![]() |
The result was no consensus. A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to the deletion discussion for Sackler Center for Arts Education. All input is welcome, though valid arguments citing relevant guidelines will be given more weight than unsupported statements; discussion guidelines are available. Be aware that using multiple accounts to reinforce a viewpoint is considered a serious breach of community trust, and that commenting on other users rather than the article is also considered disruptive. -- This was added by User:Amrit.ghimire13 ( talk) on 16 August 2014
Redirect. No reason for deletion is given by the nominator, but as the article stands now, I think the content would be better served by merging it into the museum's article, to the extent that it is not already there. There does not seem to be much unique information here. A redirect can be left in its place. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
An email marketing software. The two very brief news mentions are about the parent company. Remainder cited to Crunchbase profile and Google Chrome page. I can't see any reliable news coverage about the software. Sionk ( talk) 22:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to McCarthy Trenching. ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 09:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to McCarthy Trenching. ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 09:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Non-notable concurrency (appears to be yet another unremarkable fork of Bitcoin). Salimfadhley ( talk) 21:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete - I searched for coverage and found very little. There are websites associated with the creators of Lusocoin, cryptocurrency forums, and domain name analyses; but none of these are reliable, independent sources. As of now, the article fails WP:GNG, though this could change if the cryptocurrency suddenly gains more coverage. Altamel ( talk) 18:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete—Not nearly enough coverage to establish notability. Lesser Cartographies ( talk) 22:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:29, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I nominate this article for deletion due this article includes only armenian side of the claimed event, which is direct breach of WP:NPOV. Most of the sources for the article is just out of the context on Azerbaijani people and not-historical proven facts, which is breach of WP:BIAS. Moreover, the article is full of copy-paste material for an encyclopedic entry. The article uses fake sources such as "Audrey L. Altstadt. Azerbaijani Turks: Power and Identity Under Russian Rule", which is not related anyhow to the massacre. I think this is more than enough information. No other country except armenians are writing about this so called event. Yacatisma ( talk) 20:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Essentially an unref blp (has an external link, but no actual reference). Has been like this for several years. It has been tagged for notability for over six years, unresolved. Its last AfD, in 2008, reached no consensus. Boleyn ( talk) 20:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure). Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 06:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
I could not establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 17:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Article has been improved to show notability, nominator has withdrawn, and there are no delete opinions. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Straight-to-DVD movie with no indication of notability. I found
a single review in a low-profile publication, there are a couple of interviews with the director, and that's all. The article itself is a mess, overly detailed, convoluted plot summary and little else, and even that "little else" manages to contain errors. Even if the film were notable,
WP:TNT would be an improvement.
Huon (
talk)
17:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Johnson was a high school soccer coach. The sources tend towards local sources or directory listings. No demonstration that he meets any notability criteria John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Unreferenced article: can find nothing to confirm that this unit even exists, let alone is notable. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources, that are independent of the topic. JMHamo ( talk) 14:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Can't determine notability, I can't find reliable sources. Of the two links that work, one provides metrics for the University of Dar es salaam. The other provides a list of institutions, but not TITS. Fails GNG IMO Gbawden ( talk) 13:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 15:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't think the subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, and this article reads as indiscriminate publicity and the subject is most notable for a News event. I recognise that this article existed before that event but I still don't see that it meets the notability criteria. Jamie Kitson ( talk) 13:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Youth football team in a non professional youth league. Non notable IMO Gbawden ( talk) 13:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
All references in the article are from the websites of the organizations affiliated with Henderson. I tried to search and find additional references, and I failed to find anything useful. In the end of the day, we have someone who has published a book on motor racing safety, who is doing applied research related to safety, but who apparently does not publish and therefore fails WP:PROF. One of the references says he was a competitive racer in the 1960s, and he might be notable as a racer, but I did not find any confirmations of notability here either. Note that there is a professor of medicine (a surgeon) at the University of Melbourne who may very well be notable but who does not seem to be the same person. Ymblanter ( talk) 12:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails tennis notability guidelines. Only players who have won a grand slam event are entitled to a player season article. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Article types and recommended practices Wolbo ( talk) 10:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:NOTBURO. The Bushranger One ping only 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This page is nothing more than a timetable for trams. It does not provide much context and does not indicate the notability of the subject. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 10:01, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I do not believe this painting is notable. Most of the sources in this article don't have anything to do with the subject (the painting) itself, it seems to consist mostly of original research interpretation of the views of a living person (the artist), and the image of the painting has not had its permission confirmed through OTRS at Commons. Holdek ( talk) 09:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 09:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Looks like WP:OR. The phrase "promotional mix" occurs in lots of marketing books according to GBooks, but this article cites only one of them and actually gets the definition and the citation wrong, according to 82.192.238.55 on the talk page. Therefore, I think WP:TNT applies.
