references to the manufacturer's blog. BD2412 T 19:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable via WP:BIO or WP:GNG - Note el:Δημήτριος Τερεζόπουλος exists over on Greek Wikipedia (but is tagged for notability) maybe as many sources just passing mentions. Terezo10 has edited both copies and has identifies themselves as the subject on their Greek userpage "My purpose is to clearly state my coaching career in the big teams of Greece". KylieTastic ( talk) 19:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
20:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
23:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Another unnotable attack inside Russia purely reported by the Russian Government sources while being denied by Ukraine Viewsridge ( talk) 23:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Without prejudice to creating an article about his possibly notable book They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons. Sandstein 06:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NAUTHOR and GNG. No secondary sources to establish notability. (Just saw it was nominated before. Zero substantial change the 12 years since). EvergreenFir (talk) 06:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion needed here on the recently added citations.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify , which even the creator seems on board with. Given the circumstances around the creation, I'm going to salt this title to prevent it from coming back without AfC approval. AfC reviewers: consider this my OK for an unSALT when/if you deem this suitable for mainspace. Star Mississippi 00:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Article was moved to draft as needing further sources and material as existing information didn't meet notability. Creator copied the article to create in mainspace and tagged the draft for deletion.
Article is not ready for main space. There is one article that's a decent source and it's an obvious pre-release promotional piece. The rest are terrible sources - passing mentions or basic landing pages
Redirect to A-Plus TV Ravensfire ( talk) 22:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A little more participation would be nice here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Technically ineligible, but two relists and no dissension from the nomination. Star Mississippi 00:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Not notable. Sources are promotional and/or don't mention him. No further sourcing found. Prod overturned due to previous AFD which the bot didn't catch (it was part of a bundle AFD). Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for Soft Delete so relisting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Opinion changed after article improvements towards keeping this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Likely fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Supposedly "has written over 40 books, which have sold more than 1.5 million combined copies", but I cannot find any proper reviews in decent sources. Could be a redirect to Sisterhood Magazine, which might be more notable. Edwardx ( talk) 14:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
her single book that received reviews is definitely notable, but she is not as of yet, so i'd suggest deleting and redirecting as the creator insists on it's existence as a standalone article. I've also removed a few sources, the Yahoo source which was by a marketer that lists her as a client (the article is a word for word copy of the spy.com article written by the same person where she lists this), as well as boston voyager which is a known interview for pay site, and lastly the NYT blog, which funny enough has nothing to do with her whatsoever, the only mention is actually by a commenter, not even in the blog itself. CUPIDICAE💕 21:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No notable roles so clear WP:NACTOR fail. No sign of meeting WP:NMODEL. A WP:BEFORE search yields only social media and unreliable websites like EverybodyWiki. Likely an autobiography and the article creator keeps going into articles like Lucifer (film) and adding himself to the cast list, despite my attempts to revert. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 21:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage of him online, so it doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. The helper5667 ( talk) 18:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
I removed all the unsourced nonsense (or poorly sourced) and we're left with...not much. But even digging deep into this, I don't know who or what credible organizations recognize her as an expert, but, well, an expert she is not.
This is a lot of...quackery to say the least and not even recognized well in the communities that believe in hypnobirthing etc... CUPIDICAE💕 17:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to Woody Woodpecker filmography, not notable Indagate ( talk) 16:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
16:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I don't see a third relist bringing about any additional input. Star Mississippi 00:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
All listed sources seem to be announcements of specific movies' screenings, not in-depth coverage about the subject. Googling the subject does not seem to bring up much better sources. I does not seem to pass WP:NCORP. MarioGom ( talk) 14:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
14:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
16:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 ( talk) 16:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Russian cruiser Moskva#Sinking. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
WP:BIO1E. The only thing he seems to have received coverage for was his death as captain of the recently sunk Moskva. The article tells us nothing but this fact (which is already covered at Russian cruiser Moskva#Sinking), and I can find no coverage about him prior to his death. Sandstein 16:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
And he had received the following awards and honours:
It would be good to find proper sources either for or discounting these factoids. Yadsalohcin ( talk) 21:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ectodermal dysplasia. ✗ plicit 23:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Definitely a notable topic, but this article is one sentence with one reference that barely provides anything to the reader. Bsoyka ( talk) 16:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 06:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this is a real thing beyond the fan blogs and amateur studies cited. No notable coverage in any RS I can find. The page is a total mess of OR and likely self sourced bumpf Unbh ( talk) 16:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing much significant coverage towards WP:GNG. Only played two seasons in college, has not played in NFL. He is currently on a USFL practice squad, but there is no assumption of notability even if he plays in a game there this season. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Neeraj Agnihotri
Non-notable photographer. One previous article was deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Agnihotri. Analysis of the sources is probably not necessary, because this article is a stub that does not appear to be an improvement over the deleted article, but the sources have been checked, and are not independent:
Number | Reference | Remarks | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | www.india.com | About a film - Mostly about the director - The cinematographer is the subject of the article | Yes | Not with respect to the subject | Probably | Yes |
2 | IMDB | Includes a blurb about a film | No | Not about the subject | No | No |
3 | IMDB, same as 2 | Includes a blurb about a film | No | Not about the subject | No | No |
4 | YouTube | About a documentary by the subject | No | Probably | No | No |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
An article on a software package which has been tagged for some years for Notability and reliance on Primary Sources. A previous instance was deleted via PROD in 2013. The present article describes the ownership history and features of the product but these do not indicate notability, nor does a bronze award in an industry-body evaluation. Searches for Realisor under Wovex and BRM Fusion find some mentions relative to the tool's use by a consultancy firm, but nothing to demonstrate attained notability. Articles about the current company Wovex were speedy-deleted twice in 2016 so there is not an WP:ATD target. AllyD ( talk) 13:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails the requirements of WP:ANYBIO, is solely reliant on primary sources. The author of the article appears to have an undeclared conflict of interest. It appears to either be a resume or self promotion. Dan arndt ( talk) 14:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Stevie Stone. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 16:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV RoanokeVirginia ( talk) 14:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO RoanokeVirginia ( talk) 13:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Subject doesn't appear to be notable, and article is basically promotional. Refs are just mentions. PepperBeast (talk) 12:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Routine coverage. Brochure article. scope_creep Talk 12:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 15:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
List of not notable local politicians. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kei Kusunoki. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
The article has remained unreferenced for a long time. The only citations I was able to find were from the own publisher or from a few other publishers who licensed the series outside of Japan, but no secondary sources. - Xexerss ( talk) 06:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:16, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The rough consensus here is that presence on a single event of The Kelly Clarkson Show is insufficient grounds for notability. Based on the WP:NOTNEWS policy, that argument is rooted in policy. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Their sole claim to fame is a piece on The Kelly Clarkson Show where they were surprised by their idols Backstreet Boys, which is about the Backstreet Boys than them. They are aged 12 and 9, and do not have significant coverage. Pikavoom Talk 08:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
It does not meet WP:NCORP. Most sources here are native advertisement (e.g. Deals/Store section, source selling the services themselves), with only a few exceptions, which are passing mentions and not in-depth coverage. MarioGom ( talk) 08:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Film production company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Two relistings have not generated any further input. Apart from the nominator, the calls have been for keeping the article, and the arguments, that her work has seen significant coverage in newspapers such as Boaton Globe and Wall Street Journal, has merit. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Has been quoted in a couple sources, but none of the sources are specifically about her. Everything is WP:PRIMARY and I couldn't find anything else. Previous AFDs in 2011 and 2012 closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
CT55555 ( talk) 17:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
10:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spinning Spark 09:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
A few other "Nth planet (disambiguation)" pages that people agreed should be deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second planet (disambiguation) but need a separate discussion since they weren't properly listed here. I also boldly redirected disambiguation pages previously at First planet and Third planet. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Seventh planet (disambiguation) is just bizarre. Only one thing in the disambiguation is a seventh planet. "5th giant" is in no sense an ambiguous title here. But the disambiguation article used to contain the seventh geocentric model planet, which was Saturn. It hasn't contained any other ambiguous titles in its history that I can see, so even back when it was actually disambiguating, it was doing the same as the aforementioned 3: disambiguating two planets by number. So my reasoning for those three applies to that article, too. Take the reader directly to planet#History for historical geocentric numberings.
