The result was keep. More coverage found, the community has consensus. Please add the new sources to the article. Less Unless ( talk) 20:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE on Newspapers.com, GNews, GBooks, and ProQuest. yielded extremely few results: press releases, superficial name-drops, and TV Guide listings. It's mentioned in passing in articles about Animal Planet or Michelle Beadle, but these confirm only that the show exists and nothing more. Deprodded without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "In a world fraught with war, environmental problems and economic cricses, it's the happy animal stories that make us smile. Every week you and your children can pick up a half-hour of them on the new "Animal Planet Report." The weekly program, hosted by Michelle Beadle, premiered earlier this month and continues every Friday on Animal Planet. It's created in partnership with award-winning journalist Linda Ellerbee and her production company, Lucky Duck Productions. These are the "Hey, Martha" stories of the animal world that make viewers say ... This week your children get to see ..."
The article notes: "A half-hour weekly current events series featuring the latest developments from the natural world, such as a report on the multi-million dollar business that has grown up around wolfwatching in Yellowstone Park, the new frog species found in the rainforests of Sri Lanka and the tale of a baby hippo adopted by a giant tortoise. Presented by Tim Vincent and Maxine Trump."
The article notes: "Cable TV's Animal Planet Monday announced its new "The Animal Planet Report," a half-hour weekly current events series. The show hosted by Michelle Beadle and produced by Linda Ellerbee's Lucky Duck Productions, will bow Friday at 9 p.m. ET, the Silver Spring, Md.-based network said in a news release."
The article notes: "The former Blue Peter presenter Tim Vincent hosts this lively new magazine programme reporting from the animal kingdom. In this first part we meet the three-times winner of the coveted world’s ugliest dog prize, go to the Yellowstone National Park to look at how the reintroduction of wolves has gone, and find out about the Kenyan dog that “adopted” an abandoned human baby."
The article notes: ""Animal Planet Report" (Friday, 9 p.m., Animal Planet). In this half- hour weekly show devoted to animal happenings, host Michelle Beadle tells of a rescued manatee, and how more vets are needed in rural areas. Maggie, an overweight elephant in an Alaskan zoo, gets a diet and exercise regimen - a custom-made treadmill. Let's hope there's enough animal news to keep this show going."
The article notes: "The speedy patas monkey is discussed as well as their ability to reach speeds of 30 miles per hour and a Swiss man gets his weather report from animals."
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:56, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. WP:TOOSOON for notability. Filmography of two years Whiteguru ( talk) 08:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Local politician. Doesn't pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 04:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable local club Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 13:38, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep We have articles on many GAA clubs - both large & small. This is the nature of the organization. There are clubs in every parish and are active in local competitions. We need to keep these clubs here as they are integral to the nature of the GAA.
Pmunited ( talk) 13:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep. Is short but well sourced with citations in every part. Sources include The Echo, The Southern Star, The Corkman. None of those are part of the club (I think). -- Gaois ( talk) 22:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Speed#Series programming. Viable AtD with no one contesting it. History is there when/if sourcing is identified. Star Mississippi 15:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE turned up one press release, one less than sentence-long mention in an article on Speed Network, superficial name-drops in articles on Tanner Foust, and a crapton of TV guide listings with nothing better in sight. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Textbook WP:TOOSOON. Nothing after the initial announcement has occurred. No valid redirect target. Deprodded for no reason Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
In my view, this is a clear case for keep. Cheers MaxnaCarta ( talk) 09:47, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is the article should be improved, not deleted. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Article almost entirely sourced to IMDb, which is not acceptable by itself, and is basically only a list of songs; one source that is acceptable (Entertainment Weekly) is plainly not enough. Instead of deleting, I propose that it be moved to the draft so that sourcing (off-line or on-line) could be found. The previous discussion seemed to indicate some notability, but nothing was done since then. Szmenderowiecki ( talk) 22:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. A discussion on whether to redirect / merge can happen after this AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
I redirected this to History of Liechtenstein, but was reverted. This list is nearly empty, and the few articles it points to are nearly empty as well (and could do with a discussion of their own). E.g. the first one, 2007 in Liechtenstein, just has a joke trivia entry. Perhaps the Template:Years in Liechtenstein could be added at the bottom of the "History" article to help people who really want to access these "years" articles. But for most readers, arriving at this "list of years" article and then the underlying individual years will just be a disappointment instead of something helpful. Fram ( talk) 07:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Goldsztajn (
talk) 21:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shep Messing. North America 1000 22:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Nothing on ProQuest, Google News, or Newspapers.com. "Shep Unplugged" + "Shep Messing" turned up nothing but Wikipedia mirrors on a regular Google search. Prod and redirect both contested. Given the complete lack of literally anything verifiable, possible WP:HOAX. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 20:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
MSG.com's Video Library (Check out Shep Unplugged, a recap of the Revs match, and more). Sadly, it appears that MSG Networks pretty completely have lost/scrubbed basically all content from before ~2018 but the original Wiki article seems earnest enough plus the non-Wiki sourced blog post makes it seem to have existed. Skynxnex ( talk) 17:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
He has also been the lead analyst for the MetroStars and the re-branded New York Red Bulls of Major League Soccer for several years. During these broadcasts, Shep hosts a segment during halftime entitled Shep Unplugged. Shep is usually outspoken during this segment about league issues and global soccer news.Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Outdoor Channel#Content. North America 1000 22:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
All results on ProQuest were press releases or directory listings. Prod and redirect both contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 20:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 21:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Article has numerous problems (see maintenance tags) and is also written in-universe. Each book in the series has its own article already. Let's WP:TNT this glorified fanpage. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 19:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
"Sex Lives" + "Jay Grdina" got no results on ProQuest. Searching for "Sex Lives" + "Playboy TV" on the same was entirely false positives; just uses of the phrase "sex lives" in terms unrelated to the show. A straight Google search of "Sex Lives" + "playboy TV" turned up just IMDb (from which the plot synopis here seems to be copied) and episodes of the show on sketchy looking porn sites and absolutely no verifiable content. I'm honestly not expecting to find much in the way of RS for a porn show but I'm willing to be proven wrong. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 22:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Could only find a few passing mentions here and there: directory listings, name-drops in articles about Animal Planet, etc. The "Star Wars" episode got an article but I was unable to confirm anything else about this show beyond its mere existence. That it's been an unsourced stub since 2007 is a sign that the show made no impact whatsoever, and it definitely fails the WP:RS test. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The article reviews Animal Icons: Jaws. The article provides 144 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Just when you thought it was safe to switch the set back on. Jaws the movie was a box-office hit, but how close did Jaws come to the animal it portrayed? This edition of Animal Icons is more about the pretend shark than the real shark, which is fine by me, but may disappoint viewers genuinely interested in sharks."
The article reviews Animal Icons: King Kong. The article provides 170 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Without King Kong there would be no Lord of the Rings or Jurassic Park or Wallace and Gromit for that matter. In the first of a series celebrating the animal icons of film and TV, New Zealand director Peter Jackson reveals that he saw the movie when he was nine and resolved there and then to pursue a career in film. King Kong, left, also pioneered stop-motion animation, paving the way for Wallace and his canine sidekick. ... This story behind the story reveals how he was conceived and the trailblazing special effects that brought him to life."
The article provides 119 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Animal Icons: Star Wars Creatures, Animal Planet, Sunday, 7.30pm. Especially since we're currently in the grip of another round of Star Wars mania, it's probably little surprise that most kids list Wookiees, Gungans, Ewoks, Bantha or even something as slimy and sinister as a Dianoga as their favourite animal. But where did George Lucas and his animators get the inspiration for their galaxy of creatures? This fun special tracks down the animals that were caricaturised to create the various Star Wars beasties."
