![]() |
The result was redirect to Jake LaMotta. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Joseph LaMotta fails WP:N. A google search turns up barely any coverage, let alone coverage from reliable sources. He was the son of a notable person, and died in a notable disaster. That's it. This article needs to go. Tapered ( talk) 23:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 22:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 10:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
company with no-notability. Coverage are mere Press for being funded. nothing to add. Article is created for mere promotions and nothing else. Light2021 ( talk) 22:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Few more if you need to enhance your knowledge or my criteria of assessment. Do not make comment as Keep without assessing or passing Every article for Wikipedia. We are filled with such Directory and Corporate non-sesne Already. Thanks. Light2021 ( talk) 14:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The article notes:
mall and large enterprises have to procure industrial products from 100s of suppliers. Moglix, a business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce start-up, is trying to use technology to disrupt the traditional distribution channels for industrial products.
Recently, the B2B start-up which specialises in procurement of industrial products such as fasteners and industrial electricals, raised $4.2 million (Rs 28 crore) in a Series-A round of funding, led by Accel Partners, Jungle Ventures and SeedPlus. It had also raised $1.5 million (Rs 10 crore) in November last year in the pre-Series-A round from Accel Partners and Jungle Ventures. Ratan Tata also invested in the start-up in February.
Founded in August 2015 by Rahul Garg, the start-up caters to around 20,000 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and 100 large manufacturing houses through its platform. It has also partnered with manufacturers and distributors from China and Taiwan.
The article notes:
Founded in August 2015 by former Googler Rahul Garg, Moglix is focused on technologically disrupting the B2B industrial products space for suppliers and buyers across the globe. It specialises in B2B procurement of industrial products such as MRO, fasteners and industrial electricals.
...
Moglix recently raised pre-Series A funding from Accel Partners and Jungle Ventures and the funds are being used to enhance the technology platform, build a deep supplier base as well as increase marketing spends across Asia.
With its pre-Series A funds, the start-up was able to raise its core team from just two members -- Garg and his head of business operations, to a team of 7. It also strengthened its tech platform, says Garg.
...
Moglix has a client base of 100+ companies in the manufacturing sector. These companies typically have a turnover ranging from Rs 50 crore to Rs 1,000 crore.
The article notes:
Moglix, an ecommerce company specialising in B2B procurement of industrial products, plans to expand its footprint.
...
Founded in 2015, Moglix has been backed by VCs and industry leaders. ...
The company specialises in B2B procurement of industrial products such as MRO, Fasteners, and Industrial Electricals. In order to cater to these requirements, Moglix has partnered with manufacturers and distributors across these categories and is working with several large manufacturing companies to completely transform the business-buying.
The article notes:
When ex-Google employee Rahul Garg, conceptualized his startup in late 2014, he realized that the global trade of products was still operating in the old fashion, while the internet/ mobile, had led to democratization of the services and mobile app and advertising ecosystem.
His startup Moglix, is a B2B e-commerce platform, which specializes in B2B procurement of industrial products such as MROs, power tools, fasteners, electrical devices, industrial lubricants.
...
The Firm today announced that it has raised INR 28 crores in Series A round of funding led by Accel Partners with participation from Jungle Ventures and SeedPlus. Moglix has raised Pre-Series A funding from Accel Partners and Jungle Ventures in October 2015 and an undisclosed financial investment in the company by Ratan Tata in February 2016.
"Moglix, a business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce start-up, is trying to use....The company, which specialises in....has funding.... the start-up caters to around 20,000 small and medium-sized enterprises....It has partnered with....", " Rahul Garg, conceptualized his startup in late 2014, he realized....His start company, which specialises in....", "The Firm today announced that it has funding", "Moglix specialising in....The company specialises in" (literally within sentences and words of each other followed by "The company has been backed by....", "The company was able to get funding", "Moglix has a client base"
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable short film. PROD removed by an IP who added two references, one to IMDb and one showing this film as one entry in a list of 30 films that won awards at the LA Shorts Awards. The only other distinction claimed is a nomination for another award. Other references are all IMDb and Youtube. None show in-depth, independent discussion of the film. This is far short of the standard of WP:Notability (film). JohnCD ( talk) 21:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Transformers spacecraft. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
This fails to establish notability. Nothing was presented in previous AfDs to help with that. TTN ( talk) 19:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The article has been created way WP:TOOSOON. Although it is likely the contest will take place, it is still unknown as to what name the contest will go under as. Several sources have speculated names, including Asiavision, Asia-Eurovision, and Eurovision-Asia. The ABU (who is assumed to be the organisers) also have reported to the name ABU TV Cup Song Contest, to which ABU Cup TV Song Contest 2017 was redirected as being WP:TOOSOON with hardly any sources to warrant a standalone article at this current stage. TV shows which are still at the planning stage should not be granted an article unless the shows title is 100% confirmed. Wes Mouse T@lk 14:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
non notable writer. Most of the article is based upon SUR, apparently a tourist newspaper for English tourists in Spain. DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
WP:NOTADICTIONARY applies. I believe it means 'fucking bitch' in russian. It is indeed used commonly in the online CSGO community, but does not seem notable enough for its own article. Insert CleverPhrase Here 06:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
I could find no sources online to establish the notability of that particular sub-branch, though there are a few hits for the main company (for instance here (paywall) or here).
It would be nice to have more eyes on this; I have the gut feeling that the main company should pass notability but I did not find enough for it, so it may be that I missed a lot in my search. Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Aside from their own website, there are no sources of significant coverage to constitute notability for this non-charting group. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 15:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
I am struggling to see how this article meets WP:GNG. An irregularly published, rather short-lived publication that sounds like a fanzine and seems to be self-referencing. I'm guessing that the creator thought that contributions from some notable people would confer notability on the publication itself - it does not. Its co-publisher, Richard Shannon, is also of dubious notability. Sitush ( talk) 17:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
De-prodded for an unexplained reason while the problems still exist. My initial concern was: I don't see any real organized plot to this very short article. Also to mention that the title is not in English and I haven't a clue what it translates to. No improvements have been made at all. MPD ( Talk to me!) 15:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Non notable shopping centre, Google News brings up 3 results being mentions, and one result inregards to the centre having a new owner, I'd be happy to use it however that's not enough notability-wise, Google books brings up nothing, Fails GNG – Davey2010 Talk 13:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced BLP. Couldn't find any in-depth coverage of the subject that would point to notability. Psychonaut ( talk) 12:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Despite having scored "over twenty films and numerous TV shows", and having co-founded a commercial music licensing business, there is scant evidence of any significant independent coverage of Plessner's career. The two citations present (after I deleted the use of another Wikipedia page as a citation) are his own IMDb page and a Facebook page. Google shows me there's not much better available. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 07:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
PROD statement: Principal photography has not begun. Case of WP:TOOSOON. Nairspecht ( talk) 16:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Multiple issues, not verifyable, no sources. Fails WP:PEA but if peacockery is removed, no article is left. I left it some time to see if it would improve but it hasn't. ronaz Talk! 17:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
This is an unreferenced article on a local cable access channel. Would need to make WP:ORG, and I don't see how that could be possible. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep but add references please. Where are the references? Regards Expressway232 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Expressway232 ( talk • contribs) 05:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
NJon notable record label. Speedy removed because 'founders are notable' Not good enough imo; this is a slender and promotional article and I see no reason why the label is independatly notable TheLongTone ( talk) 12:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is poorly written and not a true comparison of bones and teeth. Major sections are essentially outlines of the qualities of teeth and of bones, which are already covered properly in their own articles. heather walls ( talk) 05:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
No source for content. No indication of nobility. Coderzombie ( talk) 08:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 09:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Was involved in a couple of films by her father. No other evidence of notability. ubiquity ( talk) 18:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Is the deputy leader of a largely burnt-out protest group that holds about 3-4 marches a year that usually attract less than a couple hundred people. Paul Golding and Britain First are probably notable, so maybe a merge is appropriate. However, there is nothing on the subject to satisfy WP:GNG JohnTombs48 ( talk) 17:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTTIMETABLE βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTTIMETABLE βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTTIMETABLE βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wayne Gretzky#Legacy. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 10:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable sports trophy Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. Can't find any significant coverage under any of his names. Kolbasz ( talk) 15:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD contested for no reason ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 15:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
From tone of writing to references. No references are found to this degree of claims made by this company. Highly and only promotional. No Encyclopedic notability. Awards and the way it has written influenced by company or made by them only. Light2021 ( talk) 15:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure) Jbh Talk 03:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Not need of disambiguation for just 1 page. Abbottonian ( talk) 15:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion. G12 copyright infringement. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete or move to Drilling. Abbottonian ( talk) 15:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
From tone of writing to Brochure links download as PDF. No references are found to this degree of claims made by this company. Highly and only promotional. No Encyclopedic notability. Light2021 ( talk) 15:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable. Highest degree or promotions. Wikipedia used as dumping corporate profile and the way it is written completely influenced by company or made by their team alone. Being old is not a criteria for Encyclopedic notability. Light2021 ( talk) 14:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:58, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
there are no sources whatsoever in this article and noting notable found in English on the web Domdeparis ( talk) 13:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete as the subject fails all notability criteria. Most of the "sources" cited are
self-published and
unreliable; including the book
John Wentworth wrote is about his own family. The author,
RWIR has been abusing Wikipedia for genealogy and this is one of many articles he's written which should not exist. I encourage you to look in the article history at the cruft this article had before I removed it.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
13:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback, though I was a little surprised at the word "abuse" and disappointed that Wentworth's three volume work, published by Little and Brown of Boston was considered self published or not reliable. Many have written about their own families, including Obama's Dreams from my father, and Ignatieff's Russian Album, and not just the Hon. John Wentworth. I will not object to the deletion of the Thomas Westbrook Waldron (Canada) article and thank everyone for the several years it has stayed on wikipedia without any challenge. Would be interested in learning what other articles are considered not notable? RWIR ( talk) 09:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if I was not clear, I have said that I would not object to this article's deletion. What I was commenting on was the assertion that Wentworth's book was self published or not reliable. Thanks again. RWIR ( talk) 06:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. COI spam Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No sources, obvious WP:COI and promotional. Kleuske ( talk) 13:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 11:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability SST flyer 13:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 15:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete-overspecific topic of dubious notability. The sourcing is there, but the importance is not. Editor is eager and energetic but has been content-forking these Philippine Scout articles for weeks, and they simply don't bear that much detail on Wikipedia Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 13:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails all criteria of WP:NACADEMIC: Google Scholar does not suggest frequent citation, and regular Google results are sparse as well. — swpb T 12:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
No sources at all Domdeparis ( talk) 12:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable national subevent of Miss Grand International, no more notable than the considerable number of articles about other Miss Grand national subevents that have previously been deleted here at AfD (such as Miss Grand Korea, Miss Grand Botswana, Miss Grand Argentina, Miss Grand Japan, Miss Grand Albania, Miss Grand Romania, Miss Grand Italy, Miss Grand Thailand, Miss Grand Cambodia, Miss Grand Algeria and Miss Grand Nepal; and Miss Grand México was redirected to Rostro de México, which has since been deleted...). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 12:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sarah Vowell#Short film. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable short film unsupported by any (reliable) sources. Carniolus ( talk) 11:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 15:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails to meet notability guidelines. All 31 references are press releases, or citations from captive publications of the media company that created the awards. Few or no independent news sources or publications cite or mention the awards. Mcenedella ( talk)( contribs) 09:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The latest bit of paid promotion for the non notable business. Business lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None of the so called awards are major. Current sourcing is a mix of PR, primary and a minor mentions. A search found nothing good for notability. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
The latest bit of paid promotion for the non notable business. Business lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Of the current sourcing: 3-5 are passing mentions; 1 is a social platform, not a reliable source, the founder talking about the business, not independent; 2 is a local interest piece. A search found more of the same and a lot of press releases. Nothing good for notability. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable medical biography. No significant contribution made to the field of medicine. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 08:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 04:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:SOLDIER, the subject must be recipient of the award for multiple times, if it is not the highest decoration of the country. Maha Vir Chakra is not the highest decoration of India. Also does not pass WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Vir Chakra is the third highest military decoration in India. Subject fails WP:SOLDIER and also WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:SOLDIER and also WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 10:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable award recipient. Per WP:SOLDIER, the subject has to be the recipient of highest award or recipient of lower award multiple times. Kirti Chakra is not the highest award in India. Also doesn't clearly pass WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 October 18, there are no procedural grounds to relisting this soon, since a new development has taken place. To summarize, from my DRV comment: Since the first AfD, this article has been deleted from Polish Wikipedia (which usually has much lower criteria for notability): pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2016:09:08:Barbara Matynia-Łyżwińska. Closing admin there concluded that a minor/local parish magazine and an obituary are not sufficient. As I feel that the deletion arguments (the subject is not notable either as an architect - all she has here is a short online bio at professional association she was a member of - and as an artist - her work is only mentioned in a local, niche, parish magazine) are significantly stronger then the votes to keep (one of which argued that said parish magazine is a sufficient source, the other that women architects are marginalized so we should keep this article to reduce our gender bias in coverage), and as there is no discussion on article's talk, despite my post there, I think we need to revisit this. Bottom line - not all architects are notable, and this one hasn't done anything to merit being in an encylopedia; ditto as an artist she fails WP:Notability (artists) - her work has not attracted attention form anywhere but said local parish magazine, and the claims of "multiple exhibitions" are not substantiated except said parish article based significantly on interview with the subject. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 10:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Claims no notability, fails WP:NALBUM. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 06:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Meets WP:ACADEMIC per consensus. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 14:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Self-written vanity page, doesn't meet the
prof test
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
05:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
@Jimfbleak I think it's a bit harsh to just state that this is a vanity page that doesn't meet the prof. test. I thought that meeting the following notability criteria for academics was sufficient? " 1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level."
The references provided substantiates this through their original, reliable sources showing 1) Ranked as no one on the world based on number of publications and number of citations and 2) receiving a Paper Impact award for the paper with the highest impact in the field during the last 10 years.
I'd like to now why you think these facts do not meet the above stated notability guidelines? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Toredy (
talk •
contribs)
11:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Jimfbleak, Thank you for your comment, I have read WP:COI, WP:Autobiography, and I understand them. If they trump notability, I will rest my case. But it doesn't seem fair given the thousands of similar, short pages about other (notable) academics. So, what I'd like to see, is that the moderators explain what it is with the two stated achievements that do not meet the academic notability guidelines. I'm just puzzled with what I experience as unfounded attacks...
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 15:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Regardless of how notable a footballer is, a list of league goals is not notable ( WP:NOTSTATS). While Wikipedia does have lists of goals scored, those are goals scored in international completion by footballers who are or were the top scorer for their nation. Anything worth keeping from this list can be merged into Lionel Messi. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 05:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable theatrical performer. A string of roles, but nothing worthy of note. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a former mayor in a city of about 60K. That's certainly large enough that a well-sourced article about a mayor could be kept, but it's not large enough that he gets an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, if the resulting article is this bad: the only reference cited here is a press release from a charitable organization about him participating in a fundraising event staged by that organization, thus making it a primary source that cannot support notability, and the article reads very much more like a PR blurb that could have been copied and pasted directly from his own campaign literature rather than an encyclopedia article. The Medicine Hat News is not archived in ProQuest's Canadian Newsstand Major Dailies database, so I can't do a repair job on this myself — I'm happy to withdraw this if somebody can locate enough coverage of him to source the article over WP:GNG, but it's not a keepable article in this state of substance and sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 21:36, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per below. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. I am not certain that CSD A11 is applicable, so taking to AfD. Article was previously PRODed and declined. Safiel ( talk) 05:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Unnecessary fork. We already have venues to write about it at Maheshinte Prathikaaram (soundtrack), which also is not really needed, and Maheshinte Prathikaaram. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 03:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment: The music section of Maheshinte Prathikaaram was split to separate articles due to bloating (72kb then, WP:TOOBIG), which was pointed out in its GA review. The "score" and the "soundtrack" are two independent albums. Both has separate release dates, album covers, track duration, and two separate type of infobox. Hence two independent articles. -- Charles Turing ( talk) 13:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
This movie was alleged to happen about four years ago. The director has never directed a movie before and there is no credible source after 2013 which talks about the movie Robinhio84 ( talk) 00:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the party is notable and sources exist. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 14:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Article fails to cite sources. The party has never won elected office. Fails WP:ORG. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 21:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. I could not locate reliable secondary sources to verify the notability of the subject. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 20:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete with a passing mention in Kia Motors. Nordic Nightfury 10:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The last nomination was discussed in 2006 and since then the criteria under WP:MUSIC have become stricter. In that context, the page does not list sufficient reliable sources or indicated notability. The long list of awards is inflated, the organisation that awards them (the Contemporary A Cappella Society) appears to be closely linked to the group. The overriding sense from the article is that this constitutes a college choir with little national profile, no chart success nor any international touring commitments. Karst ( talk) 13:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
"Musicians or ensembles ... may be notable if ... [they have] won first, second or third place in a major music competition."This article lists multiple first-place finishes at the Contemporary A Cappella Recording Awards. Personally, I don't think that the standards at WP:NMUSIC are strict enough, but the guideline apparently reflects community consensus, so I feel compelled to vote "keep." -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 03:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Potentially non-notable film personality. Discuss. Nairspecht ( talk) 12:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Nonnotable silly joke of a song
Staszek Lem (
talk)
00:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient coverage in RS to meet GNG. — swpb T 15:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The page belongs to Category:Jat clans, or one of its subcategories. All the pages of these categories lack the very basic notability guidelines. Failure WP:GNG. Must discussed and deleted per WP:NOT. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cedarsong Nature School. Black Kite (talk) 10:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:AUTHOR. Magnolia677 ( talk) 22:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
It appears at first glance that most (if not all) of the references are reports written by the subject of the article, rather than independent published
reliable sources talking about the subject. This may need further investigation by editors who can read the foreign language sources given as references.
David Biddulph (
talk)
00:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello –This article was written about the Journalist as a bio, so if it was posted in the wrong place, apologies in advance. Would like to keep this page if at all possible. Could you recommend how to post this article or the steps needed to keep an article about a known person on wiki? Thanks for your assistance and guidance to help keep this page alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taljazairi ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable individual. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, and WP:NACADEMIC. Also fails WP:POLITICIAN. – Muboshgu ( talk) 00:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to Jake LaMotta. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Joseph LaMotta fails WP:N. A google search turns up barely any coverage, let alone coverage from reliable sources. He was the son of a notable person, and died in a notable disaster. That's it. This article needs to go. Tapered ( talk) 23:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Rathfelder ( talk) 22:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 10:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
company with no-notability. Coverage are mere Press for being funded. nothing to add. Article is created for mere promotions and nothing else. Light2021 ( talk) 22:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Few more if you need to enhance your knowledge or my criteria of assessment. Do not make comment as Keep without assessing or passing Every article for Wikipedia. We are filled with such Directory and Corporate non-sesne Already. Thanks. Light2021 ( talk) 14:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The article notes:
mall and large enterprises have to procure industrial products from 100s of suppliers. Moglix, a business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce start-up, is trying to use technology to disrupt the traditional distribution channels for industrial products.
Recently, the B2B start-up which specialises in procurement of industrial products such as fasteners and industrial electricals, raised $4.2 million (Rs 28 crore) in a Series-A round of funding, led by Accel Partners, Jungle Ventures and SeedPlus. It had also raised $1.5 million (Rs 10 crore) in November last year in the pre-Series-A round from Accel Partners and Jungle Ventures. Ratan Tata also invested in the start-up in February.
Founded in August 2015 by Rahul Garg, the start-up caters to around 20,000 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and 100 large manufacturing houses through its platform. It has also partnered with manufacturers and distributors from China and Taiwan.
The article notes:
Founded in August 2015 by former Googler Rahul Garg, Moglix is focused on technologically disrupting the B2B industrial products space for suppliers and buyers across the globe. It specialises in B2B procurement of industrial products such as MRO, fasteners and industrial electricals.
...
Moglix recently raised pre-Series A funding from Accel Partners and Jungle Ventures and the funds are being used to enhance the technology platform, build a deep supplier base as well as increase marketing spends across Asia.
With its pre-Series A funds, the start-up was able to raise its core team from just two members -- Garg and his head of business operations, to a team of 7. It also strengthened its tech platform, says Garg.
...
Moglix has a client base of 100+ companies in the manufacturing sector. These companies typically have a turnover ranging from Rs 50 crore to Rs 1,000 crore.
The article notes:
Moglix, an ecommerce company specialising in B2B procurement of industrial products, plans to expand its footprint.
...
Founded in 2015, Moglix has been backed by VCs and industry leaders. ...
The company specialises in B2B procurement of industrial products such as MRO, Fasteners, and Industrial Electricals. In order to cater to these requirements, Moglix has partnered with manufacturers and distributors across these categories and is working with several large manufacturing companies to completely transform the business-buying.
The article notes:
When ex-Google employee Rahul Garg, conceptualized his startup in late 2014, he realized that the global trade of products was still operating in the old fashion, while the internet/ mobile, had led to democratization of the services and mobile app and advertising ecosystem.
His startup Moglix, is a B2B e-commerce platform, which specializes in B2B procurement of industrial products such as MROs, power tools, fasteners, electrical devices, industrial lubricants.
...
The Firm today announced that it has raised INR 28 crores in Series A round of funding led by Accel Partners with participation from Jungle Ventures and SeedPlus. Moglix has raised Pre-Series A funding from Accel Partners and Jungle Ventures in October 2015 and an undisclosed financial investment in the company by Ratan Tata in February 2016.
"Moglix, a business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce start-up, is trying to use....The company, which specialises in....has funding.... the start-up caters to around 20,000 small and medium-sized enterprises....It has partnered with....", " Rahul Garg, conceptualized his startup in late 2014, he realized....His start company, which specialises in....", "The Firm today announced that it has funding", "Moglix specialising in....The company specialises in" (literally within sentences and words of each other followed by "The company has been backed by....", "The company was able to get funding", "Moglix has a client base"
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable short film. PROD removed by an IP who added two references, one to IMDb and one showing this film as one entry in a list of 30 films that won awards at the LA Shorts Awards. The only other distinction claimed is a nomination for another award. Other references are all IMDb and Youtube. None show in-depth, independent discussion of the film. This is far short of the standard of WP:Notability (film). JohnCD ( talk) 21:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Transformers spacecraft. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
This fails to establish notability. Nothing was presented in previous AfDs to help with that. TTN ( talk) 19:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The article has been created way WP:TOOSOON. Although it is likely the contest will take place, it is still unknown as to what name the contest will go under as. Several sources have speculated names, including Asiavision, Asia-Eurovision, and Eurovision-Asia. The ABU (who is assumed to be the organisers) also have reported to the name ABU TV Cup Song Contest, to which ABU Cup TV Song Contest 2017 was redirected as being WP:TOOSOON with hardly any sources to warrant a standalone article at this current stage. TV shows which are still at the planning stage should not be granted an article unless the shows title is 100% confirmed. Wes Mouse T@lk 14:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
non notable writer. Most of the article is based upon SUR, apparently a tourist newspaper for English tourists in Spain. DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
WP:NOTADICTIONARY applies. I believe it means 'fucking bitch' in russian. It is indeed used commonly in the online CSGO community, but does not seem notable enough for its own article. Insert CleverPhrase Here 06:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
I could find no sources online to establish the notability of that particular sub-branch, though there are a few hits for the main company (for instance here (paywall) or here).
It would be nice to have more eyes on this; I have the gut feeling that the main company should pass notability but I did not find enough for it, so it may be that I missed a lot in my search. Tigraan Click here to contact me 11:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Aside from their own website, there are no sources of significant coverage to constitute notability for this non-charting group. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 15:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
I am struggling to see how this article meets WP:GNG. An irregularly published, rather short-lived publication that sounds like a fanzine and seems to be self-referencing. I'm guessing that the creator thought that contributions from some notable people would confer notability on the publication itself - it does not. Its co-publisher, Richard Shannon, is also of dubious notability. Sitush ( talk) 17:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
De-prodded for an unexplained reason while the problems still exist. My initial concern was: I don't see any real organized plot to this very short article. Also to mention that the title is not in English and I haven't a clue what it translates to. No improvements have been made at all. MPD ( Talk to me!) 15:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Non notable shopping centre, Google News brings up 3 results being mentions, and one result inregards to the centre having a new owner, I'd be happy to use it however that's not enough notability-wise, Google books brings up nothing, Fails GNG – Davey2010 Talk 13:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced BLP. Couldn't find any in-depth coverage of the subject that would point to notability. Psychonaut ( talk) 12:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Despite having scored "over twenty films and numerous TV shows", and having co-founded a commercial music licensing business, there is scant evidence of any significant independent coverage of Plessner's career. The two citations present (after I deleted the use of another Wikipedia page as a citation) are his own IMDb page and a Facebook page. Google shows me there's not much better available. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 07:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
PROD statement: Principal photography has not begun. Case of WP:TOOSOON. Nairspecht ( talk) 16:50, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Multiple issues, not verifyable, no sources. Fails WP:PEA but if peacockery is removed, no article is left. I left it some time to see if it would improve but it hasn't. ronaz Talk! 17:15, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
This is an unreferenced article on a local cable access channel. Would need to make WP:ORG, and I don't see how that could be possible. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep but add references please. Where are the references? Regards Expressway232 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Expressway232 ( talk • contribs) 05:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
NJon notable record label. Speedy removed because 'founders are notable' Not good enough imo; this is a slender and promotional article and I see no reason why the label is independatly notable TheLongTone ( talk) 12:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is poorly written and not a true comparison of bones and teeth. Major sections are essentially outlines of the qualities of teeth and of bones, which are already covered properly in their own articles. heather walls ( talk) 05:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
No source for content. No indication of nobility. Coderzombie ( talk) 08:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 09:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Was involved in a couple of films by her father. No other evidence of notability. ubiquity ( talk) 18:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Is the deputy leader of a largely burnt-out protest group that holds about 3-4 marches a year that usually attract less than a couple hundred people. Paul Golding and Britain First are probably notable, so maybe a merge is appropriate. However, there is nothing on the subject to satisfy WP:GNG JohnTombs48 ( talk) 17:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTTIMETABLE βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTTIMETABLE βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTTIMETABLE βα£α( ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wayne Gretzky#Legacy. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 10:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable sports trophy Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. Can't find any significant coverage under any of his names. Kolbasz ( talk) 15:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD contested for no reason ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 15:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
From tone of writing to references. No references are found to this degree of claims made by this company. Highly and only promotional. No Encyclopedic notability. Awards and the way it has written influenced by company or made by them only. Light2021 ( talk) 15:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure) Jbh Talk 03:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Not need of disambiguation for just 1 page. Abbottonian ( talk) 15:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion. G12 copyright infringement. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete or move to Drilling. Abbottonian ( talk) 15:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
From tone of writing to Brochure links download as PDF. No references are found to this degree of claims made by this company. Highly and only promotional. No Encyclopedic notability. Light2021 ( talk) 15:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable. Highest degree or promotions. Wikipedia used as dumping corporate profile and the way it is written completely influenced by company or made by their team alone. Being old is not a criteria for Encyclopedic notability. Light2021 ( talk) 14:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:58, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
there are no sources whatsoever in this article and noting notable found in English on the web Domdeparis ( talk) 13:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete as the subject fails all notability criteria. Most of the "sources" cited are
self-published and
unreliable; including the book
John Wentworth wrote is about his own family. The author,
RWIR has been abusing Wikipedia for genealogy and this is one of many articles he's written which should not exist. I encourage you to look in the article history at the cruft this article had before I removed it.
