The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
A news website launched 28 days ago & created by a sock. Anyway, i don't see/find any WP:SIGCOV for which it became notable in just 1 month. Fails WP:GNG, WP:WEBSITE. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 21:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear, but let me just add, for the benefit of the IP (if it really is the article subject), please know this is not an artistic judgement of the quality of your work, but an assessment of notability based on Wikipedia policy. It's also not permanent; in the event there's significant coverage in independent, reliable sources establishing notability in the future, the article can be remade. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 01:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
I have found very few actual Reliable Sources that mention this individual. They are all biographies that can be added by the individual or social media pages. Based on the article he has only been involved in a handful of "notable" films, and for those he was minor players in the scheme of things, such as the assistant location manager. VViking Talk Edits 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
moved from talk page
The person in the article, John Schwert, asked me to make some edits to his page. Unfortunately, I am new to this Wikipedia editing, and made some errors with adding links. I have permission from John Schwert to be editing, but please don't delete his page because of my mistakes. Srqflorida ( talk) 14:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
I ran into this one when participating in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny-Farthing Press, as it was suggested that article could be redirected here. However, actually looking into this article, I don't believe this comic is notable itself. The only reviews included are all from the same defunct website, which per the WP:GNG, would only count as a single source for establishing notability. And when I performed various searches, I found pretty much no coverage in reliable sources regarding the series. The most I found were very brief mentions in lists of things that Len Wein had worked on. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it fails the WP:GNG. Rorshacma ( talk) 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. This consensus has be muddied by the sock farm which targeted this discussion, but there is a clear delete consensus reached by uninvolved editors and this consensus is in keeping with the consensus reached at similar AfDs over a number of years. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
While this has lots of sources, it does not appear to have overall context or explanations. Being on the stock market does not inherently make one notable. Ask me about air Cryogenic air ( talk) 18:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 20:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to NCT (group). Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BANDMEMBER criteria. Poirot09 ( talk) 20:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed with "deprod; may be notable; take to AfD" DonaldD23 talk to me 20:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Weak keep:I would like to know the budget of the film and how it performed before it is deleted. Not sure if anyone is willing to research that or if the info exists. If it doesn't it would make a strong case for deletion especially if no additional sources confirming notability can be found.
JRed176 (
talk) 22:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Weak keep: Additional sources should be sought for, for a time that is before a final decision is made.
JRed176 (
talk) 22:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
I do not believe that the family is notable enough to warrant a separate article. The user who created the article reverted my proposed idea of deleting the article on the page with the reason, “The two news article sources in the article and some others and enough for a WP:GNG pass”. I do not believe that two news articles about a family means that the family needs an article. The family is briefly mentioned on the Hitler (name) article as being a family with the surname Hitler that is not related to Adolf Hitler. What does everyone think?-- Abdul Akter ( talk) 18:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
not convinced that this meets our standards of notability. The additional sources listed above do not change that assessment. TompaDompa ( talk) 05:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publisher. Mooonswimmer 18:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This is a list of local politicians ranked by seniority (tellingly, at the time of writing, it has not been updated since the most recent elections in May 2022). The politicians in the list largely fail WP:NPOL, and while established sources (i.e., the council website) do attest to their membership of Cardiff Council, thus meeting WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list of names is also provided by 2022 Cardiff Council election#Ward results, and I fail to see any reason why local politicians should have a separate listing by 'seniority' as well as by alphabetical order of the wards in which they were elected. In summary, I propose that this list is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. (Even if it is, the burden of updating it after changes in council membership is not justified for any usefulness, as evidenced also by there having been no update since the last election eight months ago.) _ MB190417_ ( talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) P1221 ( talk) 08:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
The subject seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. The subject is found mainly in statistic websites (like this one and this one); I wasn't able to find any news covering the subject. In addition, the page is orphan and linked only to two sandboxes. P1221 ( talk) 17:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to E-commerce in Bangladesh. Liz Read! Talk! 19:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This is not functionally distinguishable from E-commerce in Bangladesh. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to Victorian (comics). Mooonswimmer 15:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Weak keep There's a Google presence for them and perhaps more sources could be added. Its stub status doesn't mean it is not notable.
JRed176 (
talk) 22:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hachette (publisher)#Publishing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to Hachette Livre. Mooonswimmer 15:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting.
Hachette Livre is a redirect itself, so it would not be a good redirect or merge target. Do you want to instead use its target page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Small microbrewery with virtually no coverage in the media. The company is only mentioned in blogs/websites dealing with local breweries or in paid posts, no reliable sources Broc ( talk) 15:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Was draftified in the hopes of improving sourcing, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. It gets some mentions, but there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show that it meets GNG. Onel5969 TT me 15:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Linguist111 ( talk) 16:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Actress with bit parts in various things. Only appears in credits lists, which is all the sourcing that's used in the article. No lasting in-depth coverage. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
played a major role in co-creating. She has played multiple lead roles, including in Godspell, to call these "bit parts" is inaccurate.
The result was keep. Consensus is that sufficient sources exist. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
No indication the person is notable other than association with potentially notable company (and company's notability is questionable). UtherSRG (talk) 11:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG️🙃 (
ICE-T •
ICE CUBE) 14:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG️🎉 (
HAPPY
2023) 14:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Giving this discussion one more round in light of the sources recently indicated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG️🎉 (
HAPPY
2023) 14:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 12:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
It has been suggested they are not really all that notable.
I am unsure but can see how they might in fact just be publicity seekers of no lasting notability. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
I will bow to consensus, I am still un sure they are really notable (as opposed to publicity-seeking) but the community does not agree. Slatersteven ( talk) 18:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 14:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Zero in-depth coverage currently in article, or found during searches. Fails WP:GNG. Was redirected, but that was reverted, so now we are here. Onel5969 TT me 13:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
If it was redirected before and the justification was sound for doing so, it should go back to what it was prior. JRed176 ( talk) 18:51, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Survivor BG. Stifle ( talk) 14:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Long list of detailed event descriptions for a reality tv show season, without any independent sources to justify this level of detail. I redirected to Survivor BG#Season 5 which has the major facts about this season, but was reverted, so per WP:AFD the discussion is now here. The proposal is to redirect this, not to delete it. Fram ( talk) 12:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:47, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pirate radio in the United Kingdom. Stifle ( talk) 14:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, conversion to redirect pointing to Pirate radio in the United Kingdom was contested but notability issues remain unaddressed. signed, Rosguill talk 05:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep: The sources convey reliability and sufficient notability.
JRed176 (
talk) 20:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
4.40 Today's pick-up point is Bethnal Green tube; Chris is otherwise engaged, so his colleague Trevor joins us. Our first destination is Shine FM, a 20-minute drive away. Trevor reveals the address. "You've heard about this street, yeah? It's notorious." 4.50 We tune into Shine FM, where Jazzy B's show is already under way. He shouts out to Pluto, then "to the Kings Cross ladies!" 5.00 After a short wait outside a Caribbean food store, a man in a white Le Coq Sportif jacket collects us, taking us through a black door, up five flights of stairs, past a box of unopened bills and a discarded rubber glove, into an empty flat. Shine FM - some decks, a MiniDisc player, speakers and an amp with its £15 Cash Converters sticker still displayed - is based in the kitchen. A spare mic rests on the draining board.
The result was no consensus. Both sides have made policy-based arguments and there is no clear prevailing view – rather, there is a good-faith disagreement regarding whether GNG is passed or not. Stifle ( talk) 14:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Football coach who fails GNG and SPORTSBASIC. Trivial media coverage. BlameRuiner ( talk) 10:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further source analysis may be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 18:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hairspray (musical). (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 12:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Not notable per WP:NSONGS, the information is primarily about the existence of the song rather than substantial information and where coverage exists, its quotes from the overall musical rather than articles specially about the song >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 12:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 00:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find sources online to verify this film and given the fact that the third source used in the article does not verify the statement and the IMDb link leads to a different page (when using a fixed link), makes me question this completely. Can't check the first two sources to see if they are valid. Gonnym ( talk) 08:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi this is the original source 1 where the film Our Prime Minister is cited pls check if it works.
Fostera12 ( talk) 08:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
:* Keep. If the source is now good, it can be kept; there may be additional sources found in Newspapers.com, as is the case in another AFD. As need, info can be inserted about the need for additional souces — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JRed176 -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 23:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Seems like this article passes notability guidelines for politicans. Closing per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk) 00:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
There aren't enough sources available online to warrant a keep on the article. The article itself contains very much unsourced material that I cannot find online to support. I have proceeded to remove some of those. Also, quite a bit of sources that are used in the article are now dead linked. Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk) 06:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This article has existed on WP since 2008 and been tagged since 2018 for not citing sources. Yet it continues to be edited regularly with no effort to provide sourcing for the facts presented. A search for sources provided no credible third-party citations to support the facts being presented here. If we are developing an encylopedia, we must present facts and none of the remarkable detail presented here is supported by factual documentation. Even a dusty Nissan repair manual would do better than nothing. I respectfully suggest that this article be deleted, draftified OR combined with the separate "List of Nissan Engines" article (which, not surprisingly is also absent of any referencing). Volcom95 ( talk) 04:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Non notable singer & promotional article. I am unable to see/find any significant covarage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
All of sources are either interview masquerading-as-an-article or press release type. Didn't won any major/notable award. Fails every criteria of WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 03:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
* Keep: I feel it meets notability standards. I made a couple of edits in the beginning so that it sounds more neutral.
JRed176 (
talk) 19:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Moved to draft by author.. Moved to draftspace by article creator, created in mainspace by accident. Mainspace article deleted. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 04:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence of notability, it relies on his own website, and the other sources merely indicate that publications exist George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 03:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrew. (non-admin closure) Why? I Ask ( talk) 03:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The scope of the list is too huge for one Wikipedia list. There's a reason we have
Lists of American writers, not "List of American writers". China has a much longer literary history than the United States, so making a comprehensive list of Chinese writers is even more hopeless than making a comprehensive list of American writers. This page should be redirected to
Lists of Chinese writers and we should make some sub-lists, (e.g.
List of Chinese playwrights,
List of writers from Yunnan,
List of Uyghur writers, but not
List of Chinese poets, because that would include basically every writer in ancient China.
Mucube (
talk •
contribs) 02:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Very weak sourcing (one of the links is dead, the other is from a source I haven't heard of before), tagged as needing more sources since 2015. The only reliable sources about her are passing mentions. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was userfy and delete. ( non-admin closure) Worldbruce ( talk) 17:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Most of sources are about receiving a prize, but I don't think National Young Artist Art Exhibition is a major well-known and significant award (there are many such awards held every year in Bangladesh which has the word National in it) for which you will get automatic notability.
Apart from some passing mentions, i am unable to see/find any significant covarage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
All of Bengali & English source are either interview masquerading-as-an-article or passing mentions or press release. Fails every criteria of WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 02:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Note: This article has been previously created under as Draft:Mile Phakphum Romsaithong as well as Draft:Phakphum Romsaithong, where it has been moved to mainspace without AfC submission.
The article entirely (while it does cite other sources, it doesn't seem to include much, if any, about the actual person) references YouTube music videos, which doesn't establish any notability. Because of this, the far majority of the page is a violation of WP:BLP due to unsourced content. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 02:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This artist fails WP:ARTIST using the fourth criterion, and likely WP:GNG too. I cannot find any news on him from Google News besides two passing mentions. On regular search I can only find biographies about him, a few websites with pictures of some of his art, and sites selling his works. The one reference on the page is also a website selling his art. The only unique site I found about him is one person who had written part of their dissertation on Kenneth. Although the page itself can't be used as a reference because it is a blog, the references from the page could possibly contain more than a passing mention, which could pass GPG. However, he does not seem to pass ARTIST at all. Capsulecap ( talk • contribs) 02:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
*Keep He's definitely an accomplished artist and seems to pass
WP:ARTIST. If your in a gallery, an online encyclopedia like Wikipedia is where you'd check for more information.
Wikipedia Editor (
talk) 22:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting once more. Seems like a consensus for Weak Keep but hoping for more reliable sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 02:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
We have a patreon, three student sources, a self-published WordPress zine and two Screen Rant listicles for sources. I'm unsure about the reliability of Hyperreal Film Club. I'm an analog horror fan, but even bigger ones like the Mandela Catalogue don't have sufficient sourcing to warrant their own articles. — VORTEX 3427 ( Talk!) 01:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 02:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Ukrainian musician, lack of notability, instagram and couple of local news about his debuts Anntinomy ( talk) 22:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 02:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Seems like No consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. ~ Nanosci ( talk) 00:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As stated, previously PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option. It might be worth some time to consider possible Merge targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Not even a match at the top division. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 01:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Not even a match in the top division. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 00:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Only 1 game in Serbian top division. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 00:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Adobe FrameMaker#History. Liz Read! Talk! 02:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Potentially notable but zero coverage. Prod1 and 2 tags which were accurare, have been removed by caustic WP:SPA. scope_creep Talk 00:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Insteon#Corporate history. Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are company blogs, patents, aquisitions, company documents, partnership and press-releases. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:DEL4, WP:DEL14. scope_creep Talk 00:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
: Merge into
Insteon#Corporate history: I second that.
JRed176 (
talk) 18:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Of the 14 refs, 2 product reviews, 2 press-releases, 4 Non-rs, 1 manual, 1 passing mention, 1 404, 1 WP:NOT fail and 2 secondary refs. No indication of being notable due to lack of coverage. scope_creep Talk 11:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
A news website launched 28 days ago & created by a sock. Anyway, i don't see/find any WP:SIGCOV for which it became notable in just 1 month. Fails WP:GNG, WP:WEBSITE. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 21:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear, but let me just add, for the benefit of the IP (if it really is the article subject), please know this is not an artistic judgement of the quality of your work, but an assessment of notability based on Wikipedia policy. It's also not permanent; in the event there's significant coverage in independent, reliable sources establishing notability in the future, the article can be remade. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 01:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
I have found very few actual Reliable Sources that mention this individual. They are all biographies that can be added by the individual or social media pages. Based on the article he has only been involved in a handful of "notable" films, and for those he was minor players in the scheme of things, such as the assistant location manager. VViking Talk Edits 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
moved from talk page
The person in the article, John Schwert, asked me to make some edits to his page. Unfortunately, I am new to this Wikipedia editing, and made some errors with adding links. I have permission from John Schwert to be editing, but please don't delete his page because of my mistakes. Srqflorida ( talk) 14:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
I ran into this one when participating in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny-Farthing Press, as it was suggested that article could be redirected here. However, actually looking into this article, I don't believe this comic is notable itself. The only reviews included are all from the same defunct website, which per the WP:GNG, would only count as a single source for establishing notability. And when I performed various searches, I found pretty much no coverage in reliable sources regarding the series. The most I found were very brief mentions in lists of things that Len Wein had worked on. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it fails the WP:GNG. Rorshacma ( talk) 20:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. This consensus has be muddied by the sock farm which targeted this discussion, but there is a clear delete consensus reached by uninvolved editors and this consensus is in keeping with the consensus reached at similar AfDs over a number of years. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
While this has lots of sources, it does not appear to have overall context or explanations. Being on the stock market does not inherently make one notable. Ask me about air Cryogenic air ( talk) 18:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 20:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to NCT (group). Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BANDMEMBER criteria. Poirot09 ( talk) 20:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM, no reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed with "deprod; may be notable; take to AfD" DonaldD23 talk to me 20:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Weak keep:I would like to know the budget of the film and how it performed before it is deleted. Not sure if anyone is willing to research that or if the info exists. If it doesn't it would make a strong case for deletion especially if no additional sources confirming notability can be found.
