The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable. there is also no bilateral article to redirect to. nominating for the same reasons:
LibStar ( talk) 23:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ice Bucket Challenge. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Filthy Frank's page was deleted because he was only notable for the Harlem Shake. This guy is only notable for the Ice Bucket Challenge. WP:BLP1E applies. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 23:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIZ, WP:GNG Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 23:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a group project to create an article on Wikipedia based on the article creator's username. Non-encyclopedic essay about current controversies in a local school district. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete Materialscientist ( talk) 00:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Disputed PROD, concern was: Non-notable YouTube personality. Fails NBIO and the GNG. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 21:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Reasons for opposing the deletion of article "Frank Cooper" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC) It has been suggested that "Frank Cooper" is irrelevant and this page should be removed. I disagree with this due to the fact that he is a very important and significant figure for the hobby NERF, where he promotes the hobby to new viewers. NERF is in turn a very important hobby/brand/toy because many kids play with them, and NERF blasters draw in an estimated $400 US million dollars a year.
In conclusion, while he does not have as many views or subscribers as some channels, he is still significant because of his promotion for the hobby NERF. I feel this page should stay up.
Any more comments/questions may be posted in this talk page or on my talk page. Regards,Matthewethanchowtoy (talk) 21:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk • contribs)
But NERF is one of the largest toy brands in the world right now. Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk) 22:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Additionally, he has most surely caused more sales in this hobby, he has created many viral videos. NERF is significant again because it is one of the largest toy brands in the world, and contributes vastly to the global toy market. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. "Outdated" is indeed not a reason for deletion and the other issues appear to have been resolved. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
1st nomination was in 2007; the few folks who !voted, noted then this was PROMO but found it notable. Article was created by a SPA ( Special:Contributions/Mbeach14) and has hardly changed since it was created, and technology is now far outdated. No reason for this promo cruft to exist. Jytdog ( talk) 21:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable. Fails NBIO and the GNG. I only found one legitimate article in a reliable source about her. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 21:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Materialscientist ( talk) 22:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:PROF. This article looks like it exists to expound and promote this person's theories. I can find no evidence that anyone is discussing him and the references appear to be citations within his theories rather than to reliable sources about him or his work. Jbh Talk 21:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable record label. Fails NCORP and the GNG. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 20:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Surely the state of Telengana has many policies; more than can be contained in a single Wikipedia article. And if the article were to become comprehensive, it would essentially be a textbook of the laws an policies of Telengana. There is not an equivalent article on the policies of any other state or nation (although articles about specific government officials do exist) so there is no clear reason why this article (with its scant sourcing) should exist. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 20:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Poorly sourced article, with some advertorial/promotional overtones, about a musician -- he may have a valid claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, but with inadequate sourcing it's hard to determine what's accurate and what's PR bumf. Initially I speedy deleted this G11 (unambiguous advertising and promotion), but then following a request from the creator I restored it to her own sandbox for improvement -- upon which she added a couple of unreliable PR blog sources and then copy-pasted the sandbox page back into articlespace again without actually addressing the tone problems at all. It was then flagged for G11 again by another editor, which in turn was almost immediately declined by still another editor. This all remains without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source a proper article about him that reads like an encyclopedia article instead of an EPK -- but this is still not appropriate for inclusion in its current form. Bearcat ( talk) 18:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete ---No reliable sources found to establish notability, article needs much better sourcing and tone, as mentioned. ABF99 ( talk) 03:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Don't Delete --- I am agreed with the wordings which are mentioned above and yes it was already deleted and I made a request for restoring it because I wanted to make some changes in it. And I also removed some content which was seems to be like promotional content however I am still making changes in this article and I hope within a day it will be completely changed :) So, rather than deleting kindly give me time for making changes and writing in a proper way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngelaRola ( talk • contribs) 04:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC) "" Recreated from scratch "" Hey, I put my hard work for recreation of this article and removed all the content which was seems to be promotional content. Moreover I also included his accurate information. Kindly review it again and remove this tag of deletion from the article after reviewing again — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngelaRola ( talk • contribs) 06:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Delete !votes not a significant proportion of the total. ( non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 22:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
YouTube views, a Bieber tweet, and filler stories by news sites do not make a stub article's topic notable.
KATMAKROFAN (
talk) 18:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Withdrawn, taking to PROM with singer's article.
KATMAKROFAN (
talk)
00:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
*Delete per
WP:NOTNEWS. All of the sources are simply gee-whiz news stories over a week or two.(It seems that events have overtaken us and this has charted in Japan, and maybe elsewhere. 16:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC))
86.17.222.157 (
talk)
20:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
This article is essentially an ad for one company's branded version of autologous blood injection. Since we already have an article on the generic topic, the only reason for the existence of this article is to promote the particular developers' claims. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Drmies ( talk) 23:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. Single source of questionable quality. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No indications that the article's grandiose claims are accurate. The one reliable third-party source, Times, has gone 404, but the archived copy I found does not mention von Scheel. Google News only gives two blogs, no reliable sources. That leaves us with this fawning biography which I rather doubt was independent or subject to meaningful editorial oversight. Huon ( talk) 10:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 01:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail the WP:GNG. While there are a few mentions out there in news articles the coverage appears to not be significant enough as to confer notability. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 06:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NORG, with a lack of significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 05:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to East Waynesville Baptist Church. MBisanz talk 01:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
A classic example of failing WP:BLP1E - the subject is not notable for anything apart from this event. St Anselm ( talk) 02:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Player fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD contested cause he was on the bench twice this season and is bound to make his debut soon... WP:CRYSTALBALL much. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 17:26, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy close. As noted below, this is the wrong forum. Feel free to open a discussion at WP:RFD if you wish. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The redirect is meaningless, because the city of Tambov ≠ monastery in this city. The separate article is possible to create (
ru:Казанский монастырь (Тамбов)), the monastery is notable for Wikipedia. I don't understand how such redirects follow the policy.