The article provides 163 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Did you ever wonder where the idea for Jabba the Hutt came from? Or what exactly is a Boga and will there be merchandising? Or maybe how can every media outlet on the face of the Earth tie itself in with "Star Wars: Episode III"? Animal Planet has the answer to most of the above this week in an hourlong special that looks at the origin of George Lucas' galactic menagerie, from Ewoks to Wookiees and how these fantasy creatures are inspired by actual animals found on Earth."
The article provides 258 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Animal Planet is going after bigger game tonight, including George Lucas' Hutts and Wookiees. Lucas not only appears on camera but also co-produced Animal Icons: Star Wars, a tribute to the universe he created. Yes, it's an hourlong infomercial for Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith -- which, conveniently, is scheduled to open in the United States at midnight. But as commercials go, it's an entertaining one."
The article reviews Animal Icons: Star Wars Creatures. The article provides 119 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Hosted by actor Anthony Daniels (aka C-3PO), Animal Icons takes us behind the scenes to meet the conceptual artists, animators, special effects technicians and voiceover artists who brought the Star Wars safari to life."
The article notes: "With guaranteed blockbuster "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith" due in theaters Thursday, Animal Planet hopes viewers will warm up with "Animal Icons: Star Wars Creatures." It debuts at 7 p.m. Wednesday and repeats at 10 p.m. Anthony Daniels, who voices robot C-3PO in all of the "Star Wars" movies, narrates the hourlong special."
The article provides 43 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Animal Icons: Comic Book Creatures, Animal Planet Batman (pictured), Spider Man and Mighty Mouse - as comic book heroes, each has drawn their superpowers from the animal kingdom. In this episode, Animal Icons compares these characters with the real animals that inspired their creation."
The article provides 82 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Has Animal Planet exhausted the natural world? Seems like it, given that this series is devoted to iconic animal figures from the cultural world. King Kong and Jaws are to come o this week it's Garfield. Created by Jim Davis, the fat and lazy cat is big (the strip is read in 111 countries, apparently), although quite why he deserves an episode, and Snoopy doesn't, takes some explaining. Perhaps it's something to do with the behind-the-scenes look at the recent feature film."
The article provides 72 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Pure seasonal froth. The animal icons in this instance are those that appear in TV shows and films - Snoopy, Santa's Little Helper in The Simpsons, The Muppets. It's smooth voiceover and cheesy music time - so much so that you think this must be ironic - and there's lots of talk of spiritual uplift and delightful traditions. But it's an American production, which shines through in the production values and the characters on offer."
The article provides 81 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Think: Just in time to promote a movie that scarcely needs any extra hype comes this "documentary" about the film series' sundry colorful (and, yes, goofy) alien species. Don't think: The Jedi Knights are pretty much erased in Episode III - Revenge of the Sith. Just think how much more satisfying it would be if George Lucas indulged in Ewok-icide instead. In a nutshell: More Lucas hagiography in the guise of an Animal Planet show about nonexistent beasties. Nonetheless, essential for fanboys."
The article reviews Animal Icons: Garfield. The article provides 22 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "If you're one of the 260 million people worldwide who read the comic-strip, you'll enjoy this gushing profile of the sardonic feline."
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter. Highest ranking ever was 112, but he lost 9 of his next 12 fights. Fight announcements, fight results, MMA database listings, and a bio on the web page of the gym where we worked are what I found. These all fail to show the significant independent coverage required by the GNG. Sandals2 ( talk) 19:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK. Potentially notable. scope_creep Talk 18:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not enough coverage to pass notability guidelines Less Unless ( talk) 20:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG and the sources available in the article are mostly about the subject's single book entitled Borderline, that's to say the book might be notable but the subject is not. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Page creator can request restoration to Draft space at WP:REFUND should better sources emerge. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Sumeet Patil
Indian art director who does not appear to satisfy creative notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself and explain why the subject is notable, and this does not. It says that he has developed a technique to allow the blind to paint, using fragrances. That is a credible claim of significance, but this is not an A7 nomination. The reference is 404-compliant, and so fails verifiability, which is a precondition to notability. It states that he received an award, but on verification, the award appears to be one that is given to children, and so is interesting, but does not establish notability. Other than that, the article consists of a filmography of films that are merely names. So there is nothing in the article itself to establish notability. A check of the references is not helpful. One is a promoted story. Another says that he received an award that appears to be given to children. Two of the references are 404-compliant, and four of them are IMDB. The IMDB references were not checked (because they were IMDB).
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | indianexpress.com | Reads like a promoted story | No | Yes | Yes | No |
2 | nationalbalbhavan.nic.in | Says that he received an award in 2004. The award appears to be given to children. | Yes | No, not a significant award | Yes | Yes |
3 | timesofindia | 404 compliant | No | |||
4 | IMDB | Yes | No | |||
5 | IMDB | Yes | No | |||
6 | IMDB | Yes | No | |||
7 | timesofindia | 404 compliant | No | |||
8 | IMDB | Yes | No |
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable website Mooonswimmer 17:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 03:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Only has one source aside from charts, and it's from a site not listed at WP:RSMUSIC. Only other source I could fine is from Noisecreep but I'm not certain about that site's reliability. Has charted on multiple Billboard charts which is more than I can say for songs/albums that have survived my XfDs before, but I'm still not certain that's enough. QuietHere ( talk) 17:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Not a notable company - most references are to their own website, press releases, or junk sources like Amazon and BBB. They're mentioned in this book published by "Rich Dad Advisors Press" (reliability?) but the chapter was written by the company's owner, so it's not independent. No other usable sources found through WP:BEFORE. Spicy ( talk) 17:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Coolperson177 ( t| c) 22:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable middle school; possibly redirect to an article on the local school district if such an article exists Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The book notes: "成都七中育才学校成都七中育才学校的前身是成都1957年开办的一所市属普通中学。1997 年为适应成都现代化教育发展需要,在成都市教育局领导下,依托百年名校全国示范性高中成都七中,该学校改名为成都七中育才学校。办学20多年来,学校始终坚持走“文化养校”的发展道路,坚持“卓尔不群、大器天下”的核心价值诉求,坚守“重德育才、面向未来、最优发展”的办学理念,坚持信息技术与教育教学的深度融合,努力建设智慧型校园、数字化学校。目前,成都七中育才学校已成为西部乃至全国的一所初中名校。 [paragraph break] 2005年,成都七中育才学校开启全日制远程教学工作,通过多媒体教学示范班,将优质教育辐射到边远、民族地区学校,让近万名学生与该校学子共享优质教育资源,在保障育才学子实现最优发展的同时,成全了越来越多的远端学子、远端教师、远端学校、远端区域教育。截至2017年,成都七中育才学校的优质教育资源已辐射到云南、贵州、四川、江西、广西、甘肃、重庆,常年与260多所学校、近1万名教师、近8万名学生分享优质教育资源,极大地促进了教育公平,推动了教育均衡发展。"
From Google Translate: "Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School The predecessor of Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School was a municipal ordinary middle school opened in 1957 in Chengdu. In 1997, in order to meet the needs of modern education development in Chengdu, under the leadership of the Chengdu Education Bureau and relying on the national model high school Chengdu No. 7 Middle School, the school was renamed Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School. For more than 20 years of running a school, the school has always adhered to the development path of "cultivating the school", adhered to the core value appeal of "excellence and greatness in the world", adhered to the school-running concept of "emphasizing morality, cultivating talents, facing the future, and optimal development", and insisting on information Deep integration of technology and education and teaching, and strive to build smart campuses and digital schools. At present, Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School has become a famous junior high school in the west and even the whole country. [paragraph break] In 2005, Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School started full-time distance teaching work. Through multimedia teaching demonstration classes, high-quality education was radiated to schools in remote and ethnic areas, allowing nearly 10,000 students to share high-quality educational resources with the school's students, ensuring the protection of Yucai students. While achieving optimal development, more and more remote students, remote teachers, remote schools, and remote regional education have been fulfilled. As of 2017, the high-quality educational resources of Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School have radiated to Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Gansu, and Chongqing, sharing high-quality education with more than 260 schools, nearly 10,000 teachers and nearly 80,000 students throughout the year. Educational resources have greatly promoted the equity of education and promoted the balanced development of education."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School was established in 1997. It is an old-fashioned high-quality public school in Chengdu and a school with a certain influence in the country. Its predecessor was Chengdu No. 35 Middle School (a municipal ordinary middle school opened in 1957). In 1997, relying on the Chengdu No. 7 Middle School, it was restructured into the Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School with the nature of "public-run private assistance". ... In September 2009, under the direct guidance of the Chengdu Education Bureau and the Jinjiang District Education Bureau, the school was fully returned to the public. It is completely separated from Chengdu No. 7 Middle School (high school) and is a member of the No. 7 Middle School Education Group. It has a teaching connection with Chengdu No. 7 Middle School (high school) and has no administrative connection. ... No. 7 Middle School Yucai (Shuijingfang Campus) is one of the three secondary schools, and is one of the schools with the best reputation among public junior high schools in the No. 7 middle school department. It is especially outstanding and dazzling for its "online classes" and "cloud classes", which allow students to further their studies. The rate is almost 100%."
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Ponyo. CSD G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable director/musician Mooonswimmer 16:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was move to Draft:Areka Hooper. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Page creator can request restoration to Draft space at WP:REFUND should better sources emerge. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Page creator can request restoration to Draft space at WP:REFUND should better sources emerge. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial, including those not currently on the page such as [5] and [6]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial along with the ones not on the page currently: [7] and [searchlight.vc/sports/2022/03/25/international-football-returns-to-svg/]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Per apparent lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Merko ( talk) 15:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 21:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Per apparent lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources as a result of WP:BEFORE search. Merko ( talk) 15:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator ( talk) 23:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Warsaw Uprising. ✗ plicit 13:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Citing no sources since 2015, possible POV fork. I'd suggest merging back into parent article. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 22:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 02:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
On the surface, this looks like a well-sourced article of a very old organization. However, when reviewing the sources, there are no independent secondary sources that discuss the subject in-depth. All sources are affiliated with the organization, either directly to the lodge or Freemasonry. A review of sources are available at the talk page Talk:Palatine_Lodge_No._97#Excessive_Primary_Sources. As existence, even long existence is not notability, I believe this article fails WP:NORG and despite expressing concerns in draft and main space, no attempt to find independent, secondary sources has been attempted.A WP:BEFORE does not locate significant coverage. Slywriter ( talk) 21:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MelanieN ( talk) 22:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Was deleted in September 2018. Sources in article and elsewhere online are either mentions in passing, interviews or PR paid-for puff pieces. No independent in-depth coverage found. Edwardx ( talk) 20:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources currently on article and a search on Google are of a trivial nature. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is the SIGCOV met?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 23:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Note: This article was originally listed on AFD as a contested prod on March 25 2009.
This article was listed on AFD approximately 13 years ago, but the nomination lacked rational beyond stating that a proposed deletion was contested.
This article is being re-listed today as the subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines, and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Steps were taken to locate said sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Please do not hesitate to contact me should sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 21:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
2009-03 (closed as ✓ keep)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment Seems notable? Wondering if you discounted these sources for some reason Yamaguchi先生?
References
SailingInABathTub ( talk) 10:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment – strong indications of existence of significant coverage, such as this book The Origin of the South Asian Malyar Tribe, by Shahid Khan-Malyarzoi, Jacqueline Harvey and hundreds of search results with trivial mention to this tribe. Radioactive ( talk) 00:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more input would be appreciated
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep. I commented and avoided !voting in case I missed something, but the nominator hasn't answered my question. With no objections to the sources I suggested, I'll be bolder and say keep. CT55555 ( talk) 02:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 19:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable. All sources are primary. Iamreallygoodatcheckers ( talk) 00:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More participation needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with addition of sources, but they're just passing mentions in articles about graffiti artists. The other sources are social media, blogs, and superficial mentions here and there. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 16:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 07:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More participation needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 21:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Bušek was a non-medaling Olympian. The sources about sports such as Olympedia, all only have tables on him, not biographical text. I did find [13] which is a one sentence mention that one of his former team mates regularly wrote letters to Bušek. That is not enough to justify an article. There are multiple other people with this name who show up in sources, such as an inventor, so there is no reason to make this name a redirect. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 12:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A request to clarify earlier positions was not answered, making consensus of what to do unclear. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
A non-notable pseudoscience, one of an infinite variety of such, without the benefit of reliable secondary sources. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 12:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Ari T. Benchaim. Hope you are keeping well. Thanks for your time for reviewing this article. I also noticed your remarks and nomination for this article. The practice has been followed globally for various ailments. It also has sufficient secondary sources and also scientific backing for patients with these ailments. Request you to kindly reconsider and remove the tag. Thanking you. Gardenkur ( talk) 13:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to KCET. North America 1000 02:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Completely unsourced and I couldn't find anything. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nicely improved. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Stub article with practically no info or sources. Given that it says "there is no existing biography about this person" it's unlikely to ever see meaningful extension. Nothing links here either except for things like "List of people who died in 929". Hornpipe2 ( talk) 20:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is a tough one, as evidenced by this discussion remaining open since May 20th. The standards in WP:GNG are difficult to meet. Several editors have marshalled a number of sources in support of keeping the article, including convincing evidence via WorldCat that the publication is listed in important libraries (though this is typically not enough to keep an article). However, most of the sources offered by those arguing in favor of keeping fall short of "significant coverage" because they mention the subject in passing only. There are a few sources that primarily address the subject, but these appear to be less influential. At the same time, some of these passing mentions seem to indicate that the subject comes close to satisfying WP:NBOOK's third criterion. Even this argument is tenuous given the passing nature of these mentions. Ultimately, my read is that consensus has not been reached, but I suspect that a future discussion may result in the article being deleted unless additional third-party significant coverage emerges. Malinaccier ( talk) 01:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
promotional article about a magazine that afaict isn't notable, despite being created by notable founders. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
I disagree, the journal is listed in important libraries from Oxford and Cambridge university to New York public library as you can see in the world book catalogue https://www.worldcat.org/title/european-conservative/oclc/1057445721?referer=br&ht=edition -- Pepe1979 ( talk) 18:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
The European Conservative is relevant as it is widely read on the European political right and beyond and serves as a focal point for the connection of conservative academics. Do not delete in any case -- Oberlandler080 ( talk) 08:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep. The journal (and the article) is relevant and does satisfy the WP relevance criteria. There are scholarly research papers that attribute importance to the TEC because of their role in the transfer of ideas between west European and east European conservatives or right-wingers.-- 90.204.114.23 ( talk) 21:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Here is another article from Hungary, in "Mandiner", a magazine close to the Orbán government. It looks like The European Conservative is especially promoted in right-wing circles in Central East Europe. https://mandiner.hu/cikk/20210720_jon_a_megujult_the_european_conservative_magazin.-- Pepe1979 ( talk) 10:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello @Alpha3031: The paper by Valentin Behr (University of Strasbourg) (From Anticommunism to Antiliberalism. Polish Conservative intellectuals' involvement in the transnational circulation of ideas (archives-ouvertes.fr)) provides exactly what you ask for: It shows that the CER and TEC are important as plattfroms for the circulation of ideas - in this case hardline conservative, illiberale ideas by Polish anticommunist intellectuals. The book New Conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe by Katharina Bluhm and Mihail Varga also elaborates on this and mentions CER and TEC as forums for the intellectual exchange. What else do you want? I think this is getting a bit pedantic and we should all move on. Perhaps some other participants might like to join the discussion and give their opinion?-- Pepe1979 ( talk) 10:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Since NFOOTY is deprecated, GNG must be met for footballers. Although I assume the book is reliable, a single source is insufficient to keep the article. I did not locate any additional coverage (or even suggestions of coverage) on a search. Can't redirect to List of Burnley F.C. players as that only covers players with 100+ appearances. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Article about a short film, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFILM. As always, films are not "inherently" notable just because they exist; they have to have some form of notability claim, and WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage to support it -- but the only notability claim here is that the film exists, and the only reference is a deadlinked catalogue profile on the self-published website of a film festival where it screened once, which is not support for notability as it's neither analytical nor fully independent of the film. Bearcat ( talk) 14:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
The previous AfD in 2013 resulted in a 'keep' although there were still three editors in favour of deletion even at that time. Since then, WP:NFOOTBALL has been removed and it seems that NFOOTBALL and the fact that Fitri was relatively young back in 2013, were the main factors which resulted in the article being kept.