(I don't have access to the book, so I haven't been able to verify or falsify.) QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 09:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Mkativerata ( talk) 21:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
PROD was removed with the rationale "there are sources in the infobox". First, I don't care if there are "sources" in the infobox. For a BLP there need to be sources for every para in the text. Second, these aren't "sources" these are just generic external links. This is a BLP. Either do your job as a serious encyclopedia editor or get out of the way and let this be deleted, per WP:BLP. If you don't have the time to take an article seriously, don't make the encyclopedia suffer its presence. Note: yes, these are all very valid arguments for deletion per WP:BLP, WP:NOTABILITY is secondary. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 06:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - reliable sources provided. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 17:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I assume this was translated, but it has been done poorly and I struggled to understand all of it. I also think it fails WP:ANYBIO and maybe WP:GNG NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 06:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Mary Hynes is the member of a county board. This is a position that almost never is enough to make someone notable. She previously was on a county school board, another non-notable position. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was userfy. Will move this (back) to User:Warsage/Lester Yocum as requested. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
The article fails WP:GNG. The subject of this article has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. The references cited in the article are not independent of the subject. Versace1608 (Talk) 20:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure). Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 11:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Article provides no references that support the notability of this organization beyond it's listing in a directory of alt-med practices. Salimfadhley ( talk) 22:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Insufficient coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. The "accrediting association" mentioned above is a sham fringe group of dubious notability itself, and does not lend any notability to the subject. The Princeton review mention is not independent, but written by the school itself. Other mentions are trivial, and added together amount to far too little to meet any of our notability guidelines. My own search turned up nothing significant. Dominus Vobisdu ( talk) 04:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The product described in this article has not been mentioned in any independent sources; I do not think it is notable. I should point out that the article was previously tagged for speedy deletion (a bit overzealously) a few minutes after User:Seattledude created the page in 2009. The deletion at that time was denied in order to give the article a chance. I think now that a few years have passed deletion can be considered again. Gccwang ( talk) 03:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Extensive listing of sports team player stats. No evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG. Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players. Wikipedia is not a stats directory. - Mr X 02:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
I found nothing to prove notability. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Upon reviewing the article and searching myself for further WP:RS I see a major challenge with this type of article? Is it notable? Maybe. Are there RS, unfortunately not. Even looking at Anime convention there are practically no references to speak of, and those that are listed would generally not be considered as reliable. With that being said, RS and N are two very pillars of this site, and to operate with articles not reliably sourced goes against the core premise of the project. I do not intend this rationale to be prejudice for further AfD's and I hope RS can be found for all. If additional RS come to light I have no problem with any admin restoring article. Tawker ( talk) 19:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Article deleted by PROD, then userfyed at the request of the author. It has now been restored without changes to notability. No coverage by reliable and independent sources. Esw01407 ( talk) 02:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:BLP of a person whose only substantive claims of notability are as a smalltown mayor (reeve) and as an unsuccessful candidate for election to the provincial legislature — neither of which is a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL, and there's no real prospect of him passing WP:GNG either. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 01:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 11:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. The article was previously PROD but contested as, "It is a major thoroughfare and most major thoroughfares in Kowloon have an article". However, being a major thoroughfare is not the test of notability used by Wikipedia. Most thoroughfare in cities worldwide do not have articles. This article remains as single sentence dictionary entry to this date. Rincewind42 ( talk) 16:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage. The article was previously PROD under notability, which was contested with the comment, "oppose deletion on prod" but no reason given and no improvement made to the article so the notability issue remains. Rincewind42 ( talk) 15:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 02:01, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be a not-yet-notable musician who has had some film/TV appearances. The person doesn't seem to meet any criteria of WP:MUSICBIO or WP:NACTOR. She may be up-and-coming, but up-and-coming doesn't qualify for a Wikipedia article — she must have already arrived. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 14:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Multi-channel network on YouTube with no strong claim of notability — it asserts one ("11th largest MCN on YouTube"), but sources that claim only to a stats counter and not to any actual coverage in any actual reliable sources. Delete unless the sourcing can be beefed way up. Bearcat ( talk) 03:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). This short discussion is somewhat leaning toward a merge result, but not quite due to a lack of adequate participation. A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 02:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
per WP:ANYBIO in a band that doesn't have a WP page and been in one movie and one television drama. The article is also unsourced. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 06:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:ENT and WP:BIO. Has not had any significant roles in "multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". Additionally there is a lack of in depth third party coverage [29]. Please note, this article has previously been deleted through AfDs for the same reason. AlanS ( talk) 09:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
This rapper doesn't satisfy WP:MUSICBIO as far as I can see. This article is about all I could find. The article's creator is User:OSO ImagingPRFIRM, rather blatant COI. Fortunately, this is that account's only Wikipedia "contribution". Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page, if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:DIRECTOR and WP:BIO. Is not regarded as an important figure by his peers/successors. Is not known for originating any new concepts. Has not created any significant works that is the subject of the works of others. Additionally there is a lack of in depth third party coverage [30]. AlanS ( talk) 10:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. → Call me Hahc 21 17:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be solely for advertising, would be a WP:G11 if common sense told me not to after seeing sources. Mr. Guye ( talk) 01:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
No sign of WP:NOTABILITY in article; Google results are a sea of sales sites, rather than anything indicating real notability. User ID of article creator is the same as name of item's inventor. Nat Gertler ( talk) 14:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madison Metropolitan School District. per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES & nom. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable middle school, should be redirected to Madison Metropolitan School District. Jacona ( talk) 01:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Estate agency, which fails WP:ORG and asserts WP:INHERITORG regarding James Caan link. Mentions only seem to cover industry pages, but nothing outside this. No references. scope_creep talk 18:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vallivue School District - I'll hold off on the protection since it's only happened once. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable middle school. It was redirected to Vallivue School District, but that has been reverted, landing it here. Jacona ( talk) 01:44, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. This should be treated as a WP:PROD deletion because there are no meaningful "delete" or "keep" opinions on offer. The one "keep" opinion seems to incorrectly assume that this is the article about the movie, and for the "delete" opinion see WP:JNN Sandstein 08:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
A number of these being created of late. No sources to indicate the "franchise" itself is notable, just a summary culled from various other articles and non-notable topics. Doesn't serve much more purpose than a disambiguation page or navigation box (see {{ The Emperor's New Groove}}). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 16:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
To add context to this discussion, these are the other franchise articles for Walt Disney Animation Studios films (plus the Pixar ones):-- Coin945 ( talk) 13:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete Sigh, really not notable. Forbidden User ( talk) 17:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
No indication of notability, article entirely unreferenced Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Article, edging dangerously close to an outright advertisement, for a community newspaper with no strong or properly sourced indication of notability under our inclusion rules for publications. Every last "reference" here, in fact, is a primary source of one sort or another (content on the newspaper's own website, the blogs or business websites of individual people listed in the contributors list, and on and so forth) — so none of the sourcing properly confers or demonstrates notability, and the paper is not automatically entitled to keep an article on here just because it exists. There's also an apparent conflict of interest here, if you compare the creator's username to the name of the person noted in the article as the paper's founder. So in this state it's a delete, unless real sources can be brought to bear. Bearcat ( talk) 19:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I am the editor of the newspaper. We are an all-volunteer community newspaper that has been published for more than 10 years. The paper is enjoyed by more than 7000 residents every two weeks, it doesn't just "exist" as you put it. We have no interest in advertising for it. I am trying to honor the long list of volunteers and the historical stories we have written over the years. All of the entries are by me because no one else could possibly have this information. I think it would be a shame to remove the page, but if you do not want this information about what we have accomplished for our neighborhood, then I guess there is nothing I can do. I don't see how this is different from the page for the Indianapolis Star. Those facts have certainly come from employees of the Star. Mine did to. I am the only employee are the Gazette. I started the paper in 2004 and do the layout, writing, and delivery. Our volunteer writers would not have any of the information that I have posted. Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 20:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
The editing that has occurred is arbitrary and irritating. I am unwilling to have a partial list of the long history of writers, the main reason for the page. The ones someone has deemed "keepable" is completely without thought or consideration. If this is what can stay up, then please remove the page completely. If that is something I can do, please let me know. -Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 17:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
So even though I created the content, I am not allowed to delete any of it, but you are? I will no longer support Wikipedia or any of the content of the Gazette page. This is not something I wish to be associated with. I plan to share this with my 7000 readers, Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 23:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC) What you are not understanding is that you have removed so much pertinent information that what remains is an inaccurate depiction of the paper. It leaves writers in that did little, and leaves off those who wrote for years. It is now a misleading article and should be removed. -Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 00:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTADIRECTORY Jay Jay What did I do? 17:56, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The primary purpose of a list of anything, on Wikipedia, is not to be a comprehensive directory of all things that exist within the parameters of the list regardless of whether they have Wikipedia articles or not, but specifically to help people find Wikipedia articles. I'm sure this was a good faith creation at the time, but if six years later there's still only one blue link in the entire list, then it's not really serving a particularly useful purpose at the present time — and if even SweetNightmares thinks that only two or three of the redlinks really have much potential of turning blue, then that's still not a terribly strong vote of confidence that it can become more useful than it is. Delete; no prejudice against recreation in the future if we ever have a reasonable number of articles about wineries in Quebec for it to link to. I wouldn't object to merging it into a Canada-wide list as proposed above, but the category reveals that we don't have a particularly large number of articles about wineries elsewhere in Canada either — so I'm not entirely convinced that a Canada-wide list would really be all that helpful, rather than just a reduplication of Category:Wineries in Canada, either. Bearcat ( talk) 22:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Actor, writer, producer who is non-notable. Fails WP:BIO, WP:NACTOR and WP:DIRECTOR scope_creep 17:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Does not meet general notability guidelines of wikipedia. Param Mudgal ( talk) 17:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page, if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Only one of the sources listed in the article [38] cover this person in any great detail. This reference won't load for me (and is a blog so not a reliable source), this reference also won't load, and this source doesn't mention this person at all. A cursory Google search doesn't turn up any sources where he is covered in-depth. So in my view he is no more notable now than he was two years ago. ArcAngel (talk) ) 17:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Absence of English sources per se is not a reason for deletion, and, as noted in the discussion, it is likely that multiple sources are available in Slovenian. The article currently has one source, so that it certainly needs attention (preferably from a Slovenian speaker), but we do not need to delete it. I do not see any consensus for a redirect/move at this point, though if someone creates an article about the author this becomes a viable option.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 05:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Foreign-language novel with no claim to notability. Article in local-language Wiki has no references. Mikeblas ( talk) 13:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
2 appearances in television shows and one supporting role in a film are not enough to prove sufficient notability. Fails WP:NACTOR. Skr15081997 ( talk) 15:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Not Cool (disambiguation). No clear concensus to delete after two relistings. As an alternative to deletion redirecting to new disambiguation page reflects consensus for redirect/disambiguation. Philg88 ♦ talk 08:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 06:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. This is a largely indescriminate list focusing heavily on a recent event. Our concern for lists is not merely that each entry be supported by a source but that some encyclopedic constraint on entry actually exists. In this case the only constraint is that someone famous dumped a bucket of ice on their head for charity. There's not much of an upper bound for entries there and more importantly, there's little preventing the list from becoming a directory of specific events shown to exist.
Participants (on both sides) note that the Ice Bucket Challenge is "notable" and that individual members are notable, but this list merely represents the intersection of those two things. The clever memetic nature of the challenge makes managing this list quite difficult, as a number of advocates for deletion have noted. Although that is not, by itself, cause for deletion it's a good indicator that the list represents only that intersection.
Further, the size and nature of the list itself makes a merge highly problematic. Many editors have noted that merging this list into Ice Bucket Challenge will cause that page to grow unwieldy quickly. I'm inclined to agree. Even if we retain this as a standalone list, the nature of the list itself subverts reasonable attempts to cut it down to size. Proposals that the list be limited to particularly significant participants or actions are bound to be difficult and contentious because the list itself is indiscriminate. Again, that's an editorial concern but it flows directly from the reasons for deletion.
Those arguing to keep the list have noted (correctly) that each element meets the MOS on lists of people. While true, that's merely a guide to what goes on the list and not proof that the list is constrained by some encyclopedic interest. If we're interested in bringing the MOS into the discussion we could just as easily look at our guidance on standalone lists which points to the limited value of indiscriminate (though blue linked) lists.
By the numbers, the debate is relatively pitched. We do see some sockpuppet/SPA contributions, but that's not by itself dispositive or reason to distrust the sentiment behind keeping the list.
