No responguis a l'insensat segons la seva ximpleria, perquè no et tornis com ell, també tu. |
Respon a l'insensat segons la seva ximpleria, perquè no es pensi ser savi. |
Proverbi 26, 4–5 |
→Archive 2005
→Archive 2006
→Archive 2007
→Archive 2008
→Archive 2009
→Archive 2010
Physchim62 was away on vacation from 2010-08-01 to 2010-08-09 and may not have responded swiftly to queries. |
Hey PC
When you have a moment, could you take a look at his talk and respond? -- Rifleman 82 ( talk) 01:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I have closed the AfD as speedy keep. Please don't make any more WP:POINT-y nominations of well-referenced articles on topics of massive, worldwide interest. Thanks, The Hero of This Nation ( talk) 23:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Reopening an AFD that someone else closed as a snowball close, when you're the nominator = bad idea. Don't do it again pleasethankyou. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 01:20, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Physchim62, I am with you on this one. Also, it was closed before I saw it. This so-called international event is just a one-off event which may not even happen. It is well covered in the article on the church, and the article on the event should be changed to a redirect. -- Bduke (Discussion) 02:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Why have the maturity to admit you are wrong when you can invoke IAR instead? 220.210.177.79 ( talk) 10:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
It says in the article that it decomposes to manganese(III) fluoride at room temperature. Does it liberate fluorine gas? Sorry if I am asking too many questions lately. I just seem to be curious about "quirks" in wikipedia articles. -- Chemicalinterest ( talk) 00:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for that link, it pointed me in the right direction. Now I can sleep at night, I'd started wondering if there really was such a thing as 'nerve failure' lifting weights :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spoonfulsofsheep ( talk • contribs) 20:57, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I will ask you as you are knowledgeable in this area. What do you think of File:Fluorine.jpg? Is my explanation at simple:Fluorine fine? Thank you. -- Chemicalinterest ( talk) 21:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I do not have any accurate equipment. I have a scale that sometimes provides bogus results. I also have bottles of tainted impure chemicals; my hydrochloric acid is green-yellow. Last of all, I have a spatula that is covered with all sorts of chemicals and a stirring rod that is a piece of plastic pipe, with chemicals inside the pipe. --
Chemicalinterest (
talk) 19:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
I found out what was wrong. Household bleach very well may react with non-chloride acids since bleach contains sodium chloride. Pure sodium hypochlorite, on the other hand, probably won't react with acids unless it decomposed to NaCl, releasing oxygen gas. Then the Cl– is there and chlorine can be produced. --
Chemicalinterest (
talk) 19:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
A nice piece of work, and very useful. May I suggest a few things though?
On 19 September 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Philippe Croizon, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Bones! He vist que has creat l'article de CatalunyaCaixa. Tinc un dubte sobre una informació, has posat que és parcialment propietat de la Generalitat de Catalunya. No n'estic segur d'això... pot ser un error per que Caixa Catalunya és/era propietat de la Diputació de Barcelona i la Caixa Tarragona de la Diputació de Tarragona? (la de Manresa és/era privada). Bé no se si és cert, però en cas que ho sigui, igualment s'hauria d'afegir lo de les diputacions.
un salut!-- Vilar 18:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
[1] nice:) DMacks ( talk) 15:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I won't template you, but you know better. Telling another user to "shut the fuck up", even by using the acronym (we all know what it means) is completely unacceptable. It's a personal attack; plain as day. Do it again and I'll have to block you. Courcelles 20:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
On 1 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article David Lloyd Johnston, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
On 5 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Ajka alumina plant accident, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 14:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Physchim. I'm sorry you found my response to the OP somewhat 'bitey', but it wasn't intended that way and I believe it is not as clear cut as you made it to be. Frankly I'd like it if you could review your statements before submitting them and try to AGF. Hope you're well. Regards, --— Cyclonenim | Chat 17:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
OK, let's look first at the two edits from Cyclonenim ( talk · contribs) that I thought were a bit "off":
To have two edits in the space of a minute that I considered "off", on different topics and from an editor whose edits I usually find to be constructive made me think that he or she was just having a bad day for whatever reason, and that everything would be fine when they came back after a night's sleep or whatever. That was the sense of my intervention.
As for
Cuddlyable3 (
talk ·
contribs) finding my intervention "offensive", and choosing to come here to inform me of this essential fact, claiming that I have some how 'chosen to attack' Cyclonenim, well, everyone is free to have their own opinion, that is the inalieable right of being human. On the other hand, for an editor who was in no way involved in the exchanges to waste their time coming here to express their feeling of offense, in particular an editor who stars their own talk page with an invocation of
WP:RPA (for which read "if I don't like it, I'll ignore it"), then such an editor will inevitably go down several notches in my respect and esteem (whether or not my respect or esteem matters in the slightest to the editor concerned, which I doubt).
Physchim62
(talk) 20:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, hey. Let's not get too worked up over this, I wasn't expecting anyone else to reply to this other than Physchim. I completely understand that the internet lacks clarity for sarcasm, and so I was initially going to let this slide and just leave an apology on the RD. The reason I came here to make a comment is because of Physchim's recent actions at SandyGeorgia's talk page where he told her to "STFU". I didn't appreciate being told to bite my tongue for something not altogether offensive, when his/her actions somewhere else were openly aggressive. The way I see it is that if I was being sarcastic/aggressive with my remark, it would have been noted as such with something not too dissimilar from APL's example above -- but I didn't. Let's just let this pass, there's no big deal and no damage done. No need to bring personal attacks into this, I didn't see it that way, I just ask that we apply WP:AGF in future :) Regards, --— Cyclonenim | Chat 17:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
It's not bad Hungarian, only bad spelling of the name. It does not follow the uniform spelling rules (as known as akadémiai helyesírás, that is "ortography rules of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences"). We (in the huwiki) always fix these spelling mistakes (see the Hungarian interwikilink for the company's article) without checking the company's spelling customs, since the company is not a source for spelling rules, neither an authority for correct ortography. That is the general custom of handling common spelling mistakes. There is an additonal factor: to spell such compound words as "alumíniumtermelő" & "alumíniumkereskedelmi" properly according to the rules is not a simple task even for native speakers. The enwiki community certainly can do what is wants, I only wanted to inform you about such cases of misspelling & the general custom of their handling. Bennó ( talk) 08:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Um, thanks, but it was actually User:Nimur who explained antenna theory. – Henning Makholm ( talk) 22:43, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
On 16 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Benoît Mandelbrot, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Atomic weight/Table has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Yoenit (
talk) 12:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for researching the Spanish language media for sources. I am purposely not replying to your hard work about the t-shirts on the talk page yet in an attempt to not dominate the discussion so other people can weigh in.
