![]() |
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
We already have List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network and so we don't need separate articles - Sources so far in the article are extremely poor and unfortunately I cannot find any better, Fails NOTTVGUIDE (to a certain extent) and GNG, – Davey2010 Talk 01:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
I would also add this one as a second nomination:
The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 08:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Subject has won a lot of titles and appeared on a reality tv show, but there is no evidence (in the article or through extensive google searches) of significant coverage in reliable third party sources. There are a lot of hits but they are mainly fluff pieces about her meeting Prince Harry in a one-off encounter and I can't see how that contributes to notability. Bahamas Weekly articles seem largely to have been provided by the Miss Bahamas Organization and thus can't be considered independent. --- PageantUpdater ( talk) 00:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable reality tv personality/actor. No evidence (in the article or through extensive google searches) of significant coverage in reliable third party sources. --- PageantUpdater ( talk) 00:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Contest PROD (which was removed with a tirade against "Wikipedia staff"). The subject is a drag performer and host, however the only references provided confirm the existence of the show she hosts. The "Filmography" section contains a list of other performers who appear to have been on the show in the past, which perhaps points to notability for the show itself, but not necessarily the host. I note, too, that this comes uncomfortably close to being an unsourced BLP BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, which would involve independent discussion of the game. See notability of games and |Wikipedia is not a how-to manual, since this appears to be only about some of the details of playing the game. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:20, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced since re-creation in April 2006 after deletion at AfD in Jan 2006. Had substantial content until recent major surgery to article, but no sources, and Google search found only a directory-type listing. No evidence of notability. Pam D 23:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy close. Wrong namespace. To nominate this category for discussion, please go to WP:Categories for discussion. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Duplicates the "Linotype typefaces" category. Already tagged for speedy deletion by the category's creator (who hasn't edited since), I suspect for this reason. Blythwood ( talk) 23:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Not that notable to worthy of article. Moreover all the refs are videos from her own youtube page Sulaimandaud ( talk) 23:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
This autobiography does not establish biographical notability or general notability. It is nearly incomprehensible, but it doesn't appear to contain an obscure explanation of why the author is notable. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Declined CSD A9 as we have an artist for this. Was redirected to her page at one time, but that was reverted. Probably we should just do that rather than deleting entirely, but this has no free-standing notability. Dlohcierekim ( talk) 23:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the available sourcing does not pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organisations. Many of the Keep comments cite considerations outside the notability guidelines. While these aren't inherently illegitimate it is harder for these to overcome comments which do draw on notability. Hut 8.5 21:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no reliable secondary sources. Vice doesn't cover them in any detail, one source confirms they were founded, that's it. Nothing better found on Google News. Huon ( talk) 22:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Response to flagging this entry for deletion by the author: Below I have included numerous references in radio, mainstream press, and radical left printed and online publications. There are also existing references to the organization in the Platformism wikipedia entry and an entry for the group in the German language wikipedia. The existence of the organization is well established and the wide variety of sources, media, and websites all confirm this.
Wikipedia reference: Platformism: Group is listed in Platformism Today section: "Black Rose Anarchist Federation/Federación Anarquista Rosa Negra (BRRN)[13]' in the United States," /info/en/?search=Platformism
German Wikipedia entry on Black Rose Anarchist Federation: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Rose_Anarchist_Federation
Media references: The Final Straw Radio Podcast: "This week we spoke with Romina and César, who are two members of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation in LA." https://thefinalstrawradio.noblogs.org/post/2017/03/05/i-dont-know-about-yall-but-im-in-it-to-win-it-a-conversation-with-black-rose-anarchist-federation-in-l-a/
Free Flow on KCHUNG in Los Angeles. Listen 1:00-1:05 for introduction for Romina Akemi, a member of Black Rose on her piece "Breaking the Waves" discussing anarchist feminism. http://lacarchive.com/item/free-flow-15
The Oregonian. May 3, 2017: "A member of Black Rose, a local anarchist group and one of the march's organizers, said on the organization's Facebook page that police use of force instigated violence that hadn't been happening." http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/05/portland_may_day_march_organiz.html
The Oregonian. May 23, 2017. Op-Ed written by member: "Ayme S. Ueda is a member of the Portland Black Rose Anarchist Federation/Federacion Anarquista Rosa Negra. She lives in Southeast Portland." http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/05/may_day_protest_the_view_from.html
Writings Authored by members of BRRN: Truth Out author bio for Javier Sethness listing 10 published articles: "Javier Sethness is a libertarian socialist and health care provider, author of Imperiled Life: Revolution Against Climate Catastrophe, For a Free Nature: Critical Theory, Social Ecology, and Post-Developmentalism, and Eros and Revolution: The Critical Philosophy of Herbert Marcuse. He is a member of the Black Rose/Rosa Negra Anarchist Federation, and his essays and articles have appeared in a number of radical publications. " http://www.truth-out.org/author/itemlist/user/45576
Truth Out author bio for Enrique Guerrero-Lopz list two published articles: "Enrique Guerrero-López is a member of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation / Federación Anarquista Rosa Negra (BRRN) and a participant in Solidarity Networks in Austin, Texas." http://www.truth-out.org/author/itemlist/user/51280
"Breaking the Waves: Challenging the Liberal Tendency within Anarchist Feminism" By Romina Akemi and Bree Busk. Published in Perspective Journal No. 29, (Spring 2016), issue theme "Anarcha-Feminisms." See issue description: "It also includes a manifesto challenging liberal tendencies in anarchist feminism by two members of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation writing from Chile, and drawing on South American militant movements" https://www.akpress.org/perspectivesonanarchisttheorymagazine.html See also full text of the article together with the author bios at the bottom: https://anarchiststudies.org/2016/06/29/breaking-the-waves-challenging-the-liberal-tendency-within-anarchist-feminism-by-romina-akemi-and-bree-busk/
