![]() |
The result was delete. Requested by subject. No.objection. A7 and g11 appear to apply. Spartaz Humbug! 05:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This article was started before the requirements for company notability were enforced. External independent discussions about Deep Secure are cited in the current article, but there's really only one such report. The article has only ever been maintained by Deep Secure staff and this is unlikely to change, so the requirements for independence are unlikely to be met.
The article was tidied up recently, but that's the best that can be done and the view of the company is that the most appropriate action is to delete the article
.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to National Indoor Football League. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
No indication of meeting WP:GNG. I would suggest redirecting to National Indoor Football League, the league that this team played in. Searching online, I wasn't able to find any additional coverage. signed, Rosguill talk 23:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This team played in the NIFL and has sources from www.oursportscentral.com.......why would it be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 03:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Keep
Are you saying this team was not in the NIFL?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 03:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Another reference from the Houston Chronicle added https://www.chron.com/neighborhood/woodlands-sports/article/Garza-pleased-to-be-part-of-Conroe-Storm-s-success-1836727.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 04:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Article has been improved and new references included. Youtube videos included as well I again vote to keep.
FOX NEWS story on the San Antonio Steers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4cLieNtT6o
CBS NEWS story on the San Antonio Steers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4cLieNtT6o
Should suffice for additional coverage, along with other references to Keep the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 17:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Here is the CBS story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wADWzoCglWo&t=72s
I don't understand why it matters how many games the team played in this floundering league. The team played in the league before folding. 80% of the teams folded in 2007, the last year of the NIFL. The team did play in the league, why should the page be redirected as if it didn't exist?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Tucson_Mirage — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 03:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Bearcat is harshly admonished for colluding in secret plots without inviting the rest of us. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passage of
WP:CREATIVE. The strongest notability claim here is that one of his films was screened at two minor film festivals and won an award at one of them, which is not an instant notability clincher all by itself in the absence of enough media coverage to clear
WP:GNG. As always, our notability criteria are not automatically passed by just any film award that happens to exist -- they look for top-level national film awards like the Oscars, the BAFTAs or the Canadian Screen Awards, and internationally prominent megafestivals on the order of Cannes, Berlin or TIFF, but every award presented by every small film festival on the planet is not in and of itself an instant exemption from having to have solid sources. But other than the glancing namechecks of his existence in the news article about the Beverly Hills Film Festival awards and a non-notable
blog's entry about the Canadian Filmmakers Festival's overall lineup, neither of which are about him strongly enough to clinch passage of GNG if they're the best sources that can be found, this is otherwise referenced entirely to directly affiliated
primary sources (his own website, IMDB, the self-published website of the CFF, the Canadian Film and Television Producers Association and GoodReads) which are not support for notability at all. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.
Also
conflict of interest, as the article was created by an editor whose username matched the name of the subject's own production shingle.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This earthquake is lacking notability Wykx ( talk) 22:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No notability whatsoever. In a WP:BEFORE search, I found he used to have a MySpace page with 31 whole followers and a one-sentence mention in an article here. That's it. Kbabej ( talk) 22:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Simply asserting that GNG is met is worthless without actually pointing to sources. Merely being a film director or producer does not automatically put one over the GNG line sans sources. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a film industry worker, not reliably sourced as passing any part of WP:CREATIVE. The only notability claim stated here at all is that he and the films he's worked on exist, which is not an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of any reliable source coverage in media to establish the significance of his work -- but of the eight citations here five are to IMDb, two are to other IMDb-like directories, and the only one that comes from an actual media outlet is a Q&A interview with somebody else in which Rajeev Barnwal is the interviewer -- which means even that source is not about him for the purposes of helping to establish his notability. People do not get over our inclusion rules just because you can show them as the bylined creator of media coverage about other things -- they require sources in which they're the subject of media coverage created by other people. And as for his filmography, he was a "set cashier", not a performer or filmmaker, in the first film listed, and an unnamed bit part actor in the second, so those two films have nothing whatsoever to do with establishing his notability -- and while the other two films listed are potentially more significant, simply having screenwriting and directing credits still isn't an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of much better sourcing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 21:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
The subject does not have any notability. Most of the sources are from a non-notable, defunct website he used to be editor-in-chief of, and the others aren't much better. He was nominated for a local award once, again in relation to the defunct website, and then wrote a book that didn't get press coverage. In a WP:BEFORE search, there's a blog with an interview, so not considered a RS, and then a NY Sun article where he once held a party on a subway car. Not enough to pass GNG. Kbabej ( talk) 21:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not seeing anything in the keep votes to indicate GNG or nfooty pass. Fenix down ( talk) 22:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NDIRECTOR. The one reference is just incidental coverage, cannot find SIGCOV, is really noted for one play that is not well known Rogermx ( talk) 20:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find enough to support WP:GNG Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk 20:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Article about a short film, not making or reliably sourcing any strong claim to passage of WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- the notability test for films requires some evidence of the film's significance, such as noteworthy film awards or demonstrable attention from film critics. But the only notability claim even being attempted here is that the film exists, and the only reference is a Q&A interview in which the filmmaker is talking about his own overall body of work in the first person, which briefly mentions this film without being about this film to any non-trivial degree. Simply put, a film requires better sourcing than this to clear the bar. Bearcat ( talk) 20:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
promotional article that needs to be nuked from orbit, sourced entirely to gossipy, spammy unreliable sources. Praxidicae ( talk) 20:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Maggie & Bianca: Fashion Friends. MBisanz talk 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable actress MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 20:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mitre 10 Dream Home. MBisanz talk 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Season itself is not notable as the ten seasons before it aren't. Low level sourcing, definitely not substantial enough for its own article and series is already summarised on the parent article. This was a PROD and after the seven days was it up it redirected to Mitre 10 Dream Home only to be swifted reverted back. Ajf773 ( talk) 20:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Non notable lawyer. MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 20:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Non-notable and a COI product to boot. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable musician, could be speedy deleted in my opinion XFD to get the community's opinion. MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 19:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
https://open.spotify.com/artist/4lXFW8KajROcgbyce4m0Ix?si=icR_Lo9EQA6JLnm39RRSbg
https://www.instagram.com/officialshesha
https://www.facebook.com/officialSHESHA
https://twitter.com/OfficialSHESHA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarveshvara99 ( talk • contribs) 08:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
One album as a leader, a few as a sideman. Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Joanne Jordan (talent agent)#Central Talent Booking as an appropiate alternative to deletion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable company. Not finding anything besides mentions-in-passing for this company. None of the existing citations are valid links; no searches of the relevant publications' archives brings up any hits. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The abstract notes:
I do not have access to the full text of the source, which had already been used in the Wikipedia article.The article focuses on the effort of Central Talent Booking owner Joanna Jordan to book a broad range of celebrities on television shows in the U.S. It relates that Jordan has been an in-house talent booker for the television show "Jimmy Kimmel Live." It offers information on her techniques in working such as reading the trades and watching the morning news shows at six in the morning and at 10a.m., she gathers her staff for a meeting.
