The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG, was unable to find any significant coverage other than brief mentions. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please remember to sign your comments and if you are proposing a Redirect or Merge, identify a target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. If this article were Merged, what would be the Merge target article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Looks like a consensus to Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Not just it is entirely unsourced, this does not meet the WP:LISTN as this grouping isn't discussed in non-primary sources. Definitely useful as a category than being a standalone list. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 12:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Waseem Abbas#Television serials. Star Mississippi 02:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
hidden agenda[10]— Saqib ( talk I contribs) 11:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: input from disinterested parties would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
No obvious reason why bandmember should have own page. Doesn't seem to pass WP:BANDMEMBER. Very few internal links. Seaweed ( talk) 18:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject appears to fail both WP:ANYBIO and WP:NAUTHOR. JFHJr ( ㊟) 22:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. I can't think of any other applicable grounds for notability for this subject. JFHJr ( ㊟) 21:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Created evading a salting of Vaidam. Sources:
So there may be a vague glimmer of merit smothered under the REFBOMB, but not enough to let this title-gaming slip by without review. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and mild salting. . Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Two articles on radio stations in the Philippines that were created evading a salt on the unprefixed callsign ( DWIP, DWYE), and contain no real evidence of notability. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear, and approaching
WP:SNOW.
BD2412
T
03:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
A promotional article for a small, defunct accountancy company. The article is referenced only by press releases, derivative churnalism thereof, and ultra-low-value listicles. I can find no substantial independent coverage it at all ( WP:ORGCRITE). The only somewhat notable thing I can find out about the company is it, and its principals, being punished by the SEC (but that's a primary source, and the affair does not appear to have engendered much in the way of coverage either). Finlay McWalter··–· Talk 20:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything about this farm on the web except a map that may show it (complicated map). Bbb23 ( talk) 20:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shemaroo Entertainment#TV Channels. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 20:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shemaroo Entertainment#TV Channels. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 20:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
On its face, it fails WP:NORG. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Neither a redirect to Hoyt nor to Ginjer Buchanan, where neither the imprint nor this three book series appears to merit mention makes sense, so bringing this here. The books don't appear to have merited note as a series,and there's no indication this use of a pen name was. Star Mississippi 19:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Welcome to all of our new editors. I hope you stay past the closing of this discussion and help improve articles, like the rest of us spend time doing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The subject does not meet general notability requirements or the notability requirements for a politician. The only coverage of the subject is by local and obscure outlets who provide run-of-the-mill coverage of him as a candidate in local elections. thena ( talk) 19:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Translations
|
---|
1.
Wen Wei Po: In this UK general election, there are 9 British Chinese candidates running, including 29-year-old Conservative Party candidate Johnny Luk, who was born in Hong Kong. Luk, who is running for Parliament for the first time, recounts his experience of racial discrimination during his studies, revealing that he was once told to "go back to China." He calls on the Chinese community to speak up more, to drive improvements in the government's policies and funding for the Chinese community, and even to influence the UK's foreign relations with East Asia.
2. The News Lens: This includes 32-year-old Johnny Luk, who contested the Hampstead and Kilburn constituency in the 2019 general election.
3. Phoenix Television: Johnny Luk, 25 years old, followed his parents to immigrate to the UK when he was 10 years old. After graduating from a university in the UK, he now works at a non-profit organization, helping university graduates in the UK realize their entrepreneurial dreams.
4. BBC: "Seeing what is happening (in Hong Kong), I feel very sad," said 29-year-old Conservative Party candidate Johnny Luk. Although China is sometimes controversial, the China-UK relationship is still much better than the relationship between Russia and the UK. "I hope I can build a bridge between China and the UK, and enhance mutual understanding," said the 29-year-old Conservative Party candidate Johnny Luk.
|
— Editorman75 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— Duplicate !vote: Editorman75 ( talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.
— Duplicate !vote: Editorman75 ( talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.
