![]() |
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
First, this article is written so much like a college essay that to attempt to reach NPOV needs to start from nothing. Second, I am not convinced that this is notable enough to be a stand alone article from Positive psychotherapy. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
None of these links exist-potential hoax which the page creator seems tobe doing a lot of these for! Wgolf ( talk) 23:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet any of the criteria in WP:NACADEMICS. Not notable and no coverage by secondary sources. Further, article is autobiographical. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 23:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Refs are generally about drug trials where the company is noted and not given notability. Several are publications of the company's own press release. Fails WP:GNG. Might have been more notable had the article been about Firdapse and not the company that made it. Velella Velella Talk 22:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
There is no coverage from reliable sources about the subject that rises above the routine or passing mentions; everything else is self-generated and/or social media. Fails to meet WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete WP:CSD#G11. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:00, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
This article seems to be self-promotional so it may meet CSD G11. I am not sure if Rodríguez is notable or not, but based on the information here, it does not seem like he is. Also of note is that this article has been speedied G11 twice, once at this title and once at Manuel Alfredo Rodriguez. If this page is deleted, I would recommend WP:SALTing the title. Natg 19 ( talk) 21:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Can't find notability-also kind of have a hard time finding this all real (the new political party for example) His IMDB page has 2 films-if this the same guy even-and neither are notable. Wgolf ( talk) 21:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this is a real process. Unsourced, and most Google results are for unrelated uses of both words next to each other in ingredients lists, in which the words are separated by commas. This indicates that they aren't talking about the subject of the article. The article also seems like a contradiction in that it starts off talking about a process but then seems to be talking about a food additive of some sort, and is in the category "Sweeteners". In short, this seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:V and may, in fact, be a hoax. Even if it is not it is still non-notable and so should be deleted. Everymorning talk 20:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable internet slang PeterTheFourth ( talk) 20:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Not-notable or are U17/U20 appearances enough? He is rumoured to be loan out to Real, but that does not change the fact that he has yet to play in a fully pro league. Kante4 ( talk) 19:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable actor, producer and prop master. Liz Read! Talk! 19:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
If the claims in the article are correct, he meet WP:Notability (sports). However, I was completely unable to WP:VERIFY this. Perhaps someone who reads Latvian can provide sources I've missed, but unless his notability can be verified, this should be deleted. It has been tagged for notability for over 7 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved. Boleyn ( talk) 19:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator, only keep !votes, closing early. If anyone objects please let me know and I will relist. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The subject does not meet the
relevant notability guideline.
Pichpich (
talk)
18:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet
WP:NSOFTWARE
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
16:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet
WP:NSOFTWARE
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
16:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Essentially the copy of a US government document listing documents found with Osama bin Laden. Wikipedia is not a repository for "public domain or other source material such as entire books or source code, original historical documents, letters, laws, proclamations, and other source material that are only useful when presented with their original, unmodified wording. Complete copies of primary sources may go into Wikisource, but not on Wikipedia." The existence of this list should instead be mentioned, with a brief summary of the contents, at Death of Osama bin Laden. Sandstein 16:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep. The article definitely needs improving (I have started moving some of the named documents to the article's talkpage, in case they need to return and done a bit of a cleanup but more is required:)) but the subject is WP:NOTEWORTHY, as it meets WP:GNG. A google search brings up numerous notable sources including from the first 20 hits - [4] In Osama bin Laden Library: Illuminati and Bob Woodward (New York Times), [5] Osama bin Laden: US intelligence declassifies more than 100 documents seized during 2011 raid (ABC News), [6] US releases trove of Osama bin Laden letters (AlJazeera) [7] Bin Laden's 'bookshelf' included 9/11 conspiracy material (Politico) [8] U.S. Releases Documents Seized From Osama Bin Laden's Compound (npr), [9] Months before U.S. raid, bin Laden considered leaving Pakistan compound (The Washington Post), [10] Bin Laden documents reveal a paranoid family man fixated on the west (The Guardian), [11] US releases more than 100 documents recovered from Osama bin Laden raid (The Guardian), [12] Bin Laden's surprising Taste in Literature (The Atlantic), [13] Osama bin Laden's bookshelf: The contents of the terrorist’s personal library (Sydney Morning Herald), [14] Bin Laden in hiding: Hatching horrific plots despite crippling attacks on al-Qaida (NBC News). There are plenty more. Coolabahapple ( talk) 18:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rlendog ( talk) 18:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable artist-see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidin Davoudi "ArtA" Wgolf ( talk) 16:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rlendog ( talk) 18:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable band/music project-all of its refs are to Facebook or to other wikis-see also Aidin Davoudi (I have to go and don't have time to sort out the wiki links) Wgolf ( talk) 16:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wizardman 02:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable individual, fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N. Mellowed Fillmore ( talk) 16:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Davewild ( talk) 19:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Article does not appear to meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG Ormr2014 ( talk) 22:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
As for your assertion that "Trying to google "X__X", failing...shows ignorance of how search engines work" is presumptuous on your part and assumes that's what I did... As a CMO with over 15 years experience doing SEO, web development and marketing, I am well aware of how search engines work. As the saying goes, "there is more than one way to skin a cat" and searches for "No wave bands in 1978", "John D Morton", and so on don't really substantially demonstrate notability for the band. Ormr2014 | Talk
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
It is a badly written, unsourced collection of information Trumpetrep ( talk) 01:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Paracetamol brand names. L Faraone 01:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
fails NOTABILITY, lack of independent sources so fails WP:Golden Rule, WP:NOTDIRECTORY Jytdog ( talk) 13:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Drugs—The International Nonproprietary Name (INN). The INN for Panadol is Paracetamol and that is how our MOS tells us it should be titled. I should add that the article List of paracetamol brand names also already exists and has 107 entries to date. How many of these deserve entries according to the arguments espoused above? We're being asked to retain an article on the brand name of the second largest selling non-narcotic analgesic - so why not an article on the third-best seller, or the fourth? at what point do we draw the line? as I'm sure someone can find sources for all of them. Without a good reason for an exception to our article-naming guideline, this topic should exist solely within the existing Paracetamol article. -- RexxS ( talk) 19:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
We shouldn't set up a situation where we might end up with duplicate information across hundreds of articles.
Also, I'm pinging the editors who weighed in here before the pharmacy and medicine guidelines were pointed out: @ Necrothesp: @ Winner 42: @ Andrew Davidson: @ And Adoil Descended:.
@ Bondegezou: @ Boghog: and @ Everymorning: indicated familiartity with the Medicine and Pharmacy guidelines. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:29, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Merge and redirect as per Sandy and James, ensuring hat notes are in place to handle wp:EASTEREGG issues. LeadSongDog come howl! 14:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
To the arguments above about Panadol being a widely used drug, here are, as an example, the top prescribed medications in the US according to WebMD.
This is only the top 10 in the US; if we extend that to the top 100, [34] and then worldwide, we end up with a lot of duplication of information. Every one of them is a redirect to the generic, and that is desirable and per guideline, to avoid duplication of information. Being widely used does not indicate a reason to create separate articles on every trade name; any information that needs to be include a specific brand name can be included in the generic article. Trade name articles for drugs should be the exception (as in the Tylenol (brand) case per the cyanide poisonings) rather than the rule. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 15:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect. Everyone agrees with redirection. Although some editors !voted for delete and redirect, not policy-based reason is provided for why simple redirection is inadequate. Rlendog ( talk) 17:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:12, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. No need to delete then redirect. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect.There is a clear consensus to redirect. While there is some support for delete and redirect, there has been no policy-based rationale provided for why deletion is necessary and for why a simple redirect would not suffice. Rlendog ( talk) 18:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect. There is a clear consensus to redirect. While there is a split between simple redirect and delete and redirect, there has been no policy based rationale provided to support the need for the deletion step. Rlendog ( talk) 17:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable dancer with only lead of notability being a 1995 Emmy winning for Miss America with several Books results showing. However, there is nothing else to suggest notability, a lot of this information is unconfirmed but was actually added by the subject herself as what seems to be a self-bio. News found one result from a website I'm not going to click but it seems passing and minor. IMDb shows she has only had two roles both as a dancer. Multiple searches found nothing else and it is clear that Emmy winning is her only lead of notability because browser searches provide the Books links (note: It appears she now works as a interactive art designer so that explains the dancing absence). The article was actually tagged for speedy but declined due to "Winning an Emmy is a marginal source of notability is a marginal notability" but the article was never improved or nominated for possible deletion. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
@ DGG: Care to comment? SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Article dePROD by article creator without reason given. PROD reason still stands: "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article creation WP:TOOSOON. Hence: Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 12:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rlendog ( talk) 18:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
It appears this festival has never received significant and in-depth coverage as News searches found nothing (before and after enhanced with additional words) and Books found guides. Multiple browser searches found a few links such as the Nickelback tour from 2007 and a few others but it seems maybe the festival was fading and maybe now defunct (no recent results and appears the website links are now broken). A search for the "largest Canada Day celebration outside of Ottawa" found a few results but are mostly press releases or primary/local and not significant and in-depth. I would suggest moving elsewhere but I don't see a target unless a small merge to Charlottetown. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Apexart. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable person. Founding a notable organization is not enough to prove notability. A google search for "Steven Rand" artist yields only 16 results, and most of them are not even about him. JDDJS ( talk) 03:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Soft delete. Article may be restored by any administrator on request. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as well. Looks like WP:COI applies as well. Doublefrog ( talk) 06:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete or Merge While Nazneen Madan may have acted, there does not seem to be any real coverage and I'm not sure an article about her would satisfy [WP:N]]. Ormr2014 ( talk) 00:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This does not seem like a particularly notable idea. Only reference is clearly not an reliable source, more like a clickbait-blog page. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Soft delete. Article may be restored by any administrator on request. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable Brazilian director. Coimbra's one feature film to date (Homens da Pátria) received little note outside of history-centric blogs. The citations used to support this article are paper-thin references to the man. Insufficient source material available from which to derive a real article. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable person. No secondary sources. Agtx ( talk) 17:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Chrislk02 per CSD G11 and CSD G12. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 13:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Bio of a doctor that sounds like a advertisement. Might also not be notable Wgolf ( talk) 18:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete. We have enough of these self-promotional advertisements: User Sanket.futurevision has made NO other contributions aside from creating this article and is the only one who has added any content. In the best interest of Wikipedia, ~Ngeaup ( talk) 14:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable singer with no reliable references Wgolf ( talk) 18:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 21:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
This article is based on single source (ET report) apart from a self published source. Also a case of WP:COPYVIO. I am inclined to say that this article should be deleted. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
This article not based on single source.Please see [1] [2] [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amruth M D ( talk • contribs) 17:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to HPGL. North America 1000 03:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable programming library (not a programming language). Fails WP:GNG. Tagged for no sources since January 2007. Was only used in a small number of products and only internally. ― Padenton| ✉ 16:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bendix G-20. North America 1000 03:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable programming language. Fails WP:GNG. Unable to find any sources whatsoever other than wiki and other user-provided information sites. Even CMU's (where the language was created) website has little to no mention of the language. A search on CMU's website revealed this political science research paper (which mentions it as being used on page 10 and clearly qualifies as no more than a brief mention) and the other article does not appear to actually mention the language, seems to have just turned up based on the heavy use of 'gate'. Article's one reference (HOPL entry in External Links) has been dead since 2012. I found a cached ver of the page at web.archive.org from 2011, but it does not seem to support the subject's notability and only lists 2 papers giving significant coverage of the language, both written by the creators and therefore not independent. Also notifying notability tagger from February 2015: Kephir ― Padenton| ✉ 16:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This is not notable enough to warrant an article and WP:NOTSTATS and WP:LISTCRUFT. An admin suggested I go to AfD. QED237 (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 03:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
It is not notable. Spumuq ( talq) 14:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Jon Arbuckle and add indefinite full-protection. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
While the article contains a lot of info, the sources are in no way reliable. Most of this is cited to a personal blog on Wordpress or a YouTube video, neither of which are reliable sources. The person in question is only passingly notable at best, with only one VA role and literally nothing else, so either delete outright or revert the article to a redirect, as was consensus in the last two AFDs. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 13:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
there's nothing here! redirect to Indianapolis Fire Department, which had a fair amount of content on the subject. John from Idegon ( talk) 06:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 22:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
CEO for a non-notable company is not notable. Note: this is NOT a 2nd nomination. There was a different non-notable Ben Weinberger, but this isn't the same guy. Rklawton ( talk) 11:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
*Keep – He received a notable award from the Governor of Illinois for his business endeavors.
SilverSurfingSerpant (
talk) 01:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC) (Striking comment by blocked sockpuppet. --
MelanieN (
talk)
22:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC))
The result was delete. Although if someone wants the revisions relating to the Korean band restored to Draft space for a closer look I'll be happy to do that. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:43, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Article about a band which lacks enough reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and has failed all points of WP:NMUSIC - McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 01:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet the notability criteria for organizations; only sources offered are this organization's own website except for one which only establishes that it exists 331dot ( talk) 20:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Marginally notable band. Claims to have song used on TV series, but no independent evidence provided or explanation of song usage. Article lacks non-trivial support needed to establish notability. reddogsix ( talk) 00:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
PROD contested by article creator. This is a non-notable youth tournament which does not meet WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 08:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages for the exact same reason:
The result was redirect to International_V8_Supercars_Championship. This probably is TOOSOON but rather then go with the delete, I'll redirect so this can be undone with the minimum of fuss when it's time. Spartaz Humbug! 09:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON The majority of cited announcements are carry over announcements relevant to 2014 or 2015 seasons. References about DJR Penske and Prodrive Australia changing manufacturers are speculative, not announcements and there has been no calendar announcements. There is just one driver signing that is genuinely new for 2016. Not enough to start a new season article. Content is almost entirely copied over from 2015 International V8 Supercars Championship article. Falcadore ( talk) 15:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep Article reflects cited changes for 2016. Similar articles 2016 Formula One season and 2016 Grand Prix motorcycle racing season have been established. V7867 ( talk) 01:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep is cited and will evolve over time Transasia07 ( talk) 02:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete V8 Supercar season articles generally are not created until the release of the calendar, the exception being significant changes for that season (such as the entrance of new manufacturers in 2013/2014). There are currently no significant changes for 2016, so article should not be created until the calendar is released. Kytabu Talk 05:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep Maybe a bit early, but only by a few months, better a bit early than a bit late IMO. Does provide a good summary of what contracts are in place. Would feel differently if the season was > 12 months away. Drs002 ( talk) 08:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete The calendar for the season has not been released and there are not enough major changes to the manufacturers or drivers for the page to be kept as it stands. TheGRVOfLightning ( talk) 07:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete per G7. This AfD is effectively over. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 19:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Minimal coverage; self-published author. References are largely blogs. I should mention the article was previously speedied as a hoax, as it copies material from David Gandy, and the unfinished website of the alleged company founded by the subject was registered last week. Blackguard 06:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Three important links other there. Books he wrote and biography
https://play.google.com/store/books/author?id=Marvin+Amparo
http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=n%3A133140011%2Cp_27%3AMarvin%20Amparo https://farmingdale.edu/social-media/student-spotlight/marvinsantana.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.125.108.9 ( talk • contribs) 06:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 15:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Consensus is for those under 2000 to be discussed and not unilaterally redirected or prodded. Boleyn ( talk) 06:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn ( talk) 06:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that that article does not meet the main notability guideline Davewild ( talk) 19:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable magazine. Article lacks non-trivial, independent support. reddogsix ( talk) 03:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Article has no notability on its own, and despite its creation, a similar list remains on the K-pop article that is regularly maintained. Youtube rankings do not satisfy WP:CHARTS. Also Youtube itself does not track this information distinctly and the chart has had to depend on third-party bots and users having to manually update the information. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable record label. No sources and nothing obvious via a search. I only declined a WP:CSD#A7 because the label claimed to be affiliated with Sony Music, though I can't find a reliable source that confirms it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
I'LL add sources/references today. please do not remove. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2003:6A:8F02:D118:F974:6E6F:18FD:F70B (
talk)
17:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
We'are working with Sony at the moment, we do PR for some of their Artist, If you want we can send you their paychecks. Also we sold Records to Atlantic, Warner and Universal. No every label does/did that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Alright, I fix that problem. I will changed the password now, so its just me writing/editing the articles.
Richtie333, the thing is that we do not have many articles about Mister Miau on the internet.
I saw Spinnin' Records having discogs as references too, so I thought that also count for us.
Can I send you screenshots of the order emails, we are having with sony and universal employees? They ask us to do online PR for some Artists that means reaching out to all the EDM Blogs to get their tracks charted on Hypem.com. We are really not a label-spam or something. We real business. ught to the attention of th Thank you Ritchie for your understanding !
@Joseph2302 - I never shared this account, I just switched between my Macbook Pro and my Windows 7 Desktop, you should see that in the Ip address. Why so harsh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Edit: No one else logged into my account, just me. But it was not worth it to explain it. So - The cleverer give in - thats why I just said someone else logged in. You should check the IP's.
With "We'are working with Sony at the moment..." I meant that my Partner and Me are working with sony, not that I share my Wiki Account with my partner. Was this so unclear that your first reaction was: "oh he shared his account because I read the word "we"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Edit2: Its not about promoting, it's about what's going on with mister miau. We work with Sony, we released official Tracks with Tiesto (Universal), Warner and Atlantic records. I think thats what you call:
"notability regarding topics related to music".