Writing in The Independent, journalist Emma Brockes called Jordan "one of New York's most respected talent bookers".
Variety's Tatiana Siegel said Jordan "is considered one of the industry's premier bookers".
In a 2008 article, TV Guide referred to Jordan as the "force behind" the "I'm F-ing Ben Affleck" video.
In this AfD, my position is to rename the article to be about the talent agent (Joanne Jordan) instead of to be about the talent agency (Central Talent Booking) as the sources are more about the person rather the company. Wikipedia:Notability (people) applies instead of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). My rewrite provides the basis for the rename.
The result was redirect to Aziza Mustafa Zadeh. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 20:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Difficult to find sources which are not promotional. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
The result was redirect to Beer bread. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any sources for this. Possible neologism or hoax. CJK09 ( talk) 18:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable rapper with no coverage, only claim of significance is a non notable award. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:G11, likely undisclosed paid editing. Author blocked. – bradv 🍁 18:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
another paid for spam article, sourced entirely to fake news outlets run by blackhat seo firms (which i've removed), littered with fake claims of notability that cannot be verified by independent sources. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Aziza Mustafa Zadeh. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 00:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Unsourced since 2009. Not notable. Vmavanti ( talk) 23:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Are we sure this is a real rivalry? p b p 17:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Biography of a person who doesn't appear to be the subject of significant coverage in independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Why delete it, it does no good to the of motivating young women powerlifting in India, this may seem like a small decision but let it be known this could be costly to the next generation of women powerlifters in India :/ Anthonytownley333 ( talk) 18:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable musician, the only independent content about him is his escape from prison, which isn't notable. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No coverage except a few articles relating to the departure of Jennifer Morgan, where he's only briefly mentioned. No other evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Article appears to have been created as an SEO attempt. At best merge to company's article. JamesG5 ( talk) 17:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Strong keep: CEO of a 150bn DAX company with plenty of coverage in German news.-- Dewritech ( talk) 18:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Stong keep: I've created this page in order to start a page for the CEO of one of the biggest European software companies. It was really strange to enter the company article in English Wikipedia and to see the red link of the CEO's name. I tried to find some info except the official announcements, but seems that there is no much info and facts available - the guy graduated and started in SAP some 20 years ago and have grown to CEO position without switching to other companies. I hope in the future the community will help gather news, info, biography which might be useful for Wikipedia users searching for quality info about known companies and their people. If the article is not deleted I can try to spend some time to reach and get approval for use of photo and press release info about the CEO to be used in Wikipedia. @ JamesG5: // Alexgs ( talk) 08:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface.The inundation of Wikipedia with only IMDb sourced content (we are probably that site's biggest supporter) does not give the presumption of notability. When Wikipedia was a fledgling encyclopedia we gave greater latitude. At a point it is responsible to back up content with reliable sources that support claims of notability, especially concerning BLP's. It is one thing to have a poorly sourced yet notable topic, but an unsourced career stub BLP, that is less than a dictionary entry with an embedded list of a filmography section, backed by a source "generally" considered unreliable (placed in an "External links section), presenting "less" than we would consider as a pseudo biography, fails our current notability guidelines as well as more than one policy. Asserting reliable sources exists is easy to state but we need significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources to advance notability. Otr500 ( talk) 11:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Unref article on recently deceased person. Succesful, but doesn't meet
WP:PROF or
WP:GNG.
Boleyn (
talk)
17:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:G11, most likely undisclosed paid editing. – bradv 🍁 18:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This NGO is not notable enough and therefore fails GNG MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 17:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Apart from being Kangana Ranaut's sister, she is not known to media. Notability is not inherited. Brihaspati (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. – bradv 🍁 17:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This article or section may have been copied and pasted from ( http://www.halkisummit.com/speakers/rev-dn-irakli-jinjolava), possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please find the CopyVios report. Amkgp ( talk) 10:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I have just added a redirect for this page for an acronym, but the whole page looks a bit spammy (and the links to it). The only citation was a bare url to the home page of this person: https://enricomassetti.com/my-patents-enricos-inventions/ And Google finds absolutely nothing except copies of the Wikipedia article. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 07:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Appear to be a non-notable pianist with no significant coverage in reliable sources. GSS 💬 03:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing requirements for companies are more stringent Spartaz Humbug! 05:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
The article is about a company that lacks depth of coverage and reliability of sourcing that is required to establish notability. The sources presented are either press releases or closely authored, broadly about the topic of workforce management without mentioning the company/product or just contain "workforce software" as phrase, again without being about the company. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, seems WP:PEACOCKy. Majavah ( t/ c) 14:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning3 ( talk) 16:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
This negative attitude does not only affect Field Marshal Haig's Own Pipes & Drums (further: FMHOP&D), but also many other similar non-competition bands and is endangering the spirit of comradeship within the pîpeband world.
Furthermore, the person proposing the deletion has obviously no serious knowledge about the pipeband scene in Flanders(Belgium) in general and even less about the hard work the small number of specific remembrance pipebands in Flanders, the Netherlands and France are doing on this subject. This is not meant as a personal attack, but does question the authority on the subject and, as a result of that, the justification of the proposal.