— RogueWanderer29 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC/ WP:NSCIENTIST. Third-party (independent, non-primary) sources lending significant in-depth coverage appear not to exist, and are unlikely to crop up in the future. JFHJr ( ㊟) 17:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
18:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. In the future, if you "correct" a comment, the protocol is to strike the old phrase and insert the new one, don't rewrite your nomination statement. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Am article about a boxer that doesn't meet WP:SIRS on source assessment. The article in general doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 18:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep. I think I gave enough reliable sources if you had properly checked those sources before tagging it for deletion. Micheal Kaluba ( talk) 19:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T
03:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Autobiography of a not-yet-notable WP:ARCHITECT and WP:PROF. She's a highly qualified architect and university lecturer, but I can find no coverage of her work in independent, secondary sources, and her work in Google Scholar is lightly cited. Main claim to notability appears to be her notable relative, but on Wikipedia notability is not inherited, and the sources cited mention her only in passing at a memorial service. I could find no mentions of her as a politician. Wikishovel ( talk) 17:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 19:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lew Childre. Owen× ☎ 17:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Content previously deleted for lack of notability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartmath Institute, recreated under a trivially different capitalization. This is a fringe institute, for which the refbomb of references are either passing mentions, not independent, or not reliable sources. This should at best be redirected to Lew Childre, as the original Heartmath Institute has been. BD2412 T 17:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Back in 2018, there was a brief discussion about whether caretaker cabinet level positions automatically confer WP:N. The consensus was that they do not, and one has to pass the GNG to have a bio. Based on that discussion, the subject of this BLP does not fall under WP:POLITICIAN and must meet GNG, which he currently does not. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
A discussion about some new policy regarding these types of articles is welcome to take place outside this AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up to c. 60 "Line of succession to the former X throne" precedents, almost all of which resulted in Delete. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretenders to the throne of Mexico. NLeeuw ( talk) 12:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete without prejudice against early submission of a draft to AfC. Owen× ☎ 17:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Endorsed PROD objected to. Article fails to meet WP:GNG, and is likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. Local elections tend not to be considered notable enough for standalone articles. Mdann52 ( talk) 15:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT#2c. Article was renominated too soon after the previous AfD. (non-admin closure) GTrang ( talk) 17:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
An ordinary Russian journalist. There is no noticeable importance. There is no correspondence with WP:JOURNALIST. In the previous discussion, only the author of the article spoke in favor of leaving it.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 15:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Anti-abortion movements as a sensible ATD. Owen× ☎ 17:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be a WP:POVFORK of anti-abortion movements/ United States anti-abortion movement, which covers these topics. Not to say there's no such thing as "non-violent abortion protests" but that it's not an independent topic. For better or worse, there's a lot of media coverage of anti-abortion violence, but the same coverage doesn't exist that treats non-violent protests as a distinct subject that passes WP:GNG (and at minimum WP:NOPAGE would apply). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and SALT, after being deleted six times. Owen× ☎ 17:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly written as an advertisement with no indication of notability. Almost all sources are self-published. B3251 (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to A-Plus TV#Drama serials. as a valid ATD. Owen× ☎ 17:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to BIG Synergy#Fiction shows. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV. Tagged for notability since 2020 DonaldD23 talk to me 13:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital#Drama series. as a valid ATD. Owen× ☎ 17:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 13:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Compliance with WP:WRITER has not been demonstrated.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 12:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources; sources are mostly obituaries. No indication of awards or charted songs. Magnolia677 ( talk) 12:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear, borderline
WP:SNOW.
