![]() |
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 03:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable writer. PepperBeast (talk) 23:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
*Very Weak Keep Since this person have some slight importance. But there's just not enough notability for him, literally.Ploreky
Have a problem?
02:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Anuradha Bhat. Discarding all, but one, "keep" votes that state WP:INHERIT. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 23:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Article is completely unreferenced and extraneous considering most movies the songs are from seem to be non-notable FishandChipper 🐟 🍟 22:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of article improvements. It is "unreferenced" no longer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines for articles, including verifiability and citing sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Otr500 ( talk • contribs) 22:12, October 29, 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and it does not appear any further input is forthcoming. Star Mississippi 03:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
No clear indication of notability, and I didn't have much luck finding any sources. Article has been orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The article notes from Google Translate: "The name Bo Bonnie may be familiar to many Nanjing netizens, because when Xici Hutong was popular for a while, Bo Bonnie "has been haunted" in many movie music and literary editions, and she has also built her own discussion section. At that time, she was still in college. She was born in 1982 and is from Lianyungang. After graduating from high school, she was admitted to the film and television department of Nanjing University of the Arts, but after more than a year, she went to the Beijing Film Academy as an auditor. After that, she has experience in media work, column writing, and book publishing, and gradually clarified her writing direction. A few years ago, she was admitted to the Beijing Film Academy for a master's degree and systematically studied screenwriting."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bo is a legend. She once attracted much attention for being the top student in the college entrance examination who dropped out of school. She also became popular on the Internet because of "A Letter to My Sister"; she was affectionately called "the first in the West Temple" by netizens. Talented Girl", also participated in the screenwriting work of the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions" as the main force of "Youth Dream Team". After graduating from Beijing Film Academy with Zhao Wei [microblogging], she switched back and forth between the two professions of writer and screenwriter, non-stop. She is a post-80s female screenwriter and a leading figure in the new generation of writers."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Zhang Shanshan, who left Nanjing University of the Arts and went north, gave herself a new name called Bo Bonnie. ... In the summer of 2002, Zhang Shanshan, a former top student in the college entrance examination for arts in Jiangsu Province, chose to drop out; in 2007, Bo Bonnie, an auditor of the Beijing Film Academy, was admitted to the graduate school of the Beijing Film Academy and became Zhao Wei's classmate. ... This spring, Bonnie Bo was invited to Japan to interview female photographer Ninagawa Mika."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bai, whose name comes from the 1960s Hollywood love movie "Bonnie and Clyde", is the Bonnie who "looked at each other and smiled with Clyde, shot 167 times in the sun, fell to the ground and died". She fled from a university that "couldn't see her ideal", went to Beiying as an auditor, and was admitted to a graduate school."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province in 1982, Bonnie Bo was born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province. Both parents work in scientific research institutions. ... In the year of the college entrance examination, Bo Bonnie lived up to the expectations of her parents and was admitted to the Nanjing University of the Arts with a high score in the province's art category. ... In 2006, after four years of audition and study, Bonnie Bo was successfully admitted to the Literature Department of Beijing Film Academy to study for postgraduate studies. ... In March 2008, Bonnie Bo suddenly received a call from the "Dream of Red Mansions" preparatory team, inviting her and 8 other young screenwriters to write the script for the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions"."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please consider new sources offered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. PepperBeast (talk) 22:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "With Taiwanese comics starting to trickle onto North American bookshelves, the breakthrough work could be one that has all the elements of the biggest manga hits. An irreverent young hero with an unlikely gift? Check. A seemingly unattainable quest? Check. An outlandish concept and wild humor? ... When Shautieh gets pumped up, he doesn't just start emanating speedlines—he literally turns into an Eva, or Kenshin, or Batman, for crying out loud! Visual gags like that are part of the series' comedic lifeblood, along with acerbic put-downs and madcap facial expressions. If anyone could harness the energy of Bowling King, we'd have renewable power for the next several centuries. With the first major arc just underway by the end of the volume, most readers will be clamoring for the next one right away."
The article notes: "以保齡球為題材的運動漫畫《滾球王》於1997年在《新少年快報》連載,還曾在日本、韓國刊載過。由於當年台灣正盛行打保齡球,加上漫畫本身有熱血的劇情,風格也相當幽默搞笑,在台灣有不小的人氣。消息一公布後,許多書迷也曬出自己的收藏,希望老師能夠盡快補完後續。"
From Google Translate: "The bowling-themed sports manga "Bowling King" was serialized in New Youth Express in 1997, and has also been published in Japan and South Korea. Because bowling was popular in Taiwan at that time, and the comics themselves had a bloody plot, and the style was quite humorous, it was quite popular in Taiwan. As soon as the news was announced, many book fans also posted their collections, hoping that the teacher could complete the follow-up as soon as possible."
The article notes: "《新少年快報》大受歡迎的連載《滾球王》進入第200回,雜誌為此舉辦票選活動,只要投票就有機會獲得《滾球王》T恤。"
From Google Translate: "The popular series "Bowling King" of New Youth Express entered its 200th round, and the magazine held a voting event for this, as long as you vote, you will have a chance to win the "Bowling King" T-shirt."
The article notes: "第三屆漫畫金像獎其他得主 ... 最佳劇情唐靉「滾球王」"
From Google Translate: "Other winners of the 3rd Comics Awards... Best Story Tang Yu "Rolling Ball King""
The article notes: "由網友及讀者票選各項超人氣獎,得主是 ... 超人氣劇情唐靉「滾球王」..."
From Google Translate: "Netizens and readers voted for various super popular awards, and the winner was... Super popular plot Tang Yu "Bowling King"..."
The article notes: "「滾球王」是目前極受歡迎的一部國人漫畫,作者唐璦也是美女,不過她比林欣穎更低調"
From Google Translate: ""Bowling King" is currently a very popular Chinese comic. The author Tang Ai is also a beautiful woman, but she is more low-key than Lin Xinying"
The article notes: "頗受少年讀者熱愛的「滾球王」,作者唐璦也是一位行事低調的漫畫家。 ... 「滾球王」直到現在還是追著連載跑的熱門漫畫。"
From Google Translate: "Tang Ai, the author of "Rolling Ball King", which is very popular among young readers, is also a low-key cartoonist. ... "Rolling Ball King" is still a popular manga that is chasing serialization."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please consider new sources offered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Volkswagen or a section therein as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 03:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
There are no sources cited except for the company's homepage. The only other reference is a deadlink. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 16:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Ten members of Germany’s sprawling Porsche automotive dynasty, which controls Volkswagen, were named in accounts lodged at Companies House this month as “persons of significant control” behind PayByPhone, one of the UK’s most successful parking apps.. Chronicle Live:
Parking app PayByPhone says it is aware of bogus websites duping motorists; Business Intelligence for B.C.:
Any Vancouver driver who’s shunned pocket change in favour of digital payments at the city’s parking meters will no doubt be familiar with the PayByPhone Technologies Inc. logo adorning the nearly 12,000 devices.; GeekWire:
Seattle has been using PayByPhone technology since 2013. A representative of the Seattle city attorney’s office said the city couldn’t comment on pending litigation.; WLRN:
Since then, the city has been at the forefront of transitioning the parking experience from street meters to an electronic app called PayByPhone, a Canada-based app owned by Volkswagen -- the largest carmaker in the world.. Le Journal de l'Automobile:
PayByPhone nomme son nouveau président(doesn't appear to be just a PR release or paid article). And a lot more of that level. It definitely needs cleanup to make less promotional. Skynxnex ( talk) 17:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I see suggestions for a Redirect/Merge (as an ATD) but no target mentioned.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY. and is promotional material for Aquapac International Limited, (which is also not notable) SMBMovieFan ( talk) 22:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 22:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This seems made-up and should be deleted unless someone can verify that this person actually existed. Another editor, Xerxesxerxesxerxes333, flagged this as a likely hoax but the G3 speedy was declined. DanCherek ( talk) 22:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing any indication of notability about this person or how he passes WP:NPROF. When searching in the Hindi language under उमानाथ सिंह, results returned are about a person by the same name who died over 20 years ago, or other unrelated individuals. Declined at AfC but author moved back to mainspace anyway. Prose suggests he may have had notable ancestors, yet neither the article nor it's sources suggest this person inherits this notability. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST and WP:NOTDIRECTORY as both "a non-encyclopedic cross-categorization" and a "repository of loosely associated topics". This list is an original grouping that is never discussed collectively as a list in any sources; mainly compiled through an original synthesis of WP:PRIMARY sources. According to NAMUS, "4,400 unidentified bodies are recovered each year, with approximately 1,000 of those bodies remaining unidentified after one year." There is therefore nothing unusual about being a formerly unidentified body. This is essentially WP:LISTCRUFT. 4meter4 ( talk) 20:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they have essentially the same issue in passing our notability policies in regards to lists:
Please consider these articles in relation to our notability policies on lists. 4meter4 ( talk) 20:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Unclear if this meets WP:GNG. I've found a few things which use the term: an article from the Project Management Institute ( [2]), a Wiley textbook that uses it as the title ( [3]), and a paper from a 2011 conference ( [4]).
The main issue here is that each of these describe similar ideas but not necessarily the same thing; it seems possible "Project management 2.0" is in this case a buzzword that several people were independently using to describe their ideas. The sources used by the current article are mostly offline, and the ones which remain aren't reliable and in one case include a marketing blog for a company the article's primary writer might be associated with (based on their edit history; they have not declared any COI or paid involvement).
This page is also only linked from one other mainspace non-redirect page, Social project management, where it's in the "See Also" section of a page that has similar issues. Prior AfDs were a delete (the page was later recreated) and a no consensus from an AfD that had no discussion (not sure why that wasn't a soft delete).
Personally I think it's unlikely this is a widely used term and that this reads enough like promotional content and contains little enough encyclopedic value that even if there is some term of art here it's worth considering WP:TNT and letting it get re-added in a neutral/non-marketing way. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 20:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
A journal of the IMF, but notability is not inherited Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 03:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Original research by OCFGroup1 ( talk · contribs), who created it in their user page and moved into article space then expanded by SPI 68.100.233.208 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), probably the same person Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Open-channel flow#Momentum equation. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Nonencyclopedic maqth/physics treatise Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus us clear. However if someone thinks a redirect would be helpful, that's an editorial call. Star Mississippi 03:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Original reasearh Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
19:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Guerillero Parlez Moi 10:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television presenter, not properly referenced as passing our notability criteria for television presenters. The notability claims on offer here are that she (a) exists, and (b) won an award at a festival, neither of which are automatic notability freebies in the absence of adequate evidence that she would pass WP:GNG on third-party media coverage -- but the "referencing" here is entirely to primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all, such as a job footnoted to a mere repetition of the names of her colleagues rather than a third-party source, and a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person rather than having the significance of her work externally analyzed by other people in the third. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced quite a bit better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 17:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
19:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
subject was an industrialist but no indication on the page of anything suggesting notability and I can't find any GNG sources JMWt ( talk) 17:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
19:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The Sims Resource is a fan-made website to host mods and custom content for The Sims titles. This website does not receive signficant media attention, and hence fails notability requirements. Theknine2 ( talk) 19:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I really searched hard for sources that even mention this game, but I came up short. You would think with a cameo in Wreck-It Ralph, there would be something. But Google Books, Scholar, Newspapers.com, and the Wikipedia Library all came up short. Why? I Ask ( talk) 18:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a journalist with no strong claim to passing our notability criteria for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because their existence is nominally verified by a staff profile on the
self-published website of their own employer -- to qualify for an article, a journalist's notability has to be externally validated by third-party sources writing about her, in the context of such things as analyzing the importance of her work or verifying that she won a notable journalism award. But there's no content of that type here, and instead this is just following the depressingly standard template for bad articles about journalists: take staff profile, rephrase it just enough to slide past the copyvio police, source it to itself, and voila.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt Josephine Au from having to be the subject of coverage in
reliable sources independent of her own paycheque provider.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to West Florida#Later history and legacy. History is under the redirect if someone wants to selectively merge, Star Mississippi 03:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Lacks notability guidelines. Doesn't have notable enough sources as a micronation to be on Wikipedia, and is heavily inactive. MicroSupporter ( talk) 18:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
References
References
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Article about former footballer who had a brief and uneventful career in the Singapore top division. PROD was contested without providing any evidence that the article could satisfy WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG. I've searched for coverage and found nothing more than match reports (which simply report that he was in the squad) and statistical database entries (there is an article about an airline pilot with a similar name). Every search I've tried indicates this article comprehensively fails the GNG. Jogurney ( talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
American Idol contestant who came in at 10th place. Not much ample coverage on her music since then, except for a ThisisRnB article last week regarding her debut single and its video (which premiered on BET Soul) and a few ( 1, 2, 3) articles on Earmilk. Is this enough to establish notability, or is it a case of WP:TOOSOON? - Mooonswimmer 17:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
An article on a recently created website. The article was originally created with content and references from the Live India article, relating to events 15 years before this site began operation (subsequently removed). Searches find this site being spammed onto various blogs but no evidence that it has attained notability ( WP:NCORP, WP:GNG). AllyD ( talk) 16:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The article is entirely sourced to press releases which lack independence from the subject or to articles with just passing mentions. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOL. TheWikiholic ( talk) 15:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Left behind from a procedural keep consensus fail, it was an isolated rail point that has been engulfed by Yuma's sprawl. I could find nothing supporting a settlement here. Mangoe ( talk) 14:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Keep voters need to review Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
No apparent notability. The sources from the article are almost all unreliable - mostly Russian government media or blogs - and I didn't find any others when I tried searching for more. HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith ( talk) 14:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 14:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV. The article may have been created by the subject themselves. vistadan 14:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage beyond trivial mentions. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 04:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
13:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Can't find any significant coverage to indicate WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. He exists in a few football databases but this would not meet requirements. Stadium Astro is only a single passing mention. A Malaysian source search returned nothing of note. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Advertising company fails WP:NCORP. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 12:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Was deleted through AfD back in 2019, and nothing has changed since then. Still does not meet GNG or NPOL. Onel5969 TT me 12:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Seems to fail NBAND and GNG. Finding sources is made difficult by the fact that there is also a British band by this name (and the TV show), but ultimately, I see no evidence of notability. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 11:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Redirects are nominated for deletion at WP:RFD, not AFD. Will create the nomination there. signed, Rosguill talk 19:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Propaganda redirect that violates NPOV policy.-- Madame Necker ( talk) 09:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Oxford University Cricket Club players#O. Liz Read! Talk! 08:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Redirect based on replies below: Fails WP:NCRIC. References are behind a pay wall and hence cannot verify Iaintbrdpit ( talk) 09:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Person not-notable, amateur snooker players are generally not-notable and this one has never won a major title. Becoming runner-up at the world amateur is a start, but doesn't meet WP:GNG Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 09:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"Muhammad Sajjad" snookercan be found in the Wikipedia Library, but looking through the first page of results, the level of coverage in not enough to argue that the subject meets GNG. Please ping me if good sources are identified. BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 08:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
We have a name of a ship. That's it. We don't know if it ever sailed, and if so what happened to it. No idea why this was created. If there was an A7 speedy deletion criterion for ships, this would be gone as having no claim to importance or notability whatsoever. Fram ( talk) 07:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I think there is a consensus here to keep this article. That's all that I'm sure about. What happens next--Merger, Rename, Redirect--is left to the editors here to discuss on the article talk page. However, if nothing is done, I think this article will be renominated in the near future. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
TL;DR would be that this is a fork of sociocultural evolution, and that there are no reliable sources that support differentiating the concept of "cultural evolution" from "sociocultural evolution". The article was created by experts (see Talk:Sociocultural_evolution#Merge_Cultural_evolution_and_Cultural_selection_theory_here for context and short discussion), sadly, they gave up early, before finishing this. Worse, they effectively created what read back then and still does as a fork of our older article, with significant overlaps in content. The article states (without a ref) that "Cultural evolution, historically also known as sociocultural evolution", which still implies it's the same topic, but that the name "cultural evolution" is more commonly used than "sociocultural evolution" (perhaps). I suggested a merge, but the discussion never went far (link above). As there is some content to merge, I'd like to suggest reviewing this deletion discussion as a "forced merge", with the suggested result of, well, merge, and the use of relevant template (not Template:Merge from AfD, but I can't find the one that is used to indicate merge outcome of AfD; if you know which one it is, please add it to the relevant templates list there). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It's unclear to me what the suggestion is, what page is being merged into which page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. There is lots of discussion but we need simple outcome opinions that a closer can carry out here. If this article is Kept, then you can make editing choices to carry out your vision of what this article should be.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
orphan page with no refs. I can't find anything that suggests this is a notable thing - in fact the only things I've found are to do with individuals who have the name and characters in films or novels. Be interested to hear if anyone else can find anything. JMWt ( talk) 07:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Randy Feltface. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Originally proposed at Talk:Randy_Feltface#Merger_proposal but didn't realise this would be the better place for it to actually get attention and had forgotten about the proposal until just now. As I wrote there, I couldn't find much coverage of McIvor outside of his work with the Randy Feltface character and I'm not convinced he should have a separate article. The coverage already here is weak enough that I don't see a notability pass, and the info is small enough that it could be crammed into a section of the Feltface article. QuietHere ( talk) 03:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This game is not notable, with the only sources being first party from its creator, and the games own website (except for one to its own Github page). Under none of Wikipedia's policies should this game ever have been considered notable enough for its own article. According to its own website, the most players that have ever been online simultaneously was under a thousand, and its got virtually 0 coverage from credible sources. Honestly, its astonishing that it has made it through two deletion nominations in the past, with this being its 3rd. Some need to understand that just because you play a niche game, and enjoy it, doesn't mean it is notable enough to warrant its own article. You enjoy it, that's great. You do you, but it shouldn't have its own page just because you like it. Cr@$h3d@t@ t@1k t0 m3 02:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Quaemenelimbus
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
http://www.eternal-lands.com/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.el-wiki.net/Wraith ( moved to here) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://massivelyop.com/2022/01/07/open-source-fantasy-mmo-eternal-lands-releases-a-laundry-list-of-client-updates-and-features/ | ~ This blog is still active today, and is not related with the game. Seems to be an MMORPG blog though, so still related. | ~ Seems to be news reporting and opinion. | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:lijil
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bylyeva D.S., Nam T.A. The laws of existence in virtual worlds: construction and violation [1] | ~ A scholarly paper published in a Russian journal, Philosophy and Humanities in Information Society. As far as I can tell (from Google translate and English text in the journal) this is a legitimate scholarly journal, though run by a university not a for-profit mega publisher like Elsevier. This does not mean the journal is not good, but as I can't read Russian I am not 100% sure. | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Mention in book Video Gaming | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
The result was keep. Academic Challenger ( talk) 23:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 02:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. This already part of an earlier AFD that includes it. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Taking this as AFD as PROD is contested. In my opinion, this does not satisfy WP:GNG. While the business code for a state obviously existed, I didn't think that it required its own standalone Wikipedia article. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close.. This article is already nominated in a different AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Taking this as AFD as PROD is contested. In my opinion, this does not satisfy WP:GNG. While the transportation code for a state obviously existed, I didn't think that it required its own standalone Wikipedia article. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There was equal-ish support between the redirects/merges and keeps. Further, the redirects were split on the redirect target. Further discussion about what to do with this article can continue on the talk page Guerillero Parlez Moi 10:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
The only source listed for the unbuilt portion is self-published, and the existing portion of the route is covered by two other existing articles ( Wisconsin Highway 175 and Wisconsin Highway 341). - happy 5214 01:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
"stadium freeway" milwaukee
on Newspapers.com limited to sources in the state of Wisconsin turns up 607 matches.
Imzadi 1979
→
05:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is uncertainty over where this article might be redirected to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still needs to be some consesnsus on a Redirect target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Created by a blocked user and sources are not independent to the subject Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 01:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 03:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable writer. PepperBeast (talk) 23:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
*Very Weak Keep Since this person have some slight importance. But there's just not enough notability for him, literally.Ploreky
Have a problem?
02:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Anuradha Bhat. Discarding all, but one, "keep" votes that state WP:INHERIT. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 23:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Article is completely unreferenced and extraneous considering most movies the songs are from seem to be non-notable FishandChipper 🐟 🍟 22:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of article improvements. It is "unreferenced" no longer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Stand-alone lists are subject to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines for articles, including verifiability and citing sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Otr500 ( talk • contribs) 22:12, October 29, 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and it does not appear any further input is forthcoming. Star Mississippi 03:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
No clear indication of notability, and I didn't have much luck finding any sources. Article has been orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 22:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The article notes from Google Translate: "The name Bo Bonnie may be familiar to many Nanjing netizens, because when Xici Hutong was popular for a while, Bo Bonnie "has been haunted" in many movie music and literary editions, and she has also built her own discussion section. At that time, she was still in college. She was born in 1982 and is from Lianyungang. After graduating from high school, she was admitted to the film and television department of Nanjing University of the Arts, but after more than a year, she went to the Beijing Film Academy as an auditor. After that, she has experience in media work, column writing, and book publishing, and gradually clarified her writing direction. A few years ago, she was admitted to the Beijing Film Academy for a master's degree and systematically studied screenwriting."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bo is a legend. She once attracted much attention for being the top student in the college entrance examination who dropped out of school. She also became popular on the Internet because of "A Letter to My Sister"; she was affectionately called "the first in the West Temple" by netizens. Talented Girl", also participated in the screenwriting work of the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions" as the main force of "Youth Dream Team". After graduating from Beijing Film Academy with Zhao Wei [microblogging], she switched back and forth between the two professions of writer and screenwriter, non-stop. She is a post-80s female screenwriter and a leading figure in the new generation of writers."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Zhang Shanshan, who left Nanjing University of the Arts and went north, gave herself a new name called Bo Bonnie. ... In the summer of 2002, Zhang Shanshan, a former top student in the college entrance examination for arts in Jiangsu Province, chose to drop out; in 2007, Bo Bonnie, an auditor of the Beijing Film Academy, was admitted to the graduate school of the Beijing Film Academy and became Zhao Wei's classmate. ... This spring, Bonnie Bo was invited to Japan to interview female photographer Ninagawa Mika."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bai, whose name comes from the 1960s Hollywood love movie "Bonnie and Clyde", is the Bonnie who "looked at each other and smiled with Clyde, shot 167 times in the sun, fell to the ground and died". She fled from a university that "couldn't see her ideal", went to Beiying as an auditor, and was admitted to a graduate school."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province in 1982, Bonnie Bo was born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province. Both parents work in scientific research institutions. ... In the year of the college entrance examination, Bo Bonnie lived up to the expectations of her parents and was admitted to the Nanjing University of the Arts with a high score in the province's art category. ... In 2006, after four years of audition and study, Bonnie Bo was successfully admitted to the Literature Department of Beijing Film Academy to study for postgraduate studies. ... In March 2008, Bonnie Bo suddenly received a call from the "Dream of Red Mansions" preparatory team, inviting her and 8 other young screenwriters to write the script for the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions"."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please consider new sources offered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability. PepperBeast (talk) 22:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
The review notes: "With Taiwanese comics starting to trickle onto North American bookshelves, the breakthrough work could be one that has all the elements of the biggest manga hits. An irreverent young hero with an unlikely gift? Check. A seemingly unattainable quest? Check. An outlandish concept and wild humor? ... When Shautieh gets pumped up, he doesn't just start emanating speedlines—he literally turns into an Eva, or Kenshin, or Batman, for crying out loud! Visual gags like that are part of the series' comedic lifeblood, along with acerbic put-downs and madcap facial expressions. If anyone could harness the energy of Bowling King, we'd have renewable power for the next several centuries. With the first major arc just underway by the end of the volume, most readers will be clamoring for the next one right away."
The article notes: "以保齡球為題材的運動漫畫《滾球王》於1997年在《新少年快報》連載,還曾在日本、韓國刊載過。由於當年台灣正盛行打保齡球,加上漫畫本身有熱血的劇情,風格也相當幽默搞笑,在台灣有不小的人氣。消息一公布後,許多書迷也曬出自己的收藏,希望老師能夠盡快補完後續。"
From Google Translate: "The bowling-themed sports manga "Bowling King" was serialized in New Youth Express in 1997, and has also been published in Japan and South Korea. Because bowling was popular in Taiwan at that time, and the comics themselves had a bloody plot, and the style was quite humorous, it was quite popular in Taiwan. As soon as the news was announced, many book fans also posted their collections, hoping that the teacher could complete the follow-up as soon as possible."
The article notes: "《新少年快報》大受歡迎的連載《滾球王》進入第200回,雜誌為此舉辦票選活動,只要投票就有機會獲得《滾球王》T恤。"
From Google Translate: "The popular series "Bowling King" of New Youth Express entered its 200th round, and the magazine held a voting event for this, as long as you vote, you will have a chance to win the "Bowling King" T-shirt."
The article notes: "第三屆漫畫金像獎其他得主 ... 最佳劇情唐靉「滾球王」"
From Google Translate: "Other winners of the 3rd Comics Awards... Best Story Tang Yu "Rolling Ball King""
The article notes: "由網友及讀者票選各項超人氣獎,得主是 ... 超人氣劇情唐靉「滾球王」..."
From Google Translate: "Netizens and readers voted for various super popular awards, and the winner was... Super popular plot Tang Yu "Bowling King"..."
The article notes: "「滾球王」是目前極受歡迎的一部國人漫畫,作者唐璦也是美女,不過她比林欣穎更低調"
From Google Translate: ""Bowling King" is currently a very popular Chinese comic. The author Tang Ai is also a beautiful woman, but she is more low-key than Lin Xinying"
The article notes: "頗受少年讀者熱愛的「滾球王」,作者唐璦也是一位行事低調的漫畫家。 ... 「滾球王」直到現在還是追著連載跑的熱門漫畫。"
From Google Translate: "Tang Ai, the author of "Rolling Ball King", which is very popular among young readers, is also a low-key cartoonist. ... "Rolling Ball King" is still a popular manga that is chasing serialization."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please consider new sources offered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Volkswagen or a section therein as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 03:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
There are no sources cited except for the company's homepage. The only other reference is a deadlink. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 16:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Ten members of Germany’s sprawling Porsche automotive dynasty, which controls Volkswagen, were named in accounts lodged at Companies House this month as “persons of significant control” behind PayByPhone, one of the UK’s most successful parking apps.. Chronicle Live:
Parking app PayByPhone says it is aware of bogus websites duping motorists; Business Intelligence for B.C.:
Any Vancouver driver who’s shunned pocket change in favour of digital payments at the city’s parking meters will no doubt be familiar with the PayByPhone Technologies Inc. logo adorning the nearly 12,000 devices.; GeekWire:
Seattle has been using PayByPhone technology since 2013. A representative of the Seattle city attorney’s office said the city couldn’t comment on pending litigation.; WLRN:
Since then, the city has been at the forefront of transitioning the parking experience from street meters to an electronic app called PayByPhone, a Canada-based app owned by Volkswagen -- the largest carmaker in the world.. Le Journal de l'Automobile:
PayByPhone nomme son nouveau président(doesn't appear to be just a PR release or paid article). And a lot more of that level. It definitely needs cleanup to make less promotional. Skynxnex ( talk) 17:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I see suggestions for a Redirect/Merge (as an ATD) but no target mentioned.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY. and is promotional material for Aquapac International Limited, (which is also not notable) SMBMovieFan ( talk) 22:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 22:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This seems made-up and should be deleted unless someone can verify that this person actually existed. Another editor, Xerxesxerxesxerxes333, flagged this as a likely hoax but the G3 speedy was declined. DanCherek ( talk) 22:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Not seeing any indication of notability about this person or how he passes WP:NPROF. When searching in the Hindi language under उमानाथ सिंह, results returned are about a person by the same name who died over 20 years ago, or other unrelated individuals. Declined at AfC but author moved back to mainspace anyway. Prose suggests he may have had notable ancestors, yet neither the article nor it's sources suggest this person inherits this notability. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 20:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST and WP:NOTDIRECTORY as both "a non-encyclopedic cross-categorization" and a "repository of loosely associated topics". This list is an original grouping that is never discussed collectively as a list in any sources; mainly compiled through an original synthesis of WP:PRIMARY sources. According to NAMUS, "4,400 unidentified bodies are recovered each year, with approximately 1,000 of those bodies remaining unidentified after one year." There is therefore nothing unusual about being a formerly unidentified body. This is essentially WP:LISTCRUFT. 4meter4 ( talk) 20:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they have essentially the same issue in passing our notability policies in regards to lists:
Please consider these articles in relation to our notability policies on lists. 4meter4 ( talk) 20:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Unclear if this meets WP:GNG. I've found a few things which use the term: an article from the Project Management Institute ( [2]), a Wiley textbook that uses it as the title ( [3]), and a paper from a 2011 conference ( [4]).
The main issue here is that each of these describe similar ideas but not necessarily the same thing; it seems possible "Project management 2.0" is in this case a buzzword that several people were independently using to describe their ideas. The sources used by the current article are mostly offline, and the ones which remain aren't reliable and in one case include a marketing blog for a company the article's primary writer might be associated with (based on their edit history; they have not declared any COI or paid involvement).
This page is also only linked from one other mainspace non-redirect page, Social project management, where it's in the "See Also" section of a page that has similar issues. Prior AfDs were a delete (the page was later recreated) and a no consensus from an AfD that had no discussion (not sure why that wasn't a soft delete).
Personally I think it's unlikely this is a widely used term and that this reads enough like promotional content and contains little enough encyclopedic value that even if there is some term of art here it's worth considering WP:TNT and letting it get re-added in a neutral/non-marketing way. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 20:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
A journal of the IMF, but notability is not inherited Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 03:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Original research by OCFGroup1 ( talk · contribs), who created it in their user page and moved into article space then expanded by SPI 68.100.233.208 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), probably the same person Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Open-channel flow#Momentum equation. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Nonencyclopedic maqth/physics treatise Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus us clear. However if someone thinks a redirect would be helpful, that's an editorial call. Star Mississippi 03:09, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Original reasearh Lokys dar Vienas ( talk) 19:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
19:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Guerillero Parlez Moi 10:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television presenter, not properly referenced as passing our notability criteria for television presenters. The notability claims on offer here are that she (a) exists, and (b) won an award at a festival, neither of which are automatic notability freebies in the absence of adequate evidence that she would pass WP:GNG on third-party media coverage -- but the "referencing" here is entirely to primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all, such as a job footnoted to a mere repetition of the names of her colleagues rather than a third-party source, and a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person rather than having the significance of her work externally analyzed by other people in the third. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced quite a bit better than this. Bearcat ( talk) 17:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
19:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
subject was an industrialist but no indication on the page of anything suggesting notability and I can't find any GNG sources JMWt ( talk) 17:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Comr Melody Idoghor
(talk)
19:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The Sims Resource is a fan-made website to host mods and custom content for The Sims titles. This website does not receive signficant media attention, and hence fails notability requirements. Theknine2 ( talk) 19:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
I really searched hard for sources that even mention this game, but I came up short. You would think with a cameo in Wreck-It Ralph, there would be something. But Google Books, Scholar, Newspapers.com, and the Wikipedia Library all came up short. Why? I Ask ( talk) 18:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a journalist with no strong claim to passing our notability criteria for journalists. As always, journalists are not automatically notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because their existence is nominally verified by a staff profile on the
self-published website of their own employer -- to qualify for an article, a journalist's notability has to be externally validated by third-party sources writing about her, in the context of such things as analyzing the importance of her work or verifying that she won a notable journalism award. But there's no content of that type here, and instead this is just following the depressingly standard template for bad articles about journalists: take staff profile, rephrase it just enough to slide past the copyvio police, source it to itself, and voila.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt Josephine Au from having to be the subject of coverage in
reliable sources independent of her own paycheque provider.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to West Florida#Later history and legacy. History is under the redirect if someone wants to selectively merge, Star Mississippi 03:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Lacks notability guidelines. Doesn't have notable enough sources as a micronation to be on Wikipedia, and is heavily inactive. MicroSupporter ( talk) 18:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
References
References
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Article about former footballer who had a brief and uneventful career in the Singapore top division. PROD was contested without providing any evidence that the article could satisfy WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG. I've searched for coverage and found nothing more than match reports (which simply report that he was in the squad) and statistical database entries (there is an article about an airline pilot with a similar name). Every search I've tried indicates this article comprehensively fails the GNG. Jogurney ( talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
American Idol contestant who came in at 10th place. Not much ample coverage on her music since then, except for a ThisisRnB article last week regarding her debut single and its video (which premiered on BET Soul) and a few ( 1, 2, 3) articles on Earmilk. Is this enough to establish notability, or is it a case of WP:TOOSOON? - Mooonswimmer 17:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
An article on a recently created website. The article was originally created with content and references from the Live India article, relating to events 15 years before this site began operation (subsequently removed). Searches find this site being spammed onto various blogs but no evidence that it has attained notability ( WP:NCORP, WP:GNG). AllyD ( talk) 16:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
The article is entirely sourced to press releases which lack independence from the subject or to articles with just passing mentions. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOL. TheWikiholic ( talk) 15:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Left behind from a procedural keep consensus fail, it was an isolated rail point that has been engulfed by Yuma's sprawl. I could find nothing supporting a settlement here. Mangoe ( talk) 14:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Keep voters need to review Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
No apparent notability. The sources from the article are almost all unreliable - mostly Russian government media or blogs - and I didn't find any others when I tried searching for more. HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith ( talk) 14:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 14:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 14:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV. The article may have been created by the subject themselves. vistadan 14:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage beyond trivial mentions. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 04:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
13:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Can't find any significant coverage to indicate WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. He exists in a few football databases but this would not meet requirements. Stadium Astro is only a single passing mention. A Malaysian source search returned nothing of note. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Advertising company fails WP:NCORP. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 12:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Was deleted through AfD back in 2019, and nothing has changed since then. Still does not meet GNG or NPOL. Onel5969 TT me 12:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Seems to fail NBAND and GNG. Finding sources is made difficult by the fact that there is also a British band by this name (and the TV show), but ultimately, I see no evidence of notability. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 11:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Redirects are nominated for deletion at WP:RFD, not AFD. Will create the nomination there. signed, Rosguill talk 19:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Propaganda redirect that violates NPOV policy.-- Madame Necker ( talk) 09:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Oxford University Cricket Club players#O. Liz Read! Talk! 08:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Redirect based on replies below: Fails WP:NCRIC. References are behind a pay wall and hence cannot verify Iaintbrdpit ( talk) 09:53, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Person not-notable, amateur snooker players are generally not-notable and this one has never won a major title. Becoming runner-up at the world amateur is a start, but doesn't meet WP:GNG Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 09:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"Muhammad Sajjad" snookercan be found in the Wikipedia Library, but looking through the first page of results, the level of coverage in not enough to argue that the subject meets GNG. Please ping me if good sources are identified. BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 08:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
We have a name of a ship. That's it. We don't know if it ever sailed, and if so what happened to it. No idea why this was created. If there was an A7 speedy deletion criterion for ships, this would be gone as having no claim to importance or notability whatsoever. Fram ( talk) 07:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. I think there is a consensus here to keep this article. That's all that I'm sure about. What happens next--Merger, Rename, Redirect--is left to the editors here to discuss on the article talk page. However, if nothing is done, I think this article will be renominated in the near future. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
TL;DR would be that this is a fork of sociocultural evolution, and that there are no reliable sources that support differentiating the concept of "cultural evolution" from "sociocultural evolution". The article was created by experts (see Talk:Sociocultural_evolution#Merge_Cultural_evolution_and_Cultural_selection_theory_here for context and short discussion), sadly, they gave up early, before finishing this. Worse, they effectively created what read back then and still does as a fork of our older article, with significant overlaps in content. The article states (without a ref) that "Cultural evolution, historically also known as sociocultural evolution", which still implies it's the same topic, but that the name "cultural evolution" is more commonly used than "sociocultural evolution" (perhaps). I suggested a merge, but the discussion never went far (link above). As there is some content to merge, I'd like to suggest reviewing this deletion discussion as a "forced merge", with the suggested result of, well, merge, and the use of relevant template (not Template:Merge from AfD, but I can't find the one that is used to indicate merge outcome of AfD; if you know which one it is, please add it to the relevant templates list there). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It's unclear to me what the suggestion is, what page is being merged into which page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. There is lots of discussion but we need simple outcome opinions that a closer can carry out here. If this article is Kept, then you can make editing choices to carry out your vision of what this article should be.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
orphan page with no refs. I can't find anything that suggests this is a notable thing - in fact the only things I've found are to do with individuals who have the name and characters in films or novels. Be interested to hear if anyone else can find anything. JMWt ( talk) 07:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Randy Feltface. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Originally proposed at Talk:Randy_Feltface#Merger_proposal but didn't realise this would be the better place for it to actually get attention and had forgotten about the proposal until just now. As I wrote there, I couldn't find much coverage of McIvor outside of his work with the Randy Feltface character and I'm not convinced he should have a separate article. The coverage already here is weak enough that I don't see a notability pass, and the info is small enough that it could be crammed into a section of the Feltface article. QuietHere ( talk) 03:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This game is not notable, with the only sources being first party from its creator, and the games own website (except for one to its own Github page). Under none of Wikipedia's policies should this game ever have been considered notable enough for its own article. According to its own website, the most players that have ever been online simultaneously was under a thousand, and its got virtually 0 coverage from credible sources. Honestly, its astonishing that it has made it through two deletion nominations in the past, with this being its 3rd. Some need to understand that just because you play a niche game, and enjoy it, doesn't mean it is notable enough to warrant its own article. You enjoy it, that's great. You do you, but it shouldn't have its own page just because you like it. Cr@$h3d@t@ t@1k t0 m3 02:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Quaemenelimbus
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
http://www.eternal-lands.com/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.el-wiki.net/Wraith ( moved to here) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://massivelyop.com/2022/01/07/open-source-fantasy-mmo-eternal-lands-releases-a-laundry-list-of-client-updates-and-features/ | ~ This blog is still active today, and is not related with the game. Seems to be an MMORPG blog though, so still related. | ~ Seems to be news reporting and opinion. | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:lijil
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bylyeva D.S., Nam T.A. The laws of existence in virtual worlds: construction and violation [1] | ~ A scholarly paper published in a Russian journal, Philosophy and Humanities in Information Society. As far as I can tell (from Google translate and English text in the journal) this is a legitimate scholarly journal, though run by a university not a for-profit mega publisher like Elsevier. This does not mean the journal is not good, but as I can't read Russian I am not 100% sure. | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Mention in book Video Gaming | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
The result was keep. Academic Challenger ( talk) 23:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 02:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. This already part of an earlier AFD that includes it. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Taking this as AFD as PROD is contested. In my opinion, this does not satisfy WP:GNG. While the business code for a state obviously existed, I didn't think that it required its own standalone Wikipedia article. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close.. This article is already nominated in a different AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Taking this as AFD as PROD is contested. In my opinion, this does not satisfy WP:GNG. While the transportation code for a state obviously existed, I didn't think that it required its own standalone Wikipedia article. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There was equal-ish support between the redirects/merges and keeps. Further, the redirects were split on the redirect target. Further discussion about what to do with this article can continue on the talk page Guerillero Parlez Moi 10:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
The only source listed for the unbuilt portion is self-published, and the existing portion of the route is covered by two other existing articles ( Wisconsin Highway 175 and Wisconsin Highway 341). - happy 5214 01:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
"stadium freeway" milwaukee
on Newspapers.com limited to sources in the state of Wisconsin turns up 607 matches.
Imzadi 1979
→
05:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is uncertainty over where this article might be redirected to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still needs to be some consesnsus on a Redirect target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Created by a blocked user and sources are not independent to the subject Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 01:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)