In the case of FMHOP&D, the list of, often voluntary and unpaid, involvements and initiatives in the remembrance of the Great War, and, to a lesser extent, of WW2 and other conflicts, is long, especially during the Great War Centenary years Furthermore, the tradition of pipe bands in the Great War was an extremely strong one, trying to wipe out the importance of remembering the legacy of these men is rather ignorant.
One can only wonder what the real motivations behind such a move are. IMHO, it's not to an individual, or even part of the pipe band scene, to decide which aspects (i.e. competition bands) are important and which not. If there is a doubt if entries about pipebands should be included on Wikipedia, then all articles (including those about competition bands)should be removed. Wikipedia should not be shaped according to the interests of one person or faction, but has to be aimed about making (as complete as possible) information available to everyone. Obansinglemalt ( talk) 23:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Summarizing: a) the argument "non-notable" is personal and non-rational (to put it mildly) b) not only the entry for "Field Marshal Haig's Own Pipes & Drums" should be maintained, but also these of the all the other pipebands, proposed for deletion on the list of Ostrichyearning3, mentioned as "non-notable", as this argument doesn't comply with the policy of Wikipedia, which is aiming for, neutral, non-biased articles c)the person who tries to initiate the deletion is not qualified on the specific subject of pipebands in Flanders/BelgiumObansinglemalt (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obansinglemalt (talk • contribs) 19:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. And salt. Sandstein 21:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Encountered this as a new page reviewer. This article was previously deleted and in recent months has been moved in and out of mainspace and draft space as its creator seems determined to run with it despite it not being accepted at AfC. It categorically fails WP: ARCHITECT in my view, and the sources are mainly to a single design competition that the subject entered and did not win. In view of the clear notability fail and the creator’s insistence I’d suggest delete and salt. Mccapra ( talk) 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG without a sufficient number of independent and in-depth sources about the subject himself. User:Namiba 14:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 14:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet current standard at WP:NCORP. The sources are mere notices. DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
To ensure the original submission would be appropriately written and sourced, I tried to follow other entries in the ticket resale category -- /info/en/?search=StubHub, /info/en/?search=SeatGeek, /info/en/?search=TicketsNow, /info/en/?search=TicketIQ. The original submission followed StubHub and SeatGeek, including more robust citations, but those were deleted for being too promotional. Now there are fewer citations (similar to TicketsNow and TicketsIQ) which affects Notability. I am eager to fix the Vivid Seats entry to make it more appropriate for Wikipedia. I just need help better deciphering some of the edits and input, which sometimes conflict. It also would be helpful to know why this submission is being considered for deletion when no others the Ticket Sales Companies category are under similar consideration, including entries with similar citations. Please help me understand the best way to proceed.Jody Venturoni 17:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jventuroni ( talk • contribs)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
From the guideline at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Publicly traded corporations (my bolding):
S&P Global noted in an analyst report in 2016: "We view Vivid Seats' business risk profile as weak. Our assessment is based on the competitive secondary ticket market; Vivid Seat's relatively weak brand awareness, despite the low brand loyalty featured in this market; and the company's lack of distinctive or differentiating products versus its main competitors. However, Vivid Seats benefits from strong relationships with professional ticket brokers, and it has been able to gain market shares from competitors while maintaining an EBITDA margin in the low-20% rate--in line with its closest peers. Our assessment also reflects the company's minimal international presence, limited diversity of products, and smaller scale relative to industry leader Stubhub."sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports. Accordingly, article authors should make sure to seek out such coverage and add references to such articles to properly establish notability.
Moody's Investor Service noted in an analyst report in 2016, "Moody's also considers into the ratings Vivid Seats' solid market position in the online secondary ticket market, operating as the number three player behind, StubHub, owned by eBay, Inc., and Ticketmaster, owned by Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Vivid Seats benefits from a diverse base of sellers, including season ticket holders and professional brokers who purchase tickets in bulk from primary issuers, and then use Vivid Seats' marketplace platform to resell tickets to consumers. While Vivid Seats' market share continues to grow rapidly, its competitors' greater financial resources, which includes the ability to subsidize pricing with other lines of business, or the entry of other large e-commerce providers could pressure pricing or increase marketing costs."