BD2412
T
03:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This article was created in draft and speedy-deleted per WP:G11 on June 8. It was then recreated (somewhat less promotional) and PRODded. The PROD was removed by an IP, who also added some unsourced material. I (improperly because I had no right to reinstate the PROD) reverted the IP because of the unsourced material. Another administrator properly removed the PROD. The article still exists at Draft:Adeesh Babu, which is where I believe it should be until it's cleaned up and notability has been satisfied. Bbb23 ( talk) 12:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Borderline promo piece on a businessperson that doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. According to WP:RSPS, we should not accept Forbes contributor pieces nor articles on Medium as evidence of notability, as they are essentially self-published and/or have very little editorial oversight. The other sources are also quite suspect and either look like blogs or are written in a very promotional way, which indicates some sort of conflict of interest. My own searches found nothing better. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep – Antoine Sallis meets the notability criteria as demonstrated by several reliable sources. He was featured in Black Enterprise and Rolling Out, which provide significant coverage of his career and achievements: - Black Enterprise: [Antoine Sallis, the Credit Genius, teaches others how to maximize the full power of credit]( https://www.blackenterprise.com/antoine-sallis-the-credit-genius-teaches-others-how-to-maximize-the-full-power-of-credit/) - Rolling Out: [Antoine Sallis, the Credit Genius, talks about his unique leadership style]( https://rollingout.com/2022/04/30/antoine-sallis-the-credit-genius-talks-about-his-unique-leadership-style/ )
Additionally, he is a published author with books that have ISBNs and are listed in reliable databases such as Google Books:
- Google Books: [The Great American Credit Secret]( https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Great_American_Credit_Secret.html?id=pSH_zwEACAAJ)
These sources clearly establish his notability and warrant the retention of this article.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 14:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. The best source is an obituary of the founder. Other sources show that it exists but little else. A recent conversion to a redirect was immediatly reversed. Fails WP:GNG. Velella Velella Talk 11:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
limited to stations with Wikipedia articles— to me, that does not make a valid ATD.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Imran Garda without prejudice against selectively merging sourced content that fits with the target page. Owen× ☎ 17:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:GNG, or WP:NTV (which is an essay, not a policy). I've hunted around for a few days now for some independent, secondary sources about this show, assuming that a show on the state public broadcasting network TRT World with such wide geographical coverage would have some decent reviews etc in reliable sources, but all I can find is more or less what's here: passing mentions of the show, in articles about the subjects of the interview. 73 of the 84 sources cited so far are from the show's own YouTube channel. Its chief claim to notability is the many notable people who have been interviewed on the show, but on Wikipedia, notability is not inherited. Article creator is a single-purpose account, and no response yet at their user talk page about potential conflict of interest. Wikishovel ( talk) 09:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There was no support for an outright deletion. Therefore, a merger would be an alternative to Keep, not an ATD. There was rough consensus that not all three articles - Fantastic Beasts, List of Fantastic Beasts cast members and this one - should exist independently, but no consensus as to which should be merged into what. Such controversial mergers are best handled editorially on the repsective articles' Talk pages. Owen× ☎ 14:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
There are two big issues: Firstly, there's no citations outside of the one character that already has his own page, Newt Scamander. Secondly, this is for a three-film series - so not really a huge body of work - and, outside of the main four or five characters, there's one or two sentences for each person. Worse, the articles on the films have cast lists with one or two sentence descriptions of the characters, so it's redundant as well (The main characters' longer bits just being the plot summaries of the films). Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 23:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
there's an unstated presumption people care enough to actually make this into a decent article: On the one hand I think that's a valid concern, seeing that some articles stay tagged and unimproved for long periods of time. But on the other hand I think that is the basic premise of Wikipedia, and the project is immensly successful! So I prefer to err on the side of hope in accordance with WP:There is no deadline and especially WP:Work in progress. Daranios ( talk) 07:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus yet. Please do not turn
