![]() |
The result was redirect to Adelaide Plains Football League. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 14:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if there is a clearcut answer for these kinds of village-level clubs when balancing "quality/merit" of the article subject against potential coverage is village newspapers, but the main print source that is used in this article and other village football clubs is the self-published book by Peter Lines. Otherwise there are a few score results to village newspapers. This is the local football club in a village ( Hamley Bridge) of 700 people, which plays against the nearby villages. According to the Australian census, males between 15-35 are 12% of the population, so this estimates to around 80 prime-aged people who could realistically play in this team. We would never consider having articles for random high school sports teams (sporting merit would not be high enough), when most high schools have 1000 or so prime-aged students. Should we have articles on the village sports team just because there are weekly results in the village newspaper? I don't think we should Bumbubookworm ( talk) 23:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors have achieved a rough consensus against deletion. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 04:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Actor who does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. Article has been created both in draft space and in article space, which is commonly done to game the system by making it impossible to move the article into draft space. It does not prevent nominating the article for deletion.
The subject only has one listed major role, and that is deficient with respect to acting notability in two respects. First, multiple major roles are required. Second, the film has not yet been released. A review of the references shows that they are puff pieces stating that the movie is being made and that the trailer has been released.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Newsweek | A puff piece about Hoffman | Yes | No | No. See WP:NEWSWEEK. | |
2 | Hollywood Reporter | Announcement of casting | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
3 | AV Club | Announcement of trailer | Not really | No | ||
4 | People magazine | Announcement of trailer | Not really | No | Yes | No |
5 | CNN Entertainment | Announcement of trailer | Not really | No | No | |
6 | Yahoo | A promotional piece | Not really | No | No | |
The draft can be left in draft space. He will probably be notable soon enough, but it is still
too soon. The only problem with redirecting the article to the film is that the film shouldn't have an article yet either.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
22:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I've removed this deletion nonsense per WP:IAR. Come on, people. This is a speedy keep. Many mainstream sources, obvious notability. The nomination is ridiculous and tendentious. Please try to be constructive contributors to the encyclopedia, and try to expand the article instead of vandalizing the project. - Wikidemon ( talk) 04:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 ( talk) 21:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NJOURN. Lacks notability and sources. Only source I can find is CBC. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 22:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a notable subject. Most sourcing right now is Apple Music and Spotify. Fails all of WP:MUSICBIO, and WP:GNG. Sourcing is not reliable, independent, or secondary. WP:GOOGLETEST gives various song links, but no reliable sources. WhoAteMyButter ( 📨talk│ 📝contribs) 22:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a real musical artist article. But there no more source. But maxtermedia and topnewsint24 is a popular news portal. Articel owner added the source using this news portal. So delete tag should be removed.
Yes. So give me more time to improve this article. Remove delete tag.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Non notable law firm that uses its own website and Quora entries as references. Does not meet GNG nor WP:ORGCRIT. WP:BEFORE does not return any notability. Whiteguru ( talk) 21:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Mccapra ( talk) It doesn't make any sense to put the article for speedy deletion. The issues can be fixed as well as this is article about reliable firm, as you can check its notability. the article is also open for other to fix it. Kalim0135 ( talk) 23:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Whiteguru ( talk) The firm is associated with Hitesh C. Soni who is much notable for the drama serial case Ishq subhan Allah, you can check his notaility as well as his frim. The both articles are stub so its open to others to help the articles. Kalim0135 ( talk) 23:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep, per WP:NONPROFIT. BD2412 T 05:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Article is well REFBOMBED. Sources are routine and mostly unreliable. Fails WP:GNG Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Closing on behalf of the nominator who has withdrawn. Note that I am involved, so will undo this close on request. Spinning Spark 11:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
WP:Notability. The sources are a The Onion article, two newsgroup posts, and a comic. A quick web search finds a brief mention in The Guardian, a post by an unnamed author on ScienceBlog.com, and a brief mention in Slate. I don't personally doubt that this was at least a minor phenomenon in the early 2000s, but I question that this meets the WP:SIGCOV guideline. MarshallKe ( talk) 21:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) -- Xurizuri ( talk) 08:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
As far as I can figure out, doesn't meet any of WP:NACADEMIC or general biography notability. Xurizuri ( talk) 20:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
the scientific study of perception-action from a non-functionalism approach. Looks like he wrote quite a few books and also see Worldcat. Oxford University lists one of his Ecological Psychology books and Yale University Press published one. With that said, I am not sure we can create out a biography together for an article. Lightburst ( talk) 20:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Anyone who wants to create a redirect from this title to Princess Beatrice or a subsection thereof is welcome to do so, though the existing redirect from the full name may be thought sufficient. Deor ( talk) 22:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August Brooksbank: article on a minor who has no notability independent from her mother. DrKay ( talk) 20:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A); relationships do not confer notability. However, person A may be included in the related article on B. For example, Jason Allen Alexander is included in the article on Britney Spears and the page Jason Allen Alexander merely redirects to that article.TompaDompa ( talk) 20:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 14:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Article has existed since 2006 (and the charity organisation has existed since 1998), yet most mentions I can find are passing at best. Fails WP:NONPROFIT. Article has no references, and until recently was primarily promotional cruft. ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 18:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization" ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 18:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G5. ✗ plicit 12:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Jake Ejercito
Actor who does not satisfy general notability or acting notability. Article was created as draft, then declined by AFC reviewer, then moved to article space by author.