The result was redirect to Aziza Mustafa Zadeh. MBisanz talk 23:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not notable. Unsourced since 2009. Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Vmavanti ( talk) 23:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Non notable subject - majority of the content is unsourced and there's nothing on Google News, Fails NOTGUIDE, (to some extent NOTDIR) and GNG – Davey2010 Talk 13:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSEASONS as it was the sixth tier of Australian football which is way too low to be deemed professional or even semi-professional. HawkAussie ( talk) 12:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 13:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable musician with 0 independent sources and no in depth coverage. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. There are multiple subsets of the notability criteria under which this individual could be assessed, but the consensus here seems to be that he doesn't meet any of them. Yunshui 雲 水 13:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not notable. Candidates are not generally notable per WP:NPOL and not seeing anything else to make him notable. Should he be elected he would be notable Gbawden ( talk) 12:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Reviewed under new article curation / review process. No indication of wp:notability. The sources given are just listings on websites. I hate to say it but this is a missing person report rather than an encyclopedia article and am just trying to do my job properly bringing it to AFD. North8000 ( talk) 11:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G11 as per previous versions of the article which had been extensively spammed across various titles. User also blocked now as a promotional only account. Nick ( talk) 14:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article is a non notable musician that falls short of WP:MUSICBIO & general notability guidelines hence does not satisfy WP:GNG either. This article has been deleted & re-created almost three times now under different names. Celestina007 ( talk) 10:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I also think it should be deleted. She isn't noteworthy according to the Wikipedia guidelines. Nearly half the article is about the Portland home debacle, which is a word-for-word copy of the same section in Kevin Rose's article. I added a PROD, but it was removed by a moderator. I added a deletion nomination tag to the article. If a registered user could create the article's deletion discussion page, I'd appreciate it. 104.190.186.102 ( talk) 08:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC) created for above signed IP user, using comment left on Talk:Darya Rose. ~ GB fan 09:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Christmas Island#Demographics. There seems to be notable content here but no firm argument this can't sit within the overarching article Spartaz Humbug! 05:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any sources about the women on Christmas Island specifically, and the article is referenced only to a now defunct website of a Christmas Island Women's Association, and to a news piece about an event celebrating 8 March on the island. But that's not surprising given that the island has fewer than 2,000 inhabitants altogether. – Uanfala (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 00:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability that warrants a separate article for every single work of the author. There is no meaningful content in this article that cannot be covered in the article of the corresponding author. Mopswade ( talk) 09:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. There is no meaningful content in this article that cannot be covered in the article of the corresponding author. Mopswade ( talk) 08:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN and WP:V. Störm (talk) 08:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No non-primary sources available as far as I see. The article has essentially no content and references. Mopswade ( talk) 08:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLP and the person described is not notable. Not to mention the poorly written content as well. Mopswade ( talk) 08:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I agree with Fenix down towards the end of the discussion: the case for deletion seems to be stronger than the case for keeping, but it is with a few exceptions so poorly articulated here, with most "delete" opinions making no understandable argument, that I can't find a consensus for deletion. Sandstein 08:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Uh... Is nobody going to explain this? The previous discussion originally nominated by @ GiantSnowman where he provided some valid and reasonable, albeit a little flawed, arguments that received a no consensus vote somehow because the creator of the article, who hasn't even edited in THREE YEARS!!! somehow argued that the article was meritable because it receives decent coverage by news sources (the reason why is obviously that there is a bunch of U.S.-centric soccer news sites that are more than happy to write articles about about American coaches who go abroad because most of them rarely coach outside the United States) and that it isn't a list, but a prose with a table, which is basically every single featured list ever.
As an American myself, I hate it when people unnecessarily fancruft or circlejerk about their or favorite club or country's footballing endeavors, especially the country of my origin. Plus, everything in this "prose and table" is already covered in each person's biography. Kinda surprising how there aren't any articles about English managers of foreign national football teams or French managers of foreign national football teams. This article obviously fails WP:GNG, WP:LISTCRUFT, and WP:ARTN. Do I need to go on any longer? KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 17:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
A set of "Place"s, all in the forests of northern California, all of them single (or no) buildings, all of them GNIS dumps, and none of which has any evidence of being an actual settlement. These are rather difficult to search since they crank out false hits for several reasons, but I got nothing for any of them except for one "cemetery" reference on Find-a-Grave for a single burial. There are a lot of "Place"s in California, and nominating the lot in a single shot is too likely to get procedural resistance, but I really don't want to crank through fifty or so single nominations that are all the same. Mangoe ( talk) 02:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The other nominees in this group are:
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 06:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of a settlement here. Appears to be a mine-related mill. – dlthewave ☎ 01:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 00:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a journalist, not reliably sourced as passing our notability standards for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their staff profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers offer technical verification that they exist -- to be notable enough for inclusion here, a journalist has to be the subject of coverage in sources other than his own employer. But as is so often the case, this is written more like a thinly veiled rewrite of his staff profile than like an encyclopedia article, is referenced entirely to primary sources (an academic scholarship's own self-published list of its own recipients, his academic dissertation referenced to its presence in his alma mater's directory of its own students' academic dissertations, and the staff profile) with no evidence of any coverage about him in any reliable or independent sources, and says nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 16:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against redirection. czar 00:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Entirely unreferenced article that fails to demonstrate any notability, and contains nothing but a description of the product and what it does - nothing that might be considered to be encyclopedic content. In its current form it serves only to promote or publicise the product, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. Dorsetonian ( talk) 06:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This dental company fails WP:CORP notability standards. All the sources in the article are trivial coverage and that's all that comes up in a Google search. Adamant1 ( talk) 05:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
Ivoclar Vivadent received a page of coverage in the 1978 book Liechtenstein 1938–1978.
A 1994 article in the Associated Press said Ivoclar Vivadent is "a major player in the $4 billion global market for dentistry supplies", had sales of $400 million in 1993, and is "an example of highly specialized businesses that have made tiny Liechtenstein one of the world's most industrialized nations".
In 2008, The New York Times called Ivoclar Vivadent "the world's largest manufacturer of false teeth". A 2009 article in The New York Times said "in the production of dental ceramics (Ivoclar Vivadent, in the industrial region of Schaan, is the world’s top producer)".
A 2017 article in the Journal of Prosthodontics said, "Arguably, Ivoclar manufactured some of the most esthetic teeth of the late 20th century."
The "Liechtenstein" entry of the Worldmark Encyclopedia of Nations book published by Cengage said in Liechtenstein, "Among the most important domestic manufacturers are Hilti Corporation ...; Ivoclar-Vivadent, developer and distributor of well-regarded products for prosthetic, restorative, and preventive dentistry; ..."
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 06:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
An WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of how an sporting event went. DarthFlappy ( talk) 14:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 06:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable businessperson; fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. KidAd ( talk) 17:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find secondary coverage of her. I actually am the person who created the article back in 2009. I have since come to feel that we some of those past decisions were unwise. In this case Bateman had a second role in Mobsters and Mormons but I have not come up with any reliable source coverage so I think we are best off with scrapping the article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is a narrow but policy-supported consensus that the sources provided do not suffice to support notability for this subject. No prejudice against restoring to draft if further improvements can be made to overcome these objections. BD2412 T 01:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable person, Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, even the mentioned company is not on Wikipedia. The business person is only locally "known", the Stanford link is a generic set of interviews done in Estonia to record and archive local lives of locals (notable and non-notable people). One startup person among dozens of thousands. Article wrote by only one editor with an excessive promoting tone. Userland12 ( talk) 15:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Requested by subject. No.objection. A7 and g11 appear to apply. Spartaz Humbug! 05:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
This article was started before the requirements for company notability were enforced. External independent discussions about Deep Secure are cited in the current article, but there's really only one such report. The article has only ever been maintained by Deep Secure staff and this is unlikely to change, so the requirements for independence are unlikely to be met.
