The result was keep. UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted previously so could have been speedy G4, but may have been improved enough to survive new discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM, only 1 review found in a BEFORE...2 needed. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is very flawed, it is solely based on 1 story from a man who is biased, wasn't there and contradicts history even according to the source, please check the talk page for more info, the last section is enough to understand the problem Goddard2000 ( talk) 16:23, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
This is how the battle is described in Ingush folklore. Historical Russian sources contradict the folklore and describe the incident as following:
“ | In the entire century of Russian citizenship, the Ingush only once, and then with the participation of the Atagin Chechens, openly and with all their might rebelled against our government, in 1782; but upon the arrival of a detachment consisting of one battalion of infantry, one squadron of dragoons and hundreds of Cossacks, they submitted without resistance, swore an oath and eight people were taken hostage. Ever since that distant time, there have been attempts, and even taken as a rule, to strengthen our power in the Caucasus, to quarrel among themselves the Caucasian tribes, "so that they weaken their strength, leave us more alone." In view of achieving this goal, the Ingush and Chechens quarreled among themselves in various ways, and in June 1783 they fought, having up to 1000 people on each side; the result of this battle was the defeat of the Ingush and the repulsion of up to two thousand pieces of sheep from them. |
” |
— "Сборник сведений о кавказских горцах", Выпуск 9. Тифлис. 1876. с. 11 |
Chronology —
Butkov P. G. Materials for the new history of the Caucasus, from 1722 to 1803. - SPb., 1869. Volume 3. page 171.
Here are the details of the battle from the Author. — Butkov P. G. Materials for the new history of the Caucasus, from 1722 to 1803. - SPb., 1869. Volume 2. page. 111 -- Товболатов ( talk) 18:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Товболатов ,
WikiEditor1234567123 We obviously disagree with each other and we have talked 100 times in talk pages, let the admins decide now, if they want us to make our case again in here then we'll do it. It's better if we don't debate in here now.
Goddard2000 (
talk) 19:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I've hesitated a lot before closing this discussion. While most of the "delete" !votes have policy-based arguments, I find that the "keep" !votes are either WP:ILIKEIT or just some hand waving, i.e.: "meets X or Y", without going into detail how this article meets X or Y. I also find the participation of so many relatively new editors with only a few edits unusual and wonder if there has been some off-site canvassing. Whatever may be the case, I find that the "delete" !votes have the stronger arguments. Randykitty ( talk) 10:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
It has no encyclopedic relevance, it does not have enough information to be considered an encyclopedic article. It has a certain promotional tone towards the person and «Mundo Crytpto». CarlosEduardoPA ( talk) 07:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't find the Keep votes here very persuasive in countering the nominator's argument that this is a promotional article. Every week we delete articles on cryptocurrency "experts".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No additional discussion since last relist, let's try this again.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk) 18:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
User:Editorsinpulso ( talk) 03:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorsinpulso ( talk • contribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
If an article on a notable topic severely fails the verifiability or neutral point of view policies, it may be reduced to a stub, or completely deleted by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion.. Nonchalantly bringing it up in an AFD discussion, as supposedly an easily solvable problem, is not really a good thing. It is a start to add in "one" little itty-bitty transgression out of several so that might suffice until a later date. It just gets the curiosity flowing if a hesitancy to add the several not-so-good deeds is because of ulterior motives. I would venture to surmise more than a few articles have not passed AFD because of severe neutrality issues. Do I think they are solved yet---Not in the least, but it is a start. I don't think there is enough significant independent coverage in reliable sources on the subject to account for encyclopedia coverage. The sources I looked at are more about the company, or interviews (that do not advance notability), and more than a few controversial commentaries, therefore if there is notability it would be on the company. -- Otr500 ( talk) 08:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article has been attempted to be created numerous times: Draft:Loco (platform), Draft:Loco (live streaming app), Loco (Game Streaming Platform), Loco (app), and possibly more. Also very likely some sockpuppetry going on. – Pbrks ( t • c) 22:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Katara Cultural Village. czar 17:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace immediately without any. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 January 19
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per G14. (non-admin closure) – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:ONEOTHER. Onlk ( talk) 21:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Non notable Motivational Speaker, having only Paid PRs. Articles are under BrandPost feed in Hindustan Times. Mid-Day article is Partneref content, Deccan Herald is Brandspot, Outlook is Spotlight, India Today is impact feature, and rest are either not reliable. According to me, the subject is Non-notable. ---
Misterrrrr (
talk) 09:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn at
Special:Diff/1136029998.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 20:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for further discussion of the quality of the sourcing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 20:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Insufficient depth of coverage from reliable sources. "Culture Brats" does not meet WP:RS; the remaining references are either trivial mentions or read like press releases (the Broadway World one is borderline, though the coverage there is limited). The creator of this article also recently created That's What I Like (Kelsi Luck song), which clearly fails WP:NSONG. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep as there is Top40-Charts.com, MTV, Pride Source, Clash Magazine Music News, BroadwayWorld, and Vanity Fair to back up most of what's being discussed on this page. I do see blogs and a prnewswire.com source which could be removed, but this page I believe has enough other sources to make it stay.