The compelling counteraguments which find support are, variously: the list itself isn't a red linked mess, the size/nature of the list makes it inappropriate for the related article, notability is permanent (directly responding to the RECENT charge), and the list itself is meticulously and prodigiously sourced. However, the arguments for deletion flow from relatively well established policy (mainly NOT) and even if we accept the majority of arguments to keep the list, the concerns about its indiscriminate nature remain. As such, I see a consensus to delete the list. I agree with many comments that a merge would be undesirable or difficult to accomplish and I don't think the title is a likely search term, so a redirect (with or without history) seems unwise. Protonk ( talk) 15:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Indiscriminate list of people in the Ice Bucket Challenge. Having a list of everybody who dumps ice water on their head and donates to charity is hardly encyclopedic, and would be similar to listing all the participants in a marathon. — Parent5446 ☯ ( msg email) 01:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
It's time to request a sock puppet investigation. This AfD smells like a giant sock puppet farm, and someone is trying to game the system. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 22:45, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Who cares? The celebrities who have taken part could probably buy wikipedia and a bunch of jobsworth editors do not need this much say on something that hundreds of celebrities and even former presidents have taken part in.
Keivan.f Talk 19:34, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
lengthy unrelated chatter
|
---|
|
Keivan.f Talk 07:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
eight Hong Kong socks with nearly sequential IPs chime in with !votes in rapid succession; related commentary
|
---|
|
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Unref article on living people after more than 8 years - no Portuguese language article. Boleyn ( talk) 14:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hero (2014 film). → Call me Hahc 21 02:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:NACTOR. Just one unreleased film and being assistant director for another one are not enough for notability. Skr15081997 ( talk) 09:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. As failing GNG. → Call me Hahc 21 02:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I see no sign of notability but others might feel the other way around so I'm proposing this article for deletion. Mr RD 20:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Article about screen and textile printer, who professes to be a entrepreneur, but fails WP:BIO. No notability whatsoever. scope_creep talk 20:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The person is not notable yet as a singer. She might be notable in the future. -- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 14:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:48, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Is this shopping center notable? Based on a merger proposal here, it seems to be non-notable. Natg 19 ( talk) 17:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested based on the mistaken claim that the Montenegrin First League is fully pro. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 01:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONGS, never been recorded as it stands I don't believe that this song is notable Gbawden ( talk) 11:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Not able to find any noteworthy stuff about the party. It was formed. But doesn't seem like it won or even contested any elections, national or state level or municipal level.
Note: Its not to be confused with
Bharatiya Janshakti Party and
Lok Janshakti Party which turn up in multiple web search results of the term "Jan Shakti Party". §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
T/
C}
10:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears non-notable. also reads more like a fansite than a encyclopedic article -- Mdann 52 talk to me! 09:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
In my view this article can be improved and made more encyclopedic.This is a short article and it is very early to regard this article as fansite. Harshita Gaur is a notable TV Actor in India.-- Param Mudgal ( talk) 11:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of passing WP:GNG. Laun chba ller 08:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Upgrading from unref-BLP prod to failure of WP:N (primary self-published refs only) AfD. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
He doesn't appear to satisfy either WP:ACTOR or WP:GNG (not to be confused with another writer/actor of the same name). As far as I can determine, his biggest role was in Coming to America, and that one would be very borderline as far as significance is concerned. The article even admits "he is known for minor roles" in some admittedly big-budget films. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 05:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Not convinced this meets WP:ANYBIO. (I recently ran Reflinks on this and removed an "unreferenced BLP" tag from it. Just want to be sure.) Laun chba ller 21:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be an advertisement and has had said flag since 2012; service is no longer available (suspended indefinitely), and does not appear to be notable. -akoimeexx «talk» 18:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to find multiple reliable sources significantly discussing this musical artist. Google search brings up basically the same type of references as found in the article -- i.e., entries in music directories and song retailers. The Cyrillic Google search is pretty much the same thing, but includes many articles referencing the Bolshoi Ballet, which is not relevant here. ... discospinster talk 16:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn ( talk) 16:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP, no independent coverage that I am able to find. On the other hand, the Transparency Index may meet the WP:GNG, and might merit a page. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I dispute the deletion of this wikipedia page. - Jason Lee
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:GNG NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 11:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War. ( non-admin closure) Ansh 666 21:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Undiscussed WP:MAF of Syrian Civil War#Belligerents and List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War without a single reference and was obviously copy/pasted from the mentioned articles. Fitzcarmalan ( talk) 09:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. And furthermore, I hereby nominate the By number of wins table for the Edward Tufte special award for Data presentation abuse above and beyond the call of duty. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
This article has existed for some time without any references. A small number of references were found at the previous AfD, but these have approaching zero coverage of the event series as they are 'local girl made good stories' rather than indepth coverage. Not eligible for PROD. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I can find no significant coverage about this software to establish notability. The article itself is unreferenced. Whpq ( talk) 10:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 02:06, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