Eighth planet (disambiguation) is where things get interesting. There's not a geocentric model 8th planet, and this is disambiguating three heliocentric model 8th planets (two for quite a lot of the page's history). Obviously there's a primary topic. But whether 1 Ceres or Pluto were an "eighth planet" is the thing to consider. Back in the period when the first four asteroids were considered planets, 1 Ceres was listed 7th in order of distance from Sol, not 8th, in contemporary encyclopaedias and sources like François Arago's 1845 Lectures. There's a very brief window when 5 Astraea pushed it out to 8th, but by then it was already commonly listed as the first minor planet, and had been for at least 25 years. (Witness the 1819 list of minor planets in Principles of the sciences at the Internet Archive for example.) I've not found anyone actually designating Ceres as either the eighth planet or the seventh planet in that era. It never had those titles. So that's not ambiguous. As for Pluto, there are serious astronomical sources from before the conversion from major to dwarf planet that did seriously note that it was the eighth planet for a while. Unlike 1 Ceres, it did have the title. But that leaves us in the same situation as with the other three disambiguations, only 2 things to disambiguate and a non-primary topic better served by taking the reader directly to pluto#Orbit via a headnote (or some such) where the fact that it orbited inside the orbit of Neptune for 20 of the years that it was a major planet is already mentioned. Having a whole disambiguation article just to repeat that out of context is overkill.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
10:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A9, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
This article has existed for 15 years but there are barely any sources. The band's article has also been deleted, probably for the same reason. With that, I say it's time for this article to be gone for good. SirZPthundergod9001 ( talk) 09:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Another potentially notable topic that is sadly just a mostly unreferenced list of trivia in the TV trope like style (even IF sources exist, which I couldn't confirm WP:TNT would be needed first). Many position are not even WP:SIGCOV-related, and fail the ORish inclusion criteria in the lead ("some notable examples of references to Cambridge" - notable according to whom?). Sample terrible entry: "In The Good Companions (1929 novel) by J. B. Priestley, the character Inigo Jollifant is introduced as a Cambridge graduate.". Or "Missee Lee (novel 1941) by Arthur Ransome The title character is a former Cambridge student. " Sigh. This catalogue of trivia fails WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:TRIVIA, WP:OR, and mostly, WP:V. Note that while University_of_Cambridge#In_literature_and_popular_culture exits it is just as bad and probably needs to be removed as well. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Primefac ( talk) 14:17, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
PRODded by the IP user
159.253.109.209 (
talk ·
contribs ·
WHOIS) with rationale: Seems to be based on the work of one research group published in low-quality journals, most of the article describes only elementary physics.
The author
Samsiq (
talk ·
contribs) deprodded the article without adequately addressing the concerns — the new section consists only of background information about
van der Waals forces and a description of two images with no clear relation to the section's topic; and contrary to the deprodder's assertion, "elementary physics" as defined by the IP includes basic
quantum mechanics. All references are from O. P. Kucherov et al. or are irrelevant to the ostensible topic. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
08:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
non notable album of a rapper whose page was deleted ( Tony D (rapper)) FMSky ( talk) 06:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Lacks sigcov. Just database entries. Ficaia ( talk) 05:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Modussiccandi ( talk) 09:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Lacks sigcov Ficaia ( talk) 05:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Crossover music. Sandstein 14:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
WP:NEO. First and fourth sources do not use the term "crossover jazz", second and third are just directory listings. Previously declined from prod in 2019 Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
I couldn't find a source to show that this person won a legislative assembly election. He seems to have won a zilla parishad election though. Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. No significant coverage. PepperBeast (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 17:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO1E and WP:GNG. Suggesting merge into the Ellis Island article. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 21:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large onethat has been covered in a variety of ways over time. The volume and depth of coverage available also appears to make it unsuitable for a merge into an article where she is mentioned, because a separate article is warranted and a merged article
would be too long or "clunky". Beccaynr ( talk) 23:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cheers!
Fake
scientist
8000
02:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 06:44, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. DBLTAP is a questionable source, and they others are nothing beyond routine coverage, non-mentions, or passing mentions. – Pbrks ( t • c) 02:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 ( talk) 01:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
De-PROD'ed. WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:NFF for a future film lacking a notable production. A draft at Draft:X=Prem exists. If merged into the draft, I'd suggest a history merge — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 17:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:53, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. there is a consensus that a redirect would not be helpful to the reader, and that a merger is inappropriate due to the state of the content. Star Mississippi 00:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Basically an advertisement that has sat there for twelve years virtually unsourced except for references to the manufacturer's blog. BD2412 T 19:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:52, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable via WP:BIO or WP:GNG - Note el:Δημήτριος Τερεζόπουλος exists over on Greek Wikipedia (but is tagged for notability) maybe as many sources just passing mentions. Terezo10 has edited both copies and has identifies themselves as the subject on their Greek userpage "My purpose is to clearly state my coaching career in the big teams of Greece". KylieTastic ( talk) 19:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
20:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Fenix down (
talk)
23:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Another unnotable attack inside Russia purely reported by the Russian Government sources while being denied by Ukraine Viewsridge ( talk) 23:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Without prejudice to creating an article about his possibly notable book They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons. Sandstein 06:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NAUTHOR and GNG. No secondary sources to establish notability. (Just saw it was nominated before. Zero substantial change the 12 years since). EvergreenFir (talk) 06:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion needed here on the recently added citations.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify , which even the creator seems on board with. Given the circumstances around the creation, I'm going to salt this title to prevent it from coming back without AfC approval. AfC reviewers: consider this my OK for an unSALT when/if you deem this suitable for mainspace. Star Mississippi 00:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Article was moved to draft as needing further sources and material as existing information didn't meet notability. Creator copied the article to create in mainspace and tagged the draft for deletion.
Article is not ready for main space. There is one article that's a decent source and it's an obvious pre-release promotional piece. The rest are terrible sources - passing mentions or basic landing pages
Redirect to A-Plus TV Ravensfire ( talk) 22:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A little more participation would be nice here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Technically ineligible, but two relists and no dissension from the nomination. Star Mississippi 00:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Not notable. Sources are promotional and/or don't mention him. No further sourcing found. Prod overturned due to previous AFD which the bot didn't catch (it was part of a bundle AFD). Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for Soft Delete so relisting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Opinion changed after article improvements towards keeping this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Likely fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Supposedly "has written over 40 books, which have sold more than 1.5 million combined copies", but I cannot find any proper reviews in decent sources. Could be a redirect to Sisterhood Magazine, which might be more notable. Edwardx ( talk) 14:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
her single book that received reviews is definitely notable, but she is not as of yet, so i'd suggest deleting and redirecting as the creator insists on it's existence as a standalone article. I've also removed a few sources, the Yahoo source which was by a marketer that lists her as a client (the article is a word for word copy of the spy.com article written by the same person where she lists this), as well as boston voyager which is a known interview for pay site, and lastly the NYT blog, which funny enough has nothing to do with her whatsoever, the only mention is actually by a commenter, not even in the blog itself. CUPIDICAE💕 21:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No notable roles so clear WP:NACTOR fail. No sign of meeting WP:NMODEL. A WP:BEFORE search yields only social media and unreliable websites like EverybodyWiki. Likely an autobiography and the article creator keeps going into articles like Lucifer (film) and adding himself to the cast list, despite my attempts to revert. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 21:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage of him online, so it doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. The helper5667 ( talk) 18:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
I removed all the unsourced nonsense (or poorly sourced) and we're left with...not much. But even digging deep into this, I don't know who or what credible organizations recognize her as an expert, but, well, an expert she is not.
This is a lot of...quackery to say the least and not even recognized well in the communities that believe in hypnobirthing etc... CUPIDICAE💕 17:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to Woody Woodpecker filmography, not notable Indagate ( talk) 16:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
16:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I don't see a third relist bringing about any additional input. Star Mississippi 00:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
All listed sources seem to be announcements of specific movies' screenings, not in-depth coverage about the subject. Googling the subject does not seem to bring up much better sources. I does not seem to pass WP:NCORP. MarioGom ( talk) 14:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
14:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
16:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 ( talk) 16:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Russian cruiser Moskva#Sinking. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
WP:BIO1E. The only thing he seems to have received coverage for was his death as captain of the recently sunk Moskva. The article tells us nothing but this fact (which is already covered at Russian cruiser Moskva#Sinking), and I can find no coverage about him prior to his death. Sandstein 16:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
And he had received the following awards and honours:
It would be good to find proper sources either for or discounting these factoids. Yadsalohcin ( talk) 21:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ectodermal dysplasia. ✗ plicit 23:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Definitely a notable topic, but this article is one sentence with one reference that barely provides anything to the reader. Bsoyka ( talk) 16:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 06:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
No indication that this is a real thing beyond the fan blogs and amateur studies cited. No notable coverage in any RS I can find. The page is a total mess of OR and likely self sourced bumpf Unbh ( talk) 16:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing much significant coverage towards WP:GNG. Only played two seasons in college, has not played in NFL. He is currently on a USFL practice squad, but there is no assumption of notability even if he plays in a game there this season. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Neeraj Agnihotri
Non-notable photographer. One previous article was deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Agnihotri. Analysis of the sources is probably not necessary, because this article is a stub that does not appear to be an improvement over the deleted article, but the sources have been checked, and are not independent:
Number | Reference | Remarks | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | www.india.com | About a film - Mostly about the director - The cinematographer is the subject of the article | Yes | Not with respect to the subject | Probably | Yes |
2 | IMDB | Includes a blurb about a film | No | Not about the subject | No | No |
3 | IMDB, same as 2 | Includes a blurb about a film | No | Not about the subject | No | No |
4 | YouTube | About a documentary by the subject | No | Probably | No | No |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
An article on a software package which has been tagged for some years for Notability and reliance on Primary Sources. A previous instance was deleted via PROD in 2013. The present article describes the ownership history and features of the product but these do not indicate notability, nor does a bronze award in an industry-body evaluation. Searches for Realisor under Wovex and BRM Fusion find some mentions relative to the tool's use by a consultancy firm, but nothing to demonstrate attained notability. Articles about the current company Wovex were speedy-deleted twice in 2016 so there is not an WP:ATD target. AllyD ( talk) 13:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails the requirements of WP:ANYBIO, is solely reliant on primary sources. The author of the article appears to have an undeclared conflict of interest. It appears to either be a resume or self promotion. Dan arndt ( talk) 14:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Stevie Stone. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 16:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV RoanokeVirginia ( talk) 14:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO RoanokeVirginia ( talk) 13:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Subject doesn't appear to be notable, and article is basically promotional. Refs are just mentions. PepperBeast (talk) 12:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:03, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Routine coverage. Brochure article. scope_creep Talk 12:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 15:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
List of not notable local politicians. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kei Kusunoki. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
The article has remained unreferenced for a long time. The only citations I was able to find were from the own publisher or from a few other publishers who licensed the series outside of Japan, but no secondary sources. - Xexerss ( talk) 06:52, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:16, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The rough consensus here is that presence on a single event of The Kelly Clarkson Show is insufficient grounds for notability. Based on the WP:NOTNEWS policy, that argument is rooted in policy. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Their sole claim to fame is a piece on The Kelly Clarkson Show where they were surprised by their idols Backstreet Boys, which is about the Backstreet Boys than them. They are aged 12 and 9, and do not have significant coverage. Pikavoom Talk 08:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
It does not meet WP:NCORP. Most sources here are native advertisement (e.g. Deals/Store section, source selling the services themselves), with only a few exceptions, which are passing mentions and not in-depth coverage. MarioGom ( talk) 08:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Film production company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Two relistings have not generated any further input. Apart from the nominator, the calls have been for keeping the article, and the arguments, that her work has seen significant coverage in newspapers such as Boaton Globe and Wall Street Journal, has merit. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Has been quoted in a couple sources, but none of the sources are specifically about her. Everything is WP:PRIMARY and I couldn't find anything else. Previous AFDs in 2011 and 2012 closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
CT55555 ( talk) 17:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
10:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spinning Spark 09:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
A few other "Nth planet (disambiguation)" pages that people agreed should be deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second planet (disambiguation) but need a separate discussion since they weren't properly listed here. I also boldly redirected disambiguation pages previously at First planet and Third planet. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Seventh planet (disambiguation) is just bizarre. Only one thing in the disambiguation is a seventh planet. "5th giant" is in no sense an ambiguous title here. But the disambiguation article used to contain the seventh geocentric model planet, which was Saturn. It hasn't contained any other ambiguous titles in its history that I can see, so even back when it was actually disambiguating, it was doing the same as the aforementioned 3: disambiguating two planets by number. So my reasoning for those three applies to that article, too. Take the reader directly to planet#History for historical geocentric numberings.
Eighth planet (disambiguation) is where things get interesting. There's not a geocentric model 8th planet, and this is disambiguating three heliocentric model 8th planets (two for quite a lot of the page's history). Obviously there's a primary topic. But whether 1 Ceres or Pluto were an "eighth planet" is the thing to consider. Back in the period when the first four asteroids were considered planets, 1 Ceres was listed 7th in order of distance from Sol, not 8th, in contemporary encyclopaedias and sources like François Arago's 1845 Lectures. There's a very brief window when 5 Astraea pushed it out to 8th, but by then it was already commonly listed as the first minor planet, and had been for at least 25 years. (Witness the 1819 list of minor planets in Principles of the sciences at the Internet Archive for example.) I've not found anyone actually designating Ceres as either the eighth planet or the seventh planet in that era. It never had those titles. So that's not ambiguous. As for Pluto, there are serious astronomical sources from before the conversion from major to dwarf planet that did seriously note that it was the eighth planet for a while. Unlike 1 Ceres, it did have the title. But that leaves us in the same situation as with the other three disambiguations, only 2 things to disambiguate and a non-primary topic better served by taking the reader directly to pluto#Orbit via a headnote (or some such) where the fact that it orbited inside the orbit of Neptune for 20 of the years that it was a major planet is already mentioned. Having a whole disambiguation article just to repeat that out of context is overkill.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
10:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A9, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
This article has existed for 15 years but there are barely any sources. The band's article has also been deleted, probably for the same reason. With that, I say it's time for this article to be gone for good. SirZPthundergod9001 ( talk) 09:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Another potentially notable topic that is sadly just a mostly unreferenced list of trivia in the TV trope like style (even IF sources exist, which I couldn't confirm WP:TNT would be needed first). Many position are not even WP:SIGCOV-related, and fail the ORish inclusion criteria in the lead ("some notable examples of references to Cambridge" - notable according to whom?). Sample terrible entry: "In The Good Companions (1929 novel) by J. B. Priestley, the character Inigo Jollifant is introduced as a Cambridge graduate.". Or "Missee Lee (novel 1941) by Arthur Ransome The title character is a former Cambridge student. " Sigh. This catalogue of trivia fails WP:IPC, WP:GNG, WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:TRIVIA, WP:OR, and mostly, WP:V. Note that while University_of_Cambridge#In_literature_and_popular_culture exits it is just as bad and probably needs to be removed as well. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Primefac ( talk) 14:17, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
PRODded by the IP user
159.253.109.209 (
talk ·
contribs ·
WHOIS) with rationale: Seems to be based on the work of one research group published in low-quality journals, most of the article describes only elementary physics.
The author
Samsiq (
talk ·
contribs) deprodded the article without adequately addressing the concerns — the new section consists only of background information about
van der Waals forces and a description of two images with no clear relation to the section's topic; and contrary to the deprodder's assertion, "elementary physics" as defined by the IP includes basic
quantum mechanics. All references are from O. P. Kucherov et al. or are irrelevant to the ostensible topic. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
08:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
non notable album of a rapper whose page was deleted ( Tony D (rapper)) FMSky ( talk) 06:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Lacks sigcov. Just database entries. Ficaia ( talk) 05:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Modussiccandi ( talk) 09:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Lacks sigcov Ficaia ( talk) 05:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Crossover music. Sandstein 14:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
WP:NEO. First and fourth sources do not use the term "crossover jazz", second and third are just directory listings. Previously declined from prod in 2019 Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
I couldn't find a source to show that this person won a legislative assembly election. He seems to have won a zilla parishad election though. Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. No significant coverage. PepperBeast (talk) 02:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 17:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO1E and WP:GNG. Suggesting merge into the Ellis Island article. Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 21:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large onethat has been covered in a variety of ways over time. The volume and depth of coverage available also appears to make it unsuitable for a merge into an article where she is mentioned, because a separate article is warranted and a merged article
would be too long or "clunky". Beccaynr ( talk) 23:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cheers!
Fake
scientist
8000
02:18, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 06:44, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. DBLTAP is a questionable source, and they others are nothing beyond routine coverage, non-mentions, or passing mentions. – Pbrks ( t • c) 02:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 06:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 ( talk) 01:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)