The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, non-notable, article filled with self-promotion and puffery Bangabandhu ( talk) 23:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ~Styyx Talk? 15:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Placed 42nd in the Olympics and WP:BEFORE didn't give me much more than what was written on wikipedia. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 22:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
I have not been able to locate sufficient WP:SIGCOV to justify retaining this as a standalone article. The websites currently cited appear to be fansites and are not reliable. All hits on Newspapers.com are ads for the series. No coverage on JSTOR. TWL turns up one book mention, in Good Girl Messages: How Young Women Were Misled by Their Favorite Books, but it only briefly mentions Connie Blair. The single reliable book source in the article, The Girl Sleuth, is similarly brief about Connie.
I would be satisfied with a redirect to series author Betty Cavanna (there is little reliable content to bother merging). ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The book notes on pages 78–79: "Career girl Connie Blair, who begins with a brief modeling career and then moves into the advertising world, arrived in the late 1940s. The series was written by author Betty Cavanna, who was already known for her light teenage romance stories ... Using the pseudonym Betsy Allen, she combined career and mystery in the Connie Blair series. In The Clue in Blue, Connie works as a clothes model at Campion’s Department Store."
The book further notes: "Romance figures more prominently in the Connie Blair series than in the other career stories of the late 1940s, since their author was known for her romantic stories, and the series was criticized for its “boy of the book concept.” Since Connie dates a different boy in each book, none of the romances are serious, and she remains committed to her career. Critics agree that the Connie Blair series, like the Vicki Barr series, generally accepts and promotes sex role stereotypes for both men and women in the 1940s, but Chamberlain argues that the Connie Blair series questions these stereotypes directly: ..."
The book notes on page 94: "Betty Cavanna ... continued her Connie Blair career series under the pen name Betsey Allen until 1958."
The book notes on page 105: "Advertising executive Connie Blair, whose author abandoned the series in the late 1950s, was revived twice in the 1960s by publisher Grosset & Dunlap, once in hardcover and once in paperback. Her final appearance during the 1970s was in paperback."
This Google Books link has a copy of the cover of the book. This is an "encyclopedia of beloved girl's series books" and "Connie Blair" is included in the subtitle.
I do not have access to this article. These quotes are from Carpan 2009 . The article notes: "Though Connie Blair starts out as a receptionist at her advertising agency, she eventually goes to art school, wins promotions in the art department, and gets plum assignments to do on her own."
According to Carpan 2009 , "Chamberlain argues that the Connie Blair series questions these stereotypes directly" and quotes Chamberlain as saying about Connie Blair: "The series publishers obviously were not interested in reforming sex role stereotypes in the professions. They simply wanted to produce books that would appeal to adolescent girls. And just as obviously, the readers were interested in glamorous careers that could make exciting reading. Models, stewardesses, actresses, and nurses fit the bill well without requiring the readers to enter completely alien territory."
The book notes: "In the early books Connie can't go out the door without the reader being told how she looks that day. She is neat, chic, blonde. Even when she loses sleep over a case, she doesn't lose her looks [quote] Other girl sleuths are outside time and history—they are mythic—but Connie Blair mysteries are concerned with immediate commercial and social values. The stories have a certain psychological dimension, but the effect is flat and flabby. The later stories conform more rigidly to the conventional girl detective formula, and Connie gains more freedom."
The 1975 edition of the book notes: "The glamour girl image is even more extravagant in Connie Blair mysteries, the most obviously sexist and the least inspiring of them all." A 1986 review of the 1975 edition of the book says, "In fact, she believes that "the priority of Connie Blair books is sexist teachings." (p. 115)"
The book notes: "The one career series that was popular in the fifties, the Connie Blair mystery series, features a beautiful young blond working in a highly glamorized ad agency. The stories present her as more concerned about her appearance and her clothes than about her work; she seems to gain needed information or advance her career chiefly by playing up her femininity rather than through her competence. Betsy Allen, the author, was actually the pseudonym of Betty Cavanna, a popular writer of high school romances, the most popular fictional genre for girls. The Connie Blair series implies that even a working woman needs to know how to catch a man."
The book provides one sentence of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "By the way, Betsy Allen's (Betty Cavanna's) Connie Blair gets the nod as heroine of the most sexist girls' series."
The book provides three sentences of coverage about the subject. notes on page 80: "Juicier than Nancy Drew and more sentimental was Betsy Allen's Connie Blair, another girl detective I liked. Perhaps the spunky quality many girls admired in Nancy was the reason I preferred Connie Blair. First appearing in the 1940s, Connie worked for an advertising agency."
The book provides three sentences of coverage about the subjectfor the O'Keefe one. How is that WP:SIGCOV? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "Since 1949, when John Axe read his first Nancy Drew book, the Youngstown, Ohio, resident has been more than just a fan of the series and others, such as the Hardy Boys. Such have been the enthusiasm and knowledge of the former teacher that when approached by Hobby House Press to write two reference books about boys' and girls' series books, he agreed without hesitation. Axe, 60, has written more than 24 reference books for the company. But he says that the "All About Collecting Girls' Series Books" and "All About Collecting Boys' Series Books" were the most fun to research. "
The article notes: "According to John Axe, in his fascinating book, "All About Collecting Girls' Series Books" (Hobby House Press, $27.95), Nancy's mystery solving was almost always for the purpose of helping people who were powerless and in trouble. ... For the values of both first and later editions, I highly recommend Axe's book. In addition to information about the collectibility of Nancy Drew, the author sorts out the values and publication dates for other popular sets including those featuring ... Connie Blair ... ... There is a companion book, "All About Collecting Boys' Series Books," also compiled by John Axe and published by Hobby House Press. It, too, is highly recommended."
The article notes: "John Axe is the author of two excellent books about this field of collecting: All About Collecting Girls' Series Books, and All About Collecting Boys' Series Books, both published by Hobby House Press."
The article notes: "Axe is the author of hundreds of research articles and many books about dolls, teddy bears and other collectibles. He is a past editor of Doll News, the journal of the United Federation of Doll Clubs, and has designed paper dolls for UFDC convention souveneirs and journals and for a popular series published by Hobby House Press."
The article notes: "One of the best sources available on the subject is John Axe's new book "Kewpies — Dolls & Art of Rose O'Neill & Joseph L. Kallus" (Hobby House Press, hardback $19.95) which contains many photographs, detailed description and charts of manufacturers."
The article further notes, "Jan Foulke's "Blue Book, Dolls & Values" (Hobby House Press, paperback $14.95) contains reliable sample prices."
The article notes: "Now Mr John Axe, a collector of dolls, Teddies and toys, has compiled a history of the company and its products, a book which is both an invaluable guide to any collector and of general interest to others. The Magic of Merrythought: A Collector's Encyclopedia is published by the American publishers, Hobby House Press Inc and is obtainable at £16.25 (from the publisher's British distributors, Gazelle Book Services, Falcon House, Queen Square, Lancaster LA1 IRN.)"
The article reviews "Blue Book of Dolls & Values — by Jan Foulke; Hobby House Press, $12.95" and "Celebrity Doll Price Guide & Annual — by John Axe and A. Glenn Mandeville; Hobby House Press, $5.95." The book review note: "These books make clear that dolls have become big-ticket collectibles."
The article notes: "John Axe spent several days with them last fall in the preparation of his book, "The Collectible Dionne Quintuplets." Many of the dolls and Quint items in the Rodolfos' collection are pictured in the book, published recently by Hobby House Press in Riverdale, Md."
The article notes: "Kewpie Dolls and Art by John Axe, Hobby House Press Inc., Cumberland, Md. 183 pages, $19.95. This profusely illustrated reference volume devoted to the charming creations of Rose O'Neill and Joseph Kallus is the result of meticulous research by John Axe (author of The Encyclopedia of Celebrity Dolls), who was granted access to Kallus' files. ... The chief value of the work lies in its coverage of all types of Kewpie dolls and figurines, as well as other O'Neill and Kallus creations."
The "About Us" page notes: "Started in 1942 Hobby House Press, Inc. pioneered providing books on antiques via mail order. Thousands of customers were able to obtain hard-to-find research information on furniture, dolls, silver, glass and a myriad of other antiques. In the early 1970's the company concentrated its efforts on publishing books and magazines on dolls and later added teddy bears as a topic. Doll Reader magazine was first published in 1972 followed by Teddy Bear & friends magazine ten years later."
The article notes: "A new magazine aimed at filling the needs of doll artists has been launched by Hobby House Press. Doll Artistry is a bimonthly designed and written as a resource guide for those who make or dress dolls. ... Hobby House Press also publishes the magazines Doll Reader, Vintage Fashions, and Teddy Bear and Friends, as well as books on collectibles."
The book notes: "Double-check Herlocher's values in Jan Foulke's "13th Blue Book: Dolls & Values" (Hobby House Press, 1997, $17.95, 320 pp.) and/or Polly and Pam Judd's "Hard Plastic Dolls II: Identification and Price Guide" (Hobby House Press, 1994, $14.95, 263 pp.). Marjorie A. Miller's "Nancy Ann Storybook Dolls" (Hobby House Press, 1980, 232 pp.), a detailed history of the doll, is out of print."
The article notes: "Author Jan Foulke, an authority on doll collecting, said ... The Foulkes teamed up with Hobby House, publishers of Doll Reader magazine, and Thelma Bateman to produce their first book. The Foulkes exclusively have written and photographed the six successive editions. Blue Book is published by Hobby House Press."
The article notes: "These charming images of rare, antique and unique photographs from the extensive collections of Mary and Steven Wikert of Ceder Falls, have been gathered and published in a series of "Cherish Me Always" books from Hobby House Press."
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Notability not established Dachary ( talk) 20:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Creating deletion discussion for Loïc Dachary
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Unable to find any sources with significant coverage to suggest the subject is notable. –– FormalDude (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Having been relisted twice, I am skeptical that a third relist would have a meaningful difference. The keep that found that notability should be derived from a video by a youtuber was given no weight because it was not grounded in policy. GHITS is considered to be a poor argument by the community, so I did not find it persuasive. Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Product fails WP:NPRODUCT. Not only are the sources in the article primary or not reliable, but also there are no other sources that are significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources that could be found by searching on Google. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 14:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Daveout
(talk) 23:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 14:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Qatar Foundation. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
This is one of many articles written by employees of the Qatar Foundation to advertise the organization's activities. There is very little to indicate that this is an independently notable subject. If there is anything worth keeping, it should be merged with Qatar Foundation. Thenightaway ( talk) 09:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 14:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Regardless of whether the nomination has been withdrawn/extant keep vote, there is a consensus to keep Star Mississippi 02:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails
WP:SIGCOV and
WP:RS, mentions in sources are in passing or are from it's own website. Was unable to find anything sources that independently cover this website.
Dr vulpes (
💬 •
📝) 04:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Bloody Elbow is one of the most famous and most visited MMA websites in the world. It's verified on twitter and Facebook and has hundreds of thousands of followers across those platforms. I write for this site and am struggling to see why this article would be recommended for deletion when similar site MMA Fighting (which is also owned by Vox Media) has a Wikipedia page. This is my first time attempting to post something o Wikipedia, so please forgive my lack of skill and knowledge in this process. But Bloody Elbow is extremely well known within the MMA media world and is at the forefront of reporting when it comes tonissues like anti-labor practices in MMA and the intersections between combat sports and politics/crime/conflicts. If I need to put more sources in there, I will, but I really feel as though the current links show thay this site is notable (our work being featured on HBO's Real Sports feels like undeniable proof of this). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 05:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much for getting back to me and providing this advice. I must admit making a page is quite intimidating, so I appreciate the encouragement here. Below are some links which I think demonstrate Bloody Elbow's renown and popularity within the mma website industry (thanks again!):
https://blog.sbnation.com/2010/3/6/1357488/better-know-a-blogger-bloody
https://www.websiteiq.com/top-sites/fighting-mma/
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1731394-the-ufc-fans-guide-to-the-internet-the-mma-media-musts
https://martialartsdesigner.com.au/top-martial-arts-websites/
https://mymmanews.com/top-mma-news-sites/
https://aelieve.com/rankings/websites/category/sports/top-mma-sites/
https://feedly.com/i/top/mma-blogs
https://blog.feedspot.com/mma_blogs/
Do you believe these are sufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 13:09, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
All of those links are not "self-published blogs/websites". Bleacher Report is owned by Warner Bros. And SB Nation is owned by Vox media. Neither are akin to Tumblr or something without editorial oversight.
Also, I believe you may be discounting the edits on the oage which show the multiple award nominations for the site and their journalists from The World MMA Awards, which is a respected award within the industry.
The recent edits also show that BE's work has been cited by HBO, The New York Times and the Washington Post. I don't think those outlets would do second hand reporting sourcing a non notable media source.
When a NYT writer decided to learn about how to cover MMA, they studied Bloody Elbow. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/04/insider/reporter-mixed-martial-arts.html
The updates also show that notablenjndivoduals have worked at Bloody Elbow, including pro fighters past and present.
BE's work, within the industry, is known to be unique and important. They are the only site that rigorously covers incidents of domestic violence, anti-labor practices and connections between fighters and criminals (Kinahan) and warlords (Kadyrov) at the expense of gaining access to organizations like the UFC.
BE is also home to Karim Zidan, whose coverage specializes in sportswashing. He has traveled the world to talk to audiences about this practise. He was on a panel with Gary Kasparov at the Oslo Freedom Forum and has also given a talk at Princeton University.
https://oslofreedomforum.com/speakers/karim-zidan/
https://karimzidan.com/the-politics-of-mma-in-russia-a-conversation-with-karim-zidan-at-princeton/
BE is an extremely notable media source in the world of MMA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 00:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Ok, but what about The New York Times, Washington Post, HBO Real Sports and all the academic papers?
Here's an article from deadspin:
"SB Nation’s combat-sports sites—MMA Fighting, MMA Mania, Cageside Seats, Bloody Elbow, and Bad Left Hook—account for a sizable chunk of total SB Nation traffic, about 15-20 percent over the seven months we analyzed. While staffers at the high-profile blog MMA Fighting, which was acquired by Vox Media in 2011, are full-time, salaried employees like those at SBNation.com, the other combat-sports sites, like the team sites, are staffed mostly by people earning a small monthly stipend. “SB Nation employs three full-time employees and approximately 45-50 paid contributors across Bloody Elbow, Cagesideseats, MMAmania, and Bad Left Hook,” a Vox spokeswoman told me."
https://deadspin.com/leaked-data-show-vast-majority-of-sb-nation-page-views-1803138754
Here is Business Insider citing an original report from BE https://www.businessinsider.com/ufc-fighter-jon-jones-could-get-slapped-with-a-4-year-ban-2018-2
Here is the American Prospect interviewing a BE writer https://prospect.org/power/incredible-fight-trump-and-ultimate-fighting-championship/
Here is the National Center for Domestic and Sexual Violence citing original BE reporting. http://www.ncdsv.org/publications_UFC.html
Reference from Tech Crunch https://techcrunch.com/2013/10/15/sb-nation-partners-with-blogtalkradio/
The Verge citing original reporting https://www.theverge.com/2013/4/9/4204908/martial-arts-champ-responds-to-rape-allegations-with-internet-marketing-trickery
The SBN Lakers site referencing Bloody Elbow's success within the network:
"And, if you only consider blogs which started from scratch (some blogs, like CelticsBlog, existed in another form before transferring to SB Nation), SSR might be the fastest growing blog in SB Nation's history. I asked my boss if anybody had accomplished what we've done faster. It turns out this isn't exactly a known fact, but the only possibility he could think of was Bloody Elbow, which is only one of the foremost Mixed Martial Arts blog on the entire web. As a point of reference, Bloody Elbow had 1.9 million hits last month alone, and we might not have started out as fast as they did."
https://www.silverscreenandroll.com/platform/amp/2010/7/10/1563020/silver-screen-and-roll-hits-the
Print publication The Week referencing Bloody Elbow https://www.theweek.co.uk/ufc/100417/conor-mcgregor-retires-how-ufc-mma-fans-reacted-twitter-dana-white
A Bloody Elbow piece featured in the book 'Best Canadian Sportswriting' https://books.google.ca/books?id=y2a1DgAAQBAJ&pg=PT298&lpg=PT298&dq=%22sb+nation%22+%22bloody+elbow%22+-bloodyelbow.com&source=bl&ots=TXhcTrwN0T&sig=ACfU3U0SJnNnNs1WVLtVv3ErXh4S83o8VQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiSg-TjquL6AhXKDEQIHc4FBD04KBDoAXoECAMQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22sb%20nation%22%20%22bloody%20elbow%22%20-bloodyelbow.com&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 13:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The importance of those nominations at the World MMA Awards shouldn't be understated, either. It's the major awards show for the sport and is also televised
https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/2020/12/reminder-12th-annual-world-mma-awards-air-tonight-on-cbs-sports-network — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 13:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting and noting that the nomination has been withdrawn by the AFD nominator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deletes ground their arguments in policy which make them more persuasive than the keeps. I would have liked to see a source analysis, but there did no seem to be any interest and another round of relisting did not seem like it would result in any changes. Guerillero Parlez Moi 08:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article stood up on PRNewswire, company announcements, routine trade coverage. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 12:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate that this is a notable subject. This is an advertisement for the organization. Thenightaway ( talk) 09:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 12:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"About INEE". Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | INEE's website. Lacks independence and is a WP:PRIMARY source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
"Emergency education gains ground". The New Humanitarian. 2008-11-13. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Article is primarily an interview with quoted text by employees of INEE. Lacks independence from the subject, and could potentially be viewed as a primary source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT | |||||
"UNRWA HOSTS THE INTER-AGENCY NETWORK FOR EDUCATION IN EMERGENCIES (INEE) CONFLICT-SENSITIVE EDUCATION TRAINING OF TRAINERS IN AMMAN" (Press release). United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). 2017-08-08. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Press release from the organization. Lacks independence. WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT | |||||
Boudreau, Emily (2022-06-21). "Navigating Social-Emotional Learning Globally". Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Interview with EASEL Lab’s researchers who are partners of INEE. Lacks independence from the subject. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Mendizabal, Enrique; Hearn, Simon (2011). Anderson, Allison; Hodgkin, Marian (eds.). Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies: a community of practice, a catalyst for change. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies Overseas Development Institute (UK). Retrieved 2022-10-13. | WP:PRIMARY source published by the INEE. Lacks independence. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Sullivan-Owomoyela, Joan (2006). Inter-Agency Network for education in emergencies minimum standards for education in emergencies, chronic crisis, and early reconstruction: A Uganda case study (PDF). United States Agency for International Development (USAID). | Government publication. WP:PRIMARY source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Tarricone, Pina; Teo, Ian; Mestan, Kemran (2021-11-15). "A new policy tool to help build resilient education systems". Australian Council for Educational Research - ACER. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Journal publication about a policy tool developed by INEE. There is significant coverage of the policy tool, but no significant coverage of the company itself. Notability is not inherited. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Levine, Joe (2019-12-23). "The Key to Improving Refugee Education?". Teachers College - Columbia University. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Article is about the Global Refugee Forum, not the INEE. While one of the participating panelists was from the INEE, the article provided no in-depth coverage of INEE. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
"INEE Minimum Standards | INEE".} | INEE website; lacks independence. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Moriarty, Kate (2020). "Collective impacts on a global education emergency: The power of network response". Prospects. 49 (1–2): 81–85. doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09483-0. ISSN 0033-1538. PMC 7328285. PMID 32836426. | This is an excellent source which addresses the organization directly and in-detail with independent analysis. Passes WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Anderson, Allison; Mendenhall, Mary (2006). "Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies" (PDF). Forced Migration Review. Oxford, United Kingdom: United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund and the University of Oxford. Retrieved 2022-10-13. | Another excellent source which addresses the organization directly and in-detail with independent analysis. Passes WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
A common platform for education in emergencies and protracted crises Evidence paper (PDF). London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute. 2016. Retrieved 2022-10-13. | Self published by a think tank. The editorial oversight is questionable. Should probably be viewed as a WP:PRIMARY source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Burde, Dana; Lahmann, Heddy (2020). "Editorial Note" (PDF). Journal of Education in Emergencies. 8 (1): 5–12. ISSN 2518-6833. | Journal published by the INEE. Lacks independence. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Total qualifying sources | 2 | There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
|
The result was delete. Policy based input shows why this cannot be kept. Star Mississippi 02:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Italian artistic gymnast and an impressively put together article but sadly he does not pass the stringent standards of WP:NGYMNAST - which tells us he would have had to have won individual gold or individual medial to be presumed as notable. As he fails WP:GNG and there is not sustained significant coverage in secondary sources, I'm afraid deletion is appropriate. Likely WP:TOOSOON... Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
This is linked from the bottom of the BBC Radio 1 article. There are no references other than a defunct "official website" and a search for reliable sources (including in the archives of Broadcast (magazine)) reveals no relevant results. Flip Format ( talk) 11:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. It does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. MarioGom ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
As best I can tell, Kool Corner was the store and nothing else. The ruins of it are still there, but I can't find any evidence of a settlement here. Mangoe ( talk) 19:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Frank Casino. (non-admin closure) shelovesneo ( talk) 19:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Without noticing, there has been an article titled Frank Casino in the mainspace which dims the draft as inadequate and therefore has to be deleted. shelovesneo ( talk) 18:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'd offer to Draftify fhis so that it could go through AFC but it looks like this route has already been attempted. Until this artist receives more significant coverage (or you can locate it) it looks like they will not have a Wikipedia article. Liz Read! Talk! 20:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD; original reasoning was: Does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NMUSIC. Article has been
WP:REFBOMBED without any significant coverage.
. After a
WP:BEFORE, reasoning still holds.
Jalen Folf
(talk) 18:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Page has already been reviewed. Also I think you got a personal probleme with Van Snyder @ JalenFolf because you are always declining and deleting everything that has to do with him, even if the sources and references are reliable and true xD. Probably you would even consider him for deletion if he had 100M followers and billboard no 1 charting hits. what else you want?? I really think you got a personal issue with this topic, since in your profile stands that you are Fan of Monstercat and a member of WikiProject Electronic Music. I see clearly that you got something against him, your decisions what you do are not objective. I can also just copy and paste my reason for keeping article:
Van Snyder (DJ) should be kept.
@ MaxnaCarta @ JalenFolf
The reasons for this:
.) approved Wikipedia article in other language does exist
.) is artist of renowned record labels as the major label Warner Music Denmark
.) Google Knowledge Panel includes actually signed record labels as the major label Warner Music Denmark
.) many collaborations and remixes with renowned artists all over the world such as Akon, Flo Rida, Lil Wayne ft. T-Pain, Bonnie Tyler, Headhunterz, Klaas, Michael Mind Project, Plastik Funk etc..
.) coverage in the biggest EDM magazines in the world like WeRaveYou, EDMHouseNetwork
.) big and verified social media presence with millions of followers
.) discogs.com
.) according to 1001tracklists.com and songstats.com he is supported by the biggest and most known DJs in the world, hundrets of the biggest DJs in the world are playing his songs in their radioshows and DJ-Sets across the globe.
.) was played on Tomorrowland 2022, Mainstage
.) coverage in one of Denmarks biggest radiostations DR P3
.) estabilished since 2009 in the international EDM scene, you can follow his career back to/since 2009
regarding Wikipedia guidelines of notability more requirements of notability are met like being signed on really renowned and notable record labels such as Warner Music Denmark, Revealed Recordings and Black Hole Recordings. Supported in the biggest EDM News pages worldwide, collaborations with renowned and notable artists exist, chart successes on official beatport Top 100 charts exist too: BeatStats - ARTISTINFO - Van Snyder , played on one of Denmarks biggest radiostations DR P3, an indication that this article/artist is notable and relevant is also (even if not a must) but that article in other Wikipedia language exists. Altogether, a wrong decision to mark this article for deletion. Offcourse the article should be improved and for example discogs and the beatport top 100 charts successes added to references. PS: i will add now discogs and beatport top 100 charts sources to the article -- Base-X ( talk) 09:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC).[ reply
-- Base-X ( talk) 19:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
according to WP:NMUSIC musicbrainz.org can be taken as official and reliable source: https://musicbrainz.org/artist/51c9c2ec-12bc-42a5-97b1-674f07a4fec1/recordings Van Snyder on musicbrainz.org - Overview - Recordings i will include this into the references list and remove many references so that the article is no longer anymore WP:REFBOMBED. Also NOTE: that musicbrainz.org link includes official references to the Headhunterz Remix of his Make it Loud and appearances on many real physical CD-Samplers, released by major labels, CD-Samplers like Future Trance and Dream Dance, which are really huge and well known! I will include this all in the article. -- Base-X ( talk) 12:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
disputed draftification, Contains
WP:OR, eg: leaving the need for a conservative Islamic party and the sprucingsourcing, while it may show what it purports to show, is recent enough to require linking. Not ready for mainspace. Optimal solution might be to return to Draft for improvement, but I view that to be unlikely to bear fruit. Over to the community 🇺🇦
FiddleTimtrent
FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Not a single one of the references in this entire article mentions White Mountain Castle Publishing, not even trivially. The majority of the content in the article isn't even about the company, it's about the books and the people in them. If those people are notable (and it looks like some are), that content belongs in their articles, not in this one. No sources about the company located on a search. Zero indication that the company is notable in and of itself. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG IndyNotes ( talk) 16:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Bungle (
talk •
contribs) 18:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Athens Tram stops. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zappio tram stop", which was closed as "no consensus" with minimal participation and the single keep !vote not being based on policy. Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
[I]t has become necessary to AfD any train station article that doesn't merit a standalone page to gain an affirmative consensus for redirection.is just false. The reason AfDs of train stations are controversial is because people keep nominating them for deletion when they should be proposing a merge. AfD is for nominating articles for deletion, and there is a widespread consensus (affirmed time after time after time) that these articles should be merged and redirected if they aren't individually notable. And that was the conclusion of the last AfD, and will almost certainly be the conclusion of this AfD too. If time wasn't being wasted on discussions like this then there would be more merges happening with a lot less acrimony. Thryduulf ( talk) 23:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion relative to Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Deletion policy is not present. For example, per WP:NEXIST, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article, or whether or not they "work". An article being in an orphaned state is also not a valid rationale for deletion. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America 1000 19:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Since this article is orphaned and the references do not work, it seems this article does not show general notability. Given this, I am proposing to have this article deleted. Nintendoswitchfan ( talk) 17:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Bungle (
talk •
contribs) 18:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a former mayor, not reliably sourced as the subject of sufficient coverage to pass WP:NPOL #2. Full disclosure, I was the original creator of this, back in 2010 when the notability standard for mayors was an automatic "inherent" notability freebie for any mayor of any city whose population surpassed 50,000 -- but that's long since been deprecated, and the inclusion test for a mayor now hinges on how much substance can actually be written and sourced about his mayoralty: specific things he did as mayor, specific projects he spearheaded as mayor, specific effects his mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But in 12 years, absolutely nothing of substance has been added to expand the article from the initial stub at all, and even on a deep database search for at-the-time coverage that wouldn't google well, I mostly just get glancing namechecks of his existence as a provider of soundbite in coverage of other things rather than substantive or notability-building analysis about his mayoralty -- the strongest source I can find about him was covering him in the context of coming up on stage to play a little bit of guitar when Hollerado played a concert in his city, which is of no enduring significance. I simply haven't been able to find enough coverage to get him back up to the standard that mayors now have to meet, so he can't be exempted from the standards that apply in 2022 just because "mayor who exists" was good enough for the standards that applied in 2010. Bearcat ( talk) 17:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Enos733 (
talk) 17:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article on former footballer with very brief career and no apparent significant coverage. Closest I can find is Mundo Dos Guarda-Redes, which is not enough. Can't find evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant coverage so she fails GNG Dougal18 ( talk) 15:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
She fails GNG due to a lack of significant coverage on her. Dougal18 ( talk) 14:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Italian army officer, was involved briefly in an affair with a lady by the name of Donatella Di Rosa who made unfounded accusations of a planned coup d'état, leading to getting him sacked and also her husband a Colonel. And that's your lot - absolutely clear, textbook case of WP:ONEEVENT and other than this, the good General Franco is notable for nothing other than a sound military life well - and quietly - lived. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 10:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KSAWikipedian (
talk) 14:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument to draftify is weak if nobody intends to work on the draft, and nobody has expressed such an intention here. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article currently doesn't pass WP:NSPORT guidelines. Also has a draft version that was copied and pasted into main-space for similar notability reasons. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 13:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article currently doesn't pass WP:NSPORT guidelines. Also has a draft version that was copied and pasted into main-space for similar notability reasons. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 13:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Wrong venue, Redirects are only deleted at WP:RFD (non-admin closure) MB 17:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No clear evidence that "the lettuce" refers to the Daily Star lettuce as a primary topic. The reason the PROD was removed - that most Google searches for "the lettuce" bring up this particular lettuce - is a clear example of recentism. Most searches for "lettuce" bring this event up for me; should we go ahead and make Lettuce a disambiguation page? QueenofBithynia ( talk) 13:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. No reliable independent coverage of the player, only results and passing coverage. Adamtt9 ( talk) 11:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969
TT me 12:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
No non-primary sources or indication of notability. Basically promotional. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 12:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. A Weak Keep but Keep it is. There is already an article at Ante Pavlović and it's arguable whether or not this Ante Pavlović should be moved to that title in its place. I'll leave the Move decision to a discussion that can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Now this, I promise you, is interesting. Ante Pavlović was a self-proclaimed 'chiropractor' and sometime psychiatric patient, whose unpleasant erratic, extreme, violent and anti-social behaviour got him some passing notoriety in the more lurid Croatian press - including TV shows and even appears to have gained him some sort of following. So we have coverage and some degree of notoriety, but we're hardly Charles Manson and more of a public nuisance. Outside of Croatia and the complaints of his long-suffering neighbours, he is unknown. Do we need a page about the 'Following of Ante Pavlović'? The fact of that following is not the focus of the media and is not in itself notable other than a passing commentary on human culpability. So I would argue that no, we do not need this article and so this would duly be deleted. We might argue about a short biography being appropriate, but this is not that article. We could move the page title to Ante Pavlović but then this would all have to be rewritten to be biographical and it leaves me with the question - does a psychiatrically unbalanced man whose only media attention is for complaints about his awful behaviour in a foreign country merit an article in the English Wikipedia? Even if it DOES, technically, pass WP:GNG. Over to you, good people. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 11:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Sources do not have to be available online or written in English.(Original emphasis.) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow time to reach consensus, which is pretty evenly split at the moment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969
TT me 12:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 11:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I can only find stats databases, no significant news coverage. His professional career was very brief. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC, the latter guideline states [sports] biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This is not a notable subject. It's a framework or term associated with the work of a small handful of people who appear to have primarily published on this in low-tier academic publications and radical outlets. The article appears to have been created by someone whose edits are singularly focused on promoting one of these people, George S. Rigakos. There's nothing to indicate that it has broader significance. Thenightaway ( talk) 10:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Subject is not notable. Sources cited on the article are not about him but musicians he may have worked with, this includes the awards and nominations mention at the end of the article. SPAECC ( talk) 10:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Semi-pro footballer with no apparent significant coverage in Arabic or English. I found his Soccerway profile, which has no indication of notability or professional appearances. I found a single passing mention in TimeKora and Hasanews, which is an extremely basic transfer announcement with no useful information about Ammar Bilal. Does not look to pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC and might have even failed under the old WP:NFOOTBALL guideline. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Obviously will never be built as Iran cannot export to Europe because of sanctions - if sanctions were ever lifted it would still not be built as EU is decarbonizing Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After almost a month on AFD there does not seem to be any prospect that another relist will get us closer to consensus. Stifle ( talk) 10:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable French civil servant. Subject fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOL. Of the two sources cited in the article, neither provides significant independent coverage of the subject. The Who's Who entry is misleading. It is not a biographical entry on closer examination. The French language text is primarily about the celebrations of the 20th Anniversary of INPI and not about Lapierre who is only mentioned briefly. Further, it reads like a press release and has no contributing author; which makes me doubt the independence of this source. The other is a publication of the INPI; of which Lapierre is the director. It also lacks independence from the subject. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk) 08:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Cannot find any third-party sources on this film. Wonder if it even released since I cannot find its release date on database sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate that this is notable. If there is anything worth keeping, it can be merged with Qatar Foundation. Thenightaway ( talk) 09:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
This is another problem case, starting from the impossibility of searching for a word that is apparently as common on web pages as "a" and "the". The material evidence is this: the hall is definitely there, and it definitely says "Leader" on it, and it appears in topos and aerials as far back as I can go. Until the 1950s, though, it's the only building at the corner. Meanwhile, the "Leader School" appears only in one aerial in the 1950s and then disappears again. Maybe newspapers might be more illuminating, but I find no narrative about the place in any source. At best this might be a locale, but for instance there's no confirmation that the hall is named for a place as opposed to a person. Mangoe ( talk) 04:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of recent additions to the article to consider.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tacna, Arizona. Liz Read! Talk! 06:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
A searching nightmare, but the maps say this was a rail stop named Tacna before being renamed at some point. Other than that, nothing there. Mangoe ( talk) 04:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed with no improvement DonaldD23 talk to me 04:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article has unclear list criteria (whether this is about state of birth or first state represented), seems to fail WP:NLIST, double-up of information already found on other pages, and probably fails WP:NOR. OliveYouBean ( talk) 04:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they all have essentially the same problems:
The result was redirect to The Omen. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Rehash of plot elements from The Omen. References are unremarkable and character does not meet WP:IPC. AldezD ( talk) 03:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The letter of NPOL clearly doesn't apply here; this is a policeman, not an elected politician; but as I understand it, the gist of the argument below is that a high-ranking policeman ought to be notable, and for the head of provincial police of a very populous country, that's a strong argument. Arguments against a standalone article are focused on his implication in a killing, and on the letter of NPOL, but none have directly addressed the sources provided, or the idea of notability inherent in such a position. Conversely, while sources have been provided, they have not been evaluated in detail. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Subject is associated almost exclusively with a single event ( WP:ONEEVENT). Any relevant new content, if reliably sourced, should be merged into Killing of Brigadier Nofriansyah Yosua Hutabarat and a Redirect put in place. Paul W ( talk) 10:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 12:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Corresponding article in Spanish only cites one source and I could not find too much significant coverage on the film. Unlike other TV movies like Descendants or Cry Baby Lane, no evident cult following. InvadingInvader ( talk) 02:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Not notable 🌊PacificDepths talk| contrib 02:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Poorly sourced advertisement. A WP:BEFORE shows that it fails GNG. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 02:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Montpellier–Méditerranée Airport#Airlife magazine. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Magazine failed WP:GNG 4 years ago and still fails now. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This page does not contribute much encyclopedia value. The vast majority of it is either original research or mere trivia, neither of which should be presented on Wikipedia. The Enchanted article itself already discusses the noteworthy information regarding the references. My initial thought is to Delete the page, but as always, I leave it up to the community. TNstingray ( talk) 01:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Crusade (disambiguation)#Comics. Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet GNG, could not find reliable coverage. Coverage may appear in French-language publications that I don't have access to, but I at least didn't see anything in English. And for what it's worth, doesn't appear to meet any of WP:BOOKCRIT either though I'm aware that isn't meant to specifically apply to comics. QuietHere ( talk) 01:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Guerillero Parlez Moi 10:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a film, not making any serious claim to passing
WP:NFILM. As always, films don't get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, but must
reliably source some evidence of significance (critical attention, noteworthy awards, etc.) -- but existence is the only claim on offer here, the article on the Croatian Wikipedia says even less than this does and cites just one
primary source that isn't support for notability either, and I can find absolutely no
WP:GNG-worthy sources about it on a Google search under either the English or Croatian titles.
Furthermore, this was prodded in January as "non-notable film", and then deprodded a few days later as "notable film" -- but you don't make a film notable by throwing the word "notable" around, you make a film notable by adding sources to improve the article, which never happened.
As I don't have access to any databases in which I could retrieve 25-year-old Croatian media coverage, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with access to such resources can find improved sourcing to salvage it with -- but simply existing isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to cite any reliable sources.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: An analysis of sources which are not "brief", nor presumed rather than found and shown, may help to determine the notability of the subject.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 05:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi 00:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Road named after him is not relevant. No notable sources. A lot of sources talk about genealogy, which seems irrelevant to his only claim of notability. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 00:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Notability appears to be borderline, but on the balance there is consensus to keep. Some substantive sourcing has been provided, and the one argument challenging the strongest source is off the mark. No clear consensus on renaming, but the argument to reframe as an article about the huts themselves is strong, and I note that at least one of the sources appear to discuss the huts more than the association. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this specific volunteer group is too notable. The only significant mention I could find is
this page on nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/.
RPI2026F1 (
talk) 00:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of recent improvements to the article. Also consider the ATD of a redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
A more or less random spot in the forest taken from a Forest Service map. My guess is it has something to do with the notorious 1990 Dude Fire, but at any rate, not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 00:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Soundwave (Australian music festival)#2010. ✗ plicit 00:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This article isn't notable enough to have a stand-alone article. Or we could merge it with Soundwave (Australian music festival). Nythar ( 💬- 🎃) 00:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, non-notable, article filled with self-promotion and puffery Bangabandhu ( talk) 23:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ~Styyx Talk? 15:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Placed 42nd in the Olympics and WP:BEFORE didn't give me much more than what was written on wikipedia. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 22:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
I have not been able to locate sufficient WP:SIGCOV to justify retaining this as a standalone article. The websites currently cited appear to be fansites and are not reliable. All hits on Newspapers.com are ads for the series. No coverage on JSTOR. TWL turns up one book mention, in Good Girl Messages: How Young Women Were Misled by Their Favorite Books, but it only briefly mentions Connie Blair. The single reliable book source in the article, The Girl Sleuth, is similarly brief about Connie.
I would be satisfied with a redirect to series author Betty Cavanna (there is little reliable content to bother merging). ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The book notes on pages 78–79: "Career girl Connie Blair, who begins with a brief modeling career and then moves into the advertising world, arrived in the late 1940s. The series was written by author Betty Cavanna, who was already known for her light teenage romance stories ... Using the pseudonym Betsy Allen, she combined career and mystery in the Connie Blair series. In The Clue in Blue, Connie works as a clothes model at Campion’s Department Store."
The book further notes: "Romance figures more prominently in the Connie Blair series than in the other career stories of the late 1940s, since their author was known for her romantic stories, and the series was criticized for its “boy of the book concept.” Since Connie dates a different boy in each book, none of the romances are serious, and she remains committed to her career. Critics agree that the Connie Blair series, like the Vicki Barr series, generally accepts and promotes sex role stereotypes for both men and women in the 1940s, but Chamberlain argues that the Connie Blair series questions these stereotypes directly: ..."
The book notes on page 94: "Betty Cavanna ... continued her Connie Blair career series under the pen name Betsey Allen until 1958."
The book notes on page 105: "Advertising executive Connie Blair, whose author abandoned the series in the late 1950s, was revived twice in the 1960s by publisher Grosset & Dunlap, once in hardcover and once in paperback. Her final appearance during the 1970s was in paperback."
This Google Books link has a copy of the cover of the book. This is an "encyclopedia of beloved girl's series books" and "Connie Blair" is included in the subtitle.
I do not have access to this article. These quotes are from Carpan 2009 . The article notes: "Though Connie Blair starts out as a receptionist at her advertising agency, she eventually goes to art school, wins promotions in the art department, and gets plum assignments to do on her own."
According to Carpan 2009 , "Chamberlain argues that the Connie Blair series questions these stereotypes directly" and quotes Chamberlain as saying about Connie Blair: "The series publishers obviously were not interested in reforming sex role stereotypes in the professions. They simply wanted to produce books that would appeal to adolescent girls. And just as obviously, the readers were interested in glamorous careers that could make exciting reading. Models, stewardesses, actresses, and nurses fit the bill well without requiring the readers to enter completely alien territory."
The book notes: "In the early books Connie can't go out the door without the reader being told how she looks that day. She is neat, chic, blonde. Even when she loses sleep over a case, she doesn't lose her looks [quote] Other girl sleuths are outside time and history—they are mythic—but Connie Blair mysteries are concerned with immediate commercial and social values. The stories have a certain psychological dimension, but the effect is flat and flabby. The later stories conform more rigidly to the conventional girl detective formula, and Connie gains more freedom."
The 1975 edition of the book notes: "The glamour girl image is even more extravagant in Connie Blair mysteries, the most obviously sexist and the least inspiring of them all." A 1986 review of the 1975 edition of the book says, "In fact, she believes that "the priority of Connie Blair books is sexist teachings." (p. 115)"
The book notes: "The one career series that was popular in the fifties, the Connie Blair mystery series, features a beautiful young blond working in a highly glamorized ad agency. The stories present her as more concerned about her appearance and her clothes than about her work; she seems to gain needed information or advance her career chiefly by playing up her femininity rather than through her competence. Betsy Allen, the author, was actually the pseudonym of Betty Cavanna, a popular writer of high school romances, the most popular fictional genre for girls. The Connie Blair series implies that even a working woman needs to know how to catch a man."
The book provides one sentence of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "By the way, Betsy Allen's (Betty Cavanna's) Connie Blair gets the nod as heroine of the most sexist girls' series."
The book provides three sentences of coverage about the subject. notes on page 80: "Juicier than Nancy Drew and more sentimental was Betsy Allen's Connie Blair, another girl detective I liked. Perhaps the spunky quality many girls admired in Nancy was the reason I preferred Connie Blair. First appearing in the 1940s, Connie worked for an advertising agency."
The book provides three sentences of coverage about the subjectfor the O'Keefe one. How is that WP:SIGCOV? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "Since 1949, when John Axe read his first Nancy Drew book, the Youngstown, Ohio, resident has been more than just a fan of the series and others, such as the Hardy Boys. Such have been the enthusiasm and knowledge of the former teacher that when approached by Hobby House Press to write two reference books about boys' and girls' series books, he agreed without hesitation. Axe, 60, has written more than 24 reference books for the company. But he says that the "All About Collecting Girls' Series Books" and "All About Collecting Boys' Series Books" were the most fun to research. "
The article notes: "According to John Axe, in his fascinating book, "All About Collecting Girls' Series Books" (Hobby House Press, $27.95), Nancy's mystery solving was almost always for the purpose of helping people who were powerless and in trouble. ... For the values of both first and later editions, I highly recommend Axe's book. In addition to information about the collectibility of Nancy Drew, the author sorts out the values and publication dates for other popular sets including those featuring ... Connie Blair ... ... There is a companion book, "All About Collecting Boys' Series Books," also compiled by John Axe and published by Hobby House Press. It, too, is highly recommended."
The article notes: "John Axe is the author of two excellent books about this field of collecting: All About Collecting Girls' Series Books, and All About Collecting Boys' Series Books, both published by Hobby House Press."
The article notes: "Axe is the author of hundreds of research articles and many books about dolls, teddy bears and other collectibles. He is a past editor of Doll News, the journal of the United Federation of Doll Clubs, and has designed paper dolls for UFDC convention souveneirs and journals and for a popular series published by Hobby House Press."
The article notes: "One of the best sources available on the subject is John Axe's new book "Kewpies — Dolls & Art of Rose O'Neill & Joseph L. Kallus" (Hobby House Press, hardback $19.95) which contains many photographs, detailed description and charts of manufacturers."
The article further notes, "Jan Foulke's "Blue Book, Dolls & Values" (Hobby House Press, paperback $14.95) contains reliable sample prices."
The article notes: "Now Mr John Axe, a collector of dolls, Teddies and toys, has compiled a history of the company and its products, a book which is both an invaluable guide to any collector and of general interest to others. The Magic of Merrythought: A Collector's Encyclopedia is published by the American publishers, Hobby House Press Inc and is obtainable at £16.25 (from the publisher's British distributors, Gazelle Book Services, Falcon House, Queen Square, Lancaster LA1 IRN.)"
The article reviews "Blue Book of Dolls & Values — by Jan Foulke; Hobby House Press, $12.95" and "Celebrity Doll Price Guide & Annual — by John Axe and A. Glenn Mandeville; Hobby House Press, $5.95." The book review note: "These books make clear that dolls have become big-ticket collectibles."
The article notes: "John Axe spent several days with them last fall in the preparation of his book, "The Collectible Dionne Quintuplets." Many of the dolls and Quint items in the Rodolfos' collection are pictured in the book, published recently by Hobby House Press in Riverdale, Md."
The article notes: "Kewpie Dolls and Art by John Axe, Hobby House Press Inc., Cumberland, Md. 183 pages, $19.95. This profusely illustrated reference volume devoted to the charming creations of Rose O'Neill and Joseph Kallus is the result of meticulous research by John Axe (author of The Encyclopedia of Celebrity Dolls), who was granted access to Kallus' files. ... The chief value of the work lies in its coverage of all types of Kewpie dolls and figurines, as well as other O'Neill and Kallus creations."
The "About Us" page notes: "Started in 1942 Hobby House Press, Inc. pioneered providing books on antiques via mail order. Thousands of customers were able to obtain hard-to-find research information on furniture, dolls, silver, glass and a myriad of other antiques. In the early 1970's the company concentrated its efforts on publishing books and magazines on dolls and later added teddy bears as a topic. Doll Reader magazine was first published in 1972 followed by Teddy Bear & friends magazine ten years later."
The article notes: "A new magazine aimed at filling the needs of doll artists has been launched by Hobby House Press. Doll Artistry is a bimonthly designed and written as a resource guide for those who make or dress dolls. ... Hobby House Press also publishes the magazines Doll Reader, Vintage Fashions, and Teddy Bear and Friends, as well as books on collectibles."
The book notes: "Double-check Herlocher's values in Jan Foulke's "13th Blue Book: Dolls & Values" (Hobby House Press, 1997, $17.95, 320 pp.) and/or Polly and Pam Judd's "Hard Plastic Dolls II: Identification and Price Guide" (Hobby House Press, 1994, $14.95, 263 pp.). Marjorie A. Miller's "Nancy Ann Storybook Dolls" (Hobby House Press, 1980, 232 pp.), a detailed history of the doll, is out of print."
The article notes: "Author Jan Foulke, an authority on doll collecting, said ... The Foulkes teamed up with Hobby House, publishers of Doll Reader magazine, and Thelma Bateman to produce their first book. The Foulkes exclusively have written and photographed the six successive editions. Blue Book is published by Hobby House Press."
The article notes: "These charming images of rare, antique and unique photographs from the extensive collections of Mary and Steven Wikert of Ceder Falls, have been gathered and published in a series of "Cherish Me Always" books from Hobby House Press."