I may create a stub if the redirect will be deleted. -- Wolverène ( talk) 16:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
It most possibly lacks WP:MUSICBIO and WP:REFERENCE. DBrown SPS ( talk) 16:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails notability. I have found zero sources about this massacre, or coverage in reliable third party sources, or even just basic verification at a bare minimum. The article cites three non-English links (Bangladeshi, I presume) which are dead. Mar4d ( talk) 16:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
This apparently WP:COI article is basically presenting one organization's particular definition for "functional food" and its background. This is WP:UNDUE emphasis on the activities and motivations of the this one organization, the FFC. It's basically an advocacy essay, even after I deleted, just now, a section stressing the importance of all of this. It's essentially the organization using Wikipedia to publish its views. Largoplazo ( talk) 17:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Hopefully, this detail will help with the merging clarification that took place earlier today. Largoplazo made a proposition on the functional food definition by FFC wiki page and told me to link it to them. 18:41, 11 March 2016 (diff | hist) . . (+1,276) . . User talk:Largoplazo (→Proposed merge with Functional food definition by FFC: new section) It is possible that Largoplazo did not receive the message of the necessary changes that were made in my talk page, which outlined all the editing that would have resolved any issues. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Functional_food_definition_by_FFC&oldid=713739982 On April 5th, I created the talk page that would list all changes or revisions to the functional food definition by FFC page, but there was no response by Largoplazo. So there may have been a miscommunication where Largoplazo was not notified, however it was proposed by Largoplazo to merge the two pages together. The activity from earlier today was not an agenda to put out my content to advocate for FFC's definition. I'm just trying to resolve this issue by following the guidelines of wikipedia and the enforced policies by wikipedia employees, but this is much more difficult than what your suggestions offer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanikMartirosyan ( talk • contribs) Here are a few links to the conferences that took place around the world to show that FFC is an organization that represents the functional food community as a collection of scientists, professors, USDA, and FDA officials, working together to educate students, doctors, and everybody about functional foods. To clarify, these are individuals that do not exclusively work with FFC, but are collaborators. Here is a conference report for the Harvard Medical School Conference: http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/572102/dbfc12f0d4/ARCHIVE Conference Report for Kobe University: http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/572102/d5db3f5096/ARCHIVE Conference Report for University of San Diego: http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/572102/d4d2113e77/ARCHIVE These conference reports highlight notable speakers from government organizations such as the USDA and FDA, even researchers from the NHI. If you would please take a look at these conference reports, it would provide you with a bigger picture of what FFC does as a company. We are not trying to push an agenda that functional foods are as what we define it as, we are collaborating as a scientific community to reach a better understanding of functional foods and educate our audience with the current affairs. More importantly, if we could merge the two pages like what was initially proposed, then this issue would be resolved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanikMartirosyan ( talk • contribs) 19:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Commissioner (musical group). Dont usually close on 2 but consensus is always to redirect these and it's no different here so closing as such ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced. Not notable Rathfelder ( talk) 15:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Lack of coverage, fails WP:MUSICBIO. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 15:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Roberts has only released one album, and the information about the songs is already covered in the article about the album. The information about the the three b-sides is already covered in the articles about the singles that they were attached to for its release. I would recommend deleting this, and only restoring it if/when the singer releases more music to justify a separate list of this fashion. Aoba47 ( talk) 15:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Party president of small district. Not an elected government official. Fails at WP:NPOL. Couldn't find much coverage in English reliable sources, tried to translate local language sources, couldn't find anything substantial, hence failing at WP:GNG. Hitro talk 15:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Still fails WP:GNG as far as I can see. The arguments for "keep" last time round were invalid: one said that it should be kept because it was listed in a navbox (which is kinda circular) and the other said it should be kept because H. A. Rose mentioned it in his Glossary of the Tribes and Castes..., but that book by a British Raj administrator has long been deemed to be an unreliable source. I haven't been able to verify the alleged alternate spelling of Sian, which obviously might form the basis of a redirect to Sian or the Iranian town. We don't seem to have articles for anyone who uses Seyan as a last name. - Sitush ( talk) 14:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Can't find evidence that this is notable. I do see that it is affiliated with two diploma mills, Pebble Hills University (see List of unaccredited institutions of higher education) and Southern Delaware University [23] and something called Newton Hills University which seems as dubious. [24] Doug Weller talk 13:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Outdated, badly sourced article that has a strong smell of advertising. No evidence that is satisfies WP:GNG The Banner talk 13:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
I can't find anything to show that this person is notable - even his companies don't show up. Azad City doesn't seem to exist, here are the photos on its website. [25] Doug Weller talk 12:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted WP:CSD#G3 blatant hoax. JohnCD ( talk) 17:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Foreign language Rberchie ( talk) 12:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable software. The article currently has one dead link and no sources. I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kenku. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 12:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
My first AfD, apologies if this is utterly wrong. I saw this on the 'Copy Edit' required list. It appears to be just a promotional piece for the business. There are only two references, one is its own website, the other is appears to be a PR announcement issued by Ruspublica for its own online store. I couldn't find any other references to it when I googled it. Scribolt ( talk) 12:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 14:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Till now the subject hasn't contested an election. Almost all of the coverage is due to her husband's controversial statement and its aftermath. The page is written in promotional tone. Skr15081997 ( talk) 11:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The information which is provided here are true and it doesn't seems like promotional, this is not meeting WP:SPAM and this is not written in WP:PROMOTIONAL tone, article shouldn't be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.179.115.105 ( talk) 18:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The templates are not properly under consideration here at AFD and so should be listed at TFD. postdlf ( talk) 15:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Article listing the results of a student union election, which is clearly not notable. Was prodded, but the prod was removed by the article's creator. I suggest that the numerous templates created by the editor to use in this article (the only place they are used) are also deleted, specifically:
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer. Does not meet WP:NBOX Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Several users herein have determined that this article comprises WP:SYNTHESIS, and most agree that this present article is not up to Wikipedia's standards. No prejudice against the creation of a new article based upon what reliable sources report, sans any synthesis or unverifiable claims. North America 1000 23:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
This article was mainly written by three WP:SPAs and it reads as WP:SYN, pretty blatantly so. The sources do not discuss the subject as such, and most of the text is not supported by the sources. As far as I can tell this topic embodies deep speculation and is not widely discussed. Top Google hists are sites like mindcontrol.se, and most of the high ranking hits score 8 or above on the bollocksometer. Guy ( Help!) 09:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Guy ( Help!) 09:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fran Lebowitz. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
A book that exists, but seems to fail Wikipedia:Notability (books). I cannot find any reliable (non-user generated) review, nothing but a few passing mentions in media. The content of this tiny stub is repeated at Fran Lebowitz. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Probably non-notable topic. No references at all. Google didn't helped me to find something on this. XXN, 07:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 23:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
does not meet NCOLLATH, or GNG. TOOSOON John from Idegon ( talk) 05:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 01:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Extensive and specific PROD mass removed without actually looking and listening to the concerns listed, instead with the basis that it can be fixed, but that's the thing: Advertisements that are so blatant including by having SPA accounts and advertising sources, therefore cannot be fixed as if it's the nature of it, we can therefore not accept it lest we actually become a PR webhost, everything listed is exactly what the company wants to advertise about itself, and sugarcoating or stating that's it something else otherwise is completely unhonest to what Wikipedia is battling each and every day, which is exact blatant advertising like this. We can make the necessary choices therefore which is to delete them onsight and immediately and show to others that we will delete theirs as quickly also. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
the company’s cloud-based service safeguards more than 600 organizations worldwide, including three of the top four banks in the Fortune 100 and more than 25 of the world’s top 100 brands.(emphasis mine) and the list of awards won. Now, if we remove the list of awards won on grounds of puffery and "churnalism", the next thing you know is that the article will be nominated for deletion (by the usual crew) because it fails WP:N. Gerard's assertions that Gartner is a "sponsored content outlet"
The result was keep. consensus is to keep, but it needs significant editing, which I am about to do. DGG ( talk ) 07:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Not only was my specific and exact PROD removed as part of an apparent massremoval of PRODs, but the listed concerns explicitly showing this was yet another paid advertisement by several involved accounts was not taken seriously, so I will note again that literally everything here still is in fact PR, and there's no sensible method of sugarcoating it as it's only making not only the article seem worse but the encyclopedia as well, while simultaneously damning the cleanliness of a non-advertising environment. In fact what was replaced after the PROD, was literally three PR sources listing and compiling exactly what the company wanted to advertise itself, and it's apparent because that's the only mindset advertisers have with these articles (they couldn't ever care about actually substantiating an article, if all that matters is a fluffed-puffed advertisement), and there's nothing to suggest the PR awards and specifics about this company, suggest otherwise. The only solution of actually solving these advertisements is not only to bar them from happening but also to remove these that exist from influencing others. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Pure speculation, one strongly doubted report
Ahmad Behbahani arises from a single reported conversation said to have taken place with a self-identified individual. The report was never verified and the claim was strongly doubted by the NY Post on the basis that the claimant was too young to have been the person he claimed to be, which is just about as damning a challenge as one could imagine. The original claim was never repeated and does not seem to have been reported again thereafter. Lockerbie is a hot and notable topic but that does not make every rumour, speculation, unsubstantiated report or unverified claim worthy of reproduction on WP. At most, someone might want to add a brief note about this on a Lockerbie page. sirlanz 08:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
PR advertisement which was a paid advertisement at that, and the sources and information show this, including the fact it only includes what a PR business listing would say, not an actual encyclopedia, therefore I still confirm my PROD. Examples of sheer blatancy are the fact the PR awards are so damningly trivial and unconvincing as any PR attempt to make substance but it's actually far from it. This is a classic example of an advertisement, including in that it was started along with the company article, also an advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There's clearly no great urgency from the community to delete this article. Any discussion about a merge or page move is more appropriately conducted on the article's talk page. A Train talk 20:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
(This also applies to the subpages, beginning with List of hieroglyphs/A, which I haven't individually tagged.) There are several problems with this set of pages. To begin with, it is a copyright violation of this list compiled by Alan Gardiner, who died 1963, so it's still copyrighted until 2033. And then it's also basically a reproduction of a primary source, which Wikipedia is not for (see WP:NPS). That articles are not even supposed to have hierarchical subpages and that the subpages are not remotely in an article format is almost a side issue. Sandstein 10:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Question If its copyvio why not just delete it? Doug Weller talk 19:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Egyptian hieroglyphics are clearly an important subject, so that a classification system ought also to be notable.Hmm, no. (Though that particular system is.) Tigraan Click here to contact me 15:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. A Train talk 20:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable and WP:Too soon Jimfbleak ( talk) 06:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 14:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor with no roles in any notable films or other productions. Google returns no significant coverage from secondary sources. Fails WP:NACTOR. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 09:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 11:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 11:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 23:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I found this in the backlog at NPP. Since I am unsure of the standards for this sort of article, I'd rather have a consensus decision than try to make one myself. DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non notable website. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sourcing. Currently cobbled together from partners, passing mentions and press releases. duffbeerforme ( talk) 04:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I still confirm my boldly removed PROD yet it was specific and genuine about the concerns listed including that this article is only existing as PR advertising, and that is actually emphasized by the fact the advertising-only account "MomentCam" removed it (note how this one account has been the only one to ever actually contribute to this article). SwisterTwister talk 03:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment app listings mean nothing for notability and that not every news source, by name, is going to be notable -- Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 17:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "Brit + Co" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
