Fails WP:NMUSIC, not enough coverage from reliable sources to warrant a standalone article. This also appears to be an autobiography, and it was deleted at a prior AfD a couple of months ago. CycloneYoris talk! 23:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The only coverage that I can find are announcements about the company from Dayton, Ohio sources which fails WP:CORP, including WP:AUD. A company that performs there is at AfD as well - Human Race Theatre Company. SL93 ( talk) 23:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The only coverage that I can find are announcements about the company from Dayton, Ohio sources which fails WP:CORP, including WP:AUD. SL93 ( talk) 23:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Questionable notability per WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Note that this appears to be a rewrite of a declined draft about the same organization by the same author: Draft:Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC). The same issues regarding formal tone appropriate for an encyclopedia noted as problematic in the declined draft seem to afflict this version. Geoff | Who, me? 22:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
She is an author of a sole short story; that story is notable (see pl:CyberJoly Drim which I just expanded; it won awards in Poland and was subject to literary criticism) - but she herself has not done anything else to merit a stand-alone article in an encyclopedia. This article should redirect to her short story article, once it is created on en wiki, per WP:NOTINHERITED, for now it could be soft-deleted by redirecting to the page about most notable award that her story got ( Janusz A. Zajdel Award per WP:ATD-R. I'll add I've done extensive BEFORE while expanding article about her story on pl wiki and I cannot find anything that discusses her outside the analysis of her short story; the few biographical information we have about her come from a short bio note on a page of a publishing company she works or worked for at some point. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
after reviewing Her achievements in the article I think it should remain with improvements. Yakov-kobi ( talk) 19:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
After conducting a WP:BEFORE search, it seems to me that this actor/producer does not meet either the general notability guideline or notability guideline on entertainers. DanCherek ( talk) 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
18:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
22:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
A film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Of the included sources, the only one that is a full length review is not from a reliable source. The rest are just small blurbs that could not really be considered a full review. Searches using both names the film was released under did not turn up any kind of coverage or reviews in reliable sources that would indicate being able to pass WP:NFILM. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Early !voters - please review and comment on the greatly expanded sourcing and content added since the AfD was opened. Thanks!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
22:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
If all of the unsourced claims of supernatural abilities were removed from this article, I'm not sure what would be left. Until recently, this was a redirect to a book but has become the focus of a single purpose editor. Counterfeit Purses ( talk) 21:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The title of the article is "Anthony J. Resta discography, however very little of it is actually about anything Resta recorded himself. Instead it's a WP:COATRACK of everything he's ever been involved with in some manner, however minor the connection. I've looked this over for 40 minutes trying to think of what I could remove and keep but it's so much that I am failing at it. This discography article is almost all puffery and should be WP:TNTed and redone from scratch in an appropriate manner. Iggy pop goes the weasel ( talk) 21:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This does not appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm nominating this page for deletion again because the initial discussion lacked sufficient engagement and the sources provided were inadequate in both quality and quantity. There's a notable absence of substantial coverage of Imre Vallyon, his work, or his organisation in multiple reliable secondary sources. Meeting notability criteria typically requires presenting at least three such sources. The article from Stuff, while primarily focused on his legal issues, appears to be the only source that meets these criteria. Without it, the page is mostly information sourced by primary sources and a list of his self published books and ebooks.
In terms of Vallyon's notability as a writer, the two book reviews presented by Oaktree b in the previous discussion are clearly poor sources, as they seem to be paid content from freelance writers on unreliable websites. Additionally, Vallyon does not meet the criteria for notability as a criminal according to Wikipedia guidelines on crime perpetrators, despite the only significant coverage of him focusing on his legal issues. His organisation, FHL, does not seem to meet the notability standards either. Ynsfial ( talk) 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
1. Is Vallyon notable as an author? Only a few reliable sources have covered Vallyon’s works. Thus, he is not notable under WP:GNG.
2. Is Vallyon a notable criminal? Vallyon also fails WP:PERPETRATOR. A criminal is only notable if the media in many countries have covered their crimes or if the crimes were historic or major. There has been coverage of his legal issues, but it may not be enough to meet these standards.
3. Is there reliable coverage? To strengthen the argument, we rely on you, the editors and contributors, to provide sources that can offer an in-depth study of Vallyon’s life and work or his crimes.
4. Is there community consensus? The ongoing debate and non-consensus closure of previous discussions highlight the urgency of a closer review of the sources and arguments, mainly regarding their differing viewpoints. Everyone's input is crucial in this process.
In short, the coverage does not explore his works or crimes. If the consensus favors retention due to his criminal history, the article must meet WP:BLP. It is our collective duty to ensure that it remains neutral and relies on proper sources.-- AstridMitch ( talk) 19:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
AstridMitch, I struggled to follow your logic, to be honest. For example, per WP:PERPETRATOR, his crimes were covered in New Zealand and Germany, which constitutes international media coverage. Additionally, he has followers and organized groups in many countries, indicating an impact that clearly extends beyond one region or even country. Moreover, the "no consensus" closure doesn't highlight any urgency as you incorrectly claimed. This is simply not true and there is no urgency here unless it may be urgent for you. Regarding the reliable coverage argument, I didn't understand your point. Overall, your comment resembles an emotional appeal to editors' collective consciousness (also beyond my logic in terms of Wikipedia's rules) rather than providing clear arguments.-- 50.46.167.81 ( talk) 07:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
In addition to being a prolific and frequently published writer who meets WP:GNG, he is notable as a spiritual influencer or "cult leader" (arguably) with large groups of followers in several countries. He wouldn't have been covered by major media outlets in New Zealand and Europe if he were just a child molester. The point is that he was active as a philosopher and "school leader" who organized large international groups of followers, which then caught media attention. They described him as an influencer, a child molester, and a convicted felon. Therefore, I suggest adding "spiritual influencer" or "Spiritual teacher" to the definition, as supported by sources on his page. 50.46.167.81 ( talk) 04:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Created by a sock. Significant coverage happened only when this incident took place. Since then there has been news about investigations but it does not have a lasting impact Srijanx22 ( talk) 17:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Only coverage happened was actually from a couple of news outlets during June 2022 - August 2022. No coverage since. Fails WP:NOTNEWS. Srijanx22 ( talk) 17:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This is an article about an investment company that does not meet notability. The company has one notable product in cPanel through acquisition. The sourcing in the article is what looks like a regurgitated press release, a definite press release and a link to Oakley Captial which is just their web site and no mention of WebPros. I cannot find any coverage to establish notability, only more press releases. Whpq ( talk) 17:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Ambra played 164 minutes at lower Italian club of AlbinoLeffe and does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Futbol Portal is a rumor about his potential transfer to Premier League followed by interview analysis. Zahori is an interview. SME is an interview but I can't access due to paywall. Neither of these count towards significant coverage. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 17:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Nominated as WP:SIGCOV are virtually non-existent bar store pages. Sources consists of WP:PRIMARY (website and social media sites). Other third party sources center itself on Signor Alonso. WP:ATD will be a redirect into Fernando Alonso. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 17:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources, and many of the references presently used are non-RS, unfit for a BLP. toweli ( talk) 17:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Same as previous AfD (Possibly malware, few and unreliable sources, written somewhat like an ad) – The Sharpest Lives ( 💬• ✏️• ℹ️) ( ping me!) 16:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTGENEALOGY. No significant coverage in reliable sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm not seeing enough WP:SIGCOV for this goalkeeper that only played in 3 professional games. While searching for Gerald/Gerard D'Mello, I found Deccan Herald, Herald Goa, Navhind Times and Telegraph India, all of which are passing mentions. If this article is kept, we should consider moving it to 'Gerard D'Mello' as this seems to be a more popular spelling. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 16:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Potentially fails WP:GNG here. I have searched Albanian sources and found nothing better than Panorama, a passing mention about a disciplinary issue. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Only secondary sources in the article and found during WP:BEFORE check are match reports with surface level coverage of the subject. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 16:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
"they have achieved success in a major international competition at the highest level", that of being top scorer in the U17 Euro qualifying, as subjectively the U17 Euros are the highest level of competition at that age range, though I can understand how this is intended for senior competitions only, as well as only a guide to likelihood of notability, as opposed to notability itself. Either way, it wouldn't be too much of a loss if the page get's deleted, as I suspect there will be SIGCOV soon enough for it to return. It would be unfortunate for an active WSL player to have their page deleted, but based on policy/coverage it'd be understandable. I can only assume it's age-related as to why there isn't further coverage, given she would be one of the very few WSL players to have scored a league goal and not have an article. CNC ( talk) 16:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to confirm its existence. I found information on a town of this name in Mali, near Mauritania, but we shouldn't keep this if we can't verify it. Boleyn ( talk) 16:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to add to show it exists. Boleyn ( talk) 15:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to confirm it exists. Refs in other language WP articles didn't lead anywhere. Boleyn ( talk) 15:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG / WP:GNG. There are the different universities as possible WP:ATDs, but none of them are obvious targets. Boleyn ( talk) 15:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 15:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
A WP:BEFORE search failed to find any significant coverage of this biography article to meet WP:NBASIC. The most I could find were blog reviews of his books and interviews, which fail the threshold of significant independent sourcing. -1ctinus📝 🗨 15:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Embassies are not inherently notable, consulates even less so. This one fails WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 14:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 14:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Found this while looking through orphans. A WP:BEFORE Fails to come up with any reviews or charts besides programming blogs. Even reviews linked on the author's website lacks anything for WP:NBOOK. -1ctinus📝 🗨 14:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
As much as it pains me to nominate my electronic rodent brethren (lol) for deletion, I was unable to find any sources other than the one I added yesterday while searching — it also does not provide significant coverage of the subject. The band fails the notability guideline for musicians. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 18:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Two
WP:TOOSOON lists of entirely redlinked films by presumed future release dates, referenced entirely to subscriber-locked directory entries in an internal industry "films in the production pipeline" database rather than
reliable sources. To be fair, the United States does already have lists for both of these years, so I can't argue that we never let lists of films exist this far into the future -- but the US lists comprise films that (a) already have Wikipedia articles to link to under
WP:NFF provisions, and (b) already have
WP:GNG-worthy sources present to support the presumed release dates, neither of which are on offer here.
