I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI XXVII XXVIII XXIX XXX XXXI XXXII |
some flowers and music for you, - you were around when I created my first article, and we enjoyed new music -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
User:RandomCanadian: please stop making edits like this {bogus AN3 warning). Johnuniq can follow edits like this easily enough if need be. But why should John waste his time? This is the third bogus report you've made.
When I wrote, Please comment on content not editors
on
Talk:Napoleon, you did the exact opposite. It is, however, part of a standard wikipedia guideline as my edit-summary indicated.
On Talk:Napoleon, you wrote ad hominem comments directed at me. Those comments were completely unrelated to the Napoleon talk page so were hidden per WP:TPG. (The same has happened frequently on Talk:Frédéric Chopin.) You unhid them twice and then you decided to post a bogus WP:AN3 notice.
On the other hand you knew because of my edit summary, that I was having "health problems"—in fact emergency services contacted me yesterday just before 6 am. Why did that not register with you?
If you sincerely think I have been edit warring, make a post at WP:AN3/EdJohnston and supply the diffs. Thanks, Mathsci ( talk) 17:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I have muted you, to prevent any further excess.All a bit weird, but hey-hoh ...
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Kok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prades.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
In this edit, you present a drawing as being located in New York. According to the sources I consulted, it would have been bought in New York ( as indicated by the Bodmer Foundation) by the heirs of Arthur Pollen before joining their collection in London (see this BM link, in the "Curator's comments" section, search for "ii. London"). That's what I indicated in the article in French.
I may have misunderstood something, or if you have sources that contradict my postulate, I would be grateful if you could let me know.
Awaiting your response, thank you for your work on the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Braaark ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vinay V. Deodhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomington.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. I am a little concerned about the list applications. As far as I know the only one is in magnetochemistry. If you know of any others, please add them to the article or let me know on my talk page. Once the deletion tag is removed I intend to to fill out the article with details from the books by Cotton and Tsukerblat. Petergans ( talk) 10:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to let you know that the 1994 lectures of Calabi at UPenn (the links to which you removed from Riemannian connection on a surface on 18 January 2022), from what I can tell, are still available at the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine: [2]. I currently don't yet know enough about the subject to justify re-adding them with the archive links, but since you have made substantial contributions to that article, I figured I should let you know about it here. Thank you, ReGuess ( talk) 03:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. Thank you for sharing your profound knowledge of Bach's music! I decorated my talk. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with Bach's works and his No. 1 especially today! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Could you please use the added sources (at least once each), for BWV 56? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Can you please help to what "Antike Dichtung" is in English? My translator gives me "Antique poetry", but there's no such thing on Wikipedia, and "poetry of ancient Greece and ancient Rome" sounds clumsy. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
See [3]. Thanks for your help. Raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Concern about an editor going through articles changing Jewish to Israelite. Doug Weller talk 07:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
My comment on 0xDeadbeef's talk was only a passing remark on warning vandals (and opining on templating the regulars) — I'm a little confused by the opening of your reply though.. did you mean that you recognise my username from my vote? If you have any questions or concerns though, you are always more than welcome to ask on my talk page or email me — TNT ( talk • she/her) 13:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Mathsci,
Given this recent MOS discussion, it looks like Smasongarrison is correct in changing the word "suffering" to a word less emotionally fraught. It also looks like their changes are also supported by Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Careful language.
