Welcome!
Hello, Metal.lunchbox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -
crz
crztalk 13:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
You should have a read of WP:3RR and fully understand what a revert is before you file any more reports. Mtking ( talk) 05:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for the work on both the Portland, OR article and the rather ridiculous Debate on traditional and simplified Chinese characters. It's been on my watchlist for cleanup for a long time, and it's nice to see someone making positive strides there. Keep up the good work! Vertigo Acid ( talk) 16:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to this article. I'm glad to see someone take the initiative. I actually didn't even know about the bottle smashing at Tam. Nice work, and I love the Ai Weiwei pic, he's full of surprises. Randomly, I'm from Portland and was surprised to see your contributions to this article too. I appreciate your work and thanks for helping to retain the page. Many thanks. -Devin (d.s.ronis) ( talk) 02:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
This is incorrect. The ISO code "CN" clearly means mainland China, and there are separate codes for Hong Kong (HK) and Macau (MO). One example is ZH-CN, which is simplified Chinese used in the mainland, as opposed to ZH-HK (Hong Kong/Macau traditional) and ZH-TW. Please remove this and any other similar cases before presenting your findings, unless you wish to delude others into thinking that this sort of usage is nonexistent. —Xiaoyu: 聊天 (T) 和 贡献 (C) 23:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for starting the RfC. But I'm not sure how you'd like us to respond.. I'm tempted to respond with "Yes". Perhaps you could state your response so that others follow appropriately? Thanks again, Mlm42 ( talk) 00:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Planned Parenthood, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Abortion/Log. It appears you may have recently broken the 1RR restriction at Planned Parenthood, which puts you in violation of the general sanctions. If this continues, you may be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 06:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
-- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs email 02:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
If you took a couple of seconds to look, you'd see I've been around here for a while and that if I make an edit with "see talk page" as a summary, that there is probably an edit coming to the talk page explaining what I just did. For you to assume that I wasn't going to bother explaining or that I thought "see talk page" was a all I needed to do is actually fairly insulting if you think about it. Niteshift36 ( talk) 23:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Don't come to my user page and add material I removed. You used the wrong policy to base your actions on. The user pages are not the "talk page" in the guideline you linked to. The one you need is WP:REMOVED, which says I can remove comments from MY user page. Wikipedia prefers archiving, but I don't. I remove them. I am allowed to. Niteshift36 ( talk) 00:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Because the previous version [1] is just a duplicate of this: Luis García Sanz. So I restored Luis Garcia to become a redirect of the dab page Luis García, which was what it should be before [2]. Chanheigeorge ( talk) 08:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I hadn't seen you around until a week or so ago, but now I'm seeing you everywhere, so I guess I should say hi - hi! Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 01:12, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
You honestly appear to be taunting some users: 174.24.56.54, to the point of Wikihounding User:BusyWikipedian. I don't know what's going on between you guys, but I'm recommending you please stop. 184.99.28.61 ( talk) 11:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Død Beverte does not qualify for speedy deletion under A7. There are numerous links to articles discussing the subject, which is enough to be a claim of significance or importance. If you think the article should be deleted, take it to WP:AfD. Also, any user may remove a speedy deletion template at any time, so long as they believe that it does not apply (as long as they did not create the article themselves). Once the tag is removed, you may not request speedy deletion again. Qwyrxian ( talk) 12:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
On 14 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Character amnesia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that computer input methods are blamed for individuals forgetting how to write Chinese characters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Character amnesia.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
How fun, thanks for the nomination. Metal lunchbox ( talk) 16:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
You need to read up a bit on the speedy deletion categories. This is a prime example. There is no advertising whatsoever in this article. I see you've done it a few times so far, so take this as a bit of a helpful warning. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 02:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Metal.lunchbox. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of 40 Below Summer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 03:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#ClaudioSantos_and_eugenics Falcon8765 (TALK) 05:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Just a note--if a source clearly doesn't meet WP:RS, you may remove it even while the deletion discussion is ongoing. If you're not sure (like if it's some online "magazine" that you aren't completely sure is non-notable), then just tag it with [[Template:Verify credibility]]. Qwyrxian ( talk) 07:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Please read my responses to your latest post on my page. And I hope you accept my apology. I assure you what I say on there is true, and I trust that you do not intend to attack me. I will be taking time off Wikipedia to cool off, and what I have told you on my page will be dealt with offline. Thank You. BusyWikipedian ( talk) 23:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dethcentrik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dethcentrik (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Metal lunchbox, Would you mind reviewing the recent changes to Concerns and controversies over Confucius Institutes, and perhaps weighing in on the corresponding talk page discussion? I would like to recuse myself for now, but I have provided a summary of the edits in question. Thanks. Homunculus ( duihua) 17:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I notice that you were active at the above just a few moths ago. I had various concerns, and noticed that the quotefarm concerns you had seemed to be a lingering problem. The more important problem since the spinoff from the parent is content forking. I've tried to address some of the more obvious NPOV issues, and would be interested in your views as to the current incarnation of the article. Cheers, -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 07:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Død Beverte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Død Beverte (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
BusyWikipedian created this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Metal.lunchbox. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox.