These can both be recreated in 2025, 2026 or 2027 when there's reliable sourcing to support listing bluelinked films, but we don't already need either of them now if they're only using
primary sources to support red links.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I can only find sources and content unduly taking about mastaba. If there should be ATD, then redirect. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 12:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Promotional also. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 12:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This phrase has no significance separable from Kamala Harris#Public image. It is mentioned by some reliable sources, but the articles are not actually about this particular phrase, they are about her public image/memes in general. A redirect or merge would be more appropriate. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 12:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep, per WP:SNOW. jp× g 🗯️ 10:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This list is just getting bigger and bigger. It appears to violet "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of facts". Georgia guy ( talk) 12:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose and speedy close. I don't see why this deletion nomination was ever brought up in the first place. Other pages exist for
List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, a
List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign political endorsements, and a 2024 version for both of them, and they're all equally long. We have pages going back several election cycles solely for endorsement purposes, and it's common practice to list notable endorsements on literally every single federal and state campaign if there's enough notable individuals. The whole reason there's a whole page for president is because it would take up too much room on the main page. There is quite literally no argument in favor of this.
Flames675 (
talk)
12:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 12:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
AI-generated, largely unsourced duplicate of 2024 Bangladesh quota reform movement. Parts that are cited appear to have had their citations tacked on after the fact, so verifiability is pretty doubtful. Not suitable for WP:BLAR as the editorializing title is not a reasonable redirect. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 11:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The 2006 AfD nomination calling this original research was obviously correct on the merits. Unlike other comparison articles, for which there is often good sourcing (as niche publications may have deep dives within a topic area), this only compares two products, almost exclusively with primary sources that only mention one of the products. Mach61 11:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. None of the mentioned buildings are notable by itself and aren't fulfilling GNG. No SIGCOV for the list article alone. Also, WP:NOTDIR. The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Nothing that would qualify under the general notability guideline. Lots of problems with inadequate sourcing and WP:NOR. GuardianH ( talk) 07:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
08:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
09:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTV. M S Hassan ( talk | contributions) 08:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The article lacks of WP:GNG, since it is a project of cloud infrastructure in grid computing with little overall impact and very few available sources, mostly self-published sources of the authors of this project. It seems there are a few other project-related articles that are related to the Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI) of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences that seem to lack considerably WP:GNG as well. Recently, other related articles have been already deleted: [13] and [14]. The targetted articles, like this nomination, GUSE, and the deleted article of MTA SZTAKI Laboratory of Parallel and Distributed Systems, were all created by the same user many years ago. Chiserc ( talk) 07:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The article lacks of WP:GNG, since it is a project of cloud infrastructure with little overall impact. It seems there are a few other project-related articles that are related to the Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI) of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences that seem to lack considerably WP:GNG as well. Recently, other related articles have been already deleted: [15], and [16]. Chiserc ( talk) 07:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:DEL#8: Doesn't meet GNG, WP:NSPORTS or WP:NMOTORSPORT. Nobody ( talk) 07:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
should be deleted due to the lack of significant independent coverage that meets the General Notability Guideline (GNG), relying instead on primary sources, company related news and not significant mentions. LusikSnusik ( talk) 10:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
07:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Only two sources, which do not appear to qualify as SIGCOV. There does not seem to be a justification based on notability as on why this episode should have a separate article (i.e. it could also be redirected to South Park (season 2). Stanley Joseph Wilkins ( talk) 05:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This appears to be the only such list of trips made by the US president to a specific state. Cannot see how it meets the criteria at WP:NLIST. AusLondonder ( talk) 05:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Nominated on pl wiki for deletion as spam with possible hoax elements ( pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2024:07:17:ESNA European Higher Education News). It also seems to fail WP:NORG/ WP:GNG. My BEFORE finds next to zero visiblity for this entity in GS/GB. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Technical closure as you cannot nominate article for deletion that are currently featured on the main page. Schwede 66 04:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Not news, too soon, presentism, WP:NOPAGE might sum it up. Qwirkle ( talk) 04:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Created by a single purpose editor. Google news comes up with a different person, and google books comes up with 1 line mentions of this person. Fails WP:ARTIST. LibStar ( talk) 04:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