It's worth noting that nine years on, Fitri still hasn't made any further appearances and still looks to fail WP:GNG quite badly. There are no hits in Google News or ProQuest and a Singaporean source search returns only stats pages, social media and Wikipedia mirrors. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, specifically WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIRS. Native advertising. scope_creep Talk 13:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. While this topic is potentially of interest and notable, the article as it is does not establish notability. There is no prejudice against recreating this list with proper sources in the future if there is interest. Malinaccier ( talk) 21:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Yet another boilerplate "list of people on the postage stamps of X". Woefully incomplete, completely unsourced. No maintenance being put in since 2010 as usual. There is an overwhelming consensus by now that postage stamps lists aren't notable. Deprodded without comment. Obligatory ping of @ Fram: and @ Johnpacklambert: Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 13:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
This footballer only has one name, which makes an accurate WP:BEFORE tricky. I've scoured the archives of various Indonesian news sites and found a couple of mentions from 2014 that appear to relate to Danial: Okezone and Republika. These are both trivial mentions of the subject and so WP:GNG is not demonstrated. Since I could not find anything even close to the detail required for GNG, I'm sending this to AfD. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument to present sources, as requested by those advocating deletion, was not answered. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
This teaching course does not seem notable at all. Add to the fact that the article itself contradicts itself - it either ran for 26 episodes or 76 episodes over 9 seasons, makes me question the validity of everything else wrirtten there. Gonnym ( talk) 15:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More policy based input would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 13:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Stats stub on non-notable semi-pro footballer. Please do not confuse him with legendary Singaporean footballer and manager Fandi Ahmad or any of his three children Irfan Fandi Ahmad, Ikhsan Fandi Ahmad and Ilhan Fandi Ahmad, all of whom are notable and all will come up in a WP:BEFORE search.
Ultimately, Fandi Achmad seems to fail WP:GNG, which is not surprising since his career consists of 46 mins of football and then disappearing. Everything I can find in searches, including an Indonesian search, is just coverage on namesakes or a passing mention in a match summary regarding an Indonesian third tier football match. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I wanted to wait on the outcome of the equivalent women's AfD before nominating this one and since that closed as 'delete', I believe this also should be removed per WP:NOTSTATS. Whilst there haven't been many AfDs of this nature to date yet, it's worth also noting that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India national under-20 football team results and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzbekistan national under-20 football team results both closed as 'delete' too. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The consensus of the discussion is that Sørensen does not meet NPROF. I don't see enough of a consensus to spring for a merge or redirect. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable for an academic, was only a Information Systems Developer according to his personal website. Reference 2 made no references to where he was originally from and the date he started his academic career. Reference 3 is dead, and getting a PhD is not notable enough. Reference 5 has no mentions of his name, furthermore, B-Core Limited on Google doesn't show anything related. Fails WP:GNG Hadal1337 ( talk) 11:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- The criteria above are sometimes summed up as an "Average Professor Test": When judged against the average impact of a researcher in a given field, does this researcher stand out as clearly more notable or more accomplished?
- Note that this is a guideline and not a rule; exceptions may exist. Some academics may not meet any of these criteria, but may still be notable for their academic work. It is very difficult to make clear requirements in terms of number/quality of publications.
{{
notability}}
tag or discussing in the talk page first). —
Jonathan Bowen (
talk) 16:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 10:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was Revert back to the rugby union player article. Per consensus Less Unless ( talk) 20:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a complex AfD because this article was actually hijacked in Aug 2012. Previously, this was about an Argentine international rugby union player. The footballer of this name has only played at a very low level in Argentina and doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Searches in Google, ProQuest, DDG etc. only return results relating to rugby union.
If both the rugby player and the footballer are non-notable, then we simply delete this article. If the rugby player is notable but the footballer isn't, then please revert the hijacking. If both are notable then please can an admin do some sort of splitting of the histories so we have Alejandro Abadie (footballer) with relevant edit history and Alejandro Abadie (rugby union) with relevant edit history? Sorry if AfD is not the best venue but I feel that notability is questionable here so AfD was what I thought would be best. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:58, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. No effective sourcing. scope_creep Talk 08:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Footballer who technically met the old WP:NFOOTBALL with 22 mins of professional football before dropping to the semi-pro level. No WP:SIGCOV presented in the article and nothing found in searches. Google News in Hungarian name order seems to have a few hits but all of them, without exception, are trivial mentions in squad lists and match updates. A Hungarian source search only yielded stats databases and other trivial coverage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) Jumpytoo Talk 22:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Mr Loehr is likely notable, and there may be scope to write an encyclopaedia article in this space. But the hopeless puffery currently at this title is not a useful starting point for that article. I invite the community to consider deleting it, without prejudice to a proper encyclopaedia article being created later. — S Marshall T/ C 06:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment I reverted the article back to its last version before it became a copy and paste from imdb/copyvio. Puffery is gone. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. He is mostly known from the third season of Big Brother. SL93 ( talk) 03:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Darkover series. North America 1000 03:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Much like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorilla and the Bird, this one got a brief burst of sourcing at the initial announcement, but literally nothing afterward. If literally nothing happened other than the initial announcement, then there's nothing to write about, and therefore no notability. Prod was contested with a suggestion to merge, but there's just too little verifiable content here worth merging. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: NAC oveturned at
Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2022_June_5#Darkover_(TV_series). Relisting to be sure it shows on the log.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 13:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:39, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
We at FTN recently analyzed the article, which is somewhat unfocused and used mainly pro-fringe sources for medical content, and concluded that the rest should be deleted. The remaining sources are all WP:MEDPRIMARY and possibly WP:PROFRINGE, and some of them are not about hydrogen administered in aqueous solution, but rather on purported therapeutic uses of hydrogen in general. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
But the science behind those claims is weak, ... Perricone sells 'Dr. Perricone HW' @ $3/can, admits that it’s not yet known exactly how added hydrogen in water potentially works on the body; "I don’t see any downside" ... The studies to prove whether that’s the case haven’t been conducted ... it’s not clear how much hydrogen is needed to have therapeutic benefits and how much water you’d have to drink to reap the potential rewards ... "We don’t know anything about dosing or the frequency" .. no regulation to standardize formulas—mainly because there isn’t a solid scientific base to determine how much is needed to affect various conditions ... "It doesn’t seem like something that is risky". IMO this reflects the gist of the article better, as opposed the single positive and outstanding quote above. Presenting this article as an introducing source (here), is sort of self-defeating. I'm not qualified to assess Meds here, I'll leave that to RS and MED/FRINGE/&tc. researchers. DePiep ( talk) 05:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Lacks notability; only one notable role for a few years on One Life to Live. Bgsu98 ( talk) 00:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable physiotherapist Mooonswimmer 00:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
The refs given (and I didn't see significantly better ones on a BEFORE) don't add up to SIGCOV or notability. Ingratis ( talk) 00:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
The actress probably doesn't meet the notability requirements for actors. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 15:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 15:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. More coverage found, the community has consensus. Please add the new sources to the article. Less Unless ( talk) 20:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE on Newspapers.com, GNews, GBooks, and ProQuest. yielded extremely few results: press releases, superficial name-drops, and TV Guide listings. It's mentioned in passing in articles about Animal Planet or Michelle Beadle, but these confirm only that the show exists and nothing more. Deprodded without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "In a world fraught with war, environmental problems and economic cricses, it's the happy animal stories that make us smile. Every week you and your children can pick up a half-hour of them on the new "Animal Planet Report." The weekly program, hosted by Michelle Beadle, premiered earlier this month and continues every Friday on Animal Planet. It's created in partnership with award-winning journalist Linda Ellerbee and her production company, Lucky Duck Productions. These are the "Hey, Martha" stories of the animal world that make viewers say ... This week your children get to see ..."
