![]() |
The result was keep. Geschichte ( talk) 18:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Product is not notable. CanadianOtaku Talk Page 23:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Department of a university. Nothing notable about the department, just a listing. rsjaffe talk 22:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 18:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't think this is a thing. The article doesn't tell me what this is, and googling and searching the term doesn't tell me what this is. I think someone just wanted to will this into existence, but got distracted by a shiny thing in the process. It's been left uncited for 14 years collecting cute little dust bunnies. Unless someone knows what this is, and can demonstrate it's a note worthy thing, this page should go bye-bye. -- Tautomers( T C) 21:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was Delete/draftity. Simultaneously closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahanchian v Xenox Pictures Inc., et al and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrus Ahanchian. Both discussions have clearly found consensus that this person and this case have not been shown to meet our notability guidelines, and as such, there is consensus to delete. However, I rarely decline good-faith requests for draftspace work, and in this case there is a possibility that one notable article may be rescued where two cannot; hence, I'm draftifying. I am going to WP:IAR a little, and require that, given the clear consensus in the AfDs, a) this article/these articles only be recreated via AfC, b) these discussions be linked in a way that the AfC reviewer will read them, and c) some source material be included that is new, substantive, reliable, and independent of the subject. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
The current version of this article has a lot of issues, including GNG and BLP sources. This is a new article after another was AfD'ed on 7 January 2011 under the name "Amir Cyrus Ahanchian". Joojay ( talk) 21:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
@ AmirahBreen: these are not my "opinion" on citations being poor, it's clearly written. Large movies, like Yellow have many executive producers, why is this one notable? Joojay ( talk) 15:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is consensus to not keep this article. There is no consensus about whether this should be just deleted or redirected elsewhere. This can be resolved as follows: everybody is free to create the redirect (ideally after mentioning the locale in the target article with sources), and everybody else is then free to nominate the redirect for deletion. Sandstein 15:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Green Hill is a hummock in the swamp upon which was placed the Delaware Breakwater Range Rear Light, also know as the Green Hill Light. This was eventually taken down and moved to Florida, long before the topos started labelling a spot on the shore as "Green Hill". This spot had by that time been occupied by a Coast Guard station (which is still there), later joined by various nautical businesses and facilities. Delaware Place Names calls it a settlement, but the aerials all say that was never so. There's another Green Hill up in Wilmington that attracts searching, but I'm confident that this was at best a locale outside Lewes. Mangoe ( talk) 20:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Completely unnoteworthy software where the only information about it is on the github page, doesn't even pass a single sliver of notability whatsoever. The article is uncited, probably because it's impossible to cite it. The page is also written like an ad/promotion -- Tautomers( T C) 21:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 01:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Being the person on a particular radio station who was the first on that radio station to report the Kennedy assasination is not a sign of notability. The one source is a caption to a picture in a books that is exhaustively about the radio station he worked for. I searched for additional sources in all the listed possible source leads connected with the 10-year-old notice on the page of being of unquestioned notability, but I did not find any other sources. Everything else that showed up was about other Jerry Golden's in other places and times. This guy was a local radio personality who is just plain not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Neither the Torneo Federal A (regionalised Argentine 3rd tier) nor the Malaysia Premier League (2nd tier despite the name) are listed at WP:FPL so there is no evidence of WP:NFOOTBALL here; also supported by FlashScore as well as Soccerway. No other databases seem to have Dul.
In terms of WP:GNG, I was unable to find any significant coverage from the cited sources nor from Google searches or even when searching through Argentine sources and Malaysian sources. All I could find was this transfer announcement, with two sentences about him, that does nothing to establish notability. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claim here is as a member of a band, which is not an "inherent" notability freebie in and of itself -- in order to qualify for a standalone article as a separate topic from the band, he would need to establish his own independent notability by either (a) independently passing WP:NMUSIC for a solo career after the band ended, or (b) independently passing WP:GNG on the volume and depth of reliable source media coverage about him (as opposed to just mentioning his name in the process of being about the band as a whole.) But there are no properly cited footnotes here, and instead three straight "external links" are the only references -- but two of those three links are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and while the third external link was an actual news article about him, it takes a lot more than just one reliable source to get a person over GNG. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more referencing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 20:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus with no prujudice against speedy renomination. Only !vote was by an editor who disclosed a connection with the person in question. No other views expressed despite 2 relists. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Promotional article, most text added by a series of SPAs. The purpose appears to be to publicise his robotics company. Grandiose claims of notability and considerable biographical detail, but a paucity of independent third-party sources to back any of this. A WP:BEFORE shows passing coverage of the robotics firm. We don't have the necessary depth of coverage in independent RSes to sustain a BLP here. PROD removed by one of the SPAs, but adding a few new sources that were still not independent RSes. David Gerard ( talk) 09:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Disclosure: I have known Tandy since 2006 and can confirm his career since then. I worked in the Microsoft Robotics Group. I did some of the editing for Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio on Wikipedia but I am not an experienced Wikipedia author. (Just look at how many edits it takes me to get things right!) Tandy asked me to create a page for him as a favor (quite a while ago). He provided much of the content.
Facts:
Tandy worked at Microsoft from 1981 to 2009. See citations in the article for History of Microsoft 1981 and The 20 Year Club.
He was asked by Bill Gates to investigate Robotics and later appointed as the General Manager of the Robotics Group. See the citation for the Scientific American article written by Bill Gates in 2008.
As a GM he routinely interacted with the press and was the spokesperson for Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio. Google "Tandy Trower".
Tandy formed Hoaloha Robotics to develop robots for elder care and is still working towards that today.
Claims:
Tandy's claims of his early work are difficult to substantiate because they pre-date the Internet and Microsoft does not attribute work to individuals, e.g. his work on design guidelines for Windows applications, his specs for Windows 1.0 desktop apps. These claims might have to be removed from the article.
His claims regarding Robotics are accurate and his position at Microsoft made him a notable person in the industry at the time who was sought after for commentary and interviews/podcasts.
Summary:
I propose that the article be retained, possibly with some material removed. I ask for guidance on that.