It is not the first time that they have paired up to write the definitive book on aspects of South African art and artists- that is, the books Hobbs has written are known as the "definitive work" on the subject. I'm confident there will also be biographical information on her available in South African newspapers. -- asilvering ( talk) 04:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT, only primary sources provided. Nothing found when searching ["Mark Carlson" speedway] LibStar ( talk) 03:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article for a company that fails WP:NCORP. All sources are WP:ORGTRIV (routine coverage of market entries, financing, awards, etc.), WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (interviews, self-published materials), or otherwise unreliable sources. WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing validating notability. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 14:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
Joe (
talk)
17:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To see if there is any editor response to the source analysis presented.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
03:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT, only primary sources provided. Nothing found when searching ["Henry Long " speedway] LibStar ( talk) 03:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable award. References are all announcements of winners and the majority are unreliable, falling under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. A WP:BEFORE was unable to locate significant coverage that talks about the reward itself. CNMall41 ( talk) 03:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I initially WP:PRODed this with the following rationale "Non-notable, defunct retailer. None of the current sources are actual coverage of the company in reliable sources, merely being things such as database listing or user generated content like reviews. Searching for sources under both the "ZipZoomfly" and "Googlegear" names did not turn up any coverage in reliable sources." An IP user contacted me on my Talk page requesting to contest the PROD with this rationale: "ZipZoomFly.com aka GoogleGear.com was an important part of early internet history and a popular place to shop before newegg was founded. The lawsuit between them and google.com (alphabet) was a noteworthy case of parody vs trademark. The page is worth keeping because their are lessons to be learned from it's downfall." I don't agree that reasoning is sufficient to address the sourcing issues that keep this company from passing the WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, but since the PROD was contested, I am moving it to AFD for discussion instead. Rorshacma ( talk) 20:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
03:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Lack of notability established with WP:RS Amigao ( talk) 03:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 02:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Redirect to 1966 World Cup team. Simione001 ( talk) 02:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 02:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
No notability shown, no unrelated refs showing notability Naraht ( talk) 02:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Errol Musk is not in any way notable independent of his relation to Elon Musk. He ran for public office, but was never elected, but was only elected once to a local city council, he was an engineer, but didn't do anything of note. There is nothing about him is notable other than that he was the father of Elon Musk.
Ergzay (
talk)
01:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
He ran for public office, but was never electedThat's actually not correct, he was elected in '72 and served until the 80s. His 1983 resignation was front page news. Feoffer ( talk) 05:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Ergzay ( talk) 00:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, categories, lists, article titles and drafts.
Why should anyone care that Errol claimed that Elon upgraded his home security system?
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
06:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as there is still no consensus. Of interest, is
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musk family (2nd nomination) and
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Musk. I don't think that this article can be moved to
Errol Musk as that page has an extensive page history that shouldn't be deleted, there could be issues with attribution.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article was previously deleted in 2013 after an AfD. Recreated in 2020. I don't see any reason to dispute the result of that AfD; there is still little in-depth coverage cited on this page. Outside of the Supreme Court case (which appears to have been sparsely covered), the only coverage is a few mentions from minor trade publications. I tried looking for more on Google, but all I could find were press releases. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 02:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm not finding any sources discussing these games as a group, which are only connected by a single television package. As such, WP:LISTN is not met. Let'srun ( talk) 01:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Almost all the sourcing is not third party but speedway related. LibStar ( talk) 01:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to get an actual assessment of sources brought up in this discussion rather than general statements about the article lacking sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Found no coverage of the artist beyond the one MusicRow article already present. Passing mentions for credits on notable musicians' songs does not make notability here. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 02:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Equestrian who does not satisfy sports notability. There are two references. The first one is a database entry, and database entries do not establish sports notability. The second is an obituary, which may count toward general notability but is the only significant source. He competed in the Olympics, but does not have Olympic notability because he did not receive a medal.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | https://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/ma/marek-malecki-1.html | A Wayback Machine copy of a database entry of sports statistics | Yes | No | Yes | No |
2 | hejnakon.pl | Obituary in Polish equestrian magazine. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
The Heymann criterion is to find additional sources within six days.
