![]() |
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. The nominator gets the point, no need to continue piling on. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 19:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
State legislator does not pass WP:NPOL. The guide allows for "state–wide office" which is taken to mean "Constitutional offices". State legislators do not usually meet NPOL without WP:SIGCOV. Bruxton ( talk) 23:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
...have been members of legislative bodies at those levelsmeets the criteria, with state-level specifically being one of those levels. The article's subject was in the state-level legislature, so meets WP:NPOL. - Aoidh ( talk) 00:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
...or have been members of legislative bodies at those levelsis the relevant part that is met here. The Wyoming Legislature is the legislative body at the state-wide level, and he was a member of that legislative body. That is exactly what WP:NPOL is looking for. It is not a criteria that they themselves represent the entire state in the legisiature; if that were the case their national counterparts in the United States House of Representatives would also fail that criteria since they also generally only represent a part of the state, not the entire state. - Aoidh ( talk) 03:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I reverted an article page move because changing article titles mid-AFD complicates AFD closures and relistings. Go ahead and move the article although it might warrant a talk page discussion first. Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Twice disputed draftification. WP:ADMASQ, only primary sources 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus isn't really clear - both arguments seem to hold some wait. Relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Taking Out The Trash (
talk)
22:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Legoktm ( talk) 01:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Article about a short film series, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:NFO. The main notability claim here is that the first episode went viral, but that's not well-quantified by reliable sources -- of the seven footnotes here, one is just reduplicated repetition of one of the others, so there are really only six distinct sources, but three of those are its own
self-published content about itself, one more is a Slashdot post, and the only two that actually come from real
WP:GNG-worthy media are both just "local kids do stuff" in the local media of their own hometown, thus failing to establish wider significance.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have much, much stronger referencing than this is showing.
Bearcat (
talk)
20:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Ryan Wood's seven-minute short film was shown at the Toronto Film Festival. Then he posted it on a new kind of Web site that pays filmmakers - professional or amateur - each time viewers click on their work.and
Nor would Wood disclose how much he earned from two films he's posted on the site, "Pitching Mother" and "Fear of Girls." Even though "Fear of Girls," his latest, is one of Revver's most-viewed films, with more than 9,500 hits.
The hip, 21st-century phrase is "viral internet marketing," but it sounds suspiciously like good ol' word of mouth. Whatever, it's responsible for the runaway e-success of "Fear of Girls," an endearingly comic 11-minute ode to nerddom .... by Wednesday it hit the No. 1 spot of top blogsites on Daypop.com.
The result was redirect to Marquess Townshend. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This marquess fails WP:BASIC, having earned no multiple, secondary, reliable, in-depth coverage. He never got to sit in the House of Lords and therefore cannot qualify for WP:NPOL. While there is some passing coverage of the marquess in a handful of sources, he is never the subject of the article, and the amount of words dedicated to him in reliable sources never climb above 10% of the article's total. Arguably, an article about his mansion could be written, but at present the notability of the marquess is in my view not established. Possible redirect target: Marquess Townshend.
My (long) source assessment follows.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Allan Freer. " Conqueror 89" from The Conqueror database. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Bob Raynham, " The Raynham Family History". Chapter 15 "The Raynhams of Norfolk" Archived 2008-07-23 at the Wayback Machine | ![]() |
? This chapter seems to come out of a book, but is published on the author's website in full. | ![]() |
✘ No |
Kidd, Charles, Williamson, David (editors). Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage (1990 edition). New York: St Martin's Press, 1990, | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" Bruntisfield, Baron (UK, 1942)". www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk. Retrieved 12 March 2018. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Leigh Rayment's Peerage Pages | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Lundy, Darryl (2007). " FAQ". The Peerage. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Revealed: The 24 aristocrats who own 10 per cent of Norfolk's land. Eastern Daily Press. 7 August 2021. | ? Never been brought to WP:RSN | ![]() |
✘ No | |
Owners of stately home unveil new glamping site. Eastern Daily Press. 1 January 2021. | ? Never been brought to WP:RSN | ![]() |
✘ No | |
Laura Silverman, 'I play the lottery twice a week': inside the crumbling 7,000-acre estate that one couple expects will cost millions to restore. The Telegraph. 19 June 2018 | ![]() |
![]()
|
✘ No | |
Opening the doors on a beautiful Norfolk country house. Eastern Daily Press. 1 March 2018. | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
Raynham Hall to host open day to help restoration efforts, ITV, 2017. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Emma Wells, The 72-year-olds trying to save Raynham Hall in Norfolk, The Times, 25 March 2018. | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No | |
https://www.antiquestradegazette.com/news/2021/an-arts-and-crafts-cabinet-by-ernest-gimson-is-among-six-lots-to-watch-this-week/ | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
"Exhibition for Festival takes look at King's Lynn from all angles" Lynn News. 17 July 2018 | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
As one festival ends, another begins in King’s Lynn Eastern Daily Press. 15 July 2018 | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Pilaz ( talk) 21:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is obvious meat puppetry going on here and none of the keep votes stacked up against a devastating source analysis. If this gets recreated please ping me to look into the possibility of further coi editing Spartaz Humbug! 19:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Some of the sources are newer, but it's the same mix of obvious paid puff pieces, press releases, passing mentions, and doesn't-even-mention-hims. His company and his father might be notable, but notability is not inherited on Wikipedia. Editors searching for any significant, independent coverage I might have missed, please note that his name is commonly spelled Vaibhav Maloo, which was salted following repeated deletion and sockpuppetry. Storchy ( talk) 13:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Despite appearances, there is nothing to show notability here. Although the article has been re-worked since the previous AfD, all the references are either passing mentions, or don't mention the subject, or are not independent. There is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject as required by WP:BIO or WP:N.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I hope this is helpful to editors wading through the references to determine whether his notability has increased since the last deletion. Storchy ( talk) 11:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please review Storchy's source analysis just added today to the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Vaibhav sees to cherishing the high-techs and ways to improve the management techniques to win the race. Claiming a flexible mindset, he asserts, “The technique of surgical operator helps him with the ability to execute tasks with minimal recurring costs and lighter books.”
The result was keep. I think the consensus is to Keep this article but it definitely needs some improvement, cutting it down and providing a stronger focus on the primary subject of the development of national identify. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate article of Ukrainians and History of Ukraine, vastly unsourced, and I am not sure what is the point of the existence of this article. Other ethnic groups do not have an "history of nationality" page. Super Ψ Dro 09:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD, fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage of the subject exists in reliable sources. W 42 21:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD, fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage of the subject exists in reliable sources. W 42 21:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD, fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage of the subject exists in reliable sources. W 42 21:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Heritage Roads in Singapore. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. The heritage road designation is applied to roads with a lot of trees. Floydian τ ¢ 21:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This disambiguation page (or disambiguation-like page) does not disambiguate "analytic", i.e. it does not list articles that might otherwise be titled "Analytic". It is full of WP:Partial title matches and is, at best, an incomplete list of how the general-purpose adjective "analytic" might be used. An alternative to deletion might be a soft redirect to wikt, since it seems to meet the criteria at {{ Wiktionary redirect}}. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 21:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
R from adjective}}
and {{
R from ambiguous term}}
, and finally remove all but the two or three entries that actually discuss this as a mathematical idea, probably function and set at least, as LaundryPizza mentioned. Maybe an argument could be made for another few entries here and there, but most are just PTMs.
35.139.154.158 (
talk)
04:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Lacks notability. Bgsu98 ( talk) 18:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is a slight preference for deletion, but this discussion is also tainted by the fact that the nominator was a sock. Given that, no prejudice against speedy renomination. Legoktm ( talk) 01:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
original research, see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-sovereign countries.
Privybst (
talk) 17:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
WP:STRIKESOCK. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion. Also, I'll mention that the nominator is yet another sockpuppet of
Dolyn.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Scorpion (disambiguation)#Comics. Numerically, this is 8 for keeping versus 10 for deleting/redirecting, but of the 8 at least one makes it clear they wish to keep this as an index, rather than a content page, and a couple of other !votes are ambiguous. I read the first of these as at least partially supporting redirecting, as there isn't an obvious basis in policy for preferring multiple DAB pages over a single one. Furthermore, the concerns (directly stated or implied) about this not being a coherent topic for a standalone page haven't really been rebutted, and the two clearly notable characters here have standalone pages; I'm not seeing a clearly stated argument for why a standalone content page is necessary over and above those two. As such I find the arguments to "keep" somewhat weaker, and this tips consensus toward redirecting. Vanamonde ( Talk) 23:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
One of those weirdly overgrown disambis/lists ("The Scorpion is the name of multiple characters in Marvel Comics"). The problem, as usual, is that none of those multiple characters appear notable. References are short mentions or plot summaries or straight-up links to comic books. Perhaps redirect to Mac Gargan (article claims he is the best known of those characters)? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, divided between those advocating Keep and those who want a Redirect
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
17:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, still divided among editors whether to Keep or Redirect this article (and two different redirect targets have support).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Legoktm ( talk) 01:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
A longstanding unreferenced article summarising the features of a software package. This particular IntelliTalk product (there are others in other fields) appears to have been merged into Synapse Adaptive's wider classroom tool package. Searches find a couple of brief product summaries (in a product range summary by IntelliTools Inc.; and in a chapter in an "Engaging the Resistant Child" book) These are enough to make a PROD inappropriate, but I don't think they are sufficient to demonstrate that the software package attained notability. AllyD ( talk) 10:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Apparenet WP:MILL. Delete according to WP:N, WP:NCORP. Driodr ( talk) 20:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Independence We Veneto. Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Tiny party that doesn't meet WP:Notability. The page only states that this party was born of a split from Venetian Independence and that it joined Independence We Veneto, it can be merged with to the latter without any problems. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 20:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marquess of Headfort. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Irish peer, fails WP:BASIC due to a lack of secondary, independent, reliable sources covering the subject in depth. Earned the title of marquess in 2005 and therefore cannot qualify for WP:NPOL due to the House of Lords Act 1999, which deprived them of a seat in the House of Lords.
Source assessment follows:
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
"- Person Page 8114". www.thepeerage.com. Retrieved 9 February 2016. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"Headfort, Marquess of (I, 1800)". www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk. Heraldic Media Limited. Retrieved 1 May 2020. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"The Marquis of Headfort". The Telegraph. 8 December 2005. Retrieved 1 May 2020. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"Sir Thomas Michael Ronald Christopher Taylour, 7th Marquess of Headfort", * 1959 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Michael Parsons, "The Irish couple who scandalised London society", the Irish Times, 14 January 2012. Accessed 3 October 2022. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Pilaz ( talk) 20:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Legoktm ( talk) 03:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Google search doesn't reveal any good information in English. The subject doesn't appear to meet GNG or WP:NDIRECTOR. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage located on a search. Both sources linked are stats only, and look amateur on top of that. With the deprecation of WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG must be met, and this subject fails. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I cannot find even a single secondary source covering this train. Clear GNG fail. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 18:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of notability; neither of the cited sources directly relate to or mention the subject and WP:BEFORE didn't turn up sufficient sourcing either. Elli ( talk | contribs) 18:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced article for 12 years. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BEFORE searches show nothing of note. Skipple ☎ 17:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No claim to notability, and it does not look as if it has ever been sourced. For a while, there was a source in the form of a book published by "Books, LLC"; that's a company that prints Wikipedia articles. The title of the book is Chief Ministers of Sindh; Muhammad Ayub Khuhro, Allah Bux Soomro, Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi, Pir Ilahi Bux, Haji Idress Palh, Mumtaz Bhutto but the article has never claimed that Palh was Chief Minister of Sindh – and he wasn't. Being a union council member is not a claim to notability.
The article was first created as a copy of Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi, and then it was redirected to that title; after a year, the redirect was replaced with the current text. bonadea contributions talk 17:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, radio show does not appear notable from article and WP:BEFORE search didn't return anything of note. Skipple ☎ 17:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea women Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 19:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
While the subject has played at the international level, and thus would meet WP:CRIN, the subject does not pass WP:GNG as no significant coverage of her exists. Per WP:NSPORTS2022 "sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject". This may also be a case of WP:TOOSOON as the first international game was played less than 2 weeks ago. W 42 16:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 17:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this article does not seem to meet either the GNG or WP:NPROF criteria.
Since "Tim Patterson" is a fairly common name, I did a WP:BEFORE search in the Canadian Newsstream database using his name plus the word "Carleton", which is the name of his university. I could find significant coverage of Patterson in only one independent, secondary, reliable source (see Talk page).
I also have WP:COI concerns about this article. The three top editors of the article have almost never edited any article except this one and Harvey, New Brunswick (population: 358) which according to a declared COI editor is where Patterson grew up. [17]
Procedural/transparency note: This article has recently been briefly discussed at WP:WikiProject Climate change. Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 15:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No notability of the topic. Only has one reference that happens to be a dead link. Failed to find enough information on the internet to possibly make this article notable enough. WR 15:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Another very badly written and completely inaccurate article created by an editor who keeps pumping out a series of terrible articles, with little or no regard for providing attribution for their copy-and-paste or translation work, and honestly, WP:CIR should be considered here, considering the numerous warnings they have received on their talk page about their poor editing. There is no such thing as "the Leader of the Opposition" in Colombia. María Fernanda Cabal is not the Leader of the Opposition, either officially or unofficially – the first reference simply states that she is opposed to the policies of the current government. She is not even the leader of the largest political party in opposition, so I don't know how she can be the leader of the opposition without being the leader of the party. As noted at the top of the article, the editor has simply copied and pasted text from the similar article for Israel, and hasn't even bothered to change the names of the Israeli political parties, so little do they care about proofreading their work. The other two references simply discuss opposition to the government in general, nothing to do with any official position. Richard3120 ( talk) 15:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:TNT applies. ✗ plicit 14:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NPOL. Ministerial position is an appointment and no election was involved. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
*Keep the subject is notable and the statements in the article are clearly verifiable. Deletion is not cleanup. I will tidy it up now but there’s no need at all for deletion.
Mccapra (
talk)
18:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G11. (non-admin closure) Ovinus ( talk) 20:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Significant coverage in reliable sources not found ( t · c) buidhe 14:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was trainwreck. Procedural keep per here; nominated title was already a redirect due to draftification. (non-admin closure) ~Styyx Talk? 14:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Already featured in the Borscht article with as much detail as this Lithuanian version of the widely-made dish deserves in its own right, this unsourced content fork packed with OR has been the subject of some edit-warring, with an editor consistently removing the redirect to Borscht and insisting on a standalone article for this non-notable variation. Inasmuch as a soup would ever pass WP:GNG, this soup simply doesn't make the grade. If there were a WP:SOUP guideline, it wouldn't meet that either. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. Sources are just list-entries. Moved back to mainspace by author without improvement. MB 14:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BLP, WP:GNG and reliable sources Dark Juliorik ( talk) 12:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Soft-deleted, but later restored. Renominating to get a proper consensus - my view is that the company still fails WP:NCORP.
Note: the page was deleted under a different title but not sure if G4 still applies. KH-1 ( talk) 11:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No significant references or notability. The external links are all dead including the website mentioned in the personal details. The South Star Hill ( talk) 08:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I have withdrawn my nomination, two editors have voted keep and found sources to demonstrate borderline notability. VickKiang (talk) 00:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Except for The Anime Encyclopedia, which is a RS that is SIGCOV, this fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, WP:BEFORE reveals no more refs counting to notability. Russian version is no better, only having iffy press releases, including this. VickKiang (talk) 06:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
*Delete Couldn't find any reviews in a search. Fails
WP:NFILM
DonaldD23
talk to me 11:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Keep Changing vote based on discussion below.
DonaldD23
talk to me
00:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'd like to Merge or Redirect this article but I don't see widespread support for these two options in this discussion. Some strong feelings about Keeping this article but not ones based in policy and the additional sources provided discuss the Emblem of Jerusalem, not the Flag. Liz Read! Talk! 08:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This stub is unsourced for a reason, and that is because there is little to no attestation in reliable sources of the flag of the Jerusalem municipality (the image itself is captioned "Flag of the Israeli municipality of Jerusalem") being called 'the flag of Jerusalem' - this is a title that in vexillology more commonly refers to the flag of the Order of St John of Malta or, in some academic papers, a hypothetical future flag that might contain both Israeli and Palestine elements in a post-conflict reconciliation scenario. Since no material currently exists in the article on the latter, and the current material is unsupported, this page should either be deleted or redirected to Flag and coat of arms of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. Iskandar323 ( talk) 05:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting although I see no policy-based reasons for keeping this unsourced article. But one editor states that "lots of sources in Hebrew are available" so here's a few more days to track them down.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Only a few roles in some daily soaps. After carefully checking the references, all are passing mentions and routine coverages only. The creator removed the tag [23] without any improvements to the article despite suggestions to go through the AfC process. Haueirlan ( talk) 05:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep meeting WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG as the Subject has done 3 television series and she was the lead actress of those television series, also the subject has significant coverages from multiple sources. Apart from this the subject has been reviewed 2 month ago by @ North8000:, who is an experienced editor over more than 10 years so I don't think that in this 2 month subject is not meeting notablity criteria. Samir Bishal ( talk) 07:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indian Express Bangla | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Article is about the show not the actress | ~ Partial |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Article is about the show but gives a couple paragraphs on the actresses | ~ Partial |
TV9 Bangla | ? Appears to be a reproduction from a news agency | ![]() |
~ Article is about the show not the actress | ? Unknown |
Sangbad Online | ? Unable to access website | ? Unable to access website | ? Unable to access website | ? Unknown |
Anandabazar | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Actress appeared as a contestant on a TV show. | ~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This page was restored from a redirect as "plainly notable" but unfortunately I do not see that reflected in either the article's sourcing or the available sources. Of the sources listed in the article, one is a blog, one is a tourist listing, and two are simple directory listings. The only one potentially usable is the Citizens Journal source. My own search has only turned up blog posts, directory listings, and mentions in listicle-style articles like " 6 parks in Johor to get away from hustle and bustle of the city." ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they) Talk to Me! 04:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG--provided sources are either not independent or are passing mentions or non-mentions in articles about the group of political prisoners with whom he was detained. Article was created by a sockmaster who was focused on promotional articles on Egyptian human rights figures (master was blocked after the creation of this article, so this is not eligible for a G5 speedy). A search for better sources turned up articles written by him, but nothing from reliable sources about him. -- Finngall talk 01:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I am actually one of this writer's readers (I added the most recent edits after I watched his latest interview and did not find it on the page here; I assume that's what triggered the deletion request), and after some research I did find significant, consistent coverage for his case in both English and Arabic outlets (I am highlighting that the "reliability" of news outlets is not synonymous with them being "western". The local coverage is indeed extensive on his case.)
Has a consensus been reached yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:901:CFD0:4D56:F442:F9C2:F5B1 ( talk) 18:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
If no one is contributing to the discussion or offering any alternatives, shouldn't the deletion tag be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:901:CFD0:D1D4:930:7041:935D ( talk) 18:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
There are many editors on here who are better at source analysis than I am, and I hope that one or more of them chimes in here, but in my view the sources above do not add up to a set of reliable, independent or in-depth references which satisfies WP:GNG. -- Finngall talk 20:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
But, I still looked up more, and more has come up that looks very detailed, intentional, and independent.
His story, writings, and activism are widely referenced in reports and analyses around the political situation in Egypt. Some of them are wholly centred on his story and writings, and others use them as a main reference they draw upon in an argument or political analysis.
This is an op ed drawing on his story and prison writing in a political analysis on Egypt in 2019: https://www.alquds.co.uk/%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A5%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AB-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A9/
This is another article drawing on his activism and writings on current prisoners to shed light on the prison situation in Egypt in 2022: https://ghadnews.net/ar/post/2772
This is a detailed coverage of his release and backstory: https://www.fj-p.com/288784/%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF-%D8%A5%D8%AE%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%B3%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%86%D8%B4%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%AD%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%A5%D8%AE%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%B3%D8%A8/
This is an article in 2021 about a viral campaign he launched and managed for his incarcerated friend covering both their stories and the campaign by Abdelrahman: https://arabicpost.net/opinions/2021/04/13/%d8%a3%d8%ba%d9%86%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d8%b9%d9%87%d8%af-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a3%d8%b5%d8%af%d9%82%d8%a7%d8%a1-%d9%87%d9%84-%d8%aa%d9%85%d9%86%d8%ad-%d8%a3%d9%8a%d9%85%d9%86-%d9%85%d9%88%d8%b3%d9%89-%d9%81/
This is a Spanish news report on one of the biggest Spanish media outlets on Egyptian prison writing relying heavily on his story, writing and statements in its content: https://elpais.com/internacional/2022-01-07/la-vida-entre-rejas-se-hace-literatura-en-egipto.html?prm=ep-app-cabecera It was big enough to be translated and published in Arabic on another reputable Arabic platform: https://www.noonpost.com/content/42885
This is the latest news report from AlJazeera on his latest creative writing scholarship and the book project he's currently working on: https://mubasher.aljazeera.net/news/2022/8/10/%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87-6-%D8%B3%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%82-%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%85%D9%87
I am not sure how a political prisoner, writer, and activist who's been widely and consistently covered in news and published on various platforms and hosted on different outlets between 2013 and 2022 does not pass the notability threshold. I of course would love to hear others' input. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:901:CFD0:CAB:E406:9AD6:32EB ( talk) 19:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need some eyes on this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, as the subject of this article is a singer who hasn't released any albums and doesn't seem to have any album credits at all. A couple of television appearances don't meet the threshold for notability, especially since neither the subject of this article nor the television appearances received much coverage. Also relies too heavily on primary sources, as nearly all information comes from interviews with the subject if this article. Considering the dearth of secondary sources, it's almost impossible to write an article in which information isn't sourced almost exclusively from statements he has made about himself. JMB1980 ( talk) 01:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. YouVeNeverSeenBetter ( talk) 05:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G5 ( User:Ijumdiya wadzani) Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested drafting, then contested CSD A7. I still believe this is an A7 candidate. This artist does not meet any of the criteria of WP:NMUSIC and the sources do not satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG the sources used are all contributor submitted write ups and are not considered reliable. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 01:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
04:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Nominating on behalf of an IP. Concern is This is non-notable building. A Google search (in English) for additional information only returns the church's own web site and Wikipedia. The church fails WP:NGEO in terms of significant coverage.
Qwaiiplayer (
talk)
03:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jan Hammer discography. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 03:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:N and WP:NALBUM. Only source is one review by Allmusic. Google finds nothing related to the album. VTVL ( talk) 03:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete under criterion G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
This person does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. The article, which evidently is an autobiography, simply lays out the events of his life: born, attended school, took his exams, started a business. WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. Article sourcing consists of his own projects; an online search reveals nothing but social media and user-generated content. Netherzone ( talk) 01:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I was going to tag it with CSD, but figured this would be better. I don't think this deserves an article at all. Definitely fails WP:GNG. Asparagusus (interaction) 00:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
It's strangly difficult to find anything about them, but a lot of archived posts would seem to confirm it's existence. Semantism ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. The nominator gets the point, no need to continue piling on. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 19:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
State legislator does not pass WP:NPOL. The guide allows for "state–wide office" which is taken to mean "Constitutional offices". State legislators do not usually meet NPOL without WP:SIGCOV. Bruxton ( talk) 23:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
...have been members of legislative bodies at those levelsmeets the criteria, with state-level specifically being one of those levels. The article's subject was in the state-level legislature, so meets WP:NPOL. - Aoidh ( talk) 00:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
...or have been members of legislative bodies at those levelsis the relevant part that is met here. The Wyoming Legislature is the legislative body at the state-wide level, and he was a member of that legislative body. That is exactly what WP:NPOL is looking for. It is not a criteria that they themselves represent the entire state in the legisiature; if that were the case their national counterparts in the United States House of Representatives would also fail that criteria since they also generally only represent a part of the state, not the entire state. - Aoidh ( talk) 03:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I reverted an article page move because changing article titles mid-AFD complicates AFD closures and relistings. Go ahead and move the article although it might warrant a talk page discussion first. Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Twice disputed draftification. WP:ADMASQ, only primary sources 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus isn't really clear - both arguments seem to hold some wait. Relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Taking Out The Trash (
talk)
22:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Legoktm ( talk) 01:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Article about a short film series, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing
WP:NFO. The main notability claim here is that the first episode went viral, but that's not well-quantified by reliable sources -- of the seven footnotes here, one is just reduplicated repetition of one of the others, so there are really only six distinct sources, but three of those are its own
self-published content about itself, one more is a Slashdot post, and the only two that actually come from real
WP:GNG-worthy media are both just "local kids do stuff" in the local media of their own hometown, thus failing to establish wider significance.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have much, much stronger referencing than this is showing.
Bearcat (
talk)
20:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Ryan Wood's seven-minute short film was shown at the Toronto Film Festival. Then he posted it on a new kind of Web site that pays filmmakers - professional or amateur - each time viewers click on their work.and
Nor would Wood disclose how much he earned from two films he's posted on the site, "Pitching Mother" and "Fear of Girls." Even though "Fear of Girls," his latest, is one of Revver's most-viewed films, with more than 9,500 hits.
The hip, 21st-century phrase is "viral internet marketing," but it sounds suspiciously like good ol' word of mouth. Whatever, it's responsible for the runaway e-success of "Fear of Girls," an endearingly comic 11-minute ode to nerddom .... by Wednesday it hit the No. 1 spot of top blogsites on Daypop.com.
The result was redirect to Marquess Townshend. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This marquess fails WP:BASIC, having earned no multiple, secondary, reliable, in-depth coverage. He never got to sit in the House of Lords and therefore cannot qualify for WP:NPOL. While there is some passing coverage of the marquess in a handful of sources, he is never the subject of the article, and the amount of words dedicated to him in reliable sources never climb above 10% of the article's total. Arguably, an article about his mansion could be written, but at present the notability of the marquess is in my view not established. Possible redirect target: Marquess Townshend.
My (long) source assessment follows.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Allan Freer. " Conqueror 89" from The Conqueror database. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Bob Raynham, " The Raynham Family History". Chapter 15 "The Raynhams of Norfolk" Archived 2008-07-23 at the Wayback Machine | ![]() |
? This chapter seems to come out of a book, but is published on the author's website in full. | ![]() |
✘ No |
Kidd, Charles, Williamson, David (editors). Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage (1990 edition). New York: St Martin's Press, 1990, | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" Bruntisfield, Baron (UK, 1942)". www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk. Retrieved 12 March 2018. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Leigh Rayment's Peerage Pages | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Lundy, Darryl (2007). " FAQ". The Peerage. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Revealed: The 24 aristocrats who own 10 per cent of Norfolk's land. Eastern Daily Press. 7 August 2021. | ? Never been brought to WP:RSN | ![]() |
✘ No | |
Owners of stately home unveil new glamping site. Eastern Daily Press. 1 January 2021. | ? Never been brought to WP:RSN | ![]() |
✘ No | |
Laura Silverman, 'I play the lottery twice a week': inside the crumbling 7,000-acre estate that one couple expects will cost millions to restore. The Telegraph. 19 June 2018 | ![]() |
![]()
|
✘ No | |
Opening the doors on a beautiful Norfolk country house. Eastern Daily Press. 1 March 2018. | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
Raynham Hall to host open day to help restoration efforts, ITV, 2017. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Emma Wells, The 72-year-olds trying to save Raynham Hall in Norfolk, The Times, 25 March 2018. | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No | |
https://www.antiquestradegazette.com/news/2021/an-arts-and-crafts-cabinet-by-ernest-gimson-is-among-six-lots-to-watch-this-week/ | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
"Exhibition for Festival takes look at King's Lynn from all angles" Lynn News. 17 July 2018 | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
As one festival ends, another begins in King’s Lynn Eastern Daily Press. 15 July 2018 | ? | ![]() |
✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Pilaz ( talk) 21:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is obvious meat puppetry going on here and none of the keep votes stacked up against a devastating source analysis. If this gets recreated please ping me to look into the possibility of further coi editing Spartaz Humbug! 19:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Some of the sources are newer, but it's the same mix of obvious paid puff pieces, press releases, passing mentions, and doesn't-even-mention-hims. His company and his father might be notable, but notability is not inherited on Wikipedia. Editors searching for any significant, independent coverage I might have missed, please note that his name is commonly spelled Vaibhav Maloo, which was salted following repeated deletion and sockpuppetry. Storchy ( talk) 13:39, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Despite appearances, there is nothing to show notability here. Although the article has been re-worked since the previous AfD, all the references are either passing mentions, or don't mention the subject, or are not independent. There is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject as required by WP:BIO or WP:N.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I hope this is helpful to editors wading through the references to determine whether his notability has increased since the last deletion. Storchy ( talk) 11:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please review Storchy's source analysis just added today to the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Vaibhav sees to cherishing the high-techs and ways to improve the management techniques to win the race. Claiming a flexible mindset, he asserts, “The technique of surgical operator helps him with the ability to execute tasks with minimal recurring costs and lighter books.”
The result was keep. I think the consensus is to Keep this article but it definitely needs some improvement, cutting it down and providing a stronger focus on the primary subject of the development of national identify. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate article of Ukrainians and History of Ukraine, vastly unsourced, and I am not sure what is the point of the existence of this article. Other ethnic groups do not have an "history of nationality" page. Super Ψ Dro 09:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD, fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage of the subject exists in reliable sources. W 42 21:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD, fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage of the subject exists in reliable sources. W 42 21:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD, fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage of the subject exists in reliable sources. W 42 21:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Heritage Roads in Singapore. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. The heritage road designation is applied to roads with a lot of trees. Floydian τ ¢ 21:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This disambiguation page (or disambiguation-like page) does not disambiguate "analytic", i.e. it does not list articles that might otherwise be titled "Analytic". It is full of WP:Partial title matches and is, at best, an incomplete list of how the general-purpose adjective "analytic" might be used. An alternative to deletion might be a soft redirect to wikt, since it seems to meet the criteria at {{ Wiktionary redirect}}. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 21:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
R from adjective}}
and {{
R from ambiguous term}}
, and finally remove all but the two or three entries that actually discuss this as a mathematical idea, probably function and set at least, as LaundryPizza mentioned. Maybe an argument could be made for another few entries here and there, but most are just PTMs.
35.139.154.158 (
talk)
04:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Lacks notability. Bgsu98 ( talk) 18:50, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is a slight preference for deletion, but this discussion is also tainted by the fact that the nominator was a sock. Given that, no prejudice against speedy renomination. Legoktm ( talk) 01:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
original research, see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-sovereign countries.
Privybst (
talk) 17:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
WP:STRIKESOCK. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion. Also, I'll mention that the nominator is yet another sockpuppet of
Dolyn.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Scorpion (disambiguation)#Comics. Numerically, this is 8 for keeping versus 10 for deleting/redirecting, but of the 8 at least one makes it clear they wish to keep this as an index, rather than a content page, and a couple of other !votes are ambiguous. I read the first of these as at least partially supporting redirecting, as there isn't an obvious basis in policy for preferring multiple DAB pages over a single one. Furthermore, the concerns (directly stated or implied) about this not being a coherent topic for a standalone page haven't really been rebutted, and the two clearly notable characters here have standalone pages; I'm not seeing a clearly stated argument for why a standalone content page is necessary over and above those two. As such I find the arguments to "keep" somewhat weaker, and this tips consensus toward redirecting. Vanamonde ( Talk) 23:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
One of those weirdly overgrown disambis/lists ("The Scorpion is the name of multiple characters in Marvel Comics"). The problem, as usual, is that none of those multiple characters appear notable. References are short mentions or plot summaries or straight-up links to comic books. Perhaps redirect to Mac Gargan (article claims he is the best known of those characters)? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, divided between those advocating Keep and those who want a Redirect
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
17:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, still divided among editors whether to Keep or Redirect this article (and two different redirect targets have support).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Legoktm ( talk) 01:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
A longstanding unreferenced article summarising the features of a software package. This particular IntelliTalk product (there are others in other fields) appears to have been merged into Synapse Adaptive's wider classroom tool package. Searches find a couple of brief product summaries (in a product range summary by IntelliTools Inc.; and in a chapter in an "Engaging the Resistant Child" book) These are enough to make a PROD inappropriate, but I don't think they are sufficient to demonstrate that the software package attained notability. AllyD ( talk) 10:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Apparenet WP:MILL. Delete according to WP:N, WP:NCORP. Driodr ( talk) 20:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Independence We Veneto. Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Tiny party that doesn't meet WP:Notability. The page only states that this party was born of a split from Venetian Independence and that it joined Independence We Veneto, it can be merged with to the latter without any problems. Scia Della Cometa ( talk) 20:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marquess of Headfort. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Irish peer, fails WP:BASIC due to a lack of secondary, independent, reliable sources covering the subject in depth. Earned the title of marquess in 2005 and therefore cannot qualify for WP:NPOL due to the House of Lords Act 1999, which deprived them of a seat in the House of Lords.
Source assessment follows:
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
"- Person Page 8114". www.thepeerage.com. Retrieved 9 February 2016. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"Headfort, Marquess of (I, 1800)". www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk. Heraldic Media Limited. Retrieved 1 May 2020. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"The Marquis of Headfort". The Telegraph. 8 December 2005. Retrieved 1 May 2020. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"Sir Thomas Michael Ronald Christopher Taylour, 7th Marquess of Headfort", * 1959 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Michael Parsons, "The Irish couple who scandalised London society", the Irish Times, 14 January 2012. Accessed 3 October 2022. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Pilaz ( talk) 20:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Legoktm ( talk) 03:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Google search doesn't reveal any good information in English. The subject doesn't appear to meet GNG or WP:NDIRECTOR. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage located on a search. Both sources linked are stats only, and look amateur on top of that. With the deprecation of WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG must be met, and this subject fails. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I cannot find even a single secondary source covering this train. Clear GNG fail. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 18:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of notability; neither of the cited sources directly relate to or mention the subject and WP:BEFORE didn't turn up sufficient sourcing either. Elli ( talk | contribs) 18:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced article for 12 years. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BEFORE searches show nothing of note. Skipple ☎ 17:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No claim to notability, and it does not look as if it has ever been sourced. For a while, there was a source in the form of a book published by "Books, LLC"; that's a company that prints Wikipedia articles. The title of the book is Chief Ministers of Sindh; Muhammad Ayub Khuhro, Allah Bux Soomro, Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi, Pir Ilahi Bux, Haji Idress Palh, Mumtaz Bhutto but the article has never claimed that Palh was Chief Minister of Sindh – and he wasn't. Being a union council member is not a claim to notability.
The article was first created as a copy of Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi, and then it was redirected to that title; after a year, the redirect was replaced with the current text. bonadea contributions talk 17:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, radio show does not appear notable from article and WP:BEFORE search didn't return anything of note. Skipple ☎ 17:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea women Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 19:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
While the subject has played at the international level, and thus would meet WP:CRIN, the subject does not pass WP:GNG as no significant coverage of her exists. Per WP:NSPORTS2022 "sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject". This may also be a case of WP:TOOSOON as the first international game was played less than 2 weeks ago. W 42 16:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 17:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this article does not seem to meet either the GNG or WP:NPROF criteria.
Since "Tim Patterson" is a fairly common name, I did a WP:BEFORE search in the Canadian Newsstream database using his name plus the word "Carleton", which is the name of his university. I could find significant coverage of Patterson in only one independent, secondary, reliable source (see Talk page).
I also have WP:COI concerns about this article. The three top editors of the article have almost never edited any article except this one and Harvey, New Brunswick (population: 358) which according to a declared COI editor is where Patterson grew up. [17]
Procedural/transparency note: This article has recently been briefly discussed at WP:WikiProject Climate change. Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 15:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No notability of the topic. Only has one reference that happens to be a dead link. Failed to find enough information on the internet to possibly make this article notable enough. WR 15:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Another very badly written and completely inaccurate article created by an editor who keeps pumping out a series of terrible articles, with little or no regard for providing attribution for their copy-and-paste or translation work, and honestly, WP:CIR should be considered here, considering the numerous warnings they have received on their talk page about their poor editing. There is no such thing as "the Leader of the Opposition" in Colombia. María Fernanda Cabal is not the Leader of the Opposition, either officially or unofficially – the first reference simply states that she is opposed to the policies of the current government. She is not even the leader of the largest political party in opposition, so I don't know how she can be the leader of the opposition without being the leader of the party. As noted at the top of the article, the editor has simply copied and pasted text from the similar article for Israel, and hasn't even bothered to change the names of the Israeli political parties, so little do they care about proofreading their work. The other two references simply discuss opposition to the government in general, nothing to do with any official position. Richard3120 ( talk) 15:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:TNT applies. ✗ plicit 14:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NPOL. Ministerial position is an appointment and no election was involved. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
*Keep the subject is notable and the statements in the article are clearly verifiable. Deletion is not cleanup. I will tidy it up now but there’s no need at all for deletion.
Mccapra (
talk)
18:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G11. (non-admin closure) Ovinus ( talk) 20:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Significant coverage in reliable sources not found ( t · c) buidhe 14:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was trainwreck. Procedural keep per here; nominated title was already a redirect due to draftification. (non-admin closure) ~Styyx Talk? 14:49, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Already featured in the Borscht article with as much detail as this Lithuanian version of the widely-made dish deserves in its own right, this unsourced content fork packed with OR has been the subject of some edit-warring, with an editor consistently removing the redirect to Borscht and insisting on a standalone article for this non-notable variation. Inasmuch as a soup would ever pass WP:GNG, this soup simply doesn't make the grade. If there were a WP:SOUP guideline, it wouldn't meet that either. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 14:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. Sources are just list-entries. Moved back to mainspace by author without improvement. MB 14:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:BLP, WP:GNG and reliable sources Dark Juliorik ( talk) 12:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Soft-deleted, but later restored. Renominating to get a proper consensus - my view is that the company still fails WP:NCORP.
Note: the page was deleted under a different title but not sure if G4 still applies. KH-1 ( talk) 11:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
No significant references or notability. The external links are all dead including the website mentioned in the personal details. The South Star Hill ( talk) 08:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I have withdrawn my nomination, two editors have voted keep and found sources to demonstrate borderline notability. VickKiang (talk) 00:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Except for The Anime Encyclopedia, which is a RS that is SIGCOV, this fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, WP:BEFORE reveals no more refs counting to notability. Russian version is no better, only having iffy press releases, including this. VickKiang (talk) 06:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
*Delete Couldn't find any reviews in a search. Fails
WP:NFILM
DonaldD23
talk to me 11:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Keep Changing vote based on discussion below.
DonaldD23
talk to me
00:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'd like to Merge or Redirect this article but I don't see widespread support for these two options in this discussion. Some strong feelings about Keeping this article but not ones based in policy and the additional sources provided discuss the Emblem of Jerusalem, not the Flag. Liz Read! Talk! 08:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
This stub is unsourced for a reason, and that is because there is little to no attestation in reliable sources of the flag of the Jerusalem municipality (the image itself is captioned "Flag of the Israeli municipality of Jerusalem") being called 'the flag of Jerusalem' - this is a title that in vexillology more commonly refers to the flag of the Order of St John of Malta or, in some academic papers, a hypothetical future flag that might contain both Israeli and Palestine elements in a post-conflict reconciliation scenario. Since no material currently exists in the article on the latter, and the current material is unsupported, this page should either be deleted or redirected to Flag and coat of arms of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. Iskandar323 ( talk) 05:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting although I see no policy-based reasons for keeping this unsourced article. But one editor states that "lots of sources in Hebrew are available" so here's a few more days to track them down.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Only a few roles in some daily soaps. After carefully checking the references, all are passing mentions and routine coverages only. The creator removed the tag [23] without any improvements to the article despite suggestions to go through the AfC process. Haueirlan ( talk) 05:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep meeting WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG as the Subject has done 3 television series and she was the lead actress of those television series, also the subject has significant coverages from multiple sources. Apart from this the subject has been reviewed 2 month ago by @ North8000:, who is an experienced editor over more than 10 years so I don't think that in this 2 month subject is not meeting notablity criteria. Samir Bishal ( talk) 07:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indian Express Bangla | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Article is about the show not the actress | ~ Partial |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Article is about the show but gives a couple paragraphs on the actresses | ~ Partial |
TV9 Bangla | ? Appears to be a reproduction from a news agency | ![]() |
~ Article is about the show not the actress | ? Unknown |
Sangbad Online | ? Unable to access website | ? Unable to access website | ? Unable to access website | ? Unknown |
Anandabazar | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Times of India | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Actress appeared as a contestant on a TV show. | ~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
This page was restored from a redirect as "plainly notable" but unfortunately I do not see that reflected in either the article's sourcing or the available sources. Of the sources listed in the article, one is a blog, one is a tourist listing, and two are simple directory listings. The only one potentially usable is the Citizens Journal source. My own search has only turned up blog posts, directory listings, and mentions in listicle-style articles like " 6 parks in Johor to get away from hustle and bustle of the city." ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they) Talk to Me! 04:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG--provided sources are either not independent or are passing mentions or non-mentions in articles about the group of political prisoners with whom he was detained. Article was created by a sockmaster who was focused on promotional articles on Egyptian human rights figures (master was blocked after the creation of this article, so this is not eligible for a G5 speedy). A search for better sources turned up articles written by him, but nothing from reliable sources about him. -- Finngall talk 01:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I am actually one of this writer's readers (I added the most recent edits after I watched his latest interview and did not find it on the page here; I assume that's what triggered the deletion request), and after some research I did find significant, consistent coverage for his case in both English and Arabic outlets (I am highlighting that the "reliability" of news outlets is not synonymous with them being "western". The local coverage is indeed extensive on his case.)
Has a consensus been reached yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:901:CFD0:4D56:F442:F9C2:F5B1 ( talk) 18:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
If no one is contributing to the discussion or offering any alternatives, shouldn't the deletion tag be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:901:CFD0:D1D4:930:7041:935D ( talk) 18:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
There are many editors on here who are better at source analysis than I am, and I hope that one or more of them chimes in here, but in my view the sources above do not add up to a set of reliable, independent or in-depth references which satisfies WP:GNG. -- Finngall talk 20:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
But, I still looked up more, and more has come up that looks very detailed, intentional, and independent.
His story, writings, and activism are widely referenced in reports and analyses around the political situation in Egypt. Some of them are wholly centred on his story and writings, and others use them as a main reference they draw upon in an argument or political analysis.
This is an op ed drawing on his story and prison writing in a political analysis on Egypt in 2019: https://www.alquds.co.uk/%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A5%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AB-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A9/
This is another article drawing on his activism and writings on current prisoners to shed light on the prison situation in Egypt in 2022: https://ghadnews.net/ar/post/2772
This is a detailed coverage of his release and backstory: https://www.fj-p.com/288784/%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF-%D8%A5%D8%AE%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%B3%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%86%D8%B4%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%AD%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%A5%D8%AE%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%B3%D8%A8/
This is an article in 2021 about a viral campaign he launched and managed for his incarcerated friend covering both their stories and the campaign by Abdelrahman: https://arabicpost.net/opinions/2021/04/13/%d8%a3%d8%ba%d9%86%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d8%b9%d9%87%d8%af-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a3%d8%b5%d8%af%d9%82%d8%a7%d8%a1-%d9%87%d9%84-%d8%aa%d9%85%d9%86%d8%ad-%d8%a3%d9%8a%d9%85%d9%86-%d9%85%d9%88%d8%b3%d9%89-%d9%81/
This is a Spanish news report on one of the biggest Spanish media outlets on Egyptian prison writing relying heavily on his story, writing and statements in its content: https://elpais.com/internacional/2022-01-07/la-vida-entre-rejas-se-hace-literatura-en-egipto.html?prm=ep-app-cabecera It was big enough to be translated and published in Arabic on another reputable Arabic platform: https://www.noonpost.com/content/42885
This is the latest news report from AlJazeera on his latest creative writing scholarship and the book project he's currently working on: https://mubasher.aljazeera.net/news/2022/8/10/%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87-6-%D8%B3%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%82-%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%85%D9%87
I am not sure how a political prisoner, writer, and activist who's been widely and consistently covered in news and published on various platforms and hosted on different outlets between 2013 and 2022 does not pass the notability threshold. I of course would love to hear others' input. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:901:CFD0:CAB:E406:9AD6:32EB ( talk) 19:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need some eyes on this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, as the subject of this article is a singer who hasn't released any albums and doesn't seem to have any album credits at all. A couple of television appearances don't meet the threshold for notability, especially since neither the subject of this article nor the television appearances received much coverage. Also relies too heavily on primary sources, as nearly all information comes from interviews with the subject if this article. Considering the dearth of secondary sources, it's almost impossible to write an article in which information isn't sourced almost exclusively from statements he has made about himself. JMB1980 ( talk) 01:10, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. YouVeNeverSeenBetter ( talk) 05:46, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G5 ( User:Ijumdiya wadzani) Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested drafting, then contested CSD A7. I still believe this is an A7 candidate. This artist does not meet any of the criteria of WP:NMUSIC and the sources do not satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG the sources used are all contributor submitted write ups and are not considered reliable. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 01:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
04:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Nominating on behalf of an IP. Concern is This is non-notable building. A Google search (in English) for additional information only returns the church's own web site and Wikipedia. The church fails WP:NGEO in terms of significant coverage.
Qwaiiplayer (
talk)
03:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jan Hammer discography. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 03:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:N and WP:NALBUM. Only source is one review by Allmusic. Google finds nothing related to the album. VTVL ( talk) 03:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete under criterion G11. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
This person does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG nor WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. The article, which evidently is an autobiography, simply lays out the events of his life: born, attended school, took his exams, started a business. WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. Article sourcing consists of his own projects; an online search reveals nothing but social media and user-generated content. Netherzone ( talk) 01:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
I was going to tag it with CSD, but figured this would be better. I don't think this deserves an article at all. Definitely fails WP:GNG. Asparagusus (interaction) 00:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
It's strangly difficult to find anything about them, but a lot of archived posts would seem to confirm it's existence. Semantism ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)