Chermie222 (
talk) 23:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC) —
Chermie222 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. czar 17:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
This gallery (no longer in operation) does not meet our notability criteria per WP:GNG nor WP:NCORP. The sourcing consists of a press release in StreetArtNews, and a database listing of posters for sale on an art sales website. An online WP:BEFORE search reveals social media posts, calendar listings, blogs, and a review about an artist who showed there but not about the gallery itself. Nothing substantial that could be considered significant coverage WP:SIGCOV seems to exist. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone ( talk) 17:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a biographical article about a radio personality/voice artists with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The sourcing for the article consists one reference which is identified as an interview in Sac Music Rocks. I am unable to find any publication by this name. My search for other sources turns up nothing useful. The closest thing to a source I could find is a voiceover CV. Fails WP:GNG. Whpq ( talk) 14:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Promotional piece about a religious school, lacking independent sourcing. I did not see anything in English to support notability, though there may be adequate sourcing in other languages. Mccapra ( talk) 13:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
This page providing all the information regarding the Bramhrishi Bawra Shanti Vidya Peeth and it's founder are legit. This page must not be nominated for deletion. Bramhrishi mission has supported lives of thousands of people and given a new direction to it. Though not very visible on the global scale, the people of this mission are doing the moral work with honesty and determination. Wikipedia as an internationally recognized open encyclopedia understands and has the moral responsibility to keep this page about BRAMHRISHI BAWRA SHANTI VIDYA PEETH from being deleted
THANKYOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saumya behl ( talk • contribs) 09:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Apparent memorial page of a restaurateur, entirely unsourced. I don’t see any sources that would support notability, although given the age of the subject there may be offline sources or archived US news pieces I haven’t turned up. Mccapra ( talk) 13:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close.. Over the past week, this article has been Merged into Shinabe clans leaving this page as a simple Redirect. I would have closed this discussion as a Soft Delete if it hadn't already been emptied of content and I see no value in deleting a valid Redirect. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Please draftify. The topic may have potential but the text of the article makes no sense. To begin with, the first paragraph introduces four names (Fuhitobe, History Department, Tomo, and Kabane) without making it clear if these are synonyms or in any way different. The next paragraph continues with new names without any bridging between the paragraphs. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 15:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. I am sending both this article and the article about the Chinese academic who developed it to AfD as I did not feel bundling was appropriate. All the current sourcing in this article is primary sourcing, although the article about the academic did include a single independent source which goes in-depth about both the procedure and the academic. Both articles were tagged for a week without improvement, after which I sent this article to draft, and prodded the other one. This was returned to mainspace and the other was de-prodded, both without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that either passes GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The book notes: "Another is Daoyin Yangsheng, developed by Zhang Guangde 张广德, a Beijing academic who developed serious health problems and in 1974 was diagnosed with heart disease and tuberculosis. Then, as the workshop flyer of Red Lotus Tai Chi Qigong in New Hampshire says, [quote]. Zhang's system, which is quite popular in China and practiced variously in the West, is documented in his book Daoyin yangsheng gong 导引养生功 (2001). Acknowledged officially as a form of qigong and recognized by various martial arts and sports organizations in China, it involves moves that are adapted from taiji quan but that are gentler and more medically focused. Its sequences tend to specialize in different areas of ailments. ..."
The book notes: "In the 1970s Daoyin Yangsheng enters the picture. Daoyin Yangsheng is a modern healthcare system created by Professor Zhang Guangde and taught at the Beijing Sports University. This comprehensive system follows the usual Daoyin actions of gentle exercise with breath control, the stimulation of key acupoints in the body, self massage and mental development but has now been updated by combining Traditional Chinese Medicine with modern knowledge of anatomy, physiology and medical theory. Professor Zhang made a keen study of the classical theories of the Daoyin, Yangsheng and Longevity schools. He had inherited a family owned "Exercises for Chronic Diseases" from his maternal grandfather and started the development of modern Daoyin Yangsheng when he, himself, was severely ill. Basing his work on this huge wealth of traditional knowledge, Professor Zhang developed his new style to combine the methods of Daoyin with physical exercise and mental cultivation. It was through the use of this health system, so it is claimed, that the Professor overcame his own illnesses."
The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 15:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
While accomplished, does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. While he did originate a procedure, apparently, all the sourcing for procedure, which will also be at AfD as I did not feel bundling was appropriate, is primary sourcing, except for the one book reference in this article. Both articles were tagged for a week without improvement, after which I prodded this one, and sent the article about the procedure to draft. This was de-prodded, and the procedure article was returned to mainspace, both without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that either passes GNG. Onel5969 TT me 11:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. He didn't originate just a procedure but a novel system that has been incorporated into China's curriculum of education. This novel system is taught in China's academic institutions and used as alternative or complementary medicine in hospitals in China. The subject aslo meets WP:ANYBIO#2 and WP:CREATIVE#2. As I already pointed out to the nom in other venues, articles aren't draftify because they aren't notable, and WP:DRAFTIFY is not a backdoor to deletion. If you think that the subject of an article does not meet any inclusion criteria, nominate it for deletion. Shoerack ( talk) 12:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. Here are some sources:
The book notes: "Another is Daoyin Yangsheng, developed by Zhang Guangde 张广德, a Beijing academic who developed serious health problems and in 1974 was diagnosed with heart disease and tuberculosis. Then, as the workshop flyer of Red Lotus Tai Chi Qigong in New Hampshire says, [quote]. Zhang's system, which is quite popular in China and practiced variously in the West, is documented in his book Daoyin yangsheng gong 导引养生功 (2001). Acknowledged officially as a form of qigong and recognized by various martial arts and sports organizations in China, it involves moves that are adapted from taiji quan but that are gentler and more medically focused. Its sequences tend to specialize in different areas of ailments. ..."
The book notes: "In the 1970s Daoyin Yangsheng enters the picture. Daoyin Yangsheng is a modern healthcare system created by Professor Zhang Guangde and taught at the Beijing Sports University. This comprehensive system follows the usual Daoyin actions of gentle exercise with breath control, the stimulation of key acupoints in the body, self massage and mental development but has now been updated by combining Traditional Chinese Medicine with modern knowledge of anatomy, physiology and medical theory. Professor Zhang made a keen study of the classical theories of the Daoyin, Yangsheng and Longevity schools. He had inherited a family owned "Exercises for Chronic Diseases" from his maternal grandfather and started the development of modern Daoyin Yangsheng when he, himself, was severely ill. Basing his work on this huge wealth of traditional knowledge, Professor Zhang developed his new style to combine the methods of Daoyin with physical exercise and mental cultivation. It was through the use of this health system, so it is claimed, that the Professor overcame his own illnesses."
The book notes: "【张广德】( 1932 ~ )养生学家。河北省唐山市人。 1963 年北京体育学院武术研究生毕业,留校任教。根据自己的研究和实践经验,创编“导引养生功”系列,在国内外具有广泛影响。于太极拳等武术领域也多有研究, 1996 年当选“中华武林百杰”。中国武术学会常委, ..."
From Google Translate: "【Zhang Guangde】(1932 ~ ) Health preserver. Born in Tangshan City, Hebei Province. In 1963, he graduated from the Beijing Institute of Physical Education as a master of Wushu and stayed at the school to teach. Based on his own research and practical experience, he created the series of "Daoyin Health Preserving Exercises", which has a wide influence at home and abroad. In 1996, he was selected as one of the "Hundred Masters of Chinese Martial Arts". Member of the Standing Committee of the Chinese Wushu Association, ..."
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 18:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Actor doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in non- WP:ROUTINE sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Has had significant roles in multiple notable ... television shows ...- Lead role (by definition significant) in multiple notable TV shows (as shown by the fact that these shows have articles). UtherSRG (talk) 12:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I can’t find the tournament on Google at all. – 333 -blue at 09:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORG. All of the sources offered are either interviews with staff, press release type stories, or announcements of the activities of the company. No sources with significant coverage. 331dot ( talk) 09:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing per WP:RELIST, consensus to keep formed, no substative differences from earlier AfD discussions. Note: nomination by editor subsequently blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 02:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
non-notable media outlet, I checked under the urdu name/spelling (اردو پوائنٹ) and found even less sourcing, which indicates to me that this is a complete notability fail despite the many attempts to spam it crosswiki. This new Pakistani TV channel has no references that demonstrate it meets the ">Parkashjit Singh30 18:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 04:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
The nominator is also reminded that if you wish to nominate future articles for AFD discussions, please tag the article and inform the article creator of the existence of the discussion. They appear to be inactive but other editors might have their talk page on their Watchlists. Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
A little-known band. After searching in Google books and a regular search engine, I found nothing but the doom metal band of the same name. The sources on the page are unreliable and dead. Crystallizedh, 17:52 — Preceding undated comment added 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 03:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
(Go-pal) Why this word used in sanskrit . To indicate that person is cow owner simple is that ,so why some group of people took Go-pal as their caste indicator, If you see in this world many people's have their own Cows so how can they Grant Go-pal name for their self example , Yadav, Ahir whatever their name is that's why I suggest all people on Wikipedia this page should be deleted . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhagruti ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is not only a consensus to Keep this article but a lack of a coherent deletion rationale from the AFD nominator. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete Gopal Caste Article Because Gopal means Cow Owner and in ancient time/after independence all people have their own Cows, buffalo example like Farmers, Brahmin, Barber, Rajput etc and many people in this world have their own Cows so how can Ahir,Goaud, Yadav is Claiming , Gopal is name of Shri Krishna because he is owner of Cow also So this article not match it's content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhagruti ( talk • contribs) 03:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 03:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
No references-at-all!!! Especially in the field of social sciences and politics, this is an extremely unacceptable situation for an encyclopedia that wants to be taken serious (like Wikipedia)!! Corriebertus ( talk) 12:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
WJ94 (
talk) 12:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk) 03:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. While there is a slight majority to Redirect this article, there also a misperception that this is a one sentence article about a reality show contestant when it actually is a full-fledged article that appears to be well-sourced. So, I find the reasoning behind some of those arguing for a Redirect to be faulty and will default to Keeping this article. Of course, there is room for improvement but that is the case with all articles on the project. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The article doesn't answer to the criteria of WP:GNG and it lacks in-depth sourcing. Radiohist ( talk) 01:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:DAB. Two entries on this page have no meaningful connection to the dab title. // Timothy :: talk 02:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:DAB. Two entries on this page have no meaningful connection to the dab title. // Timothy :: talk 02:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. Sufficient sources were found, I withdraw the nomination with no other delete rationales. (non-admin closure) McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 21:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced article about an BBS software which does not seem to meet the requirements of WP:GNG. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 03:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Poorly sourced BLP article. Article and sources do not meet SIGCOV for GNG or NBIO. // Timothy :: talk 01:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Solar Entertainment Corporation. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
another page subject to a slow-motion long duration edit war in regards to notability and whether it should be a standalone article or a redirect Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 03:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Article does not meet GNG or NBIO. No indication of notability. Sources are not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 02:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Article does not meet GNG or NBIO. No indication of notability. Sources are not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 02:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
I am not sure how to categorize this individual's profession but given the weight of this article upon her education, I'm going to say that she doesn't meet WP:PROF. In my online search get mentions of her in "the media", her website and social media accounts but being in the press doesn't equate to notability on Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 01:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
NOTE: The following comment was posted by an editor who has edited this page both using the account Effortshitconsistentinvest and using IP editing, with the IP address 211.30.131.151. JBW ( talk) 20:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
NOTE: The following comment was posted by an editor who has edited this page both using the account Effortshitconsistentinvest and using IP editing, with the IP address 211.30.131.151. JBW ( talk) 20:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
NOTE: The following comment was posted by an editor who has edited this page both using the account Effortshitconsistentinvest and using IP editing, with the IP address 211.30.131.151. JBW ( talk) 20:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 03:50, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete per
WP:NOTDIR,
WP:NOTCATALOG. Tons of non-inks and red links. The list isn't particularly vibrant, so it doesn't meet
WP:LSC which says Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance, not just verifiable existence
.
Mikeblas (
talk) 01:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content) it should be kept. Why? I Ask ( talk) 06:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't see evidence of notability here. One source is an advertorial, one the camp's website, one (NYT) a decent source, and one a trivial mention. A BEFORE search doesn't find anything other than trivial coverage. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 01:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
No disambiguation needed Leschnei ( talk) 00:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Wikipedia:PROCEDURALCLOSE as the item is currently linked from the main page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Schwede66 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Not a notable enough resignation to warrant its own article. The Background section is all repeated infomation from the Jacinda Ardern and Sixth Labour Government of New Zealand articles. The actual Resignation section of the article comprises 5 sentences and a large extended quote. The reactions section contains some infomation about suprise and typical quotes from world leaders (in addition to evaluations of Ardern's premiership which is not relevant to her resignation). Simliar to other world leader's resignations like Boris Johnson and Liz Truss which do not have their own articles. Anything else that may be useful can be added to the Jacinda Ardern and Sixth Labour Government of New Zealand articles. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 00:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted previously so could have been speedy G4, but may have been improved enough to survive new discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM, only 1 review found in a BEFORE...2 needed. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is very flawed, it is solely based on 1 story from a man who is biased, wasn't there and contradicts history even according to the source, please check the talk page for more info, the last section is enough to understand the problem Goddard2000 ( talk) 16:23, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
This is how the battle is described in Ingush folklore. Historical Russian sources contradict the folklore and describe the incident as following:
“ | In the entire century of Russian citizenship, the Ingush only once, and then with the participation of the Atagin Chechens, openly and with all their might rebelled against our government, in 1782; but upon the arrival of a detachment consisting of one battalion of infantry, one squadron of dragoons and hundreds of Cossacks, they submitted without resistance, swore an oath and eight people were taken hostage. Ever since that distant time, there have been attempts, and even taken as a rule, to strengthen our power in the Caucasus, to quarrel among themselves the Caucasian tribes, "so that they weaken their strength, leave us more alone." In view of achieving this goal, the Ingush and Chechens quarreled among themselves in various ways, and in June 1783 they fought, having up to 1000 people on each side; the result of this battle was the defeat of the Ingush and the repulsion of up to two thousand pieces of sheep from them. |
” |
— "Сборник сведений о кавказских горцах", Выпуск 9. Тифлис. 1876. с. 11 |
Chronology —
Butkov P. G. Materials for the new history of the Caucasus, from 1722 to 1803. - SPb., 1869. Volume 3. page 171.
Here are the details of the battle from the Author. — Butkov P. G. Materials for the new history of the Caucasus, from 1722 to 1803. - SPb., 1869. Volume 2. page. 111 -- Товболатов ( talk) 18:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Товболатов ,
WikiEditor1234567123 We obviously disagree with each other and we have talked 100 times in talk pages, let the admins decide now, if they want us to make our case again in here then we'll do it. It's better if we don't debate in here now.
Goddard2000 (
talk) 19:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I've hesitated a lot before closing this discussion. While most of the "delete" !votes have policy-based arguments, I find that the "keep" !votes are either WP:ILIKEIT or just some hand waving, i.e.: "meets X or Y", without going into detail how this article meets X or Y. I also find the participation of so many relatively new editors with only a few edits unusual and wonder if there has been some off-site canvassing. Whatever may be the case, I find that the "delete" !votes have the stronger arguments. Randykitty ( talk) 10:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
It has no encyclopedic relevance, it does not have enough information to be considered an encyclopedic article. It has a certain promotional tone towards the person and «Mundo Crytpto». CarlosEduardoPA ( talk) 07:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't find the Keep votes here very persuasive in countering the nominator's argument that this is a promotional article. Every week we delete articles on cryptocurrency "experts".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No additional discussion since last relist, let's try this again.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk) 18:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
User:Editorsinpulso ( talk) 03:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorsinpulso ( talk • contribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
If an article on a notable topic severely fails the verifiability or neutral point of view policies, it may be reduced to a stub, or completely deleted by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion.. Nonchalantly bringing it up in an AFD discussion, as supposedly an easily solvable problem, is not really a good thing. It is a start to add in "one" little itty-bitty transgression out of several so that might suffice until a later date. It just gets the curiosity flowing if a hesitancy to add the several not-so-good deeds is because of ulterior motives. I would venture to surmise more than a few articles have not passed AFD because of severe neutrality issues. Do I think they are solved yet---Not in the least, but it is a start. I don't think there is enough significant independent coverage in reliable sources on the subject to account for encyclopedia coverage. The sources I looked at are more about the company, or interviews (that do not advance notability), and more than a few controversial commentaries, therefore if there is notability it would be on the company. -- Otr500 ( talk) 08:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article has been attempted to be created numerous times: Draft:Loco (platform), Draft:Loco (live streaming app), Loco (Game Streaming Platform), Loco (app), and possibly more. Also very likely some sockpuppetry going on. – Pbrks ( t • c) 22:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Katara Cultural Village. czar 17:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Zero in-depth refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Was sent to draft in hopes of improvement, but returned to mainspace immediately without any. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 January 19
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per G14. (non-admin closure) – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:ONEOTHER. Onlk ( talk) 21:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Non notable Motivational Speaker, having only Paid PRs. Articles are under BrandPost feed in Hindustan Times. Mid-Day article is Partneref content, Deccan Herald is Brandspot, Outlook is Spotlight, India Today is impact feature, and rest are either not reliable. According to me, the subject is Non-notable. ---
Misterrrrr (
talk) 09:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn at
Special:Diff/1136029998.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 20:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for further discussion of the quality of the sourcing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 20:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Insufficient depth of coverage from reliable sources. "Culture Brats" does not meet WP:RS; the remaining references are either trivial mentions or read like press releases (the Broadway World one is borderline, though the coverage there is limited). The creator of this article also recently created That's What I Like (Kelsi Luck song), which clearly fails WP:NSONG. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
*Keep as there is Top40-Charts.com, MTV, Pride Source, Clash Magazine Music News, BroadwayWorld, and Vanity Fair to back up most of what's being discussed on this page. I do see blogs and a prnewswire.com source which could be removed, but this page I believe has enough other sources to make it stay.