On a separate but related concern. Have you had confidence that all the Spanish sources cited in fact cover the statements that they are attached to? My Spanish is not good enough to even attempt to review them so I haven't been flagging them as unverified out of good faith.
Cheers Veriss ( talk) 19:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh...no no no!!! I was referring to the dozens of other citations in the article from other editors, many anon IPs. I'm very sorry that I worded that so poorly. I did not have a single thought to doubt your sources. You've worked very hard on the article as have many other Spanish speaking editors. Again, my sincere apologies. Veriss ( talk) 20:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
The creator of the graphic has replied to our posts on Wikicommons and it seems that he is willing to help. I'm not sure how to link from there to here.
[[commons:File talk:MSJ.en.svg#Factually incorrect]]
;) Your message crossed with my reply at commons, but thanks for letting me know anyway: I don't spend much time on commons so I could easily have missed it.
Physchim62
(talk) 20:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)You deleted an edit I made on the corporate section of this article. Your reason for deletion is given as vandalism. I added the following line to the list of companies that provided equipement to the rescue.
Mincon International Ltd of Ireland manufactured the Mincon MX5053 reverse circulation hammer and drill bits that drilled the breakthrough hole.
I added three news sources. One to the company itself, one to a national newspaper and one to a popular newssite. Unfortunately, the Mincon site is down at the moment, but information about their involvement is available through the Google cache of their site. There is a plethora of news sources on Mincon on the web, including: The Irish Times ( http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/1014/1224281064133.html ) BBC ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11544067 )
If you had good reason(s) for deleting my contribution, then please enlighten me.
I may have been wrong in my edit but tellimg me to "Die. Fall down and die, stupid drool." is not good form.
(talk) 15.33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
The attack was a recent addition by an IP: I have reverted to the pre-vandalism version. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 11:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Sweet, I knew if I put that on the To-Do list someone would know how to fix it. I couldn't figure it out at all. Thanks and cheers! Veriss ( talk) 20:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Please refresh your memory on WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL and proper use of edit summaries.
I understand you may still be troubled over the wayward "s" in a Featured article that you saw eons ago that no reviewer picked up, but I had to read that paragraph (back then) half a dozen times before I spotted it even after you pointed it out; I wish we could resolve whatever led to your campaign against FAC and now appears increasingly directed at me.
You were already warned about personal attacks when you told me to Shut The Fuck Up. Today you labeled an edit you clearly knew in advance was a good faith edit as vandalism. Is there something we need to talk about to get your AGFometer back on track? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 20:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Follow up. And now, after all our edit conflicts, I've taken the time to re-read José Sisto, understanding that my mistake there may have predisposed you on the second article, which was a BLP, to mistrust and quickly revert me. I still can't find any mention on that article that Sisto is dead; the original author says there is no source for the date of his death, but if the article said anywhere that he was dead, and if I hadn't gone first to an archived link, I might not have made such a big mistake. I read what I thought was a BLP, and got to work. I know DYKs aren't supposed to be perfect, but the article (unless I'm missing it) implies he's alive! I'm sorry if that mistake led to part of this, and I'm glad the original author was so gracious and understanding. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
It's going to be a long time before I can catch up, so I'll just say: 1) I noticed at DYK that you have been one editor long advocating for all the right things (slow it down, check better, etc), and 2) your recent input at FAC is most helpful. I'm glad we sorted this. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Since you are also reviewing current TFAs, I was wondering if you could take a look (just to be on the safe side) the Stephens City, Virginia article. It was promoted to FA on August 15, 2010 and promoted to TFA on September 5, 2010. It was my main project for the past two and half years, I used 78 sources (several more than once), one with an active OTRS ticket, I had many people working on the article, two PRs, multiple independent reviews during GAN and FAC, along with weeks of tinkering and constant updates, so I don't think I can say with a good deal of certainty there aren't any copyvios, but with the current mindset of the community, I want to make absolutely sure. So, could you give the page a look-see and check for me. I would greatly appreciate it. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't think the situation here is particularly clear. The uploader seems to claim to be Joseph Fitzpatrick who was/is the election agent for Woolas. However, it seems unlikely that the images which are used in the leaflet can be considered pd even if the creator of the leaflet releases it as pd. This perhaps could be converted to fair use or alternatively I think a deletion discussion would be appropriate to consider some of the issues here. Adambro ( talk) 15:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, Phys, no admin can seem to be bothered to answer my question about who I should notify, so I'm notifying you since I mention the interaction between you and me that led to Nyttend's use of RevDel. Sorry it had to come to this, but he just wouldn't respond to me, used RevDel again, and continues to allege that I vandalized. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- I think I'm going to take a break from ITN for a bit (too much stress). Can you let me know on my talk page if they ever get around to retooling the criteria page? I'll want to be a part of that. Thanks -- Mwalcoff ( talk) 23:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- I need the help of experts in the field of metrology. Since you seem to be knowledgeable in metrology, I would really appreciate your help here.
Sounds like a yes? The case is here: Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-11-21/Kendrick_mass - if you still have the time and inclination to mediate, Physchim62. -- Kkmurray ( talk) 19:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 14:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
There's already an article on this topic: Wedding of Prince William of Wales and Kate Middleton. -- GoodDay ( talk) 19:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Ciao! Just a quick note after I noticed your very early creation of Castellbisbal... Roman (Architecture) is something quite different than Romanesque architecture: the former is ancient (belonging to ancient Rome), the latter is medieval, without any connection to Rome in general. Let me know if you used the same convention elseqhere so I can correct. Ciao and good work!! -- '''Attilios''' ( talk) 07:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
On 23 November 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Phnom Penh stampede, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Kslotte ( talk) 19:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I have no problem with you removing it from WP:ERRORS, it's stale now. But if you think that (a) a communist party source is in any way a reliable source for a communist politician; or that (b) an admin who acts upon that problem is pushing pov, you need to acquaint yourself more with core wikipedia policies. I'd suggest starting at WP:RS. -- Mkativerata ( talk) 19:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
A rejection of a communist party source simply because it is a communist party source is about as huge a violation of WP:NPOV as I can imagine. It is also ridiculous, as "western" sources use the same "communist" news agencies as Wikipedia does. Mkativerata ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has tried to reject articles in this way twice now in little over 24 hours, I will not tolerate a third time. Physchim62 (talk) 19:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Ever since you were involved in the preliminary discussion on Non-Roman characters in article titles, there has been a separate proposal regarding the usage of Non-Roman characters in re-directs and DABs, and you may be interested in joining the discussions on this page. Your input will be appreciated. -- HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 23:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
This blatant accusation of RegentsPark without any basis of evidence, one of the respected users in Indian wiki project (other than may be for YogeshKandke) shows you have not taken any effort to really understand the editors and issues clearly. The use of vandal template for User:YellowMonkey is also quite interesting. -- CarTick ( talk) 04:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
On 26 November 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Tongan general election, 2010, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
For someone who claims to not want to feed the trolls, I thought this was a very trollish response. The OP was just trying to indicate they wanted references to actual studies, not off-the-cuff opinions. Saying "you'll get what you get" is really not contributing. If you don't have anything useful to say about a topic, please just refrain from posting on it. I have removed the comment in question. -- Mr.98 ( talk) 02:55, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Physchim62. I noticed your edit and diff insertion and realized that my clarification was probably not procedurally correct and perhaps put you in an awkward position. So, I rephrased it as a response to you. Sorry about that. -- RegentsPark ( talk) 03:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
A proposed closing statement has been posted here. Please could you confirm whether you support or oppose this summary. Thanks. Elen of the Roads ( talk) 21:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated speed of light for FAC. As a major contributor, please leave your 2cents on the review page. TimothyRias ( talk) 16:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I tried to e-mail to the following arbcom-l-owner@lists.wikimedia.org, but the system will not allow it. What I am doing wrong ? Thanks Kanatonian ( talk) 21:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Your use of the term "unconstructive" is entirely too confrontational, unnecessary, and subjective (IMHO, subjectively wrong). Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
On 17 December 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Henry IV of France, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Physchim62. Please participate in the discussion Commons:Commons talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Template:Molecule. -- Leyo 16:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Patent-EU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 19:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
hey there, this is just a bulk message inviting you to re-think the topic as was discussed more than 6 months ago and is still unresolved. feel free to jump here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Icelandic_debt_repayment_referendum,_2010#Time_to_settle_the_title_dispute.3F and help figure out how we can end this conclusively this time. -- Lotsofmagnets ( talk) 02:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, As well as being a Wikipedian, I'm also a curator/employee at ChemSpider and have responded to some of your recent feedback at ChemSpider.org. I believe that I have managed to work out how to solve many of the issues that you experienced with borane compounds. I will go back and try and resolve all of the issues that you pointed out. As a start I have created a record for pentaborane (and amended the WP page). When you view the ChemSpider record the strucuture representation will appear incorrect if you are logged in (due to a bug) but you can see the correct image by either using the Zoom option or logging out.
If you have any questions or comments feel free to get in touch -- The chemistds ( talk) 14:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I am an editor of the article Amount of substance. We have corresponded previously with regard to this article, e.g. here.
After a substantial hiatus, I took a look at the text of Amount of substance. I see that a major change occurred with your edit of 16 February 2010, and that the article has remained substantially the same since then. The comment accompanying your change was “This seems like a quicker fix,” presumably in response to the comment from the previous editor. But that editor merely complained about the then-current lead paragraph. All that he or she did was to move the previous lead paragraph to a new “Overview” section and write a new, much shorter lead paragraph; in particular, that edit deleted nothing. Your edit, on the other hand, deleted more than half of the previous version of the article—its length went from 53,762 bytes to 22,195 bytes.
Did you really mean to cut out that much? If you indeed did mean to do it, could you please explain why, and in particular explain why you deleted from the article all mention of the following topics:
Thank you, and I'm looking forward to your response. Reuqr ( talk) 16:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the prompt reply.
Before we get to discussing any actual specific statements, I suggest we try to see if we are on the same page about what this article should be like. Here is what I think: among other things, this article should address common misconceptions and confusions, something it doesn't do in its present form. I'm saying this because I could imagine someone objecting to this, on the grounds that it is not really encyclopedic to do so. What I'm saying is that I would prefer to err on the side of perhaps being less encyclopedic and more pedagogical, especially if the result is progress in eliminating widespread and persistent confusions. I think the warrant to err on the side of being more, not less, pedagogical is especially strong in the case of an article such as this one, because I'm pretty sure (though I can point to no study as a reference) that the most numerous readers of this particular article will be precisely high school and college students who got confused in their chemistry class. (Of course, one can still go overboard in being pedagogical, which is why it's a good thing there are multiple editors.)
For example, as you pointed out, invocations of the standard batch size concept are quite common; I would add that even reputable sources sometimes use it. It follows that many readers of the Wikipedia article will encounter the standard batch size concept, either before or after reading the Wikipedia article. Either way, this concept and the associated misconceptions are already out there in the world. Here at Wikipedia, we can't erase the presence of this concept in the wider world, but we can do something to help erase the misconceptions to which it may lead. Thus, I think this article should acknowledge that this standard batch size concept exists, indeed that it is common, and then proceed to clarify what is and isn't right about that concept. (Incidentally, the preceding is also my answer to your question, Why even introduce "batch size" when you already know that it will lead to misconceptions?)
Similarly, we do indeed, as you say, confuse students by telling them that the amount of substance is a "standard batch size", but that we can't count the number of items in a batch. I think that this article is a nice place to clarify these issues, perhaps in language that is not too far off from what you just said in reply to my issue (6). After all, isn't Wikipedia these days one of the first places a confused student may turn to for help?
As yet another example of a common misconception, many do not realize the truth of what you said in the first sentence of your reply to my issue (7), namely, that the amount of substance was being measured for more than a hundred years before the absolute number of entities was known. I think that this article is a nice place to make this truth more widely appreciated.
The article in its present form does not include any discussion of these issues. I think that the article should include discussions of these issues, as well as of any other stubborn misconceptions. Can we agree on that basic point? Can we agree that the article should not simply state the official definition, and pretty much just leave it at that—which is more or less the state of the article right now? Reuqr ( talk) 00:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
There has been a major revision of the the
Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.
Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
Herostratus ( talk) 09:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
There has been a major revision of the the
Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.
Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
Herostratus ( talk) 21:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Do you know "la représentation de Cram"? It's on fr.wiki, but what would it be called in English? Cram projection? Cram structure? Cram notation? DS ( talk) 14:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:USAF-AUX. Since you had some involvement with the Template:USAF-AUX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
You were previously involved. Please see.
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Training and Development Agency for Schools requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 23:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Template:Ecb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Leyo 14:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 ( talk) at 18:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC).
Template:EU regulation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Added this to Infobox discussion Infobox Talk Page MSDS Section: "We had an awesome ad-hoc thing going with linking to oxford's MSDS service, but as of Dec 2011, that service has been discontinued (liability?)... I am loathe to link to chemical suppliers, but I have been linking infoboxes as I come across them generally to sciencelab.com due tot he comprehensive nature of those MSDS files which comes close to that of the oxford ones. The ICSC cards are good, but they don't function quite like standard MSDS, I feel. Is there perhaps a more permanent resource than chemical supplier sites that we can begin to move the oxford links to?"
Perhaps you have some input? As an undergrad student, I must admit some personal interest in having comprehensive and well laid-out MSDS, but I am unsure of how "international" ICSCs are. Cheers Fourloves 22:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Physchim62. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi PC, long time no see! Anyway, you may be interested in this post. Have you been talking with the polymer people at all? Regards, Walkerma ( talk) 14:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Chemicals for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - Mabeenot ( talk) 05:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi PC -- I am a chemical engineer (Master's), and I'm wondering how I could help validate chemical data on the Wikipedia. Please let me know!
Thanks, Paolo -- Paolodm ( talk) 03:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
There is a dispute at Talk:David_Johnston#Order regarding what titles are best for subsections. I think we need a third opinion. I found you edited the page a bunch a few times and you are an experienced editor. One note: User:Miesianiacal has done an exceptionally large percent of edits on this page and is now in an WP:EDITWAR over another point on the same page. Thanks for your help. >> M.P.Schneider,LC ( parlemus • feci) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Physchim62! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editors are welcome! (But being multilingual is not a requirement.) Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 21:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. X Ottawahitech ( talk) 15:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:H-phrases/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Leyo 16:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CAT:Chem. Since you had some involvement with the CAT:Chem redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg ( chat) 11:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Stockholm Convention Secretariat.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Basel Convention Secretariat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Template:March5th has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:RXNO cat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:29CFR1910.1018 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:Housecroft&Sharpe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 11:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Morphine (data page). Since you had some involvement with the Morphine (data page) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Template:RubberBible53rd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drierite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drierite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella Velella Talk 15:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:Webelements has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Physchim62. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:CSDG. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:CSDG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 08:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:RXNO has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Template:EU directive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 20:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Physchim62. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I noted you commented on the article Empúries or Ampurias - a few quite respectable editors seem to have differing opinions on the issue. The article uses Empúries for its title, but Ampurias in the text. I've opened a section on the talk page to try to reach a consensus on what to do. (I visited Empúries, but not Ampurias :), yesterday). Bdushaw ( talk) 14:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Physchim62. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:Chembox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Throughput rate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Dicdef of obsolete term; new/current terms do not have articles, so not suitable as redirect.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 16:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Element color/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Other deprecated Element color templates which you've created are also nominated. Gonnym ( talk) 11:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Trademark-EU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Copyright-EU has been nominated for merging with Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 19:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Template:Design-EU has been nominated for merging with Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 19:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
A while back you created Template:GHS category, but didn't provide any documentation on how to populate the fields, I was wondering if you still recalled and could provide any information on it.-- The Navigators ( talk) 11:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Template:11thRoC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logan Talk Contributions 03:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Template:InChI URL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow ( talk) 09:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:R2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sysages ( talk | contribs) 02:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Repr3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 23:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Articles with validated CAS Registry Numbers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 04:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Carboxylic acid derivatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:VA-Class Measurement articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Measurement articles for project management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Template:Saint Kitts and Nevis general election, 2010 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:GHS category has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 13:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Muta2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 13:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Muta3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 13:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated Barthélemy Boganda for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ( t · c) buidhe 05:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Chembox entry. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 21#Template:Chembox entry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DePiep ( talk) 05:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antimony trioxide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nucleus hydro elemon ( talk) 04:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenic trioxide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nucleus hydro elemon ( talk) 04:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beryllium oxide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nucleus hydro elemon ( talk) 08:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Inorganic bromides has been
nominated for merging with
Template:Bromides. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 17:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phosphorus tribromide (data page), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phosphorus tribromide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arsenic trioxide (data page) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Proton affinity (data page) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
Template:GHSref has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 11:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:RENFE-Barcelona R1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej ( talk) 18:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Physchim62! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:WP:CHM ACR/Toolbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno ( talk) 17:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Faraday Lecturers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Measurement category quality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 12:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Template:WP:CHM ACR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities, boroughs and towns in the Republic of Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 10:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Template:Periodic table (by valence) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Apothecaries' system has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 18:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The redirect CAT:Chem has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22 § CAT:Chem until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
No responguis a l'insensat segons la seva ximpleria, perquè no et tornis com ell, també tu. |
Respon a l'insensat segons la seva ximpleria, perquè no es pensi ser savi. |
Proverbi 26, 4–5 |
→Archive 2005
→Archive 2006
→Archive 2007
→Archive 2008
→Archive 2009
→Archive 2010
Physchim62 was away on vacation from 2010-08-01 to 2010-08-09 and may not have responded swiftly to queries. |
Hey PC
When you have a moment, could you take a look at his talk and respond? -- Rifleman 82 ( talk) 01:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I have closed the AfD as speedy keep. Please don't make any more WP:POINT-y nominations of well-referenced articles on topics of massive, worldwide interest. Thanks, The Hero of This Nation ( talk) 23:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Reopening an AFD that someone else closed as a snowball close, when you're the nominator = bad idea. Don't do it again pleasethankyou. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 01:20, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Physchim62, I am with you on this one. Also, it was closed before I saw it. This so-called international event is just a one-off event which may not even happen. It is well covered in the article on the church, and the article on the event should be changed to a redirect. -- Bduke (Discussion) 02:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Why have the maturity to admit you are wrong when you can invoke IAR instead? 220.210.177.79 ( talk) 10:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
It says in the article that it decomposes to manganese(III) fluoride at room temperature. Does it liberate fluorine gas? Sorry if I am asking too many questions lately. I just seem to be curious about "quirks" in wikipedia articles. -- Chemicalinterest ( talk) 00:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for that link, it pointed me in the right direction. Now I can sleep at night, I'd started wondering if there really was such a thing as 'nerve failure' lifting weights :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spoonfulsofsheep ( talk • contribs) 20:57, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I will ask you as you are knowledgeable in this area. What do you think of File:Fluorine.jpg? Is my explanation at simple:Fluorine fine? Thank you. -- Chemicalinterest ( talk) 21:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
I do not have any accurate equipment. I have a scale that sometimes provides bogus results. I also have bottles of tainted impure chemicals; my hydrochloric acid is green-yellow. Last of all, I have a spatula that is covered with all sorts of chemicals and a stirring rod that is a piece of plastic pipe, with chemicals inside the pipe. --
Chemicalinterest (
talk) 19:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
I found out what was wrong. Household bleach very well may react with non-chloride acids since bleach contains sodium chloride. Pure sodium hypochlorite, on the other hand, probably won't react with acids unless it decomposed to NaCl, releasing oxygen gas. Then the Cl– is there and chlorine can be produced. --
Chemicalinterest (
talk) 19:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
A nice piece of work, and very useful. May I suggest a few things though?
On 19 September 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Philippe Croizon, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Bones! He vist que has creat l'article de CatalunyaCaixa. Tinc un dubte sobre una informació, has posat que és parcialment propietat de la Generalitat de Catalunya. No n'estic segur d'això... pot ser un error per que Caixa Catalunya és/era propietat de la Diputació de Barcelona i la Caixa Tarragona de la Diputació de Tarragona? (la de Manresa és/era privada). Bé no se si és cert, però en cas que ho sigui, igualment s'hauria d'afegir lo de les diputacions.
un salut!-- Vilar 18:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
[1] nice:) DMacks ( talk) 15:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I won't template you, but you know better. Telling another user to "shut the fuck up", even by using the acronym (we all know what it means) is completely unacceptable. It's a personal attack; plain as day. Do it again and I'll have to block you. Courcelles 20:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
On 1 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article David Lloyd Johnston, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
On 5 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Ajka alumina plant accident, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 14:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Physchim. I'm sorry you found my response to the OP somewhat 'bitey', but it wasn't intended that way and I believe it is not as clear cut as you made it to be. Frankly I'd like it if you could review your statements before submitting them and try to AGF. Hope you're well. Regards, --— Cyclonenim | Chat 17:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
OK, let's look first at the two edits from Cyclonenim ( talk · contribs) that I thought were a bit "off":
To have two edits in the space of a minute that I considered "off", on different topics and from an editor whose edits I usually find to be constructive made me think that he or she was just having a bad day for whatever reason, and that everything would be fine when they came back after a night's sleep or whatever. That was the sense of my intervention.
As for
Cuddlyable3 (
talk ·
contribs) finding my intervention "offensive", and choosing to come here to inform me of this essential fact, claiming that I have some how 'chosen to attack' Cyclonenim, well, everyone is free to have their own opinion, that is the inalieable right of being human. On the other hand, for an editor who was in no way involved in the exchanges to waste their time coming here to express their feeling of offense, in particular an editor who stars their own talk page with an invocation of
WP:RPA (for which read "if I don't like it, I'll ignore it"), then such an editor will inevitably go down several notches in my respect and esteem (whether or not my respect or esteem matters in the slightest to the editor concerned, which I doubt).
Physchim62
(talk) 20:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Hey, hey. Let's not get too worked up over this, I wasn't expecting anyone else to reply to this other than Physchim. I completely understand that the internet lacks clarity for sarcasm, and so I was initially going to let this slide and just leave an apology on the RD. The reason I came here to make a comment is because of Physchim's recent actions at SandyGeorgia's talk page where he told her to "STFU". I didn't appreciate being told to bite my tongue for something not altogether offensive, when his/her actions somewhere else were openly aggressive. The way I see it is that if I was being sarcastic/aggressive with my remark, it would have been noted as such with something not too dissimilar from APL's example above -- but I didn't. Let's just let this pass, there's no big deal and no damage done. No need to bring personal attacks into this, I didn't see it that way, I just ask that we apply WP:AGF in future :) Regards, --— Cyclonenim | Chat 17:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
It's not bad Hungarian, only bad spelling of the name. It does not follow the uniform spelling rules (as known as akadémiai helyesírás, that is "ortography rules of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences"). We (in the huwiki) always fix these spelling mistakes (see the Hungarian interwikilink for the company's article) without checking the company's spelling customs, since the company is not a source for spelling rules, neither an authority for correct ortography. That is the general custom of handling common spelling mistakes. There is an additonal factor: to spell such compound words as "alumíniumtermelő" & "alumíniumkereskedelmi" properly according to the rules is not a simple task even for native speakers. The enwiki community certainly can do what is wants, I only wanted to inform you about such cases of misspelling & the general custom of their handling. Bennó ( talk) 08:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Um, thanks, but it was actually User:Nimur who explained antenna theory. – Henning Makholm ( talk) 22:43, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
On 16 October 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Benoît Mandelbrot, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Atomic weight/Table has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Yoenit (
talk) 12:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for researching the Spanish language media for sources. I am purposely not replying to your hard work about the t-shirts on the talk page yet in an attempt to not dominate the discussion so other people can weigh in.
On a separate but related concern. Have you had confidence that all the Spanish sources cited in fact cover the statements that they are attached to? My Spanish is not good enough to even attempt to review them so I haven't been flagging them as unverified out of good faith.
Cheers Veriss ( talk) 19:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh...no no no!!! I was referring to the dozens of other citations in the article from other editors, many anon IPs. I'm very sorry that I worded that so poorly. I did not have a single thought to doubt your sources. You've worked very hard on the article as have many other Spanish speaking editors. Again, my sincere apologies. Veriss ( talk) 20:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
The creator of the graphic has replied to our posts on Wikicommons and it seems that he is willing to help. I'm not sure how to link from there to here.
[[commons:File talk:MSJ.en.svg#Factually incorrect]]
;) Your message crossed with my reply at commons, but thanks for letting me know anyway: I don't spend much time on commons so I could easily have missed it.
Physchim62
(talk) 20:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)You deleted an edit I made on the corporate section of this article. Your reason for deletion is given as vandalism. I added the following line to the list of companies that provided equipement to the rescue.
Mincon International Ltd of Ireland manufactured the Mincon MX5053 reverse circulation hammer and drill bits that drilled the breakthrough hole.
I added three news sources. One to the company itself, one to a national newspaper and one to a popular newssite. Unfortunately, the Mincon site is down at the moment, but information about their involvement is available through the Google cache of their site. There is a plethora of news sources on Mincon on the web, including: The Irish Times ( http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/1014/1224281064133.html ) BBC ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11544067 )
If you had good reason(s) for deleting my contribution, then please enlighten me.
I may have been wrong in my edit but tellimg me to "Die. Fall down and die, stupid drool." is not good form.
(talk) 15.33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
The attack was a recent addition by an IP: I have reverted to the pre-vandalism version. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 11:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Sweet, I knew if I put that on the To-Do list someone would know how to fix it. I couldn't figure it out at all. Thanks and cheers! Veriss ( talk) 20:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Please refresh your memory on WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL and proper use of edit summaries.
I understand you may still be troubled over the wayward "s" in a Featured article that you saw eons ago that no reviewer picked up, but I had to read that paragraph (back then) half a dozen times before I spotted it even after you pointed it out; I wish we could resolve whatever led to your campaign against FAC and now appears increasingly directed at me.
You were already warned about personal attacks when you told me to Shut The Fuck Up. Today you labeled an edit you clearly knew in advance was a good faith edit as vandalism. Is there something we need to talk about to get your AGFometer back on track? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 20:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Follow up. And now, after all our edit conflicts, I've taken the time to re-read José Sisto, understanding that my mistake there may have predisposed you on the second article, which was a BLP, to mistrust and quickly revert me. I still can't find any mention on that article that Sisto is dead; the original author says there is no source for the date of his death, but if the article said anywhere that he was dead, and if I hadn't gone first to an archived link, I might not have made such a big mistake. I read what I thought was a BLP, and got to work. I know DYKs aren't supposed to be perfect, but the article (unless I'm missing it) implies he's alive! I'm sorry if that mistake led to part of this, and I'm glad the original author was so gracious and understanding. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
It's going to be a long time before I can catch up, so I'll just say: 1) I noticed at DYK that you have been one editor long advocating for all the right things (slow it down, check better, etc), and 2) your recent input at FAC is most helpful. I'm glad we sorted this. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Since you are also reviewing current TFAs, I was wondering if you could take a look (just to be on the safe side) the Stephens City, Virginia article. It was promoted to FA on August 15, 2010 and promoted to TFA on September 5, 2010. It was my main project for the past two and half years, I used 78 sources (several more than once), one with an active OTRS ticket, I had many people working on the article, two PRs, multiple independent reviews during GAN and FAC, along with weeks of tinkering and constant updates, so I don't think I can say with a good deal of certainty there aren't any copyvios, but with the current mindset of the community, I want to make absolutely sure. So, could you give the page a look-see and check for me. I would greatly appreciate it. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't think the situation here is particularly clear. The uploader seems to claim to be Joseph Fitzpatrick who was/is the election agent for Woolas. However, it seems unlikely that the images which are used in the leaflet can be considered pd even if the creator of the leaflet releases it as pd. This perhaps could be converted to fair use or alternatively I think a deletion discussion would be appropriate to consider some of the issues here. Adambro ( talk) 15:38, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, Phys, no admin can seem to be bothered to answer my question about who I should notify, so I'm notifying you since I mention the interaction between you and me that led to Nyttend's use of RevDel. Sorry it had to come to this, but he just wouldn't respond to me, used RevDel again, and continues to allege that I vandalized. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- I think I'm going to take a break from ITN for a bit (too much stress). Can you let me know on my talk page if they ever get around to retooling the criteria page? I'll want to be a part of that. Thanks -- Mwalcoff ( talk) 23:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- I need the help of experts in the field of metrology. Since you seem to be knowledgeable in metrology, I would really appreciate your help here.
