Reason: If
List of NFL champions (1920–1969) is the primary topic, why does it need a disambiguation in brackets? Either the article should be moved to this name or the redirect is better replaced by a disambiguation page.
Reason: The current target appears to be the result of an unfortunate bot cleanup of double redirects, and there is no need for the redirects to point at this specific section.
Reason: As A", E", and O" all point at articles about letters with a diaeresis, it seems more appropriate to retarget this to
Ü. Alternatively, all four could be deleted per
WP:XY (disambiguating seems a bit absurd in this case).
Reason: The current target is referring to
Ş (where this would normally be retargeted), but given that this {{R from ASCII-only}} uses a comma, it may well also be a replacement for
S-comma. Disambiguating this would look ridiculous to me.
Reason: This should actually have
Template:R from modification as a target, very weird. Either way, I don't think a full stop at the end is a particularly likely typo.
Reason: Given that
Tajiks (redirects) does not exist anymore and the page has no significant history whatsoever, I think this redirect can be deleted as well. Pinging
Jenks24, who deleted the main page.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL spacing. Looking at the histories of this redirect an Savage (Thee Stallion song), the correctly spelt version, it appears that the page was moved as a redirect (in violation of
WP:MOVEREDIRECT), which means that the actual article never existed under this title.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL. The article existed under this title for three minutes before being moved to the correctly parenthesised version, Bustan Ketab (publishing) (and later to the title without disambiguation).
Reason: This does not have a section at the target title, and from a quick search, this seems to be different from the
Realme X50 Pro, on which we have a separate article.
Reason: This does not have a section at the target title, and from a quick search, this seems to be different from the
Realme X2 Pro, on which we do have a separate article.
Reason: No reason to have a XNR like that to a draft named "Entrepreneurship", which is not even about entrepreneurship, but an autobiography of a likely unnotable entrepreneur.
Reason: If kept, this should be retargeted to
Michael Cimino's unrealized projects, where more information is provided; however, I don't think this is a likely search term.
Reason: This was created under this title in error, but instead of being moved, it was copied and pasted to
Wikipedia:Meetup/AfroCROWD-OFWA/WikiYearOfReturn, but by the same user. Is a histmerge needed in this case?
Reason: Should probably be unified with
D-subminiature. There are almost no search results for the term at all, but the variant with the hyphen also seems very slightly more common.
Reason: Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more: no incoming links. @
Seventyfiveyears and
Tavix: Pinging the participants of
the previous discussion.
Reason: This should not be an XNR, but redirect to
United States patent law, where US Patent also points, instead; however,
EncMstr seems to have a different opinion.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Delete to encourage article creation. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia: the only cricket-related search results for "R. Coleman" are at
English women's cricket team in Australia and New Zealand in 1934–35 and
Alfred Coleman; "R. Fawkes" seems to be ambiguous as per the mention at
Wikisource (for the rest, search does not return anything even slightly related).
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Delete to encourage article creation. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia: there are quite a few cricketers named "Hyde" and "Duncan" on Wikipedia, but none of them seems to have played for Europeans; "B. Gaillard" only returns unrelated citations; the rest has no slightly related search results at all.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Redirecting cross-namespace to a category page seems irrational; all of them are mentioned at
List of Oxford UCCE & MCCU players. I suggest retargeting them there (and probably unlinking them in the list), tagging them as {{R with possibilities}}.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: This page was created in 2003, but multiple
WP:MOVEREDIRECTs made the current title implausible; it actually clutters the search suggestions of "Capi (". If anybody thinks this history should be retained, I suggest the redirect be moved back to one of its historical titles.
Reason: This is not mentioned at the target; however, this is listed at
List of Apple codenames#Accessories. As
AirTag does not seem to have a plural, this seems to be the only appropriate target.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason:
Board of Control for Cricket in India seems to be the main article. The current title has a miscapitalised "of" and lacks an article, so if the "Governing Council of the Indian Premier League" is correct, it should be renamed there.
Reason:
John Smith (Sheffield cricketer) was redirected by the page creator, AssociateAffiliate, to the category page. These are not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Maybe restore the article content without prejudice for AfD?
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found. Per the backlinks, this also seems to be ambiguous with a painter.
Reason: These redirects result from moving pages that were intended to be in user space. In article space, they are clearly implausible and unnecessary.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Apart from an unrelated search result at
Melbourne Grammar School#Campuses, I could not find any mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. There is a mention at
List of English cricketers (1841–1850)#T, so I suggest retargeting there.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia (though we do have
Frederic Price (cricketer, born 1852) and
Frederic Price (cricketer, born 1840)). Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. There is a mention at
List of English cricketers (1826–1840)#G, so I suggest retargeting there.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: The only edit count mentioned at the target dab page is the link to
Wikipedia:WikiProject edit counters in the hatnote. This should either be retargeted to
Wikipedia:Edit count or, if deemed inappropriate as a XNR, deleted.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Although there are quite a few cricketers named Campbell on Wikipedia, none of them seems to have played for Fast vs Slow. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not describe at target. There is a mention at
List of Hardy Boys books; however, that hyperlinks all of the books, which (if left like that) would be an argument for deletion to avoid circular linking.
Reason: User talk pages are for communicating with a user, not reaching an article. If there is a CSD criterion that could apply, please tell me, as there are quite a few more of these redirects.
Reason: Unnecessarily redirected from a stub to a page without mention instead of being CSDed, but mentioned at
Patife Band (EP). Not sure about the "(character)" one though.
Reason: Not mentioned at target, an insource search does not seem to return more than usage in references and a few passing mentions. Delete unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: The target does not explicitly mention any release candidate with a number 3, but this might also refer to the "remote Chaos Experience" of the
Chaos Communication Congress.
Reason: The current redirect does not make sense to me. I suggest it be retargeted to {{R to redirect template}}, where {{R to rcat}} points, too. Note that the only transclusion of this redirect seems to have been at Template:R project page (see
Special:Diff/943088386), where I replaced it by the proposed target.
Reason: These should go to the same target, but neither of them mentions the term itself. I also could not find a mention anywhere else. The redirects get very little page views, so it might be better to tell the reader we don't have any specific information on this.
Reason: Seems to be a neologism, not further explained at the target. It is mentioned at
Generation Z#Arts and culture, so retargeting there might be an option. Alternatively Wiktionary redirect to
wikt:Twitterati or delete.
Reason: This seems to be an unofficial Discord client, but it is not mentioned at the target, so it might be better to show the reader we do not have any information on it.
Reason: The current target now has a main article,
Twitter trends; however, I'm not sure how unambiguous this term is. Creating the corresponding titles with a "(Twitter)" disambiguator as redirects there and retargeting these to
Trend might be a better option.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. An internet search returns quite a few search results related to a "teeth whitening" company as well as "cloud based software designed for business", but nothing related to blogging.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Even though this is listed at the
List of wikis, it is probably supposed to only contain wikis with a mention outside of it (at least all entries are linked).
Reason: This was initially pointing at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter, but was
retargeted by an anonymous editor. Backlinks refer both to the wrestling newsletter and content ownership, while the hatnote at the current target links to the wrestling notability guidelines. I'd prefer retargeting this to one of the wrestling pages, as you can usually pwn n00bs, but not content.
Reason: Eeeehhhhhhh This seems to be a misspelling of
Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllandysiliogogogoch, and should redirect there if kept, but I don't think it's any more likely than any random syllables appended to "Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwll", and this one even lacks a y in "pwllgwyngyll".
Reason:
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 27#Test Wikipedia resulted in a retarget; however, the topic is not mentioned at the target anymore nor anywhere else in mainspace. Since there is also no standalone page about this in other namespaces, I suggest deletion.
Reason: Not mentioned at target or anywhere on Wikipedia, causes unnecessary confusion (cf.
talk page: This is, I suppose, a derogatory term for the "Internet forum" term. I don't have the time to go through the
WP:Article titles policy base, but it seems obvious to me that we are not allowing such redirects. If we make exceptions, please let me know.
Nxavar (
talk) 17:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)). Soft retarget to
wikt:postwhore or delete.
Reason: No explanation anywhere at target; the only passing mention we have is at
PHP-Nuke. Also potentially ambiguous as this term is not exclusive to internet fora: This might even refer to the
Control Panel (Windows), particularly the Administrative Tools.
Reason: Looking at the page history, "AIM" is an abbreviation of "AOL Instant Messenger". While there is a short mention of the messenger in the section
Chatbot#Malicious use, to which this could be refined, "AIMBot" on its own is not mentioned at the target nor anywhere else and could cause unnecessary confusion with an
aimbot.
Reason: Not mentioned anywhere in relation to Slashdot. There is an unrelated list entry at
List of villains in VR Troopers#Slashbot though, to which I propose this be retargeted.
Reason: This was redirected to the current target after
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twestival, but is not currently mentioned at the target. Given the AfD, I suggest deletion.
Reason: While this is described at the target, I'm pretty sure thet
Arabic numerals is the primary topic. A hatnote might be added there, but I don't think it's necessary. This redirect gets well over a hundred monthly pageviews and might be confusing for many people. Note that 0123456789 also redirects to the proposed target.
Reason: This was moved by
Greyshark09 in July 2015, but should have probably been disambiguated between the current target and
Battle of Zabadani (2015). Alternatively, the page could be moved back here if it is the primary topic.
Reason: The target is not even a "disambig", and this is a nonstandard disambiguation anyway, so it will generate intdab errors if used as a redirect to a "disambig" page.
Reason: These should point at the same target. "Unbounded" does not only refer to functions, but also to sets in general. I'm okay with redirecting them to
Infinity, at which the first one currently points, but that does not mention the corresponding antonyms as listed at
Boundedness, for which a reader is pretty likely to be actually looking (cf. redirects Unbounded function, Unbounded set etc.).
Reason: A web search for "Creating Locomotive Services" returns no results. Locomotive Services Ltd. was created a couple minutes later by the same user, so this seems to be created in error.
Reason: This was created as a redirect from the beginning, and has never been a draft. The Bowling Alley-Cat was redirected by
Koavf in 2019, but that's not a reason for this redirect to exist.
Reason: Eeeehhhhhhh This template does not look very useful – probably because it isn't. It has two mainspace transclusions, which seem to need to be cleaned up.
Reason: This was moved in February, but I think this is quite ambiguous, as {{Self reference}} exists and is spelt very similarly. I think that is a better target because of the singular number, although I understand that the current target has been under this title since 2006.
Reason: Not only is this redirect totally implausible, consisting of an initialism disambiguated by its expanded form with an additional "(disambiguation)" appended (even though the title does not seem to be ambiguous); this is not even mentioned at the target. A mention may be added per
List of university and college schools of music, but this redirect should be deleted. I also think
Music School of Eastern Africa should better not be created, as the list does not provide any further information and the redlink there encourages article creation.
Reason: This redirect is incorrect. Not every redirect to a person also goes to a person. I just wanted to tag Education Standards Institute with this template, but with its current target, it would not fit the redirect. Either delete (and examine the ~20 transclusions case-by-case) or create as a new rcat.
Reason: Apart from the easily fixable issue that the section does not exist at the target, I think that redirecting this to the article about the English grammar phenomenon is biased.
Grammatical tense seems to be a good alternative.
Reason: Given that College (Quebec) (
College (Québec) does not exist currently, but might be created) redirects to the more general
College education in Quebec and this was created in draftspace as a redirect, I don't see a point in this redirect.
Reason: Neither the target nor any other article mentions "hyper-authoritarianism", and the fact that this redirect was created immediately in draftspace doesn't quite make it more useful.
Reason: This might also refer to 60-frames-per-second
interlaced video, and I would argue this is the primary topic, though it is only really described at the
24p article as far as I can see.
Reason: I find it confusing that these point to different target, given that an editor might search for either of these with the same in mind. I would prefer
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Unit names and symbols as a target, though that could include a reference to the MOS:MATHS section.
Reason: Not even mentioned at target, and apparently the only Hangul character not redirecting to the
Hangul article (where this is mentioned in the lead).
Reason: "Redirect-Class" is usually used for WikiProjects, this one is not. If this is supposed to be an rcat (like
Category:Redirects from emoji), it should be named "Redirects from flags".
Reason: Looking at the current contents of the category, I see at least
Yogh,
Thorn (letter),
Vend (letter), and
Wynn where I can't understand how they are "variants". They could be removed from the category, but is it really
WP:defining for a palaeographic letter to be a variant?
Reason: The page's initial content was referring to a track from
The Hunter (Blondie album), but as it does not seem notable (I can only find lyric pages on a quick web search), I suggest deleting this per
WP:UNNATURAL.
Reason: Nominating
on behalf of
D-M. Quoting the nomination text: The fighter is the more notable person under this name. The fighter competes in the premier organization of his sport, and was at least for a time being listed at least among the top 20 fighters in his weight division globally (as per
this site). He has headed a main event in the UFC organization (
UFC Fight Night: Cowboy vs. Cowboy). These appear to be overall more notable achievements than those of the footballer. The footballer played his career in 2nd and 3rd tier leagues in different countries. There seems very little media coverage on the footballer, despite competing in the overall far more notable sport. Recency should not be the issue as the footballer played well into the internet age, so digitally available media coverage should exist aplenty. It is difficult to evaluate as the footballer never competed in the English-speaking world, my research may indeed be biased.
Reason: WikiProjects should be in project namespace. As simply adding the namespace would make the title surpass the limit of 255 bytes, one of the MfD subpages will need to be removed.
Reason: A quick web search reveals a lot of unrelated meanings, such as a so-called "Google Attack Page" and general malicious websites. No reason for this
WP:XNR to exist.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL error; page was moved from this title on the day of its creation. Note also the edit summary of this page move (which is only shown in the history of this page, not the target one).
Reason: This page was created in 2005 as a plain URL link to the actual article and immediately redirected, instead of being speedied as A3 or even R3 a bit later. No need to keep this
WP:UNNATURAL error.
Reason: This was created with the content "MEDUSA" in 2005 and immediately redirected with the summary "Better to redirect than to delete". I would suggest deletion of this
WP:UNNATURAL error; however, for some reason, this does get some 10 pageviews per month.
Reason: Not mentioned at the target. Search results suggest that this is referring to some sort of altar or shrine, but no article currently describes the topic on its own.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL error, probably a typo when Frank Pakenham (which had been created before this one) was intended to be created. Does not seem to have any use.
Reason: I can't quite make sense of the page history at the target, though it seems the article was moved on the day after its creation. This is getting virtually no page views, so I don't think we need to keep it around.
Reason: This seems to be another typo during redirect creation; the target article never existed under this title. Given that
James Cannon is not a redirect to the article about the bishop, I think this one is doing more harm than good.
Reason: Dani Fernández (disambiguation) was moved from this title a day after creation (and then moved/merged to the current target of this redirect). Per
WP:RDAB, there is no worth in keeping this around.
Reason: This was created with the edit summary of "per
WP:INTDABLINK", even though he correctly spelt Michael Heller (disambiguation) had already been existing for almost four years. This typo should probably be deleted per
WP:RDAB.
Reason: These look like they are closely related, so I wonder whether they could be merged. If not merged, {{Motorways and Trunk Roads in England}} should probably be renamed to {{Highways England}} as that seems to be the actual topic of the navbox (to add more confusion, the headline of the template is neither of those but rather "Strategic road network in England").
Reason: This was created in 2005 with the content "Fucking Backstabber and Biterphobia are the songs included on the rare single Soul Intent by the group Soul Intent." and soon redirected to Eminem, but is not mentioned at target. The closest I could find anywhere else is a track "Backstabber" at
Infinite (Eminem album), though that mentions neither "F***in'" nor "Biterphobia".
Reason: A quick web search returned no Wikipedia-related results. There seem to be multiple organisations by this name, and even Wikipedia
mentions the word combination in an unrealted sense. Confusing/misleading
WP:XNR.
Reason: I can't quite make sense of the redirect. There are multiple things on Wikipedia that might be referred to by "broad street", but none of them would plausibly use a plural.
Reason: This was created as an article, which was redirected per AfD, but is not currently explained at the target. The term is mentioned in multiple articles, but
Hugh Atkin seems to be the best option.
Reason: The synagogue does not seem to have "Sudbury's" as part of its name, but as there are multiple places called
Shaar Hashamayim, a disambiguation is still needed.
Reason: "village" seems to be a disambiguator rather than an actual part of the name, so I suggest this be renamed per Wikipedia's disambiguation conventions.
Reason: Looking at
d:Q1781198, every other language edition of Wikipedia uses "agronomist". Also, the whole category tree uses
Category:Agronomists, and moving the page would be much easier than renaming the cats per
WP:C2D.
Reason: "village" seems to be a disambiguator rather than an actual part of the name, so I suggest this be renamed per Wikipedia's disambiguation conventions.
Reason: I'm not sure why this is formatted as a subpage of the nonexistent
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI, and think my proposed name would make more sense.
Reason: Neither of the targets mentions the term. I'm also not on the right device right now to figure out what the difference between these two titles is.
Reason: Implausible redirect. As can be seen from the edit history of the target, it seems to have been moved to this title in error, which was fixed a minute later.
Reason: I suggest the same approach is done as with
irreducible: redirecting the adjective to the noun (
indecomposability), and moving the dab page to the noun with a parenthesised qualifier.
Reason: Not mentioned at targets, but the first page has history and the term is briefly mentioned at
Strong Bad#Reception, so probably better to retarget there.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; search results for the website only appear to be in citations.
