![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. Non-notable band. SL93 ( talk) 23:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
23:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Meeting this requirement alone does not indicate notability, but it does indicate that there are likely sufficient sources to merit a stand-alone article.This doesn't absolve the subject from actually meeting GNG, it's literally just the bare minimum for all athlete articles. One piece of purely local non-trivial coverage of his collegiate career does not cut it. JoelleJay ( talk) 01:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
A person is presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of significant coverage, that is, multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable. The Blue Ayuyus’ Relucio gets recognition has some significant coverage, but a lot of interviewing and lacks a disinterested tone. A WP:BLP has to be more than a pseudo biography or just mainly statistics. -- Otr500 ( talk) 12:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing per SNOW - If anyone disagrees with my close please leave a message on my talk page and I will undo my close and leave for an administrator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta ( talk) 13:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing per SNOW - If anyone disagrees with my close please leave a message on my talk page and I will undo my close and leave for an administrator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta ( talk) 13:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG. –– FormalDude talk 21:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant. Won one season of The Amazing Race in 2006, and nothing since then. Bgsu98 ( talk) 21:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nickelodeon Animation Studio. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:GNG. Only available sources are trivial mentions or unreliable. TipsyElephant ( talk) 20:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
A 19th century nonnotable colloquialism referenced to a novel. I failed to find any good referenbces, although I did find a couple of similar uses. Loew Galitz ( talk) 21:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Blanket sleeper. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Non notable product called 'Dr. Denton', a type of pyjama or blanket. No sources and I cannot find any additional information about this brand of blanket anywhere, and I have never heard of this brand either even thought it is allegedly a genericised trademark. Kadzi ( talk) 19:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk)
19:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
20:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMAG Lavalizard101 ( talk) 20:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Source inspection wanted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
20:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The book notes: "In 1974, into this fertile environment, former boatbuilder Jon Wilson launched what was to become the voice of the movement: WoodenBoat magazine. Aimed at the amateur and professional boatbuilder, it was packed to the gills with practical and historical articles about (mostly) indigenous American craft. Within a year the magazine had attracted 8,000 subscribers, and by the end of its third year it employed a staff of twelve and its circulation and had risen to 25,000. By 1981 it was secure enough to move to grandiose new offices in Brooklin on a 60-acre estate overlooking Eggemoggin Reach, on the east side of Penobscot Bay. There, with the participation of eminent figures such as yacht designer Joel White and authors Maynard Bray and Peter Spectre, the magazine continued to expand and set up its own programme of boatbuilding and sailing courses. By the mid-1980s, its circulation was over 100,000, where it has remained ever since. Clearly, as Wilson wrote in his very first editorial, it was a magazine 'whose time has come'."
The article notes: "Brooklin, Maine — WoodenBoat, "the magazine for wooden boat owners, builders and designers," must have the most spectacular view of any publication in New England. Its headquarters, in a brick, 35-room house on 60 acres of woods and open space here, look south over Eggemoggin Reach — shimmering salt water, spruce-covered islands, distant blue hills, gulls, white sails in the summer. Several of the 24 staff members face their desks away from the windows so they can do their work. The rest just enjoy it. WoodenBoat has other attributes, such as a 70,000 combined circulation (which doubled in the last three years), $1 million in annual sales, and Jonathan Wilson. A 36-year-old college dropout and ex-boatbuilder from Rhode Island, Wilson started the magazine in 1974 with a budget of $14,500 — $11,000 from the sale of his Alden ketch, $3500 borrowed."
The book provides one page of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "WoodenBoat is now an online CoP of owners, admirers, builders, and designers of wooden boats (woodenboat.com). Founded in September 1974 by Wilson WoodenBoat, WoodenBoat was born as an American magazine for boat amateurs and, then, it is become an important virtual place for people who share interest and passion for old and new wooden boats. Today, WoodenBoat reaches readers and community members by various ways such as publications, website, forum and blog, thematic events, and photo and video gallery."
The article notes: "When Jon Wilson started WoodenBoat magazine in 1974 in an off-grid cabin in Brooksville, it filled a niche in the world of wooden boats as a good professional trade journal. The company has since become a mainstay in the wooden boat community with about 60,000 readers. ... Matt Murphy, the editor of WoodenBoat magazine, and Andrew Breece, the publisher of the company’s magazine division, purchased the company on New Year’s Day and plan to keep filling the pages with stories on the emerging technologies and traditional methods of boat building — while also expanding the company’s digital presence."
