The result was keep. Arguments for keeping or merging are stronger than those for deletion. A discussion about merging with History of human migration or another target can continue on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 13:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a WP:INDISCRIMINATE list without clear inclusion criteria. It states that it has the most "important" explorations without referencing who calls them important besides the article creator. Even if notable, it would fall under WP:TNT and is invalid as a navigational list as it does not link to articles specifically about those explorations. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Melmann 07:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bahria Town#Bahria Town Nawabshah. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Can't find any passable source for WP:ANYBIO. Subject also doesn't pass WP:NPROF inherently. It's also lacking in terms of WP:GNG. Also, can't find good figures in directories like Google Scholar. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 15:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Lack of quality independent WP:SIGCOV, some cited awards don't seem to check out. Previously PRODded, no indication that the subject is notable or outstanding in their field. Content is WP:NOTRESUME. Likely WP:COI, possibly undisclosed WP:PAID, the creator appears to work only on topic closely related to the commercial entity that the subject has an interest in. Melmann 20:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation album that doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. The only review I could find is the OC Weekly one linked, no other reviews or WP:SIGCOV found. No clear redirect target as the record label was deleted for being non-notable. Last AfD (in 2006) closed as no consensus. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already visited AFD before so a Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. No need to leave this open for three more days. Owen× ☎ 21:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I've been unable to find if this Nigerian footballer who recently died in a car crash passes WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib.) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Questionable notability and clearly WP:PROMO Amigao ( talk) 22:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawing. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 12:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM. I could not find any significant coverage, though coverage in databases and WP:ROTM sources exists, but this does not help in meeting WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. The article does not meet any other NFILM criteria. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 22:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Book of Ether. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Notability doubtful. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 10:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
22:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Liga 1 U-14. Quoting from there: "Football tournament for children supported by a couple of primary sources. Utterly insignificant within the football world, fails WP:SIGCOV". Geschichte ( talk) 22:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Claims 10 communities in their own official website. The French version was deleted by consensus. Leefeni aures audiendi audiat 22:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Fontys University of Applied Sciences#Tilburg. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
There has not been a source added to this article since it was created in 2006. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 21:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Norway Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Cricket is a negligible sport in Norway and is only practiced in select diaspora communities. That explains why there is not a single - zero - hits in any Norwegian media for Pratik Agnihotri. Google yields LinkedIn and some stat sites. I will defer if there is WP:SIGCOV in other languages. Geschichte ( talk) 21:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
There is a major lack of sources for verification. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 21:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of airports in Israel. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Poorly cited list that has little or no encyclopedic value. There is one main airport in Israel, one that's mostly domestic (Eilat-Ramon), and one unscheduled (Haifa) with no data present. The comparison of these three airports is mostly useless, as it compares very different things. Artem.G ( talk) 19:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This isn't a real fish.
The article cites only one reference, and it's a dead URL. However, an archived version of it does exist on the Wayback Machine:
...And nowhere in the archived source does it say it's a new species. Nor are there any papers from around that time period on Google Scholar about the discovery of a new, as-of-yet-undescribed species of Anotopterus. In fact, the picture given in the article/source is identical to the one FishBase uses for Anotopterus vorax, which already has a page.
Please nuke this page from orbit. It's 16 years overdue.
— Kodiak Blackjack ( talk) • ( contribs) 18:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of political self-immolations#2020s. This incident is already mentioned at the target article but this is a Merge in case any additional information is deemed relevant. It then can be Redirected. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Here we are, a month after Azzarello's death and there's no evidence of lasting coverage or information about his significance to merit a merger elsewhere. The most recent coverage, also represented in the article, is of the donation of his kidneys. A redirect to List_of_political_self-immolations#2020s where this is mentioned is probably more than sufficient. The AfD was well attended, but explicitly allowed revisiting it, so bringing it back here. Star Mississippi 18:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Since nobody has found a reliable source in over 10 years, there likely won't be any more sources. I couldn't find any sources either. EternalNub ( talk) 17:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
*
WP:PROD would have been good for this. Australia has lots of beaches, without sources Delete
Reywas92
Talk 18:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Struck per HEY
Reywas92
Talk
16:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet the notability guidelines outlined in WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It was accepted through AfC by an inexperienced user. The reference to The New York Times is merely a passing mention and is behind a paywall. Hitro talk 13:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
17:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
No change since the last AfD, coverage does not meet WP:ORGCRITE--the article's creator should have challenged the close by requesting that it be relisted, but instead went straight to RFUD. The additional sources linked in the discussion which they claim demonstrate notability do not include in-depth independent coverage of the organization that would satisfy WP:ORGCRITE. signed, Rosguill talk 17:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
up and coming organizationis a clear indication that it is likely simply too soon to have an article on it, the criteria would normally only after they are already successful or prominent, not likely to do so in the future (i.e. § Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time). The Fox article does not clearly meet ORGIND, and even if we were to make an exception on the general consensus on think tanks in this case, the Daily Signal article is clearly WP:RSOPINION and therefore not considered reliable for statements of fact.
closely following such organisations would probably help you develop an article, I don't believe your evaluation of the sources accurately reflect the standards they are assessed on. As for the other organisations for which coverage on this one far exceeds, I would say they most likely would be deleted if they cannot be brought to standard, but most such articles are not reviewed regularly (after all, we have 6 million of them, that would take some time). Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Moved unilaterally to mainspace after prior draftification. I see poor referencing, churnalism, and lists of "stuff" albeit as prose. WP:BIO insists on references for facts subject to challenge, and there is a shortfall, so I see a WP:BIO failure. I also see WP:ADMASQ for a WP:ROTM "cross-platform media executive, filmmaker, print and broadcast journalist, and environmentalist." doing his job. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable conspiracy theory presented as fact. Note that article was translated from the Spanish Wikipedia, which has a long history of propaganda and fabrication in Falklands-related topics. Kahastok talk 16:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of largest stars. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage in literature and only exists on the basis of being a star with an extremely large radius. Does not meet WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 15:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep
Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO or WP:ACAD. Only thing that comes close to WP:GNG is a obituary in Popular Astronomy from 1948. nf utvol ( talk) 15:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Baalveer. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
The series might be notable but not the seasons. None of the seasons is found passing WP:GNG. At present, Ref 1 is about the actor (Dev Joshi), Ref 2 covers trivial, Ref 3 redirects to Mid-Day about actors, Ref 4 is announcement and interview, Ref 5 is interview, Ref 6 is same as 5, Ref 7 press release, Ref 8 is interview about the actors. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 14:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
The article cites trade publications and a Forbes contributor article. Some of the sources are about the person for interviews. I think this article is promotional and we need to demonstrate that it is notable per WP:NCORP. A G11 by a previous reviewer was declined so I will leave this for the community to decide. Lightburst ( talk) 17:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
13:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. Funding announcements are ORGTRIV, interviews fail ORGIND. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 12:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject doesn’t seem to pass WP:GNG. Does appearing on notable fashion platform calls for a Wikipedia page? Because we have so many people appearing on notable fashion platform but no independent reliable sources. Most of the source on the page just only talked about her appearing and nothing more. Meligirl5 ( talk) 11:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment Also this seems to be like a promotional work, paid work or a conflict of interest.-- Meligirl5 ( talk) 12:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 12:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability not demonstrated. I find a couple of passing references to Bartlett in reliable sources, but nothing substantial. See discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#John_Bartlett_(racing_driver) Dweller ( talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 08:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Beanie's request, and as there is currently no consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
00:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per request at
WP:Requests_for_undeletion#John_Bartlett_(racing_driver).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
08:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
A quick Google search reveals that this actress may or may not be notable. It is clear that she has no large roles post 2021. Most of her sources are about her role in Ammani which from the way it is credited looks like a supporting/minor role. Not sure how much screen time, she had but it can be considered a level below supporting and above minor.
Her actual supporting/lead roles are in Maadathy and Mmmmm while she had a lead role in Sennai (no article). The roles that she likes to take up are village/dalit roles and the confirmation of her roles can show her notability. She also played a supporting role in Vadham. While her speaking out against the casting couch against dark skinned actresses is laudable, it is also the reason why she could fail WP:NACTOR. She stars in several other commercial films however in very minor roles. Her role in Kalvan lasted a few seconds (no dialogue) and hence original research as many of her roles may be. Other roles that seem minor include "Housewife in Prabhavathy's documentary", "Mother of kidnapped child", "Kid's mother", "Einar clan member" (likely no dialogues), "Cancer-affected girl's mother" and "District Forest Officer".
She is credited second in
Thunikaram but the reviewer mentions how
[27] Though Semmalar Annam doesn't have much scope to perform, she does a decent job in the given time
Her name is not mentioned in the review of Kattumaram and there are no sources for The Tremor. Since the other roles don't add any notability and the fact that she directs short films not feature films, consider the films/series
Ammani,
Vadham, Sennai,
Mmmmm (role name?), and
Thunikaram and if her roles are notable or not (main guideline for WP:NACTOR).
Her role in
Maadathy is definitely notable: she played the lead character's mother. Semmarlar Annam in a yet another remarkable performance. How long will the mainstream filmmakers ignore her?
[28] Sadly, Mmmm has no reviews and Sennai is reviewed by Film Companion (blacklisted)
[29] but barely mentions much of her role. A creation of the article Sennai can help her notability
[30]. Does Mmmm being sent to Oscars add notability?
[31] His role seems more notable (because it's the lead). Vijayan plays a beekeeper while she plays his wife
[32]. Her role could be supporting.
Her ommision from mainstream Tamil cinema affects notability greatly as 90% of her films are from there. Her roles were notably removed by editors in Valimai and Bachelor (2021 film) [33] [34], showing how short her roles can be.
Notable roles: (based on screen time)
Year | Film | Role |
---|---|---|
2019 | Maadathy | third to Ajmina Kassim |
2021 | Sennai | Lead (no article) |
Mmmmm | second to I. M. Vijayan |
Supporting roles:
Year | Film | Role | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | Ammani | credited seventh | subject of multiple sources after the release of the film and none in reviews of the film |
2021 | Vadham | credited third | |
2022 | Thunikaram | credited second | Despite being credited second, her screen time is less. |
None of her other roles are being considered for notability. DareshMohan ( talk) 19:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep, linked from Main Page, WP:SK #6. — Kusma ( talk) 08:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
After careful analysis of the seemingly extensive sources, my judgement is Downard-Wilke does not meet our notability guidelines for people. The article cites 51 sources, so please bear with me – a full explanation will necessarily take some time.
Some important context: Downard-Wilke is Schwede66 ( talk · contribs), who sits on Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand's management committee and is a Wikipedia administrator. The main contributors to the article have been the New Zealand Wikipedians Wainuiomartian ( talk · contribs) and Marshelec ( talk · contribs). Given Marshelec apparently sits on the same Wikimedia NZ management committee as Schwede66, there appears to be some problematic conflict-of-interest editing going on here. I am in the process of opening a COIN thread which I will link when finished.
Now let's get onto the sources. I uncontroversially rule out the following sources for independence concerns. By uncontroversial, I mean something like "Downard-Wilke wrote the source", "The source is Downard-Wilke's company", or "Downard-Wilke was on this organisation's committee at the time":
This knocks out 21 of the 51 sources. To put it another way, about 40% of this article’s sources are obviously and uncontroversially not independent.
