![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 23:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable crime, no sustained coverage beyond the sequence of events. Wikipedia is not a repository of news stories. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 00:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
A list seemingly relying on copying from a Plus/4 World database. IgelRM ( talk) 22:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
This company was hardly notable in 2014 and has done nothing notable since. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 18:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
22:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject is marginally notable - has played supporting roles in a web series and a TV miniseries. Phönedinger's jellyfish II ( talk) 21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
21:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Of course, if an editor would want to work on this article in Draft space and submit to AFC for review, contact me or WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 07:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Prod was removed, fairly, as exhibition list here shows it could meet WP:NARTIST. I couldn't find sources to show it meets this or WP:GNG, however. Boleyn ( talk) 19:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
21:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject doesn't seem to meet the WP:NLIST as this grouping is not discussed in secondary sources. Randam ( talk) 21:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Basically a list of games, suggesting redirect to Get Fit With Mel B. IgelRM ( talk) 21:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Played only 132 mins of professional football and doesn't seem to have any WP:SIGCOV. The most recent source that I could find was Top Presa, which confirmed that he was playing in the Regional Amateur Football Groups (Bulgaria), the 4th tier of Bulgarian football, which hardly gives me confidence that SIGCOV will be found. Other sources only address him in passing, such as Marica and Blitz. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing this as No consensus. I don't think relisting would resolve these differing perceptions of the article and newly found sources. Numerically, more editors argue that this article should be Kept but many are "Weak Keep"s (and one Weak Delete as well) signifying an existing uncertainty that lands us in No consensus Land. But please let this not be an article that is nominated annually until a desired outcome is provided. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. The attempted notability claim here is that she was a non-winning competitor on American Idol, which is not an automatic notability freebie in and of itself -- obviously a person can lose an Idol series and still go on to accomplish other notable things in their music career anyway, but people don't automatically qualify for articles just for competing on Idol per se -- but the only other thing here is that an independent album exists for sale on CDBaby, which isn't a notability clincher either.
And for footnotes we've got one directly affiliated primary source, one directory entry, one glancing namecheck of her existence in an Idol episode recap that isn't otherwise about her, and one deadlinked piece of "local young woman ends run on reality show" in her hometown local media, which isn't enough to get her over
WP:GNG all by itself if it's the only piece of proper media coverage about her that she has.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have more noteworthy achievements, and better sourcing for them, than just competing in a reality show.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "But Wright State University and Centerville High School alum Alexis Gomez is at her happiest when she’s on an area stage mixing it up with the crowd. ... While Idol helped Gomez get her name “out there,” she’s still working tirelessly to get her big break. She lives in Nashville and can be found spending four or five hours a day in writing sessions, and countless hours networking, searching online, and walking into meetings to get her name and face into as many places as she can. She does substitute teaching at Centerville High School when she’s home, and babysits and performs other odd jobs as well. ... She also has a modeling contract in Nashville that has helped her get into a Hardee’s commercial and a small part in a music video of a new song from country singer Tracy Lawrence, a star in the 1990s who is making a comeback."
The article notes: "Gomez got her start singing with her family band in Dayton, Ohio. Her first performance was when she was eight years old and she hasn't looked back since. Then, four years ago, she found herself on the hit TV show America Idol, which has produced famous singers such as Scotty McCreery and Carrie Underwood. ... After being on that show, she went on to start recording her own albums and going on tour, singing her songs to the public."
The article notes: "Gomez, a graduate of Centerville High School and Wright State University, was a Top 16 finalist on Season 14 of “American Idol” in 2015. She went on to compete as a Top 10 finalist in “Nash Next” in 2016 and 2017, and has continued her singing career following these competitions by performing around the local area this summer."
The article notes: "Gomez grew up in the Dayton area and has been singing and playing music for as long as she can remember. She plays guitar, piano and dabbles around with a few other instruments to include banjo, bass and drums. Her songwriting has been recognized in recent years as she has won a number of local contests where’s she’s been given the opportunity to showcase some of her original music. She plays locally with her band, The Mad River Band, as well as with a variety of bands in Nashville, Tennessee, on the Broadway strip."
The article notes: "Centerville and Wright State graduate Alexis Gomez is best known as the semi-finalist on the hit FOX show American Idol (Season 14). She also was a finalist in the Nash Next National Contest in 2016 to find the next Rising Country Star."
The article notes: "Gomez, a graduate of Centerville High School and Wright State University, was a semi-finalist on the hit show “American Idol” (Season 14). The multi-instrumentalist went on to compete as a finalist in “Nash Next” in 2016 and 2017, and has opened for artists such as Randy Hauser, Midland, Montgomery Gentry, Cassadee Pope, Clint Black and Old Dominion."
The article notes: "A former American Idol contender played the Preble County Historical Society Amphitheater last Friday night, for an excited crowd of fans of all ages. ... Gomez played for a two hours and covered major country hits from artists ranging from Johnny Cash to Carrie Underwood. The concert brought in approximately 160 guests and 80 percent of them had never been to the venue, White said."
The article notes: "Dayton-area native Alexis Gomez was named winner of the 32nd Annual Texaco Country Showdown local competition, a country music talent search and radio promotion held at the 2013 Clark County Fair on Thursday evening. ... Gomez grew up in the Dayton area and has been singing and playing music for as long as she can remember. Her father, brother and sister are all musicians. As she got older, she joined the family band. She plays guitar and piano, and dabbles around with a few other instruments including banjo, bass and drums. She's won a number of local contests, where she’s been given the opportunity to showcase some of her original music."
The guideline does not require "nationalizing significance". Alexis Gomez also meets Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria and Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard ( talk) 03:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria.
- Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability" (emphasis mine) from Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, I believe GNG is met when combining all sources together, but just barely. Because of this, WP:NMUSIC is irrelevant. — Sirdog ( talk) 04:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient depth-of-coverage from third-party sources; Forbes article is from Forbes "contributor" which doesn't count toward notability. Only other is from Ilna, which by itself isn't sufficient. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Virtually a list of games, doesn't appear sufficiently notable. Suggesting redirect to Milestone (Italian company). IgelRM ( talk) 20:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced with a list of games. Bill Gardner should probably be mentioned somewhere, but this publisher doesn't appear sufficiently notable. IgelRM ( talk) 20:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
the page has no references, only contains the mission statement, and seems very much like a promotional article. Gaismagorm ( talk) 20:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Scaledish!
Talkish?
Statish.
15:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)The result was keep. This is not casting aspersions but don't nominate an article for deletion because "I don't think he really meets notability guidelines". There is a lot of uncertainty in a statement like that and "he doesn't strike me as notable" opens the door to editors who DO think he strikes them as notable. I'm not singling out this AFD because I see this a lot in AFDLand but if you aren't sure there is notability present or you haven't done a thorough BEFORE, then a nomination for deletion isn't called for. Really. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This kid is pretty good at getting his viewpoint in the media but I don't think he really meets notability guidelines. Maybe someday. — Chowbok ☠ 19:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn in favor of a possible move as suggested by User:Toughpigs. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 05:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Not individually notable really. I think his group, BLTNM, is notable (see the coverage on this article), but most of the coverage he has gotten seems to be WP:INHERITED from that. This article should either be deleted, or move/merged with a BLTNM article Allan Nonymous ( talk) 18:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn in favor of WP:TNT + move. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 20:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
There may be a case for an article on this topic (there probably is) but this is an unmitigated mess that really isn't focusing on the issues and is just a spam list of songs. We should WP:TNT this and start over, especially given this is a WP:CTOP. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 17:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
A previous AfD was sock-produced; turns out much of the content was likewise produced by a now-blocked UPE--and I see now that there is quite a bit of spamming done by UPEs. Notability is highly questionable, besides the promotion: Google proves the company exists, but I see nothing proving notability per GNG or NCORP. Drmies ( talk) 17:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was a few sentences here about a suspension reduction. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Reads like
WP:PROMO... for another article (see Noam Cohen). No real sign of notability here. Edit: The concern here is mainly a
WP:BLP1E concern which is visible in the lede of the article, which includes "mainly notable for".
Allan Nonymous (
talk)
17:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 12:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Only receives tangential coverage and reads like WP:PROMO. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 17:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Welsh rugby union referee, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 08:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Poland in ESC 2024 article. Song is not notable for anything other than being in Eurovision, which is still a month away. If this song does well, the separate article can be restored. - 62.165.249.180 ( talk) 08:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of radio stations in Kansas. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Defunct low-power radio station with zero secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 16:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Procedural nomination following the closure of this RfD. The article was blanked and redirected in 2013 by NorthBySouthBaranof. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 15:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Martínez has played only 4 minutes of professional league football and there is no sign of WP:SPORTBASIC #5 or any other valid guideline being met. My searches yielded squad list mentions in El Vigía, Esto and Soccer Today, none of which are even close to WP:SIGCOV. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Played 56 mins in a professional league but with no evidence of any WP:SIGCOV. The only Arabic-language source that is close to decent is Kooora, but it's just a routine contract renewal announcement and doesn't explore Naser Obaid in any detail. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Another footballer with a minor and brief career. He played only 28 mins in a professional league. The only reliable source on him appears to be Al Kass but, after translation, it's only a passing mention and not WP:SIGCOV. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC #5 or WP:GNG. He has played 27 mins of professional football for Qatar SC (please note that this is a football club and not a national team). FilGoal is the only source that I can find but it's just a database source. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Played 23 minutes at professional level before disappearing. I'm not finding any evidence of WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Al Watan has a passing mention of a futsal player of the same name but this isn't SIGCOV in any case. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 13:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Ehrmagerd, werds! As interesting as I find this, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PepperBeast (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is a procedural close. Both the article creator and the nominator have been blocked for UPE which is a distraction from evaluating the article on its merits. No penalty for an uninvolved editor nominating this article again in the future with a thoughtful, policy-based deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 08:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems like a UPE as the creator also created the article on its owner, Luca Schnetzler which is also at AfD. This is why it has been draftified to go through AfC [7] but it is again directly put back to mainspace by the creator. Since, the notability seems on the borderline and the references looks like paid placements so AfD would be the best place for it. Bhivuti45 ( talk) 09:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Such a long article, tagged for improvements since 2020, has only IMDB as references. I have tried to find something on GoogleNews but couldn't. WP:TNT. fail to meet the relevant notability guideline. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 11:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
10:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Rejected at WP:AFC fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong ( talk) 08:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
07:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The editor who created this article stated they were going to work on improving it but, 10 days later, no content changes have been made to the article so I'm going with the consensus to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable by WP:BIO or WP:GNG. He's worked with several notable people and groups, but on Wikipedia, notability is not inherited. In a WP:BEFORE search I can find only passing mentions in reliable, secondary sources; the rest is music blogs and a few profiles in what look like paid placements. Wikishovel ( talk) 07:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tangerine Dream. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NBASIC. Only claim to fame is being a member of Tangerine Dream. Notability is not inherited. TarnishedPath talk 07:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient notability; many roads are named after notable people, but only those that are notable as roads should have articles. CoolieCoolster ( talk) 07:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject of the article clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (people), since there is no a single secondary WP:RS that can establish a shred of notability.
Thus, I propose the article be deleted. Veverve ( talk) 07:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 08:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP and needs more WP:SIGCOV in WP:RSP. At the present moment, the coverage provided is considered trivial. Notedolly2 ( talk) 06:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of television stations in Tennessee#LPTV stations. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable LPTV; some sources are questionable. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ultraelectromagneticpop!. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Article tagged as unreferenced since 2011. GNews, GNews Archives and GSearch did not yield reliable references. Do note that you might get false positive due to the typhoons named Toyang. Alternatively, Redirect to its parent album Ultraelectromagneticpop! -- Lenticel ( talk) 05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article but also an acknowledgement that it needs some clean-up work done on it (hint! hint! to interested editors). Liz Read! Talk! 03:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Not highly cited. This seems to have been created for a class project. —Kaliforniyka Hi! 05:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I declined the speedy G4 because it has been 6 years since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Mary's College, Negombo. There's some coverage: 1 2 that I located quickly, so I'm bringing this here just to check. TLA tlak 04:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Nominating on behalf of PaPa PaPaRoony who wrote the following deletion rationale at WT:AFD:
The event does not have long-lasting effects whatsoever and has no notability. It is only covered by local media and there has been no lasting coverage from any international media. It was not a significant event, neither in civilian nor military aviation. As such I would like someone to nominate this page for deletion. Thank you so much.
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
14:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTRESS. Article is cited excessively to self published and primary sources. Those few independent secondary references that are used only mention the subject in passing within cast lists and do not address the subject directly or in detail as required by GNG. No significant roles in television or film. No major theatre productions either. Seems to have worked only in minor regional theatre and touring productions. 4meter4 ( talk) 01:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Why do we even have this topic? Earthquakes in New York are rare. Seems like WP:NOTNEWS. But even most of the sources used in this article aren't really specific to New York earthquakes. We don't even have an article about seismicity of San Francisco which probably would be more appropriate.I could see incorporating some of this into an article about Earthquakes in the eastern United States, but we don't even have that. Articles about New York do not get auto-notability, just because its New York. Rusf10 ( talk) 01:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Inactive organization; lacks notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Because of the earlier PROD, this AFD is not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO notability tests. This man seems to be of interest to his descendants (because he is the earliest known person with the family name), but he has not received significant coverage in published sources and there is not indication of his being important outside the family or a very local context (the article's best assertion for his notability is that he was one of the several founders of a colonial village). The three books cited in the article are a book (probably self-published) of family history and genealogy and two books of the history of the area where he lived. Before starting this AfD, I found online copies of the two history books, identified places where his name was mentioned, and added citations to the article. I found only peripheral mentions of him. He is also covered on the genealogical site WikiTree at https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Snedeker-9 in an article that has far more information and reference citations than the Wikipedia article, but nothing I see there indicates significant published coverage or demonstrates his importance to people who are not his descendants. Orlady ( talk) 16:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a clear WP:NOTSTATS violation of indiscriminate trivia. Let'srun ( talk) 20:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
...it's unfortunate for the creators of these articles who expect other editors to follow their lead: Consensus can change, not that there's evidence that there was a formal consensus that these pages were ever needed. As early as 2007, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Dwyane Wade was a "delete". As the nom said, WP:NOTSTATS, and WP's purpose is not to recreate basketball-reference.com's database or compile tidbits sourced to AI site statsmuse.com. There's a reason articles have an "External links" section.— Bagumba ( talk) 03:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusingThe page is a pure stats dump.— Bagumba ( talk) 03:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
indiscriminate mentions of being one of X players to achieve a trivial statistical cross section", whether it is WP:Trivia is a matter of opinion. For all we know there is significant RS coverage discussing these "one of X players" achievements. I hope these AfD's do not spill over into WP:SPINOUT articles for Top 10 players. They are justified and appropriate IMO. - BeFriendlyGoodSir ( talk) 17:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
whether it is WP:Trivia is a matter of opinionAnd this discussion is about our opinions.
For all we know there is significant RS coverage discussing these "one of X players" achievements: Per WP:ONUS, feel free to source them and gain consensus.— Bagumba ( talk) 15:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Instead of trying to go by similar pages that were kept or deleted, it would be useful to go back to the relevant P&G.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested WP:PROD. The article lacks secondary reliable sources to satisfy the WP:GNG. A quick WP:BEFORE yields no reviews, which is unfortunately strongly suggestive of non-notability. VRXCES ( talk) 00:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this previously unfootnoted article about a musician and church leader, and added two reviews of one of his albums. I have not found other coverage to add. I am not sure if one of the publications, CCM Magazine, is a reliable source, as its About says "The information in the post above may have been formatted to suit this website, but is not necessarily material originally created by, or exclusive to CCMmagazine.com", and no author is given. In any case, based on two reviews I do not think that the subject of the article is notable under WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 23:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable crime, no sustained coverage beyond the sequence of events. Wikipedia is not a repository of news stories. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 21:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 00:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
A list seemingly relying on copying from a Plus/4 World database. IgelRM ( talk) 22:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
This company was hardly notable in 2014 and has done nothing notable since. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 18:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
22:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject is marginally notable - has played supporting roles in a web series and a TV miniseries. Phönedinger's jellyfish II ( talk) 21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
21:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Of course, if an editor would want to work on this article in Draft space and submit to AFC for review, contact me or WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 07:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Prod was removed, fairly, as exhibition list here shows it could meet WP:NARTIST. I couldn't find sources to show it meets this or WP:GNG, however. Boleyn ( talk) 19:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
21:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject doesn't seem to meet the WP:NLIST as this grouping is not discussed in secondary sources. Randam ( talk) 21:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Basically a list of games, suggesting redirect to Get Fit With Mel B. IgelRM ( talk) 21:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Played only 132 mins of professional football and doesn't seem to have any WP:SIGCOV. The most recent source that I could find was Top Presa, which confirmed that he was playing in the Regional Amateur Football Groups (Bulgaria), the 4th tier of Bulgarian football, which hardly gives me confidence that SIGCOV will be found. Other sources only address him in passing, such as Marica and Blitz. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing this as No consensus. I don't think relisting would resolve these differing perceptions of the article and newly found sources. Numerically, more editors argue that this article should be Kept but many are "Weak Keep"s (and one Weak Delete as well) signifying an existing uncertainty that lands us in No consensus Land. But please let this not be an article that is nominated annually until a desired outcome is provided. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. The attempted notability claim here is that she was a non-winning competitor on American Idol, which is not an automatic notability freebie in and of itself -- obviously a person can lose an Idol series and still go on to accomplish other notable things in their music career anyway, but people don't automatically qualify for articles just for competing on Idol per se -- but the only other thing here is that an independent album exists for sale on CDBaby, which isn't a notability clincher either.
And for footnotes we've got one directly affiliated primary source, one directory entry, one glancing namecheck of her existence in an Idol episode recap that isn't otherwise about her, and one deadlinked piece of "local young woman ends run on reality show" in her hometown local media, which isn't enough to get her over
WP:GNG all by itself if it's the only piece of proper media coverage about her that she has.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have more noteworthy achievements, and better sourcing for them, than just competing in a reality show.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "But Wright State University and Centerville High School alum Alexis Gomez is at her happiest when she’s on an area stage mixing it up with the crowd. ... While Idol helped Gomez get her name “out there,” she’s still working tirelessly to get her big break. She lives in Nashville and can be found spending four or five hours a day in writing sessions, and countless hours networking, searching online, and walking into meetings to get her name and face into as many places as she can. She does substitute teaching at Centerville High School when she’s home, and babysits and performs other odd jobs as well. ... She also has a modeling contract in Nashville that has helped her get into a Hardee’s commercial and a small part in a music video of a new song from country singer Tracy Lawrence, a star in the 1990s who is making a comeback."
The article notes: "Gomez got her start singing with her family band in Dayton, Ohio. Her first performance was when she was eight years old and she hasn't looked back since. Then, four years ago, she found herself on the hit TV show America Idol, which has produced famous singers such as Scotty McCreery and Carrie Underwood. ... After being on that show, she went on to start recording her own albums and going on tour, singing her songs to the public."
The article notes: "Gomez, a graduate of Centerville High School and Wright State University, was a Top 16 finalist on Season 14 of “American Idol” in 2015. She went on to compete as a Top 10 finalist in “Nash Next” in 2016 and 2017, and has continued her singing career following these competitions by performing around the local area this summer."
The article notes: "Gomez grew up in the Dayton area and has been singing and playing music for as long as she can remember. She plays guitar, piano and dabbles around with a few other instruments to include banjo, bass and drums. Her songwriting has been recognized in recent years as she has won a number of local contests where’s she’s been given the opportunity to showcase some of her original music. She plays locally with her band, The Mad River Band, as well as with a variety of bands in Nashville, Tennessee, on the Broadway strip."
The article notes: "Centerville and Wright State graduate Alexis Gomez is best known as the semi-finalist on the hit FOX show American Idol (Season 14). She also was a finalist in the Nash Next National Contest in 2016 to find the next Rising Country Star."
The article notes: "Gomez, a graduate of Centerville High School and Wright State University, was a semi-finalist on the hit show “American Idol” (Season 14). The multi-instrumentalist went on to compete as a finalist in “Nash Next” in 2016 and 2017, and has opened for artists such as Randy Hauser, Midland, Montgomery Gentry, Cassadee Pope, Clint Black and Old Dominion."
The article notes: "A former American Idol contender played the Preble County Historical Society Amphitheater last Friday night, for an excited crowd of fans of all ages. ... Gomez played for a two hours and covered major country hits from artists ranging from Johnny Cash to Carrie Underwood. The concert brought in approximately 160 guests and 80 percent of them had never been to the venue, White said."
The article notes: "Dayton-area native Alexis Gomez was named winner of the 32nd Annual Texaco Country Showdown local competition, a country music talent search and radio promotion held at the 2013 Clark County Fair on Thursday evening. ... Gomez grew up in the Dayton area and has been singing and playing music for as long as she can remember. Her father, brother and sister are all musicians. As she got older, she joined the family band. She plays guitar and piano, and dabbles around with a few other instruments including banjo, bass and drums. She's won a number of local contests, where she’s been given the opportunity to showcase some of her original music."
The guideline does not require "nationalizing significance". Alexis Gomez also meets Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria and Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard ( talk) 03:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria.
- Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability" (emphasis mine) from Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, I believe GNG is met when combining all sources together, but just barely. Because of this, WP:NMUSIC is irrelevant. — Sirdog ( talk) 04:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient depth-of-coverage from third-party sources; Forbes article is from Forbes "contributor" which doesn't count toward notability. Only other is from Ilna, which by itself isn't sufficient. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Virtually a list of games, doesn't appear sufficiently notable. Suggesting redirect to Milestone (Italian company). IgelRM ( talk) 20:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced with a list of games. Bill Gardner should probably be mentioned somewhere, but this publisher doesn't appear sufficiently notable. IgelRM ( talk) 20:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
the page has no references, only contains the mission statement, and seems very much like a promotional article. Gaismagorm ( talk) 20:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Scaledish!
Talkish?
Statish.
15:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)The result was keep. This is not casting aspersions but don't nominate an article for deletion because "I don't think he really meets notability guidelines". There is a lot of uncertainty in a statement like that and "he doesn't strike me as notable" opens the door to editors who DO think he strikes them as notable. I'm not singling out this AFD because I see this a lot in AFDLand but if you aren't sure there is notability present or you haven't done a thorough BEFORE, then a nomination for deletion isn't called for. Really. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This kid is pretty good at getting his viewpoint in the media but I don't think he really meets notability guidelines. Maybe someday. — Chowbok ☠ 19:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn in favor of a possible move as suggested by User:Toughpigs. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 05:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Not individually notable really. I think his group, BLTNM, is notable (see the coverage on this article), but most of the coverage he has gotten seems to be WP:INHERITED from that. This article should either be deleted, or move/merged with a BLTNM article Allan Nonymous ( talk) 18:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn in favor of WP:TNT + move. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 20:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
There may be a case for an article on this topic (there probably is) but this is an unmitigated mess that really isn't focusing on the issues and is just a spam list of songs. We should WP:TNT this and start over, especially given this is a WP:CTOP. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 17:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
A previous AfD was sock-produced; turns out much of the content was likewise produced by a now-blocked UPE--and I see now that there is quite a bit of spamming done by UPEs. Notability is highly questionable, besides the promotion: Google proves the company exists, but I see nothing proving notability per GNG or NCORP. Drmies ( talk) 17:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was a few sentences here about a suspension reduction. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Reads like
WP:PROMO... for another article (see Noam Cohen). No real sign of notability here. Edit: The concern here is mainly a
WP:BLP1E concern which is visible in the lede of the article, which includes "mainly notable for".
Allan Nonymous (
talk)
17:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 12:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Only receives tangential coverage and reads like WP:PROMO. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 17:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Welsh rugby union referee, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 08:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Poland in ESC 2024 article. Song is not notable for anything other than being in Eurovision, which is still a month away. If this song does well, the separate article can be restored. - 62.165.249.180 ( talk) 08:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of radio stations in Kansas. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Defunct low-power radio station with zero secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 16:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Procedural nomination following the closure of this RfD. The article was blanked and redirected in 2013 by NorthBySouthBaranof. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 15:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Martínez has played only 4 minutes of professional league football and there is no sign of WP:SPORTBASIC #5 or any other valid guideline being met. My searches yielded squad list mentions in El Vigía, Esto and Soccer Today, none of which are even close to WP:SIGCOV. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Played 56 mins in a professional league but with no evidence of any WP:SIGCOV. The only Arabic-language source that is close to decent is Kooora, but it's just a routine contract renewal announcement and doesn't explore Naser Obaid in any detail. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Another footballer with a minor and brief career. He played only 28 mins in a professional league. The only reliable source on him appears to be Al Kass but, after translation, it's only a passing mention and not WP:SIGCOV. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC #5 or WP:GNG. He has played 27 mins of professional football for Qatar SC (please note that this is a football club and not a national team). FilGoal is the only source that I can find but it's just a database source. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Played 23 minutes at professional level before disappearing. I'm not finding any evidence of WP:SIGCOV for this footballer. Al Watan has a passing mention of a futsal player of the same name but this isn't SIGCOV in any case. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 13:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Ehrmagerd, werds! As interesting as I find this, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PepperBeast (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is a procedural close. Both the article creator and the nominator have been blocked for UPE which is a distraction from evaluating the article on its merits. No penalty for an uninvolved editor nominating this article again in the future with a thoughtful, policy-based deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 08:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems like a UPE as the creator also created the article on its owner, Luca Schnetzler which is also at AfD. This is why it has been draftified to go through AfC [7] but it is again directly put back to mainspace by the creator. Since, the notability seems on the borderline and the references looks like paid placements so AfD would be the best place for it. Bhivuti45 ( talk) 09:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Such a long article, tagged for improvements since 2020, has only IMDB as references. I have tried to find something on GoogleNews but couldn't. WP:TNT. fail to meet the relevant notability guideline. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 11:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
10:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Rejected at WP:AFC fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong ( talk) 08:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
07:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The editor who created this article stated they were going to work on improving it but, 10 days later, no content changes have been made to the article so I'm going with the consensus to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable by WP:BIO or WP:GNG. He's worked with several notable people and groups, but on Wikipedia, notability is not inherited. In a WP:BEFORE search I can find only passing mentions in reliable, secondary sources; the rest is music blogs and a few profiles in what look like paid placements. Wikishovel ( talk) 07:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tangerine Dream. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NBASIC. Only claim to fame is being a member of Tangerine Dream. Notability is not inherited. TarnishedPath talk 07:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient notability; many roads are named after notable people, but only those that are notable as roads should have articles. CoolieCoolster ( talk) 07:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject of the article clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (people), since there is no a single secondary WP:RS that can establish a shred of notability.
Thus, I propose the article be deleted. Veverve ( talk) 07:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 08:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP and needs more WP:SIGCOV in WP:RSP. At the present moment, the coverage provided is considered trivial. Notedolly2 ( talk) 06:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of television stations in Tennessee#LPTV stations. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable LPTV; some sources are questionable. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ultraelectromagneticpop!. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Article tagged as unreferenced since 2011. GNews, GNews Archives and GSearch did not yield reliable references. Do note that you might get false positive due to the typhoons named Toyang. Alternatively, Redirect to its parent album Ultraelectromagneticpop! -- Lenticel ( talk) 05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article but also an acknowledgement that it needs some clean-up work done on it (hint! hint! to interested editors). Liz Read! Talk! 03:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Not highly cited. This seems to have been created for a class project. —Kaliforniyka Hi! 05:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I declined the speedy G4 because it has been 6 years since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Mary's College, Negombo. There's some coverage: 1 2 that I located quickly, so I'm bringing this here just to check. TLA tlak 04:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Nominating on behalf of PaPa PaPaRoony who wrote the following deletion rationale at WT:AFD:
The event does not have long-lasting effects whatsoever and has no notability. It is only covered by local media and there has been no lasting coverage from any international media. It was not a significant event, neither in civilian nor military aviation. As such I would like someone to nominate this page for deletion. Thank you so much.
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
14:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTRESS. Article is cited excessively to self published and primary sources. Those few independent secondary references that are used only mention the subject in passing within cast lists and do not address the subject directly or in detail as required by GNG. No significant roles in television or film. No major theatre productions either. Seems to have worked only in minor regional theatre and touring productions. 4meter4 ( talk) 01:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Why do we even have this topic? Earthquakes in New York are rare. Seems like WP:NOTNEWS. But even most of the sources used in this article aren't really specific to New York earthquakes. We don't even have an article about seismicity of San Francisco which probably would be more appropriate.I could see incorporating some of this into an article about Earthquakes in the eastern United States, but we don't even have that. Articles about New York do not get auto-notability, just because its New York. Rusf10 ( talk) 01:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Inactive organization; lacks notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Because of the earlier PROD, this AFD is not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO notability tests. This man seems to be of interest to his descendants (because he is the earliest known person with the family name), but he has not received significant coverage in published sources and there is not indication of his being important outside the family or a very local context (the article's best assertion for his notability is that he was one of the several founders of a colonial village). The three books cited in the article are a book (probably self-published) of family history and genealogy and two books of the history of the area where he lived. Before starting this AfD, I found online copies of the two history books, identified places where his name was mentioned, and added citations to the article. I found only peripheral mentions of him. He is also covered on the genealogical site WikiTree at https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Snedeker-9 in an article that has far more information and reference citations than the Wikipedia article, but nothing I see there indicates significant published coverage or demonstrates his importance to people who are not his descendants. Orlady ( talk) 16:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a clear WP:NOTSTATS violation of indiscriminate trivia. Let'srun ( talk) 20:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
...it's unfortunate for the creators of these articles who expect other editors to follow their lead: Consensus can change, not that there's evidence that there was a formal consensus that these pages were ever needed. As early as 2007, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Dwyane Wade was a "delete". As the nom said, WP:NOTSTATS, and WP's purpose is not to recreate basketball-reference.com's database or compile tidbits sourced to AI site statsmuse.com. There's a reason articles have an "External links" section.— Bagumba ( talk) 03:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusingThe page is a pure stats dump.— Bagumba ( talk) 03:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
indiscriminate mentions of being one of X players to achieve a trivial statistical cross section", whether it is WP:Trivia is a matter of opinion. For all we know there is significant RS coverage discussing these "one of X players" achievements. I hope these AfD's do not spill over into WP:SPINOUT articles for Top 10 players. They are justified and appropriate IMO. - BeFriendlyGoodSir ( talk) 17:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
whether it is WP:Trivia is a matter of opinionAnd this discussion is about our opinions.
For all we know there is significant RS coverage discussing these "one of X players" achievements: Per WP:ONUS, feel free to source them and gain consensus.— Bagumba ( talk) 15:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Instead of trying to go by similar pages that were kept or deleted, it would be useful to go back to the relevant P&G.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested WP:PROD. The article lacks secondary reliable sources to satisfy the WP:GNG. A quick WP:BEFORE yields no reviews, which is unfortunately strongly suggestive of non-notability. VRXCES ( talk) 00:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this previously unfootnoted article about a musician and church leader, and added two reviews of one of his albums. I have not found other coverage to add. I am not sure if one of the publications, CCM Magazine, is a reliable source, as its About says "The information in the post above may have been formatted to suit this website, but is not necessarily material originally created by, or exclusive to CCMmagazine.com", and no author is given. In any case, based on two reviews I do not think that the subject of the article is notable under WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Tacyarg ( talk) 00:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)