I appreciate you seeking to uphold the quality of content on the project but I don't think you need to be double-checking their contributions so closely and making unnecessary reversions over differences in terminology where you might hold a different opinion. There are so many more serious and problematic issues with articles to get into an edit-war over a word here and there and I'd hate to see things end up on WP:ANEW because of differing interpretations over the use of "suffering". You are both long-time editors and I'd like to see you continue to contribute, unhindered by conflict with each other. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Empathy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Attempting to connect a user to an IP, especially when it contains additional geographical information, is a form of harassment and is not appropriate. Please do not do it again. Primefac ( talk) 05:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I think there may have been some misunderstanding regarding this edit. I changed "The British Prime Minister, Theresa May ..." to "Then British Prime Minister, Theresa May ..." because at the time the sentence is describing (2018) she was the Prime Minister, but she isn't anymore. Simply stating "The" Prime minister could confuse people not in the know into thinking she is still the current UK PM, when she isn't. Therefore its correct to say "then" PM. Helper201 ( talk) 18:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
On 4 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first recording of Bach's Kreuzstab cantata was a 1939 Dutch live broadcast sung by Mack Harrell, 25 years before the 1964 German recording by his protégé Barry McDaniel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor_Mathsci_deleting_my_comment. Thank you. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 11:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mathsci, I'm happy to wait for the outcome of the CfD before continuing the conversation about adding the UK article to the category - I won't argue with you in edit summaries! But would be good to discuss on the UK talk page if the community decides to keep the category. If consensus is to delete then the point is moot :) SamWilson989 ( talk) 10:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. D.Lazard ( talk) 11:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I was planning on adding you to that page given your statements on ANI (I haven't done it yet). But since well, it was ANI of all places where you said that, I feel like I need to ask you if you're okay with being listed on WP:WWA. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 23:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Per the consensus from the Wikipedia community, you are site banned from Wikipedia. The banning policy explains how to appeal a ban; however given the strength of those calling for it, I would suggest it is unlikely that any appeal would be successful for a considerable period of time, if at all. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Mathsci. I've been sorry to see things unfold at AN/I. I didn't feel I had anything helpful to add, in either direction, as someone who's only interacted with you briefly; but our interactions have been pleasant, and, without attempting to critique that discussion's outcome, I'll miss seeing you around. One thing I learned, through the AN/I thread, is that you and I were once neighbors. Well, maybe that's a slight exaggeration, but I lived in Aix as a child, '04–'05 school year, and it was one of the happiest years of my life. If you were in town that year (as your biography suggests you were), we may well have walked past each other on the street without any sense that we'd later meet on a project that, at that point, had only just been transferred away from Bomis. So I feel a certain Aquisextain kinship.
I wish you the best in life away from this wiki, whatever may come. Good luck and bon courage. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 09:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 23, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 23, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Edmund-de-Unger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI XXVII XXVIII XXIX XXX XXXI XXXII |
some flowers and music for you, - you were around when I created my first article, and we enjoyed new music -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
User:RandomCanadian: please stop making edits like this {bogus AN3 warning). Johnuniq can follow edits like this easily enough if need be. But why should John waste his time? This is the third bogus report you've made.
When I wrote, Please comment on content not editors
on
Talk:Napoleon, you did the exact opposite. It is, however, part of a standard wikipedia guideline as my edit-summary indicated.
On Talk:Napoleon, you wrote ad hominem comments directed at me. Those comments were completely unrelated to the Napoleon talk page so were hidden per WP:TPG. (The same has happened frequently on Talk:Frédéric Chopin.) You unhid them twice and then you decided to post a bogus WP:AN3 notice.
On the other hand you knew because of my edit summary, that I was having "health problems"—in fact emergency services contacted me yesterday just before 6 am. Why did that not register with you?
If you sincerely think I have been edit warring, make a post at WP:AN3/EdJohnston and supply the diffs. Thanks, Mathsci ( talk) 17:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I have muted you, to prevent any further excess.All a bit weird, but hey-hoh ...
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Kok, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prades.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
In this edit, you present a drawing as being located in New York. According to the sources I consulted, it would have been bought in New York ( as indicated by the Bodmer Foundation) by the heirs of Arthur Pollen before joining their collection in London (see this BM link, in the "Curator's comments" section, search for "ii. London"). That's what I indicated in the article in French.
I may have misunderstood something, or if you have sources that contradict my postulate, I would be grateful if you could let me know.
