The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
This organization, which existed from 2010 to 2018, is simply not notable. It fails WP:ORGSIG. There is no evidence it ever did or achieved anything other than conduct a short-lived programme of advocacy. Most of the sources are primary or self-published, with a bunch of pieces penned by Cherie Blair, who was one of the founders, several corporate website links, a companies house link (which is just a registration profile), some dead links, and a few more that fail verification. Altogether pretty dismal sourcing, and no significant coverage. Even with the sourcing being largely primary, there is still nothing to really suggest that the organization ever actually achieved or impacted anything. Iskandar323 ( talk) 16:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR with just one major role, in a relatively obscure film, Itty Bitty Titty Committee. No significant media coverage, and her career seems to have stalled. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
There seems to be a lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Most of the sources in the article are from the subject of the article and the article was almost entirely written by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/R.o.t (note the initials).
Searching JSTOR for "Raimo Olavi Toivonen" yields 0 results, searching for "Raimo Toivonen" yields 1 result. The one main space article that links to this is Aatto Sonninen which was written by the same blocked sockpuppeting account. Searching Google Scholar does find some papers and references to their papers, but it doesn't seem significant compared to any random researcher. Also see User_talk:R.o.t/Archives/2020/November. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 22:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
IP sock of indef blocked user R.o.t making trouble
|
---|
|
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. References are very poor for a WP:BLP scope_creep Talk 17:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
I would have liked to accomodate those seeking a Merge but no one replied to my query asking for a target article to Merge this one to. But since it is a Soft Deletion, this article can be restored should you ever create that target article. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm the creator of this article. Following last month's deletion discussion of List of Criterion Collection releases (which ultimately resulted in that article being deleted), it seems that this article would fail an AfD just as well. Minor note: one difference between this article and the Criterion one is that all entries (at least the ones I contributed to the page) are accompanied by primary or secondary sources. However, the main guideline cited in the Criterion deletion discussion was WP:NOTDIRECTORY, which I believe is independent of whether or not the material in question is supported by citations. — Matthew / ( talk) 20:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd love to accommodate some of your wishes for a Merge but without an existing target article to Merge to, this article will most likely be deleted. Here's another week to get something resembling a decent llist article together.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Burundi women's national football team. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least six caps for the Burundi women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, is there a possible redirect here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would a redirect to
Burundi women's national football team be acceptable?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least two caps for the Panama women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is one editor arguing to Keep this article. If there is no further support coming in the next week, would those advocating Delete object to a Redirect as the nominator suggests?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. Black Kite (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least three caps for the Panama women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Half the participants are advocating for a Redirect but that still leaves half wanting a different resolution so I'm relisting this discussion another week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:41, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. After discounting the views of the now blocked sockpuppets, there was a clear consensus here to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable reputation management company. Fails WP:NCORP. Mercenf ( talk) 15:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:29, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Giving this discussion one more relist. As an aside, I've never seen service review sites considered a RS as far Wikipedia standards go as they are user-generated content that rarely receive any editorial oversight.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:35, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
"We fix negative Google search results. We have created exclusive partnerships…"The 2 review sites you referenced don't remotely meet our reliable sources requirement.
Be completely independent of the article subject.NZ Herald depends very heavily on quotes and attributed statements an executive employee (
Net Reputation executive Ryan Sherman Jnr) of the subject:
Sherman Jnr said his company’s strategy in trying to preserve the online reputation of a person charged or convicted of sexual assault would not be attempting to get online media articles taken down post-conviction. “Removal would not be the approach if Mr Molloy were the suspect in this case,” Sherman Jnr said. “We would manipulate the search engine using a branding campaign with high-end digital assets to suppress the information. That being said, we like to be proactive in situations like this. Of course, it was a stretch, but there were some clues on why I had my suspicions about Mr Molloy. If you look at the blurred-out pictures, his shoulders match the individual, and his name is also spoken about in multiple blog threads regarding this case. “Apologies that my suspicions were wrong this time around. We typically contact people who are actually in trouble versus playing guessing games as we did here.” Sherman Jnr said they had approached three individuals in relation to the Waitākere District Court sex assault case and all existing Net Reputation clients are under non-disclosure agreements. “I am no professional investigator, so I will do these individuals justice and leave them unnamed as I am in discussion with them currently to help with their reputation online,” Sherman Jnr said. “We target individuals and companies across the world. Not just New Zealand.”This article cannot be considered completely independent of the subject per SIRS requirements.