1428 Elm Street is related, though I'm not sure how useful retargeting the (first) redirect there would be.
Reason: Literally means "
German orthography" (misspelt/miscapitalised, should be "Rechtschreibung"); not sure why this should be redirecting to the reform.
Reason: Given that both search terms refer to any entry in
Ajax#Greek mythology and tragedy, I suggest that they be pointed at the same target. Considering that Aias redirects to
Ajax the Great, I would prefer that one.
Reason: Since these are just alternative spellings of
Dzhugashvili (and the two spellings Jughashvili and Jugashvili already redirect there), I suggest retargeting the redirects to that page.
Reason: Not mentioned at target (nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter); a web search did not reveal anything useful. If this is supposed to be a misspelling, it is a highly unlikely one.
Reason: For consistency, these should have the same naming pattern. I would prefer the shorter version, though I get that we specifically don't want to include the basic Latin alphabet in each one of these categories.
Reason: The article on this page was merged into the current target by
Klbrain in January 2020. In July 2020,
Apronia of Toul was created by
Figureskatingfan. It looks like the best solution is to just retarget this redirect there, though
Aponia gens needs to be accounted for, probably with a hatnote.
Reason: This is a historic name for the star, and while
USS Azimech, another possible meaning of the search term, is mentioned at the target (though not ideally from a navigation point of view),
Arcturus#Etymology and cultural significance suggests that another star can be referred to by this name as well.
Reason: Upmerge per the main article (
Khakas), since there does not seem to be a difference in scope between the categories according to their description.
Reason: Possibly a bit unspecific, but most importantly, this is a former nickname of
Arkansas. Should this be resolved with a hatnote, another one for
Land of Opportunity should be added as well.
Reason: Unlikely typo of "stereotypic" (the only redirect with this misspelling); while from a merge, the exact same content is preserved in the history of the correctly spelt Stereotypic behaviour in giraffes redirect.
Reason: No mention at target, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia; already attempted to be nominated for deletion by
Randomran in 2008, though with an incorrect procedure.
Reason: Apparently the result of a page move test? Moved to this title and back a minute later. Does not look like "ddd" has any relation to the target.
Reason: Neither the target nor any other article mentions this; there is some page history, though it only relied on one primary source and does not seem to be used in any current page.
Reason: This doesn't seem to be a proper name of any association of universities (though I'm not sure what the "groups" are referring to exactly), so this should not be capitalised.
Reason: The
http://www.ntg.nl/maps/26/15.pdf reference cited in the article as well as a further search at Google Scholar suggest that "MetaType1" is at least as widely used as the title of the article. The suggested title should resolve the current inconsistency with
Metafont and
MetaPost, which can all also be stylised in all caps/small caps.
Reason: "Typ" is not a widely-used shortening of "typography", and {{digital-typography-stub}} already uses the more unambiguously understood word choice.
Reason: The current target only has a passing mention in the "Pronunciation and spelling" section; if the target is retained, it should be refined to that, though I suggest that
Donald Knuth#Literate programming presents more information on this subject.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; otherwise only appears to have a passing mention at
Pyo Yeong-jae#Video game dubbing. Delete unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: First page was merged into the current target in 2016, but isn't mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia anymore. Second one used to redirect to the first, but was retargeted as a double redirect.
Reason: Various food days, not mentioned at target and otherwise only listed as passing mentions at the
September article with links back to the list at the redirects' target.
Reason: While this is a symbol for the sound described at the target, the article about the character itself is located at
Turned h, which also describes its usage in the IPA among other alphabets. Thus, I suggest retargeting this to the article about the letter, which appears to be the primary topic.
Reason: While trigraphs like кӏу and пӏу are mentioned at the target, this specific two-letter combination is not explained anywhere, and a
"Ӏ" section, to which the redirect initially pointed, does not exist at this point either.
Reason: The additive inverses are not explicitly described at the number articles, so these redirects are not particularly helpful for the reader. Looking at deletions like
Special:Redirect/logid/24922761,
Special:Redirect/logid/24922757,
Special:Redirect/logid/24922754, it appears that there has been some previous discussion regarding this (possibly concerning articles rather than redirects though); however, the WikiProject in the summary is a redlink.
−9:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
9 (notified) 13:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−8:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
8 (notified) 13:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−7:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
7 (notified) 13:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−6:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
6 (notified) 13:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−4:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
4 (notified) 13:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: This title suggests that the template parameter is completely invisible, like in {{Void}}. However, since it does display in userspace, I suggest that the name should reflect that.
Reason: Has history, but not mentioned at target and all other mentions on-wiki appear to be talking about any of the chemical compounds with this sum formula.
Reason: The current name appears to be redundant to
Category:Conversion templates; however, since it seems to refer to one specific template, I suggest renaming it to be singular, as already is the case with
Category:Coord template.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Other mentions on-wiki consist only of descriptions of apparent instances of this class, as well as unrelated radio stations.
Reason: This could be retargeted to
Type Ib and Ic supernovae to match the Type Ib supernova redirect; however, I'm doubtful how likely this misspelling is, and we don't have a redirect for the much more general
typr either.
Reason: This should definitely include "Wikipedia" somewhere to avoid being too broad, but I suggest simultaneously aligning it with
Category:Wikipedia competitions.
Reason: "GUS", standing for "German userbox solution" (see
Wikipedia:Userbox migration), seems like a niche abbreviation and may be quite confusing in a category name. I suggest moving it to something more obvious, and since the linked page calls the meaning of this acronym (?) a "former" name, I suggest the new name employ the term "Userbox migration".
Reason: Unused; refers to a nonexistent
mx-ui article in the code. Does not appear to be related to
MX Player, though a web search did not help in clarifying that.
Reason: Not mentioned at the target, neither at
Pair-instability supernova, nor anywhere else on the English Wikipedia currently. Used to point at
Hypernova before being fixed as a double redirect at that point, and
Hypernova#History indeed seems good enough for a target to me.
Reason: TNT does not contain
nobelium nor does an element abbreviated by "Ch" exist, but even with corrected capitalisation this appears to be missing two hydrogen atoms.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; otherwise only used in a passing mention at
Tara Platt, as well as entries also linking to the current target at the
Couteau disambiguation and
Katarina (given name) pages.
Reason: Since
4'-chloro-2-hydroxyaurone is redlinked next to the mention of this formula at the target, these should be deleted to encourage article creation as well.
Reason: Looking at the general formula, this appears to be lacking two fluorine atoms, and while there were passing mentions, I couldn't find any proper discussion of any compound with this formula on the web.
Reason: "unofficial" does not mean "person who is not an official" but rather
"not officially established". The related sense of "official" is only described at the
Official (disambiguation) page, so it might make sense to convert this into a Wiktionary redirect?
Reason: Google Scholar finds a lot more results for "H2 receptor antagonist" than for "H2 antagonist", and similarly for the plural forms. While
H3 receptor antagonist is already named similarly, it looks like
H1 antagonist would need to be moved as well.
Reason: Someone searching for this is probably more likely to be looking for
Category:Minor planet object articles (unnumbered), since the current target contains minor planets that have since been assigned numbers.
Reason: The English Wikipedia does not describe this term anywhere. We do have an article on
helonium, but this appears to be referring to a different concept looking at the page history and talk page post.
Reason: Looks like these are just different ways of presenting the same content. Not sure which one should be preferred, but transcluding both on every page listed is certainly redundant.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Listed (and linked) at
Onium ion#Group 14 (carbon group) onium cations, but that also contains a number of redlinks, making a case for deletion to encourage article creation.
Reason: The template is only used on one of the pages and appears to list a subset of the articles in the other one. Maybe the oxidation states can be added to that as well?
Reason: Unclear scope; do all logos which have another variant belong here? Note that this is also categories under "Non-free logos" without this being explicitly specified anywhere.
Reason: Both's scope appears to be likely under-TOO logos marked as non-free. Both titles are not optimal IMO, but the name of the older cat is at least not paradoxical.
Reason: Seems to be a misspelling of "medical isotope" that should be retargeted to
isotopes in medicine; however,
isotop does not exist as a redirect, raising the question whether this misspelling is particularly likely.
Reason: While a web search easily finds the current spelling in a number of sources, this one seems to be more common and is also the one listed in
Merriam-Webster.
Reason:
WP:RLOTE: No affinity to German (though
Cantor did invent some terminology for transfinite arithmetic, this term is older and not described at the target anyway).
Unendlich does not provide any helpful targets either.
Reason: Created here, moved to {{Mozambican-politician-stub}} six minutes later, then merged into the current target. Seems to be an unlikely/
WP:UNNATURAL typo.
Reason: This was moved to Video captures two days after creation, which was later merged as a duplicate article. It looks like this would be better as a redirect to
subtitles, of which "captions" is usually a synonym.