Trevor Taylor — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrevorTaylor ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
I didn't realise I had to sign my comments. This is all new to me. TrevorTaylor ( talk) 22:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Milk & Kisses. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 04:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG. Has one charting position but has received no significant coverage from reliable sources. Been in CAT:NN for over eleven years. – DarkGlow • 20:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boyz II Men discography. Sandstein 15:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not satisfy WP:NALBUM. Has been in CAT:NN for over eleven years, hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 20:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy WP:NBAND. No chart positions or significant coverage on their career. – DarkGlow • 20:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy WP:NAUTHOR/ WP:BASIC. – DarkGlow • 19:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Not yet notable. Future TV show that hasn't been produced or aired yet. ♟♙ ( talk) 19:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not satisfy WP:NALBUM. – DarkGlow • 19:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG. Had three chart positions but has no coverage in reliable sources. – DarkGlow • 19:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to To Hrono Stamatao. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Freaky Styley. RL0919 ( talk) 21:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 23:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fiji–United States relations. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not even default notable, let alone acting heads of an embassy for which we have no indepdent sources, just employer published information, and even that just amounts to extremely passing mentions with no substance John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Expecting to Fly (album). Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN for ten years hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Fading#Discography as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 19:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Independently released (i.e. not on a record label) EP. The article cites one "review", just a points rating with no rationale, which in other words doesn't count as coverage. Geschichte ( talk) 18:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. The page was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak as unambiguous promotion and a copyright violation. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 13:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Written like an advertisement and fails WP:NBAND. Geschichte ( talk) 18:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 23:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not pass the GNG as far as I can tell – the only reference listed gives it a passing mention and no more. Mover of molehills ( talk) 18:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Prod was contested because "lists are genereallly incomplete, so that's not an objection", yet that was not the main concern. It has no criteria for inclusion. This is better addressed with a category such as Category:American performers of Christian music and Category:Christian music songwriters. If all entertainers in Christian "media" (music, radio, TV, film, stage, etc.) were included, it would be inordinately large as well. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 16:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 23:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The organization fails WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. If you take a close look at all the sources used in the article you’d note they are press releases/announcements and pr sponsored posts. For example see the first source used in the article. Furthermore WP:ORGDEPTH isn’t met. A before search turns up nothing concrete. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Norwalk, Connecticut#Sports. Consensus is for a straight redirect, however article history is preserved if any existing content is appropriate to be merged. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable former sports facility, nor marsh. There are not sufficient substantial, independent sources covering the subject. User:Namiba 14:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Edgemoor, Delaware. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Another "lost in mechanical translation" case, as Delaware Place Names, the ultimate source for GNIS, calls this a "suburban development." As soon as it appears in maps and aerials, it is essentially distinguishable from the adjacent city. At best a city neighborhood, and all the GHits seem to be clickbait. Mangoe ( talk) 13:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 23:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Actor has only been in smaller playhouse renditions of notable stories but not been part of notable stage productions. They have only had minors roles on any television and movie roles. The references that mention him are either a listing, profile or mentions in the reviews of the plays, therefore fails WP:NACTOR. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 16:37, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep, seems to meet the notability guidelines. Like I mentioned on the talk page, it is not to be confused with the Canadian actor (which the first deletion nomination was about). I know that I shouldn’t compare articles but look at Ben Lloyd-Hughes compared to this article. Both the actors were in Great Expectations (2012 film). Are you going to delete that article? Sahaib ( talk) 16:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No rationale for deletion is presented, only for a move. The nominator (and only supporter) was blocked for their various personal attacks. (non-admin closure) User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 19:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no schism between Constantinople and Moscow. Constantinople is the head of the Christian Orthodox Church and Moscow is an independent church, like all other, but under the Ecumenical Orthodox Church of Constantinople. There was an attempted Moscow schism on 2018 for reason to oppose the recognition of Ukrainian Church as Autocephalus. Until recently the Ukrainian Church was under the responsibility of Moscow, however according to the Orthodox rules and laws, if a state request to become independent under their own state authority, this right should be granded. Technically and literally this is none of Moscow business other than to meddling with Ukrainian Church affairs, of course for matters of control and power. This is not the first time Moscow try to undermine the Ecumenical Orthodox Church or even other independent churches.
The title of this article is clearly misleading and not true. Used for matters of propaganda which could be linked to Moscow's troll paid activity as we are all aware of.
There is no official statement of any schism either by the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople and all Orthodox Churches, or from the Moscow Church.
(2021) Ecumenical Patriarch: There is no schism in Orthodoxy https://orthodoxtimes.com/ecumenical-patriarch-there-is-no-schism-in-orthodoxy-i-have-no-right-to-take-a-step-back/
(2018) Russian Orthodox Church warns of violence and schism over Ukraine https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/russian-orthodox-church-warns-of-violence-and-schism-over-ukraine-1.3631073
Moscow have repeatedly tried and failed to overpower the Christian Orthodox Head in order to take over, in multiple attempts for the past 50 years.
A Schism between Constantinople and Moscow technically is not possible. There could be a Schism between Christian Orthodoxy and Moscow as a matter of scientific terms and fact.
It is advisable the article to be renamed as 2018 Moscow attempted schism or breakaway from the Christian Orthodoxy. However the article even if with impovment to the title, is hugely misleading and false.
There is no schism. More references available if necessary, definitely more than that exists in google search. -- Charalampe ( talk) 11:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no official statement of any schism either by the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople and all Orthodox Churches, or from the Moscow Church.Well, the article states Met. Hilarion, head of the DECR stated: "As of today, we have very clearly stated: the fact that the Patriarchate of Constantinople has recognized a schismatic structure means for us that Constantinople itself is now in schism. It has identified itself with a schism. Accordingly, we cannot have the full Eucharistic communion with it." Hilarion added that when members of the Russian Orthodox of Moscow Patriarchate pay visits to the monasteries on Mount Athos, they cannot participate in the sacraments (for example, receive communion), and promised punishment to any priests who participate in the divine services together with the local clergy" (emphasis added). This is a quote from the official DECR website here.
There is an Official Statement of the Ecumenical Orthodox Patriarch the head of all Orthodox Churches which states there is no schismHere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charalampe ( talk • contribs)
The result was keep. North America 1000 11:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage to meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 10:57, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I have to disregard what Eiga-Kevin2 wrote, and the sources found by BuySomeApples have been found to be wanting in the subsequent discussion with arguments that have remained uncontested. Sandstein 15:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Was deleted with the rationale, "Decline PROD, several sources already cited", and no improvement. However, the sources are simple blurbs, listings, or mere mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:GNG, and it doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 02:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a COI article that only serves to promote the subject. Out of the 14 sources on the article, 2 are screenshots of the game, an about us page, press release, source code / binaries, repositories but hardly any significant third party indepth coverage that clears the burden of WP:GNG.
Not surprisingly, this article was deleted 4 times previously and eventually salted. After it's current recreation, it was again nominated for AFD in this debate, however due to many SPA editors, the debate resulted in "no consensus". Nearly all keep votes were from SPAs that signed up to "vote".
I think it is time to delete this article now because it is not really eligible for wikipedia in anyway. Drewziii ( talk) 12:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 15:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No references given, just a resume and self-promotion page. Mikeblas ( talk) 03:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 11:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced article in CAT:NN for 12 years. I couldn't establish that it meets WP:CORP or WP:GNG, but may be missing something due to language. Possible ATD is merge/redirect to Tractors in India#Pittie Tractors, as this is the only place on WP this business is mentioned. Boleyn ( talk) 07:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was Self withdrawn. Mainspace article has been moved by Btspurplegalaxy to draftspace hence making this request redundant. (non-admin closure) — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 00:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Person doesn't meet WP:BANDMEMBER criteria, a quick search on Naver shows subject is highly associated with Iz*One rather than individual. Fyr, there is Draft:Lee Chae-yeon (singer, born 2000) which has been rejected multiple times. — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 11:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 10:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The subject of the article is not notable enough. It has only two source cited. One of them is written by Rabi Purification, probably a former headmaster of the school. [2] The other source is probably a supplement of the newspaper The Daily Star (Bangladesh); [3] its reliability is not established. Lunush01 ( talk) 10:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
References
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 10:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. Best source I was able to find was this (archived version of source 2 in the article), though its independence seems pretty dubious. – Tera tix ₵ 09:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Even after disregarding Bellaclarita's contribution - angry questions to the nominator are not valid arguments to keep an article - we don't have agreement about whether this group is notable separate from its revue. Sandstein 15:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
While the revue is itself notable, this troupe is not. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage about this troupe, by itself, to pass WP:GNG. Would redirect, but another editor insists on recreating. Onel5969 TT me 14:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1. The so-called "searches" that were done, where were these done? How many people had done it? Searching on Yahoo Japan, Google, or Twitter? Searching for Japanese topics and trying to read Japanese text using Google translate? Or just searching for English info? Because if searches were done using the 2 former methods, the sheer amount of Takarazuka-related Japanese Wikipedia pages alone should've kept you busy for the next 3 months, and have no time to be typing here.