The result was redirect to Ian Irvine. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing a pass of
WP:NBOOK; in fact, I couldn't find a single reliable review online (Googling "three worlds cycle" review
and "view from the mirror" review
). There's some stuff on Goodreads and some blog posts, but not much else. Suggesting redirect to
Ian Irvine, the author of the series.
Ovinus (
talk)
20:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
While this person might or might not be notable, this article is wholly an advertisement and should be deleted under WP:TNT. It seems too old to delete via WP:G11. Tartar Torte 18:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage. At best, merge to Butter as just another flavoured butter type. Geoff | Who, me? 17:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG --- FMSky ( talk) 13:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP as it has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary independent sources. The company has only received coverage in reliable independent sources as a result of an event in 2009 (see the three refs currently in the article) and the coverage about the company itself is hardly significant ( [10] and [11] are passing mentions, and [12] only contains a few sentences with some basic background info on the company). Google Books and Google Scholar searches also only return passing mentions afaics. Felida97 ( talk) 16:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Lack of in-depth independent coverage. Searching only finds a few directory/database type listings, and mentions at catalogs selling their products. MB 16:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Views are split primarily between keep and merge (neither of which requires admin action) with a side order of delete (which did not appear to have sufficient consensus). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
non-notable band that hasn't released anything -- FMSky ( talk) 10:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that several new sources were added to the article on 26 July 2022 (UTC), after this nomination for deletion and after most of the commentary above occurred.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
14:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
This article was initially proposed for discussion on the Talk page for its previous name, One Rail Australia (East Coast). Some elements of the article were misleading so the article was subsequently edited to more accurately describe the subject pending a decision on deletion.
Background (see One Rail Australia article for details):
The main reasons for proposing the article's deletion are that the business is ephemeral and not notable in its own right, and that all information in the article is already in the parent company's article.
Accordingly, I propose deletion. Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 12:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Wiggles. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Per the nomination note and arguments made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Hamilton (entertainer), which was procedurally closed due to issues with the nomination page itself. jp× g 10:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR . [ It has some sources but these sources do not tell about her project. DNA (COVID Recorery [14]) , The Times of India (Mohit Malik Interview [15]) The Times of India ( family life ( [16] ) NDTV ( Baby Boy [17])] PravinGanechari ( talk) 08:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sources have been added after the AfD nomination; they do seem a bit questionable, but nobody here has discussed them. Sandstein 19:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP/ WP:SIGCOV Kleuske ( talk) 08:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG PravinGanechari ( talk) 11:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nominator has withdrawn, and no delete !votes are present. North America 1000 15:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
This article exists in draft space, where it belongs. The article does not make clear what position the subject holds, and the sources are one Facebook post and one news piece that is not about the subject. This version should be deleted while the article is improved in draft space. Mccapra ( talk) 10:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Most sources are trivial. [21] is fully of quotes and cannot count towards GNG and [22] seems to be a reasonable source, but one source falls well short of both GNG and SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
13:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Article source analysis
|
---|
1.
FB Ref: stats page, ✗ Fail |
Can someone with Gale access describe the newspaper articles that cover her? JoelleJay ( talk) 02:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Centenary State High's Matalena Daniells, a former Samoa Women's National Football Team captain, made it to the finals after inspiring students to excel and participate in sport.)
However we have also been very fortunate to have an influx of young and energetic players come into the team, Matalena Daniells..)