But do whatever you want to do, I'm exhausted. If you feel better with ranking up your deleted article stats, go for it.
Still, thanks anyways for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for admitting it chillum. Will send this talk to jimmy aka jimbo. Please still take a look at spinnin' records. They use the same RS and you dont say nothing!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 15:37, 21 May 2015
I would not nominate Spinnin' Records for deletion because a search for news sources shows many hits, while the same search for Mister Miau says, verbatim, "Your search - "mister miau" - did not match any news results" and lists a Facebook page. That's my usual triage for articles, and I will cut a lot of slack for historical articles where sources are only in print form, but probably less so for modern record labels, who really need to be written about in The Guardian or The Independent. User:Uncle G/On notability has further interesting reading. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Clear copyvio of the company's website pages. Yunshui 雲 水 12:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
This article reads like an advert, and there appears to be no notability, as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORP Joseph2302 ( talk) 11:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 15:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 10:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment The creator has removed the AfD tag from the article, plus unref, notability etc. tags, with an insulting edit summary. I'm not interested in edit warring and have already reverted a similar removal by the same editor earlier today so am loath to risk WP:3RR by doing this myself. Boleyn ( talk) 12:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Character in a trading card game, which just asserts her existence and fails to demonstrate her notability. Most of this article, in fact, isn't actually about her at all, but is merely a WP:COATRACK for a tangential summary of LGBT representation in gaming in general — it actually says almost as much about Super Mario Bros. 2 as it does about the game that the topic named in the title is actually in. Beyond the introductory statement of her existence, any other content which is actually about Alesha herself consists entirely of blogsourced opinion commentary rather than reliably sourced fact or encyclopedic context. It might be possible to write a real article about her as an encyclopedia topic in her own right — I find that very unlikely, but I'm not enough of an expert in this particular branch of nerd culture to rule it out entirely — but this, as written and sourced, is not that article. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 08:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 09:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This Article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines , please the references here are mostly talking about Welcome to Lagos: how Nigeria's dirt poor scratch a living in a city teeming with business flair .... there is NO Evidence of Notability about the Musician himself on those few Relieble Article here... -- Samat lib ( talk) 09:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note to closing Admin:
User:Samat lib and
User: Kokobenin are currently under investigation for possible Sockpuppetry as
User: Kokobenin account was specifically created for disruptive purpose probably by
User:Samat lib to always support their hilarious nominations at AfDs. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samat lib.
Wikic¤l¤gy
t@lk to M£
21:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Eric Obuh to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not seem to be notable per WP:COMPANY and does seem to fall well within WP:ADVERT. Tone of the article absolutely suggests a COI. -- Non-Dropframe talk 07:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This list really offers no real encyclopedic information to this site. If someone really wants to know the best places to retire they can check out Forbes not Wikipedia.
WP:INDISCRIMINATE
WP:NOTGUIDE and
WP:NOTDIRECTORY, we don't have articles for rankings of best places to live or to take a vacation, so this article isn't really unnecessary.
Jay
Jay
What did I do?
00:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete per WP:TOOSOON. -- MelanieN ( talk) 16:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable actress-it even says upcoming. And also a not inherited issue. Wgolf ( talk) 00:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The only source is AllMusic review, not enough to met WP:NALBUMS. All About That Bass ( A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 15:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
TV channel I'm having trouble finding notability for. Most results are just containing any combo of the words it seems. Wgolf ( talk) 16:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). The notion of a page move can be further discussed on the article's talk page, or perhaps boldly performed. North America 1000 04:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
There's a decent claim to notability here - one of Moldova's leading pharmacy chains - but try as I might, and I did search diligently in Romanian, I can't find any independent coverage of this firm. True, there's this and this, but I have several problems with those links. First, the text is exactly the same on both sites, suggesting we're dealing with publicity material. Second, this text indeed a laudatory one, with little attempt at balance. Third, one of the links is a gossip/fashion magazine, the other a men's magazine, neither of which is really the type of high-quality reference one might want to establish the notability of a pharmacy. - Biruitorul Talk 22:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Found no evidence of notability of this program in any sources. Google search turns up this article first and foremost. Other hits are places where you can buy it, and apparently nothing else. Unless some reliable independent secondary sources can be found, I propose this article be deleted as non-notable. KDS4444 Talk 03:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). The notion of a merge can be discussed on the article's talk page, or perhaps boldly performed. North America 1000 04:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
News searches found this Huffington Post minor mention and this Spanish minor mention and a Books search found one listing. Basically, it seems this is a think tank but maybe not a notable one. Multiple other searches (including with the Netherlands name and a precautionary search at Scholar) failed to find anything good. SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Due to lack of participation with no prejudice to a speedy relist. Davewild ( talk) 19:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable neighborhood and searches including Books, News and browser find nothing to suggest this is notable. Also, the article reads more like a tour guide than an encyclopedia. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 08:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Looks like promotional. VagaboundWind ( talk) 07:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
*Delete. Does not meet criteria of WP:N. Furthermore, all cited references are non-credible blog posts, a Wikipedia article reprinted on mtv.com, and a Facebook page. A search for the awards supposedly won reveals nothing. I did find several lists of recipients of the National Bravery Award for the year 2000, but none of them listed Richa. Ormr2014 | Talk
* Faint delete. Despite her notability, this article comes across as being non-encyclopedic. -- JenniferTheEmpress0 ( talk) 18:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Neither of the Keep arguments address the delete concerns that the article fails the main notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Davewild ( talk) 19:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Fails notability. It's a church plant of a notable church, but does not meet WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as blatantly promotional (as well as being a likely copyvio). — David Eppstein ( talk) 22:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
A BLP with no references. Reads like a CV Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be notable, poorly referenced. I dream of horses ( T) @ 03:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't find any independent reliable sources except for Quackwatch and two "human interest" type news stories from 2007 [60] [61]. (The journal article appears to have been written by an employee of the organization that is promoting the diet.) The other sources are either passing mentions (e.g., a book about diets includes it in a long list of diets) or not WP:Independent sources. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 03:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
I defy any normal human to find their way in this thicket of links and run-on sentences, so I hope my vote - to KEEP gets included in the totals. I could not figure out how to put it in the KEEP section. I fail to understand why this very sensible and, it must be noted, unprofitable nutrition regimen would be getting the axe in the first place. Are you also considering the deletion of your McDonald's entry? If not, why not. The Hallelujah Diet, bland though it may be to the average American's jaded palate, is at least not killing tens of thousands of Bernaysed customers with its marginal nutrition and all-sugar-all-the-time fare; not to mention all those damn carcinogenics. And why do we give a damn what Quackwatch says? Many of us know that site is just a shill created for the sole purpose of fighting tooth and nail against any and all attempts to threaten the income stream of its owners, the AMA and the medical-industrial, sickness-maintenance cabal; hardly an objective opinion, eh? The only "...serious deficiencies" in Mr Barrett's QW smear are to the bottom lines of those who pay him. How many veggies have you ever heard of being the subject of a pharmacological study? I also note that QW is your only quoted source but, I would never ever accuse Wiki of trying to stack the deck. That wouldn't be right, would it? Might even be seen by some as an abuse of power ;) Is Jimmy really in favor of stifling the very few (and small) voices of reason on this issue? If so, why? I don't want to believe it's because he might be working for the same gentle folks who would like to see the eating habits of Americans remain just as they are. note: I have tried before to register (I am not a big fan of unsigned opinions) with no success. I hope this meets your contribution guidelines anyway as I feel it is necessary input. If it doesn't measure up try making this stuff comprehensible to the average analog mind. Thanks, NjW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.231.136 ( talk) 14:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC) — 70.106.231.136 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Hi, I'm back with a postscript. As I was closing this page, I decided to re-review my original comments, They're fine as-is. However, I noticed that the first researcher's comments, Whatamidoing, states that all he was able to come up with in the way of Pro or Con was Quackwatch's (interesting history - look it up, just not on Wiki) input on this diet. In hopes of doubling the range of opinion, here is another POV for all you Deleters. Dr Russell Blalock knows this stuff backwards, forwards and sideways. He also walked away from a thriving Neurosurgical practice in order to focus on educating the public as to the abysmal truth behind American fare (diet would be to insult that term). We call that living a principle-centered life where I come from; I recommend it. If it's the medical science aspect of this diet that is so hard to comprehend for those who just want to hit the old delete key, all that info is in his seminal book, Health and Nutrition Secrets, 2006. He says it in plain English (unlike the maze one encounters all over today's culture, such as the editing page of a Wiki entry), with total command of his subject. You-all (the Doc hails from Louisiana) may delete this diet for a host of reasons but, after reading a few reviews (you didn't think I was going to ask you to read the thing, did you? ;) of the Doc's book, the FACTS as to why this diet stands head and shoulders above most of the others won't be one of them. I advise you not to waste your time on the obligatory Quackwatch smear of this good Doc or anyone else speaking a smidgen of the despicable truth. Just trying to bring a bit of balance into this discussion. My name is Nigel at freesense at gmail and nobody is paying me to say any of this. You can take that to the bank because I refuse to. NjW PPS me again, sorry. Motivation (cui bono) is always my first concern in surmising someone's reasons for opining as s/he does. So you know, I am a freethinking Humanist civil libertarian (far Left) AND libertarian (far Right). Not too many of us around in any era. My goal here is, as always, to help increase the variety of voices and views - on this or any other issue. I MIGHT be okay with a merging of this entry so long as there was an easy UNIVERSAL TAG way to search for its main tag terms. For now, I am still in the KEEP column. I'd also appreciate a quick email from someone once a decision is made - be nice to know how this shakes out. NjW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.231.136 ( talk) 15:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Davewild ( talk) 19:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer. Does not meet WP:NBOX. Being a sparring partner is not a claim to notability. Peter Rehse ( talk) 07:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the sources found by Wikicology are enough to demonstrate the subject should have a standalone article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Low citations [73]. Note, started life as a copyright violation. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chris Mortensen. Both nom and 2 !voters prefer it redirected which is usually preferred over deletion. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 20:25, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Only 146 Google results. Out of these, only 1 is a reliable source focusing on the documentary. Zero reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was See below. If it's a hoax, it needs to be deleted. If it's not, it needs to be moved since this is not the primary topic. I'm going to go and move the DAB page to this primary page and restore some proper DABby content. If it turns out there is a rugby player who's notable enough, it can be recreated--preferably not with a copy-paste job from this history. Drmies ( talk) 18:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a hoax. No player named Gareth Davies has played for the England national rugby union team. References are all copied from Tom Wood (rugby union) with small changes, such as substituting "Wood" with "Davies", club names, or making the dates from the 1990s to match his career span.
