The result was merge to 2006 United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona. Consensus exists below that the article shouldn't exist (the delete and merge arguments were the most compelling), so I was left with having to identify which of those was the stronger argued case. I have narrowly come down on the side of merging the content, in part because preserving content is a decent argument for merge over deletion, and secondly because the majority of the delete arguments did not preclude a merge as being an option they were open to. Daniel ( talk) 09:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article fails WP:GNG and WP:SPLIT. It is literally just an ordinary election. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 23:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
"I confess my bias as the 3rd-party candidate in this race"Great for telling me that for some reason. That only weakens the Keep argument. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 02:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete as spam. There is unambiguous consensus against retaining the article. Unusual influx of single-purpose accounts discounted, obviously. El_C 05:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Run-of-the-mill businessman who does not satisfy general notability. The article does not show significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Naïve Google search shows that Hannibal Brumskine II and Hannibal Brumskine III exist and that III uses social media. We knew that.
Article was created by paid editor in violation of conflict of interest policy, which could be dealt with by moving to draft space for review, but there is already also a draft. The draft can be left alone. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
·Keep. The individual covered in the article's references are not run of the mill and the article's topics and stories themself explain why the individual is not. The coverage is also significant, hence why there is an Early Life section in this article. If you'd like to see that section improved, then please offer constructive suggestions. African publications and the Wikipedia pages that are established from them are important. As for the paid editor, this was disclosed on the article's talk page in compliance with Wikipedia's position. “Hannibal Brumskine II and Hannibal Brumskine III exist, and that III uses social media. We knew that.” Not sure what you mean by this? 68.100.232.86 ( talk) 06:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm putting this through AfD in case anyone thinks there is any connection between this siding and Soledad Prison, whose entrance is indeed roughly opposite this spot. It's possible that the pre-existence of the siding made it convenient to build the prison nearby, but it is not the case that there was ever anything resembling a town; maybe there was a station building here (it's not clear either way) but the siding, which has always run at a diagonal away from the main, rather than the usual parallel position, and given the rural location was probably there to load produce; at any rate, for some forty years or more, it has served a produce shipping warehouse. That is what the GHits indicate as well, when they are not recording an impressive set of misscans and other false hits. It's not a notable rail location, and certainly not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 23:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HistoricalAccountings ( talk) 15:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No need to be a seperate article. Minor variation of a food group and the article has no extra information. Fryedk ( talk) 22:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Not sure why this can't be a separate page? The existing page is extremely large, and we already have boiled peanuts, list of peanut dishes, peanut butter etc. However I am not sure if the refs show notability for a separate page like the other articles. There is only one article provided (SFGate) that could be called significant (though that's dubious), most of the others are primary. If other editors improve it (wp:hey) I vote Keep, if not it is a Delete. Davidstewartharvey ( talk) 06:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 20:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORGCRIT. A before search links to a plethora of primary sources such as this. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus to delete this text. Whether it should be kept as is or merged is an editorial decision that does not require AfD. StarM 02:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC) StarM 02:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
This article does not pass WP:GNG or WP:SPLIT. It's literally just an ordinary election. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 22:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The sources given are Google Lyrics and an interview with the subject. Given that he has released just one single with a record label, it's not surprising there isn't much coverage on him. Perhaps he'll be notable one day, bur for now the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO Modussiccandi ( talk) 21:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A whole lot of "I like it" vs" I don't like it" arguments here, but there doesn't appear to be a strong consensus to delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 22:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. A first lieutenant who died in a training accident and received common awards. Lettler hello • contribs 15:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
agenda to delete articles of heroic Hispanic military personnel, and I would ask you to please dial back your assumptions of bad faith - the fact is there are quite a few articles on non-notable military personel that were created based on misconstrued presumptions of notability like yours, and therefore, when they are cleaned up, it can look like "targeting" until you consider the actual facts. That said, being the first Puerto Rican pilot in the USAAF should be a presumption of notability, but...
WP:GNG does not seem to apply hereOn what basis is this rather bold assertion made? - The Bushranger One ping only 21:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subjectbeyond WP:JNN. jp× g 16:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus to delete. Some discussion between keeping and merging, but it looks like that discussion might need to be broader in scope and brought up in a different venue. bibliomaniac 1 5 22:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
This article does not pass WP:SPLIT or WP:GNG. It's literally just a regular election race. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 21:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG; no other mentions in reputable sources, the subject generally appears to be a somewhat high achieving engineer, but there's no proof of established notability. There are no third party independent sources about them. The article was created by a new single-purpose account that have made no other edits in past two years. GreaterPonce665 ( TALK) 21:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Technically meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to 25 mins of professional football but a Hungarian search did not uncover any significant coverage on the player. The best source that I could find was this brief match report. As per recent consensus on similar cases, deletion should be considered. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGCRIT. Only one reliable source reported, which is now a dead link. Cannot find any other reliable sources in Google search. Rogermx ( talk) 20:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 20:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTESSAY. Reads like the introductory paragraph of an Architecture 101 essay. KidAd talk 20:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
This is long, long overdue. Unsourced for 16 years and my WP:BEFORE search is not turning up the sort of coverage required to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. NCORP is a high bar, to be fair, but for good reason. This has no hits at all on Google News, Google Books or ProQuest. Even the Discogs page is bare. There is also nothing coming up in a British newspaper search. I think this is actually the first time I've searched something and had no hits!