I am nominating this article for deletion because the subject has received little to no significant coverage in reliable sources. He only received significant coverage during the time of the Don Jazzy/Wande Coal feud. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The subject however has been nominated for two notable awards in his country, and happens to meet WP:ANYBIO. I don't believe the ANYBIO criteria is enough to warrant a stand alone article. Versace1608 (Talk) 00:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment:To tell you the truth, I don't know this producer, but for him to have produced all these major hits(more than one hit), it speaks notability. If he was nominated just once, it would have been a different thing (He was nominated twice for 2 different notable awards). It's just like a movie director that has directed 4 major award winning films, whether or not he passes GNG or not will no longer matter cuz he already passed WP:FILMS. Darreg ( talk) 22:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep. Nominator withdrawn.( non-admin closure) ΤheQ Editor Talk? 21:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. Should be deleted, merged or redirected. TheQ Editor (Talk) 14:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines AlvinMarplesJr ( talk) 22:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was no consensus. A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to the deletion discussion for Sackler Center for Arts Education. All input is welcome, though valid arguments citing relevant guidelines will be given more weight than unsupported statements; discussion guidelines are available. Be aware that using multiple accounts to reinforce a viewpoint is considered a serious breach of community trust, and that commenting on other users rather than the article is also considered disruptive. -- This was added by User:Amrit.ghimire13 ( talk) on 16 August 2014
Redirect. No reason for deletion is given by the nominator, but as the article stands now, I think the content would be better served by merging it into the museum's article, to the extent that it is not already there. There does not seem to be much unique information here. A redirect can be left in its place. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
An email marketing software. The two very brief news mentions are about the parent company. Remainder cited to Crunchbase profile and Google Chrome page. I can't see any reliable news coverage about the software. Sionk ( talk) 22:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to McCarthy Trenching. ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 09:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to McCarthy Trenching. ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 09:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Non-notable concurrency (appears to be yet another unremarkable fork of Bitcoin). Salimfadhley ( talk) 21:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete - I searched for coverage and found very little. There are websites associated with the creators of Lusocoin, cryptocurrency forums, and domain name analyses; but none of these are reliable, independent sources. As of now, the article fails WP:GNG, though this could change if the cryptocurrency suddenly gains more coverage. Altamel ( talk) 18:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete—Not nearly enough coverage to establish notability. Lesser Cartographies ( talk) 22:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:29, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I nominate this article for deletion due this article includes only armenian side of the claimed event, which is direct breach of WP:NPOV. Most of the sources for the article is just out of the context on Azerbaijani people and not-historical proven facts, which is breach of WP:BIAS. Moreover, the article is full of copy-paste material for an encyclopedic entry. The article uses fake sources such as "Audrey L. Altstadt. Azerbaijani Turks: Power and Identity Under Russian Rule", which is not related anyhow to the massacre. I think this is more than enough information. No other country except armenians are writing about this so called event. Yacatisma ( talk) 20:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Essentially an unref blp (has an external link, but no actual reference). Has been like this for several years. It has been tagged for notability for over six years, unresolved. Its last AfD, in 2008, reached no consensus. Boleyn ( talk) 20:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure). Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 06:43, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
I could not establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 17:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Article has been improved to show notability, nominator has withdrawn, and there are no delete opinions. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Straight-to-DVD movie with no indication of notability. I found
a single review in a low-profile publication, there are a couple of interviews with the director, and that's all. The article itself is a mess, overly detailed, convoluted plot summary and little else, and even that "little else" manages to contain errors. Even if the film were notable,
WP:TNT would be an improvement.
Huon (
talk)
17:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Johnson was a high school soccer coach. The sources tend towards local sources or directory listings. No demonstration that he meets any notability criteria John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Unreferenced article: can find nothing to confirm that this unit even exists, let alone is notable. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources, that are independent of the topic. JMHamo ( talk) 14:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Can't determine notability, I can't find reliable sources. Of the two links that work, one provides metrics for the University of Dar es salaam. The other provides a list of institutions, but not TITS. Fails GNG IMO Gbawden ( talk) 13:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 15:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't think the subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, and this article reads as indiscriminate publicity and the subject is most notable for a News event. I recognise that this article existed before that event but I still don't see that it meets the notability criteria. Jamie Kitson ( talk) 13:49, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Youth football team in a non professional youth league. Non notable IMO Gbawden ( talk) 13:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
All references in the article are from the websites of the organizations affiliated with Henderson. I tried to search and find additional references, and I failed to find anything useful. In the end of the day, we have someone who has published a book on motor racing safety, who is doing applied research related to safety, but who apparently does not publish and therefore fails WP:PROF. One of the references says he was a competitive racer in the 1960s, and he might be notable as a racer, but I did not find any confirmations of notability here either. Note that there is a professor of medicine (a surgeon) at the University of Melbourne who may very well be notable but who does not seem to be the same person. Ymblanter ( talk) 12:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails tennis notability guidelines. Only players who have won a grand slam event are entitled to a player season article. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Article types and recommended practices Wolbo ( talk) 10:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:NOTBURO. The Bushranger One ping only 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This page is nothing more than a timetable for trams. It does not provide much context and does not indicate the notability of the subject. Passengerpigeon ( talk) 10:01, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I do not believe this painting is notable. Most of the sources in this article don't have anything to do with the subject (the painting) itself, it seems to consist mostly of original research interpretation of the views of a living person (the artist), and the image of the painting has not had its permission confirmed through OTRS at Commons. Holdek ( talk) 09:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure) czar ♔ 09:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Looks like WP:OR. The phrase "promotional mix" occurs in lots of marketing books according to GBooks, but this article cites only one of them and actually gets the definition and the citation wrong, according to 82.192.238.55 on the talk page. Therefore, I think WP:TNT applies.