I uncontroversially rule out the following sources as not mentioning Downward-Wilke at all:
I also uncontroversially rule out source 7 (raw election results, obviously not significant) and 45 (Wikipedia discussion, user-generated). That is all the sources I believe can be uncontroversially eliminated.
I rule out the following sources as cases where Downard-Wilke merely acts as a spokesperson providing brief comment and receives no significant coverage himself:
I rule out sources 35 and 36 (ProQuest, ask me for full text) and sources 46 and 47 for the same reason, but I wanted to note these separately because they give slightly more extensive coverage.
I rule out source 2 as a "man-on-the-street" type of interview, where Downard-Wilke is interviewed by a German paper because he is someone with a German background who experienced the Christchurch earthquake. This sort of coverage does not indicate the interviewee is significant.
I rule out source 3 as the type of interview that is considered non-independent (see the essay Wikipedia:Interviews). There is not enough independent content beyond Downard-Wilke’s answers to the questions.
I could only partially verify source 6, finding a NZ Library record. However, given the context of the source (a local paper covering Downard-Wilke running for a regional council election where even winning candidates don’t have articles unless they have some sort of national political career), it’s unlikely it contributes to notability.
I rule out source 12 (ProQuest, ask me for full text) as covering a case where Downard-Wilke received an award from an organisation while he was on their executive committee. Not sufficiently independent.
I rule out Boulter 2020 (cites 13 and 21) because the document notes itself to be a draft copy. I have other concerns, but drafts are at the very least unreliable.
I was unable to verify source 25, which provides extremely little bibliographical information. However, judging by the type and brevity of the information it is cited as supporting (the fact Downard-Wilke won a local German bike race), we have good reason to think this is not the sort of source that would deliver significant coverage.
Source 43, a Stuff article, initially looked promising to me, but judging by the link at the bottom, it appears to have been written to promote this edit-a-thon which was explicitly geared towards improving coverage on Stuff. Downard-Wilke seems to have played some part in organising the meet-up. Not sufficiently independent.
I could not find any promising sources that weren't already in the article, so I conclude the article fails NBIO. I appreciate you reading this through to the end and I hope you can appreciate it is difficult to strike a balance between comprehensive discussion and brevity when you are dealing with 51 sources. – Tera tix ₵ 07:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 12:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
BLP with no evidence of notability. Existing references are to:
WP:BEFORE search does not turn up any significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 13:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. It is difficult to WP:V the information currently on the page or whether this is the same person that several sources name as involved directly in Nazi crimes. Currently my thought is that this page should be WP:TNT until someone can do a better job of it, but I would be interested if others can find good sources to offer against the WP:GNG JMWt ( talk) 12:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing refs to consider but perhaps they exist in languages I can't read. JMWt ( talk) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing sources to WP:V basic details, whether it is a degree awarding institution etc. Possibly sources exist that I'm not seeing but currently per WP:V claims can be removed. JMWt ( talk) 08:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 12:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2011, notability unclear. jengod ( talk) 06:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 10:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 12:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Found no signs of notability (some notable publications covered the announcement/lead single but it's not exactly NMUSIC#1 level) and redirected. That's been undone, so now we're here. Got a response on my talk page including "That's an actual published album by a known rock band that has been producing albums for decades"; just wanna emphasize NOTINHERITED here in case they or anyone else is thinking of bringing that up. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 01:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more discussion and input from editors. But from what I'm reading here, deletion is off the table and we are trying to decide between Keeping a standalone article or a Redirect/Merge closure. Either way, the content would be preserved in case there are more reviews in the future.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacking of citations and General Notability Bennyaha ( talk) 04:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2000 in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 13:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
The article is talking about a country that did not exist yet. Not only does the leadership section list the president as the President of Serbia and Montenegro, but Kosovo only declared independence in 2008, so any [year] in Kosovo pages from before this time shouldn't exist either. At least it's not standard procedure, as for example there's not a 1775 in the United States article: since the United States, like Kosovo, had not declared independence as a nation yet, and was only fighting for it. These protests should instead be placed on the page 2000 in Serbia and Montenegro where they were officially taking place. Cheers! Johnson 524 12:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
18:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Reference 2 on the article itself is Meany's place names, and he says that Forest was a post office briefly located at Newaukum prairie. Please remember that post offices back then did not always use the same name as the place where they were, in alot a cases that place didn't exist.The fourth reference (jtenton) is a semi unreliable source that also says it was post office, and the sources used to make that claim are basically also the story of a post office, a school district, and election district named forest. It was also earlier a grange district. As you might imagine such things appear in newspapers but you want find any of those news papers that ever say it was a town. The remaining sources are of no use, and I haven't found anything further than those that actually give any substance on it. James.folsom ( talk) 23:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) XabqEfdg ( talk) 06:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not seem to be independently notable. Suggest merging with Auburn tigers football. XabqEfdg ( talk) 03:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. And still no discussion has followed. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator nominated 49 of these in 30 minutes. No discussion has followed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Considered keep per WP:NEXIST but no one actually posted a keep !vote. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. More discussion was needed. This has already been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Again, the nominator's rush to nominate dozens of articles in under half an hour failed to stimulate discussion about many of them, such as this one. It has already been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The nominator's race to nominate dozens of articles within half an hour failed to stimulate any discussion whatsoever about many of them, such as this instance. It has already been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads#North Korea. ✗ plicit 03:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage. May be notable, but insufficient sources for an article. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 02:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Because redirect was rejected, there is no consensus here and it has been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The nominator's burst of dozens of nominations within half an hour failed to stimulate any discussion about many of them. This one did get one weak keep at least, but that is not a full discussion and this has been relisted twice already. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