This surely, surely does not meet 2021 Wikipedia notability standards for a company. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO, WP:NAUTHOR. None of the references provide in-depth, reliable, independent coverage of Unay. Routine coverage only that is likely self-promotion. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 19:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
1) If you search "Deniz Unay Social Media Expert" on Google News, you can find many explanations and articles in English. 2) "Sea Ünay" living in Turkey can examine a major name kaynaklard career completely addictive for Technology in Turkey "Social Responsibility Project" offers training and seminars for 5 years. not only in Turkey Erasmus Project has trained in eğitimcilere from abroad covered Finally, the Russian government Advocates of unity "for Social Media Regulation in Russia" online with expert names in the field in the world to have been invited to the conference Feedback has been published by inviting institutions and the Russian national press. 3) In addition, his articles have been translated into more than 15 languages. As you can see on the Talk page, Al Jazeraa has been featured in important news websites and International agencies such as Pakistan NY TIMES. 4) Deniz UNAY's views on the Covid 19 infodemia were included in the "Europan Science" Science journal and in the Spanish science article. 5) This article was previously rejected as duplicate content. Then it turned out that after my article was published, this error was copied and published by other sites. 6) Yesterday this article was approved by an admin, and then a warning was issued for this article in the form of a paid and for money article. I did not pay any name to any of them. This is definitely a mistake just like a copy content error, and I have no problem to give anyone a dignity that they do not have. Imagine if a person has been doing important studies in his country and around the world for 5 years, if his articles are translated from language to language and published, do you think there may be a doubt, I just added what I think is the most important by reviewing more than 2000 articles on googe news. It would be approved in a shorter time, not a long and controversial process like 4 months. 7) As for the conversations in the Wikipedia support chat room. I have applied all positive and constructive evaluations I deleted what I should have deleted I corrected the statements deemed inappropriate in the article. But I did not hurt me in the face of hurtful behavior towards me. I tried to understand and apply it correctly within 4 months. If the subject of this article did not deserve to be on Wikipedia, maybe it would be deleted in the first days. Frankly, it was a reason that made me hope and gave up. Finally, I do not want to lose my belief that you will be more positive and constructive in this article. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs)
Look, there are dozens of articles in Google News results. There is a Protocol document with the Ministry of Education. We are not talking about an ordinary person An important name who produces projects, whose opinions are asked, his articles have been translated into 15 languages, and his views used in science articles It's true I have trouble understanding Wikipedia, but I'm sure this person really deserves to be on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 10:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Hello As far as I understand from the press in Turkey and I need to make a statement about the sources 1) "Anadolu Agency", one of my sources, is the state's news agency and is a 100-year-old news agency. "Anadolu Agency" broadcasts in about 10 languages. Here you need to be an important person to make a statement or express an opinion. 2) The Independent in Turkey Sea Ünay page belonging text itself has not caused any significant article you published. https://www.indyturk.com/node/136106/t%C3%BCrkiyeden-sesler/%C3%A7e%C5%9Fitli-ya%C5%9F-gruplar%C4%B1nda-teknoloji-ba%C4%9F % C4% B1ml% C4% B1l% C4% B1% C4% 9F% C4% B1-you-how-up-e-social 3) Many national publications such as Hurriyet, Milliyet in Turkey, Haberturk has included the explanation repeatedly. 4) Approximately 5 years in Turkey CNN consulted several times in the national news as Turkish TRT channel. 5) Recently, for the adverse share on social media for Vaccine Denial of Turkey Ministry of Health Sciences Board members who place their opinions after Anadolu Agency joined the program to the TV program has a news service https://www.aa.com.tr/en/latest-on-coronavirus-outbreak/combat-infodemic-over-covid-19-vaccines-says-expert/2108013 In the title of this article, he is mentioned as a Turkish Social Media Expert and writer. It is also a name that has entered many national and international sources. why would you prefer paid publications? If you have contact with Wikipedia Turkish editors, these resources will definitely verify you. Frankly, I hope you will understand better and help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Has been featured in Kazakhstan News agency and websites https://www.google.com/search?q=site:kz+%22deniz+unay%22&filter=0&biw=1280&bih=612 Also in Vietnam https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Avn+%22deniz+unay%22&oq=site%3Avn+%22deniz+unay%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.7452j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Spanish https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/tecnologia/1/coronavirus-infodemia-pandemia There are many places even outside Turkey Please don't be so biased and negative For Wikipedia, it is not enough for you that someone has done major projects with the "Educator" Volunteer Author and the Ministry of Education in his own country. For example, look at this He prepared great galleries with his signature on special occasions such as Mother's Day, April 23 Children's Day, and these galleries became news in all national media. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/pg/foto-galeri/basin-ilan-kurumundan-anneler-gunu-albumu- https://www.trthaber.com/haber/turkiye/dunya-gundemine-yon-veren-isimlerin-cocukluk-halleri-412886.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm having trouble understanding the discussion here 1) From the very beginning; I work with all my good intentions and efforts and offer many resources and references. But each editor looks at the behavior of the other and writes Delete, Delete Quickly Delete. 2) Well, if everyone is going to behave so cruelly and unfairly, new editors won't have much chance to survive ... 3) Yes, if you really want to lynch and delete them collectively, I don't have the power to prevent it. You can delete it is possible. 4) Everyone deserves to be conscientious, to see the effort, to be just and kind. Finally, if a referee or review team will listen to me and understand me, I am sure, outside of this environment. a more just conclusion will come ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Please could you help me with this article /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources Say here Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include:
University-level textbooks Books published by respected publishing houses Magazines Mainstream newspapers
Ok let's take a look at my resources accordingly 1) file: /// Users / denizunay / Downloads / 6101-14047-1-PB% 20 (8) .pdf Europine Science Peer-reviewed scientific journal published in Europe The article is published by citing his article published by Anadolu Agency. 2) http://revistaestilosdeaprendizaje.com/article/download/2171/3207/ Scientific Paper Study for the European Observatory Committee of Experts Peer-reviewed scientific journal published in Europe The article is published by citing his article published by Anadolu Agency. 3) https://www.trt.net.tr/vizyondergisi/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/mart-2019.pdf State television TRT in Turkey belongs to "TRT Vision" magazine cover his "Game Not Cyberbullying" Cover the warning did. This news operation in the Republic of Turkey News on page 30 was given to the views of the Minister of Education and Minister of Transport. 4) Among my sources were links of organizations that broadcast Mainstream Regularly. Anadolu Agency Takes Jazerá Hurriyet, Milliyet bianet.org independent Turkish Haberturk tribune.co inside and outside of Turkey, such as many reliable sources https://mubasher.aljazeera.net/news/politics/2020/4/12/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%D9%85%D8 % A7% D8% AA-% D8% A7% D9 84% D9 85% D8% B6% D9 84% D9 84% D8% A9-% D9 81% D9% 8A% D8% B1% D9 88% D8% B3-% D8% A3% D9 83% D8% AB% D8% B1-% D8% A7% D9% 86% D8% AA% D8% B4% D8% A7% D8% B1% D8 A7 http://tribune.com.pk/story/2208176/8-connection-5g-COVID-19 5) He also has Turkish and English CV's of his own and enough information about himself and his work. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, and I offer resources from other official institutions 6) Erasmus Program Training I presented as a source, https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/tech-addiction-poses-mental-physical-threats-expert-150261/ In addition, the Russian National Press has given his views on the Social Media Law Regulation in Russia after the International Conference he attended. https://www.oprf.ru/press/news/2617/newsitem/56156 https://www.gazeta.ru/tech/2020/12/10_a_13394533.shtml 7) One of his articles translated into Vietnamese and published in the entire Vietnamese national press https://ictnews.vietnamnet.vn/cuoc-song-so/tong-thong-trump-mang-xa-hoi-dang-thao-tung-tu -do-ngon-luan-cua-cong-chung-253844.html 8) Self-written and published Children's storybook translated into Turkish and English He wrote a book called Muzip Yaman telling about technology addiction for primary and secondary school children, and it was translated into English with the name Willy Yaman. More resources from all the details are available on Google All of the resources I have provided to date meet all the criteria. He is an author, an educator, his book has been published. Please help me before deleting this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 15:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable school. WP:BEFORE only reveals passing mentions in sources, so does not pass WP:ORG or WP:N. pinktoebeans (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Vanity article on a non-notable rapper. Has no decent coverage outside self-published sources like Soundcloud, Fandom, Linkedin, Spotify, Apple Music etc.