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Notability not established Dachary ( talk) 20:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Creating deletion discussion for Loïc Dachary
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Unable to find any sources with significant coverage to suggest the subject is notable. –– FormalDude (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Having been relisted twice, I am skeptical that a third relist would have a meaningful difference. The keep that found that notability should be derived from a video by a youtuber was given no weight because it was not grounded in policy. GHITS is considered to be a poor argument by the community, so I did not find it persuasive. Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Product fails WP:NPRODUCT. Not only are the sources in the article primary or not reliable, but also there are no other sources that are significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources that could be found by searching on Google. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 14:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Daveout
(talk) 23:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 14:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Qatar Foundation. Liz Read! Talk! 06:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
This is one of many articles written by employees of the Qatar Foundation to advertise the organization's activities. There is very little to indicate that this is an independently notable subject. If there is anything worth keeping, it should be merged with Qatar Foundation. Thenightaway ( talk) 09:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000 14:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Regardless of whether the nomination has been withdrawn/extant keep vote, there is a consensus to keep Star Mississippi 02:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails
WP:SIGCOV and
WP:RS, mentions in sources are in passing or are from it's own website. Was unable to find anything sources that independently cover this website.
Dr vulpes (
💬 •
📝) 04:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Bloody Elbow is one of the most famous and most visited MMA websites in the world. It's verified on twitter and Facebook and has hundreds of thousands of followers across those platforms. I write for this site and am struggling to see why this article would be recommended for deletion when similar site MMA Fighting (which is also owned by Vox Media) has a Wikipedia page. This is my first time attempting to post something o Wikipedia, so please forgive my lack of skill and knowledge in this process. But Bloody Elbow is extremely well known within the MMA media world and is at the forefront of reporting when it comes tonissues like anti-labor practices in MMA and the intersections between combat sports and politics/crime/conflicts. If I need to put more sources in there, I will, but I really feel as though the current links show thay this site is notable (our work being featured on HBO's Real Sports feels like undeniable proof of this). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 05:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you so much for getting back to me and providing this advice. I must admit making a page is quite intimidating, so I appreciate the encouragement here. Below are some links which I think demonstrate Bloody Elbow's renown and popularity within the mma website industry (thanks again!):
https://blog.sbnation.com/2010/3/6/1357488/better-know-a-blogger-bloody
https://www.websiteiq.com/top-sites/fighting-mma/
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1731394-the-ufc-fans-guide-to-the-internet-the-mma-media-musts
https://martialartsdesigner.com.au/top-martial-arts-websites/
https://mymmanews.com/top-mma-news-sites/
https://aelieve.com/rankings/websites/category/sports/top-mma-sites/
https://feedly.com/i/top/mma-blogs
https://blog.feedspot.com/mma_blogs/
Do you believe these are sufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 13:09, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
All of those links are not "self-published blogs/websites". Bleacher Report is owned by Warner Bros. And SB Nation is owned by Vox media. Neither are akin to Tumblr or something without editorial oversight.
Also, I believe you may be discounting the edits on the oage which show the multiple award nominations for the site and their journalists from The World MMA Awards, which is a respected award within the industry.
The recent edits also show that BE's work has been cited by HBO, The New York Times and the Washington Post. I don't think those outlets would do second hand reporting sourcing a non notable media source.
When a NYT writer decided to learn about how to cover MMA, they studied Bloody Elbow. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/04/insider/reporter-mixed-martial-arts.html
The updates also show that notablenjndivoduals have worked at Bloody Elbow, including pro fighters past and present.
BE's work, within the industry, is known to be unique and important. They are the only site that rigorously covers incidents of domestic violence, anti-labor practices and connections between fighters and criminals (Kinahan) and warlords (Kadyrov) at the expense of gaining access to organizations like the UFC.
BE is also home to Karim Zidan, whose coverage specializes in sportswashing. He has traveled the world to talk to audiences about this practise. He was on a panel with Gary Kasparov at the Oslo Freedom Forum and has also given a talk at Princeton University.
https://oslofreedomforum.com/speakers/karim-zidan/
https://karimzidan.com/the-politics-of-mma-in-russia-a-conversation-with-karim-zidan-at-princeton/
BE is an extremely notable media source in the world of MMA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 00:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 13:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Ok, but what about The New York Times, Washington Post, HBO Real Sports and all the academic papers?
Here's an article from deadspin:
"SB Nation’s combat-sports sites—MMA Fighting, MMA Mania, Cageside Seats, Bloody Elbow, and Bad Left Hook—account for a sizable chunk of total SB Nation traffic, about 15-20 percent over the seven months we analyzed. While staffers at the high-profile blog MMA Fighting, which was acquired by Vox Media in 2011, are full-time, salaried employees like those at SBNation.com, the other combat-sports sites, like the team sites, are staffed mostly by people earning a small monthly stipend. “SB Nation employs three full-time employees and approximately 45-50 paid contributors across Bloody Elbow, Cagesideseats, MMAmania, and Bad Left Hook,” a Vox spokeswoman told me."
https://deadspin.com/leaked-data-show-vast-majority-of-sb-nation-page-views-1803138754
Here is Business Insider citing an original report from BE https://www.businessinsider.com/ufc-fighter-jon-jones-could-get-slapped-with-a-4-year-ban-2018-2
Here is the American Prospect interviewing a BE writer https://prospect.org/power/incredible-fight-trump-and-ultimate-fighting-championship/
Here is the National Center for Domestic and Sexual Violence citing original BE reporting. http://www.ncdsv.org/publications_UFC.html
Reference from Tech Crunch https://techcrunch.com/2013/10/15/sb-nation-partners-with-blogtalkradio/
The Verge citing original reporting https://www.theverge.com/2013/4/9/4204908/martial-arts-champ-responds-to-rape-allegations-with-internet-marketing-trickery
The SBN Lakers site referencing Bloody Elbow's success within the network:
"And, if you only consider blogs which started from scratch (some blogs, like CelticsBlog, existed in another form before transferring to SB Nation), SSR might be the fastest growing blog in SB Nation's history. I asked my boss if anybody had accomplished what we've done faster. It turns out this isn't exactly a known fact, but the only possibility he could think of was Bloody Elbow, which is only one of the foremost Mixed Martial Arts blog on the entire web. As a point of reference, Bloody Elbow had 1.9 million hits last month alone, and we might not have started out as fast as they did."
https://www.silverscreenandroll.com/platform/amp/2010/7/10/1563020/silver-screen-and-roll-hits-the
Print publication The Week referencing Bloody Elbow https://www.theweek.co.uk/ufc/100417/conor-mcgregor-retires-how-ufc-mma-fans-reacted-twitter-dana-white
A Bloody Elbow piece featured in the book 'Best Canadian Sportswriting' https://books.google.ca/books?id=y2a1DgAAQBAJ&pg=PT298&lpg=PT298&dq=%22sb+nation%22+%22bloody+elbow%22+-bloodyelbow.com&source=bl&ots=TXhcTrwN0T&sig=ACfU3U0SJnNnNs1WVLtVv3ErXh4S83o8VQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiSg-TjquL6AhXKDEQIHc4FBD04KBDoAXoECAMQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22sb%20nation%22%20%22bloody%20elbow%22%20-bloodyelbow.com&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 13:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The importance of those nominations at the World MMA Awards shouldn't be understated, either. It's the major awards show for the sport and is also televised
https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/2020/12/reminder-12th-annual-world-mma-awards-air-tonight-on-cbs-sports-network — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C01:FA00:AD5B:D5F9:436D:1AB6 ( talk) 13:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting and noting that the nomination has been withdrawn by the AFD nominator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deletes ground their arguments in policy which make them more persuasive than the keeps. I would have liked to see a source analysis, but there did no seem to be any interest and another round of relisting did not seem like it would result in any changes. Guerillero Parlez Moi 08:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article stood up on PRNewswire, company announcements, routine trade coverage. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 12:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate that this is a notable subject. This is an advertisement for the organization. Thenightaway ( talk) 09:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 12:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Source | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Pass/Fail | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"About INEE". Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | INEE's website. Lacks independence and is a WP:PRIMARY source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
"Emergency education gains ground". The New Humanitarian. 2008-11-13. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Article is primarily an interview with quoted text by employees of INEE. Lacks independence from the subject, and could potentially be viewed as a primary source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT | |||||
"UNRWA HOSTS THE INTER-AGENCY NETWORK FOR EDUCATION IN EMERGENCIES (INEE) CONFLICT-SENSITIVE EDUCATION TRAINING OF TRAINERS IN AMMAN" (Press release). United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). 2017-08-08. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Press release from the organization. Lacks independence. WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT | |||||
Boudreau, Emily (2022-06-21). "Navigating Social-Emotional Learning Globally". Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Interview with EASEL Lab’s researchers who are partners of INEE. Lacks independence from the subject. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Mendizabal, Enrique; Hearn, Simon (2011). Anderson, Allison; Hodgkin, Marian (eds.). Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies: a community of practice, a catalyst for change. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies Overseas Development Institute (UK). Retrieved 2022-10-13. | WP:PRIMARY source published by the INEE. Lacks independence. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Sullivan-Owomoyela, Joan (2006). Inter-Agency Network for education in emergencies minimum standards for education in emergencies, chronic crisis, and early reconstruction: A Uganda case study (PDF). United States Agency for International Development (USAID). | Government publication. WP:PRIMARY source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Tarricone, Pina; Teo, Ian; Mestan, Kemran (2021-11-15). "A new policy tool to help build resilient education systems". Australian Council for Educational Research - ACER. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Journal publication about a policy tool developed by INEE. There is significant coverage of the policy tool, but no significant coverage of the company itself. Notability is not inherited. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Levine, Joe (2019-12-23). "The Key to Improving Refugee Education?". Teachers College - Columbia University. Retrieved 2022-10-15. | Article is about the Global Refugee Forum, not the INEE. While one of the participating panelists was from the INEE, the article provided no in-depth coverage of INEE. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
