The result was redirect to Dhankundi. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined prod. Fails WP:NSCHOOL only a primary source provided. LibStar ( talk) 23:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NLIST as this is not discussed as a group within secondary sources. Readers are much better off finding automatically updated team rosters on the league/team websites.
I'm also nominating the following pages per WP:BUNDLE under similar circumstances:
Let'srun ( talk) 16:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Media hasn't covered Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain directly and in-depth, so this fails
WP:GNG. Also, he is a judge of a local court so fails
WP:NJUDGE.
HistoriesUnveiler (
talk) 15:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 17:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, coverage is limited to PR and unreliable sources. I was not able to find coverage that would establish that this is a WP:DUE addition at say, World Mental Health Day, which the subject coincides with. There's a mention at Karen Darke supported by this PR piece which should probably be removed if that's the only source that can be found to support it. signed, Rosguill talk 18:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Now added is the fact that this is a fully registered charity. signed, Ssteedman talk 21:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with significant sources, apparently a pretty generic piece of highway infrastructure Reywas92 Talk 17:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
A list of people, none of whom have their own articles, that's been unsourced since its creation in 2006 except for someone adding the name of a church to the reference section. I'm thinking this fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, does not appear to have ever made it to release, and the only available coverage are unreliable database entries and PR of its production circa 2017. Searching for coverage online, I only found reviews of an unrelated show by the same name. signed, Rosguill talk 16:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Nifty Gateway. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Not notable. Cannot find any reliable non-primary sources about him. Aintabli ( talk) 21:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
No independent coverage - it's all just military websites/publications. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Cannot find any WP:SIGCOV. popodameron talk 22:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on an article on this subject, I'll be happy to restore to Draft space or you can request this at WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, coverage is limited to brief mentions in match writeups and non-independent reporting by his club. signed, Rosguill talk 20:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of any notability given, none found with a google - appears to just be just another run-of-the-mill school. KylieTastic ( talk) 19:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability added since the first nomination for this pseudoscientific nonsense. In the previous keepers' nom says "There are many independent and authoritative sources"; well I found no WP:RS that fit enwiki requirements. - Altenmann >talk 16:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk) 18:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable book series for seven chapbooks. I have looked for reviews on Kirkus Reviews, Booklist, and Publishers Weekly, as well as a general Google and Google Scholar search. I found the chapbooks on ISFDB, but it did not list any reviews or awards for any of the books. I would generally WP:BLAR, but the series has two authors, so it doesn't make sense to redirect to one author and not the other. Further, the page previously highlighted a Creepers book series by Edgar J. Hyde. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 23:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Cited sources are PR or otherwise non-independent. Searching online, I was able to find some brief coverage in Le Figaro ( [3]), but on its own that does not get us to WP:NCORP. The creation of this article alongside articles on simple.wiki and es.wiki, but not fr.wiki, is unusual and suggestive of possible cross-wiki spam. signed, Rosguill talk 19:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 22:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Pourquoi choisir Jet Solidaire ?(why choose Jet Solidaire?),
Un service d’excellence(a service of excellence),
Des critères de sélection draconiens pour une sécurité optimale(Draconian quality control for optimal security), etc. This is not independent coverage, and they advertise services to "enhance your online presence and engage your audience" (
nos services peuvent vous aider à valoriser votre présence en ligne et à engager votre audience de manière significative.on their about page.