Gareth Davies was originally a disambiguation page, changed to this version in March 2013. The article is now the primary topic, listed at the top of Gareth Davies (disambiguation) (which has 16 articles). A revert and merge may be required rather than deletion, if determined to be hoax. Jevansen ( talk) 12:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
There are no reliable sources to support the claim of follow-on submarines of "Arihant class" i.e., new class. The sources does not mention anything about follow on class of Arihant (It simply mentions 'follow on submarines of INS arihant' i.e., INS Aridhaman, ATV-3 and ATV-4). Hence the article might simply be a hoax.. Proposing DELETION. Regards JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 18:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete- For now due to the lack of multiple or any reference which points to a follow on class of Arihant as of may 2015, the article should be deleted. a discussion was open on 21 March 2015 regarding Number of ships in Arihant class please check this Talk:Arihant-class submarine page and post your comments also. Nicky mathew ( talk) 19:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. I don't think anyone is seriously insisting on deletion at this point. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to meep Wikipedia's WP:N criteria. Also may possibly be promotional in nature. Ormr2014 ( talk) 19:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
(Sorry if this is disorganized, I don't know how this page should be structured, forgive my lack of Wikipedia experience.)
This article was marked for deletion on May 11 on grounds of lack of references to attest notability. I removed the notice on the 12th because a stub simply doesn't always have enough content for references to be included. As for notability is concerned, just because mainstream media ignores Eastern Europe in most of the English speaking world, it doesn't mean it's internationally irrelevant. The English Wikipedia is directed towards the international community in general, and not only to the community of native speakers. I believe I speak for many editors when I say I do not have time to create a full article at once, and I defend the approach of creating stubs and working on it gradually. After removing the notice I added a justification to the talk page explaining that I intended to add more information and references ASAP.
On the same day the page was proposed for deletion again and the justification was included in this page. I worked a bit more on the article and included references to international reports and academic journals mentioning the organization. The article is still a stub and I know that much improvement is needed, but I believe that for now there is enough referenced information for the notice to be removed. As for it being "promotional in nature", I think this is an accusation that applies equally well to any article on a member organization of IHEU. I believe the references included in the article provide credibility to my defense. I fail to see how the article on the Icelandic Ethical Humanist Association is more relevant than this one. If someone is of the opinion that it is clearly more relevant, please explain me why it is so.
That being said, I once again bring attention to the fact that I am fully aware that the article needs improvement, but I believe this is normal for a young article. Wikipedia is collaborative and grows gradually, the first version can't be perfect. You are all welcome and encouraged to add any "this article needs improvement" notice that you see fit, I just don't think deleting it is a fair or necessary measure. Ariel Pontes ( talk) 12:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
*This AFD is Closed - As the article has not been finished and the author expressed a desire to continue working on it without it being deleted, I have moved the article to the Draft Namespace.
Ormr2014 (
talk)
16:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ormr2014, thanks for closing the AfD! However, I don't think I expressed myself well enough and there might have been a misunderstanding. I did not say that I see the article as a draft that I will work on until I "finish" it. What does "finishing" an article on Wikipedia mean anyway? All articles on Wikipedia are incremental and subject to change. The concept of a "finished" article is meaningless. What is meaningful is the concept of a "minimum viable stub", and I have provided the arguments to defend that this is one and I still maintain my position. After all, if this is not a valid stub, what is? Wikipedia has the concept of a stub for a reason, and the fact that it provides stub templates for editors to include in their articles implies that the existence of stubs is legitimate.
That being said, please don't take it as a personal challenge, but I removed the article from the draft namespace. I don't want to seem stubborn but I also don't think I should be passive and act contrary to my beliefs just to avoid any possible conflicts. I have added some more information and I hope you will consider that the article is more decent now. In any case, as further evidence that stubs as short as this one are legitimate, you can check these articles:
For more see: Category:Non-governmental organization stubs. Thanks for understanding. Ariel Pontes ( talk) 07:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Insignificant band that does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria as outlined in WP:BAND Ormr2014 ( talk) 19:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash! (Y) 00:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The article may merit inclusion here, but it is written like an essay or term paper, there are no references, and the Bibliography is only accessible to individuals who actually have access to the books. Ormr2014 | Talk 19:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Merge/redirect to Allentown, Pennsylvania#Fire Department. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This is a non-notable fire department. The only sources available are from the fire department website. Tinton5 ( talk) 00:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 20:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
As the 1,900 bus Sydney Buses article has been incorporated into the State Transit Authority article, propose this article on the smaller 200 bus fleet also be set as a Redirect per branch policy. Mo7838 ( talk) 23:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 18:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Article about a documentary film. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NFILM. - Mr X 01:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash! (Y) 00:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:Notability and WP:BLP1E, sourced from a ~30-word BBC article. There is no justification for this standalone article. Step hen 01:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:16, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Apparently a hoax. I cannot find any sources that support any of this. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
It's not a hoax, but it is exaggerated and unsourced. It's the Croat word for jackal. singular Čagalj plural Čagljevi. If you go to the English article on jackals and click on the 'Hrvatski' link under Languages you'll reach the Croatian page on jackals. At the end of the article is a section on jackals in Croatia (Čagalj u Hrvatskoj) that states that a subspecies of the golden jackal is seen in southern Croatia and Slavonia, that they are a pest in winter when they come into settlements in search of food and that they can be mistaken for foxes. They are real, not mythical. I doubt that the information currently in the Čagalj article is notable and see no evidence of jackals being any more dangerous than wolves but if someone has reliable secondary evidence regarding jackals or mythical jackals in Croatia it would surely be better placed in the jackals article or one of the articles regarding individual species, such as the European jackal. Regards Guffydrawers ( talk) 12:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Singer who may not qualify yet for a wiki page-apparently another band member of this group was redirected (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hani (singer) Wgolf ( talk) 17:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- I vote to keep. Solji is the only one that has been associated with multiple groups, not just EXID, as well as having roles as providing guide vocals and being a vocal trainer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsujimasen ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solji (maybe these 2 afds should turn into one afd) Wgolf ( talk) 17:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Singer that might fall under too soon See- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solji Wgolf ( talk) 17:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Article is an essay about a school but without a clear indication of what the subject is. Major flaw is that it is an essay, but Wikipedia is not a repository of original research. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep (nomination withdrawn)( non-admin closure) ƬheStrike Σagle 06:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
WithdrawnNon notable unreleased film that has been deleted a couple times via prod already-so I guess it just time to do afd it seems. Wgolf ( talk) 14:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Wgolf ( talk) 20:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
First, this article is written so much like a college essay that to attempt to reach NPOV needs to start from nothing. Second, I am not convinced that this is notable enough to be a stand alone article from Positive psychotherapy. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
None of these links exist-potential hoax which the page creator seems tobe doing a lot of these for! Wgolf ( talk) 23:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet any of the criteria in WP:NACADEMICS. Not notable and no coverage by secondary sources. Further, article is autobiographical. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 23:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Refs are generally about drug trials where the company is noted and not given notability. Several are publications of the company's own press release. Fails WP:GNG. Might have been more notable had the article been about Firdapse and not the company that made it. Velella Velella Talk 22:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
There is no coverage from reliable sources about the subject that rises above the routine or passing mentions; everything else is self-generated and/or social media. Fails to meet WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete WP:CSD#G11. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:00, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
This article seems to be self-promotional so it may meet CSD G11. I am not sure if Rodríguez is notable or not, but based on the information here, it does not seem like he is. Also of note is that this article has been speedied G11 twice, once at this title and once at Manuel Alfredo Rodriguez. If this page is deleted, I would recommend WP:SALTing the title. Natg 19 ( talk) 21:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Can't find notability-also kind of have a hard time finding this all real (the new political party for example) His IMDB page has 2 films-if this the same guy even-and neither are notable. Wgolf ( talk) 21:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this is a real process. Unsourced, and most Google results are for unrelated uses of both words next to each other in ingredients lists, in which the words are separated by commas. This indicates that they aren't talking about the subject of the article. The article also seems like a contradiction in that it starts off talking about a process but then seems to be talking about a food additive of some sort, and is in the category "Sweeteners". In short, this seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:V and may, in fact, be a hoax. Even if it is not it is still non-notable and so should be deleted. Everymorning talk 20:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable internet slang PeterTheFourth ( talk) 20:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Not-notable or are U17/U20 appearances enough? He is rumoured to be loan out to Real, but that does not change the fact that he has yet to play in a fully pro league. Kante4 ( talk) 19:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable actor, producer and prop master. Liz Read! Talk! 19:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
If the claims in the article are correct, he meet WP:Notability (sports). However, I was completely unable to WP:VERIFY this. Perhaps someone who reads Latvian can provide sources I've missed, but unless his notability can be verified, this should be deleted. It has been tagged for notability for over 7 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved. Boleyn ( talk) 19:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator, only keep !votes, closing early. If anyone objects please let me know and I will relist. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The subject does not meet the
relevant notability guideline.