PROD removed yet it was specific and thorough therefore it still applies, paid advertising by paid advertising users with they not adding anything else but what the company imaginably of course wanted to put as if this were their own PR and that's not surprising examining everything that is listed, as it actually goes to specifics about what the business wants to advertise. Once we succumb to advertising, we're damned as an encyclopedia. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
References
`cd It doesn't matter if the company is notable, if the article was written for promotional purposes. WP does not serve for this purpose, and that is one of our basic policies. The correct way of thinking about this is WP:TNT, which says that is the company is actually notable, the first step is to delete the promotioanl article,and the second step is for someone to write a new one. Keeping the promotional material even in the history is a violation of our basic principles. DGG ( talk ) 07:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I still confirm my extensive and specific here which clearly states this was yet another article part of a PR advertising campaign and there's nothing else to suggest otherwise. As I noted with my PROD, this has been deleted before as advertising and it was actually not only restored by request of 1 user, but then this different version of an article was started by another advertising-only account, showing the sheer persistence and blatancy, therefore we would literally damn ourselves as an encyclopedia if we accept such BS advertising. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Literally an advertisement, simply enhanced with equal advertising and that's not surprising given this was part of a PR advertising campaign. Therefore, I still confirm my PROD here as it still applies. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete as utterly non-notable -- joke of an article about a political sinecure. This is one step below campaign literature. Quis separabit? 03:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
As I still confirm my extensive and specific PROD here, this is still an advertising for a company who involves itself with an advertisement and the users who were involved with this article clearly started it for exactly that, therefore we make no compromises at all to keep or improve this, because it would otherwise damage us as a serious encyclopedia. SwisterTwister talk 03:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
declined PROD. the one source introduced in declining the prod is merely him saying something as spokesperson for the government rather than him being the subject of coverage. there is no inherent notability being an ambassador let alone deputy ambassador. LibStar ( talk) 02:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
It has poor source and non reliable source, and failed to satisfy WP:ORG. ~AntanO4task ( talk) 02:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
My PROD removed with the basis of adding paywalled sources yet I was explicit with the concerns of this clearly being a paid advertisement the fact not only are there several accounts only heavily involved with this one article, but the fact the contents themselves are advertising, My PROD covers all of this genuinely and thoroughly therefore I still confirm it. SwisterTwister talk 02:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I still confirm my extensive and specific PROD here which listed the advertising concerns and the facts of this not actually containing something convincing; what is listed is simply either advertising by people who are choosing to advertise the company or actually then republishing the company's own words. SwisterTwister talk 01:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
I was under the impression this was resolved before when it was edited to be factual, and using reputatable sources such as Drapers. As ever, its always better for Editors on Wikipedia to edit articles to a level they see fit rather than spend hours and hours discussing its deletion. There are thousands of poorly made wikipedia pages relating to companies which can read badly when looking at it with cynical eyes. Edit the article to the way you see fit, dont complain and offer no suggestions thats not how the community will survive, its already struggling to get new editors on board. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmorgans ( talk • contribs) 11:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Another local voice actor, had died a few years ago, but still no indication of why he is important. Tim Marcoh in Full Metal Alchemist is his most notable role and that's way down in the supporting cast. Kiril in Dragonaut is supporting, General Froi in D.Gray-man is supporting, Saburota in Princess Jellyfish isn't main cast, neither is Tubai in RomeoxJuliet, Mr. Cho in Witchblade isn't main, Kogan Iwamoto is main on Shigurui but it isn't strongly notable. Papa is a recurring but is a once in a while character in Initial D. I don't see what kind of biography can be written other than the standard obituary paragraphs as with ANN and Dallas Voice. [56] He did found the Stage West theatre group in Fort Worth so Texas may have a different viewpoint so need some feedback as to how Wikipedia-notable he is with those news sources. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed here, one day because its scheduled deletion but I still confirm it, article for a new and starting person and none of this actually establishes what we need for independent notability and substance, the one link is still not being the substance we need for an article, and it merely emphasizes how "starting" her career actually is. SwisterTwister talk 01:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:27, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails BLP1E ( 2016 Chicago Cubs season). Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 01:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 15:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as a week gas not suggested anything else and there are no serious concerns (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 01:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Article has been tagged for verifiability and original research for over 6 years now with no significant improvements. Was also PROD'ed back in 2008 but removed. Article is nothing more than a definition of a term violating WP:NOTDIC and doesn't seem to meet any WP:GNG guidelines. SanAnMan ( talk) 20:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of churches in Nigeria. Sandstein 09:56, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
This has previously passed through Afd but no consensus was reached. So, had to bring it back up because the list really doesn't worth keeping per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOSTATS. It should be deleted permanently and should not redirect anywhere. The little remaining content can be moved to List of churches in Nigeria. Stanleytux ( talk) 23:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable. there is also no bilateral article to redirect to. nominating for the same reasons:
LibStar ( talk) 23:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ice Bucket Challenge. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Filthy Frank's page was deleted because he was only notable for the Harlem Shake. This guy is only notable for the Ice Bucket Challenge. WP:BLP1E applies. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 23:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIZ, WP:GNG Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 23:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a group project to create an article on Wikipedia based on the article creator's username. Non-encyclopedic essay about current controversies in a local school district. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete Materialscientist ( talk) 00:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Disputed PROD, concern was: Non-notable YouTube personality. Fails NBIO and the GNG. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 21:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Reasons for opposing the deletion of article "Frank Cooper" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC) It has been suggested that "Frank Cooper" is irrelevant and this page should be removed. I disagree with this due to the fact that he is a very important and significant figure for the hobby NERF, where he promotes the hobby to new viewers. NERF is in turn a very important hobby/brand/toy because many kids play with them, and NERF blasters draw in an estimated $400 US million dollars a year.
In conclusion, while he does not have as many views or subscribers as some channels, he is still significant because of his promotion for the hobby NERF. I feel this page should stay up.
Any more comments/questions may be posted in this talk page or on my talk page. Regards,Matthewethanchowtoy (talk) 21:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk • contribs)
But NERF is one of the largest toy brands in the world right now. Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk) 22:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Additionally, he has most surely caused more sales in this hobby, he has created many viral videos. NERF is significant again because it is one of the largest toy brands in the world, and contributes vastly to the global toy market. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewethanchowtoy ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. "Outdated" is indeed not a reason for deletion and the other issues appear to have been resolved. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
1st nomination was in 2007; the few folks who !voted, noted then this was PROMO but found it notable. Article was created by a SPA ( Special:Contributions/Mbeach14) and has hardly changed since it was created, and technology is now far outdated. No reason for this promo cruft to exist. Jytdog ( talk) 21:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable. Fails NBIO and the GNG. I only found one legitimate article in a reliable source about her. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 21:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Materialscientist ( talk) 22:45, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:PROF. This article looks like it exists to expound and promote this person's theories. I can find no evidence that anyone is discussing him and the references appear to be citations within his theories rather than to reliable sources about him or his work. Jbh Talk 21:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable record label. Fails NCORP and the GNG. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 20:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Surely the state of Telengana has many policies; more than can be contained in a single Wikipedia article. And if the article were to become comprehensive, it would essentially be a textbook of the laws an policies of Telengana. There is not an equivalent article on the policies of any other state or nation (although articles about specific government officials do exist) so there is no clear reason why this article (with its scant sourcing) should exist. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 20:25, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Vanamonde ( talk) 07:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Poorly sourced article, with some advertorial/promotional overtones, about a musician -- he may have a valid claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, but with inadequate sourcing it's hard to determine what's accurate and what's PR bumf. Initially I speedy deleted this G11 (unambiguous advertising and promotion), but then following a request from the creator I restored it to her own sandbox for improvement -- upon which she added a couple of unreliable PR blog sources and then copy-pasted the sandbox page back into articlespace again without actually addressing the tone problems at all. It was then flagged for G11 again by another editor, which in turn was almost immediately declined by still another editor. This all remains without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source a proper article about him that reads like an encyclopedia article instead of an EPK -- but this is still not appropriate for inclusion in its current form. Bearcat ( talk) 18:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete ---No reliable sources found to establish notability, article needs much better sourcing and tone, as mentioned. ABF99 ( talk) 03:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Don't Delete --- I am agreed with the wordings which are mentioned above and yes it was already deleted and I made a request for restoring it because I wanted to make some changes in it. And I also removed some content which was seems to be like promotional content however I am still making changes in this article and I hope within a day it will be completely changed :) So, rather than deleting kindly give me time for making changes and writing in a proper way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngelaRola ( talk • contribs) 04:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC) "" Recreated from scratch "" Hey, I put my hard work for recreation of this article and removed all the content which was seems to be promotional content. Moreover I also included his accurate information. Kindly review it again and remove this tag of deletion from the article after reviewing again — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngelaRola ( talk • contribs) 06:04, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Delete !votes not a significant proportion of the total. ( non-admin closure) Primefac ( talk) 22:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
YouTube views, a Bieber tweet, and filler stories by news sites do not make a stub article's topic notable.
KATMAKROFAN (
talk) 18:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Withdrawn, taking to PROM with singer's article.
KATMAKROFAN (
talk)
00:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
*Delete per
WP:NOTNEWS. All of the sources are simply gee-whiz news stories over a week or two.(It seems that events have overtaken us and this has charted in Japan, and maybe elsewhere. 16:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC))
86.17.222.157 (
talk)
20:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:07, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
This article is essentially an ad for one company's branded version of autologous blood injection. Since we already have an article on the generic topic, the only reason for the existence of this article is to promote the particular developers' claims. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Drmies ( talk) 23:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No indication of notability. Single source of questionable quality. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No indications that the article's grandiose claims are accurate. The one reliable third-party source, Times, has gone 404, but the archived copy I found does not mention von Scheel. Google News only gives two blogs, no reliable sources. That leaves us with this fawning biography which I rather doubt was independent or subject to meaningful editorial oversight. Huon ( talk) 10:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 01:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail the WP:GNG. While there are a few mentions out there in news articles the coverage appears to not be significant enough as to confer notability. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 06:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NORG, with a lack of significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 05:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to East Waynesville Baptist Church. MBisanz talk 01:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
A classic example of failing WP:BLP1E - the subject is not notable for anything apart from this event. St Anselm ( talk) 02:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Player fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD contested cause he was on the bench twice this season and is bound to make his debut soon... WP:CRYSTALBALL much. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 17:26, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy close. As noted below, this is the wrong forum. Feel free to open a discussion at WP:RFD if you wish. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The redirect is meaningless, because the city of Tambov ≠ monastery in this city. The separate article is possible to create (
ru:Казанский монастырь (Тамбов)), the monastery is notable for Wikipedia. I don't understand how such redirects follow the policy.
I may create a stub if the redirect will be deleted. -- Wolverène ( talk) 16:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
It most possibly lacks WP:MUSICBIO and WP:REFERENCE. DBrown SPS ( talk) 16:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails notability. I have found zero sources about this massacre, or coverage in reliable third party sources, or even just basic verification at a bare minimum. The article cites three non-English links (Bangladeshi, I presume) which are dead. Mar4d ( talk) 16:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
This apparently WP:COI article is basically presenting one organization's particular definition for "functional food" and its background. This is WP:UNDUE emphasis on the activities and motivations of the this one organization, the FFC. It's basically an advocacy essay, even after I deleted, just now, a section stressing the importance of all of this. It's essentially the organization using Wikipedia to publish its views. Largoplazo ( talk) 17:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Hopefully, this detail will help with the merging clarification that took place earlier today. Largoplazo made a proposition on the functional food definition by FFC wiki page and told me to link it to them. 18:41, 11 March 2016 (diff | hist) . . (+1,276) . . User talk:Largoplazo (→Proposed merge with Functional food definition by FFC: new section) It is possible that Largoplazo did not receive the message of the necessary changes that were made in my talk page, which outlined all the editing that would have resolved any issues. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Functional_food_definition_by_FFC&oldid=713739982 On April 5th, I created the talk page that would list all changes or revisions to the functional food definition by FFC page, but there was no response by Largoplazo. So there may have been a miscommunication where Largoplazo was not notified, however it was proposed by Largoplazo to merge the two pages together. The activity from earlier today was not an agenda to put out my content to advocate for FFC's definition. I'm just trying to resolve this issue by following the guidelines of wikipedia and the enforced policies by wikipedia employees, but this is much more difficult than what your suggestions offer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanikMartirosyan ( talk • contribs) Here are a few links to the conferences that took place around the world to show that FFC is an organization that represents the functional food community as a collection of scientists, professors, USDA, and FDA officials, working together to educate students, doctors, and everybody about functional foods. To clarify, these are individuals that do not exclusively work with FFC, but are collaborators. Here is a conference report for the Harvard Medical School Conference: http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/572102/dbfc12f0d4/ARCHIVE Conference Report for Kobe University: http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/572102/d5db3f5096/ARCHIVE Conference Report for University of San Diego: http://hosted-p0.vresp.com/572102/d4d2113e77/ARCHIVE These conference reports highlight notable speakers from government organizations such as the USDA and FDA, even researchers from the NHI. If you would please take a look at these conference reports, it would provide you with a bigger picture of what FFC does as a company. We are not trying to push an agenda that functional foods are as what we define it as, we are collaborating as a scientific community to reach a better understanding of functional foods and educate our audience with the current affairs. More importantly, if we could merge the two pages like what was initially proposed, then this issue would be resolved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanikMartirosyan ( talk • contribs) 19:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Commissioner (musical group). Dont usually close on 2 but consensus is always to redirect these and it's no different here so closing as such ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced. Not notable Rathfelder ( talk) 15:41, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Lack of coverage, fails WP:MUSICBIO. - TheMagnificentist ( talk) 15:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Roberts has only released one album, and the information about the songs is already covered in the article about the album. The information about the the three b-sides is already covered in the articles about the singles that they were attached to for its release. I would recommend deleting this, and only restoring it if/when the singer releases more music to justify a separate list of this fashion. Aoba47 ( talk) 15:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Party president of small district. Not an elected government official. Fails at WP:NPOL. Couldn't find much coverage in English reliable sources, tried to translate local language sources, couldn't find anything substantial, hence failing at WP:GNG. Hitro talk 15:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Still fails WP:GNG as far as I can see. The arguments for "keep" last time round were invalid: one said that it should be kept because it was listed in a navbox (which is kinda circular) and the other said it should be kept because H. A. Rose mentioned it in his Glossary of the Tribes and Castes..., but that book by a British Raj administrator has long been deemed to be an unreliable source. I haven't been able to verify the alleged alternate spelling of Sian, which obviously might form the basis of a redirect to Sian or the Iranian town. We don't seem to have articles for anyone who uses Seyan as a last name. - Sitush ( talk) 14:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Can't find evidence that this is notable. I do see that it is affiliated with two diploma mills, Pebble Hills University (see List of unaccredited institutions of higher education) and Southern Delaware University [23] and something called Newton Hills University which seems as dubious. [24] Doug Weller talk 13:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drmies ( talk) 23:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Outdated, badly sourced article that has a strong smell of advertising. No evidence that is satisfies WP:GNG The Banner talk 13:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
I can't find anything to show that this person is notable - even his companies don't show up. Azad City doesn't seem to exist, here are the photos on its website. [25] Doug Weller talk 12:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted WP:CSD#G3 blatant hoax. JohnCD ( talk) 17:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Foreign language Rberchie ( talk) 12:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable software. The article currently has one dead link and no sources. I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 12:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kenku. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
This article does not establish notability. TTN ( talk) 12:42, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:12, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
My first AfD, apologies if this is utterly wrong. I saw this on the 'Copy Edit' required list. It appears to be just a promotional piece for the business. There are only two references, one is its own website, the other is appears to be a PR announcement issued by Ruspublica for its own online store. I couldn't find any other references to it when I googled it. Scribolt ( talk) 12:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 14:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Till now the subject hasn't contested an election. Almost all of the coverage is due to her husband's controversial statement and its aftermath. The page is written in promotional tone. Skr15081997 ( talk) 11:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The information which is provided here are true and it doesn't seems like promotional, this is not meeting WP:SPAM and this is not written in WP:PROMOTIONAL tone, article shouldn't be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.179.115.105 ( talk) 18:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. The templates are not properly under consideration here at AFD and so should be listed at TFD. postdlf ( talk) 15:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Article listing the results of a student union election, which is clearly not notable. Was prodded, but the prod was removed by the article's creator. I suggest that the numerous templates created by the editor to use in this article (the only place they are used) are also deleted, specifically:
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer. Does not meet WP:NBOX Peter Rehse ( talk) 10:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Several users herein have determined that this article comprises WP:SYNTHESIS, and most agree that this present article is not up to Wikipedia's standards. No prejudice against the creation of a new article based upon what reliable sources report, sans any synthesis or unverifiable claims. North America 1000 23:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
This article was mainly written by three WP:SPAs and it reads as WP:SYN, pretty blatantly so. The sources do not discuss the subject as such, and most of the text is not supported by the sources. As far as I can tell this topic embodies deep speculation and is not widely discussed. Top Google hists are sites like mindcontrol.se, and most of the high ranking hits score 8 or above on the bollocksometer. Guy ( Help!) 09:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Guy ( Help!) 09:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fran Lebowitz. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
A book that exists, but seems to fail Wikipedia:Notability (books). I cannot find any reliable (non-user generated) review, nothing but a few passing mentions in media. The content of this tiny stub is repeated at Fran Lebowitz. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Probably non-notable topic. No references at all. Google didn't helped me to find something on this. XXN, 07:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 23:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
does not meet NCOLLATH, or GNG. TOOSOON John from Idegon ( talk) 05:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 01:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Extensive and specific PROD mass removed without actually looking and listening to the concerns listed, instead with the basis that it can be fixed, but that's the thing: Advertisements that are so blatant including by having SPA accounts and advertising sources, therefore cannot be fixed as if it's the nature of it, we can therefore not accept it lest we actually become a PR webhost, everything listed is exactly what the company wants to advertise about itself, and sugarcoating or stating that's it something else otherwise is completely unhonest to what Wikipedia is battling each and every day, which is exact blatant advertising like this. We can make the necessary choices therefore which is to delete them onsight and immediately and show to others that we will delete theirs as quickly also. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
the company’s cloud-based service safeguards more than 600 organizations worldwide, including three of the top four banks in the Fortune 100 and more than 25 of the world’s top 100 brands.(emphasis mine) and the list of awards won. Now, if we remove the list of awards won on grounds of puffery and "churnalism", the next thing you know is that the article will be nominated for deletion (by the usual crew) because it fails WP:N. Gerard's assertions that Gartner is a "sponsored content outlet"
The result was keep. consensus is to keep, but it needs significant editing, which I am about to do. DGG ( talk ) 07:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Not only was my specific and exact PROD removed as part of an apparent massremoval of PRODs, but the listed concerns explicitly showing this was yet another paid advertisement by several involved accounts was not taken seriously, so I will note again that literally everything here still is in fact PR, and there's no sensible method of sugarcoating it as it's only making not only the article seem worse but the encyclopedia as well, while simultaneously damning the cleanliness of a non-advertising environment. In fact what was replaced after the PROD, was literally three PR sources listing and compiling exactly what the company wanted to advertise itself, and it's apparent because that's the only mindset advertisers have with these articles (they couldn't ever care about actually substantiating an article, if all that matters is a fluffed-puffed advertisement), and there's nothing to suggest the PR awards and specifics about this company, suggest otherwise. The only solution of actually solving these advertisements is not only to bar them from happening but also to remove these that exist from influencing others. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Pure speculation, one strongly doubted report
Ahmad Behbahani arises from a single reported conversation said to have taken place with a self-identified individual. The report was never verified and the claim was strongly doubted by the NY Post on the basis that the claimant was too young to have been the person he claimed to be, which is just about as damning a challenge as one could imagine. The original claim was never repeated and does not seem to have been reported again thereafter. Lockerbie is a hot and notable topic but that does not make every rumour, speculation, unsubstantiated report or unverified claim worthy of reproduction on WP. At most, someone might want to add a brief note about this on a Lockerbie page. sirlanz 08:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
PR advertisement which was a paid advertisement at that, and the sources and information show this, including the fact it only includes what a PR business listing would say, not an actual encyclopedia, therefore I still confirm my PROD. Examples of sheer blatancy are the fact the PR awards are so damningly trivial and unconvincing as any PR attempt to make substance but it's actually far from it. This is a classic example of an advertisement, including in that it was started along with the company article, also an advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 05:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There's clearly no great urgency from the community to delete this article. Any discussion about a merge or page move is more appropriately conducted on the article's talk page. A Train talk 20:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
(This also applies to the subpages, beginning with List of hieroglyphs/A, which I haven't individually tagged.) There are several problems with this set of pages. To begin with, it is a copyright violation of this list compiled by Alan Gardiner, who died 1963, so it's still copyrighted until 2033. And then it's also basically a reproduction of a primary source, which Wikipedia is not for (see WP:NPS). That articles are not even supposed to have hierarchical subpages and that the subpages are not remotely in an article format is almost a side issue. Sandstein 10:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Question If its copyvio why not just delete it? Doug Weller talk 19:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Egyptian hieroglyphics are clearly an important subject, so that a classification system ought also to be notable.Hmm, no. (Though that particular system is.) Tigraan Click here to contact me 15:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. A Train talk 20:28, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable and WP:Too soon Jimfbleak ( talk) 06:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 14:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor with no roles in any notable films or other productions. Google returns no significant coverage from secondary sources. Fails WP:NACTOR. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 09:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 11:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 11:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:GNG notability that would justify an independent article beyond 2016 Asian Beach Games. Fails WP:NOTSTATS. - Mr X 12:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 23:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I found this in the backlog at NPP. Since I am unsure of the standards for this sort of article, I'd rather have a consensus decision than try to make one myself. DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non notable website. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sourcing. Currently cobbled together from partners, passing mentions and press releases. duffbeerforme ( talk) 04:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I still confirm my boldly removed PROD yet it was specific and genuine about the concerns listed including that this article is only existing as PR advertising, and that is actually emphasized by the fact the advertising-only account "MomentCam" removed it (note how this one account has been the only one to ever actually contribute to this article). SwisterTwister talk 03:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment app listings mean nothing for notability and that not every news source, by name, is going to be notable -- Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 17:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "Brit + Co" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
PROD removed yet it was specific and thorough therefore it still applies, paid advertising by paid advertising users with they not adding anything else but what the company imaginably of course wanted to put as if this were their own PR and that's not surprising examining everything that is listed, as it actually goes to specifics about what the business wants to advertise. Once we succumb to advertising, we're damned as an encyclopedia. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
References
`cd It doesn't matter if the company is notable, if the article was written for promotional purposes. WP does not serve for this purpose, and that is one of our basic policies. The correct way of thinking about this is WP:TNT, which says that is the company is actually notable, the first step is to delete the promotioanl article,and the second step is for someone to write a new one. Keeping the promotional material even in the history is a violation of our basic principles. DGG ( talk ) 07:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I still confirm my extensive and specific here which clearly states this was yet another article part of a PR advertising campaign and there's nothing else to suggest otherwise. As I noted with my PROD, this has been deleted before as advertising and it was actually not only restored by request of 1 user, but then this different version of an article was started by another advertising-only account, showing the sheer persistence and blatancy, therefore we would literally damn ourselves as an encyclopedia if we accept such BS advertising. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Literally an advertisement, simply enhanced with equal advertising and that's not surprising given this was part of a PR advertising campaign. Therefore, I still confirm my PROD here as it still applies. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete as utterly non-notable -- joke of an article about a political sinecure. This is one step below campaign literature. Quis separabit? 03:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
As I still confirm my extensive and specific PROD here, this is still an advertising for a company who involves itself with an advertisement and the users who were involved with this article clearly started it for exactly that, therefore we make no compromises at all to keep or improve this, because it would otherwise damage us as a serious encyclopedia. SwisterTwister talk 03:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
declined PROD. the one source introduced in declining the prod is merely him saying something as spokesperson for the government rather than him being the subject of coverage. there is no inherent notability being an ambassador let alone deputy ambassador. LibStar ( talk) 02:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 09:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
It has poor source and non reliable source, and failed to satisfy WP:ORG. ~AntanO4task ( talk) 02:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
My PROD removed with the basis of adding paywalled sources yet I was explicit with the concerns of this clearly being a paid advertisement the fact not only are there several accounts only heavily involved with this one article, but the fact the contents themselves are advertising, My PROD covers all of this genuinely and thoroughly therefore I still confirm it. SwisterTwister talk 02:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I still confirm my extensive and specific PROD here which listed the advertising concerns and the facts of this not actually containing something convincing; what is listed is simply either advertising by people who are choosing to advertise the company or actually then republishing the company's own words. SwisterTwister talk 01:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
I was under the impression this was resolved before when it was edited to be factual, and using reputatable sources such as Drapers. As ever, its always better for Editors on Wikipedia to edit articles to a level they see fit rather than spend hours and hours discussing its deletion. There are thousands of poorly made wikipedia pages relating to companies which can read badly when looking at it with cynical eyes. Edit the article to the way you see fit, dont complain and offer no suggestions thats not how the community will survive, its already struggling to get new editors on board. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmorgans ( talk • contribs) 11:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Another local voice actor, had died a few years ago, but still no indication of why he is important. Tim Marcoh in Full Metal Alchemist is his most notable role and that's way down in the supporting cast. Kiril in Dragonaut is supporting, General Froi in D.Gray-man is supporting, Saburota in Princess Jellyfish isn't main cast, neither is Tubai in RomeoxJuliet, Mr. Cho in Witchblade isn't main, Kogan Iwamoto is main on Shigurui but it isn't strongly notable. Papa is a recurring but is a once in a while character in Initial D. I don't see what kind of biography can be written other than the standard obituary paragraphs as with ANN and Dallas Voice. [56] He did found the Stage West theatre group in Fort Worth so Texas may have a different viewpoint so need some feedback as to how Wikipedia-notable he is with those news sources. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed here, one day because its scheduled deletion but I still confirm it, article for a new and starting person and none of this actually establishes what we need for independent notability and substance, the one link is still not being the substance we need for an article, and it merely emphasizes how "starting" her career actually is. SwisterTwister talk 01:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:27, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Fails BLP1E ( 2016 Chicago Cubs season). Ks0stm ( T• C• G• E) 01:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 08:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 15:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as a week gas not suggested anything else and there are no serious concerns (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 01:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Article has been tagged for verifiability and original research for over 6 years now with no significant improvements. Was also PROD'ed back in 2008 but removed. Article is nothing more than a definition of a term violating WP:NOTDIC and doesn't seem to meet any WP:GNG guidelines. SanAnMan ( talk) 20:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of churches in Nigeria. Sandstein 09:56, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
This has previously passed through Afd but no consensus was reached. So, had to bring it back up because the list really doesn't worth keeping per WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOSTATS. It should be deleted permanently and should not redirect anywhere. The little remaining content can be moved to List of churches in Nigeria. Stanleytux ( talk) 23:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)