None of the three roles listed in the filmography are described as major roles in their own Wikipedia articles.
Role | Major ? | Comments |
---|---|---|
Sunday Noontime Live | No | Listed fifth as host |
ASAP | No | Not found in list of performers |
Marry Me, Marry You | No | Listed as a supporting role |
A check of the references shows that most of them are simply announcements that he has signed a contract with the largest agency in the Philippines. None of them come close to qualifying as significant coverage for general notability.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ABS-CBN.COM | Appears to be a photo gallery | No | No | No | |
2 | ABS-CBN.COM News | Announcement of contract with agency | No | No | No | |
3 | ABS-CBN.COM News | Another announcement of signing contract with agency | No | No | No | |
4 | PEP-PH.COM | Another story about signing contract with agency | No | No | No | |
5 | Yahoo | Yet another story about signing contract with Star Magic agency | No | No | No |
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Very dodgy sourcing for a person who may have one claim to fame. Its hard to tell as it also very badly written. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that the subject is sufficiently notable relative to the time period from which she came. BD2412 T 05:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. I can find nothing worthwhile in secondary sources other than confirmation of the name, and the article is just a restatement of genealogical trivia already covered elsewhere. Avilich ( talk) 02:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Xavier Institute students and staff. Consensus is that the consent is insufficiently sourced to justify a content merge and redirection was generally better favoured, even by the sole delete !vote as per WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Article fails to meet WP:GNG. No reliable sources discuss the character. TTN ( talk) 00:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was Merge/Redirect to List of Marvel Comics Characters. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 01:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Other than a singular Portuguese scholar source, there doesn't seem to be any particular coverage of the character. TTN ( talk) 00:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Looks like something that was obviously made up by somebody (i.e. WP:OR); contributed by an SPA whose editing pattern indicates they're closely related to this subject, likely the inventor of the idea (this is obvious from one of the self-published pages used as a source, [12]). I can't verify the rest since the sources are (unhelpfully) all in Polish; but this same topic was deleted also on Polish wiki ( [13]); with the same concerns that I have, namely that this is WP:OR and that no mention of this can be found in reliable secondary sources, failing WP:GNG as well. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 16:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated article under multiple names; see extensive history under Mpiima jeson, Mpiima johnson and Mpiima Jeson as well as this article. No reliable sources have been cited and a WP:BEFORE search comes back only with other wiki sites like Gyaanipedia and Everybodywiki, which are user-generated and unacceptable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Whilst his 22 mins of professional football 10 years ago might give an assertion of meeting WP:GNG, there is clear consensus that this does actually need to be supported by WP:RS showing significant and direct coverage of Csepregi for him to have a stand-alone biography article.
A search of Hungarian sources yields only mentions in tabloids relating to his girlfriend Viki Singh. WP:BLP is extremely clear on Wikipedia policy when it comes to using tabloid junk to reference articles. Since I can't see any potential for this article to be cited to anything better than trashy celeb gossip articles in Blikk and BorsOnline, I do not believe that GNG or WP:BIO are met. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep all. 4meter4 ( talk) 16:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
An article with no encyclopedia value with links cited that don't count as a source. One is to a news article that may not count as a reliable source, the other is just a webpage that is two charts, one from 2003 to 2014 of the highest and lowest temperature and rainfall data. The other of the period from 1971 to 2000. The article is nothing more than unsourced information and a picture gallery. Don't see the notability for this and the three below. GNG clearly is not met here. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages over the same concerns as with the Rajasthan article:
-- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm updating the nomination to include the following related articles over the same issues upon further examination of the sourcing and information:
These five have the same issues as the four nominated above as the majority of sources are about weather events and temperature. There is very little information about the climate of these regions as well. Articles about the weather don't qualify as being notable simply because it was a record amount of rainfall outside a storm. This falls under trivial information. GNG is not met here as well. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Geschichte ( talk) 07:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Almost no indication of notability; only one source. Minkai ( talk to me)( see where I screwed up) 14:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not notable aviation incident. While the plane was written off, those caused by runway overruns are very common. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. Any editor in good standing may renominate the article for deletion. ✗ plicit 14:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
The defunct company doesn't meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH.
Asketbouncer (
talk)
13:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
:: agree! removed. However, the template remains for 14 years.
