The result was Draftify as the release date is within reasonable draft incubation Star Mississippi 02:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
I cannot determine a reason under WP:NFILM why this article should exist. The film is upcoming. WP:TOOSOON may apply, so I suggest deletion without prejudice to future recreation once notability is established. In addition more than one reference deployed in the article makes no mention of the film, and many others are churnalism 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 11:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:DICDEF Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Technicaly ineligible, but I don't see any input forthcoming Star Mississippi 02:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability and cn-tagged since 2015. I don't see a WP:GNG pass when I look, but there are lots of things complicating the search: his books are in Hindi, he writes on marginalized topics (Dalit/Bahujan empowerment), and he doesn't speak English or work at a university. In principle, he could well be notable - can anyone find sources to prove it?
He's "Dusādha, Eca. Ela." in my library catalogue (at least, I think these are the same person), but that didn't help me find anything for WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK (to get WP:NAUTHOR). Leaving that in case it helps anyone else. asilvering ( talk) 19:27, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this is a WP:NPROF pass, unless someone in theology has some good arguments otherwise? Does not pass WP:NAUTHOR - the one single-authored book (Wealth and Poverty) has at least three academic reviews, so it passes WP:NBOOK, but it's just the one. The only footnote is "Discussion with Dr. Washington, November 17, 2009." asilvering ( talk) 20:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Might juuust squak by NMUSIC6, but it's not clear Harrow is independently notable of sigh, and Kawashima redirects there. Unable to find evidence of coverage to meet GNG for this one off collaboration, nor identify a viable AtD. Star Mississippi 20:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. There's a Yahoo Finance link, but it points to a press release by Multigate. Otherwise, no WP:SIGCOV. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 20:19, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 09:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
"Pink Houses" is not called "Ain't That America", meaning it is not a valid disambiguation entry. Prod contested because "it may be useful" even though that's not how dabs work. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Internet censorship in Russia#Instances of censorship or such other article as might be agreed on the talk page. Stifle ( talk) 09:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Conceptually, the topic for this article is not an encyclopedia article topic-- it isn't a discrete specific thing (since a meta platform can be blocked from anywhere, not just russia), and this article is essentially a content fork. We don't host articles with titles like "When a car accident happens" or "Politicians sometimes interfere with the lawmaking process" or "A neighborhood that has the best sidewalks" because although references can be found that discuss these things in depth, they aren't themes that belong in an encyclopedia because of what they try to conceptualize. The article might be movable to "Blocking of Meta platforms in Russia during the second Russian-Ukrainian war" or some other longwinded thing like that, or the content can be added into the article on the war itself or to one on Internet censorship such as that practiced by China and other totalitarian regimes. A loose necktie ( talk) 23:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTFORUM+ this is enwiki, not zhwiki
|
---|
|
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Found only press releases and passing mentions. Prod contested in violation of WP:NPA. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "I expected to hate ESPN's new series, Beg, Borrow & Deal (Tuesdays, 5 p.m.). The show is the latest in the so-called reality-TV genre, where "reality" is usually a misnomer. But after watching the first episode, I must admit the show is off to a promising start. ... Beg, Borrow & Deal isn't quite reality as we know it -- unless you're a transient, in which case you probably don't have a TV anyway -- but it's a legitimate struggle, distinguishing it from some of the other reality series I regularly skip. ... At the very least, Beg, Borrow & Deal is a step in the right direction for ESPN Original Entertainment, which also produced the laughably bad A Season on the Brink."
The article notes: "Instead, the sports network is starting its own competition tonight with the reality show Beg, Borrow & Deal. The new show looks like The Amazing Race -- teams compete to get from one place to another for a prize. But while the Race goes globetrotting in pairs of two, with a few bucks in its pocket, Beg stays in the country but strips its teams of money. That means the two Beg teams of four -- two men and two women on each team -- must use their wits, coast to coast, for transportation, food and lodging. ... Beg, Borrow & Deal was originally cast more than a year ago, Mandt said. That's when filming was to have begun, but fallout from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks delayed the show."
The article notes: "Starting Tuesday, the 27-year-old Chester native will be among eight contestants spotlighted on the eight-week ESPN series "Beg, Borrow & Deal." After a series of interviews and videos sent to ESPN, the station selected eight contestants. Britton is the lone Southerner among them. ... Teams are required to complete 10 of 40 listed tasks en route to their final destination of Alcatraz Island in San Francisco. Among the tasks: Ride a Zamboni ice resurfacer between periods of an NHL game. Compete in a marathon and not finish last. Catch a 35-yard pass from an NFL quarterback. Play in a prison basketball game. Bike ride for a mile with Lance Armstrong."
The article notes: "Last week's episode of the ESPN reality show "Beg, Borrow & Deal 2" allowed Bulls fans to take a melancholy trip back in time. ... On "Beg, Borrow & Deal," two teams of contestants cross the country trying to accomplish sports-related tasks without money or the use of a vehicle. Porter convinced Williams to rent a limousine that would ferry his team to Wrigley Field."
The article notes: "Always on the cutting edge, ESPN is doing it's own "reality show," introducing Beg, Borrow & Deal tonight at 8. ... Anyway, the teams can choose from among 40 listed tasks. And to give you a taste of what to expect, we at CSI -- Cheap Seats Investigations -- have listed what look like the 10 most interesting tasks."
The article notes: "As the stereotype goes, queer men aren't supposed to play or follow competitive sports. Openly gay entertainment reporter Julian Bryce hopes to break this image as a competitor in ESPN's first reality-based game show, Beg, Borrow & Deal, premiering September 17. Still, he's the first to admit he might seem to fit the stereotype to a tee."
The article notes: "A whopping increase in the number of young-adult viewers has helped land a second-season renewal from ESPN for "Beg, Borrow & Deal," its weekly primetime entertainment-reality series. ... The show is averaging a modest 436,000 households for the six weeks since it premiered Tuesday at 8 on Sept. 17, which is only about half of ESPN's average primetime rating, and 26% below the shows in the time period for the same six months in 2001. But outweighing the bad news is the fact that the show is up in three key demographic categories from a year ago: by 135% among adults 18 to 34, by 46% with adults 18 to 49 and by 20% for adults 25 to 54."
The article notes: "Encouraged by the response from new viewers and overall Nielsen Media Research returns from its foray into the reality game show fray, ESPN will order a second season of Beg, Borrow & Deal and is hoping to pair it with a second genre entry next year. ... Through the first five of its eight installments, Beg, Borrow & Deal averaged a 0.5 household rating and a 0.8 among its core male 18 to 34 audience."
The result was delete. I don't see a consensus for a redirect, but if someone wants to make one after the fact, I wouldn't make a fuss. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This article is about a musician and actor that lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to justify an article on Wikipedia. The only source provided is an interview in which the subject os one of three singers covered. The article itself makes no great claims to notability with the statement of being an actress and providing no information about any major roles. As a singer, she has provided backing vocals and sung commercial jingles. My own search for sourcing does not turn up any significant coverage. Whpq ( talk) 19:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. Clear consensus not to retain a standalone; redirect to list seems a reasonable WP:ATD. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways.If someone looks up Toua Tueni, they can find out the country he played for, his position, when he played, etc. A redirect has no notability requirements, only the target of the redirect does. - 2pou ( talk) 21:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. WP:ATD. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. WP:ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
No independent sources, no substantial improvement since it was created 12 years ago, and tagged for notability since 2018. BD2412 T 18:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Not notable as per WP:GNG, no independent WP:SIGCOV. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 17:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games#Sports. ✗ plicit 13:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Empty tables; fails GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:DICDEF. Seems to be mostly tied to promotional material from Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron and one art teacher. Most of the articles cited either don't use the term, use the term but don't define it, or echo-chamber Jeffrey Katzenberg's quote about Spirit. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 17:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Coverage revolves around trivial stuff such as partnerships, ad campaigns and sponsorships, all of which are insufficient to establish notability per WP:CORPDEPTH. M4DU7 ( talk) 16:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
This is a collection of state highways in Indiana which share a common designation. A Google search turns up only a few articles referring to this road, and various mapping websites prefer the numerical designations over the name. I'm not convinced the name is commonly used enough to warrant a separate article. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 16:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
List of early summer flowers and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of late spring flowers previously deleted. Subjective, undefinable, unhelpful, unsourced, listified prior-cat stub since 2007. Hyperik ⌜ talk⌟ 15:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
A totally unknown party; it seems that it is not possible to find any source on this party. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 15:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 10:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Mostly unsourced article, including information and pictures that is not even directly related to the topic. - LouisAragon ( talk) 15:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Contested G4. Are nominees actually notable? Post holders, perhaps. Primary sources, previously deleted at AfD as "Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL" by Muboshgu, and I see no reason to differ here. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that there is sufficient sourcing to establish notability (and a dose of WP:HEY). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 02:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Seems like an original compilation and thus fails WP:OR (the whole of the prose is also entirely unsourced), and probably isn't quite accurate (for example, this only mentions "About a dozen women have played college football at various levels"; which is well below the nearly two dozen included here). RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 13:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do some of your own work. The article is broadly sour sourced, if you want to dismiss all 131 sources, you should actually really dismiss some of them yourself.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I've never heard anyone argue that there are too many sources in an article as a reason to delete. Here's more from a quick google search--I'm unsure if any of these sources are referenced in the article or not:
Clearly meets WP:GNG, WP:LISTN... WP:IMPACT... Do I have to keep doing this?-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 01:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
At this point, I am done addressing the comments from wjemather. I write this for anyone else who comes along and is seeking clarity. Here's a short list of articles about female players discussed as a group and specifically the impact that some individuals have had on the group as a whole.