Chris Troutman (
talk)
13:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback, though I was a little surprised at the word "abuse" and disappointed that Wentworth's three volume work, published by Little and Brown of Boston was considered self published or not reliable. Many have written about their own families, including Obama's Dreams from my father, and Ignatieff's Russian Album, and not just the Hon. John Wentworth. I will not object to the deletion of the Thomas Westbrook Waldron (Canada) article and thank everyone for the several years it has stayed on wikipedia without any challenge. Would be interested in learning what other articles are considered not notable? RWIR ( talk) 09:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if I was not clear, I have said that I would not object to this article's deletion. What I was commenting on was the assertion that Wentworth's book was self published or not reliable. Thanks again. RWIR ( talk) 06:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. COI spam Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No sources, obvious WP:COI and promotional. Kleuske ( talk) 13:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 11:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability SST flyer 13:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 15:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete-overspecific topic of dubious notability. The sourcing is there, but the importance is not. Editor is eager and energetic but has been content-forking these Philippine Scout articles for weeks, and they simply don't bear that much detail on Wikipedia Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 13:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails all criteria of WP:NACADEMIC: Google Scholar does not suggest frequent citation, and regular Google results are sparse as well. — swpb T 12:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
No sources at all Domdeparis ( talk) 12:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable national subevent of Miss Grand International, no more notable than the considerable number of articles about other Miss Grand national subevents that have previously been deleted here at AfD (such as Miss Grand Korea, Miss Grand Botswana, Miss Grand Argentina, Miss Grand Japan, Miss Grand Albania, Miss Grand Romania, Miss Grand Italy, Miss Grand Thailand, Miss Grand Cambodia, Miss Grand Algeria and Miss Grand Nepal; and Miss Grand México was redirected to Rostro de México, which has since been deleted...). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 12:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sarah Vowell#Short film. ( non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable short film unsupported by any (reliable) sources. Carniolus ( talk) 11:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 15:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails to meet notability guidelines. All 31 references are press releases, or citations from captive publications of the media company that created the awards. Few or no independent news sources or publications cite or mention the awards. Mcenedella ( talk)( contribs) 09:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 15:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The latest bit of paid promotion for the non notable business. Business lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None of the so called awards are major. Current sourcing is a mix of PR, primary and a minor mentions. A search found nothing good for notability. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
The latest bit of paid promotion for the non notable business. Business lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Of the current sourcing: 3-5 are passing mentions; 1 is a social platform, not a reliable source, the founder talking about the business, not independent; 2 is a local interest piece. A search found more of the same and a lot of press releases. Nothing good for notability. duffbeerforme ( talk) 09:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable medical biography. No significant contribution made to the field of medicine. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 08:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 04:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:SOLDIER, the subject must be recipient of the award for multiple times, if it is not the highest decoration of the country. Maha Vir Chakra is not the highest decoration of India. Also does not pass WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Vir Chakra is the third highest military decoration in India. Subject fails WP:SOLDIER and also WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:SOLDIER and also WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 10:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable award recipient. Per WP:SOLDIER, the subject has to be the recipient of highest award or recipient of lower award multiple times. Kirti Chakra is not the highest award in India. Also doesn't clearly pass WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 07:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 October 18, there are no procedural grounds to relisting this soon, since a new development has taken place. To summarize, from my DRV comment: Since the first AfD, this article has been deleted from Polish Wikipedia (which usually has much lower criteria for notability): pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2016:09:08:Barbara Matynia-Łyżwińska. Closing admin there concluded that a minor/local parish magazine and an obituary are not sufficient. As I feel that the deletion arguments (the subject is not notable either as an architect - all she has here is a short online bio at professional association she was a member of - and as an artist - her work is only mentioned in a local, niche, parish magazine) are significantly stronger then the votes to keep (one of which argued that said parish magazine is a sufficient source, the other that women architects are marginalized so we should keep this article to reduce our gender bias in coverage), and as there is no discussion on article's talk, despite my post there, I think we need to revisit this. Bottom line - not all architects are notable, and this one hasn't done anything to merit being in an encylopedia; ditto as an artist she fails WP:Notability (artists) - her work has not attracted attention form anywhere but said local parish magazine, and the claims of "multiple exhibitions" are not substantiated except said parish article based significantly on interview with the subject. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 10:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Claims no notability, fails WP:NALBUM. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 06:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Meets WP:ACADEMIC per consensus. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 14:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Self-written vanity page, doesn't meet the
prof test
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
05:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
@Jimfbleak I think it's a bit harsh to just state that this is a vanity page that doesn't meet the prof. test. I thought that meeting the following notability criteria for academics was sufficient? " 1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. 2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level."
The references provided substantiates this through their original, reliable sources showing 1) Ranked as no one on the world based on number of publications and number of citations and 2) receiving a Paper Impact award for the paper with the highest impact in the field during the last 10 years.
I'd like to now why you think these facts do not meet the above stated notability guidelines? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Toredy (
talk •
contribs)
11:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Jimfbleak, Thank you for your comment, I have read WP:COI, WP:Autobiography, and I understand them. If they trump notability, I will rest my case. But it doesn't seem fair given the thousands of similar, short pages about other (notable) academics. So, what I'd like to see, is that the moderators explain what it is with the two stated achievements that do not meet the academic notability guidelines. I'm just puzzled with what I experience as unfounded attacks...
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 15:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Regardless of how notable a footballer is, a list of league goals is not notable ( WP:NOTSTATS). While Wikipedia does have lists of goals scored, those are goals scored in international completion by footballers who are or were the top scorer for their nation. Anything worth keeping from this list can be merged into Lionel Messi. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 05:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable theatrical performer. A string of roles, but nothing worthy of note. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a former mayor in a city of about 60K. That's certainly large enough that a well-sourced article about a mayor could be kept, but it's not large enough that he gets an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, if the resulting article is this bad: the only reference cited here is a press release from a charitable organization about him participating in a fundraising event staged by that organization, thus making it a primary source that cannot support notability, and the article reads very much more like a PR blurb that could have been copied and pasted directly from his own campaign literature rather than an encyclopedia article. The Medicine Hat News is not archived in ProQuest's Canadian Newsstand Major Dailies database, so I can't do a repair job on this myself — I'm happy to withdraw this if somebody can locate enough coverage of him to source the article over WP:GNG, but it's not a keepable article in this state of substance and sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 21:36, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per below. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. I am not certain that CSD A11 is applicable, so taking to AfD. Article was previously PRODed and declined. Safiel ( talk) 05:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Unnecessary fork. We already have venues to write about it at Maheshinte Prathikaaram (soundtrack), which also is not really needed, and Maheshinte Prathikaaram. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 03:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment: The music section of Maheshinte Prathikaaram was split to separate articles due to bloating (72kb then, WP:TOOBIG), which was pointed out in its GA review. The "score" and the "soundtrack" are two independent albums. Both has separate release dates, album covers, track duration, and two separate type of infobox. Hence two independent articles. -- Charles Turing ( talk) 13:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
This movie was alleged to happen about four years ago. The director has never directed a movie before and there is no credible source after 2013 which talks about the movie Robinhio84 ( talk) 00:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the party is notable and sources exist. ( non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 14:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Article fails to cite sources. The party has never won elected office. Fails WP:ORG. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 21:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. I could not locate reliable secondary sources to verify the notability of the subject. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 20:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete with a passing mention in Kia Motors. Nordic Nightfury 10:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The last nomination was discussed in 2006 and since then the criteria under WP:MUSIC have become stricter. In that context, the page does not list sufficient reliable sources or indicated notability. The long list of awards is inflated, the organisation that awards them (the Contemporary A Cappella Society) appears to be closely linked to the group. The overriding sense from the article is that this constitutes a college choir with little national profile, no chart success nor any international touring commitments. Karst ( talk) 13:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
"Musicians or ensembles ... may be notable if ... [they have] won first, second or third place in a major music competition."This article lists multiple first-place finishes at the Contemporary A Cappella Recording Awards. Personally, I don't think that the standards at WP:NMUSIC are strict enough, but the guideline apparently reflects community consensus, so I feel compelled to vote "keep." -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 03:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Potentially non-notable film personality. Discuss. Nairspecht ( talk) 12:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) TonyBallioni ( talk) 16:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Nonnotable silly joke of a song
Staszek Lem (
talk)
00:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient coverage in RS to meet GNG. — swpb T 15:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
The page belongs to Category:Jat clans, or one of its subcategories. All the pages of these categories lack the very basic notability guidelines. Failure WP:GNG. Must discussed and deleted per WP:NOT. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 01:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cedarsong Nature School. Black Kite (talk) 10:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:AUTHOR. Magnolia677 ( talk) 22:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 10:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
It appears at first glance that most (if not all) of the references are reports written by the subject of the article, rather than independent published
reliable sources talking about the subject. This may need further investigation by editors who can read the foreign language sources given as references.
David Biddulph (
talk)
00:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello –This article was written about the Journalist as a bio, so if it was posted in the wrong place, apologies in advance. Would like to keep this page if at all possible. Could you recommend how to post this article or the steps needed to keep an article about a known person on wiki? Thanks for your assistance and guidance to help keep this page alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taljazairi ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable individual. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, and WP:NACADEMIC. Also fails WP:POLITICIAN. – Muboshgu ( talk) 00:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)