MATALENA Daniells, the Moreton Bay United Jets defender, has led Samoa to its first medal in the Pacific Games.) More than a passing mention and mentions her brother, but a very short article.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN and WP:NOT. Fram ( talk) 08:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lokesh Cinematic Universe. ✗ plicit 11:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable character who played a cameo in a single film. Fail Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). DareshMohan ( talk) 06:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Redundant content to eating disorder - as far as I can tell, the only thing that this article has which eating disorder does not, is DSM-5 copyright violations for the diagnostic criteria. The AN "diagnostic history" section has some possibly interesting statistics, although the sources are of questionable reliability (two are deadlinks, one is from CNN) and ultimately the epidemiology at Anorexia nervosa#Epidemiology and Eating disorder#Anorexia seem to be more detailed. Contrary to the article's title, there does not seem to be any substantive discussion of the development of eating disorders except for claims in the lead that it is related with childhood development (this is covered in a few sections at eating disorder). Darcyisverycute ( talk) 06:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
This is, yes, a rail junction, but sorting it took some effort. It was a wye on the Chicago, Attica and Southern Railroad, with the main line running due north-south and a branch heading off to the northwest. If you go to GMaps, you can still see one branch of the wye as a wide arc in the field just southwest of the GNIS coordinates, but as one might imagine there's no other trace of anything railroad-related from a line that was abandoned in 1946. The topos and aerials don't go back anything like far enough, soe they aren't much help. I was, however, able to find two references (besides name drops of it as a station) which together show matters clearly. First, in this newsletter, at the bottom of page 5, there is a photo of the station and its surrounding buildings. Along with that, I found this map which shows the same three buildings, and nothing else at the junction. So it's just a rail spot of no particular note, and not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 02:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Bgsu98 ( talk) 03:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, no indication of notability. Notability is not inherited from its source material or any cast members. Yeeno ( talk) 03:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Academic credentials also appear to be non-notable. Bgsu98 ( talk) 03:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG. I cannot find any references to this person aside from database references (which means it fails SPORTBASIC) though I was a bit hampered by the common name. ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 02:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some comments here but trying to read through the lines, I can't tell if you want the article Kept or Deleted, just what should be done IF the article is deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 14:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Sources mentioned are only about his death, no GNG. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No reliable and independent sources, no significant work. Zafir94 ( talk) 02:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reconsider nomination after additions to the article nominated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mariana de Jesús de Paredes. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Looking for sources turned up little other than blogs and a handful of sites talking about the story of its appearance. Likely warrants mention in Mariana de Jesús de Paredes but isn't notable on its own. Vermont ( 🐿️— 🏳️🌈) 02:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to consider Merge option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Previously deprodded with no reason given. – dlthewave ☎ 05:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept in 2018 under the argument that although schools are no longer considered inherently notable, we should still consider them notable in case they turn out to be notable. I will be frank in saying that is the silliest argument I have ever seen succeed at AfD.
I did a thorough BEFORE check using basic Google resources, Newspapers.com, and the Wikipedia Library, and I was not able to find sufficient SIGCOV to justify keeping the article. Please be careful when you search not to conflate this school with other schools in California which have similar names, such as the Mountain View Academy in Mountain View, California, which is still operational. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Undeleted here based on the claim that additional sources likely exist, however none have been found and the article fails SPORTBASIC #5 which requires that at least one SIGCOV source be included in the article. – dlthewave ☎ 04:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Non notable island mislabeled as a community, fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Successfully prodded for this reason in 2021 and re-created in 2022; original deletion rationale still stands. – dlthewave ☎ 04:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Feel free to create a redirect from this page title. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers. Sandstein 19:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rugbyfan22's argument is actually one for deletion, given that they say that they have only found passing mentions. There's broad community consensus by now that sportspeople with no substantial coverage in reliable sources don't get an article, just like everybody else. Sandstein 19:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage by independent sources. Google only returns 5 pages of results, a portion of which is false positives, and the rest is trivial or connected (their social media, alumni mag mentions, etc.). There was one instance of substantial local coverage ( they were sued in 2013) but it never received any attention outside of local news, so WP:AUD applies. GBooks doesn't turn up anything helpful, and neither do GNews and GNews Archive. Apocheir ( talk) 03:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Not sure how to resolve this when the nominator says Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV and the discussion participants say, "Yes, it does". Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep pass GNG and SIGCOV. Gold at Carebaco International and Suriname International, participant in 2022 Commonwealth Games, 2019 Pan American Games. Florentyna ( talk) 14:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Appears to be a WP:MILL restaurant. The article makes no claim of notability. Besides typical restaurant review coverage, there is not much - No in-depth significant independent coverage. Routine reviews in the food section are not sufficient. MB 01:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Not enough significant coverage found in multiple reliable sources. Reading Beans ( talk) 01:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Small restaurant chain with about a dozen location. Only source is a company website. Searching does find a few routine local newspaper articles on the opening of individual stores, but nothing on the company overall. Most hits are things like yelp, doordash, grubhub, etc. Lack of independent in-depth coverage. MB 01:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional article edited extensively by SPAs. Company is not notable and fails WP:CORPDEPTH, all press is just WP:ROUTINE announcements of acquisitions. BrigadierG ( talk) 01:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:A7 Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Absolutely zero sources. Fails WP:GNG. ~Styyx Talk? 00:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. His highest ranking was 41st at lightweight, his current is 113th. A quick WP:BEFORE doesn't show any significant or in-depth coverage. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 00:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. Non-notable band. SL93 ( talk) 23:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
23:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Meeting this requirement alone does not indicate notability, but it does indicate that there are likely sufficient sources to merit a stand-alone article.This doesn't absolve the subject from actually meeting GNG, it's literally just the bare minimum for all athlete articles. One piece of purely local non-trivial coverage of his collegiate career does not cut it. JoelleJay ( talk) 01:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
A person is presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of significant coverage, that is, multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable. The Blue Ayuyus’ Relucio gets recognition has some significant coverage, but a lot of interviewing and lacks a disinterested tone. A WP:BLP has to be more than a pseudo biography or just mainly statistics. -- Otr500 ( talk) 12:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing per SNOW - If anyone disagrees with my close please leave a message on my talk page and I will undo my close and leave for an administrator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta ( talk) 13:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing per SNOW - If anyone disagrees with my close please leave a message on my talk page and I will undo my close and leave for an administrator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta ( talk) 13:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG. –– FormalDude talk 21:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant. Won one season of The Amazing Race in 2006, and nothing since then. Bgsu98 ( talk) 21:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nickelodeon Animation Studio. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:GNG. Only available sources are trivial mentions or unreliable. TipsyElephant ( talk) 20:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
A 19th century nonnotable colloquialism referenced to a novel. I failed to find any good referenbces, although I did find a couple of similar uses. Loew Galitz ( talk) 21:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Blanket sleeper. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Non notable product called 'Dr. Denton', a type of pyjama or blanket. No sources and I cannot find any additional information about this brand of blanket anywhere, and I have never heard of this brand either even thought it is allegedly a genericised trademark. Kadzi ( talk) 19:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Femke (
talk)
19:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
20:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMAG Lavalizard101 ( talk) 20:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Source inspection wanted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿)
20:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The book notes: "In 1974, into this fertile environment, former boatbuilder Jon Wilson launched what was to become the voice of the movement: WoodenBoat magazine. Aimed at the amateur and professional boatbuilder, it was packed to the gills with practical and historical articles about (mostly) indigenous American craft. Within a year the magazine had attracted 8,000 subscribers, and by the end of its third year it employed a staff of twelve and its circulation and had risen to 25,000. By 1981 it was secure enough to move to grandiose new offices in Brooklin on a 60-acre estate overlooking Eggemoggin Reach, on the east side of Penobscot Bay. There, with the participation of eminent figures such as yacht designer Joel White and authors Maynard Bray and Peter Spectre, the magazine continued to expand and set up its own programme of boatbuilding and sailing courses. By the mid-1980s, its circulation was over 100,000, where it has remained ever since. Clearly, as Wilson wrote in his very first editorial, it was a magazine 'whose time has come'."
The article notes: "Brooklin, Maine — WoodenBoat, "the magazine for wooden boat owners, builders and designers," must have the most spectacular view of any publication in New England. Its headquarters, in a brick, 35-room house on 60 acres of woods and open space here, look south over Eggemoggin Reach — shimmering salt water, spruce-covered islands, distant blue hills, gulls, white sails in the summer. Several of the 24 staff members face their desks away from the windows so they can do their work. The rest just enjoy it. WoodenBoat has other attributes, such as a 70,000 combined circulation (which doubled in the last three years), $1 million in annual sales, and Jonathan Wilson. A 36-year-old college dropout and ex-boatbuilder from Rhode Island, Wilson started the magazine in 1974 with a budget of $14,500 — $11,000 from the sale of his Alden ketch, $3500 borrowed."
The book provides one page of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "WoodenBoat is now an online CoP of owners, admirers, builders, and designers of wooden boats (woodenboat.com). Founded in September 1974 by Wilson WoodenBoat, WoodenBoat was born as an American magazine for boat amateurs and, then, it is become an important virtual place for people who share interest and passion for old and new wooden boats. Today, WoodenBoat reaches readers and community members by various ways such as publications, website, forum and blog, thematic events, and photo and video gallery."
The article notes: "When Jon Wilson started WoodenBoat magazine in 1974 in an off-grid cabin in Brooksville, it filled a niche in the world of wooden boats as a good professional trade journal. The company has since become a mainstay in the wooden boat community with about 60,000 readers. ... Matt Murphy, the editor of WoodenBoat magazine, and Andrew Breece, the publisher of the company’s magazine division, purchased the company on New Year’s Day and plan to keep filling the pages with stories on the emerging technologies and traditional methods of boat building — while also expanding the company’s digital presence."