Chermie222 (
talk) 23:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC) —
Chermie222 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. czar 17:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
This gallery (no longer in operation) does not meet our notability criteria per WP:GNG nor WP:NCORP. The sourcing consists of a press release in StreetArtNews, and a database listing of posters for sale on an art sales website. An online WP:BEFORE search reveals social media posts, calendar listings, blogs, and a review about an artist who showed there but not about the gallery itself. Nothing substantial that could be considered significant coverage WP:SIGCOV seems to exist. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone ( talk) 17:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a biographical article about a radio personality/voice artists with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The sourcing for the article consists one reference which is identified as an interview in Sac Music Rocks. I am unable to find any publication by this name. My search for other sources turns up nothing useful. The closest thing to a source I could find is a voiceover CV. Fails WP:GNG. Whpq ( talk) 14:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Promotional piece about a religious school, lacking independent sourcing. I did not see anything in English to support notability, though there may be adequate sourcing in other languages. Mccapra ( talk) 13:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
This page providing all the information regarding the Bramhrishi Bawra Shanti Vidya Peeth and it's founder are legit. This page must not be nominated for deletion. Bramhrishi mission has supported lives of thousands of people and given a new direction to it. Though not very visible on the global scale, the people of this mission are doing the moral work with honesty and determination. Wikipedia as an internationally recognized open encyclopedia understands and has the moral responsibility to keep this page about BRAMHRISHI BAWRA SHANTI VIDYA PEETH from being deleted
THANKYOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saumya behl ( talk • contribs) 09:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Apparent memorial page of a restaurateur, entirely unsourced. I don’t see any sources that would support notability, although given the age of the subject there may be offline sources or archived US news pieces I haven’t turned up. Mccapra ( talk) 13:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close.. Over the past week, this article has been Merged into Shinabe clans leaving this page as a simple Redirect. I would have closed this discussion as a Soft Delete if it hadn't already been emptied of content and I see no value in deleting a valid Redirect. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Please draftify. The topic may have potential but the text of the article makes no sense. To begin with, the first paragraph introduces four names (Fuhitobe, History Department, Tomo, and Kabane) without making it clear if these are synonyms or in any way different. The next paragraph continues with new names without any bridging between the paragraphs. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 15:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. I am sending both this article and the article about the Chinese academic who developed it to AfD as I did not feel bundling was appropriate. All the current sourcing in this article is primary sourcing, although the article about the academic did include a single independent source which goes in-depth about both the procedure and the academic. Both articles were tagged for a week without improvement, after which I sent this article to draft, and prodded the other one. This was returned to mainspace and the other was de-prodded, both without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that either passes GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The book notes: "Another is Daoyin Yangsheng, developed by Zhang Guangde 张广德, a Beijing academic who developed serious health problems and in 1974 was diagnosed with heart disease and tuberculosis. Then, as the workshop flyer of Red Lotus Tai Chi Qigong in New Hampshire says, [quote]. Zhang's system, which is quite popular in China and practiced variously in the West, is documented in his book Daoyin yangsheng gong 导引养生功 (2001). Acknowledged officially as a form of qigong and recognized by various martial arts and sports organizations in China, it involves moves that are adapted from taiji quan but that are gentler and more medically focused. Its sequences tend to specialize in different areas of ailments. ..."
The book notes: "In the 1970s Daoyin Yangsheng enters the picture. Daoyin Yangsheng is a modern healthcare system created by Professor Zhang Guangde and taught at the Beijing Sports University. This comprehensive system follows the usual Daoyin actions of gentle exercise with breath control, the stimulation of key acupoints in the body, self massage and mental development but has now been updated by combining Traditional Chinese Medicine with modern knowledge of anatomy, physiology and medical theory. Professor Zhang made a keen study of the classical theories of the Daoyin, Yangsheng and Longevity schools. He had inherited a family owned "Exercises for Chronic Diseases" from his maternal grandfather and started the development of modern Daoyin Yangsheng when he, himself, was severely ill. Basing his work on this huge wealth of traditional knowledge, Professor Zhang developed his new style to combine the methods of Daoyin with physical exercise and mental cultivation. It was through the use of this health system, so it is claimed, that the Professor overcame his own illnesses."
The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 15:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
While accomplished, does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. While he did originate a procedure, apparently, all the sourcing for procedure, which will also be at AfD as I did not feel bundling was appropriate, is primary sourcing, except for the one book reference in this article. Both articles were tagged for a week without improvement, after which I prodded this one, and sent the article about the procedure to draft. This was de-prodded, and the procedure article was returned to mainspace, both without improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that either passes GNG. Onel5969 TT me 11:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. He didn't originate just a procedure but a novel system that has been incorporated into China's curriculum of education. This novel system is taught in China's academic institutions and used as alternative or complementary medicine in hospitals in China. The subject aslo meets WP:ANYBIO#2 and WP:CREATIVE#2. As I already pointed out to the nom in other venues, articles aren't draftify because they aren't notable, and WP:DRAFTIFY is not a backdoor to deletion. If you think that the subject of an article does not meet any inclusion criteria, nominate it for deletion. Shoerack ( talk) 12:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. Here are some sources:
The book notes: "Another is Daoyin Yangsheng, developed by Zhang Guangde 张广德, a Beijing academic who developed serious health problems and in 1974 was diagnosed with heart disease and tuberculosis. Then, as the workshop flyer of Red Lotus Tai Chi Qigong in New Hampshire says, [quote]. Zhang's system, which is quite popular in China and practiced variously in the West, is documented in his book Daoyin yangsheng gong 导引养生功 (2001). Acknowledged officially as a form of qigong and recognized by various martial arts and sports organizations in China, it involves moves that are adapted from taiji quan but that are gentler and more medically focused. Its sequences tend to specialize in different areas of ailments. ..."
The book notes: "In the 1970s Daoyin Yangsheng enters the picture. Daoyin Yangsheng is a modern healthcare system created by Professor Zhang Guangde and taught at the Beijing Sports University. This comprehensive system follows the usual Daoyin actions of gentle exercise with breath control, the stimulation of key acupoints in the body, self massage and mental development but has now been updated by combining Traditional Chinese Medicine with modern knowledge of anatomy, physiology and medical theory. Professor Zhang made a keen study of the classical theories of the Daoyin, Yangsheng and Longevity schools. He had inherited a family owned "Exercises for Chronic Diseases" from his maternal grandfather and started the development of modern Daoyin Yangsheng when he, himself, was severely ill. Basing his work on this huge wealth of traditional knowledge, Professor Zhang developed his new style to combine the methods of Daoyin with physical exercise and mental cultivation. It was through the use of this health system, so it is claimed, that the Professor overcame his own illnesses."
The book notes: "【张广德】( 1932 ~ )养生学家。河北省唐山市人。 1963 年北京体育学院武术研究生毕业,留校任教。根据自己的研究和实践经验,创编“导引养生功”系列,在国内外具有广泛影响。于太极拳等武术领域也多有研究, 1996 年当选“中华武林百杰”。中国武术学会常委, ..."
From Google Translate: "【Zhang Guangde】(1932 ~ ) Health preserver. Born in Tangshan City, Hebei Province. In 1963, he graduated from the Beijing Institute of Physical Education as a master of Wushu and stayed at the school to teach. Based on his own research and practical experience, he created the series of "Daoyin Health Preserving Exercises", which has a wide influence at home and abroad. In 1996, he was selected as one of the "Hundred Masters of Chinese Martial Arts". Member of the Standing Committee of the Chinese Wushu Association, ..."