I looked for reliable sources and books but couldn't find anything. The article can be redirected. GrabUp - Talk 02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Again, this has been relisted twice without stimulating any discussion. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This has been relisted twice without stimulating any discussion. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This has already been relisted twice without stimulating discussion beyond one !vote for procedural keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Again, despite discussion regarding the nominator's related Akiko Kitamura AfD in the same week, no discussion has occurred yet on this one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
02:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Despite discussion regarding the nominator's related Akiko Kitamura AfD in the same week, no discussion has occured yet on this one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
02:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
02:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't see support for Deletion and a Soft Deletion is not possible. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, a comment for Procedural Keep is not an argument to Keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This subject is far from notable by Wikipedia’s standards. There is a major lack of significant coverage addressing the subject directly, and the ones that do mention the subject fall short of being reliable sources. Majority of the sources listed are the subjects own YouTube channel or to instagram posts, see WP:NOSOCIAL. The subject falls incredibly short of the standards that are in place by Wikipedia to establish notability, as being married to someone famous does not make someone notable. 4theloveofallthings ( talk) 01:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 13:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly fails notability guidelines, no significant coverage. No reason for this article. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 00:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: On the one hand, there is no support for deletion. On the other hand, the keep argument is not strong. Let's hear some more thoughts on this before passing a verdict.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
00:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Same as previous relisting comment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is a very messy AFD discussion, full of misplaced and unsupported accusations of nationalism and canvassing. We don't administer purity tests to see who can and cannot participate in any discussion on this project. This discussion's purpose is not to determine whether or not a Tamil genocide occurred and many of the editors arguing for Delete simply say that the subject doesn't exist. While the article might be poorly written, lack a NPOV or have an unacceptable article page title, those elements can be remedied through editing and improving the article. The only factor that matters here is not what the participant editors believe to be true but what reliable sources can verify. The first 2/3 of this discussion isn't very helpful at all in terms of determining a closure but in the latter 1/3 editors brought forward actual, accepted reliable sources that can verify that this subject, which might be in dispute, is indeed notable. That factor is, generally, what determines an AFD closure.
In fact, I think it might be appropriate for a section to be added to this article discussing the fact that the term itself is a matter of contention and conflict, outlining arguments for those deny that a genocide occurred. I think it would also be wise to start a talk page discussion on a possible article page title change since some editors' primary objection was to the identification of a genocide and they didn't focus on the article content and sourcing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
Sri Lanka, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Article created by a rabid sock puppets abuser after admittedly copying content from War crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War. [48]
Nobody recognizes any "Tamil Genocide". The creation of this WP:POVFORK is a clear-cut misuse of Wikipedia as per WP:SOAP and WP:RGW. Ratnahastin ( talk) 02:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
References
Note to closing admin: several accounts !voting "keep" have either never been active in this topic or have not at all been active in recent months or years. There's a real possibility of off-wiki co-ordination. — kashmīrī TALK 10:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Preponderance of reliable academic sources? Sanglap is of doubtful reliability, is published by an unknown publisher and has no impact factor. The other two are interviews and can't be used to establish notability (see WP:PRIMARY). Can you provide actual academic sources that can be used on Wikipedia? — kashmīrī TALK 13:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Nobody recognizes any "Tamil Genocide". An absurd statement like that gives me the impression that the nominator didn't even attempt an WP:BEFORE. There is quite clearly a preponderance of reliable academic sources discussing the genocide of the Tamil people. The most basic of research would have demonstrated that to them. TarnishedPath talk 11:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Question: to all editors voting Keep: since many of you refer to "numerous reliable sources" mentioning or discussing the term Tamil genocide, while providing 2–3 links at most, will you likewise argue to keep an article titled Palestinian genocide, given the existence of an incomparably higher number of sources mentioning or discussing the latter term? Or will you use a completely different yardstick, as the editors there have done? Because the issue of naming consistency in genocide-focused articles is of paramount importance, as it has already used an incredible amount of community time. — kashmīrī TALK 18:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Administrator note: To aid the closer, participants are allowed to mark single-purpose and dormant accounts with {{ spa}} or {{ canvassed}}, respectively. But in the interest of transparency, these need to be accompanied by a sig + timestamp in small text (<small>text</small>) so that it's clear who had placed a given tag when. Thank you. El_C 19:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Tamil Genocide was committed by Sri Lankan military assisted by most of the western countries + India, Pakistan, china and Russia. Over 169,000 innocent Tamil people were slaughtered by the Sinhala military. Tamils were prosecuted by Sinhala since the independence of SL in 1948. Tamil genocide page is essential for public knowledge. Canada has acknowledged by the Tamil genocide and multiple US congressmen/women have voiced concern. A resolution was passed for Tamils to exercise self determination and an independent referendum for statehood. This page must not deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.97.140.74 ( talk) — 98.97.140.74 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 18:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I’m not convinced that it has enough of a mass recognition as genocide", Konanen said "
attempted genocide is still a genocide,", Obi2canibe said "
There are reliable sources that discuss the possibility that genocide occurred in Sri Lanka". This confirms my comment thatthere is no clear case of genocide even according to several "keep" supporters. Abhishek0831996 ( talk) 03:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
