Please consider reversing your findings on a consensus to merge 2023 Alberta wildfires into 2023 Canadian wildfires. Some commentators explicitly opposed that merger due to the Alberta article's length and the fires' impact (it more than satisfies GNG too). No one spoke at length about reasons to support merging the Alberta article, because there really aren't any. Most of the supporters talked about how short the subarticles are, which indicates they didn't actually look at the Alberta article, and that may be because it was added to the merge proposal late. There is no consensus to lump the Alberta fires in with the others. Ribbet32 ( talk) 21:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @ Ribbet32: I do not have time to review in depth today, but will take a closer second look tomorrow. Combefere ★ Talk 22:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Ribbet32: Sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. The Alberta wildfires article was added very early in discussion (before any votes were even cast), and was well understood to be a part of the discussion by all who participated. Comments like
"I think it's a much better idea to merge them all together"
and"Support merging the articles listed in nom... [a]s it stands, they're just smaller pieces of one subject.
include reasons to merge the Alberta article, even if they don't call it out by name. Further, I'm not convinced that the discussion was primarily (or even substantially) over article length; the nom also lists coordination and organization, while other users cite readability. After review, I still see a strong consensus to merge the Alberta article into the main Canadian wildfires article. Combefere ★ Talk 16:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I did a close review on AN Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Challenge_close_Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#RFC_on_current_consensus_#14 Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 22:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Jtbobwaysf: Thanks for the notice. Care to sign the comment above? Thanks!
Combefere ★
Talk 22:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I think this must have been due to me making this comment in the same time as the AN notification, it created two talk page sections. Sorry about that! Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 22:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Thanks!
Jtbobwaysf (
talk) 22:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
That is of course if you have the time, and the draft that I´m referring is the draft, which I have just added to the International Relations talk page. StrongALPHA ( talk) 15:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please consider reversing your findings on a consensus to merge 2023 Alberta wildfires into 2023 Canadian wildfires. Some commentators explicitly opposed that merger due to the Alberta article's length and the fires' impact (it more than satisfies GNG too). No one spoke at length about reasons to support merging the Alberta article, because there really aren't any. Most of the supporters talked about how short the subarticles are, which indicates they didn't actually look at the Alberta article, and that may be because it was added to the merge proposal late. There is no consensus to lump the Alberta fires in with the others. Ribbet32 ( talk) 21:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @ Ribbet32: I do not have time to review in depth today, but will take a closer second look tomorrow. Combefere ★ Talk 22:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Ribbet32: Sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. The Alberta wildfires article was added very early in discussion (before any votes were even cast), and was well understood to be a part of the discussion by all who participated. Comments like
"I think it's a much better idea to merge them all together"
and"Support merging the articles listed in nom... [a]s it stands, they're just smaller pieces of one subject.
include reasons to merge the Alberta article, even if they don't call it out by name. Further, I'm not convinced that the discussion was primarily (or even substantially) over article length; the nom also lists coordination and organization, while other users cite readability. After review, I still see a strong consensus to merge the Alberta article into the main Canadian wildfires article. Combefere ★ Talk 16:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I did a close review on AN Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Challenge_close_Talk:COVID-19_pandemic#RFC_on_current_consensus_#14 Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 22:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @
Jtbobwaysf: Thanks for the notice. Care to sign the comment above? Thanks!
Combefere ★
Talk 22:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I think this must have been due to me making this comment in the same time as the AN notification, it created two talk page sections. Sorry about that! Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 22:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Thanks!
Jtbobwaysf (
talk) 22:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
That is of course if you have the time, and the draft that I´m referring is the draft, which I have just added to the International Relations talk page. StrongALPHA ( talk) 15:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)