Web series "No Borderd" that was sponsored by Black Rose:"No Borders, Social Struggles across the world (Sin Fronteras, La lucha social a través del mundo), is the name of a web series presenting experiences of social organizations and anti-capitalist resistance in different regions of the world. ... The first season of this web series was realized with the collaboration of Black Rose Anarchist Federation Locals (EEUU)" https://eng.surnegro.tv/third-chapter-social-struggles-boston/
Reposting of BRRN articles by similar radical left media pages:
It's Going Down https://itsgoingdown.org/author/black-rose-anarchist-federation/
libcom.org https://libcom.org/tags/black-rose-anarchist-federation
Social Media: See Facebook page with 26,000 followers: https://www.facebook.com/BRRNfed/
Other references: Rational Wiki listing of current anarchist organizations: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anarchism#Anarchist_organizations
Left Forum 2017 Left Forum 2017 Exhibitors: https://www.leftforum.org/left-forum-2017-exhibitors
Cali1155 ( talk) 01:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Response to @Colapeninsula: I have read and understand the guidelines. I have also included additional links in the entry which show coverage of activities by external and non-campaigner websites. There are now five citations of non-campaigner news outlets that reference or discuss the group and it's activities including The College Fix, North Jersey, The Guardian, The Oregonian, and Vice News. But there are plenty of entries that list major and minor organizations on the left that do not seem to be held to the same criteria. Also there is an existing
German language wiki entry on this organization. And the
Platformism wiki page now links to this page. There is also wiki entry for [
Struggle] which merged into this group. You can verify this by looking at the archival website of the former group nefac.net
Next, take a look at the entry for the [ |International Socialist Organization], which is the one of the largest Trotskyist organizations in the US. All citations used for the sections for the Introduction, Ideology, and History (citations 1-19) all cite the organization, campaigner websites, or publications written by members of the organization. Even the citations in the Activities section mostly are either dead links, only mention the presence of the group at a demonstration or link to the organizations publication. Cali1155 ( talk) 16:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Currently there are 8 citations linking to mainstream media that discuss the activities of the group and establish notability. These include The College Fix, North Jersey, WXXI News, TWC News, USA Today, The Guardian, The Oregonian, and Vice News. Cali1155 ( talk) 19:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
A fine example of points 1 and 5 of WP:DOAL, and then some. I can't envision a need for this list as a freestanding article, the list obviously isn't complete, it appears to be a magnet for non-notable companies to add themselves via inline external links (without references and without filling in requested information), and the notion of "notable uses" of a company's tear gas is bizarre and appears inherently unconfirmable. (Caveat: I haven't nominated a list for deletion before and if I did this wrong, I kindly implore someone to tell me where there are better instructions and/or guidelines; I looked, and gave up after a fruitless half-hour and plowed boldly ahead.) Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure of the degree of coverage this has received in RSis a pretty bad reason to vote delete, you are supposed to check and base this decision on sources. ALso how is it a possible case of WP:YELLOWPAGES—I don't see any contact info in the article and the companies are notable. This seems to be editors who are ignoring the rules of AfD to delete an article because they don't like the content and not for policy reasons. Seraphim System ( talk) 14:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
So far the editors have supported deletion for the following reasons:
Did I miss any? IMHO, editors who say things like "only blue-linked companies pass notability standards" should probably not even be allowed to participate in AfD discussions until they have a better understanding of our notability guidelines. Seraphim System ( talk) 14:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Notability is not established. TTN ( talk) 20:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 08:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Voice actress known mainly for her role as Alice in the Milky Holmes franchise. That's about it. No other notable roles according to ANN [5] AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 19:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. "Overlooked" and "long after" are WP:OR and opinionated criteria. – Train2104 ( t • c) 19:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Greyhawk. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 08:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
This fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
[{WP:PROMO]] article. scope_creep ( talk) 19:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Entirely non notable. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep ( talk) 19:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR. Cook's (mostly self-published) works do not appear to be "significant or notable", and Cook has not received "significant critical attention". The cited sources demonstrate that (a) Cook was featured in one episode of a locally produced series that runs on public television affiliates viewable in northern New Jersey and regions of surrounding states, (b) she was quoted briefly in a USA Today article about beach town storm damage from Hurricane Sandy, and (c) she was one of a host of people who won a regional public television station's "Everyday Hero" awards for helping folks with addictions. She has otherwise only contributed to and/or been mentioned in the Huffington Post, some other blogs, and regional newspapers. Laudable, but not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable software lab/company with no coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per G11 Ad Orientem ( talk) 21:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person. All citations are merely this person's name included in a list. Many websites thank all of the people who report any security vulnerabilities, and Alam has been included in several such lists, but there is no evidence of any significant coverage of this individual. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:filmmaker scope_creep ( talk) 17:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2017 Finsbury Park attack. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 09:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Spinoff from 2017 Finsbury Park attack, and this is just a quote farm. An unnecessary list of people and countries just saying "we're thinking of you, and this attack was bad". No encyclopedic value. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet the notability criteria for academics or the general criteria. A brief search didn't reveal any coverage of this person in reliable sources. Rentier ( talk) 16:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Lot of information which has been shared is from websites and from Dallas news. this should be considered.
Despite the sources recently added the company fails WP:NORG notably WP:ORGDEPTH; The sources are essentially press releases and 2 local news stories that cover Panna their product and a passing mention of one of the co-founders in a local newspaper. Domdeparis ( talk) 16:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 01:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Essay that reads like a homework assignment. It consists almost entirely of quotes from the play. Dammitkevin ( talk) 16:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Basically an extra as far as I can see Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No consensus after three relists. (non-admin closure) f e minist 01:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I have nominated this page for deletion as I don't think this particular awards ceremony meets WP:GNG as it doesn't have significant independent coverage in reliable secondary sources. The only coverage I could find is a simple list of award wins. Cowlibob ( talk) 14:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 12:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable music producer lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 15:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep- Julian Feifel apears on many gold and platinum awarded records worldwide as a producer writer musician. His songs and productions have reached international top charts positions. Julian Feifel gets more than 18000 results on Google. I think its a notable and relevant article for Wikipedia Martinfissler ( talk) 06:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep the article about Julian Feifel seems to be relevant for me. There are just a few german producer with worldwide success. I found a wikipedia article of Julian Feifel in German that is existing since 2007. So thats already notable for Wikipedia since 10 years. Jlanzas.089 ( talk) 01:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC) — Jlanzas.089 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Possible WP:TNT. No evidence of worth. Strong advertising component. scope_creep ( talk) 14:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm proposing the deletion of The Truman Show delusion based on the fact that, according to the stub itself: "The term was coined in 2008 by brothers Joel and Ian Gold, a psychiatrist and a neurophilosopher, respectively, after the 1998 film The Truman Show. It is not officially recognized nor listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association." So how is it any different than Schizophrenia, which actually is recognized and listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association? Furthermore, as an editor mentioned on the article's Talk page, the article isn't just lacking in notability or credibility (as the brothers who coined the term do not meet the criterion for WP:NOTABILITY themselves), it could also be viewed as destructive in lieu of real domestic surveillance crimes against citizens such as COINTELPRO, also known as "Gang Stalking". WikiEditorial101 ( talk) 03:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG notably WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:GNG. This article has changed names several times from "The WalterMart Group" to "Walter Mart" to "WalterMart" to "Abenson (WalterMart)" none of these names through up very much and sticking the 2 names on the same article seems to be a way of accumulating the very meager notability of both companies to pass the notability guidelines. IMHO it is a failed attempt. Domdeparis ( talk) 14:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice on re-nominating. ( non-admin closure) Nördic Nightfury 07:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Website lacks notability from independent reliable sources. Prod removed by page creator, but reply on talk page shows misunderstanding of what notability is and what Wikipedia is for (basically, the page is needed because the website may be useful to our readers). Fram ( talk) 13:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, doesn't comply with the notability guidelines for web content or organizations. Contains no evidence of notability from reliable independent sources. The references that are cited are either a primary source or a mention in passing. Dan arndt ( talk) 13:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Dan arndt ( talk) 13:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
BLP with all sources being primary, or WP:PUS (Mirror, blog), and/or non-independent (interviews). Notability in interviews is for the topic Grenfell Tower fire, and is WP:NOTINHERITED by this person. Creating BLP on those notability grounds seems a BLP violation e.g. a balanced article cannot be created right now, and stringing together a BLP from primaries in connection with this potentially criminal topic is best avoided (with current sourcing), and this article currently WP:COATRACKs controversy sourced to the Mirror and a blog. Without a single secondary, independent RS about the subject this fails notability WP:GNG. Don't think K&C region counts per WP:NPOLITICIAN either. (no objection to article if the BLP is based on WP:RS per WP:BLP) Widefox; talk 13:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
"Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage", which criterion he satisfied before the fire. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:15, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG; de-PROD'd without reason. Chris Troutman ( talk) 10:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Already deleted as a copyvio, but there is consensus for removal even without that Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
No independent references. No evidence on Google search of independent coverage by third-party sources. Google search turns up nothing but mentions by Pantaleev. Just giving a name to something doesn't always make it notable. Robert McClenon ( talk) 10:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. The only argument to keep was an appeal to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Redirecting to Lakewood Township, New Jersey#Local government seems like a reasonable plan, but there was no discussion of that, so I'm not going to implement it. If anybody wants to create the redirect on their own editorial initiative, there's nothing in this AfD that prevents them from doing so. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Local politician in a township in which the mayor is selected by the members of the council, not directly elected by the voters. Nothing in this article or available in a Google search would support a claim of notability. Alansohn ( talk) 02:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Djflem ( talk) 17:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment In previous discussions, the community has distinguished between directly-elected mayors and those selected as mayor internally by the council members themselves. In a Council–manager government, an appointed city manager performs the executive functions of the jurisdiction, while the mayor presides over the council meeting, may be the official spokesperson for the jurisdiction (but remains an equal member of the council), and the title is primarily ceremonial. Both the method of election and powers of the office, I think, are significant in presuming the notability of the individual. Individuals campaigning for the position of mayor of large cities do receive more third-party coverage of their campaigns (than candidates for council). In addition, the actions of the mayor (including presentation of the budget, oversight of the police, and veto power of legislation) provide additional opportunities for independent news coverage. -- Enos733 ( talk) 19:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus seems clear enough DGG ( talk ) 08:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Contested prod. I believe that this is a case of WP:BLP1E and NOTNEWS. The individual is likely to remain a low profile individual (criteria 2) but his role appears to be well documented, possibly a case of NOTNEWS Gbawden ( talk) 09:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:MILPEOPLE Sulaimandaud ( talk) 09:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. clear consrnsus DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is an attempt to discuss left-wing technocracy, but this is not supported by the sources. Although the term has been used, it has been as a synonym for technocracy (sometimes, but not always, implying a critical standpoint) and not specifically a left-wing incarnation of it.
The current content replaced earlier content which was an attempt to define the term, but was short and entirely unreferenced and so not worth reverting to. Unless it can be shown that this phrase is commonly used to refer to the purported subject of the article, it should be deleted and probably a redirect to technocracy put in its place. Warofdreams talk 23:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Unnotable live/archival album. Available references of information are limited to primary sources, no secondary reviews or press releases. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 08:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given the low input Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:EVENT. No national news coverage, no indication that event has impact beyond its immediate area. Rogermx ( talk) 16:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, doesn't comply with the notability guidelines for web content or organizations. Contains no evidence of notability from reliable independent sources. The references that are cited are either a passing mention or a blog site. Dan arndt ( talk) 07:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't see anything that makes this person notable. The article has been around a long time, and a notability tag was removed without improvement in 2009 by an IP, and the article has languished ever since without much change. Most of the article is unsourced background of a routine nature, then a couple of sentences on a arrest for selling meth. BLP1E at the most. MB 04:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Owner of six radio stations, all in one fairly small market. Probably does not meet the GNG. Raymie ( t • c) 07:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I doubt this operator of two public access channels in far northern California meets the GNG. Raymie ( t • c) 07:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
A brand that lasted four years for shared newscasts in a small TV market. Any unique content can probably be merged into KHSL-TV and KNVN. Raymie ( t • c) 07:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I have doubts he passes WP:CREATIVE or GNG. Self-published, he is popular enough to have several interviews, but no awards, nothing to suggest, well, notability. Two interviews that are linked (and I don't see anything more) don't seem to suffice for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 12:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. WP:CORPSPAM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. While the keep comments before the latest relisting did not provide confidence (with no disrespect to the editors, including Brian) as none provided any policy or guideline based review, the three comments post the re-list tilt the discussion consensus towards keep. ( non-admin closure) Lourdes 01:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is an advertisement for a technique that is trying to use its trademark to maintain a monopoly on the use of the term. Almost all the refs are to their own publicity.