Similar to other articles in the Career achievements of basketball players category, this is a collection of indiscriminate trivia with trivial statistical cross sections, which is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS and does not meet the notability criteria under WP:NLIST. The most pertinent info is already included in the main article. Let'srun ( talk) 00:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a collection of indiscriminate trivia with trivial statistical cross sections, which is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS. The most pertinent info is already included in the main article. Let'srun ( talk) 00:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I was unable to find any evidence verifying notability for this team under the WP:GNG. From what I can tell, the WBSC does not even have the team ranked as seen at [ [25]]. Let'srun ( talk) 00:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Since the last AfD, we are a lot stricter of notability of schools. Could not find sources to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 00:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC, not enough coverage from reliable sources to warrant a standalone article. This also appears to be an autobiography, and it was deleted at a prior AfD a couple of months ago. CycloneYoris talk! 23:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The only coverage that I can find are announcements about the company from Dayton, Ohio sources which fails WP:CORP, including WP:AUD. A company that performs there is at AfD as well - Human Race Theatre Company. SL93 ( talk) 23:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The only coverage that I can find are announcements about the company from Dayton, Ohio sources which fails WP:CORP, including WP:AUD. SL93 ( talk) 23:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Questionable notability per WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Note that this appears to be a rewrite of a declined draft about the same organization by the same author: Draft:Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC). The same issues regarding formal tone appropriate for an encyclopedia noted as problematic in the declined draft seem to afflict this version. Geoff | Who, me? 22:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
She is an author of a sole short story; that story is notable (see pl:CyberJoly Drim which I just expanded; it won awards in Poland and was subject to literary criticism) - but she herself has not done anything else to merit a stand-alone article in an encyclopedia. This article should redirect to her short story article, once it is created on en wiki, per WP:NOTINHERITED, for now it could be soft-deleted by redirecting to the page about most notable award that her story got ( Janusz A. Zajdel Award per WP:ATD-R. I'll add I've done extensive BEFORE while expanding article about her story on pl wiki and I cannot find anything that discusses her outside the analysis of her short story; the few biographical information we have about her come from a short bio note on a page of a publishing company she works or worked for at some point. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
after reviewing Her achievements in the article I think it should remain with improvements. Yakov-kobi ( talk) 19:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
After conducting a WP:BEFORE search, it seems to me that this actor/producer does not meet either the general notability guideline or notability guideline on entertainers. DanCherek ( talk) 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
18:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
22:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
A film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Of the included sources, the only one that is a full length review is not from a reliable source. The rest are just small blurbs that could not really be considered a full review. Searches using both names the film was released under did not turn up any kind of coverage or reviews in reliable sources that would indicate being able to pass WP:NFILM. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Early !voters - please review and comment on the greatly expanded sourcing and content added since the AfD was opened. Thanks!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
22:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
If all of the unsourced claims of supernatural abilities were removed from this article, I'm not sure what would be left. Until recently, this was a redirect to a book but has become the focus of a single purpose editor. Counterfeit Purses ( talk) 21:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The title of the article is "Anthony J. Resta discography, however very little of it is actually about anything Resta recorded himself. Instead it's a WP:COATRACK of everything he's ever been involved with in some manner, however minor the connection. I've looked this over for 40 minutes trying to think of what I could remove and keep but it's so much that I am failing at it. This discography article is almost all puffery and should be WP:TNTed and redone from scratch in an appropriate manner. Iggy pop goes the weasel ( talk) 21:10, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This does not appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm nominating this page for deletion again because the initial discussion lacked sufficient engagement and the sources provided were inadequate in both quality and quantity. There's a notable absence of substantial coverage of Imre Vallyon, his work, or his organisation in multiple reliable secondary sources. Meeting notability criteria typically requires presenting at least three such sources. The article from Stuff, while primarily focused on his legal issues, appears to be the only source that meets these criteria. Without it, the page is mostly information sourced by primary sources and a list of his self published books and ebooks.
In terms of Vallyon's notability as a writer, the two book reviews presented by Oaktree b in the previous discussion are clearly poor sources, as they seem to be paid content from freelance writers on unreliable websites. Additionally, Vallyon does not meet the criteria for notability as a criminal according to Wikipedia guidelines on crime perpetrators, despite the only significant coverage of him focusing on his legal issues. His organisation, FHL, does not seem to meet the notability standards either. Ynsfial ( talk) 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
1. Is Vallyon notable as an author? Only a few reliable sources have covered Vallyon’s works. Thus, he is not notable under WP:GNG.
2. Is Vallyon a notable criminal? Vallyon also fails WP:PERPETRATOR. A criminal is only notable if the media in many countries have covered their crimes or if the crimes were historic or major. There has been coverage of his legal issues, but it may not be enough to meet these standards.
3. Is there reliable coverage? To strengthen the argument, we rely on you, the editors and contributors, to provide sources that can offer an in-depth study of Vallyon’s life and work or his crimes.
4. Is there community consensus? The ongoing debate and non-consensus closure of previous discussions highlight the urgency of a closer review of the sources and arguments, mainly regarding their differing viewpoints. Everyone's input is crucial in this process.