(I don't have access to the book, so I haven't been able to verify or falsify.) QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 09:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Mkativerata ( talk) 21:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
PROD was removed with the rationale "there are sources in the infobox". First, I don't care if there are "sources" in the infobox. For a BLP there need to be sources for every para in the text. Second, these aren't "sources" these are just generic external links. This is a BLP. Either do your job as a serious encyclopedia editor or get out of the way and let this be deleted, per WP:BLP. If you don't have the time to take an article seriously, don't make the encyclopedia suffer its presence. Note: yes, these are all very valid arguments for deletion per WP:BLP, WP:NOTABILITY is secondary. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 06:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - reliable sources provided. Volunteer Marek ( talk) 17:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I assume this was translated, but it has been done poorly and I struggled to understand all of it. I also think it fails WP:ANYBIO and maybe WP:GNG NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 06:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Mary Hynes is the member of a county board. This is a position that almost never is enough to make someone notable. She previously was on a county school board, another non-notable position. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was userfy. Will move this (back) to User:Warsage/Lester Yocum as requested. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
The article fails WP:GNG. The subject of this article has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. The references cited in the article are not independent of the subject. Versace1608 (Talk) 20:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Keep. ( non-admin closure). Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 11:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Article provides no references that support the notability of this organization beyond it's listing in a directory of alt-med practices. Salimfadhley ( talk) 22:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete: Insufficient coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. The "accrediting association" mentioned above is a sham fringe group of dubious notability itself, and does not lend any notability to the subject. The Princeton review mention is not independent, but written by the school itself. Other mentions are trivial, and added together amount to far too little to meet any of our notability guidelines. My own search turned up nothing significant. Dominus Vobisdu ( talk) 04:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The product described in this article has not been mentioned in any independent sources; I do not think it is notable. I should point out that the article was previously tagged for speedy deletion (a bit overzealously) a few minutes after User:Seattledude created the page in 2009. The deletion at that time was denied in order to give the article a chance. I think now that a few years have passed deletion can be considered again. Gccwang ( talk) 03:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Extensive listing of sports team player stats. No evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG. Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players. Wikipedia is not a stats directory. - Mr X 02:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
I found nothing to prove notability. Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Upon reviewing the article and searching myself for further WP:RS I see a major challenge with this type of article? Is it notable? Maybe. Are there RS, unfortunately not. Even looking at Anime convention there are practically no references to speak of, and those that are listed would generally not be considered as reliable. With that being said, RS and N are two very pillars of this site, and to operate with articles not reliably sourced goes against the core premise of the project. I do not intend this rationale to be prejudice for further AfD's and I hope RS can be found for all. If additional RS come to light I have no problem with any admin restoring article. Tawker ( talk) 19:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Article deleted by PROD, then userfyed at the request of the author. It has now been restored without changes to notability. No coverage by reliable and independent sources. Esw01407 ( talk) 02:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:BLP of a person whose only substantive claims of notability are as a smalltown mayor (reeve) and as an unsuccessful candidate for election to the provincial legislature — neither of which is a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL, and there's no real prospect of him passing WP:GNG either. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 01:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 11:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. The article was previously PROD but contested as, "It is a major thoroughfare and most major thoroughfares in Kowloon have an article". However, being a major thoroughfare is not the test of notability used by Wikipedia. Most thoroughfare in cities worldwide do not have articles. This article remains as single sentence dictionary entry to this date. Rincewind42 ( talk) 16:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable street in Hong Kong. The article fails to provide sufficient sources or even details in the text, to support its notability. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability and WP:RS. Note that existence does not prove notability. The road needs to be the a subject covered by the source not simply a location mentioned while discussing some ancillary topic. Wikipedia is not a directory of places or tourist guide book. This article would be better suited to WikiVoyage. The article was previously PROD under notability, which was contested with the comment, "oppose deletion on prod" but no reason given and no improvement made to the article so the notability issue remains. Rincewind42 ( talk) 15:50, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 02:01, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be a not-yet-notable musician who has had some film/TV appearances. The person doesn't seem to meet any criteria of WP:MUSICBIO or WP:NACTOR. She may be up-and-coming, but up-and-coming doesn't qualify for a Wikipedia article — she must have already arrived. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 14:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Multi-channel network on YouTube with no strong claim of notability — it asserts one ("11th largest MCN on YouTube"), but sources that claim only to a stats counter and not to any actual coverage in any actual reliable sources. Delete unless the sourcing can be beefed way up. Bearcat ( talk) 03:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). This short discussion is somewhat leaning toward a merge result, but not quite due to a lack of adequate participation. A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 02:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
per WP:ANYBIO in a band that doesn't have a WP page and been in one movie and one television drama. The article is also unsourced. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 06:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:ENT and WP:BIO. Has not had any significant roles in "multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". Additionally there is a lack of in depth third party coverage [29]. Please note, this article has previously been deleted through AfDs for the same reason. AlanS ( talk) 09:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
This rapper doesn't satisfy WP:MUSICBIO as far as I can see. This article is about all I could find. The article's creator is User:OSO ImagingPRFIRM, rather blatant COI. Fortunately, this is that account's only Wikipedia "contribution". Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page, if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:DIRECTOR and WP:BIO. Is not regarded as an important figure by his peers/successors. Is not known for originating any new concepts. Has not created any significant works that is the subject of the works of others. Additionally there is a lack of in depth third party coverage [30]. AlanS ( talk) 10:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. → Call me Hahc 21 17:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be solely for advertising, would be a WP:G11 if common sense told me not to after seeing sources. Mr. Guye ( talk) 01:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
No sign of WP:NOTABILITY in article; Google results are a sea of sales sites, rather than anything indicating real notability. User ID of article creator is the same as name of item's inventor. Nat Gertler ( talk) 14:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madison Metropolitan School District. per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES & nom. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable middle school, should be redirected to Madison Metropolitan School District. Jacona ( talk) 01:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Estate agency, which fails WP:ORG and asserts WP:INHERITORG regarding James Caan link. Mentions only seem to cover industry pages, but nothing outside this. No references. scope_creep talk 18:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vallivue School District - I'll hold off on the protection since it's only happened once. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 • (talk) 15:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable middle school. It was redirected to Vallivue School District, but that has been reverted, landing it here. Jacona ( talk) 01:44, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. This should be treated as a WP:PROD deletion because there are no meaningful "delete" or "keep" opinions on offer. The one "keep" opinion seems to incorrectly assume that this is the article about the movie, and for the "delete" opinion see WP:JNN Sandstein 08:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