The article notes: "A half-hour weekly current events series featuring the latest developments from the natural world, such as a report on the multi-million dollar business that has grown up around wolfwatching in Yellowstone Park, the new frog species found in the rainforests of Sri Lanka and the tale of a baby hippo adopted by a giant tortoise. Presented by Tim Vincent and Maxine Trump."
The article notes: "Cable TV's Animal Planet Monday announced its new "The Animal Planet Report," a half-hour weekly current events series. The show hosted by Michelle Beadle and produced by Linda Ellerbee's Lucky Duck Productions, will bow Friday at 9 p.m. ET, the Silver Spring, Md.-based network said in a news release."
The article notes: "The former Blue Peter presenter Tim Vincent hosts this lively new magazine programme reporting from the animal kingdom. In this first part we meet the three-times winner of the coveted world’s ugliest dog prize, go to the Yellowstone National Park to look at how the reintroduction of wolves has gone, and find out about the Kenyan dog that “adopted” an abandoned human baby."
The article notes: ""Animal Planet Report" (Friday, 9 p.m., Animal Planet). In this half- hour weekly show devoted to animal happenings, host Michelle Beadle tells of a rescued manatee, and how more vets are needed in rural areas. Maggie, an overweight elephant in an Alaskan zoo, gets a diet and exercise regimen - a custom-made treadmill. Let's hope there's enough animal news to keep this show going."
The article notes: "The speedy patas monkey is discussed as well as their ability to reach speeds of 30 miles per hour and a Swiss man gets his weather report from animals."
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:56, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. WP:TOOSOON for notability. Filmography of two years Whiteguru ( talk) 08:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Local politician. Doesn't pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 04:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable local club Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 13:38, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep We have articles on many GAA clubs - both large & small. This is the nature of the organization. There are clubs in every parish and are active in local competitions. We need to keep these clubs here as they are integral to the nature of the GAA.
Pmunited ( talk) 13:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep. Is short but well sourced with citations in every part. Sources include The Echo, The Southern Star, The Corkman. None of those are part of the club (I think). -- Gaois ( talk) 22:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Speed#Series programming. Viable AtD with no one contesting it. History is there when/if sourcing is identified. Star Mississippi 15:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE turned up one press release, one less than sentence-long mention in an article on Speed Network, superficial name-drops in articles on Tanner Foust, and a crapton of TV guide listings with nothing better in sight. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Textbook WP:TOOSOON. Nothing after the initial announcement has occurred. No valid redirect target. Deprodded for no reason Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
In my view, this is a clear case for keep. Cheers MaxnaCarta ( talk) 09:47, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is the article should be improved, not deleted. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Article almost entirely sourced to IMDb, which is not acceptable by itself, and is basically only a list of songs; one source that is acceptable (Entertainment Weekly) is plainly not enough. Instead of deleting, I propose that it be moved to the draft so that sourcing (off-line or on-line) could be found. The previous discussion seemed to indicate some notability, but nothing was done since then. Szmenderowiecki ( talk) 22:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. A discussion on whether to redirect / merge can happen after this AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
I redirected this to History of Liechtenstein, but was reverted. This list is nearly empty, and the few articles it points to are nearly empty as well (and could do with a discussion of their own). E.g. the first one, 2007 in Liechtenstein, just has a joke trivia entry. Perhaps the Template:Years in Liechtenstein could be added at the bottom of the "History" article to help people who really want to access these "years" articles. But for most readers, arriving at this "list of years" article and then the underlying individual years will just be a disappointment instead of something helpful. Fram ( talk) 07:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Goldsztajn (
talk) 21:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shep Messing. North America 1000 22:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Nothing on ProQuest, Google News, or Newspapers.com. "Shep Unplugged" + "Shep Messing" turned up nothing but Wikipedia mirrors on a regular Google search. Prod and redirect both contested. Given the complete lack of literally anything verifiable, possible WP:HOAX. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 20:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
MSG.com's Video Library (Check out Shep Unplugged, a recap of the Revs match, and more). Sadly, it appears that MSG Networks pretty completely have lost/scrubbed basically all content from before ~2018 but the original Wiki article seems earnest enough plus the non-Wiki sourced blog post makes it seem to have existed. Skynxnex ( talk) 17:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
He has also been the lead analyst for the MetroStars and the re-branded New York Red Bulls of Major League Soccer for several years. During these broadcasts, Shep hosts a segment during halftime entitled Shep Unplugged. Shep is usually outspoken during this segment about league issues and global soccer news.Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Outdoor Channel#Content. North America 1000 22:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
All results on ProQuest were press releases or directory listings. Prod and redirect both contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 20:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 21:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Article has numerous problems (see maintenance tags) and is also written in-universe. Each book in the series has its own article already. Let's WP:TNT this glorified fanpage. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 19:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
"Sex Lives" + "Jay Grdina" got no results on ProQuest. Searching for "Sex Lives" + "Playboy TV" on the same was entirely false positives; just uses of the phrase "sex lives" in terms unrelated to the show. A straight Google search of "Sex Lives" + "playboy TV" turned up just IMDb (from which the plot synopis here seems to be copied) and episodes of the show on sketchy looking porn sites and absolutely no verifiable content. I'm honestly not expecting to find much in the way of RS for a porn show but I'm willing to be proven wrong. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 22:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Could only find a few passing mentions here and there: directory listings, name-drops in articles about Animal Planet, etc. The "Star Wars" episode got an article but I was unable to confirm anything else about this show beyond its mere existence. That it's been an unsourced stub since 2007 is a sign that the show made no impact whatsoever, and it definitely fails the WP:RS test. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The article reviews Animal Icons: Jaws. The article provides 144 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Just when you thought it was safe to switch the set back on. Jaws the movie was a box-office hit, but how close did Jaws come to the animal it portrayed? This edition of Animal Icons is more about the pretend shark than the real shark, which is fine by me, but may disappoint viewers genuinely interested in sharks."
The article reviews Animal Icons: King Kong. The article provides 170 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Without King Kong there would be no Lord of the Rings or Jurassic Park or Wallace and Gromit for that matter. In the first of a series celebrating the animal icons of film and TV, New Zealand director Peter Jackson reveals that he saw the movie when he was nine and resolved there and then to pursue a career in film. King Kong, left, also pioneered stop-motion animation, paving the way for Wallace and his canine sidekick. ... This story behind the story reveals how he was conceived and the trailblazing special effects that brought him to life."
The article provides 119 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Animal Icons: Star Wars Creatures, Animal Planet, Sunday, 7.30pm. Especially since we're currently in the grip of another round of Star Wars mania, it's probably little surprise that most kids list Wookiees, Gungans, Ewoks, Bantha or even something as slimy and sinister as a Dianoga as their favourite animal. But where did George Lucas and his animators get the inspiration for their galaxy of creatures? This fun special tracks down the animals that were caricaturised to create the various Star Wars beasties."
The article provides 163 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Did you ever wonder where the idea for Jabba the Hutt came from? Or what exactly is a Boga and will there be merchandising? Or maybe how can every media outlet on the face of the Earth tie itself in with "Star Wars: Episode III"? Animal Planet has the answer to most of the above this week in an hourlong special that looks at the origin of George Lucas' galactic menagerie, from Ewoks to Wookiees and how these fantasy creatures are inspired by actual animals found on Earth."