Being new to an industry can come with its challenges, but it’s also an opportunity to grow tremendously, Petrilli has learned....By 2017, Petrilli says the company had grown to $3.5 million, up 150%. “In the grand scheme of just being a small business, going from zero to $1.4 million — there was a lot to do there,” he says. “It’s very hectic to maintain a certain level of growth.”...“We were in a new industry so there wasn’t really a playbook,” he says....“The severity of it and what they need will vary from customer to customer based on the problem,” he says. “If you have a big reputation, like a big company or celebrity, you’re going to need more resources than the teacher who’s from Sarasota High School who maybe did something he or she wasn’t supposed to.”. The majority of the clients come to them, but Petrilli says if someone is involved in something on a national level, the company might reach out on its own. In revenue, Petrilli says his company only has two big competitors: Reputation.com, which surpassed $100 million in annual recurring revenue earlier this year in addition to a $150 million minority growth investment; and Reputation Defender, a company Pertrilli says is slightly ahead in revenue compared to NetReputation. ... “We’re on pace to be the second largest full-service reputation management agency in America,” he says, a statistic he provided based on revenue. “It’s a testament to being focused on growth as a company.” In addition, to the team and the market opportunity, another big driver for the success, Petrilli says, is reinvesting back into the organization. ... "More people than ever are online,” Petrilli says, “so more people than ever need a solution to be online.”
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:siroxo
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tampa Bay Times [7] | SIRS requires complete independence This iis based on quote by founder |
one-sentence paragraph, doesn't meet CORPDEPTH | ✘ No | |
Business Observer [8] | heavily depends on founder's quotes and attributed statements | ✘ No | ||
NZ Herald | Ryan Sherman Jnr, executive employee of subject is quoted several times in peice | ✘ No | ||
Intl Business Times [9] | Closes with a promotional quote from CEO/founder | WP:IBTIMES | ✘ No | |
Superb Crew [10] | interview with founder | ? | ✘ No | |
Acesswire [11] | PR wire | ~ | ~ | ✘ No |
Business Wire [12] | PR wire | ~ | ✘ No | |
inc.com [13] | "Information provided by company." | ? | ~ | ✘ No |
MirrorReview [14] | ? | "The magazine also promotes enterprises that serve their clients with futuristic offerings and acute integrity" | ✘ No | |
QuickSprout [15] | ? | seems to have weak editorial practices, this article was credited to the owner of QuickSprout, they have no listed editorial staff | ✘ No | |
Top Work Places [16] | voice of company, uses employee feedback too | ~ | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Checkuser note:, the closer should pay careful attention to the accounts in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Seriy333. This discussion is full of now-blocked socks. Courcelles ( talk) 17:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Reggie White. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Article is about a minor charitable program run by a relatively minor charity. Sources listed and those I've searched for all seem to be press release style articles with no discussion of scope, effect, efficacy, etc. Seems to fail WP:ORG and warrants deletion. AP1787 ( talk) 20:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
No available source on the Internet whatsoever, despite trying to use all my Google-wizardry. Likely to be something not noteworthy at all, even if it is it can be incorporated into Internet in Turkey article. ahmetlii ✉ (Please ping me on a reply!) 19:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced article about a television series, not making any strong claim to passage of WP:TVSHOW. The only notability claim being attempted at all is that it existed, and the only "source" is the self-published website of the channel that aired it -- and while a WP:BEFORE search turned up a handful of glancing namechecks of the fact that this existed, I found absolutely no substantive coverage about the series to get it over WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 19:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced article about a series of short films, not making any strong claim to passing WP:NFILM or WP:TVSHOW. The only notability claim even really being attempted here at all is that it existed, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of media coverage about it to get it over WP:GNG -- but literally the only "source" here is the self-published website of the television channel that purportedly aired these, and absolutely no GNG-worthy coverage in media independent of the topic has proven locatable at all on a WP:BEFORE search. There's just nothing here that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from actually having to have had any media coverage. (Also probably conflict of interest, as it was first created by a virtual WP:SPA whose only other Wikipedia edits also pertained to the work of this series' creators.) Bearcat ( talk) 19:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Individual has not met notability guidelines, with no solid demonstrations of notability provided even after months of having an active page. Relevant reporting seems to be extremely limited to the fallout of the Johnny Depp Amber Heard trials, and most of that reporting is in tabloids and celeb gossip rags. Pretty much anything else that turns up about the article subject is her own writing or social media pages. Best case scenario, it may be possible to merge what brief information there is into the related articles. Paragon Deku ( talk) 17:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The author of this article, Jeavinparklee, has a Conflict of interest. Firstly, his initial edit from his account on Vishvendra Singh has been reverted for "inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content".
Context: Vishvendra Singh joined the congress in 2008 over conflict with his party colleague Digamber Singh.
This user has made a lot of unsourced additions in-between properly cited additions to Digamber Singh in the last 7 days. And has created Dr. Digamber Singh Pro Kabaddi Tournament which has been moved to draft now. He has also created Dr. Digamber Singh ‘Samadhi’.
Secondly, This account has been only used to promote Digamber Singh and his family members till now. After a brief search, Shailesh Digamber Singh was previously created on 10 March 2023 and moved to draft on 11 March 2023 by an admin, Refer - Draft:Shailesh Digamber Singh. Now it looks like Jeavinparklee can be a sock of Af1grazel or Kirat sinh (Sock account already banned). All three accounts mentioned above have only been used to promote Digamber Singh and his family till now.
Thirdly, Shailesh Digamber Singh fails WP:N. There is no significant coverage of him. A simple Google search result shows not even a single reliable source discussing him except for trivial mentions. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Out of the 6 sources cited in the article, only 2 of them are reliable, one discusses his loss against Vishvendra Singh and the other one is a trivial mention. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 17:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dainik Bhaskar | Yes. | ? It is unclear whether or not this newspaper is reliable enough for the English wiki. | Brief mention that he is running (not sufficient according to WP:NPOL. | ✘ No |
Hindustan Times | Yes. | Legit news organization. | Passing mention in an article about his dad. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Isn't it a hoax? Embellishment? The article was created in the spirit of the author: there are fewer Kazakhs, more opponents, but the Kazakhs still win and even do not suffer any special losses. Kazman322 ( talk) 17:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pugachev's Rebellion. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Significance of the event? Kazman322 ( talk) 17:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This academic society does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGCRIT, or any other notability guideline. Indeed, I have not been able to find any WP:SECONDARY coverage that discusses it in any depth. Coverage appears to be limited to glancing mentions in marginal sources like these: [17] [18]. A "relies excessively on references to primary sources" tag has been present on the page since 2008, with no attempt to address the issue since then. My attention was drawn to this article by recent apparent COI editing. Generalrelative ( talk) 17:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
I just finished removing all the dumb award lists, self-coverage, press releases, and general cruft from this article and after doing it, I realized I was left with almost nothing as far as WP:RS goes for SigCov.
I suggest looking at the version before I canned almost everything. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Deepak_Ohri&oldid=1167447417
The other side of this coin is I did find some coverage which appeared to be independent and significant.
There's a LOT of press release reposts, meaningless lists, paid-for coverage, coverage by entites he's associated with, etc etc etc. Every time I think I've found something that's a real coverage, it's paid for, unverified, or non-independent. Really struggling to find anything to meet GNG apart from these two short news segments.
Every source that discusses him, even if independent-seeming just gushes over his various successes and provides no actual substance. Take a look at this source for example:
Is this independent? Reliable? Significant? Maybe? If this meets the bar, then he has dozens of sources to meet GNG. If it doesn't (which I don't think it does), he might just be non-notable. The presence of an SPA who's spent the last few years ass-blasting irrelevant content into the article doesn't help.
BrigadierG ( talk) 17:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The page should not be deleted. It is rewritten. Deepak Ohri is well-known entrepreneur with a long career in the hospitality industry. The references are independent and include: BBC, ABC News, Robb Report, Forbes, Bloomberg, Harvard Business Publishing. - DSan22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DSan22 ( talk • contribs) 12:18, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
The page should not be deleted. It is rewritten. Deepak Ohri is well-known entrepreneur with a long career in the hospitality industry. The references are independent and include: BBC, ABC News, Robb Report, Forbes, Bloomberg, Harvard Business Publishing. -- DSan22 ( talk) 12:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)DSan22
The page should stay.
The page had in-depth coverage, but another user modified it and deleted most of the content. Currently, the page has content with references from various independent sources. The page was created several years ago and was never questioned. All is documented. -- DSan22 ( talk) 23:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Bigg Boss OTT (Hindi season 2). TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This seems like a case of WP:BLP1E. Most of the news coverage I can find of Fukra Insaan is centered around Bigg Boss OTT and nothing else. Deauthorized. ( talk) 17:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hypnotize (album). Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This was previously nominated for deletion sixteen years ago, when it was redirected to the article Hypnotize (album). There are only four sources, none of which independently discuss the song or assert any kind of notability outside of the album it appears on. I was willing to take a look at the article to see if it had improved in the years since the original discussion, and clearly it hasn't done so by much. Seems like a no-brainer redirect, but I want to open up discussion so that others can have input. JeffSpaceman ( talk) 16:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a politician, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NPOL. The basis for creation here was that she was recently announced as her party's candidate in an upcoming provincial legislature by-election -- but the notability test at that level is holding a seat in the legislature, not just running for one, and as yet unelected candidates get articles only if they already had preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy. But the only other attempted notability claim here is that she has served on the municipal council of a midsized city that is not in the rarefied tier of internationally prominent
global cities, which is also not "inherently" notable either — even incumbent city councillors in most cities get articles only if they can mount a credible claim that their time on city council was a special case of significantly greater notability than most other city councillors, but that hasn't been shown here at all.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation after by-election day if she wins the seat, but nothing here is already enough to already earn her a Wikipedia article now.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was redirect per WP:BOLD revert by Beyond My Ken. ( non-admin closure) JMWt ( talk) 16:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
unencyclopedic content, no references, no claims to notability on the page. Previously a redirect. JMWt ( talk) 15:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
The article is entirely unsourced, and I am quite sure that the article topic is non-notable. In English, I could only find one RS discussing the game in a significant manner besides standard release information. Checking the linked other-language versions of the page, there don't seem to be any non-English RS with significant coverage of the game either. QuietCicada ( talk) 15:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator Thank you both for finding those sources. :) QuietCicada ( talk) 12:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 17:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Uppala is a small town in the Indian state of Kerala. Not even a single mosque/temple in the list has a Wikipedia article. Not a single source is cited. I would suggest a merge with List of Hindu temples in Kerala and List of mosques in Kerala but I don't think any content can be salvaged to merge. AmateurHi$torian ( talk) 15:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. If people want to redirect it can be discussed on the talk. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The character, originated in the first Superman film, doesn't seem notable. The article consists of the plot only, and there is no reliable source. Redjedi23 ( talk) 15:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Notability. This page appears to be an advertisement/blog for Neural Lab, it lacks any sources that refer to Neural Lab. I could not find any reputable source that mentions this software. The talk page is filled with accounts that appear to be sockpuppets created for the sole purpose of promoting the software. Chemeez ( talk) 14:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect challenged. The coverage is mostly PR-based, and it still fails to meet WP:GNG. Mercenf ( talk) 14:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that there is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to assert notability. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The one source listed might not be reliable (not sure if it's self-published/user-generated) and seems biased (relying on machine translation for determining that though); I personally couldn't find any other reliable sources about this place (all the ones I could find were user-generated). I don't believe this is notable enough for an article, based on my research. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 14:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — Mdaniels5757 ( talk • contribs) 17:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