A number of these being created of late. No sources to indicate the "franchise" itself is notable, just a summary culled from various other articles and non-notable topics. Doesn't serve much more purpose than a disambiguation page or navigation box (see {{ The Emperor's New Groove}}). Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 16:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
To add context to this discussion, these are the other franchise articles for Walt Disney Animation Studios films (plus the Pixar ones):-- Coin945 ( talk) 13:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete Sigh, really not notable. Forbidden User ( talk) 17:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
No indication of notability, article entirely unreferenced Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Article, edging dangerously close to an outright advertisement, for a community newspaper with no strong or properly sourced indication of notability under our inclusion rules for publications. Every last "reference" here, in fact, is a primary source of one sort or another (content on the newspaper's own website, the blogs or business websites of individual people listed in the contributors list, and on and so forth) — so none of the sourcing properly confers or demonstrates notability, and the paper is not automatically entitled to keep an article on here just because it exists. There's also an apparent conflict of interest here, if you compare the creator's username to the name of the person noted in the article as the paper's founder. So in this state it's a delete, unless real sources can be brought to bear. Bearcat ( talk) 19:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I am the editor of the newspaper. We are an all-volunteer community newspaper that has been published for more than 10 years. The paper is enjoyed by more than 7000 residents every two weeks, it doesn't just "exist" as you put it. We have no interest in advertising for it. I am trying to honor the long list of volunteers and the historical stories we have written over the years. All of the entries are by me because no one else could possibly have this information. I think it would be a shame to remove the page, but if you do not want this information about what we have accomplished for our neighborhood, then I guess there is nothing I can do. I don't see how this is different from the page for the Indianapolis Star. Those facts have certainly come from employees of the Star. Mine did to. I am the only employee are the Gazette. I started the paper in 2004 and do the layout, writing, and delivery. Our volunteer writers would not have any of the information that I have posted. Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 20:52, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
The editing that has occurred is arbitrary and irritating. I am unwilling to have a partial list of the long history of writers, the main reason for the page. The ones someone has deemed "keepable" is completely without thought or consideration. If this is what can stay up, then please remove the page completely. If that is something I can do, please let me know. -Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 17:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
So even though I created the content, I am not allowed to delete any of it, but you are? I will no longer support Wikipedia or any of the content of the Gazette page. This is not something I wish to be associated with. I plan to share this with my 7000 readers, Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 23:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC) What you are not understanding is that you have removed so much pertinent information that what remains is an inaccurate depiction of the paper. It leaves writers in that did little, and leaves off those who wrote for years. It is now a misleading article and should be removed. -Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.147.187.147 ( talk) 00:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTADIRECTORY Jay Jay What did I do? 17:56, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The primary purpose of a list of anything, on Wikipedia, is not to be a comprehensive directory of all things that exist within the parameters of the list regardless of whether they have Wikipedia articles or not, but specifically to help people find Wikipedia articles. I'm sure this was a good faith creation at the time, but if six years later there's still only one blue link in the entire list, then it's not really serving a particularly useful purpose at the present time — and if even SweetNightmares thinks that only two or three of the redlinks really have much potential of turning blue, then that's still not a terribly strong vote of confidence that it can become more useful than it is. Delete; no prejudice against recreation in the future if we ever have a reasonable number of articles about wineries in Quebec for it to link to. I wouldn't object to merging it into a Canada-wide list as proposed above, but the category reveals that we don't have a particularly large number of articles about wineries elsewhere in Canada either — so I'm not entirely convinced that a Canada-wide list would really be all that helpful, rather than just a reduplication of Category:Wineries in Canada, either. Bearcat ( talk) 22:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Actor, writer, producer who is non-notable. Fails WP:BIO, WP:NACTOR and WP:DIRECTOR scope_creep 17:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Does not meet general notability guidelines of wikipedia. Param Mudgal ( talk) 17:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on a talk page, if desired. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Only one of the sources listed in the article [38] cover this person in any great detail. This reference won't load for me (and is a blog so not a reliable source), this reference also won't load, and this source doesn't mention this person at all. A cursory Google search doesn't turn up any sources where he is covered in-depth. So in my view he is no more notable now than he was two years ago. ArcAngel (talk) ) 17:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Absence of English sources per se is not a reason for deletion, and, as noted in the discussion, it is likely that multiple sources are available in Slovenian. The article currently has one source, so that it certainly needs attention (preferably from a Slovenian speaker), but we do not need to delete it. I do not see any consensus for a redirect/move at this point, though if someone creates an article about the author this becomes a viable option.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 05:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Foreign-language novel with no claim to notability. Article in local-language Wiki has no references. Mikeblas ( talk) 13:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 17:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
2 appearances in television shows and one supporting role in a film are not enough to prove sufficient notability. Fails WP:NACTOR. Skr15081997 ( talk) 15:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Not Cool (disambiguation). No clear concensus to delete after two relistings. As an alternative to deletion redirecting to new disambiguation page reflects consensus for redirect/disambiguation. Philg88 ♦ talk 08:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 06:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. This is a largely indescriminate list focusing heavily on a recent event. Our concern for lists is not merely that each entry be supported by a source but that some encyclopedic constraint on entry actually exists. In this case the only constraint is that someone famous dumped a bucket of ice on their head for charity. There's not much of an upper bound for entries there and more importantly, there's little preventing the list from becoming a directory of specific events shown to exist.
Participants (on both sides) note that the Ice Bucket Challenge is "notable" and that individual members are notable, but this list merely represents the intersection of those two things. The clever memetic nature of the challenge makes managing this list quite difficult, as a number of advocates for deletion have noted. Although that is not, by itself, cause for deletion it's a good indicator that the list represents only that intersection.
Further, the size and nature of the list itself makes a merge highly problematic. Many editors have noted that merging this list into Ice Bucket Challenge will cause that page to grow unwieldy quickly. I'm inclined to agree. Even if we retain this as a standalone list, the nature of the list itself subverts reasonable attempts to cut it down to size. Proposals that the list be limited to particularly significant participants or actions are bound to be difficult and contentious because the list itself is indiscriminate. Again, that's an editorial concern but it flows directly from the reasons for deletion.
Those arguing to keep the list have noted (correctly) that each element meets the MOS on lists of people. While true, that's merely a guide to what goes on the list and not proof that the list is constrained by some encyclopedic interest. If we're interested in bringing the MOS into the discussion we could just as easily look at our guidance on standalone lists which points to the limited value of indiscriminate (though blue linked) lists.
By the numbers, the debate is relatively pitched. We do see some sockpuppet/SPA contributions, but that's not by itself dispositive or reason to distrust the sentiment behind keeping the list.