2. Let's assume for a moment that, to have the confidence to decide an individual listing of a Takarazuka troupe unnecessary, Onel5969 has sufficient knowledge of the Takarazuka Revue: So please, take look at the chart and explain to us why there are such terms as "School Year" and "Graduated". Explain to us why a theatre company with a limited fanbase needs to have 5 teams (400+ members) and how the teams rotate, how the performances are planned and scheduled. Explain to us the difference between the 5 troupes. Which one is known to have the best dancers? Which one is known to have taller members? Which one is known for the best sword fights? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellaclarita ( talk • contribs)
The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Main advocate for keeping blocked for UPE. This does not necessarily mean all their comments are rendered null and void, but I have to give them much less weight, and therefore consensus is quite clear. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Increasingly lacking in confidece that this is a notable article. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 13:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
@ MrsSnoozyTurtle: What is your note supposed to mean? Does it mean that my opinion should not be recognized in an open discussion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.204.221.186 ( talk) 09:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
a statement, with no validity, no more than your statement above hence my comment. Whilst on the subject of AfD procedures, the nomination of the article is taken as read that the nominator !votes delete, so doesn't add a separate !vote within the discussion. However, I've got far more constructive things to do with my time than argue over this so have struck through my "statement". -- John B123 ( talk) 15:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Vexations ( talk) 21:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep I came across this article and discussion but I know nothing about this man. However, while reading the story and reference links, I would suggest saving them. There seems to be a lot of effort re-establishing the information and links provided. I don't think it harms Wikipedia or overrates this person. To me it doesn't read as an advertisement, maybe a little colorful in the news articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:6200:8851:8ce1:edad:17dc:5c05:e9da ( talk) — 2403:6200:8851:8ce1:edad:17dc:5c05:e9da ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Note: You should give people easier access to participate !! I found it very difficult to find the comments section. I don't like this fella but he did some great things here in Pattaya. So if my vote counts keep it then — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.47.155.200 ( talk • contribs)
... The Munich artist Mario Kleff has meticulously traced 14 pages from this unique specimen on parchment following the model in detail. These replicas can be seen together with information boards on the genesis work..., Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, August 13, 2001, No. 186. p. 62
... In 1990, this gave the now 33-year-old painter and designer Mario Kleff , who was fascinated by the Book of Kells, with the idea of tracing the book down to the last detail with the orginal colors and on calf's parchment and thus preserving it for posterity ... In February 1993 Kleff was able to present five finished pages in the Gutenberg Museum Mainz ..., Allgemeine Zeitung, 06/29/00
... A few weeks ago, the artist Mario Kleff was a guest in the Bishop's Cathedral and Diocesan Museum, who made it his business to copy the "Book of Kells". Some of these re-painted pages can be seen in the facsimile exhibition in the Episcopal Cathedral and Diocesan Museum ... Paulinus, No. 42, p. 11
... The German art expert Mario Kleff (born in 1967) has been making a duplicate based on a bet for about ten years Gospels. In the meantime 30 of about 700 pages have been reproduced. 15th his precise works are exhibited in the Calauer Landkirche and can be compared with the originals ... Lausitzer Rundschau, 08/28/2003
... About 1200 years ago three monks wrote and illustrated in Ireland infinite ingenuity on veal parchment the four gospels in Latin language. The Munich artist Mario Kleff left this Handwriting with with original recipes meticulously handcrafted ..., Rhein-Zeitung, 02.03.1999 / LOK
There is more on this subject. Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 00:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment I spent time and research creating the article on Mr. Mario Kleff, helped to keep it. Information above along with other references found on Google Books [58] and Google News [59] should be viewed as factually verifiable. Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 01:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
but I don't speak GermanYou just wrote:
I've downloaded and translated some. Did you mean that you used machine translation? Not necessary. We can do that too, and some of us speak German. Better give the German text. But do provide a proper reference please. Vexations ( talk) 01:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Genious is a business information site, information in the form of blog, press-releases, whitepapers, research papers put out by companies. They would not be independent.Since you speak German, I recommend that you download and read, or translate if you don't [60]. Quote scope_creep
The name date of publication, title, author are the minimum. A URL is optional, but not required.Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 02:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment Regardless, the article Mario Kleff contains over 27 reference links as well as new information revealed on this page; Information that they claim is promotional and unverifiable. Keep - unless you can prove incorrect information. Regards
Meow2021 (
talk)
02:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93:The nomination for the deletion claim, which relates to articles that lack in-depth information, is utter nonsense. In view of the evidence, Mr Mario Kleff has undoubtedly been known for years in connection with the Book of Kells. His work was presented in 1993 in the Gutenberg Museum Mainz, in 1997 in the Diocesan Museum Trier and from 1993 to 2000 in numerous other locations. His daughter is Jiang Li Wongsin. Mario Kleff is the director of Wandeegroup, Wandee Real Estate and Wandeegroup Asia with the given Thai name Thiti Teerachin. His wife is Nittaya Wongsin, they are married so it oviously that they both are linked to leopards. The article was fairly rewritten but again edited before the discussion closed. That seems like cherry picking to me; or personally?
Note: The following information that I found on the Wandeegroup website is not used to verify the article but to aid the information in question. It says here Jiang Li Wongsin [64], daughter of Mario Kleff and Nittaya Wongsin. Kleff was presented at the Trier Museum and worked on the Book of Kells. [65] This is how it reads when you enter the German text and use Google translate into English: "A masterpiece of expressiveness and craftsmanship - the artist and designer copies the Book of Kells. A few weeks ago, the artist who made it his mission to copy the Book of Kells was a guest in the Episcopal Cathedral and Diocesan Museum. Some of the painted pages can also be seen in the facsimile exhibition in the Episcopal Museum. About seven years ago, Mario Kleff started to recreate this work. Born in Boppard, Kleff learned early Christian book illumination with a focus on the manufacture of writing and work implements before he decided to study painting, graphics and design." Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 10:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 10:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Meow is a professional business woman with excellent relationships with the authorities and the government. And our project THE TOUCH does really break new ground in terms of design, value and customer satisfaction and takes the real estate industry to a new level.”. So with the username Meow2021, your Mario Kleff's wife with a clear WP:COI. I'll need to post this up to the coin noticeboard. scope_creep Talk 11:22, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
The following information that I found on the Wandeegroup website is not used to verify the article. Who please, Kleff's wife ??? Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 12:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps you should discuss this with the author of the article. Not only do you seem unsatisfied with links to information provided, you are questioning their content. However, I've looked a little more. Lapis Lazuli pigment 1kg 20.262,73 €* [66] Meow2021 ( talk) 14:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
References
Vexations ( talk) 00:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
To your information: An editor on this talk page has included poorly sourced information in the article. Got it removed. Interesting is that the same editor voted Delete - promotional article and, as per MrOlllie, most of the sources are native advertising, therefore the subject lacks independent coverage.