The result was redirect to Ian Irvine. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing a pass of
WP:NBOOK; in fact, I couldn't find a single reliable review online (Googling "three worlds cycle" review
and "view from the mirror" review
). There's some stuff on Goodreads and some blog posts, but not much else. Suggesting redirect to
Ian Irvine, the author of the series.
Ovinus (
talk)
20:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
While this person might or might not be notable, this article is wholly an advertisement and should be deleted under WP:TNT. It seems too old to delete via WP:G11. Tartar Torte 18:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage. At best, merge to Butter as just another flavoured butter type. Geoff | Who, me? 17:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG --- FMSky ( talk) 13:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP as it has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary independent sources. The company has only received coverage in reliable independent sources as a result of an event in 2009 (see the three refs currently in the article) and the coverage about the company itself is hardly significant ( [10] and [11] are passing mentions, and [12] only contains a few sentences with some basic background info on the company). Google Books and Google Scholar searches also only return passing mentions afaics. Felida97 ( talk) 16:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Lack of in-depth independent coverage. Searching only finds a few directory/database type listings, and mentions at catalogs selling their products. MB 16:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Views are split primarily between keep and merge (neither of which requires admin action) with a side order of delete (which did not appear to have sufficient consensus). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
non-notable band that hasn't released anything -- FMSky ( talk) 10:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that several new sources were added to the article on 26 July 2022 (UTC), after this nomination for deletion and after most of the commentary above occurred.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
14:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
This article was initially proposed for discussion on the Talk page for its previous name, One Rail Australia (East Coast). Some elements of the article were misleading so the article was subsequently edited to more accurately describe the subject pending a decision on deletion.
Background (see One Rail Australia article for details):
The main reasons for proposing the article's deletion are that the business is ephemeral and not notable in its own right, and that all information in the article is already in the parent company's article.
Accordingly, I propose deletion. Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 12:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Wiggles. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Per the nomination note and arguments made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Hamilton (entertainer), which was procedurally closed due to issues with the nomination page itself. jp× g 10:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR . [ It has some sources but these sources do not tell about her project. DNA (COVID Recorery [14]) , The Times of India (Mohit Malik Interview [15]) The Times of India ( family life ( [16] ) NDTV ( Baby Boy [17])] PravinGanechari ( talk) 08:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sources have been added after the AfD nomination; they do seem a bit questionable, but nobody here has discussed them. Sandstein 19:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP/ WP:SIGCOV Kleuske ( talk) 08:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG PravinGanechari ( talk) 11:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nominator has withdrawn, and no delete !votes are present. North America 1000 15:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
This article exists in draft space, where it belongs. The article does not make clear what position the subject holds, and the sources are one Facebook post and one news piece that is not about the subject. This version should be deleted while the article is improved in draft space. Mccapra ( talk) 10:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Most sources are trivial. [21] is fully of quotes and cannot count towards GNG and [22] seems to be a reasonable source, but one source falls well short of both GNG and SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi
13:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Article source analysis
|
---|
1.
FB Ref: stats page, ✗ Fail |
Can someone with Gale access describe the newspaper articles that cover her? JoelleJay ( talk) 02:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Centenary State High's Matalena Daniells, a former Samoa Women's National Football Team captain, made it to the finals after inspiring students to excel and participate in sport.)
However we have also been very fortunate to have an influx of young and energetic players come into the team, Matalena Daniells..)