Reason: Same as with
#Category:Dictator below and as stated by the nominator there; not an objective criterion of categorisation. Not merging into that nomination since it has comments already.
Reason: Only railway station category named "proposed or under construction". Looking at the
Category:Proposed railway stations by country tree, "under construction" categories are always sorted under the "proposed" categories, so choosing the more general name for consistency seems reasonable.
Reason: Current title seems redundant, is hard to find, and Gardiner's list is not the only catalogue of Egyptian hieroglyphs (ignoring that the title does not even specify that list is meant).
Reason: Not mentioned at target apart from a reference and an external link; someone searching for a fandom wiki will not be helped by the article about its topic.
Reason: As with
#Ḹ below, an article with an explanation, such as
ISO 15919, is probably more useful than an article listing a set of characters with no notes on usage (and even with circular redirects).
Reason: Completely implausible;
graphemes are much more than just ligatures (and the target is not even about single ligatures but about titles spelt with them). Retargeting to {{R from symbol}} might be an option.
Reason: Not described at target; these are U+02C5 MODIFIER LETTER DOWN ARROWHEAD and U+02C4 MODIFIER LETTER UP ARROWHEAD, annotated in Unicode with "raised articulation" and "lowered articulation" respectively.
Reason: Redirects for specific star polygons neither mentioned at target nor at
Star polygon,
Polygram (geometry) or elsewhere on the English Wikipedia.
Reason: Implausible title. Created as an "article" with no apparent encyclopaedic content; then redirected as a vandalised stub pov fork instead of being deleted.
Reason: Only passing mentions on the English Wikipedia, but could be soft-redirected to
wikt:semordnilap. Note that there is some history behind the first one of these.
Reason: The target mentions this as a synonym of
seminorm, which has a standalone article, but according to
pseudonorm (Q2115755), this is a different kind of generalisation which weakens the condition of homogeneity by replacing the equality by an inequality, rather than removing the positive definiteness.
Reason: It looks like the topics referred to by the Greek version should be limited to
Agenor (mythology), but perhaps
Agenor, the primary topic for the name in Latin letters, should be the primary topic for the Greek spelling too.
Reason: Since these are spelt "α-Lactone", "β-Lactone" at the start of a sentence, I believe this should also be done here. (Articles such as
alpha-Propiolactone format it like "alpha-Propiolactone".)
Reason: Appears to be a shortening for "singular", but easily ambiguous: {{R from singular}} or {{R to singular}}? The latter is actually even significantly more common.
Reason: Since the primary topic for the English spelling is considered
the bread and both have the same affinity to the relevant Slavic languages, targeting this to that article too seems more appropriate.
Reason: Has a backlink and probably refers to the
Reich Chamber of Culture (which had a subdivision named
Reich Chamber of Music), but despite this having a backlink, I can't find either of this title and "Reich Chamber of Culture and Music" anywhere online.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Listed at
Dance music#2010s; all other uses on the English Wikipedia appear to be passing mentions. Could be retargeted to
Glitch (music), which gives context and mentions house, despite not describing this style specifically.
Reason: Only subcategory of
Category:Voiceless oral consonants by a specific manner of articulation, and no corresponding
Category:Voiced plosives category either. This just makes the speech sounds category tree harder to navigate in my opinion.
Reason: Per
Tap and flap consonants#Tap vs. flap and since we don't appear to have separate articles on taps and flaps with the same place of articulation, this is probably an unnecessary layer of categorisation.
Reason: This is probably more helpful if retargeted to
Integrally closed domain (the other, more general meaning I can see from a Scholar search appears to be the one described in the "Normal rings" section of that article).
Reason:
Regular function redirects to
Morphism of algebraic varieties. While this redirect is linked there (section "Regular functions"), the concept is a lot more general than the
coordinate ring (also linked there and also redirecting to Affine variety), so I suggest it be redirected to the morphism article instead.
Reason: I think these should be deleted for the same reason we don't have redirects like {{R from German}}. While the target template accepts parameters for the redirect and target languages, this one suggests that it is not necessary to use it with the redirect. If deemed necessary, this could alternatively be expanded to a template; there also appears to be a single wrapper of this sort in
Category:Templates for redirects involving diacritics or language change, {{R to English}}, but creating more might imply completeness, achieving which would require quite a bit of additional work.
Reason: More redirects similar to
#Vladislav Surkov (Template). All created by the same user and probably intended as {{R from statistical redirect}}s; these have no links anymore and get zero or close to zero pageviews a month.
Reason: This starts like a disambiguation page but actually only talks about use in geology. Suggest moving this and creating a dab page between this article and the mathematical
Equidimensionality in its place.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; should probably be retargeted to an appropriate anchor at
Apicomplexan life cycle as with the other terms mentioned there.
Reason: Word is not currently mentioned at target. Used in context of Chinese timekeeping at
Metric time, and more generally at
Decimal time (whither I just redirected the newly-created
Deciday).
Reason: Unlikely search term. Surely there's no list on Wikipedia containing all death metal bands in existence. This page should have been deleted upon creation rather than being redirected.
Reason: No longer mentioned at target. Search brings up a lot of, partly passing, mentions in various articles though, so probably an option to retarget it.
Reason: Not currently described at target. Mentioned in a few other articles (not all relevant to FR), though I can't assess which is the most appropriate option.
Reason: These are currently redlinks in {{Portuguese dialects}} (also used at target). with an appended "dialect". I believe either these should be deleted, or the respective "dialect" versions created.
Reason: The former is not mentioned at its target; the latter was
retargeted from that article to one where it is mentioned, but where the former is linked. I suppose aligning the first with the second would currently be the best solution, though the then-circular-links would need to be removed.
Reason: Unused; one of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs. Potentially misleading as the title reads more akin to a navigation template.
Reason: Unused; one of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs. Potentially misleading as the title reads more akin to a navigation template.
Reason: Unused (created last year); part of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs. No such redirects exist for other countries.
Reason: Unused; one of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs, and the only two "-bio" redirects to "-bio-stub"s. Note that the latter results from a naming error fixed by the template author shortly after its creation in 2007.
Reason: As far as I understand, this should either be disambiguated at
16S ribosomal RNA, or redirected to the article currently titled this way (with an according hatnote), since "rRNA" is just an abbreviation for "ribosomal RNA".
Reason: It seems that this should be pointing at
16S ribosomal RNA (and
16S gene,
16S rRNA gene redirects to the same target should be created accordingly).
Reason: Not sure how plausible this typo is given we don't have an
Arkhanglesk redirect to
Arkhangelsk, but if this is kept, it should at least redirect to its correct spelling
Novoarkhangelsk, a disambiguation page.
Reason: This page has a long history of pointing at various targets. Right now
Arity has a link to
p-adic number, one of the previous targets of this redirect, in the "see also" section (which I would consider misuse, as hatnotes should be used for this purpose). Incidentally, until 2018, this was redirecting to the article on the more general concept of
Completion of a ring (which currently does not explicitly introduce the term "I-adic completion" but does so for the
I-adic topology, while linking to the main article on that topic). It also briefly was some sort of disambiguation page, as the title (modulo capitalisation) can also be an abbreviation of
Advanced Digital Information Corporation. The question is whether arity is the primary topic here (and the ambiguity should be resolved by hatnotes or a separate DAB page), or whether this title itself should be disambiguated.
Reason: Right now this describes the geometric term in the first paragraph but goes on to repeat part of the
Flat#Mathematics and geometry or
Flatness (disambiguation) disambiguation pages. I suggest moving this to reflect the meaning in geometry, while redirecting
Flatness (mathematics) to the Flatness DAB (see also
Flat (mathematics), which is also linked from this article).
Reason: While this might be a taxonomic prefix, a reader is quite likely to be looking for some information on the prefix in general. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but the fact that we have information on this specific usage is sort of arbitrary.
Reason: This used to be an avoided double redirect to
Punctured neighbourhood, which used to redirect to this glossary (though has since been retargeted). However, this is not really conceptually related to punctured neighbourhoods. One place where this is described is
Scheme (mathematics)#Examples, though there might be similar content portraying this topic from some other mathematical field's POV.
Reason: This is probably more generally explained at
Topological_ring#Completion, to which I was going to redirect a new
complete topological ring page. Note that there is also a
Complete local ring redirect, though the article on topological rings does not currently mention local rings.
Reason: This refers to
birational maps. Right now the target article has a hatnote for three of the arrows redirecting there, but I'm not sure expanding that indefinitely would be the best option.
Reason: I think this should redirect to the more general notion of
Computably enumerable set. (When this discussion is closed, a
Turing-recognizable redirect should be created with the same target.)
Reason: No content on this specific group at target. Could be retargeted to
Heterotic string theory or similar articles related to the physical application.
Reason: If
List of NFL champions (1920–1969) is the primary topic, why does it need a disambiguation in brackets? Either the article should be moved to this name or the redirect is better replaced by a disambiguation page.