Awaiting your response, thank you for your work on the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Braaark ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vinay V. Deodhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomington.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. I am a little concerned about the list applications. As far as I know the only one is in magnetochemistry. If you know of any others, please add them to the article or let me know on my talk page. Once the deletion tag is removed I intend to to fill out the article with details from the books by Cotton and Tsukerblat. Petergans ( talk) 10:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I wanted to let you know that the 1994 lectures of Calabi at UPenn (the links to which you removed from Riemannian connection on a surface on 18 January 2022), from what I can tell, are still available at the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine: [2]. I currently don't yet know enough about the subject to justify re-adding them with the archive links, but since you have made substantial contributions to that article, I figured I should let you know about it here. Thank you, ReGuess ( talk) 03:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. Thank you for sharing your profound knowledge of Bach's music! I decorated my talk. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with Bach's works and his No. 1 especially today! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Could you please use the added sources (at least once each), for BWV 56? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Can you please help to what "Antike Dichtung" is in English? My translator gives me "Antique poetry", but there's no such thing on Wikipedia, and "poetry of ancient Greece and ancient Rome" sounds clumsy. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
See [3]. Thanks for your help. Raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Concern about an editor going through articles changing Jewish to Israelite. Doug Weller talk 07:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
My comment on 0xDeadbeef's talk was only a passing remark on warning vandals (and opining on templating the regulars) — I'm a little confused by the opening of your reply though.. did you mean that you recognise my username from my vote? If you have any questions or concerns though, you are always more than welcome to ask on my talk page or email me — TNT ( talk • she/her) 13:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Mathsci,
Given this recent MOS discussion, it looks like Smasongarrison is correct in changing the word "suffering" to a word less emotionally fraught. It also looks like their changes are also supported by Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Careful language.
I appreciate you seeking to uphold the quality of content on the project but I don't think you need to be double-checking their contributions so closely and making unnecessary reversions over differences in terminology where you might hold a different opinion. There are so many more serious and problematic issues with articles to get into an edit-war over a word here and there and I'd hate to see things end up on WP:ANEW because of differing interpretations over the use of "suffering". You are both long-time editors and I'd like to see you continue to contribute, unhindered by conflict with each other. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Empathy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Attempting to connect a user to an IP, especially when it contains additional geographical information, is a form of harassment and is not appropriate. Please do not do it again. Primefac ( talk) 05:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
I think there may have been some misunderstanding regarding this edit. I changed "The British Prime Minister, Theresa May ..." to "Then British Prime Minister, Theresa May ..." because at the time the sentence is describing (2018) she was the Prime Minister, but she isn't anymore. Simply stating "The" Prime minister could confuse people not in the know into thinking she is still the current UK PM, when she isn't. Therefore its correct to say "then" PM. Helper201 ( talk) 18:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
On 4 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first recording of Bach's Kreuzstab cantata was a 1939 Dutch live broadcast sung by Mack Harrell, 25 years before the 1964 German recording by his protégé Barry McDaniel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor_Mathsci_deleting_my_comment. Thank you. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 11:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mathsci, I'm happy to wait for the outcome of the CfD before continuing the conversation about adding the UK article to the category - I won't argue with you in edit summaries! But would be good to discuss on the UK talk page if the community decides to keep the category. If consensus is to delete then the point is moot :) SamWilson989 ( talk) 10:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. D.Lazard ( talk) 11:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I was planning on adding you to that page given your statements on ANI (I haven't done it yet). But since well, it was ANI of all places where you said that, I feel like I need to ask you if you're okay with being listed on WP:WWA. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 23:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Per the consensus from the Wikipedia community, you are site banned from Wikipedia. The banning policy explains how to appeal a ban; however given the strength of those calling for it, I would suggest it is unlikely that any appeal would be successful for a considerable period of time, if at all. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Mathsci. I've been sorry to see things unfold at AN/I. I didn't feel I had anything helpful to add, in either direction, as someone who's only interacted with you briefly; but our interactions have been pleasant, and, without attempting to critique that discussion's outcome, I'll miss seeing you around. One thing I learned, through the AN/I thread, is that you and I were once neighbors. Well, maybe that's a slight exaggeration, but I lived in Aix as a child, '04–'05 school year, and it was one of the happiest years of my life. If you were in town that year (as your biography suggests you were), we may well have walked past each other on the street without any sense that we'd later meet on a project that, at that point, had only just been transferred away from Bomis. So I feel a certain Aquisextain kinship.
I wish you the best in life away from this wiki, whatever may come. Good luck and bon courage. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 09:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 23, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 23, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Edmund-de-Unger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)