The article provides 258 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Animal Planet is going after bigger game tonight, including George Lucas' Hutts and Wookiees. Lucas not only appears on camera but also co-produced Animal Icons: Star Wars, a tribute to the universe he created. Yes, it's an hourlong infomercial for Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith -- which, conveniently, is scheduled to open in the United States at midnight. But as commercials go, it's an entertaining one."
The article reviews Animal Icons: Star Wars Creatures. The article provides 119 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Hosted by actor Anthony Daniels (aka C-3PO), Animal Icons takes us behind the scenes to meet the conceptual artists, animators, special effects technicians and voiceover artists who brought the Star Wars safari to life."
The article notes: "With guaranteed blockbuster "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith" due in theaters Thursday, Animal Planet hopes viewers will warm up with "Animal Icons: Star Wars Creatures." It debuts at 7 p.m. Wednesday and repeats at 10 p.m. Anthony Daniels, who voices robot C-3PO in all of the "Star Wars" movies, narrates the hourlong special."
The article provides 43 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Animal Icons: Comic Book Creatures, Animal Planet Batman (pictured), Spider Man and Mighty Mouse - as comic book heroes, each has drawn their superpowers from the animal kingdom. In this episode, Animal Icons compares these characters with the real animals that inspired their creation."
The article provides 82 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Has Animal Planet exhausted the natural world? Seems like it, given that this series is devoted to iconic animal figures from the cultural world. King Kong and Jaws are to come o this week it's Garfield. Created by Jim Davis, the fat and lazy cat is big (the strip is read in 111 countries, apparently), although quite why he deserves an episode, and Snoopy doesn't, takes some explaining. Perhaps it's something to do with the behind-the-scenes look at the recent feature film."
The article provides 72 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Pure seasonal froth. The animal icons in this instance are those that appear in TV shows and films - Snoopy, Santa's Little Helper in The Simpsons, The Muppets. It's smooth voiceover and cheesy music time - so much so that you think this must be ironic - and there's lots of talk of spiritual uplift and delightful traditions. But it's an American production, which shines through in the production values and the characters on offer."
The article provides 81 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Think: Just in time to promote a movie that scarcely needs any extra hype comes this "documentary" about the film series' sundry colorful (and, yes, goofy) alien species. Don't think: The Jedi Knights are pretty much erased in Episode III - Revenge of the Sith. Just think how much more satisfying it would be if George Lucas indulged in Ewok-icide instead. In a nutshell: More Lucas hagiography in the guise of an Animal Planet show about nonexistent beasties. Nonetheless, essential for fanboys."
The article reviews Animal Icons: Garfield. The article provides 22 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "If you're one of the 260 million people worldwide who read the comic-strip, you'll enjoy this gushing profile of the sardonic feline."
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter. Highest ranking ever was 112, but he lost 9 of his next 12 fights. Fight announcements, fight results, MMA database listings, and a bio on the web page of the gym where we worked are what I found. These all fail to show the significant independent coverage required by the GNG. Sandals2 ( talk) 19:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK. Potentially notable. scope_creep Talk 18:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not enough coverage to pass notability guidelines Less Unless ( talk) 20:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails GNG and the sources available in the article are mostly about the subject's single book entitled Borderline, that's to say the book might be notable but the subject is not. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Page creator can request restoration to Draft space at WP:REFUND should better sources emerge. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 18:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Sumeet Patil
Indian art director who does not appear to satisfy creative notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself and explain why the subject is notable, and this does not. It says that he has developed a technique to allow the blind to paint, using fragrances. That is a credible claim of significance, but this is not an A7 nomination. The reference is 404-compliant, and so fails verifiability, which is a precondition to notability. It states that he received an award, but on verification, the award appears to be one that is given to children, and so is interesting, but does not establish notability. Other than that, the article consists of a filmography of films that are merely names. So there is nothing in the article itself to establish notability. A check of the references is not helpful. One is a promoted story. Another says that he received an award that appears to be given to children. Two of the references are 404-compliant, and four of them are IMDB. The IMDB references were not checked (because they were IMDB).
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | indianexpress.com | Reads like a promoted story | No | Yes | Yes | No |
2 | nationalbalbhavan.nic.in | Says that he received an award in 2004. The award appears to be given to children. | Yes | No, not a significant award | Yes | Yes |
3 | timesofindia | 404 compliant | No | |||
4 | IMDB | Yes | No | |||
5 | IMDB | Yes | No | |||
6 | IMDB | Yes | No | |||
7 | timesofindia | 404 compliant | No | |||
8 | IMDB | Yes | No |
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable website Mooonswimmer 17:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 03:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Only has one source aside from charts, and it's from a site not listed at WP:RSMUSIC. Only other source I could fine is from Noisecreep but I'm not certain about that site's reliability. Has charted on multiple Billboard charts which is more than I can say for songs/albums that have survived my XfDs before, but I'm still not certain that's enough. QuietHere ( talk) 17:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Not a notable company - most references are to their own website, press releases, or junk sources like Amazon and BBB. They're mentioned in this book published by "Rich Dad Advisors Press" (reliability?) but the chapter was written by the company's owner, so it's not independent. No other usable sources found through WP:BEFORE. Spicy ( talk) 17:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Coolperson177 ( t| c) 22:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable middle school; possibly redirect to an article on the local school district if such an article exists Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 17:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The book notes: "成都七中育才学校成都七中育才学校的前身是成都1957年开办的一所市属普通中学。1997 年为适应成都现代化教育发展需要,在成都市教育局领导下,依托百年名校全国示范性高中成都七中,该学校改名为成都七中育才学校。办学20多年来,学校始终坚持走“文化养校”的发展道路,坚持“卓尔不群、大器天下”的核心价值诉求,坚守“重德育才、面向未来、最优发展”的办学理念,坚持信息技术与教育教学的深度融合,努力建设智慧型校园、数字化学校。目前,成都七中育才学校已成为西部乃至全国的一所初中名校。 [paragraph break] 2005年,成都七中育才学校开启全日制远程教学工作,通过多媒体教学示范班,将优质教育辐射到边远、民族地区学校,让近万名学生与该校学子共享优质教育资源,在保障育才学子实现最优发展的同时,成全了越来越多的远端学子、远端教师、远端学校、远端区域教育。截至2017年,成都七中育才学校的优质教育资源已辐射到云南、贵州、四川、江西、广西、甘肃、重庆,常年与260多所学校、近1万名教师、近8万名学生分享优质教育资源,极大地促进了教育公平,推动了教育均衡发展。"
From Google Translate: "Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School The predecessor of Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School was a municipal ordinary middle school opened in 1957 in Chengdu. In 1997, in order to meet the needs of modern education development in Chengdu, under the leadership of the Chengdu Education Bureau and relying on the national model high school Chengdu No. 7 Middle School, the school was renamed Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School. For more than 20 years of running a school, the school has always adhered to the development path of "cultivating the school", adhered to the core value appeal of "excellence and greatness in the world", adhered to the school-running concept of "emphasizing morality, cultivating talents, facing the future, and optimal development", and insisting on information Deep integration of technology and education and teaching, and strive to build smart campuses and digital schools. At present, Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School has become a famous junior high school in the west and even the whole country. [paragraph break] In 2005, Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School started full-time distance teaching work. Through multimedia teaching demonstration classes, high-quality education was radiated to schools in remote and ethnic areas, allowing nearly 10,000 students to share high-quality educational resources with the school's students, ensuring the protection of Yucai students. While achieving optimal development, more and more remote students, remote teachers, remote schools, and remote regional education have been fulfilled. As of 2017, the high-quality educational resources of Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School have radiated to Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Gansu, and Chongqing, sharing high-quality education with more than 260 schools, nearly 10,000 teachers and nearly 80,000 students throughout the year. Educational resources have greatly promoted the equity of education and promoted the balanced development of education."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School was established in 1997. It is an old-fashioned high-quality public school in Chengdu and a school with a certain influence in the country. Its predecessor was Chengdu No. 35 Middle School (a municipal ordinary middle school opened in 1957). In 1997, relying on the Chengdu No. 7 Middle School, it was restructured into the Chengdu No. 7 Middle School Yucai School with the nature of "public-run private assistance". ... In September 2009, under the direct guidance of the Chengdu Education Bureau and the Jinjiang District Education Bureau, the school was fully returned to the public. It is completely separated from Chengdu No. 7 Middle School (high school) and is a member of the No. 7 Middle School Education Group. It has a teaching connection with Chengdu No. 7 Middle School (high school) and has no administrative connection. ... No. 7 Middle School Yucai (Shuijingfang Campus) is one of the three secondary schools, and is one of the schools with the best reputation among public junior high schools in the No. 7 middle school department. It is especially outstanding and dazzling for its "online classes" and "cloud classes", which allow students to further their studies. The rate is almost 100%."
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Ponyo. CSD G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable director/musician Mooonswimmer 16:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was move to Draft:Areka Hooper. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Page creator can request restoration to Draft space at WP:REFUND should better sources emerge. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Page creator can request restoration to Draft space at WP:REFUND should better sources emerge. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial, including those not currently on the page such as [5] and [6]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 16:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial along with the ones not on the page currently: [7] and [searchlight.vc/sports/2022/03/25/international-football-returns-to-svg/]. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 15:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Per apparent lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Merko ( talk) 15:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 21:55, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Per apparent lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources as a result of WP:BEFORE search. Merko ( talk) 15:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator ( talk) 23:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Warsaw Uprising. ✗ plicit 13:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Citing no sources since 2015, possible POV fork. I'd suggest merging back into parent article. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 22:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America 1000 02:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
On the surface, this looks like a well-sourced article of a very old organization. However, when reviewing the sources, there are no independent secondary sources that discuss the subject in-depth. All sources are affiliated with the organization, either directly to the lodge or Freemasonry. A review of sources are available at the talk page Talk:Palatine_Lodge_No._97#Excessive_Primary_Sources. As existence, even long existence is not notability, I believe this article fails WP:NORG and despite expressing concerns in draft and main space, no attempt to find independent, secondary sources has been attempted.A WP:BEFORE does not locate significant coverage. Slywriter ( talk) 21:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MelanieN ( talk) 22:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Was deleted in September 2018. Sources in article and elsewhere online are either mentions in passing, interviews or PR paid-for puff pieces. No independent in-depth coverage found. Edwardx ( talk) 20:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:56, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources currently on article and a search on Google are of a trivial nature. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is the SIGCOV met?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 23:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Note: This article was originally listed on AFD as a contested prod on March 25 2009.
This article was listed on AFD approximately 13 years ago, but the nomination lacked rational beyond stating that a proposed deletion was contested.
This article is being re-listed today as the subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines, and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Steps were taken to locate said sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Please do not hesitate to contact me should sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 21:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
2009-03 (closed as ✓ keep)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment Seems notable? Wondering if you discounted these sources for some reason Yamaguchi先生?
References
SailingInABathTub ( talk) 10:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment – strong indications of existence of significant coverage, such as this book The Origin of the South Asian Malyar Tribe, by Shahid Khan-Malyarzoi, Jacqueline Harvey and hundreds of search results with trivial mention to this tribe. Radioactive ( talk) 00:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more input would be appreciated
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep. I commented and avoided !voting in case I missed something, but the nominator hasn't answered my question. With no objections to the sources I suggested, I'll be bolder and say keep. CT55555 ( talk) 02:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 19:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable. All sources are primary. Iamreallygoodatcheckers ( talk) 00:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 02:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More participation needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with addition of sources, but they're just passing mentions in articles about graffiti artists. The other sources are social media, blogs, and superficial mentions here and there. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 16:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 07:29, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More participation needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 21:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Bušek was a non-medaling Olympian. The sources about sports such as Olympedia, all only have tables on him, not biographical text. I did find [13] which is a one sentence mention that one of his former team mates regularly wrote letters to Bušek. That is not enough to justify an article. There are multiple other people with this name who show up in sources, such as an inventor, so there is no reason to make this name a redirect. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 12:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A request to clarify earlier positions was not answered, making consensus of what to do unclear. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
A non-notable pseudoscience, one of an infinite variety of such, without the benefit of reliable secondary sources. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 12:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Ari T. Benchaim. Hope you are keeping well. Thanks for your time for reviewing this article. I also noticed your remarks and nomination for this article. The practice has been followed globally for various ailments. It also has sufficient secondary sources and also scientific backing for patients with these ailments. Request you to kindly reconsider and remove the tag. Thanking you. Gardenkur ( talk) 13:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to KCET. North America 1000 02:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Completely unsourced and I couldn't find anything. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nicely improved. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Stub article with practically no info or sources. Given that it says "there is no existing biography about this person" it's unlikely to ever see meaningful extension. Nothing links here either except for things like "List of people who died in 929". Hornpipe2 ( talk) 20:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This is a tough one, as evidenced by this discussion remaining open since May 20th. The standards in WP:GNG are difficult to meet. Several editors have marshalled a number of sources in support of keeping the article, including convincing evidence via WorldCat that the publication is listed in important libraries (though this is typically not enough to keep an article). However, most of the sources offered by those arguing in favor of keeping fall short of "significant coverage" because they mention the subject in passing only. There are a few sources that primarily address the subject, but these appear to be less influential. At the same time, some of these passing mentions seem to indicate that the subject comes close to satisfying WP:NBOOK's third criterion. Even this argument is tenuous given the passing nature of these mentions. Ultimately, my read is that consensus has not been reached, but I suspect that a future discussion may result in the article being deleted unless additional third-party significant coverage emerges. Malinaccier ( talk) 01:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
promotional article about a magazine that afaict isn't notable, despite being created by notable founders. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
I disagree, the journal is listed in important libraries from Oxford and Cambridge university to New York public library as you can see in the world book catalogue https://www.worldcat.org/title/european-conservative/oclc/1057445721?referer=br&ht=edition -- Pepe1979 ( talk) 18:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
The European Conservative is relevant as it is widely read on the European political right and beyond and serves as a focal point for the connection of conservative academics. Do not delete in any case -- Oberlandler080 ( talk) 08:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep. The journal (and the article) is relevant and does satisfy the WP relevance criteria. There are scholarly research papers that attribute importance to the TEC because of their role in the transfer of ideas between west European and east European conservatives or right-wingers.-- 90.204.114.23 ( talk) 21:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Here is another article from Hungary, in "Mandiner", a magazine close to the Orbán government. It looks like The European Conservative is especially promoted in right-wing circles in Central East Europe. https://mandiner.hu/cikk/20210720_jon_a_megujult_the_european_conservative_magazin.-- Pepe1979 ( talk) 10:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello @Alpha3031: The paper by Valentin Behr (University of Strasbourg) (From Anticommunism to Antiliberalism. Polish Conservative intellectuals' involvement in the transnational circulation of ideas (archives-ouvertes.fr)) provides exactly what you ask for: It shows that the CER and TEC are important as plattfroms for the circulation of ideas - in this case hardline conservative, illiberale ideas by Polish anticommunist intellectuals. The book New Conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe by Katharina Bluhm and Mihail Varga also elaborates on this and mentions CER and TEC as forums for the intellectual exchange. What else do you want? I think this is getting a bit pedantic and we should all move on. Perhaps some other participants might like to join the discussion and give their opinion?-- Pepe1979 ( talk) 10:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Since NFOOTY is deprecated, GNG must be met for footballers. Although I assume the book is reliable, a single source is insufficient to keep the article. I did not locate any additional coverage (or even suggestions of coverage) on a search. Can't redirect to List of Burnley F.C. players as that only covers players with 100+ appearances. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:27, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Article about a short film, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFILM. As always, films are not "inherently" notable just because they exist; they have to have some form of notability claim, and WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage to support it -- but the only notability claim here is that the film exists, and the only reference is a deadlinked catalogue profile on the self-published website of a film festival where it screened once, which is not support for notability as it's neither analytical nor fully independent of the film. Bearcat ( talk) 14:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
The previous AfD in 2013 resulted in a 'keep' although there were still three editors in favour of deletion even at that time. Since then, WP:NFOOTBALL has been removed and it seems that NFOOTBALL and the fact that Fitri was relatively young back in 2013, were the main factors which resulted in the article being kept.