Reason: The current target appears to be the result of an unfortunate bot cleanup of double redirects, and there is no need for the redirects to point at this specific section.
Reason: As A", E", and O" all point at articles about letters with a diaeresis, it seems more appropriate to retarget this to
Ü. Alternatively, all four could be deleted per
WP:XY (disambiguating seems a bit absurd in this case).
Reason: The current target is referring to
Ş (where this would normally be retargeted), but given that this {{R from ASCII-only}} uses a comma, it may well also be a replacement for
S-comma. Disambiguating this would look ridiculous to me.
Reason: This should actually have
Template:R from modification as a target, very weird. Either way, I don't think a full stop at the end is a particularly likely typo.
Reason: Given that
Tajiks (redirects) does not exist anymore and the page has no significant history whatsoever, I think this redirect can be deleted as well. Pinging
Jenks24, who deleted the main page.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL spacing. Looking at the histories of this redirect an Savage (Thee Stallion song), the correctly spelt version, it appears that the page was moved as a redirect (in violation of
WP:MOVEREDIRECT), which means that the actual article never existed under this title.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL. The article existed under this title for three minutes before being moved to the correctly parenthesised version, Bustan Ketab (publishing) (and later to the title without disambiguation).
Reason: This does not have a section at the target title, and from a quick search, this seems to be different from the
Realme X50 Pro, on which we have a separate article.
Reason: This does not have a section at the target title, and from a quick search, this seems to be different from the
Realme X2 Pro, on which we do have a separate article.
Reason: No reason to have a XNR like that to a draft named "Entrepreneurship", which is not even about entrepreneurship, but an autobiography of a likely unnotable entrepreneur.
Reason: If kept, this should be retargeted to
Michael Cimino's unrealized projects, where more information is provided; however, I don't think this is a likely search term.
Reason: This was created under this title in error, but instead of being moved, it was copied and pasted to
Wikipedia:Meetup/AfroCROWD-OFWA/WikiYearOfReturn, but by the same user. Is a histmerge needed in this case?
Reason: Should probably be unified with
D-subminiature. There are almost no search results for the term at all, but the variant with the hyphen also seems very slightly more common.
Reason: Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more: no incoming links. @
Seventyfiveyears and
Tavix: Pinging the participants of
the previous discussion.
Reason: This should not be an XNR, but redirect to
United States patent law, where US Patent also points, instead; however,
EncMstr seems to have a different opinion.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Delete to encourage article creation. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia: the only cricket-related search results for "R. Coleman" are at
English women's cricket team in Australia and New Zealand in 1934–35 and
Alfred Coleman; "R. Fawkes" seems to be ambiguous as per the mention at
Wikisource (for the rest, search does not return anything even slightly related).
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Delete to encourage article creation. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia: there are quite a few cricketers named "Hyde" and "Duncan" on Wikipedia, but none of them seems to have played for Europeans; "B. Gaillard" only returns unrelated citations; the rest has no slightly related search results at all.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Redirecting cross-namespace to a category page seems irrational; all of them are mentioned at
List of Oxford UCCE & MCCU players. I suggest retargeting them there (and probably unlinking them in the list), tagging them as {{R with possibilities}}.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: This page was created in 2003, but multiple
WP:MOVEREDIRECTs made the current title implausible; it actually clutters the search suggestions of "Capi (". If anybody thinks this history should be retained, I suggest the redirect be moved back to one of its historical titles.
Reason: This is not mentioned at the target; however, this is listed at
List of Apple codenames#Accessories. As
AirTag does not seem to have a plural, this seems to be the only appropriate target.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason:
Board of Control for Cricket in India seems to be the main article. The current title has a miscapitalised "of" and lacks an article, so if the "Governing Council of the Indian Premier League" is correct, it should be renamed there.
Reason:
John Smith (Sheffield cricketer) was redirected by the page creator, AssociateAffiliate, to the category page. These are not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Maybe restore the article content without prejudice for AfD?
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found. Per the backlinks, this also seems to be ambiguous with a painter.
Reason: These redirects result from moving pages that were intended to be in user space. In article space, they are clearly implausible and unnecessary.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Apart from an unrelated search result at
Melbourne Grammar School#Campuses, I could not find any mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. There is a mention at
List of English cricketers (1841–1850)#T, so I suggest retargeting there.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia (though we do have
Frederic Price (cricketer, born 1852) and
Frederic Price (cricketer, born 1840)). Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. There is a mention at
List of English cricketers (1826–1840)#G, so I suggest retargeting there.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: The only edit count mentioned at the target dab page is the link to
Wikipedia:WikiProject edit counters in the hatnote. This should either be retargeted to
Wikipedia:Edit count or, if deemed inappropriate as a XNR, deleted.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Although there are quite a few cricketers named Campbell on Wikipedia, none of them seems to have played for Fast vs Slow. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: Not describe at target. There is a mention at
List of Hardy Boys books; however, that hyperlinks all of the books, which (if left like that) would be an argument for deletion to avoid circular linking.
Reason: User talk pages are for communicating with a user, not reaching an article. If there is a CSD criterion that could apply, please tell me, as there are quite a few more of these redirects.
Reason: Unnecessarily redirected from a stub to a page without mention instead of being CSDed, but mentioned at
Patife Band (EP). Not sure about the "(character)" one though.
Reason: Not mentioned at target, an insource search does not seem to return more than usage in references and a few passing mentions. Delete unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: The target does not explicitly mention any release candidate with a number 3, but this might also refer to the "remote Chaos Experience" of the
Chaos Communication Congress.
Reason: The current redirect does not make sense to me. I suggest it be retargeted to {{R to redirect template}}, where {{R to rcat}} points, too. Note that the only transclusion of this redirect seems to have been at Template:R project page (see
Special:Diff/943088386), where I replaced it by the proposed target.
Reason: These should go to the same target, but neither of them mentions the term itself. I also could not find a mention anywhere else. The redirects get very little page views, so it might be better to tell the reader we don't have any specific information on this.
Reason: Seems to be a neologism, not further explained at the target. It is mentioned at
Generation Z#Arts and culture, so retargeting there might be an option. Alternatively Wiktionary redirect to
wikt:Twitterati or delete.
Reason: This seems to be an unofficial Discord client, but it is not mentioned at the target, so it might be better to show the reader we do not have any information on it.
Reason: The current target now has a main article,
Twitter trends; however, I'm not sure how unambiguous this term is. Creating the corresponding titles with a "(Twitter)" disambiguator as redirects there and retargeting these to
Trend might be a better option.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. An internet search returns quite a few search results related to a "teeth whitening" company as well as "cloud based software designed for business", but nothing related to blogging.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Even though this is listed at the
List of wikis, it is probably supposed to only contain wikis with a mention outside of it (at least all entries are linked).
Reason: This was initially pointing at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter, but was
retargeted by an anonymous editor. Backlinks refer both to the wrestling newsletter and content ownership, while the hatnote at the current target links to the wrestling notability guidelines. I'd prefer retargeting this to one of the wrestling pages, as you can usually pwn n00bs, but not content.
Reason: Eeeehhhhhhh This seems to be a misspelling of
Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllandysiliogogogoch, and should redirect there if kept, but I don't think it's any more likely than any random syllables appended to "Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwll", and this one even lacks a y in "pwllgwyngyll".
Reason:
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 April 27#Test Wikipedia resulted in a retarget; however, the topic is not mentioned at the target anymore nor anywhere else in mainspace. Since there is also no standalone page about this in other namespaces, I suggest deletion.
Reason: Not mentioned at target or anywhere on Wikipedia, causes unnecessary confusion (cf.
talk page: This is, I suppose, a derogatory term for the "Internet forum" term. I don't have the time to go through the
WP:Article titles policy base, but it seems obvious to me that we are not allowing such redirects. If we make exceptions, please let me know.
Nxavar (
talk) 17:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)). Soft retarget to
wikt:postwhore or delete.
Reason: No explanation anywhere at target; the only passing mention we have is at
PHP-Nuke. Also potentially ambiguous as this term is not exclusive to internet fora: This might even refer to the
Control Panel (Windows), particularly the Administrative Tools.
Reason: Looking at the page history, "AIM" is an abbreviation of "AOL Instant Messenger". While there is a short mention of the messenger in the section
Chatbot#Malicious use, to which this could be refined, "AIMBot" on its own is not mentioned at the target nor anywhere else and could cause unnecessary confusion with an
aimbot.
Reason: Not mentioned anywhere in relation to Slashdot. There is an unrelated list entry at
List of villains in VR Troopers#Slashbot though, to which I propose this be retargeted.
Reason: This was redirected to the current target after
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twestival, but is not currently mentioned at the target. Given the AfD, I suggest deletion.
