Default pronouns selected. (they/them)
Welcome! | User home | Talk | Userboxes I made! | Welcome! | Guestbook | Email me! | Subpages | Welcome! |
Start a new discussion thread |
Huggums537 is currently wikibonked and is operating at a lower edit level than usual. Hitting the wall is a temporary condition, and the user should return to normal edit levels in time. |
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Huggums537. |
Released into public domain | ||
---|---|---|
I agree to release my text and image contributions, unless otherwise stated, into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under public domain terms, please check the multi-licensing guide. |
>Very low level of vandalism
>Low
pending changes backlog: 4 pages according to
DatBot as of 08:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
|
||||
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Huggums537. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! BilCat ( talk) 17:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Well, thank you very much! This is honestly the first extremely positive experience I've had since I became active. It's appreciated! Huggums537 ( talk) 17:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Cheers! DonQuixote ( talk) 19:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC) |
Short Description Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your work so far answering the call to add short descriptions to the level-5 vital articles. Keep it up! {{u| Sdkb}} talk 16:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks! I plan to keep going... Huggums537 ( talk) 19:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
... for what you said to Flyer22 -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
On 26 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Protection Court, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the show Protection Court continued to air episodes during an investigation launched by the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission alleging that litigants were filmed without their consent? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Protection Court. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Protection Court), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Kusma ( talk) 00:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Jack345110 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
@ Huggums537 Thank you for being the second person to sign my guestbook. Jack345110 ( talk) 12:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William Street Bird. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 00:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sevier County, Utah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Asian and Latino. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi User:Huggums537. Recently, I've been repeatedly experiencing editors asserting the absurd position that WP:AUD means that statewide or city-wide sources like the Herald Sun, The West Australian, PerthNow, or The Age are 'local' sources; as a means to discount even fully in-depth coverage of subjects such as ~800-1000 word detailed reviews of restaurants per the requirement for 'traditional' restaurant reviews under the WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS policy.
Frankly, its driving me a bit mental, as it de-facto is resulting in me being unable to write about most Australian subjects. Its incredibly demotivating and really driving up my frustrating with trying to contribute meaningfully to this encyclopedia. Even when I try to find in-depth sources, this officious and bizarre interpretation of existing policy has become a meaningful barrier.
I'm not asking for you to participate in any AfDs now, or advocate for any policy change at the moment that would assist; (obviously asking for such assistance would be inappropriate given I am T-banned from AfD and it would also amount to canvassing), but as you are someone that I perceive as a somewhat sympathetic editor; this message is an attempt to communicate my frustration. I am really beginning to reach my limit here with the approach of editors refusing to take Australian sources into account. If I can't use major Australian news publications as a source for Australian subjects, what other blooming alternative do I have? It takes my breath away as an Australian to see our largest news publications being called 'local'.
Kind regards Jack4576 ( talk) 16:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
I think it's interesting that the editor retention project is including blocked editors with chances to appeal in its scope. That makes sense to me and I hope the work results in some editors getting unblocked and returning to activity on the project. I would, however, caution you about making statements like I could not help but notice that your block seemed somewhat well out of process
. Koyla's block was not a community ban as you seem to think. It was a block by the Arbitration Committee and so there was no public discussion to link to. Instead, it followed appropriate procedure in both the talk page message, by noting it was an Arbitration Committee block and how that can be appealed, and log for ArbCom blocks. Given that you admit I don't know hardly anything about arbcom processes
it seems unwise to offer advice to another editor.
Barkeep49 (
talk) 16:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
While I understand the sentiment, I think your final sentence in this edit goes too far and crosses the line into being uncivil. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Exactly what I wanted to say—and more!—but couldn't for the life of me find a way to say it. Cheers! Serial 16:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for signing my guestbook!
Notrealname1234 (
talk) 14:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Default pronouns selected. (they/them)
Welcome! | User home | Talk | Userboxes I made! | Welcome! | Guestbook | Email me! | Subpages | Welcome! |
Start a new discussion thread |
Huggums537 is currently wikibonked and is operating at a lower edit level than usual. Hitting the wall is a temporary condition, and the user should return to normal edit levels in time. |
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Huggums537. |
Released into public domain | ||
---|---|---|
I agree to release my text and image contributions, unless otherwise stated, into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under public domain terms, please check the multi-licensing guide. |
>Very low level of vandalism
>Low
pending changes backlog: 4 pages according to
DatBot as of 08:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
|
||||
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Huggums537. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! BilCat ( talk) 17:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Well, thank you very much! This is honestly the first extremely positive experience I've had since I became active. It's appreciated! Huggums537 ( talk) 17:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Cheers! DonQuixote ( talk) 19:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC) |
Short Description Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your work so far answering the call to add short descriptions to the level-5 vital articles. Keep it up! {{u| Sdkb}} talk 16:35, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks! I plan to keep going... Huggums537 ( talk) 19:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
... for what you said to Flyer22 -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
On 26 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Protection Court, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the show Protection Court continued to air episodes during an investigation launched by the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission alleging that litigants were filmed without their consent? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Protection Court. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Protection Court), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Kusma ( talk) 00:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Jack345110 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
@ Huggums537 Thank you for being the second person to sign my guestbook. Jack345110 ( talk) 12:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William Street Bird. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 00:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sevier County, Utah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Asian and Latino. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi User:Huggums537. Recently, I've been repeatedly experiencing editors asserting the absurd position that WP:AUD means that statewide or city-wide sources like the Herald Sun, The West Australian, PerthNow, or The Age are 'local' sources; as a means to discount even fully in-depth coverage of subjects such as ~800-1000 word detailed reviews of restaurants per the requirement for 'traditional' restaurant reviews under the WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS policy.
Frankly, its driving me a bit mental, as it de-facto is resulting in me being unable to write about most Australian subjects. Its incredibly demotivating and really driving up my frustrating with trying to contribute meaningfully to this encyclopedia. Even when I try to find in-depth sources, this officious and bizarre interpretation of existing policy has become a meaningful barrier.
I'm not asking for you to participate in any AfDs now, or advocate for any policy change at the moment that would assist; (obviously asking for such assistance would be inappropriate given I am T-banned from AfD and it would also amount to canvassing), but as you are someone that I perceive as a somewhat sympathetic editor; this message is an attempt to communicate my frustration. I am really beginning to reach my limit here with the approach of editors refusing to take Australian sources into account. If I can't use major Australian news publications as a source for Australian subjects, what other blooming alternative do I have? It takes my breath away as an Australian to see our largest news publications being called 'local'.
Kind regards Jack4576 ( talk) 16:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
I think it's interesting that the editor retention project is including blocked editors with chances to appeal in its scope. That makes sense to me and I hope the work results in some editors getting unblocked and returning to activity on the project. I would, however, caution you about making statements like I could not help but notice that your block seemed somewhat well out of process
. Koyla's block was not a community ban as you seem to think. It was a block by the Arbitration Committee and so there was no public discussion to link to. Instead, it followed appropriate procedure in both the talk page message, by noting it was an Arbitration Committee block and how that can be appealed, and log for ArbCom blocks. Given that you admit I don't know hardly anything about arbcom processes
it seems unwise to offer advice to another editor.
Barkeep49 (
talk) 16:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
While I understand the sentiment, I think your final sentence in this edit goes too far and crosses the line into being uncivil. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Exactly what I wanted to say—and more!—but couldn't for the life of me find a way to say it. Cheers! Serial 16:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for signing my guestbook!
Notrealname1234 (
talk) 14:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)