lien URL https://www.jetsolidaire.com. Not independent
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. There's some brief mentions in Russian-language writeups of local youth chess tournaments, but no significant biographic coverage. The strongest source I could find was this. signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 22:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. RL0919 ( talk) 22:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, etc.) No evidence of notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to SMS (hydrology software). Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I do not believe that this article meets the criteria in WP:PRODUCT to have its own page. The mentions in secondary sources are rather brief. The Salt Lake Tribune did mention WMS significantly in the article cited, however the heading at the top mentions that the information may be out of date and is for personal research only. Additionally, it seems like this is part of a product line in addition to SMS (hydrology software), which is also a rather short article. However, I am not a hydrology expert, so those who know more about the topic may have further insights on its notability. Sagflaps ( talk) 21:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2010, 2011, 2012, etc.) No evidence of notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of this college football coach to meet WP:GNG. The strongest sources are this interview and some blurbs about his hiring ( 1, 2). I would support draftification as an ATD. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
All of the sources and external links are connected to the subject. Not clear the topic passes WP:GNG due to lack of independent sources. 4meter4 ( talk) 21:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Was PROD deleted then restored via WP:RFU. Single reference added, not enough to fulfill the notability requirements. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Article does not meet guidelines for verifiability and no original research. Subject does not meet guidelines for notability. Bennychloroplast ( talk) 02:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 18:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 19:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kadı Message 18:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but I couldn't find sources to establish that it meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 18:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 19:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Low notability, unable to find any reliable sources. detriaskies 17:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 18:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
This was the only source I found [5]. I'm not sure if it's worth AtD by redirecting to Digital Spy. Ben Azura ( talk) 17:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
There's no indication that this meets WP:CORP or WP:GNG. The company won "Best Hybrid Broker 2022 at the Ultimate Fintech Awards", and "Best Broker Award 2023 by AtoZ Markets", awards of unclear notability from what I can find about them online. Sources cited for the company are press releases, an interview, reviews on sites of unknown reliability, and routine inclusions in listings. There's plenty more of that online, but no significant coverage that I can find in reliable, secondary sources. Wikishovel ( talk) 17:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable invention that got some churnalism coverage when it was created, but there are no further sources ( WP:LASTING) indicating significance or that this ever went beyond a prototype. Reywas92 Talk 15:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
It does not seem to be a real thing, I could not find any mention of this code. I would opt for a redirect to Intellectual rights to magic methods, but if this is a hoax, it should be deleted. Broc ( talk) 12:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Lots of assertions that he is significant as an academic and planner, but no evidence he meets threshold. Boleyn ( talk) 11:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 14:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Although there are passing mentions in those sources, it's not an indication of the subject's notability. Israel's Son 11:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The page has zero references [...] This doesn't suggest notability to meappears to show disrespect for the golden WP:NEXIST rule and strengthens the impression that no serious WP:BEFORE was performed. gidonb ( talk) 20:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
A county-level branch of a political party with no specific claim to notability seperate from the larger party organisation. Fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Much of the article consists of lists of very minor elected officials, such as members of a probate office. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus that this article should be Deleted. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Created today. A collection of armed attacks against Israelis in Israel. Article misuses the label "terrorist", which goes against MOS:TERRORIST. A number of incidents on the list have not been labelled as terrorism by the linked sources, so we have a fundamental OR/SYNTH problem. The list also indiscriminately includes incidents that are arguably not classified as terrorism (e.g., armed attacks against Israeli military installations or personnel). Finally, it can be argued that the list criteria violate WP:NPOV, since the article only considers attacks against Israelis but not against other nationalities. — kashmīrī TALK 12:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
BanyanClimber
(talk) 23:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)meet the three core content policies, however the discussion here is that two out of these three policies are likely not met and so PRESERVE is not applicable. — kashmīrī TALK 08:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