Reason: While this is described at the target, I'm pretty sure thet
Arabic numerals is the primary topic. A hatnote might be added there, but I don't think it's necessary. This redirect gets well over a hundred monthly pageviews and might be confusing for many people. Note that 0123456789 also redirects to the proposed target.
Reason: This was moved by
Greyshark09 in July 2015, but should have probably been disambiguated between the current target and
Battle of Zabadani (2015). Alternatively, the page could be moved back here if it is the primary topic.
Reason: The target is not even a "disambig", and this is a nonstandard disambiguation anyway, so it will generate intdab errors if used as a redirect to a "disambig" page.
Reason: These should point at the same target. "Unbounded" does not only refer to functions, but also to sets in general. I'm okay with redirecting them to
Infinity, at which the first one currently points, but that does not mention the corresponding antonyms as listed at
Boundedness, for which a reader is pretty likely to be actually looking (cf. redirects Unbounded function, Unbounded set etc.).
Reason: A web search for "Creating Locomotive Services" returns no results. Locomotive Services Ltd. was created a couple minutes later by the same user, so this seems to be created in error.
Reason: This was created as a redirect from the beginning, and has never been a draft. The Bowling Alley-Cat was redirected by
Koavf in 2019, but that's not a reason for this redirect to exist.
Reason: Eeeehhhhhhh This template does not look very useful – probably because it isn't. It has two mainspace transclusions, which seem to need to be cleaned up.
Reason: This was moved in February, but I think this is quite ambiguous, as {{Self reference}} exists and is spelt very similarly. I think that is a better target because of the singular number, although I understand that the current target has been under this title since 2006.
Reason: Not only is this redirect totally implausible, consisting of an initialism disambiguated by its expanded form with an additional "(disambiguation)" appended (even though the title does not seem to be ambiguous); this is not even mentioned at the target. A mention may be added per
List of university and college schools of music, but this redirect should be deleted. I also think
Music School of Eastern Africa should better not be created, as the list does not provide any further information and the redlink there encourages article creation.
Reason: This redirect is incorrect. Not every redirect to a person also goes to a person. I just wanted to tag Education Standards Institute with this template, but with its current target, it would not fit the redirect. Either delete (and examine the ~20 transclusions case-by-case) or create as a new rcat.
Reason: Apart from the easily fixable issue that the section does not exist at the target, I think that redirecting this to the article about the English grammar phenomenon is biased.
Grammatical tense seems to be a good alternative.
Reason: Given that College (Quebec) (
College (Québec) does not exist currently, but might be created) redirects to the more general
College education in Quebec and this was created in draftspace as a redirect, I don't see a point in this redirect.
Reason: Neither the target nor any other article mentions "hyper-authoritarianism", and the fact that this redirect was created immediately in draftspace doesn't quite make it more useful.
Reason: This might also refer to 60-frames-per-second
interlaced video, and I would argue this is the primary topic, though it is only really described at the
24p article as far as I can see.
Reason: I find it confusing that these point to different target, given that an editor might search for either of these with the same in mind. I would prefer
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Unit names and symbols as a target, though that could include a reference to the MOS:MATHS section.
Reason: Not even mentioned at target, and apparently the only Hangul character not redirecting to the
Hangul article (where this is mentioned in the lead).
Reason: "Redirect-Class" is usually used for WikiProjects, this one is not. If this is supposed to be an rcat (like
Category:Redirects from emoji), it should be named "Redirects from flags".
Reason: Looking at the current contents of the category, I see at least
Yogh,
Thorn (letter),
Vend (letter), and
Wynn where I can't understand how they are "variants". They could be removed from the category, but is it really
WP:defining for a palaeographic letter to be a variant?
Reason: The page's initial content was referring to a track from
The Hunter (Blondie album), but as it does not seem notable (I can only find lyric pages on a quick web search), I suggest deleting this per
WP:UNNATURAL.
Reason: Nominating
on behalf of
D-M. Quoting the nomination text: The fighter is the more notable person under this name. The fighter competes in the premier organization of his sport, and was at least for a time being listed at least among the top 20 fighters in his weight division globally (as per
this site). He has headed a main event in the UFC organization (
UFC Fight Night: Cowboy vs. Cowboy). These appear to be overall more notable achievements than those of the footballer. The footballer played his career in 2nd and 3rd tier leagues in different countries. There seems very little media coverage on the footballer, despite competing in the overall far more notable sport. Recency should not be the issue as the footballer played well into the internet age, so digitally available media coverage should exist aplenty. It is difficult to evaluate as the footballer never competed in the English-speaking world, my research may indeed be biased.
Reason: WikiProjects should be in project namespace. As simply adding the namespace would make the title surpass the limit of 255 bytes, one of the MfD subpages will need to be removed.
Reason: A quick web search reveals a lot of unrelated meanings, such as a so-called "Google Attack Page" and general malicious websites. No reason for this
WP:XNR to exist.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL error; page was moved from this title on the day of its creation. Note also the edit summary of this page move (which is only shown in the history of this page, not the target one).
Reason: This page was created in 2005 as a plain URL link to the actual article and immediately redirected, instead of being speedied as A3 or even R3 a bit later. No need to keep this
WP:UNNATURAL error.
Reason: This was created with the content "MEDUSA" in 2005 and immediately redirected with the summary "Better to redirect than to delete". I would suggest deletion of this
WP:UNNATURAL error; however, for some reason, this does get some 10 pageviews per month.
Reason: Not mentioned at the target. Search results suggest that this is referring to some sort of altar or shrine, but no article currently describes the topic on its own.
Reason:
WP:UNNATURAL error, probably a typo when Frank Pakenham (which had been created before this one) was intended to be created. Does not seem to have any use.
Reason: I can't quite make sense of the page history at the target, though it seems the article was moved on the day after its creation. This is getting virtually no page views, so I don't think we need to keep it around.
Reason: This seems to be another typo during redirect creation; the target article never existed under this title. Given that
James Cannon is not a redirect to the article about the bishop, I think this one is doing more harm than good.
Reason: Dani Fernández (disambiguation) was moved from this title a day after creation (and then moved/merged to the current target of this redirect). Per
WP:RDAB, there is no worth in keeping this around.
Reason: This was created with the edit summary of "per
WP:INTDABLINK", even though he correctly spelt Michael Heller (disambiguation) had already been existing for almost four years. This typo should probably be deleted per
WP:RDAB.
Reason: These look like they are closely related, so I wonder whether they could be merged. If not merged, {{Motorways and Trunk Roads in England}} should probably be renamed to {{Highways England}} as that seems to be the actual topic of the navbox (to add more confusion, the headline of the template is neither of those but rather "Strategic road network in England").
Reason: This was created in 2005 with the content "Fucking Backstabber and Biterphobia are the songs included on the rare single Soul Intent by the group Soul Intent." and soon redirected to Eminem, but is not mentioned at target. The closest I could find anywhere else is a track "Backstabber" at
Infinite (Eminem album), though that mentions neither "F***in'" nor "Biterphobia".
Reason: A quick web search returned no Wikipedia-related results. There seem to be multiple organisations by this name, and even Wikipedia
mentions the word combination in an unrealted sense. Confusing/misleading
WP:XNR.
Reason: I can't quite make sense of the redirect. There are multiple things on Wikipedia that might be referred to by "broad street", but none of them would plausibly use a plural.
Reason: This was created as an article, which was redirected per AfD, but is not currently explained at the target. The term is mentioned in multiple articles, but
Hugh Atkin seems to be the best option.
Reason: The synagogue does not seem to have "Sudbury's" as part of its name, but as there are multiple places called
Shaar Hashamayim, a disambiguation is still needed.
Reason: "village" seems to be a disambiguator rather than an actual part of the name, so I suggest this be renamed per Wikipedia's disambiguation conventions.
Reason: Looking at
d:Q1781198, every other language edition of Wikipedia uses "agronomist". Also, the whole category tree uses
Category:Agronomists, and moving the page would be much easier than renaming the cats per
WP:C2D.
Reason: "village" seems to be a disambiguator rather than an actual part of the name, so I suggest this be renamed per Wikipedia's disambiguation conventions.
Reason: I'm not sure why this is formatted as a subpage of the nonexistent
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI, and think my proposed name would make more sense.
Reason: Neither of the targets mentions the term. I'm also not on the right device right now to figure out what the difference between these two titles is.
Reason: Implausible redirect. As can be seen from the edit history of the target, it seems to have been moved to this title in error, which was fixed a minute later.
Reason: I suggest the same approach is done as with
irreducible: redirecting the adjective to the noun (
indecomposability), and moving the dab page to the noun with a parenthesised qualifier.
Reason: Not mentioned at targets, but the first page has history and the term is briefly mentioned at
Strong Bad#Reception, so probably better to retarget there.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; search results for the website only appear to be in citations.
