The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Old Hill, Indiana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a farmstead. Searching finds a cemetery that's in Brazil (IN), an old hill, and various juxtapositions, and lots of real estate hits, but nothing whatsoever that says anything I can clearly attribute to this place. Mangoe ( talk) 23:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment: I did some editing and adding of sources. I would conclude based on what I've seen so far that "Old Hill" is really just a place name, though at times rural residents may be credited as living in the "Old Hill" area. It is a known local topographic feature/location. Since it appears as a place name on USGS maps, it creeped into GNIS and later wikipedia.-- Milowent • ^{has spoken} 19:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Milowent is correct, geo feature. James.folsom ( talk) 00:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - this is a farmstead or neighborhood. There are a few sources, but nothing significant. See also my standards. Bearian ( talk) 15:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - fails WP:NGEO. Contributor892z ( talk) 17:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 23:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Jarrod Halliday (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a New Zealand rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and New Zealand. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Lots of squad announcements etc, but not really enough for a WP:GNG pass. No suitable redirect per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 18:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Has not played top club level which is Super Rugby. LibStar ( talk) 20:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Legendele Olimpului (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks sufficient notability and reliable secondary sources to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Despite being a children's book, the article does not provide significant coverage in independent sources that demonstrate its impact or importance in literature. Additionally, the article has been tagged for multiple issues, including being an orphan and needing more citations, indicating persistent problems that have not been addressed. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 17:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and History. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 17:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mythology and Romania. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 20:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Mr. SOS (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Enahnced some, but recreation of previously deleted subject. Mikeblas ( talk) 19:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, California, and Florida. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete: An article that doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 08:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete for want of WP:SIGCOV and a WP:BLP violation: WP:SALT. First off, there is a total lack of significant coverage. Producers are not automatically notable, and I just don't see much of anything in secondary sources. We have long ago agreed that producers are run of the mill, and I don't see that consensus changing soon. In terms of content, much is placed on his divorce; there is no evidence that his ex-wife and children are notable or public figures. This is a second creation after deletion, which warrants a creation protection, absent very good reasons. Bearian ( talk) 15:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 08:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Throne Wishlist (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only coverage is press releases/funding announcements. No secondary coverage. Probable COI. BrigadierG ( talk) 21:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Texas. BrigadierG ( talk) 21:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 08:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Peter Wuteh Vakunta (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable professor. I can't find a Google Scholar for him; ResearchGate indicates he's only been cited 22 times (which seems too low to meet WP:NPROF). A search for sources only turns up profiles for him and sites hawking his books. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 19:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Language, Poetry, and Cameroon. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment.Although he does not seem to satisfy WP:NPROF, subject may possibly satisfy WP:AUTHOR (C3). I do see a few reviews of published works; not sure if there is enough, though. Qflib ( talk) 00:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Weak delete: I am certain the article meets WP:AUTHOR but that isn't enough when they aren't verifiable. This can still be notable in the future. For now, WP:NPROF and WP:SIGCOV issue. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 17:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Article does not meet WP:NPROF. Article's only use seems to be listing subject's various publications. Boredintheevening ( talk) 15:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 01:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Richard Raymond (pianist) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing on this guy but articles about a student of his, fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 18:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep Article was unsourced, and still requires some cleanup and improvement, however the subject is notable under GNG and WP:NMUSIC, particularly criteria 1 and 9. I added a few sources found quickly from a google search. A deeper search may reveal more. Bgv. ( talk) 23:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

A competition is only "major" enough to fulfill NMUSIC #9 if it gets WP:GNG-worthy media coverage that reports its winners as news, and is not "major" enough to pass that criterion if you have to rely on its own self-published press releases because third-party coverage treating it as newsworthy is non-existent. So he hasn't been shown to pass #9 at all, and with only one real media source about him he has not yet been shown to pass #1 either. Bearcat ( talk) 15:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I'm glad to see one article that may satisfy the WP:GNG criterion, however, we'd need more sustained coverage in order for it to actually pass WP:GNG. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC) reply

With respect to the concern of competitions not being major, I only now noticed that the citation in the article is to the subject's self-published website, however the wins have been confirmed by other sources (e.g. [1], [2]). I'll digress that the competitions cited are not "major" enough to have their winners make the mainstream news, however the status of winning of (specifically) the Stepping Stone Competition has been cited by mainstream news sources in their determination of endorsements for young musicians (e.g. [3], [4], and less significant coverage [5]). Focusing more heavily on NMUSIC #1 and the GNG, please see 1 and 2 above, along with this news article, and this inclusion of his biography backing the claims of notability from the Quebec Contemporary Music Society. For what it's worth, his discography was aired on the radio, as demonstrated here, and here. I will plug a few of these into the article, hopefully by the time anyone is reading this. Bgv. ( talk) 01:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep: Meets WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Pianist are usually argued to be non notable but not here. Winning awards per WP:ANYBIO and performing at notable places makes the article individual notable. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 07:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete There are only 2 references that are substantially about him: The first Artsfile one and the WaPo one. Both of these, however, are reviews of specific performances and say little about him "biographically." The big problem is that most of the rest of the citations are not independent. The Forest Hill one is taken directly from his web site, as is the SMCQ one. Many of the others are mere name-checks, such as him named in the last CBC reference merely in passing. So I don't find anything independent to support a biography. Lamona ( talk) 04:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comments - Marginal. It's unclear if he's a full professor. The coverage, as noted, is not quite significant as most editors would define it. Bearian ( talk) 15:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 08:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Grampian Flyers B.C. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This may meet a little notability but in the current state lacks sources. My research showed they are trivially mention in news articles and those, doesn't seem to be notability. Per SE, doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. Redirect can also be better if there is any. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 23:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Sports, Basketball, and Scotland. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 23:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any potential redirects?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 08:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Raza Development Fund (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NORG. Non-notable CFORK. Source eval:

BEFORE found nothing that meets WP:SIRS. No objection to a consensus redirect/merge of properly sourced content to UnidosUS (I would have boldly done so but it would have been reverted).  //  Timothy ::  talk  22:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Arizona. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  I don't have a lot of knowledge about english wikipedia guidelines. If it can't stay it can be deleted ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. אקסינו ( talk) 08:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Datadog#Acquisitions where it is mentioned Star Mississippi 01:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

HDIV (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedual nomination following the closure of this RfD. The article was proposed for deletion, then blanked and redirected by 0xDeadbeef in September 2022. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 20:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Computing, and Websites. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 20:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Courtesy pings for Jay, Shhhnotsoloud, and Tavix, who participated in the previous discussion. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 20:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Redirect or Merge to Datadog as it was acquired by them. Currently the article lacks proper citations. Hkkingg ( talk) 08:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

This isn't mentioned in the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

There now seems to be a mention of HDIV at § Acquisitions. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 19:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 15:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Jacques Alberts (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. I'm thinking he goes by a nickname because I found an astonishingly low amount of hits. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and South Africa. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG. No suitable redirect per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 18:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Contributor892z ( talk) 06:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Jean Cook (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and South Africa. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Lots of coverage, but I'm not sure there's enough to suggest a WP:ATD pass. No suitable redirect per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 18:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure)‎ Geschichte ( talk) 20:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Matthew Levitt (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally created by some pro-Israeli sock puppet in 2008 that has since been perma-banned? Very sporadic updates since then. Cannot find any independent secondary sources (Washington Institute is main source of all the info, his employer, and is also a pro-Israeli thinktank?), and this reads more like some kinda WP:RESUME than anything else. I cannot think of any good way to salvage this without useful secondary and independent sources. User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 22:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 27. — ^{cyberbot I} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Terrorism, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep Passes WP:Prof#c1 on GS cites. Also WP:Author for books on counter-terrorism. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC). Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC). reply

  all the sources saying he is an important figure in counterterrorism are from his own books or the thinktank he is a part of User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 03:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep. The books alone are not enough but I found and added plenty of reviews (11 for 3 books), giving him a pass of WP:AUTHOR. I agree that there is also a case for WP:PROF#C1. The nominator's interjection of politics into the rationale for deletion is also troublesome. — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  thank you for edits and review citations.

  i didnt see matthew levitts citation count actually, kinda agree on wp:prof 1 now that he is notable, so i kinda change to weak keep maybe. not sure about wp:author.

  pointing out the politics is not troubling i think. his page reads very much like a wp:resume and does not indicate that the think tank he works at has been identified by both nytimes and others as both founded by aipac, run with money from aipac donors, and very much proisraeli.

  much of his work reflects this bias (i found his article by seeing folks uncritically cite his work as bedrock truth on wikipedia pushing that muslim brotherhood/hamas had infiltrated many if not most muslim orgs)

  much of it still reads like a wp:resume i think, especially as article takes significant amount of info from the thinktank. User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 04:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  also for future help in determining the notability of these types of articles, how did you find such book reviews?

  honestly asking, the first few page of google search when i was looking were all just his own work or the think tank, didnt know where else to search or find other sources and would love new ways to find sources for articles User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 04:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  I found many of them using a JSTOR advanced search with his name as a quoted string, checking the box restricting the search results to reviews. With that as a base, I filled in some more searching Google Scholar for works whose titles included the title of the book. E.g. search string intitle:"Hezbollah: The Global Footprint of Lebanon's Party of God". — David Eppstein ( talk) 07:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep, on WP:AUTHOR grounds. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 05:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep. Convinced by arguments and citation count (didn't see them). Still think the article could use some work. User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 05:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Nassim Nasr (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be well-sourced but none of them get the subject over the hurdle of WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. A quick source analysis: Source 1 and 2 are WP:INTERVIEWS and thus primary sources. Source 4 is an official corporate bio and thus also a primary source. Source 5 is a paid press release. Source 6 is a gallery website and thus a primary source. Sources 7, 8 and 9 are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs that do not provide WP:SIGCOV. Sources 10 and 11 appear to provide significant coverage, but it is actually marketing material. The publisher--Artoze-- describes itself as an "International Online Art Gallery ... We excel in creating strategic art events to boost the visibility of the brands helping them gain more footfall and catalyzing the business growth." This is a marketing platform, not a reliable and independent source. The final source left is 3, Slimi Magazine, whose independence is uncertain. (Other articles seem to be directly provided by the artists profiled.) Even if Slimi works for GNG, more secondary, reliable, independent sources are needed. There in particular appears to be no independent, secondary sourcing for the claims about Nasr's artistic style and approach. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 21:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Lebanon. Shellwood ( talk) 21:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination. The claim of pioneering "Expressive Color Minimalism" doesn't mean anything, because Expressive Color Minimalism is a made-up term. Diverging from the conventional gallery system, Nasr donates many of his works to schools and charitable causes. with a reference to a local arts listing. Fails WP:ARTIST -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Martin Polniš (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Young Slovak footballer who just started his career on the unremarkable second tier. Fails GNG in that a search yielded no significant and/or independent sources whatsoever. Contested draft. I don't see this being more notable in 6 months time. Geschichte ( talk) 21:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no decent coverage found. The only source giving him more than a passing mention is FC ŠTK 1914 Šamorín, which is obviously not independent. Creator has a possible WP:COI as, in their whole time here, they have only written about Polniš who, on the face of it, seems to be nothing more than your average semi-pro youth footballer. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. He may become notable one day, but nothing indicates at the moment. Svartner ( talk) 00:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete—Poorly formatted and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Anwegmann ( talk) 21:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom, also is there a WP:COI with user Pplbk with this article and the other article FC ŠTK 1914 Šamorín... Something feels iffy. Govvy ( talk) 22:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Ladislav Nagy (footballer) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Slovak footballer who played 3 minutes on the first tier before dipping into the second tier and then disappearing. Fails GNG in that there is a lack of significant and/or independent sources for a biography. Geschichte ( talk) 21:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete—Possibly WP:TOOSOON... Anwegmann ( talk) 21:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Scott Michaels (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG, with no significant secondary coverage in RS. The best I could find in a WP:BEFORE search was a few interviews in essentiallysports.com, and the rest is social media, press releases, and some coverage in WP:THESUN and WP:DAILYEXPRESS. Strong aroma of UPE here, including this addition today of a selfie, unavailable on the source claimed at Commons.

Please note that the first AFD was about a writer and filmmaker, and not about the football businessman. Wikishovel ( talk) 19:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Football, and England. Wikishovel ( talk) 19:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. Obviously promotional. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete—Almost feels like self-promotion. Anwegmann ( talk) 21:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Does feel somewhat promo, agree with nomination, this should be a straight up delete. Govvy ( talk) 21:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete – Per above. Svartner ( talk) 13:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Iron Maiden's lyrical themes and inspirations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is 95% original research (borderline WP:FANCRUFT) that has a handful of "sources" that themselves are largely poorly-cited pop website listicles, which only support a small portion of the claims here. The Iron Maiden#Musical style and influences section itself is much-better sourced and comprehensive, and sufficient without this page. ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Philosophy, Poetry, Film, Music, History, and Mythology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete as an unnecessary and short spin out. This sort of content should be covered at Iron Maiden#Musical style and influences. Very little of it is sourced and not redundant to the main article, so no need for a merge, and I don't feel like it's a particularly likely search term either, so probably doesn't require a redirect either. Sergecross73 msg me 20:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  Maybe it should be covered in this section of the main article. As an author, I think someone should try to use the content from may art to create something correct. RALFFPL ( talk) 17:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  Far too many of the entries in your article are unsourced, and without a source, would violate WP:NOR. Until this is addressed, it can't be placed in the main Iron Maiden article. Sergecross73 msg me 13:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete Unnecessary and pretty trivial. Shankargb ( talk) 02:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete but agree with User:Sergecross73 that the literary and historical themes should be covered on the band's main page, I will try and make a start on that today. Orange sticker ( talk) 11:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  As the author of the article I improved the content, added sources, links, data, and more details. Originally I planned to add to the main article info about the lyrics of Iron Maiden - mainly describing the inspirations and connections between their music and dramaturgy and lyrical content. The problem is with the band's catalog which contains numerous songs based on historical events, films, novels, etc. You may check my article and choose fragments to use them. And referring to the deleting process - if we have a bunch of info about the lyrics on the artists' arts on Wikipedia, so - why can't I write a little about IM ones? Not interesting content (?) for whom and why? I can not understand this kind of limitation and restriction policy. Regards RALFFPL ( talk) 17:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

As the author of the article Please read WP:OWN as you cannot assume ownership of an article whether you created the article or not. HorrorLover555 ( talk) 17:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry, it's about semantical context. I called myself an "author" regarding the fact I have started publishing the content, nothing less and more. Ownership is no reason, I'm just a member of the community and trying to develop some articles on Wiki. Referring to the subject of Iron Maiden lyrics I try to improve the article. Regards RALFFPL ( talk) 18:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete Unnecessary and clearly not sufficiently useful or encyclopedic information to justify preserving the page history by redirecting. Psychastes ( talk) 18:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete Definitely WP:FANCRUFT and per Sergecross73's reason. HorrorLover555 ( talk) 15:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Weak delete A topic like this certainly seems like something that could justify an article depending on how much research academics have poured into the subject (for example I'm sure a dedicated Beatlemaniac could make one for said band), but in this case I don't think the article justifies itself with enough quality sources. ★Trekker ( talk) 21:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Draftify I was skeptical at first but the subject may be notable. See [this book by Routledge https://books.google.com/books?id=DOoGDAAAQBAJ]: "...the more widely disseminated (and hence culturally significant) work of major bands such as Iron maiden...Campbell questions whether the traditionalism inherent in adopting classical paradigms undermines the ostensibly radical ideology adopted by some bands, or whether for others it simply underlines what is a surprisingly conservative standpoint"...I'm convinced by this that the subject is notable even if the article is not ready for mainspace. Ben Azura ( talk) 12:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  I dont think said article would look anything like this though. It's not currently an article, it's nothing but unsourced example bloat and name dropping. It reads more like something you'd read on a fansite or fan wikia. Sergecross73 msg me 15:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  I agree with Sergecross73. It feels like it would be more suited for the Iron Maiden fandom wiki. HorrorLover555 ( talk) 18:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  THX for your opinion, I have improved the art a lot. I think the article referring to the lyrical content of every artist which we use to describe as "legendary" is worth publishing. RALFFPL ( talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Comments - I don't suggest this is an easy deletion, but as it's currently written, this is an essay, not an article. Userfy? Bearian ( talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete a typical example of Iron Maiden fancruft which has subtly proliferated on wiki. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Aluko Damilola Grand SADG (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. This is literally a non-notable subject, no sources whatsoever to establish notability. Spammy, promotional puffery, this should probably be Speedy deleted. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 19:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Speedy per Vanderwaalforces. The article is purely about a non notable person that doesn't meet Wikipedia guidelines for entry. Promotional self creation! Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 23:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Satish Awasthi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable promotional nonsense. None of the sources in the article confer notability, most of them are either paid-for promotional pieces or listicals. Might potentially even be UPE or DUCKY. Sohom ( talk) 17:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astrology, Internet, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astrology, Internet, and Uttar Pradesh. ―  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  18:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Speedy delete G11. Mccapra ( talk) 18:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: I don't think this subject is notable under WP:NBIO from anywhere and it's references seem to be unreliable to me but I think article is only creating for a purpose of conflict of Interest. ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє], 01:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Notable I found that he has 2 YouTube Channels with million’s of Subscribers and but there are something missing in reference you can check after that it will not claim wiki guidelines please delete. Metaxtech ( talk) 18:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I've edited your comment to correctly format it. (You used {{ notable}} which creates a template and not a bolded !vote). Regarding your statement, the number of youtube followers does not have any relation with the notability of a person (please review WP:ENT and WP:GNG both of which need to satisfied for the subject to be notable). Sohom ( talk) 19:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Speedy delete - G11. Promotional nonsense. jellyfish  ✉ 19:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

•  Comment: The author of this article is currently blocked for using multiple accounts to socking on Wikipedia. Happy editing ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє] 17:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Speedy: Created by a blocked contributor and promotional. Aaron Liu ( talk) 17:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - zero reliable sources, which are required for a WP:BLP. The current consensus is that even 8 million followers is not enough for automatic inclusion at the English Wikipedia, although I would be more lenient. Bearian ( talk) 15:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Bukit Jalil National Secondary School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable school fails to satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations see WP:NSCHOOL. Existing sources show passing mentions only and a before comes up with nothing of note. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Malaysia. Theroadislong ( talk) 17:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

It is a Malaysian article, you don't search Bukit Jalil National Secondary School which is the non-native name and expect to find a lot of things. As per the Wikipedia article, the school is commonly referred to as 'SMK Bukit Jalil' and 'Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Bukit Jalil.' Here are the materials/citations that I've not put and put some are in Malay and some are not. In the mean time the article has been moved to draft.

1. https://www.mymrt.com.my/ms/info-truck-year/2018-ms/page/3/?post_type=mrt-info-truck
2. https://bjalil.pimaxis.my/pendidikan.html
3. https://www.limkokwing.net/cambodia/news/article/smk_bukit_jalil_students_visit_limkokwing_university
4. https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2024/03/31/freak-thunderstorm-wreaks-havoc-in-government-housing-schemes-in-kl
5. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/community/2006/10/27/latecomer-still-shines-in-handball
6. https://unclekentang.com/blog/2020/03/11/taklimat-cpr-kepada-350-badan-unit-beruniform-smk-bukit-jalil/
7. http://kmz.com.my/?page_id=417

N niyaz ( talk) 17:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ―  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  18:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Comment You have clearly misunderstood what we mean by significant coverage, all of the above are passing mentions only. Theroadislong ( talk) 18:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom, no sign of notability of any flavour. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 18:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom; notability nowhere near established. Feline Hymnic ( talk) 22:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom; searching for further coverage under the "commonly referred to" names referenced in the first comment here doesn't dredge up anything supporting notability either. Chiselinccc ( talk) 06:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Šimon Horniak (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Now, this is a Slovak footballer who seems to fail WP:GNG massively. Had a first-tier career that lasted one or two minutes, and nothing in the way of biographical sourcing. Geschichte ( talk) 16:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. Shellwood ( talk) 17:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete – Per nom. Svartner ( talk) 09:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete – I can't find any coverage of him on Slovak news websites. SME sub-website My Nitra is only a passing mention in squad announcement, and very unlikely to coverage due to being paywalled. Clara A. Djalim ( talk) 10:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete—Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Anwegmann ( talk) 21:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Air Dravida (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikilover3509 ( talk · contribs) attempted to start a second nomination for this article, but wound up adding it on to the the first nomination. Their rationale follows:

Fails to meet WP:GNG. Even the website of the promoter Zircon International which is included as an external link draws a blank.

This article did survive that prior AfD from 2010 (and a contested PROD before that), but both of the "keeps" from then warned that the article needed to be significantly improved to avoid renomination. It has since been tagged as a potential WP:CORP failure—which might be the more relevant guideline here—since 2019. All that being said, my involvement is mainly procedural and I have no real opinion or further comment at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Travel and tourism, Aviation, and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: This talks about the airlines in general at the time it was to launch [6], but that seems to be the extent of coverage. Delete for a lack of sourcing. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: it was just a project which died before the launch. Charlie ( talk) 04:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted‎ by Deb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as " G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Radio Jupiter (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AFC draft moved to mainspace by author. Sources don't show notability, redirect to Radio Caroline? IgelRM ( talk) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United Kingdom. IgelRM ( talk) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Draftify: I don't think Radio Caroline is the right answer. I think this requires work to show notability, since kt fails WP:NCORP currently. Draft space is a place to work with little pressure 🇺🇦  Fiddle^Timtrent  Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete or Draftify - This article does not speak for itself. It does not explain to a reader why the station is notable, and Wikipedia is written for the readers. This has been a contested draftify, so if this article is draftified here, it may not be moved back to article space except via AFC. Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete To anyone in 2024, this is a bog-standard Internet oldies station run by who are now older personnel. This is no different from a known commercial radio station keeping an older staff member on Saturday mornings for listener goodwill so they don't get 'Cruel megabroadcaster fires innocent DJ for being too old' headlines. The N for Radio Caroline cannot extend to something that was created well after its existence ended as a nostalgia appeal. Nate • ( chatter) 18:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per Nate - my thoughts exactly. RobinCarmody ( talk) 18:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: PROMO with no coverage in RS. This is a different Radio Jupiter [7], nothing else found. I don't think the redirect as suggested would help. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete, promo piece on a 'radio station' with zero evidence of notability. Do not draftify, as there has been plenty of time for the necessary sources to be gathered, and if nothing has turned up in the past few years, I can't see that suddenly changing in the next few months. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 10:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator‎ since DRV for previous AfD is still open. Owen× ☎ 16:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Connecteam (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourcing does not meet GNG/ WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. Previous AfD significantly manipulated by editors now blocked for spamming. HighKing ⁺⁺ 15:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. HighKing ⁺⁺ 15:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Pinging previous contributors Alpha3031, thetechie and the closer BoraVoro. 4 of the previous Keep !voters now appear to have been blocked for likely COI / sock/meat puppetry. HighKing ⁺⁺ 15:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Apologies I reopened this before noticing it was at DRV. Probably no real harm as it was heading towards an early renomination anyway but no issues if someone wants to close this early. HighKing ⁺⁺ 15:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Henry Foster III (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Members of the San Diego City Council or of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors are not presumptively notable based on WP:NPOL. They have to pass WP:GNG or at least WP:ANYBIO. This subject lacks in all, the sources presented in the article and from WP:BEFORE can not be used to the establish notability of this subject based on GNG. Sources are either lacking in independence or mostly in significant coverage of the subject. Most are WP:ROUTINE coverages which provide nothing but an announcement of Foster winning the seat or what have we, while some are result sheets, etc. Nothing to establish notability here. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 15:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete This could be deleted as WP:ONEEVENT - all we have is that he ran for a local office and won. The only personal details are from non-independent sources (his campaign web site). Everything else is routine local election stuff, and those articles are quite short with little information about him. Lamona ( talk) 05:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - while I am sympathetic, I think the consensus is that the city of San Diego isn't big or prominent enough to convey automatic notability to all its public officials. He won with less than 9,000 votes. Bearian ( talk) 15:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/ _Rational 16:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Jerome K. Moore (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this BLP about an artist working in comics and animation, and added a reference. I cannot find more coverage, however, so do not think he meets WP:GNG, WP:NARTIST or WP:ANYBIO. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Visual arts, Comics and animation, and Maine. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Netherzone ( talk) 15:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete. Just a single source in the article, and my searches are not finding anything else. Does not meet WP:ARTIST at this time. Elspea756 ( talk) 13:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete It's a real shame that the folks who edited this article didn't give any indication of where they got the info. I can't find anything but name-checks and most of those are in bibliographical listings (e.g. names of those who contributed to specific comics). Lamona ( talk) 05:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete I am not finding any references for the biographical information presented in the article. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 00:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Tonga national rugby union players as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 01:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Soane Asi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find references on Google. Doesn't meet WP:SPORTBASIC Shinadamina ( talk) 14:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and Rugby union. Shinadamina ( talk) 14:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. The only reliable information for him is on this ESPN page, that provides a mediocre amount of information. Other than that I couldn't find any reliable sources on him. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 ^{(The Garage)} 14:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  I found some more information KoreanDragon ( talk) 20:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: ESPN is about the extent of coverage. Some unrelated linkedin posts, nothing else for notability I can find. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  The Linkedin profile stated that it was him, as seen in the info.

  "My name is Soane Asi being working as Lab Technician for Winstone for 23 years migrates from the Kingdom of Tonga 1987 after the very first Rugby World Cup where I represent Tonga I play as an Utility Backs from 2nd Five eight to Full Back but I play my first game on wing against Canada.

  Back Home I work for the ministry of Works as a Technical Officers for 8 years. Graduate with a Civil Engineering Diploma on Road Constructions 2 years Study on Ministry of Works Courses." KoreanDragon ( talk) 10:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to List of Tonga national rugby union players Some sourcing exists, but difficult to judge whether it would pass WP:GNG with offline coverage, redirect is a suitable WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 18:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Star Mississippi 01:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Puerto Rico Challenge (college baseball) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Baseball tournament scheduled for 2025 fails WP:GNG. All sources are press releases from the participating teams or sponsor organization. The only media coverage ( [8], [9]) is churnalism regurgitating the press releases and cannot support notability per WP:NEWSORG. Until there is sufficient WP:SIGCOV in secondary, independent, reliable sources, it's WP:TOOSOON for this article. As an AtD, I propose to draftify, since I expect there will be coverage next year closer to or after the event. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 14:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Baseball, and Puerto Rico. Owen× ☎ 15:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Let'srun ( talk) 01:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Draftify per nom. Current coverage is limited to routine announcements. Frank Anchor 14:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 14:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Jalen Schlachter (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable football player. Sources are all standard run-of-the-mill sources so failed GNG, never played in the NFL, pedestrian college football carer. Wizardman 13:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Wizardman 13:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Michigan. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: No coverage found for this person; playing college football alone isn't notable. Not meeting notability requirements. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Unable to find any WP:SIGCOV for the subject to meet the WP:GNG, only some routine mentions in articles about other players. This [ [10]] may be WP:SIGCOV but it is paywalled. Let'srun ( talk) 15:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment. Some coverage is available here, here, here, here, and here. Ejgreen77 ( talk) 02:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  I saw that coverage but it all fails WP:YOUNGATH in my opinion. Other minds may differ. Let'srun ( talk) 13:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/ _Rational 14:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Md Moin Khan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bangladeshi military officer fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. No WP:SIGCOV in any WP:SIRS; coverage cited in article (and found in BEFORE search) is WP:TRIVIALMENTION. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 12:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Bangladesh. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment Delete I can only find trivial mentions of the subject in English language sources but would like to know whether there is anything available in Bengali before voting. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 19:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Searches in Bengali found the same sort of thing as what is available in English - press releases announcing promotions/assignments or mentioning in passing that he inaugurated a golf tournament. [11] [12] [13] No significant coverage to justify an article. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 00:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete No significant coverage. Ontor22 ( talk) 11:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WorldBruce. There is not enough coverage. Zakaria ښه راغلاست ( talk) 00:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Only WP:TRIVIALMENTION and fails GNG-- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 11:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Despite the lack of explict !votes other than two keeps, the keep arguments are not strong. As commenters touch upon, we need to know more about those possible sources. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 21:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Embassy of Italy, Tirana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is based on 1 primary source and merely confirms it exists. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 07:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Albania, and Italy. LibStar ( talk) 07:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Like many other embassies, this one occupies an architecturally significant building. The corresponding article in the Albanian Wikipedia at sq:Ambasada_Italiane_në_Tiranë, provides some information abut the building's status as a Cultural Monument of Albania that I have added to the English article. Several photos of the embassy are on Commons at commons:Category:Embassy_of_Italy,_Tirana. It is always a good idea to check an article's counterpart in the Wikipedias of other languages before nominating it for deletion. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 08:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• I disagree with Eastmain, the fact that other languages have content on a subject does not mean that it is notable. I am not able to read AR and ARZ Wikipedia (I'm not even sure which languages they are without looking it up) but it looks like they may have more sources. I was not able to find any sources with a quick search but one may have to use other languages or look up a different phrase. ✶Qux yz ✶ 13:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep: Listed cultural monuments will have documentation on file with the corresponding authorities; I see no reason to believe this one wouldn't. I can't read Albanian but some Gsearch and Gtranslate brings up at least a few mentions of this building. Oaktree b ( talk) 19:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment: Here's the listing: https://iktk.gov.al/site/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Vendim-nr.-32-date-07.02.2023-Ambasada-Italiane.pdf Oaktree b ( talk) 19:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  Perhaps redirect to the "Cultural Monument of Albania"? Oaktree b ( talk) 20:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Moxie Software (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. Annoyingly the company appears to have changed its name several times (previously BSG Alliance and nGenera), so an AfD rather than a PROD just to make sure I'm not missing anything. Best sources I could find: [14] [15] [16]... "not great" would be an understatement. – Tera tix ₵ 07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, California, and Texas. – Tera tix ₵ 07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ⁺⁺ 20:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 08:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Akbar Shandermani (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL, WP:NPROF, and not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 12:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Comment I can’t read Farsi but he may be a GNG pass. A Google books search brings up his name in multiple publications though I can’t judge which are in-depth or independent. Mccapra ( talk) 12:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  @ Mccapra Yes, these are things I did as WP:BEFORE, they're mostly not about him directly but about events he's involved in or something of that nature. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 13:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Iran. Shellwood ( talk) 13:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 14:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Piwik PRO Analytics Suite (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I appreciate the paid disclosure from the creator of this article, but I don't see this meeting NCORP and it should have gone through AfC. Similar appears to be have been deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piwik PRO, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piwik PRO (2nd nomination). Disregarding that, none of the sources are sufficient to pass NCORP, many are press releases or primary sources related to the company. There's a bunch of statistic sites (e.g. [17]), which in counts as trivial coverage under "inclusion in collections that have indiscriminate inclusion criteria". Other trivial coverage under ncorp includes raising capital ( [18]). Many supposed third-party sources are written or possibly written by the company and thus primary ( [19] is written by their PR manager, [20] is written by a "guest writer", and covers a merger which is also trivial coverage). BEFORE search only turns up more of the same. Pahunkat ( talk) 10:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Pahunkat ( talk) 10:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Internet, Software, and Poland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete. As per my previous assessment of this aricle before my BLAR, I substantially agree with the assessment of potential sources. All I have to add is that I reiterate my recomendation to the article creator that any such future edits go through the appropriate processes ( Wikipedia:Articles for creation, Wikipedia:Edit requests). The community's patience is not infinite, and while I do not pretend to be a barometer in this specific regard, moving through the proper channels may reduce the pace at which such patience wears. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Sources fail WP:ORGCRIT, and BEFORE search turns up nothing else. Should this discussion result in deletion, I recommend WP:SALTing "Piwik Pro" and permutations of it given persistent efforts to reject community consensus and evade appropriate channels like AfC for paid edits. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 14:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/ _Rational 14:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Ahsan Akbar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Based on the previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Devil's Thumbprint, I still do not think this passes WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. There is not enough SIGCOV in RSs to establish notability. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 10:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Poetry, Bangladesh, and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Agree with the nominator. - AlbeitPK ( talk) 16:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep - Clearly notable. Not just as a poet/columnist, but also as a successful cultural producer/entrepreneur whose literary festival is the biggest of its kind in one of the world's largest countries (at least three times bigger than the UK by population). Anglophones may or may not be aware of it, but that is utterly irrelevant to the Bangladesh-based popularity of Dhaka LitFest. -- Peripatetic ( talk) 12:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 11:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete References appear to be not about him, notability not established; unclear why his role in Dhaka LitFest meets notability thresholds. Royal Autumn Crest ( talk) 11:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Some sources are primary but I am sure there will notability in the future. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 07:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Piano Island Festival (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a non-notable festival with no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. A Google News search yields only a few passing mentions, but nothing that satisfies WP:GNG. GSS  ^💬 13:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Singapore. GSS  ^💬 13:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 08:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Tony Dyer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. None of the offices the subject occupies/occupied can make them inherently notable under NPOL. GNG is not passable as there are insufficient sources. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 09:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete: Minimal coverage for the city position, simply standing as a candidate isn't notable enough for here. Not meeting notability, I can't find anything beyond confirmation of the city position. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Don't meet WP:NPOL. Unverifiable contents. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 15:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Shane Merrill (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL as he was defeated in the run for a seat in South Dakota State Senate. WP:GNG is not passable as the sources are WP:RUNOFTHEMILL/ WP:ROUTINE and do not provide WP:SIGCOV. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 09:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and South Dakota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Delete: Being the Chairman of a political party is not enough to bear notability per WP:NPOL. However, good redirecting to the party will be good also. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 20:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to 2007 Rugby World Cup squads#Portgual. Star Mississippi 01:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Diogo Gama (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Shinadamina ( talk) 18:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. Fails WP:SPORTBASIC Shinadamina ( talk) 07:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Portugal. Shinadamina ( talk) 18:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Suggest a procedural keep as no rationale for deletion has been presented. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 19:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Speedy Keep: WP:CSK#1 applies as no deletion rationale has been presented. Let'srun ( talk) 21:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC) reply

I apologize, I have added the rationale now. Shinadamina ( talk) 07:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to 2007 Rugby World Cup squads#Portgual Featured at a World Cup and for a minor nation, struggling to see suitable sourcing but there maybe more offline. Redirect a suitable WP:ATD for now. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment. A week has not passed since the rationale was added. It should have been there the moment the AfD was posted, not tagged on later. This should have been closed immediately for lack of rationale. The original lack of rationale suggests WP:BEFORE issue. The lack of rationale other than noting lack of sources, including failure to discuss notability, still suggests WP:BEFORE issue. Do we know anything about the individual covered by the article? Did the nominator "take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources"? Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 03:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes, I have searched google and unable to find proper news articles on this individual. If you can find any, please post here. Shinadamina ( talk) 18:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, X ( talk) 09:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to 2007 Rugby World Cup squads#Portgual per above. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 22:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 08:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Rodolfo Carter (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. This article says nothing other than the subject is a mayor which fails NPOL. The sources are obvious WP:ROUTINE coverages and do not count towards GNG either. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 08:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Chile. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. Mccapra ( talk) 18:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Weak delete: I don't agree with lacking WP:GNG rather particular about WP:NPOL which the article slightly meets. Safari Scribe ^{Edits! Talk!} 07:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply

  It's either a subject meets a notability guideline, or it doesn't, there's nothing like "slightly meets" or "almost meets" or whatever. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 08:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Zella Day. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 21:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

DayxDay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn't find significant coverage in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Zella Day. toweli ( talk) 06:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. toweli ( talk) 06:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 11:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to Zella Day: per nomination. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 12:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗ plicit 11:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Sergey Vabishchevich (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite a few games for Dinamo Brest many years ago, I can't find any WP:SIGCOV of the footballer of this name. I found kick-off.by and football.by but neither of these are even close to significant. There is a basketball player with the same name but they are different people as the basketball player celebrates his birthday on 4 June. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Belarus. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner ( talk) 16:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete—Several games and then nothing at all. Fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann ( talk) 21:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

List of diplomatic missions of the Luhansk People's Republic (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Aldij ( talk) 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Aldij ( talk) 11:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Lists. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Delete Already covered elsewhere. Does not need an article. Abhishek0831996 ( talk) 12:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply