The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
A gestalt article on three different articles that define this word differently. No substantial independent coverage for any definition. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotional and created by an SPA account.
Insufficient sourcing independent of Lindsay Oades, a few other scholarly articles exist but none appear substantial enough to re-write this article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Marked for notability concerns since 2018. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 23:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Council of State members are not inherently notable and there’s not enough source to establish GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 19:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to India–Malta relations as an AtD. Daniel ( talk) 02:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. No in-depth third party coverage. Sources 5-9 merely confirm former high commissioners. LibStar ( talk) 22:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. There's a couple sentences here. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV other than this, which seems like a press release ("The whole company expresses the utmost satisfaction"). JTtheOG ( talk) 19:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I see no point in keeping this article along with its parent article Umayyad campaigns in India, when there are no sources explicitly covering this event as "Arab conquest of Kaikan", the source cited in the lead for it nowhere mentions this event as the title. Another problem with orginal researched articles is their defined timeline, despite having no source for the hoax timelines the authors of these articles love to furnish their own preferred timeline of one, two or even three centuries. The article topic also seems to lack notability and significant coverage as there are many uncertainty and unknown belligerents. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 08:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. as there is disagreement if this article complies with WP:NLIST. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides being mostly unsourced; they consists of WP:PRIMARY, announcements, some appears to be rewritten from each other. Most of those are about the game itself, others are dead or redirected pages. Barely much to help this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 08:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merging multiple deletion discussions into a single AfD is a nomination choice, not a valid reason for procedural close, unless another AfD for the same page is already in progress. Please address the specific article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Routine events such as sports matches ... may be better covered as part of another article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. as there is disagreement over whether this article complies with WP:NLIST. Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides being mostly unsourced; most of those are about the game itself, others consists of WP:PRIMARY, YouTube and dead or redirected pages. Barely much to help this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 08:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merging multiple deletion discussions into a single AfD is a nomination choice, not a valid reason for procedural close, unless another AfD for the same page is already in progress. Please address the specific article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Routine events such as sports matches ... may be better covered as part of another article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. as there is disagreement over whether this article complies with WP:NLIST. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides being mostly unsourced; both sources are about the game and nothing to do with the TV coverage or just a mere mention and another is a redirect link; not doing anything to help this list to assert notability. An WP:ATD will be to trim and merge it into Monday Night Football. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 07:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merging multiple deletion discussions into a single AfD is a nomination choice, not a valid reason for procedural close, unless another AfD for the same page is already in progress. Please address the specific article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Routine events such as sports matches ... may be better covered as part of another article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Samuel Alito. Star Mississippi 16:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTNEWS and can also be covered sufficiently at Samuel Alito. Esolo5002 ( talk) 20:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ooberman. Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage establishing independent notability. It seems that most coverage of the subject is in the context of Ooberman (and to a lesser extent – The Magic Theatre, which is a section of the Ooberman article), a redirect to which would make sense as an alternative to deletion. toweli ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 20:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Not a valid disambiguation page, just synonyms of a vague term. Walsh90210 ( talk) 18:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zeds Dead. Liz Read! Talk! 21:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability independent of the band Zeds Dead, per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:ARTIST. Nearly all of the content (and sources) here is about the band, and the coverage I can find of him in RS is about his work with the band, including some mentions of the art he displays when the band performs. I proposed a merge on 9 March, but that's had no response apart from the article creator. Creator has now removed the merge proposal template from this article, so I've closed the merge proposal at Talk:Zeds Dead, but the problem of notability hasn't been addressed yet. A redirect to Zeds Dead would be fine as an WP:ATD. Wikishovel ( talk) 18:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Euthanasia in the Netherlands. Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I really don't see the purpose of this article. This was a private individual who chose to die under Netherlands long ago passed euthanasia laws. Her death is unlikely to change anything regarding the Netherlands euthanasia policy, and thus does not pass WP:LASTING. All coverage is about her death and thus is a WP:BLP1E and fails WP:NOTNEWS. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2022 Florida gubernatorial election. Star Mississippi 16:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Prod declined. Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. She is a teacher and a leader in a local union who was chosen as a major party's nominee for governor's runningmate in 2022. It appears that the Miami Herald wrote up one in-depth piece on her during the campaign and there are other WP:ROUTINE articles relating to the election and the Crist ticket that do not cover her in significant depth. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Arguments for Deletion, to Keep and to Redirect so I'm relisting this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; two of the references lead to dead links. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to WNYX-LD. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; just two sources. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 16:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Found nothing per WP:GEOLAND as no census data and history found. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 16:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Apart from lacking sources to reliable sources, the article doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 16:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level does not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. No senior level competition at all. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 16:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Contested proposed deletion. PROD reasoning was "Appears to fail to have been the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources." It was removed with the edit sumarry " sources exist, see talk". Those sources seem fine for verification, but they do nothing to establish notability. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 15:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Not notable, looks like a company portfolio. IgelRM ( talk) 15:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; besides unsourced, a majority of those are WP:PRIMARY, some including primary sources are dead links. one that isn't offering much isn't offering much to assert notability. Besides being by a banned sock. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 13:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous AFD at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; besides unsourced, a majority of those are WP:PRIMARY and dead links besides the YouTube posts, not offering anything to assert notability. Besides being by a banned sock. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 13:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous AFD at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. A mausoleum in a cemetery. The only source is the cemetery's grave location website. Note that the creator's user name is also Miles. This is an older article that recently got set for NPP review, I believe due to a name change. North8000 ( talk) 14:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC) North8000 ( talk) 14:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
It literally does not has any sources cited in it. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 13:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
delete the place may well have existed, there may have been a battle there, but this article does not seem to be about those, and is thus OR. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete, as per Slatersteven-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of an actress and writer, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing inclusion criteria for actresses or writers. The main notability claim on the table here is that her work exists, which is not automatic grounds for an article -- the notability test doesn't hinge on doing stuff per se, it hinges on the amount of third-party coverage and analysis that has or hasn't been paid to the stuff she did in
WP:GNG-worthy sources like media or books.
But this is referenced entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all -- audiobook narration and writing credits sourced to the works' presence on online bookstores, acting credits sourced to her own self-published acting résumé, volunteer work sourced to the self-published websites of directly affiliated organizations, and I've already stripped a good half-dozen citations to
IMDb on the grounds of
IMDb not being a reliable source -- with not a whit of GNG-building coverage about her in reliable sources shown at all.