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN but all the best to him. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable publisher, I cannot find any significant coverage of the publisher to satisfy WP:COMPANY. Has been tagged and unrefenced for 10 years. Jay Jay What did I do? 03:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Child actor in 3 Ninjas films at the age of 8-10, who fails the notability bar outside of that. Geschichte ( talk) 08:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to East Longmeadow School District. Sandstein 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Lack of WP:RS and fails WP:NSCHOOL — Amkgp 💬 17:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT. Creator is also suspected of undisclosed paid COI. WP:TOOSOON at best. Adam9007 ( talk) 17:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. I tried to PROD it, but an IP-only user removed the PROD without any comments. Thanks, Kolma8 ( talk) 17:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actress. Previous versions of the article included the subject's plans to start producing and had a section on 'becoming a celebrity.' Let's look at the references:
[21] This is a movie review on how to throw a party at the Playboy Mansion. I cannot find a mention of the subject here.
[22] IMDB, and credited as 'Girl at Party #1.
[23] same, credited as 'Model 2.
[24] same, credited as 'Newsroom Porn Star.
[25] Her blog.
[26] Her blog again.
More recently, she had a bit role in a web series called 'Bite Me.' She acted in three episodes. The series ran for two seasons but as a web series (YouTube, I think) this does not establish notability as an actress.
Also, in performing a
WP:BEFORE search, she was a subject of a news story for allegedly misusing AirBnB and annoying her neighbors, but she was not charged.
So in summary, the sources do not add up to making WP:NACTOR nor WP:GNG. The recent news item does not contribute either to her notability, thus the nomination for deletion. Jip Orlando ( talk) 17:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Article has been turned into a redirect and the nomination was withdrawn, and so eligible for speedy closure. Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
not an independently notable business woman, no objection to a redirect where she is mentioned in her fathers page but as of right now the only sources talk about her in relation to her father or are basically press releases/passing mentions about the company. Perhaps an article on the company would be more appropriate with a redirect there but I fail to see how she is independently notable. CUPIDICAE💕 17:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. The nomination has received little support and plenty of opposition and so there is no consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) Andrew🐉( talk) 19:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
American is not a monarchy. We have no heirs presumptive, and as Massachusetts showed last year people have stopped bowing to the Kennedy family and their false presumptions they are better than the rest of us. There is nothing about this guy that is anywhere near notability, and the fact that foreign journalists disrespect our Republicanism and create articles built on false assumptions of inheritance of office and power is not in and of itself a good reason to have an article on someone who has never made any notable accomplishments John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable artist who fails WP:ARTIST, WP:ANYBIO, WP:SIGCOV. Citations in the article are only some passing mention. Google search doesn't provide anything better. RationalPuff ( talk) 16:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
non notable student actor, no major roles and no in depth coverage in any language. CUPIDICAE💕 16:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; not notable outside of posts by Satoshi Nakamoto, and it is already adequately covered in that article. Guy Macon ( talk) 15:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
There appears to be some discrepancy here. He either fails WP:NFOOTBALL or just about skin-of-teeth passes it with one game. Soccerbase is the source that suggests that he did play one league game about six years ago. Soccerway, HLSZ and MLSZ all suggest that he does not pass WP:NFOOTBALL. Please note that the league cup game was against a third tier side so wouldn't qualify him for notability and that kispad means he sat on the bench and didn't play, if my Hungarian teacher has taught me correctly. In terms of coverage, the best I could find was name checks here and here as well as a paragraph on his club's own site and this very, very brief interview so I think he doesn't pass WP:GNG either. If we say, for the sake of argument, that he did play that one league game, there is still strong consensus from more than 100 AfDs that this is not sufficient when GNG is not met. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The subject fails WP:GNG - there are plenty of refs, however there is no significant coverage - only passing mentions. It's also a WP:COMPOSER fail - none of the awards are major, the pieces composed are not notable. The page was deleted but there were no significant changes to the career ever since. Less Unless ( talk) 14:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per G5. ( non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 10:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Only one review source cited Jenyire2 ( talk) 18:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional character. Zero real world notability as per WP:PLOT. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 15:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Cuoxo ( talk) 14:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 15:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The gentleman fails our notability threshold. He appears to be a WP:ROTM businessman, doming his job well, but not meeting WP:N. Fiddle Faddle 13:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Current sources doesn't pass WP:GNG Cuoxo ( talk) 13:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Was originally deleted through Prod. Then re-created as a redirect to the footballer Andy Langford. Was then turned into an article about this basketball player/coach. Redirect was restored and article was recreated. Speedy was declined due to playing professional basketball. However, the team he played for does not qualify for WP:NBASKET (the correct link, which isn't in the current article is this. So, fails both WP:GNG and WP:NBASKET. Onel5969 TT me 13:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 ( talk) 15:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable "scene". At best worth a mention in the skinhead article. Geschichte ( talk) 09:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear notable though his father and brother are. Holding a portfolio in an organisation does not bring automatic notability. Vikram Vincent 11:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy WP:NACTOR. No WP:SIGCOV on his career. – DarkGlow ( contribs • talk) 01:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
I’m mostly a user of Wikipedia and just wanted to mention that I specifically came to search for Timothy Innes’ page because he plays King Edward in season 4 of the last kingdom. I am sure you have good reasons to delete the page but it would be a shame not to have some kind of the information available on this actor. 06:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhodydog ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks WP:ACADEMICS, just received an award from his college. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 11:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.. BrxBrx( talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 15:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