It's worth noting that nine years on, Fitri still hasn't made any further appearances and still looks to fail WP:GNG quite badly. There are no hits in Google News or ProQuest and a Singaporean source search returns only stats pages, social media and Wikipedia mirrors. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:31, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, specifically WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIRS. Native advertising. scope_creep Talk 13:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. While this topic is potentially of interest and notable, the article as it is does not establish notability. There is no prejudice against recreating this list with proper sources in the future if there is interest. Malinaccier ( talk) 21:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Yet another boilerplate "list of people on the postage stamps of X". Woefully incomplete, completely unsourced. No maintenance being put in since 2010 as usual. There is an overwhelming consensus by now that postage stamps lists aren't notable. Deprodded without comment. Obligatory ping of @ Fram: and @ Johnpacklambert: Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 15:05, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 13:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
This footballer only has one name, which makes an accurate WP:BEFORE tricky. I've scoured the archives of various Indonesian news sites and found a couple of mentions from 2014 that appear to relate to Danial: Okezone and Republika. These are both trivial mentions of the subject and so WP:GNG is not demonstrated. Since I could not find anything even close to the detail required for GNG, I'm sending this to AfD. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument to present sources, as requested by those advocating deletion, was not answered. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
This teaching course does not seem notable at all. Add to the fact that the article itself contradicts itself - it either ran for 26 episodes or 76 episodes over 9 seasons, makes me question the validity of everything else wrirtten there. Gonnym ( talk) 15:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More policy based input would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 13:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Stats stub on non-notable semi-pro footballer. Please do not confuse him with legendary Singaporean footballer and manager Fandi Ahmad or any of his three children Irfan Fandi Ahmad, Ikhsan Fandi Ahmad and Ilhan Fandi Ahmad, all of whom are notable and all will come up in a WP:BEFORE search.
Ultimately, Fandi Achmad seems to fail WP:GNG, which is not surprising since his career consists of 46 mins of football and then disappearing. Everything I can find in searches, including an Indonesian search, is just coverage on namesakes or a passing mention in a match summary regarding an Indonesian third tier football match. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I wanted to wait on the outcome of the equivalent women's AfD before nominating this one and since that closed as 'delete', I believe this also should be removed per WP:NOTSTATS. Whilst there haven't been many AfDs of this nature to date yet, it's worth also noting that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India national under-20 football team results and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzbekistan national under-20 football team results both closed as 'delete' too. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The consensus of the discussion is that Sørensen does not meet NPROF. I don't see enough of a consensus to spring for a merge or redirect. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable for an academic, was only a Information Systems Developer according to his personal website. Reference 2 made no references to where he was originally from and the date he started his academic career. Reference 3 is dead, and getting a PhD is not notable enough. Reference 5 has no mentions of his name, furthermore, B-Core Limited on Google doesn't show anything related. Fails WP:GNG Hadal1337 ( talk) 11:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- The criteria above are sometimes summed up as an "Average Professor Test": When judged against the average impact of a researcher in a given field, does this researcher stand out as clearly more notable or more accomplished?
- Note that this is a guideline and not a rule; exceptions may exist. Some academics may not meet any of these criteria, but may still be notable for their academic work. It is very difficult to make clear requirements in terms of number/quality of publications.
{{
notability}}
tag or discussing in the talk page first). —
Jonathan Bowen (
talk) 16:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 10:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was Revert back to the rugby union player article. Per consensus Less Unless ( talk) 20:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a complex AfD because this article was actually hijacked in Aug 2012. Previously, this was about an Argentine international rugby union player. The footballer of this name has only played at a very low level in Argentina and doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Searches in Google, ProQuest, DDG etc. only return results relating to rugby union.
If both the rugby player and the footballer are non-notable, then we simply delete this article. If the rugby player is notable but the footballer isn't, then please revert the hijacking. If both are notable then please can an admin do some sort of splitting of the histories so we have Alejandro Abadie (footballer) with relevant edit history and Alejandro Abadie (rugby union) with relevant edit history? Sorry if AfD is not the best venue but I feel that notability is questionable here so AfD was what I thought would be best. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:58, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. No effective sourcing. scope_creep Talk 08:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Footballer who technically met the old WP:NFOOTBALL with 22 mins of professional football before dropping to the semi-pro level. No WP:SIGCOV presented in the article and nothing found in searches. Google News in Hungarian name order seems to have a few hits but all of them, without exception, are trivial mentions in squad lists and match updates. A Hungarian source search only yielded stats databases and other trivial coverage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) Jumpytoo Talk 22:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Mr Loehr is likely notable, and there may be scope to write an encyclopaedia article in this space. But the hopeless puffery currently at this title is not a useful starting point for that article. I invite the community to consider deleting it, without prejudice to a proper encyclopaedia article being created later. — S Marshall T/ C 06:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Comment I reverted the article back to its last version before it became a copy and paste from imdb/copyvio. Puffery is gone. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. He is mostly known from the third season of Big Brother. SL93 ( talk) 03:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Darkover series. North America 1000 03:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Much like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorilla and the Bird, this one got a brief burst of sourcing at the initial announcement, but literally nothing afterward. If literally nothing happened other than the initial announcement, then there's nothing to write about, and therefore no notability. Prod was contested with a suggestion to merge, but there's just too little verifiable content here worth merging. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: NAC oveturned at
Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2022_June_5#Darkover_(TV_series). Relisting to be sure it shows on the log.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 13:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 02:39, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
We at FTN recently analyzed the article, which is somewhat unfocused and used mainly pro-fringe sources for medical content, and concluded that the rest should be deleted. The remaining sources are all WP:MEDPRIMARY and possibly WP:PROFRINGE, and some of them are not about hydrogen administered in aqueous solution, but rather on purported therapeutic uses of hydrogen in general. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
But the science behind those claims is weak, ... Perricone sells 'Dr. Perricone HW' @ $3/can, admits that it’s not yet known exactly how added hydrogen in water potentially works on the body; "I don’t see any downside" ... The studies to prove whether that’s the case haven’t been conducted ... it’s not clear how much hydrogen is needed to have therapeutic benefits and how much water you’d have to drink to reap the potential rewards ... "We don’t know anything about dosing or the frequency" .. no regulation to standardize formulas—mainly because there isn’t a solid scientific base to determine how much is needed to affect various conditions ... "It doesn’t seem like something that is risky". IMO this reflects the gist of the article better, as opposed the single positive and outstanding quote above. Presenting this article as an introducing source (here), is sort of self-defeating. I'm not qualified to assess Meds here, I'll leave that to RS and MED/FRINGE/&tc. researchers. DePiep ( talk) 05:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Lacks notability; only one notable role for a few years on One Life to Live. Bgsu98 ( talk) 00:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable physiotherapist Mooonswimmer 00:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
The refs given (and I didn't see significantly better ones on a BEFORE) don't add up to SIGCOV or notability. Ingratis ( talk) 00:08, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
The actress probably doesn't meet the notability requirements for actors. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 15:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 15:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:05, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)