The result was no consensus. There's no consensus here for a particular outcome. Discussion about the article can continue on its talk page, if desired. North America 1000 12:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
All the coverage relates it to being set up by people from Cambridge Analytica following the scandal Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar ( talk) 01:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
00:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced article since 2009, no evidence of notability in the text beyond the fact that he has play some shows, which does not pass WP:MUSICBIO. Searching for coverage brings up nothing on this artist beyond start concert and festival listings. InDimensional ( talk) 21:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The only notable thing in the article seems to be a 3rd prize in a dubious "Song of the Year" award in Estonia. There is a citation but it links to a recording of a radio show which is in Estonian. Searching for information about this award or any coverage of the subject brings up absolutely nothing apart from the artist's socials. Additionally the article was written by the subject or his staff as WP:PROMO InDimensional ( talk) 20:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability in the article. The closest claim to notability is a Grammy nomination which was for another artists album that he had a hand in writing one song on. Searching for coverage brings up an interview with him on the PreSonus blog, which is just the subject talking about himself and not significant enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. InDimensional ( talk) 20:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and no support for Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD was contested in 2011, but there have been no meaningful changes to the article since then besides the addition of a book cover image. WP:BEFORE provides no direct information on the book besides a few advertisements and passing mentions, and some extremely brief quotations or citations in works that describe the whole of H. G. Wells' career. The quotation it is "best known for" appears once in the literature relevant to it that I could find (which I do not have access to): [6] Recon rabbit 20:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
An article about a football player that doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion in the encyclopedia and WP:SPORTSBASIC. No news hit on Google news except sports database—lacks SIGCOV! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Previously prodded, deprodded, and then redirected, but there is no good redirect target. Could be merged into culture media or enrichment culture but unclear if topic is notable and deletion may be best. Mdewman6 ( talk) 19:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Promotional, unreferenced article on organisation that doesn't seem to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. on the basis of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. I'll just add that there have been about two dozen AFDs on articles in this same model for different countries and except for this one and Sports broadcasting contracts in Estonia, I have seen no support for Keeping these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
18:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 18:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 18:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hugh Herbert#Selected filmography. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:NFILM / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. given references that have been added. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unref article, and I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 17:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep/withdaw. (non-admin closure) -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 15:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
BLP fails WP:GNG. only sources are Databases. -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 16:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Pakistan women ODI cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
BLP fails WP:GNG. only sources are Databases. -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 16:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No sources outside of crypto pubs, which are not notable per WP:NCRYPTO. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No signs of news coverage, only coverage is in books about cram schools in clearly passing coverage. Even if we take the (now dead) Japanpost links at face value they are, at best, routine coverage. Fails WP:GNG pretty clearly. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No real evidence of notability, and tagged as non-notable for years without improvement. Previously deleted and salted at Screams of Cold Winter * Pppery * it has begun... 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NATFEAT. "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. [...] If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river". The small island seems to be of little significance, with no hope of expanding it to an encyclopedic article. Geschichte ( talk) 15:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
While the WP:SURMOUNTABLE issues noted in the first AfD are addressed (incl. the self-penned stuff about "his passion for cars and the motor industry", "[being] instrumental in establishing Navan's Energy Radio [..] from a garden shed" and "his love of drama"), there is still nothing to indicate that the applicable notability criteria are met. In terms of:
I am, TBH, annoyed at myself for staying on the fence in the second AfD. And remain baffled by the "keep" recommendations in the first AfD (indicating that two of the five refs somehow and unequivocally supported GNG; When they're the same refs we have today; Still clearly not independent and/or passing mentions.) Anyway, while I'm loathe to relitigate, as the last AfD was "no consensus", and as (despite significant effort) I can't justify removing the hatnotes, I'm left with AfD (again).
TLDR version. Subject is a jobbing radio presenter. Like any other. Who also works as a voice artist. Doing station idents and the like. And was once an extra in a film. With insufficient coverage to expand the article beyond a NOTCV "list of jobs" the subject's had. And no independent biographical coverage contributing to notability. The WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMO issues (clear in the article's initial creation) also remain difficult to overlook. Guliolopez ( talk) 15:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 06:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage on the web and clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO InDimensional ( talk) 13:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
14:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about an actor, and added a reference, but cannot see significant coverage which would meet WP:GNG. His strongest claim to notability as an actor is his role as the friend of the protagonist in Ace Lightning, but I do not think this meets WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There's some desire expressed to keep or redirect the page to the film, but discussion consensus is that insufficient reliable sources exist to support the page as a biography of a person not clearly proven deceased. I'm going to redirect the deleted page to the film, per thoughts expressed in this discussion. BusterD ( talk) 12:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
This biography was originally deleted 15 June 2020 due to "lack of in-depth sources". The same objections apply to the recreated article: subject does not meet notability under WP:NACTOR, which requires "significant roles in multiple notable films". Muzilon ( talk) 03:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
04:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
09:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is close to being reached. Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
14:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this actor, and cannot find reliable sources to add. The article has been tagged as an unreferenced BLP since December 2023. I do not think he meets WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg ( talk) 08:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for the previously unreferenced BLP on this Flatland BMX rider, and added two references. They are brief mentions, however, and I cannot see WP:SIGCOV of him. He does not meet WP:NCYC. Tacyarg ( talk) 07:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cake that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. This should be turned into a redirect to cake, which should include a sentence stating "White cake, named after the color of the crumb, is made without using egg yolks". BaduFerreira ( talk) 13:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cake that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. BaduFerreira ( talk) 13:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is my absolutely favorite type of cake but I don't think this makes me involved here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 06:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT or WP:NTENNIS. LibStar ( talk) 04:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I could not find any reliable secondary sources. For the sources in the article:
10 is sourced to an article that also only mentions the software once. QuietCicada chirp 15:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for newly found source eval.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
17:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
01:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
06:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't see any reliable source secondary coverage on this person. I do see a lot of primary sources - stuff Lyn Squire himself wrote. Unfortunately, that does not meet WP:GNG. His writings claim a few mid-level positions at the World Bank, but I can't even find coverage of those in secondary sources. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
c'mon. Curbon7 ( talk) 16:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
An orphan article. Given the period when he lived, it was difficult to find sources. Small mentions come up in google books and Australian database trove. But nothing indepth to meet WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 05:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass GNG or NACTOR. Has had no significant roles in the mentioned films. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 05:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Almost entirely unreferenced time capsule from 2011. No evidence of notability. Previously deleted and salted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LARP_Alliance * Pppery * it has begun... 03:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
03:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:REFBOMBed with sources that only mention the organization in passing but don't provide the required in-depth, independent coverage. Previously deleted and salted as IPE Global * Pppery * it has begun... 02:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
an unsourced article about roosevelt's activities in oyster bay created by a user called user:inoysterbay violates at least 4 policies and guidelines ( WP:V, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:GNG, WP:COI). ltb d l ( talk) 02:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Searching for this is hopelessly masked by the former military facility in California, but judging by the topos it appears to have been a literal camp. The oldest topos don't show it or the main buildings there; then it abruptly appears. If someone could shed some moe light on this it would be helpful. Mangoe ( talk) 02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:REFBOMBed with sources that only mention the organization in passing but don't provide the required in-depth, independent coverage. Previously deleted and salted as IPE Global * Pppery * it has begun... 02:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:TOOSOON. Way too early yet for this article to exist. CycloneYoris talk! 02:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Normally, I'd redirect but there arguments against a redirect so I won't take that step myself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The lack of anything but a few houses at a crossroads, most of which appear to be modern, suggests that the entire history of the place is that of the post office. Does not appear be a real settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 01:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The article ultimately does not reach the notability criteria for any points of WP:ACADEMIC. It best approaches point 7, which it seems to rely on, but even there it lacks the widespread coverage in independent sources usually necessary to establish notability.
As an associate professor, Fiesler doesn't currently hold a high-level position in academia or has demonstrably had a large scholarly influence over her subject area ( human-centered computing). Five out of seven of the article's sources are primary ( [37] [38] [39] [40] [41]) and the remaining two are local news ( [42] [43]), which are outlined in WP:NOTABILITY as not being sufficient enough to demonstrate a subject's notability. The Slate article is itself written by Fiesler and as such can't be used to demonstrate notabiltiy here. Looking into Fiesler online, news articles about her are either those she authored, are exclusively local, or contain passing quotations/comments on her work, all of which cannot demonstrate notability per the specific criteria notes. GuardianH ( talk) 01:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
References
A small number of quotations [...] is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark.[elided as this isn't a local article].
Casey Fiesler, an information science professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, said she did not want to downplay any potential menace, but it was possible that students who had noticed increased fear of school violence among their peers were hoping to get attention. TikTok has moderators and guidelines that prohibit posts promoting or threatening violence, but Fiesler said such rules could be circumvented by savvy users. And she noted that TikTok’s accessibility — its algorithm means posts from people with relatively small followings on the platform have a “much higher” chance of being widely circulated — allows for “content that would otherwise maybe not spread as much [to] go viral.” .... Fiesler, the Colorado professor, offered a hypothetical scenario of a student pulling a fire alarm to skip an exam. It could be “the same kind of thing, just at a much larger scale,” she said.
the fact that multiple news sources showcase her work indicates notability, and as the main author, i consider the fact that i can [write] three+ paragraphs with independent, reliable sources on nearly every sentence indicates notability.— Okay, first of all, not all news sources are made the same. WP:ACADEMIC and WP:NOTABILITY specify independent, reliable sources to prove significant coverage. The bulk of the articles here are, as I've pointed out, not independent, and they also happen to be local, which itself can't prove notability. GuardianH ( talk) 03:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
12 awardsclaim, a reliable source demonstrating the NSF Career award is
significantenough to demonstrate it is a
highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level, [1] and when you cited the White House visit, you provided Instagram, which is not a reliable source. Even so, a visit to the White House does not fit any part of the notability criteria laid out in WP:ACADEMIC.
one of the two leading academic conferences in all of human-centered computing. Digging reveals that she is a co-chair of one (Organizing Committee) of three committees – Organizing Committee, Program Committee, Steering Committee — rather than chair of the entire organization itself. GuardianH ( talk) 04:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC) GuardianH ( talk) 04:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Please don’t “bite the newbie” but if an article for deletion and the story of her making a tiktok being surprised about having a Wikipedia page manages to make the main stream media or highly viewed on tiktok could that in it of itself be controversial enough to warrant a Wikipedia page? My great grandpa was a 1 star army general and his a Wikipedia but he didn’t do much and they don’t delete him, in fact all he only appears on Google as his Wikipedia page and list of ww1 veterans - anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.11.80 ( talk) 22:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:A7 and WP:G12 by User:Deb (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 01:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. This seems like a rare instance of an article subject whose article has been deleted multiple times, now being seen as notable. I'll remove the "salt" tag since I see a consensus now to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of Autostrad. Sources largely do not contain significant coverage of the band. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There's no consensus here for a particular outcome. Discussion about the article can continue on its talk page, if desired. North America 1000 12:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
All the coverage relates it to being set up by people from Cambridge Analytica following the scandal Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar ( talk) 01:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
00:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced article since 2009, no evidence of notability in the text beyond the fact that he has play some shows, which does not pass WP:MUSICBIO. Searching for coverage brings up nothing on this artist beyond start concert and festival listings. InDimensional ( talk) 21:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The only notable thing in the article seems to be a 3rd prize in a dubious "Song of the Year" award in Estonia. There is a citation but it links to a recording of a radio show which is in Estonian. Searching for information about this award or any coverage of the subject brings up absolutely nothing apart from the artist's socials. Additionally the article was written by the subject or his staff as WP:PROMO InDimensional ( talk) 20:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability in the article. The closest claim to notability is a Grammy nomination which was for another artists album that he had a hand in writing one song on. Searching for coverage brings up an interview with him on the PreSonus blog, which is just the subject talking about himself and not significant enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. InDimensional ( talk) 20:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and no support for Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD was contested in 2011, but there have been no meaningful changes to the article since then besides the addition of a book cover image. WP:BEFORE provides no direct information on the book besides a few advertisements and passing mentions, and some extremely brief quotations or citations in works that describe the whole of H. G. Wells' career. The quotation it is "best known for" appears once in the literature relevant to it that I could find (which I do not have access to): [6] Recon rabbit 20:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
An article about a football player that doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion in the encyclopedia and WP:SPORTSBASIC. No news hit on Google news except sports database—lacks SIGCOV! Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Previously prodded, deprodded, and then redirected, but there is no good redirect target. Could be merged into culture media or enrichment culture but unclear if topic is notable and deletion may be best. Mdewman6 ( talk) 19:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Promotional, unreferenced article on organisation that doesn't seem to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. on the basis of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. I'll just add that there have been about two dozen AFDs on articles in this same model for different countries and except for this one and Sports broadcasting contracts in Estonia, I have seen no support for Keeping these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Very simply, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Note that I'm unfortunately nominating a lot of pages separately here because there is consensus at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sports_broadcasting_contracts_in_Serbia that these shouldn't be nominated together. BrigadierG ( talk) 16:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
18:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 18:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 18:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Panama women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hugh Herbert#Selected filmography. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:NFILM / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. given references that have been added. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Unref article, and I couldn't find sources to show it meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 17:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep/withdaw. (non-admin closure) -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 15:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
BLP fails WP:GNG. only sources are Databases. -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 16:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Pakistan women ODI cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
BLP fails WP:GNG. only sources are Databases. -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 16:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No sources outside of crypto pubs, which are not notable per WP:NCRYPTO. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No signs of news coverage, only coverage is in books about cram schools in clearly passing coverage. Even if we take the (now dead) Japanpost links at face value they are, at best, routine coverage. Fails WP:GNG pretty clearly. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No real evidence of notability, and tagged as non-notable for years without improvement. Previously deleted and salted at Screams of Cold Winter * Pppery * it has begun... 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NATFEAT. "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. [...] If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river". The small island seems to be of little significance, with no hope of expanding it to an encyclopedic article. Geschichte ( talk) 15:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
While the WP:SURMOUNTABLE issues noted in the first AfD are addressed (incl. the self-penned stuff about "his passion for cars and the motor industry", "[being] instrumental in establishing Navan's Energy Radio [..] from a garden shed" and "his love of drama"), there is still nothing to indicate that the applicable notability criteria are met. In terms of:
I am, TBH, annoyed at myself for staying on the fence in the second AfD. And remain baffled by the "keep" recommendations in the first AfD (indicating that two of the five refs somehow and unequivocally supported GNG; When they're the same refs we have today; Still clearly not independent and/or passing mentions.) Anyway, while I'm loathe to relitigate, as the last AfD was "no consensus", and as (despite significant effort) I can't justify removing the hatnotes, I'm left with AfD (again).
TLDR version. Subject is a jobbing radio presenter. Like any other. Who also works as a voice artist. Doing station idents and the like. And was once an extra in a film. With insufficient coverage to expand the article beyond a NOTCV "list of jobs" the subject's had. And no independent biographical coverage contributing to notability. The WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMO issues (clear in the article's initial creation) also remain difficult to overlook. Guliolopez ( talk) 15:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 06:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage on the web and clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO InDimensional ( talk) 13:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
14:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about an actor, and added a reference, but cannot see significant coverage which would meet WP:GNG. His strongest claim to notability as an actor is his role as the friend of the protagonist in Ace Lightning, but I do not think this meets WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There's some desire expressed to keep or redirect the page to the film, but discussion consensus is that insufficient reliable sources exist to support the page as a biography of a person not clearly proven deceased. I'm going to redirect the deleted page to the film, per thoughts expressed in this discussion. BusterD ( talk) 12:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
This biography was originally deleted 15 June 2020 due to "lack of in-depth sources". The same objections apply to the recreated article: subject does not meet notability under WP:NACTOR, which requires "significant roles in multiple notable films". Muzilon ( talk) 03:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
04:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
09:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is close to being reached. Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk)
14:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this actor, and cannot find reliable sources to add. The article has been tagged as an unreferenced BLP since December 2023. I do not think he meets WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg ( talk) 08:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for the previously unreferenced BLP on this Flatland BMX rider, and added two references. They are brief mentions, however, and I cannot see WP:SIGCOV of him. He does not meet WP:NCYC. Tacyarg ( talk) 07:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cake that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. This should be turned into a redirect to cake, which should include a sentence stating "White cake, named after the color of the crumb, is made without using egg yolks". BaduFerreira ( talk) 13:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cake that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. BaduFerreira ( talk) 13:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is my absolutely favorite type of cake but I don't think this makes me involved here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 06:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT or WP:NTENNIS. LibStar ( talk) 04:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I could not find any reliable secondary sources. For the sources in the article:
10 is sourced to an article that also only mentions the software once. QuietCicada chirp 15:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for newly found source eval.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
17:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
01:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
06:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't see any reliable source secondary coverage on this person. I do see a lot of primary sources - stuff Lyn Squire himself wrote. Unfortunately, that does not meet WP:GNG. His writings claim a few mid-level positions at the World Bank, but I can't even find coverage of those in secondary sources. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
c'mon. Curbon7 ( talk) 16:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
An orphan article. Given the period when he lived, it was difficult to find sources. Small mentions come up in google books and Australian database trove. But nothing indepth to meet WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 05:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass GNG or NACTOR. Has had no significant roles in the mentioned films. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 05:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Almost entirely unreferenced time capsule from 2011. No evidence of notability. Previously deleted and salted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LARP_Alliance * Pppery * it has begun... 03:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
03:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:REFBOMBed with sources that only mention the organization in passing but don't provide the required in-depth, independent coverage. Previously deleted and salted as IPE Global * Pppery * it has begun... 02:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
an unsourced article about roosevelt's activities in oyster bay created by a user called user:inoysterbay violates at least 4 policies and guidelines ( WP:V, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:GNG, WP:COI). ltb d l ( talk) 02:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Searching for this is hopelessly masked by the former military facility in California, but judging by the topos it appears to have been a literal camp. The oldest topos don't show it or the main buildings there; then it abruptly appears. If someone could shed some moe light on this it would be helpful. Mangoe ( talk) 02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:REFBOMBed with sources that only mention the organization in passing but don't provide the required in-depth, independent coverage. Previously deleted and salted as IPE Global * Pppery * it has begun... 02:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs)
02:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:TOOSOON. Way too early yet for this article to exist. CycloneYoris talk! 02:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Normally, I'd redirect but there arguments against a redirect so I won't take that step myself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The lack of anything but a few houses at a crossroads, most of which appear to be modern, suggests that the entire history of the place is that of the post office. Does not appear be a real settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 01:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a clear consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The article ultimately does not reach the notability criteria for any points of WP:ACADEMIC. It best approaches point 7, which it seems to rely on, but even there it lacks the widespread coverage in independent sources usually necessary to establish notability.
As an associate professor, Fiesler doesn't currently hold a high-level position in academia or has demonstrably had a large scholarly influence over her subject area ( human-centered computing). Five out of seven of the article's sources are primary ( [37] [38] [39] [40] [41]) and the remaining two are local news ( [42] [43]), which are outlined in WP:NOTABILITY as not being sufficient enough to demonstrate a subject's notability. The Slate article is itself written by Fiesler and as such can't be used to demonstrate notabiltiy here. Looking into Fiesler online, news articles about her are either those she authored, are exclusively local, or contain passing quotations/comments on her work, all of which cannot demonstrate notability per the specific criteria notes. GuardianH ( talk) 01:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
References
A small number of quotations [...] is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark.[elided as this isn't a local article].
Casey Fiesler, an information science professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, said she did not want to downplay any potential menace, but it was possible that students who had noticed increased fear of school violence among their peers were hoping to get attention. TikTok has moderators and guidelines that prohibit posts promoting or threatening violence, but Fiesler said such rules could be circumvented by savvy users. And she noted that TikTok’s accessibility — its algorithm means posts from people with relatively small followings on the platform have a “much higher” chance of being widely circulated — allows for “content that would otherwise maybe not spread as much [to] go viral.” .... Fiesler, the Colorado professor, offered a hypothetical scenario of a student pulling a fire alarm to skip an exam. It could be “the same kind of thing, just at a much larger scale,” she said.
the fact that multiple news sources showcase her work indicates notability, and as the main author, i consider the fact that i can [write] three+ paragraphs with independent, reliable sources on nearly every sentence indicates notability.— Okay, first of all, not all news sources are made the same. WP:ACADEMIC and WP:NOTABILITY specify independent, reliable sources to prove significant coverage. The bulk of the articles here are, as I've pointed out, not independent, and they also happen to be local, which itself can't prove notability. GuardianH ( talk) 03:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
12 awardsclaim, a reliable source demonstrating the NSF Career award is
significantenough to demonstrate it is a
highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level, [1] and when you cited the White House visit, you provided Instagram, which is not a reliable source. Even so, a visit to the White House does not fit any part of the notability criteria laid out in WP:ACADEMIC.
one of the two leading academic conferences in all of human-centered computing. Digging reveals that she is a co-chair of one (Organizing Committee) of three committees – Organizing Committee, Program Committee, Steering Committee — rather than chair of the entire organization itself. GuardianH ( talk) 04:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC) GuardianH ( talk) 04:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Please don’t “bite the newbie” but if an article for deletion and the story of her making a tiktok being surprised about having a Wikipedia page manages to make the main stream media or highly viewed on tiktok could that in it of itself be controversial enough to warrant a Wikipedia page? My great grandpa was a 1 star army general and his a Wikipedia but he didn’t do much and they don’t delete him, in fact all he only appears on Google as his Wikipedia page and list of ww1 veterans - anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.11.80 ( talk) 22:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:A7 and WP:G12 by User:Deb (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 01:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. This seems like a rare instance of an article subject whose article has been deleted multiple times, now being seen as notable. I'll remove the "salt" tag since I see a consensus now to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of Autostrad. Sources largely do not contain significant coverage of the band. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)