It might be possible to have a NPOV article, but the first step is deleting this. DGG ( talk ) 00:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
No indications of notability, all sources present are primary, and a lot of information seems invalid as well; should be deleted or, if kept, rewritten from ground up by someone familiar to the company or at least the respective WikiProject. Lordtobi ( ✉) 17:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Promotional, questionable notability, refs are not independent, Atsme 📞 📧 18:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual. - The Magnificentist 18:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. - The Magnificentist 19:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Mayor of a small rural Moldovan commune. XXN, 19:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Tiny non-notable online-only school fails WP:GNG. I'm not even sure if it is properly classified as a school, it sounds more like a training program. I can find no WP:RS about the organization. The only two non-affiliated secondary sources I could find were trivial mentions where its founder was quoted discussing other matters. Most of the sources cited in the article are either non-independent or primary-source documents like government registrations. Also appears to be a violation of WP:PROMOTION: the article's creator appears to be affiliated with the school and has created several other self-promotion articles that are currently in AfD ( 1, 2, 3). This article also has an advertisement-like style and has content promoting non-notable theories and inventions of its founder. GretLomborg ( talk) 06:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. And salt, this should only be restored through WP:AFC if anything. I've opted to discard dribe-by IPs given the sockpuppetry that seems to be happening Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private business. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH not found. What comes up is PR-driven or funding related. The company raised $1.5M strongly suggesting that it's WP:TOOSOON for an article. Created by Special:Contributions/Deepak.kumar8744 with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 01:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CREATIVE, The company doesn't has a wiki page Sulaimandaud ( talk) 08:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
That article was already created and deleted a year or so ago by WP:PROD. The same editor recreated it again; it is probably against the spirit of PROD to renominate it, but the institution is no more notable now that it was before.
I considered speedy deletion, but as an educational institution, it is not covered by WP:A7, and IMO it does not quite raise to the level of WP:G11. Tigraan Click here to contact me 09:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 12:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 03:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CRYSTAL as the article is nothing but speculation. - KAP03( Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 04:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
No indication of the subject passing WP:NMUSIC. Not signed to a major record label, no charting songs or albums, no major awards won, etc. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV either. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Indeed, it is non-notable and promotional. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 14:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
"Process" invented by article creator. I originally tagged this as an advert-speedy, but after noticing the AfDs on the related articles, I think it would be better to consider these COI articles as a group. Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lacks reliable sourcing to verify claims. Drmies ( talk) 21:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable person that fails WP:ACTOR and WP:PORN Legacypac ( talk) 23:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
BigHaz How can you say that the given sources are not reliable ? Check This link..its posted by kantipur's official site(one of the best news channel of Nepal) that she claims to be the first pornstar of Nepal. And similarly you can see the official site of 'The himalayan times' where about her movie chesko is posted. Check it.— Big Hero 06:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus with WP:NPASR. Between a very weak deletion nomination, some very weak keep !votes and some !votes advocating draftifying I don't see any clear consensus how to handle this at this point. So Why 12:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Reliable sources for this article are problematic. NJ.com has published several pieces ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) that have yet to be added to the article, and they seem to be the best source available. "The Stute", the newspaper of the college where the convention occurs, has published several articles ( 1, 2), but I am unsure this would meet the independent sources requirement. AXS also has coverage ( 1, 2, 3, 4) but it's questionable where they fall within reliable sources as they are part of the entertainment organization AEG. I could not locate TV or any reliable industry coverage. Esw01407 ( talk) 16:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ENTERTAINER Legacypac ( talk) 00:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Indeed, it is non-notable and promotional. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 14:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet book notability. No references to reviews of the book. Purely promotional by the artist-author.
By the way, I can't even find a listing of this book by a Google search, and that is saying something. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Indeed, it is non-notable and promotional. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 14:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
This doesn't appear to have had any independent coverage by third-party sources, and so appears to be a use of Wikipedia to promote original research or a new movement.
Portions of this appear to be copyvio. Have not had time to determine conclusively whether it is entirely copyvio.