List of Fantastic Beasts cast members into a Redirect as that article is being discussed as a possible Merge target article which can't occur if the page is a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus to keep the content. No prejudice against merging, if someone want to pursue that avenue and do the work. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Articles on diplomatic relations are supposed to be country specific as long as they concern modern period. This article's title is too broad, inaccurate and whatever is added here can be already found on other articles. Ratnahastin ( talk) 05:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The deciding issue here is the lack of in-depth and independent sourcing. For commercial companies, the standards here are quite stringent. If press releases and the like are accepted as sufficient sourcing, ut is hard to avoid Wikipedia becoming an indirect marketing tool. The article contains several sources, not all of them about the company. Hkkingg listed a number of sources that cover the company in some depth, but the analysis by HighKing on the source's independence and reliability is convincing here. Sjakkalle (Check!) 05:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
So as I mentioned on my AfD for their CEO, here I am. There were... quite the volume of WP:PRODUCTREV to get through, but nothing with significant coverage of the company, and barely anything on any specific product. Though this was not the primary focus, I do not believe any individual product of theirs is notable either, even ignoring questions of ORGIND or RS. The coverage of their events would seem to be excluded on WP:SPIP. I don't see any plausible way to meet WP:NCORP here. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 10:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Guess I was talking to a sock
|
---|
|
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 19:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the typology in reliable sources. I found several mentions, but they were brief. toweli ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCIENTIST. His singular discovery is not a notable event, just noteworthy (in the list where it appears). There's just not enough in unrelated third-party reliable sources about him to make an encyclopedic biography. JFHJr ( ㊟) 04:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources have been provided. The nomination needed explanation and specificity. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG. jlwoodwa ( talk) 04:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Renominating the article because it has been restored to its original state (after minimal participation in the previous AfD) and has not been modified since the date of its refund (12 May 2024). This circumstance provides ample reason to once again initiate the deletion of the article, based on the same rationale presented during the initial deletion discussion. - "Trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. Citations are collections of paid news which are highly pervasive and deeply integrated practice within Indian news media WP:NEWSORGINDIA. The primary issue arises from the editor's attempt to pass off two financial products ( exchange traded funds), namely BANDHAN S&P BSE SENSEX ETF (BSE:540154) and BANDHAN NIFTY 50 ETF (NSE:IDFNIFTYYET), as company's own stock market listings, which they are not, thereby failing to adhere to WP:LISTED. A comparable effort was observed in the AFD discussion of Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance, wherein the company tried to be part of NIFTY 50 without proper validation. In a nutshell, the company falls short when it comes to meeting WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND." TCBT1CSI ( talk) 07:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion (again)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. an AFD discussion can't close as Soft Deletion twice. And since there has already been an AFD Soft Deletion is not an option at all.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up to c. 60 "Line of succession to the former X throne" precedents, almost all of which resulted in Delete. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretenders to the throne of Parma. NLeeuw ( talk) 12:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
It exists but isn't notable enough for its own article, and I can't find a good WP:ATD. Has been unreferenced and tagged for notability for a long time. Boleyn ( talk) 07:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG or NORG. Sources are all interviews, lists of products, or do not mention Central 23. No RS found during BEFORE search. StartGrammarTime ( talk) 05:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete I'm not finding any significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Some of the sources in the article don't even mention the company and others barely mention it. — Iadmc ♫ talk 05:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Star Maa#Drama series. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Only a single source is TOI which only verifies an actor's role in the series. A WP:BEFORE found references to verify it exists, but no significant coverage to establish notability. CNMall41 ( talk) 04:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn, WP:HEY applies ( non-admin closure). Crouch, Swale ( talk) 16:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no coverage and the one sentence article is unreferenced. SL93 ( talk) 03:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable band. Fails WP:BAND. SL93 ( talk) 04:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:GNG in any way, [41] which the article cites is just a list of train times. Sohom ( talk) 03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Marked for COI and primary sourcing issues over 10 years ago, this article's sourcing still consists of 1) coverage about other topics that merely mention the subject, and 2) primary sources. JFHJr ( ㊟) 01:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This person is far from notable. There are no articles about him from any source other than his own school's website. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 01:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mercer University#Student life. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; questionable sourcing. Merge with Mercer University#Student life. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 01:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable darts player per WP:SPORTCRIT. I found no significant coverage. SL93 ( talk) 00:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG, was unable to find any significant coverage other than brief mentions. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please remember to sign your comments and if you are proposing a Redirect or Merge, identify a target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. If this article were Merged, what would be the Merge target article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Looks like a consensus to Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Not just it is entirely unsourced, this does not meet the WP:LISTN as this grouping isn't discussed in non-primary sources. Definitely useful as a category than being a standalone list. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 12:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Waseem Abbas#Television serials. Star Mississippi 02:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 15:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
09:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
hidden agenda[10]— Saqib ( talk I contribs) 11:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: input from disinterested parties would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
No obvious reason why bandmember should have own page. Doesn't seem to pass WP:BANDMEMBER. Very few internal links. Seaweed ( talk) 18:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject appears to fail both WP:ANYBIO and WP:NAUTHOR. JFHJr ( ㊟) 22:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. I can't think of any other applicable grounds for notability for this subject. JFHJr ( ㊟) 21:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Created evading a salting of Vaidam. Sources:
So there may be a vague glimmer of merit smothered under the REFBOMB, but not enough to let this title-gaming slip by without review. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and mild salting. . Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Two articles on radio stations in the Philippines that were created evading a salt on the unprefixed callsign ( DWIP, DWYE), and contain no real evidence of notability. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear, and approaching
WP:SNOW.
BD2412
T
03:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
A promotional article for a small, defunct accountancy company. The article is referenced only by press releases, derivative churnalism thereof, and ultra-low-value listicles. I can find no substantial independent coverage it at all ( WP:ORGCRITE). The only somewhat notable thing I can find out about the company is it, and its principals, being punished by the SEC (but that's a primary source, and the affair does not appear to have engendered much in the way of coverage either). Finlay McWalter··–· Talk 20:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything about this farm on the web except a map that may show it (complicated map). Bbb23 ( talk) 20:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shemaroo Entertainment#TV Channels. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 20:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shemaroo Entertainment#TV Channels. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 20:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
On its face, it fails WP:NORG. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Neither a redirect to Hoyt nor to Ginjer Buchanan, where neither the imprint nor this three book series appears to merit mention makes sense, so bringing this here. The books don't appear to have merited note as a series,and there's no indication this use of a pen name was. Star Mississippi 19:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Welcome to all of our new editors. I hope you stay past the closing of this discussion and help improve articles, like the rest of us spend time doing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The subject does not meet general notability requirements or the notability requirements for a politician. The only coverage of the subject is by local and obscure outlets who provide run-of-the-mill coverage of him as a candidate in local elections. thena ( talk) 19:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Translations
|
---|
1.
Wen Wei Po: In this UK general election, there are 9 British Chinese candidates running, including 29-year-old Conservative Party candidate Johnny Luk, who was born in Hong Kong. Luk, who is running for Parliament for the first time, recounts his experience of racial discrimination during his studies, revealing that he was once told to "go back to China." He calls on the Chinese community to speak up more, to drive improvements in the government's policies and funding for the Chinese community, and even to influence the UK's foreign relations with East Asia.
2. The News Lens: This includes 32-year-old Johnny Luk, who contested the Hampstead and Kilburn constituency in the 2019 general election.
3. Phoenix Television: Johnny Luk, 25 years old, followed his parents to immigrate to the UK when he was 10 years old. After graduating from a university in the UK, he now works at a non-profit organization, helping university graduates in the UK realize their entrepreneurial dreams.
4. BBC: "Seeing what is happening (in Hong Kong), I feel very sad," said 29-year-old Conservative Party candidate Johnny Luk. Although China is sometimes controversial, the China-UK relationship is still much better than the relationship between Russia and the UK. "I hope I can build a bridge between China and the UK, and enhance mutual understanding," said the 29-year-old Conservative Party candidate Johnny Luk.
|
— Editorman75 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— Duplicate !vote: Editorman75 ( talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.
— Duplicate !vote: Editorman75 ( talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.
— RogueWanderer29 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check |url=
value (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC/ WP:NSCIENTIST. Third-party (independent, non-primary) sources lending significant in-depth coverage appear not to exist, and are unlikely to crop up in the future. JFHJr ( ㊟) 17:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
18:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. In the future, if you "correct" a comment, the protocol is to strike the old phrase and insert the new one, don't rewrite your nomination statement. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Am article about a boxer that doesn't meet WP:SIRS on source assessment. The article in general doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 18:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep. I think I gave enough reliable sources if you had properly checked those sources before tagging it for deletion. Micheal Kaluba ( talk) 19:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear.
BD2412
T
03:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Autobiography of a not-yet-notable WP:ARCHITECT and WP:PROF. She's a highly qualified architect and university lecturer, but I can find no coverage of her work in independent, secondary sources, and her work in Google Scholar is lightly cited. Main claim to notability appears to be her notable relative, but on Wikipedia notability is not inherited, and the sources cited mention her only in passing at a memorial service. I could find no mentions of her as a politician. Wikishovel ( talk) 17:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 19:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lew Childre. Owen× ☎ 17:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Content previously deleted for lack of notability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartmath Institute, recreated under a trivially different capitalization. This is a fringe institute, for which the refbomb of references are either passing mentions, not independent, or not reliable sources. This should at best be redirected to Lew Childre, as the original Heartmath Institute has been. BD2412 T 17:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Back in 2018, there was a brief discussion about whether caretaker cabinet level positions automatically confer WP:N. The consensus was that they do not, and one has to pass the GNG to have a bio. Based on that discussion, the subject of this BLP does not fall under WP:POLITICIAN and must meet GNG, which he currently does not. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 16:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
A discussion about some new policy regarding these types of articles is welcome to take place outside this AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up to c. 60 "Line of succession to the former X throne" precedents, almost all of which resulted in Delete. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretenders to the throne of Mexico. NLeeuw ( talk) 12:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete without prejudice against early submission of a draft to AfC. Owen× ☎ 17:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Endorsed PROD objected to. Article fails to meet WP:GNG, and is likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. Local elections tend not to be considered notable enough for standalone articles. Mdann52 ( talk) 15:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT#2c. Article was renominated too soon after the previous AfD. (non-admin closure) GTrang ( talk) 17:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
An ordinary Russian journalist. There is no noticeable importance. There is no correspondence with WP:JOURNALIST. In the previous discussion, only the author of the article spoke in favor of leaving it.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 15:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Anti-abortion movements as a sensible ATD. Owen× ☎ 17:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be a WP:POVFORK of anti-abortion movements/ United States anti-abortion movement, which covers these topics. Not to say there's no such thing as "non-violent abortion protests" but that it's not an independent topic. For better or worse, there's a lot of media coverage of anti-abortion violence, but the same coverage doesn't exist that treats non-violent protests as a distinct subject that passes WP:GNG (and at minimum WP:NOPAGE would apply). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and SALT, after being deleted six times. Owen× ☎ 17:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Clearly written as an advertisement with no indication of notability. Almost all sources are self-published. B3251 (talk) 14:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to A-Plus TV#Drama serials. as a valid ATD. Owen× ☎ 17:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to BIG Synergy#Fiction shows. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV. Tagged for notability since 2020 DonaldD23 talk to me 13:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ARY Digital#Drama series. as a valid ATD. Owen× ☎ 17:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 13:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:03, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Compliance with WP:WRITER has not been demonstrated.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 12:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources; sources are mostly obituaries. No indication of awards or charted songs. Magnolia677 ( talk) 12:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear, borderline
WP:SNOW.
BD2412
T
03:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This article was created in draft and speedy-deleted per WP:G11 on June 8. It was then recreated (somewhat less promotional) and PRODded. The PROD was removed by an IP, who also added some unsourced material. I (improperly because I had no right to reinstate the PROD) reverted the IP because of the unsourced material. Another administrator properly removed the PROD. The article still exists at Draft:Adeesh Babu, which is where I believe it should be until it's cleaned up and notability has been satisfied. Bbb23 ( talk) 12:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Borderline promo piece on a businessperson that doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. According to WP:RSPS, we should not accept Forbes contributor pieces nor articles on Medium as evidence of notability, as they are essentially self-published and/or have very little editorial oversight. The other sources are also quite suspect and either look like blogs or are written in a very promotional way, which indicates some sort of conflict of interest. My own searches found nothing better. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep – Antoine Sallis meets the notability criteria as demonstrated by several reliable sources. He was featured in Black Enterprise and Rolling Out, which provide significant coverage of his career and achievements: - Black Enterprise: [Antoine Sallis, the Credit Genius, teaches others how to maximize the full power of credit]( https://www.blackenterprise.com/antoine-sallis-the-credit-genius-teaches-others-how-to-maximize-the-full-power-of-credit/) - Rolling Out: [Antoine Sallis, the Credit Genius, talks about his unique leadership style]( https://rollingout.com/2022/04/30/antoine-sallis-the-credit-genius-talks-about-his-unique-leadership-style/ )
Additionally, he is a published author with books that have ISBNs and are listed in reliable databases such as Google Books:
- Google Books: [The Great American Credit Secret]( https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Great_American_Credit_Secret.html?id=pSH_zwEACAAJ)
These sources clearly establish his notability and warrant the retention of this article.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 14:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. The best source is an obituary of the founder. Other sources show that it exists but little else. A recent conversion to a redirect was immediatly reversed. Fails WP:GNG. Velella Velella Talk 11:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
limited to stations with Wikipedia articles— to me, that does not make a valid ATD.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Imran Garda without prejudice against selectively merging sourced content that fits with the target page. Owen× ☎ 17:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:GNG, or WP:NTV (which is an essay, not a policy). I've hunted around for a few days now for some independent, secondary sources about this show, assuming that a show on the state public broadcasting network TRT World with such wide geographical coverage would have some decent reviews etc in reliable sources, but all I can find is more or less what's here: passing mentions of the show, in articles about the subjects of the interview. 73 of the 84 sources cited so far are from the show's own YouTube channel. Its chief claim to notability is the many notable people who have been interviewed on the show, but on Wikipedia, notability is not inherited. Article creator is a single-purpose account, and no response yet at their user talk page about potential conflict of interest. Wikishovel ( talk) 09:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There was no support for an outright deletion. Therefore, a merger would be an alternative to Keep, not an ATD. There was rough consensus that not all three articles - Fantastic Beasts, List of Fantastic Beasts cast members and this one - should exist independently, but no consensus as to which should be merged into what. Such controversial mergers are best handled editorially on the repsective articles' Talk pages. Owen× ☎ 14:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
There are two big issues: Firstly, there's no citations outside of the one character that already has his own page, Newt Scamander. Secondly, this is for a three-film series - so not really a huge body of work - and, outside of the main four or five characters, there's one or two sentences for each person. Worse, the articles on the films have cast lists with one or two sentence descriptions of the characters, so it's redundant as well (The main characters' longer bits just being the plot summaries of the films). Adam Cuerden ( talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 23:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
there's an unstated presumption people care enough to actually make this into a decent article: On the one hand I think that's a valid concern, seeing that some articles stay tagged and unimproved for long periods of time. But on the other hand I think that is the basic premise of Wikipedia, and the project is immensly successful! So I prefer to err on the side of hope in accordance with WP:There is no deadline and especially WP:Work in progress. Daranios ( talk) 07:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus yet. Please do not turn
List of Fantastic Beasts cast members into a Redirect as that article is being discussed as a possible Merge target article which can't occur if the page is a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus to keep the content. No prejudice against merging, if someone want to pursue that avenue and do the work. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Articles on diplomatic relations are supposed to be country specific as long as they concern modern period. This article's title is too broad, inaccurate and whatever is added here can be already found on other articles. Ratnahastin ( talk) 05:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The deciding issue here is the lack of in-depth and independent sourcing. For commercial companies, the standards here are quite stringent. If press releases and the like are accepted as sufficient sourcing, ut is hard to avoid Wikipedia becoming an indirect marketing tool. The article contains several sources, not all of them about the company. Hkkingg listed a number of sources that cover the company in some depth, but the analysis by HighKing on the source's independence and reliability is convincing here. Sjakkalle (Check!) 05:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
So as I mentioned on my AfD for their CEO, here I am. There were... quite the volume of WP:PRODUCTREV to get through, but nothing with significant coverage of the company, and barely anything on any specific product. Though this was not the primary focus, I do not believe any individual product of theirs is notable either, even ignoring questions of ORGIND or RS. The coverage of their events would seem to be excluded on WP:SPIP. I don't see any plausible way to meet WP:NCORP here. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 10:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Guess I was talking to a sock
|
---|
|
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 19:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the typology in reliable sources. I found several mentions, but they were brief. toweli ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCIENTIST. His singular discovery is not a notable event, just noteworthy (in the list where it appears). There's just not enough in unrelated third-party reliable sources about him to make an encyclopedic biography. JFHJr ( ㊟) 04:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources have been provided. The nomination needed explanation and specificity. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG. jlwoodwa ( talk) 04:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Renominating the article because it has been restored to its original state (after minimal participation in the previous AfD) and has not been modified since the date of its refund (12 May 2024). This circumstance provides ample reason to once again initiate the deletion of the article, based on the same rationale presented during the initial deletion discussion. - "Trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. Citations are collections of paid news which are highly pervasive and deeply integrated practice within Indian news media WP:NEWSORGINDIA. The primary issue arises from the editor's attempt to pass off two financial products ( exchange traded funds), namely BANDHAN S&P BSE SENSEX ETF (BSE:540154) and BANDHAN NIFTY 50 ETF (NSE:IDFNIFTYYET), as company's own stock market listings, which they are not, thereby failing to adhere to WP:LISTED. A comparable effort was observed in the AFD discussion of Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance, wherein the company tried to be part of NIFTY 50 without proper validation. In a nutshell, the company falls short when it comes to meeting WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND." TCBT1CSI ( talk) 07:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion (again)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. an AFD discussion can't close as Soft Deletion twice. And since there has already been an AFD Soft Deletion is not an option at all.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up to c. 60 "Line of succession to the former X throne" precedents, almost all of which resulted in Delete. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretenders to the throne of Parma. NLeeuw ( talk) 12:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
It exists but isn't notable enough for its own article, and I can't find a good WP:ATD. Has been unreferenced and tagged for notability for a long time. Boleyn ( talk) 07:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG or NORG. Sources are all interviews, lists of products, or do not mention Central 23. No RS found during BEFORE search. StartGrammarTime ( talk) 05:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete I'm not finding any significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Some of the sources in the article don't even mention the company and others barely mention it. — Iadmc ♫ talk 05:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Star Maa#Drama series. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Only a single source is TOI which only verifies an actor's role in the series. A WP:BEFORE found references to verify it exists, but no significant coverage to establish notability. CNMall41 ( talk) 04:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep, withdrawn, WP:HEY applies ( non-admin closure). Crouch, Swale ( talk) 16:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I found no coverage and the one sentence article is unreferenced. SL93 ( talk) 03:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable band. Fails WP:BAND. SL93 ( talk) 04:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:GNG in any way, [41] which the article cites is just a list of train times. Sohom ( talk) 03:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Marked for COI and primary sourcing issues over 10 years ago, this article's sourcing still consists of 1) coverage about other topics that merely mention the subject, and 2) primary sources. JFHJr ( ㊟) 01:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
This person is far from notable. There are no articles about him from any source other than his own school's website. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 01:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mercer University#Student life. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; questionable sourcing. Merge with Mercer University#Student life. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 01:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable darts player per WP:SPORTCRIT. I found no significant coverage. SL93 ( talk) 00:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)