The result was keep. Randykitty ( talk) 18:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Actor doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in non- WP:ROUTINE sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Has had significant roles in multiple notable ... television shows ...- Lead role (by definition significant) in multiple notable TV shows (as shown by the fact that these shows have articles). UtherSRG (talk) 12:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I can’t find the tournament on Google at all. – 333 -blue at 09:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORG. All of the sources offered are either interviews with staff, press release type stories, or announcements of the activities of the company. No sources with significant coverage. 331dot ( talk) 09:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing per WP:RELIST, consensus to keep formed, no substative differences from earlier AfD discussions. Note: nomination by editor subsequently blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 02:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
non-notable media outlet, I checked under the urdu name/spelling (اردو پوائنٹ) and found even less sourcing, which indicates to me that this is a complete notability fail despite the many attempts to spam it crosswiki. This new Pakistani TV channel has no references that demonstrate it meets the ">Parkashjit Singh30 18:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 04:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
The nominator is also reminded that if you wish to nominate future articles for AFD discussions, please tag the article and inform the article creator of the existence of the discussion. They appear to be inactive but other editors might have their talk page on their Watchlists. Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
A little-known band. After searching in Google books and a regular search engine, I found nothing but the doom metal band of the same name. The sources on the page are unreliable and dead. Crystallizedh, 17:52 — Preceding undated comment added 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 03:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
(Go-pal) Why this word used in sanskrit . To indicate that person is cow owner simple is that ,so why some group of people took Go-pal as their caste indicator, If you see in this world many people's have their own Cows so how can they Grant Go-pal name for their self example , Yadav, Ahir whatever their name is that's why I suggest all people on Wikipedia this page should be deleted . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhagruti ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is not only a consensus to Keep this article but a lack of a coherent deletion rationale from the AFD nominator. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete Gopal Caste Article Because Gopal means Cow Owner and in ancient time/after independence all people have their own Cows, buffalo example like Farmers, Brahmin, Barber, Rajput etc and many people in this world have their own Cows so how can Ahir,Goaud, Yadav is Claiming , Gopal is name of Shri Krishna because he is owner of Cow also So this article not match it's content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhagruti ( talk • contribs) 03:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun... 03:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
No references-at-all!!! Especially in the field of social sciences and politics, this is an extremely unacceptable situation for an encyclopedia that wants to be taken serious (like Wikipedia)!! Corriebertus ( talk) 12:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
WJ94 (
talk) 12:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk) 03:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. While there is a slight majority to Redirect this article, there also a misperception that this is a one sentence article about a reality show contestant when it actually is a full-fledged article that appears to be well-sourced. So, I find the reasoning behind some of those arguing for a Redirect to be faulty and will default to Keeping this article. Of course, there is room for improvement but that is the case with all articles on the project. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
The article doesn't answer to the criteria of WP:GNG and it lacks in-depth sourcing. Radiohist ( talk) 01:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:DAB. Two entries on this page have no meaningful connection to the dab title. // Timothy :: talk 02:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:DAB. Two entries on this page have no meaningful connection to the dab title. // Timothy :: talk 02:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. Sufficient sources were found, I withdraw the nomination with no other delete rationales. (non-admin closure) McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 21:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced article about an BBS software which does not seem to meet the requirements of WP:GNG. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 03:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Poorly sourced BLP article. Article and sources do not meet SIGCOV for GNG or NBIO. // Timothy :: talk 01:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Solar Entertainment Corporation. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
another page subject to a slow-motion long duration edit war in regards to notability and whether it should be a standalone article or a redirect Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 03:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Article does not meet GNG or NBIO. No indication of notability. Sources are not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 02:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Article does not meet GNG or NBIO. No indication of notability. Sources are not SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 02:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 01:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 15:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
I am not sure how to categorize this individual's profession but given the weight of this article upon her education, I'm going to say that she doesn't meet WP:PROF. In my online search get mentions of her in "the media", her website and social media accounts but being in the press doesn't equate to notability on Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 01:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
NOTE: The following comment was posted by an editor who has edited this page both using the account Effortshitconsistentinvest and using IP editing, with the IP address 211.30.131.151. JBW ( talk) 20:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
NOTE: The following comment was posted by an editor who has edited this page both using the account Effortshitconsistentinvest and using IP editing, with the IP address 211.30.131.151. JBW ( talk) 20:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
NOTE: The following comment was posted by an editor who has edited this page both using the account Effortshitconsistentinvest and using IP editing, with the IP address 211.30.131.151. JBW ( talk) 20:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 03:50, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete per
WP:NOTDIR,
WP:NOTCATALOG. Tons of non-inks and red links. The list isn't particularly vibrant, so it doesn't meet
WP:LSC which says Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance, not just verifiable existence
.
Mikeblas (
talk) 01:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content) it should be kept. Why? I Ask ( talk) 06:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't see evidence of notability here. One source is an advertorial, one the camp's website, one (NYT) a decent source, and one a trivial mention. A BEFORE search doesn't find anything other than trivial coverage. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 01:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
No disambiguation needed Leschnei ( talk) 00:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Wikipedia:PROCEDURALCLOSE as the item is currently linked from the main page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Schwede66 ( talk • contribs) 00:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Not a notable enough resignation to warrant its own article. The Background section is all repeated infomation from the Jacinda Ardern and Sixth Labour Government of New Zealand articles. The actual Resignation section of the article comprises 5 sentences and a large extended quote. The reactions section contains some infomation about suprise and typical quotes from world leaders (in addition to evaluations of Ardern's premiership which is not relevant to her resignation). Simliar to other world leader's resignations like Boris Johnson and Liz Truss which do not have their own articles. Anything else that may be useful can be added to the Jacinda Ardern and Sixth Labour Government of New Zealand articles. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 00:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)