. Why? Regards
Meow2021 (
talk)
12:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
"... there is little to no information in the press in the Chonuri area, so I sourced as best as I could.", ([SIC], should be Chonburi) shown as a diff as there are two User Talk Headings named "August 2021".-- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 18:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Palestinians in Iraq. ✗ plicit 08:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicates Palestinians in Iraq - as the Fall of Saddam is covered on that page. Whiteguru ( talk) 08:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. There was only 8 episodes according to IMDb which may be the reason I can't find anything significant. SL93 ( talk) 01:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 15:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a strange one - a very incoherent and confusing article. As Sergecross73 put it in a prior discussion, "It's hard to follow what exactly is being documented here, or it's real scope." Nominating to get some more eyes on it, because I have a feeling it shouldn't exist at all. Popcornfud ( talk) 22:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
The article extensively discusses the history of "二次創作" (translated as derivative works or secondary creations) in Hong Kong. The Wikipedia article heavily relies on this article as a source to discuss the history of the topic from the 1960s to 2016.
The book notes: "當然, 把周星馳代表的那種離經叛道、脫繮野馬式的無厘頭文化繼續發揚光大的, 是網絡中林林總總的所謂「二次創作」(類似英語中的 derivative works), 其中包括「改圖」、「改片」、或「改編歌詞」。周星馳的無厘頭文化可以是無傷大雅或純粹搞笑的荒謬及粗俗(如《整蠱專家》中的「超級戇膠膠」), 亦可以是有意識的政治或社會諷刺 (如《國產凌凌漆》的中國「偉大」發明「太陽能電筒」)。
From Google Translate: "Of course, it is the so-called "secondary creation" (similar to the derivative works in English) of the so-called "secondary creation" (similar to the English derivative works) that is represented by Zhou Xingchi, which includes Film", or "adapted lyrics". Stephen Chow's nonsensical culture can be innocuous or purely funny, absurd and vulgar (such as the "super sticky glue" in "Tricky Expert"), or it can be conscious political or social satire (such as the "domestic Lingling Paint" China's "great" invention of "solar flashlight")."
The next at least five paragraphs discuss derivative works.
The book notes: "但「二次創作」並非版權法學的常用概念,其實質涵蓋範圍不清。而翻譯、改編這些衍生創作 (derivative works) 在現有版權法中屬原作品版權人的專有權利,有明確的保護。" From Google Translate: "However, 'secondary creation' is not a common concept in copyright law, and its substantive scope is unclear. The translation and adaptation of these derivative works are the exclusive rights of the copyright holders of the original works in the existing copyright law and are clearly protected."
The book discusses secondary creations and the copyright law implications of secondary creations on pages 66–75.
The book notes: "secondary creation (parody) N yih chi chong jok jok bán 二次創作作品"
The book notes:
最後, 我們也可以用較 formal 的「derivative work (n. phrase)」(二次創作) 來表達「惡搞」。
Some people think that regulation of derivative work may stifle local creativity.有人認為監管二次創作可能會扼殺本地創意。
The derivative works on the Internet show netizens' immense creativity.網上嘅二次創作反映網民嘅無限創意。
The book discusses secondary creation in the context of Japan. The book notes: "In contrast, what is called “secondary creation” (niji sōsaku 二次創作), often seen in YouTube and other video sharing sites, has a more rigid distinction between the original and copies. For example, Pikotaro's original Pen Pineapple Apple Pen (PPAP) music video, which was released on August 25, 2016 on YouTube and went viral soon after, led to a proliferation of copies, but they remain parodies, hence the process is called secondary creation.16"
The article talks about secondary creations in the context of Malaysia. The article notes: "二次创作(secondary creation/create)是创作和表达方式的一种"
I agree with the comment here: "My first thought is that the article is badly titled... most of it doesn't talk about sampling, but about parody songs, which is an entirely different thing."
The Chinese term is simplified Chinese: 二次创作; traditional Chinese: 二次創作. I think a page move of music sampling in Hong Kong to secondary creations in Hong Kong (the literal translation) or derivative works in Hong Kong (the other translation commonly used by reliable sources) would better reflect the reliable sources and the article content. The article currently discusses the history of secondary creations of music in Hong Kong as well as the legality of secondary creations in general.
I would oppose deletion based on WP:TNT as although the article can be improved, the article content when viewed through the lens of "secondary creations" or "derivative works" makes sense to me and accurately reflects the sources I reviewed.
I am not "proposing writing a whole different article". The current article is satisfactory after I removed the incorrect mention of "music sampling" (which was added as part of the incorrect page move). I added information about how the topic refers to "secondary creations" and "derivative works". The article can be improved as well as expanded with the sources I found. But it does not need to be rewritten to be retained in mainspace since the article accurately reflects the sources. It accurately discusses the history of the secondary creations of music in Hong Kong and the legality of the secondary creations. Here are two existing sources in the article:
Cunard ( talk) 01:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
The "Controversy" section discusses how the proposed law Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014 could have affected the legality of secondary creations. Some commentators believed the proposed law would have restricted the freedom of expression and creation with respect to secondary creations. But the article notes that a secondary creation that is considered a parody, satire, pastiche, caricature or commentary, would not be considered copyright infringement under the bill. The "Effects" section further discusses the copyright implications of secondary creations.
The article can be copyedited and expanded but the article's topic and presentation are very clear to me.
The result was keep. Consensus is to keep as player has just signed a loan deal with a professional club. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played in a WP:FPL. BRDude70 ( talk) 03:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
A mirror celeb with no current acting roles for many years now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hojczy ( talk • contribs) 20:37, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm sure she looks very nice in her swimsuit, but it's not evidence of notability :P ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NMODEL. Her role in "Let It Remain Between Us" ( Azerbaijani: Aramızda qalsın) wasn't one of the main roles in the series. NMW03 ( talk) 01:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
"Samra Huseynova shared her bikini, PHOTOS". ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 15:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Carlsberg Group. ✗ plicit 03:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Article involves a very small brewery that's completely unreferenced. Could maybe be merged as Carlsberg article Sucker for All ( talk) 23:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) 4meter4 ( talk) 19:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Local politician at the county level. Fails WP:NPOL. Additionally, the main source, Charlie Brown Remembers Atlanta, was written by Brown himself with the assistance of James C. Bryant (see [69]). As Brown is the credited author of the book, the source lacks independence. The obituary website does not look like a reliable source either. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
This one took a bit of digging, not helped out by Silverbrook Gardens, Delaware a short ways to the south and a "Silver Brook" in/near Newark, but from what I can tell it is actually a rail spot which turned into a somewhat vague locale. The oldest topos show the name directly adjacent to where the now-ex-Reading tracks cross the road, and I found an old reference to the station in some legislative document. Across the road in 1898 the vast Silverbrook Cemetery opened; then, shortly after WW II, a large apartment complex appears further to the NW, and the map label drifts over to it; as infill increases the label wanders back and forth. I see no evidence that this was ever regarded as a separate settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 02:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Having trouble getting the Maryland place of the same name to stop barging into searching, but from what I can see this is either an overly complicated (but highly symmetrical) three-way interchange, or the subdivision just to the southwest of it. I can't see that is a notable place. Mangoe ( talk) 00:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The article does not meet the notability criteria, per Wikipedia:NSEASONS. Sakiv ( talk) 00:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
This blog does not pass the WP:GNG, or any other notability guideline. There are several mentions of it in reliable sources, but nothing we would consider significant coverage. Ganesha811 ( talk) 00:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Broadcom Inc. as an WP:ATD. Anyone is free to merge any content to the target article if needed. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
This product/technology does not meet the WP:GNG - no significant coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet any other criteria for notability either. Ganesha811 ( talk) 00:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. Geschichte ( talk) 18:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Product is not notable. CanadianOtaku Talk Page 23:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Department of a university. Nothing notable about the department, just a listing. rsjaffe talk 22:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 18:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't think this is a thing. The article doesn't tell me what this is, and googling and searching the term doesn't tell me what this is. I think someone just wanted to will this into existence, but got distracted by a shiny thing in the process. It's been left uncited for 14 years collecting cute little dust bunnies. Unless someone knows what this is, and can demonstrate it's a note worthy thing, this page should go bye-bye. -- Tautomers( T C) 21:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was Delete/draftity. Simultaneously closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahanchian v Xenox Pictures Inc., et al and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrus Ahanchian. Both discussions have clearly found consensus that this person and this case have not been shown to meet our notability guidelines, and as such, there is consensus to delete. However, I rarely decline good-faith requests for draftspace work, and in this case there is a possibility that one notable article may be rescued where two cannot; hence, I'm draftifying. I am going to WP:IAR a little, and require that, given the clear consensus in the AfDs, a) this article/these articles only be recreated via AfC, b) these discussions be linked in a way that the AfC reviewer will read them, and c) some source material be included that is new, substantive, reliable, and independent of the subject. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
The current version of this article has a lot of issues, including GNG and BLP sources. This is a new article after another was AfD'ed on 7 January 2011 under the name "Amir Cyrus Ahanchian". Joojay ( talk) 21:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
@ AmirahBreen: these are not my "opinion" on citations being poor, it's clearly written. Large movies, like Yellow have many executive producers, why is this one notable? Joojay ( talk) 15:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is consensus to not keep this article. There is no consensus about whether this should be just deleted or redirected elsewhere. This can be resolved as follows: everybody is free to create the redirect (ideally after mentioning the locale in the target article with sources), and everybody else is then free to nominate the redirect for deletion. Sandstein 15:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Green Hill is a hummock in the swamp upon which was placed the Delaware Breakwater Range Rear Light, also know as the Green Hill Light. This was eventually taken down and moved to Florida, long before the topos started labelling a spot on the shore as "Green Hill". This spot had by that time been occupied by a Coast Guard station (which is still there), later joined by various nautical businesses and facilities. Delaware Place Names calls it a settlement, but the aerials all say that was never so. There's another Green Hill up in Wilmington that attracts searching, but I'm confident that this was at best a locale outside Lewes. Mangoe ( talk) 20:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Completely unnoteworthy software where the only information about it is on the github page, doesn't even pass a single sliver of notability whatsoever. The article is uncited, probably because it's impossible to cite it. The page is also written like an ad/promotion -- Tautomers( T C) 21:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 01:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Being the person on a particular radio station who was the first on that radio station to report the Kennedy assasination is not a sign of notability. The one source is a caption to a picture in a books that is exhaustively about the radio station he worked for. I searched for additional sources in all the listed possible source leads connected with the 10-year-old notice on the page of being of unquestioned notability, but I did not find any other sources. Everything else that showed up was about other Jerry Golden's in other places and times. This guy was a local radio personality who is just plain not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Neither the Torneo Federal A (regionalised Argentine 3rd tier) nor the Malaysia Premier League (2nd tier despite the name) are listed at WP:FPL so there is no evidence of WP:NFOOTBALL here; also supported by FlashScore as well as Soccerway. No other databases seem to have Dul.
In terms of WP:GNG, I was unable to find any significant coverage from the cited sources nor from Google searches or even when searching through Argentine sources and Malaysian sources. All I could find was this transfer announcement, with two sentences about him, that does nothing to establish notability. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claim here is as a member of a band, which is not an "inherent" notability freebie in and of itself -- in order to qualify for a standalone article as a separate topic from the band, he would need to establish his own independent notability by either (a) independently passing WP:NMUSIC for a solo career after the band ended, or (b) independently passing WP:GNG on the volume and depth of reliable source media coverage about him (as opposed to just mentioning his name in the process of being about the band as a whole.) But there are no properly cited footnotes here, and instead three straight "external links" are the only references -- but two of those three links are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and while the third external link was an actual news article about him, it takes a lot more than just one reliable source to get a person over GNG. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more referencing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 20:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus with no prujudice against speedy renomination. Only !vote was by an editor who disclosed a connection with the person in question. No other views expressed despite 2 relists. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Promotional article, most text added by a series of SPAs. The purpose appears to be to publicise his robotics company. Grandiose claims of notability and considerable biographical detail, but a paucity of independent third-party sources to back any of this. A WP:BEFORE shows passing coverage of the robotics firm. We don't have the necessary depth of coverage in independent RSes to sustain a BLP here. PROD removed by one of the SPAs, but adding a few new sources that were still not independent RSes. David Gerard ( talk) 09:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Disclosure: I have known Tandy since 2006 and can confirm his career since then. I worked in the Microsoft Robotics Group. I did some of the editing for Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio on Wikipedia but I am not an experienced Wikipedia author. (Just look at how many edits it takes me to get things right!) Tandy asked me to create a page for him as a favor (quite a while ago). He provided much of the content.
Facts:
Tandy worked at Microsoft from 1981 to 2009. See citations in the article for History of Microsoft 1981 and The 20 Year Club.
He was asked by Bill Gates to investigate Robotics and later appointed as the General Manager of the Robotics Group. See the citation for the Scientific American article written by Bill Gates in 2008.
As a GM he routinely interacted with the press and was the spokesperson for Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio. Google "Tandy Trower".
Tandy formed Hoaloha Robotics to develop robots for elder care and is still working towards that today.
Claims:
Tandy's claims of his early work are difficult to substantiate because they pre-date the Internet and Microsoft does not attribute work to individuals, e.g. his work on design guidelines for Windows applications, his specs for Windows 1.0 desktop apps. These claims might have to be removed from the article.
His claims regarding Robotics are accurate and his position at Microsoft made him a notable person in the industry at the time who was sought after for commentary and interviews/podcasts.
Summary:
I propose that the article be retained, possibly with some material removed. I ask for guidance on that.