Sounds like a yes? The case is here: Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-11-21/Kendrick_mass - if you still have the time and inclination to mediate, Physchim62. -- Kkmurray ( talk) 19:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 14:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
There's already an article on this topic: Wedding of Prince William of Wales and Kate Middleton. -- GoodDay ( talk) 19:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Ciao! Just a quick note after I noticed your very early creation of Castellbisbal... Roman (Architecture) is something quite different than Romanesque architecture: the former is ancient (belonging to ancient Rome), the latter is medieval, without any connection to Rome in general. Let me know if you used the same convention elseqhere so I can correct. Ciao and good work!! -- '''Attilios''' ( talk) 07:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
On 23 November 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Phnom Penh stampede, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- Kslotte ( talk) 19:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I have no problem with you removing it from WP:ERRORS, it's stale now. But if you think that (a) a communist party source is in any way a reliable source for a communist politician; or that (b) an admin who acts upon that problem is pushing pov, you need to acquaint yourself more with core wikipedia policies. I'd suggest starting at WP:RS. -- Mkativerata ( talk) 19:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
A rejection of a communist party source simply because it is a communist party source is about as huge a violation of WP:NPOV as I can imagine. It is also ridiculous, as "western" sources use the same "communist" news agencies as Wikipedia does. Mkativerata ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has tried to reject articles in this way twice now in little over 24 hours, I will not tolerate a third time. Physchim62 (talk) 19:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Ever since you were involved in the preliminary discussion on Non-Roman characters in article titles, there has been a separate proposal regarding the usage of Non-Roman characters in re-directs and DABs, and you may be interested in joining the discussions on this page. Your input will be appreciated. -- HXL 's Roundtable, and Record 23:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
This blatant accusation of RegentsPark without any basis of evidence, one of the respected users in Indian wiki project (other than may be for YogeshKandke) shows you have not taken any effort to really understand the editors and issues clearly. The use of vandal template for User:YellowMonkey is also quite interesting. -- CarTick ( talk) 04:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
On 26 November 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Tongan general election, 2010, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
For someone who claims to not want to feed the trolls, I thought this was a very trollish response. The OP was just trying to indicate they wanted references to actual studies, not off-the-cuff opinions. Saying "you'll get what you get" is really not contributing. If you don't have anything useful to say about a topic, please just refrain from posting on it. I have removed the comment in question. -- Mr.98 ( talk) 02:55, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Physchim62. I noticed your edit and diff insertion and realized that my clarification was probably not procedurally correct and perhaps put you in an awkward position. So, I rephrased it as a response to you. Sorry about that. -- RegentsPark ( talk) 03:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
A proposed closing statement has been posted here. Please could you confirm whether you support or oppose this summary. Thanks. Elen of the Roads ( talk) 21:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated speed of light for FAC. As a major contributor, please leave your 2cents on the review page. TimothyRias ( talk) 16:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I tried to e-mail to the following arbcom-l-owner@lists.wikimedia.org, but the system will not allow it. What I am doing wrong ? Thanks Kanatonian ( talk) 21:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Your use of the term "unconstructive" is entirely too confrontational, unnecessary, and subjective (IMHO, subjectively wrong). Magog the Ogre ( talk) 13:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
On 17 December 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Henry IV of France, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Physchim62. Please participate in the discussion Commons:Commons talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Template:Molecule. -- Leyo 16:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Patent-EU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 19:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
hey there, this is just a bulk message inviting you to re-think the topic as was discussed more than 6 months ago and is still unresolved. feel free to jump here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Icelandic_debt_repayment_referendum,_2010#Time_to_settle_the_title_dispute.3F and help figure out how we can end this conclusively this time. -- Lotsofmagnets ( talk) 02:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, As well as being a Wikipedian, I'm also a curator/employee at ChemSpider and have responded to some of your recent feedback at ChemSpider.org. I believe that I have managed to work out how to solve many of the issues that you experienced with borane compounds. I will go back and try and resolve all of the issues that you pointed out. As a start I have created a record for pentaborane (and amended the WP page). When you view the ChemSpider record the strucuture representation will appear incorrect if you are logged in (due to a bug) but you can see the correct image by either using the Zoom option or logging out.
If you have any questions or comments feel free to get in touch -- The chemistds ( talk) 14:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I am an editor of the article Amount of substance. We have corresponded previously with regard to this article, e.g. here.
After a substantial hiatus, I took a look at the text of Amount of substance. I see that a major change occurred with your edit of 16 February 2010, and that the article has remained substantially the same since then. The comment accompanying your change was “This seems like a quicker fix,” presumably in response to the comment from the previous editor. But that editor merely complained about the then-current lead paragraph. All that he or she did was to move the previous lead paragraph to a new “Overview” section and write a new, much shorter lead paragraph; in particular, that edit deleted nothing. Your edit, on the other hand, deleted more than half of the previous version of the article—its length went from 53,762 bytes to 22,195 bytes.
Did you really mean to cut out that much? If you indeed did mean to do it, could you please explain why, and in particular explain why you deleted from the article all mention of the following topics:
Thank you, and I'm looking forward to your response. Reuqr ( talk) 16:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the prompt reply.
Before we get to discussing any actual specific statements, I suggest we try to see if we are on the same page about what this article should be like. Here is what I think: among other things, this article should address common misconceptions and confusions, something it doesn't do in its present form. I'm saying this because I could imagine someone objecting to this, on the grounds that it is not really encyclopedic to do so. What I'm saying is that I would prefer to err on the side of perhaps being less encyclopedic and more pedagogical, especially if the result is progress in eliminating widespread and persistent confusions. I think the warrant to err on the side of being more, not less, pedagogical is especially strong in the case of an article such as this one, because I'm pretty sure (though I can point to no study as a reference) that the most numerous readers of this particular article will be precisely high school and college students who got confused in their chemistry class. (Of course, one can still go overboard in being pedagogical, which is why it's a good thing there are multiple editors.)
For example, as you pointed out, invocations of the standard batch size concept are quite common; I would add that even reputable sources sometimes use it. It follows that many readers of the Wikipedia article will encounter the standard batch size concept, either before or after reading the Wikipedia article. Either way, this concept and the associated misconceptions are already out there in the world. Here at Wikipedia, we can't erase the presence of this concept in the wider world, but we can do something to help erase the misconceptions to which it may lead. Thus, I think this article should acknowledge that this standard batch size concept exists, indeed that it is common, and then proceed to clarify what is and isn't right about that concept. (Incidentally, the preceding is also my answer to your question, Why even introduce "batch size" when you already know that it will lead to misconceptions?)