Pichpich (
talk)
18:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet
WP:NSOFTWARE
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
16:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet
WP:NSOFTWARE
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
16:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Essentially the copy of a US government document listing documents found with Osama bin Laden. Wikipedia is not a repository for "public domain or other source material such as entire books or source code, original historical documents, letters, laws, proclamations, and other source material that are only useful when presented with their original, unmodified wording. Complete copies of primary sources may go into Wikisource, but not on Wikipedia." The existence of this list should instead be mentioned, with a brief summary of the contents, at Death of Osama bin Laden. Sandstein 16:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep. The article definitely needs improving (I have started moving some of the named documents to the article's talkpage, in case they need to return and done a bit of a cleanup but more is required:)) but the subject is WP:NOTEWORTHY, as it meets WP:GNG. A google search brings up numerous notable sources including from the first 20 hits - [4] In Osama bin Laden Library: Illuminati and Bob Woodward (New York Times), [5] Osama bin Laden: US intelligence declassifies more than 100 documents seized during 2011 raid (ABC News), [6] US releases trove of Osama bin Laden letters (AlJazeera) [7] Bin Laden's 'bookshelf' included 9/11 conspiracy material (Politico) [8] U.S. Releases Documents Seized From Osama Bin Laden's Compound (npr), [9] Months before U.S. raid, bin Laden considered leaving Pakistan compound (The Washington Post), [10] Bin Laden documents reveal a paranoid family man fixated on the west (The Guardian), [11] US releases more than 100 documents recovered from Osama bin Laden raid (The Guardian), [12] Bin Laden's surprising Taste in Literature (The Atlantic), [13] Osama bin Laden's bookshelf: The contents of the terrorist’s personal library (Sydney Morning Herald), [14] Bin Laden in hiding: Hatching horrific plots despite crippling attacks on al-Qaida (NBC News). There are plenty more. Coolabahapple ( talk) 18:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rlendog ( talk) 18:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable artist-see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidin Davoudi "ArtA" Wgolf ( talk) 16:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rlendog ( talk) 18:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable band/music project-all of its refs are to Facebook or to other wikis-see also Aidin Davoudi (I have to go and don't have time to sort out the wiki links) Wgolf ( talk) 16:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wizardman 02:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable individual, fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N. Mellowed Fillmore ( talk) 16:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Davewild ( talk) 19:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Article does not appear to meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG Ormr2014 ( talk) 22:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
As for your assertion that "Trying to google "X__X", failing...shows ignorance of how search engines work" is presumptuous on your part and assumes that's what I did... As a CMO with over 15 years experience doing SEO, web development and marketing, I am well aware of how search engines work. As the saying goes, "there is more than one way to skin a cat" and searches for "No wave bands in 1978", "John D Morton", and so on don't really substantially demonstrate notability for the band. Ormr2014 | Talk
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
It is a badly written, unsourced collection of information Trumpetrep ( talk) 01:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Paracetamol brand names. L Faraone 01:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
fails NOTABILITY, lack of independent sources so fails WP:Golden Rule, WP:NOTDIRECTORY Jytdog ( talk) 13:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Drugs—The International Nonproprietary Name (INN). The INN for Panadol is Paracetamol and that is how our MOS tells us it should be titled. I should add that the article List of paracetamol brand names also already exists and has 107 entries to date. How many of these deserve entries according to the arguments espoused above? We're being asked to retain an article on the brand name of the second largest selling non-narcotic analgesic - so why not an article on the third-best seller, or the fourth? at what point do we draw the line? as I'm sure someone can find sources for all of them. Without a good reason for an exception to our article-naming guideline, this topic should exist solely within the existing Paracetamol article. -- RexxS ( talk) 19:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
We shouldn't set up a situation where we might end up with duplicate information across hundreds of articles.
Also, I'm pinging the editors who weighed in here before the pharmacy and medicine guidelines were pointed out: @ Necrothesp: @ Winner 42: @ Andrew Davidson: @ And Adoil Descended:.
@ Bondegezou: @ Boghog: and @ Everymorning: indicated familiartity with the Medicine and Pharmacy guidelines. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:29, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Merge and redirect as per Sandy and James, ensuring hat notes are in place to handle wp:EASTEREGG issues. LeadSongDog come howl! 14:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
To the arguments above about Panadol being a widely used drug, here are, as an example, the top prescribed medications in the US according to WebMD.
This is only the top 10 in the US; if we extend that to the top 100, [34] and then worldwide, we end up with a lot of duplication of information. Every one of them is a redirect to the generic, and that is desirable and per guideline, to avoid duplication of information. Being widely used does not indicate a reason to create separate articles on every trade name; any information that needs to be include a specific brand name can be included in the generic article. Trade name articles for drugs should be the exception (as in the Tylenol (brand) case per the cyanide poisonings) rather than the rule. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 15:23, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect. Everyone agrees with redirection. Although some editors !voted for delete and redirect, not policy-based reason is provided for why simple redirection is inadequate. Rlendog ( talk) 17:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:12, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. No need to delete then redirect. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect.There is a clear consensus to redirect. While there is some support for delete and redirect, there has been no policy-based rationale provided for why deletion is necessary and for why a simple redirect would not suffice. Rlendog ( talk) 18:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect. There is a clear consensus to redirect. While there is a split between simple redirect and delete and redirect, there has been no policy based rationale provided to support the need for the deletion step. Rlendog ( talk) 17:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Rlendog ( talk) 17:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn ( talk) 12:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable dancer with only lead of notability being a 1995 Emmy winning for Miss America with several Books results showing. However, there is nothing else to suggest notability, a lot of this information is unconfirmed but was actually added by the subject herself as what seems to be a self-bio. News found one result from a website I'm not going to click but it seems passing and minor. IMDb shows she has only had two roles both as a dancer. Multiple searches found nothing else and it is clear that Emmy winning is her only lead of notability because browser searches provide the Books links (note: It appears she now works as a interactive art designer so that explains the dancing absence). The article was actually tagged for speedy but declined due to "Winning an Emmy is a marginal source of notability is a marginal notability" but the article was never improved or nominated for possible deletion. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
@ DGG: Care to comment? SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 19:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Article dePROD by article creator without reason given. PROD reason still stands: "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article creation WP:TOOSOON. Hence: Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 12:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Rlendog ( talk) 18:26, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
It appears this festival has never received significant and in-depth coverage as News searches found nothing (before and after enhanced with additional words) and Books found guides. Multiple browser searches found a few links such as the Nickelback tour from 2007 and a few others but it seems maybe the festival was fading and maybe now defunct (no recent results and appears the website links are now broken). A search for the "largest Canada Day celebration outside of Ottawa" found a few results but are mostly press releases or primary/local and not significant and in-depth. I would suggest moving elsewhere but I don't see a target unless a small merge to Charlottetown. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Apexart. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:02, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable person. Founding a notable organization is not enough to prove notability. A google search for "Steven Rand" artist yields only 16 results, and most of them are not even about him. JDDJS ( talk) 03:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Soft delete. Article may be restored by any administrator on request. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as well. Looks like WP:COI applies as well. Doublefrog ( talk) 06:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete or Merge While Nazneen Madan may have acted, there does not seem to be any real coverage and I'm not sure an article about her would satisfy [WP:N]]. Ormr2014 ( talk) 00:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This does not seem like a particularly notable idea. Only reference is clearly not an reliable source, more like a clickbait-blog page. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Soft delete. Article may be restored by any administrator on request. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:21, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable Brazilian director. Coimbra's one feature film to date (Homens da Pátria) received little note outside of history-centric blogs. The citations used to support this article are paper-thin references to the man. Insufficient source material available from which to derive a real article. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable person. No secondary sources. Agtx ( talk) 17:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Chrislk02 per CSD G11 and CSD G12. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 13:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Bio of a doctor that sounds like a advertisement. Might also not be notable Wgolf ( talk) 18:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete. We have enough of these self-promotional advertisements: User Sanket.futurevision has made NO other contributions aside from creating this article and is the only one who has added any content. In the best interest of Wikipedia, ~Ngeaup ( talk) 14:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:25, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable singer with no reliable references Wgolf ( talk) 18:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 21:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
This article is based on single source (ET report) apart from a self published source. Also a case of WP:COPYVIO. I am inclined to say that this article should be deleted. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
This article not based on single source.Please see [1] [2] [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amruth M D ( talk • contribs) 17:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to HPGL. North America 1000 03:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable programming library (not a programming language). Fails WP:GNG. Tagged for no sources since January 2007. Was only used in a small number of products and only internally. ― Padenton| ✉ 16:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bendix G-20. North America 1000 03:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable programming language. Fails WP:GNG. Unable to find any sources whatsoever other than wiki and other user-provided information sites. Even CMU's (where the language was created) website has little to no mention of the language. A search on CMU's website revealed this political science research paper (which mentions it as being used on page 10 and clearly qualifies as no more than a brief mention) and the other article does not appear to actually mention the language, seems to have just turned up based on the heavy use of 'gate'. Article's one reference (HOPL entry in External Links) has been dead since 2012. I found a cached ver of the page at web.archive.org from 2011, but it does not seem to support the subject's notability and only lists 2 papers giving significant coverage of the language, both written by the creators and therefore not independent. Also notifying notability tagger from February 2015: Kephir ― Padenton| ✉ 16:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This is not notable enough to warrant an article and WP:NOTSTATS and WP:LISTCRUFT. An admin suggested I go to AfD. QED237 (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. North America 1000 03:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
It is not notable. Spumuq ( talq) 14:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Jon Arbuckle and add indefinite full-protection. -- MelanieN ( talk) 20:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
While the article contains a lot of info, the sources are in no way reliable. Most of this is cited to a personal blog on Wordpress or a YouTube video, neither of which are reliable sources. The person in question is only passingly notable at best, with only one VA role and literally nothing else, so either delete outright or revert the article to a redirect, as was consensus in the last two AFDs. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 13:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
there's nothing here! redirect to Indianapolis Fire Department, which had a fair amount of content on the subject. John from Idegon ( talk) 06:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 22:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
CEO for a non-notable company is not notable. Note: this is NOT a 2nd nomination. There was a different non-notable Ben Weinberger, but this isn't the same guy. Rklawton ( talk) 11:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
*Keep – He received a notable award from the Governor of Illinois for his business endeavors.
SilverSurfingSerpant (
talk) 01:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC) (Striking comment by blocked sockpuppet. --
MelanieN (
talk)
22:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC))
The result was delete. Although if someone wants the revisions relating to the Korean band restored to Draft space for a closer look I'll be happy to do that. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:43, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Article about a band which lacks enough reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and has failed all points of WP:NMUSIC - McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 01:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet the notability criteria for organizations; only sources offered are this organization's own website except for one which only establishes that it exists 331dot ( talk) 20:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Marginally notable band. Claims to have song used on TV series, but no independent evidence provided or explanation of song usage. Article lacks non-trivial support needed to establish notability. reddogsix ( talk) 00:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
PROD contested by article creator. This is a non-notable youth tournament which does not meet WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 08:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages for the exact same reason:
The result was redirect to International_V8_Supercars_Championship. This probably is TOOSOON but rather then go with the delete, I'll redirect so this can be undone with the minimum of fuss when it's time. Spartaz Humbug! 09:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON The majority of cited announcements are carry over announcements relevant to 2014 or 2015 seasons. References about DJR Penske and Prodrive Australia changing manufacturers are speculative, not announcements and there has been no calendar announcements. There is just one driver signing that is genuinely new for 2016. Not enough to start a new season article. Content is almost entirely copied over from 2015 International V8 Supercars Championship article. Falcadore ( talk) 15:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep Article reflects cited changes for 2016. Similar articles 2016 Formula One season and 2016 Grand Prix motorcycle racing season have been established. V7867 ( talk) 01:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep is cited and will evolve over time Transasia07 ( talk) 02:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete V8 Supercar season articles generally are not created until the release of the calendar, the exception being significant changes for that season (such as the entrance of new manufacturers in 2013/2014). There are currently no significant changes for 2016, so article should not be created until the calendar is released. Kytabu Talk 05:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep Maybe a bit early, but only by a few months, better a bit early than a bit late IMO. Does provide a good summary of what contracts are in place. Would feel differently if the season was > 12 months away. Drs002 ( talk) 08:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete The calendar for the season has not been released and there are not enough major changes to the manufacturers or drivers for the page to be kept as it stands. TheGRVOfLightning ( talk) 07:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete per G7. This AfD is effectively over. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 19:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Minimal coverage; self-published author. References are largely blogs. I should mention the article was previously speedied as a hoax, as it copies material from David Gandy, and the unfinished website of the alleged company founded by the subject was registered last week. Blackguard 06:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Three important links other there. Books he wrote and biography
https://play.google.com/store/books/author?id=Marvin+Amparo
http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=n%3A133140011%2Cp_27%3AMarvin%20Amparo https://farmingdale.edu/social-media/student-spotlight/marvinsantana.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.125.108.9 ( talk • contribs) 06:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 15:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Consensus is for those under 2000 to be discussed and not unilaterally redirected or prodded. Boleyn ( talk) 06:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn ( talk) 06:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that that article does not meet the main notability guideline Davewild ( talk) 19:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable magazine. Article lacks non-trivial, independent support. reddogsix ( talk) 03:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Article has no notability on its own, and despite its creation, a similar list remains on the K-pop article that is regularly maintained. Youtube rankings do not satisfy WP:CHARTS. Also Youtube itself does not track this information distinctly and the chart has had to depend on third-party bots and users having to manually update the information. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable record label. No sources and nothing obvious via a search. I only declined a WP:CSD#A7 because the label claimed to be affiliated with Sony Music, though I can't find a reliable source that confirms it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
I'LL add sources/references today. please do not remove. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2003:6A:8F02:D118:F974:6E6F:18FD:F70B (
talk)
17:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
We'are working with Sony at the moment, we do PR for some of their Artist, If you want we can send you their paychecks. Also we sold Records to Atlantic, Warner and Universal. No every label does/did that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Alright, I fix that problem. I will changed the password now, so its just me writing/editing the articles.
Richtie333, the thing is that we do not have many articles about Mister Miau on the internet.
I saw Spinnin' Records having discogs as references too, so I thought that also count for us.
Can I send you screenshots of the order emails, we are having with sony and universal employees? They ask us to do online PR for some Artists that means reaching out to all the EDM Blogs to get their tracks charted on Hypem.com. We are really not a label-spam or something. We real business. ught to the attention of th Thank you Ritchie for your understanding !
@Joseph2302 - I never shared this account, I just switched between my Macbook Pro and my Windows 7 Desktop, you should see that in the Ip address. Why so harsh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Edit: No one else logged into my account, just me. But it was not worth it to explain it. So - The cleverer give in - thats why I just said someone else logged in. You should check the IP's.
With "We'are working with Sony at the moment..." I meant that my Partner and Me are working with sony, not that I share my Wiki Account with my partner. Was this so unclear that your first reaction was: "oh he shared his account because I read the word "we"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Edit2: Its not about promoting, it's about what's going on with mister miau. We work with Sony, we released official Tracks with Tiesto (Universal), Warner and Atlantic records. I think thats what you call:
"notability regarding topics related to music".
