The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
This has some typical "impressive" sources which turn out to be problematic. Things like this from the "Seattle Daily Observer" or this from the "Denver Reporter" are pure promo pieces, for two "newspapers" without a presence on enwiki (bizarre if they were truly newspapers from these cities) and no indication why they, as local publications, would give this person so much glowing attention. Worse perhaps is this from "Worldwineinfocenter", bringing an article that doesn't mention wine even once. But, wow, it is written by "Jennyfer Smith Senior Journalist https://www.afp.com". Now, that is the website of Agence France-Presse, a very reputable news source, so this would be a clear indication of importance. Strange though how the only references I can find for a Jennyfer Smith working for AFP (as a "senior journalist"), are all for articles about Jossifakis: looking back, the "Denver Reporter" article is also written by her!
Whether he is notable or not (doubtful), the current article needs to be deleted as a promo piece (but not clear enough to just tag it as G11, some explanation was needed I think). And perhaps some of the sources so nicely presented should be blacklisted as they don't seem to be useful... Fram ( talk) 14:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 02:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
It does not meet WP:GNG. The original redirect should be restored: Special:Permalink/618783298. MarioGom ( talk) 16:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For evaluation of the references provided on the article's
talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This does not appear to be notable. The author is barely notable, and the book itself has not been extensively commented on to meet WP:SIGCOV. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
[i]f editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page. As such, it makes sense for the article on the book to be kept and expanded in light of these reviews. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 18:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Legislative Assembly of Ulyanovsk Oblast or another location as decided on editorially. There is consensus against this existing as a standalone article. Star Mississippi 02:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST with only 2 items, no reason for this article to exist. Gabe114 ( talk) 19:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on merging?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Drywall#Construction techniques Limited input, but valid AtD since the nom is fine with that, and no one is making an argument any other way. Star Mississippi 02:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced dictionary definition that doesn't merit a stand-alone encyclopedia article. Could be a one-sentence mention in Drywall#Construction_techniques. ZimZalaBim talk 20:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep and continue the conversation about the name editorially. Star Mississippi 02:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable pen name for a non-notable book series. SL93 ( talk) 21:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Too many issues. The "Comparison of the poetic translation of the Quran" section, besides not adhering to WP:RSUE, uses large parts of quotations of translated material, hence potential for copyvio, for the website as well as the page here. [This source https://archive.ph/ZbZ9E], on which the section relies upon, is likely unreliable anyways. The section "Translations in time line" is replete with unreliable sources like [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] whenever it's not citing Kaler Kantho, on which the article is highly reliant upon (Kaler Kantho is cited 50+ times). The timeline is a mish-mash of Kaler Kantho's work plus some OR. - hako9 ( talk) 23:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Businessman who fails WP:BIO. While there are plenty of references in the article, none are satisfactory (various problems, including likely self-authored, PR, listings, short mentions, etc.) I don't see any significant coverage. Note also that the article was most likely written by a sockpuppet of a blocked editor. (See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ginginie11/Archive) Pichpich ( talk) 23:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Current reference in the article is a trivial mention at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced stub since 2010, mostly consists of OR. If there is a notable show under this, then WP:TNT Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "This week, television viewers can join the unit's members as they tackle cases both routine and exotic on Miami Animal Police, a new series on the Animal Planet network. ... On the first show, wildlife expert Bob Freer is called out to the kitschy tourist attraction, Monkey Jungle, to remove an unwanted resident: an 8-foot gator who has outgrown his waterhole. ... On tonight's show, animal control officer Kathy Labrada faces a more unusual problem: a stray goat found in South Miami's business district with a package tied around its neck."
The review notes: "On the prowl for nine months with Miami-Dade police: Animal Planet. Miami Animal Police, a TV series starring real Miami-Dade cops who work in Animal Services, premieres next month on the cable network. Among the highlights: Sgt. Charlie Daye, 40, Officer Lydia Marquez, 31, and animal control supervisor Kris Miller, 52, capture a four-foot alligator on the Palmetto Expressway during morning rush hour, causing a mega traffic jam. ... Other episodes: animal cruelty, and a foot chase of a bad guy with some mean yard dogs."
This is a 139-word review of the subject. The review notes: "A four-metre python is devouring neighbourhood pets and the Animal Police must catch it before it takes a small child! It's a great story, but not quite for the reasons this program's makers believe. They do get footage of a snake consuming a critter, but it's a look-alike python eating a defrosted duck."
The review notes from Google Translate: "Hello, I'm back with a new report about these great heroes who are Recinto Miami (Miami animal police), they take care that in Miami there is no violence against animals and that they are well and do not suffer physical or mental abuse. ... I recommend you watch it, it's a great program that can help you understand why your dog growls at you and never hit an animal on the street."
The review notes: "This new Animal Planet series does not concern animals who police Miami, but rather human members of the Miami Dade Police Department Animal Services Unit. The unit handles some 2,500 calls a month, everything from alligators on the loose to pythons in public restrooms."
The article notes: "As one of the stars of Animal Planet's reality show "Miami Animal Police" (now airing in syndication Friday nights at 9), Daye patrols Miami-Dade County - a 2,000-square-mile area that includes Miami Beach and part of the Everglades - with his team of animal investigators. ... Daye said producers from Animal Planet (an affiliate of Discovery Networks) approached the offices of the Miami-Dade County police because of the success of the network's "Animal Cops" series, which was filmed in Houston and Detroit."
[d]isputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page, except in severe casesand that
[i]f editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page. The page is unsourced, but the sources presented in this discussion should be enough to source the content is what is now the lead; this is not a severe case of the entire article violating WP:NPOV and WP:MINREF. The section comparing and contrasting the show with Animal Cops: Miami should be blanked as WP:OR if no source can be provided to substantiate it. But this alone is not enough to establish that the TNT-threshold (i.e.
the article's content is useless (including all the versions in history)) is met. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 21:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as hoax. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
This is an article for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed, and fails to meet the relevant notability guidelines: Reasons for deletion #7-8. Possibly #6 as well. See WP:DEL-REASON TNstingray ( talk) 22:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 23:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources provided counter nom and vote citing nom. Star Mississippi 02:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with addition of Common Sense Media review, but sourcing is minimal otherwise Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "The show is pretty violent, with frequent scenes of people being chased, attacked, bitten, and/or eaten alive. Victims (many of whom are the actual attack survivors) are shown screaming in fear and pain, throwing up, and having other panicked reactions. Some of these moments are replayed several times in a single segment in order to make the story even more shocking."
The review notes: "The description for last night’s premiere of Your Worst Animal Nightmares: “Camp Terror; Blood Bath.” That sounded enticing so I had to watch. Animal Planet’s new docudrama series does not make people’s hypothetical worst nightmares happen. The subjects are actual victims and the show jumps from news footage of their real-life accidents (crocodile attacks Australian campers; Great White Shark “silently stalks” four teens) to interviews with the victims and their families. But the bulk of the air time involves really, really, really horrific dramatizations of the accidents themselves."
This is a 400-word review of Your Worst Animal Nightmares. The review notes: "I continue to wait. Eight minutes to go. Graphic bloodshed is coming, this is Your Worst Animal Nightmares after all. "As I near the shallower water I cast a look over my right shoulder and saw the shark veer away from the jagged inshore rocks," he says. Seriously? That's it? The extent of his "nightmare" was a minor self-inflicted knife wound? Harrowing. But wait, that's not all. Morris has nightmares about the ordeal and eventually goes to Australia to conquer his fear by swimming with sharks while he's in a cage. As the sixth episode in the series I can only assume things are going to get worse. Apparently the next episode is about a woman who gets dog saliva on her new jacket."
The article provides 65 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Your Worst Animal Nightmares (TV3, Mondays) depicted 18-year-old Nick Peterson being attacked by a Great White shark off the South Australian coast. It was long on reconstruction and short on education. I waited for a lesson on "how to avoid being eaten" but it never came, though Nick's family and friends will live with the horror of his death for the rest of their lives."
The article notes: "Stainton (pictured), who witnessed Irwin's death in a stingray attack in September 2006, is now filming Your Worst Animal Nightmares, for The Discovery Channel. While the series will feature dramatic re-enactments of highly-publicised animal encounters, Stainton has stated he will stay away from Irwin's fatal end on the Great Barrier Reef. ... The pilot, which featured the headlined story in 2005 of a young mum who jumped on top of a crocodile north of Cooktown to save her son's friend, impressed TV executives for its sympathetic treatment of the animal."