1428 Elm Street is related, though I'm not sure how useful retargeting the (first) redirect there would be.
Reason: Literally means "
German orthography" (misspelt/miscapitalised, should be "Rechtschreibung"); not sure why this should be redirecting to the reform.
Reason: Given that both search terms refer to any entry in
Ajax#Greek mythology and tragedy, I suggest that they be pointed at the same target. Considering that Aias redirects to
Ajax the Great, I would prefer that one.
Reason: Since these are just alternative spellings of
Dzhugashvili (and the two spellings Jughashvili and Jugashvili already redirect there), I suggest retargeting the redirects to that page.
Reason: Not mentioned at target (nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter); a web search did not reveal anything useful. If this is supposed to be a misspelling, it is a highly unlikely one.
Reason: For consistency, these should have the same naming pattern. I would prefer the shorter version, though I get that we specifically don't want to include the basic Latin alphabet in each one of these categories.
Reason: The article on this page was merged into the current target by
Klbrain in January 2020. In July 2020,
Apronia of Toul was created by
Figureskatingfan. It looks like the best solution is to just retarget this redirect there, though
Aponia gens needs to be accounted for, probably with a hatnote.
Reason: This is a historic name for the star, and while
USS Azimech, another possible meaning of the search term, is mentioned at the target (though not ideally from a navigation point of view),
Arcturus#Etymology and cultural significance suggests that another star can be referred to by this name as well.
Reason: Upmerge per the main article (
Khakas), since there does not seem to be a difference in scope between the categories according to their description.
Reason: Possibly a bit unspecific, but most importantly, this is a former nickname of
Arkansas. Should this be resolved with a hatnote, another one for
Land of Opportunity should be added as well.
Reason: Unlikely typo of "stereotypic" (the only redirect with this misspelling); while from a merge, the exact same content is preserved in the history of the correctly spelt Stereotypic behaviour in giraffes redirect.
Reason: No mention at target, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia; already attempted to be nominated for deletion by
Randomran in 2008, though with an incorrect procedure.
Reason: Apparently the result of a page move test? Moved to this title and back a minute later. Does not look like "ddd" has any relation to the target.
Reason: Neither the target nor any other article mentions this; there is some page history, though it only relied on one primary source and does not seem to be used in any current page.
Reason: This doesn't seem to be a proper name of any association of universities (though I'm not sure what the "groups" are referring to exactly), so this should not be capitalised.
Reason: The
http://www.ntg.nl/maps/26/15.pdf reference cited in the article as well as a further search at Google Scholar suggest that "MetaType1" is at least as widely used as the title of the article. The suggested title should resolve the current inconsistency with
Metafont and
MetaPost, which can all also be stylised in all caps/small caps.
Reason: "Typ" is not a widely-used shortening of "typography", and {{digital-typography-stub}} already uses the more unambiguously understood word choice.
Reason: The current target only has a passing mention in the "Pronunciation and spelling" section; if the target is retained, it should be refined to that, though I suggest that
Donald Knuth#Literate programming presents more information on this subject.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; otherwise only appears to have a passing mention at
Pyo Yeong-jae#Video game dubbing. Delete unless an appropriate target can be found.
Reason: First page was merged into the current target in 2016, but isn't mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia anymore. Second one used to redirect to the first, but was retargeted as a double redirect.
Reason: Various food days, not mentioned at target and otherwise only listed as passing mentions at the
September article with links back to the list at the redirects' target.
Reason: While this is a symbol for the sound described at the target, the article about the character itself is located at
Turned h, which also describes its usage in the IPA among other alphabets. Thus, I suggest retargeting this to the article about the letter, which appears to be the primary topic.
Reason: While trigraphs like кӏу and пӏу are mentioned at the target, this specific two-letter combination is not explained anywhere, and a
"Ӏ" section, to which the redirect initially pointed, does not exist at this point either.
Reason: The additive inverses are not explicitly described at the number articles, so these redirects are not particularly helpful for the reader. Looking at deletions like
Special:Redirect/logid/24922761,
Special:Redirect/logid/24922757,
Special:Redirect/logid/24922754, it appears that there has been some previous discussion regarding this (possibly concerning articles rather than redirects though); however, the WikiProject in the summary is a redlink.
−9:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
9 (notified) 13:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−8:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
8 (notified) 13:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−7:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
7 (notified) 13:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−6:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
6 (notified) 13:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
−4:
nominated at
RfD; Target:
4 (notified) 13:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Reason: This title suggests that the template parameter is completely invisible, like in {{Void}}. However, since it does display in userspace, I suggest that the name should reflect that.
Reason: Has history, but not mentioned at target and all other mentions on-wiki appear to be talking about any of the chemical compounds with this sum formula.
Reason: The current name appears to be redundant to
Category:Conversion templates; however, since it seems to refer to one specific template, I suggest renaming it to be singular, as already is the case with
Category:Coord template.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Other mentions on-wiki consist only of descriptions of apparent instances of this class, as well as unrelated radio stations.
Reason: This could be retargeted to
Type Ib and Ic supernovae to match the Type Ib supernova redirect; however, I'm doubtful how likely this misspelling is, and we don't have a redirect for the much more general
typr either.
Reason: This should definitely include "Wikipedia" somewhere to avoid being too broad, but I suggest simultaneously aligning it with
Category:Wikipedia competitions.
Reason: "GUS", standing for "German userbox solution" (see
Wikipedia:Userbox migration), seems like a niche abbreviation and may be quite confusing in a category name. I suggest moving it to something more obvious, and since the linked page calls the meaning of this acronym (?) a "former" name, I suggest the new name employ the term "Userbox migration".
Reason: Unused; refers to a nonexistent
mx-ui article in the code. Does not appear to be related to
MX Player, though a web search did not help in clarifying that.
Reason: Not mentioned at the target, neither at
Pair-instability supernova, nor anywhere else on the English Wikipedia currently. Used to point at
Hypernova before being fixed as a double redirect at that point, and
Hypernova#History indeed seems good enough for a target to me.
Reason: TNT does not contain
nobelium nor does an element abbreviated by "Ch" exist, but even with corrected capitalisation this appears to be missing two hydrogen atoms.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; otherwise only used in a passing mention at
Tara Platt, as well as entries also linking to the current target at the
Couteau disambiguation and
Katarina (given name) pages.
Reason: Since
4'-chloro-2-hydroxyaurone is redlinked next to the mention of this formula at the target, these should be deleted to encourage article creation as well.
Reason: Looking at the general formula, this appears to be lacking two fluorine atoms, and while there were passing mentions, I couldn't find any proper discussion of any compound with this formula on the web.
Reason: "unofficial" does not mean "person who is not an official" but rather
"not officially established". The related sense of "official" is only described at the
Official (disambiguation) page, so it might make sense to convert this into a Wiktionary redirect?
Reason: Google Scholar finds a lot more results for "H2 receptor antagonist" than for "H2 antagonist", and similarly for the plural forms. While
H3 receptor antagonist is already named similarly, it looks like
H1 antagonist would need to be moved as well.
Reason: Someone searching for this is probably more likely to be looking for
Category:Minor planet object articles (unnumbered), since the current target contains minor planets that have since been assigned numbers.
Reason: The English Wikipedia does not describe this term anywhere. We do have an article on
helonium, but this appears to be referring to a different concept looking at the page history and talk page post.
Reason: Looks like these are just different ways of presenting the same content. Not sure which one should be preferred, but transcluding both on every page listed is certainly redundant.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Listed (and linked) at
Onium ion#Group 14 (carbon group) onium cations, but that also contains a number of redlinks, making a case for deletion to encourage article creation.
Reason: The template is only used on one of the pages and appears to list a subset of the articles in the other one. Maybe the oxidation states can be added to that as well?
Reason: Unclear scope; do all logos which have another variant belong here? Note that this is also categories under "Non-free logos" without this being explicitly specified anywhere.
Reason: Both's scope appears to be likely under-TOO logos marked as non-free. Both titles are not optimal IMO, but the name of the older cat is at least not paradoxical.
Reason: Seems to be a misspelling of "medical isotope" that should be retargeted to
isotopes in medicine; however,
isotop does not exist as a redirect, raising the question whether this misspelling is particularly likely.
Reason: While a web search easily finds the current spelling in a number of sources, this one seems to be more common and is also the one listed in
Merriam-Webster.
Reason:
WP:RLOTE: No affinity to German (though
Cantor did invent some terminology for transfinite arithmetic, this term is older and not described at the target anyway).
Unendlich does not provide any helpful targets either.
Reason: Created here, moved to {{Mozambican-politician-stub}} six minutes later, then merged into the current target. Seems to be an unlikely/
WP:UNNATURAL typo.
Reason: This was moved to Video captures two days after creation, which was later merged as a duplicate article. It looks like this would be better as a redirect to
subtitles, of which "captions" is usually a synonym.