No independent evidence of notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Subject of article appears to lack notability, as the subject is primarily known for filing a lawsuit in the wake of the 2016 shooting of Dallas police officers. In addition, the article's creator claimed to represent the subject of the article. Given that the article is mostly about the subject's lawsuits, there may be WP:COI concerns. Weazie ( talk) 19:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. This "Bandcamp" article was the only source found, however, this suggests that Bandcamp exists for the self-promotion of bands, so likely the bio there is self-published. Magnolia677 ( talk) 20:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2U (album). MBisanz talk 02:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Listing at AfD to canvass opinions, but this would be appropriate as a redirect to 2U (album) as {{ R from song}}. f e minist 02:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
No reliable, independent sources about her, all sources are from her publisher or related. Fails WP:BIO and WP:RS. Fram ( talk) 06:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced and no indication that any of the streets are important. Fails WP:LISTN Ajf773 ( talk) 07:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Per revised deletion guidelines, after being relisted and with no votes or participation I am treating this as a de-facto expired Prod. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability guidelines. References currently in the article are all affiliated (groups he sits on boards of). Google finds passing references, databases, and self-generated material, but nothing that establishes notability. Nat Gertler ( talk) 13:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Kinu t/ c 23:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Not sourced. Alexf505 ( talk) 05:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 11:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Neither the game itself or the rumour of its existence have been covered in reliable sources. It's possible that this is nothing more than an internet meme. Whatever the case, there's no hope of this becoming a proper encyclopaedia article. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
We already have List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network and so we don't need separate articles - Sources so far in the article are extremely poor and unfortunately I cannot find any better, Fails NOTTVGUIDE (to a certain extent) and GNG, – Davey2010 Talk 01:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
I would also add this one as a second nomination:
The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 08:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Subject has won a lot of titles and appeared on a reality tv show, but there is no evidence (in the article or through extensive google searches) of significant coverage in reliable third party sources. There are a lot of hits but they are mainly fluff pieces about her meeting Prince Harry in a one-off encounter and I can't see how that contributes to notability. Bahamas Weekly articles seem largely to have been provided by the Miss Bahamas Organization and thus can't be considered independent. --- PageantUpdater ( talk) 00:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable reality tv personality/actor. No evidence (in the article or through extensive google searches) of significant coverage in reliable third party sources. --- PageantUpdater ( talk) 00:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Contest PROD (which was removed with a tirade against "Wikipedia staff"). The subject is a drag performer and host, however the only references provided confirm the existence of the show she hosts. The "Filmography" section contains a list of other performers who appear to have been on the show in the past, which perhaps points to notability for the show itself, but not necessarily the host. I note, too, that this comes uncomfortably close to being an unsourced BLP BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, which would involve independent discussion of the game. See notability of games and |Wikipedia is not a how-to manual, since this appears to be only about some of the details of playing the game. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:20, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced since re-creation in April 2006 after deletion at AfD in Jan 2006. Had substantial content until recent major surgery to article, but no sources, and Google search found only a directory-type listing. No evidence of notability. Pam D 23:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy close. Wrong namespace. To nominate this category for discussion, please go to WP:Categories for discussion. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Duplicates the "Linotype typefaces" category. Already tagged for speedy deletion by the category's creator (who hasn't edited since), I suspect for this reason. Blythwood ( talk) 23:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Not that notable to worthy of article. Moreover all the refs are videos from her own youtube page Sulaimandaud ( talk) 23:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
This autobiography does not establish biographical notability or general notability. It is nearly incomprehensible, but it doesn't appear to contain an obscure explanation of why the author is notable. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Declined CSD A9 as we have an artist for this. Was redirected to her page at one time, but that was reverted. Probably we should just do that rather than deleting entirely, but this has no free-standing notability. Dlohcierekim ( talk) 23:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the available sourcing does not pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organisations. Many of the Keep comments cite considerations outside the notability guidelines. While these aren't inherently illegitimate it is harder for these to overcome comments which do draw on notability. Hut 8.5 21:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no reliable secondary sources. Vice doesn't cover them in any detail, one source confirms they were founded, that's it. Nothing better found on Google News. Huon ( talk) 22:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Response to flagging this entry for deletion by the author: Below I have included numerous references in radio, mainstream press, and radical left printed and online publications. There are also existing references to the organization in the Platformism wikipedia entry and an entry for the group in the German language wikipedia. The existence of the organization is well established and the wide variety of sources, media, and websites all confirm this.
Wikipedia reference: Platformism: Group is listed in Platformism Today section: "Black Rose Anarchist Federation/Federación Anarquista Rosa Negra (BRRN)[13]' in the United States," /info/en/?search=Platformism
German Wikipedia entry on Black Rose Anarchist Federation: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Rose_Anarchist_Federation
Media references: The Final Straw Radio Podcast: "This week we spoke with Romina and César, who are two members of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation in LA." https://thefinalstrawradio.noblogs.org/post/2017/03/05/i-dont-know-about-yall-but-im-in-it-to-win-it-a-conversation-with-black-rose-anarchist-federation-in-l-a/
Free Flow on KCHUNG in Los Angeles. Listen 1:00-1:05 for introduction for Romina Akemi, a member of Black Rose on her piece "Breaking the Waves" discussing anarchist feminism. http://lacarchive.com/item/free-flow-15
The Oregonian. May 3, 2017: "A member of Black Rose, a local anarchist group and one of the march's organizers, said on the organization's Facebook page that police use of force instigated violence that hadn't been happening." http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2017/05/portland_may_day_march_organiz.html
The Oregonian. May 23, 2017. Op-Ed written by member: "Ayme S. Ueda is a member of the Portland Black Rose Anarchist Federation/Federacion Anarquista Rosa Negra. She lives in Southeast Portland." http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/05/may_day_protest_the_view_from.html
Writings Authored by members of BRRN: Truth Out author bio for Javier Sethness listing 10 published articles: "Javier Sethness is a libertarian socialist and health care provider, author of Imperiled Life: Revolution Against Climate Catastrophe, For a Free Nature: Critical Theory, Social Ecology, and Post-Developmentalism, and Eros and Revolution: The Critical Philosophy of Herbert Marcuse. He is a member of the Black Rose/Rosa Negra Anarchist Federation, and his essays and articles have appeared in a number of radical publications. " http://www.truth-out.org/author/itemlist/user/45576