president of a notable national or international scholarly society, etc.- the only problem I see is that the SLAAS might itself not be considered a notable national society, depending on how one sees the scientific community of Sri Lanka. BrxBrx( talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 15:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Tagged as probably not notable and having poor sources for almost 2 years now. I did a WP:BEFORE search and couldn't find any independent coverage on this company nor its founder Simon Davies. The incredibly generic name does not help at all, though. The references provided are a blog, two promo pieces and the company's own website and I have found no indication online that this can pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced article about non-notable person, credited with only non-notable music and film works. Fails WP:GNG / WP:CREATIVE. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced promo piece about a non-notable musician, fails WP:GNG / WP:MUSICBIO. Also, so full of unsourced BLP claims, peacockery and either OR and/or COI editing, that even if the subject were notable, the article would need WP:TNT. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not look to pass WP:NFOOTBALL as has never played in a competitive match between two teams playing in leagues listed at WP:FPL in the fully professional section of the page nor does he appear to have any full senior caps for Angola. My WP:BEFORE search did not yield any significant coverage of the player nor do any of the three sources used in the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
No sources cited. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 06:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
no evidence for the significance of the theory. Some of the references are untraceable, and Google Scholar and google shows that no publication on this theory has had more than a very small number of references. Some of the people associated with the article are notable -- but that's because of their other work, none of which is very closely related to this.
This was apparently the result of an educational assignment back in 2009. We were just starting such projects then, had had very little in the way of standards to go by. . DGG ( talk ) 06:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Highly promotional article on non-notable organization, almost all the content does not belong in an encyclopedia but on their web site. A list of grants made is not encyclopedia content. A list of partner organizations (most of them non-notable ) with no accompanying information aboutthe partnerships, is not encyclopedic content. And almost none of the references are third party. They are either a publication of a supported researcher, or a mere news item about the organization. Shouldn ever have been accepted from Draf. DGG ( talk ) 06:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Original reason was: Not a notable number (apart from maybe
p value but that's hardly worth mentioning here)
. Reason still stands.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Fractions from halves (1/2) to twentieths (1/20 to 19/20) are acceptable at this point.
These are proposals.Can't see that these proposals have ever gained wide acceptance. — Kusma ( t· c) 22:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whether to also create a redirect is an editorial matter, as there's been no discussion of that proposal here. Sandstein 08:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Tagged since 2017. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR which requires significant roles in multiple notable productions. Perhaps best known for a long-running series of TV commercials for a New Zealand bank - but as his character already has a standalone article, I'm not sure the actor merits a standalone biography per WP:NOTINHERIT. Muzilon ( talk) 04:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Sandstein 08:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Nothing in the sourcing to indicate it passes WP:BCAST, and searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boney M. discography#Non-international compilation albums. And protect. Sandstein 08:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Did not chart. Fails WP:NALBUM. This venue is a last resort after multiple redirect overwrites. Another common target of WP:LTA/HANOI Jalen Folf (talk) 01:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boney M. discography#Non-international compilation albums. And protect. Sandstein 08:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Did not chart. Fails WP:NALBUM. This venue is a last resort after multiple redirect overwrites. Another common target of WP:LTA/HANOI. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:1E for modeling—the Superbods contest doesn't have a page, and the (encyclopedic) content of this page is essentially accounted for on Mister World Philippines—and WP:ENT for acting—his ( IMDB page only lists minor roles in two television dramas. – LogStar100 ( talk) 01:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Danube#Names and etymology. Sandstein 08:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
An alternate name for the Danube River, and probably all that's needed on this topic is one or two sentences on that page. The true purpose of this article seems to be coatracking for various debates on whether or not Nostradamus correctly predicted the rise of Adolf Hitler, and should therefore be deleted. Thunderbunny ( talk) 01:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Wrong venue. The nominator (oddly) nominated this redirect at RfD before self-reverting. (non-admin closure) — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 03:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not even a thing. Seems to be a misspelling of Amman. Greenknight dv ( talk) 01:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I can find no reliable sources to add Chavay, Ecuador or Lake Chavay to an existing article. Perhaps redirect to Chavay Kuy? Leschnei ( talk) 13:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jimmy DiResta. Sandstein 08:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Prodded with "he coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". Prod removed w/out ratinale. I am not seeing any reliable discussion out there, few mentions in passing, the best is this short passage from the toy creator: [29]. This is a bit longer but of dubious reliability. Non-notable toy. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Promotional and non-notable. It would do very well as a web page for the organization. The Overview half is a product catalog. The History half is a list of funding, and a repetition of their promotional efforts.; the references, as expected, are pure promotion and advertising. --some are even in places like Newswire, which isa dedicate PR site. Some are interviews designed for the founders to say how good their project is. Most are mere notices. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CreativeLive. DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to New Castle County, Delaware. Sandstein 08:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails GNG. We rarely have county legislatures, unless they are of really notable counties like LA County. Iamreallygoodatcheckers ( talk) 06:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2006 United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona. Consensus exists below that the article shouldn't exist (the delete and merge arguments were the most compelling), so I was left with having to identify which of those was the stronger argued case. I have narrowly come down on the side of merging the content, in part because preserving content is a decent argument for merge over deletion, and secondly because the majority of the delete arguments did not preclude a merge as being an option they were open to. Daniel ( talk) 09:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The article fails WP:GNG and WP:SPLIT. It is literally just an ordinary election. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 23:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
"I confess my bias as the 3rd-party candidate in this race"Great for telling me that for some reason. That only weakens the Keep argument. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 02:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete as spam. There is unambiguous consensus against retaining the article. Unusual influx of single-purpose accounts discounted, obviously. El_C 05:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Run-of-the-mill businessman who does not satisfy general notability. The article does not show significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Naïve Google search shows that Hannibal Brumskine II and Hannibal Brumskine III exist and that III uses social media. We knew that.