The result was keep. Sources have been confirmed to exist. TPH, I'm not going to tone police you, but this sub-conversation is not productive. You're welcome to add the sources yourself as well. Star Mississippi 02:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with sources, but they don't seem to be much in the way of WP:SIGCOV. Searches found only false positives or TV Guide listings. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia started in 2001. The embryo of Lists of People on Postage Stamps (LPPS) started in 2002 and has been added to sporadically over the last 20 years. Philately is a hobby so updates occurred once in a while as collectors chose to enhance the data. I chose to update Central and South America in 2013 and was doing the same in 2022. I followed the format and content developed over 20 years. I believed that it had been vetted and approved before I started my updates. Hundreds of volunteers have dedicated thousands of hours to creating and maintaining these lists. Obviously there is no point in continuing.
For some reason, this particular set of lists (LPPS) seems to have galled users Fram, Johnpacklambert, and TenPoundHammer to the point where they have initiated a complete purge of the list tree. One of them actually referred to the lists as "philatelykruft". (I assume "kruft" is Newspeak for Bovine Fecal Matter). There was no round table discussion on how to improve the articles. There was no call for volunteers to work on changes or improvements. There was no effort to make the list more "notable" (a highly vague concept). Instead a major purge has been started. Further discussion is meaningless in AfDs since the purge effort is in full swing.
Thank you to all of the stamp collectors who built the lists over the years (although you may never see my thanks!!!). I had enough notice that I was able to take copies of many of the files for my personal use. I am saddened that so much effort is being destroyed. Good bye Bill Blampied ( talk) 22:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Only one source found. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5 by Bbb23. ✗ plicit 23:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
I don't think that this specific incident deserves its own page, as it centers on events arguably less notable than those already on Juan Carlos I. Accordingly, I propose either a delete or a merge. Iseult Δx parlez moi 20:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is sourcing is sufficient to counter 1E concerns, regardless of whether that should apply in Oulson's case or not. Star Mississippi 02:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Completly generic and mediocre. Fails WP:GNG, scope_creep Talk 20:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
It seems like exactly the type of event that should be included as per WP:NEWSEVENT CT55555 ( talk) 06:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Modussiccandi ( talk) 11:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Non notable businessman and philanthropist who has won a non notable prize and opened a cafe in a railway station. Sources are mostly either not independent or not reliable (I’m not sure about “Telegram”). Mccapra ( talk) 20:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Driver Era. There is no standalone notability for Rocky Lynch. Most of the content has been copied from Ross Lynch, R5 (band), and The Driver Era. Result is Redirect. Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) scope_creep Talk 08:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. No identity outside band. No coverage. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. scope_creep Talk 20:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify to allow for continued improvement. Star Mississippi 02:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Massively refbombed article about a minor denomination. Strip out the puff and encyclopaedic language and we’re left with a scant history propped by unreliable sources. Mccapra ( talk) 20:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Non-existant sourcing. No coverage. scope_creep Talk 20:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing is of insufficient quality. If someone wants to actively work on this in draft, I'm happy to provide it without going through REFUND. Star Mississippi 02:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Covert advertising article. Fails WP:BIO. Refs are either passing mentions, primary. scope_creep Talk 18:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
*Keep the article has been translated from Ukrainian Wikipedia. There are enough sources with not just short mentions, but deep reportage: Bloomberg, New York Times, Wall Steer Journal and a bunch of serious independent Ukrainian media sources. Easily passes WP:GNG as he is the couuntry's and slightly Eastern European leader in his sphere. Also, his fundraising efforts amidst Russian invasion of Ukraine are important and well covered too.
Petrushchak ivan (
talk)
11:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC).
(edit conflict)
The references are very poor. The usual run-of-the-mill PR, press-release, reports on the company, interviews. scope_creep Talk 12:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Basically the references are not so poor. I will not discuss the previous long comment, but will add my own view. Regarding general notability criteria the subject meets them. There are plenty of sources on various occasins, which are not PR or press-releases but with brief, medium or deep coverage.
So, the verdict is clear for me: Keep the article as the subject is notable, with quite history and media coverage and with a verified impact on crypto and not only sphere (biggest crypto fundraising in the world, first crypto exchange in CIS region, community building, etc). However it may be shortened, rewritten, fixed etc in order to meet all Wikipedia criteria and what WP is not. I agree that for English language auditory the translation of Ukrainian article may seem promotional, but it's more cultural differences and a zeitgeist (war with Russian and related stuff). -- IgorTurzh ( talk) 14:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Draftify I think I can rewrite and make it more suitable for wikipedia. Please put this article into a Draft space. I will search for new reliable sources. Petrushchak ivan ( talk) 17:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
19:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Only two references. As an article, fails WP:IPC (also, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:GNG). As a list it fails WP:NLIST. Relevant reading: WP:NOTTVTROPES. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games#Sports. ✗ plicit 13:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Empty tables; fails GNG. This nomination also includes Judo at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games and Karate at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games. These latter two have the same issue. Two other Afd's related to these three articles, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrestling at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archery at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games have also cited the empty tables and GNG concern. All three articles here are just sitting around until the games begin in August 2022. Can be userified for the creator until there is more information to be added. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. There are a large number of citations on the page to cryptocurrency-specific websites and to press releases, neither of which are considered to be independent reliable sources for the purposes of corporate notability (per WP:NCRYPTO). Crypto-specific websites cited in the article include Coinbase, CoinMarketCap, Binance, CoinCarp, CoinGecko, cryptobuyingtips, Coinspeaker, and Smart Liquidity Network, while the remaining sources are composed of press releases. The sole exception to all this is the Tweet, which is obviously not independent. I'm also not able to find sourcing that would satisfy WP:ORGCRIT. As such, I believe that this article should be deleted for failing the relevant notability guideline. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 17:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn, as promised, because the article has seen neutralization and referencing repair. Bearcat ( talk) 21:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Highly advertorialized
WP:BLP of a concert violinist, whose notability claims per
WP:NMUSIC are not
reliably sourced. There are some definite conflict of interest issues here, as the article was first created by a virtual
WP:SPA whose edit history concentrated exclusively on Da Costa, one other musician and a music school that they both seem to have some unspecified association with (they all interlink each other as see-alsos, but none of them offer any context at all to explain why), and was also subsequently edited by the subject himself — but the core problem is that while this says a lot of notable-sounding stuff, it doesn't properly support any of it with reliable notability-building sources.
And while one claim here ("Juno Award winner") is both verifiably true and a solid inherent notability claim that clinches his includability in principle, the overall tone of the article is so egregiously advertorialized that it's not enough to just plop down a footnote on the Juno Award statement and walk away.