Asketbouncer (
talk)
20:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
After 15 years this article still has no references to demonstrate notability. In reviewing the text it does not seem to scream notable, and could do with a review for those with that interest in motor sport and car parts. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL, his professional play consisting of 28 minutes in the cup. Totally uncontroversial proposal. Geschichte ( talk) 12:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. due to lack of further participation; WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 17:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFSOURCES and WP:NFO. I did a WP:BEFORE search and found nothing. The Film Creator ( talk) 23:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) reference work entry with details on filmThe result was keep. Consensus that article passes WP:SIGCOV based on Chinese languages sources discussed during the course of the AfD. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:MMANOT for having no fights in top tier promotions. Also fails WP:GNG as coverage for fights are routine report. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 11:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
From Google Translate: "Fan Rong has a strong physique, not only has huge muscles, but also has clear lines, and his beautiful abdominal muscles are not lost to small-level fighters. He has practiced javelin, discus and shot put since he was a child and is an excellent track and field athlete. After being admitted to the Sports Training Department of Harbin Institute of Physical Education in 2009, he began to understand and get in touch with mixed martial arts. ... In the arena, he played a good record of 11 wins and 2 losses. It is worth mentioning that Fan Rong also represented the Chinese national team in the MMA Asian Championships. With two surrenders and one TKO, he defeated three powerful enemies and won the 93 kg gold medal."
From Google Translate: "Fan Rong, previously a special police officer, officially entered the professional mixed martial arts competition in early 2016. In just over two years, he has won ten consecutive victories in domestic competitions, including four surrenders and five KO end victories. ... At the beginning of 2019, Fan Rong continued to pursue his dream of mixed martial arts, successfully completed the signing of the ONE Championship, and successfully entered the international arena. ... In his debut at Manila this year, Fan Rong challenged Reinier De Ridder, a Dutch athlete who is 193 cm tall. In the first round of the competition, the Dutch used perfect Jiu-Jitsu skills to create unprecedented pressure on Fan Rong. While ending Fan Rong's ten-game winning streak, he improved his record to 10 wins and 0 losses."
From Google Translate: "At present, the best middleweight player in my country's mixed martial arts should be the "war police" Fan Rong. He is 185 cm tall and weighs about 85 kg. He has a current record of 11 wins and 2 losses. He has a very good body and is also very good at surrendering opponents. There are not many domestic athletes who can compare with him, so in the future, Fan Rong will mainly challenge Russian and European and American players. It is conceivable that the difficulty is very large. Fan Rong’s opponent this time is Brazilian Yuri Simmons, who currently has no mixed martial arts record and has won the championship of innocent jiu-jitsu."
The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G7. ✗ plicit 12:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Fails GNG but should be redirected to Dollar Shave Club INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
News channel that lacks WP:RS INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Number | Reference | Remarks | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nagaur News | Announcement of channel | N | Y | N | |
2 | Bastikhabar Online | A story about Pegasus Spyware | No. The subject is the web site. | N/A | Y | No |
3 | JharkandAajKal | A story about Basti Khabar | No | Yes | No | |
4 | Harraiya Times | Appears to be an ad for Basti Khabar | No | No | ||
5 | Medium.com | A story about Basti Khabar | No. In the nature of a press release. | N/A | No | |
6 | NDTV.in | It appears that this site is republishing news from the subject news service | No | No | Yes | No |
7 | Jagran.com | It appears that this site is republishing news from the subject news service | No | No | Yes | No |
8 | Livehindustan | Labeled as Basti News | No | No | Yes | No |
9 | Amarjula | Labeled as Basti News | No | No | Yes | No |
10 | Zeenews.India.com | Basti News | No | No | Yes | No |
Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
No professional games recorded on Soccerway, MLSZ or HLSZ so doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL. Nothing on Google News or DDG supports a claim to WP:GNG. At best, I found one interview of him in a local Orosháza-based website here but if you strip out the content that isn't directly from Csiszár's mouth, there's little there and, in any case, GNG calls for multiple reliable sources not just one. The website also looks closer to a blog than a reputable news source. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER criteria. Yaakovaryeh ( talk) 11:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
8 minutes of professional football might provide a weak presumption of WP:GNG notability but there is little evidence of a pass. Very little found in a Hungarian source search. Origo and Nemzeti Sport do have mentions of him in match reports for semi-pro games but nothing more than that. Given that he seemingly retired over 10 years ago, I'm not seeing any likelihood of future notability either. Hungarian Wikipedia has an article on him but it's sourced entirely to an unacceptable Wordpress blog. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 07:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Debrah was an unused substitute for one single Championship game but, apart from that, there is no claim to being close to being notable. The cited sources lack depth so do not demonstrate WP:GNG. Nothing better found in this search. Google News has this Halifax Courier article, however, the overwhelming majority of the article is just a regurgitation of his post-match comments to the local press with little independent analysis. The journalist makes some comments about his height and that he spent 10 years at Millwall but I'm not seeing enough there in this one local paper to justify a stand-alone article in a global encyclopaedia, especially considering that he is yet to play even one minute of football at the professional level. GNG also generally requires multiple sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Unsourced since 2007. I cannot find any significant coverage of this foundation, nor does the article make any credible claim of notability. Lennart97 ( talk) 10:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who has spent his entire career playing in semi-pro leagues with no apparent claim to notability. I will do a source analysis to explain why I believe that the current sourcing falls short on WP:GNG. An Indonesian search came back with nothing better so I am confident that the current sources show the best coverage. FlashScore and Football Database confirm the WP:NFOOTBALL failure. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ... discospinster talk 15:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Likely WP:AUTOBIO or WP:COI given the multiple recreations under Daud ali, Daud Ali YouTuber, Daud ali (mr daud1304) and Mr daud1304. Wikipedia is not a web host nor is it an advertising space. The article fails to cite even a single reliable, independent source and I could find nothing better in a WP:BEFORE search.
I have sent this to AfD rather than doing a speedy delete as I feel that there is an endless cycle of recreation at the moment and a discussion will at least make future creations eligible for WP:G4 if the creator insists on continual reposting further to this discussion.
Alternatively, if there is significant coverage from reliable sources, then please share. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia), specifically WP:NOTPROMO. TompaDompa ( talk) 12:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
There seem to be no reliable sources for "Kepaksian Sekala Brak Kuno" [36], and very few sources in general [37]. The article is also barely comprehensible. It seems to be part of a series of new similar articles by one or two(?) brand new editors, User:The cinnamon and User:Anaya Fayola Amijaya, including Draft:Sekala Brak, Kepaksian Sekala Brak and Draft:Islam in Lampung (2): while these are not included in this AfD, they may help in deciding what best to do here (deleting, draftifying, redirecting, ...). But without better sources, I propose simple deletion as the best solution. Fram ( talk) 09:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. The title already redirects to Shahzada Khanam and this is an incomplete nomination as well. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet with WP:GNG guideline. ➤ Tajwar.thesuperman Talk 09:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Geschichte ( talk) 07:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet with WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG. ➤ Tajwar.thesuperman Talk 08:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT(3), as CORPDEPTH doesn't apply to a biography and the nomination rationale appears copied from other nominations ( [39] [40] [41] [42]). In addition this a clear snow situation.( non-admin closure) --07:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉)
Do not meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH. Asketbouncer ( talk) 07:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Some sources provided with print sources likely existing. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 14:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Contested WP:PROD. WP:BEFORE doesn't come up with any non-trivial sources besides the single Allmusic review. Fails WP:NALBUM. Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 04:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There are two issues here. The first is notability (other than for the lawsuit). In this regard, opinions are divided, although all who have commented after 4meter4 have found their sources convincing, so that part of the discussion probably tends towards a keep. The second issue is privacy. That problem, to the extent it is one, does not need deletion, but can be resolved by omitting personal information from the article. Sandstein 08:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
There is one reference on how
Suede (singer) forced
Suede (band) to change their trademarked name in the United States. This
WP:BLP is basically a
WP:SINGLEEVENT. A mention of this can be included in
Suede (band) but that's about it.
Shushugah (he/him •
talk)
17:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
To be clear and for the record - NO threat of lawsuit or legal action against wiki was ever mentioned by me or my agents. Not once. The point was made (perhaps poorly worded, thus rescinded immediately) that anyone continuing to refer to the British band London Suede as Suede after the settled Trademark violation lawsuit, wherein I was victorious, is (likely unwittingly) not honoring the agreement settled by a NY court of law. NO threat was or is being made. I am well aware that the band's agents are the ones guilty of neglecting due diligence in this matter, which IS a direct violation of the suit on their part, FWIW. The band, btw, was great during the entire tedious process as Sony dragged it on and on. Sony was sued, not the band, to be clear, for the record.
As for continuing to publish my birth name, my real concern - again, I cite Wiki's WP:BLPPRIVACY clause and re-state my respectful request to please stop doing so, to honor my privacy. Ironically, a few have correctly stated the fact that the lawsuit really has nothing to do with my now 40 year successful and ongoing career as a full-time independent artist - whether some have heard of me or not. Thank you. Suedewave ( talk) 15:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Consumer protection#United States as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced. Non-notable term. I was thinking of prodding this, but I decided not to since the article has been around since 2004. SL93 ( talk) 02:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand the point of a list with two non-notable recreational walks. SL93 ( talk) 01:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree ( talk) 15:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This article appears to have been created for publicity purposes. It does not meet the WP:NCORP guidelines. Gentleman wiki ( talk) 00:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Coolperson177 ( talk) 00:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is using Wikipedia for advertisement. It clearly does not comply with WP:NCORP or WP:NGEO. Gentleman wiki ( talk) 00:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to Adelaide Plains Football League. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 14:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if there is a clearcut answer for these kinds of village-level clubs when balancing "quality/merit" of the article subject against potential coverage is village newspapers, but the main print source that is used in this article and other village football clubs is the self-published book by Peter Lines. Otherwise there are a few score results to village newspapers. This is the local football club in a village ( Hamley Bridge) of 700 people, which plays against the nearby villages. According to the Australian census, males between 15-35 are 12% of the population, so this estimates to around 80 prime-aged people who could realistically play in this team. We would never consider having articles for random high school sports teams (sporting merit would not be high enough), when most high schools have 1000 or so prime-aged students. Should we have articles on the village sports team just because there are weekly results in the village newspaper? I don't think we should Bumbubookworm ( talk) 23:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors have achieved a rough consensus against deletion. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 04:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Actor who does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. Article has been created both in draft space and in article space, which is commonly done to game the system by making it impossible to move the article into draft space. It does not prevent nominating the article for deletion.
The subject only has one listed major role, and that is deficient with respect to acting notability in two respects. First, multiple major roles are required. Second, the film has not yet been released. A review of the references shows that they are puff pieces stating that the movie is being made and that the trailer has been released.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Newsweek | A puff piece about Hoffman | Yes | No | No. See WP:NEWSWEEK. | |
2 | Hollywood Reporter | Announcement of casting | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
3 | AV Club | Announcement of trailer | Not really | No | ||
4 | People magazine | Announcement of trailer | Not really | No | Yes | No |
5 | CNN Entertainment | Announcement of trailer | Not really | No | No | |
6 | Yahoo | A promotional piece | Not really | No | No | |
The draft can be left in draft space. He will probably be notable soon enough, but it is still
too soon. The only problem with redirecting the article to the film is that the film shouldn't have an article yet either.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
22:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I've removed this deletion nonsense per WP:IAR. Come on, people. This is a speedy keep. Many mainstream sources, obvious notability. The nomination is ridiculous and tendentious. Please try to be constructive contributors to the encyclopedia, and try to expand the article instead of vandalizing the project. - Wikidemon ( talk) 04:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Thepharoah17 ( talk) 21:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NJOURN. Lacks notability and sources. Only source I can find is CBC. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 22:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a notable subject. Most sourcing right now is Apple Music and Spotify. Fails all of WP:MUSICBIO, and WP:GNG. Sourcing is not reliable, independent, or secondary. WP:GOOGLETEST gives various song links, but no reliable sources. WhoAteMyButter ( 📨talk│ 📝contribs) 22:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a real musical artist article. But there no more source. But maxtermedia and topnewsint24 is a popular news portal. Articel owner added the source using this news portal. So delete tag should be removed.
Yes. So give me more time to improve this article. Remove delete tag.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Non notable law firm that uses its own website and Quora entries as references. Does not meet GNG nor WP:ORGCRIT. WP:BEFORE does not return any notability. Whiteguru ( talk) 21:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Mccapra ( talk) It doesn't make any sense to put the article for speedy deletion. The issues can be fixed as well as this is article about reliable firm, as you can check its notability. the article is also open for other to fix it. Kalim0135 ( talk) 23:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Whiteguru ( talk) The firm is associated with Hitesh C. Soni who is much notable for the drama serial case Ishq subhan Allah, you can check his notaility as well as his frim. The both articles are stub so its open to others to help the articles. Kalim0135 ( talk) 23:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep, per WP:NONPROFIT. BD2412 T 05:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Article is well REFBOMBED. Sources are routine and mostly unreliable. Fails WP:GNG Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Closing on behalf of the nominator who has withdrawn. Note that I am involved, so will undo this close on request. Spinning Spark 11:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
WP:Notability. The sources are a The Onion article, two newsgroup posts, and a comic. A quick web search finds a brief mention in The Guardian, a post by an unnamed author on ScienceBlog.com, and a brief mention in Slate. I don't personally doubt that this was at least a minor phenomenon in the early 2000s, but I question that this meets the WP:SIGCOV guideline. MarshallKe ( talk) 21:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) -- Xurizuri ( talk) 08:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
As far as I can figure out, doesn't meet any of WP:NACADEMIC or general biography notability. Xurizuri ( talk) 20:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
the scientific study of perception-action from a non-functionalism approach. Looks like he wrote quite a few books and also see Worldcat. Oxford University lists one of his Ecological Psychology books and Yale University Press published one. With that said, I am not sure we can create out a biography together for an article. Lightburst ( talk) 20:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Anyone who wants to create a redirect from this title to Princess Beatrice or a subsection thereof is welcome to do so, though the existing redirect from the full name may be thought sufficient. Deor ( talk) 22:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August Brooksbank: article on a minor who has no notability independent from her mother. DrKay ( talk) 20:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A); relationships do not confer notability. However, person A may be included in the related article on B. For example, Jason Allen Alexander is included in the article on Britney Spears and the page Jason Allen Alexander merely redirects to that article.TompaDompa ( talk) 20:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 14:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Article has existed since 2006 (and the charity organisation has existed since 1998), yet most mentions I can find are passing at best. Fails WP:NONPROFIT. Article has no references, and until recently was primarily promotional cruft. ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 18:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization" ~ TNT (she/they • talk) 18:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G5. ✗ plicit 12:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Jake Ejercito
Actor who does not satisfy general notability or acting notability. Article was created as draft, then declined by AFC reviewer, then moved to article space by author.