You don't make a writer notable by sourcing her books to Amazon as evidence that they exist, you make a writer notable by sourcing her books to reviews of the books by professional literary critics in newspapers or magazines as evidence that they got significant attention. You don't make an actress notable by sourcing her acting roles to IMDb or her own résumé, you make an actress notable by sourcing her acting roles to reviews of the films or television shows that singled her performance out for third-party analysis. And on and so forth.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Ok, Bearcat, how about deleting the title of actress and the acting credits table. Would this suit you? ScorpioKLM
Extended content
|
---|
Bearcat, I respectfully disagree with your statement that we haven't properly established Krystle Minkoff's notability as a writer or audiobook narrator. Let me explain why I believe the proof is in the citations provided: Multiple Independent Sources: The citations we’ve included are from multiple independent sources, not just self-references or public relations materials. These sources include reputable databases, industry publications, and media outlets that adhere to strict verification standards. Industry Standards and Recognition: As a writer and audiobook narrator, Krystle Minkoff/Meritt North has received recognition within the industry. While you emphasize the need for literary critics to review her books, the notability can also be established through awards, nominations, and notable projects she has been a part of. These are documented in the citations provided. Audiobook Narration: The role of an audiobook narrator is inherently significant within the literary and entertainment industries. Notability in this field is often established through the body of work and collaborations with well-known authors and publishers. Minkoff/North's work is verifiably documented through these collaborations, which are detailed in the citations. WP Compliance: We have adhered to Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines (WP ). The sources used to support her notability are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage about her work. These are not mere mentions but in-depth articles and features that highlight her contributions and impact. Proof in Citations: The citations include reviews, interviews, and articles from established media and literary platforms. These are GNG-worthy sources that validate her achievements and establish her as a notable figure in both writing and audiobook narration. Removing references to her acting roles does not diminish the verifiable and well-documented evidence of her contributions as a writer and audiobook narrator. The proof is in the detailed and independent citations that have been meticulously provided to support her notability in these fields. I believe that a comprehensive evaluation of the sources will reveal that the criteria for notability are indeed met, and Krystle Minkoff's diverse career merits recognition across her various roles. I highly disagree. Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North have been cited over 90 times by various websites, online newspapers, journals, and magazines crediting her for all of her audiobook narrations. However, in order for IMDb to credit officially, it has to be reviewed and approved by IMDb, casting directors, directors, and other actors. It is up for scrutiny by all and goes through a lengthy period of scrutinization before being attributed a final credit. There are 3 titles to which Meritt aka Krystle Minkoff and credited by such, has this blue official IMDb credit. Just a consideration. Here is the strict incliusion of credits criteria that must be met on IMDb. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/filmography-credits/imdb-credit-eligibility-faq/GXMWNMB8LQCZYFH8?ref_=helpart_nav_10# What do you mean by "eligible"? A. As stated above, the first and most important thing is to have received a credit on the title. There are a few additional requirements -- we normally only list people who were credited in the original version of a title. For films, this means we'll only list people credited in the initial original theatrical release; for TV titles, it means people credited when the show first aired. B. When a title is announced or in production and is added to the database, our editors will normally start accepting credits for it. These credits, as per the disclaimer on the page, are always subject to change and can be removed at any time. When the title is actually released (or about to be released) and credits are finalized by the production, our editors routinely compare our listing with the actual on-screen credits and delete any entries that cannot be verified or do not match. If you used to be listed on a title and your credit has disappeared, it means our editors could not verify its accuracy during one of these routine checks. C. There are 4 credits that have been verified by IMDb. 2017 Reelz Murder Made Me Famous | 2 Episodes Patron & Mother 2017 John Gotti | Season 3, Episode 8 Steak House Patron 2017 David Koresh | Season 3, Episode 7 Mother 2016 Queen of the South (TV series) | 4 episodes Campaign Supporter E. The title of "Actress" should remain associated with Krystle Minkoff due to her significant and well-documented career as a Voice Actress. Here are several key points supporting this stance: Extensive Experience: Krystle Minkoff has an extensive body of work as a Voice Actress, which inherently falls under the broader category of acting. Voice acting requires a diverse set of skills similar to those needed for on-screen acting, such as character development, emotional expression, and vocal control. Notable Roles: Her roles as a Voice Actress have been notable and influential within the industry. These roles contribute to her overall recognition as an actress, as voice acting is a respected and integral part of the entertainment field. Published Credits: There are numerous publications and sources that document her work as a Voice Actress. These sources include her credited roles on platforms such as IMDb, which adhere to strict guidelines for verifying the legitimacy of professional credits. Industry Standards: In the entertainment industry, individuals who perform voice acting are commonly referred to as actors or actresses. This standard industry terminology reflects the comprehensive nature of their work, encompassing all forms of acting, whether it be on-screen or voice-over. Verifiability and Notability: The information regarding her career as a Voice Actress is verifiable through multiple independent sources, fulfilling Wikipedia’s criteria for notability. This substantiates her professional title as an actress, encompassing her voice acting achievements. Removing the title of "Actress" would not only undermine her substantial contributions to the field of voice acting but also misrepresent the comprehensive nature of her career. Therefore, it is both accurate and appropriate to maintain the title of "Actress" to reflect her extensive and notable experience in the industry. Kindly review and advise. ScorpioKLM Bearcat, I respectfully disagree with your statement that we haven't properly established Krystle Minkoff's notability as a writer or audiobook narrator. Let me explain why I believe the proof is in the citations provided: Multiple Independent Sources: The citations we’ve included are from multiple independent sources, not just self-references or public relations materials. These sources include reputable databases, industry publications, and media outlets that adhere to strict verification standards. Industry Standards and Recognition: As a writer and audiobook narrator, Krystle Minkoff has received recognition within the industry. While you emphasize the need for literary critics to review her books, the notability can also be established through awards, nominations, and notable projects she has been a part of. These are documented in the citations provided. Audiobook Narration: The role of an audiobook narrator is inherently significant within the literary and entertainment industries. Notability in this field is often established through the body of work and collaborations with well-known authors and publishers. Minkoff’s work is verifiably documented through these collaborations, which are detailed in the citations. WP Compliance: We have adhered to Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines (WP ). The sources used to support her notability are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage about her work. These are not mere mentions but in-depth articles and features that highlight her contributions and impact. Proof in Citations: The citations include reviews, interviews, and articles from established media and literary platforms. These are GNG-worthy sources that validate her achievements and establish her as a notable figure in both writing and audiobook narration. Removing references to her acting roles does not diminish the verifiable and well-documented evidence of her contributions as a writer and audiobook narrator. The proof is in the detailed and independent citations that have been meticulously provided to support her notability in these fields. I believe that a comprehensive evaluation of the sources will reveal that the criteria for notability are indeed met, and Krystle Minkoff's diverse career merits recognition across her various roles. I highly disagree. Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North have been cited over 90 times by various websites, online newspapers, journals, and magazines crediting her for all of her audiobook narrations. In addition: When a title on IMDb is announced or in production and is added to the database, thier editors will normally start accepting credits for it. These credits, as per the disclaimer on the page, are always subject to change and can be removed at any time. When the title is actually released (or about to be released) and credits are finalized by the production, our editors routinely compare our listing with the actual on-screen credits and delete any entries that cannot be verified or do not match. If you used to be listed on a title and your credit has disappeared, it means our editors could not verify its accuracy during one of these routine checks. D. There are 4 credits that have been verified by IMDb. 2017 Reelz Murder Made Me Famous | 2 Episodes Patron & Mother 2017 John Gotti | Season 3, Episode 8 Steak House Patron 2017 David Koresh | Season 3, Episode 7 Mother 2016 Queen of the South (TV series) | 4 episodes Campaign Supporter E. The title of "Actress" should remain associated with Krystle Minkoff due to her significant and well-documented career as a Voice Actress. Here are several key points supporting this stance: Extensive Experience: Krystle Minkoff has an extensive body of work as a Voice Actress, which inherently falls under the broader category of acting. Voice acting requires a diverse set of skills similar to those needed for on-screen acting, such as character development, emotional expression, and vocal control. Notable Roles: Her roles as a Voice Actress have been notable and influential within the industry. These roles contribute to her overall recognition as an actress, as voice acting is a respected and integral part of the entertainment field. Published Credits: There are numerous publications and sources that document her work as a Voice Actress. These sources include her credited roles on platforms such as IMDb, which adhere to strict guidelines for verifying the legitimacy of professional credits. Industry Standards: In the entertainment industry, individuals who perform voice acting are commonly referred to as actors or actresses. This standard industry terminology reflects the comprehensive nature of their work, encompassing all forms of acting, whether it be on-screen or voice-over. Verifiability and Notability: The information regarding her career as a Voice Actress is verifiable through multiple independent sources, fulfilling Wikipedia’s criteria for notability. This substantiates her professional title as an actress, encompassing her voice acting achievements. Removing the title of "Actress" would not only undermine her substantial contributions to the field of voice acting but also misrepresent the comprehensive nature of her career. Therefore, it is both accurate and appropriate to maintain the title of "Actress" to reflect her extensive and notable experience in the industry. Review policy