In short, the coverage does not explore his works or crimes. If the consensus favors retention due to his criminal history, the article must meet WP:BLP. It is our collective duty to ensure that it remains neutral and relies on proper sources.-- AstridMitch ( talk) 19:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
AstridMitch, I struggled to follow your logic, to be honest. For example, per WP:PERPETRATOR, his crimes were covered in New Zealand and Germany, which constitutes international media coverage. Additionally, he has followers and organized groups in many countries, indicating an impact that clearly extends beyond one region or even country. Moreover, the "no consensus" closure doesn't highlight any urgency as you incorrectly claimed. This is simply not true and there is no urgency here unless it may be urgent for you. Regarding the reliable coverage argument, I didn't understand your point. Overall, your comment resembles an emotional appeal to editors' collective consciousness (also beyond my logic in terms of Wikipedia's rules) rather than providing clear arguments.-- 50.46.167.81 ( talk) 07:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
In addition to being a prolific and frequently published writer who meets WP:GNG, he is notable as a spiritual influencer or "cult leader" (arguably) with large groups of followers in several countries. He wouldn't have been covered by major media outlets in New Zealand and Europe if he were just a child molester. The point is that he was active as a philosopher and "school leader" who organized large international groups of followers, which then caught media attention. They described him as an influencer, a child molester, and a convicted felon. Therefore, I suggest adding "spiritual influencer" or "Spiritual teacher" to the definition, as supported by sources on his page. 50.46.167.81 ( talk) 04:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Created by a sock. Significant coverage happened only when this incident took place. Since then there has been news about investigations but it does not have a lasting impact Srijanx22 ( talk) 17:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Only coverage happened was actually from a couple of news outlets during June 2022 - August 2022. No coverage since. Fails WP:NOTNEWS. Srijanx22 ( talk) 17:54, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This is an article about an investment company that does not meet notability. The company has one notable product in cPanel through acquisition. The sourcing in the article is what looks like a regurgitated press release, a definite press release and a link to Oakley Captial which is just their web site and no mention of WebPros. I cannot find any coverage to establish notability, only more press releases. Whpq ( talk) 17:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Ambra played 164 minutes at lower Italian club of AlbinoLeffe and does not seem to meet WP:GNG. Futbol Portal is a rumor about his potential transfer to Premier League followed by interview analysis. Zahori is an interview. SME is an interview but I can't access due to paywall. Neither of these count towards significant coverage. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 17:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Nominated as WP:SIGCOV are virtually non-existent bar store pages. Sources consists of WP:PRIMARY (website and social media sites). Other third party sources center itself on Signor Alonso. WP:ATD will be a redirect into Fernando Alonso. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 17:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources, and many of the references presently used are non-RS, unfit for a BLP. toweli ( talk) 17:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Same as previous AfD (Possibly malware, few and unreliable sources, written somewhat like an ad) – The Sharpest Lives ( 💬• ✏️• ℹ️) ( ping me!) 16:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTGENEALOGY. No significant coverage in reliable sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm not seeing enough WP:SIGCOV for this goalkeeper that only played in 3 professional games. While searching for Gerald/Gerard D'Mello, I found Deccan Herald, Herald Goa, Navhind Times and Telegraph India, all of which are passing mentions. If this article is kept, we should consider moving it to 'Gerard D'Mello' as this seems to be a more popular spelling. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 16:42, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Potentially fails WP:GNG here. I have searched Albanian sources and found nothing better than Panorama, a passing mention about a disciplinary issue. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Only secondary sources in the article and found during WP:BEFORE check are match reports with surface level coverage of the subject. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 16:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
"they have achieved success in a major international competition at the highest level", that of being top scorer in the U17 Euro qualifying, as subjectively the U17 Euros are the highest level of competition at that age range, though I can understand how this is intended for senior competitions only, as well as only a guide to likelihood of notability, as opposed to notability itself. Either way, it wouldn't be too much of a loss if the page get's deleted, as I suspect there will be SIGCOV soon enough for it to return. It would be unfortunate for an active WSL player to have their page deleted, but based on policy/coverage it'd be understandable. I can only assume it's age-related as to why there isn't further coverage, given she would be one of the very few WSL players to have scored a league goal and not have an article. CNC ( talk) 16:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to confirm its existence. I found information on a town of this name in Mali, near Mauritania, but we shouldn't keep this if we can't verify it. Boleyn ( talk) 16:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to add to show it exists. Boleyn ( talk) 15:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to confirm it exists. Refs in other language WP articles didn't lead anywhere. Boleyn ( talk) 15:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG / WP:GNG. There are the different universities as possible WP:ATDs, but none of them are obvious targets. Boleyn ( talk) 15:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 15:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
A WP:BEFORE search failed to find any significant coverage of this biography article to meet WP:NBASIC. The most I could find were blog reviews of his books and interviews, which fail the threshold of significant independent sourcing. -1ctinus📝 🗨 15:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Embassies are not inherently notable, consulates even less so. This one fails WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 14:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 14:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Found this while looking through orphans. A WP:BEFORE Fails to come up with any reviews or charts besides programming blogs. Even reviews linked on the author's website lacks anything for WP:NBOOK. -1ctinus📝 🗨 14:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
As much as it pains me to nominate my electronic rodent brethren (lol) for deletion, I was unable to find any sources other than the one I added yesterday while searching — it also does not provide significant coverage of the subject. The band fails the notability guideline for musicians. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 18:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Two
WP:TOOSOON lists of entirely redlinked films by presumed future release dates, referenced entirely to subscriber-locked directory entries in an internal industry "films in the production pipeline" database rather than
reliable sources. To be fair, the United States does already have lists for both of these years, so I can't argue that we never let lists of films exist this far into the future -- but the US lists comprise films that (a) already have Wikipedia articles to link to under
WP:NFF provisions, and (b) already have
WP:GNG-worthy sources present to support the presumed release dates, neither of which are on offer here.
These can both be recreated in 2025, 2026 or 2027 when there's reliable sourcing to support listing bluelinked films, but we don't already need either of them now if they're only using
primary sources to support red links.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I can only find sources and content unduly taking about mastaba. If there should be ATD, then redirect. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 12:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Promotional also. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 12:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This phrase has no significance separable from Kamala Harris#Public image. It is mentioned by some reliable sources, but the articles are not actually about this particular phrase, they are about her public image/memes in general. A redirect or merge would be more appropriate. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 12:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep, per WP:SNOW. jp× g 🗯️ 10:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This list is just getting bigger and bigger. It appears to violet "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of facts". Georgia guy ( talk) 12:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Oppose and speedy close. I don't see why this deletion nomination was ever brought up in the first place. Other pages exist for
List of Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign endorsements, a
List of Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign political endorsements, and a 2024 version for both of them, and they're all equally long. We have pages going back several election cycles solely for endorsement purposes, and it's common practice to list notable endorsements on literally every single federal and state campaign if there's enough notable individuals. The whole reason there's a whole page for president is because it would take up too much room on the main page. There is quite literally no argument in favor of this.
Flames675 (
talk)
12:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 12:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
AI-generated, largely unsourced duplicate of 2024 Bangladesh quota reform movement. Parts that are cited appear to have had their citations tacked on after the fact, so verifiability is pretty doubtful. Not suitable for WP:BLAR as the editorializing title is not a reasonable redirect. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 11:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The 2006 AfD nomination calling this original research was obviously correct on the merits. Unlike other comparison articles, for which there is often good sourcing (as niche publications may have deep dives within a topic area), this only compares two products, almost exclusively with primary sources that only mention one of the products. Mach61 11:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. None of the mentioned buildings are notable by itself and aren't fulfilling GNG. No SIGCOV for the list article alone. Also, WP:NOTDIR. The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:43, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Nothing that would qualify under the general notability guideline. Lots of problems with inadequate sourcing and WP:NOR. GuardianH ( talk) 07:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
08:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
09:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTV. M S Hassan ( talk | contributions) 08:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The article lacks of WP:GNG, since it is a project of cloud infrastructure in grid computing with little overall impact and very few available sources, mostly self-published sources of the authors of this project. It seems there are a few other project-related articles that are related to the Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI) of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences that seem to lack considerably WP:GNG as well. Recently, other related articles have been already deleted: [13] and [14]. The targetted articles, like this nomination, GUSE, and the deleted article of MTA SZTAKI Laboratory of Parallel and Distributed Systems, were all created by the same user many years ago. Chiserc ( talk) 07:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The article lacks of WP:GNG, since it is a project of cloud infrastructure with little overall impact. It seems there are a few other project-related articles that are related to the Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI) of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences that seem to lack considerably WP:GNG as well. Recently, other related articles have been already deleted: [15], and [16]. Chiserc ( talk) 07:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:DEL#8: Doesn't meet GNG, WP:NSPORTS or WP:NMOTORSPORT. Nobody ( talk) 07:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
should be deleted due to the lack of significant independent coverage that meets the General Notability Guideline (GNG), relying instead on primary sources, company related news and not significant mentions. LusikSnusik ( talk) 10:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
07:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Only two sources, which do not appear to qualify as SIGCOV. There does not seem to be a justification based on notability as on why this episode should have a separate article (i.e. it could also be redirected to South Park (season 2). Stanley Joseph Wilkins ( talk) 05:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This appears to be the only such list of trips made by the US president to a specific state. Cannot see how it meets the criteria at WP:NLIST. AusLondonder ( talk) 05:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Nominated on pl wiki for deletion as spam with possible hoax elements ( pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2024:07:17:ESNA European Higher Education News). It also seems to fail WP:NORG/ WP:GNG. My BEFORE finds next to zero visiblity for this entity in GS/GB. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Technical closure as you cannot nominate article for deletion that are currently featured on the main page. Schwede 66 04:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Not news, too soon, presentism, WP:NOPAGE might sum it up. Qwirkle ( talk) 04:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Created by a single purpose editor. Google news comes up with a different person, and google books comes up with 1 line mentions of this person. Fails WP:ARTIST. LibStar ( talk) 04:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
It is not the first time that they have paired up to write the definitive book on aspects of South African art and artists- that is, the books Hobbs has written are known as the "definitive work" on the subject. I'm confident there will also be biographical information on her available in South African newspapers. -- asilvering ( talk) 04:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT, only primary sources provided. Nothing found when searching ["Mark Carlson" speedway] LibStar ( talk) 03:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article for a company that fails WP:NCORP. All sources are WP:ORGTRIV (routine coverage of market entries, financing, awards, etc.), WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (interviews, self-published materials), or otherwise unreliable sources. WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing validating notability. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 14:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
Joe (
talk)
17:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To see if there is any editor response to the source analysis presented.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
03:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT, only primary sources provided. Nothing found when searching ["Henry Long " speedway] LibStar ( talk) 03:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable award. References are all announcements of winners and the majority are unreliable, falling under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. A WP:BEFORE was unable to locate significant coverage that talks about the reward itself. CNMall41 ( talk) 03:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I initially WP:PRODed this with the following rationale "Non-notable, defunct retailer. None of the current sources are actual coverage of the company in reliable sources, merely being things such as database listing or user generated content like reviews. Searching for sources under both the "ZipZoomfly" and "Googlegear" names did not turn up any coverage in reliable sources." An IP user contacted me on my Talk page requesting to contest the PROD with this rationale: "ZipZoomFly.com aka GoogleGear.com was an important part of early internet history and a popular place to shop before newegg was founded. The lawsuit between them and google.com (alphabet) was a noteworthy case of parody vs trademark. The page is worth keeping because their are lessons to be learned from it's downfall." I don't agree that reasoning is sufficient to address the sourcing issues that keep this company from passing the WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, but since the PROD was contested, I am moving it to AFD for discussion instead. Rorshacma ( talk) 20:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
03:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Lack of notability established with WP:RS Amigao ( talk) 03:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 02:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Redirect to 1966 World Cup team. Simione001 ( talk) 02:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 02:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
No notability shown, no unrelated refs showing notability Naraht ( talk) 02:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Errol Musk is not in any way notable independent of his relation to Elon Musk. He ran for public office, but was never elected, but was only elected once to a local city council, he was an engineer, but didn't do anything of note. There is nothing about him is notable other than that he was the father of Elon Musk.
Ergzay (
talk)
01:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
He ran for public office, but was never electedThat's actually not correct, he was elected in '72 and served until the 80s. His 1983 resignation was front page news. Feoffer ( talk) 05:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Ergzay ( talk) 00:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, categories, lists, article titles and drafts.
Why should anyone care that Errol claimed that Elon upgraded his home security system?
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
06:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as there is still no consensus. Of interest, is
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musk family (2nd nomination) and
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol Musk. I don't think that this article can be moved to
Errol Musk as that page has an extensive page history that shouldn't be deleted, there could be issues with attribution.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Article was previously deleted in 2013 after an AfD. Recreated in 2020. I don't see any reason to dispute the result of that AfD; there is still little in-depth coverage cited on this page. Outside of the Supreme Court case (which appears to have been sparsely covered), the only coverage is a few mentions from minor trade publications. I tried looking for more on Google, but all I could find were press releases. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 02:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm not finding any sources discussing these games as a group, which are only connected by a single television package. As such, WP:LISTN is not met. Let'srun ( talk) 01:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Almost all the sourcing is not third party but speedway related. LibStar ( talk) 01:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to get an actual assessment of sources brought up in this discussion rather than general statements about the article lacking sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Found no coverage of the artist beyond the one MusicRow article already present. Passing mentions for credits on notable musicians' songs does not make notability here. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 02:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Equestrian who does not satisfy sports notability. There are two references. The first one is a database entry, and database entries do not establish sports notability. The second is an obituary, which may count toward general notability but is the only significant source. He competed in the Olympics, but does not have Olympic notability because he did not receive a medal.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | https://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/ma/marek-malecki-1.html | A Wayback Machine copy of a database entry of sports statistics | Yes | No | Yes | No |
2 | hejnakon.pl | Obituary in Polish equestrian magazine. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
The Heymann criterion is to find additional sources within six days.
Similar to other articles in the Career achievements of basketball players category, this is a collection of indiscriminate trivia with trivial statistical cross sections, which is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS and does not meet the notability criteria under WP:NLIST. The most pertinent info is already included in the main article. Let'srun ( talk) 00:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a collection of indiscriminate trivia with trivial statistical cross sections, which is a violation of WP:NOTSTATS. The most pertinent info is already included in the main article. Let'srun ( talk) 00:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I was unable to find any evidence verifying notability for this team under the WP:GNG. From what I can tell, the WBSC does not even have the team ranked as seen at [ [25]]. Let'srun ( talk) 00:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Since the last AfD, we are a lot stricter of notability of schools. Could not find sources to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 00:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)