No sources that establish notability. Skyerise ( talk) 14:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 17:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Totally unsourced. Just looks like an advert for the temple - Rich T| C| E-Mail 14:35, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable firm. Sourced to an interview; USGS page doesn't appear to mention it. Valereee ( talk) 14:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
I am having doubts this person meets WP:NBIO ( WP:NAUTHOR?). I am not seeing WP:SIGCOV coverage of his life, just some mentions in passing, and many sources don't look very reliable. AfD from 2010 had arguments that some of his works have been reviewed by reliable sources (assuming Yoga Journal is reliable...), but WP:NOTINHERITED. Maybe some of his works are notable if they have been reviewed and meet WP:NBOOK, but that doesn't mean the author is notable too. On a side note, if this is kept, we need to deal with promotional language ("Over the years that followed, Prabhupada showered Tripurari with affection and repeatedly expressed his appreciation for Tripurari's selfless service and ability to inspire others", etc.). Fixing neutrality issues is a surmountable problem, but can we deal with the likely lack of notability (SIGCOV)? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
A leftover POV fork sub-article of a deleted POV fork article created by the same sock. The article doesn't have any reliable sources and I don't see any purpose of it remaining on Wikipedia. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 12:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. RL0919 ( talk) 13:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Public defenders are not inherently notable, and there is not enough to suggest he passes WP:GNG. Redirecting to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies, where his WP:BLP1E is listed, makes sense. Let'srun ( talk) 11:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:07, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
The sources provided are the mosque's own website and facebook page, and an article about the community kitchen at the mosque AmateurHi$torian ( talk) 10:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kobra and the Lotus. Maybe some of the content of this article could be Merged to the band's article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:BANDMEMBER, shes not notable outside of her band. i'm suggesting a redirect to Kobra and the Lotus -- FMSky ( talk) 02:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 02:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 02:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 02:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." Different Wikipedians have tried updating the article over the years, but it has also been moved back to a redirect. The current edition has been live for just over a week. However, the article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. Significa liberdade ( talk) 01:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 10:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article has been live since 2022 and does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling the AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 01:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article has been live since 2022 and does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 01:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Redirect>>
Seohae Line.
Djflem (
talk) 09:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Currently sourced to the website of the subject's own company. I am unable to find any coverage in reliable independent sources. Taavi ( talk!) 10:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bloomberg ( https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/person/1902407#xj4y7vzkg) | Passing mention, basically, nothing significant here. | ✘ No | ||
Various Company websites | He is a part of these companies | ✘ No | ||
Crunchbase and LinkedIn | Primary sources | ✘ No | ||
Wikipedia (only source presently in article) | WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
IAmHuitzilopochtli ( talk) 03:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Dune characters#Introduced in Dune Messiah (1969). Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Neither the article, nor my BEFORE, suggest that this character is notable. We have a plot summary and information on which books/other media she appears in, and that's it. No reception, no analysis, next to nothing in GScholar even for counting hits. Redirect to List of Dune characters or perhaps the Children of Dune (the book she is central to), per WP:ATD/SOFTDELETE? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned six caps for the Liechtenstein women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Lacks sustained coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 01:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Miss California website | No. She participated in this competition. | Passing mention of her among all the other winners. | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Article does not meet WP:GNG. Of the current sources, only 1 has a reasonable amount of significant coverage, with the other being written by the subject. I could not find anything else to note this subject, originally created by an SPI with no other edits, being notable in any meaningful way. Let'srun ( talk) 00:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
*keep I'm taking note
Salted and then canned meat product (
talk) 03:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia Library sources
|
---|
|
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
This organization, which existed from 2010 to 2018, is simply not notable. It fails WP:ORGSIG. There is no evidence it ever did or achieved anything other than conduct a short-lived programme of advocacy. Most of the sources are primary or self-published, with a bunch of pieces penned by Cherie Blair, who was one of the founders, several corporate website links, a companies house link (which is just a registration profile), some dead links, and a few more that fail verification. Altogether pretty dismal sourcing, and no significant coverage. Even with the sourcing being largely primary, there is still nothing to really suggest that the organization ever actually achieved or impacted anything. Iskandar323 ( talk) 16:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR with just one major role, in a relatively obscure film, Itty Bitty Titty Committee. No significant media coverage, and her career seems to have stalled. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
There seems to be a lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Most of the sources in the article are from the subject of the article and the article was almost entirely written by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/R.o.t (note the initials).
Searching JSTOR for "Raimo Olavi Toivonen" yields 0 results, searching for "Raimo Toivonen" yields 1 result. The one main space article that links to this is Aatto Sonninen which was written by the same blocked sockpuppeting account. Searching Google Scholar does find some papers and references to their papers, but it doesn't seem significant compared to any random researcher. Also see User_talk:R.o.t/Archives/2020/November. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 22:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
IP sock of indef blocked user R.o.t making trouble
|
---|
|
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. References are very poor for a WP:BLP scope_creep Talk 17:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
I would have liked to accomodate those seeking a Merge but no one replied to my query asking for a target article to Merge this one to. But since it is a Soft Deletion, this article can be restored should you ever create that target article. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm the creator of this article. Following last month's deletion discussion of List of Criterion Collection releases (which ultimately resulted in that article being deleted), it seems that this article would fail an AfD just as well. Minor note: one difference between this article and the Criterion one is that all entries (at least the ones I contributed to the page) are accompanied by primary or secondary sources. However, the main guideline cited in the Criterion deletion discussion was WP:NOTDIRECTORY, which I believe is independent of whether or not the material in question is supported by citations. — Matthew / ( talk) 20:09, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd love to accommodate some of your wishes for a Merge but without an existing target article to Merge to, this article will most likely be deleted. Here's another week to get something resembling a decent llist article together.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Burundi women's national football team. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least six caps for the Burundi women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, is there a possible redirect here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would a redirect to
Burundi women's national football team be acceptable?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least two caps for the Panama women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is one editor arguing to Keep this article. If there is no further support coming in the next week, would those advocating Delete object to a Redirect as the nominator suggests?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. Black Kite (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least three caps for the Panama women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Half the participants are advocating for a Redirect but that still leaves half wanting a different resolution so I'm relisting this discussion another week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:41, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. After discounting the views of the now blocked sockpuppets, there was a clear consensus here to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable reputation management company. Fails WP:NCORP. Mercenf ( talk) 15:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:29, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Giving this discussion one more relist. As an aside, I've never seen service review sites considered a RS as far Wikipedia standards go as they are user-generated content that rarely receive any editorial oversight.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:35, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
"We fix negative Google search results. We have created exclusive partnerships…"The 2 review sites you referenced don't remotely meet our reliable sources requirement.
Be completely independent of the article subject.NZ Herald depends very heavily on quotes and attributed statements an executive employee (
Net Reputation executive Ryan Sherman Jnr) of the subject:
Sherman Jnr said his company’s strategy in trying to preserve the online reputation of a person charged or convicted of sexual assault would not be attempting to get online media articles taken down post-conviction. “Removal would not be the approach if Mr Molloy were the suspect in this case,” Sherman Jnr said. “We would manipulate the search engine using a branding campaign with high-end digital assets to suppress the information. That being said, we like to be proactive in situations like this. Of course, it was a stretch, but there were some clues on why I had my suspicions about Mr Molloy. If you look at the blurred-out pictures, his shoulders match the individual, and his name is also spoken about in multiple blog threads regarding this case. “Apologies that my suspicions were wrong this time around. We typically contact people who are actually in trouble versus playing guessing games as we did here.” Sherman Jnr said they had approached three individuals in relation to the Waitākere District Court sex assault case and all existing Net Reputation clients are under non-disclosure agreements. “I am no professional investigator, so I will do these individuals justice and leave them unnamed as I am in discussion with them currently to help with their reputation online,” Sherman Jnr said. “We target individuals and companies across the world. Not just New Zealand.”This article cannot be considered completely independent of the subject per SIRS requirements.
Being new to an industry can come with its challenges, but it’s also an opportunity to grow tremendously, Petrilli has learned....By 2017, Petrilli says the company had grown to $3.5 million, up 150%. “In the grand scheme of just being a small business, going from zero to $1.4 million — there was a lot to do there,” he says. “It’s very hectic to maintain a certain level of growth.”...“We were in a new industry so there wasn’t really a playbook,” he says....“The severity of it and what they need will vary from customer to customer based on the problem,” he says. “If you have a big reputation, like a big company or celebrity, you’re going to need more resources than the teacher who’s from Sarasota High School who maybe did something he or she wasn’t supposed to.”. The majority of the clients come to them, but Petrilli says if someone is involved in something on a national level, the company might reach out on its own. In revenue, Petrilli says his company only has two big competitors: Reputation.com, which surpassed $100 million in annual recurring revenue earlier this year in addition to a $150 million minority growth investment; and Reputation Defender, a company Pertrilli says is slightly ahead in revenue compared to NetReputation. ... “We’re on pace to be the second largest full-service reputation management agency in America,” he says, a statistic he provided based on revenue. “It’s a testament to being focused on growth as a company.” In addition, to the team and the market opportunity, another big driver for the success, Petrilli says, is reinvesting back into the organization. ... "More people than ever are online,” Petrilli says, “so more people than ever need a solution to be online.”
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:siroxo
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tampa Bay Times [7] | SIRS requires complete independence This iis based on quote by founder |
one-sentence paragraph, doesn't meet CORPDEPTH | ✘ No | |
Business Observer [8] | heavily depends on founder's quotes and attributed statements | ✘ No | ||
NZ Herald | Ryan Sherman Jnr, executive employee of subject is quoted several times in peice | ✘ No | ||
Intl Business Times [9] | Closes with a promotional quote from CEO/founder | WP:IBTIMES | ✘ No | |
Superb Crew [10] | interview with founder | ? | ✘ No | |
Acesswire [11] | PR wire | ~ | ~ | ✘ No |
Business Wire [12] | PR wire | ~ | ✘ No | |
inc.com [13] | "Information provided by company." | ? | ~ | ✘ No |
MirrorReview [14] | ? | "The magazine also promotes enterprises that serve their clients with futuristic offerings and acute integrity" | ✘ No | |
QuickSprout [15] | ? | seems to have weak editorial practices, this article was credited to the owner of QuickSprout, they have no listed editorial staff | ✘ No | |
Top Work Places [16] | voice of company, uses employee feedback too | ~ | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Checkuser note:, the closer should pay careful attention to the accounts in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Seriy333. This discussion is full of now-blocked socks. Courcelles ( talk) 17:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Reggie White. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Article is about a minor charitable program run by a relatively minor charity. Sources listed and those I've searched for all seem to be press release style articles with no discussion of scope, effect, efficacy, etc. Seems to fail WP:ORG and warrants deletion. AP1787 ( talk) 20:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
No available source on the Internet whatsoever, despite trying to use all my Google-wizardry. Likely to be something not noteworthy at all, even if it is it can be incorporated into Internet in Turkey article. ahmetlii ✉ (Please ping me on a reply!) 19:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced article about a television series, not making any strong claim to passage of WP:TVSHOW. The only notability claim being attempted at all is that it existed, and the only "source" is the self-published website of the channel that aired it -- and while a WP:BEFORE search turned up a handful of glancing namechecks of the fact that this existed, I found absolutely no substantive coverage about the series to get it over WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 19:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced article about a series of short films, not making any strong claim to passing WP:NFILM or WP:TVSHOW. The only notability claim even really being attempted here at all is that it existed, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of media coverage about it to get it over WP:GNG -- but literally the only "source" here is the self-published website of the television channel that purportedly aired these, and absolutely no GNG-worthy coverage in media independent of the topic has proven locatable at all on a WP:BEFORE search. There's just nothing here that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from actually having to have had any media coverage. (Also probably conflict of interest, as it was first created by a virtual WP:SPA whose only other Wikipedia edits also pertained to the work of this series' creators.) Bearcat ( talk) 19:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Individual has not met notability guidelines, with no solid demonstrations of notability provided even after months of having an active page. Relevant reporting seems to be extremely limited to the fallout of the Johnny Depp Amber Heard trials, and most of that reporting is in tabloids and celeb gossip rags. Pretty much anything else that turns up about the article subject is her own writing or social media pages. Best case scenario, it may be possible to merge what brief information there is into the related articles. Paragon Deku ( talk) 17:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The author of this article, Jeavinparklee, has a Conflict of interest. Firstly, his initial edit from his account on Vishvendra Singh has been reverted for "inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content".
Context: Vishvendra Singh joined the congress in 2008 over conflict with his party colleague Digamber Singh.
This user has made a lot of unsourced additions in-between properly cited additions to Digamber Singh in the last 7 days. And has created Dr. Digamber Singh Pro Kabaddi Tournament which has been moved to draft now. He has also created Dr. Digamber Singh ‘Samadhi’.
Secondly, This account has been only used to promote Digamber Singh and his family members till now. After a brief search, Shailesh Digamber Singh was previously created on 10 March 2023 and moved to draft on 11 March 2023 by an admin, Refer - Draft:Shailesh Digamber Singh. Now it looks like Jeavinparklee can be a sock of Af1grazel or Kirat sinh (Sock account already banned). All three accounts mentioned above have only been used to promote Digamber Singh and his family till now.