But do whatever you want to do, I'm exhausted. If you feel better with ranking up your deleted article stats, go for it.
Still, thanks anyways for your understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for admitting it chillum. Will send this talk to jimmy aka jimbo. Please still take a look at spinnin' records. They use the same RS and you dont say nothing!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtrpb ( talk • contribs) 15:37, 21 May 2015
I would not nominate Spinnin' Records for deletion because a search for news sources shows many hits, while the same search for Mister Miau says, verbatim, "Your search - "mister miau" - did not match any news results" and lists a Facebook page. That's my usual triage for articles, and I will cut a lot of slack for historical articles where sources are only in print form, but probably less so for modern record labels, who really need to be written about in The Guardian or The Independent. User:Uncle G/On notability has further interesting reading. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Clear copyvio of the company's website pages. Yunshui 雲 水 12:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
This article reads like an advert, and there appears to be no notability, as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORP Joseph2302 ( talk) 11:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 15:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 10:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment The creator has removed the AfD tag from the article, plus unref, notability etc. tags, with an insulting edit summary. I'm not interested in edit warring and have already reverted a similar removal by the same editor earlier today so am loath to risk WP:3RR by doing this myself. Boleyn ( talk) 12:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Character in a trading card game, which just asserts her existence and fails to demonstrate her notability. Most of this article, in fact, isn't actually about her at all, but is merely a WP:COATRACK for a tangential summary of LGBT representation in gaming in general — it actually says almost as much about Super Mario Bros. 2 as it does about the game that the topic named in the title is actually in. Beyond the introductory statement of her existence, any other content which is actually about Alesha herself consists entirely of blogsourced opinion commentary rather than reliably sourced fact or encyclopedic context. It might be possible to write a real article about her as an encyclopedia topic in her own right — I find that very unlikely, but I'm not enough of an expert in this particular branch of nerd culture to rule it out entirely — but this, as written and sourced, is not that article. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 08:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 09:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This Article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines , please the references here are mostly talking about Welcome to Lagos: how Nigeria's dirt poor scratch a living in a city teeming with business flair .... there is NO Evidence of Notability about the Musician himself on those few Relieble Article here... -- Samat lib ( talk) 09:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note to closing Admin:
User:Samat lib and
User: Kokobenin are currently under investigation for possible Sockpuppetry as
User: Kokobenin account was specifically created for disruptive purpose probably by
User:Samat lib to always support their hilarious nominations at AfDs. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samat lib.
Wikic¤l¤gy
t@lk to M£
21:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Eric Obuh to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not seem to be notable per WP:COMPANY and does seem to fall well within WP:ADVERT. Tone of the article absolutely suggests a COI. -- Non-Dropframe talk 07:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
This list really offers no real encyclopedic information to this site. If someone really wants to know the best places to retire they can check out Forbes not Wikipedia.
WP:INDISCRIMINATE
WP:NOTGUIDE and
WP:NOTDIRECTORY, we don't have articles for rankings of best places to live or to take a vacation, so this article isn't really unnecessary.
Jay
Jay
What did I do?
00:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete per WP:TOOSOON. -- MelanieN ( talk) 16:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Non notable actress-it even says upcoming. And also a not inherited issue. Wgolf ( talk) 00:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The only source is AllMusic review, not enough to met WP:NALBUMS. All About That Bass ( A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 15:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
TV channel I'm having trouble finding notability for. Most results are just containing any combo of the words it seems. Wgolf ( talk) 16:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). The notion of a page move can be further discussed on the article's talk page, or perhaps boldly performed. North America 1000 04:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
There's a decent claim to notability here - one of Moldova's leading pharmacy chains - but try as I might, and I did search diligently in Romanian, I can't find any independent coverage of this firm. True, there's this and this, but I have several problems with those links. First, the text is exactly the same on both sites, suggesting we're dealing with publicity material. Second, this text indeed a laudatory one, with little attempt at balance. Third, one of the links is a gossip/fashion magazine, the other a men's magazine, neither of which is really the type of high-quality reference one might want to establish the notability of a pharmacy. - Biruitorul Talk 22:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 04:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Found no evidence of notability of this program in any sources. Google search turns up this article first and foremost. Other hits are places where you can buy it, and apparently nothing else. Unless some reliable independent secondary sources can be found, I propose this article be deleted as non-notable. KDS4444 Talk 03:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). The notion of a merge can be discussed on the article's talk page, or perhaps boldly performed. North America 1000 04:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
News searches found this Huffington Post minor mention and this Spanish minor mention and a Books search found one listing. Basically, it seems this is a think tank but maybe not a notable one. Multiple other searches (including with the Netherlands name and a precautionary search at Scholar) failed to find anything good. SwisterTwister talk 04:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Due to lack of participation with no prejudice to a speedy relist. Davewild ( talk) 19:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable neighborhood and searches including Books, News and browser find nothing to suggest this is notable. Also, the article reads more like a tour guide than an encyclopedia. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 08:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Looks like promotional. VagaboundWind ( talk) 07:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
*Delete. Does not meet criteria of WP:N. Furthermore, all cited references are non-credible blog posts, a Wikipedia article reprinted on mtv.com, and a Facebook page. A search for the awards supposedly won reveals nothing. I did find several lists of recipients of the National Bravery Award for the year 2000, but none of them listed Richa. Ormr2014 | Talk
* Faint delete. Despite her notability, this article comes across as being non-encyclopedic. -- JenniferTheEmpress0 ( talk) 18:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Neither of the Keep arguments address the delete concerns that the article fails the main notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Davewild ( talk) 19:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Fails notability. It's a church plant of a notable church, but does not meet WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as blatantly promotional (as well as being a likely copyvio). — David Eppstein ( talk) 22:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
A BLP with no references. Reads like a CV Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be notable, poorly referenced. I dream of horses ( T) @ 03:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't find any independent reliable sources except for Quackwatch and two "human interest" type news stories from 2007 [60] [61]. (The journal article appears to have been written by an employee of the organization that is promoting the diet.) The other sources are either passing mentions (e.g., a book about diets includes it in a long list of diets) or not WP:Independent sources. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 03:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
I defy any normal human to find their way in this thicket of links and run-on sentences, so I hope my vote - to KEEP gets included in the totals. I could not figure out how to put it in the KEEP section. I fail to understand why this very sensible and, it must be noted, unprofitable nutrition regimen would be getting the axe in the first place. Are you also considering the deletion of your McDonald's entry? If not, why not. The Hallelujah Diet, bland though it may be to the average American's jaded palate, is at least not killing tens of thousands of Bernaysed customers with its marginal nutrition and all-sugar-all-the-time fare; not to mention all those damn carcinogenics. And why do we give a damn what Quackwatch says? Many of us know that site is just a shill created for the sole purpose of fighting tooth and nail against any and all attempts to threaten the income stream of its owners, the AMA and the medical-industrial, sickness-maintenance cabal; hardly an objective opinion, eh? The only "...serious deficiencies" in Mr Barrett's QW smear are to the bottom lines of those who pay him. How many veggies have you ever heard of being the subject of a pharmacological study? I also note that QW is your only quoted source but, I would never ever accuse Wiki of trying to stack the deck. That wouldn't be right, would it? Might even be seen by some as an abuse of power ;) Is Jimmy really in favor of stifling the very few (and small) voices of reason on this issue? If so, why? I don't want to believe it's because he might be working for the same gentle folks who would like to see the eating habits of Americans remain just as they are. note: I have tried before to register (I am not a big fan of unsigned opinions) with no success. I hope this meets your contribution guidelines anyway as I feel it is necessary input. If it doesn't measure up try making this stuff comprehensible to the average analog mind. Thanks, NjW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.231.136 ( talk) 14:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC) — 70.106.231.136 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Hi, I'm back with a postscript. As I was closing this page, I decided to re-review my original comments, They're fine as-is. However, I noticed that the first researcher's comments, Whatamidoing, states that all he was able to come up with in the way of Pro or Con was Quackwatch's (interesting history - look it up, just not on Wiki) input on this diet. In hopes of doubling the range of opinion, here is another POV for all you Deleters. Dr Russell Blalock knows this stuff backwards, forwards and sideways. He also walked away from a thriving Neurosurgical practice in order to focus on educating the public as to the abysmal truth behind American fare (diet would be to insult that term). We call that living a principle-centered life where I come from; I recommend it. If it's the medical science aspect of this diet that is so hard to comprehend for those who just want to hit the old delete key, all that info is in his seminal book, Health and Nutrition Secrets, 2006. He says it in plain English (unlike the maze one encounters all over today's culture, such as the editing page of a Wiki entry), with total command of his subject. You-all (the Doc hails from Louisiana) may delete this diet for a host of reasons but, after reading a few reviews (you didn't think I was going to ask you to read the thing, did you? ;) of the Doc's book, the FACTS as to why this diet stands head and shoulders above most of the others won't be one of them. I advise you not to waste your time on the obligatory Quackwatch smear of this good Doc or anyone else speaking a smidgen of the despicable truth. Just trying to bring a bit of balance into this discussion. My name is Nigel at freesense at gmail and nobody is paying me to say any of this. You can take that to the bank because I refuse to. NjW PPS me again, sorry. Motivation (cui bono) is always my first concern in surmising someone's reasons for opining as s/he does. So you know, I am a freethinking Humanist civil libertarian (far Left) AND libertarian (far Right). Not too many of us around in any era. My goal here is, as always, to help increase the variety of voices and views - on this or any other issue. I MIGHT be okay with a merging of this entry so long as there was an easy UNIVERSAL TAG way to search for its main tag terms. For now, I am still in the KEEP column. I'd also appreciate a quick email from someone once a decision is made - be nice to know how this shakes out. NjW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.231.136 ( talk) 15:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Davewild ( talk) 19:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable boxer. Does not meet WP:NBOX. Being a sparring partner is not a claim to notability. Peter Rehse ( talk) 07:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the sources found by Wikicology are enough to demonstrate the subject should have a standalone article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Low citations [73]. Note, started life as a copyright violation. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chris Mortensen. Both nom and 2 !voters prefer it redirected which is usually preferred over deletion. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 20:25, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Only 146 Google results. Out of these, only 1 is a reliable source focusing on the documentary. Zero reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was See below. If it's a hoax, it needs to be deleted. If it's not, it needs to be moved since this is not the primary topic. I'm going to go and move the DAB page to this primary page and restore some proper DABby content. If it turns out there is a rugby player who's notable enough, it can be recreated--preferably not with a copy-paste job from this history. Drmies ( talk) 18:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a hoax. No player named Gareth Davies has played for the England national rugby union team. References are all copied from Tom Wood (rugby union) with small changes, such as substituting "Wood" with "Davies", club names, or making the dates from the 1990s to match his career span.