You are invited to join
WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of
brands and brand-related topics. |
---|
Hello Metal.lunchbox. I'm not sure if you're familiar with t'ai chi ch'uan, but there are terms associated with it that are part of the manner in which different aspects of the martial art are referred to by shifus, books, etc. For example, Yang style's taolu is known for it's low "movement", not slow "speed". There are also loanwords common to this wushu that are used over there translated counterparts. I would thus like to request that if you should want to alter terms present on the page, you please start by suggesting it on the talk page and getting feedback, to reduce the need for reverts from edits to valid terms. Thanks. ~ InferKNOX ( talk) 12:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I hope you have a legitimate point to make and aren't just playing semantic games. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 21:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much! WhisperToMe ( talk) 16:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
SarahStierch ( talk) 17:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for expanding Shen Congwen! It's been on my to-do list for a while, but now I can simply relax and enjoy the fruit of your hard work :-) Zanhe ( talk) 19:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC) |
There was a bit of more nationalist editing after you showed up. Could you stop by the talk page to discuss it because it got fully protected and m:wrong version and such?— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 15:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Metal.lunchbox. Noticed you have been dealing with User:Trust Is All You Need's recent "People's Democratic Republic" crusade over at Talk:China. Wondering if you could give me a hand dealing with him over at Talk:South Yemen? Keep up the good fight. GrahamNoyes ( talk) 20:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Metal.lunchbox, why did you call my edit pointy? I added the sources because the proposer of the move request asked for them. - Zanhe ( talk) 02:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure I am not the only one getting harassed over these RMs. In any case, keep up the good work. La crème de la crème ( talk) 13:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
On 25 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lü Zushan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lü Zushan succeeded Xi Jinping, now President of China, as Governor of Zhejiang province? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lü Zushan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dethcentrik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dethcentrik (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your efforts. To be honest, I created several articles about High Speed Railways in China around the same time. Mostly translating the Chinese language version of the article to create this English version of the Chongqing–Wanzhou Intercity Railway. From time to time, I have revisited the Chinese articles to see if they have been expanded over time and I may expand the English article or add from other sources. Alas I had not followed through with this particular article, for which I see it has been expanded greatly in the Chinese article possibly since the recent opening of this line. Livewireshock ( talk) 15:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐) 01:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:ChinaRMarchive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 06:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Metal.lunchbox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -
crz
crztalk 13:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
You should have a read of WP:3RR and fully understand what a revert is before you file any more reports. Mtking ( talk) 05:20, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for the work on both the Portland, OR article and the rather ridiculous Debate on traditional and simplified Chinese characters. It's been on my watchlist for cleanup for a long time, and it's nice to see someone making positive strides there. Keep up the good work! Vertigo Acid ( talk) 16:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to this article. I'm glad to see someone take the initiative. I actually didn't even know about the bottle smashing at Tam. Nice work, and I love the Ai Weiwei pic, he's full of surprises. Randomly, I'm from Portland and was surprised to see your contributions to this article too. I appreciate your work and thanks for helping to retain the page. Many thanks. -Devin (d.s.ronis) ( talk) 02:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
This is incorrect. The ISO code "CN" clearly means mainland China, and there are separate codes for Hong Kong (HK) and Macau (MO). One example is ZH-CN, which is simplified Chinese used in the mainland, as opposed to ZH-HK (Hong Kong/Macau traditional) and ZH-TW. Please remove this and any other similar cases before presenting your findings, unless you wish to delude others into thinking that this sort of usage is nonexistent. —Xiaoyu: 聊天 (T) 和 贡献 (C) 23:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for starting the RfC. But I'm not sure how you'd like us to respond.. I'm tempted to respond with "Yes". Perhaps you could state your response so that others follow appropriately? Thanks again, Mlm42 ( talk) 00:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Planned Parenthood, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Abortion/Log. It appears you may have recently broken the 1RR restriction at Planned Parenthood, which puts you in violation of the general sanctions. If this continues, you may be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 06:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
-- 李博杰 | — Talk contribs email 02:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
If you took a couple of seconds to look, you'd see I've been around here for a while and that if I make an edit with "see talk page" as a summary, that there is probably an edit coming to the talk page explaining what I just did. For you to assume that I wasn't going to bother explaining or that I thought "see talk page" was a all I needed to do is actually fairly insulting if you think about it. Niteshift36 ( talk) 23:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Don't come to my user page and add material I removed. You used the wrong policy to base your actions on. The user pages are not the "talk page" in the guideline you linked to. The one you need is WP:REMOVED, which says I can remove comments from MY user page. Wikipedia prefers archiving, but I don't. I remove them. I am allowed to. Niteshift36 ( talk) 00:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Because the previous version [1] is just a duplicate of this: Luis García Sanz. So I restored Luis Garcia to become a redirect of the dab page Luis García, which was what it should be before [2]. Chanheigeorge ( talk) 08:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
I hadn't seen you around until a week or so ago, but now I'm seeing you everywhere, so I guess I should say hi - hi! Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 01:12, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