Trevor Taylor — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrevorTaylor ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
I didn't realise I had to sign my comments. This is all new to me. TrevorTaylor ( talk) 22:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Milk & Kisses. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 04:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG. Has one charting position but has received no significant coverage from reliable sources. Been in CAT:NN for over eleven years. – DarkGlow • 20:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Boyz II Men discography. Sandstein 15:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not satisfy WP:NALBUM. Has been in CAT:NN for over eleven years, hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 20:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy WP:NBAND. No chart positions or significant coverage on their career. – DarkGlow • 20:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy WP:NAUTHOR/ WP:BASIC. – DarkGlow • 19:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Not yet notable. Future TV show that hasn't been produced or aired yet. ♟♙ ( talk) 19:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not satisfy WP:NALBUM. – DarkGlow • 19:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 22:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG. Had three chart positions but has no coverage in reliable sources. – DarkGlow • 19:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to To Hrono Stamatao. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Freaky Styley. RL0919 ( talk) 21:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 23:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fiji–United States relations. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not even default notable, let alone acting heads of an embassy for which we have no indepdent sources, just employer published information, and even that just amounts to extremely passing mentions with no substance John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Expecting to Fly (album). Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NSONG; been in CAT:NN for ten years hence the nomination. – DarkGlow • 19:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Fading#Discography as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 19:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Independently released (i.e. not on a record label) EP. The article cites one "review", just a points rating with no rationale, which in other words doesn't count as coverage. Geschichte ( talk) 18:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete. The page was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak as unambiguous promotion and a copyright violation. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost ( talk) 13:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Written like an advertisement and fails WP:NBAND. Geschichte ( talk) 18:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 23:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not pass the GNG as far as I can tell – the only reference listed gives it a passing mention and no more. Mover of molehills ( talk) 18:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Prod was contested because "lists are genereallly incomplete, so that's not an objection", yet that was not the main concern. It has no criteria for inclusion. This is better addressed with a category such as Category:American performers of Christian music and Category:Christian music songwriters. If all entertainers in Christian "media" (music, radio, TV, film, stage, etc.) were included, it would be inordinately large as well. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 16:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 23:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The organization fails WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. If you take a close look at all the sources used in the article you’d note they are press releases/announcements and pr sponsored posts. For example see the first source used in the article. Furthermore WP:ORGDEPTH isn’t met. A before search turns up nothing concrete. Celestina007 ( talk) 15:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Norwalk, Connecticut#Sports. Consensus is for a straight redirect, however article history is preserved if any existing content is appropriate to be merged. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable former sports facility, nor marsh. There are not sufficient substantial, independent sources covering the subject. User:Namiba 14:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Edgemoor, Delaware. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Another "lost in mechanical translation" case, as Delaware Place Names, the ultimate source for GNIS, calls this a "suburban development." As soon as it appears in maps and aerials, it is essentially distinguishable from the adjacent city. At best a city neighborhood, and all the GHits seem to be clickbait. Mangoe ( talk) 13:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 23:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Actor has only been in smaller playhouse renditions of notable stories but not been part of notable stage productions. They have only had minors roles on any television and movie roles. The references that mention him are either a listing, profile or mentions in the reviews of the plays, therefore fails WP:NACTOR. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 16:37, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep, seems to meet the notability guidelines. Like I mentioned on the talk page, it is not to be confused with the Canadian actor (which the first deletion nomination was about). I know that I shouldn’t compare articles but look at Ben Lloyd-Hughes compared to this article. Both the actors were in Great Expectations (2012 film). Are you going to delete that article? Sahaib ( talk) 16:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No rationale for deletion is presented, only for a move. The nominator (and only supporter) was blocked for their various personal attacks. (non-admin closure) User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 19:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no schism between Constantinople and Moscow. Constantinople is the head of the Christian Orthodox Church and Moscow is an independent church, like all other, but under the Ecumenical Orthodox Church of Constantinople. There was an attempted Moscow schism on 2018 for reason to oppose the recognition of Ukrainian Church as Autocephalus. Until recently the Ukrainian Church was under the responsibility of Moscow, however according to the Orthodox rules and laws, if a state request to become independent under their own state authority, this right should be granded. Technically and literally this is none of Moscow business other than to meddling with Ukrainian Church affairs, of course for matters of control and power. This is not the first time Moscow try to undermine the Ecumenical Orthodox Church or even other independent churches.
The title of this article is clearly misleading and not true. Used for matters of propaganda which could be linked to Moscow's troll paid activity as we are all aware of.
There is no official statement of any schism either by the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople and all Orthodox Churches, or from the Moscow Church.
(2021) Ecumenical Patriarch: There is no schism in Orthodoxy https://orthodoxtimes.com/ecumenical-patriarch-there-is-no-schism-in-orthodoxy-i-have-no-right-to-take-a-step-back/
(2018) Russian Orthodox Church warns of violence and schism over Ukraine https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/russian-orthodox-church-warns-of-violence-and-schism-over-ukraine-1.3631073
Moscow have repeatedly tried and failed to overpower the Christian Orthodox Head in order to take over, in multiple attempts for the past 50 years.
A Schism between Constantinople and Moscow technically is not possible. There could be a Schism between Christian Orthodoxy and Moscow as a matter of scientific terms and fact.
It is advisable the article to be renamed as 2018 Moscow attempted schism or breakaway from the Christian Orthodoxy. However the article even if with impovment to the title, is hugely misleading and false.
There is no schism. More references available if necessary, definitely more than that exists in google search. -- Charalampe ( talk) 11:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no official statement of any schism either by the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople and all Orthodox Churches, or from the Moscow Church.Well, the article states Met. Hilarion, head of the DECR stated: "As of today, we have very clearly stated: the fact that the Patriarchate of Constantinople has recognized a schismatic structure means for us that Constantinople itself is now in schism. It has identified itself with a schism. Accordingly, we cannot have the full Eucharistic communion with it." Hilarion added that when members of the Russian Orthodox of Moscow Patriarchate pay visits to the monasteries on Mount Athos, they cannot participate in the sacraments (for example, receive communion), and promised punishment to any priests who participate in the divine services together with the local clergy" (emphasis added). This is a quote from the official DECR website here.
There is an Official Statement of the Ecumenical Orthodox Patriarch the head of all Orthodox Churches which states there is no schismHere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charalampe ( talk • contribs)
The result was keep. North America 1000 11:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage to meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 10:57, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I have to disregard what Eiga-Kevin2 wrote, and the sources found by BuySomeApples have been found to be wanting in the subsequent discussion with arguments that have remained uncontested. Sandstein 15:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Was deleted with the rationale, "Decline PROD, several sources already cited", and no improvement. However, the sources are simple blurbs, listings, or mere mentions. Searches did not turn up enough to show it passes WP:GNG, and it doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 02:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Clearly a COI article that only serves to promote the subject. Out of the 14 sources on the article, 2 are screenshots of the game, an about us page, press release, source code / binaries, repositories but hardly any significant third party indepth coverage that clears the burden of WP:GNG.
Not surprisingly, this article was deleted 4 times previously and eventually salted. After it's current recreation, it was again nominated for AFD in this debate, however due to many SPA editors, the debate resulted in "no consensus". Nearly all keep votes were from SPAs that signed up to "vote".
I think it is time to delete this article now because it is not really eligible for wikipedia in anyway. Drewziii ( talk) 12:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 15:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No references given, just a resume and self-promotion page. Mikeblas ( talk) 03:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 11:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced article in CAT:NN for 12 years. I couldn't establish that it meets WP:CORP or WP:GNG, but may be missing something due to language. Possible ATD is merge/redirect to Tractors in India#Pittie Tractors, as this is the only place on WP this business is mentioned. Boleyn ( talk) 07:27, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was Self withdrawn. Mainspace article has been moved by Btspurplegalaxy to draftspace hence making this request redundant. (non-admin closure) — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 00:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Person doesn't meet WP:BANDMEMBER criteria, a quick search on Naver shows subject is highly associated with Iz*One rather than individual. Fyr, there is Draft:Lee Chae-yeon (singer, born 2000) which has been rejected multiple times. — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 11:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 10:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The subject of the article is not notable enough. It has only two source cited. One of them is written by Rabi Purification, probably a former headmaster of the school. [2] The other source is probably a supplement of the newspaper The Daily Star (Bangladesh); [3] its reliability is not established. Lunush01 ( talk) 10:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
References
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 10:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. Best source I was able to find was this (archived version of source 2 in the article), though its independence seems pretty dubious. – Tera tix ₵ 09:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Even after disregarding Bellaclarita's contribution - angry questions to the nominator are not valid arguments to keep an article - we don't have agreement about whether this group is notable separate from its revue. Sandstein 15:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
While the revue is itself notable, this troupe is not. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage about this troupe, by itself, to pass WP:GNG. Would redirect, but another editor insists on recreating. Onel5969 TT me 14:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
1. The so-called "searches" that were done, where were these done? How many people had done it? Searching on Yahoo Japan, Google, or Twitter? Searching for Japanese topics and trying to read Japanese text using Google translate? Or just searching for English info? Because if searches were done using the 2 former methods, the sheer amount of Takarazuka-related Japanese Wikipedia pages alone should've kept you busy for the next 3 months, and have no time to be typing here.