The article was tidied up recently, but that's the best that can be done and the view of the company is that the most appropriate action is to delete the article
.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to National Indoor Football League. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
No indication of meeting WP:GNG. I would suggest redirecting to National Indoor Football League, the league that this team played in. Searching online, I wasn't able to find any additional coverage. signed, Rosguill talk 23:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This team played in the NIFL and has sources from www.oursportscentral.com.......why would it be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 03:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Keep
Are you saying this team was not in the NIFL?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 03:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Another reference from the Houston Chronicle added https://www.chron.com/neighborhood/woodlands-sports/article/Garza-pleased-to-be-part-of-Conroe-Storm-s-success-1836727.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 04:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Article has been improved and new references included. Youtube videos included as well I again vote to keep.
FOX NEWS story on the San Antonio Steers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4cLieNtT6o
CBS NEWS story on the San Antonio Steers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4cLieNtT6o
Should suffice for additional coverage, along with other references to Keep the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 17:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Here is the CBS story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wADWzoCglWo&t=72s
I don't understand why it matters how many games the team played in this floundering league. The team played in the league before folding. 80% of the teams folded in 2007, the last year of the NIFL. The team did play in the league, why should the page be redirected as if it didn't exist?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Tucson_Mirage — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmja5 ( talk • contribs) 03:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Bearcat is harshly admonished for colluding in secret plots without inviting the rest of us. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passage of
WP:CREATIVE. The strongest notability claim here is that one of his films was screened at two minor film festivals and won an award at one of them, which is not an instant notability clincher all by itself in the absence of enough media coverage to clear
WP:GNG. As always, our notability criteria are not automatically passed by just any film award that happens to exist -- they look for top-level national film awards like the Oscars, the BAFTAs or the Canadian Screen Awards, and internationally prominent megafestivals on the order of Cannes, Berlin or TIFF, but every award presented by every small film festival on the planet is not in and of itself an instant exemption from having to have solid sources. But other than the glancing namechecks of his existence in the news article about the Beverly Hills Film Festival awards and a non-notable
blog's entry about the Canadian Filmmakers Festival's overall lineup, neither of which are about him strongly enough to clinch passage of GNG if they're the best sources that can be found, this is otherwise referenced entirely to directly affiliated
primary sources (his own website, IMDB, the self-published website of the CFF, the Canadian Film and Television Producers Association and GoodReads) which are not support for notability at all. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.
Also
conflict of interest, as the article was created by an editor whose username matched the name of the subject's own production shingle.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This earthquake is lacking notability Wykx ( talk) 22:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No notability whatsoever. In a WP:BEFORE search, I found he used to have a MySpace page with 31 whole followers and a one-sentence mention in an article here. That's it. Kbabej ( talk) 22:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Simply asserting that GNG is met is worthless without actually pointing to sources. Merely being a film director or producer does not automatically put one over the GNG line sans sources. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a film industry worker, not reliably sourced as passing any part of WP:CREATIVE. The only notability claim stated here at all is that he and the films he's worked on exist, which is not an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of any reliable source coverage in media to establish the significance of his work -- but of the eight citations here five are to IMDb, two are to other IMDb-like directories, and the only one that comes from an actual media outlet is a Q&A interview with somebody else in which Rajeev Barnwal is the interviewer -- which means even that source is not about him for the purposes of helping to establish his notability. People do not get over our inclusion rules just because you can show them as the bylined creator of media coverage about other things -- they require sources in which they're the subject of media coverage created by other people. And as for his filmography, he was a "set cashier", not a performer or filmmaker, in the first film listed, and an unnamed bit part actor in the second, so those two films have nothing whatsoever to do with establishing his notability -- and while the other two films listed are potentially more significant, simply having screenwriting and directing credits still isn't an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of much better sourcing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 21:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
The subject does not have any notability. Most of the sources are from a non-notable, defunct website he used to be editor-in-chief of, and the others aren't much better. He was nominated for a local award once, again in relation to the defunct website, and then wrote a book that didn't get press coverage. In a WP:BEFORE search, there's a blog with an interview, so not considered a RS, and then a NY Sun article where he once held a party on a subway car. Not enough to pass GNG. Kbabej ( talk) 21:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not seeing anything in the keep votes to indicate GNG or nfooty pass. Fenix down ( talk) 22:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 20:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NDIRECTOR. The one reference is just incidental coverage, cannot find SIGCOV, is really noted for one play that is not well known Rogermx ( talk) 20:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find enough to support WP:GNG Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk 20:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Article about a short film, not making or reliably sourcing any strong claim to passage of WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- the notability test for films requires some evidence of the film's significance, such as noteworthy film awards or demonstrable attention from film critics. But the only notability claim even being attempted here is that the film exists, and the only reference is a Q&A interview in which the filmmaker is talking about his own overall body of work in the first person, which briefly mentions this film without being about this film to any non-trivial degree. Simply put, a film requires better sourcing than this to clear the bar. Bearcat ( talk) 20:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
promotional article that needs to be nuked from orbit, sourced entirely to gossipy, spammy unreliable sources. Praxidicae ( talk) 20:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Maggie & Bianca: Fashion Friends. MBisanz talk 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable actress MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 20:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mitre 10 Dream Home. MBisanz talk 23:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Season itself is not notable as the ten seasons before it aren't. Low level sourcing, definitely not substantial enough for its own article and series is already summarised on the parent article. This was a PROD and after the seven days was it up it redirected to Mitre 10 Dream Home only to be swifted reverted back. Ajf773 ( talk) 20:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Non notable lawyer. MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 20:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Non-notable and a COI product to boot. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable musician, could be speedy deleted in my opinion XFD to get the community's opinion. MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 19:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
https://open.spotify.com/artist/4lXFW8KajROcgbyce4m0Ix?si=icR_Lo9EQA6JLnm39RRSbg
https://www.instagram.com/officialshesha
https://www.facebook.com/officialSHESHA
https://twitter.com/OfficialSHESHA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarveshvara99 ( talk • contribs) 08:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
One album as a leader, a few as a sideman. Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Joanne Jordan (talent agent)#Central Talent Booking as an appropiate alternative to deletion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 01:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable company. Not finding anything besides mentions-in-passing for this company. None of the existing citations are valid links; no searches of the relevant publications' archives brings up any hits. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The abstract notes:
I do not have access to the full text of the source, which had already been used in the Wikipedia article.The article focuses on the effort of Central Talent Booking owner Joanna Jordan to book a broad range of celebrities on television shows in the U.S. It relates that Jordan has been an in-house talent booker for the television show "Jimmy Kimmel Live." It offers information on her techniques in working such as reading the trades and watching the morning news shows at six in the morning and at 10a.m., she gathers her staff for a meeting.