Thirdly, Shailesh Digamber Singh fails WP:N. There is no significant coverage of him. A simple Google search result shows not even a single reliable source discussing him except for trivial mentions. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Out of the 6 sources cited in the article, only 2 of them are reliable, one discusses his loss against Vishvendra Singh and the other one is a trivial mention. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 17:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dainik Bhaskar | Yes. | ? It is unclear whether or not this newspaper is reliable enough for the English wiki. | Brief mention that he is running (not sufficient according to WP:NPOL. | ✘ No |
Hindustan Times | Yes. | Legit news organization. | Passing mention in an article about his dad. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Isn't it a hoax? Embellishment? The article was created in the spirit of the author: there are fewer Kazakhs, more opponents, but the Kazakhs still win and even do not suffer any special losses. Kazman322 ( talk) 17:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pugachev's Rebellion. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Significance of the event? Kazman322 ( talk) 17:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This academic society does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGCRIT, or any other notability guideline. Indeed, I have not been able to find any WP:SECONDARY coverage that discusses it in any depth. Coverage appears to be limited to glancing mentions in marginal sources like these: [17] [18]. A "relies excessively on references to primary sources" tag has been present on the page since 2008, with no attempt to address the issue since then. My attention was drawn to this article by recent apparent COI editing. Generalrelative ( talk) 17:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
I just finished removing all the dumb award lists, self-coverage, press releases, and general cruft from this article and after doing it, I realized I was left with almost nothing as far as WP:RS goes for SigCov.
I suggest looking at the version before I canned almost everything. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Deepak_Ohri&oldid=1167447417
The other side of this coin is I did find some coverage which appeared to be independent and significant.
There's a LOT of press release reposts, meaningless lists, paid-for coverage, coverage by entites he's associated with, etc etc etc. Every time I think I've found something that's a real coverage, it's paid for, unverified, or non-independent. Really struggling to find anything to meet GNG apart from these two short news segments.
Every source that discusses him, even if independent-seeming just gushes over his various successes and provides no actual substance. Take a look at this source for example:
Is this independent? Reliable? Significant? Maybe? If this meets the bar, then he has dozens of sources to meet GNG. If it doesn't (which I don't think it does), he might just be non-notable. The presence of an SPA who's spent the last few years ass-blasting irrelevant content into the article doesn't help.
BrigadierG ( talk) 17:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The page should not be deleted. It is rewritten. Deepak Ohri is well-known entrepreneur with a long career in the hospitality industry. The references are independent and include: BBC, ABC News, Robb Report, Forbes, Bloomberg, Harvard Business Publishing. - DSan22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DSan22 ( talk • contribs) 12:18, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
The page should not be deleted. It is rewritten. Deepak Ohri is well-known entrepreneur with a long career in the hospitality industry. The references are independent and include: BBC, ABC News, Robb Report, Forbes, Bloomberg, Harvard Business Publishing. -- DSan22 ( talk) 12:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)DSan22
The page should stay.
The page had in-depth coverage, but another user modified it and deleted most of the content. Currently, the page has content with references from various independent sources. The page was created several years ago and was never questioned. All is documented. -- DSan22 ( talk) 23:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Bigg Boss OTT (Hindi season 2). TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:25, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This seems like a case of WP:BLP1E. Most of the news coverage I can find of Fukra Insaan is centered around Bigg Boss OTT and nothing else. Deauthorized. ( talk) 17:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hypnotize (album). Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
This was previously nominated for deletion sixteen years ago, when it was redirected to the article Hypnotize (album). There are only four sources, none of which independently discuss the song or assert any kind of notability outside of the album it appears on. I was willing to take a look at the article to see if it had improved in the years since the original discussion, and clearly it hasn't done so by much. Seems like a no-brainer redirect, but I want to open up discussion so that others can have input. JeffSpaceman ( talk) 16:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a politician, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NPOL. The basis for creation here was that she was recently announced as her party's candidate in an upcoming provincial legislature by-election -- but the notability test at that level is holding a seat in the legislature, not just running for one, and as yet unelected candidates get articles only if they already had preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy. But the only other attempted notability claim here is that she has served on the municipal council of a midsized city that is not in the rarefied tier of internationally prominent
global cities, which is also not "inherently" notable either — even incumbent city councillors in most cities get articles only if they can mount a credible claim that their time on city council was a special case of significantly greater notability than most other city councillors, but that hasn't been shown here at all.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation after by-election day if she wins the seat, but nothing here is already enough to already earn her a Wikipedia article now.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was redirect per WP:BOLD revert by Beyond My Ken. ( non-admin closure) JMWt ( talk) 16:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
unencyclopedic content, no references, no claims to notability on the page. Previously a redirect. JMWt ( talk) 15:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