"INEE Minimum Standards | INEE".} | INEE website; lacks independence. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Moriarty, Kate (2020). "Collective impacts on a global education emergency: The power of network response". Prospects. 49 (1–2): 81–85. doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09483-0. ISSN 0033-1538. PMC 7328285. PMID 32836426. | This is an excellent source which addresses the organization directly and in-detail with independent analysis. Passes WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Anderson, Allison; Mendenhall, Mary (2006). "Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies" (PDF). Forced Migration Review. Oxford, United Kingdom: United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund and the University of Oxford. Retrieved 2022-10-13. | Another excellent source which addresses the organization directly and in-detail with independent analysis. Passes WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
A common platform for education in emergencies and protracted crises Evidence paper (PDF). London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute. 2016. Retrieved 2022-10-13. | Self published by a think tank. The editorial oversight is questionable. Should probably be viewed as a WP:PRIMARY source. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Burde, Dana; Lahmann, Heddy (2020). "Editorial Note" (PDF). Journal of Education in Emergencies. 8 (1): 5–12. ISSN 2518-6833. | Journal published by the INEE. Lacks independence. Fails WP:SIGCOV/ WP:ORGCRIT. | |||||
Total qualifying sources | 2 | There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
|
The result was delete. Policy based input shows why this cannot be kept. Star Mississippi 02:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Italian artistic gymnast and an impressively put together article but sadly he does not pass the stringent standards of WP:NGYMNAST - which tells us he would have had to have won individual gold or individual medial to be presumed as notable. As he fails WP:GNG and there is not sustained significant coverage in secondary sources, I'm afraid deletion is appropriate. Likely WP:TOOSOON... Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
This is linked from the bottom of the BBC Radio 1 article. There are no references other than a defunct "official website" and a search for reliable sources (including in the archives of Broadcast (magazine)) reveals no relevant results. Flip Format ( talk) 11:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. It does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. MarioGom ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
As best I can tell, Kool Corner was the store and nothing else. The ruins of it are still there, but I can't find any evidence of a settlement here. Mangoe ( talk) 19:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Frank Casino. (non-admin closure) shelovesneo ( talk) 19:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Without noticing, there has been an article titled Frank Casino in the mainspace which dims the draft as inadequate and therefore has to be deleted. shelovesneo ( talk) 18:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'd offer to Draftify fhis so that it could go through AFC but it looks like this route has already been attempted. Until this artist receives more significant coverage (or you can locate it) it looks like they will not have a Wikipedia article. Liz Read! Talk! 20:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Contested PROD; original reasoning was: Does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NMUSIC. Article has been
WP:REFBOMBED without any significant coverage.
. After a
WP:BEFORE, reasoning still holds.
Jalen Folf
(talk) 18:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Page has already been reviewed. Also I think you got a personal probleme with Van Snyder @ JalenFolf because you are always declining and deleting everything that has to do with him, even if the sources and references are reliable and true xD. Probably you would even consider him for deletion if he had 100M followers and billboard no 1 charting hits. what else you want?? I really think you got a personal issue with this topic, since in your profile stands that you are Fan of Monstercat and a member of WikiProject Electronic Music. I see clearly that you got something against him, your decisions what you do are not objective. I can also just copy and paste my reason for keeping article:
Van Snyder (DJ) should be kept.
@ MaxnaCarta @ JalenFolf
The reasons for this:
.) approved Wikipedia article in other language does exist
.) is artist of renowned record labels as the major label Warner Music Denmark
.) Google Knowledge Panel includes actually signed record labels as the major label Warner Music Denmark
.) many collaborations and remixes with renowned artists all over the world such as Akon, Flo Rida, Lil Wayne ft. T-Pain, Bonnie Tyler, Headhunterz, Klaas, Michael Mind Project, Plastik Funk etc..
.) coverage in the biggest EDM magazines in the world like WeRaveYou, EDMHouseNetwork
.) big and verified social media presence with millions of followers
.) discogs.com
.) according to 1001tracklists.com and songstats.com he is supported by the biggest and most known DJs in the world, hundrets of the biggest DJs in the world are playing his songs in their radioshows and DJ-Sets across the globe.
.) was played on Tomorrowland 2022, Mainstage
.) coverage in one of Denmarks biggest radiostations DR P3
.) estabilished since 2009 in the international EDM scene, you can follow his career back to/since 2009
regarding Wikipedia guidelines of notability more requirements of notability are met like being signed on really renowned and notable record labels such as Warner Music Denmark, Revealed Recordings and Black Hole Recordings. Supported in the biggest EDM News pages worldwide, collaborations with renowned and notable artists exist, chart successes on official beatport Top 100 charts exist too: BeatStats - ARTISTINFO - Van Snyder , played on one of Denmarks biggest radiostations DR P3, an indication that this article/artist is notable and relevant is also (even if not a must) but that article in other Wikipedia language exists. Altogether, a wrong decision to mark this article for deletion. Offcourse the article should be improved and for example discogs and the beatport top 100 charts successes added to references. PS: i will add now discogs and beatport top 100 charts sources to the article -- Base-X ( talk) 09:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC).[ reply
-- Base-X ( talk) 19:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
according to WP:NMUSIC musicbrainz.org can be taken as official and reliable source: https://musicbrainz.org/artist/51c9c2ec-12bc-42a5-97b1-674f07a4fec1/recordings Van Snyder on musicbrainz.org - Overview - Recordings i will include this into the references list and remove many references so that the article is no longer anymore WP:REFBOMBED. Also NOTE: that musicbrainz.org link includes official references to the Headhunterz Remix of his Make it Loud and appearances on many real physical CD-Samplers, released by major labels, CD-Samplers like Future Trance and Dream Dance, which are really huge and well known! I will include this all in the article. -- Base-X ( talk) 12:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
disputed draftification, Contains
WP:OR, eg: leaving the need for a conservative Islamic party and the sprucingsourcing, while it may show what it purports to show, is recent enough to require linking. Not ready for mainspace. Optimal solution might be to return to Draft for improvement, but I view that to be unlikely to bear fruit. Over to the community 🇺🇦
FiddleTimtrent
FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Not a single one of the references in this entire article mentions White Mountain Castle Publishing, not even trivially. The majority of the content in the article isn't even about the company, it's about the books and the people in them. If those people are notable (and it looks like some are), that content belongs in their articles, not in this one. No sources about the company located on a search. Zero indication that the company is notable in and of itself. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG IndyNotes ( talk) 16:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Bungle (
talk •
contribs) 18:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Athens Tram stops. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zappio tram stop", which was closed as "no consensus" with minimal participation and the single keep !vote not being based on policy. Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
[I]t has become necessary to AfD any train station article that doesn't merit a standalone page to gain an affirmative consensus for redirection.is just false. The reason AfDs of train stations are controversial is because people keep nominating them for deletion when they should be proposing a merge. AfD is for nominating articles for deletion, and there is a widespread consensus (affirmed time after time after time) that these articles should be merged and redirected if they aren't individually notable. And that was the conclusion of the last AfD, and will almost certainly be the conclusion of this AfD too. If time wasn't being wasted on discussions like this then there would be more merges happening with a lot less acrimony. Thryduulf ( talk) 23:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion relative to Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Deletion policy is not present. For example, per WP:NEXIST, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article, or whether or not they "work". An article being in an orphaned state is also not a valid rationale for deletion. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America 1000 19:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Since this article is orphaned and the references do not work, it seems this article does not show general notability. Given this, I am proposing to have this article deleted. Nintendoswitchfan ( talk) 17:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Bungle (
talk •
contribs) 18:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a former mayor, not reliably sourced as the subject of sufficient coverage to pass WP:NPOL #2. Full disclosure, I was the original creator of this, back in 2010 when the notability standard for mayors was an automatic "inherent" notability freebie for any mayor of any city whose population surpassed 50,000 -- but that's long since been deprecated, and the inclusion test for a mayor now hinges on how much substance can actually be written and sourced about his mayoralty: specific things he did as mayor, specific projects he spearheaded as mayor, specific effects his mayoralty had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But in 12 years, absolutely nothing of substance has been added to expand the article from the initial stub at all, and even on a deep database search for at-the-time coverage that wouldn't google well, I mostly just get glancing namechecks of his existence as a provider of soundbite in coverage of other things rather than substantive or notability-building analysis about his mayoralty -- the strongest source I can find about him was covering him in the context of coming up on stage to play a little bit of guitar when Hollerado played a concert in his city, which is of no enduring significance. I simply haven't been able to find enough coverage to get him back up to the standard that mayors now have to meet, so he can't be exempted from the standards that apply in 2022 just because "mayor who exists" was good enough for the standards that applied in 2010. Bearcat ( talk) 17:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Enos733 (
talk) 17:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article on former footballer with very brief career and no apparent significant coverage. Closest I can find is Mundo Dos Guarda-Redes, which is not enough. Can't find evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant coverage so she fails GNG Dougal18 ( talk) 15:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
She fails GNG due to a lack of significant coverage on her. Dougal18 ( talk) 14:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Italian army officer, was involved briefly in an affair with a lady by the name of Donatella Di Rosa who made unfounded accusations of a planned coup d'état, leading to getting him sacked and also her husband a Colonel. And that's your lot - absolutely clear, textbook case of WP:ONEEVENT and other than this, the good General Franco is notable for nothing other than a sound military life well - and quietly - lived. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 10:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KSAWikipedian (
talk) 14:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument to draftify is weak if nobody intends to work on the draft, and nobody has expressed such an intention here. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article currently doesn't pass WP:NSPORT guidelines. Also has a draft version that was copied and pasted into main-space for similar notability reasons. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 13:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article currently doesn't pass WP:NSPORT guidelines. Also has a draft version that was copied and pasted into main-space for similar notability reasons. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 13:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Wrong venue, Redirects are only deleted at WP:RFD (non-admin closure) MB 17:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