Truth Out author bio for Enrique Guerrero-Lopz list two published articles: "Enrique Guerrero-López is a member of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation / Federación Anarquista Rosa Negra (BRRN) and a participant in Solidarity Networks in Austin, Texas." http://www.truth-out.org/author/itemlist/user/51280
"Breaking the Waves: Challenging the Liberal Tendency within Anarchist Feminism" By Romina Akemi and Bree Busk. Published in Perspective Journal No. 29, (Spring 2016), issue theme "Anarcha-Feminisms." See issue description: "It also includes a manifesto challenging liberal tendencies in anarchist feminism by two members of the Black Rose Anarchist Federation writing from Chile, and drawing on South American militant movements" https://www.akpress.org/perspectivesonanarchisttheorymagazine.html See also full text of the article together with the author bios at the bottom: https://anarchiststudies.org/2016/06/29/breaking-the-waves-challenging-the-liberal-tendency-within-anarchist-feminism-by-romina-akemi-and-bree-busk/
Web series "No Borderd" that was sponsored by Black Rose:"No Borders, Social Struggles across the world (Sin Fronteras, La lucha social a través del mundo), is the name of a web series presenting experiences of social organizations and anti-capitalist resistance in different regions of the world. ... The first season of this web series was realized with the collaboration of Black Rose Anarchist Federation Locals (EEUU)" https://eng.surnegro.tv/third-chapter-social-struggles-boston/
Reposting of BRRN articles by similar radical left media pages:
It's Going Down https://itsgoingdown.org/author/black-rose-anarchist-federation/
libcom.org https://libcom.org/tags/black-rose-anarchist-federation
Social Media: See Facebook page with 26,000 followers: https://www.facebook.com/BRRNfed/
Other references: Rational Wiki listing of current anarchist organizations: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Anarchism#Anarchist_organizations
Left Forum 2017 Left Forum 2017 Exhibitors: https://www.leftforum.org/left-forum-2017-exhibitors
Cali1155 ( talk) 01:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Response to @Colapeninsula: I have read and understand the guidelines. I have also included additional links in the entry which show coverage of activities by external and non-campaigner websites. There are now five citations of non-campaigner news outlets that reference or discuss the group and it's activities including The College Fix, North Jersey, The Guardian, The Oregonian, and Vice News. But there are plenty of entries that list major and minor organizations on the left that do not seem to be held to the same criteria. Also there is an existing
German language wiki entry on this organization. And the
Platformism wiki page now links to this page. There is also wiki entry for [
Struggle] which merged into this group. You can verify this by looking at the archival website of the former group nefac.net
Next, take a look at the entry for the [ |International Socialist Organization], which is the one of the largest Trotskyist organizations in the US. All citations used for the sections for the Introduction, Ideology, and History (citations 1-19) all cite the organization, campaigner websites, or publications written by members of the organization. Even the citations in the Activities section mostly are either dead links, only mention the presence of the group at a demonstration or link to the organizations publication. Cali1155 ( talk) 16:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Currently there are 8 citations linking to mainstream media that discuss the activities of the group and establish notability. These include The College Fix, North Jersey, WXXI News, TWC News, USA Today, The Guardian, The Oregonian, and Vice News. Cali1155 ( talk) 19:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
A fine example of points 1 and 5 of WP:DOAL, and then some. I can't envision a need for this list as a freestanding article, the list obviously isn't complete, it appears to be a magnet for non-notable companies to add themselves via inline external links (without references and without filling in requested information), and the notion of "notable uses" of a company's tear gas is bizarre and appears inherently unconfirmable. (Caveat: I haven't nominated a list for deletion before and if I did this wrong, I kindly implore someone to tell me where there are better instructions and/or guidelines; I looked, and gave up after a fruitless half-hour and plowed boldly ahead.) Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure of the degree of coverage this has received in RSis a pretty bad reason to vote delete, you are supposed to check and base this decision on sources. ALso how is it a possible case of WP:YELLOWPAGES—I don't see any contact info in the article and the companies are notable. This seems to be editors who are ignoring the rules of AfD to delete an article because they don't like the content and not for policy reasons. Seraphim System ( talk) 14:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
So far the editors have supported deletion for the following reasons:
Did I miss any? IMHO, editors who say things like "only blue-linked companies pass notability standards" should probably not even be allowed to participate in AfD discussions until they have a better understanding of our notability guidelines. Seraphim System ( talk) 14:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Notability is not established. TTN ( talk) 20:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 08:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Voice actress known mainly for her role as Alice in the Milky Holmes franchise. That's about it. No other notable roles according to ANN [5] AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 19:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD. "Overlooked" and "long after" are WP:OR and opinionated criteria. – Train2104 ( t • c) 19:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Greyhawk. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 08:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
This fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 19:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
[{WP:PROMO]] article. scope_creep ( talk) 19:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Entirely non notable. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep ( talk) 19:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR. Cook's (mostly self-published) works do not appear to be "significant or notable", and Cook has not received "significant critical attention". The cited sources demonstrate that (a) Cook was featured in one episode of a locally produced series that runs on public television affiliates viewable in northern New Jersey and regions of surrounding states, (b) she was quoted briefly in a USA Today article about beach town storm damage from Hurricane Sandy, and (c) she was one of a host of people who won a regional public television station's "Everyday Hero" awards for helping folks with addictions. She has otherwise only contributed to and/or been mentioned in the Huffington Post, some other blogs, and regional newspapers. Laudable, but not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable software lab/company with no coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per G11 Ad Orientem ( talk) 21:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person. All citations are merely this person's name included in a list. Many websites thank all of the people who report any security vulnerabilities, and Alam has been included in several such lists, but there is no evidence of any significant coverage of this individual. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:filmmaker scope_creep ( talk) 17:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2017 Finsbury Park attack. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 09:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Spinoff from 2017 Finsbury Park attack, and this is just a quote farm. An unnecessary list of people and countries just saying "we're thinking of you, and this attack was bad". No encyclopedic value. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet the notability criteria for academics or the general criteria. A brief search didn't reveal any coverage of this person in reliable sources. Rentier ( talk) 16:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Lot of information which has been shared is from websites and from Dallas news. this should be considered.