Article was created by paid editor in violation of conflict of interest policy, which could be dealt with by moving to draft space for review, but there is already also a draft. The draft can be left alone. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
·Keep. The individual covered in the article's references are not run of the mill and the article's topics and stories themself explain why the individual is not. The coverage is also significant, hence why there is an Early Life section in this article. If you'd like to see that section improved, then please offer constructive suggestions. African publications and the Wikipedia pages that are established from them are important. As for the paid editor, this was disclosed on the article's talk page in compliance with Wikipedia's position. “Hannibal Brumskine II and Hannibal Brumskine III exist, and that III uses social media. We knew that.” Not sure what you mean by this? 68.100.232.86 ( talk) 06:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm putting this through AfD in case anyone thinks there is any connection between this siding and Soledad Prison, whose entrance is indeed roughly opposite this spot. It's possible that the pre-existence of the siding made it convenient to build the prison nearby, but it is not the case that there was ever anything resembling a town; maybe there was a station building here (it's not clear either way) but the siding, which has always run at a diagonal away from the main, rather than the usual parallel position, and given the rural location was probably there to load produce; at any rate, for some forty years or more, it has served a produce shipping warehouse. That is what the GHits indicate as well, when they are not recording an impressive set of misscans and other false hits. It's not a notable rail location, and certainly not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 23:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HistoricalAccountings ( talk) 15:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
No need to be a seperate article. Minor variation of a food group and the article has no extra information. Fryedk ( talk) 22:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment Not sure why this can't be a separate page? The existing page is extremely large, and we already have boiled peanuts, list of peanut dishes, peanut butter etc. However I am not sure if the refs show notability for a separate page like the other articles. There is only one article provided (SFGate) that could be called significant (though that's dubious), most of the others are primary. If other editors improve it (wp:hey) I vote Keep, if not it is a Delete. Davidstewartharvey ( talk) 06:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 20:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORGCRIT. A before search links to a plethora of primary sources such as this. Celestina007 ( talk) 22:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus to delete this text. Whether it should be kept as is or merged is an editorial decision that does not require AfD. StarM 02:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC) StarM 02:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
This article does not pass WP:GNG or WP:SPLIT. It's literally just an ordinary election. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 22:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The sources given are Google Lyrics and an interview with the subject. Given that he has released just one single with a record label, it's not surprising there isn't much coverage on him. Perhaps he'll be notable one day, bur for now the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO Modussiccandi ( talk) 21:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A whole lot of "I like it" vs" I don't like it" arguments here, but there doesn't appear to be a strong consensus to delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 22:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. A first lieutenant who died in a training accident and received common awards. Lettler hello • contribs 15:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
agenda to delete articles of heroic Hispanic military personnel, and I would ask you to please dial back your assumptions of bad faith - the fact is there are quite a few articles on non-notable military personel that were created based on misconstrued presumptions of notability like yours, and therefore, when they are cleaned up, it can look like "targeting" until you consider the actual facts. That said, being the first Puerto Rican pilot in the USAAF should be a presumption of notability, but...
WP:GNG does not seem to apply hereOn what basis is this rather bold assertion made? - The Bushranger One ping only 21:54, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subjectbeyond WP:JNN. jp× g 16:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus to delete. Some discussion between keeping and merging, but it looks like that discussion might need to be broader in scope and brought up in a different venue. bibliomaniac 1 5 22:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
This article does not pass WP:SPLIT or WP:GNG. It's literally just a regular election race. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 21:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG; no other mentions in reputable sources, the subject generally appears to be a somewhat high achieving engineer, but there's no proof of established notability. There are no third party independent sources about them. The article was created by a new single-purpose account that have made no other edits in past two years. GreaterPonce665 ( TALK) 21:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Technically meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to 25 mins of professional football but a Hungarian search did not uncover any significant coverage on the player. The best source that I could find was this brief match report. As per recent consensus on similar cases, deletion should be considered. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGCRIT. Only one reliable source reported, which is now a dead link. Cannot find any other reliable sources in Google search. Rogermx ( talk) 20:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 20:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTESSAY. Reads like the introductory paragraph of an Architecture 101 essay. KidAd talk 20:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
This is long, long overdue. Unsourced for 16 years and my WP:BEFORE search is not turning up the sort of coverage required to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. NCORP is a high bar, to be fair, but for good reason. This has no hits at all on Google News, Google Books or ProQuest. Even the Discogs page is bare. There is also nothing coming up in a British newspaper search. I think this is actually the first time I've searched something and had no hits!
This surely, surely does not meet 2021 Wikipedia notability standards for a company. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO, WP:NAUTHOR. None of the references provide in-depth, reliable, independent coverage of Unay. Routine coverage only that is likely self-promotion. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 19:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
1) If you search "Deniz Unay Social Media Expert" on Google News, you can find many explanations and articles in English. 2) "Sea Ünay" living in Turkey can examine a major name kaynaklard career completely addictive for Technology in Turkey "Social Responsibility Project" offers training and seminars for 5 years. not only in Turkey Erasmus Project has trained in eğitimcilere from abroad covered Finally, the Russian government Advocates of unity "for Social Media Regulation in Russia" online with expert names in the field in the world to have been invited to the conference Feedback has been published by inviting institutions and the Russian national press. 3) In addition, his articles have been translated into more than 15 languages. As you can see on the Talk page, Al Jazeraa has been featured in important news websites and International agencies such as Pakistan NY TIMES. 4) Deniz UNAY's views on the Covid 19 infodemia were included in the "Europan Science" Science journal and in the Spanish science article. 5) This article was previously rejected as duplicate content. Then it turned out that after my article was published, this error was copied and published by other sites. 6) Yesterday this article was approved by an admin, and then a warning was issued for this article in the form of a paid and for money article. I did not pay any name to any of them. This is definitely a mistake just like a copy content error, and I have no problem to give anyone a dignity that they do not have. Imagine if a person has been doing important studies in his country and around the world for 5 years, if his articles are translated from language to language and published, do you think there may be a doubt, I just added what I think is the most important by reviewing more than 2000 articles on googe news. It would be approved in a shorter time, not a long and controversial process like 4 months. 7) As for the conversations in the Wikipedia support chat room. I have applied all positive and constructive evaluations I deleted what I should have deleted I corrected the statements deemed inappropriate in the article. But I did not hurt me in the face of hurtful behavior towards me. I tried to understand and apply it correctly within 4 months. If the subject of this article did not deserve to be on Wikipedia, maybe it would be deleted in the first days. Frankly, it was a reason that made me hope and gave up. Finally, I do not want to lose my belief that you will be more positive and constructive in this article. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs)
Look, there are dozens of articles in Google News results. There is a Protocol document with the Ministry of Education. We are not talking about an ordinary person An important name who produces projects, whose opinions are asked, his articles have been translated into 15 languages, and his views used in science articles It's true I have trouble understanding Wikipedia, but I'm sure this person really deserves to be on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 10:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Hello As far as I understand from the press in Turkey and I need to make a statement about the sources 1) "Anadolu Agency", one of my sources, is the state's news agency and is a 100-year-old news agency. "Anadolu Agency" broadcasts in about 10 languages. Here you need to be an important person to make a statement or express an opinion. 2) The Independent in Turkey Sea Ünay page belonging text itself has not caused any significant article you published. https://www.indyturk.com/node/136106/t%C3%BCrkiyeden-sesler/%C3%A7e%C5%9Fitli-ya%C5%9F-gruplar%C4%B1nda-teknoloji-ba%C4%9F % C4% B1ml% C4% B1l% C4% B1% C4% 9F% C4% B1-you-how-up-e-social 3) Many national publications such as Hurriyet, Milliyet in Turkey, Haberturk has included the explanation repeatedly. 4) Approximately 5 years in Turkey CNN consulted several times in the national news as Turkish TRT channel. 5) Recently, for the adverse share on social media for Vaccine Denial of Turkey Ministry of Health Sciences Board members who place their opinions after Anadolu Agency joined the program to the TV program has a news service https://www.aa.com.tr/en/latest-on-coronavirus-outbreak/combat-infodemic-over-covid-19-vaccines-says-expert/2108013 In the title of this article, he is mentioned as a Turkish Social Media Expert and writer. It is also a name that has entered many national and international sources. why would you prefer paid publications? If you have contact with Wikipedia Turkish editors, these resources will definitely verify you. Frankly, I hope you will understand better and help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 10:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Has been featured in Kazakhstan News agency and websites https://www.google.com/search?q=site:kz+%22deniz+unay%22&filter=0&biw=1280&bih=612 Also in Vietnam https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Avn+%22deniz+unay%22&oq=site%3Avn+%22deniz+unay%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.7452j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Spanish https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/tecnologia/1/coronavirus-infodemia-pandemia There are many places even outside Turkey Please don't be so biased and negative For Wikipedia, it is not enough for you that someone has done major projects with the "Educator" Volunteer Author and the Ministry of Education in his own country. For example, look at this He prepared great galleries with his signature on special occasions such as Mother's Day, April 23 Children's Day, and these galleries became news in all national media. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/pg/foto-galeri/basin-ilan-kurumundan-anneler-gunu-albumu- https://www.trthaber.com/haber/turkiye/dunya-gundemine-yon-veren-isimlerin-cocukluk-halleri-412886.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm having trouble understanding the discussion here 1) From the very beginning; I work with all my good intentions and efforts and offer many resources and references. But each editor looks at the behavior of the other and writes Delete, Delete Quickly Delete. 2) Well, if everyone is going to behave so cruelly and unfairly, new editors won't have much chance to survive ... 3) Yes, if you really want to lynch and delete them collectively, I don't have the power to prevent it. You can delete it is possible. 4) Everyone deserves to be conscientious, to see the effort, to be just and kind. Finally, if a referee or review team will listen to me and understand me, I am sure, outside of this environment. a more just conclusion will come ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Please could you help me with this article /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources Say here Editors may also use material from reliable non-academic sources, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include:
University-level textbooks Books published by respected publishing houses Magazines Mainstream newspapers
Ok let's take a look at my resources accordingly 1) file: /// Users / denizunay / Downloads / 6101-14047-1-PB% 20 (8) .pdf Europine Science Peer-reviewed scientific journal published in Europe The article is published by citing his article published by Anadolu Agency. 2) http://revistaestilosdeaprendizaje.com/article/download/2171/3207/ Scientific Paper Study for the European Observatory Committee of Experts Peer-reviewed scientific journal published in Europe The article is published by citing his article published by Anadolu Agency. 3) https://www.trt.net.tr/vizyondergisi/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/mart-2019.pdf State television TRT in Turkey belongs to "TRT Vision" magazine cover his "Game Not Cyberbullying" Cover the warning did. This news operation in the Republic of Turkey News on page 30 was given to the views of the Minister of Education and Minister of Transport. 4) Among my sources were links of organizations that broadcast Mainstream Regularly. Anadolu Agency Takes Jazerá Hurriyet, Milliyet bianet.org independent Turkish Haberturk tribune.co inside and outside of Turkey, such as many reliable sources https://mubasher.aljazeera.net/news/politics/2020/4/12/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%D9%85%D8 % A7% D8% AA-% D8% A7% D9 84% D9 85% D8% B6% D9 84% D9 84% D8% A9-% D9 81% D9% 8A% D8% B1% D9 88% D8% B3-% D8% A3% D9 83% D8% AB% D8% B1-% D8% A7% D9% 86% D8% AA% D8% B4% D8% A7% D8% B1% D8 A7 http://tribune.com.pk/story/2208176/8-connection-5g-COVID-19 5) He also has Turkish and English CV's of his own and enough information about himself and his work. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, and I offer resources from other official institutions 6) Erasmus Program Training I presented as a source, https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/tech-addiction-poses-mental-physical-threats-expert-150261/ In addition, the Russian National Press has given his views on the Social Media Law Regulation in Russia after the International Conference he attended. https://www.oprf.ru/press/news/2617/newsitem/56156 https://www.gazeta.ru/tech/2020/12/10_a_13394533.shtml 7) One of his articles translated into Vietnamese and published in the entire Vietnamese national press https://ictnews.vietnamnet.vn/cuoc-song-so/tong-thong-trump-mang-xa-hoi-dang-thao-tung-tu -do-ngon-luan-cua-cong-chung-253844.html 8) Self-written and published Children's storybook translated into Turkish and English He wrote a book called Muzip Yaman telling about technology addiction for primary and secondary school children, and it was translated into English with the name Willy Yaman. More resources from all the details are available on Google All of the resources I have provided to date meet all the criteria. He is an author, an educator, his book has been published. Please help me before deleting this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer ( talk • contribs) 15:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable school. WP:BEFORE only reveals passing mentions in sources, so does not pass WP:ORG or WP:N. pinktoebeans (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Vanity article on a non-notable rapper. Has no decent coverage outside self-published sources like Soundcloud, Fandom, Linkedin, Spotify, Apple Music etc.
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN but all the best to him. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable publisher, I cannot find any significant coverage of the publisher to satisfy WP:COMPANY. Has been tagged and unrefenced for 10 years. Jay Jay What did I do? 03:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Child actor in 3 Ninjas films at the age of 8-10, who fails the notability bar outside of that. Geschichte ( talk) 08:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to East Longmeadow School District. Sandstein 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Lack of WP:RS and fails WP:NSCHOOL — Amkgp 💬 17:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT. Creator is also suspected of undisclosed paid COI. WP:TOOSOON at best. Adam9007 ( talk) 17:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE. I tried to PROD it, but an IP-only user removed the PROD without any comments. Thanks, Kolma8 ( talk) 17:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actress. Previous versions of the article included the subject's plans to start producing and had a section on 'becoming a celebrity.' Let's look at the references:
[21] This is a movie review on how to throw a party at the Playboy Mansion. I cannot find a mention of the subject here.
[22] IMDB, and credited as 'Girl at Party #1.
[23] same, credited as 'Model 2.
[24] same, credited as 'Newsroom Porn Star.
[25] Her blog.
[26] Her blog again.
More recently, she had a bit role in a web series called 'Bite Me.' She acted in three episodes. The series ran for two seasons but as a web series (YouTube, I think) this does not establish notability as an actress.
Also, in performing a
WP:BEFORE search, she was a subject of a news story for allegedly misusing AirBnB and annoying her neighbors, but she was not charged.
So in summary, the sources do not add up to making WP:NACTOR nor WP:GNG. The recent news item does not contribute either to her notability, thus the nomination for deletion. Jip Orlando ( talk) 17:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Article has been turned into a redirect and the nomination was withdrawn, and so eligible for speedy closure. Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
not an independently notable business woman, no objection to a redirect where she is mentioned in her fathers page but as of right now the only sources talk about her in relation to her father or are basically press releases/passing mentions about the company. Perhaps an article on the company would be more appropriate with a redirect there but I fail to see how she is independently notable. CUPIDICAE💕 17:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. The nomination has received little support and plenty of opposition and so there is no consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) Andrew🐉( talk) 19:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
American is not a monarchy. We have no heirs presumptive, and as Massachusetts showed last year people have stopped bowing to the Kennedy family and their false presumptions they are better than the rest of us. There is nothing about this guy that is anywhere near notability, and the fact that foreign journalists disrespect our Republicanism and create articles built on false assumptions of inheritance of office and power is not in and of itself a good reason to have an article on someone who has never made any notable accomplishments John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable artist who fails WP:ARTIST, WP:ANYBIO, WP:SIGCOV. Citations in the article are only some passing mention. Google search doesn't provide anything better. RationalPuff ( talk) 16:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
non notable student actor, no major roles and no in depth coverage in any language. CUPIDICAE💕 16:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; not notable outside of posts by Satoshi Nakamoto, and it is already adequately covered in that article. Guy Macon ( talk) 15:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
There appears to be some discrepancy here. He either fails WP:NFOOTBALL or just about skin-of-teeth passes it with one game. Soccerbase is the source that suggests that he did play one league game about six years ago. Soccerway, HLSZ and MLSZ all suggest that he does not pass WP:NFOOTBALL. Please note that the league cup game was against a third tier side so wouldn't qualify him for notability and that kispad means he sat on the bench and didn't play, if my Hungarian teacher has taught me correctly. In terms of coverage, the best I could find was name checks here and here as well as a paragraph on his club's own site and this very, very brief interview so I think he doesn't pass WP:GNG either. If we say, for the sake of argument, that he did play that one league game, there is still strong consensus from more than 100 AfDs that this is not sufficient when GNG is not met. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 20:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The subject fails WP:GNG - there are plenty of refs, however there is no significant coverage - only passing mentions. It's also a WP:COMPOSER fail - none of the awards are major, the pieces composed are not notable. The page was deleted but there were no significant changes to the career ever since. Less Unless ( talk) 14:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per G5. ( non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 10:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Only one review source cited Jenyire2 ( talk) 18:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable fictional character. Zero real world notability as per WP:PLOT. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 15:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Cuoxo ( talk) 14:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Tone 15:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The gentleman fails our notability threshold. He appears to be a WP:ROTM businessman, doming his job well, but not meeting WP:N. Fiddle Faddle 13:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Current sources doesn't pass WP:GNG Cuoxo ( talk) 13:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 15:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Was originally deleted through Prod. Then re-created as a redirect to the footballer Andy Langford. Was then turned into an article about this basketball player/coach. Redirect was restored and article was recreated. Speedy was declined due to playing professional basketball. However, the team he played for does not qualify for WP:NBASKET (the correct link, which isn't in the current article is this. So, fails both WP:GNG and WP:NBASKET. Onel5969 TT me 13:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Nothing notable on a WP:BEFORE Kolma8 ( talk) 15:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable "scene". At best worth a mention in the skinhead article. Geschichte ( talk) 09:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear notable though his father and brother are. Holding a portfolio in an organisation does not bring automatic notability. Vikram Vincent 11:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy WP:NACTOR. No WP:SIGCOV on his career. – DarkGlow ( contribs • talk) 01:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
I’m mostly a user of Wikipedia and just wanted to mention that I specifically came to search for Timothy Innes’ page because he plays King Edward in season 4 of the last kingdom. I am sure you have good reasons to delete the page but it would be a shame not to have some kind of the information available on this actor. 06:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhodydog ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Lacks WP:ACADEMICS, just received an award from his college. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 11:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.. BrxBrx( talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 15:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
president of a notable national or international scholarly society, etc.- the only problem I see is that the SLAAS might itself not be considered a notable national society, depending on how one sees the scientific community of Sri Lanka. BrxBrx( talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}}) 15:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Tagged as probably not notable and having poor sources for almost 2 years now. I did a WP:BEFORE search and couldn't find any independent coverage on this company nor its founder Simon Davies. The incredibly generic name does not help at all, though. The references provided are a blog, two promo pieces and the company's own website and I have found no indication online that this can pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced article about non-notable person, credited with only non-notable music and film works. Fails WP:GNG / WP:CREATIVE. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Poorly-sourced promo piece about a non-notable musician, fails WP:GNG / WP:MUSICBIO. Also, so full of unsourced BLP claims, peacockery and either OR and/or COI editing, that even if the subject were notable, the article would need WP:TNT. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Does not look to pass WP:NFOOTBALL as has never played in a competitive match between two teams playing in leagues listed at WP:FPL in the fully professional section of the page nor does he appear to have any full senior caps for Angola. My WP:BEFORE search did not yield any significant coverage of the player nor do any of the three sources used in the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
No sources cited. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 06:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
no evidence for the significance of the theory. Some of the references are untraceable, and Google Scholar and google shows that no publication on this theory has had more than a very small number of references. Some of the people associated with the article are notable -- but that's because of their other work, none of which is very closely related to this.
This was apparently the result of an educational assignment back in 2009. We were just starting such projects then, had had very little in the way of standards to go by. . DGG ( talk ) 06:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Highly promotional article on non-notable organization, almost all the content does not belong in an encyclopedia but on their web site. A list of grants made is not encyclopedia content. A list of partner organizations (most of them non-notable ) with no accompanying information aboutthe partnerships, is not encyclopedic content. And almost none of the references are third party. They are either a publication of a supported researcher, or a mere news item about the organization. Shouldn ever have been accepted from Draf. DGG ( talk ) 06:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Original reason was: Not a notable number (apart from maybe
p value but that's hardly worth mentioning here)
. Reason still stands.
Jalen Folf
(talk)
05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Fractions from halves (1/2) to twentieths (1/20 to 19/20) are acceptable at this point.
These are proposals.Can't see that these proposals have ever gained wide acceptance. — Kusma ( t· c) 22:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whether to also create a redirect is an editorial matter, as there's been no discussion of that proposal here. Sandstein 08:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Tagged since 2017. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR which requires significant roles in multiple notable productions. Perhaps best known for a long-running series of TV commercials for a New Zealand bank - but as his character already has a standalone article, I'm not sure the actor merits a standalone biography per WP:NOTINHERIT. Muzilon ( talk) 04:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Sandstein 08:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Nothing in the sourcing to indicate it passes WP:BCAST, and searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boney M. discography#Non-international compilation albums. And protect. Sandstein 08:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Did not chart. Fails WP:NALBUM. This venue is a last resort after multiple redirect overwrites. Another common target of WP:LTA/HANOI Jalen Folf (talk) 01:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boney M. discography#Non-international compilation albums. And protect. Sandstein 08:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Did not chart. Fails WP:NALBUM. This venue is a last resort after multiple redirect overwrites. Another common target of WP:LTA/HANOI. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:1E for modeling—the Superbods contest doesn't have a page, and the (encyclopedic) content of this page is essentially accounted for on Mister World Philippines—and WP:ENT for acting—his ( IMDB page only lists minor roles in two television dramas. – LogStar100 ( talk) 01:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Danube#Names and etymology. Sandstein 08:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
An alternate name for the Danube River, and probably all that's needed on this topic is one or two sentences on that page. The true purpose of this article seems to be coatracking for various debates on whether or not Nostradamus correctly predicted the rise of Adolf Hitler, and should therefore be deleted. Thunderbunny ( talk) 01:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Wrong venue. The nominator (oddly) nominated this redirect at RfD before self-reverting. (non-admin closure) — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 03:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
This is not even a thing. Seems to be a misspelling of Amman. Greenknight dv ( talk) 01:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I can find no reliable sources to add Chavay, Ecuador or Lake Chavay to an existing article. Perhaps redirect to Chavay Kuy? Leschnei ( talk) 13:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jimmy DiResta. Sandstein 08:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Prodded with "he coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". Prod removed w/out ratinale. I am not seeing any reliable discussion out there, few mentions in passing, the best is this short passage from the toy creator: [29]. This is a bit longer but of dubious reliability. Non-notable toy. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Promotional and non-notable. It would do very well as a web page for the organization. The Overview half is a product catalog. The History half is a list of funding, and a repetition of their promotional efforts.; the references, as expected, are pure promotion and advertising. --some are even in places like Newswire, which isa dedicate PR site. Some are interviews designed for the founders to say how good their project is. Most are mere notices. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CreativeLive. DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to New Castle County, Delaware. Sandstein 08:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails GNG. We rarely have county legislatures, unless they are of really notable counties like LA County. Iamreallygoodatcheckers ( talk) 06:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)