MATALENA Daniells, the Moreton Bay United Jets defender, has led Samoa to its first medal in the Pacific Games.) More than a passing mention and mentions her brother, but a very short article.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
09:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN and WP:NOT. Fram ( talk) 08:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lokesh Cinematic Universe. ✗ plicit 11:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable character who played a cameo in a single film. Fail Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). DareshMohan ( talk) 06:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Redundant content to eating disorder - as far as I can tell, the only thing that this article has which eating disorder does not, is DSM-5 copyright violations for the diagnostic criteria. The AN "diagnostic history" section has some possibly interesting statistics, although the sources are of questionable reliability (two are deadlinks, one is from CNN) and ultimately the epidemiology at Anorexia nervosa#Epidemiology and Eating disorder#Anorexia seem to be more detailed. Contrary to the article's title, there does not seem to be any substantive discussion of the development of eating disorders except for claims in the lead that it is related with childhood development (this is covered in a few sections at eating disorder). Darcyisverycute ( talk) 06:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
This is, yes, a rail junction, but sorting it took some effort. It was a wye on the Chicago, Attica and Southern Railroad, with the main line running due north-south and a branch heading off to the northwest. If you go to GMaps, you can still see one branch of the wye as a wide arc in the field just southwest of the GNIS coordinates, but as one might imagine there's no other trace of anything railroad-related from a line that was abandoned in 1946. The topos and aerials don't go back anything like far enough, soe they aren't much help. I was, however, able to find two references (besides name drops of it as a station) which together show matters clearly. First, in this newsletter, at the bottom of page 5, there is a photo of the station and its surrounding buildings. Along with that, I found this map which shows the same three buildings, and nothing else at the junction. So it's just a rail spot of no particular note, and not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 02:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Bgsu98 ( talk) 03:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, no indication of notability. Notability is not inherited from its source material or any cast members. Yeeno ( talk) 03:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Academic credentials also appear to be non-notable. Bgsu98 ( talk) 03:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG. I cannot find any references to this person aside from database references (which means it fails SPORTBASIC) though I was a bit hampered by the common name. ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 02:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some comments here but trying to read through the lines, I can't tell if you want the article Kept or Deleted, just what should be done IF the article is deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 14:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Sources mentioned are only about his death, no GNG. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No reliable and independent sources, no significant work. Zafir94 ( talk) 02:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reconsider nomination after additions to the article nominated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mariana de Jesús de Paredes. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Looking for sources turned up little other than blogs and a handful of sites talking about the story of its appearance. Likely warrants mention in Mariana de Jesús de Paredes but isn't notable on its own. Vermont ( 🐿️— 🏳️🌈) 02:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to consider Merge option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Previously deprodded with no reason given. – dlthewave ☎ 05:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept in 2018 under the argument that although schools are no longer considered inherently notable, we should still consider them notable in case they turn out to be notable. I will be frank in saying that is the silliest argument I have ever seen succeed at AfD.
I did a thorough BEFORE check using basic Google resources, Newspapers.com, and the Wikipedia Library, and I was not able to find sufficient SIGCOV to justify keeping the article. Please be careful when you search not to conflate this school with other schools in California which have similar names, such as the Mountain View Academy in Mountain View, California, which is still operational. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. – dlthewave ☎ 05:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Undeleted here based on the claim that additional sources likely exist, however none have been found and the article fails SPORTBASIC #5 which requires that at least one SIGCOV source be included in the article. – dlthewave ☎ 04:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Non notable island mislabeled as a community, fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Successfully prodded for this reason in 2021 and re-created in 2022; original deletion rationale still stands. – dlthewave ☎ 04:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Feel free to create a redirect from this page title. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers. Sandstein 19:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rugbyfan22's argument is actually one for deletion, given that they say that they have only found passing mentions. There's broad community consensus by now that sportspeople with no substantial coverage in reliable sources don't get an article, just like everybody else. Sandstein 19:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage by independent sources. Google only returns 5 pages of results, a portion of which is false positives, and the rest is trivial or connected (their social media, alumni mag mentions, etc.). There was one instance of substantial local coverage ( they were sued in 2013) but it never received any attention outside of local news, so WP:AUD applies. GBooks doesn't turn up anything helpful, and neither do GNews and GNews Archive. Apocheir ( talk) 03:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Not sure how to resolve this when the nominator says Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV and the discussion participants say, "Yes, it does". Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep pass GNG and SIGCOV. Gold at Carebaco International and Suriname International, participant in 2022 Commonwealth Games, 2019 Pan American Games. Florentyna ( talk) 14:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Appears to be a WP:MILL restaurant. The article makes no claim of notability. Besides typical restaurant review coverage, there is not much - No in-depth significant independent coverage. Routine reviews in the food section are not sufficient. MB 01:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Not enough significant coverage found in multiple reliable sources. Reading Beans ( talk) 01:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NCORP. Small restaurant chain with about a dozen location. Only source is a company website. Searching does find a few routine local newspaper articles on the opening of individual stores, but nothing on the company overall. Most hits are things like yelp, doordash, grubhub, etc. Lack of independent in-depth coverage. MB 01:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional article edited extensively by SPAs. Company is not notable and fails WP:CORPDEPTH, all press is just WP:ROUTINE announcements of acquisitions. BrigadierG ( talk) 01:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:A7 Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Absolutely zero sources. Fails WP:GNG. ~Styyx Talk? 00:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMMA. His highest ranking was 41st at lightweight, his current is 113th. A quick WP:BEFORE doesn't show any significant or in-depth coverage. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 00:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)