See also Genocidal intent. But, as Ravenswing accurately says, this point is not relevant to the validity and notability of the article. – Konanen ( talk) 12:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Contested draftification. Article is completely unsourced and barely has any content. Also, context is insufficient and leaves a lot to be desired. Editor has created several of these articles, which have only been tagged as "unsourced". I suggest returning to draftspace so it can be improved there. No objection to deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 20:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Retired professor with single-digit number of publications, one with 24 citations on Google Scholar and all the rest less than 10, far from enough for WP:PROF. All sources are by her or from her employer, inadequate for WP:GNG. This was already draftified and restored to article space (by copy & paste) without any significant improvement; for draft history see [65]. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arguments for keeping or merging are stronger than those for deletion. A discussion about merging with History of human migration or another target can continue on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 13:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a WP:INDISCRIMINATE list without clear inclusion criteria. It states that it has the most "important" explorations without referencing who calls them important besides the article creator. Even if notable, it would fall under WP:TNT and is invalid as a navigational list as it does not link to articles specifically about those explorations. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Melmann 07:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bahria Town#Bahria Town Nawabshah. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Can't find any passable source for WP:ANYBIO. Subject also doesn't pass WP:NPROF inherently. It's also lacking in terms of WP:GNG. Also, can't find good figures in directories like Google Scholar. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 15:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Lack of quality independent WP:SIGCOV, some cited awards don't seem to check out. Previously PRODded, no indication that the subject is notable or outstanding in their field. Content is WP:NOTRESUME. Likely WP:COI, possibly undisclosed WP:PAID, the creator appears to work only on topic closely related to the commercial entity that the subject has an interest in. Melmann 20:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation album that doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. The only review I could find is the OC Weekly one linked, no other reviews or WP:SIGCOV found. No clear redirect target as the record label was deleted for being non-notable. Last AfD (in 2006) closed as no consensus. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already visited AFD before so a Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. No need to leave this open for three more days. Owen× ☎ 21:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I've been unable to find if this Nigerian footballer who recently died in a car crash passes WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib.) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Questionable notability and clearly WP:PROMO Amigao ( talk) 22:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawing. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 12:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM. I could not find any significant coverage, though coverage in databases and WP:ROTM sources exists, but this does not help in meeting WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. The article does not meet any other NFILM criteria. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 22:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Book of Ether. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Notability doubtful. RadioactiveBoulevardier ( talk) 10:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
22:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Liga 1 U-14. Quoting from there: "Football tournament for children supported by a couple of primary sources. Utterly insignificant within the football world, fails WP:SIGCOV". Geschichte ( talk) 22:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG. Claims 10 communities in their own official website. The French version was deleted by consensus. Leefeni aures audiendi audiat 22:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Fontys University of Applied Sciences#Tilburg. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
There has not been a source added to this article since it was created in 2006. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 21:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Norway Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Cricket is a negligible sport in Norway and is only practiced in select diaspora communities. That explains why there is not a single - zero - hits in any Norwegian media for Pratik Agnihotri. Google yields LinkedIn and some stat sites. I will defer if there is WP:SIGCOV in other languages. Geschichte ( talk) 21:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
There is a major lack of sources for verification. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 21:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of airports in Israel. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Poorly cited list that has little or no encyclopedic value. There is one main airport in Israel, one that's mostly domestic (Eilat-Ramon), and one unscheduled (Haifa) with no data present. The comparison of these three airports is mostly useless, as it compares very different things. Artem.G ( talk) 19:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This isn't a real fish.
The article cites only one reference, and it's a dead URL. However, an archived version of it does exist on the Wayback Machine:
...And nowhere in the archived source does it say it's a new species. Nor are there any papers from around that time period on Google Scholar about the discovery of a new, as-of-yet-undescribed species of Anotopterus. In fact, the picture given in the article/source is identical to the one FishBase uses for Anotopterus vorax, which already has a page.
Please nuke this page from orbit. It's 16 years overdue.
— Kodiak Blackjack ( talk) • ( contribs) 18:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of political self-immolations#2020s. This incident is already mentioned at the target article but this is a Merge in case any additional information is deemed relevant. It then can be Redirected. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Here we are, a month after Azzarello's death and there's no evidence of lasting coverage or information about his significance to merit a merger elsewhere. The most recent coverage, also represented in the article, is of the donation of his kidneys. A redirect to List_of_political_self-immolations#2020s where this is mentioned is probably more than sufficient. The AfD was well attended, but explicitly allowed revisiting it, so bringing it back here. Star Mississippi 18:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Since nobody has found a reliable source in over 10 years, there likely won't be any more sources. I couldn't find any sources either. EternalNub ( talk) 17:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
*
WP:PROD would have been good for this. Australia has lots of beaches, without sources Delete
Reywas92
Talk 18:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Struck per HEY
Reywas92
Talk
16:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet the notability guidelines outlined in WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It was accepted through AfC by an inexperienced user. The reference to The New York Times is merely a passing mention and is behind a paywall. Hitro talk 13:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
17:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
No change since the last AfD, coverage does not meet WP:ORGCRITE--the article's creator should have challenged the close by requesting that it be relisted, but instead went straight to RFUD. The additional sources linked in the discussion which they claim demonstrate notability do not include in-depth independent coverage of the organization that would satisfy WP:ORGCRITE. signed, Rosguill talk 17:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
up and coming organizationis a clear indication that it is likely simply too soon to have an article on it, the criteria would normally only after they are already successful or prominent, not likely to do so in the future (i.e. § Notable topics have attracted attention over a sufficiently significant period of time). The Fox article does not clearly meet ORGIND, and even if we were to make an exception on the general consensus on think tanks in this case, the Daily Signal article is clearly WP:RSOPINION and therefore not considered reliable for statements of fact.
closely following such organisations would probably help you develop an article, I don't believe your evaluation of the sources accurately reflect the standards they are assessed on. As for the other organisations for which coverage on this one far exceeds, I would say they most likely would be deleted if they cannot be brought to standard, but most such articles are not reviewed regularly (after all, we have 6 million of them, that would take some time). Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Moved unilaterally to mainspace after prior draftification. I see poor referencing, churnalism, and lists of "stuff" albeit as prose. WP:BIO insists on references for facts subject to challenge, and there is a shortfall, so I see a WP:BIO failure. I also see WP:ADMASQ for a WP:ROTM "cross-platform media executive, filmmaker, print and broadcast journalist, and environmentalist." doing his job. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 16:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable conspiracy theory presented as fact. Note that article was translated from the Spanish Wikipedia, which has a long history of propaganda and fabrication in Falklands-related topics. Kahastok talk 16:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of largest stars. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage in literature and only exists on the basis of being a star with an extremely large radius. Does not meet WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 15:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep
Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO or WP:ACAD. Only thing that comes close to WP:GNG is a obituary in Popular Astronomy from 1948. nf utvol ( talk) 15:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Baalveer. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
The series might be notable but not the seasons. None of the seasons is found passing WP:GNG. At present, Ref 1 is about the actor (Dev Joshi), Ref 2 covers trivial, Ref 3 redirects to Mid-Day about actors, Ref 4 is announcement and interview, Ref 5 is interview, Ref 6 is same as 5, Ref 7 press release, Ref 8 is interview about the actors. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 14:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
The article cites trade publications and a Forbes contributor article. Some of the sources are about the person for interviews. I think this article is promotional and we need to demonstrate that it is notable per WP:NCORP. A G11 by a previous reviewer was declined so I will leave this for the community to decide. Lightburst ( talk) 17:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
13:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. Funding announcements are ORGTRIV, interviews fail ORGIND. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 12:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject doesn’t seem to pass WP:GNG. Does appearing on notable fashion platform calls for a Wikipedia page? Because we have so many people appearing on notable fashion platform but no independent reliable sources. Most of the source on the page just only talked about her appearing and nothing more. Meligirl5 ( talk) 11:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment Also this seems to be like a promotional work, paid work or a conflict of interest.-- Meligirl5 ( talk) 12:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 12:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability not demonstrated. I find a couple of passing references to Bartlett in reliable sources, but nothing substantial. See discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#John_Bartlett_(racing_driver) Dweller ( talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 08:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Beanie's request, and as there is currently no consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
00:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per request at
WP:Requests_for_undeletion#John_Bartlett_(racing_driver).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
08:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
A quick Google search reveals that this actress may or may not be notable. It is clear that she has no large roles post 2021. Most of her sources are about her role in Ammani which from the way it is credited looks like a supporting/minor role. Not sure how much screen time, she had but it can be considered a level below supporting and above minor.
Her actual supporting/lead roles are in Maadathy and Mmmmm while she had a lead role in Sennai (no article). The roles that she likes to take up are village/dalit roles and the confirmation of her roles can show her notability. She also played a supporting role in Vadham. While her speaking out against the casting couch against dark skinned actresses is laudable, it is also the reason why she could fail WP:NACTOR. She stars in several other commercial films however in very minor roles. Her role in Kalvan lasted a few seconds (no dialogue) and hence original research as many of her roles may be. Other roles that seem minor include "Housewife in Prabhavathy's documentary", "Mother of kidnapped child", "Kid's mother", "Einar clan member" (likely no dialogues), "Cancer-affected girl's mother" and "District Forest Officer".
She is credited second in
Thunikaram but the reviewer mentions how
[27] Though Semmalar Annam doesn't have much scope to perform, she does a decent job in the given time
Her name is not mentioned in the review of Kattumaram and there are no sources for The Tremor. Since the other roles don't add any notability and the fact that she directs short films not feature films, consider the films/series
Ammani,
Vadham, Sennai,
Mmmmm (role name?), and
Thunikaram and if her roles are notable or not (main guideline for WP:NACTOR).
Her role in
Maadathy is definitely notable: she played the lead character's mother. Semmarlar Annam in a yet another remarkable performance. How long will the mainstream filmmakers ignore her?
[28] Sadly, Mmmm has no reviews and Sennai is reviewed by Film Companion (blacklisted)
[29] but barely mentions much of her role. A creation of the article Sennai can help her notability
[30]. Does Mmmm being sent to Oscars add notability?
[31] His role seems more notable (because it's the lead). Vijayan plays a beekeeper while she plays his wife
[32]. Her role could be supporting.
Her ommision from mainstream Tamil cinema affects notability greatly as 90% of her films are from there. Her roles were notably removed by editors in Valimai and Bachelor (2021 film) [33] [34], showing how short her roles can be.
Notable roles: (based on screen time)
Year | Film | Role |
---|---|---|
2019 | Maadathy | third to Ajmina Kassim |
2021 | Sennai | Lead (no article) |
Mmmmm | second to I. M. Vijayan |
Supporting roles:
Year | Film | Role | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | Ammani | credited seventh | subject of multiple sources after the release of the film and none in reviews of the film |
2021 | Vadham | credited third | |
2022 | Thunikaram | credited second | Despite being credited second, her screen time is less. |
None of her other roles are being considered for notability. DareshMohan ( talk) 19:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep, linked from Main Page, WP:SK #6. — Kusma ( talk) 08:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
After careful analysis of the seemingly extensive sources, my judgement is Downard-Wilke does not meet our notability guidelines for people. The article cites 51 sources, so please bear with me – a full explanation will necessarily take some time.
Some important context: Downard-Wilke is Schwede66 ( talk · contribs), who sits on Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand's management committee and is a Wikipedia administrator. The main contributors to the article have been the New Zealand Wikipedians Wainuiomartian ( talk · contribs) and Marshelec ( talk · contribs). Given Marshelec apparently sits on the same Wikimedia NZ management committee as Schwede66, there appears to be some problematic conflict-of-interest editing going on here. I am in the process of opening a COIN thread which I will link when finished.
Now let's get onto the sources. I uncontroversially rule out the following sources for independence concerns. By uncontroversial, I mean something like "Downard-Wilke wrote the source", "The source is Downard-Wilke's company", or "Downard-Wilke was on this organisation's committee at the time":
This knocks out 21 of the 51 sources. To put it another way, about 40% of this article’s sources are obviously and uncontroversially not independent.
I uncontroversially rule out the following sources as not mentioning Downward-Wilke at all:
I also uncontroversially rule out source 7 (raw election results, obviously not significant) and 45 (Wikipedia discussion, user-generated). That is all the sources I believe can be uncontroversially eliminated.
I rule out the following sources as cases where Downard-Wilke merely acts as a spokesperson providing brief comment and receives no significant coverage himself:
I rule out sources 35 and 36 (ProQuest, ask me for full text) and sources 46 and 47 for the same reason, but I wanted to note these separately because they give slightly more extensive coverage.
I rule out source 2 as a "man-on-the-street" type of interview, where Downard-Wilke is interviewed by a German paper because he is someone with a German background who experienced the Christchurch earthquake. This sort of coverage does not indicate the interviewee is significant.
I rule out source 3 as the type of interview that is considered non-independent (see the essay Wikipedia:Interviews). There is not enough independent content beyond Downard-Wilke’s answers to the questions.
I could only partially verify source 6, finding a NZ Library record. However, given the context of the source (a local paper covering Downard-Wilke running for a regional council election where even winning candidates don’t have articles unless they have some sort of national political career), it’s unlikely it contributes to notability.
I rule out source 12 (ProQuest, ask me for full text) as covering a case where Downard-Wilke received an award from an organisation while he was on their executive committee. Not sufficiently independent.
I rule out Boulter 2020 (cites 13 and 21) because the document notes itself to be a draft copy. I have other concerns, but drafts are at the very least unreliable.
I was unable to verify source 25, which provides extremely little bibliographical information. However, judging by the type and brevity of the information it is cited as supporting (the fact Downard-Wilke won a local German bike race), we have good reason to think this is not the sort of source that would deliver significant coverage.
Source 43, a Stuff article, initially looked promising to me, but judging by the link at the bottom, it appears to have been written to promote this edit-a-thon which was explicitly geared towards improving coverage on Stuff. Downard-Wilke seems to have played some part in organising the meet-up. Not sufficiently independent.
I could not find any promising sources that weren't already in the article, so I conclude the article fails NBIO. I appreciate you reading this through to the end and I hope you can appreciate it is difficult to strike a balance between comprehensive discussion and brevity when you are dealing with 51 sources. – Tera tix ₵ 07:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 12:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
BLP with no evidence of notability. Existing references are to:
WP:BEFORE search does not turn up any significant coverage in reliable, secondary, independent sources. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 13:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. It is difficult to WP:V the information currently on the page or whether this is the same person that several sources name as involved directly in Nazi crimes. Currently my thought is that this page should be WP:TNT until someone can do a better job of it, but I would be interested if others can find good sources to offer against the WP:GNG JMWt ( talk) 12:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacks sig/in-depth coverage so, fails WP:GNG. I don't see it passing WP:ORG either. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 09:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing refs to consider but perhaps they exist in languages I can't read. JMWt ( talk) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing sources to WP:V basic details, whether it is a degree awarding institution etc. Possibly sources exist that I'm not seeing but currently per WP:V claims can be removed. JMWt ( talk) 08:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 12:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2011, notability unclear. jengod ( talk) 06:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 10:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 12:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Found no signs of notability (some notable publications covered the announcement/lead single but it's not exactly NMUSIC#1 level) and redirected. That's been undone, so now we're here. Got a response on my talk page including "That's an actual published album by a known rock band that has been producing albums for decades"; just wanna emphasize NOTINHERITED here in case they or anyone else is thinking of bringing that up. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 01:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more discussion and input from editors. But from what I'm reading here, deletion is off the table and we are trying to decide between Keeping a standalone article or a Redirect/Merge closure. Either way, the content would be preserved in case there are more reviews in the future.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 22:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Lacking of citations and General Notability Bennyaha ( talk) 04:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2000 in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 13:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
The article is talking about a country that did not exist yet. Not only does the leadership section list the president as the President of Serbia and Montenegro, but Kosovo only declared independence in 2008, so any [year] in Kosovo pages from before this time shouldn't exist either. At least it's not standard procedure, as for example there's not a 1775 in the United States article: since the United States, like Kosovo, had not declared independence as a nation yet, and was only fighting for it. These protests should instead be placed on the page 2000 in Serbia and Montenegro where they were officially taking place. Cheers! Johnson 524 12:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
18:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Reference 2 on the article itself is Meany's place names, and he says that Forest was a post office briefly located at Newaukum prairie. Please remember that post offices back then did not always use the same name as the place where they were, in alot a cases that place didn't exist.The fourth reference (jtenton) is a semi unreliable source that also says it was post office, and the sources used to make that claim are basically also the story of a post office, a school district, and election district named forest. It was also earlier a grange district. As you might imagine such things appear in newspapers but you want find any of those news papers that ever say it was a town. The remaining sources are of no use, and I haven't found anything further than those that actually give any substance on it. James.folsom ( talk) 23:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) XabqEfdg ( talk) 06:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not seem to be independently notable. Suggest merging with Auburn tigers football. XabqEfdg ( talk) 03:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. And still no discussion has followed. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator nominated 49 of these in 30 minutes. No discussion has followed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Considered keep per WP:NEXIST but no one actually posted a keep !vote. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
03:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. More discussion was needed. This has already been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Again, the nominator's rush to nominate dozens of articles in under half an hour failed to stimulate discussion about many of them, such as this one. It has already been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The nominator's race to nominate dozens of articles within half an hour failed to stimulate any discussion whatsoever about many of them, such as this instance. It has already been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the 1976 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads#North Korea. ✗ plicit 03:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage. May be notable, but insufficient sources for an article. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 02:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Because redirect was rejected, there is no consensus here and it has been relisted twice. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The nominator's burst of dozens of nominations within half an hour failed to stimulate any discussion about many of them. This one did get one weak keep at least, but that is not a full discussion and this has been relisted twice already. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