You honestly appear to be taunting some users: 174.24.56.54, to the point of Wikihounding User:BusyWikipedian. I don't know what's going on between you guys, but I'm recommending you please stop. 184.99.28.61 ( talk) 11:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Død Beverte does not qualify for speedy deletion under A7. There are numerous links to articles discussing the subject, which is enough to be a claim of significance or importance. If you think the article should be deleted, take it to WP:AfD. Also, any user may remove a speedy deletion template at any time, so long as they believe that it does not apply (as long as they did not create the article themselves). Once the tag is removed, you may not request speedy deletion again. Qwyrxian ( talk) 12:29, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
On 14 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Character amnesia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that computer input methods are blamed for individuals forgetting how to write Chinese characters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Character amnesia.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 08:03, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
How fun, thanks for the nomination. Metal lunchbox ( talk) 16:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
You need to read up a bit on the speedy deletion categories. This is a prime example. There is no advertising whatsoever in this article. I see you've done it a few times so far, so take this as a bit of a helpful warning. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 02:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Metal.lunchbox. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of 40 Below Summer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 03:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#ClaudioSantos_and_eugenics Falcon8765 (TALK) 05:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Just a note--if a source clearly doesn't meet WP:RS, you may remove it even while the deletion discussion is ongoing. If you're not sure (like if it's some online "magazine" that you aren't completely sure is non-notable), then just tag it with [[Template:Verify credibility]]. Qwyrxian ( talk) 07:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Please read my responses to your latest post on my page. And I hope you accept my apology. I assure you what I say on there is true, and I trust that you do not intend to attack me. I will be taking time off Wikipedia to cool off, and what I have told you on my page will be dealt with offline. Thank You. BusyWikipedian ( talk) 23:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dethcentrik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dethcentrik (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Metal lunchbox, Would you mind reviewing the recent changes to Concerns and controversies over Confucius Institutes, and perhaps weighing in on the corresponding talk page discussion? I would like to recuse myself for now, but I have provided a summary of the edits in question. Thanks. Homunculus ( duihua) 17:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I notice that you were active at the above just a few moths ago. I had various concerns, and noticed that the quotefarm concerns you had seemed to be a lingering problem. The more important problem since the spinoff from the parent is content forking. I've tried to address some of the more obvious NPOV issues, and would be interested in your views as to the current incarnation of the article. Cheers, -- Ohconfucius ¡digame! 07:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Død Beverte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Død Beverte (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:40, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
BusyWikipedian created this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Metal.lunchbox. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox.
You are invited to join
WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of
brands and brand-related topics. |
---|
Hello Metal.lunchbox. I'm not sure if you're familiar with t'ai chi ch'uan, but there are terms associated with it that are part of the manner in which different aspects of the martial art are referred to by shifus, books, etc. For example, Yang style's taolu is known for it's low "movement", not slow "speed". There are also loanwords common to this wushu that are used over there translated counterparts. I would thus like to request that if you should want to alter terms present on the page, you please start by suggesting it on the talk page and getting feedback, to reduce the need for reverts from edits to valid terms. Thanks. ~ InferKNOX ( talk) 12:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I hope you have a legitimate point to make and aren't just playing semantic games. Curly Turkey ( gobble) 21:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much! WhisperToMe ( talk) 16:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
SarahStierch ( talk) 17:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for expanding Shen Congwen! It's been on my to-do list for a while, but now I can simply relax and enjoy the fruit of your hard work :-) Zanhe ( talk) 19:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC) |
There was a bit of more nationalist editing after you showed up. Could you stop by the talk page to discuss it because it got fully protected and m:wrong version and such?— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 15:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Metal.lunchbox. Noticed you have been dealing with User:Trust Is All You Need's recent "People's Democratic Republic" crusade over at Talk:China. Wondering if you could give me a hand dealing with him over at Talk:South Yemen? Keep up the good fight. GrahamNoyes ( talk) 20:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Metal.lunchbox, why did you call my edit pointy? I added the sources because the proposer of the move request asked for them. - Zanhe ( talk) 02:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure I am not the only one getting harassed over these RMs. In any case, keep up the good work. La crème de la crème ( talk) 13:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
On 25 September 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lü Zushan, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lü Zushan succeeded Xi Jinping, now President of China, as Governor of Zhejiang province? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lü Zushan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dethcentrik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dethcentrik (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your efforts. To be honest, I created several articles about High Speed Railways in China around the same time. Mostly translating the Chinese language version of the article to create this English version of the Chongqing–Wanzhou Intercity Railway. From time to time, I have revisited the Chinese articles to see if they have been expanded over time and I may expand the English article or add from other sources. Alas I had not followed through with this particular article, for which I see it has been expanded greatly in the Chinese article possibly since the recent opening of this line. Livewireshock ( talk) 15:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐) 01:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Metal.lunchbox. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:ChinaRMarchive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 06:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)