just news reports about individual terrorist attacks and so this list fails WP:NLIST. P-Makoto (she/her) ( talk) 19:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO. Pakistani playback singer, no RS, handout press information repeated in most of the sources here, look out for "Ayaz father’s name is muhammad abid sheikh and grandfather’s abdul khaliq sheikh. Ayaz started a career in radio pakistan hyderabad as an voice acting child artist in 2004." Oh! The very content in this WP page. Submission declined twice, ignored by the author and here we are. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 00:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Unable to verify this meets WP:NALBUM. I could only find one review and it seems to only be noteworthy in the context of being the soundtrack to a popular show. Sources listed are primary or just a listing. I think a redirect to The_Venture_Bros.#Soundtrack_CD would be appropriate. StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk) 02:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 11:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Primary school without any credible claim to meeting notability requirements at WP:NORG; namely "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." AusLondonder ( talk) 11:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Has had no secondary sources since creation, only sources I could find were trivial mentions in local media, certainly not significant coverage. Earlier AfD 16 years ago advanced arguments now rejected by the community regarding school notability. AusLondonder ( talk) 10:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD removed. Namecruft that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. No reliable sources outside of databases, and even then not many are reliable. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Individual maybe passing WP:GNG, but does not pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:NARTIST. It may be WP:WHATNOT User4edits ( talk) 10:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTMEMORIAL, millions died in German concentration camps during WWII and no particular information is given (nor could I find it during a WP:BEFORE) as to why this victim was notable. Geschichte ( talk) 09:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
fails to meet WP:GNG as well WP:POLITICIAN.. the references cited only mention about this death... nom it for deletion per WP:BIO1E Saqib ( talk) 08:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was closed as the page got moved back to draftspace by its creator a few hours after this discussion was initiated. Bearcat ( talk) 16:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Politician in a US Senate race that lost (receiving 2% of the vote). No indication of notability. Primefac ( talk) 07:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
unnotable professor. only sourced to an obituary. ltb d l ( talk) 07:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 09:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Can't find any sources on it. Searching newspapers.com and the Newspaper Archive gives a couple results on Hoff's *next* book, the Tao of Pooh, but nothing on this one. Rusalkii ( talk) 07:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. given search for sources and improvement in the article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Has existed unsourced for nearly 20 years. Lacks any substantive content other than where the club was located. Searches have failed to unearth "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". AusLondonder ( talk) 07:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
no sourcing in here, and no good sourcing online other than event notices and his own website. anyway i think this also meets the WP:TNT thing. Password (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I think I can close this now that the nominator is arguing to Keep this article and the one editor who advocated for Delete has crossed out their "vote". Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Patton is an elite multisport athlete that fails WP:NCOLLATH, WP:NHSPHSATH, WP:NHOOPS and WP:GNG. He has been hired in as a shooting coach by various National Basketball Association teams Timberwolves in 2016, Mavericks in 2018, and Bulls in 2023. These are not roles that generally support notability. High school star player in three sports. Played at DePaul where one year he went 29–53 on threes. No NCAA records or statistical championships. Not even conference statistical championships in the mid-major conferences DePaul was in during his years. This falls far short of any test of notability. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2011. Completely unnotable mayor of a small city, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL, no secondary sources found. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Feel free to create a Redirect from this page title to the target article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable mayor of a small city, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Received some coverage upon his death, though I don't think that means anything. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for lacking sources since 2010. Not clear the subject meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 ( talk) 01:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The review notes: "David Pittu does an admirable job of narrating, giving each character a distinctive voice; listeners may find the chronic raspy quality of Dan's voice wearing by the end of the story. The exaggerated voicing of the bonus material at the end of the story is reminiscent of old time radio shows."
The Book Review Index verifies the publication details of the review.
The review notes: "The series still pushes credulity past the tipping point, but these installments introduce new developments (heretofore cartoonish competitors reveal hints of humanity; the sibs' stalwart nanny becomes suspicious; clues to their parents' death surface) that rejuvenate the foundering plots."
The review notes: "In this fast-paced volume, Amy and Dan are drawn to Russia when they receive a mysterious telegram with a challenge from someone called "N.R.R.""
The review notes: "The temptation to find out what really happened the night their parents died may prove too strong to resist. Full of danger and intrigue - a great game of cat and mouse!"
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done 05:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 04:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:PROF. All 7 sources provided are primary. LibStar ( talk) 03:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. reads like ad copy. ltb d l ( talk) 03:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to StarFist series. ✗ plicit 04:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Contested WP:BLAR. Should be redirected to the series, StarFist series, which appears to be notable.
No reviews on PW/Kirkus, no relevant hits on newspapers.com. PW does review some of the later books in the series: [24]. asilvering ( talk) 01:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Also nominating the other early entries in the series:
The result was redirect to Dhankundi. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined prod. Fails WP:NSCHOOL only a primary source provided. LibStar ( talk) 23:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NLIST as this is not discussed as a group within secondary sources. Readers are much better off finding automatically updated team rosters on the league/team websites.
I'm also nominating the following pages per WP:BUNDLE under similar circumstances:
Let'srun ( talk) 16:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Media hasn't covered Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain directly and in-depth, so this fails
WP:GNG. Also, he is a judge of a local court so fails
WP:NJUDGE.
HistoriesUnveiler (
talk) 15:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 17:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, coverage is limited to PR and unreliable sources. I was not able to find coverage that would establish that this is a WP:DUE addition at say, World Mental Health Day, which the subject coincides with. There's a mention at Karen Darke supported by this PR piece which should probably be removed if that's the only source that can be found to support it. signed, Rosguill talk 18:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Now added is the fact that this is a fully registered charity. signed, Ssteedman talk 21:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with significant sources, apparently a pretty generic piece of highway infrastructure Reywas92 Talk 17:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
A list of people, none of whom have their own articles, that's been unsourced since its creation in 2006 except for someone adding the name of a church to the reference section. I'm thinking this fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, does not appear to have ever made it to release, and the only available coverage are unreliable database entries and PR of its production circa 2017. Searching for coverage online, I only found reviews of an unrelated show by the same name. signed, Rosguill talk 16:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Nifty Gateway. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Not notable. Cannot find any reliable non-primary sources about him. Aintabli ( talk) 21:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
No independent coverage - it's all just military websites/publications. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Cannot find any WP:SIGCOV. popodameron talk 22:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on an article on this subject, I'll be happy to restore to Draft space or you can request this at WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, coverage is limited to brief mentions in match writeups and non-independent reporting by his club. signed, Rosguill talk 20:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of any notability given, none found with a google - appears to just be just another run-of-the-mill school. KylieTastic ( talk) 19:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability added since the first nomination for this pseudoscientific nonsense. In the previous keepers' nom says "There are many independent and authoritative sources"; well I found no WP:RS that fit enwiki requirements. - Altenmann >talk 16:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk) 18:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable book series for seven chapbooks. I have looked for reviews on Kirkus Reviews, Booklist, and Publishers Weekly, as well as a general Google and Google Scholar search. I found the chapbooks on ISFDB, but it did not list any reviews or awards for any of the books. I would generally WP:BLAR, but the series has two authors, so it doesn't make sense to redirect to one author and not the other. Further, the page previously highlighted a Creepers book series by Edgar J. Hyde. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 23:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Cited sources are PR or otherwise non-independent. Searching online, I was able to find some brief coverage in Le Figaro ( [3]), but on its own that does not get us to WP:NCORP. The creation of this article alongside articles on simple.wiki and es.wiki, but not fr.wiki, is unusual and suggestive of possible cross-wiki spam. signed, Rosguill talk 19:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 22:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Pourquoi choisir Jet Solidaire ?(why choose Jet Solidaire?),
Un service d’excellence(a service of excellence),
Des critères de sélection draconiens pour une sécurité optimale(Draconian quality control for optimal security), etc. This is not independent coverage, and they advertise services to "enhance your online presence and engage your audience" (
nos services peuvent vous aider à valoriser votre présence en ligne et à engager votre audience de manière significative.on their about page.
lien URL https://www.jetsolidaire.com. Not independent
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. There's some brief mentions in Russian-language writeups of local youth chess tournaments, but no significant biographic coverage. The strongest source I could find was this. signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 22:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. RL0919 ( talk) 22:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, etc.) No evidence of notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to SMS (hydrology software). Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I do not believe that this article meets the criteria in WP:PRODUCT to have its own page. The mentions in secondary sources are rather brief. The Salt Lake Tribune did mention WMS significantly in the article cited, however the heading at the top mentions that the information may be out of date and is for personal research only. Additionally, it seems like this is part of a product line in addition to SMS (hydrology software), which is also a rather short article. However, I am not a hydrology expert, so those who know more about the topic may have further insights on its notability. Sagflaps ( talk) 21:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2010, 2011, 2012, etc.) No evidence of notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of this college football coach to meet WP:GNG. The strongest sources are this interview and some blurbs about his hiring ( 1, 2). I would support draftification as an ATD. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
All of the sources and external links are connected to the subject. Not clear the topic passes WP:GNG due to lack of independent sources. 4meter4 ( talk) 21:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Was PROD deleted then restored via WP:RFU. Single reference added, not enough to fulfill the notability requirements. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Article does not meet guidelines for verifiability and no original research. Subject does not meet guidelines for notability. Bennychloroplast ( talk) 02:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 18:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 19:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kadı Message 18:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but I couldn't find sources to establish that it meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 18:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 19:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Low notability, unable to find any reliable sources. detriaskies 17:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 18:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
This was the only source I found [5]. I'm not sure if it's worth AtD by redirecting to Digital Spy. Ben Azura ( talk) 17:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
There's no indication that this meets WP:CORP or WP:GNG. The company won "Best Hybrid Broker 2022 at the Ultimate Fintech Awards", and "Best Broker Award 2023 by AtoZ Markets", awards of unclear notability from what I can find about them online. Sources cited for the company are press releases, an interview, reviews on sites of unknown reliability, and routine inclusions in listings. There's plenty more of that online, but no significant coverage that I can find in reliable, secondary sources. Wikishovel ( talk) 17:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable invention that got some churnalism coverage when it was created, but there are no further sources ( WP:LASTING) indicating significance or that this ever went beyond a prototype. Reywas92 Talk 15:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
It does not seem to be a real thing, I could not find any mention of this code. I would opt for a redirect to Intellectual rights to magic methods, but if this is a hoax, it should be deleted. Broc ( talk) 12:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Lots of assertions that he is significant as an academic and planner, but no evidence he meets threshold. Boleyn ( talk) 11:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 14:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Although there are passing mentions in those sources, it's not an indication of the subject's notability. Israel's Son 11:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The page has zero references [...] This doesn't suggest notability to meappears to show disrespect for the golden WP:NEXIST rule and strengthens the impression that no serious WP:BEFORE was performed. gidonb ( talk) 20:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
A county-level branch of a political party with no specific claim to notability seperate from the larger party organisation. Fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Much of the article consists of lists of very minor elected officials, such as members of a probate office. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus that this article should be Deleted. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Created today. A collection of armed attacks against Israelis in Israel. Article misuses the label "terrorist", which goes against MOS:TERRORIST. A number of incidents on the list have not been labelled as terrorism by the linked sources, so we have a fundamental OR/SYNTH problem. The list also indiscriminately includes incidents that are arguably not classified as terrorism (e.g., armed attacks against Israeli military installations or personnel). Finally, it can be argued that the list criteria violate WP:NPOV, since the article only considers attacks against Israelis but not against other nationalities. — kashmīrī TALK 12:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
BanyanClimber
(talk) 23:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)meet the three core content policies, however the discussion here is that two out of these three policies are likely not met and so PRESERVE is not applicable. — kashmīrī TALK 08:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
just news reports about individual terrorist attacks and so this list fails WP:NLIST. P-Makoto (she/her) ( talk) 19:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO. Pakistani playback singer, no RS, handout press information repeated in most of the sources here, look out for "Ayaz father’s name is muhammad abid sheikh and grandfather’s abdul khaliq sheikh. Ayaz started a career in radio pakistan hyderabad as an voice acting child artist in 2004." Oh! The very content in this WP page. Submission declined twice, ignored by the author and here we are. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 00:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Unable to verify this meets WP:NALBUM. I could only find one review and it seems to only be noteworthy in the context of being the soundtrack to a popular show. Sources listed are primary or just a listing. I think a redirect to The_Venture_Bros.#Soundtrack_CD would be appropriate. StreetcarEnjoyer ( talk) 02:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 11:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Primary school without any credible claim to meeting notability requirements at WP:NORG; namely "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." AusLondonder ( talk) 11:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Has had no secondary sources since creation, only sources I could find were trivial mentions in local media, certainly not significant coverage. Earlier AfD 16 years ago advanced arguments now rejected by the community regarding school notability. AusLondonder ( talk) 10:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD removed. Namecruft that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. No reliable sources outside of databases, and even then not many are reliable. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Individual maybe passing WP:GNG, but does not pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:NARTIST. It may be WP:WHATNOT User4edits ( talk) 10:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTMEMORIAL, millions died in German concentration camps during WWII and no particular information is given (nor could I find it during a WP:BEFORE) as to why this victim was notable. Geschichte ( talk) 09:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
fails to meet WP:GNG as well WP:POLITICIAN.. the references cited only mention about this death... nom it for deletion per WP:BIO1E Saqib ( talk) 08:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was closed as the page got moved back to draftspace by its creator a few hours after this discussion was initiated. Bearcat ( talk) 16:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Politician in a US Senate race that lost (receiving 2% of the vote). No indication of notability. Primefac ( talk) 07:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
unnotable professor. only sourced to an obituary. ltb d l ( talk) 07:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 09:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Can't find any sources on it. Searching newspapers.com and the Newspaper Archive gives a couple results on Hoff's *next* book, the Tao of Pooh, but nothing on this one. Rusalkii ( talk) 07:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. given search for sources and improvement in the article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Has existed unsourced for nearly 20 years. Lacks any substantive content other than where the club was located. Searches have failed to unearth "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". AusLondonder ( talk) 07:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
no sourcing in here, and no good sourcing online other than event notices and his own website. anyway i think this also meets the WP:TNT thing. Password (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I think I can close this now that the nominator is arguing to Keep this article and the one editor who advocated for Delete has crossed out their "vote". Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Patton is an elite multisport athlete that fails WP:NCOLLATH, WP:NHSPHSATH, WP:NHOOPS and WP:GNG. He has been hired in as a shooting coach by various National Basketball Association teams Timberwolves in 2016, Mavericks in 2018, and Bulls in 2023. These are not roles that generally support notability. High school star player in three sports. Played at DePaul where one year he went 29–53 on threes. No NCAA records or statistical championships. Not even conference statistical championships in the mid-major conferences DePaul was in during his years. This falls far short of any test of notability. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2011. Completely unnotable mayor of a small city, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL, no secondary sources found. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Feel free to create a Redirect from this page title to the target article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable mayor of a small city, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Received some coverage upon his death, though I don't think that means anything. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for lacking sources since 2010. Not clear the subject meets WP:GNG. 4meter4 ( talk) 01:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The review notes: "David Pittu does an admirable job of narrating, giving each character a distinctive voice; listeners may find the chronic raspy quality of Dan's voice wearing by the end of the story. The exaggerated voicing of the bonus material at the end of the story is reminiscent of old time radio shows."
The Book Review Index verifies the publication details of the review.
The review notes: "The series still pushes credulity past the tipping point, but these installments introduce new developments (heretofore cartoonish competitors reveal hints of humanity; the sibs' stalwart nanny becomes suspicious; clues to their parents' death surface) that rejuvenate the foundering plots."
The review notes: "In this fast-paced volume, Amy and Dan are drawn to Russia when they receive a mysterious telegram with a challenge from someone called "N.R.R.""
The review notes: "The temptation to find out what really happened the night their parents died may prove too strong to resist. Full of danger and intrigue - a great game of cat and mouse!"
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done 05:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 04:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:PROF. All 7 sources provided are primary. LibStar ( talk) 03:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. reads like ad copy. ltb d l ( talk) 03:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to StarFist series. ✗ plicit 04:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Contested WP:BLAR. Should be redirected to the series, StarFist series, which appears to be notable.
No reviews on PW/Kirkus, no relevant hits on newspapers.com. PW does review some of the later books in the series: [24]. asilvering ( talk) 01:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Also nominating the other early entries in the series: