The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 13:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
None of the information in this article is sourced, the "references" are just links to Rabinky's artwork. A Google search only produces links to websites selling her artwork, although I did find this press release on Google News about a distinction she seems to have won. I'm unsure of its notability. In any case, I haven't found anything else. (NB: Sorry for resubmitting, was interrupted when I did it the first time and it was deleted.) WikiFouf ( talk) 02:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Handball at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's team rosters. as an ATD. If a different redirect target article is preferred, that can be discussed. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. It should also be noted Australia only got to play handball in 2000 Olympics as host nation. They lost every game. LibStar ( talk) 23:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Article on a hostage taking that lasted one day from 19 years ago, created the day of the hostage taking, uncited even then. Article has sat largely untouched for the past two decades. There are sources exclusively from the day this happened. The only thing I found that wasn't from the actual day this occurred was a 1 paragraph mention in a list of German hostage crises from 2010, which does not have enough detail to build an article from.
Fails WP:NEVENT. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 23:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
An inter school cricket competition that fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Similar AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPA Cup (2nd nomination) LibStar ( talk) 23:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Scottish women's footballer that fails WP:GNG. The She Kicks and Daily Record references already in the article are the closest to WP:SIGCOV I could find, and they each have just a few sentences of routine coverage. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. While opinion was pretty evenly split, those editors arguing to Keep failed to provide reliable sources that could be used to establish notability, even when asked multiple times by other editors. Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Every reference is PR and churnalism. Every reference is a PR announcement. Fails WP:NCORP and the key tenet of WP:V. This is WP:ADMASQ. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 05:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to see a review of sources brought to the discussion by the IP editor. Other Keep votes making assertions without providing citations are not worth much at all
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
The result was delete. The only person who did anything significant to this page is the creator, who has nominated it for speedy deletion per WP:G7. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 01:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I don’t think this needs an explanation. This should definitely be deleted or merged into the main article. 48JCL TALK 23:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
No independent sources. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROD. jlwoodwa ( talk) 17:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources found in brief WP:BEFORE search, so it fails WP:GNG. I lack the knowledge to judge whether the subject "has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline" per WP:NPROF. However, even if notability can be established by that criteria, I don't think there are sufficient sources for us to write an article that satisfies WP:V. Daask ( talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of characters in the Family Guy franchise#Cleveland Brown Jr.. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet general notability guidelines. The little significant coverage mentioning this character is not about the character itself, rather focusing on the show at large. - Samoht27 ( talk) 22:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, little coverage outside of user-generated sources. Was kept at last AfD but barely improved since. TappyTurtle [ talk | contribs] 17:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT is not a community recognized WP:SNG. It's only an essay and doesn't appear to be widely vetted as it doesn't look like it's linked from any guidelines pages. Graywalls ( talk) 23:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
A book review too can be an opinion.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no action.. The minimally-participated discussion here was unanimous to merge with Glossary of German military terms. But without a nomination to delete, AfD is not required. Any editor is welcome to merge as suggested, or to discuss a different editorial approach on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 23:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
It seems like this article should be merged into articles about the German and Austrian militaries of various eras, which generally include discussion of uniforms. Just because there is a German word for "military uniform" doesn't mean that word is a distinct topic. We already have military uniform; the military uniforms of German-speaking countries (as opposed to Germany and Austria and Switerland, separately) don't make a natural subtopic of that. -- Beland ( talk) 21:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Article is a mess
with multiple
WP:BLPVIO issues. The seeming lack of information about
Count Emicho outside the wall of text about the First Crusade or
Rhineland massacres seems to confirm the article lacks
WP: NOTABILITY. The article even had a Holocaust reference in it for whatever reason, until I removed it.
Fantastic Mr. Fox (
talk)
21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
A secondary source provides thought and reflection based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. [...] They rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them. Curbon7 ( talk) 22:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I have struck through the BLP statement, I have no clue what was running through my head at the time. The correct wording is that it fails WP:NPOV. Fantastic Mr. Fox ( talk) 06:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, an English rugby league player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found were routine transactional announcements ( 1, 2). Possible redirect targets include List of St Helens R.F.C. players and List of North Wales Crusaders players. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCRIC/ WP:OFFCRIC. Non-notable tournament which ran twice, over 15 years ago. No WP:LASTING. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE. AA ( talk) 20:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
A similar article exists. Kindly redirect to that NBV2010 ( talk) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Besides the first Google news hit, the rest of the coverage I found was not in depth. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 19:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to MLB London Series. RL0919 ( talk) 20:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Non notable series with no non-routine coverage that can be covered sufficiently at MLB London Series. Esolo5002 ( talk) 18:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
no non-routine coverageis just an odd thing to say when WP:BEFORE is conducted. Here's CNN, a news site that doesn't often cover baseball. Here's from The Guardian. I could keep going but that seems unnecessary. – Muboshgu ( talk) 18:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
This entire article reads like a WP:CRYSTAL essay and contains nothing that isn't covered better in the many other AI-related articles, most of which are linked. Black Kite (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Appears to be a WP:MERGE request ( WP:SKCRIT 1). (non-admin closure) CMD ( talk) 05:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 16:40, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination reason was invalid. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 17:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 14:09, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 14:12, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Nova Direita. as an ATD Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I know it has only been two months since the last nomination but that ended as no consensus, which was not an endorsement of notability. There has been another nationwide election since then and this candidate is still getting under 0.5%. There are sources about her, yes, but they're mainly discussing her candidacies and are part of a WP:ROUTINE coverage expected in a democracy. Some other parties are mainly based around the founder, such as Vox and Chega, but those parties have hundreds of other office holders and the founders have their own individual notability as office holders and nationally recognisable figures. Apart from being an unsuccessful candidate, what can be said about Liber that isn't about her party? The page used to have information about education and children, which I removed as unsourced per BLP. I also removed the blow-by-blow of setting up a political party, as that's obviously more about the organisation than about her. But the thing is, would we ever need to know personal information about someone this notable? I saw the comment before that Liber is notable as a founder and leader of a political party, but in a democracy it's reasonably easy to set up a party, and extremely easy to be the leader of your own party. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 16:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. C messier ( talk) 15:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT C messier ( talk) 15:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No deletion rationale provided. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 13:27, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fairly sure this fails the notability guidelines for companies but I'd appreciate a once-over from editors more familiar with aviation software, Sri Lanka or the UAE to make sure this nomination isn't a howler. Its presence on Wikipedia (including list entries and other links, hence I don't favour a redirect) is entirely down to a single-purpose account, almost certainly with a conflict of interest. – Tera tix ₵ 13:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Autobiography of an apparently non-notable retired photography teacher. No in-depth secondary sources, and his awards for photography and teaching do not seem to be significant ones. Belbury ( talk) 13:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Per Talk:Preethi#Requested move 2 June 2024 the film is the only topic with this title. The other two entries are WP:TITLEPTMs. As names they should follow MOS:DABNAME, but with only two entries disambiguation can be handled by hatnotes. Polyamorph ( talk) 12:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
If this page cannot be kept, I would like to propose merging Preethi (name) into Preeti, and redirecting Preethi (disambiguation) to one of those two pages with history in tact. It has been said that hatnotes should redirect to a title that has "(disambiguation)" in it, in the event that such an article is created at that title. Would we be able to relist this AFD in order to converse about these possibilities? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 22:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP because of a lack of significant, independent coverage of the company. The current sources are either press releases or are covering routine business transactions, and a BEFORE check didn't come up with much better. Let'srun ( talk) 11:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
12:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP because of a lack of coverage about the network's activities. Let'srun ( talk) 11:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
12:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:GNG as there are no reliable sources which provide significant coverage of this event or mentions the event as Conquest of Mandaran. it relies heavily on Non- WP:RS sources. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 09:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
12:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Under Ruknuddin Barbak Shah, Shah Ismail Ghazi sieged and conquered a fort near Gar Mandaran in 1464, everything else seems to be WP:SYNTH. Walsh90210 ( talk) 20:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:N. It's also in such a promotional, unsourced state that it would need TNTing if kept. Boleyn ( talk) 08:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Considering that the first bullet point refers to a page about legal punishment, not extrajudicial, and the second bullet point refers to a page which doesn't even mention Lebanon, I don't think this disambiguation serves any real purpose. Fram ( talk) 08:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arguments to keep are weak, given that the sources are fairly routine in my view. That said, there is not consensus to delete the article, perhaps due to a lack of participation. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I would argue that this fails the notability criteria: since the article is based on routine press coverage, and there's not much more mentions in reliable sources after the show did not move forward in September 2023. Maybe the specific guideline is WP:NOTNEWS, but I've seen most unaired television/film articles that do not have extensive coverage beyond cancellation be draftified, so maybe draftifying is the best option? I'm open to other options, though. Spinixster (trout me!) 09:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
TOO Soon; lacks reliable sources; BoraVoro ( talk) 06:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
South African rugby BLP. I found a handful of sentences of coverage here, which I don't see as enough to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 07:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Non notable article about an organization/club that doesn't meet WP:GNG. I can't talk of WP:NCORP when there is no notability and WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the Micronesian Games. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
OK, the relevant Afd was in 2011. Let's ask some questions.
My answers are to these questions
Despite or possibly because Wikipedia:AFDISNOTCLEANUP I'm fine with any alternate outcome Shirt58 ( talk) 🦘 09:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was procedural close as the wrong venue — AfD is for articles only; files go to files for discussion. (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Fan-made album cover, serves no purpose Sricsi ( talk) 08:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:N, or a suitable WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 12 years now, so hopefully we can decide now one way or the other. Boleyn ( talk) 07:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Townsquare Media. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:N. Due to the way it is written (and wholly unsourced), even if notable it would need TNTing. I couldn't see a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 07:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2024 French legislative election. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
It could be merged into the article of 2024 French legislative election. Cmsth11126a02 ( talk) 07:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
<
RetroCraft
314 />
16:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable speaker. Zero in-depth secondary source about him. A few mentions in promotional guest posts or invitations of his events. Tagged since 2015 but has been continously attracting COI/UPE editors. Fails WP:GNG. Teltle ( talk) 05:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
ROTM self-help coach who has authored some guest posts or has been mentioned in guest post - nothing in secondary references. Fails WP:GNG. Teltle ( talk) 05:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I'm not sure why this discussion kept being relisted as there is a clear consensus to Keep this article. A move discussion can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced; besides being minimal, none of the two are extant, not helping this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep and move? Or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 23:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
"Blood purity" does not occur as a term in any of the linked articles except Fictional universe of Harry Potter (the original intention of the page as first written), and Limpieza de sangre: other entries fail MOS:DABMENTION. If rewritten as an article it would require sources, which it currently doesn't have and so fails WP:V. An alternative to deletion may be to redirect to Fictional universe of Harry Potter with a hatnote to other use(s). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 17:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Belgium–Russia relations. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Russian version of this article also only has 1 source. LibStar ( talk) 05:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Due to lack of participation. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Most of the sources are not in-depth or are primary. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 03:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No new comments after two relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
A hat-rack article with no clear topic. Primarily a list of citations, rather than actual content. Walsh90210 ( talk) 03:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BASIC C F A 💬 02:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the needed sources to meet the WP:NCORP. Let'srun ( talk) 03:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I nominated this for AfD because an IP prodded it and I felt like it might be controversial. Not sure if he meets the WP:GNG but there are a decent amount of sources. (Don’t seem reliable though, citehighlighter is highlighting a lot of them orange and red) 48JCL TALK 02:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 13:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
None of the information in this article is sourced, the "references" are just links to Rabinky's artwork. A Google search only produces links to websites selling her artwork, although I did find this press release on Google News about a distinction she seems to have won. I'm unsure of its notability. In any case, I haven't found anything else. (NB: Sorry for resubmitting, was interrupted when I did it the first time and it was deleted.) WikiFouf ( talk) 02:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Handball at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's team rosters. as an ATD. If a different redirect target article is preferred, that can be discussed. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. It should also be noted Australia only got to play handball in 2000 Olympics as host nation. They lost every game. LibStar ( talk) 23:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Article on a hostage taking that lasted one day from 19 years ago, created the day of the hostage taking, uncited even then. Article has sat largely untouched for the past two decades. There are sources exclusively from the day this happened. The only thing I found that wasn't from the actual day this occurred was a 1 paragraph mention in a list of German hostage crises from 2010, which does not have enough detail to build an article from.
Fails WP:NEVENT. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 23:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
An inter school cricket competition that fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Similar AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPA Cup (2nd nomination) LibStar ( talk) 23:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Scottish women's footballer that fails WP:GNG. The She Kicks and Daily Record references already in the article are the closest to WP:SIGCOV I could find, and they each have just a few sentences of routine coverage. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. While opinion was pretty evenly split, those editors arguing to Keep failed to provide reliable sources that could be used to establish notability, even when asked multiple times by other editors. Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Every reference is PR and churnalism. Every reference is a PR announcement. Fails WP:NCORP and the key tenet of WP:V. This is WP:ADMASQ. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 05:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to see a review of sources brought to the discussion by the IP editor. Other Keep votes making assertions without providing citations are not worth much at all
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
The result was delete. The only person who did anything significant to this page is the creator, who has nominated it for speedy deletion per WP:G7. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 01:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I don’t think this needs an explanation. This should definitely be deleted or merged into the main article. 48JCL TALK 23:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
No independent sources. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROD. jlwoodwa ( talk) 17:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources found in brief WP:BEFORE search, so it fails WP:GNG. I lack the knowledge to judge whether the subject "has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline" per WP:NPROF. However, even if notability can be established by that criteria, I don't think there are sufficient sources for us to write an article that satisfies WP:V. Daask ( talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of characters in the Family Guy franchise#Cleveland Brown Jr.. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet general notability guidelines. The little significant coverage mentioning this character is not about the character itself, rather focusing on the show at large. - Samoht27 ( talk) 22:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, little coverage outside of user-generated sources. Was kept at last AfD but barely improved since. TappyTurtle [ talk | contribs] 17:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT is not a community recognized WP:SNG. It's only an essay and doesn't appear to be widely vetted as it doesn't look like it's linked from any guidelines pages. Graywalls ( talk) 23:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
A book review too can be an opinion.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no action.. The minimally-participated discussion here was unanimous to merge with Glossary of German military terms. But without a nomination to delete, AfD is not required. Any editor is welcome to merge as suggested, or to discuss a different editorial approach on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 23:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
It seems like this article should be merged into articles about the German and Austrian militaries of various eras, which generally include discussion of uniforms. Just because there is a German word for "military uniform" doesn't mean that word is a distinct topic. We already have military uniform; the military uniforms of German-speaking countries (as opposed to Germany and Austria and Switerland, separately) don't make a natural subtopic of that. -- Beland ( talk) 21:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Article is a mess
with multiple
WP:BLPVIO issues. The seeming lack of information about
Count Emicho outside the wall of text about the First Crusade or
Rhineland massacres seems to confirm the article lacks
WP: NOTABILITY. The article even had a Holocaust reference in it for whatever reason, until I removed it.
Fantastic Mr. Fox (
talk)
21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
A secondary source provides thought and reflection based on primary sources, generally at least one step removed from an event. It contains analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources. [...] They rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them. Curbon7 ( talk) 22:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I have struck through the BLP statement, I have no clue what was running through my head at the time. The correct wording is that it fails WP:NPOV. Fantastic Mr. Fox ( talk) 06:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, an English rugby league player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found were routine transactional announcements ( 1, 2). Possible redirect targets include List of St Helens R.F.C. players and List of North Wales Crusaders players. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCRIC/ WP:OFFCRIC. Non-notable tournament which ran twice, over 15 years ago. No WP:LASTING. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE. AA ( talk) 20:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
A similar article exists. Kindly redirect to that NBV2010 ( talk) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Besides the first Google news hit, the rest of the coverage I found was not in depth. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 19:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to MLB London Series. RL0919 ( talk) 20:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Non notable series with no non-routine coverage that can be covered sufficiently at MLB London Series. Esolo5002 ( talk) 18:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
no non-routine coverageis just an odd thing to say when WP:BEFORE is conducted. Here's CNN, a news site that doesn't often cover baseball. Here's from The Guardian. I could keep going but that seems unnecessary. – Muboshgu ( talk) 18:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
This entire article reads like a WP:CRYSTAL essay and contains nothing that isn't covered better in the many other AI-related articles, most of which are linked. Black Kite (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Appears to be a WP:MERGE request ( WP:SKCRIT 1). (non-admin closure) CMD ( talk) 05:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 16:40, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination reason was invalid. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 17:57, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 14:09, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 14:12, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Nova Direita. as an ATD Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I know it has only been two months since the last nomination but that ended as no consensus, which was not an endorsement of notability. There has been another nationwide election since then and this candidate is still getting under 0.5%. There are sources about her, yes, but they're mainly discussing her candidacies and are part of a WP:ROUTINE coverage expected in a democracy. Some other parties are mainly based around the founder, such as Vox and Chega, but those parties have hundreds of other office holders and the founders have their own individual notability as office holders and nationally recognisable figures. Apart from being an unsuccessful candidate, what can be said about Liber that isn't about her party? The page used to have information about education and children, which I removed as unsourced per BLP. I also removed the blow-by-blow of setting up a political party, as that's obviously more about the organisation than about her. But the thing is, would we ever need to know personal information about someone this notable? I saw the comment before that Liber is notable as a founder and leader of a political party, but in a democracy it's reasonably easy to set up a party, and extremely easy to be the leader of your own party. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 16:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. C messier ( talk) 15:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT C messier ( talk) 15:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No deletion rationale provided. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I first saw this article when I was searching about the article containing a list of current Iran governors-general. I prefer the information of this article be transferred on the article that contains the list of governors in Iran. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymy365248 ( talk • contribs) 13:27, June 10, 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fairly sure this fails the notability guidelines for companies but I'd appreciate a once-over from editors more familiar with aviation software, Sri Lanka or the UAE to make sure this nomination isn't a howler. Its presence on Wikipedia (including list entries and other links, hence I don't favour a redirect) is entirely down to a single-purpose account, almost certainly with a conflict of interest. – Tera tix ₵ 13:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Autobiography of an apparently non-notable retired photography teacher. No in-depth secondary sources, and his awards for photography and teaching do not seem to be significant ones. Belbury ( talk) 13:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Per Talk:Preethi#Requested move 2 June 2024 the film is the only topic with this title. The other two entries are WP:TITLEPTMs. As names they should follow MOS:DABNAME, but with only two entries disambiguation can be handled by hatnotes. Polyamorph ( talk) 12:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
If this page cannot be kept, I would like to propose merging Preethi (name) into Preeti, and redirecting Preethi (disambiguation) to one of those two pages with history in tact. It has been said that hatnotes should redirect to a title that has "(disambiguation)" in it, in the event that such an article is created at that title. Would we be able to relist this AFD in order to converse about these possibilities? -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 22:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP because of a lack of significant, independent coverage of the company. The current sources are either press releases or are covering routine business transactions, and a BEFORE check didn't come up with much better. Let'srun ( talk) 11:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
12:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP because of a lack of coverage about the network's activities. Let'srun ( talk) 11:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
12:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:GNG as there are no reliable sources which provide significant coverage of this event or mentions the event as Conquest of Mandaran. it relies heavily on Non- WP:RS sources. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 09:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
12:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Under Ruknuddin Barbak Shah, Shah Ismail Ghazi sieged and conquered a fort near Gar Mandaran in 1464, everything else seems to be WP:SYNTH. Walsh90210 ( talk) 20:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:N. It's also in such a promotional, unsourced state that it would need TNTing if kept. Boleyn ( talk) 08:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Considering that the first bullet point refers to a page about legal punishment, not extrajudicial, and the second bullet point refers to a page which doesn't even mention Lebanon, I don't think this disambiguation serves any real purpose. Fram ( talk) 08:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arguments to keep are weak, given that the sources are fairly routine in my view. That said, there is not consensus to delete the article, perhaps due to a lack of participation. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I would argue that this fails the notability criteria: since the article is based on routine press coverage, and there's not much more mentions in reliable sources after the show did not move forward in September 2023. Maybe the specific guideline is WP:NOTNEWS, but I've seen most unaired television/film articles that do not have extensive coverage beyond cancellation be draftified, so maybe draftifying is the best option? I'm open to other options, though. Spinixster (trout me!) 09:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
TOO Soon; lacks reliable sources; BoraVoro ( talk) 06:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
South African rugby BLP. I found a handful of sentences of coverage here, which I don't see as enough to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 07:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Non notable article about an organization/club that doesn't meet WP:GNG. I can't talk of WP:NCORP when there is no notability and WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the Micronesian Games. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
OK, the relevant Afd was in 2011. Let's ask some questions.
My answers are to these questions
Despite or possibly because Wikipedia:AFDISNOTCLEANUP I'm fine with any alternate outcome Shirt58 ( talk) 🦘 09:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was procedural close as the wrong venue — AfD is for articles only; files go to files for discussion. (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Fan-made album cover, serves no purpose Sricsi ( talk) 08:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:N, or a suitable WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 12 years now, so hopefully we can decide now one way or the other. Boleyn ( talk) 07:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Townsquare Media. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show this meets WP:N. Due to the way it is written (and wholly unsourced), even if notable it would need TNTing. I couldn't see a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 07:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2024 French legislative election. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
It could be merged into the article of 2024 French legislative election. Cmsth11126a02 ( talk) 07:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
<
RetroCraft
314 />
16:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable speaker. Zero in-depth secondary source about him. A few mentions in promotional guest posts or invitations of his events. Tagged since 2015 but has been continously attracting COI/UPE editors. Fails WP:GNG. Teltle ( talk) 05:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
ROTM self-help coach who has authored some guest posts or has been mentioned in guest post - nothing in secondary references. Fails WP:GNG. Teltle ( talk) 05:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I'm not sure why this discussion kept being relisted as there is a clear consensus to Keep this article. A move discussion can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent NFL fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides those unsourced; besides being minimal, none of the two are extant, not helping this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 17:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep and move? Or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 23:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
"Blood purity" does not occur as a term in any of the linked articles except Fictional universe of Harry Potter (the original intention of the page as first written), and Limpieza de sangre: other entries fail MOS:DABMENTION. If rewritten as an article it would require sources, which it currently doesn't have and so fails WP:V. An alternative to deletion may be to redirect to Fictional universe of Harry Potter with a hatnote to other use(s). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 17:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Belgium–Russia relations. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Russian version of this article also only has 1 source. LibStar ( talk) 05:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Due to lack of participation. Malinaccier ( talk) 14:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Most of the sources are not in-depth or are primary. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 03:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No new comments after two relistings so I'm closing this as No consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
A hat-rack article with no clear topic. Primarily a list of citations, rather than actual content. Walsh90210 ( talk) 03:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:BASIC C F A 💬 02:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the needed sources to meet the WP:NCORP. Let'srun ( talk) 03:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I nominated this for AfD because an IP prodded it and I felt like it might be controversial. Not sure if he meets the WP:GNG but there are a decent amount of sources. (Don’t seem reliable though, citehighlighter is highlighting a lot of them orange and red) 48JCL TALK 02:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)