2. Let's assume for a moment that, to have the confidence to decide an individual listing of a Takarazuka troupe unnecessary, Onel5969 has sufficient knowledge of the Takarazuka Revue: So please, take look at the chart and explain to us why there are such terms as "School Year" and "Graduated". Explain to us why a theatre company with a limited fanbase needs to have 5 teams (400+ members) and how the teams rotate, how the performances are planned and scheduled. Explain to us the difference between the 5 troupes. Which one is known to have the best dancers? Which one is known to have taller members? Which one is known for the best sword fights? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellaclarita ( talk • contribs)
The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Not notable golf course. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:50, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Main advocate for keeping blocked for UPE. This does not necessarily mean all their comments are rendered null and void, but I have to give them much less weight, and therefore consensus is quite clear. Vanamonde ( Talk) 06:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Increasingly lacking in confidece that this is a notable article. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep Talk 13:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
@ MrsSnoozyTurtle: What is your note supposed to mean? Does it mean that my opinion should not be recognized in an open discussion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.204.221.186 ( talk) 09:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
a statement, with no validity, no more than your statement above hence my comment. Whilst on the subject of AfD procedures, the nomination of the article is taken as read that the nominator !votes delete, so doesn't add a separate !vote within the discussion. However, I've got far more constructive things to do with my time than argue over this so have struck through my "statement". -- John B123 ( talk) 15:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Vexations ( talk) 21:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep I came across this article and discussion but I know nothing about this man. However, while reading the story and reference links, I would suggest saving them. There seems to be a lot of effort re-establishing the information and links provided. I don't think it harms Wikipedia or overrates this person. To me it doesn't read as an advertisement, maybe a little colorful in the news articles.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:6200:8851:8ce1:edad:17dc:5c05:e9da ( talk) — 2403:6200:8851:8ce1:edad:17dc:5c05:e9da ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Note: You should give people easier access to participate !! I found it very difficult to find the comments section. I don't like this fella but he did some great things here in Pattaya. So if my vote counts keep it then — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.47.155.200 ( talk • contribs)
... The Munich artist Mario Kleff has meticulously traced 14 pages from this unique specimen on parchment following the model in detail. These replicas can be seen together with information boards on the genesis work..., Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, August 13, 2001, No. 186. p. 62
... In 1990, this gave the now 33-year-old painter and designer Mario Kleff , who was fascinated by the Book of Kells, with the idea of tracing the book down to the last detail with the orginal colors and on calf's parchment and thus preserving it for posterity ... In February 1993 Kleff was able to present five finished pages in the Gutenberg Museum Mainz ..., Allgemeine Zeitung, 06/29/00
... A few weeks ago, the artist Mario Kleff was a guest in the Bishop's Cathedral and Diocesan Museum, who made it his business to copy the "Book of Kells". Some of these re-painted pages can be seen in the facsimile exhibition in the Episcopal Cathedral and Diocesan Museum ... Paulinus, No. 42, p. 11
... The German art expert Mario Kleff (born in 1967) has been making a duplicate based on a bet for about ten years Gospels. In the meantime 30 of about 700 pages have been reproduced. 15th his precise works are exhibited in the Calauer Landkirche and can be compared with the originals ... Lausitzer Rundschau, 08/28/2003
... About 1200 years ago three monks wrote and illustrated in Ireland infinite ingenuity on veal parchment the four gospels in Latin language. The Munich artist Mario Kleff left this Handwriting with with original recipes meticulously handcrafted ..., Rhein-Zeitung, 02.03.1999 / LOK
There is more on this subject. Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 00:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment I spent time and research creating the article on Mr. Mario Kleff, helped to keep it. Information above along with other references found on Google Books [58] and Google News [59] should be viewed as factually verifiable. Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 01:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
but I don't speak GermanYou just wrote:
I've downloaded and translated some. Did you mean that you used machine translation? Not necessary. We can do that too, and some of us speak German. Better give the German text. But do provide a proper reference please. Vexations ( talk) 01:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Genious is a business information site, information in the form of blog, press-releases, whitepapers, research papers put out by companies. They would not be independent.Since you speak German, I recommend that you download and read, or translate if you don't [60]. Quote scope_creep
The name date of publication, title, author are the minimum. A URL is optional, but not required.Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 02:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment Regardless, the article Mario Kleff contains over 27 reference links as well as new information revealed on this page; Information that they claim is promotional and unverifiable. Keep - unless you can prove incorrect information. Regards
Meow2021 (
talk)
02:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Vanamonde93:The nomination for the deletion claim, which relates to articles that lack in-depth information, is utter nonsense. In view of the evidence, Mr Mario Kleff has undoubtedly been known for years in connection with the Book of Kells. His work was presented in 1993 in the Gutenberg Museum Mainz, in 1997 in the Diocesan Museum Trier and from 1993 to 2000 in numerous other locations. His daughter is Jiang Li Wongsin. Mario Kleff is the director of Wandeegroup, Wandee Real Estate and Wandeegroup Asia with the given Thai name Thiti Teerachin. His wife is Nittaya Wongsin, they are married so it oviously that they both are linked to leopards. The article was fairly rewritten but again edited before the discussion closed. That seems like cherry picking to me; or personally?
Note: The following information that I found on the Wandeegroup website is not used to verify the article but to aid the information in question. It says here Jiang Li Wongsin [64], daughter of Mario Kleff and Nittaya Wongsin. Kleff was presented at the Trier Museum and worked on the Book of Kells. [65] This is how it reads when you enter the German text and use Google translate into English: "A masterpiece of expressiveness and craftsmanship - the artist and designer copies the Book of Kells. A few weeks ago, the artist who made it his mission to copy the Book of Kells was a guest in the Episcopal Cathedral and Diocesan Museum. Some of the painted pages can also be seen in the facsimile exhibition in the Episcopal Museum. About seven years ago, Mario Kleff started to recreate this work. Born in Boppard, Kleff learned early Christian book illumination with a focus on the manufacture of writing and work implements before he decided to study painting, graphics and design." Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 10:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 10:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Meow is a professional business woman with excellent relationships with the authorities and the government. And our project THE TOUCH does really break new ground in terms of design, value and customer satisfaction and takes the real estate industry to a new level.”. So with the username Meow2021, your Mario Kleff's wife with a clear WP:COI. I'll need to post this up to the coin noticeboard. scope_creep Talk 11:22, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
The following information that I found on the Wandeegroup website is not used to verify the article. Who please, Kleff's wife ??? Regards Meow2021 ( talk) 12:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps you should discuss this with the author of the article. Not only do you seem unsatisfied with links to information provided, you are questioning their content. However, I've looked a little more. Lapis Lazuli pigment 1kg 20.262,73 €* [66] Meow2021 ( talk) 14:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
References
Vexations ( talk) 00:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
To your information: An editor on this talk page has included poorly sourced information in the article. Got it removed. Interesting is that the same editor voted Delete - promotional article and, as per MrOlllie, most of the sources are native advertising, therefore the subject lacks independent coverage.