No clear evidence that "the lettuce" refers to the Daily Star lettuce as a primary topic. The reason the PROD was removed - that most Google searches for "the lettuce" bring up this particular lettuce - is a clear example of recentism. Most searches for "lettuce" bring this event up for me; should we go ahead and make Lettuce a disambiguation page? QueenofBithynia ( talk) 13:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. No reliable independent coverage of the player, only results and passing coverage. Adamtt9 ( talk) 11:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969
TT me 12:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
No non-primary sources or indication of notability. Basically promotional. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 12:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. A Weak Keep but Keep it is. There is already an article at Ante Pavlović and it's arguable whether or not this Ante Pavlović should be moved to that title in its place. I'll leave the Move decision to a discussion that can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Now this, I promise you, is interesting. Ante Pavlović was a self-proclaimed 'chiropractor' and sometime psychiatric patient, whose unpleasant erratic, extreme, violent and anti-social behaviour got him some passing notoriety in the more lurid Croatian press - including TV shows and even appears to have gained him some sort of following. So we have coverage and some degree of notoriety, but we're hardly Charles Manson and more of a public nuisance. Outside of Croatia and the complaints of his long-suffering neighbours, he is unknown. Do we need a page about the 'Following of Ante Pavlović'? The fact of that following is not the focus of the media and is not in itself notable other than a passing commentary on human culpability. So I would argue that no, we do not need this article and so this would duly be deleted. We might argue about a short biography being appropriate, but this is not that article. We could move the page title to Ante Pavlović but then this would all have to be rewritten to be biographical and it leaves me with the question - does a psychiatrically unbalanced man whose only media attention is for complaints about his awful behaviour in a foreign country merit an article in the English Wikipedia? Even if it DOES, technically, pass WP:GNG. Over to you, good people. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 11:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Sources do not have to be available online or written in English.(Original emphasis.) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow time to reach consensus, which is pretty evenly split at the moment.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969
TT me 12:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. —Femke 🐦 ( talk) 11:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
I can only find stats databases, no significant news coverage. His professional career was very brief. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC, the latter guideline states [sports] biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This is not a notable subject. It's a framework or term associated with the work of a small handful of people who appear to have primarily published on this in low-tier academic publications and radical outlets. The article appears to have been created by someone whose edits are singularly focused on promoting one of these people, George S. Rigakos. There's nothing to indicate that it has broader significance. Thenightaway ( talk) 10:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Subject is not notable. Sources cited on the article are not about him but musicians he may have worked with, this includes the awards and nominations mention at the end of the article. SPAECC ( talk) 10:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Semi-pro footballer with no apparent significant coverage in Arabic or English. I found his Soccerway profile, which has no indication of notability or professional appearances. I found a single passing mention in TimeKora and Hasanews, which is an extremely basic transfer announcement with no useful information about Ammar Bilal. Does not look to pass WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC and might have even failed under the old WP:NFOOTBALL guideline. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Obviously will never be built as Iran cannot export to Europe because of sanctions - if sanctions were ever lifted it would still not be built as EU is decarbonizing Chidgk1 ( talk) 09:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After almost a month on AFD there does not seem to be any prospect that another relist will get us closer to consensus. Stifle ( talk) 10:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable French civil servant. Subject fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NPOL. Of the two sources cited in the article, neither provides significant independent coverage of the subject. The Who's Who entry is misleading. It is not a biographical entry on closer examination. The French language text is primarily about the celebrations of the 20th Anniversary of INPI and not about Lapierre who is only mentioned briefly. Further, it reads like a press release and has no contributing author; which makes me doubt the independence of this source. The other is a publication of the INPI; of which Lapierre is the director. It also lacks independence from the subject. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk) 08:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Cannot find any third-party sources on this film. Wonder if it even released since I cannot find its release date on database sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate that this is notable. If there is anything worth keeping, it can be merged with Qatar Foundation. Thenightaway ( talk) 09:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
This is another problem case, starting from the impossibility of searching for a word that is apparently as common on web pages as "a" and "the". The material evidence is this: the hall is definitely there, and it definitely says "Leader" on it, and it appears in topos and aerials as far back as I can go. Until the 1950s, though, it's the only building at the corner. Meanwhile, the "Leader School" appears only in one aerial in the 1950s and then disappears again. Maybe newspapers might be more illuminating, but I find no narrative about the place in any source. At best this might be a locale, but for instance there's no confirmation that the hall is named for a place as opposed to a person. Mangoe ( talk) 04:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of recent additions to the article to consider.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tacna, Arizona. Liz Read! Talk! 06:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
A searching nightmare, but the maps say this was a rail stop named Tacna before being renamed at some point. Other than that, nothing there. Mangoe ( talk) 04:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE.
PROD removed with no improvement DonaldD23 talk to me 04:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Article has unclear list criteria (whether this is about state of birth or first state represented), seems to fail WP:NLIST, double-up of information already found on other pages, and probably fails WP:NOR. OliveYouBean ( talk) 04:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because they all have essentially the same problems:
The result was redirect to The Omen. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Rehash of plot elements from The Omen. References are unremarkable and character does not meet WP:IPC. AldezD ( talk) 03:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The letter of NPOL clearly doesn't apply here; this is a policeman, not an elected politician; but as I understand it, the gist of the argument below is that a high-ranking policeman ought to be notable, and for the head of provincial police of a very populous country, that's a strong argument. Arguments against a standalone article are focused on his implication in a killing, and on the letter of NPOL, but none have directly addressed the sources provided, or the idea of notability inherent in such a position. Conversely, while sources have been provided, they have not been evaluated in detail. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Subject is associated almost exclusively with a single event ( WP:ONEEVENT). Any relevant new content, if reliably sourced, should be merged into Killing of Brigadier Nofriansyah Yosua Hutabarat and a Redirect put in place. Paul W ( talk) 10:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 12:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:06, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Corresponding article in Spanish only cites one source and I could not find too much significant coverage on the film. Unlike other TV movies like Descendants or Cry Baby Lane, no evident cult following. InvadingInvader ( talk) 02:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Not notable 🌊PacificDepths talk| contrib 02:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Poorly sourced advertisement. A WP:BEFORE shows that it fails GNG. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 02:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Montpellier–Méditerranée Airport#Airlife magazine. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Magazine failed WP:GNG 4 years ago and still fails now. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This page does not contribute much encyclopedia value. The vast majority of it is either original research or mere trivia, neither of which should be presented on Wikipedia. The Enchanted article itself already discusses the noteworthy information regarding the references. My initial thought is to Delete the page, but as always, I leave it up to the community. TNstingray ( talk) 01:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Crusade (disambiguation)#Comics. Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet GNG, could not find reliable coverage. Coverage may appear in French-language publications that I don't have access to, but I at least didn't see anything in English. And for what it's worth, doesn't appear to meet any of WP:BOOKCRIT either though I'm aware that isn't meant to specifically apply to comics. QuietHere ( talk) 01:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Guerillero Parlez Moi 10:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a film, not making any serious claim to passing
WP:NFILM. As always, films don't get an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, but must
reliably source some evidence of significance (critical attention, noteworthy awards, etc.) -- but existence is the only claim on offer here, the article on the Croatian Wikipedia says even less than this does and cites just one
primary source that isn't support for notability either, and I can find absolutely no
WP:GNG-worthy sources about it on a Google search under either the English or Croatian titles.
Furthermore, this was prodded in January as "non-notable film", and then deprodded a few days later as "notable film" -- but you don't make a film notable by throwing the word "notable" around, you make a film notable by adding sources to improve the article, which never happened.
As I don't have access to any databases in which I could retrieve 25-year-old Croatian media coverage, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with access to such resources can find improved sourcing to salvage it with -- but simply existing isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to cite any reliable sources.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: An analysis of sources which are not "brief", nor presumed rather than found and shown, may help to determine the notability of the subject.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 05:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi 00:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Road named after him is not relevant. No notable sources. A lot of sources talk about genealogy, which seems irrelevant to his only claim of notability. RPI2026F1 ( talk) 00:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Notability appears to be borderline, but on the balance there is consensus to keep. Some substantive sourcing has been provided, and the one argument challenging the strongest source is off the mark. No clear consensus on renaming, but the argument to reframe as an article about the huts themselves is strong, and I note that at least one of the sources appear to discuss the huts more than the association. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
I don't think this specific volunteer group is too notable. The only significant mention I could find is
this page on nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/.
RPI2026F1 (
talk) 00:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of recent improvements to the article. Also consider the ATD of a redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
A more or less random spot in the forest taken from a Forest Service map. My guess is it has something to do with the notorious 1990 Dude Fire, but at any rate, not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 00:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Soundwave (Australian music festival)#2010. ✗ plicit 00:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This article isn't notable enough to have a stand-alone article. Or we could merge it with Soundwave (Australian music festival). Nythar ( 💬- 🎃) 00:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)