at this URL: https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/filmography-credits/imdb-credit-eligibility-faq/GXMWNMB8LQCZYFH8?ref_=helpart_nav_10# Kindly review and advise. ScorpioKLM Here is a full list of all of platforms her audiobooks are verified published at and credited to her as both Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North. You cannot dispute her notability as an audiobook narrator. Cites for Audiobook Narrator: https://www.storytel.com/in/narrators/meritt-north-525444 https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details/Murder_to_the_Max_Witches_of_Keyhole_Lake_Book_2?id=AQAAAEBMSh8KQM&hl=en_IN&gl=IN https://www.booktopia.com.au/murder-to-the-max-meritt-north/audiobook/9781987150421.html https://www.kobo.com/us/en/audiobook/moonshine-valentine https://tantor.com/narrator/meritt-north.html https://www.audible.com/author/Meritt-North/B01M3YNGSB https://www.audible.com/search?keywords=meritt+North&skip_spell_correction=true&ref_pageloadid=not_applicable&ref=a_search_t3_noResReversionUrl&pf_rd_p=7a98be95-bbf9-496e-a68c-79ce2c792da5&pf_rd_r=W5AQ8S259PFJWH9HB8CB&pageLoadId=rbqvivlTWdN7xXYc&ref_plink=not_applicable&creativeId=85146ce4-11f8-4d13-a628-fae19c79acaa https://www.audiofilemagazine.com/audiobookindustry/meritt-north/ https://www.audiobooks.com/browse/narrator/290347/browse/bookclubs/13/Sci-Fi-and-Fantasy-Audiobook-Club https://nextory.com/se-en/narrator/meritt-north-776316 https://library2go.overdrive.com/library2go-94-111/content/media/4578862 https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/jarods-heart-elise-manion/1122395364 https://www.overdrive.com/creators/1811412/tegan-maher https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/moonshine-valentine-tegan-maher/1131877202 https://www.kobo.com/us/en/list/mystery-thriller-audiobooks-9-99-or-less/sIjyvZtfms0HgQjU4Thsmg https://libro.fm/audiobooks/9781987192872-cruise-ship-caper https://www.chirpbooks.com/audiobooks/murder-of-the-month-by-tegan-maher https://www.audiobooks.com/audiobook/20-dating-advice-for-women-the-secrets-most-men-dont-want-you-to-know/323130 https://open.spotify.com/show/5sHA37R3rNqqTTCZbKLMyn https://www.storytel.com/tv/books/the-heartsong-cowboy-488808
You are obviously disregarding all of the media formats, platforms, publications, audiobook production companies, websites, and audiobook resellers citations that prove her notability as an established voice actress. Here are the cites again. I emplore you to review each one. Cites for Audiobook Narrator: https://www.storytel.com/in/narrators/meritt-north-525444 https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details/Murder_to_the_Max_Witches_of_Keyhole_Lake_Book_2?id=AQAAAEBMSh8KQM&hl=en_IN&gl=IN https://www.booktopia.com.au/murder-to-the-max-meritt-north/audiobook/9781987150421.html https://www.kobo.com/us/en/audiobook/moonshine-valentine https://tantor.com/narrator/meritt-north.html https://www.audible.com/author/Meritt-North/B01M3YNGSB https://www.audible.com/search?keywords=meritt+North&skip_spell_correction=true&ref_pageloadid=not_applicable&ref=a_search_t3_noResReversionUrl&pf_rd_p=7a98be95-bbf9-496e-a68c-79ce2c792da5&pf_rd_r=W5AQ8S259PFJWH9HB8CB&pageLoadId=rbqvivlTWdN7xXYc&ref_plink=not_applicable&creativeId=85146ce4-11f8-4d13-a628-fae19c79acaa https://www.audiofilemagazine.com/audiobookindustry/meritt-north/ https://www.audiobooks.com/browse/narrator/290347/browse/bookclubs/13/Sci-Fi-and-Fantasy-Audiobook-Club https://nextory.com/se-en/narrator/meritt-north-776316 https://library2go.overdrive.com/library2go-94-111/content/media/4578862 https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/jarods-heart-elise-manion/1122395364 https://www.overdrive.com/creators/1811412/tegan-maher https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/moonshine-valentine-tegan-maher/1131877202 https://www.kobo.com/us/en/list/mystery-thriller-audiobooks-9-99-or-less/sIjyvZtfms0HgQjU4Thsmg https://libro.fm/audiobooks/9781987192872-cruise-ship-caper https://www.chirpbooks.com/audiobooks/murder-of-the-month-by-tegan-maher https://www.audiobooks.com/audiobook/20-dating-advice-for-women-the-secrets-most-men-dont-want-you-to-know/323130 https://open.spotify.com/show/5sHA37R3rNqqTTCZbKLMyn https://www.storytel.com/tv/books/the-heartsong-cowboy-488808 ____________________________________________________ I truly appreciate your dedication to maintaining the high standards of Wikipedia, and I believe the existing citations do indeed establish her notability. Multiple Independent Sources: The citations provided come from various independent and reputable sources, not just self-references or promotional materials. These include industry publications, reputable databases, and media outlets known for their strict verification standards. These sources collectively affirm her contributions and impact in the fields of writing and audiobook narration. Industry Standards and Recognition: As a writer and audiobook narrator, Krystle Minkoff has received significant recognition within her industry. Her work has been acknowledged through awards, nominations, and notable projects. These achievements are documented in the citations provided, demonstrating her industry impact. Audiobook Narration: The field of audiobook narration is a respected and integral part of the literary and entertainment industries. Minkoff's collaborations with well-known authors and publishers further establish her credibility. The citations detail these collaborations and highlight her extensive body of work, which is an essential aspect of her notability. Compliance with WP
). The sources supporting her notability are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage of her work. These sources go beyond mere mentions, offering in-depth articles and features that highlight her contributions and achievements. Proof in Citations: The citations include a wide range of reviews and articles from established media and literary platforms. These are GNG-worthy sources that validate her achievements and establish her as a notable figure in both writing and audiobook narration. Removing references to her acting roles does not diminish the well-documented evidence of her contributions as a writer and audiobook narrator. The detailed and independent citations provided substantiate her notability in these fields. In addition, IMDb’s rigorous process for verifying credits further supports her legitimacy in these roles. For example, her verified acting credits include roles in "Murder Made Me Famous," "John Gotti," "David Koresh," and "Queen of the South." These credits reflect her significant involvement in the industry. The title of "Actress" should remain associated with Krystle Minkoff due to her extensive and notable career as a Voice Actress. Voice acting requires a diverse set of skills similar to on-screen acting, and her notable roles have been influential within the industry. Her work is documented by credible sources, including IMDb, which adheres to strict verification guidelines. I believe a thorough evaluation of the sources will reveal that Krystle Minkoff's and Meritt North's career merits recognition across her various roles. Her contributions to the fields of writing and audiobook narration are clearly well documented here and significant. I invite you to review the comprehensive list of platforms where her audiobooks are verified and credited to her, both as Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North. These platforms include Barnes & Noble, Storytel, Google Play, Booktopia, Kobo, Tantor Audio, Audible, AudioFile Magazine, and many more. Each of these sources supports her notability as an audiobook narrator, which cannot be disputed. Thank you for considering this perspective, and I look forward to your thoughts on how we can further ensure the accuracy and completeness of this article. Best regards, ScorpioKLM In response to this "establish notability by citing her work to THIRD-PARTY MEDIA COVERAGE AND ANALYSIS ABOUT IT". I have cited to third-party media coverage and analysis about it. Please re-review the citations sent above. Kindest Wishes, ScorpioKLM |
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
It appears the subject doesn't meet the WP:JOURNALIST or WP:AUTHOR, as their works don't seem noteworthy enough. The press coverage in WP:RS also not significant or in depth enough, so fails to meet WP:GNG. Does not satisfy WP:N — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
This raises doubts about the reliability and verifiability of the information provided, as there is no way to verify the expertise or credibility of the contributor,when a creator doesn't require anything on whether to delete an article or keep them. However, this is a process and you can't vote twice. Do remove any of the votes. Thanks! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Focus on policy, not issues that can be addressed via editing and Crosji, please strike your duplicate vote.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
13:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Granted that I don't know what reference sources would discuss this Christian animated children's show but I didn't find anything in my online search that wasn't either user-generated content, product-focused (promotion) or sites that allowed users to view episodes. I found no secondary sources or SIGCOV. One site called it an "award-winning" show but I never could locate what that award was. Given the detail of content about the characters, I think this article mainly serves as a nostalgia page for IP editors to write about a series they might have watched when they were younger. Dare I say it? I don't think it is notable or encyclopedic. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
13:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't understand why this page is in the mainspace when the sources provide only one line of information about this topic, "After his successful mission of Adhoni, he annexed Kanchan Garh without any bloodshed." The ongoing issue with poorly documented Indian 'Wars,' 'Sieges,' 'Battles,' and 'Captures' articles needs to be thoroughly reviewed. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 08:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The arguments to keep are remarkably weak. Only one of them provides any evidence of WP:SIGCOV, and the source therein has been convincingly rebutted. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 16:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Seems almost whole primary sources, thus seems to not pass wp:n Slatersteven ( talk) 13:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia doesn't care if it's true.Sure, but Wikipedia cares if it's WP:DUE. That's an essential part of WP:GNG. – Austronesier ( talk) 18:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
11:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
"The current Grand Master Jean-Louis de Biasi continues to maintain the high moral standards of this tradition") and unsalvageable. If sufficient appropriate sources can ever be found to justify a new article, none of the existing content will be required. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 11:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kid Icarus (series)#Characters. Consensus is the sourcing depth is not there to support a standalone. I will protect the redirect to avoid a 4th AfD, but the suggestion of working on a draft is a good one. It should go thorugh AfC to avoid further issues though as consensus in both 2024 AFDs is strong. Star Mississippi 15:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Article was brought back recently, and again I feel the arguments of the previous AfD hold true here. Every new source added- with few exceptions- are either unreliable or a very trivial mention in a review of Uprising. Even using sources from the previous iteration of Pit's article, there still isn't nearly enough for a whole article. I recommend to restore the redirect, since nothing has been proven to state that the discussion's consensus has changed. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 02:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. On the Siliconera article, the article is about a figurine—of Pit. This isn't about figurines generally; it's about content pertaining to this character that would probably be undue in Kid Icarus but are relevant to understanding to the character Pit as promoted by the company and consumed by audiences. As for the IGN article, it seems we disagree with how to read and regard the source. Related to the book and IGN article, I'll add that I don't see where in WP:SIGCOV coverage that summarizes is prohibited. A Wikipedia article shouldn't be purely summary, but that doesn't necessarily mean a source isn't significant coverage if it is providing summarization. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 05:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Redirect. The sources added are by and large low-quality or not a show of notability. As far as the sources mentioned by Dream Focus go, I question their judgment when they are arguing that a WP:ROUTINE news piece about figure release is a show of notability or significance. Articles about figure releases are very common, there is nothing exceptional about this. The D&D source is also quite tenuous, being a part of many articles, which doesn't come off as an exceptional source. It doesn't help that the article is from a source said to not be usable to demonstrate notability. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 19:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV#Telefilms. Star Mississippi 15:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this and this. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 17:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital#Long format/Soaps. Star Mississippi 15:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by TV One (Pakistan)#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this and this. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by TV One (Pakistan)#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by TV One (Pakistan)#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Aliya Bukhari#Dramas. Star Mississippi 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark. This time, though, I'm adding the observation that I'm already tired of my own copy/paste and wish we'd noticed this the day these nominations were made to consider speedy close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Babar Javed#Filmography. Star Mississippi 15:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this etc. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Angeline Malik#As a director. Star Mississippi 15:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Syed Ahmed Kamran. Star Mississippi 15:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sign/in-depth coverage, such as reviews. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV#Drama series as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fahad Mustafa#Selected television as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Amin Iqbal#Television as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV#Anthology series as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some namechecks coverage. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 14:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to A-Plus TV#Drama serials as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 14:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tamasha (TV series) as a viable ATD with no indication input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 15:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Tamasha Season 2 hasn't received coverage that should satisfy GNG. The only coverage I found are ROTM - all from same publication -
like this,
this, and
this one. Not enough because Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.
and provided coverage is without bylines. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs)
13:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Goa University#Recognised institutions. Star Mississippi 15:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NORG. The only source is from the college's LinkedIn page, and I found no press coverage online. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Private school that does not appear notable due to lack of reliable sources. Sanglahi86 ( talk) 13:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 15:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This AfD may be the same issue as with Kristína Panáková AfD back in November 2023, except it's about a former men's footballer. He has played hundred of career games in total and even appeared for his national team, but fails WP:GNG due to lack of in-depth coverage. I'm struggling to find enough sufficient sources as this article has been written terribly with possible dubious stories for years, so does corresponding Slovak Wikipedia, which would help copy over English article otherwise (I already checked and translated it). Clara A. Djalim ( talk) 09:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Yet another article with poor sources that fails verification, this article seems to rely heavily on WP:POVFORK & WP:SYNTH. The infobox mentions that Dul Chand fought for Delhi sultanate however the Siege section mentions him as a ruler/king of a different kingdom and it has no mention of Delhi sultanate. Moreover there are no cited sources mentioning the event as Sack of Bhatner fort (1398). Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 07:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; questionable sourcing. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to University of Kansas#Media. Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; merge with University of Kansas#Media. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; questionable sourcing. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to WVXF. Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Notable only on local level, Fox affiliation notwithstanding. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
One more article which lacks significant coverage and the sources don't go beyond mentioning some scattered lines that "Visaladeva, the tenth descendant of this line, was killed by a Muslim ruler of Delhi." There's no Battle of Sambalpur ever occurred per source. It's clearly a WP:HOAX article. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 06:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Yet another article appears to cover a series of conflicts spanning over a century, which have been amalgamated into many 'wars.' The only source Jaques Tony cited for this title and its prolonged duration does not support the timeline mentioned in the lead and infobox (note that timeline in lead and infobox aren't aligned). This discrepancy creates confusion and suggests a lack of notability. Additionally, the article seems to rely heavily on WP:SYNTH and WP:POVFORK, which is concerning. I hope we don't get to see another non notable 'wars' article spanning centuries or even millennia. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 06:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
There seems to be some confusion here about our policies and guidelines.
Given that the deletion criteria are unsupported, the article is going to be kept. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The article lacks general notability, as there are no cited sources specifically mentioning the Siege of Chittorgarh (1544) or providing significant coverage of this conflict. Instead, it focuses more on unrelated events such as the other conquests of Sher Shah and the Battle of Harmoda (1557). While some sources briefly mention Sher Shah's attention towards Mewar in 1544, there is no substantial coverage of a proper siege of Chittorgarh in these sources. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 05:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[39]
Pg.181
[40]
Pg.A53
[41]
Pg-529
[42]
Pg.76
[43]
This article neither contains any unreliable source nor dealing with any unrelated topics.Battle of Harmoda,As mentioned above is completely related to the topic.The commander Haji khan and Shams khan were left by Sher shah to face the Udai singh that must be mentioned and the aftermath should also being mentioned.
Kemilliogolgi (
talk) 06:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) —
Kemilliogolgi (
talk ·
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
AdityaNakul (
talk ·
contribs).
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
When Sher Shah Suri was within a mere distance of 12 Kos from Chittor, Udai Singh II made the decision to surrender the fort without engaging in a direct confrontation.This is not what we call WP:SIGCOV. There's no significant engagement, so we can't carve out an article which only has 2-3 lines of non-engagement "Siege of Chittor". And I have checked and thoroughly reviewed the sources, out of 14 only 3 deals with this meagre siege and the rest focuses on other unrelated events. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 17:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two dramatically different interpretations of this article, we need more participants here to come to a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
BLP of a religious leader lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. There may be sources in other languages, in which case it would be good if someone could add them. Mccapra ( talk) 10:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for draftification?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Slightly more extensive than 2012 Scottsdale mayoral election. Still probably falls under WP:MILL. Okmrman ( talk) 23:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Yet another subarticle of Precision cut tissue slices, created by a now-blocked paid editor for a company in the industry. There's a minimal history; not sure if it's too detailed for Wikipedia or would want to be merged into Histology or something. -- Beland ( talk) 02:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
Precision cut tissue slices was deleted through an AFD, do you have another suggested Merge target article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Like precision cut tissue slices, this appears to have been created by a now-blocked paid editor, and is of uneven quality. Precision cut lung slices was created at the same time, but seems more informative. (I mention it in case someone wants to nominate it as well.) -- Beland ( talk) 02:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
Precision cut tissue slices has been deleted. Do you see another potential Merge topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources found that make this topic meet for notability. 日期20220626 ( talk) 04:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable clergy person and musician. There is nothing in this article that satisfies musical notability or general notability. The one reference says that he exists. Existence != Notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reads promo-y currently and I'm not turning up any RS coverage. Some mentions in books that list software, and it looks like its won some minor awards. ~ Bluecrystal004 ( talk · contribs) 03:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Estrella TV affiliates#Owned-and-operated stations. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rocket from the Crypt. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This only uses a single source, cannot find many/any sources outside of the listed one. Top results from searching show a separate Jason Crane. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This biography lacks any sources that are significant coverage. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vicious Cycle Software#Technology. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Not notable IgelRM ( talk) 01:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Agus River#Timoga Springs. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability in question, potentially promotional material. The article was tagged as unreferenced since 2009. GNews search gave articles on craft beer. GNews archives search points to a property of the former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. GBooks has a passing mention in a book about 100 stories written by kids and an interview of a resort owner by the National Steel Corporation. GSearch is filled with travel blogs and social media posts that do not pass RS guidelines. -- Lenticel ( talk) 01:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard ( talk) 09:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
A gestalt article on three different articles that define this word differently. No substantial independent coverage for any definition. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotional and created by an SPA account.
Insufficient sourcing independent of Lindsay Oades, a few other scholarly articles exist but none appear substantial enough to re-write this article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Marked for notability concerns since 2018. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 23:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Council of State members are not inherently notable and there’s not enough source to establish GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 19:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to India–Malta relations as an AtD. Daniel ( talk) 02:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. No in-depth third party coverage. Sources 5-9 merely confirm former high commissioners. LibStar ( talk) 22:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. There's a couple sentences here. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV other than this, which seems like a press release ("The whole company expresses the utmost satisfaction"). JTtheOG ( talk) 19:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I see no point in keeping this article along with its parent article Umayyad campaigns in India, when there are no sources explicitly covering this event as "Arab conquest of Kaikan", the source cited in the lead for it nowhere mentions this event as the title. Another problem with orginal researched articles is their defined timeline, despite having no source for the hoax timelines the authors of these articles love to furnish their own preferred timeline of one, two or even three centuries. The article topic also seems to lack notability and significant coverage as there are many uncertainty and unknown belligerents. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 08:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. as there is disagreement if this article complies with WP:NLIST. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides being mostly unsourced; they consists of WP:PRIMARY, announcements, some appears to be rewritten from each other. Most of those are about the game itself, others are dead or redirected pages. Barely much to help this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 08:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merging multiple deletion discussions into a single AfD is a nomination choice, not a valid reason for procedural close, unless another AfD for the same page is already in progress. Please address the specific article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Routine events such as sports matches ... may be better covered as part of another article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. as there is disagreement over whether this article complies with WP:NLIST. Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides being mostly unsourced; most of those are about the game itself, others consists of WP:PRIMARY, YouTube and dead or redirected pages. Barely much to help this list to assert notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 08:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merging multiple deletion discussions into a single AfD is a nomination choice, not a valid reason for procedural close, unless another AfD for the same page is already in progress. Please address the specific article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Routine events such as sports matches ... may be better covered as part of another article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. as there is disagreement over whether this article complies with WP:NLIST. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to the most ardent fans. Fails WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per WP:RS besides being mostly unsourced; both sources are about the game and nothing to do with the TV coverage or just a mere mention and another is a redirect link; not doing anything to help this list to assert notability. An WP:ATD will be to trim and merge it into Monday Night Football. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 07:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merging multiple deletion discussions into a single AfD is a nomination choice, not a valid reason for procedural close, unless another AfD for the same page is already in progress. Please address the specific article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Routine events such as sports matches ... may be better covered as part of another article. Walsh90210 ( talk) 23:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Samuel Alito. Star Mississippi 16:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTNEWS and can also be covered sufficiently at Samuel Alito. Esolo5002 ( talk) 20:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ooberman. Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage establishing independent notability. It seems that most coverage of the subject is in the context of Ooberman (and to a lesser extent – The Magic Theatre, which is a section of the Ooberman article), a redirect to which would make sense as an alternative to deletion. toweli ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 20:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Not a valid disambiguation page, just synonyms of a vague term. Walsh90210 ( talk) 18:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zeds Dead. Liz Read! Talk! 21:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability independent of the band Zeds Dead, per WP:MUSICBIO and WP:ARTIST. Nearly all of the content (and sources) here is about the band, and the coverage I can find of him in RS is about his work with the band, including some mentions of the art he displays when the band performs. I proposed a merge on 9 March, but that's had no response apart from the article creator. Creator has now removed the merge proposal template from this article, so I've closed the merge proposal at Talk:Zeds Dead, but the problem of notability hasn't been addressed yet. A redirect to Zeds Dead would be fine as an WP:ATD. Wikishovel ( talk) 18:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Euthanasia in the Netherlands. Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I really don't see the purpose of this article. This was a private individual who chose to die under Netherlands long ago passed euthanasia laws. Her death is unlikely to change anything regarding the Netherlands euthanasia policy, and thus does not pass WP:LASTING. All coverage is about her death and thus is a WP:BLP1E and fails WP:NOTNEWS. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2022 Florida gubernatorial election. Star Mississippi 16:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Prod declined. Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. She is a teacher and a leader in a local union who was chosen as a major party's nominee for governor's runningmate in 2022. It appears that the Miami Herald wrote up one in-depth piece on her during the campaign and there are other WP:ROUTINE articles relating to the election and the Crist ticket that do not cover her in significant depth. – Muboshgu ( talk) 17:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Arguments for Deletion, to Keep and to Redirect so I'm relisting this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; two of the references lead to dead links. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to WNYX-LD. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; just two sources. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 16:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Found nothing per WP:GEOLAND as no census data and history found. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 16:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Apart from lacking sources to reliable sources, the article doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 16:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level does not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. No senior level competition at all. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 16:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Contested proposed deletion. PROD reasoning was "Appears to fail to have been the subject of significant coverage in independent reliable sources." It was removed with the edit sumarry " sources exist, see talk". Those sources seem fine for verification, but they do nothing to establish notability. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 15:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Not notable, looks like a company portfolio. IgelRM ( talk) 15:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; besides unsourced, a majority of those are WP:PRIMARY, some including primary sources are dead links. one that isn't offering much isn't offering much to assert notability. Besides being by a banned sock. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 13:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous AFD at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Of the sources per WP:RS; besides unsourced, a majority of those are WP:PRIMARY and dead links besides the YouTube posts, not offering anything to assert notability. Besides being by a banned sock. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 13:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous AFD at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of West Coast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. A mausoleum in a cemetery. The only source is the cemetery's grave location website. Note that the creator's user name is also Miles. This is an older article that recently got set for NPP review, I believe due to a name change. North8000 ( talk) 14:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC) North8000 ( talk) 14:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
It literally does not has any sources cited in it. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 13:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
delete the place may well have existed, there may have been a battle there, but this article does not seem to be about those, and is thus OR. Slatersteven ( talk) 14:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete, as per Slatersteven-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 16:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of an actress and writer, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing inclusion criteria for actresses or writers. The main notability claim on the table here is that her work exists, which is not automatic grounds for an article -- the notability test doesn't hinge on doing stuff per se, it hinges on the amount of third-party coverage and analysis that has or hasn't been paid to the stuff she did in
WP:GNG-worthy sources like media or books.
But this is referenced entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all -- audiobook narration and writing credits sourced to the works' presence on online bookstores, acting credits sourced to her own self-published acting résumé, volunteer work sourced to the self-published websites of directly affiliated organizations, and I've already stripped a good half-dozen citations to
IMDb on the grounds of
IMDb not being a reliable source -- with not a whit of GNG-building coverage about her in reliable sources shown at all.
You don't make a writer notable by sourcing her books to Amazon as evidence that they exist, you make a writer notable by sourcing her books to reviews of the books by professional literary critics in newspapers or magazines as evidence that they got significant attention. You don't make an actress notable by sourcing her acting roles to IMDb or her own résumé, you make an actress notable by sourcing her acting roles to reviews of the films or television shows that singled her performance out for third-party analysis. And on and so forth.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Ok, Bearcat, how about deleting the title of actress and the acting credits table. Would this suit you? ScorpioKLM
Extended content
|
---|
Bearcat, I respectfully disagree with your statement that we haven't properly established Krystle Minkoff's notability as a writer or audiobook narrator. Let me explain why I believe the proof is in the citations provided: Multiple Independent Sources: The citations we’ve included are from multiple independent sources, not just self-references or public relations materials. These sources include reputable databases, industry publications, and media outlets that adhere to strict verification standards. Industry Standards and Recognition: As a writer and audiobook narrator, Krystle Minkoff/Meritt North has received recognition within the industry. While you emphasize the need for literary critics to review her books, the notability can also be established through awards, nominations, and notable projects she has been a part of. These are documented in the citations provided. Audiobook Narration: The role of an audiobook narrator is inherently significant within the literary and entertainment industries. Notability in this field is often established through the body of work and collaborations with well-known authors and publishers. Minkoff/North's work is verifiably documented through these collaborations, which are detailed in the citations. WP Compliance: We have adhered to Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines (WP ). The sources used to support her notability are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage about her work. These are not mere mentions but in-depth articles and features that highlight her contributions and impact. Proof in Citations: The citations include reviews, interviews, and articles from established media and literary platforms. These are GNG-worthy sources that validate her achievements and establish her as a notable figure in both writing and audiobook narration. Removing references to her acting roles does not diminish the verifiable and well-documented evidence of her contributions as a writer and audiobook narrator. The proof is in the detailed and independent citations that have been meticulously provided to support her notability in these fields. I believe that a comprehensive evaluation of the sources will reveal that the criteria for notability are indeed met, and Krystle Minkoff's diverse career merits recognition across her various roles. I highly disagree. Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North have been cited over 90 times by various websites, online newspapers, journals, and magazines crediting her for all of her audiobook narrations. However, in order for IMDb to credit officially, it has to be reviewed and approved by IMDb, casting directors, directors, and other actors. It is up for scrutiny by all and goes through a lengthy period of scrutinization before being attributed a final credit. There are 3 titles to which Meritt aka Krystle Minkoff and credited by such, has this blue official IMDb credit. Just a consideration. Here is the strict incliusion of credits criteria that must be met on IMDb. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/filmography-credits/imdb-credit-eligibility-faq/GXMWNMB8LQCZYFH8?ref_=helpart_nav_10# What do you mean by "eligible"? A. As stated above, the first and most important thing is to have received a credit on the title. There are a few additional requirements -- we normally only list people who were credited in the original version of a title. For films, this means we'll only list people credited in the initial original theatrical release; for TV titles, it means people credited when the show first aired. B. When a title is announced or in production and is added to the database, our editors will normally start accepting credits for it. These credits, as per the disclaimer on the page, are always subject to change and can be removed at any time. When the title is actually released (or about to be released) and credits are finalized by the production, our editors routinely compare our listing with the actual on-screen credits and delete any entries that cannot be verified or do not match. If you used to be listed on a title and your credit has disappeared, it means our editors could not verify its accuracy during one of these routine checks. C. There are 4 credits that have been verified by IMDb. 2017 Reelz Murder Made Me Famous | 2 Episodes Patron & Mother 2017 John Gotti | Season 3, Episode 8 Steak House Patron 2017 David Koresh | Season 3, Episode 7 Mother 2016 Queen of the South (TV series) | 4 episodes Campaign Supporter E. The title of "Actress" should remain associated with Krystle Minkoff due to her significant and well-documented career as a Voice Actress. Here are several key points supporting this stance: Extensive Experience: Krystle Minkoff has an extensive body of work as a Voice Actress, which inherently falls under the broader category of acting. Voice acting requires a diverse set of skills similar to those needed for on-screen acting, such as character development, emotional expression, and vocal control. Notable Roles: Her roles as a Voice Actress have been notable and influential within the industry. These roles contribute to her overall recognition as an actress, as voice acting is a respected and integral part of the entertainment field. Published Credits: There are numerous publications and sources that document her work as a Voice Actress. These sources include her credited roles on platforms such as IMDb, which adhere to strict guidelines for verifying the legitimacy of professional credits. Industry Standards: In the entertainment industry, individuals who perform voice acting are commonly referred to as actors or actresses. This standard industry terminology reflects the comprehensive nature of their work, encompassing all forms of acting, whether it be on-screen or voice-over. Verifiability and Notability: The information regarding her career as a Voice Actress is verifiable through multiple independent sources, fulfilling Wikipedia’s criteria for notability. This substantiates her professional title as an actress, encompassing her voice acting achievements. Removing the title of "Actress" would not only undermine her substantial contributions to the field of voice acting but also misrepresent the comprehensive nature of her career. Therefore, it is both accurate and appropriate to maintain the title of "Actress" to reflect her extensive and notable experience in the industry. Kindly review and advise. ScorpioKLM Bearcat, I respectfully disagree with your statement that we haven't properly established Krystle Minkoff's notability as a writer or audiobook narrator. Let me explain why I believe the proof is in the citations provided: Multiple Independent Sources: The citations we’ve included are from multiple independent sources, not just self-references or public relations materials. These sources include reputable databases, industry publications, and media outlets that adhere to strict verification standards. Industry Standards and Recognition: As a writer and audiobook narrator, Krystle Minkoff has received recognition within the industry. While you emphasize the need for literary critics to review her books, the notability can also be established through awards, nominations, and notable projects she has been a part of. These are documented in the citations provided. Audiobook Narration: The role of an audiobook narrator is inherently significant within the literary and entertainment industries. Notability in this field is often established through the body of work and collaborations with well-known authors and publishers. Minkoff’s work is verifiably documented through these collaborations, which are detailed in the citations. WP Compliance: We have adhered to Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines (WP ). The sources used to support her notability are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage about her work. These are not mere mentions but in-depth articles and features that highlight her contributions and impact. Proof in Citations: The citations include reviews, interviews, and articles from established media and literary platforms. These are GNG-worthy sources that validate her achievements and establish her as a notable figure in both writing and audiobook narration. Removing references to her acting roles does not diminish the verifiable and well-documented evidence of her contributions as a writer and audiobook narrator. The proof is in the detailed and independent citations that have been meticulously provided to support her notability in these fields. I believe that a comprehensive evaluation of the sources will reveal that the criteria for notability are indeed met, and Krystle Minkoff's diverse career merits recognition across her various roles. I highly disagree. Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North have been cited over 90 times by various websites, online newspapers, journals, and magazines crediting her for all of her audiobook narrations. In addition: When a title on IMDb is announced or in production and is added to the database, thier editors will normally start accepting credits for it. These credits, as per the disclaimer on the page, are always subject to change and can be removed at any time. When the title is actually released (or about to be released) and credits are finalized by the production, our editors routinely compare our listing with the actual on-screen credits and delete any entries that cannot be verified or do not match. If you used to be listed on a title and your credit has disappeared, it means our editors could not verify its accuracy during one of these routine checks. D. There are 4 credits that have been verified by IMDb. 2017 Reelz Murder Made Me Famous | 2 Episodes Patron & Mother 2017 John Gotti | Season 3, Episode 8 Steak House Patron 2017 David Koresh | Season 3, Episode 7 Mother 2016 Queen of the South (TV series) | 4 episodes Campaign Supporter E. The title of "Actress" should remain associated with Krystle Minkoff due to her significant and well-documented career as a Voice Actress. Here are several key points supporting this stance: Extensive Experience: Krystle Minkoff has an extensive body of work as a Voice Actress, which inherently falls under the broader category of acting. Voice acting requires a diverse set of skills similar to those needed for on-screen acting, such as character development, emotional expression, and vocal control. Notable Roles: Her roles as a Voice Actress have been notable and influential within the industry. These roles contribute to her overall recognition as an actress, as voice acting is a respected and integral part of the entertainment field. Published Credits: There are numerous publications and sources that document her work as a Voice Actress. These sources include her credited roles on platforms such as IMDb, which adhere to strict guidelines for verifying the legitimacy of professional credits. Industry Standards: In the entertainment industry, individuals who perform voice acting are commonly referred to as actors or actresses. This standard industry terminology reflects the comprehensive nature of their work, encompassing all forms of acting, whether it be on-screen or voice-over. Verifiability and Notability: The information regarding her career as a Voice Actress is verifiable through multiple independent sources, fulfilling Wikipedia’s criteria for notability. This substantiates her professional title as an actress, encompassing her voice acting achievements. Removing the title of "Actress" would not only undermine her substantial contributions to the field of voice acting but also misrepresent the comprehensive nature of her career. Therefore, it is both accurate and appropriate to maintain the title of "Actress" to reflect her extensive and notable experience in the industry. Review policy at this URL: https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/filmography-credits/imdb-credit-eligibility-faq/GXMWNMB8LQCZYFH8?ref_=helpart_nav_10# Kindly review and advise. ScorpioKLM Here is a full list of all of platforms her audiobooks are verified published at and credited to her as both Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North. You cannot dispute her notability as an audiobook narrator. Cites for Audiobook Narrator: https://www.storytel.com/in/narrators/meritt-north-525444 https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details/Murder_to_the_Max_Witches_of_Keyhole_Lake_Book_2?id=AQAAAEBMSh8KQM&hl=en_IN&gl=IN https://www.booktopia.com.au/murder-to-the-max-meritt-north/audiobook/9781987150421.html https://www.kobo.com/us/en/audiobook/moonshine-valentine https://tantor.com/narrator/meritt-north.html https://www.audible.com/author/Meritt-North/B01M3YNGSB https://www.audible.com/search?keywords=meritt+North&skip_spell_correction=true&ref_pageloadid=not_applicable&ref=a_search_t3_noResReversionUrl&pf_rd_p=7a98be95-bbf9-496e-a68c-79ce2c792da5&pf_rd_r=W5AQ8S259PFJWH9HB8CB&pageLoadId=rbqvivlTWdN7xXYc&ref_plink=not_applicable&creativeId=85146ce4-11f8-4d13-a628-fae19c79acaa https://www.audiofilemagazine.com/audiobookindustry/meritt-north/ https://www.audiobooks.com/browse/narrator/290347/browse/bookclubs/13/Sci-Fi-and-Fantasy-Audiobook-Club https://nextory.com/se-en/narrator/meritt-north-776316 https://library2go.overdrive.com/library2go-94-111/content/media/4578862 https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/jarods-heart-elise-manion/1122395364 https://www.overdrive.com/creators/1811412/tegan-maher https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/moonshine-valentine-tegan-maher/1131877202 https://www.kobo.com/us/en/list/mystery-thriller-audiobooks-9-99-or-less/sIjyvZtfms0HgQjU4Thsmg https://libro.fm/audiobooks/9781987192872-cruise-ship-caper https://www.chirpbooks.com/audiobooks/murder-of-the-month-by-tegan-maher https://www.audiobooks.com/audiobook/20-dating-advice-for-women-the-secrets-most-men-dont-want-you-to-know/323130 https://open.spotify.com/show/5sHA37R3rNqqTTCZbKLMyn https://www.storytel.com/tv/books/the-heartsong-cowboy-488808
You are obviously disregarding all of the media formats, platforms, publications, audiobook production companies, websites, and audiobook resellers citations that prove her notability as an established voice actress. Here are the cites again. I emplore you to review each one. Cites for Audiobook Narrator: https://www.storytel.com/in/narrators/meritt-north-525444 https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details/Murder_to_the_Max_Witches_of_Keyhole_Lake_Book_2?id=AQAAAEBMSh8KQM&hl=en_IN&gl=IN https://www.booktopia.com.au/murder-to-the-max-meritt-north/audiobook/9781987150421.html https://www.kobo.com/us/en/audiobook/moonshine-valentine https://tantor.com/narrator/meritt-north.html https://www.audible.com/author/Meritt-North/B01M3YNGSB https://www.audible.com/search?keywords=meritt+North&skip_spell_correction=true&ref_pageloadid=not_applicable&ref=a_search_t3_noResReversionUrl&pf_rd_p=7a98be95-bbf9-496e-a68c-79ce2c792da5&pf_rd_r=W5AQ8S259PFJWH9HB8CB&pageLoadId=rbqvivlTWdN7xXYc&ref_plink=not_applicable&creativeId=85146ce4-11f8-4d13-a628-fae19c79acaa https://www.audiofilemagazine.com/audiobookindustry/meritt-north/ https://www.audiobooks.com/browse/narrator/290347/browse/bookclubs/13/Sci-Fi-and-Fantasy-Audiobook-Club https://nextory.com/se-en/narrator/meritt-north-776316 https://library2go.overdrive.com/library2go-94-111/content/media/4578862 https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/jarods-heart-elise-manion/1122395364 https://www.overdrive.com/creators/1811412/tegan-maher https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/moonshine-valentine-tegan-maher/1131877202 https://www.kobo.com/us/en/list/mystery-thriller-audiobooks-9-99-or-less/sIjyvZtfms0HgQjU4Thsmg https://libro.fm/audiobooks/9781987192872-cruise-ship-caper https://www.chirpbooks.com/audiobooks/murder-of-the-month-by-tegan-maher https://www.audiobooks.com/audiobook/20-dating-advice-for-women-the-secrets-most-men-dont-want-you-to-know/323130 https://open.spotify.com/show/5sHA37R3rNqqTTCZbKLMyn https://www.storytel.com/tv/books/the-heartsong-cowboy-488808 ____________________________________________________ I truly appreciate your dedication to maintaining the high standards of Wikipedia, and I believe the existing citations do indeed establish her notability. Multiple Independent Sources: The citations provided come from various independent and reputable sources, not just self-references or promotional materials. These include industry publications, reputable databases, and media outlets known for their strict verification standards. These sources collectively affirm her contributions and impact in the fields of writing and audiobook narration. Industry Standards and Recognition: As a writer and audiobook narrator, Krystle Minkoff has received significant recognition within her industry. Her work has been acknowledged through awards, nominations, and notable projects. These achievements are documented in the citations provided, demonstrating her industry impact. Audiobook Narration: The field of audiobook narration is a respected and integral part of the literary and entertainment industries. Minkoff's collaborations with well-known authors and publishers further establish her credibility. The citations detail these collaborations and highlight her extensive body of work, which is an essential aspect of her notability. Compliance with WP
). The sources supporting her notability are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage of her work. These sources go beyond mere mentions, offering in-depth articles and features that highlight her contributions and achievements. Proof in Citations: The citations include a wide range of reviews and articles from established media and literary platforms. These are GNG-worthy sources that validate her achievements and establish her as a notable figure in both writing and audiobook narration. Removing references to her acting roles does not diminish the well-documented evidence of her contributions as a writer and audiobook narrator. The detailed and independent citations provided substantiate her notability in these fields. In addition, IMDb’s rigorous process for verifying credits further supports her legitimacy in these roles. For example, her verified acting credits include roles in "Murder Made Me Famous," "John Gotti," "David Koresh," and "Queen of the South." These credits reflect her significant involvement in the industry. The title of "Actress" should remain associated with Krystle Minkoff due to her extensive and notable career as a Voice Actress. Voice acting requires a diverse set of skills similar to on-screen acting, and her notable roles have been influential within the industry. Her work is documented by credible sources, including IMDb, which adheres to strict verification guidelines. I believe a thorough evaluation of the sources will reveal that Krystle Minkoff's and Meritt North's career merits recognition across her various roles. Her contributions to the fields of writing and audiobook narration are clearly well documented here and significant. I invite you to review the comprehensive list of platforms where her audiobooks are verified and credited to her, both as Krystle Minkoff and Meritt North. These platforms include Barnes & Noble, Storytel, Google Play, Booktopia, Kobo, Tantor Audio, Audible, AudioFile Magazine, and many more. Each of these sources supports her notability as an audiobook narrator, which cannot be disputed. Thank you for considering this perspective, and I look forward to your thoughts on how we can further ensure the accuracy and completeness of this article. Best regards, ScorpioKLM In response to this "establish notability by citing her work to THIRD-PARTY MEDIA COVERAGE AND ANALYSIS ABOUT IT". I have cited to third-party media coverage and analysis about it. Please re-review the citations sent above. Kindest Wishes, ScorpioKLM |
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
It appears the subject doesn't meet the WP:JOURNALIST or WP:AUTHOR, as their works don't seem noteworthy enough. The press coverage in WP:RS also not significant or in depth enough, so fails to meet WP:GNG. Does not satisfy WP:N — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
This raises doubts about the reliability and verifiability of the information provided, as there is no way to verify the expertise or credibility of the contributor,when a creator doesn't require anything on whether to delete an article or keep them. However, this is a process and you can't vote twice. Do remove any of the votes. Thanks! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 10:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Focus on policy, not issues that can be addressed via editing and Crosji, please strike your duplicate vote.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
13:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Granted that I don't know what reference sources would discuss this Christian animated children's show but I didn't find anything in my online search that wasn't either user-generated content, product-focused (promotion) or sites that allowed users to view episodes. I found no secondary sources or SIGCOV. One site called it an "award-winning" show but I never could locate what that award was. Given the detail of content about the characters, I think this article mainly serves as a nostalgia page for IP editors to write about a series they might have watched when they were younger. Dare I say it? I don't think it is notable or encyclopedic. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
13:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't understand why this page is in the mainspace when the sources provide only one line of information about this topic, "After his successful mission of Adhoni, he annexed Kanchan Garh without any bloodshed." The ongoing issue with poorly documented Indian 'Wars,' 'Sieges,' 'Battles,' and 'Captures' articles needs to be thoroughly reviewed. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 08:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The arguments to keep are remarkably weak. Only one of them provides any evidence of WP:SIGCOV, and the source therein has been convincingly rebutted. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 16:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Seems almost whole primary sources, thus seems to not pass wp:n Slatersteven ( talk) 13:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia doesn't care if it's true.Sure, but Wikipedia cares if it's WP:DUE. That's an essential part of WP:GNG. – Austronesier ( talk) 18:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
11:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
"The current Grand Master Jean-Louis de Biasi continues to maintain the high moral standards of this tradition") and unsalvageable. If sufficient appropriate sources can ever be found to justify a new article, none of the existing content will be required. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 11:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kid Icarus (series)#Characters. Consensus is the sourcing depth is not there to support a standalone. I will protect the redirect to avoid a 4th AfD, but the suggestion of working on a draft is a good one. It should go thorugh AfC to avoid further issues though as consensus in both 2024 AFDs is strong. Star Mississippi 15:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Article was brought back recently, and again I feel the arguments of the previous AfD hold true here. Every new source added- with few exceptions- are either unreliable or a very trivial mention in a review of Uprising. Even using sources from the previous iteration of Pit's article, there still isn't nearly enough for a whole article. I recommend to restore the redirect, since nothing has been proven to state that the discussion's consensus has changed. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 02:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. On the Siliconera article, the article is about a figurine—of Pit. This isn't about figurines generally; it's about content pertaining to this character that would probably be undue in Kid Icarus but are relevant to understanding to the character Pit as promoted by the company and consumed by audiences. As for the IGN article, it seems we disagree with how to read and regard the source. Related to the book and IGN article, I'll add that I don't see where in WP:SIGCOV coverage that summarizes is prohibited. A Wikipedia article shouldn't be purely summary, but that doesn't necessarily mean a source isn't significant coverage if it is providing summarization. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 05:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Redirect. The sources added are by and large low-quality or not a show of notability. As far as the sources mentioned by Dream Focus go, I question their judgment when they are arguing that a WP:ROUTINE news piece about figure release is a show of notability or significance. Articles about figure releases are very common, there is nothing exceptional about this. The D&D source is also quite tenuous, being a part of many articles, which doesn't come off as an exceptional source. It doesn't help that the article is from a source said to not be usable to demonstrate notability. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 19:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV#Telefilms. Star Mississippi 15:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this and this. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 17:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital#Long format/Soaps. Star Mississippi 15:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by TV One (Pakistan)#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this and this. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by TV One (Pakistan)#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by TV One (Pakistan)#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Aliya Bukhari#Dramas. Star Mississippi 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark. This time, though, I'm adding the observation that I'm already tired of my own copy/paste and wish we'd noticed this the day these nominations were made to consider speedy close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Babar Javed#Filmography. Star Mississippi 15:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this etc. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital#Drama series. Star Mississippi 15:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Angeline Malik#As a director. Star Mississippi 15:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Syed Ahmed Kamran. Star Mississippi 15:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sign/in-depth coverage, such as reviews. All I could find is some ROTM coverage like this. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV#Drama series as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fahad Mustafa#Selected television as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Amin Iqbal#Television as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV#Anthology series as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some namechecks coverage. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 14:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to A-Plus TV#Drama serials as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 15:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 14:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tamasha (TV series) as a viable ATD with no indication input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 15:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Tamasha Season 2 hasn't received coverage that should satisfy GNG. The only coverage I found are ROTM - all from same publication -
like this,
this, and
this one. Not enough because Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.
and provided coverage is without bylines. —
Saqib (
talk I
contribs)
13:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Goa University#Recognised institutions. Star Mississippi 15:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NORG. The only source is from the college's LinkedIn page, and I found no press coverage online. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Private school that does not appear notable due to lack of reliable sources. Sanglahi86 ( talk) 13:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 15:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This AfD may be the same issue as with Kristína Panáková AfD back in November 2023, except it's about a former men's footballer. He has played hundred of career games in total and even appeared for his national team, but fails WP:GNG due to lack of in-depth coverage. I'm struggling to find enough sufficient sources as this article has been written terribly with possible dubious stories for years, so does corresponding Slovak Wikipedia, which would help copy over English article otherwise (I already checked and translated it). Clara A. Djalim ( talk) 09:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Yet another article with poor sources that fails verification, this article seems to rely heavily on WP:POVFORK & WP:SYNTH. The infobox mentions that Dul Chand fought for Delhi sultanate however the Siege section mentions him as a ruler/king of a different kingdom and it has no mention of Delhi sultanate. Moreover there are no cited sources mentioning the event as Sack of Bhatner fort (1398). Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 07:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; questionable sourcing. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to University of Kansas#Media. Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; merge with University of Kansas#Media. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; questionable sourcing. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to WVXF. Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Notable only on local level, Fox affiliation notwithstanding. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
One more article which lacks significant coverage and the sources don't go beyond mentioning some scattered lines that "Visaladeva, the tenth descendant of this line, was killed by a Muslim ruler of Delhi." There's no Battle of Sambalpur ever occurred per source. It's clearly a WP:HOAX article. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 06:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Yet another article appears to cover a series of conflicts spanning over a century, which have been amalgamated into many 'wars.' The only source Jaques Tony cited for this title and its prolonged duration does not support the timeline mentioned in the lead and infobox (note that timeline in lead and infobox aren't aligned). This discrepancy creates confusion and suggests a lack of notability. Additionally, the article seems to rely heavily on WP:SYNTH and WP:POVFORK, which is concerning. I hope we don't get to see another non notable 'wars' article spanning centuries or even millennia. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 06:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
There seems to be some confusion here about our policies and guidelines.
Given that the deletion criteria are unsupported, the article is going to be kept. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
The article lacks general notability, as there are no cited sources specifically mentioning the Siege of Chittorgarh (1544) or providing significant coverage of this conflict. Instead, it focuses more on unrelated events such as the other conquests of Sher Shah and the Battle of Harmoda (1557). While some sources briefly mention Sher Shah's attention towards Mewar in 1544, there is no substantial coverage of a proper siege of Chittorgarh in these sources. Based Kashmiri ( talk) 05:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[39]
Pg.181
[40]
Pg.A53
[41]
Pg-529
[42]
Pg.76
[43]
This article neither contains any unreliable source nor dealing with any unrelated topics.Battle of Harmoda,As mentioned above is completely related to the topic.The commander Haji khan and Shams khan were left by Sher shah to face the Udai singh that must be mentioned and the aftermath should also being mentioned.
Kemilliogolgi (
talk) 06:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC) —
Kemilliogolgi (
talk ·
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
AdityaNakul (
talk ·
contribs).
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
15:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
When Sher Shah Suri was within a mere distance of 12 Kos from Chittor, Udai Singh II made the decision to surrender the fort without engaging in a direct confrontation.This is not what we call WP:SIGCOV. There's no significant engagement, so we can't carve out an article which only has 2-3 lines of non-engagement "Siege of Chittor". And I have checked and thoroughly reviewed the sources, out of 14 only 3 deals with this meagre siege and the rest focuses on other unrelated events. Based.Kashmiri (🗨️) 17:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two dramatically different interpretations of this article, we need more participants here to come to a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
BLP of a religious leader lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. There may be sources in other languages, in which case it would be good if someone could add them. Mccapra ( talk) 10:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for draftification?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Slightly more extensive than 2012 Scottsdale mayoral election. Still probably falls under WP:MILL. Okmrman ( talk) 23:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
04:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Yet another subarticle of Precision cut tissue slices, created by a now-blocked paid editor for a company in the industry. There's a minimal history; not sure if it's too detailed for Wikipedia or would want to be merged into Histology or something. -- Beland ( talk) 02:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
Precision cut tissue slices was deleted through an AFD, do you have another suggested Merge target article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Like precision cut tissue slices, this appears to have been created by a now-blocked paid editor, and is of uneven quality. Precision cut lung slices was created at the same time, but seems more informative. (I mention it in case someone wants to nominate it as well.) -- Beland ( talk) 02:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
Precision cut tissue slices has been deleted. Do you see another potential Merge topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources found that make this topic meet for notability. 日期20220626 ( talk) 04:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable clergy person and musician. There is nothing in this article that satisfies musical notability or general notability. The one reference says that he exists. Existence != Notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Reads promo-y currently and I'm not turning up any RS coverage. Some mentions in books that list software, and it looks like its won some minor awards. ~ Bluecrystal004 ( talk · contribs) 03:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Estrella TV affiliates#Owned-and-operated stations. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rocket from the Crypt. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This only uses a single source, cannot find many/any sources outside of the listed one. Top results from searching show a separate Jason Crane. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This biography lacks any sources that are significant coverage. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vicious Cycle Software#Technology. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Not notable IgelRM ( talk) 01:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Agus River#Timoga Springs. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability in question, potentially promotional material. The article was tagged as unreferenced since 2009. GNews search gave articles on craft beer. GNews archives search points to a property of the former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. GBooks has a passing mention in a book about 100 stories written by kids and an interview of a resort owner by the National Steel Corporation. GSearch is filled with travel blogs and social media posts that do not pass RS guidelines. -- Lenticel ( talk) 01:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard ( talk) 09:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)