Gareth Davies was originally a disambiguation page, changed to this version in March 2013. The article is now the primary topic, listed at the top of Gareth Davies (disambiguation) (which has 16 articles). A revert and merge may be required rather than deletion, if determined to be hoax. Jevansen ( talk) 12:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
There are no reliable sources to support the claim of follow-on submarines of "Arihant class" i.e., new class. The sources does not mention anything about follow on class of Arihant (It simply mentions 'follow on submarines of INS arihant' i.e., INS Aridhaman, ATV-3 and ATV-4). Hence the article might simply be a hoax.. Proposing DELETION. Regards JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 18:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete- For now due to the lack of multiple or any reference which points to a follow on class of Arihant as of may 2015, the article should be deleted. a discussion was open on 21 March 2015 regarding Number of ships in Arihant class please check this Talk:Arihant-class submarine page and post your comments also. Nicky mathew ( talk) 19:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. I don't think anyone is seriously insisting on deletion at this point. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:56, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to meep Wikipedia's WP:N criteria. Also may possibly be promotional in nature. Ormr2014 ( talk) 19:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
(Sorry if this is disorganized, I don't know how this page should be structured, forgive my lack of Wikipedia experience.)
This article was marked for deletion on May 11 on grounds of lack of references to attest notability. I removed the notice on the 12th because a stub simply doesn't always have enough content for references to be included. As for notability is concerned, just because mainstream media ignores Eastern Europe in most of the English speaking world, it doesn't mean it's internationally irrelevant. The English Wikipedia is directed towards the international community in general, and not only to the community of native speakers. I believe I speak for many editors when I say I do not have time to create a full article at once, and I defend the approach of creating stubs and working on it gradually. After removing the notice I added a justification to the talk page explaining that I intended to add more information and references ASAP.
On the same day the page was proposed for deletion again and the justification was included in this page. I worked a bit more on the article and included references to international reports and academic journals mentioning the organization. The article is still a stub and I know that much improvement is needed, but I believe that for now there is enough referenced information for the notice to be removed. As for it being "promotional in nature", I think this is an accusation that applies equally well to any article on a member organization of IHEU. I believe the references included in the article provide credibility to my defense. I fail to see how the article on the Icelandic Ethical Humanist Association is more relevant than this one. If someone is of the opinion that it is clearly more relevant, please explain me why it is so.
That being said, I once again bring attention to the fact that I am fully aware that the article needs improvement, but I believe this is normal for a young article. Wikipedia is collaborative and grows gradually, the first version can't be perfect. You are all welcome and encouraged to add any "this article needs improvement" notice that you see fit, I just don't think deleting it is a fair or necessary measure. Ariel Pontes ( talk) 12:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
*This AFD is Closed - As the article has not been finished and the author expressed a desire to continue working on it without it being deleted, I have moved the article to the Draft Namespace.
Ormr2014 (
talk)
16:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ormr2014, thanks for closing the AfD! However, I don't think I expressed myself well enough and there might have been a misunderstanding. I did not say that I see the article as a draft that I will work on until I "finish" it. What does "finishing" an article on Wikipedia mean anyway? All articles on Wikipedia are incremental and subject to change. The concept of a "finished" article is meaningless. What is meaningful is the concept of a "minimum viable stub", and I have provided the arguments to defend that this is one and I still maintain my position. After all, if this is not a valid stub, what is? Wikipedia has the concept of a stub for a reason, and the fact that it provides stub templates for editors to include in their articles implies that the existence of stubs is legitimate.
That being said, please don't take it as a personal challenge, but I removed the article from the draft namespace. I don't want to seem stubborn but I also don't think I should be passive and act contrary to my beliefs just to avoid any possible conflicts. I have added some more information and I hope you will consider that the article is more decent now. In any case, as further evidence that stubs as short as this one are legitimate, you can check these articles:
For more see: Category:Non-governmental organization stubs. Thanks for understanding. Ariel Pontes ( talk) 07:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Insignificant band that does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria as outlined in WP:BAND Ormr2014 ( talk) 19:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash! (Y) 00:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
The article may merit inclusion here, but it is written like an essay or term paper, there are no references, and the Bibliography is only accessible to individuals who actually have access to the books. Ormr2014 | Talk 19:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Merge/redirect to Allentown, Pennsylvania#Fire Department. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
This is a non-notable fire department. The only sources available are from the fire department website. Tinton5 ( talk) 00:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 20:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
As the 1,900 bus Sydney Buses article has been incorporated into the State Transit Authority article, propose this article on the smaller 200 bus fleet also be set as a Redirect per branch policy. Mo7838 ( talk) 23:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 18:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Article about a documentary film. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:NFILM. - Mr X 01:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — Yash! (Y) 00:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:Notability and WP:BLP1E, sourced from a ~30-word BBC article. There is no justification for this standalone article. Step hen 01:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:16, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Apparently a hoax. I cannot find any sources that support any of this. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
It's not a hoax, but it is exaggerated and unsourced. It's the Croat word for jackal. singular Čagalj plural Čagljevi. If you go to the English article on jackals and click on the 'Hrvatski' link under Languages you'll reach the Croatian page on jackals. At the end of the article is a section on jackals in Croatia (Čagalj u Hrvatskoj) that states that a subspecies of the golden jackal is seen in southern Croatia and Slavonia, that they are a pest in winter when they come into settlements in search of food and that they can be mistaken for foxes. They are real, not mythical. I doubt that the information currently in the Čagalj article is notable and see no evidence of jackals being any more dangerous than wolves but if someone has reliable secondary evidence regarding jackals or mythical jackals in Croatia it would surely be better placed in the jackals article or one of the articles regarding individual species, such as the European jackal. Regards Guffydrawers ( talk) 12:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Singer who may not qualify yet for a wiki page-apparently another band member of this group was redirected (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hani (singer) Wgolf ( talk) 17:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- I vote to keep. Solji is the only one that has been associated with multiple groups, not just EXID, as well as having roles as providing guide vocals and being a vocal trainer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsujimasen ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solji (maybe these 2 afds should turn into one afd) Wgolf ( talk) 17:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. L Faraone 01:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Singer that might fall under too soon See- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solji Wgolf ( talk) 17:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Article is an essay about a school but without a clear indication of what the subject is. Major flaw is that it is an essay, but Wikipedia is not a repository of original research. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep (nomination withdrawn)( non-admin closure) ƬheStrike Σagle 06:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
WithdrawnNon notable unreleased film that has been deleted a couple times via prod already-so I guess it just time to do afd it seems. Wgolf ( talk) 14:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC) Wgolf ( talk) 20:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)