As always, the notability test isn't in the things the article says, it's in the quality of the referencing that the article is or isn't using to support the things the article says — so obviously no prejudice against recreation if somebody can write a neutral version that actually supports its content with reliable sourcing, but in this highly advertorialized form it requires the
blow it up and start over treatment.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
17:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 14:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Nothing to indicate notability. The page has 1 sentence. Would be better to expand on (?) Réunion ( talk!) 17:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The person has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionaryper the two national biographic dictionaries/encyclopedias mentioned by Piecesofuk. Likely meets WP:GNG based on citations in Polish & Ukranian WP, and the entry found by Piotrus. Netherzone ( talk) 22:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Looking at the article and an internet search, likely fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 17:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Not a single WP:RS in this article. This 'figure' does not appear in WP:RS, such as From the Kur to the Aras: A Military History of Russia's Move into the South Caucasus and the First Russo-Iranian War, which mentions all the khans/governors of the Shirvan Khanate. Made by a indeffed user notable for WP:TENDENTIOUS edits and sockpuppetry. HistoryofIran ( talk) 16:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. And transwiki, which can be done by anybody interested, who may request userfication of this content for that purpose via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 18:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The vast majority of these have no source, no context, and aren't even important enough to be discussed in the article on the commune itself. Thankfully the list is very incomplete, as France has more than 36 thousand communes apparently. Heraldrist ( talk) 05:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TheWikiholic (
talk)
16:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Transwiki and delete Given that the images I spot checked already exist on Commons I'm not sure what editors suggesting to transwiki are really asking to do, but will follow-up on the article's talk page before deleting locally. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Category-masquerading-as-an-article. Fails WP:NOTGALLERY. Save a few exceptions, most of these coats of arms are not even important enough to get mentioned on the page of their respective city. Thus, there is no reasonable ground on which to expect the presence of significant coverage from which to write encyclopedic prose for this list topic, either, on top of the NOT issue. Heraldrist ( talk) 05:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TheWikiholic (
talk)
16:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Katana Zero. Star Mississippi 02:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. Some minor coverage. scope_creep Talk 16:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable military person. No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIER. Could not find any sources independent of Ukrainian government (0 hits for Ukrainian name on Google News). ( t · c) buidhe 16:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIERis therefore simply not true. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 16:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non notable military officer. No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIER. The only possibly independent sources I could find in Ukrainian or any other language are two really brief announcements of his receipt of the award. GNG is not met. ( t · c) buidhe 16:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIERis therefore simply not true. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 16:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Random intersection of two characteristics: does a country belong to ASEAN and how has that country fared at major sporting events. See WP:NOT, specifically Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations. Fram ( talk) 15:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ali Akram Shuvo with history under the redirect if someone wants to merge what is sourced. Abbasulu, I think you have a misunderstanding of sourcing requirements. Every article needs independent, reliable sources. Star Mississippi 02:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
i originally tried to redirect but considering the target article also only has 2 sources for the entirety of it, i don't see how this woudl be suitable as a standalone article since his discog isn't significant enough. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep - the article is well sourced, most of his film scores are charted in several online sites. There's no question of notability. Discographies must mention only the composer's name and the soundtrack's name. Thry shouldn’t have any article or newspaper story like biographical articles. Abbasulu ( talk) 08:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Swimming at the 1924 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metre breaststroke. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 01:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Maw was a non-medaling competitor in the Olympics. The text from Olympedia is not enough on its own to pass GNG. A search showed no more sources other than sports tables. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
BLP sourced mostly to IMDB and fansites. The sources that weren't those, that I was able to get back from archive.org don't even mention Mancini but just talk about the search for the missing relative. The article does mention some appearances on some stuff so maybe there are some sources that I can't find through a search, but for now I don't see enough for WP:GNG. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional thoughts on draftifying?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:GNG. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 11:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:VAGUEWAVE.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of General Hospital characters. ✗ plicit 14:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Article is 100% overly-detailed plot summary and casting history, GNews entries are mostly tabloid-like material and recaps. Most references are primary or about the actress, Finola Hughes. Likely fails WP:GNG. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 01:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under new page patrol. I wish him the best but no indication of wp:notability of him as an individual . The only two sources are a track listing and his youtube page. A third was to a a Wikipedia page on a band which I took out. Article has been recreated 3-4 times. 3 removals of redirects and Page Curation indicated a previous deletion. Possibly should be salted if deleted? North8000 ( talk) 12:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete , which does not preclude a redirect, which is an editorial decision. Star Mississippi 02:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The Daily Maverick is not WP:RS, and without that, nothing in the article discloses much about the person. I can't find much written about him that is from sources that are WP:RS, most of what's online is from various pages loosely affiliated with the Abahlali baseMjondolo. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 14:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
There seems to be a good faith misunderstanding here. The Daily Maverick is actually the leading daily publication in South Africa. It is certainly taken as credible. It is has no political alignment to the organisation that Ngila was a member of at the time of his assassination. Certainly the article needs a lot of work but that is happening, albeit slowly. It has been substantially improved since this notice was placed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red Bird 1973 ( talk • contribs) 09:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NAUTHOR, not notable under WP:GNG. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 13:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Sources mostly look suspect. I am also not sure that it’s common practice to create Battle list articles for ethnic groups and rather to do so for kingdoms or nations e.g. Battles involving the Maratha Empire or List of wars involving Finland. Surely it would be better to have separate articles for the kingdoms/states involved in these battles rather than just for an ethnic group. RuudVanClerk ( talk) 11:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is Hero of Ukraine is not sufficient for notability for this recipient Star Mississippi 02:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable military officer. No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIER. Could not find any sources independent of Ukrainian government (0 hits for Ukrainian name on Google News). ( t · c) buidhe 10:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIERis therefore simply not true. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 16:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable app; page appears to have been created by account representing the developer in question. Atlantis536 ( talk) 09:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable list of mosques in a region of the Punjab, Pakistan. Article does not meet guidelines set out in WP:NLIST. Whiteguru ( talk) 08:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Randykitty ( talk) 10:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Little or no hint of person's significance. Huge problems with WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reliable sources? Bash7oven ( talk) 21:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Europe's richest person under 40 is Sergei Popov. The 36-year-old was worth $6.4 billion in March when we last estimated his wealth. He spent the 1990s trading metals in the frosty environs of the Urals and Siberia, selling pipes and copper cable. As a client of MDM Bank, he became friendly with the company's young owner, Andrei Melnichenko.; which is at best very much marginally significant coverage; and still wouldn't allow us to write very much encyclopedic about him. What would be required is a good, independent source with at least a couple of in-depth paragraphs on him. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Even though there is a slight 'numerical advantage' for the keep !votes (4 keep, 2 delete + nomination statement), the arguments on the delete side are more convincing. The first two keep !votes offer nothing by way of policy-based argumentation. The first delete !vote by Megtetg34 argues cogently for the weakness of the sources used in the article. The third !keep vote is incomprehensible, while the final one insists on the subject's awards as a sign of notability. However, WP:ANYBIO is normally interpreted so as to demand very well-known (read: notable) awards; this was not the case here. On balance, no strong arguments have been presented by the keep side and Megtetg34's analysis was not successfully challenged. Modussiccandi ( talk) 09:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Businessman does not seem to meet WP:NBIO- coverage is of WP:RUNOFTHEMILL events for a person in this role. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: less comment on editors, more policy-based input please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. List of mayors of Clearwater, Florida, a potential redirect target, has since been deleted. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. Has not received significant press coverage. Coverage is entirely routine. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there another option given that it looks like the redirect target is likely to be deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus - No clear consensus clear after two re-listings with no further discussion. ( non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 03:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Insufficient Secondary RS to establish N. T. E. Breitenbach is probably notable by virtue of his Rome Prize, though the article seems a bit looong for the scope of his career. Proverbidioms seems like it passes notability on its own b/c of its significant cultural impact. But this one seems like a stretch. A combo of WP:OR and a bit of belief that notability is inherited from Morrison. The creator/primary author of the article is a WP:SPA working on these three articles. Theredproject ( talk) 22:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
seems well sourcedis absurd. There is one on-line source, the website of the creator of the painting that is the subject of the article. The book by Silva has an ISBN number that yields not results, is not listed in worldcat and doesn't appear to be held in any libraries for us to consult. Davis does mention Breitenbach in Jim Morrison: Life, Death, Legend, on page 390: "He even had the album jacket in mind when he replied to a letter from a college art student, T.E. Breitenbach, who had sent Jim samples of his work ...". That is not well-sourced, that is very poorly sourced. This painting is in no collection and has not been the subject of independent, critical reviews. The only coverage it has received is in Wikipedia and Wikipedia clones. Vexations ( talk) 14:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability is not established for this church. References consist of diocesan listing by UCAN (a news outlet) and directory of a religious congregation. Article fails general notability, WP:GNG Whiteguru ( talk) 08:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
advertising.The references are to trivial events such as funding, or are PR-based interviews, or blog postings. DGG ( talk ) 07:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
References given in this article do not address this particular church, hence, notability is not established. Ad limina visits to Rome, Congregations of Nuns and Christian politics in Tamil Nadu have nothing to do with notability for this church. Fails GNG. Whiteguru ( talk) 06:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
I checked it for reliable references and didn't found anything which can be called as reliable. The article has no WP:RS reference for many days. I don't think the article meets WP:GNG, apart from it most of the content of the article is from community based mirror sites like jatland wiki. Considering all this, I think this is the best step here. RS6784 ( talk) 05:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Buolick. Star Mississippi 03:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Most of this article is about electoral divisions in general, rather than about Buolick. There are 3440 electoral divisions in Ireland, which despite the name, since the foundation of the state have mostly been used as census divisions. I can't see how any one of these reaches the Wikipedia:Notability standards. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 06:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Blatant vandalism, with no meaningful content. JBW ( talk) 07:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
This page has been repeatedly re-created following deletion. It has never had any content worth preserving. I'd kindly ask that this be salted and deleted per WP:DEL-REASON#3. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 06:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Semi-pro second-tier Belarusian footballer with no apparent significant coverage. Google News has a number of hits, most of which relate to a Ukrainian journalist of the same name who died recently. The hits that are relevant are mere squad list mentions like football.by and gs.by. I had no better luck when searching the Belarusian version of his name. In fact, I could not find anything significant at all about this particular Yevgeny Bal so WP:GNG is likely failed here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Formosa Taishin Dreamers. Star Mississippi 03:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This article suffers from a dearth of sourcing, which in large part is due to the general lack of substantial sourcing about the Formosa Sexy that is separate from coverage of the Formosa Taishin Dreamers. In fact, it doesn't really look like this group is independently notable from the Formosa Taishin Dreamers. The article should be redirected to the article on the basketball team, where the basketball cheerleaders are more naturally covered. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 06:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Arthrogryposis. as the latter suggested redirects here as well. Star Mississippi 03:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a WP:CFORK that's based entirely off of a single primary medical study, which gives weight to this complex that the source says has affected three people. I looked to see if there were other reliable sources that might cover this by checking sources that cite the study, but none seem to give this particular multiplex coverage beyond a couple of sentences—the article fails WP:GNG. As such, it seems more appropriate that this article be redirected to Arthrogryposis, where this topic can be given a sentence and covered in proper context (just as this review does). — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 05:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of CONMEBOL club competition winners. ✗ plicit 06:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and requires no original research. The article seems to be a listing of trivial statistics and it's not a well-defined list, so I really don't know what to do with this except to redirect to List of CONMEBOL club competition winners. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 05:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Jacksonville University. ✗ plicit 06:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability Happyecheveria ( talk) 05:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability Happyecheveria ( talk) 04:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sweden v. Yamaguchi. I have only done this with Wilson Jr. as the other articles were not tagged nor formally bundled. Can be handled editorially if there is consensus to do so. Star Mississippi 03:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unreferenced biography of a person of unclear notability. This is basically written as a cross between the "subject is a person who had a job" and "subject is a person who had a genealogy" versions of Wikipedia notability fail, and it isn't supported by any reliable sources -- with the added bonus that it's been tagged for lacking referencing since 2009 without ever seeing a whit of improvement in 13 years since. None of this is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on the sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 04:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 03:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Topic cannot meet WP:GNG. Nothing in this article constitutes Notability or SIGCOV about the topic itself nor have I found it online. This is a Medium.com website. The bottom line of the first paragraph reads, "Unlike most online boxing sites, Stiff Jab is considered a credible news source, as evidenced by the many websites[13] and journalists[14][15] who link[16] to its content." There has to be multiple, independent RS with SIGCOV to constitute GNG for Wikipedia's purposes. Source 1 is about a pro boxer and topic receives a trivial, 5 word mention in the article as "a prominent boxing Web site". Source 2 is an interview with the topic's founder and Joe Frazier on NPR. No coverage about topic. Source 3 is an interview with the topic's founder about Muhammad Ali, not the topic. Source 4 is a trivial mention at the bottom of the page regarding a Detroit Free Press interview, which is again, not about the topic. Source 5 is unavailable. There is no mention of topic in Source 6. Source 7 is a video from MSNBC where the topic's founder, whom was introduced as a staff writer for the Wall Street Journal, makes a few comments about Floyd Mayweather v Manny Pacquiao. The source is not about the topic itself again. Source 8 is an article written by the founder himself for the Wall Street Journal, which does not make it a NPOV source. Source 9 is another trivial mention on the bottom of the page. Source 10 is another article written by the founder himself which does not make it a NPOV source. Source 11 is a guest article from Stiff Jab editor posted on Ring.com. There is no content about the topic itself in this source, nor is the topic even mentioned. Source 12 is unavailable. Source 13 is a link to a Stiff Jab article written by the founder. Source 14 is a quote from the topic's founder. The article is not about the topic at all. Source 15 I read through twice and did not find a mention of the topic. Source 16 references the topic's founder writing a boxing article for the Washington Post. Source 17 is a link to the founder's personal LinkedIn profile. Source 18, no mention of topic. Source 19, no mention of topic. Source 20 is unavailable. Source 21 references Source 22, which is an article written by the topic's founder on NPR.org. I suppose if the topic's founder has a relationship with NPR, as he does other new's sources, I'm unsure how the sources could constitute NPOV in any capacity when he writes the articles. Regardless, the source is still not about the topic. Source 23 is an article directly from topic's own website. Source 24 is a Medium.com blog post copied and pasted from the topic's own website. Source 25 is unavailable. Source 26 is an article from the topic's own website. Source 27 is another article from the topic's own website. I apologize for the long winded nom here my fellow editors, but this looks like WP:CITEKILL. There are nearly 30 citations on this page and not 1 of them covers the topic. I wanted to go through them one by one before I nominated it as I read on the topic's talk page about how notable this topic is. In addition to the lack of coverage, the assertion in the opening line of the article that the topic is frequently cited by journalists and publications only applies to 2 of the sources, and I don't even know if they could be considered NPOV because the topic's founder has a relationship to them. Megtetg34 ( talk) 02:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Most of the reliable coverage on this entity is routinary, and it has actually decreased through time, as it has never been more than a project. The only sources that go into more detail are blogs, reddit posts and other sources taking their info from the organisation itself. There is some indirect coverage of the entity in articles discussing the founder's alleged legal problems, but they're described as not reliable by some editors (they seem COI editors, but they probably have a point anyways...). A possible alternative solution may be to turn the article into a redirect to Huston Huddleston, as most of the coverage on the entity is related to him. Urbanoc ( talk) 02:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
No hint of person's significance. Huge problems with WP:GNG and WP:BIO Bash7oven ( talk) 21:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 03:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor "known" only for supporting and bit parts. As always, actors don't get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because acting roles have happened -- the notability test isn't in the ability to list acting roles, it's in the ability to support the acting roles with reliable source coverage about him and his roles in media in order to demonstrate that the roles have been externally validated as significant, but there are absolutely no sources here to support any of the content at all. Bearcat ( talk) 02:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus ( non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced and not notable. The phenomenon itself is notable, and is discussed in our article Phrasal verb. However this particular terminology and implied category is not one that linguists would recognize. A Google search shows that a few language teachers are using the phrase, but not serious sources, and not enough to make this "a thing". In language history, words do migrate from one part of speech to another, and there is nothing unusual about dig sometimes being a verb and sometimes a noun, or down sometimes a preposition and sometimes an adverb. Prepositions and adverbs do often have the same form in many languages, but "prepositional adverb" is not a standard term. Delete or possibly convert to a redirect? Doric Loon ( talk) 10:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk)
14:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was G11. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The article has been 1st nominated for WP:G5 speedy delete and then suggested for AfD by @Justlettersandnumbers. The concerning article was created and mainly maintained by banned user @IMLone_wolf. This biographic article looks much like an intricated case of WP:CLOAK, WP:MASK to fabricate notability. The same user was also the primary creator and editor of several associated wiki pages of a related startup company and its products (viz. WP:SOAP). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobias2934 ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Not enough coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. Article was created by a likely sock with cut-and-paste move from the draft which had failed AfC recently before creation. 0xDeadbeef ( T C) 01:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
However, it was previously prodded so I'm procedurally moving this to AFD Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Barring one measly 20 year citation, the extent of the rather bare webpage in question stands, unsourced, hence why I opt for deletion vis-à-vis the nomination process.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Almost zero coverage of this princely state online (as compared to a zamindari with the same name) except for its own website, would fail WP:NOTABILITY. Scratchinghead ( talk) 14:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I vote to keep this article, it seems to be relevant in the history of india. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyaytyhyaynyiyeylyluytyeysy ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:40, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
This has some typical "impressive" sources which turn out to be problematic. Things like this from the "Seattle Daily Observer" or this from the "Denver Reporter" are pure promo pieces, for two "newspapers" without a presence on enwiki (bizarre if they were truly newspapers from these cities) and no indication why they, as local publications, would give this person so much glowing attention. Worse perhaps is this from "Worldwineinfocenter", bringing an article that doesn't mention wine even once. But, wow, it is written by "Jennyfer Smith Senior Journalist https://www.afp.com". Now, that is the website of Agence France-Presse, a very reputable news source, so this would be a clear indication of importance. Strange though how the only references I can find for a Jennyfer Smith working for AFP (as a "senior journalist"), are all for articles about Jossifakis: looking back, the "Denver Reporter" article is also written by her!
Whether he is notable or not (doubtful), the current article needs to be deleted as a promo piece (but not clear enough to just tag it as G11, some explanation was needed I think). And perhaps some of the sources so nicely presented should be blacklisted as they don't seem to be useful... Fram ( talk) 14:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 02:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
It does not meet WP:GNG. The original redirect should be restored: Special:Permalink/618783298. MarioGom ( talk) 16:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For evaluation of the references provided on the article's
talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This does not appear to be notable. The author is barely notable, and the book itself has not been extensively commented on to meet WP:SIGCOV. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 23:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
[i]f editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page. As such, it makes sense for the article on the book to be kept and expanded in light of these reviews. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 18:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Legislative Assembly of Ulyanovsk Oblast or another location as decided on editorially. There is consensus against this existing as a standalone article. Star Mississippi 02:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST with only 2 items, no reason for this article to exist. Gabe114 ( talk) 19:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on merging?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Drywall#Construction techniques Limited input, but valid AtD since the nom is fine with that, and no one is making an argument any other way. Star Mississippi 02:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced dictionary definition that doesn't merit a stand-alone encyclopedia article. Could be a one-sentence mention in Drywall#Construction_techniques. ZimZalaBim talk 20:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep and continue the conversation about the name editorially. Star Mississippi 02:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable pen name for a non-notable book series. SL93 ( talk) 21:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Too many issues. The "Comparison of the poetic translation of the Quran" section, besides not adhering to WP:RSUE, uses large parts of quotations of translated material, hence potential for copyvio, for the website as well as the page here. [This source https://archive.ph/ZbZ9E], on which the section relies upon, is likely unreliable anyways. The section "Translations in time line" is replete with unreliable sources like [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] whenever it's not citing Kaler Kantho, on which the article is highly reliant upon (Kaler Kantho is cited 50+ times). The timeline is a mish-mash of Kaler Kantho's work plus some OR. - hako9 ( talk) 23:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Businessman who fails WP:BIO. While there are plenty of references in the article, none are satisfactory (various problems, including likely self-authored, PR, listings, short mentions, etc.) I don't see any significant coverage. Note also that the article was most likely written by a sockpuppet of a blocked editor. (See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ginginie11/Archive) Pichpich ( talk) 23:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Current reference in the article is a trivial mention at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced stub since 2010, mostly consists of OR. If there is a notable show under this, then WP:TNT Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 22:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "This week, television viewers can join the unit's members as they tackle cases both routine and exotic on Miami Animal Police, a new series on the Animal Planet network. ... On the first show, wildlife expert Bob Freer is called out to the kitschy tourist attraction, Monkey Jungle, to remove an unwanted resident: an 8-foot gator who has outgrown his waterhole. ... On tonight's show, animal control officer Kathy Labrada faces a more unusual problem: a stray goat found in South Miami's business district with a package tied around its neck."
The review notes: "On the prowl for nine months with Miami-Dade police: Animal Planet. Miami Animal Police, a TV series starring real Miami-Dade cops who work in Animal Services, premieres next month on the cable network. Among the highlights: Sgt. Charlie Daye, 40, Officer Lydia Marquez, 31, and animal control supervisor Kris Miller, 52, capture a four-foot alligator on the Palmetto Expressway during morning rush hour, causing a mega traffic jam. ... Other episodes: animal cruelty, and a foot chase of a bad guy with some mean yard dogs."
This is a 139-word review of the subject. The review notes: "A four-metre python is devouring neighbourhood pets and the Animal Police must catch it before it takes a small child! It's a great story, but not quite for the reasons this program's makers believe. They do get footage of a snake consuming a critter, but it's a look-alike python eating a defrosted duck."
The review notes from Google Translate: "Hello, I'm back with a new report about these great heroes who are Recinto Miami (Miami animal police), they take care that in Miami there is no violence against animals and that they are well and do not suffer physical or mental abuse. ... I recommend you watch it, it's a great program that can help you understand why your dog growls at you and never hit an animal on the street."
The review notes: "This new Animal Planet series does not concern animals who police Miami, but rather human members of the Miami Dade Police Department Animal Services Unit. The unit handles some 2,500 calls a month, everything from alligators on the loose to pythons in public restrooms."
The article notes: "As one of the stars of Animal Planet's reality show "Miami Animal Police" (now airing in syndication Friday nights at 9), Daye patrols Miami-Dade County - a 2,000-square-mile area that includes Miami Beach and part of the Everglades - with his team of animal investigators. ... Daye said producers from Animal Planet (an affiliate of Discovery Networks) approached the offices of the Miami-Dade County police because of the success of the network's "Animal Cops" series, which was filmed in Houston and Detroit."
[d]isputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page, except in severe casesand that
[i]f editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page. The page is unsourced, but the sources presented in this discussion should be enough to source the content is what is now the lead; this is not a severe case of the entire article violating WP:NPOV and WP:MINREF. The section comparing and contrasting the show with Animal Cops: Miami should be blanked as WP:OR if no source can be provided to substantiate it. But this alone is not enough to establish that the TNT-threshold (i.e.
the article's content is useless (including all the versions in history)) is met. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 21:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as hoax. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
This is an article for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed, and fails to meet the relevant notability guidelines: Reasons for deletion #7-8. Possibly #6 as well. See WP:DEL-REASON TNstingray ( talk) 22:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 23:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 22:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 22:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources provided counter nom and vote citing nom. Star Mississippi 02:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with addition of Common Sense Media review, but sourcing is minimal otherwise Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "The show is pretty violent, with frequent scenes of people being chased, attacked, bitten, and/or eaten alive. Victims (many of whom are the actual attack survivors) are shown screaming in fear and pain, throwing up, and having other panicked reactions. Some of these moments are replayed several times in a single segment in order to make the story even more shocking."
The review notes: "The description for last night’s premiere of Your Worst Animal Nightmares: “Camp Terror; Blood Bath.” That sounded enticing so I had to watch. Animal Planet’s new docudrama series does not make people’s hypothetical worst nightmares happen. The subjects are actual victims and the show jumps from news footage of their real-life accidents (crocodile attacks Australian campers; Great White Shark “silently stalks” four teens) to interviews with the victims and their families. But the bulk of the air time involves really, really, really horrific dramatizations of the accidents themselves."
This is a 400-word review of Your Worst Animal Nightmares. The review notes: "I continue to wait. Eight minutes to go. Graphic bloodshed is coming, this is Your Worst Animal Nightmares after all. "As I near the shallower water I cast a look over my right shoulder and saw the shark veer away from the jagged inshore rocks," he says. Seriously? That's it? The extent of his "nightmare" was a minor self-inflicted knife wound? Harrowing. But wait, that's not all. Morris has nightmares about the ordeal and eventually goes to Australia to conquer his fear by swimming with sharks while he's in a cage. As the sixth episode in the series I can only assume things are going to get worse. Apparently the next episode is about a woman who gets dog saliva on her new jacket."
The article provides 65 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Your Worst Animal Nightmares (TV3, Mondays) depicted 18-year-old Nick Peterson being attacked by a Great White shark off the South Australian coast. It was long on reconstruction and short on education. I waited for a lesson on "how to avoid being eaten" but it never came, though Nick's family and friends will live with the horror of his death for the rest of their lives."
The article notes: "Stainton (pictured), who witnessed Irwin's death in a stingray attack in September 2006, is now filming Your Worst Animal Nightmares, for The Discovery Channel. While the series will feature dramatic re-enactments of highly-publicised animal encounters, Stainton has stated he will stay away from Irwin's fatal end on the Great Barrier Reef. ... The pilot, which featured the headlined story in 2005 of a young mum who jumped on top of a crocodile north of Cooktown to save her son's friend, impressed TV executives for its sympathetic treatment of the animal."
The result was keep. Sources have been confirmed to exist. TPH, I'm not going to tone police you, but this sub-conversation is not productive. You're welcome to add the sources yourself as well. Star Mississippi 02:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with sources, but they don't seem to be much in the way of WP:SIGCOV. Searches found only false positives or TV Guide listings. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia started in 2001. The embryo of Lists of People on Postage Stamps (LPPS) started in 2002 and has been added to sporadically over the last 20 years. Philately is a hobby so updates occurred once in a while as collectors chose to enhance the data. I chose to update Central and South America in 2013 and was doing the same in 2022. I followed the format and content developed over 20 years. I believed that it had been vetted and approved before I started my updates. Hundreds of volunteers have dedicated thousands of hours to creating and maintaining these lists. Obviously there is no point in continuing.
For some reason, this particular set of lists (LPPS) seems to have galled users Fram, Johnpacklambert, and TenPoundHammer to the point where they have initiated a complete purge of the list tree. One of them actually referred to the lists as "philatelykruft". (I assume "kruft" is Newspeak for Bovine Fecal Matter). There was no round table discussion on how to improve the articles. There was no call for volunteers to work on changes or improvements. There was no effort to make the list more "notable" (a highly vague concept). Instead a major purge has been started. Further discussion is meaningless in AfDs since the purge effort is in full swing.
Thank you to all of the stamp collectors who built the lists over the years (although you may never see my thanks!!!). I had enough notice that I was able to take copies of many of the files for my personal use. I am saddened that so much effort is being destroyed. Good bye Bill Blampied ( talk) 22:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Yet another "list of people on the postage stamps of X" that suffers the same problem as the others: unsourced, unmaintained, unverifiable, erroneous, you name it. Prod contested because WP:ITSNOTABLE. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Only one source found. Deprodded without comment Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5 by Bbb23. ✗ plicit 23:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
I don't think that this specific incident deserves its own page, as it centers on events arguably less notable than those already on Juan Carlos I. Accordingly, I propose either a delete or a merge. Iseult Δx parlez moi 20:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is sourcing is sufficient to counter 1E concerns, regardless of whether that should apply in Oulson's case or not. Star Mississippi 02:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Completly generic and mediocre. Fails WP:GNG, scope_creep Talk 20:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
It seems like exactly the type of event that should be included as per WP:NEWSEVENT CT55555 ( talk) 06:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Modussiccandi ( talk) 11:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Non notable businessman and philanthropist who has won a non notable prize and opened a cafe in a railway station. Sources are mostly either not independent or not reliable (I’m not sure about “Telegram”). Mccapra ( talk) 20:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Driver Era. There is no standalone notability for Rocky Lynch. Most of the content has been copied from Ross Lynch, R5 (band), and The Driver Era. Result is Redirect. Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) scope_creep Talk 08:21, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. No identity outside band. No coverage. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. scope_creep Talk 20:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Draftify to allow for continued improvement. Star Mississippi 02:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Massively refbombed article about a minor denomination. Strip out the puff and encyclopaedic language and we’re left with a scant history propped by unreliable sources. Mccapra ( talk) 20:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Non-existant sourcing. No coverage. scope_creep Talk 20:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing is of insufficient quality. If someone wants to actively work on this in draft, I'm happy to provide it without going through REFUND. Star Mississippi 02:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Covert advertising article. Fails WP:BIO. Refs are either passing mentions, primary. scope_creep Talk 18:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
*Keep the article has been translated from Ukrainian Wikipedia. There are enough sources with not just short mentions, but deep reportage: Bloomberg, New York Times, Wall Steer Journal and a bunch of serious independent Ukrainian media sources. Easily passes WP:GNG as he is the couuntry's and slightly Eastern European leader in his sphere. Also, his fundraising efforts amidst Russian invasion of Ukraine are important and well covered too.
Petrushchak ivan (
talk)
11:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC).
(edit conflict)
The references are very poor. The usual run-of-the-mill PR, press-release, reports on the company, interviews. scope_creep Talk 12:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Basically the references are not so poor. I will not discuss the previous long comment, but will add my own view. Regarding general notability criteria the subject meets them. There are plenty of sources on various occasins, which are not PR or press-releases but with brief, medium or deep coverage.
So, the verdict is clear for me: Keep the article as the subject is notable, with quite history and media coverage and with a verified impact on crypto and not only sphere (biggest crypto fundraising in the world, first crypto exchange in CIS region, community building, etc). However it may be shortened, rewritten, fixed etc in order to meet all Wikipedia criteria and what WP is not. I agree that for English language auditory the translation of Ukrainian article may seem promotional, but it's more cultural differences and a zeitgeist (war with Russian and related stuff). -- IgorTurzh ( talk) 14:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Draftify I think I can rewrite and make it more suitable for wikipedia. Please put this article into a Draft space. I will search for new reliable sources. Petrushchak ivan ( talk) 17:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
19:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Only two references. As an article, fails WP:IPC (also, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:GNG). As a list it fails WP:NLIST. Relevant reading: WP:NOTTVTROPES. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games#Sports. ✗ plicit 13:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Empty tables; fails GNG. This nomination also includes Judo at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games and Karate at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games. These latter two have the same issue. Two other Afd's related to these three articles, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrestling at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archery at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games have also cited the empty tables and GNG concern. All three articles here are just sitting around until the games begin in August 2022. Can be userified for the creator until there is more information to be added. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. There are a large number of citations on the page to cryptocurrency-specific websites and to press releases, neither of which are considered to be independent reliable sources for the purposes of corporate notability (per WP:NCRYPTO). Crypto-specific websites cited in the article include Coinbase, CoinMarketCap, Binance, CoinCarp, CoinGecko, cryptobuyingtips, Coinspeaker, and Smart Liquidity Network, while the remaining sources are composed of press releases. The sole exception to all this is the Tweet, which is obviously not independent. I'm also not able to find sourcing that would satisfy WP:ORGCRIT. As such, I believe that this article should be deleted for failing the relevant notability guideline. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 17:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn, as promised, because the article has seen neutralization and referencing repair. Bearcat ( talk) 21:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Highly advertorialized
WP:BLP of a concert violinist, whose notability claims per
WP:NMUSIC are not
reliably sourced. There are some definite conflict of interest issues here, as the article was first created by a virtual
WP:SPA whose edit history concentrated exclusively on Da Costa, one other musician and a music school that they both seem to have some unspecified association with (they all interlink each other as see-alsos, but none of them offer any context at all to explain why), and was also subsequently edited by the subject himself — but the core problem is that while this says a lot of notable-sounding stuff, it doesn't properly support any of it with reliable notability-building sources.
And while one claim here ("Juno Award winner") is both verifiably true and a solid inherent notability claim that clinches his includability in principle, the overall tone of the article is so egregiously advertorialized that it's not enough to just plop down a footnote on the Juno Award statement and walk away.
As always, the notability test isn't in the things the article says, it's in the quality of the referencing that the article is or isn't using to support the things the article says — so obviously no prejudice against recreation if somebody can write a neutral version that actually supports its content with reliable sourcing, but in this highly advertorialized form it requires the
blow it up and start over treatment.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
17:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 14:35, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Nothing to indicate notability. The page has 1 sentence. Would be better to expand on (?) Réunion ( talk!) 17:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The person has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionaryper the two national biographic dictionaries/encyclopedias mentioned by Piecesofuk. Likely meets WP:GNG based on citations in Polish & Ukranian WP, and the entry found by Piotrus. Netherzone ( talk) 22:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:34, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Looking at the article and an internet search, likely fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 17:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Not a single WP:RS in this article. This 'figure' does not appear in WP:RS, such as From the Kur to the Aras: A Military History of Russia's Move into the South Caucasus and the First Russo-Iranian War, which mentions all the khans/governors of the Shirvan Khanate. Made by a indeffed user notable for WP:TENDENTIOUS edits and sockpuppetry. HistoryofIran ( talk) 16:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. And transwiki, which can be done by anybody interested, who may request userfication of this content for that purpose via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 18:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The vast majority of these have no source, no context, and aren't even important enough to be discussed in the article on the commune itself. Thankfully the list is very incomplete, as France has more than 36 thousand communes apparently. Heraldrist ( talk) 05:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TheWikiholic (
talk)
16:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Transwiki and delete Given that the images I spot checked already exist on Commons I'm not sure what editors suggesting to transwiki are really asking to do, but will follow-up on the article's talk page before deleting locally. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Category-masquerading-as-an-article. Fails WP:NOTGALLERY. Save a few exceptions, most of these coats of arms are not even important enough to get mentioned on the page of their respective city. Thus, there is no reasonable ground on which to expect the presence of significant coverage from which to write encyclopedic prose for this list topic, either, on top of the NOT issue. Heraldrist ( talk) 05:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TheWikiholic (
talk)
16:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Katana Zero. Star Mississippi 02:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. Some minor coverage. scope_creep Talk 16:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable military person. No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIER. Could not find any sources independent of Ukrainian government (0 hits for Ukrainian name on Google News). ( t · c) buidhe 16:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIERis therefore simply not true. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 16:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non notable military officer. No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIER. The only possibly independent sources I could find in Ukrainian or any other language are two really brief announcements of his receipt of the award. GNG is not met. ( t · c) buidhe 16:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIERis therefore simply not true. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 16:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Random intersection of two characteristics: does a country belong to ASEAN and how has that country fared at major sporting events. See WP:NOT, specifically Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations. Fram ( talk) 15:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ali Akram Shuvo with history under the redirect if someone wants to merge what is sourced. Abbasulu, I think you have a misunderstanding of sourcing requirements. Every article needs independent, reliable sources. Star Mississippi 02:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
i originally tried to redirect but considering the target article also only has 2 sources for the entirety of it, i don't see how this woudl be suitable as a standalone article since his discog isn't significant enough. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep - the article is well sourced, most of his film scores are charted in several online sites. There's no question of notability. Discographies must mention only the composer's name and the soundtrack's name. Thry shouldn’t have any article or newspaper story like biographical articles. Abbasulu ( talk) 08:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Swimming at the 1924 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metre breaststroke. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 01:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Maw was a non-medaling competitor in the Olympics. The text from Olympedia is not enough on its own to pass GNG. A search showed no more sources other than sports tables. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
BLP sourced mostly to IMDB and fansites. The sources that weren't those, that I was able to get back from archive.org don't even mention Mancini but just talk about the search for the missing relative. The article does mention some appearances on some stuff so maybe there are some sources that I can't find through a search, but for now I don't see enough for WP:GNG. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 07:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional thoughts on draftifying?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:GNG. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 11:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:VAGUEWAVE.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of General Hospital characters. ✗ plicit 14:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Article is 100% overly-detailed plot summary and casting history, GNews entries are mostly tabloid-like material and recaps. Most references are primary or about the actress, Finola Hughes. Likely fails WP:GNG. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 01:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under new page patrol. I wish him the best but no indication of wp:notability of him as an individual . The only two sources are a track listing and his youtube page. A third was to a a Wikipedia page on a band which I took out. Article has been recreated 3-4 times. 3 removals of redirects and Page Curation indicated a previous deletion. Possibly should be salted if deleted? North8000 ( talk) 12:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete , which does not preclude a redirect, which is an editorial decision. Star Mississippi 02:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The Daily Maverick is not WP:RS, and without that, nothing in the article discloses much about the person. I can't find much written about him that is from sources that are WP:RS, most of what's online is from various pages loosely affiliated with the Abahlali baseMjondolo. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 14:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
There seems to be a good faith misunderstanding here. The Daily Maverick is actually the leading daily publication in South Africa. It is certainly taken as credible. It is has no political alignment to the organisation that Ngila was a member of at the time of his assassination. Certainly the article needs a lot of work but that is happening, albeit slowly. It has been substantially improved since this notice was placed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red Bird 1973 ( talk • contribs) 09:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NAUTHOR, not notable under WP:GNG. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 13:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Sources mostly look suspect. I am also not sure that it’s common practice to create Battle list articles for ethnic groups and rather to do so for kingdoms or nations e.g. Battles involving the Maratha Empire or List of wars involving Finland. Surely it would be better to have separate articles for the kingdoms/states involved in these battles rather than just for an ethnic group. RuudVanClerk ( talk) 11:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is Hero of Ukraine is not sufficient for notability for this recipient Star Mississippi 02:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable military officer. No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIER. Could not find any sources independent of Ukrainian government (0 hits for Ukrainian name on Google News). ( t · c) buidhe 10:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
No military awards grant presumption of notability since deprecation of WP:SOLDIERis therefore simply not true. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 16:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable app; page appears to have been created by account representing the developer in question. Atlantis536 ( talk) 09:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable list of mosques in a region of the Punjab, Pakistan. Article does not meet guidelines set out in WP:NLIST. Whiteguru ( talk) 08:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Randykitty ( talk) 10:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Little or no hint of person's significance. Huge problems with WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reliable sources? Bash7oven ( talk) 21:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Europe's richest person under 40 is Sergei Popov. The 36-year-old was worth $6.4 billion in March when we last estimated his wealth. He spent the 1990s trading metals in the frosty environs of the Urals and Siberia, selling pipes and copper cable. As a client of MDM Bank, he became friendly with the company's young owner, Andrei Melnichenko.; which is at best very much marginally significant coverage; and still wouldn't allow us to write very much encyclopedic about him. What would be required is a good, independent source with at least a couple of in-depth paragraphs on him. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Even though there is a slight 'numerical advantage' for the keep !votes (4 keep, 2 delete + nomination statement), the arguments on the delete side are more convincing. The first two keep !votes offer nothing by way of policy-based argumentation. The first delete !vote by Megtetg34 argues cogently for the weakness of the sources used in the article. The third !keep vote is incomprehensible, while the final one insists on the subject's awards as a sign of notability. However, WP:ANYBIO is normally interpreted so as to demand very well-known (read: notable) awards; this was not the case here. On balance, no strong arguments have been presented by the keep side and Megtetg34's analysis was not successfully challenged. Modussiccandi ( talk) 09:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Businessman does not seem to meet WP:NBIO- coverage is of WP:RUNOFTHEMILL events for a person in this role. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: less comment on editors, more policy-based input please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. List of mayors of Clearwater, Florida, a potential redirect target, has since been deleted. Modussiccandi ( talk) 08:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. Has not received significant press coverage. Coverage is entirely routine. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there another option given that it looks like the redirect target is likely to be deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus - No clear consensus clear after two re-listings with no further discussion. ( non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 03:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Insufficient Secondary RS to establish N. T. E. Breitenbach is probably notable by virtue of his Rome Prize, though the article seems a bit looong for the scope of his career. Proverbidioms seems like it passes notability on its own b/c of its significant cultural impact. But this one seems like a stretch. A combo of WP:OR and a bit of belief that notability is inherited from Morrison. The creator/primary author of the article is a WP:SPA working on these three articles. Theredproject ( talk) 22:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
seems well sourcedis absurd. There is one on-line source, the website of the creator of the painting that is the subject of the article. The book by Silva has an ISBN number that yields not results, is not listed in worldcat and doesn't appear to be held in any libraries for us to consult. Davis does mention Breitenbach in Jim Morrison: Life, Death, Legend, on page 390: "He even had the album jacket in mind when he replied to a letter from a college art student, T.E. Breitenbach, who had sent Jim samples of his work ...". That is not well-sourced, that is very poorly sourced. This painting is in no collection and has not been the subject of independent, critical reviews. The only coverage it has received is in Wikipedia and Wikipedia clones. Vexations ( talk) 14:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
08:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability is not established for this church. References consist of diocesan listing by UCAN (a news outlet) and directory of a religious congregation. Article fails general notability, WP:GNG Whiteguru ( talk) 08:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
advertising.The references are to trivial events such as funding, or are PR-based interviews, or blog postings. DGG ( talk ) 07:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
References given in this article do not address this particular church, hence, notability is not established. Ad limina visits to Rome, Congregations of Nuns and Christian politics in Tamil Nadu have nothing to do with notability for this church. Fails GNG. Whiteguru ( talk) 06:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
I checked it for reliable references and didn't found anything which can be called as reliable. The article has no WP:RS reference for many days. I don't think the article meets WP:GNG, apart from it most of the content of the article is from community based mirror sites like jatland wiki. Considering all this, I think this is the best step here. RS6784 ( talk) 05:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:57, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Buolick. Star Mississippi 03:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Most of this article is about electoral divisions in general, rather than about Buolick. There are 3440 electoral divisions in Ireland, which despite the name, since the foundation of the state have mostly been used as census divisions. I can't see how any one of these reaches the Wikipedia:Notability standards. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 06:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Blatant vandalism, with no meaningful content. JBW ( talk) 07:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
This page has been repeatedly re-created following deletion. It has never had any content worth preserving. I'd kindly ask that this be salted and deleted per WP:DEL-REASON#3. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 06:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:30, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Semi-pro second-tier Belarusian footballer with no apparent significant coverage. Google News has a number of hits, most of which relate to a Ukrainian journalist of the same name who died recently. The hits that are relevant are mere squad list mentions like football.by and gs.by. I had no better luck when searching the Belarusian version of his name. In fact, I could not find anything significant at all about this particular Yevgeny Bal so WP:GNG is likely failed here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Formosa Taishin Dreamers. Star Mississippi 03:05, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This article suffers from a dearth of sourcing, which in large part is due to the general lack of substantial sourcing about the Formosa Sexy that is separate from coverage of the Formosa Taishin Dreamers. In fact, it doesn't really look like this group is independently notable from the Formosa Taishin Dreamers. The article should be redirected to the article on the basketball team, where the basketball cheerleaders are more naturally covered. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 06:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Arthrogryposis. as the latter suggested redirects here as well. Star Mississippi 03:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be a WP:CFORK that's based entirely off of a single primary medical study, which gives weight to this complex that the source says has affected three people. I looked to see if there were other reliable sources that might cover this by checking sources that cite the study, but none seem to give this particular multiplex coverage beyond a couple of sentences—the article fails WP:GNG. As such, it seems more appropriate that this article be redirected to Arthrogryposis, where this topic can be given a sentence and covered in proper context (just as this review does). — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 05:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of CONMEBOL club competition winners. ✗ plicit 06:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and requires no original research. The article seems to be a listing of trivial statistics and it's not a well-defined list, so I really don't know what to do with this except to redirect to List of CONMEBOL club competition winners. — Ⓜ️hawk10 ( talk) 05:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Jacksonville University. ✗ plicit 06:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability Happyecheveria ( talk) 05:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Notability Happyecheveria ( talk) 04:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sweden v. Yamaguchi. I have only done this with Wilson Jr. as the other articles were not tagged nor formally bundled. Can be handled editorially if there is consensus to do so. Star Mississippi 03:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unreferenced biography of a person of unclear notability. This is basically written as a cross between the "subject is a person who had a job" and "subject is a person who had a genealogy" versions of Wikipedia notability fail, and it isn't supported by any reliable sources -- with the added bonus that it's been tagged for lacking referencing since 2009 without ever seeing a whit of improvement in 13 years since. None of this is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on the sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 04:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 03:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Topic cannot meet WP:GNG. Nothing in this article constitutes Notability or SIGCOV about the topic itself nor have I found it online. This is a Medium.com website. The bottom line of the first paragraph reads, "Unlike most online boxing sites, Stiff Jab is considered a credible news source, as evidenced by the many websites[13] and journalists[14][15] who link[16] to its content." There has to be multiple, independent RS with SIGCOV to constitute GNG for Wikipedia's purposes. Source 1 is about a pro boxer and topic receives a trivial, 5 word mention in the article as "a prominent boxing Web site". Source 2 is an interview with the topic's founder and Joe Frazier on NPR. No coverage about topic. Source 3 is an interview with the topic's founder about Muhammad Ali, not the topic. Source 4 is a trivial mention at the bottom of the page regarding a Detroit Free Press interview, which is again, not about the topic. Source 5 is unavailable. There is no mention of topic in Source 6. Source 7 is a video from MSNBC where the topic's founder, whom was introduced as a staff writer for the Wall Street Journal, makes a few comments about Floyd Mayweather v Manny Pacquiao. The source is not about the topic itself again. Source 8 is an article written by the founder himself for the Wall Street Journal, which does not make it a NPOV source. Source 9 is another trivial mention on the bottom of the page. Source 10 is another article written by the founder himself which does not make it a NPOV source. Source 11 is a guest article from Stiff Jab editor posted on Ring.com. There is no content about the topic itself in this source, nor is the topic even mentioned. Source 12 is unavailable. Source 13 is a link to a Stiff Jab article written by the founder. Source 14 is a quote from the topic's founder. The article is not about the topic at all. Source 15 I read through twice and did not find a mention of the topic. Source 16 references the topic's founder writing a boxing article for the Washington Post. Source 17 is a link to the founder's personal LinkedIn profile. Source 18, no mention of topic. Source 19, no mention of topic. Source 20 is unavailable. Source 21 references Source 22, which is an article written by the topic's founder on NPR.org. I suppose if the topic's founder has a relationship with NPR, as he does other new's sources, I'm unsure how the sources could constitute NPOV in any capacity when he writes the articles. Regardless, the source is still not about the topic. Source 23 is an article directly from topic's own website. Source 24 is a Medium.com blog post copied and pasted from the topic's own website. Source 25 is unavailable. Source 26 is an article from the topic's own website. Source 27 is another article from the topic's own website. I apologize for the long winded nom here my fellow editors, but this looks like WP:CITEKILL. There are nearly 30 citations on this page and not 1 of them covers the topic. I wanted to go through them one by one before I nominated it as I read on the topic's talk page about how notable this topic is. In addition to the lack of coverage, the assertion in the opening line of the article that the topic is frequently cited by journalists and publications only applies to 2 of the sources, and I don't even know if they could be considered NPOV because the topic's founder has a relationship to them. Megtetg34 ( talk) 02:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Most of the reliable coverage on this entity is routinary, and it has actually decreased through time, as it has never been more than a project. The only sources that go into more detail are blogs, reddit posts and other sources taking their info from the organisation itself. There is some indirect coverage of the entity in articles discussing the founder's alleged legal problems, but they're described as not reliable by some editors (they seem COI editors, but they probably have a point anyways...). A possible alternative solution may be to turn the article into a redirect to Huston Huddleston, as most of the coverage on the entity is related to him. Urbanoc ( talk) 02:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
No hint of person's significance. Huge problems with WP:GNG and WP:BIO Bash7oven ( talk) 21:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 03:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor "known" only for supporting and bit parts. As always, actors don't get an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because acting roles have happened -- the notability test isn't in the ability to list acting roles, it's in the ability to support the acting roles with reliable source coverage about him and his roles in media in order to demonstrate that the roles have been externally validated as significant, but there are absolutely no sources here to support any of the content at all. Bearcat ( talk) 02:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus ( non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced and not notable. The phenomenon itself is notable, and is discussed in our article Phrasal verb. However this particular terminology and implied category is not one that linguists would recognize. A Google search shows that a few language teachers are using the phrase, but not serious sources, and not enough to make this "a thing". In language history, words do migrate from one part of speech to another, and there is nothing unusual about dig sometimes being a verb and sometimes a noun, or down sometimes a preposition and sometimes an adverb. Prepositions and adverbs do often have the same form in many languages, but "prepositional adverb" is not a standard term. Delete or possibly convert to a redirect? Doric Loon ( talk) 10:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk)
14:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was G11. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The article has been 1st nominated for WP:G5 speedy delete and then suggested for AfD by @Justlettersandnumbers. The concerning article was created and mainly maintained by banned user @IMLone_wolf. This biographic article looks much like an intricated case of WP:CLOAK, WP:MASK to fabricate notability. The same user was also the primary creator and editor of several associated wiki pages of a related startup company and its products (viz. WP:SOAP). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobias2934 ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Not enough coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. Article was created by a likely sock with cut-and-paste move from the draft which had failed AfC recently before creation. 0xDeadbeef ( T C) 01:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
However, it was previously prodded so I'm procedurally moving this to AFD Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Barring one measly 20 year citation, the extent of the rather bare webpage in question stands, unsourced, hence why I opt for deletion vis-à-vis the nomination process.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Almost zero coverage of this princely state online (as compared to a zamindari with the same name) except for its own website, would fail WP:NOTABILITY. Scratchinghead ( talk) 14:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I vote to keep this article, it seems to be relevant in the history of india. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyaytyhyaynyiyeylyluytyeysy ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)