JRed176 (
talk) 22:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Weak keep: Additional sources should be sought for, for a time that is before a final decision is made.
JRed176 (
talk) 22:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
I do not believe that the family is notable enough to warrant a separate article. The user who created the article reverted my proposed idea of deleting the article on the page with the reason, “The two news article sources in the article and some others and enough for a WP:GNG pass”. I do not believe that two news articles about a family means that the family needs an article. The family is briefly mentioned on the Hitler (name) article as being a family with the surname Hitler that is not related to Adolf Hitler. What does everyone think?-- Abdul Akter ( talk) 18:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
not convinced that this meets our standards of notability. The additional sources listed above do not change that assessment. TompaDompa ( talk) 05:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publisher. Mooonswimmer 18:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This is a list of local politicians ranked by seniority (tellingly, at the time of writing, it has not been updated since the most recent elections in May 2022). The politicians in the list largely fail WP:NPOL, and while established sources (i.e., the council website) do attest to their membership of Cardiff Council, thus meeting WP:LISTPEOPLE, this list of names is also provided by 2022 Cardiff Council election#Ward results, and I fail to see any reason why local politicians should have a separate listing by 'seniority' as well as by alphabetical order of the wards in which they were elected. In summary, I propose that this list is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. (Even if it is, the burden of updating it after changes in council membership is not justified for any usefulness, as evidenced also by there having been no update since the last election eight months ago.) _ MB190417_ ( talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) P1221 ( talk) 08:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
The subject seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. The subject is found mainly in statistic websites (like this one and this one); I wasn't able to find any news covering the subject. In addition, the page is orphan and linked only to two sandboxes. P1221 ( talk) 17:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to E-commerce in Bangladesh. Liz Read! Talk! 19:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This is not functionally distinguishable from E-commerce in Bangladesh. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to Victorian (comics). Mooonswimmer 15:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Weak keep There's a Google presence for them and perhaps more sources could be added. Its stub status doesn't mean it is not notable.
JRed176 (
talk) 22:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 01:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hachette (publisher)#Publishing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable publishing company. Redirect to Hachette Livre. Mooonswimmer 15:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting.
Hachette Livre is a redirect itself, so it would not be a good redirect or merge target. Do you want to instead use its target page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Small microbrewery with virtually no coverage in the media. The company is only mentioned in blogs/websites dealing with local breweries or in paid posts, no reliable sources Broc ( talk) 15:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Was draftified in the hopes of improving sourcing, but was returned to mainspace without improvement. It gets some mentions, but there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show that it meets GNG. Onel5969 TT me 15:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Linguist111 ( talk) 16:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Actress with bit parts in various things. Only appears in credits lists, which is all the sourcing that's used in the article. No lasting in-depth coverage. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
played a major role in co-creating. She has played multiple lead roles, including in Godspell, to call these "bit parts" is inaccurate.
The result was keep. Consensus is that sufficient sources exist. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
No indication the person is notable other than association with potentially notable company (and company's notability is questionable). UtherSRG (talk) 11:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG️🙃 (
ICE-T •
ICE CUBE) 14:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG️🎉 (
HAPPY
2023) 14:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Giving this discussion one more round in light of the sources recently indicated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ASTIG️🎉 (
HAPPY
2023) 14:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 12:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
It has been suggested they are not really all that notable.