Despite the sources recently added the company fails WP:NORG notably WP:ORGDEPTH; The sources are essentially press releases and 2 local news stories that cover Panna their product and a passing mention of one of the co-founders in a local newspaper. Domdeparis ( talk) 16:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 01:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Essay that reads like a homework assignment. It consists almost entirely of quotes from the play. Dammitkevin ( talk) 16:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Basically an extra as far as I can see Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No consensus after three relists. (non-admin closure) f e minist 01:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I have nominated this page for deletion as I don't think this particular awards ceremony meets WP:GNG as it doesn't have significant independent coverage in reliable secondary sources. The only coverage I could find is a simple list of award wins. Cowlibob ( talk) 14:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 12:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable music producer lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix ( talk) 15:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep- Julian Feifel apears on many gold and platinum awarded records worldwide as a producer writer musician. His songs and productions have reached international top charts positions. Julian Feifel gets more than 18000 results on Google. I think its a notable and relevant article for Wikipedia Martinfissler ( talk) 06:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep the article about Julian Feifel seems to be relevant for me. There are just a few german producer with worldwide success. I found a wikipedia article of Julian Feifel in German that is existing since 2007. So thats already notable for Wikipedia since 10 years. Jlanzas.089 ( talk) 01:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC) — Jlanzas.089 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Possible WP:TNT. No evidence of worth. Strong advertising component. scope_creep ( talk) 14:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm proposing the deletion of The Truman Show delusion based on the fact that, according to the stub itself: "The term was coined in 2008 by brothers Joel and Ian Gold, a psychiatrist and a neurophilosopher, respectively, after the 1998 film The Truman Show. It is not officially recognized nor listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association." So how is it any different than Schizophrenia, which actually is recognized and listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association? Furthermore, as an editor mentioned on the article's Talk page, the article isn't just lacking in notability or credibility (as the brothers who coined the term do not meet the criterion for WP:NOTABILITY themselves), it could also be viewed as destructive in lieu of real domestic surveillance crimes against citizens such as COINTELPRO, also known as "Gang Stalking". WikiEditorial101 ( talk) 03:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG notably WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:GNG. This article has changed names several times from "The WalterMart Group" to "Walter Mart" to "WalterMart" to "Abenson (WalterMart)" none of these names through up very much and sticking the 2 names on the same article seems to be a way of accumulating the very meager notability of both companies to pass the notability guidelines. IMHO it is a failed attempt. Domdeparis ( talk) 14:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice on re-nominating. ( non-admin closure) Nördic Nightfury 07:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Website lacks notability from independent reliable sources. Prod removed by page creator, but reply on talk page shows misunderstanding of what notability is and what Wikipedia is for (basically, the page is needed because the website may be useful to our readers). Fram ( talk) 13:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, doesn't comply with the notability guidelines for web content or organizations. Contains no evidence of notability from reliable independent sources. The references that are cited are either a primary source or a mention in passing. Dan arndt ( talk) 13:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Dan arndt ( talk) 13:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
BLP with all sources being primary, or WP:PUS (Mirror, blog), and/or non-independent (interviews). Notability in interviews is for the topic Grenfell Tower fire, and is WP:NOTINHERITED by this person. Creating BLP on those notability grounds seems a BLP violation e.g. a balanced article cannot be created right now, and stringing together a BLP from primaries in connection with this potentially criminal topic is best avoided (with current sourcing), and this article currently WP:COATRACKs controversy sourced to the Mirror and a blog. Without a single secondary, independent RS about the subject this fails notability WP:GNG. Don't think K&C region counts per WP:NPOLITICIAN either. (no objection to article if the BLP is based on WP:RS per WP:BLP) Widefox; talk 13:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
"Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage", which criterion he satisfied before the fire. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:15, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:TVSHOW and WP:GNG; de-PROD'd without reason. Chris Troutman ( talk) 10:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Already deleted as a copyvio, but there is consensus for removal even without that Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
No independent references. No evidence on Google search of independent coverage by third-party sources. Google search turns up nothing but mentions by Pantaleev. Just giving a name to something doesn't always make it notable. Robert McClenon ( talk) 10:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. The only argument to keep was an appeal to WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Redirecting to Lakewood Township, New Jersey#Local government seems like a reasonable plan, but there was no discussion of that, so I'm not going to implement it. If anybody wants to create the redirect on their own editorial initiative, there's nothing in this AfD that prevents them from doing so. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Local politician in a township in which the mayor is selected by the members of the council, not directly elected by the voters. Nothing in this article or available in a Google search would support a claim of notability. Alansohn ( talk) 02:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Djflem ( talk) 17:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment In previous discussions, the community has distinguished between directly-elected mayors and those selected as mayor internally by the council members themselves. In a Council–manager government, an appointed city manager performs the executive functions of the jurisdiction, while the mayor presides over the council meeting, may be the official spokesperson for the jurisdiction (but remains an equal member of the council), and the title is primarily ceremonial. Both the method of election and powers of the office, I think, are significant in presuming the notability of the individual. Individuals campaigning for the position of mayor of large cities do receive more third-party coverage of their campaigns (than candidates for council). In addition, the actions of the mayor (including presentation of the budget, oversight of the police, and veto power of legislation) provide additional opportunities for independent news coverage. -- Enos733 ( talk) 19:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. consensus seems clear enough DGG ( talk ) 08:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Contested prod. I believe that this is a case of WP:BLP1E and NOTNEWS. The individual is likely to remain a low profile individual (criteria 2) but his role appears to be well documented, possibly a case of NOTNEWS Gbawden ( talk) 09:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:MILPEOPLE Sulaimandaud ( talk) 09:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. clear consrnsus DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is an attempt to discuss left-wing technocracy, but this is not supported by the sources. Although the term has been used, it has been as a synonym for technocracy (sometimes, but not always, implying a critical standpoint) and not specifically a left-wing incarnation of it.
The current content replaced earlier content which was an attempt to define the term, but was short and entirely unreferenced and so not worth reverting to. Unless it can be shown that this phrase is commonly used to refer to the purported subject of the article, it should be deleted and probably a redirect to technocracy put in its place. Warofdreams talk 23:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Unnotable live/archival album. Available references of information are limited to primary sources, no secondary reviews or press releases. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 08:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE given the low input Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:EVENT. No national news coverage, no indication that event has impact beyond its immediate area. Rogermx ( talk) 16:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, doesn't comply with the notability guidelines for web content or organizations. Contains no evidence of notability from reliable independent sources. The references that are cited are either a passing mention or a blog site. Dan arndt ( talk) 07:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't see anything that makes this person notable. The article has been around a long time, and a notability tag was removed without improvement in 2009 by an IP, and the article has languished ever since without much change. Most of the article is unsourced background of a routine nature, then a couple of sentences on a arrest for selling meth. BLP1E at the most. MB 04:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Owner of six radio stations, all in one fairly small market. Probably does not meet the GNG. Raymie ( t • c) 07:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I doubt this operator of two public access channels in far northern California meets the GNG. Raymie ( t • c) 07:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
A brand that lasted four years for shared newscasts in a small TV market. Any unique content can probably be merged into KHSL-TV and KNVN. Raymie ( t • c) 07:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
I have doubts he passes WP:CREATIVE or GNG. Self-published, he is popular enough to have several interviews, but no awards, nothing to suggest, well, notability. Two interviews that are linked (and I don't see anything more) don't seem to suffice for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 12:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. WP:CORPSPAM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. While the keep comments before the latest relisting did not provide confidence (with no disrespect to the editors, including Brian) as none provided any policy or guideline based review, the three comments post the re-list tilt the discussion consensus towards keep. ( non-admin closure) Lourdes 01:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is an advertisement for a technique that is trying to use its trademark to maintain a monopoly on the use of the term. Almost all the refs are to their own publicity.