Similarly, we do indeed, as you say, confuse students by telling them that the amount of substance is a "standard batch size", but that we can't count the number of items in a batch. I think that this article is a nice place to clarify these issues, perhaps in language that is not too far off from what you just said in reply to my issue (6). After all, isn't Wikipedia these days one of the first places a confused student may turn to for help?
As yet another example of a common misconception, many do not realize the truth of what you said in the first sentence of your reply to my issue (7), namely, that the amount of substance was being measured for more than a hundred years before the absolute number of entities was known. I think that this article is a nice place to make this truth more widely appreciated.
The article in its present form does not include any discussion of these issues. I think that the article should include discussions of these issues, as well as of any other stubborn misconceptions. Can we agree on that basic point? Can we agree that the article should not simply state the official definition, and pretty much just leave it at that—which is more or less the state of the article right now? Reuqr ( talk) 00:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
There has been a major revision of the the
Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.
Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
Herostratus ( talk) 09:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
There has been a major revision of the the
Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.
Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.
Herostratus ( talk) 21:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Do you know "la représentation de Cram"? It's on fr.wiki, but what would it be called in English? Cram projection? Cram structure? Cram notation? DS ( talk) 14:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:USAF-AUX. Since you had some involvement with the Template:USAF-AUX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
You were previously involved. Please see.
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Training and Development Agency for Schools requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 23:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Template:Ecb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Leyo 14:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 ( talk) at 18:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC).
Template:EU regulation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator ( talk) 23:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Added this to Infobox discussion Infobox Talk Page MSDS Section: "We had an awesome ad-hoc thing going with linking to oxford's MSDS service, but as of Dec 2011, that service has been discontinued (liability?)... I am loathe to link to chemical suppliers, but I have been linking infoboxes as I come across them generally to sciencelab.com due tot he comprehensive nature of those MSDS files which comes close to that of the oxford ones. The ICSC cards are good, but they don't function quite like standard MSDS, I feel. Is there perhaps a more permanent resource than chemical supplier sites that we can begin to move the oxford links to?"
Perhaps you have some input? As an undergrad student, I must admit some personal interest in having comprehensive and well laid-out MSDS, but I am unsure of how "international" ICSCs are. Cheers Fourloves 22:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Physchim62. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi PC, long time no see! Anyway, you may be interested in this post. Have you been talking with the polymer people at all? Regards, Walkerma ( talk) 14:21, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Chemicals for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - Mabeenot ( talk) 05:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi PC -- I am a chemical engineer (Master's), and I'm wondering how I could help validate chemical data on the Wikipedia. Please let me know!
Thanks, Paolo -- Paolodm ( talk) 03:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
There is a dispute at Talk:David_Johnston#Order regarding what titles are best for subsections. I think we need a third opinion. I found you edited the page a bunch a few times and you are an experienced editor. One note: User:Miesianiacal has done an exceptionally large percent of edits on this page and is now in an WP:EDITWAR over another point on the same page. Thanks for your help. >> M.P.Schneider,LC ( parlemus • feci) 07:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Physchim62! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editors are welcome! (But being multilingual is not a requirement.) Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 21:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. X Ottawahitech ( talk) 15:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Template:H-phrases/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Leyo 16:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CAT:Chem. Since you had some involvement with the CAT:Chem redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg ( chat) 11:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Stockholm Convention Secretariat.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Basel Convention Secretariat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Template:March5th has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:RXNO cat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:29CFR1910.1018 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 10:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:Housecroft&Sharpe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 11:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Morphine (data page). Since you had some involvement with the Morphine (data page) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Template:RubberBible53rd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 ( talk) 02:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drierite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drierite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella Velella Talk 15:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:Webelements has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:32, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Physchim62. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:CSDG. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:CSDG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 08:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:RXNO has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Template:EU directive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 20:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Physchim62. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I noted you commented on the article Empúries or Ampurias - a few quite respectable editors seem to have differing opinions on the issue. The article uses Empúries for its title, but Ampurias in the text. I've opened a section on the talk page to try to reach a consensus on what to do. (I visited Empúries, but not Ampurias :), yesterday). Bdushaw ( talk) 14:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Physchim62. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Template:Chembox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Throughput rate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Dicdef of obsolete term; new/current terms do not have articles, so not suitable as redirect.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 16:56, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Element color/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Other deprecated Element color templates which you've created are also nominated. Gonnym ( talk) 11:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Trademark-EU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 22:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Copyright-EU has been nominated for merging with Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 19:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Template:Design-EU has been nominated for merging with Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 19:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
A while back you created Template:GHS category, but didn't provide any documentation on how to populate the fields, I was wondering if you still recalled and could provide any information on it.-- The Navigators ( talk) 11:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Template:11thRoC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logan Talk Contributions 03:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Template:InChI URL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TheImaCow ( talk) 09:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:R2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sysages ( talk | contribs) 02:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Repr3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 23:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:Articles with validated CAS Registry Numbers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect ( talk) 04:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Carboxylic acid derivatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:VA-Class Measurement articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Measurement articles for project management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Template:Saint Kitts and Nevis general election, 2010 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 01:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:GHS category has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 13:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Muta2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 13:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Muta3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 13:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated Barthélemy Boganda for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ( t · c) buidhe 05:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Chembox entry. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 21#Template:Chembox entry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DePiep ( talk) 05:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antimony trioxide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nucleus hydro elemon ( talk) 04:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenic trioxide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nucleus hydro elemon ( talk) 04:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beryllium oxide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nucleus hydro elemon ( talk) 08:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Inorganic bromides has been
nominated for merging with
Template:Bromides. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 17:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phosphorus tribromide (data page), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phosphorus tribromide (data page) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arsenic trioxide (data page) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Proton affinity (data page) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.
Template:GHSref has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 11:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:RENFE-Barcelona R1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej ( talk) 18:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Physchim62! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:WP:CHM ACR/Toolbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno ( talk) 17:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Faraday Lecturers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Measurement category quality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 12:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Template:WP:CHM ACR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities, boroughs and towns in the Republic of Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 10:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Template:Periodic table (by valence) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 17:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Apothecaries' system has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 18:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The redirect CAT:Chem has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 22 § CAT:Chem until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)