The compelling counteraguments which find support are, variously: the list itself isn't a red linked mess, the size/nature of the list makes it inappropriate for the related article, notability is permanent (directly responding to the RECENT charge), and the list itself is meticulously and prodigiously sourced. However, the arguments for deletion flow from relatively well established policy (mainly NOT) and even if we accept the majority of arguments to keep the list, the concerns about its indiscriminate nature remain. As such, I see a consensus to delete the list. I agree with many comments that a merge would be undesirable or difficult to accomplish and I don't think the title is a likely search term, so a redirect (with or without history) seems unwise. Protonk ( talk) 15:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Indiscriminate list of people in the Ice Bucket Challenge. Having a list of everybody who dumps ice water on their head and donates to charity is hardly encyclopedic, and would be similar to listing all the participants in a marathon. — Parent5446 ☯ ( msg email) 01:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
It's time to request a sock puppet investigation. This AfD smells like a giant sock puppet farm, and someone is trying to game the system. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 22:45, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Who cares? The celebrities who have taken part could probably buy wikipedia and a bunch of jobsworth editors do not need this much say on something that hundreds of celebrities and even former presidents have taken part in.
Keivan.f Talk 19:34, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
lengthy unrelated chatter
|
---|
|
Keivan.f Talk 07:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
eight Hong Kong socks with nearly sequential IPs chime in with !votes in rapid succession; related commentary
|
---|
|
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Unref article on living people after more than 8 years - no Portuguese language article. Boleyn ( talk) 14:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hero (2014 film). → Call me Hahc 21 02:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:NACTOR. Just one unreleased film and being assistant director for another one are not enough for notability. Skr15081997 ( talk) 09:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. As failing GNG. → Call me Hahc 21 02:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I see no sign of notability but others might feel the other way around so I'm proposing this article for deletion. Mr RD 20:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Article about screen and textile printer, who professes to be a entrepreneur, but fails WP:BIO. No notability whatsoever. scope_creep talk 20:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The person is not notable yet as a singer. She might be notable in the future. -- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 14:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:48, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Is this shopping center notable? Based on a merger proposal here, it seems to be non-notable. Natg 19 ( talk) 17:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested based on the mistaken claim that the Montenegrin First League is fully pro. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 01:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSONGS, never been recorded as it stands I don't believe that this song is notable Gbawden ( talk) 11:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Not able to find any noteworthy stuff about the party. It was formed. But doesn't seem like it won or even contested any elections, national or state level or municipal level.
Note: Its not to be confused with
Bharatiya Janshakti Party and
Lok Janshakti Party which turn up in multiple web search results of the term "Jan Shakti Party". §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
T/
C}
10:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears non-notable. also reads more like a fansite than a encyclopedic article -- Mdann 52 talk to me! 09:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
In my view this article can be improved and made more encyclopedic.This is a short article and it is very early to regard this article as fansite. Harshita Gaur is a notable TV Actor in India.-- Param Mudgal ( talk) 11:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of passing WP:GNG. Laun chba ller 08:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Upgrading from unref-BLP prod to failure of WP:N (primary self-published refs only) AfD. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
He doesn't appear to satisfy either WP:ACTOR or WP:GNG (not to be confused with another writer/actor of the same name). As far as I can determine, his biggest role was in Coming to America, and that one would be very borderline as far as significance is concerned. The article even admits "he is known for minor roles" in some admittedly big-budget films. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 05:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Not convinced this meets WP:ANYBIO. (I recently ran Reflinks on this and removed an "unreferenced BLP" tag from it. Just want to be sure.) Laun chba ller 21:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be an advertisement and has had said flag since 2012; service is no longer available (suspended indefinitely), and does not appear to be notable. -akoimeexx «talk» 18:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to find multiple reliable sources significantly discussing this musical artist. Google search brings up basically the same type of references as found in the article -- i.e., entries in music directories and song retailers. The Cyrillic Google search is pretty much the same thing, but includes many articles referencing the Bolshoi Ballet, which is not relevant here. ... discospinster talk 16:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 00:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn ( talk) 16:12, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP, no independent coverage that I am able to find. On the other hand, the Transparency Index may meet the WP:GNG, and might merit a page. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I dispute the deletion of this wikipedia page. - Jason Lee
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 01:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:GNG NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 11:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War. ( non-admin closure) Ansh 666 21:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Undiscussed WP:MAF of Syrian Civil War#Belligerents and List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War without a single reference and was obviously copy/pasted from the mentioned articles. Fitzcarmalan ( talk) 09:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. And furthermore, I hereby nominate the By number of wins table for the Edward Tufte special award for Data presentation abuse above and beyond the call of duty. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
This article has existed for some time without any references. A small number of references were found at the previous AfD, but these have approaching zero coverage of the event series as they are 'local girl made good stories' rather than indepth coverage. Not eligible for PROD. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I can find no significant coverage about this software to establish notability. The article itself is unreferenced. Whpq ( talk) 10:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 02:06, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
I am nominating this article for deletion because the subject has received little to no significant coverage in reliable sources. He only received significant coverage during the time of the Don Jazzy/Wande Coal feud. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The subject however has been nominated for two notable awards in his country, and happens to meet WP:ANYBIO. I don't believe the ANYBIO criteria is enough to warrant a stand alone article. Versace1608 (Talk) 00:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment:To tell you the truth, I don't know this producer, but for him to have produced all these major hits(more than one hit), it speaks notability. If he was nominated just once, it would have been a different thing (He was nominated twice for 2 different notable awards). It's just like a movie director that has directed 4 major award winning films, whether or not he passes GNG or not will no longer matter cuz he already passed WP:FILMS. Darreg ( talk) 22:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep. Nominator withdrawn.( non-admin closure) ΤheQ Editor Talk? 21:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. Should be deleted, merged or redirected. TheQ Editor (Talk) 14:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 02:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines AlvinMarplesJr ( talk) 22:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)