It might be possible to have a NPOV article, but the first step is deleting this. DGG ( talk ) 00:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:27, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
No indications of notability, all sources present are primary, and a lot of information seems invalid as well; should be deleted or, if kept, rewritten from ground up by someone familiar to the company or at least the respective WikiProject. Lordtobi ( ✉) 17:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Promotional, questionable notability, refs are not independent, Atsme 📞 📧 18:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual. - The Magnificentist 18:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. - The Magnificentist 19:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Mayor of a small rural Moldovan commune. XXN, 19:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Tiny non-notable online-only school fails WP:GNG. I'm not even sure if it is properly classified as a school, it sounds more like a training program. I can find no WP:RS about the organization. The only two non-affiliated secondary sources I could find were trivial mentions where its founder was quoted discussing other matters. Most of the sources cited in the article are either non-independent or primary-source documents like government registrations. Also appears to be a violation of WP:PROMOTION: the article's creator appears to be affiliated with the school and has created several other self-promotion articles that are currently in AfD ( 1, 2, 3). This article also has an advertisement-like style and has content promoting non-notable theories and inventions of its founder. GretLomborg ( talk) 06:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. And salt, this should only be restored through WP:AFC if anything. I've opted to discard dribe-by IPs given the sockpuppetry that seems to be happening Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private business. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH not found. What comes up is PR-driven or funding related. The company raised $1.5M strongly suggesting that it's WP:TOOSOON for an article. Created by Special:Contributions/Deepak.kumar8744 with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 01:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CREATIVE, The company doesn't has a wiki page Sulaimandaud ( talk) 08:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
That article was already created and deleted a year or so ago by WP:PROD. The same editor recreated it again; it is probably against the spirit of PROD to renominate it, but the institution is no more notable now that it was before.
I considered speedy deletion, but as an educational institution, it is not covered by WP:A7, and IMO it does not quite raise to the level of WP:G11. Tigraan Click here to contact me 09:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 12:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 03:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CRYSTAL as the article is nothing but speculation. - KAP03( Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 04:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
No indication of the subject passing WP:NMUSIC. Not signed to a major record label, no charting songs or albums, no major awards won, etc. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV either. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Indeed, it is non-notable and promotional. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 14:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
"Process" invented by article creator. I originally tagged this as an advert-speedy, but after noticing the AfDs on the related articles, I think it would be better to consider these COI articles as a group. Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lacks reliable sourcing to verify claims. Drmies ( talk) 21:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable person that fails WP:ACTOR and WP:PORN Legacypac ( talk) 23:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
BigHaz How can you say that the given sources are not reliable ? Check This link..its posted by kantipur's official site(one of the best news channel of Nepal) that she claims to be the first pornstar of Nepal. And similarly you can see the official site of 'The himalayan times' where about her movie chesko is posted. Check it.— Big Hero 06:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus with WP:NPASR. Between a very weak deletion nomination, some very weak keep !votes and some !votes advocating draftifying I don't see any clear consensus how to handle this at this point. So Why 12:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Reliable sources for this article are problematic. NJ.com has published several pieces ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) that have yet to be added to the article, and they seem to be the best source available. "The Stute", the newspaper of the college where the convention occurs, has published several articles ( 1, 2), but I am unsure this would meet the independent sources requirement. AXS also has coverage ( 1, 2, 3, 4) but it's questionable where they fall within reliable sources as they are part of the entertainment organization AEG. I could not locate TV or any reliable industry coverage. Esw01407 ( talk) 16:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:ENTERTAINER Legacypac ( talk) 00:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Indeed, it is non-notable and promotional. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 14:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet book notability. No references to reviews of the book. Purely promotional by the artist-author.
By the way, I can't even find a listing of this book by a Google search, and that is saying something. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Indeed, it is non-notable and promotional. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 14:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
This doesn't appear to have had any independent coverage by third-party sources, and so appears to be a use of Wikipedia to promote original research or a new movement.
Portions of this appear to be copyvio. Have not had time to determine conclusively whether it is entirely copyvio.
No independent evidence of notability. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Subject of article appears to lack notability, as the subject is primarily known for filing a lawsuit in the wake of the 2016 shooting of Dallas police officers. In addition, the article's creator claimed to represent the subject of the article. Given that the article is mostly about the subject's lawsuits, there may be WP:COI concerns. Weazie ( talk) 19:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. This "Bandcamp" article was the only source found, however, this suggests that Bandcamp exists for the self-promotion of bands, so likely the bio there is self-published. Magnolia677 ( talk) 20:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2U (album). MBisanz talk 02:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Listing at AfD to canvass opinions, but this would be appropriate as a redirect to 2U (album) as {{ R from song}}. f e minist 02:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
No reliable, independent sources about her, all sources are from her publisher or related. Fails WP:BIO and WP:RS. Fram ( talk) 06:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced and no indication that any of the streets are important. Fails WP:LISTN Ajf773 ( talk) 07:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Per revised deletion guidelines, after being relisted and with no votes or participation I am treating this as a de-facto expired Prod. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet notability guidelines. References currently in the article are all affiliated (groups he sits on boards of). Google finds passing references, databases, and self-generated material, but nothing that establishes notability. Nat Gertler ( talk) 13:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Kinu t/ c 23:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Not sourced. Alexf505 ( talk) 05:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page. (non-admin closure) - The Magnificentist 11:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Neither the game itself or the rumour of its existence have been covered in reliable sources. It's possible that this is nothing more than an internet meme. Whatever the case, there's no hope of this becoming a proper encyclopaedia article. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)