I am unsure but can see how they might in fact just be publicity seekers of no lasting notability. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
I will bow to consensus, I am still un sure they are really notable (as opposed to publicity-seeking) but the community does not agree. Slatersteven ( talk) 18:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 14:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Zero in-depth coverage currently in article, or found during searches. Fails WP:GNG. Was redirected, but that was reverted, so now we are here. Onel5969 TT me 13:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
If it was redirected before and the justification was sound for doing so, it should go back to what it was prior. JRed176 ( talk) 18:51, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Survivor BG. Stifle ( talk) 14:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Long list of detailed event descriptions for a reality tv show season, without any independent sources to justify this level of detail. I redirected to Survivor BG#Season 5 which has the major facts about this season, but was reverted, so per WP:AFD the discussion is now here. The proposal is to redirect this, not to delete it. Fram ( talk) 12:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:47, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pirate radio in the United Kingdom. Stifle ( talk) 14:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, conversion to redirect pointing to Pirate radio in the United Kingdom was contested but notability issues remain unaddressed. signed, Rosguill talk 05:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep: The sources convey reliability and sufficient notability.
JRed176 (
talk) 20:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
4.40 Today's pick-up point is Bethnal Green tube; Chris is otherwise engaged, so his colleague Trevor joins us. Our first destination is Shine FM, a 20-minute drive away. Trevor reveals the address. "You've heard about this street, yeah? It's notorious." 4.50 We tune into Shine FM, where Jazzy B's show is already under way. He shouts out to Pluto, then "to the Kings Cross ladies!" 5.00 After a short wait outside a Caribbean food store, a man in a white Le Coq Sportif jacket collects us, taking us through a black door, up five flights of stairs, past a box of unopened bills and a discarded rubber glove, into an empty flat. Shine FM - some decks, a MiniDisc player, speakers and an amp with its £15 Cash Converters sticker still displayed - is based in the kitchen. A spare mic rests on the draining board.
The result was no consensus. Both sides have made policy-based arguments and there is no clear prevailing view – rather, there is a good-faith disagreement regarding whether GNG is passed or not. Stifle ( talk) 14:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Football coach who fails GNG and SPORTSBASIC. Trivial media coverage. BlameRuiner ( talk) 10:11, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further source analysis may be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 18:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hairspray (musical). (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 12:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Not notable per WP:NSONGS, the information is primarily about the existence of the song rather than substantial information and where coverage exists, its quotes from the overall musical rather than articles specially about the song >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 12:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 00:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Can't find sources online to verify this film and given the fact that the third source used in the article does not verify the statement and the IMDb link leads to a different page (when using a fixed link), makes me question this completely. Can't check the first two sources to see if they are valid. Gonnym ( talk) 08:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi this is the original source 1 where the film Our Prime Minister is cited pls check if it works.
Fostera12 ( talk) 08:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
:* Keep. If the source is now good, it can be kept; there may be additional sources found in Newspapers.com, as is the case in another AFD. As need, info can be inserted about the need for additional souces — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
JRed176 -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 23:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Seems like this article passes notability guidelines for politicans. Closing per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk) 00:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
There aren't enough sources available online to warrant a keep on the article. The article itself contains very much unsourced material that I cannot find online to support. I have proceeded to remove some of those. Also, quite a bit of sources that are used in the article are now dead linked. Wikiexplorationandhelping ( talk) 06:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This article has existed on WP since 2008 and been tagged since 2018 for not citing sources. Yet it continues to be edited regularly with no effort to provide sourcing for the facts presented. A search for sources provided no credible third-party citations to support the facts being presented here. If we are developing an encylopedia, we must present facts and none of the remarkable detail presented here is supported by factual documentation. Even a dusty Nissan repair manual would do better than nothing. I respectfully suggest that this article be deleted, draftified OR combined with the separate "List of Nissan Engines" article (which, not surprisingly is also absent of any referencing). Volcom95 ( talk) 04:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Non notable singer & promotional article. I am unable to see/find any significant covarage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
All of sources are either interview masquerading-as-an-article or press release type. Didn't won any major/notable award. Fails every criteria of WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 03:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
* Keep: I feel it meets notability standards. I made a couple of edits in the beginning so that it sounds more neutral.