None of the three roles listed in the filmography are described as major roles in their own Wikipedia articles.
Role | Major ? | Comments |
---|---|---|
Sunday Noontime Live | No | Listed fifth as host |
ASAP | No | Not found in list of performers |
Marry Me, Marry You | No | Listed as a supporting role |
A check of the references shows that most of them are simply announcements that he has signed a contract with the largest agency in the Philippines. None of them come close to qualifying as significant coverage for general notability.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ABS-CBN.COM | Appears to be a photo gallery | No | No | No | |
2 | ABS-CBN.COM News | Announcement of contract with agency | No | No | No | |
3 | ABS-CBN.COM News | Another announcement of signing contract with agency | No | No | No | |
4 | PEP-PH.COM | Another story about signing contract with agency | No | No | No | |
5 | Yahoo | Yet another story about signing contract with Star Magic agency | No | No | No |
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Very dodgy sourcing for a person who may have one claim to fame. Its hard to tell as it also very badly written. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus that the subject is sufficiently notable relative to the time period from which she came. BD2412 T 05:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. I can find nothing worthwhile in secondary sources other than confirmation of the name, and the article is just a restatement of genealogical trivia already covered elsewhere. Avilich ( talk) 02:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Xavier Institute students and staff. Consensus is that the consent is insufficiently sourced to justify a content merge and redirection was generally better favoured, even by the sole delete !vote as per WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Article fails to meet WP:GNG. No reliable sources discuss the character. TTN ( talk) 00:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was Merge/Redirect to List of Marvel Comics Characters. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 ( talk) 01:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Other than a singular Portuguese scholar source, there doesn't seem to be any particular coverage of the character. TTN ( talk) 00:50, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Looks like something that was obviously made up by somebody (i.e. WP:OR); contributed by an SPA whose editing pattern indicates they're closely related to this subject, likely the inventor of the idea (this is obvious from one of the self-published pages used as a source, [12]). I can't verify the rest since the sources are (unhelpfully) all in Polish; but this same topic was deleted also on Polish wiki ( [13]); with the same concerns that I have, namely that this is WP:OR and that no mention of this can be found in reliable secondary sources, failing WP:GNG as well. RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 16:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated article under multiple names; see extensive history under Mpiima jeson, Mpiima johnson and Mpiima Jeson as well as this article. No reliable sources have been cited and a WP:BEFORE search comes back only with other wiki sites like Gyaanipedia and Everybodywiki, which are user-generated and unacceptable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Whilst his 22 mins of professional football 10 years ago might give an assertion of meeting WP:GNG, there is clear consensus that this does actually need to be supported by WP:RS showing significant and direct coverage of Csepregi for him to have a stand-alone biography article.
A search of Hungarian sources yields only mentions in tabloids relating to his girlfriend Viki Singh. WP:BLP is extremely clear on Wikipedia policy when it comes to using tabloid junk to reference articles. Since I can't see any potential for this article to be cited to anything better than trashy celeb gossip articles in Blikk and BorsOnline, I do not believe that GNG or WP:BIO are met. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep all. 4meter4 ( talk) 16:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
An article with no encyclopedia value with links cited that don't count as a source. One is to a news article that may not count as a reliable source, the other is just a webpage that is two charts, one from 2003 to 2014 of the highest and lowest temperature and rainfall data. The other of the period from 1971 to 2000. The article is nothing more than unsourced information and a picture gallery. Don't see the notability for this and the three below. GNG clearly is not met here. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages over the same concerns as with the Rajasthan article:
-- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I'm updating the nomination to include the following related articles over the same issues upon further examination of the sourcing and information:
These five have the same issues as the four nominated above as the majority of sources are about weather events and temperature. There is very little information about the climate of these regions as well. Articles about the weather don't qualify as being notable simply because it was a record amount of rainfall outside a storm. This falls under trivial information. GNG is not met here as well. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Geschichte ( talk) 07:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Almost no indication of notability; only one source. Minkai ( talk to me)( see where I screwed up) 14:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not notable aviation incident. While the plane was written off, those caused by runway overruns are very common. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. Any editor in good standing may renominate the article for deletion. ✗ plicit 14:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
The defunct company doesn't meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH.
Asketbouncer (
talk)
13:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
:: agree! removed. However, the template remains for 14 years.
Asketbouncer (
talk)
20:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
After 15 years this article still has no references to demonstrate notability. In reviewing the text it does not seem to scream notable, and could do with a review for those with that interest in motor sport and car parts. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL, his professional play consisting of 28 minutes in the cup. Totally uncontroversial proposal. Geschichte ( talk) 12:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. due to lack of further participation; WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 17:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFSOURCES and WP:NFO. I did a WP:BEFORE search and found nothing. The Film Creator ( talk) 23:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) reference work entry with details on filmThe result was keep. Consensus that article passes WP:SIGCOV based on Chinese languages sources discussed during the course of the AfD. (non-admin closure) Bungle ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:MMANOT for having no fights in top tier promotions. Also fails WP:GNG as coverage for fights are routine report. ♡RAFAEL♡( talk) 11:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
From Google Translate: "Fan Rong has a strong physique, not only has huge muscles, but also has clear lines, and his beautiful abdominal muscles are not lost to small-level fighters. He has practiced javelin, discus and shot put since he was a child and is an excellent track and field athlete. After being admitted to the Sports Training Department of Harbin Institute of Physical Education in 2009, he began to understand and get in touch with mixed martial arts. ... In the arena, he played a good record of 11 wins and 2 losses. It is worth mentioning that Fan Rong also represented the Chinese national team in the MMA Asian Championships. With two surrenders and one TKO, he defeated three powerful enemies and won the 93 kg gold medal."
From Google Translate: "Fan Rong, previously a special police officer, officially entered the professional mixed martial arts competition in early 2016. In just over two years, he has won ten consecutive victories in domestic competitions, including four surrenders and five KO end victories. ... At the beginning of 2019, Fan Rong continued to pursue his dream of mixed martial arts, successfully completed the signing of the ONE Championship, and successfully entered the international arena. ... In his debut at Manila this year, Fan Rong challenged Reinier De Ridder, a Dutch athlete who is 193 cm tall. In the first round of the competition, the Dutch used perfect Jiu-Jitsu skills to create unprecedented pressure on Fan Rong. While ending Fan Rong's ten-game winning streak, he improved his record to 10 wins and 0 losses."
From Google Translate: "At present, the best middleweight player in my country's mixed martial arts should be the "war police" Fan Rong. He is 185 cm tall and weighs about 85 kg. He has a current record of 11 wins and 2 losses. He has a very good body and is also very good at surrendering opponents. There are not many domestic athletes who can compare with him, so in the future, Fan Rong will mainly challenge Russian and European and American players. It is conceivable that the difficulty is very large. Fan Rong’s opponent this time is Brazilian Yuri Simmons, who currently has no mixed martial arts record and has won the championship of innocent jiu-jitsu."
The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G7. ✗ plicit 12:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Fails GNG but should be redirected to Dollar Shave Club INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:12, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
News channel that lacks WP:RS INeedToFlyForever ( talk) 12:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Number | Reference | Remarks | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nagaur News | Announcement of channel | N | Y | N | |
2 | Bastikhabar Online | A story about Pegasus Spyware | No. The subject is the web site. | N/A | Y | No |
3 | JharkandAajKal | A story about Basti Khabar | No | Yes | No | |
4 | Harraiya Times | Appears to be an ad for Basti Khabar | No | No | ||
5 | Medium.com | A story about Basti Khabar | No. In the nature of a press release. | N/A | No | |
6 | NDTV.in | It appears that this site is republishing news from the subject news service | No | No | Yes | No |
7 | Jagran.com | It appears that this site is republishing news from the subject news service | No | No | Yes | No |
8 | Livehindustan | Labeled as Basti News | No | No | Yes | No |
9 | Amarjula | Labeled as Basti News | No | No | Yes | No |
10 | Zeenews.India.com | Basti News | No | No | Yes | No |
Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
No professional games recorded on Soccerway, MLSZ or HLSZ so doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL. Nothing on Google News or DDG supports a claim to WP:GNG. At best, I found one interview of him in a local Orosháza-based website here but if you strip out the content that isn't directly from Csiszár's mouth, there's little there and, in any case, GNG calls for multiple reliable sources not just one. The website also looks closer to a blog than a reputable news source. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER criteria. Yaakovaryeh ( talk) 11:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
8 minutes of professional football might provide a weak presumption of WP:GNG notability but there is little evidence of a pass. Very little found in a Hungarian source search. Origo and Nemzeti Sport do have mentions of him in match reports for semi-pro games but nothing more than that. Given that he seemingly retired over 10 years ago, I'm not seeing any likelihood of future notability either. Hungarian Wikipedia has an article on him but it's sourced entirely to an unacceptable Wordpress blog. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Geschichte ( talk) 07:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Debrah was an unused substitute for one single Championship game but, apart from that, there is no claim to being close to being notable. The cited sources lack depth so do not demonstrate WP:GNG. Nothing better found in this search. Google News has this Halifax Courier article, however, the overwhelming majority of the article is just a regurgitation of his post-match comments to the local press with little independent analysis. The journalist makes some comments about his height and that he spent 10 years at Millwall but I'm not seeing enough there in this one local paper to justify a stand-alone article in a global encyclopaedia, especially considering that he is yet to play even one minute of football at the professional level. GNG also generally requires multiple sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Unsourced since 2007. I cannot find any significant coverage of this foundation, nor does the article make any credible claim of notability. Lennart97 ( talk) 10:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Footballer who has spent his entire career playing in semi-pro leagues with no apparent claim to notability. I will do a source analysis to explain why I believe that the current sourcing falls short on WP:GNG. An Indonesian search came back with nothing better so I am confident that the current sources show the best coverage. FlashScore and Football Database confirm the WP:NFOOTBALL failure. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ... discospinster talk 15:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Likely WP:AUTOBIO or WP:COI given the multiple recreations under Daud ali, Daud Ali YouTuber, Daud ali (mr daud1304) and Mr daud1304. Wikipedia is not a web host nor is it an advertising space. The article fails to cite even a single reliable, independent source and I could find nothing better in a WP:BEFORE search.
I have sent this to AfD rather than doing a speedy delete as I feel that there is an endless cycle of recreation at the moment and a discussion will at least make future creations eligible for WP:G4 if the creator insists on continual reposting further to this discussion.
Alternatively, if there is significant coverage from reliable sources, then please share. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia), specifically WP:NOTPROMO. TompaDompa ( talk) 12:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
There seem to be no reliable sources for "Kepaksian Sekala Brak Kuno" [36], and very few sources in general [37]. The article is also barely comprehensible. It seems to be part of a series of new similar articles by one or two(?) brand new editors, User:The cinnamon and User:Anaya Fayola Amijaya, including Draft:Sekala Brak, Kepaksian Sekala Brak and Draft:Islam in Lampung (2): while these are not included in this AfD, they may help in deciding what best to do here (deleting, draftifying, redirecting, ...). But without better sources, I propose simple deletion as the best solution. Fram ( talk) 09:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. The title already redirects to Shahzada Khanam and this is an incomplete nomination as well. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet with WP:GNG guideline. ➤ Tajwar.thesuperman Talk 09:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Geschichte ( talk) 07:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet with WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG. ➤ Tajwar.thesuperman Talk 08:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT(3), as CORPDEPTH doesn't apply to a biography and the nomination rationale appears copied from other nominations ( [39] [40] [41] [42]). In addition this a clear snow situation.( non-admin closure) --07:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉)
Do not meet WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:MULTSOURCES and WP:CORPDEPTH. Asketbouncer ( talk) 07:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Some sources provided with print sources likely existing. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 14:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Contested WP:PROD. WP:BEFORE doesn't come up with any non-trivial sources besides the single Allmusic review. Fails WP:NALBUM. Qwaiiplayer ( talk) 04:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There are two issues here. The first is notability (other than for the lawsuit). In this regard, opinions are divided, although all who have commented after 4meter4 have found their sources convincing, so that part of the discussion probably tends towards a keep. The second issue is privacy. That problem, to the extent it is one, does not need deletion, but can be resolved by omitting personal information from the article. Sandstein 08:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
There is one reference on how
Suede (singer) forced
Suede (band) to change their trademarked name in the United States. This
WP:BLP is basically a
WP:SINGLEEVENT. A mention of this can be included in
Suede (band) but that's about it.
Shushugah (he/him •
talk)
17:46, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
To be clear and for the record - NO threat of lawsuit or legal action against wiki was ever mentioned by me or my agents. Not once. The point was made (perhaps poorly worded, thus rescinded immediately) that anyone continuing to refer to the British band London Suede as Suede after the settled Trademark violation lawsuit, wherein I was victorious, is (likely unwittingly) not honoring the agreement settled by a NY court of law. NO threat was or is being made. I am well aware that the band's agents are the ones guilty of neglecting due diligence in this matter, which IS a direct violation of the suit on their part, FWIW. The band, btw, was great during the entire tedious process as Sony dragged it on and on. Sony was sued, not the band, to be clear, for the record.
As for continuing to publish my birth name, my real concern - again, I cite Wiki's WP:BLPPRIVACY clause and re-state my respectful request to please stop doing so, to honor my privacy. Ironically, a few have correctly stated the fact that the lawsuit really has nothing to do with my now 40 year successful and ongoing career as a full-time independent artist - whether some have heard of me or not. Thank you. Suedewave ( talk) 15:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Consumer protection#United States as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 03:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unreferenced. Non-notable term. I was thinking of prodding this, but I decided not to since the article has been around since 2004. SL93 ( talk) 02:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand the point of a list with two non-notable recreational walks. SL93 ( talk) 01:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree ( talk) 15:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This article appears to have been created for publicity purposes. It does not meet the WP:NCORP guidelines. Gentleman wiki ( talk) 00:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Coolperson177 ( talk) 00:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This article is using Wikipedia for advertisement. It clearly does not comply with WP:NCORP or WP:NGEO. Gentleman wiki ( talk) 00:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)