Reason: Same as with
#Category:Dictator below and as stated by the nominator there; not an objective criterion of categorisation. Not merging into that nomination since it has comments already.
Reason: Only railway station category named "proposed or under construction". Looking at the
Category:Proposed railway stations by country tree, "under construction" categories are always sorted under the "proposed" categories, so choosing the more general name for consistency seems reasonable.
Reason: Current title seems redundant, is hard to find, and Gardiner's list is not the only catalogue of Egyptian hieroglyphs (ignoring that the title does not even specify that list is meant).
Reason: Not mentioned at target apart from a reference and an external link; someone searching for a fandom wiki will not be helped by the article about its topic.
Reason: As with
#Ḹ below, an article with an explanation, such as
ISO 15919, is probably more useful than an article listing a set of characters with no notes on usage (and even with circular redirects).
Reason: Completely implausible;
graphemes are much more than just ligatures (and the target is not even about single ligatures but about titles spelt with them). Retargeting to {{R from symbol}} might be an option.
Reason: Not described at target; these are U+02C5 MODIFIER LETTER DOWN ARROWHEAD and U+02C4 MODIFIER LETTER UP ARROWHEAD, annotated in Unicode with "raised articulation" and "lowered articulation" respectively.
Reason: Redirects for specific star polygons neither mentioned at target nor at
Star polygon,
Polygram (geometry) or elsewhere on the English Wikipedia.
Reason: Implausible title. Created as an "article" with no apparent encyclopaedic content; then redirected as a vandalised stub pov fork instead of being deleted.
Reason: Only passing mentions on the English Wikipedia, but could be soft-redirected to
wikt:semordnilap. Note that there is some history behind the first one of these.
Reason: The target mentions this as a synonym of
seminorm, which has a standalone article, but according to
pseudonorm (Q2115755), this is a different kind of generalisation which weakens the condition of homogeneity by replacing the equality by an inequality, rather than removing the positive definiteness.
Reason: It looks like the topics referred to by the Greek version should be limited to
Agenor (mythology), but perhaps
Agenor, the primary topic for the name in Latin letters, should be the primary topic for the Greek spelling too.
Reason: Since these are spelt "α-Lactone", "β-Lactone" at the start of a sentence, I believe this should also be done here. (Articles such as
alpha-Propiolactone format it like "alpha-Propiolactone".)
Reason: Appears to be a shortening for "singular", but easily ambiguous: {{R from singular}} or {{R to singular}}? The latter is actually even significantly more common.
Reason: Since the primary topic for the English spelling is considered
the bread and both have the same affinity to the relevant Slavic languages, targeting this to that article too seems more appropriate.
Reason: Has a backlink and probably refers to the
Reich Chamber of Culture (which had a subdivision named
Reich Chamber of Music), but despite this having a backlink, I can't find either of this title and "Reich Chamber of Culture and Music" anywhere online.
Reason: Not mentioned at target. Listed at
Dance music#2010s; all other uses on the English Wikipedia appear to be passing mentions. Could be retargeted to
Glitch (music), which gives context and mentions house, despite not describing this style specifically.
Reason: Only subcategory of
Category:Voiceless oral consonants by a specific manner of articulation, and no corresponding
Category:Voiced plosives category either. This just makes the speech sounds category tree harder to navigate in my opinion.
Reason: Per
Tap and flap consonants#Tap vs. flap and since we don't appear to have separate articles on taps and flaps with the same place of articulation, this is probably an unnecessary layer of categorisation.
Reason: This is probably more helpful if retargeted to
Integrally closed domain (the other, more general meaning I can see from a Scholar search appears to be the one described in the "Normal rings" section of that article).
Reason:
Regular function redirects to
Morphism of algebraic varieties. While this redirect is linked there (section "Regular functions"), the concept is a lot more general than the
coordinate ring (also linked there and also redirecting to Affine variety), so I suggest it be redirected to the morphism article instead.
Reason: I think these should be deleted for the same reason we don't have redirects like {{R from German}}. While the target template accepts parameters for the redirect and target languages, this one suggests that it is not necessary to use it with the redirect. If deemed necessary, this could alternatively be expanded to a template; there also appears to be a single wrapper of this sort in
Category:Templates for redirects involving diacritics or language change, {{R to English}}, but creating more might imply completeness, achieving which would require quite a bit of additional work.
Reason: More redirects similar to
#Vladislav Surkov (Template). All created by the same user and probably intended as {{R from statistical redirect}}s; these have no links anymore and get zero or close to zero pageviews a month.
Reason: This starts like a disambiguation page but actually only talks about use in geology. Suggest moving this and creating a dab page between this article and the mathematical
Equidimensionality in its place.
Reason: Not mentioned at target; should probably be retargeted to an appropriate anchor at
Apicomplexan life cycle as with the other terms mentioned there.
Reason: Word is not currently mentioned at target. Used in context of Chinese timekeeping at
Metric time, and more generally at
Decimal time (whither I just redirected the newly-created
Deciday).
Reason: Unlikely search term. Surely there's no list on Wikipedia containing all death metal bands in existence. This page should have been deleted upon creation rather than being redirected.
Reason: No longer mentioned at target. Search brings up a lot of, partly passing, mentions in various articles though, so probably an option to retarget it.
Reason: Not currently described at target. Mentioned in a few other articles (not all relevant to FR), though I can't assess which is the most appropriate option.
Reason: These are currently redlinks in {{Portuguese dialects}} (also used at target). with an appended "dialect". I believe either these should be deleted, or the respective "dialect" versions created.
Reason: The former is not mentioned at its target; the latter was
retargeted from that article to one where it is mentioned, but where the former is linked. I suppose aligning the first with the second would currently be the best solution, though the then-circular-links would need to be removed.
Reason: Unused; one of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs. Potentially misleading as the title reads more akin to a navigation template.
Reason: Unused; one of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs. Potentially misleading as the title reads more akin to a navigation template.
Reason: Unused (created last year); part of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs. No such redirects exist for other countries.
Reason: Unused; one of the
roughly 20 quite unusual redirects/shortcuts to stub templates that do not reference stubs, and the only two "-bio" redirects to "-bio-stub"s. Note that the latter results from a naming error fixed by the template author shortly after its creation in 2007.
Reason: As far as I understand, this should either be disambiguated at
16S ribosomal RNA, or redirected to the article currently titled this way (with an according hatnote), since "rRNA" is just an abbreviation for "ribosomal RNA".
Reason: It seems that this should be pointing at
16S ribosomal RNA (and
16S gene,
16S rRNA gene redirects to the same target should be created accordingly).
Reason: Not sure how plausible this typo is given we don't have an
Arkhanglesk redirect to
Arkhangelsk, but if this is kept, it should at least redirect to its correct spelling
Novoarkhangelsk, a disambiguation page.
Reason: This page has a long history of pointing at various targets. Right now
Arity has a link to
p-adic number, one of the previous targets of this redirect, in the "see also" section (which I would consider misuse, as hatnotes should be used for this purpose). Incidentally, until 2018, this was redirecting to the article on the more general concept of
Completion of a ring (which currently does not explicitly introduce the term "I-adic completion" but does so for the
I-adic topology, while linking to the main article on that topic). It also briefly was some sort of disambiguation page, as the title (modulo capitalisation) can also be an abbreviation of
Advanced Digital Information Corporation. The question is whether arity is the primary topic here (and the ambiguity should be resolved by hatnotes or a separate DAB page), or whether this title itself should be disambiguated.
Reason: Right now this describes the geometric term in the first paragraph but goes on to repeat part of the
Flat#Mathematics and geometry or
Flatness (disambiguation) disambiguation pages. I suggest moving this to reflect the meaning in geometry, while redirecting
Flatness (mathematics) to the Flatness DAB (see also
Flat (mathematics), which is also linked from this article).
Reason: While this might be a taxonomic prefix, a reader is quite likely to be looking for some information on the prefix in general. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but the fact that we have information on this specific usage is sort of arbitrary.
Reason: This used to be an avoided double redirect to
Punctured neighbourhood, which used to redirect to this glossary (though has since been retargeted). However, this is not really conceptually related to punctured neighbourhoods. One place where this is described is
Scheme (mathematics)#Examples, though there might be similar content portraying this topic from some other mathematical field's POV.
Reason: This is probably more generally explained at
Topological_ring#Completion, to which I was going to redirect a new
complete topological ring page. Note that there is also a
Complete local ring redirect, though the article on topological rings does not currently mention local rings.
Reason: This refers to
birational maps. Right now the target article has a hatnote for three of the arrows redirecting there, but I'm not sure expanding that indefinitely would be the best option.
Reason: I think this should redirect to the more general notion of
Computably enumerable set. (When this discussion is closed, a
Turing-recognizable redirect should be created with the same target.)
Reason: No content on this specific group at target. Could be retargeted to
Heterotic string theory or similar articles related to the physical application.