Writing in The Independent, journalist Emma Brockes called Jordan "one of New York's most respected talent bookers".
Variety's Tatiana Siegel said Jordan "is considered one of the industry's premier bookers".
In a 2008 article, TV Guide referred to Jordan as the "force behind" the "I'm F-ing Ben Affleck" video.
In this AfD, my position is to rename the article to be about the talent agent (Joanne Jordan) instead of to be about the talent agency (Central Talent Booking) as the sources are more about the person rather the company. Wikipedia:Notability (people) applies instead of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). My rewrite provides the basis for the rename.
The result was redirect to Aziza Mustafa Zadeh. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 20:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Difficult to find sources which are not promotional. Questionable notability. Vmavanti ( talk) 18:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
The result was redirect to Beer bread. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any sources for this. Possible neologism or hoax. CJK09 ( talk) 18:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable rapper with no coverage, only claim of significance is a non notable award. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:G11, likely undisclosed paid editing. Author blocked. – bradv 🍁 18:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
another paid for spam article, sourced entirely to fake news outlets run by blackhat seo firms (which i've removed), littered with fake claims of notability that cannot be verified by independent sources. Praxidicae ( talk) 18:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Aziza Mustafa Zadeh. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 00:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Unsourced since 2009. Not notable. Vmavanti ( talk) 23:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Are we sure this is a real rivalry? p b p 17:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Biography of a person who doesn't appear to be the subject of significant coverage in independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Why delete it, it does no good to the of motivating young women powerlifting in India, this may seem like a small decision but let it be known this could be costly to the next generation of women powerlifters in India :/ Anthonytownley333 ( talk) 18:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable musician, the only independent content about him is his escape from prison, which isn't notable. Praxidicae ( talk) 17:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No coverage except a few articles relating to the departure of Jennifer Morgan, where he's only briefly mentioned. No other evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Article appears to have been created as an SEO attempt. At best merge to company's article. JamesG5 ( talk) 17:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Strong keep: CEO of a 150bn DAX company with plenty of coverage in German news.-- Dewritech ( talk) 18:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Stong keep: I've created this page in order to start a page for the CEO of one of the biggest European software companies. It was really strange to enter the company article in English Wikipedia and to see the red link of the CEO's name. I tried to find some info except the official announcements, but seems that there is no much info and facts available - the guy graduated and started in SAP some 20 years ago and have grown to CEO position without switching to other companies. I hope in the future the community will help gather news, info, biography which might be useful for Wikipedia users searching for quality info about known companies and their people. If the article is not deleted I can try to spend some time to reach and get approval for use of photo and press release info about the CEO to be used in Wikipedia. @ JamesG5: // Alexgs ( talk) 08:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface.The inundation of Wikipedia with only IMDb sourced content (we are probably that site's biggest supporter) does not give the presumption of notability. When Wikipedia was a fledgling encyclopedia we gave greater latitude. At a point it is responsible to back up content with reliable sources that support claims of notability, especially concerning BLP's. It is one thing to have a poorly sourced yet notable topic, but an unsourced career stub BLP, that is less than a dictionary entry with an embedded list of a filmography section, backed by a source "generally" considered unreliable (placed in an "External links section), presenting "less" than we would consider as a pseudo biography, fails our current notability guidelines as well as more than one policy. Asserting reliable sources exists is easy to state but we need significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources to advance notability. Otr500 ( talk) 11:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Unref article on recently deceased person. Succesful, but doesn't meet
WP:PROF or
WP:GNG.
Boleyn (
talk)
17:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:G11, most likely undisclosed paid editing. – bradv 🍁 18:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This NGO is not notable enough and therefore fails GNG MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 17:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Apart from being Kangana Ranaut's sister, she is not known to media. Notability is not inherited. Brihaspati (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. – bradv 🍁 17:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This article or section may have been copied and pasted from ( http://www.halkisummit.com/speakers/rev-dn-irakli-jinjolava), possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please find the CopyVios report. Amkgp ( talk) 10:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I have just added a redirect for this page for an acronym, but the whole page looks a bit spammy (and the links to it). The only citation was a bare url to the home page of this person: https://enricomassetti.com/my-patents-enricos-inventions/ And Google finds absolutely nothing except copies of the Wikipedia article. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 07:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Appear to be a non-notable pianist with no significant coverage in reliable sources. GSS 💬 03:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing requirements for companies are more stringent Spartaz Humbug! 05:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
The article is about a company that lacks depth of coverage and reliability of sourcing that is required to establish notability. The sources presented are either press releases or closely authored, broadly about the topic of workforce management without mentioning the company/product or just contain "workforce software" as phrase, again without being about the company. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, seems WP:PEACOCKy. Majavah ( t/ c) 14:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
non-notable pipe band. Ostrichyearning3 ( talk) 16:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
This negative attitude does not only affect Field Marshal Haig's Own Pipes & Drums (further: FMHOP&D), but also many other similar non-competition bands and is endangering the spirit of comradeship within the pîpeband world.
Furthermore, the person proposing the deletion has obviously no serious knowledge about the pipeband scene in Flanders(Belgium) in general and even less about the hard work the small number of specific remembrance pipebands in Flanders, the Netherlands and France are doing on this subject. This is not meant as a personal attack, but does question the authority on the subject and, as a result of that, the justification of the proposal.
In the case of FMHOP&D, the list of, often voluntary and unpaid, involvements and initiatives in the remembrance of the Great War, and, to a lesser extent, of WW2 and other conflicts, is long, especially during the Great War Centenary years Furthermore, the tradition of pipe bands in the Great War was an extremely strong one, trying to wipe out the importance of remembering the legacy of these men is rather ignorant.
One can only wonder what the real motivations behind such a move are. IMHO, it's not to an individual, or even part of the pipe band scene, to decide which aspects (i.e. competition bands) are important and which not. If there is a doubt if entries about pipebands should be included on Wikipedia, then all articles (including those about competition bands)should be removed. Wikipedia should not be shaped according to the interests of one person or faction, but has to be aimed about making (as complete as possible) information available to everyone. Obansinglemalt ( talk) 23:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Summarizing: a) the argument "non-notable" is personal and non-rational (to put it mildly) b) not only the entry for "Field Marshal Haig's Own Pipes & Drums" should be maintained, but also these of the all the other pipebands, proposed for deletion on the list of Ostrichyearning3, mentioned as "non-notable", as this argument doesn't comply with the policy of Wikipedia, which is aiming for, neutral, non-biased articles c)the person who tries to initiate the deletion is not qualified on the specific subject of pipebands in Flanders/BelgiumObansinglemalt (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obansinglemalt (talk • contribs) 19:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. And salt. Sandstein 21:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Encountered this as a new page reviewer. This article was previously deleted and in recent months has been moved in and out of mainspace and draft space as its creator seems determined to run with it despite it not being accepted at AfC. It categorically fails WP: ARCHITECT in my view, and the sources are mainly to a single design competition that the subject entered and did not win. In view of the clear notability fail and the creator’s insistence I’d suggest delete and salt. Mccapra ( talk) 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG without a sufficient number of independent and in-depth sources about the subject himself. User:Namiba 14:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 14:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Does not meet current standard at WP:NCORP. The sources are mere notices. DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
To ensure the original submission would be appropriately written and sourced, I tried to follow other entries in the ticket resale category -- /info/en/?search=StubHub, /info/en/?search=SeatGeek, /info/en/?search=TicketsNow, /info/en/?search=TicketIQ. The original submission followed StubHub and SeatGeek, including more robust citations, but those were deleted for being too promotional. Now there are fewer citations (similar to TicketsNow and TicketsIQ) which affects Notability. I am eager to fix the Vivid Seats entry to make it more appropriate for Wikipedia. I just need help better deciphering some of the edits and input, which sometimes conflict. It also would be helpful to know why this submission is being considered for deletion when no others the Ticket Sales Companies category are under similar consideration, including entries with similar citations. Please help me understand the best way to proceed.Jody Venturoni 17:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jventuroni ( talk • contribs)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
From the guideline at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Publicly traded corporations (my bolding):
S&P Global noted in an analyst report in 2016: "We view Vivid Seats' business risk profile as weak. Our assessment is based on the competitive secondary ticket market; Vivid Seat's relatively weak brand awareness, despite the low brand loyalty featured in this market; and the company's lack of distinctive or differentiating products versus its main competitors. However, Vivid Seats benefits from strong relationships with professional ticket brokers, and it has been able to gain market shares from competitors while maintaining an EBITDA margin in the low-20% rate--in line with its closest peers. Our assessment also reflects the company's minimal international presence, limited diversity of products, and smaller scale relative to industry leader Stubhub."sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above. Examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports. Accordingly, article authors should make sure to seek out such coverage and add references to such articles to properly establish notability.
Moody's Investor Service noted in an analyst report in 2016, "Moody's also considers into the ratings Vivid Seats' solid market position in the online secondary ticket market, operating as the number three player behind, StubHub, owned by eBay, Inc., and Ticketmaster, owned by Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Vivid Seats benefits from a diverse base of sellers, including season ticket holders and professional brokers who purchase tickets in bulk from primary issuers, and then use Vivid Seats' marketplace platform to resell tickets to consumers. While Vivid Seats' market share continues to grow rapidly, its competitors' greater financial resources, which includes the ability to subsidize pricing with other lines of business, or the entry of other large e-commerce providers could pressure pricing or increase marketing costs."
The result was redirect to Aziza Mustafa Zadeh. MBisanz talk 23:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not notable. Unsourced since 2009. Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Vmavanti ( talk) 23:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Non notable subject - majority of the content is unsourced and there's nothing on Google News, Fails NOTGUIDE, (to some extent NOTDIR) and GNG – Davey2010 Talk 13:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSEASONS as it was the sixth tier of Australian football which is way too low to be deemed professional or even semi-professional. HawkAussie ( talk) 12:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 13:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
non notable musician with 0 independent sources and no in depth coverage. Praxidicae ( talk) 12:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. There are multiple subsets of the notability criteria under which this individual could be assessed, but the consensus here seems to be that he doesn't meet any of them. Yunshui 雲 水 13:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Not notable. Candidates are not generally notable per WP:NPOL and not seeing anything else to make him notable. Should he be elected he would be notable Gbawden ( talk) 12:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Reviewed under new article curation / review process. No indication of wp:notability. The sources given are just listings on websites. I hate to say it but this is a missing person report rather than an encyclopedia article and am just trying to do my job properly bringing it to AFD. North8000 ( talk) 11:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G11 as per previous versions of the article which had been extensively spammed across various titles. User also blocked now as a promotional only account. Nick ( talk) 14:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Subject of article is a non notable musician that falls short of WP:MUSICBIO & general notability guidelines hence does not satisfy WP:GNG either. This article has been deleted & re-created almost three times now under different names. Celestina007 ( talk) 10:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Per WP:LISTPEOPLE - The list of finalists is already available on the show's article. Most names do not satisfy the WP:BLP requirements thus do not have inherited notability. There is no need for such low level profiling on a separate list. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
I also think it should be deleted. She isn't noteworthy according to the Wikipedia guidelines. Nearly half the article is about the Portland home debacle, which is a word-for-word copy of the same section in Kevin Rose's article. I added a PROD, but it was removed by a moderator. I added a deletion nomination tag to the article. If a registered user could create the article's deletion discussion page, I'd appreciate it. 104.190.186.102 ( talk) 08:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC) created for above signed IP user, using comment left on Talk:Darya Rose. ~ GB fan 09:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was merge to Christmas Island#Demographics. There seems to be notable content here but no firm argument this can't sit within the overarching article Spartaz Humbug! 05:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I can't find any sources about the women on Christmas Island specifically, and the article is referenced only to a now defunct website of a Christmas Island Women's Association, and to a news piece about an event celebrating 8 March on the island. But that's not surprising given that the island has fewer than 2,000 inhabitants altogether. – Uanfala (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 00:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability that warrants a separate article for every single work of the author. There is no meaningful content in this article that cannot be covered in the article of the corresponding author. Mopswade ( talk) 09:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. There is no meaningful content in this article that cannot be covered in the article of the corresponding author. Mopswade ( talk) 08:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN and WP:V. Störm (talk) 08:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No non-primary sources available as far as I see. The article has essentially no content and references. Mopswade ( talk) 08:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLP and the person described is not notable. Not to mention the poorly written content as well. Mopswade ( talk) 08:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I agree with Fenix down towards the end of the discussion: the case for deletion seems to be stronger than the case for keeping, but it is with a few exceptions so poorly articulated here, with most "delete" opinions making no understandable argument, that I can't find a consensus for deletion. Sandstein 08:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Uh... Is nobody going to explain this? The previous discussion originally nominated by @ GiantSnowman where he provided some valid and reasonable, albeit a little flawed, arguments that received a no consensus vote somehow because the creator of the article, who hasn't even edited in THREE YEARS!!! somehow argued that the article was meritable because it receives decent coverage by news sources (the reason why is obviously that there is a bunch of U.S.-centric soccer news sites that are more than happy to write articles about about American coaches who go abroad because most of them rarely coach outside the United States) and that it isn't a list, but a prose with a table, which is basically every single featured list ever.
As an American myself, I hate it when people unnecessarily fancruft or circlejerk about their or favorite club or country's footballing endeavors, especially the country of my origin. Plus, everything in this "prose and table" is already covered in each person's biography. Kinda surprising how there aren't any articles about English managers of foreign national football teams or French managers of foreign national football teams. This article obviously fails WP:GNG, WP:LISTCRUFT, and WP:ARTN. Do I need to go on any longer? KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 17:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
A set of "Place"s, all in the forests of northern California, all of them single (or no) buildings, all of them GNIS dumps, and none of which has any evidence of being an actual settlement. These are rather difficult to search since they crank out false hits for several reasons, but I got nothing for any of them except for one "cemetery" reference on Find-a-Grave for a single burial. There are a lot of "Place"s in California, and nominating the lot in a single shot is too likely to get procedural resistance, but I really don't want to crank through fifty or so single nominations that are all the same. Mangoe ( talk) 02:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
The other nominees in this group are:
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 06:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of a settlement here. Appears to be a mine-related mill. – dlthewave ☎ 01:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 00:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a journalist, not reliably sourced as passing our notability standards for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their staff profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers offer technical verification that they exist -- to be notable enough for inclusion here, a journalist has to be the subject of coverage in sources other than his own employer. But as is so often the case, this is written more like a thinly veiled rewrite of his staff profile than like an encyclopedia article, is referenced entirely to primary sources (an academic scholarship's own self-published list of its own recipients, his academic dissertation referenced to its presence in his alma mater's directory of its own students' academic dissertations, and the staff profile) with no evidence of any coverage about him in any reliable or independent sources, and says nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 16:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against redirection. czar 00:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Entirely unreferenced article that fails to demonstrate any notability, and contains nothing but a description of the product and what it does - nothing that might be considered to be encyclopedic content. In its current form it serves only to promote or publicise the product, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. Dorsetonian ( talk) 06:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
This dental company fails WP:CORP notability standards. All the sources in the article are trivial coverage and that's all that comes up in a Google search. Adamant1 ( talk) 05:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
Ivoclar Vivadent received a page of coverage in the 1978 book Liechtenstein 1938–1978.
A 1994 article in the Associated Press said Ivoclar Vivadent is "a major player in the $4 billion global market for dentistry supplies", had sales of $400 million in 1993, and is "an example of highly specialized businesses that have made tiny Liechtenstein one of the world's most industrialized nations".
In 2008, The New York Times called Ivoclar Vivadent "the world's largest manufacturer of false teeth". A 2009 article in The New York Times said "in the production of dental ceramics (Ivoclar Vivadent, in the industrial region of Schaan, is the world’s top producer)".
A 2017 article in the Journal of Prosthodontics said, "Arguably, Ivoclar manufactured some of the most esthetic teeth of the late 20th century."
The "Liechtenstein" entry of the Worldmark Encyclopedia of Nations book published by Cengage said in Liechtenstein, "Among the most important domestic manufacturers are Hilti Corporation ...; Ivoclar-Vivadent, developer and distributor of well-regarded products for prosthetic, restorative, and preventive dentistry; ..."
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy ( talk) 06:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
An WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of how an sporting event went. DarthFlappy ( talk) 14:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 06:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable businessperson; fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. KidAd ( talk) 17:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find secondary coverage of her. I actually am the person who created the article back in 2009. I have since come to feel that we some of those past decisions were unwise. In this case Bateman had a second role in Mobsters and Mormons but I have not come up with any reliable source coverage so I think we are best off with scrapping the article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is a narrow but policy-supported consensus that the sources provided do not suffice to support notability for this subject. No prejudice against restoring to draft if further improvements can be made to overcome these objections. BD2412 T 01:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable person, Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, even the mentioned company is not on Wikipedia. The business person is only locally "known", the Stanford link is a generic set of interviews done in Estonia to record and archive local lives of locals (notable and non-notable people). One startup person among dozens of thousands. Article wrote by only one editor with an excessive promoting tone. Userland12 ( talk) 15:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)