I looked for reliable sources and books but couldn't find anything. The article can be redirected. GrabUp - Talk 02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Again, this has been relisted twice without stimulating any discussion. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This has been relisted twice without stimulating any discussion. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This has already been relisted twice without stimulating discussion beyond one !vote for procedural keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Again, despite discussion regarding the nominator's related Akiko Kitamura AfD in the same week, no discussion has occurred yet on this one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
02:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Despite discussion regarding the nominator's related Akiko Kitamura AfD in the same week, no discussion has occured yet on this one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
02:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
02:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no support for Deletion and Soft Deletion is not an option. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't see support for Deletion and a Soft Deletion is not possible. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, a comment for Procedural Keep is not an argument to Keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. PROD removed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This subject is far from notable by Wikipedia’s standards. There is a major lack of significant coverage addressing the subject directly, and the ones that do mention the subject fall short of being reliable sources. Majority of the sources listed are the subjects own YouTube channel or to instagram posts, see WP:NOSOCIAL. The subject falls incredibly short of the standards that are in place by Wikipedia to establish notability, as being married to someone famous does not make someone notable. 4theloveofallthings ( talk) 01:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 13:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly fails notability guidelines, no significant coverage. No reason for this article. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 00:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: On the one hand, there is no support for deletion. On the other hand, the keep argument is not strong. Let's hear some more thoughts on this before passing a verdict.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
00:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Same as previous relisting comment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is a very messy AFD discussion, full of misplaced and unsupported accusations of nationalism and canvassing. We don't administer purity tests to see who can and cannot participate in any discussion on this project. This discussion's purpose is not to determine whether or not a Tamil genocide occurred and many of the editors arguing for Delete simply say that the subject doesn't exist. While the article might be poorly written, lack a NPOV or have an unacceptable article page title, those elements can be remedied through editing and improving the article. The only factor that matters here is not what the participant editors believe to be true but what reliable sources can verify. The first 2/3 of this discussion isn't very helpful at all in terms of determining a closure but in the latter 1/3 editors brought forward actual, accepted reliable sources that can verify that this subject, which might be in dispute, is indeed notable. That factor is, generally, what determines an AFD closure.
In fact, I think it might be appropriate for a section to be added to this article discussing the fact that the term itself is a matter of contention and conflict, outlining arguments for those deny that a genocide occurred. I think it would also be wise to start a talk page discussion on a possible article page title change since some editors' primary objection was to the identification of a genocide and they didn't focus on the article content and sourcing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
Sri Lanka, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Article created by a rabid sock puppets abuser after admittedly copying content from War crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War. [48]
Nobody recognizes any "Tamil Genocide". The creation of this WP:POVFORK is a clear-cut misuse of Wikipedia as per WP:SOAP and WP:RGW. Ratnahastin ( talk) 02:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
References
Note to closing admin: several accounts !voting "keep" have either never been active in this topic or have not at all been active in recent months or years. There's a real possibility of off-wiki co-ordination. — kashmīrī TALK 10:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Preponderance of reliable academic sources? Sanglap is of doubtful reliability, is published by an unknown publisher and has no impact factor. The other two are interviews and can't be used to establish notability (see WP:PRIMARY). Can you provide actual academic sources that can be used on Wikipedia? — kashmīrī TALK 13:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Nobody recognizes any "Tamil Genocide". An absurd statement like that gives me the impression that the nominator didn't even attempt an WP:BEFORE. There is quite clearly a preponderance of reliable academic sources discussing the genocide of the Tamil people. The most basic of research would have demonstrated that to them. TarnishedPath talk 11:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Question: to all editors voting Keep: since many of you refer to "numerous reliable sources" mentioning or discussing the term Tamil genocide, while providing 2–3 links at most, will you likewise argue to keep an article titled Palestinian genocide, given the existence of an incomparably higher number of sources mentioning or discussing the latter term? Or will you use a completely different yardstick, as the editors there have done? Because the issue of naming consistency in genocide-focused articles is of paramount importance, as it has already used an incredible amount of community time. — kashmīrī TALK 18:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Administrator note: To aid the closer, participants are allowed to mark single-purpose and dormant accounts with {{ spa}} or {{ canvassed}}, respectively. But in the interest of transparency, these need to be accompanied by a sig + timestamp in small text (<small>text</small>) so that it's clear who had placed a given tag when. Thank you. El_C 19:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Tamil Genocide was committed by Sri Lankan military assisted by most of the western countries + India, Pakistan, china and Russia. Over 169,000 innocent Tamil people were slaughtered by the Sinhala military. Tamils were prosecuted by Sinhala since the independence of SL in 1948. Tamil genocide page is essential for public knowledge. Canada has acknowledged by the Tamil genocide and multiple US congressmen/women have voiced concern. A resolution was passed for Tamils to exercise self determination and an independent referendum for statehood. This page must not deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.97.140.74 ( talk) — 98.97.140.74 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 18:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I’m not convinced that it has enough of a mass recognition as genocide", Konanen said "
attempted genocide is still a genocide,", Obi2canibe said "
There are reliable sources that discuss the possibility that genocide occurred in Sri Lanka". This confirms my comment thatthere is no clear case of genocide even according to several "keep" supporters. Abhishek0831996 ( talk) 03:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
See also Genocidal intent. But, as Ravenswing accurately says, this point is not relevant to the validity and notability of the article. – Konanen ( talk) 12:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Contested draftification. Article is completely unsourced and barely has any content. Also, context is insufficient and leaves a lot to be desired. Editor has created several of these articles, which have only been tagged as "unsourced". I suggest returning to draftspace so it can be improved there. No objection to deletion. CycloneYoris talk! 20:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Retired professor with single-digit number of publications, one with 24 citations on Google Scholar and all the rest less than 10, far from enough for WP:PROF. All sources are by her or from her employer, inadequate for WP:GNG. This was already draftified and restored to article space (by copy & paste) without any significant improvement; for draft history see [65]. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)