. Why? Regards
Meow2021 (
talk)
12:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
"... there is little to no information in the press in the Chonuri area, so I sourced as best as I could.", ([SIC], should be Chonburi) shown as a diff as there are two User Talk Headings named "August 2021".-- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 18:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Palestinians in Iraq. ✗ plicit 08:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplicates Palestinians in Iraq - as the Fall of Saddam is covered on that page. Whiteguru ( talk) 08:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. There was only 8 episodes according to IMDb which may be the reason I can't find anything significant. SL93 ( talk) 01:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 15:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a strange one - a very incoherent and confusing article. As Sergecross73 put it in a prior discussion, "It's hard to follow what exactly is being documented here, or it's real scope." Nominating to get some more eyes on it, because I have a feeling it shouldn't exist at all. Popcornfud ( talk) 22:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
The article extensively discusses the history of "二次創作" (translated as derivative works or secondary creations) in Hong Kong. The Wikipedia article heavily relies on this article as a source to discuss the history of the topic from the 1960s to 2016.
The book notes: "當然, 把周星馳代表的那種離經叛道、脫繮野馬式的無厘頭文化繼續發揚光大的, 是網絡中林林總總的所謂「二次創作」(類似英語中的 derivative works), 其中包括「改圖」、「改片」、或「改編歌詞」。周星馳的無厘頭文化可以是無傷大雅或純粹搞笑的荒謬及粗俗(如《整蠱專家》中的「超級戇膠膠」), 亦可以是有意識的政治或社會諷刺 (如《國產凌凌漆》的中國「偉大」發明「太陽能電筒」)。
From Google Translate: "Of course, it is the so-called "secondary creation" (similar to the derivative works in English) of the so-called "secondary creation" (similar to the English derivative works) that is represented by Zhou Xingchi, which includes Film", or "adapted lyrics". Stephen Chow's nonsensical culture can be innocuous or purely funny, absurd and vulgar (such as the "super sticky glue" in "Tricky Expert"), or it can be conscious political or social satire (such as the "domestic Lingling Paint" China's "great" invention of "solar flashlight")."
The next at least five paragraphs discuss derivative works.
The book notes: "但「二次創作」並非版權法學的常用概念,其實質涵蓋範圍不清。而翻譯、改編這些衍生創作 (derivative works) 在現有版權法中屬原作品版權人的專有權利,有明確的保護。" From Google Translate: "However, 'secondary creation' is not a common concept in copyright law, and its substantive scope is unclear. The translation and adaptation of these derivative works are the exclusive rights of the copyright holders of the original works in the existing copyright law and are clearly protected."
The book discusses secondary creations and the copyright law implications of secondary creations on pages 66–75.
The book notes: "secondary creation (parody) N yih chi chong jok jok bán 二次創作作品"
The book notes:
最後, 我們也可以用較 formal 的「derivative work (n. phrase)」(二次創作) 來表達「惡搞」。
Some people think that regulation of derivative work may stifle local creativity.有人認為監管二次創作可能會扼殺本地創意。
The derivative works on the Internet show netizens' immense creativity.網上嘅二次創作反映網民嘅無限創意。
The book discusses secondary creation in the context of Japan. The book notes: "In contrast, what is called “secondary creation” (niji sōsaku 二次創作), often seen in YouTube and other video sharing sites, has a more rigid distinction between the original and copies. For example, Pikotaro's original Pen Pineapple Apple Pen (PPAP) music video, which was released on August 25, 2016 on YouTube and went viral soon after, led to a proliferation of copies, but they remain parodies, hence the process is called secondary creation.16"
The article talks about secondary creations in the context of Malaysia. The article notes: "二次创作(secondary creation/create)是创作和表达方式的一种"
I agree with the comment here: "My first thought is that the article is badly titled... most of it doesn't talk about sampling, but about parody songs, which is an entirely different thing."
The Chinese term is simplified Chinese: 二次创作; traditional Chinese: 二次創作. I think a page move of music sampling in Hong Kong to secondary creations in Hong Kong (the literal translation) or derivative works in Hong Kong (the other translation commonly used by reliable sources) would better reflect the reliable sources and the article content. The article currently discusses the history of secondary creations of music in Hong Kong as well as the legality of secondary creations in general.
I would oppose deletion based on WP:TNT as although the article can be improved, the article content when viewed through the lens of "secondary creations" or "derivative works" makes sense to me and accurately reflects the sources I reviewed.
I am not "proposing writing a whole different article". The current article is satisfactory after I removed the incorrect mention of "music sampling" (which was added as part of the incorrect page move). I added information about how the topic refers to "secondary creations" and "derivative works". The article can be improved as well as expanded with the sources I found. But it does not need to be rewritten to be retained in mainspace since the article accurately reflects the sources. It accurately discusses the history of the secondary creations of music in Hong Kong and the legality of the secondary creations. Here are two existing sources in the article:
Cunard ( talk) 01:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
The "Controversy" section discusses how the proposed law Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2014 could have affected the legality of secondary creations. Some commentators believed the proposed law would have restricted the freedom of expression and creation with respect to secondary creations. But the article notes that a secondary creation that is considered a parody, satire, pastiche, caricature or commentary, would not be considered copyright infringement under the bill. The "Effects" section further discusses the copyright implications of secondary creations.
The article can be copyedited and expanded but the article's topic and presentation are very clear to me.
The result was keep. Consensus is to keep as player has just signed a loan deal with a professional club. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played in a WP:FPL. BRDude70 ( talk) 03:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
A mirror celeb with no current acting roles for many years now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hojczy ( talk • contribs) 20:37, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm sure she looks very nice in her swimsuit, but it's not evidence of notability :P ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NMODEL. Her role in "Let It Remain Between Us" ( Azerbaijani: Aramızda qalsın) wasn't one of the main roles in the series. NMW03 ( talk) 01:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
"Samra Huseynova shared her bikini, PHOTOS". ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 15:18, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Carlsberg Group. ✗ plicit 03:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Article involves a very small brewery that's completely unreferenced. Could maybe be merged as Carlsberg article Sucker for All ( talk) 23:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) 4meter4 ( talk) 19:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Local politician at the county level. Fails WP:NPOL. Additionally, the main source, Charlie Brown Remembers Atlanta, was written by Brown himself with the assistance of James C. Bryant (see [69]). As Brown is the credited author of the book, the source lacks independence. The obituary website does not look like a reliable source either. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
This one took a bit of digging, not helped out by Silverbrook Gardens, Delaware a short ways to the south and a "Silver Brook" in/near Newark, but from what I can tell it is actually a rail spot which turned into a somewhat vague locale. The oldest topos show the name directly adjacent to where the now-ex-Reading tracks cross the road, and I found an old reference to the station in some legislative document. Across the road in 1898 the vast Silverbrook Cemetery opened; then, shortly after WW II, a large apartment complex appears further to the NW, and the map label drifts over to it; as infill increases the label wanders back and forth. I see no evidence that this was ever regarded as a separate settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 02:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Having trouble getting the Maryland place of the same name to stop barging into searching, but from what I can see this is either an overly complicated (but highly symmetrical) three-way interchange, or the subdivision just to the southwest of it. I can't see that is a notable place. Mangoe ( talk) 00:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The article does not meet the notability criteria, per Wikipedia:NSEASONS. Sakiv ( talk) 00:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
This blog does not pass the WP:GNG, or any other notability guideline. There are several mentions of it in reliable sources, but nothing we would consider significant coverage. Ganesha811 ( talk) 00:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Broadcom Inc. as an WP:ATD. Anyone is free to merge any content to the target article if needed. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
This product/technology does not meet the WP:GNG - no significant coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet any other criteria for notability either. Ganesha811 ( talk) 00:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)