I am now done with this song-and-dance routine. I don't dance. The facts have been presented multiple times from an abundance of high-quality widely accepted reliable third party sources. Those arguing for deletion are refusing to do the work to support their argument and I'm tired of continuing to provide the detail to support the argument to keep. May the closer do as they see fit.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list.Check. The remaining delete rationales (after a few strikes) are all counter to the WP:ATD policy:
Disputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page, except in severe cases..— Bagumba ( talk) 15:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Trivial ethnicity and occupation intersection, no reliable independent source whatsoever provided to support encyclopedic context about this (individual sources about individual members are not appropriate for a wider list, per WP:NLIST). What there is to be said about the topic is probably already included (or could be without any difficulty) at Religion in space#Judaism. Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 13:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
An unknown party, on the web there is only some news about its foundation and nothing more. It does not appear to have participated in any elections. The page, written in two lines, at present does not demonstrate the relevance of the party and is decidedly useless. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 13:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to the category tree and NOT failing and everything; but even more importantly, there is simply no precedent for this kind of list by sub-national division. Doing so would simply be encouraging the proliferation of similar useless lists which would only include a few entries and would definitively be a WP:BADIDEA. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 12:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to the category treecontradicts WP:NOTDUP (a guideline), and it seems like a perfectly encyclopedic topic to me. The constituent countries of the UK have strong regional identities and it's entirely possible for a Welsh person to feel Welsh but not British, or more Welsh than British. If inappropriate lists of people by sub-national division are created then they can simply be deleted. Hut 8.5 11:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Leoluca Orlando. RL0919 ( talk) 13:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Almost completely unknown movement, rarely mentioned in some sources only for its founder. The page reads only "The 139 Movement is a political party in Italy led by Leoluca Orlando": in this state it is a useless page. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 12:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Adult Swim history under the redirect if someone finds the references to spin it back out and/or wants to merge it, but I don't see another relist changing this. Star Mississippi 02:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Could only find passing mentions and Wikpiedia mirrors. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 12:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 09:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable canceled video game. Some sourcing does exist, but it covers two specific events: The game was announced with a few hands on articles, and then subsequently cancelled the next year. There's nothing indicating any lasting importance or significance. -- ferret ( talk) 00:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 12:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Alfio Marchini. Star Mississippi 02:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
It was just a personal civic list like hundreds of other civic lists in Italy. I do not see a particular relevance to consider the page on the list as encyclopedic. No specific sources regarding the list on the page, whose name was not even Marchini List. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 12:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Football referee with limited coverage. All Google News mentions are trivial. This German source search gives us only stats databases and passing mentions like this one in DFB. Even ProQuest only has one passing match report mention. Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a dead-end page only with irrelevant external links. A possible candidate for deletion? Abani79 ( talk) 11:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Alliance Party of Northern Ireland. Anything worth merging is still available from the article history. Randykitty ( talk) 18:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Any standalone article on an organization needs to meet WP:NORG, but I cannot find such coverage. For example, there are only 9 results on Google news all of which are either op-eds (not RS) or brief mentions. I'm told this article was created as a sizesplit from the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland, but if the info is UNDUE there it can just be removed without creating a separate article that does not meet notability requirements. ( t · c) buidhe 23:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep. Very hasty with the nomination. I'm not going to pretend there's lots of sources to choose from however the ones found are WP:RS and does meet basic notability guidelines. I wish this was discussed prior rather than straight to AfD. Abcmaxx ( talk) 00:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Also it looks like it isn't formally registered as a separate organisation, like some other youth wings of bigger entities are; they're just the youth of this political party under an informal banner. I don't think anyone can argue that the parent article doesn't meet criteria therefore I see no reason why this fork should be treated differently. All a redirect would do is create a long messy parent article. Abcmaxx ( talk) 01:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Update Articles from Trouw, British Youth Council and Irish Times have been added. Abcmaxx ( talk) 09:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Local museum. Refs are not independent and/or minor mentions. Lack of in-depth coverage in independent RS. MB 00:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Many of the refs are to the company website. Most of the others are minor mentions of the firm that primarily discuss projects they are associated with. No in-depth significant coverage of the firm itself. MB 00:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Judo at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's 66 kg. Anything worth merging is still available from the article history. Randykitty ( talk) 18:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG AND WP:NOLYMPICS. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 09:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. No chart entry, no significant coverage in the media. Binksternet ( talk) 15:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 15:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
ProQuest yielded only press releases and passing mentions. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "When it debuts tonight on Food Network, the season premiere of “Ultimate Recipe Showdown” will feature Simi Valley resident Rick Massa making mac ’n’ cheese under the hot lights of a New York TV studio, the prying eyes of celebrity food dude Guy Fieri, and the constraints of a time limit — with $25,000 in prize money on the line. ... “Ultimate Recipe Showdown” first aired in early 2008, with Fieri and Marc Summers as hosts. The show has since undergone a makeover and now spends more time delving into the lives of each competitor. ... Selected by a panel of judges that includes the director of the Food Network test kitchens, an editor from Family Circle magazine and chef Michael Psilakis of Anthos restaurant in New York, the winner of each week’s competition also may see his or her recipe turned into a “Watch it Sunday, Taste it Monday” special at T.G.I.Friday’s restaurants. ... Still to come in the season are episodes devoted to burgers (Jan. 11), cakes (Jan. 18), hot and spicy dishes (Jan. 25), desserts (Feb. 8) and “hometown favorites” (Feb. 15)."
The article notes: "Called "The Ultimate Recipe Showdown," and set in a stadium in Hollywood, the program, like many Food Network programs, will be a cooking contest. Its goal, producers say, is to find the best recipes in America. ... For the March 2 episode, Isacsson is one of nine contestants, four of whom are chefs and five, people who simply love to cook. Three make chili, three make macaroni and cheese and three make sandwiches. All are competing for a prize of $25,000. ... After whittling down entries to 54, the Network decided to divide them into six categories, hence, the six weekly shows. There will be hour-long shows for burgers, chicken, comfort foods, pasta, cakes and cookies. Each week, nine finalists will compete."
The article notes: "Fogelman will be vying for a $25,000 prize, along with $5,000 worth of products from Kohl's, when the second show of this six-part series airs on the cable network at 9 p.m. Sunday. ... This is the show's third season, which, when it is over, will have featured 24 contestants spread across six categories. It is hosted by Guy Fieri, a competition winner himself. ... Last week, the series debuted with the finalists in the comfort food category. By the season's conclusion, a winner will be crowned by three judges for a hot and spicy dish, the best burger, the tastiest cake or other dessert, and the top hometown favorite. More than 8,000 recipes were entered into competition, according to the network."
The article notes: "This is the show's third season, which, when it is over, will result in six winners in six categories. It is hosted by Guy Fieri. The judges, which include Katherine Alford, vice president of Food Network kitchens; chef Michael Psilakis, owner of several New York restaurants; and Rosemary Ellis, editor-in-chief of "Good Housekeeping," determine who will win $25,000, as well as $5,000 worth of Kohl's products."
The article notes: "Food Network's "Ultimate Recipe Showdown: Burgers" airs at 8 p.m. on Sunday, April 4. Home cooks nationwide submitted more than 10,000 recipes in hopes of achieving culinary fame in one of six categories: Comfort Food, Party Food, Hot & Spicy, Burgers, Cakes & Desserts and Hometown Favorites. In this six-week series hosted by Guy Fieri, each episode focuses on one category and features the top four contestants who compete in two rounds of competition including a signature-dish round and speed-dish round."
The article notes: "The Food Network's Ultimate Recipe Showdown ended last weekend and now five winning recipes are on the menu at T.G.I. Friday's restaurants. Among them is a hamburger from Dr. Harold Cohen, a retired Hollywood plastic surgeon. Four items were judged by a panel of food experts. The Ultimate Recipe Beverage Showdown winner was determined by online voting. In case you missed the show, it was a six-week series which pitted category finalists against each other for a $25,000 prize."
The article notes: "Are two local foodies the winners of a round in the Food Network's $25,000 Ultimate Recipe Showdown? ... A few weeks after submission, the women got a call from the network saying that out of 10,000 entries, their idea was now among 4,000 to be further tested."
The article notes: "Standing in front of the judges can be a nerve-racking experience for contestants because whatever dish is the best in the three judges' opinion is the dish dubbed the "Ultimate Recipe" and wins the creator $25,000 and a spot on T.G.I. Friday's menu across the country, Alford said."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo (soundtrack). (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
In Indian movies, there are many songs in a movie. It would not be a good idea to create an article for each one. This song is from Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo (soundtrack). Unlike the other songs from this movie, this song was not a state wide chartbuster and only received 50 million views on YouTube like hundreds of other songs. Since it did not win any awards, it does not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (music). See Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Songs. DareshMohan ( talk) 08:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rangasthalam (soundtrack). Discarding one "keep" vote from IP user which has no explanation. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 08:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
5/6 of the article is bad sources. There is not a reason why as to why this article exists nor are there enough references given for the song. DareshMohan ( talk) 08:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
"has won one or more significant awards or honor,"so merely being a notable award isn't enough anyway Ab207 ( talk) 11:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Bbb23: CSD G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (MeLucifer) in violation of ban or block. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Most of the sources are about Nosh (app) rather than about the company Nosh Technologies, and notability is not inherited. The Enterpreneur source is the only that talks really about the company, but does not satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH, and is not quite independent (full of quotes). A search for additional sources did not find any sources that could count towards notability. Femke ( talk) 08:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- coverage is mostly WP:PASSING mentions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Textbook WP:NCORP failure. Short-lived shopping website; most references appear to have been press releases or routine coverage. Declined speedy in 2017 taken down by LionMans Account. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This fictional character has only one film appearance. Does not meet WP:GNG as it lacks independent coverage in reliable sources including enough real-world/out-of-universe perspective. In addition, the page itself is written like a fancruft. Ab207 ( talk) 06:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. Sandstein 10:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Article about non-notable footballer that was previously kept at AfD in October 2020. The same deletion rationale applies today - this footballer made a few appearances in the Portuguese second level, but the article comprehensively fails WP:GNG. At the time the article was kept under the deprecated NFOOTBALL standard with the idea that it needed and could be improved. 18 months later, NFOOTBALL is no longer applicable and the article hasn't been improved (and a new search for SIGCOV yielded nothing). Jogurney ( talk) 03:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
I found only one reliable source with significant coverage for this DVD release. SL93 ( talk) 02:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Insufficient sources to support an article, and no target left to which to redirect this title.
BD2412
T 03:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't satisfy WP:MUSICBIO; session musicians rarely do. Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to see how Zoot AfD closes. This could go either way (redirect, delete) at the moment, but there's no point in redirecting if that's going to be deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Calling this no consensus vs. an actual keep, despite outcome being the same, as neither keep !votes are policy based. I don't see a 3rd relist bringing input since the first two have not. Star Mississippi 15:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The tools did not include my message so I'm manually recreating it here. Listed as a part of New Page Patrol review. A "stats only" article about a subset of Islamic Solidarity Games. The 2 sources do not cover it, it has a mere mention or list entry in them. Suggest merging into the Islamic Solidarity Games article— Preceding unsigned comment added by North8000 ( talk • contribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to White noise. Stifle ( talk) 09:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Wiktionary is there for that instead. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 18:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Only source in the article is TV Guide, and I could find nothing better Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "It was like something out of a game show dream, complete with the consummate game show host Wink Martindale. Parkland resident Rich Bowen won more than $60,000 in prizes as a contestant on the Fox Network's game show "The Last Word" in October. ... The object of the game, which airs on Ch. 13 at 10:30 a.m. Monday through Friday, is to guess the last word. Each game has three words, all of which are somehow related. For example, contestants might be asked to guess the words Marx, Smothers and Wright. The connection between the words is that all the words are the names of famous brothers. ... In the first game, the male contestant competes against the female celebrity and in the second game the female contestant challenges the male celebrity. In the event of a tie, the male and female contestants go head to head."
The article notes: "Veteran producer Merrill Heatter has taken his newest series, "The Last Word," to Vancouver, B.C., where he's taping 65 episodes for U.S. syndication. And he's hired someone in Gig Harbor to scout for contestants right in our backyard. ... Sinclair says if the program's a hit, it'll become "a resident game show" in the Northwest. "The Last Word," with emcee Wink Martindale, premieres nationally the week of Sept. 18; KCPQ will air it at 10:30 a.m. on Channel 13."
The book provides 118 words of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "The Last Word. (Series; Game; Syn. 1989–1990). Concept: Two teams compete, each composed of a celebrity captain and a non-celebrity player. A board with three unknown words (indicated by blank spaces) is shown. One player from each team competes. One player begins by asking for a letter. If it is contained in the word it appears in its appropriate place on the board. The object is for players to guess each word (which are related to each other). The first player to identify the last word of the three words that are shown wins the round for his team. The team with the most correct identifications wins the game and merchandise points. Host: Wink Martindale. Assistant: Jennifer Lyall."
The article provides 86 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "From the Who Cares file — polyester game show host Wink Martindale is getting a new gig, courtesy of — you guessed it — Ted Turner. "The Last Word," a game created by Merrill Heatter of "Hollywood Squares" fame, will be peddled to stations at the January NAPTE video convention in Houston. Produced in a joint deal with Turner Program Services, the game pits celebs and nobodies in a high-tech computerized format that also involves the audience, for what it's worth. Turner will distribute the series starting next fall."
The book provides 28 words of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "The Last Word. Syndicated: 1989–1990. Host: Wink Martindale. A word game in which contestants teamed up with celebrities, including Jill Whelan, Ted Lange, Susan Ruttan and Gordon Jump."
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Could only find tangential mentions, press releases, and TV Guide listings Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "Parents need to know that, overall, this docuseries emphasizes shock value over education -- while there are some scattered opportunities for families to learn about animal behavior and science, they're usually overshadowed by the greater factor of curiosity. The amount of over-the-top/iffy content varies by episode, but it's safe to say that sensitive young viewers might be disturbed by scenes of mutant animals (a cyclopic piglet and a dog with no front legs, for instance) or stories of animals eating humans."
The article provides 138 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Tonight this watchable animal clip show focuses on animal attacks caught on video. And there's no shortage of those - from a Taiwanese preacher being mauled by a lion after he jumped into a zoo exhibit to evangelise the beast, to a Rwandan tour guide being dragged into the jungle by a gorilla. The most memorable account comes from an underwater cameraman attacked by an elephant seal - the animal engulfed his whole head, making everything pitch black and pressing his whole face into its tongue. Animal experts provide illuminating commentary. At first it's a bummer to see a huge anaconda disgorging a big animal carcass in a bid to get away from humans - but those humans might have saved its life. In cool weather, we learn, snakes' digestion slows and big meals can putrefy, killing them from the inside."
The article notes: "Weird, True & Freaky 9 and 9:30 p.m., Animal Planet. Three-headed frogs, two-headed cats, a six-legged deer, piglets nursing on a tiger, a leg growing on a lamb's head, a snake that swallows golf balls — you can't say the title of this show isn't accurate. There's nothing like a good old-fashioned mutation or genetic defect to keep you on the edge of your seat."
The article notes: "Other shows take a tabloid-headline approach to the odd. Animal Planet’s “Weird, True & Freaky,” for instance, has featured a lobster so big that it was called Lobzilla; a python in Indonesia that measured 50 feet, thought to be the longest snake in recorded history (“handlers feed it three or four dogs a month”); and a 1,091-pound squid caught in Antarctica (“an eye the size of a soccer ball”)."
The article notes: "9 P.M. (Animal Planet) WEIRD, TRUE & FREAKY More stories about creepy crawlers, including maggots that live in the scalp and feed on the brain, leeches that reside in the nose and flies that make their homes in the neck. At 9:30 the series moves on to stomach-turning animal births."
The article notes: "And Wendy hasn't let worldwide attention change her, even with recent guest appearances on television shows such as Weird, True and Freaky. (A black Persian cat with gold-plated lower canine teeth, owned by a dentist, and a featherless parrot were her co-stars.)"
The article notes: ""Weird, True & Freaky” (8:30 p.m. on Animal Planet): This episode features a segment on the world’s deadliest spider that was reportedly found in the produce aisle of a Tulsa grocery store in March."
The article notes: ""Weird, True & Freaky" (Tuesday, 8:30 p.m., Animal Planet). Enough of these scourges of nature are in Australia to serve as an anti-travel commercial. Sure there are the expected dingoes, wild dogs roaming in feral packs, but the king toad, some 200 million strong, that grows to 9.5-inches and 5 pounds, is alarming."
The article notes: "'Weird, True & Freaky' 8:30 p.m., Animal Planet: This episode examines the unusual relationships that develop between dogs and other animals. I might not want to watch, depending on just how freaky it's going to get."
The article notes: "“Weird, True & Freaky,” 8 p.m. (Animal Planet): Italians place snakes on a statue of St. Dominic to ward off snakebites; Indians perform a frog marriage to end a drought; a Kenyan fertility ritual involves goat blood."
The article notes: "The story of Spyder, a six-legged fawn found in the Rome area in July, continues to fascinate. And now it looks like his story will be featured on Animal Planet's popular show called "Weird, True and Freaky," according to a local veterinarian who examined the young deer when it was discovered. Dan Pate of West Rome Animal Clinic said this morning that TV crews from the show are expected to be in town Monday and Tuesday."
The result was keep. consensus appears clear after a strong debate. No active discussions of significance. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 13:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
No encyclopedic content whatsoever, and really seems like a category-masquerading-as-an-article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a simple directory-like listing. This list also appears to be obvious WP:OR: the specific selection criteria seem highly arbitrary and doesn't quite seem to match with either the natural English meaning of the word "Russian" (which is "from Russia", not "from the part of the Soviet Union which is now Russia" [the proper term, of course, being "Soviet", unless this is a list by ethnicity, which this doesn't seem to be], or "from some other part of the Soviet Union" or "spent a few years there at some point in their life"). This is already duplicated by the nationality branches of the category tree, so not even necessary for someone to bother spending the effort to categorify it. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources.Page views are not convincing arguments for notability, much less for failing WP:NOT. If the articles were deleted, the exact same information would be available to the readers via categories (which would likely get a boost), which are the more appropriate way to organise this than some OR/NOT lists. Maintenance templates can't fix this failing WP:NOT or address the fact that by it's very nature (given the ambiguity of "Russian") this list is going to keep encouraging OR and is thus a bad idea. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 12:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- WP:NOTDUP says, as a conclusion: '
When deciding whether to create or avoid a list, the existence of a category on the same topic is irrelevant. This applies to both sides of the argument.- Categories are what are meant to be navigational aids, and WP:LISTPURP says that
The list may be a valuable information source. The list is not a valuable information source as its content is already at List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Russia and Soviet Union with more information than this article has. This article consists of no prose. See WP:NOTSTATS—which as a policy surpasses MOS—especially point #3 which states thatWikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of informationandStatistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context. Also, page views are not a measure of notability.- Same as above;
page views are not a measure of notability.
laureates who were citizens of Russia/Soviet Union at the time of receiving the award or in another time of their lifeare nonsensical, for multiple reasons. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
seems like a category-masquerading-as-an-articleis invalid. The nominator's argument that
articles should provide encyclopedic prose and contextis irrelevant because this is a list and not an article. While high quality lists usually have a paragraph or two at the start to set some context, the absence of such a thing is not a reason to delete the list and it usually duplicates the relevant article anyway. It is fine for list entries not to contain significant prose. I also don't agree that the topic is unencyclopedic, Nobel laureates are definitely an encyclopedic topic and nationality is an obvious way to categorise them.
spent a few years there at some point in their life, the entries who are not Russian or Soviet nationals clearly have strong connections to Russia, e.g. Andre Geim was born in Russia and seems to have lived there for the first 30 years or so of his life. Hut 8.5 16:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
laureates of the Nobel Prize who were citizens of the Soviet Union or Russia at the time of receiving the award, or at another time during their life. Which, given that the Soviet Union always encompassed more than just Russia, would seem to potentially encompass people who weren't by any reasonable definition 'Russian'. While it may be common amongst the less-educated to conflate the Soviet Union with Russia, Wikipedia certainly shouldn't be perpetuating this misapprehension. If the list is to be kept, we need to come up with clear inclusion criteria which actually agree with the title. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 12:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject) of a topic where the title doesn't match the content? AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Zero sourcing found. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "From trash compactors big enough to chew up a home to a unique NFL stadium, there's no end to the fun that Rogers -- and viewers -- will have checking out the latest and greatest big thing. ... This intriguing series is as big on fun as it is devoid of iffy content, and the charismatic and adventurous Rogers is a great host. Really Big Things offers some really great family entertainment for parents and their kids, especially boys -- who are likely to be most awed by the array of massive vehicles."
The article provides 196 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Really Big Things provides a rambling road tour of massive man-made wonders located all over the world. Hosted by former American Idol hopeful Matt Rogers, the six-part series is short on concept but long on travel budget. In the first show alone, the energetic Rogers journeys down south to examine the sprawling concrete fixture designed to prevent bank erosion along the mighty Mississippi River; then it's off to Sweden to witness a huge machine called the "Rammer Hammer" break iron ore. ... Really Big Things is undeniably juvenile in tone, but it's still good fun."
The article provides 171 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "... And sometimes it's necessary if you want to watch other things that clash. Like season two of Really Big Things on Discovery (Tuesdays at 9pm). It's really guy stuff, and bigger is better. Size really does count, and all that. In the first episode, host Matt Rogers helped pitch the massive big top for Cirque du Soleil, which was full of interesting factoids and statistics. Most of the inserts are, and answer all the questions you might have about how big, how wide, how deep or how high. There have been man-made white-water rapids which are used for fun and Olympic training, and an impressive military hovercraft. Episode two was my favourite so far, beginning with the dancing fountains at the Bellagio Hotel in Las Vegas. Usually I don't like knowing how these pretty things work because it steals away something of the magic, but going underwater and into the "bat cave" where everything is programmed and maintained was jolly interesting. The window factory and the thing that munches up trees and spits out wood chips - not so much. Like I said: guy stuff."
The article notes: "Waiting for "the big one"? Gigantic, humongous, mammoth items are on display in "Really Big Things." Host Matt Rogers shows viewers the super-size versions of machines, structures and other massive man-made marvels."
The article notes: "The show, "Really Big Things," takes a close look at how the aquarium moved whale sharks Yushan and Taroko this summer. ... Viewers will follow the host, Matt Rogers, as the aquarium prepares for the whale sharks' arrival. The episode also includes footage from Taiwan and the air transport to Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport."
The article notes: "In this new technology and invention series, Matt Rogers travels the globe to prove that, in some cases, size does matter, starting with the sinking unit that places concrete mattresses along the banks of the Mississippi River to help prevent bank erosion; the rammer hammer used to break ore in the Arctic Circle, and the world's largest paper mill."
The result was Withdrawn. Apparently, in this instance, people do not share my dislike and WP:NOT concerns about intersections like this (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 03:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I could go on about how this fails WP:NOT or something, but then that's going to invite round-about arguments about how it supposedly doesn't. So let's go for something simpler, and far less ambiguous: this is patent and blatant
WP:OR (being first published on Wikipedia and thus OR by definition) which provides no encyclopedic content except some unsourced statistical trivia about when the last woman to win a Nobel or how many have won x category of prizes (and statistics being correct is not a reason to keep an article). An hypothetical
Gender bias of Nobel Prizes or
Systematic bias of Nobel Prizes could be a valid encyclopedic article, but that doesn't seem to justify this kind of list.
Update: Also obviously fails WP:NOTMIRROR, as this is a near exact copy of the nobelprize.org page on the same subject; and WP:NOTSTATS/ WP:INDISCRIMINATE (as, beyond the OR statistics about how many women have won X category of prizes, or which one was the first one, there is nothing else to this); and the excessive quotes (all copied from the same nobelprize.org page) are also probably WP:QUOTEFARM/ WP:COPYVIO issues RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, e.g. Gender and Science: Women Nobel Laureates ( Journal of Creative Behavior, 2011, "Eleven female Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry and physiology/medicine between 1901 and 2006 were compared with 37 males who received the Nobel Prize in the same area one year prior and one year after the women."), Gender bias in Nobel prizes (Nature, 2019, "In 2018, Professor D. Strickland received the Nobel Prize in Physics as the first woman in 55 years. From 1901 to 2018, the Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded 112 times to 209 different candidates; among these are only two more women; namely M. Curie in 1903 and M. Goeppert Mayer in 1963."), A Prize for Grumpy Old Men? Reflections on the Lack of Female Nobel Laureates ( Gender & History, 2014), Who can get the next Nobel Prize in infectious diseases? ( International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2016, "In the future, more female laureates would be expected in the IDR field."), Secret history ( Physics World, 2007, "Why have there been so few female Nobel laureates in science – and just two in physics? The usual retort is to blame universities for not allowing women to study there until well into the 19th century."), Iraqi Women and Science: Past, Present and Future (Journal of Medical and Surgical Research 2016, "One simple check of the prestigious Nobel Prize winners since its establishment in 1901 will show that among the 49 female recipients of prize, only 17 of them won the prize for scientific contributions. Among these, 14 female winners shared the prize with male colleagues. Also 12 of these prizes were in the field of medicine or physiology, while only 2 in physics and 4 in chemistry."), Women in physics representation in Malaysian universities (AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, "As to date, only three women have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics out of 51 female Nobel Laureates since 1901. The percentage of women laureates has roughly doubled in the 21st century."), Gender differences in mathematics and science competitions: A systematic review, ( Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2019, "Since 1901, Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine have been awarded to 604 outstanding researchers. Only 19 of these researchers were women (The Nobel Foundation, 2018).") Beccaynr ( talk) 14:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
From an WP:IAR standpoint, I also think it is not a great look for the encylopedia to only define marginalized groups from within the confines of their oppression (i.e. focus only on bias, systemic or otherwise) without having a place to celebrate what people have collectively accomplished, despite the various biases and other factors that may contribute to disparities but also make the group accomplishment worthy of notice.Beccaynr ( talk) 14:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 01:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails
WP:V,
WP:NLIST, and
WP:NOTDIRECTORY (to quote almost exactly: people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X who have won award Y
...) The only sources presented are for trivial facts about Nobel Prizes and have nothing to do with this specific intersection of "ethnicity" and "some other thing", thus this probably also borderline fails
WP:NOR as a topic which has nothing published about it elsewhere is OR by definition.
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs) 00:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon.I find that less convincing than they way you quoted it. But I'm not sure. It seems to me that this is encyclopaedic, that winning a nobel is very notable, and that racial inequity in winning is a notable topic:
Non-encyclopedicand therefore my reading is that as long as it's encyclopedic, nothing after those words therefore matters. I lean keep, but keen to see what others thing before !voting. CT55555 ( talk) 13:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, e.g. Towards Producing Black Nobel Laureates Affiliated with African Universities (APS March Meeting Abstracts 2016, presenting the notable group and then adding research and analysis), African Gold: The Story of Africa's Nobel Laureates (2008, e.g. p. 9, discussing 'so few black Nobel laureates'), Abdulrazak Gurnah wins the 2021 Nobel prize in literature ( Guardian 2021, "No black African writer has won the prize since Wole Soyinka in 1986. Gurnah is the first black writer to win since Toni Morrison in 1993."), No black scientist has ever won a Nobel – that's bad for science, and bad for society (The Conversation/Phys.org, 2018, "a painful reminder that of the more than 900 Nobel laureates, only 14 (1.5%) have been black and none in science."), The Nobels Overwhelmingly Go to Men — This Year's Prize For Medicine Was No Exception (NPR 2020, "All the attention given to women that year prompted Winston Morgan, a researcher at the University of East London, to check whether any Black scientist had ever won a Nobel Prize for science. He couldn't find one. [...] If a Black scientist or physician won a Nobel Prize, says Morgan, the effect would be profound. It would create "lots of optimism, both within the Black community and wider," he says."). A list of people are notable because of the secondary sources that discuss the accomplishments of the group or set. Separate articles can be created for subtopics based on secondary sources that analyze and comment on the group. Beccaynr ( talk) 17:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Modussiccandi ( talk) 09:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails
WP:V,
WP:NLIST, and
WP:NOTDIRECTORY (to quote almost exactly: people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X who have won award Y
...) The only sources presented are for trivial facts about Nobel Prizes and have nothing to do with this specific intersection of "ethnicity" and "some other thing", thus this probably also borderline fails
WP:NOR as a topic which has nothing published about it elsewhere is OR by definition.
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs) 00:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourcing has been found to exist Star Mississippi 02:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
First source is just a local-interest story in a vet magazine, which is not enough to convey notability. Nothing better found Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "Cezar is in her fourth year at Michigan State University College of Veterinary Medicine and is one of the stars of Vet School Confidential. The weekly Animal Planet reality series follows five of the school's students through their daily lives as they apply the knowledge learned in the classroom in a functioning hospital setting or on a farm. Most of Vet School Confidential's footage is shot in MSU's Veterinary Teaching Hospital."
The article notes: "Debuting on the Animal Planet network tonight, a 13-week series called Vet School Confidential follows the lives of Cezar and four other Michigan State University students, tracking their highs and lows while simultaneously recording the sophisticated state of medical treatment for animals. There's Casey, a cute little furball of a dog gone blind from cataracts. And there's Kent Vince, the student trying to give Casey his vision back while also flirting with a cute student on her way to surgery. There are tips on how to keep manure from getting in your boots while working on horses, and there are anxious owners waiting to see if their pets will survive."
The article notes: "One of my kids told me Vet School Confidential was "a really good show, Mom, really." It's not a typical kid's show by any means. It's about veterinary students at Michigan State University, airs fairly late on a school night and covers rather arcane vet school topics. In one recent episode, vets were replacing the pacemaker in a dog and trying to get a day-old reindeer to nurse - not events you'd think a youngster would find interesting to watch."
The article notes: "Want to see a dog undergo cataract surgery, the birth of a foal or the de-horning of a goat? These medical procedures and more will be featured on a new Animal Planet show, "Vet School Confidential," a 13-part television series filmed at Michigan State University. The weekly, half-hour series is scheduled to begin airing Aug. 7 on the cable channel."
The article notes: "Besides, the animals don't talk on Vet School Confidential. It's the students who do most of the conversing during the offbeat, entertaining new 13-episode Animal Planet reality series, which follows the hectic lives of Mehler and several classmates at Michigan State University's College of Veterinary Medicine. ... Vet School Confidential, at 9:30 p.m. Tuesdays on Animal Planet, was filmed over four months on the MSU campus in East Lansing last winter and early spring."
The article notes: "For a real close-up taste of what your typical vet goes through en route to making sure your dog or ferret remains healthy, check out "Vet School Confidential" on Animal Planet tonight at 10:30 p.m. ... In an eye-opening first episode, 48 hours into vet student Kent Vince's first opthalmology rotation, he is shocked to discover he is assisting in his first cataract surgery."
The article notes: "When "Vet School Confidential opens tonight, it will introduce a fresh supply of local heroes. The show — 9:30 p.m. Tuesdays on cable's Animal Planet — spends the next 13 weeks viewing Michigan State University's veterinary school."
The article notes: "Medical dramas have always been a solid bet, and reality programs are now all the rage. Put them both together with an animal angle and you get "Vet School Confidential." This new series follows five real-life veterinary students as they deal with (among other things): a life-threatening auto accident involving a Labrador retriever; a newborn reindeer having nursing difficulties; and an ornery goat that needs to be dehorned."
The article notes: "We've seen medical students learning their skills on a variety of doctor shows, but Animal Planet shifts the focus with "Vet School Confidential." The new series follows a group of veterinary students at Michigan State University as they go through the clinical rotations that will teach them how to care for our pets."
The result was Draftify as the release date is within reasonable draft incubation Star Mississippi 02:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
I cannot determine a reason under WP:NFILM why this article should exist. The film is upcoming. WP:TOOSOON may apply, so I suggest deletion without prejudice to future recreation once notability is established. In addition more than one reference deployed in the article makes no mention of the film, and many others are churnalism 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 11:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:DICDEF Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Technicaly ineligible, but I don't see any input forthcoming Star Mississippi 02:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability and cn-tagged since 2015. I don't see a WP:GNG pass when I look, but there are lots of things complicating the search: his books are in Hindi, he writes on marginalized topics (Dalit/Bahujan empowerment), and he doesn't speak English or work at a university. In principle, he could well be notable - can anyone find sources to prove it?
He's "Dusādha, Eca. Ela." in my library catalogue (at least, I think these are the same person), but that didn't help me find anything for WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK (to get WP:NAUTHOR). Leaving that in case it helps anyone else. asilvering ( talk) 19:27, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this is a WP:NPROF pass, unless someone in theology has some good arguments otherwise? Does not pass WP:NAUTHOR - the one single-authored book (Wealth and Poverty) has at least three academic reviews, so it passes WP:NBOOK, but it's just the one. The only footnote is "Discussion with Dr. Washington, November 17, 2009." asilvering ( talk) 20:03, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Might juuust squak by NMUSIC6, but it's not clear Harrow is independently notable of sigh, and Kawashima redirects there. Unable to find evidence of coverage to meet GNG for this one off collaboration, nor identify a viable AtD. Star Mississippi 20:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. There's a Yahoo Finance link, but it points to a press release by Multigate. Otherwise, no WP:SIGCOV. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 20:19, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Stifle ( talk) 09:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
"Pink Houses" is not called "Ain't That America", meaning it is not a valid disambiguation entry. Prod contested because "it may be useful" even though that's not how dabs work. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Internet censorship in Russia#Instances of censorship or such other article as might be agreed on the talk page. Stifle ( talk) 09:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Conceptually, the topic for this article is not an encyclopedia article topic-- it isn't a discrete specific thing (since a meta platform can be blocked from anywhere, not just russia), and this article is essentially a content fork. We don't host articles with titles like "When a car accident happens" or "Politicians sometimes interfere with the lawmaking process" or "A neighborhood that has the best sidewalks" because although references can be found that discuss these things in depth, they aren't themes that belong in an encyclopedia because of what they try to conceptualize. The article might be movable to "Blocking of Meta platforms in Russia during the second Russian-Ukrainian war" or some other longwinded thing like that, or the content can be added into the article on the war itself or to one on Internet censorship such as that practiced by China and other totalitarian regimes. A loose necktie ( talk) 23:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTFORUM+ this is enwiki, not zhwiki
|
---|
|
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Found only press releases and passing mentions. Prod contested in violation of WP:NPA. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "I expected to hate ESPN's new series, Beg, Borrow & Deal (Tuesdays, 5 p.m.). The show is the latest in the so-called reality-TV genre, where "reality" is usually a misnomer. But after watching the first episode, I must admit the show is off to a promising start. ... Beg, Borrow & Deal isn't quite reality as we know it -- unless you're a transient, in which case you probably don't have a TV anyway -- but it's a legitimate struggle, distinguishing it from some of the other reality series I regularly skip. ... At the very least, Beg, Borrow & Deal is a step in the right direction for ESPN Original Entertainment, which also produced the laughably bad A Season on the Brink."
The article notes: "Instead, the sports network is starting its own competition tonight with the reality show Beg, Borrow & Deal. The new show looks like The Amazing Race -- teams compete to get from one place to another for a prize. But while the Race goes globetrotting in pairs of two, with a few bucks in its pocket, Beg stays in the country but strips its teams of money. That means the two Beg teams of four -- two men and two women on each team -- must use their wits, coast to coast, for transportation, food and lodging. ... Beg, Borrow & Deal was originally cast more than a year ago, Mandt said. That's when filming was to have begun, but fallout from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks delayed the show."
The article notes: "Starting Tuesday, the 27-year-old Chester native will be among eight contestants spotlighted on the eight-week ESPN series "Beg, Borrow & Deal." After a series of interviews and videos sent to ESPN, the station selected eight contestants. Britton is the lone Southerner among them. ... Teams are required to complete 10 of 40 listed tasks en route to their final destination of Alcatraz Island in San Francisco. Among the tasks: Ride a Zamboni ice resurfacer between periods of an NHL game. Compete in a marathon and not finish last. Catch a 35-yard pass from an NFL quarterback. Play in a prison basketball game. Bike ride for a mile with Lance Armstrong."
The article notes: "Last week's episode of the ESPN reality show "Beg, Borrow & Deal 2" allowed Bulls fans to take a melancholy trip back in time. ... On "Beg, Borrow & Deal," two teams of contestants cross the country trying to accomplish sports-related tasks without money or the use of a vehicle. Porter convinced Williams to rent a limousine that would ferry his team to Wrigley Field."
The article notes: "Always on the cutting edge, ESPN is doing it's own "reality show," introducing Beg, Borrow & Deal tonight at 8. ... Anyway, the teams can choose from among 40 listed tasks. And to give you a taste of what to expect, we at CSI -- Cheap Seats Investigations -- have listed what look like the 10 most interesting tasks."
The article notes: "As the stereotype goes, queer men aren't supposed to play or follow competitive sports. Openly gay entertainment reporter Julian Bryce hopes to break this image as a competitor in ESPN's first reality-based game show, Beg, Borrow & Deal, premiering September 17. Still, he's the first to admit he might seem to fit the stereotype to a tee."
The article notes: "A whopping increase in the number of young-adult viewers has helped land a second-season renewal from ESPN for "Beg, Borrow & Deal," its weekly primetime entertainment-reality series. ... The show is averaging a modest 436,000 households for the six weeks since it premiered Tuesday at 8 on Sept. 17, which is only about half of ESPN's average primetime rating, and 26% below the shows in the time period for the same six months in 2001. But outweighing the bad news is the fact that the show is up in three key demographic categories from a year ago: by 135% among adults 18 to 34, by 46% with adults 18 to 49 and by 20% for adults 25 to 54."
The article notes: "Encouraged by the response from new viewers and overall Nielsen Media Research returns from its foray into the reality game show fray, ESPN will order a second season of Beg, Borrow & Deal and is hoping to pair it with a second genre entry next year. ... Through the first five of its eight installments, Beg, Borrow & Deal averaged a 0.5 household rating and a 0.8 among its core male 18 to 34 audience."
The result was delete. I don't see a consensus for a redirect, but if someone wants to make one after the fact, I wouldn't make a fuss. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This article is about a musician and actor that lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to justify an article on Wikipedia. The only source provided is an interview in which the subject os one of three singers covered. The article itself makes no great claims to notability with the statement of being an actress and providing no information about any major roles. As a singer, she has provided backing vocals and sung commercial jingles. My own search for sourcing does not turn up any significant coverage. Whpq ( talk) 19:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. Clear consensus not to retain a standalone; redirect to list seems a reasonable WP:ATD. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways.If someone looks up Toua Tueni, they can find out the country he played for, his position, when he played, etc. A redirect has no notability requirements, only the target of the redirect does. - 2pou ( talk) 21:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. WP:ATD. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. WP:ATD ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
No independent sources, no substantial improvement since it was created 12 years ago, and tagged for notability since 2018. BD2412 T 18:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 17:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Not notable as per WP:GNG, no independent WP:SIGCOV. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 17:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games#Sports. ✗ plicit 13:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Empty tables; fails GNG Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:DICDEF. Seems to be mostly tied to promotional material from Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron and one art teacher. Most of the articles cited either don't use the term, use the term but don't define it, or echo-chamber Jeffrey Katzenberg's quote about Spirit. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 17:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Coverage revolves around trivial stuff such as partnerships, ad campaigns and sponsorships, all of which are insufficient to establish notability per WP:CORPDEPTH. M4DU7 ( talk) 16:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
This is a collection of state highways in Indiana which share a common designation. A Google search turns up only a few articles referring to this road, and various mapping websites prefer the numerical designations over the name. I'm not convinced the name is commonly used enough to warrant a separate article. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 16:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
List of early summer flowers and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of late spring flowers previously deleted. Subjective, undefinable, unhelpful, unsourced, listified prior-cat stub since 2007. Hyperik ⌜ talk⌟ 15:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
A totally unknown party; it seems that it is not possible to find any source on this party. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 15:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 10:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Mostly unsourced article, including information and pictures that is not even directly related to the topic. - LouisAragon ( talk) 15:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Contested G4. Are nominees actually notable? Post holders, perhaps. Primary sources, previously deleted at AfD as "Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL" by Muboshgu, and I see no reason to differ here. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus that there is sufficient sourcing to establish notability (and a dose of WP:HEY). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 02:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Seems like an original compilation and thus fails WP:OR (the whole of the prose is also entirely unsourced), and probably isn't quite accurate (for example, this only mentions "About a dozen women have played college football at various levels"; which is well below the nearly two dozen included here). RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 13:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do some of your own work. The article is broadly sour sourced, if you want to dismiss all 131 sources, you should actually really dismiss some of them yourself.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 21:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
I've never heard anyone argue that there are too many sources in an article as a reason to delete. Here's more from a quick google search--I'm unsure if any of these sources are referenced in the article or not:
Clearly meets WP:GNG, WP:LISTN... WP:IMPACT... Do I have to keep doing this?-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 01:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
At this point, I am done addressing the comments from wjemather. I write this for anyone else who comes along and is seeking clarity. Here's a short list of articles about female players discussed as a group and specifically the impact that some individuals have had on the group as a whole.
I am now done with this song-and-dance routine. I don't dance. The facts have been presented multiple times from an abundance of high-quality widely accepted reliable third party sources. Those arguing for deletion are refusing to do the work to support their argument and I'm tired of continuing to provide the detail to support the argument to keep. May the closer do as they see fit.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list.Check. The remaining delete rationales (after a few strikes) are all counter to the WP:ATD policy:
Disputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page, except in severe cases..— Bagumba ( talk) 15:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Trivial ethnicity and occupation intersection, no reliable independent source whatsoever provided to support encyclopedic context about this (individual sources about individual members are not appropriate for a wider list, per WP:NLIST). What there is to be said about the topic is probably already included (or could be without any difficulty) at Religion in space#Judaism. Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 13:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:17, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
An unknown party, on the web there is only some news about its foundation and nothing more. It does not appear to have participated in any elections. The page, written in two lines, at present does not demonstrate the relevance of the party and is decidedly useless. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 13:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to the category tree and NOT failing and everything; but even more importantly, there is simply no precedent for this kind of list by sub-national division. Doing so would simply be encouraging the proliferation of similar useless lists which would only include a few entries and would definitively be a WP:BADIDEA. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 12:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Redundant to the category treecontradicts WP:NOTDUP (a guideline), and it seems like a perfectly encyclopedic topic to me. The constituent countries of the UK have strong regional identities and it's entirely possible for a Welsh person to feel Welsh but not British, or more Welsh than British. If inappropriate lists of people by sub-national division are created then they can simply be deleted. Hut 8.5 11:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Leoluca Orlando. RL0919 ( talk) 13:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Almost completely unknown movement, rarely mentioned in some sources only for its founder. The page reads only "The 139 Movement is a political party in Italy led by Leoluca Orlando": in this state it is a useless page. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 12:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Adult Swim history under the redirect if someone finds the references to spin it back out and/or wants to merge it, but I don't see another relist changing this. Star Mississippi 02:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Could only find passing mentions and Wikpiedia mirrors. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 12:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Stifle ( talk) 09:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable canceled video game. Some sourcing does exist, but it covers two specific events: The game was announced with a few hands on articles, and then subsequently cancelled the next year. There's nothing indicating any lasting importance or significance. -- ferret ( talk) 00:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 12:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Alfio Marchini. Star Mississippi 02:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
It was just a personal civic list like hundreds of other civic lists in Italy. I do not see a particular relevance to consider the page on the list as encyclopedic. No specific sources regarding the list on the page, whose name was not even Marchini List. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 12:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Football referee with limited coverage. All Google News mentions are trivial. This German source search gives us only stats databases and passing mentions like this one in DFB. Even ProQuest only has one passing match report mention. Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a dead-end page only with irrelevant external links. A possible candidate for deletion? Abani79 ( talk) 11:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Alliance Party of Northern Ireland. Anything worth merging is still available from the article history. Randykitty ( talk) 18:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Any standalone article on an organization needs to meet WP:NORG, but I cannot find such coverage. For example, there are only 9 results on Google news all of which are either op-eds (not RS) or brief mentions. I'm told this article was created as a sizesplit from the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland, but if the info is UNDUE there it can just be removed without creating a separate article that does not meet notability requirements. ( t · c) buidhe 23:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep. Very hasty with the nomination. I'm not going to pretend there's lots of sources to choose from however the ones found are WP:RS and does meet basic notability guidelines. I wish this was discussed prior rather than straight to AfD. Abcmaxx ( talk) 00:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Also it looks like it isn't formally registered as a separate organisation, like some other youth wings of bigger entities are; they're just the youth of this political party under an informal banner. I don't think anyone can argue that the parent article doesn't meet criteria therefore I see no reason why this fork should be treated differently. All a redirect would do is create a long messy parent article. Abcmaxx ( talk) 01:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Update Articles from Trouw, British Youth Council and Irish Times have been added. Abcmaxx ( talk) 09:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Local museum. Refs are not independent and/or minor mentions. Lack of in-depth coverage in independent RS. MB 00:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Many of the refs are to the company website. Most of the others are minor mentions of the firm that primarily discuss projects they are associated with. No in-depth significant coverage of the firm itself. MB 00:53, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Judo at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's 66 kg. Anything worth merging is still available from the article history. Randykitty ( talk) 18:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG AND WP:NOLYMPICS. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 10:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 09:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. No chart entry, no significant coverage in the media. Binksternet ( talk) 15:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 15:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
ProQuest yielded only press releases and passing mentions. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "When it debuts tonight on Food Network, the season premiere of “Ultimate Recipe Showdown” will feature Simi Valley resident Rick Massa making mac ’n’ cheese under the hot lights of a New York TV studio, the prying eyes of celebrity food dude Guy Fieri, and the constraints of a time limit — with $25,000 in prize money on the line. ... “Ultimate Recipe Showdown” first aired in early 2008, with Fieri and Marc Summers as hosts. The show has since undergone a makeover and now spends more time delving into the lives of each competitor. ... Selected by a panel of judges that includes the director of the Food Network test kitchens, an editor from Family Circle magazine and chef Michael Psilakis of Anthos restaurant in New York, the winner of each week’s competition also may see his or her recipe turned into a “Watch it Sunday, Taste it Monday” special at T.G.I.Friday’s restaurants. ... Still to come in the season are episodes devoted to burgers (Jan. 11), cakes (Jan. 18), hot and spicy dishes (Jan. 25), desserts (Feb. 8) and “hometown favorites” (Feb. 15)."
The article notes: "Called "The Ultimate Recipe Showdown," and set in a stadium in Hollywood, the program, like many Food Network programs, will be a cooking contest. Its goal, producers say, is to find the best recipes in America. ... For the March 2 episode, Isacsson is one of nine contestants, four of whom are chefs and five, people who simply love to cook. Three make chili, three make macaroni and cheese and three make sandwiches. All are competing for a prize of $25,000. ... After whittling down entries to 54, the Network decided to divide them into six categories, hence, the six weekly shows. There will be hour-long shows for burgers, chicken, comfort foods, pasta, cakes and cookies. Each week, nine finalists will compete."
The article notes: "Fogelman will be vying for a $25,000 prize, along with $5,000 worth of products from Kohl's, when the second show of this six-part series airs on the cable network at 9 p.m. Sunday. ... This is the show's third season, which, when it is over, will have featured 24 contestants spread across six categories. It is hosted by Guy Fieri, a competition winner himself. ... Last week, the series debuted with the finalists in the comfort food category. By the season's conclusion, a winner will be crowned by three judges for a hot and spicy dish, the best burger, the tastiest cake or other dessert, and the top hometown favorite. More than 8,000 recipes were entered into competition, according to the network."
The article notes: "This is the show's third season, which, when it is over, will result in six winners in six categories. It is hosted by Guy Fieri. The judges, which include Katherine Alford, vice president of Food Network kitchens; chef Michael Psilakis, owner of several New York restaurants; and Rosemary Ellis, editor-in-chief of "Good Housekeeping," determine who will win $25,000, as well as $5,000 worth of Kohl's products."
The article notes: "Food Network's "Ultimate Recipe Showdown: Burgers" airs at 8 p.m. on Sunday, April 4. Home cooks nationwide submitted more than 10,000 recipes in hopes of achieving culinary fame in one of six categories: Comfort Food, Party Food, Hot & Spicy, Burgers, Cakes & Desserts and Hometown Favorites. In this six-week series hosted by Guy Fieri, each episode focuses on one category and features the top four contestants who compete in two rounds of competition including a signature-dish round and speed-dish round."
The article notes: "The Food Network's Ultimate Recipe Showdown ended last weekend and now five winning recipes are on the menu at T.G.I. Friday's restaurants. Among them is a hamburger from Dr. Harold Cohen, a retired Hollywood plastic surgeon. Four items were judged by a panel of food experts. The Ultimate Recipe Beverage Showdown winner was determined by online voting. In case you missed the show, it was a six-week series which pitted category finalists against each other for a $25,000 prize."
The article notes: "Are two local foodies the winners of a round in the Food Network's $25,000 Ultimate Recipe Showdown? ... A few weeks after submission, the women got a call from the network saying that out of 10,000 entries, their idea was now among 4,000 to be further tested."
The article notes: "Standing in front of the judges can be a nerve-racking experience for contestants because whatever dish is the best in the three judges' opinion is the dish dubbed the "Ultimate Recipe" and wins the creator $25,000 and a spot on T.G.I. Friday's menu across the country, Alford said."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo (soundtrack). (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
In Indian movies, there are many songs in a movie. It would not be a good idea to create an article for each one. This song is from Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo (soundtrack). Unlike the other songs from this movie, this song was not a state wide chartbuster and only received 50 million views on YouTube like hundreds of other songs. Since it did not win any awards, it does not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (music). See Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Songs. DareshMohan ( talk) 08:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rangasthalam (soundtrack). Discarding one "keep" vote from IP user which has no explanation. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 08:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
5/6 of the article is bad sources. There is not a reason why as to why this article exists nor are there enough references given for the song. DareshMohan ( talk) 08:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
"has won one or more significant awards or honor,"so merely being a notable award isn't enough anyway Ab207 ( talk) 11:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Bbb23: CSD G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (MeLucifer) in violation of ban or block. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Most of the sources are about Nosh (app) rather than about the company Nosh Technologies, and notability is not inherited. The Enterpreneur source is the only that talks really about the company, but does not satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH, and is not quite independent (full of quotes). A search for additional sources did not find any sources that could count towards notability. Femke ( talk) 08:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- coverage is mostly WP:PASSING mentions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Textbook WP:NCORP failure. Short-lived shopping website; most references appear to have been press releases or routine coverage. Declined speedy in 2017 taken down by LionMans Account. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
This fictional character has only one film appearance. Does not meet WP:GNG as it lacks independent coverage in reliable sources including enough real-world/out-of-universe perspective. In addition, the page itself is written like a fancruft. Ab207 ( talk) 06:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Tuvalu international footballers. Sandstein 10:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Article about non-notable footballer that was previously kept at AfD in October 2020. The same deletion rationale applies today - this footballer made a few appearances in the Portuguese second level, but the article comprehensively fails WP:GNG. At the time the article was kept under the deprecated NFOOTBALL standard with the idea that it needed and could be improved. 18 months later, NFOOTBALL is no longer applicable and the article hasn't been improved (and a new search for SIGCOV yielded nothing). Jogurney ( talk) 03:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
I found only one reliable source with significant coverage for this DVD release. SL93 ( talk) 02:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Insufficient sources to support an article, and no target left to which to redirect this title.
BD2412
T 03:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't satisfy WP:MUSICBIO; session musicians rarely do. Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to see how Zoot AfD closes. This could go either way (redirect, delete) at the moment, but there's no point in redirecting if that's going to be deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Calling this no consensus vs. an actual keep, despite outcome being the same, as neither keep !votes are policy based. I don't see a 3rd relist bringing input since the first two have not. Star Mississippi 15:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The tools did not include my message so I'm manually recreating it here. Listed as a part of New Page Patrol review. A "stats only" article about a subset of Islamic Solidarity Games. The 2 sources do not cover it, it has a mere mention or list entry in them. Suggest merging into the Islamic Solidarity Games article— Preceding unsigned comment added by North8000 ( talk • contribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to White noise. Stifle ( talk) 09:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Wiktionary is there for that instead. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 18:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Only source in the article is TV Guide, and I could find nothing better Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "It was like something out of a game show dream, complete with the consummate game show host Wink Martindale. Parkland resident Rich Bowen won more than $60,000 in prizes as a contestant on the Fox Network's game show "The Last Word" in October. ... The object of the game, which airs on Ch. 13 at 10:30 a.m. Monday through Friday, is to guess the last word. Each game has three words, all of which are somehow related. For example, contestants might be asked to guess the words Marx, Smothers and Wright. The connection between the words is that all the words are the names of famous brothers. ... In the first game, the male contestant competes against the female celebrity and in the second game the female contestant challenges the male celebrity. In the event of a tie, the male and female contestants go head to head."
The article notes: "Veteran producer Merrill Heatter has taken his newest series, "The Last Word," to Vancouver, B.C., where he's taping 65 episodes for U.S. syndication. And he's hired someone in Gig Harbor to scout for contestants right in our backyard. ... Sinclair says if the program's a hit, it'll become "a resident game show" in the Northwest. "The Last Word," with emcee Wink Martindale, premieres nationally the week of Sept. 18; KCPQ will air it at 10:30 a.m. on Channel 13."
The book provides 118 words of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "The Last Word. (Series; Game; Syn. 1989–1990). Concept: Two teams compete, each composed of a celebrity captain and a non-celebrity player. A board with three unknown words (indicated by blank spaces) is shown. One player from each team competes. One player begins by asking for a letter. If it is contained in the word it appears in its appropriate place on the board. The object is for players to guess each word (which are related to each other). The first player to identify the last word of the three words that are shown wins the round for his team. The team with the most correct identifications wins the game and merchandise points. Host: Wink Martindale. Assistant: Jennifer Lyall."
The article provides 86 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "From the Who Cares file — polyester game show host Wink Martindale is getting a new gig, courtesy of — you guessed it — Ted Turner. "The Last Word," a game created by Merrill Heatter of "Hollywood Squares" fame, will be peddled to stations at the January NAPTE video convention in Houston. Produced in a joint deal with Turner Program Services, the game pits celebs and nobodies in a high-tech computerized format that also involves the audience, for what it's worth. Turner will distribute the series starting next fall."
The book provides 28 words of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "The Last Word. Syndicated: 1989–1990. Host: Wink Martindale. A word game in which contestants teamed up with celebrities, including Jill Whelan, Ted Lange, Susan Ruttan and Gordon Jump."
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Could only find tangential mentions, press releases, and TV Guide listings Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "Parents need to know that, overall, this docuseries emphasizes shock value over education -- while there are some scattered opportunities for families to learn about animal behavior and science, they're usually overshadowed by the greater factor of curiosity. The amount of over-the-top/iffy content varies by episode, but it's safe to say that sensitive young viewers might be disturbed by scenes of mutant animals (a cyclopic piglet and a dog with no front legs, for instance) or stories of animals eating humans."
The article provides 138 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Tonight this watchable animal clip show focuses on animal attacks caught on video. And there's no shortage of those - from a Taiwanese preacher being mauled by a lion after he jumped into a zoo exhibit to evangelise the beast, to a Rwandan tour guide being dragged into the jungle by a gorilla. The most memorable account comes from an underwater cameraman attacked by an elephant seal - the animal engulfed his whole head, making everything pitch black and pressing his whole face into its tongue. Animal experts provide illuminating commentary. At first it's a bummer to see a huge anaconda disgorging a big animal carcass in a bid to get away from humans - but those humans might have saved its life. In cool weather, we learn, snakes' digestion slows and big meals can putrefy, killing them from the inside."
The article notes: "Weird, True & Freaky 9 and 9:30 p.m., Animal Planet. Three-headed frogs, two-headed cats, a six-legged deer, piglets nursing on a tiger, a leg growing on a lamb's head, a snake that swallows golf balls — you can't say the title of this show isn't accurate. There's nothing like a good old-fashioned mutation or genetic defect to keep you on the edge of your seat."
The article notes: "Other shows take a tabloid-headline approach to the odd. Animal Planet’s “Weird, True & Freaky,” for instance, has featured a lobster so big that it was called Lobzilla; a python in Indonesia that measured 50 feet, thought to be the longest snake in recorded history (“handlers feed it three or four dogs a month”); and a 1,091-pound squid caught in Antarctica (“an eye the size of a soccer ball”)."
The article notes: "9 P.M. (Animal Planet) WEIRD, TRUE & FREAKY More stories about creepy crawlers, including maggots that live in the scalp and feed on the brain, leeches that reside in the nose and flies that make their homes in the neck. At 9:30 the series moves on to stomach-turning animal births."
The article notes: "And Wendy hasn't let worldwide attention change her, even with recent guest appearances on television shows such as Weird, True and Freaky. (A black Persian cat with gold-plated lower canine teeth, owned by a dentist, and a featherless parrot were her co-stars.)"
The article notes: ""Weird, True & Freaky” (8:30 p.m. on Animal Planet): This episode features a segment on the world’s deadliest spider that was reportedly found in the produce aisle of a Tulsa grocery store in March."
The article notes: ""Weird, True & Freaky" (Tuesday, 8:30 p.m., Animal Planet). Enough of these scourges of nature are in Australia to serve as an anti-travel commercial. Sure there are the expected dingoes, wild dogs roaming in feral packs, but the king toad, some 200 million strong, that grows to 9.5-inches and 5 pounds, is alarming."
The article notes: "'Weird, True & Freaky' 8:30 p.m., Animal Planet: This episode examines the unusual relationships that develop between dogs and other animals. I might not want to watch, depending on just how freaky it's going to get."
The article notes: "“Weird, True & Freaky,” 8 p.m. (Animal Planet): Italians place snakes on a statue of St. Dominic to ward off snakebites; Indians perform a frog marriage to end a drought; a Kenyan fertility ritual involves goat blood."
The article notes: "The story of Spyder, a six-legged fawn found in the Rome area in July, continues to fascinate. And now it looks like his story will be featured on Animal Planet's popular show called "Weird, True and Freaky," according to a local veterinarian who examined the young deer when it was discovered. Dan Pate of West Rome Animal Clinic said this morning that TV crews from the show are expected to be in town Monday and Tuesday."
The result was keep. consensus appears clear after a strong debate. No active discussions of significance. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 13:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
No encyclopedic content whatsoever, and really seems like a category-masquerading-as-an-article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a simple directory-like listing. This list also appears to be obvious WP:OR: the specific selection criteria seem highly arbitrary and doesn't quite seem to match with either the natural English meaning of the word "Russian" (which is "from Russia", not "from the part of the Soviet Union which is now Russia" [the proper term, of course, being "Soviet", unless this is a list by ethnicity, which this doesn't seem to be], or "from some other part of the Soviet Union" or "spent a few years there at some point in their life"). This is already duplicated by the nationality branches of the category tree, so not even necessary for someone to bother spending the effort to categorify it. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 01:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources.Page views are not convincing arguments for notability, much less for failing WP:NOT. If the articles were deleted, the exact same information would be available to the readers via categories (which would likely get a boost), which are the more appropriate way to organise this than some OR/NOT lists. Maintenance templates can't fix this failing WP:NOT or address the fact that by it's very nature (given the ambiguity of "Russian") this list is going to keep encouraging OR and is thus a bad idea. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 12:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- WP:NOTDUP says, as a conclusion: '
When deciding whether to create or avoid a list, the existence of a category on the same topic is irrelevant. This applies to both sides of the argument.- Categories are what are meant to be navigational aids, and WP:LISTPURP says that
The list may be a valuable information source. The list is not a valuable information source as its content is already at List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Russia and Soviet Union with more information than this article has. This article consists of no prose. See WP:NOTSTATS—which as a policy surpasses MOS—especially point #3 which states thatWikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of informationandStatistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context. Also, page views are not a measure of notability.- Same as above;
page views are not a measure of notability.
laureates who were citizens of Russia/Soviet Union at the time of receiving the award or in another time of their lifeare nonsensical, for multiple reasons. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
seems like a category-masquerading-as-an-articleis invalid. The nominator's argument that
articles should provide encyclopedic prose and contextis irrelevant because this is a list and not an article. While high quality lists usually have a paragraph or two at the start to set some context, the absence of such a thing is not a reason to delete the list and it usually duplicates the relevant article anyway. It is fine for list entries not to contain significant prose. I also don't agree that the topic is unencyclopedic, Nobel laureates are definitely an encyclopedic topic and nationality is an obvious way to categorise them.
spent a few years there at some point in their life, the entries who are not Russian or Soviet nationals clearly have strong connections to Russia, e.g. Andre Geim was born in Russia and seems to have lived there for the first 30 years or so of his life. Hut 8.5 16:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
laureates of the Nobel Prize who were citizens of the Soviet Union or Russia at the time of receiving the award, or at another time during their life. Which, given that the Soviet Union always encompassed more than just Russia, would seem to potentially encompass people who weren't by any reasonable definition 'Russian'. While it may be common amongst the less-educated to conflate the Soviet Union with Russia, Wikipedia certainly shouldn't be perpetuating this misapprehension. If the list is to be kept, we need to come up with clear inclusion criteria which actually agree with the title. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 12:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject) of a topic where the title doesn't match the content? AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Zero sourcing found. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "From trash compactors big enough to chew up a home to a unique NFL stadium, there's no end to the fun that Rogers -- and viewers -- will have checking out the latest and greatest big thing. ... This intriguing series is as big on fun as it is devoid of iffy content, and the charismatic and adventurous Rogers is a great host. Really Big Things offers some really great family entertainment for parents and their kids, especially boys -- who are likely to be most awed by the array of massive vehicles."
The article provides 196 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Really Big Things provides a rambling road tour of massive man-made wonders located all over the world. Hosted by former American Idol hopeful Matt Rogers, the six-part series is short on concept but long on travel budget. In the first show alone, the energetic Rogers journeys down south to examine the sprawling concrete fixture designed to prevent bank erosion along the mighty Mississippi River; then it's off to Sweden to witness a huge machine called the "Rammer Hammer" break iron ore. ... Really Big Things is undeniably juvenile in tone, but it's still good fun."
The article provides 171 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "... And sometimes it's necessary if you want to watch other things that clash. Like season two of Really Big Things on Discovery (Tuesdays at 9pm). It's really guy stuff, and bigger is better. Size really does count, and all that. In the first episode, host Matt Rogers helped pitch the massive big top for Cirque du Soleil, which was full of interesting factoids and statistics. Most of the inserts are, and answer all the questions you might have about how big, how wide, how deep or how high. There have been man-made white-water rapids which are used for fun and Olympic training, and an impressive military hovercraft. Episode two was my favourite so far, beginning with the dancing fountains at the Bellagio Hotel in Las Vegas. Usually I don't like knowing how these pretty things work because it steals away something of the magic, but going underwater and into the "bat cave" where everything is programmed and maintained was jolly interesting. The window factory and the thing that munches up trees and spits out wood chips - not so much. Like I said: guy stuff."
The article notes: "Waiting for "the big one"? Gigantic, humongous, mammoth items are on display in "Really Big Things." Host Matt Rogers shows viewers the super-size versions of machines, structures and other massive man-made marvels."
The article notes: "The show, "Really Big Things," takes a close look at how the aquarium moved whale sharks Yushan and Taroko this summer. ... Viewers will follow the host, Matt Rogers, as the aquarium prepares for the whale sharks' arrival. The episode also includes footage from Taiwan and the air transport to Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport."
The article notes: "In this new technology and invention series, Matt Rogers travels the globe to prove that, in some cases, size does matter, starting with the sinking unit that places concrete mattresses along the banks of the Mississippi River to help prevent bank erosion; the rammer hammer used to break ore in the Arctic Circle, and the world's largest paper mill."
The result was Withdrawn. Apparently, in this instance, people do not share my dislike and WP:NOT concerns about intersections like this (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 03:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I could go on about how this fails WP:NOT or something, but then that's going to invite round-about arguments about how it supposedly doesn't. So let's go for something simpler, and far less ambiguous: this is patent and blatant
WP:OR (being first published on Wikipedia and thus OR by definition) which provides no encyclopedic content except some unsourced statistical trivia about when the last woman to win a Nobel or how many have won x category of prizes (and statistics being correct is not a reason to keep an article). An hypothetical
Gender bias of Nobel Prizes or
Systematic bias of Nobel Prizes could be a valid encyclopedic article, but that doesn't seem to justify this kind of list.
Update: Also obviously fails WP:NOTMIRROR, as this is a near exact copy of the nobelprize.org page on the same subject; and WP:NOTSTATS/ WP:INDISCRIMINATE (as, beyond the OR statistics about how many women have won X category of prizes, or which one was the first one, there is nothing else to this); and the excessive quotes (all copied from the same nobelprize.org page) are also probably WP:QUOTEFARM/ WP:COPYVIO issues RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, e.g. Gender and Science: Women Nobel Laureates ( Journal of Creative Behavior, 2011, "Eleven female Nobel laureates in physics, chemistry and physiology/medicine between 1901 and 2006 were compared with 37 males who received the Nobel Prize in the same area one year prior and one year after the women."), Gender bias in Nobel prizes (Nature, 2019, "In 2018, Professor D. Strickland received the Nobel Prize in Physics as the first woman in 55 years. From 1901 to 2018, the Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded 112 times to 209 different candidates; among these are only two more women; namely M. Curie in 1903 and M. Goeppert Mayer in 1963."), A Prize for Grumpy Old Men? Reflections on the Lack of Female Nobel Laureates ( Gender & History, 2014), Who can get the next Nobel Prize in infectious diseases? ( International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2016, "In the future, more female laureates would be expected in the IDR field."), Secret history ( Physics World, 2007, "Why have there been so few female Nobel laureates in science – and just two in physics? The usual retort is to blame universities for not allowing women to study there until well into the 19th century."), Iraqi Women and Science: Past, Present and Future (Journal of Medical and Surgical Research 2016, "One simple check of the prestigious Nobel Prize winners since its establishment in 1901 will show that among the 49 female recipients of prize, only 17 of them won the prize for scientific contributions. Among these, 14 female winners shared the prize with male colleagues. Also 12 of these prizes were in the field of medicine or physiology, while only 2 in physics and 4 in chemistry."), Women in physics representation in Malaysian universities (AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, "As to date, only three women have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics out of 51 female Nobel Laureates since 1901. The percentage of women laureates has roughly doubled in the 21st century."), Gender differences in mathematics and science competitions: A systematic review, ( Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2019, "Since 1901, Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine have been awarded to 604 outstanding researchers. Only 19 of these researchers were women (The Nobel Foundation, 2018).") Beccaynr ( talk) 14:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
From an WP:IAR standpoint, I also think it is not a great look for the encylopedia to only define marginalized groups from within the confines of their oppression (i.e. focus only on bias, systemic or otherwise) without having a place to celebrate what people have collectively accomplished, despite the various biases and other factors that may contribute to disparities but also make the group accomplishment worthy of notice.Beccaynr ( talk) 14:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 01:38, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails
WP:V,
WP:NLIST, and
WP:NOTDIRECTORY (to quote almost exactly: people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X who have won award Y
...) The only sources presented are for trivial facts about Nobel Prizes and have nothing to do with this specific intersection of "ethnicity" and "some other thing", thus this probably also borderline fails
WP:NOR as a topic which has nothing published about it elsewhere is OR by definition.
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs) 00:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon.I find that less convincing than they way you quoted it. But I'm not sure. It seems to me that this is encyclopaedic, that winning a nobel is very notable, and that racial inequity in winning is a notable topic:
Non-encyclopedicand therefore my reading is that as long as it's encyclopedic, nothing after those words therefore matters. I lean keep, but keen to see what others thing before !voting. CT55555 ( talk) 13:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, e.g. Towards Producing Black Nobel Laureates Affiliated with African Universities (APS March Meeting Abstracts 2016, presenting the notable group and then adding research and analysis), African Gold: The Story of Africa's Nobel Laureates (2008, e.g. p. 9, discussing 'so few black Nobel laureates'), Abdulrazak Gurnah wins the 2021 Nobel prize in literature ( Guardian 2021, "No black African writer has won the prize since Wole Soyinka in 1986. Gurnah is the first black writer to win since Toni Morrison in 1993."), No black scientist has ever won a Nobel – that's bad for science, and bad for society (The Conversation/Phys.org, 2018, "a painful reminder that of the more than 900 Nobel laureates, only 14 (1.5%) have been black and none in science."), The Nobels Overwhelmingly Go to Men — This Year's Prize For Medicine Was No Exception (NPR 2020, "All the attention given to women that year prompted Winston Morgan, a researcher at the University of East London, to check whether any Black scientist had ever won a Nobel Prize for science. He couldn't find one. [...] If a Black scientist or physician won a Nobel Prize, says Morgan, the effect would be profound. It would create "lots of optimism, both within the Black community and wider," he says."). A list of people are notable because of the secondary sources that discuss the accomplishments of the group or set. Separate articles can be created for subtopics based on secondary sources that analyze and comment on the group. Beccaynr ( talk) 17:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Modussiccandi ( talk) 09:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails
WP:V,
WP:NLIST, and
WP:NOTDIRECTORY (to quote almost exactly: people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X who have won award Y
...) The only sources presented are for trivial facts about Nobel Prizes and have nothing to do with this specific intersection of "ethnicity" and "some other thing", thus this probably also borderline fails
WP:NOR as a topic which has nothing published about it elsewhere is OR by definition.
RandomCanadian (
talk /
contribs) 00:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourcing has been found to exist Star Mississippi 02:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
First source is just a local-interest story in a vet magazine, which is not enough to convey notability. Nothing better found Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "Cezar is in her fourth year at Michigan State University College of Veterinary Medicine and is one of the stars of Vet School Confidential. The weekly Animal Planet reality series follows five of the school's students through their daily lives as they apply the knowledge learned in the classroom in a functioning hospital setting or on a farm. Most of Vet School Confidential's footage is shot in MSU's Veterinary Teaching Hospital."
The article notes: "Debuting on the Animal Planet network tonight, a 13-week series called Vet School Confidential follows the lives of Cezar and four other Michigan State University students, tracking their highs and lows while simultaneously recording the sophisticated state of medical treatment for animals. There's Casey, a cute little furball of a dog gone blind from cataracts. And there's Kent Vince, the student trying to give Casey his vision back while also flirting with a cute student on her way to surgery. There are tips on how to keep manure from getting in your boots while working on horses, and there are anxious owners waiting to see if their pets will survive."
The article notes: "One of my kids told me Vet School Confidential was "a really good show, Mom, really." It's not a typical kid's show by any means. It's about veterinary students at Michigan State University, airs fairly late on a school night and covers rather arcane vet school topics. In one recent episode, vets were replacing the pacemaker in a dog and trying to get a day-old reindeer to nurse - not events you'd think a youngster would find interesting to watch."
The article notes: "Want to see a dog undergo cataract surgery, the birth of a foal or the de-horning of a goat? These medical procedures and more will be featured on a new Animal Planet show, "Vet School Confidential," a 13-part television series filmed at Michigan State University. The weekly, half-hour series is scheduled to begin airing Aug. 7 on the cable channel."
The article notes: "Besides, the animals don't talk on Vet School Confidential. It's the students who do most of the conversing during the offbeat, entertaining new 13-episode Animal Planet reality series, which follows the hectic lives of Mehler and several classmates at Michigan State University's College of Veterinary Medicine. ... Vet School Confidential, at 9:30 p.m. Tuesdays on Animal Planet, was filmed over four months on the MSU campus in East Lansing last winter and early spring."
The article notes: "For a real close-up taste of what your typical vet goes through en route to making sure your dog or ferret remains healthy, check out "Vet School Confidential" on Animal Planet tonight at 10:30 p.m. ... In an eye-opening first episode, 48 hours into vet student Kent Vince's first opthalmology rotation, he is shocked to discover he is assisting in his first cataract surgery."
The article notes: "When "Vet School Confidential opens tonight, it will introduce a fresh supply of local heroes. The show — 9:30 p.m. Tuesdays on cable's Animal Planet — spends the next 13 weeks viewing Michigan State University's veterinary school."
The article notes: "Medical dramas have always been a solid bet, and reality programs are now all the rage. Put them both together with an animal angle and you get "Vet School Confidential." This new series follows five real-life veterinary students as they deal with (among other things): a life-threatening auto accident involving a Labrador retriever; a newborn reindeer having nursing difficulties; and an ornery goat that needs to be dehorned."
The article notes: "We've seen medical students learning their skills on a variety of doctor shows, but Animal Planet shifts the focus with "Vet School Confidential." The new series follows a group of veterinary students at Michigan State University as they go through the clinical rotations that will teach them how to care for our pets."