|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hi, I saw that you added the ARBPIA tag to Weaponization of antisemitism article here: [1].
I would like to edit the article, but cannot because this tag was added. I think that the tag was added erroneously. Per WP:PIA under "General sanctions upon related content", When disruptive edits are being made to such content, any editor may invoke ARBPIA General Sanctions for that content ... Editors should apply the ARBPIA General Sanctions templates to related content only when disruption creates a need for additional administrative tools.
I looked through the article editing history, and I couldn't find any examples of editing that could be considered WP:DISRUPTIVE and merit adding the ARBPIA tag. Could you please point me at examples of edits that you considered WP:DISRUPTIVE that would merit adding the ARBPIA tag? Happy to hear your thoughts and see if we can reach an understanding on this. Thanks! spintheer ( talk) 20:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
{{
ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement|relatedcontent=yes}}
template. It's conceivable I suppose that an editor would like to propose expanding the coverage of the article into areas that are unambiguously outside the scope of ARBPIA. I assume it would be fine for them to do that on the talk page. And if the scope expanded the template could be changed. But Spintheer should appreciate that it's not a negotiation. They should only participate in ARBPIA related matters via edit requests or after they have been granted the extended confirmed privilege. As you suggest, there are millions of articles to work on in the meantime.
Sean.hoyland (
talk) 12:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 ( talk) 02:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Pantheon obelisk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JoeNMLC ( talk) 20:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palestinian citizens of Israel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian citizens of Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
On 9 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in South Africa's genocide case against Israel, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to "punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide" against Palestinians in Gaza? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 ( talk) 00:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Non-combatant Casualty Value at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 06:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hi, I saw that you added the ARBPIA tag to Weaponization of antisemitism article here: [1].
I would like to edit the article, but cannot because this tag was added. I think that the tag was added erroneously. Per WP:PIA under "General sanctions upon related content", When disruptive edits are being made to such content, any editor may invoke ARBPIA General Sanctions for that content ... Editors should apply the ARBPIA General Sanctions templates to related content only when disruption creates a need for additional administrative tools.
I looked through the article editing history, and I couldn't find any examples of editing that could be considered WP:DISRUPTIVE and merit adding the ARBPIA tag. Could you please point me at examples of edits that you considered WP:DISRUPTIVE that would merit adding the ARBPIA tag? Happy to hear your thoughts and see if we can reach an understanding on this. Thanks! spintheer ( talk) 20:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
{{
ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement|relatedcontent=yes}}
template. It's conceivable I suppose that an editor would like to propose expanding the coverage of the article into areas that are unambiguously outside the scope of ARBPIA. I assume it would be fine for them to do that on the talk page. And if the scope expanded the template could be changed. But Spintheer should appreciate that it's not a negotiation. They should only participate in ARBPIA related matters via edit requests or after they have been granted the extended confirmed privilege. As you suggest, there are millions of articles to work on in the meantime.
Sean.hoyland (
talk) 12:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 ( talk) 02:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Pantheon obelisk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JoeNMLC ( talk) 20:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palestinian citizens of Israel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palestinian citizens of Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
On 9 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in South Africa's genocide case against Israel, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to "punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide" against Palestinians in Gaza? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 ( talk) 00:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Non-combatant Casualty Value at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 06:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)