JRed176 (
talk) 19:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Moved to draft by author.. Moved to draftspace by article creator, created in mainspace by accident. Mainspace article deleted. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 04:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
There is no evidence of notability, it relies on his own website, and the other sources merely indicate that publications exist George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 03:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrew. (non-admin closure) Why? I Ask ( talk) 03:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The scope of the list is too huge for one Wikipedia list. There's a reason we have
Lists of American writers, not "List of American writers". China has a much longer literary history than the United States, so making a comprehensive list of Chinese writers is even more hopeless than making a comprehensive list of American writers. This page should be redirected to
Lists of Chinese writers and we should make some sub-lists, (e.g.
List of Chinese playwrights,
List of writers from Yunnan,
List of Uyghur writers, but not
List of Chinese poets, because that would include basically every writer in ancient China.
Mucube (
talk •
contribs) 02:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Very weak sourcing (one of the links is dead, the other is from a source I haven't heard of before), tagged as needing more sources since 2015. The only reliable sources about her are passing mentions. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was userfy and delete. ( non-admin closure) Worldbruce ( talk) 17:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Most of sources are about receiving a prize, but I don't think National Young Artist Art Exhibition is a major well-known and significant award (there are many such awards held every year in Bangladesh which has the word National in it) for which you will get automatic notability.
Apart from some passing mentions, i am unable to see/find any significant covarage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
All of Bengali & English source are either interview masquerading-as-an-article or passing mentions or press release. Fails every criteria of WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 02:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Note: This article has been previously created under as Draft:Mile Phakphum Romsaithong as well as Draft:Phakphum Romsaithong, where it has been moved to mainspace without AfC submission.
The article entirely (while it does cite other sources, it doesn't seem to include much, if any, about the actual person) references YouTube music videos, which doesn't establish any notability. Because of this, the far majority of the page is a violation of WP:BLP due to unsourced content. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 02:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
This artist fails WP:ARTIST using the fourth criterion, and likely WP:GNG too. I cannot find any news on him from Google News besides two passing mentions. On regular search I can only find biographies about him, a few websites with pictures of some of his art, and sites selling his works. The one reference on the page is also a website selling his art. The only unique site I found about him is one person who had written part of their dissertation on Kenneth. Although the page itself can't be used as a reference because it is a blog, the references from the page could possibly contain more than a passing mention, which could pass GPG. However, he does not seem to pass ARTIST at all. Capsulecap ( talk • contribs) 02:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
*Keep He's definitely an accomplished artist and seems to pass
WP:ARTIST. If your in a gallery, an online encyclopedia like Wikipedia is where you'd check for more information.
Wikipedia Editor (
talk) 22:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting once more. Seems like a consensus for Weak Keep but hoping for more reliable sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 ( HAPPY 2023) 02:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
We have a patreon, three student sources, a self-published WordPress zine and two Screen Rant listicles for sources. I'm unsure about the reliability of Hyperreal Film Club. I'm an analog horror fan, but even bigger ones like the Mandela Catalogue don't have sufficient sourcing to warrant their own articles. — VORTEX 3427 ( Talk!) 01:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 02:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Ukrainian musician, lack of notability, instagram and couple of local news about his debuts Anntinomy ( talk) 22:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:47, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 02:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Seems like No consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. ~ Nanosci ( talk) 00:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As stated, previously PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option. It might be worth some time to consider possible Merge targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:52, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Not even a match at the top division. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 01:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Not even a match in the top division. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 00:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Only 1 game in Serbian top division. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 00:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Adobe FrameMaker#History. Liz Read! Talk! 02:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Potentially notable but zero coverage. Prod1 and 2 tags which were accurare, have been removed by caustic WP:SPA. scope_creep Talk 00:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Insteon#Corporate history. Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are company blogs, patents, aquisitions, company documents, partnership and press-releases. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:DEL4, WP:DEL14. scope_creep Talk 00:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
: Merge into
Insteon#Corporate history: I second that.
JRed176 (
talk) 18:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC) -
WP:SOCKSTRIKE -
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Of the 14 refs, 2 product reviews, 2 press-releases, 4 Non-rs, 1 manual, 1 passing mention, 1 404, 1 WP:NOT fail and 2 secondary refs. No indication of being notable due to lack of coverage. scope_creep Talk 11:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)