The article is entirely unsourced, and I am quite sure that the article topic is non-notable. In English, I could only find one RS discussing the game in a significant manner besides standard release information. Checking the linked other-language versions of the page, there don't seem to be any non-English RS with significant coverage of the game either. QuietCicada ( talk) 15:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator Thank you both for finding those sources. :) QuietCicada ( talk) 12:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 17:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Uppala is a small town in the Indian state of Kerala. Not even a single mosque/temple in the list has a Wikipedia article. Not a single source is cited. I would suggest a merge with List of Hindu temples in Kerala and List of mosques in Kerala but I don't think any content can be salvaged to merge. AmateurHi$torian ( talk) 15:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. If people want to redirect it can be discussed on the talk. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The character, originated in the first Superman film, doesn't seem notable. The article consists of the plot only, and there is no reliable source. Redjedi23 ( talk) 15:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Notability. This page appears to be an advertisement/blog for Neural Lab, it lacks any sources that refer to Neural Lab. I could not find any reputable source that mentions this software. The talk page is filled with accounts that appear to be sockpuppets created for the sole purpose of promoting the software. Chemeez ( talk) 14:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect challenged. The coverage is mostly PR-based, and it still fails to meet WP:GNG. Mercenf ( talk) 14:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that there is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to assert notability. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The one source listed might not be reliable (not sure if it's self-published/user-generated) and seems biased (relying on machine translation for determining that though); I personally couldn't find any other reliable sources about this place (all the ones I could find were user-generated). I don't believe this is notable enough for an article, based on my research. Suntooooth, it/he ( talk/ contribs) 14:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — Mdaniels5757 ( talk • contribs) 17:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
No sources that establish notability. Skyerise ( talk) 14:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 17:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Totally unsourced. Just looks like an advert for the temple - Rich T| C| E-Mail 14:35, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable firm. Sourced to an interview; USGS page doesn't appear to mention it. Valereee ( talk) 14:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
I am having doubts this person meets WP:NBIO ( WP:NAUTHOR?). I am not seeing WP:SIGCOV coverage of his life, just some mentions in passing, and many sources don't look very reliable. AfD from 2010 had arguments that some of his works have been reviewed by reliable sources (assuming Yoga Journal is reliable...), but WP:NOTINHERITED. Maybe some of his works are notable if they have been reviewed and meet WP:NBOOK, but that doesn't mean the author is notable too. On a side note, if this is kept, we need to deal with promotional language ("Over the years that followed, Prabhupada showered Tripurari with affection and repeatedly expressed his appreciation for Tripurari's selfless service and ability to inspire others", etc.). Fixing neutrality issues is a surmountable problem, but can we deal with the likely lack of notability (SIGCOV)? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
A leftover POV fork sub-article of a deleted POV fork article created by the same sock. The article doesn't have any reliable sources and I don't see any purpose of it remaining on Wikipedia. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 12:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:53, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. RL0919 ( talk) 13:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Public defenders are not inherently notable, and there is not enough to suggest he passes WP:GNG. Redirecting to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies, where his WP:BLP1E is listed, makes sense. Let'srun ( talk) 11:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:07, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
The sources provided are the mosque's own website and facebook page, and an article about the community kitchen at the mosque AmateurHi$torian ( talk) 10:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kobra and the Lotus. Maybe some of the content of this article could be Merged to the band's article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:BANDMEMBER, shes not notable outside of her band. i'm suggesting a redirect to Kobra and the Lotus -- FMSky ( talk) 02:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 02:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 02:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 02:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." Different Wikipedians have tried updating the article over the years, but it has also been moved back to a redirect. The current edition has been live for just over a week. However, the article does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. Significa liberdade ( talk) 01:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 10:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article has been live since 2022 and does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling the AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 01:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article has been live since 2022 and does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade ( talk) 01:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Redirect>>
Seohae Line.
Djflem (
talk) 09:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 11:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Currently sourced to the website of the subject's own company. I am unable to find any coverage in reliable independent sources. Taavi ( talk!) 10:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bloomberg ( https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/person/1902407#xj4y7vzkg) | Passing mention, basically, nothing significant here. | ✘ No | ||
Various Company websites | He is a part of these companies | ✘ No | ||
Crunchbase and LinkedIn | Primary sources | ✘ No | ||
Wikipedia (only source presently in article) | WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
IAmHuitzilopochtli ( talk) 03:16, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Dune characters#Introduced in Dune Messiah (1969). Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Neither the article, nor my BEFORE, suggest that this character is notable. We have a plot summary and information on which books/other media she appears in, and that's it. No reception, no analysis, next to nothing in GScholar even for counting hits. Redirect to List of Dune characters or perhaps the Children of Dune (the book she is central to), per WP:ATD/SOFTDELETE? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned six caps for the Liechtenstein women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Lacks sustained coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 01:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Miss California website | No. She participated in this competition. | Passing mention of her among all the other winners. | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Article does not meet WP:GNG. Of the current sources, only 1 has a reasonable amount of significant coverage, with the other being written by the subject. I could not find anything else to note this subject, originally created by an SPI with no other edits, being notable in any meaningful way. Let'srun ( talk) 00:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
*keep I'm taking note
Salted and then canned meat product (
talk) 03:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia Library sources
|
---|
|