|
|
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Ironholds ( talk) 18:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
MOS:IDENTITY is being revisited: How should Wikipedia refer to transgender individuals before and after their transition?
You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.
Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 02:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I saw you stripped down the page Serbia national cricket team with intentions to improve at a later time. I'm not trying to impose or be disrespectful, but that was a few months ago now. It had some good information on it. Although it was obviously not written in a good format, I think a lot of it was useful. Do you think you'd be able to expand the page next time you have an opportunity? Again, I respect you as an editor and would like to see several sports pages expanded. That's all, thank you. :) JTtheOG ( talk) 01:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
There is an ongoing RfC at Talk: Jeb Bush which you may care to weigh in on. Spartan7W § 14:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bozzio. The non-free usage of File:Cricket India Crest.svg in Indian national cricket team was discused at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Cricket India Crest.svg. The closing administrator of that discusion was Explicit and he was the one who removed the file from the article and the corresponding non-free use rationale from the file's page. There is a record of this deiscussion listed on File talk:Cricket India Crest.svg at the top of this page. If you disagree with Explicit's close and would like him to reconsider it, then you should discuss it at User talk:Explicit or follow the instructions listed at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- There is only one person involved in that discussion – you. Looking through the history of the
India national cricket team article it seems you've been edit warring on this issue for a while. Wikipedia works on
consensus, the burden is on you to gain support for your position not to unilaterally delete images that have been in place for years. Thanks,
¡Boz
zio! 04:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- I did not close the discussion, an admnistrator did. I didn't delete the image, it was only removed from one of the articles by said administrator. If you wish to challenge the close, then you should discuss it with Explicit. If you wish to challenge the way the policy was interpreted by Explicit, you should dicuss it at WT:NFCC. As for the "burden", WP:NFCCE clearly says that the burden is on those willing to use a non-free image in an article to show that said usage satisfies WP:NFCCP by providing a valid non-free use rationale, not the other way around. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Friday Zico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sudanese Civil War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Bozzio. I saw you deleted the "current person" template on the Tim Kaine page. You acted in good faith - and correctly - because I feel that the story of him being chosen as Hillary Clinton's running mate has run its course, at least here on Wikipedia. Thanks!
It was added originally because it was a huge news story at the time, and resulted in a flurry of edits to his page. But the page is stable, despite a few bad faith edits which have already been dealt with. I just wanted to clarify that the template was not intended to be left there through the November election. Again, thanks for all of your efforts here on Wikipedia. I mean that sincerely. Juneau Mike ( talk) 19:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fyodor Konyukhov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for creating List of U.S. state governors born outside the United States, Bozzio!
Wikipedia editor Airplaneman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Interesting list! One thing: it's got no references, which is concerning to me because it lists a lot of currently living people. If you used any sources to create this article, could you please cite them? Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 08:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Airplaneman's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
project:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump email controversy. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Please do not create frivolous articles for deletion nominations
00ff00 (
talk) 15:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nominating an article for deletion is "vandalism"? Fuck off, you clearly don't know what you're talking about. ¡Boz zio! 09:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Bozzio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.--
John (
talk) 15:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BRD and WP:Don't template the regulars. If you're an admin I shouldn't need to be writing this. ¡Boz zio! 16:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
John (
talk) 06:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bozzio. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —
DoRD (
talk) 22:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Ironholds ( talk) 18:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
MOS:IDENTITY is being revisited: How should Wikipedia refer to transgender individuals before and after their transition?
You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.
Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 02:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
I saw you stripped down the page Serbia national cricket team with intentions to improve at a later time. I'm not trying to impose or be disrespectful, but that was a few months ago now. It had some good information on it. Although it was obviously not written in a good format, I think a lot of it was useful. Do you think you'd be able to expand the page next time you have an opportunity? Again, I respect you as an editor and would like to see several sports pages expanded. That's all, thank you. :) JTtheOG ( talk) 01:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
There is an ongoing RfC at Talk: Jeb Bush which you may care to weigh in on. Spartan7W § 14:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bozzio. The non-free usage of File:Cricket India Crest.svg in Indian national cricket team was discused at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 18#File:Cricket India Crest.svg. The closing administrator of that discusion was Explicit and he was the one who removed the file from the article and the corresponding non-free use rationale from the file's page. There is a record of this deiscussion listed on File talk:Cricket India Crest.svg at the top of this page. If you disagree with Explicit's close and would like him to reconsider it, then you should discuss it at User talk:Explicit or follow the instructions listed at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- There is only one person involved in that discussion – you. Looking through the history of the
India national cricket team article it seems you've been edit warring on this issue for a while. Wikipedia works on
consensus, the burden is on you to gain support for your position not to unilaterally delete images that have been in place for years. Thanks,
¡Boz
zio! 04:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- I did not close the discussion, an admnistrator did. I didn't delete the image, it was only removed from one of the articles by said administrator. If you wish to challenge the close, then you should discuss it with Explicit. If you wish to challenge the way the policy was interpreted by Explicit, you should dicuss it at WT:NFCC. As for the "burden", WP:NFCCE clearly says that the burden is on those willing to use a non-free image in an article to show that said usage satisfies WP:NFCCP by providing a valid non-free use rationale, not the other way around. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Friday Zico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sudanese Civil War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Bozzio. I saw you deleted the "current person" template on the Tim Kaine page. You acted in good faith - and correctly - because I feel that the story of him being chosen as Hillary Clinton's running mate has run its course, at least here on Wikipedia. Thanks!
It was added originally because it was a huge news story at the time, and resulted in a flurry of edits to his page. But the page is stable, despite a few bad faith edits which have already been dealt with. I just wanted to clarify that the template was not intended to be left there through the November election. Again, thanks for all of your efforts here on Wikipedia. I mean that sincerely. Juneau Mike ( talk) 19:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fyodor Konyukhov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for creating List of U.S. state governors born outside the United States, Bozzio!
Wikipedia editor Airplaneman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Interesting list! One thing: it's got no references, which is concerning to me because it lists a lot of currently living people. If you used any sources to create this article, could you please cite them? Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 08:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Airplaneman's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
project:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump email controversy. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Please do not create frivolous articles for deletion nominations
00ff00 (
talk) 15:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nominating an article for deletion is "vandalism"? Fuck off, you clearly don't know what you're talking about. ¡Boz zio! 09:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Bozzio. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.--
John (
talk) 15:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BRD and WP:Don't template the regulars. If you're an admin I shouldn't need to be writing this. ¡Boz zio! 16:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
John (
talk) 06:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bozzio. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —
DoRD (
talk) 22:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC) |